Next Article in Journal
Dynamical Response of Particles in Asymmetric Ratchet Potential
Next Article in Special Issue
Determining Amino Acid Chirality in the Supernova Neutrino Processing Model
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Microscopic Approaches to Nuclear Matter and Symmetry Energy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chlorophylls, Symmetry, Chirality, and Photosynthesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Symmetry
Volume 6
Issue 4
10.3390/sym6040880
symmetry-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Supramolecular Chirality in Dynamic Coordination Chemistry

by
Hiroyuki Miyake
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, Sugimoto, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka 558-8585, Japan
Symmetry 2014, 6(4), 880-895; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym6040880
Submission received: 26 September 2014 / Revised: 16 October 2014 / Accepted: 17 October 2014 / Published: 24 October 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Supramolecular Chirality)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Labile metal complexes have a useful coordination bond; which is weaker than a covalent C–C bond and is reversibly and dynamically formed and dissociated. Such labile metal complexes also can be used to construct chiral shapes and offer dynamic conversion of chiral molecular shapes in response to external stimuli. This review provides recent examples of chirality induction and describes the dynamic conversion systems produced by chiral metal complexes including labile metal centers, most of which respond to external stimuli by exhibiting sophisticated conversion phenomena.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Supramolecular chirality is found in biological systems and plays an essential role in the transfer of biological information in living systems [1–4]. The classic example of the F1 motor in ATP synthase shows that supramolecular chirality can regulate the rotational direction of protein motors to maintain homeostasis [5,6]. Helicity switching between a right-handed B-DNA helix and a left-handed Z-DNA may be involved in regulating gene expression and in DNA processing events [6,7]. Polyproline adopts two helical structures, a right-handed type I helical structure and a left-handed type II helical structure, which are interconverted through a change in media polarity [8] and other external stimuli [9,10]. The cis-trans conversion of peptidyl-prolyl bonds can be catalyzed by prolyl isomerase to change the entire protein structure and to determine the rate of protein folding [11,12]. In these examples, noncovalent interactions play an important role in determining the helical structure. Although some artificial systems, such as small organic molecules [13–19], polymers [20–23], metamaterials [24], and assemblies [25–28], have been developed for chirality induction and switching in response to external stimuli, more sophisticated systems are required to mimic natural systems.
Metal complexes have features desirable for supramolecular chirality, including chirality induction and switching through their dynamic coordination bonds. Metalloporphyrins and coordinatively unsaturated lanthanide complexes are typical examples for chirality induction exhibiting chirality sensing of external substrates via dynamic coordination [29–31]. Furthermore, the metal complexes can function as chiral building units for a variety of molecular geometries including linear, triangular, tetrahedral, octahedral, and higher polyhedral structures [32–35], some of which are easily converted to each other in response to environmental conditions. Their stereoisomers often have similar free energy, which results in labile metal complexes being generated as a racemate and/or coexisting in solution (Figure 1). Designing labile metal complexes with isomers having a free energy difference great enough to produce one isomer could provide a sophisticated structural conversion system through switching of this energy balance. Dynamic attachment and detachment features of coordination bonds can be applied to construct molecular machines. Sauvage et al. developed copper-mediated dynamic catenanes and rotaxanes [36,37]. The Cu(II) center prefers 5- or 6-coordination and possesses rapid ligand exchange character (5.7 × 109 s−1 for water exchange rate k1 of [Cu(H2O)5]2+ at 298 K) [38], and the Cu(I) center prefers 4-coordination geometry. Thus, Cu(II)/Cu(I) redox switching triggered ligand rearrangement between 5-coordination and 4-coordination, resulting in dynamic molecular machines.

2. Supramolecular Chirality from Helicates to Foldamers

Metallo-helicates are typical mimics of the DNA helical structures and so have been investigated thoroughly. Most helicates have been prepared from Cu(I) and Ag(I) metal centers and polybidentate ligands, in which the metal centers have tetrahedral geometry as demonstrated initially by Lehn et al. [39]. Several types of helicates, such as duplexes, triplexes, and their chiral derivatives have been developed [40–42]. Recently, unique chiral helicates have been reported. Furusho and Yashima designed double-stranded metal helicate polymers, in which amidinium–carboxylate salt bridges and inert Pt(II)–acetylide coordination cooperated to provide a complementary one-handed duplex (Figure 2) [43]. A characteristic induced CD signal was observed in the Pt(II)–acetylide complex region, indicating that the chirality of the phenylethyl groups on the amidinium unites was transferred to the Pt(II) center to produce the preferred one-handed helical structure in solution.
A new type of Cu(I) double-stranded helicate was also prepared from ketamine-bridged tris(bipyridine) ligands (Figure 3) [44]. The tetranuclear Cu(I) helicate prepared was a racemic mixture of right- and left-handed helical structures. Although the Cu(I) cation has a generally typical labile character [38], the racemate was successfully resolved to each enantiomer. The racemate was treated with chiral binaphthyl hydrogen phosphate anion and the diastereomeric salt obtained was treated further with NH4PF6 to obtain an optically pure enantiomer. During anion exchange, no racemization of the helicate was observed.
Fabbrizzi et al. prepared a dinuclear Cu(I) double-stranded helicate by condensation of R,R-1,2-cyclohexanediamine and 8-naphthylmethoxyquinoline-2-carbaldehyde, followed by complexation with [Cu(CH3CN)4](ClO4) (Figure 4) [45]. The one-handed helicate obtained was stabilized by the presence of four interstrand π–π interactions involving quinoline and naphthyloxymethylene moieties and showed a fully reversible one-electron oxidation despite the labile character of the Cu(I) centers.
Because these helicate systems contain Schiff base binding sites that are easily and rapidly produced by mixing a primary amine and aldehyde in situ, the preparation of these helicates is convenient and suitable for systematic studies for discovering novel functions [46,47].
Metal complexes consisting of a d8 transition metal cation, such as Ni(II), Pd(II), and Pt(II) complexes, favor a square planar structure suitable for construction of highly ordered chain architectures, including helices and sheets. Among these d8 metal complexes, Pd(II) complexes often are used for the construction of molecular strands [48], coordination capsules [49], and spherical complexes [50]. Because the Pd(II) center has a hemi-labile coordination bond, dynamic molecular motion and ligand exchange phenomena have been investigated by 1H NMR spectroscopy as well as other spectroscopic methods. Miyake recently synthesized a diastereomeric pair of left- and right-handed square planar Pd(II) complexes from a single chiral precursor NS,NS–PdCl2 complex (Figure 5) [51]. The precursor NS,NS–PdCl2 complex was prepared using the chiral ligand and Na2PdCl4, in which the Pd(II) center had a square planar structure coordinated by two tertiary amine nitrogens and two chloride anions. The precursor complex was converted quantitatively into the left-handed NS,NS–PdCl complex having a semi-contracted molecular shape upon addition of an equimolar amount of Et3N, during which one amide moiety was deprotonated to coordinate with the Pd(II) center. Both amine nitrogen-centered chiralities in these complexes possessed the S-configuration. The left-handed NS,NS–PdCl complex was rapidly inverted to the R-configuration to form the NR,NR–PdCl complex as the thermodynamic product. The half-life of the inversion was 1.5 min at 100 °C. Interestingly, microwave irradiation at 120 °C directly converted the precursor NS,NS–PdCl2 complex to the right-handed NR,NR–PdCl complex. Since the Pd(II) center has a hemi-labile character, the NS,NS–PdCl complex could be trapped as a kinetic product and helicity inversion occurred rapidly under thermal condition and microwave irradiation.
Attaching chiral amine moieties at the formyl group of the ligand conveniently and effectively induced chiral Schiff base ligands for metal complexation that can provide dynamic covalent bonds and is a promising methodology for developing supramolecular chirality chemistry in combination with metal complexes. Setsune developed single helicates of Pd(II)2 hexapyrroles (Figure 6) [52]. The Pd(II)2 hexapyrolle with terminal formyl groups favored a closed form, in which helicity underwent rapid interchange between two enantiomers at room temperature. Introduction of (R)-(−)-1-cyclohexylethylamine to the two terminal formyl groups significantly slowed the conformational change rate and induced helical handedness as high as 85% diastereoselectivity. One-electron oxidation of the Pd(II)2 complex changed the chiroptical property by shifting the CD spectra at 699 nm to 741 nm with induction of an intense ESR signal at g = 2.001 due to formation of a π cation radical delocalized over the 2,2′-bisdipyrrin chromophore.
Such helical shapes can be produced by multinuclear complex systems containing oxime ligands and transition metal and lanthanide cations, exhibiting dynamic structural conversions. Akine and Nabeshima investigated a molecular leverage system [53]. They employed a ligand that contained two benzocrown rings attached to a chiral ethylenediamine unit as a transducer that formed a tetranuclear Zn(II)3–La(III) complex (Figure 7). Complexation of a shorter diammonium guest H3N+–(CH2)n–NH3+ (n = 4, 5, or 6) with the two crown rings produced a P-helical structure, while the longer guest H3N+–(CH2)12–NH3+ induced an M-helical structure.
Stepwise helicity inversion of helical multinuclear complex also was accomplished by multisequential metal exchange (Figure 8) [54]. The chiral hexaoxime ligand favored a right-handed helical structure in the presence of three equivalents of Zn(II) cations, which could be inverted to a left-handed structure by addition of two more equivalents of Zn(II) cation (P→M). The helical direction was further inverted in a stepwise manner to the right-handed (M→P) and the left-handed structures (P→M) by subsequent addition of Ba(II) cation and La(III) cation (74:26 for the left- and right-handed diastereomers).

3. Dynamic Production and Inversion of Supramolecular Chirality in Octahedral Metal Complexes

Chirality in octahedral systems is interesting because many metal cations favor octahedral geometry and can provide more complex, dynamic, and functional systems including triple helicates [55,56], circular helicates [57,58], tetrahedral clusters [59], and heteronuclear helicates consisting of lanthanide and transition metal cations [60–62]. Chirality induction in octahedral metal complexes has been widely investigated using chiral ligands, starting with Werner’s pioneering works [29,30], in which most metal centers were kinetically inert; their complexations often required long periods of time for completion, and purification procedures were required for obtaining diastereo- and enantiopure complexes. The dynamic supramolecular chirality systems discussed here include labile metal centers that allow dynamic ligand exchange and shape conversions.
Recently, Scott et al. successfully induced optically pure metal complexes with a tris(diimine) ligand prepared from a suitable amine and aldehyde in situ [63,64]. The chiral phenylethylamine and 2-pyridinecarboxaldehyde were added to a solution of Fe(II) cation, forming one optical isomer with an octahedral geometry (Figure 9). Combination of three sets of intramolecular π–π interactions between the pyridine and phenyl rings in addition to steric interactions caused by three-point chiralities in the chiral ligands provided high stereoselective formation. Since the Fe(II) complex prepared with 2-pyridinecarboxaldehyde and chiral 2-butylamine produced four diastereomers [65], these weak π–π interactions played an important role in stereoselective complex formation. This synthetic method was used to prepare optically pure dinuclear triple helicate (Figure 10), which maintained its stereochemistry in water. Even at pH = 1.5, it decomposed only ~8% over 10 days. The triple helicate exhibited specific interaction with DNA and showed antimicrobial activity; the Λ enantiomer had greater binding affinity with DNA, produced greater stabilization of the DNA duplex, and exhibited greater antimicrobial activity than the corresponding Δ enantiomer [66]. The corresponding triple helicate exhibited high, stereodependent toxicity to human colon cancer cell lines, but no significant toxicity to Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [67]. The dinuclear helicates also exhibited enantioselective inhibition of amyloid-β aggregation [68]. Thus, these dinuclear helicates are strong candidates for new enantioselective pharmaceuticals.
Nitschke et al. developed a tetrahedral chiral metal cage prepared using 6 eqs. of 6,6′-diformyl-3,3′-bipyridine and 12 eqs. chiral amine in the presence of 4 eqs. Fe(II) cation [69,70]. Each metal center in the chiral cage had octahedral geometry with the same stereogenic configuration: (S)-1-phenylethylamine-generated Δ configuration at all metal centers. Interestingly, addition of the chiral amine (S)-1-phenylethylamine to the solution containing the racemic cage with the achiral amine subcomponent p-toluidine promoted induction of the ΔΔΔΔ chiral cage (Figure 11). The CD intensities of the racemic cage obtained by the addition of 6 eqs. of (S)-1-phenylethylamine were similar to those of the ΔΔΔΔ cage, and the CD intensities increased nonlinearly with the %ee of 1-phenylethylamine, indicating cooperative communication between metal centers.
They also found that tetranuclear Fe(II) cage complexes containing chiral 2-butylamine were formed with high stereoselectivity (63%~89%de) [65]. The low stereoselectivity (ca. 0.5%ee) of the corresponding mononuclear Fe(II) complex indicated stereochemical communication between the Fe(II) centers in the tetranuclear cage. The tetranuclear Fe(II) cage prepared from tris(formylpyridyl)benzene and (S)-1-cyclohexylethylamine also was obtained as a ΔΔΔΔ chiral isomer. When the chiral amine subcomponent was displaced by the achiral amine tris(2-aminoethyl)amine, the cage retained its stereochemistry with high enantiomer excess (99%ee) (Figure 12) [71].
Raymond et al. reported the diastereoselective formation of a tetrahedral cage assembled using six biscatecholates with chiral amide terminals and four Ga(III) cations without involving any cationic species [72]. The chiral cage possessed greater stability toward air oxidation and low pH compared to the corresponding tetrahedral cage without chiral amide terminals. The chiral cage functioned as an efficient catalyst for enantioselective and chemoselective carbonyl-ene cyclization of a neutral substrate (Figure 13).
Yashima et al. designed a chirality transfer system of an octahedral tris-bipyridyl Fe(II) complex having helical oligopeptides at the 5 and 5′ positions of 2,2′-bipyridine (Figure 14) [73]. Introduction of (S)-valine in the oligopeptide induced a right-handed helical structure in the peptide chain, which information further relayed to the octahedral Fe(II) center to induce the Δ structure (de = 85% which increased to 98% in the presence of Cl− anion). When a racemic Co(II) complex produced with achiral peptide ligands was mixed with a chiral Λ Co(II) analog of the Fe(II) complex, chirality amplification around Co(II) center and in achiral peptide helices were observed via chirality transfer from chiral peptide chains to metal center and to achiral peptide chains.
Miyake et al. demonstrated that the labile Co(II) complex with a chiral tetradentate ligand containing amide linkages acted as a helicity inversion unit in response to achiral NO3− anion (Figure 15) [74,75]. In a solid complex prepared by mixing the chiral ligand and Co(ClO4)2·6H2O, the Co(II) complex formed the Λ cis-α structure, in which both coordinating nitrogen atoms adopted the (S) configuration. The 1H NMR spectrum showed only one paramagnetic complex, indicating that the asymmetric helical structure was retained in solution. This complex exhibited a positive CD signal in the range of a d–d transition in CH3CN/CH2Cl2 (1/9) solution. However, the addition of 10 eqs. of NO3− anion dynamically changed its sign to negative, indicating helicity inversion around the Co(II) center from the Λ to the Δ form. The Λ/Δ ratio of the Co(II) complex in CD3CN/CD2Cl2 (1/9) at room temperature was 15/85 as determined by 1H NMR. Crystal structure analysis of the complex of the related ligand and Co(NO3)2·6H2O revealed that one NO3− anion coordinated with the Co(II) center in a bidentate fashion while the other NO3− anion formed hydrogen bonds with the amide hydrogen. Thus, the cooperative action of the two NO3− anions stabilized the Δ form more effectively than the corresponding Λ form. The Λ/Δ ratio of the ligand –Co(NO3)2·6H2O complex also could be adjusted by changing the solvent components: Λ/Δ = 88/12 in CH3CN and 31/69 in CH3CN/CH2Cl2 (1/9). In methanol or aqueous solution, the CD and 1H NMR spectra of the complex showed the existence of only the Λ complex, indicating NO3− anion did not interact adequately with the Co(II) center or the amide hydrogens for inversion of its helical direction due to the higher donor number of these solvents.
This helicity switching system was applied successfully to the inversion of peptide helices. The racemic peptide, –(Aib–ΔPhe)2–Aib–OCH3 (Aib = α-aminoisobutyric acid, ΔPhe = α,β-didehydrophenylalanine) was attached to both ends of a chiral N,N′-ethylene-bis[N-methyl-(S)-alanine] ligand (Figure 16) [76]. The peptide ligand obtained, which possessed 310 intramolecular hydrogen bonding, complexed with Zn(ClO4)2, Co(ClO4)2, or Ni(ClO4)2 to form a left-handed Λ cis-α structure around the metal center and a right-handed P helical structure in the peptide chains containing two 310 intramolecular hydrogen bonds in each peptide chain. The addition of NO3− anion inversed helicity around the metal center (Λ→Δ), as well as the directions of both peptide helices (P→M). Thus, achiral NO3− anion has a unique ability to change the helical natures of peptides in cooperation with a chiral metal unit.
A chiral bisalanine ligand with 2,5-dimethoxyaniline amide terminals also formed a left-handed Λ cis-α structure by the complexation with Co(ClO4)2 or Co(OTf)2, which exhibited acid-base-triggered elastic molecular motion, as well as helicity inversion of the metal center (Λ ⇄Δ) (Figure 17) [77]. When a strong organic base, such as N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-1,8-naphthalenediamine, deprotonated the secondary amide groups, the linkage isomerism at the amide coordination sites promoted conversion to the contracted complex. Successive addition of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid protonated the amide groups and restored the shape to its original extended form. This acid-base-triggered contraction/extension molecular motion was fully reversible. The contracted complex also could be converted to the extended Δ-form with an opposite helical structure by adding an acid in the presence of the NO3− anion. Thus, combining two external stimuli promotes two different molecular motions.

4. Conclusions

This review highlights the recent progress of supramolecular chiral complexes with dynamic coordination chemistry for the development of structurally and functionally defined metal complexes. Since the metal complexes have characteristic features including redox reactivity, unique spectroscopic and magnetic properties, and coordination geometry and dynamic coordination bonding, they are promising candidates for supramolecular chirality switching, which offers advantages compared to organic chiral foldamers constructed only from stable covalent bonds. Recent developments have advanced the field of supramolecular chirality on coordination chemistry. Using specific interactions between side chains within molecules and external stimuli, several labile metal helicates were stereospecifically induced to produce enantioselective pharmaceuticals and enantioselective catalysts. In addition, helical structures could be dynamically converted as observed in biological DNA and proteins. Thus, labile metal helicates are useful for designing sophisticated supramolecular chirality materials. The design and implementation of chirality recognition and regulation of dynamic ordering advances the emerging field of molecular-based nanoscience for development of substances with integrated functions. Metal coordination chemistry provides effective supramolecular chirality devices that can be applied to material science and nanotechnology.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant-in-Aids for Scientific Research 26102540).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Voet, D.; Voet, J.G. Biochemistry, 4th ed; John Wiley & Sons, Inc: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. Buschmann, H.; Hauptmann, M.; Niessing, D.; Lloyd, C.W.; Schäffnera, A.R. Helical growth of the Arabidopsis mutant tortifolia2 does not depend on cell division patterns but involves handed twisting of isolated cells. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2090–2106. [Google Scholar]
  3. Capdevila, J.; Vogan, K.J.; Tabin, C.J.; Belmonte, J.C.I. Mechanisms of left-right determination in vertebrates. Cell 2000, 101, 9–21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hashimoto, T. Molecular genetic analysis of left–right handedness in plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 357, 799–808. [Google Scholar]
  5. Samatey, F.A.; Imada, K.; Nagashima, S.; Vonderviszt, F.; Kumasaka, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Namba, K. Structure of the bacterial flagellar protofilament and implications for a switch for supercoiling. Nature 2001, 410, 331–337. [Google Scholar]
  6. Song, G.; Ren, J. Recognition and regulation of unique nucleic acid structures by small molecules. Chem. Commun 2010, 46, 7283–7294. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, G.; Christensen, L.A.; Vasquez, K.M. Z-DNA-forming sequences generate large-scale deletions in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 2677–2682. [Google Scholar]
  8. Abe, A.; Hiraga, K.; Imada, Y.; Hiejima, T.; Furuya, H. Screw-sense inversion characteristic of α-helical poly(β-p-chlorobenzyl l-aspartate) and comparison with other related polyaspartates. Biopolymers 2005, 80, 249–257. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pandey, A.K.; Thomas, K.M.; Forbes, C.R.; Zondlo, N.J. Tunable control of polyproline helix (PPII) structure via aromatic electronic effects: An electronic switch of polyproline helix. Biochemistry 2014, 53, 5307–5314. [Google Scholar]
  10. Horng, J.-C.; Raines, R.T. Stereoelectronic effects on polyproline conformation. Protein Sci 2006, 15, 74–83. [Google Scholar]
  11. Schmid, F.X. Prolyl isomerases. Adv. Protein Chem 2002, 59, 243–281. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pastorino, L.; Sun, A.; Lu, P.-J.; Zhou, X.Z.; Balastik, M.; Finn, G.; Wulf, G.; Lim, J.; Li, S.-H.; Li, X.; et al. The prolyl isomerase Pin1 regulates amyloid precursor protein processing and amyloid-β production. Nature 2006, 440, 528–534. [Google Scholar]
  13. Suk, J.-M.; Naidu, V.R.; Liu, X.; Lah, M.S.; Jeong, K.-S. A foldamer-based chiroptical molecular switch that displays complete inversion of the helical sense upon anion binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 13938–13941. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiang, X.; Lim, Y.-K.; Zhang, B.J.; Opsitnick, E.A.; Baik, M.-H.; Lee, D. Dendritic molecular switch: Chiral folding and helicity inversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 16812–16822. [Google Scholar]
  15. Opsitnick, E.A.; Jiang, X.; Hollenbeck, A.N.; Lee, D. Hydrogen-bond-assisted helical folding of propeller-shaped molecules: Effects of extended π-conjugation on chiral selection, conformational stability, and exciton coupling. Eur. J. Org. Chem 2012, 708–720. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lu, W.; Du, G.; Liu, K.; Jiang, L.; Ling, J.; Shen, Z. Chiroptical inversion induced by rotation of a carbon-carbon single bond: An experimental and theoretical study. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 283–292. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kang, J.; Miyajima, D.; Itoh, Y.; Mori, T.; Tanaka, H.; Yamauchi, M.; Inoue, Y.; Harada, S.; Aida, T. C5-Symmetric chiral corannulenes: Desymmetrization of bowl inversion equilibrium via “intramolecular” hydrogen-bonding network. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 10640–10644. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kolomiets, E.; Berl, V.; Lehn, J.-M. Chirality induction and protonation-induced molecular motions in helical molecular strands. Chem. Eur. J 2007, 13, 5466–5479. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hua, Y.; Flood, A.H. Flipping the switch on chloride concentrations with a light-active foldamer. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 12838–12840. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yashima, E.; Maeda, K.; Iida, H.; Furusho, Y.; Nagai, K. Helical polymers: Synthesis, structures, and functions. Chem. Rev 2009, 109, 6102–6211. [Google Scholar]
  21. Shimomura, K.; Ikai, T.; Kanoh, S.; Yashima, E.; Maeda, K. Switchable enantioseparation based on macromolecular memory of a helical polyacetylene in the solid state. Nat. Chem 2014, 6, 429–434. [Google Scholar]
  22. Brown, R.A.; Diemer, V.; Webb, S.J.; Clayden, J. End-to-end conformational communication through a synthetic purinergic receptor by ligand-induced helicity switching. Nat. Chem 2013, 5, 853–860. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fujiki, M. Switching handedness in optically active polysilanes. J. Organomet. Chem 2003, 685, 15–34. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, S.; Zhou, J.; Park, Y.-S.; Rho, J.; Singh, R.; Nam, S.; Azad, A.K.; Chen, H.-T.; Yin, X.; Taylor, A.J.; et al. Photoinduced handedness switching in terahertz chiral metamolecules. Nat. Commun 2012, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Manchineella, S.; Prathyusha, V.; Priyakumar, U.D.; Govindaraju, T. Solvent-induced helical assembly and reversible chiroptical switching of chiral cyclic-dipeptide-functionalized naphthalenediimides. Chem. Eur. J 2013, 19, 16615–16624. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sargsyan, G.; Schatz, A.A.; Kubelka, J.; Balaz, M. Formation and helicity control of ssDNA templated porphyrin nanoassemblies. Chem. Commun 2013, 49, 1020–1022. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pijper, D.; Jongejan, M.G.M.; Meetsma, A.; Feringa, B.L. Light-controlled supramolecular helicity of a liquid crystalline phase using a helical polymer functionalized with a single chiroptical molecular switch. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 4541–4552. [Google Scholar]
  28. San Jose, B.A.; Yan, J.; Akagi, K. Dynamic switching of the circularly polarized luminescence of disubstituted polyacetylene by selective transmission through a thermotropic chiral nematic liquid crystal. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 126, 10817–10820. [Google Scholar]
  29. Borovkov, V. Supramolecular chirality in porphyrin chemistry. Symmetry 2014, 6, 256–294. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tsukube, H.; Shinoda, S. Lanthanide complexes in molecular recognition and chirality sensing of biological substrates. Chem. Rev 2002, 102, 2389–2403. [Google Scholar]
  31. Miyake, H.; Terada, K.; Tsukube, H. Lanthanide tris(β-diketonates) as useful probes for chirality determination of biological amino alcohols in vibrational circular dichroism: Ligand to ligand chirality transfer in lanthanide coordination sphere. Chirality 2014, 26, 293–299. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ernst, K.-H.; Wild, F.R.W.P.; Blacque, O.; Berke, H. Alfred Werner’s coordination chemistry: New insights from old samples. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2011, 50, 10780–10787. [Google Scholar]
  33. Constable, E.C.; Housecroft, C.E. Coordination chemistry: The scientific legacy of Alfred Werner. Chem. Soc. Rev 2013, 42, 1429–1439. [Google Scholar]
  34. Crassous, J. Transfer of chirality from ligands to metal centers: Recent examples. Chem. Commun 2012, 48, 9684–9692. [Google Scholar]
  35. Miyake, H.; Tsukube, H. Coordination chemistry strategies for dynamic helicates: Time-programmable chirality switching with labile and inert metal helicates. Chem. Soc. Rev 2012, 41, 6977–6991. [Google Scholar]
  36. Durot, S.; Reviriego, F.; Sauvage, J.-P. Copper-complexed catenanes and rotaxanes in motion: 15 years of molecular machines. Dalton Trans 2010, 39, 10557–10570. [Google Scholar]
  37. Forgan, R.S.; Sauvage, J.-P.; Stoddart, J.F. Chemical topology: Complex molecular knots, links, and entanglements. Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 5434–5464. [Google Scholar]
  38. Helm, L.; Merbach, A.E. Inorganic and bioinorganic solvent exchange mechanisms. Chem. Rev 2005, 105, 1923–1959. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lehn, J.-M.; Rigault, A.; Siegel, J.; Harrowfield, J.; Chevrier, B.; Moras, D. Spontaneous assembly of double-stranded helicates from oligobipyridine ligands and copper(I) cations: Structure of an inorganic double helix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 2565–2569. [Google Scholar]
  40. Piguet, C.; Bernardinelli, G.; Hopfgartner, G. Helicates as versatile supramolecular complexes. Chem. Rev 1997, 97, 2005–2062. [Google Scholar]
  41. Albrecht, M. “Let’s twist again” sdouble-stranded, triple-stranded, and circular helicates”. Chem. Rev 2001, 101, 3457–3497. [Google Scholar]
  42. Howson, S.E.; Scott, P. Approaches to the synthesis of optically pure helicates. Dalton Trans 2011, 40, 10268–10277. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ito, H.; Ikeda, M.; Hasegawa, T.; Furusho, Y.; Yashima, E. Synthesis of complementary double-stranded helical oligomers through chiral and achiral amidinium-carboxylate salt bridges and chiral amplification in their double-helix formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 3419–3432. [Google Scholar]
  44. Furusho, Y.; Goto, H.; Itomi, K.; Katagiri, H.; Miyagawa, T.; Yashima, E. Synthesis and optical resolution of a Cu(I) double-stranded helicate with ketimine-bridged tris(bipyridine) ligands. Chem. Commun 2011, 47, 9795–9797. [Google Scholar]
  45. Boiocchi, M.; Brega, V.; Ciarrocchi, C.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Pallavicini, P. Dicopper double-strand helicates held together by additional π–π interactions. Inorg. Chem 2013, 52, 10643–10652. [Google Scholar]
  46. Yamada, H.; Furusho, Y.; Yashima, E. Diastereoselective imine-bond formation through complementary double-helix formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 7250–7253. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kovaříček, P.; Lehn, J.-M. Merging constitutional and motional covalent dynamics in reversible imine formation and exchange processes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 9446–9455. [Google Scholar]
  48. Stadler, A.-M.; Lehn, J.-M.P. Coupled nanomechanical motions: Metal-ion-effected, ph-modulated, simultaneous extension/contraction motions of double-domain helical/linear molecular strands. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 3400–3409. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tsujimoto, Y.; Kojima, T.; Hiraoka, S. Rate-determining step in the self-assembly process of supramolecular coordination capsules. Chem. Sci 2014, 5, 4167–4172. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sato, S.; Ishido, Y.; Fujita, M. Remarkable stabilization of M12L24 spherical frameworks through the cooperation of 48 Pd(II)-pyridine interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131, 6064–6065. [Google Scholar]
  51. Miyake, H.; Ueda, M.; Murota, S.; Sugimoto, H.; Tsukube, H. Helicity inversion from left- to right-handed square planar Pd(II) complexes: Synthesis of a diastereomer pair from a single chiral ligand and their structure dynamism. Chem. Commun 2012, 48, 3721–3723. [Google Scholar]
  52. Eerdun, C.; Hisanaga, S.; Setsune, J. Single helicates of dipalladium(II) hexapyrroles: Helicity induction and redox tuning of chiroptical properties. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2013, 52, 929–932. [Google Scholar]
  53. Akine, S.; Hotate, S.; Nabeshima, T. A molecular leverage for helicity control and helix inversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 13868–13871. [Google Scholar]
  54. Akine, S.; Sairenji, S.; Taniguchi, T.; Nabeshima, T. Stepwise helicity inversions by multisequential metal exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 12948–12951. [Google Scholar]
  55. Krämer, R.; Lehn, J.-M.; de Cian, A.; Fischer, J. Self-assembly, structure, and spontaneous resolution of a trinuclear triple helix from an oligobipyridine ligand and NiIIions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 1993, 32, 703–706. [Google Scholar]
  56. Lehn, J.-M. Toward self-organization and complex matter. Science 2002, 295, 2400–2403. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hasenknopf, B.; Lehn, J.-M.; Kneisel, B.O.; Baum, G.; Fenske, D. Self-assembly of a circular double helicate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 1996, 35, 1838–1840. [Google Scholar]
  58. Hasenknopf, B.; Lehn, J.-M.; Boumediene, N.; Dupont-Gervais, A.; van Dorsselaer, A.; Kneisel, B.; Fenske, D. Self-assembly of tetra- and hexanuclear circular helicates. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1997, 119, 10956–10962. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang, Z.J.; Clary, K.N.; Bergman, R.G.; Raymond, K.N.; Toste, F.D. A supramolecular approach to combining enzymatic and transition metal catalysis. Nat. Chem 2013, 5, 100–103. [Google Scholar]
  60. Aboshyan-Sorgho, L.; Cantuel, M.; Bernardinellib, G.; Piguet, C. Looking for the origin of the switch between coordination-captured helicates and catenates. Dalton Trans 2012, 41, 7218–7226. [Google Scholar]
  61. Imbert, D.; Cantuel, M.; Bünzli, J.-C.G.; Bernardinelli, G.; Piguet, C. Extending lifetimes of lanthanide-based NIR emitters (Nd, Yb) in the millisecond range through Cr(III) sensitization in discrete bimetallic edifices. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2003, 125, 15698–15699. [Google Scholar]
  62. Aboshyan-Sorgho, L.; Nozary, H.; Aebischer, A.; Bünzli, J.-C.G.; Morgantini, P.-Y.; Kittilstved, K.R.; Hauser, A.; Eliseeva, S.V.; Petoud, S.; Piguet, C.; et al. Optimizing millisecond time scale near-infrared emission in polynuclear chrome(III)–lanthanide(III) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 12675–12684. [Google Scholar]
  63. Howson, S.E.; Allan, L.E.N.; Chmel, N.P.; Clarkson, G.J.; van Gorkum, R.; Scott, P. Self-assembling optically pure Fe(A–B)3 chelates. Chem. Commun 2009, 1727–1729. [Google Scholar]
  64. Howson, S.E.; Allan, L.E.N.; Chmel, N.P.; Clarkson, G.J.; Deeth, R.J.; Faulkner, A.D.; Simpson, D.H.; Scott, P. Origins of stereoselectivity in optically pure phenylethaniminopyridine tris-chelates M(NN′)3n+ (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni and Zn). Dalton Trans 2011, 40, 10416–10433. [Google Scholar]
  65. Ousaka, N.; Grunder, S.; Castilla, A.M.; Whalley, A.C.; Stoddart, J.F.; Nitschke, J.R. Efficient long-range stereochemical communication and cooperative effects in self-assembled Fe4L6 cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 15528–15537. [Google Scholar]
  66. Howson, S.E.; Bolhuis, A.; Brabec, V.; Clarkson, G.J.; Malina, J.; Rodger, A.; Scott, P. Optically pure, water-stable metallo-helical “flexicate” assemblies with antibiotic activity. Nat. Chem 2012, 4, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  67. Faulkner, A.D.; Kaner, R.A.; Abdallah, Q.M.A.; Clarkson, G.; Fox, D.J.; Gurnani, P.; Howson, S.E.; Phillips, R.M.; Roper, D.I.; Simpson, D.H.; et al. Asymmetric triplex metallohelices with high and selective activity against cancer cells. Nat. Chem 2014, 6, 797–803. [Google Scholar]
  68. Li, M.; Howson, S.E.; Dong, K.; Gao, N.; Ren, J.; Scott, P.; Qu, X. Chiral metallohelical complexes enantioselectively target amyloid β for treating alzheimer’s disease. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 11655–11663. [Google Scholar]
  69. Castilla, A.M.; Ramsay, W.J.; Nitschke, J.R. Stereochemistry in subcomponent self-assembly. Acc. Chem. Res 2014, 47, 2063–2073. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ousaka, N.; Clegg, J.K.; Nitschke, J.R. Nonlinear enhancement of chiroptical response through subcomponent substitution in M4L6 cages. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2012, 51, 1464–1468. [Google Scholar]
  71. Castilla, A.M.; Ousaka, N.; Bilbeisi, R.A.; Valeri, E.; Ronson, T.K.; Nitschke, J.R. High-fidelity stereochemical memory in a FeII4L4 tetrahedral capsule. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 17999–18006. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhao, C.; Sun, Q.-F.; Hart-Cooper, W.M.; DiPasquale, A.G.; Toste, F.D.; Bergman, R.G.; Raymond, K.N. Chiral amide directed assembly of a diastereo- and enantiopure supramolecular host and its application to enantioselective catalysis of neutral substrates. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 18802–18805. [Google Scholar]
  73. Ousaka, N.; Takeyama, Y.; Iida, H.; Yashima, E. Chiral information harvesting in dendritic metallopeptides. Nat Chem 2011, 3, 856–861. [Google Scholar]
  74. Miyake, H.; Yoshida, K.; Sugimoto, H.; Tsukube, H. Dynamic helicity inversion by achiral anion stimulus in synthetic labile cobalt(II) complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004, 126, 6524–6525. [Google Scholar]
  75. Miyake, H.; Sugimoto, H.; Tamiaki, H.; Tsukube, H. Dynamic helicity inversion in an octahedral cobalt(II) complex system via solvato-diastereomerism. Chem. Commun 2005, 4291–4293. [Google Scholar]
  76. Miyake, H.; Kamon, H.; Miyahara, I.; Sugimoto, H.; Tsukube, H. Time-programmed peptide helix inversion of a synthetic metal complex triggered by an achiral NO3− anion. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 792–793. [Google Scholar]
  77. Miyake, H.; Hikita, M.; Itazaki, M.; Nakazawa, H.; Sugimoto, H.; Tsukube, H. A chemical device that exhibits dual mode motions: Dynamic coupling of amide coordination isomerism and metal-centered helicity inversion in a chiral cobalt(II) complex. Chem. Eur. J 2008, 14, 5393–5396. [Google Scholar]
Symmetry 06 00880f1 1024
Figure 1. Representative enantiomeric pairs based on coordination geometries of metal complexes: (a) square planar; (b) tetrahedral; (c) trigonal pyramid; (d) octahedral with tris(bidentates); (e) octahedral with linear tetradentate; (f) square antiprism with tetra(bidentates); (g) square antiprism with tetra-armed cyclen.
Figure 1. Representative enantiomeric pairs based on coordination geometries of metal complexes: (a) square planar; (b) tetrahedral; (c) trigonal pyramid; (d) octahedral with tris(bidentates); (e) octahedral with linear tetradentate; (f) square antiprism with tetra(bidentates); (g) square antiprism with tetra-armed cyclen.
Symmetry 06 00880f1
Symmetry 06 00880f2 1024
Figure 2. Double-stranded metal helicate polymer consisting of chiral amidine and an achiral carboxylic acid (R = octynyl).
Figure 2. Double-stranded metal helicate polymer consisting of chiral amidine and an achiral carboxylic acid (R = octynyl).
Symmetry 06 00880f2
Symmetry 06 00880f3 1024
Figure 3. Cu(I) double-stranded helicate consisting of ketamine-bridged tris(bipyridine).
Figure 3. Cu(I) double-stranded helicate consisting of ketamine-bridged tris(bipyridine).
Symmetry 06 00880f3
Symmetry 06 00880f4 1024
Figure 4. Cu(I) double-stranded helicate stabilized by π–π interactions.
Figure 4. Cu(I) double-stranded helicate stabilized by π–π interactions.
Symmetry 06 00880f4
Symmetry 06 00880f5 1024
Figure 5. Synthesis and helicity inversion of diastereomeric Pd(II) complexes. Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry [48].
Figure 5. Synthesis and helicity inversion of diastereomeric Pd(II) complexes. Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry [48].
Symmetry 06 00880f5
Symmetry 06 00880f6 1024
Figure 6. Helicity induction by Schiff base formation between a chiral amine and Pd(II)2 hexapyrroles.
Figure 6. Helicity induction by Schiff base formation between a chiral amine and Pd(II)2 hexapyrroles.
Symmetry 06 00880f6
Symmetry 06 00880f7 1024
Figure 7. Guest-induced helicity inversion of a tetranuclear metal complex.
Figure 7. Guest-induced helicity inversion of a tetranuclear metal complex.
Symmetry 06 00880f7
Symmetry 06 00880f8 1024
Figure 8. Stepwise multisequential helicity inversions of a hexaoxime–metal helicate.
Figure 8. Stepwise multisequential helicity inversions of a hexaoxime–metal helicate.
Symmetry 06 00880f8
Symmetry 06 00880f9 1024
Figure 9. Diastereoselective complexation between a labile Fe(II) center and chiral tris(imine) ligand.
Figure 9. Diastereoselective complexation between a labile Fe(II) center and chiral tris(imine) ligand.
Symmetry 06 00880f9
Symmetry 06 00880f10 1024
Figure 10. Stereoselective formation of a dinuclear Fe(II) complex with a chiral tris(diimine) ligand.
Figure 10. Stereoselective formation of a dinuclear Fe(II) complex with a chiral tris(diimine) ligand.
Symmetry 06 00880f10
Symmetry 06 00880f11 1024
Figure 11. Chiral cage formation from racemic cage by subcomponent substitution.
Figure 11. Chiral cage formation from racemic cage by subcomponent substitution.
Symmetry 06 00880f11
Symmetry 06 00880f12 1024
Figure 12. Chiral cage formation and chirality memory.
Figure 12. Chiral cage formation and chirality memory.
Symmetry 06 00880f12
Symmetry 06 00880f13 1024
Figure 13. Enantioselective and chemoselective cyclization of a neutral substrate catalyzed by the ΔΔΔΔ tetrahedral cage.
Figure 13. Enantioselective and chemoselective cyclization of a neutral substrate catalyzed by the ΔΔΔΔ tetrahedral cage.
Symmetry 06 00880f13
Symmetry 06 00880f14 1024
Figure 14. Chirality induction in an octahedral tris-bipyridyl Fe(II) complex induced by (S)-valine via a helical tetrapeptides.
Figure 14. Chirality induction in an octahedral tris-bipyridyl Fe(II) complex induced by (S)-valine via a helical tetrapeptides.
Symmetry 06 00880f14
Symmetry 06 00880f15 1024
Figure 15. NO3− anion-induced helicity inversion of a Co(II) complex.
Figure 15. NO3− anion-induced helicity inversion of a Co(II) complex.
Symmetry 06 00880f15
Symmetry 06 00880f16 1024
Figure 16. Helicity inversion around a metal center and sequential chirality transfer to peptide helices (left) and CD spectral changes upon addition of NO3− anion (right). Reproduced by permission of American Chemical Society [73].
Figure 16. Helicity inversion around a metal center and sequential chirality transfer to peptide helices (left) and CD spectral changes upon addition of NO3− anion (right). Reproduced by permission of American Chemical Society [73].
Symmetry 06 00880f16
Symmetry 06 00880f17 1024
Figure 17. Stretching and inverting motions of a Co(II) complex.
Figure 17. Stretching and inverting motions of a Co(II) complex.
Symmetry 06 00880f17

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miyake, H. Supramolecular Chirality in Dynamic Coordination Chemistry. Symmetry 2014, 6, 880-895. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym6040880

AMA Style

Miyake H. Supramolecular Chirality in Dynamic Coordination Chemistry. Symmetry. 2014; 6(4):880-895. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym6040880

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miyake, Hiroyuki. 2014. "Supramolecular Chirality in Dynamic Coordination Chemistry" Symmetry 6, no. 4: 880-895. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym6040880

APA Style

Miyake, H. (2014). Supramolecular Chirality in Dynamic Coordination Chemistry. Symmetry, 6(4), 880-895. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym6040880

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop