Next Article in Journal
A Review on Non-Newtonian Nanofluid Applications for Convection in Cavities under Magnetic Field
Next Article in Special Issue
Bi-Condition of Existence for a Compatible Directed Order on an Arbitrary Field
Previous Article in Journal
The Weak Field Approximation of General Relativity and the Problem of Precession of the Perihelion for Mercury
Previous Article in Special Issue
Solving Quaternion Linear System Based on Semi-Tensor Product of Quaternion Matrices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Matrix Equation’s Reflexive and Anti-Reflexive Solutions over Quaternions

1
Macau Institute of Systems Engineering, Faculty of Innovation Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Macau 999078, China
2
Department of Mathematics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2023, 15(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010040
Submission received: 29 October 2022 / Revised: 11 December 2022 / Accepted: 14 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Quaternion Matrix and Its Applications)

Abstract

:
We consider when the quaternion matrix equation A X B + C X D = E has a reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solution with respect to a given generalized reflection matrix. We adopt a real representation method to derive the solutions when it is solvable. Moreover, we obtain the explicit expressions of the least-squares reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solutions.

1. Introduction

Recall that an n × n matrix P over the complex number field C is said to be a generalized reflection matrix if P satisfies the following two conditions: P 2 = I n and P = P * (the conjugate transpose of P). For a given such generalized reflection matrix P, two kinds of special subspaces in C n × n have been considered (see [1,2,3]).
C r n × n ( P ) = A C n × n A = P A P and C a n × n ( P ) = A C n × n A = P A P .
A matrix A C r n × n ( P ) (or A C a n × n ( P ) ) is called reflexive (or anti-reflexive) about a generalized reflection matrix P. It is well known that a reflexive (or anti-reflexive) matrix is centrosymmetric (or centroskew symmetric) when P is provided by J n , which is an n × n backward identity matrix having the elements along the southwest-northeast diagonal and with the remaining elements being zeros. Many properties of a generalized reflexive matrix P and anti-reflexive matrix have been widely used in engineering and scientific research (for example, see [4]).
The reflexive and anti-reflexive solutions to the different kinds of complex matrix equations have been studied previously (see e.g., [4,5,6,7,8,9,10], etc.) For instance, in [8], the reflexive and anti-reflexive solutions of the matrix equation A X = B were studied with respect to the generalized reflection matrix P. Moreover, the authors discussed the related problems of the nearness of the matrix. In [5,9], the authors dealt with the complex matrix equation A X B = C . The authors in [11,12,13] considered certain quaternion matrix equations. For instance, in [12], the authors derived the sufficient and necessary conditions for the existence and general expressions of reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solutions of the system A 1 X 1 = C 1 , A 2 X 2 = C 2 , A X 1 B + C X 2 D = E . As a more general form of reflexive and anti-reflexive solutions, the ( P , Q ) reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solutions to matrix equation have been widely investigated (see e.g., [11,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]). In [13], the authors investigated the ( P , Q ) - maximal and minimal rank reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solutions to the system of quaternion matrix equations A X = B , X C = D using the rank method. In [11], an iterative method was proposed to derive the ( P , Q ) -reflextive solution to the system of quaternion matrix equations
l = 1 M ( A l s X l B l s + C l s X l ˜ D l s ) = F s , s = 1 , 2 , , N ,
where X l ˜ denotes the η -conjugate of X l . The authors of [17] proposed an iterative algorithm to find the ( P , Q ) -reflexive solution to the system of quaternion matrix equations
( A l X B l + C s X T D s ) = F .
For more related works, interested readers may refer to [20,21]. The real Hamilton quaternion H is a four-dimensional division algebra over the real number field R , that is,
H = a 1 + a 2 i + a 3 j + a 4 k i 2 = j 2 = k 2 = 1 , i j k = 1 , a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , a 4 R .
The main obstacle in the study of quaternion matrices comes from the noncommutative multiplication of quaternions. One efficient method for overcoming this difficulty is using real representation methods. In this paper, we mainly study the least-squares reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solutions to the quaternion matrix equation
A X B + C X D = E
about the generalized reflection quaternion matrix P following the method of real representation.
The structure of this paper is as follows: in Section 2, we introduce a real representation and several properties that are used in this paper; in Section 3, we explore the solvability conditions and reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solutions to (1) and A X = B ; next, the explicit expressions of the least-squares reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solutions to (1) are derived in Section 4; finally, a numerical example is provided in Section 5.

2. Real Representation

The real representations of a quaternion matrix can convert problems from the quaternion skew field H to the complex number field C . The definition of a real representation adopted in this paper is as follows:
Definition 1. 
Let X = X 0 + X 1 i + X 2 j + X 3 k H m × n , X i R m × n , i = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 . The real representation is defined as
X τ = X 0 X 1 X 2 X 3 X 1 X 0 X 3 X 2 X 2 X 3 X 0 X 1 X 3 X 2 X 1 X 0 .
To further discuss its properties, we need to use the following special matrices:
Q n = 0 I n 0 0 I n 0 0 0 0 0 0 I n 0 0 I n 0 , R n = 0 0 I n 0 0 0 0 I n I n 0 0 0 0 I n 0 0 , S n = 0 0 0 I n 0 0 I n 0 0 I n 0 0 I n 0 0 0 .
These special matrices have the following properties:
Lemma 1. 
Q n , R n , S n are all orthogonal matrices. Moreover, for any A H n × n ,
A τ Q n = Q n A τ , A τ R n = R n A τ , A τ S n = S n A τ .
Next, we summarize the properties of the above real representation, shown below. We denote A T as the transpose of A.
Proposition 1. 
Let A , B H m × n , C H m × s , a R . Then, the real representation has the following properties:
(a)
( A + B ) τ = A τ + B τ , ( a A ) τ = a A τ ;
(b)
( A C ) τ = A τ C τ ;
(c)
Q m T A τ Q n = A τ , R m T A τ R n = A τ , S m T A τ S n = A τ ;
(d)
A * τ = A τ T ;
(e)
For a generalized reflection matrix P H n × n , we can preserve P τ C 4 n × 4 n as a generalized reflection matrix, that is,
( P τ ) * = P τ , ( P τ ) 2 = I 4 n .
Proof. 
As Properties (a)–(d) are well known, we only need to prove Property (e). Applying (b) to P 2 = I n and P * = P results in ( P τ ) 2 = I 4 n , ( P * ) τ = P τ . Note that P τ is a real matrix; thus, combining with (d) yields
( P * ) τ = ( P τ ) T = ( P τ ) * = P τ .
Proposition 2 provides a method to generate a quaternion matrix X from its real representation matrix X τ .
Proposition 2. 
Let X H m × n ; then,
X = 1 4 I n i I n j I n k I n X τ I n i I n j I n k I n .

3. Existence and Expression of Solutions

In Section 3, we mainly consider the consistency of the quaternion Equation (1) using the real representation matrix introduced in Section 2. As an application, we explore the general solution form of A X = B when it is consistent.
Theorem 1. 
Let A , C H m × n , B , D H n × p , E H m × p and P H n × n be a generalized reflection matrix. Then,
(a)
The real matrix equation
A τ Y B τ + C τ Y D τ = E τ
is consistent if and only if the quaternion matrix Equation (1) is consistent.
(b)
If Y = ± P τ Y P τ R 4 n × 4 n is the solution to (2), then the quaternion matrix Equation (1) has a solution X = ± P X P H n × n , which is provided by
X = 1 16 I n i I n j I n k I n Y + Q n Y Q n T + R n Y R n T + S n Y S n T I n i I n j I n k I n .
Proof. 
First, we show that any reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solution Y of the real matrix equation
A τ Y B τ + C τ Y D τ = E τ
with respect to P τ can generate a reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solution X of the quaternion matrix Equation (1) with respect to P. That is, if (2) is consistent, then (1) is consistent as well.
Assume that (2) has a reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solution Y; then, Y satisfies (2) and
± P τ Y P τ = Y .
Applying (c) in Proposition 1 to (2), we obtain
Q m T A τ Q n Y Q n T B τ Q p + Q m T C τ Q n Y Q n T D τ Q p = Q m T E τ Q p ,
R m T A τ R n Y R n T B τ R p + R m T C τ R n Y R n T D τ R p = R m T E τ R p ,
S m T A τ S n Y S n T B τ S p + S m T C τ S n Y S n T D τ S p = S m T E τ S p .
Premultiplying Q m and postmultiplying Q p T to both sides of (5), we obtain
A τ Q n Y Q n T B τ + C τ Q n Y Q n T D τ = E τ .
In a similar way, we can obtain
A τ R n Y R n T B τ + C τ R n Y R n T D τ = E τ .
A τ S n Y S n T B τ + C τ S n Y S n T D τ = E τ .
Moreover, using Lemma 1 and (4) yields
Q n Y Q n T = ± P τ ( Q n Y Q n T ) P τ ,
R n Y R n T = ± P τ ( R n Y R n T ) P τ ,
S n Y S n T = ± P τ ( S n Y S n T ) P τ .
By virtue of Property (e) of Proposition 1, P τ is a generalized reflection matrix. Thus, the above equations imply that Q n Y Q n T , R n Y R n T and S n Y S n T are reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solutions of (2) with respect to P τ , as is
Y = 1 4 Y + Q n Y Q n T + R n Y R n T + S n Y S n T .
Assume that Y = Y i j 4 × 4 has the form
Y = [ Y 11 Y 12 Y 13 Y 14 Y 21 Y 22 Y 23 Y 24 Y 31 Y 32 Y 33 Y 34 Y 41 Y 42 Y 43 Y 44 ]
Then, by substituting it in (6) we can obtain
Y = Z 0 Z 1 Z 2 Z 3 Z 1 Z 0 Z 3 Z 2 Z 2 Z 3 Z 0 Z 1 Z 3 Z 2 Z 1 Z 0 ,
where
Z 0 = 1 4 Y 11 + Y 22 + Y 33 + Y 44 , Z 1 = 1 4 Y 21 Y 12 + Y 43 Y 34 , Z 2 = 1 4 Y 31 Y 42 Y 13 + Y 24 , Z 3 = 1 4 Y 41 + Y 32 Y 23 Y 14 .
Now, we construct a new reflexive (anti-reflexive) quaternion matrix X using Z i :
X = Z 0 + Z 1 i + Z 2 j + Z 3 k = 1 4 I n i I n j I n k I n Y I n i I n j I n k I n .
It is easy to verify that X τ = Y . Note that Y is a solution of (2). By virtue of Property (b) of Proposition 1, we obtain
A τ Y B τ + C τ Y D τ = A τ X τ B τ + C τ X τ D τ = ( A X B + C X D ) τ = E τ ,
± P τ Y P τ = ± P τ X τ P τ = ± ( P X P ) τ = X τ ,
and X is a reflexive (anti-reflexive) solution to (1) with respect to P.
In order to prove that when (1) is consistent, (2) is consistent as well, we assume that X 0 is a reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solution to A X B + C X D = E with respect to a generalized reflection matrix P H n × n , i.e., ± P X 0 P = X 0 .
Applying Property (b) of Proposition 1 yields
A τ ( X 0 ) τ B τ + C τ ( X 0 ) τ D τ = E τ
and
± P τ X 0 τ P τ = X 0 τ .
Observe that P τ is a generalized reflection matrix. Thus, X 0 τ is a reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solution to (2) with regard to P τ . Finally, it is shown that (1) is consistent if and only if (2) is consistent; if (2) is consistent, then the solution in (3) is our required result. □
Next, we apply Theorem 1 to find the consistency conditions and solutions to the matrix equation
A X = B .
We start with a few useful lemmas (see, e.g., [8]). Throughout this paper, R denotes the Moore–Penrose inverse of a complex matrix R.
Lemma 2. 
Given A , B C m × n and a generalized reflection matrix P C n × n , we assume that P can be expressed as
P = U I r 0 0 I n r U * .
Moreover, A U and B U have the following partition from
A U = A 1 , A 2 , A 1 C m × r , A 2 C m × ( n r ) ,
B U = B 1 , B 2 , B 1 C m × r , B 2 C m × ( n r ) .
Then, A X = B has a solution X C r n × n ( P ) if and only if
A 1 A 1 B 1 = B 1 , A 2 A 2 B 2 = B 2 .
In this case it has the general solution
X = U A 1 B 1 + I r A 1 A 1 G 1 0 0 A 2 B 2 + I n r A 2 A 2 G 2 U * ,
where  G 1 C r × r , G 2 C ( n r ) × ( n r ) are arbitrary matrices.
Lemma 3. 
Given A , B C m × n and a generalized reflection matrix P of size n, we assume that P C n × n can be expressed as (8) and that A U and B U have the following partition from (9) and (10); then, A X = B has a solution X C a n × n ( P ) if and only if
A 1 A 1 B 2 = B 2 , A 2 A 2 B 1 = B 1 .
In this case, it has the general solution
X = U 0 A 1 B 2 + I r A 1 A 1 G 1 A 2 B 1 + I n r A 2 A 2 G 2 0 U * ,
where  G 1 C r × ( n r ) , G 2 C ( n r ) × r are arbitrary matrices.
For a generalized reflection matrix P H n × n , from Properties (b) and (d) of Proposition 1 it can be shown that P τ C 4 n × 4 n can be preserved as a generalized reflection matrix, that is,
( P τ ) * = P τ , ( P τ ) 2 = I 4 n .
Thus, below we can assume that P τ can be decomposed as
P τ = U I 4 r 0 0 I 4 n 4 r U * ,
then decompose A τ and B τ as follows:
A τ U = A 1 A 2 , A 1 C 4 m × 4 r , A 2 C 4 m × ( 4 n 4 r ) ,
B τ U = B 1 B 2 , B 1 B 4 m × 4 r , B 2 B 4 m × ( 4 n 4 r ) .
Combining Theorem 1 with Lemma 2 (or Lemma 3), we can derive the following two corollaries.
Corollary 1. 
Let A , B H m × n and P H n × n be a generalized reflection matrix. If
A 1 τ A 1 τ B 1 τ = B 1 τ , A 2 τ A 2 τ B 2 τ = B 2 τ
hold, then the quaternion matrix Equation (7) has a solution  X = P X P H n × n , which is provided by
X = 1 16 I n i I n j I n k I n Y + Q n Y Q n T + R n Y R n T + S n Y S n T I n i I n j I n k I n ,
where
Y = U A 1 τ B 1 τ + ( I 4 r ( A 1 τ ) A 1 τ ) G 1 0 0 A 2 τ B 2 τ + ( I 4 n 4 r ( A 2 τ ) A 2 τ ) G 2 U *
and  G 1 H 4 r × 4 r , G 2 H ( 4 n 4 r ) × ( 4 n 4 r ) are arbitrary matrices.
Corollary 2. 
Let A , B H m × n , and P H n × n be a generalized reflection matrix. If the equations
A 1 τ A 1 τ B 2 τ = B 2 τ , A 2 τ A 2 τ B 1 τ = B 1 τ
hold, then the quaternion matrix Equation (7) has a solution  X = P X P H n × n , which is provided by
X = 1 16 I n i I n j I n k I n Y + Q n Y Q n T + R n Y R n T + S n Y S n T I n i I n j I n k I n ,
where
Y = U 0 ( A 1 τ ) B 2 τ + ( I 4 r ( A 1 τ ) A 1 τ ) G 1 ( A 2 τ ) B 1 τ + ( I 4 n 4 r ( A 2 τ ) A 2 τ ) G 2 0 U *
and  G 1 C 4 r × ( 4 n 4 r ) , G 2 C ( 4 n 4 r ) × 4 r are arbitrary matrices.

4. Least-Squares Reflexive (or Anti-Reflexive) Solution

In this section, we derive the least-squares reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solutions to the quaternion matrix Equation (1). Let M = M 1 + M 2 i + M 3 j + M 4 k H p × m , where M i R p × m . We define
M c τ = M 1 M 2 M 3 M 4 .
It is easy to check that for any N H m × q ,
( M N ) c τ = M τ N c τ .
Now, using this real representation (14), we can define the Frobenius norm of the quaternion matrix M as
M | | F 1 2 M τ | | F M c τ F .
Let A , C H m × n , B , D H n × p , E H m × p and P H n × n be a generalized reflection matrix. Next, we find the least-squares reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solutions X = ± P X P H n × n such that
A X B + C X D E F = min X 0 H n × n , X 0 = ± P X 0 P A X 0 B + C X 0 D E F ,
The lemma concerning the least-squares solutions is as follows:
Lemma 4 
([22]). The solutions of the least-squares problem of a complex matrix equation A X = B are
X = A B + ( I A A ) Z ,
in which Z is arbitrary.
Next, we introduce two important decompositions for a quaternion reflexive (or anti-reflexive) solution with respect to P.
Lemma 5 
([12]). Let P H n × n be nontrivial involuntary matrices with the decompositions
P = T I r 0 0 I n r T 1 .
Then:
(a)
X H n × n is reflexive if and only if X can be expressed as
X = T X 1 0 0 X 2 T 1 ,
where  X 1 H r × r , X 2 H ( n r ) × ( n r ) .
(b)
Y H n × n is anti-reflexive if and only if Y can be expressed as
Y = T 0 Y 1 Y 2 0 T 1 ,
where Y 1 H r × ( n r ) , Y 2 H ( n r ) × r .
Next, we present the main result of this section. According to the decomposition of a reflexive (or anti-reflexive) matrix X in Lemma 5, we can partition the following matrices:
A T = [ T 1 , T 2 ] , T 1 B = S 1 S 2 ,
C T = [ E 1 , E 2 ] , T 1 D = F 1 F 2 ,
where T 1 , E 1 H m × r , T 2 , E 2 H m × ( n r ) , S 1 , F 1 H r × p , S 2 , F 2 H ( n r ) × p .
Theorem 2. 
Let A , C H m × n , B , D H n × p , E H m × p and P H n × n be a generalized reflection matrix. Then, the general expression of the least-squares reflexive solution to the matrix Equation (1) is provided by
X = T X 1 0 0 X 2 T 1 ,
where T is provided in Lemma 5,
V e c ( X 1 ) = I r 2 0 1 i I r 2 0 1 j I r 2 0 1 k I r 2 0 1 y ,
V e c ( X 2 ) = 0 2 I ( n r ) 2 0 2 i I ( n r ) 2 0 2 j I ( n r ) 2 0 2 k I ( n r ) 2 y ,
y = P b + ( I P P ) z , P = [ ( S 1 T T 1 + F 1 T E 1 ) , ( S 2 T T 2 + F 2 T E 2 ) ] τ , b = ( V e c ( B ) ) c τ , 0 1   is   the   zero   matrix   with   size   r 2 × ( n r ) 2 , 0 2   is   the   zero   matrix   with   size   ( n r ) 2 × r 2 , z C 4 r 2 + 4 ( n r ) 2   is   arbitrary .
Proof. 
By virtue of (a) in Lemma 5, we have
A X B + C X D E F = A T X 1 0 0 X 2 T 1 B + C T X 1 0 0 X 2 T 1 D E F = T 1 X 1 S 1 + T 2 X 2 S 2 + E 1 X 1 F 1 + E 2 X 2 F 2 E F
Then, (1) has a least-squares reflexive solution X if and only if
T 1 X 1 S 1 + T 2 X 2 S 2 + E 1 X 1 F 1 + E 2 X 2 F 2 = E
has a least-squares solution pair { X 1 , X 2 } . Using the vector operation with the above equation results in
( S 1 T T 1 + F 1 T E 1 ) V e c ( X 1 ) + ( S 2 T T 2 + F 2 T E 2 ) V e c ( X 2 ) = V e c ( E )
i.e.,
[ ( S 1 T T 1 + F 1 T E 1 ) , ( S 2 T T 2 + F 2 T E 2 ) ] V e c ( X 1 ) V e c ( X 2 ) = V e c ( E ) .
Taking the real representations on both sides of (19),
[ ( S 1 T T 1 + F 1 T E 1 ) , ( S 2 T T 2 + F 2 T E 2 ) ] τ V e c ( X 1 ) V e c ( X 2 ) τ = V e c ( E ) τ ,
It follows from (15) and (16) that
[ ( S 1 T T 1 + F 1 T E 1 ) , ( S 2 T T 2 + F 2 T E 2 ) ] τ V e c ( X 1 ) V e c ( X 2 ) τ ( V e c ( E ) ) τ F = 2 [ ( S 1 T T 1 + F 1 T E 1 ) , ( S 2 T T 2 + F 2 T E 2 ) ] τ V e c ( X 1 ) V e c ( X 2 ) c τ ( V e c ( E ) ) c τ F ,
Thus, we only need to find the least-squares solution of
P y = b ,
where
P = [ ( S 1 T T 1 + F 1 T E 1 ) , ( S 2 T T 2 + F 2 T E 2 ) ] τ ,
y = V e c ( X 1 ) V e c ( X 2 ) c τ , b = ( V e c ( E ) ) c τ .
It follows from Lemma 4 that y = P b + ( I P P ) z is the least-squares solution. Clearly,
V e c ( X 1 ) = I r 2 0 1 i I r 2 0 1 j I r 2 0 1 k I r 2 0 1 y ,
V e c ( X 2 ) = 0 2 I ( n r ) 2 0 2 i I ( n r ) 2 0 2 j I ( n r ) 2 0 2 k I ( n r ) 2 y ,
0 1 is the zero matrix with the size of r 2 × ( n r ) 2 and 0 2 is the zero matrix with the size of ( n r ) 2 × r 2 . Then,
X = T X 1 0 0 X 2 T 1
is our required solution. □
Theorem 3. 
Let A , C H m × n , B , D H n × p , E H m × p and P H n × n be a generalized reflection matrix. Then, the general expression of the least-squares anti-reflexive solution to the matrix Equation (1) is provided by
X = T 0 Y 1 Y 2 0 T 1 ,
where T is provided in Lemma 5 and T 1 , T 2 , S 1 , S 2 , E 1 , E 2 , F 1 , F 2 by (17) and (18).
V e c ( Y 1 ) = I r ( n r ) 0 3 i I r ( n r ) 0 3 j I r ( n r ) 0 3 k I r ( n r ) 0 3 y ,
V e c ( Y 2 ) = 0 3 I r ( n r ) 0 3 i I r ( n r ) 0 3 j I r ( n r ) 0 3 k I r ( n r ) y ,
y = P b + ( I P P ) z , P = [ ( S 2 T T 1 + F 2 T E 1 ) , ( S 1 T T 2 + F 1 T E 2 ) ] τ , b = ( V e c ( E ) ) c τ , 0 3   is   the   zero   matrix   with   the   size   of   r ( n r ) × r ( n r ) , z C 8 r ( n r )   is   arbitrary .

5. Numerical Example

In Section 5, we provide a numerical example to explain our result (quoted to two decimal places).
Example 1. 
Let  P H 4 × 4 ,
P = 0.28 0 0.96 k 0 0 0.28 0 0.96 j 0.96 k 0 0.28 0 0 0.96 j 0 0.28 ,
where P satisfies P * = P and P 2 = I . For the quaternion matrix equation
A X = B ,
where
A = [ 1 , 0 , 0 , 1 ] + [ 0 , 2 , 4 , 0 ] i + [ 3 , 5 , 0 , 7 ] j + [ 0 , 4 , 0 , 0 ] k ,
B = [ 0.06 , 1.32 , 0.86 , 2.80 ] + [ 2.70 , 0.72 , 5.12 , 0.48 ] i + [ 4.84 , 2.10 , 0.10 , 1.76 ] j + [ 1.48 , 0.36 , 2.08 , 0.96 ] k .
Next we, find the reflexive solution with respect to P .
First, we convert the matrix equation over H into a matrix equation over R by real representation:
A τ Y = B τ ,
where Y C 16 × 16 is an unknown matrix with
A τ = 1 0 0 1 0 2 4 0 3 5 0 7 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 3 5 0 7 3 5 0 7 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 4 0 0 4 0 0 3 5 0 7 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 1 C 4 × 16 ,
B τ = 0.06 1.32 0.86 2.80 2.70 0.72 5.12 2.70 0.72 5.12 0.48 0.06 1.32 0.86 4.84 2.10 0.10 1.76 1.48 0.36 2.08 1.48 0.36 2.08 0.96 4.84 2.10 0.10 0.48 4.84 2.10 0.10 1.76 1.48 0.36 2.08 0.96 2.80 1.48 0.36 2.08 0.96 4.84 2.10 0.10 1.76 0.96 0.06 1.32 0.86 2.80 2.70 0.72 5.12 0.48 1.76 2.70 0.72 5.12 0.48 0.06 1.32 0.86 2.80 C 4 × 16 .
Using MATLAB, we have
A 1 τ A 1 τ B 1 τ = B 1 τ , A 2 τ A 2 τ B 2 τ = B 2 τ .
Thus, the real matrix Equation (20) is solvable. By computing (12), we have a reflexive solution Y with regard to P τ :
Y = 0.68 0.18 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.14 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.48 0.24 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.68 0.18 0.24 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.24 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.48 0.24 0.14 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.18 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.36 0.18 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.32 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.48 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.36 0.18 0.48 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.18 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.36 0.18 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.32 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.48 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.36 0.18 0.48 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.68 0.18 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.14 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.48 0.24 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.68 0.18 0.24 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.24 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.48 0.24 0.14 0.00 .
We can verify  Y = P τ Y P τ ,  A τ Y = B τ . Now, per Corollary 1, we can construct our required X from Y by (11):
X = 0.68 0.18 0.24 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.48 0.24 0.14 0.00 + 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 i + 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.36 0.18 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.32 j + 0.18 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.32 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.64 0.00 k .
By direct computation, we find that X satisfies X = P X P , A X = B .

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, X.L. and K.W.; validation, X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, K.W.; writing—review and editing, X.L. and Y.Z.; supervision, Y.Z.; funding acquisition, X.L. and Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Macao Science and Technology Development Fund (No. 0013/2021/ITP), the NSFC (11571220), Canada NSERC, and the joint research and development fund of Wuyi University, Hong Kong and Macao (2019WGALH20), The MUST Faculty Research Grants (FRG-22-073-FIE).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, H.C. The SAS Domain Decomposition Method for Structural Analysis; CSRD Tech. Report 754; Center for Supercomputing Research and Development, University of Illinois: Urbana, IL, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, H.C. Generalized reflexive matrices: Special properties and applications. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 1998, 19, 140–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, J.L.; Chen, X.H. Special Matrixes; Qinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2001. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, H.C.; Sameh, A. Numerical linear algebra algebra algorithms on the ceder system. Parrallel Comput. Their Impact Mech. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. 1987, 86, 101–125. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cvetković-Ilić, D. The reflexive solutions of the matrix equation AXB = C. Comput. Math. Appl. 2006, 51, 897–902. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dehghan, M.; Hajarian, M. The Reflexive and Anti-Reflexive Solutions of a Linear Matrix Equation and Systems of Matrix Equations. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 2010, 40, 825–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dehghan, M.; Hajarian, M. An iterative algorithm for the reflexive solutions of the generalized coupled sylvester matrix equations and its optimal approximation. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 202, 571–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peng, Z.Y.; Hu, X.Y. The reflexive and anti-reflexive solutions of the matrix equation AX = B. Linear Algebra Its Appl. 2003, 375, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Peng, X.; Hu, X.; Zhang, L. The reflexive and anti-reflexive solutions of the matrix equation AHXB = C. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2007, 200, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Xie, Y.J.; Huang, N.; Ma, C.F. Iterative method to solve the generalized coupled Sylvester-transpose linear matrix equations over reflexive or anti-reflexive matrix. Comput. Math. Appl. 2014, 67, 2071–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, J.; Li, N. An Iterative Algorithm for the Generalized Reflexive Solution Group of a System of Quaternion Matrix Equations. Symmetry 2022, 14, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Q.W.; Chang, H.X.; Lin, C.Y. P-(skew)symmetric common solutions to a pair of quaternion matrix equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 195, 721–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Q.; Wang, Q.W. The (P,Q)-(skew)symmetric extremal rank solutions to a system of quaternion matrix equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 217, 9286–9296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dehghan, M.; Hajarian, M. Analysis of an iterative algorithm to solve the generalized coupled Sylvester matrix equations. Appl. Math. Model. 2011, 35, 3285–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dehghan, M.; Hajarian, M. On the generalized reflexive and anti-reflexive solutions to a system of matrix equations. Linear Algebra Appl. 2012, 437, 2793–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lin, Y.; Wang, Q.W. Generalized reflexive and generalized anti-reflexive solutions to a system of matrix equations. J. Appl. Math. 2014, 2014, 352327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Li, N.; Wang, Q.W. Iterative algorithm for solving a class of quaternion matrix equation over the generalized (P,Q)-reflexive matrices. Abstract Appl. Anal. 2013, 2013, 831656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, X.; Yuan, Y. Generalized reflexive and anti-reflexive solutions of AX = B. Calcolo 2016, 53, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, J.C.; Zhou, S.Z.; Hu, X.Y. The (P,Q)-generalized reflexive and anti-reflexive solutions of the matrix equation AX = B. Appl. Math. Comput. 2009, 209, 254–258. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang, Q.W.; Zhang, F. The reflexive re-nonnegative definite solution to a quaternion matrix equation. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 2008, 17, 88–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zhou, S.; Yang, S. The Hermitian reflexive solutions and the anti-Hermitian reflexive solutions for a class of matrix equations (AX = B, XC = D). Energy Procedia 2012, 17, 1591–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ben-Israel, A.; Greville, T.N.E. Generalized Inverses Theory and Applications; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, X.; Wen, K.; Zhang, Y. Matrix Equation’s Reflexive and Anti-Reflexive Solutions over Quaternions. Symmetry 2023, 15, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010040

AMA Style

Liu X, Wen K, Zhang Y. Matrix Equation’s Reflexive and Anti-Reflexive Solutions over Quaternions. Symmetry. 2023; 15(1):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Xin, Kaiqi Wen, and Yang Zhang. 2023. "Matrix Equation’s Reflexive and Anti-Reflexive Solutions over Quaternions" Symmetry 15, no. 1: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15010040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop