Next Article in Journal
Numerical Method for Solving Fractional Order Optimal Control Problems with Free and Non-Free Terminal Time
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Spectroscopic Studies of Tungsten and Carbon Deposits on Plasma-Facing Components in Thermonuclear Fusion Reactors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Difference Asymmetry between Preferred Dominant and Non-Dominant Legs in Muscular Power and Balance among Sub-Elite Soccer Players in Qatar

1
Physical Education Department, College of Education, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
2
Research Laboratory, Education, Motricité, Sport et Santé (EM2S), LR 19JS01, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia
3
School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1C 5S7, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2023, 15(3), 625; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030625
Submission received: 6 October 2022 / Revised: 10 November 2022 / Accepted: 2 December 2022 / Published: 2 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Life Sciences)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine and compare leg asymmetry between preferred dominant and non-dominant legs in muscular power and balance among sub-elite soccer (football) players in Qatar. Thirty-two professional local soccer players from the Qatar Stars League (Second Division) participated in the study (23.1 ± 6.1 years). They were classified according to their preferred dominant leg (preferred leg to kick the ball). Twenty-two players had a right dominant leg, and the remaining ten had a left dominant leg. Countermovement jump (CMJ) was used to measure unilateral and bilateral vertical jump performances. The Y-balance test (YBT) was used to assess dynamic balance. No significant differences were found between the dominant and non-dominant leg for CMJ flight height (p > 0.05; asymmetry index (AI) = 1.83 ± 11.46) or the relative and absolute reach distance derived from the YBT (p > 0.05; AI (relative) = −0.45 ± 9.68, AI (absolute) = −0.60 ± 12.3). Bilateral asymmetry in dynamic balance was not significant for any of the anterior, posteromedial, or the posterolateral reaching directions (p > 0.05). The selected football players demonstrated an acceptable level of leg symmetry for power and dynamic balance. These findings may prove helpful for the assessment and evaluation of talents and should help to develop and optimize training regimes.
Keywords: asymmetry; soccer; balance; jumps asymmetry; soccer; balance; jumps

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haddad, M.; Abbes, Z.; Zarrouk, N.; Aganovic, Z.; Hulweh, A.; Moussa-Chamari, I.; Behm, D.G. Difference Asymmetry between Preferred Dominant and Non-Dominant Legs in Muscular Power and Balance among Sub-Elite Soccer Players in Qatar. Symmetry 2023, 15, 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030625

AMA Style

Haddad M, Abbes Z, Zarrouk N, Aganovic Z, Hulweh A, Moussa-Chamari I, Behm DG. Difference Asymmetry between Preferred Dominant and Non-Dominant Legs in Muscular Power and Balance among Sub-Elite Soccer Players in Qatar. Symmetry. 2023; 15(3):625. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030625

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haddad, Monoem, Zied Abbes, Nidhal Zarrouk, Zlatan Aganovic, Albraa Hulweh, Imen Moussa-Chamari, and David G. Behm. 2023. "Difference Asymmetry between Preferred Dominant and Non-Dominant Legs in Muscular Power and Balance among Sub-Elite Soccer Players in Qatar" Symmetry 15, no. 3: 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030625

APA Style

Haddad, M., Abbes, Z., Zarrouk, N., Aganovic, Z., Hulweh, A., Moussa-Chamari, I., & Behm, D. G. (2023). Difference Asymmetry between Preferred Dominant and Non-Dominant Legs in Muscular Power and Balance among Sub-Elite Soccer Players in Qatar. Symmetry, 15(3), 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030625

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop