Next Article in Journal
A Brief Survey on the Riemann Hypothesis and Some Attempts to Prove It
Previous Article in Journal
Dual-Performance Multi-Subpopulation Adaptive Restart Differential Evolutionary Algorithm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Growth of a Sub-Centimeter-Sized CsPbBr3 Bulk Single Crystal Using an Anti-Solvent Precipitation Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Removal of Acid Orange 7 onto Layered Interleaved Symmetrical 3D Flower-like CeO2 with Y(III) Doping

1
Laboratory for Functional Materials, School of New Energy Materials and Chemistry, Leshan Normal University, Leshan 614000, China
2
Leshan West Silicon Materials Photovoltaic and New Energy Industry Technology Research Institute, Leshan 614000, China
3
College of Materials Science and Engineering, National Engineering Research Center for Magnesium Alloys, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
4
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2025, 17(2), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020224
Submission received: 24 December 2024 / Revised: 13 January 2025 / Accepted: 28 January 2025 / Published: 4 February 2025

Abstract

:
CeO2 has a potential application in the purification of organic dye wastewater because of the abundant oxygen vacancy (VO) defects in its crystals. In this study, a cubic CeO2 microsphere with layered interleaved symmetrical 3D flower-like morphology was synthesized, and its adsorption capacity for acid orange 7 (AO7) was further enhanced by Y doping. The impact of varying amounts of Y ions on the phase composition, lattice parameters, and morphology of the product was investigated, revealing that 4 mol.% was determined as the doping level limit of Y ions in CeO2 crystals. XPS, Raman, and H2−TPR techniques were employed to compare surface species changes before and after 4 mol.% Y doping in the CeO2 crystals, including O−Ce(III), O−Ce(IV), O−Y(III), and VO correlation, yielding a rough quantitative assessment of these species. The 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 (2.0 g/L) demonstrated the highest removal rate for 20 mg/L of AO7 dye within just 20 min to reach adsorption–desorption equilibrium, half the time required by undoped CeO2, achieving an impressive adsorption rate of 94.6%, compared to only 69.5% for undoped CeO2 at 20 min. The adsorption capacity of undoped CeO2 was enhanced by 19.05% through the doping of 4 mol.% Y, achieving a value of 16.56 mg/L. The feasibility of enhancing the adsorption capacity of CeO2 by Y doping provides a reference for the application of CeO2 and other metal oxides.

1. Introduction

The emergence and rapid development of synthetic dyes have had a profound impact on the textile printing and dyeing industry, not only enriching the choice of color, but also improving dyeing efficiency, reducing production costs, and, importantly, promoting the innovation of chemical technology [1]. The application of synthetic dyes is not only limited to the printing and dyeing of textiles, but has also widely penetrated into many fields such as paper making, plastics, leather, rubber, paint, ink, cosmetics, photosensitive materials, and so on, which has profoundly changed industrial production patterns [2,3]. However, it also brings about certain environmental problems, as a large amount of wastewater is produced in the production and use of synthetic dyes, causing pollution to the environment. Therefore, dye removal from textile wastewater is a significant environmental concern, particularly regarding azo dyes, which contain one or more azo bonds. These dyes make up approximately 60~70% of the dyes used in the textile industry. Some of these azo dyes are known to be aquatic toxic or allergenic, and can produce carcinogenic aromatic amines under reducing conditions [4]. In addition to being non-biodegradable, their toxic and potentially carcinogenic properties give rise to a serious threat to aquatic organisms, as well as animals and humans [5].
Traditional physico-chemical processes such as filtration, coagulation, flocculation, ion exchange, and photocatalytic degradation are not suitable for treating large areas of sewage [6,7]. In addition to this limitation, these methods may incur higher costs and can potentially lead to the generation of additional toxic byproducts. Moreover, azo dyes also pose a significant challenge to biological treatment processes due to their high toxicity and non-biodegradability [8]. Among the various water treatment technologies available, the liquid-phase adsorption process, using a solid adsorbent as the stationary phase to adsorb the contaminants in a liquid, has been proven to be one of the most reliable and effective dye removal technologies [9,10]. Although adsorbents usually require regeneration, which increases the cost of the process and can be time-consuming, adsorption remains the most widely used wastewater treatment process today [11]. This is due to its ability to handle considerable flow rates, produce high-quality wastewater, and avoid the formation of toxic and harmful intermediates such as free radicals, ozone, and dye degradants, etc. Currently, activated carbon particles [12] and fibers [13], zeolite [14], and humic-acid- [15] and coal-based [16] adsorbents are widely utilized due to their high specific surface area and excellent adsorption capacity [17]. However, their application is constrained by production costs and the challenges associated with waste regeneration. Consequently, there has been a growing interest in exploring the potential of low-cost agricultural waste as biosorbents [18]. Nevertheless, these cost-effective alternatives either have a limited adsorption capacity or require carbonization, which escalates treatment expenses [19]. Therefore, there remains a significant demand for affordable adsorbent materials with high adsorption capabilities.
There is an urgent necessity to develop cost-effective, uncomplicated, and efficient micro/nano adsorbent materials for the effective removal of various pollutants. Among the various metal oxide semiconductors, cerium dioxide (CeO2) is widely utilized in polishing materials, catalysts, catalyst carriers or auxiliaries, automobile exhaust absorbers, ultraviolet absorbers, solid oxide fuel cell electrolytes, electronic ceramics, and many other fields due to its exceptional physical and chemical properties and crystallography characteristics. However, there are limited studies on the application of CeO2 as an adsorbent [20]. A few reports have demonstrated that CeO2 is effective in removing highly toxic pollutants such as arsenic (V) and chromium (VI), as well as azo dyes like Congo red and acid orange from water. CeO2 crystals contain abundant oxygen vacancy defects, which can effectively bind with acidic dye molecules (R–SO3Na) through the electron-rich sulfonic acid group (SO3) [21]. Therefore, theoretically, CeO2 is suitable for adsorbing acidic dye molecules, and the interaction between CeO2 and dye molecules is more stable than physical adsorption.
The doping of various metallic elements into the CeO2 lattice has been demonstrated to be an effective strategy for enhancing its oxygen storage capacity, catalytic performance, transport properties, and room-temperature ferromagnetism. In this study, yttrium (Y), a rare earth element, was selected as a dopant for incorporation into the CeO2 lattice based on the similarity–intermiscibility theory. A series of samples with varying ratios of Ce and Y were synthesized using a solvothermal method combined with a calcination process, employing only Ce(NO3)3∙6H2O and Y(NO3)3∙6H2O as raw materials, along with a solvent mixture of ethylene glycol and distilled water. The introduction of trace amounts of Y (4 mol.%) not only reduced the adsorption time required for CeO2 to reach adsorption–desorption equilibrium with AO7 dye by half-achieving equilibrium in just 20 min, but also enhanced its adsorption capacity by 19.05%. This innovative approach achieved the optimal adsorption properties with minimal levels of impurity elements, offering a promising alternative for merchants seeking advanced solutions for treating dye wastewater.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Starting Materials

Ce(NO3)3∙6H2O (99.95%), Y(NO3)3∙6H2O (99.9%), ethylene glycol (99.8%), and acid orange 7 (AO7, 98.0%) were supplied by Aladdin Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The water used in the experiment was distilled water.

2.2. Synthesis of Y-Doped CeO2

Firstly, the desired amounts of Ce(NO3)3∙6H2O and Y(NO3)3∙6H2O with different Y/(Y + Ce) (mol.%) were dissolved in a solution consisting of 25 mL of ethylene glycol and 5 mL of distilled water, resulting in a total amount of 4.0 mmol of Ce3+ and Y3+ ions. Subsequently, the mixed solution was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and sealed for the solvothermal process, lasting for 24 h at a temperature of 200 °C. Following the reaction, the resulting precipitates were collected by centrifugation and washed alternately with distilled water and ethanol, then dried in air at 80 °C for 12 h. Finally, a series of Y-doped CeO2 powders were obtained through calcination in air at 500 °C for 2 h.
For comparison purposes, two reference samples were also synthesized using an identical procedure as controls, but without Ce(NO3)3∙6H2O or Y(NO3)3∙6H2O.

2.3. Characterization

The phases of the samples were determined by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD, 40 mA, 40 kV; Rigaku D/MAX 2200 PC, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). The morphologies of the samples were observed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, 20 kV; JEOL–7500F, Tokyo, Japan). The binding energy and surface composition of undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 were determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Monochromated Al Kalph 150W; ESCALAB 250, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The natures of the surface VO defects were identified using Raman spectroscopy with a He–Cd laser of 325 nm (LabRAM Aramis, Horiba Jobin Yvon, Paris, France). The VO defects in the undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 were quantified by hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H2–TPR) measurements (TP–5080, Tianjin Xianquan industry and Tradde Development Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China). Furthermore, 0.05 g CeO2 powders were initially treated in a 5% O2/N2 stream at 500 °C for 1 h, then cooled and purged with N2 to remove excess O2. Subsequently, a flow of 5% H2/N2 was introduced into the reactor at a flow rate of 30 mL/min, and the temperature was raised to ~960 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The specific surface areas of the samples were determined using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method, based on nitrogen (N2) adsorption–desorption isotherms obtained from a QuadraSorb SI (Quantachrome, Boynton Beach, FL, USA).

2.4. Removal of AO7 Dye

AO7 azo dye was selected as the model target to evaluate the removal capacity of the CeO2 product. The adsorption experiments were conducted without pH pre-adjustments in the dark at a constant ambient temperature (26 °C). Briefly, the resulting 0.2 g powders were dispersed into 100 mL of AO7 solution (20~40 mg/L) under continuous stirring (200 rpm) until the suspension was withdrawn at designated time (10~60 min). After filtering out about 5 mL of the clear liquid, it was immediately taken to test its absorbance using a U−3900 Uv–vis spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The removal rate at the set time, t, labeled as ηt (%), was calculated using Equation (1). Significantly, the adsorption experiments were conducted in triplicate to ensure credibility, and the resultant average was utilized for the subsequent analysis.
η t ( % ) = A 0 A t A 0 × 100
where A0 represents the absorbance of a 20 mg/L AO7 solution at 485 nm and At represents the absorbance of the AO7 filtrate at 485 nm at a specific time t.

3. Results and Discussion

XRD was utilized to investigate the impact of the incorporation of Y elements on the phase composition and crystallographic structure of the samples. Figure 1a presents the XRD patterns of the samples synthesized without Y. All discernible diffraction peaks were consistent with the standard CeO2 pattern (Cubic, Fm–3m(225); JCPDS no. 34−0394), and no impurity phases, such as CeCO3 or CeCO3OH, were detected. For the sample synthesized with a 10 mol.% Y content (Figure 1b), the XRD diffraction peak was similar to that of the undoped CeO2 in Figure 1a, however, there was a slight but not negligible shift towards lower 2θ values. This shift might be attributed to the partial substitution of host Ce4+ (0.97 Å) ions by larger Y3+ (1.02 Å) ions and the resulting local lattice expansion of the CeO2 crystal structure. For the samples synthesized with 30 mol.% (Figure 1c) and 50 mol.% (Figure 1d) contents, their XRD diffraction peaks exhibited similar peak positions and shapes to those of the undoped CeO2 in Figure 1a, without any noticeable shifts. However, when the amount of Y increased to 70 mol.%, only four smooth diffraction peaks appeared in the XRD pattern of the obtained sample (Figure 1e). In contrast, when no Ce was added, only three smooth diffraction peaks with a lower intensity were observed in the XRD pattern of Figure 1f, and these could be matched with the three strong peaks characteristic of standard Y2O3 (Cubic, Fm–3m(225); JCPDS no.43–0661). This suggested that either a low crystallinity or amorphous substances were present in these obtained Y2O3 samples.
When impurity ions entered the lattice, they induced lattice distortion, which could be discerned by alterations in the lattice parameters to determine whether the lattice had expanded or contracted. In this work, the lattice parameters of the resulting cubic samples were determined based on Bragg’s equation, and the findings are presented in Figure 2. Specifically, the lattice parameter of undoped CeO2 (i.e., 0 mol.%) was measured at 5.4117 Å, while that of CeO2 doped with 10 mol.% Y was found to be slightly larger at 5.4227 Å. This observation aligns with the phenomenon depicted in Figure 1b, wherein a shift in the XRD diffraction peak towards lower 2θ values was evident for the doped sample compared to its undoped counterpart. The introduction of Y was shown to cause an expansion of the CeO2 lattice, indicating a significant influence on its structural properties. With the gradual addition of Y, the lattice parameters of the cubic samples decreased. When 70 mol.% of Y was added, the resulting sample showed a lattice parameter of 5.3891 Å, which closely approximated the theoretical lattice parameter of cubic Y2O3 (5.2644 Å).
SEM analysis was undertaken to elucidate the morphological characteristics of the samples synthesized with varying dosages of Y. In the sample synthesized without Y, namely, the undoped cubic CeO2 (Figure 3a), the morphology exhibited a multilayered structure consisting of interwoven nanodisk sheets (20 nm) with a diameter of approximately 5 μm. Upon introducing 10 mol.% of Y (Figure 3b), the multilayered structure remained unchanged. However, with an increase to 30 mol.% of Y (Figure 3c), a new morphology emerged in the form of coral-like aggregate particles alongside the original multilayered structure. Subsequently, at a 50 mol.% addition of Y (Figure 3d), the multilayered structure was completely replaced by coral-like aggregate particles. Notably, as the Y content increased to 70 mol.% (Figure 3e), there was a reduction in the size observed for these coral-like aggregate particles. Conversely, in the sample synthesized without Ce, namely, cubic Y2O3 (Figure 3f), two distinct types of coral-like aggregates were identified, one large and one small in size. Based on the shifts of 2θ in Figure 1, the variation in lattice parameters in Figure 2, and the evolution of morphology in Figure 3, it can be concluded that the doping levels for Y within CeO2 were controlled within a range not exceeding 10 mol%.
Figure 4a illustrates the time-dependent adsorption profiles of AO7 dye in the presence of undoped CeO2 (i.e., without Y). The removal rate within 10 min of contact reached 60.2% at an initial AO7 concentration of 20 mg/L. As the adsorption reaction progressed, the process was mostly complete within 40 min, indicating that adsorption–desorption equilibrium on the undoped CeO2 surface was established within this timeframe. The removal rate within 60 min was found to be 83.6%. The rapid and efficient removal of AO7 within 10 min might be attributed to the presence of special oxygen vacancy defects (VO), which could be enhanced by the introduction of Y ions, while the removal rate at adsorption–desorption equilibrium within 60 min represents the adsorption capacity of CeO2. Therefore, we provide a comparison of the removal rates for all samples at both 10 and 60 min intervals, as shown in Figure 4b. For samples with 10 and 15 mol.% of Y additions, the removal rates were nearly identical at 10 min, reaching 76.6% and 76.3%, respectively, which surpassed the 60.2% removal rate observed for undoped CeO2. Furthermore, at 60 min, the removal rates increased to 88.2% and 87.2%, slightly exceeding the value of 83.6% for undoped CeO2. In contrast, for the sample with an Y addition of 30 mol.%, there was a significant decrease in the removal rate at both time points, dropping to only 41.6% at 10 min and further declining to just 60.2% at 60 min. As the Y addition increased to 50 mol.%, there was a sharp decline in the removal rate of the obtained sample, plummeting to only 3.0% at 10 min and 5. 4% at 60 min. Notably, for Y additions of 70 mol.% and 100 mol.% (i.e., without Ce, or Y2O3), their respective removal rates for AO7 were negligible. It was evident that Y2O3 exhibited no adsorption capacity for AO7.
Figure 5a illustrates the lattice parameters of undoped CeO2 (namely, 0 mol.%), as well as doped CeO2 with 1~9 mol.% Y, which provides a comprehensive view of the structural changes induced by doping in the CeO2 lattice. As observed, the lattice parameters of the resulting CeO2 sample exhibited a gradual increase with the addition of Y, ultimately reaching a maximum value of 5.4242 Å at a 4 mol.% Y addition. Subsequently, there was a slight decrease in the lattice constant with further increases in Y addition. The inflection point of the lattice constant curve can be regarded as the doping limit of Y ions in the CeO2 lattice, indicating that the solid solubility of Y in CeO2 was 4 mol%. The inset in Figure 5a presents the SEM image of the 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 sample. In comparison to the undoped CeO2 (Figure 3a) and the 10 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 (Figure 3b), this sample retained a multilayered structure. Figure 5b displays the XRD pattern for the 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 sample, which features sharp peaks, with all diffraction peaks aligning with those of standard cubic CeO2 (Fluorite, JCPDS no. 34–0394). The indexed planes include (111), (200), (220), (311), (222), (400), (331), and (420). These findings were consistent with the XRD analysis results presented in Figure 1. Notably, no signals corresponding to Y2O3 or other Y compounds were detected in the 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 sample.
XPS analysis was utilized to examine the chemical composition and oxidation states of the CeO2 surface before and after Y doping, with the aim of gaining insight into any potential alterations. Figure 6a depicts the wide-scan XPS spectra of undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2. All wide-scan XPS spectra exhibited distinct CeO2 features, as evidenced by the signals of Ce 3p3, Ce 3d, Ce Auger, Ce 4p3, Ce 4d, and O 1s, which were in excellent agreement with previously reported XPS patterns of both undoped and Y-doped CeO2 [22,23,24]. Notably, the prominent C 1s peaks observed at approximately 284.8 eV were attributed to adventitious carbon present for sample calibration purposes. Furthermore, a faint Y 3d signal was visible in the vertical ellipse, and the corresponding Y 3d XPS region is shown in the inset of Figure 6a. The presence of an Y 3d characteristic peak in the XPS spectrum strongly suggested the existence of Y(III) species within the lattice structure of CeO2. This finding provides compelling evidence for the incorporation of Y ions into this crystal framework, thereby enriching our understanding of the complex interplay between Y and Ce oxides at a molecular level. In order to investigate the chemical states of Ce in CeO2, the Ce 3d XPS core-level regions of undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 were recorded, as depicted in Figure 6b. Upon comparison with the Ce 3d XPS region of undoped CeO2, no significant alterations in peak shape and binding energy were discerned for the 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2, suggesting that the Y doping had minimal impact on the Ce species in CeO2. To delve into the chemical states of O in CeO2, the O 1s XPS core-level regions of the undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 were recorded and fitted, as illustrated in Figure 6c and d. For undoped CeO2, its O 1s XPS region could be curve-fitted into three peaks. The peaks with binding energies of approximately 528.3 and 529.8 eV could be attributed to the lattice oxygen of O−Ce(III) and O−Ce(IV) species, respectively, while that at approximately 531.6 eV could be assigned to chemisorbed oxygen or/and weakly bonded oxygen species associated with VO defects. As for the 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2, alongside the aforementioned three peaks (representing O−Ce(III), O−Ce(IV), and VO correlation), a new curve was fitted at around 527.9 eV, which might be ascribed to corresponding O−Y(III) species. Furthermore, the relative VO content could be approximated by determining the ratio of the integrated area of the peak associated with the VO defect to that of all peaks. The calculated value for 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 was found to be 27.2%, which was notably higher than that of undoped CeO2 at 13.4%. This implied that the incorporation of Y doping had a positive impact on the generation of VO in CeO2, suggesting an advantageous influence on its overall performance.
Raman scattering was utilized to explore the structural characteristics of the undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2, owing to its sensitivity towards VO defects. This advanced technique allowed for a comprehensive investigation into the composition and arrangement of these materials, shedding light on their intricate properties. In Figure 7a, the Raman spectrum of undoped CeO2 is elegantly fitted into three distinct peaks. The peaks observed at Raman shifts of approximately 419.9 cm−1 and 463.7 cm−1 were confidently attributed to the lattice oxygen of O−Ce(III) and O−Ce(IV) bonds, respectively, while the peak at approximately 583.5 cm−1 was unequivocally assigned to the oxygen species associated with VO defects. In contrast, for the 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2, in addition to three peaks corresponding to O−Ce(III), O−Ce(IV), and VO correlations, a novel curve emerged at around 346.4 cm–1, which was ascribed to the O–Y(III) bond. Upon comparison of the Raman spectra of the undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2, it became evident that a significant transformation occurred in two peaks at 580 cm−1 and 460 cm−1. In the case of undoped CeO2, the dominant Raman peak belonged to the Ce species, whereas after Y doping, the Vo-related peak took precedence. This radical shift in peak dominance underscores the impact of Y doping on the Raman spectra of CeO2. Moreover, akin to the XPS analysis, the relative VO and O−Ce(III) contents were also estimated by determining the ratio of the integrated area of the peak associated with the VO defect or O−Ce(III) to that of all peaks, respectively. The calculated values for VO and O−Ce(III) in the 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 were determined to be 64.9% and 66.6%, which significantly exceeded those of undoped CeO2 at 25.0% and 32.1%. Additionally, the relative O−Y(III) content was approximated to be 4.6%. This suggests that undoped CeO2 inherently possesses a certain number of VO defects and Ce(III) species, while Y doping promotes the presence of more species.
To more precisely ascertain the quantity of VO defects, H2 was employed as a reducing agent in H2−TPR apparatus to facilitate the reduction of the CeO2 sample while undergoing a continuous temperature elevation. Figure 8 illustrates the H2–TPR profile of the 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 alongside that of the undoped CeO2 for comparison. In Figure 8a, the H2–TPR spectrum of undoped CeO2 reveals a reduction process occurring at approximately 200 °C, with two distinct peaks in H2 consumption observed at around 500 °C and 770 °C. The reduction peak around 500 °C was attributed to the direct reduction in surface oxygen species by H2, while the peak around 600 °C was associated with a reduction in bulk oxygen that migrated to the CeO2 surface through VO defects and reacted with H2. In contrast to undoped CeO2, the 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2, as shown in Figure 8b, exhibited a certain ability to be reduced at room temperature up to 200 °C, with a shift in the low-temperature reduction peak towards higher temperatures by approximately 14 °C. Additionally, an observable shoulder from 360 °C to 440 °C appeared. Furthermore, the reduction band at about 600 °C was significantly elevated compared to baseline levels. These phenomena suggested that Y doping optimized the surface states of CeO2, thereby enhancing its redox properties. For the solid adsorbents and catalysts, physicochemical reactions mainly occurred on the surface of materials, so it is crucial to discuss their surface properties. The reduction peak at 500 °C in Figure 8 corresponds to the adsorption of oxygen by VO on the surface/sub-surface of CeO2. Therefore, the VO content on the surface and sub-surface of CeO2 was quantified using the amount of H2 consumption per gram of CeO2 powders (mmol H2/g CeO2) by measuring the corresponding peak areas of the H2–TPR profiles. For the undoped CeO2, the value of H2 consumption per gram from 20 °C to 593 °C was 0.23 mmol/g, while for the 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 from 20 °C to 612 °C, it was measured at 0.39 mmol/g, with an increase of 70.6%.
According to the analyses conducted via XPS in Figure 6, Raman scattering in Figure 7, and H2−TPR in Figure 8, it was evident that undoped CeO2 contained a significant number of intrinsic VO defects. The formation and filling of these vacancies were accompanied by the release and storage of oxygen atoms within the CeO2 lattice, leading to a substantial deviation from stoichiometry in the atmosphere. This resulted in the formation of nonstoichiometric oxide CeO2-δ, as expressed by Equation (2). During the synthesis of Y-doped CeO2, the primary phase component identified was cerium carbonate hydroxide (CeCO3OH) (JCPDS no. 52−0352), which was initially obtained through a solvothermal process. The Y compound either adhered to the surface of CeCO3OH or integrated into its lattice structure. Subsequently, calcination in the air at 500 °C facilitated not only the phase transformation from CeCO3OH to CeO2, but also enabled doping modification of the CeO2 lattice with Y ions, corroborated by our previous report [25]. Following doping with Y3+ cations, CeO2 maintained its fluorite crystal structure (refer to Figure 1 and Figure 5b), while concurrently resulting in the considerable generation of extrinsic VO defects, as indicated by the Kroger and Vink notations in Equation (3).
C e O 2 O x y g e n   s t o r a g e O x y g e n   r e l e a s e C e 1 x 4 + C e x 3 + O 2 x 2 ( V O ) x 2 + x 4 O 2
Y 2 O 3   2 CeO 2   2 Y Ce + 3 O O × + V O
where Y Ce denotes a Y3+ cation that occupies the site of a Ce4+ cation. O O × refers to a lattice oxygen atom. V O represents an VO defect with two positive charges, respectively, which is produced through the vacancy compensation mechanism.
The temporal variations in the AO7 removal rates in the presence of undoped and doped CeO2 with varying Y concentrations are illustrated in Figure 9a. As observed, it was noted that all CeO2 samples exhibited the most rapid rates of AO7 removal within the initial 10 min of the adsorption process. In the case of Y-doped CeO2 samples with a solid solubility lower than 4 mol.%, the sequence of removal rates at 10 min unfolded as follows: 93.7% (4 mol.% Y) > 85.0% (3 mol.% Y) > 82.0% (2 mol.% Y) > 81.5% (1 mol.% Y) > 60.2% (undoped). The removal rates of the CeO2 samples at this juncture experienced a decline with an increase in the quantity of Y, specifically only 71.5% for the CeO2 with a higher concentration of Y at 9 mol.%. Most importantly, for 1~8 mol.% Y-doped CeO2, the adsorption–desorption equilibrium was basically reached at 20 min of the adsorption reaction, and the time to reach adsorption–desorption equilibrium was reduced by half compared with 40 min for undoped CeO2. The order of adsorption rate at 20 min was as follows: 94.6% (4 mol.% Y) > 92.3% (3 mol.% Y) > 91.3% (2 mol.% Y) > 91.0% (1 mol.% Y) > 69.5% (undoped). For CeO2 doped with 5~8 mol.% of Y, the removal rates at 20 min remained consistently high, ranging between 91 and 93%. However, the adsorption rate for CeO2 doped with 9 mol.% of Y was notably lower at only 77.7%. Considering the varying removal rates of CeO2 with different Y addition amounts for AO7 dye, businesses are advised to integrate their specific requirements into the selection process for suitable products in the purification treatment of dye wastewater. Factors such as the cost of Y element addition, the wastewater treatment cycle, and other practical considerations should be taken into account in practical applications. Moreover, the specific surface areas of the undoped, 2 mol.%, 4 mol.%, and 9 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 were estimated based on N2 adsorption–desorption experiments conducted using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method. The results are presented in Figure 9b as a histogram. The specific surface areas for the undoped, 2 mol.%, 4 mol.%, and 9 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 were found to be 96.0, 102.0, 98.1, and 98.4 m2/g, respectively. These findings indicate that low-concentration Y doping had a minimal impact on the specific surface area of CeO2 products. In conjunction with the analyses of the morphology and specific surface area of both undoped and Y-doped CeO2 samples, it can be concluded that the enhanced adsorption capacity might be attributed to the incorporation of Y3+ ions into the CeO2 lattice, which partially substituted for host Ce4+ ions and promoted the formation of additional VO defects.
The effects of the initial concentration of AO7 on its removal rate within 60 min of the reaction are illustrated in Figure 10a. As observed, the removal rates for both undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 decreased with increasing initial concentrations of AO7. This decline could be attributed to the limited number of adsorption sites available on the adsorbent. Moreover, the saturated adsorption capacity of AO7 was determined using the Langmuir isotherm model (Equations (4) and (5)) [25]. The Langmuir linear fits for the experimental data regarding the adsorption of AO7 dye onto both undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 are presented in Figure 10b, and the corresponding Langmuir parameters calculated are listed in Table 1. The saturated adsorption capacities (qm) of AO7 were found to be 13.91 mg/g for undoped CeO2 and 16.56 mg/g for 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2, as determined through Langmuir linear fitting. The high correlation coefficients (R2) of 0.9971 and 0.9945 indicated that the Langmuir isotherm model provided an excellent fit for modeling the adsorption of AO7 onto both undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2.
q e = ( C 0 C e ) V m
C e q e = 1 q m C e + 1 K L q m
where C0 (mg/L) and Ce (mg/L) are the initial concentration and the concentration of AO7 solution at equilibrium, respectively. qe (mg/g) is the amount of AO7 adsorbed per gram of CeO2 at equilibrium, corresponding to a specific initial concentration of AO7. qm (mg/g) is the maximum amount of AO7 molecules adsorbed per gram of CeO2. KL is the Langmuir constant related to the energy of adsorption.
The possible adsorption mechanisms between AO7 molecules and the Y-doped CeO2 adsorbent are illustrated in Figure 11. In an aqueous solution, the SO3 groups within the AO7 molecule dissociated, resulting in the formation of anionic dye ions. The hydroxyl groups on the surface of CeO2 (Ce–OH) could be protonated to form Ce–OH2+ species. The adsorption process was further facilitated by electrostatic attraction between these oppositely charged ions, as depicted in Figure 11a. Additionally, bidentate structures formed between SO3 groups and Ce4+ cations, representing another significant pathway for CeO2 to effectively capture AO7 molecules, as shown in Figure 11b,c. Furthermore, VO defects might have induced reactive oxygen species, enhancing the potential of CeO2 as a photocatalyst for organic matter degradation.

4. Conclusions

Three-dimensional flower-like CeO2 with a layered interleaved structure was synthesized, and its removal rate for AO7 dye was optimized by incorporating 10 mol.% Y while maintaining its original morphology. The doping limit of Y ions in CeO2 was established at 4 mol.% with a positive trivalent oxidation state. The introduction of 4 mol.% Y ions resulted in an increased abundance of O−Ce(III) and VO defects in the CeO2 crystals. The quantity of surface/sub-surface VO was measured at 0.23 mmol/g for undoped CeO2, rising to 0.39 mmol/g following 4 mol.% Y doping based on H2–TPR. The incorporation of 1~8 mol.% Y ions could shorten the adsorption equilibrium of CeO2 by half, bringing it down to just 20 min, and the maximum removal rate of AO7 was achieved with 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2, reaching an impressive value of 94.6%, in contrast to only 69.5% for undoped CeO2. The adsorption of AO7 onto both undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 could be well described by the Langmuir isotherm model. The saturated adsorption capacity of AO7 dye on 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 was 16.56 mg/g, as determined through Langmuir linear fitting, representing an enhancement of 19.05% compared to the undoped CeO2. The strategy of doping CeO2 with trace amounts of rare earth elements to enhance its adsorption capacity for AO7 dye is a viable approach, offering an innovative alternative method for improving the properties of CeO2 and other metal oxides. In subsequent experiments, we will utilize 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 as a catalyst to investigate its photocatalytic degradation characteristics concerning AO7 dyes under simulated ultraviolet light or natural sunlight.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.X.; validation, Y.X. and Y.L.; investigation, Y.X. and Y.L.; resources, Y.X. and Z.D.; data curation, Y.X., Y.L., and L.G.; writing—original draft, Y.X.; writing—review and editing, L.G. and Z.D.; supervision, L.G. and Z.D.; project administration, Y.X. and Z.D.; funding acquisition, Y.X. and Z.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by Leshan Normal University Research Program, China (KYPY2023–0001) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (2023CDJXY–019).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Alegbe, E.O.; Uthman, T.O. A review of history, properties, classification, applications and challenges of natural and synthetic dyes. Heliyon 2024, 10, e33646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kaushal, J.; Mahajan, P.; Kaur, N. A review on application of phytoremediation technique for eradication of synthetic dyes by using ornamental plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2021, 28, 67970–67989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. López-Rodríguez, D.; Micó-Vicent, B.; Jordán-Núñez, J.; Moncho-Santonja, M.; Bou-Belda, E. Printing with hydrotalcite hybrid nanoclays and dispersed, reactive, direct dyes. Dye. Pigment. 2023, 210, 111022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sharma, J.; Sharma, S.; Soni, V. Classification and impact of synthetic textile dyes on Aquatic Flora: A review. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2021, 45, 101802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tkaczyk, A.; Mitrowska, K.; Posyniak, A. Synthetic organic dyes as contaminants of the aquatic environment and their implications for ecosystems: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 717, 137222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Forgacs, E.; Cserhati, T.; Oros, G. Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: A review. Environ. Int. 2004, 30, 953–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Brillas, E.; Martínez-Huitle, C.A. Decontamination of wastewaters containing synthetic organic dyes by electrochemical methods. An updated review. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2015, 166–167, 603–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Srivastava, A.; Rani, M.R.; Patle, D.S.; Kumar, S. Emerging bioremediation technologies for the treatment of textile wastewater containing synthetic dyes: A comprehensive review. J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 2022, 97, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ngulube, T.; Gumbo, J.R.; Masindi, V.; Maity, A. An update on synthetic dyes adsorption onto clay based minerals: A state-of-art review. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 191, 35–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. López-Rodríguez, D.; Micó-Vicent, B.; Jordán-Núñez, J.; Bonet-Aracil, M.; Bou-Belda, E. Uses of Nanoclays and Adsorbents for Dye Recovery: A Textile Industry Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mokif, L.A. Removal Methods of Synthetic Dyes from Industrial Wastewater: A review. Mesop. Environ. J. 2019, 5, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lv, B.; Chai, X.; Deng, X.; Jiao, F.; Fang, C.; Xing, B. Adsorptive removal of methylene blue by magnetic activated carbon particles in a magnetically stabilized fluidized bed. Process Saf. Environ. 2024, 186, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Silva, M.C.; Crespo, L.H.S.; Cazetta, A.L.; Silva, T.L.; Spessato, L.; Almeida, V.C. Activated carbon fibers of high surface area from corn husk: Mono and multicomponent adsorption studies of Pb2+ and Cu2+ ions from aqueous solution. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 405, 124919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yu, Q.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Sun, N.; Liu, W.; Liu, Y.; Yi, H.; Tang, X. Silica-alumina zeolite adsorbents for oxygen generation via pressure swing adsorption: Mechanisms and challenge. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 481, 148788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Radwan, E.K.; Ghafar, H.H.A.; Moursy, A.S.; Langford, C.H.; Achari, G. Preparation and characterization of humic acid-carbon hybrid materials as adsorbents for organic micro-pollutants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2015, 22, 12035–12049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Buzukashvili, S.; Sommerville, R.; Rowson, N. An overview of zeolites synthesised from coal fly ash and their potential for extracting heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Can. Metall. Q. 2024, 63, 130–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Terdkiatburana, T.; Wang, S.; Tadé, M.O. Competition and complexation of heavy metal ions and humic acid on zeolitic MCM-22 and activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 139, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pal, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Bhattacharyya, N. Microorganism and Agricultural based Biosorbents towards Removal of Cadmium from Waste-water: An Overview. Recent Pat. Biotechnol. 2017, 11, 20–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sud, D.; Mahajan, G.; Kaur, M.P. Agricultural waste material as potential adsorbent for sequestering heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions—A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 6017–6027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Koyale, P.A.; Delekar, S.D. A review on practical aspects of CeO2 and its composites for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 51, 515–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tomić, N.; Dohčević-Mitrović, Z.; Paunović, N.; Mijin, D.; Radić, N.; Grbić, B.; Aškrabić, S.; Babić, B.; Bajuk-Bogdanović, D. Nanocrystalline CeO2-δ as Effective Adsorbent of Azo Dyes. Langmuir 2014, 30, 11582–11590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pan, M.; Meng, G.Y.; Xin, H.W.; Chen, C.S.; Peng, D.K.; Lin, Y.S. Pure and doped CeO2 thin films prepared by MOCVD process. Thin Solid Films 1998, 324, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, B.; Zhang, Q.; Yuan, S.; Liu, S.; Zhang, M.; Ohno, T. Synthesis and photocatalytic performance of yttrium-doped CeO2 with a hollow sphere structure. Catal. Today 2017, 281, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, Y.; Gao, L.; Hou, Q.; Wu, P.; Zhou, Y.; Ding, Z. Enhanced Oxygen Storage Capacity of Porous CeO2 by Rare Earth Doping. Molecules 2023, 28, 6005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Langmuir, I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1918, 40, 1361–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the samples synthesized (a) without Y; with (b) 10, (c) 30, (d) 50, and (e) 70 mol.% Y; and (f) without Ce.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the samples synthesized (a) without Y; with (b) 10, (c) 30, (d) 50, and (e) 70 mol.% Y; and (f) without Ce.
Symmetry 17 00224 g001
Figure 2. Lattice parameters of doped CeO2 with different Y amounts of 10, 30, 50, and 70 mol.%. (0 mol.% represents the reference sample synthesized without Y, namely, the undoped CeO2).
Figure 2. Lattice parameters of doped CeO2 with different Y amounts of 10, 30, 50, and 70 mol.%. (0 mol.% represents the reference sample synthesized without Y, namely, the undoped CeO2).
Symmetry 17 00224 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of the samples synthesized (a) without Y; with (b) 10 mol.% Y, (c) 30 mol.% Y, (d) 50 mol.% Y, and (e) 70 mol.% Y; and (f) without Ce.
Figure 3. SEM images of the samples synthesized (a) without Y; with (b) 10 mol.% Y, (c) 30 mol.% Y, (d) 50 mol.% Y, and (e) 70 mol.% Y; and (f) without Ce.
Symmetry 17 00224 g003
Figure 4. (a) Time dependence of AO7 removal rates in the presence of undoped CeO2 and (b) removal rates at 10 min and 60 min of contact onto the samples synthesized with different Y dosages, where 0 mol.% represents the reference sample synthesized without Y, namely, the undoped CeO2 sample, and 100 mol.% represents the reference sample synthesized without Ce, namely Y2O3.
Figure 4. (a) Time dependence of AO7 removal rates in the presence of undoped CeO2 and (b) removal rates at 10 min and 60 min of contact onto the samples synthesized with different Y dosages, where 0 mol.% represents the reference sample synthesized without Y, namely, the undoped CeO2 sample, and 100 mol.% represents the reference sample synthesized without Ce, namely Y2O3.
Symmetry 17 00224 g004
Figure 5. (a) Lattice parameters of doped CeO2 with different Y amounts of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 mol.% and (b) XRD pattern of the CeO2 synthesized with 4 mol.% Y (0 mol.% represents the reference sample synthesized without Y, namely, the undoped CeO2, and the inset in Figure 5a shows the SEM image of the CeO2 synthesized with 4 mol.% Y).
Figure 5. (a) Lattice parameters of doped CeO2 with different Y amounts of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 mol.% and (b) XRD pattern of the CeO2 synthesized with 4 mol.% Y (0 mol.% represents the reference sample synthesized without Y, namely, the undoped CeO2, and the inset in Figure 5a shows the SEM image of the CeO2 synthesized with 4 mol.% Y).
Symmetry 17 00224 g005
Figure 6. (a) Full-range XPS spectra and (b) Ce 3d XPS regions of the undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 (inset in Figure 1a id the corresponding Y 3d XPS regions of 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2) and O 1s core-level XPS spectra of the (c) undoped and (d) 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2.
Figure 6. (a) Full-range XPS spectra and (b) Ce 3d XPS regions of the undoped and 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 (inset in Figure 1a id the corresponding Y 3d XPS regions of 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2) and O 1s core-level XPS spectra of the (c) undoped and (d) 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2.
Symmetry 17 00224 g006
Figure 7. Raman spectra of the (a) undoped and (b) 4 mol.% Yb-doped CeO2.
Figure 7. Raman spectra of the (a) undoped and (b) 4 mol.% Yb-doped CeO2.
Symmetry 17 00224 g007
Figure 8. H2–TPR profiles of the (a) undoped and (b) 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2.
Figure 8. H2–TPR profiles of the (a) undoped and (b) 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2.
Symmetry 17 00224 g008
Figure 9. (a) Time dependence of AO7 removal rates in the presence of undoped and doped CeO2 with different Y amounts of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 mol.% and (b) specific surface areas of undoped, 2 mol.%, 4 mol.%, and 9 mol.% Y-doped CeO2.
Figure 9. (a) Time dependence of AO7 removal rates in the presence of undoped and doped CeO2 with different Y amounts of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 mol.% and (b) specific surface areas of undoped, 2 mol.%, 4 mol.%, and 9 mol.% Y-doped CeO2.
Symmetry 17 00224 g009
Figure 10. (a) Effects of the initial concentration of AO7 on its removal rate within 60 min of reaction, utilizing either undoped or 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 as the adsorbent, and (b) corresponding Langmuir linear fits.
Figure 10. (a) Effects of the initial concentration of AO7 on its removal rate within 60 min of reaction, utilizing either undoped or 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2 as the adsorbent, and (b) corresponding Langmuir linear fits.
Symmetry 17 00224 g010
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of AO7 adsorption on the Y-doped CeO2 surface: (a) electrostatic interactions between the protonated CeO2 surface and the SO3 group; (b) and (c) bidentate structures formed between the SO3 group and Ce cations; and (d) potential active oxygen species generated by VO defects.
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of AO7 adsorption on the Y-doped CeO2 surface: (a) electrostatic interactions between the protonated CeO2 surface and the SO3 group; (b) and (c) bidentate structures formed between the SO3 group and Ce cations; and (d) potential active oxygen species generated by VO defects.
Symmetry 17 00224 g011
Table 1. Estimated parameters of Langmuir linear fitting for AO7 molecule adsorption onto either undoped or 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2.
Table 1. Estimated parameters of Langmuir linear fitting for AO7 molecule adsorption onto either undoped or 4 mol.% Y-doped CeO2.
ModelLangmuir Isotherm Model
Parametersqm (mg/g)KLR2
Undoped CeO213.910.41740.9971
4 mol.% Y-doped CeO216.561.47240.9945
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, Y.; Li, Y.; Gao, L.; Ding, Z. Enhanced Removal of Acid Orange 7 onto Layered Interleaved Symmetrical 3D Flower-like CeO2 with Y(III) Doping. Symmetry 2025, 17, 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020224

AMA Style

Xu Y, Li Y, Gao L, Ding Z. Enhanced Removal of Acid Orange 7 onto Layered Interleaved Symmetrical 3D Flower-like CeO2 with Y(III) Doping. Symmetry. 2025; 17(2):224. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Yaohui, Yong Li, Liangjuan Gao, and Zhao Ding. 2025. "Enhanced Removal of Acid Orange 7 onto Layered Interleaved Symmetrical 3D Flower-like CeO2 with Y(III) Doping" Symmetry 17, no. 2: 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020224

APA Style

Xu, Y., Li, Y., Gao, L., & Ding, Z. (2025). Enhanced Removal of Acid Orange 7 onto Layered Interleaved Symmetrical 3D Flower-like CeO2 with Y(III) Doping. Symmetry, 17(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020224

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop