Next Article in Journal
Natural and Anthropogenic Origin of Metals in Lacustrine Sediments; Assessment and Consequences—A Case Study of Wigry Lake (Poland)
Next Article in Special Issue
The Long-Term Effect of Industrial Waste Landfill on Surface Water. An Example from Central Poland
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models with Hyperparameter Optimization Algorithm for Mapping Mineral Prospectivity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Cr(VI) Stability in Contaminated Coastal Groundwater: Salinity as a Driving Force

by
Ioannis-Porfyrios D. Eliopoulos
1,
George D. Eliopoulos
2 and
Maria Economou-Eliopoulos
3,*
1
Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National University of Athens, GR-15771 Zografou, Greece
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, GR-70013 Heraklion, Greece
3
Department of Geology and Geoenvironment, National University of Athens, GR-15784 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2021, 11(2), 160; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11020160
Submission received: 29 December 2020 / Revised: 20 January 2021 / Accepted: 29 January 2021 / Published: 3 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trace Metal Distribution and Cycling in Aquatic Environments)

Abstract

:
Chromium concentrations in seawater are less than 0.5 μg/L, but the Cr(VI) in contaminated coastal groundwater affected by Cr-bearing rocks/ores and/or human activities, coupled with the intrusion of seawater may reach values of hundreds of μg/L. A potential explanation for the stability of the harmful Cr(VI) in contaminated coastal aquifers is still unexplored. The present study is an overview of new and literature data on the composition of coastal groundwater and seawater, aiming to provide potential relationships between Cr(VI) with major components in seawater and explain the elevated Cr(VI) concentrations. It is known that the oxidation of Cr(III) to Cr(VI) and the subsequent back-reduction of Cr(VI) processes, during the transport of the mobilized Cr(VI) in various aquifers, facilitate the natural attenuation process of Cr(VI). Moreover, the presented positive trend between B and Cr(VI) and negative trend between δ53Cr values and B concentration may suggest that seawater components significantly inhibit the Cr(VI) reduction into Cr(III), and provide insights on the role of the borate, [B(OH)4] ions, a potential buffer, on the stability of Cr(VI) in coastal groundwater. Therefore, efforts are needed toward the prevention and/or minimization of the contamination by Cr(VI) of in coastal aquifers, which are influenced by the intrusion of seawater and are threatened by changes in sea level, due to climate change. The knowledge of the contamination sources, hotspots and monitoring of water salinization processes (geochemical mapping) for every coastal country may contribute to the optimization of agricultural management strategies.

1. Introduction

The scientific interest on the sustainable management of water resources and the effect on groundwater aquifers by either nature processes and/or extensive application in industry, is an attractive and fundamental subject to global food security. Among heavy metals, chromium (Cr) has become widespread in the environment. It appears in several oxidation states, the trivalent Cr(III) and hexavalent forms [Cr(VI)] being the most thermodynamically stable Cr forms in nature [1,2]. Cr(III) is necessary for lipid and sugar metabolism, and it is an essential trace element for human and animal health, whereas Cr(VI) in the food chain (groundwater, soil and plants), has created an alarming situation for human life and ecosystems [3,4,5]. Potential sources for the relatively high Cr contents in soil and groundwater may be the widespread Cr-bearing peridotites, which are parts of ophiolite complexes, covering more than 1% of the earth, along orogenetic zones [6], intense ore mining/smelting, industrial and agriculture activities (fertilizers and pesticides) [7,8]. The weathering processes of ultramafic rocks, depending mainly on the climate conditions and morphology, may result in the formation of laterites, both releasing significant amounts of Cr among other heavy metals (Ni, Co, Mn, Fe). Groundwater from sites characterized by the extensive presence of ultramafic rocks contain more than 10 μg/L Cr(VI), reaching values up to hundreds of μg/L of Cr(VI) [6,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. The contamination of groundwater by Cr may be derived from industrial activities, such as in the Czech Republic (a highly industrialized country in Central Europe) [17], at the area of Friuli Venezia Giulia (northern Italy) [18], the Assopos Basin (Oinofyta or Inofyta, near the Assopos river) in Greece, exhibiting as high as 8000 μg/L Cr(VI) in shallow groundwater [19]. Additionally, ferrochromium (FeCr), which is a critical alloy in the production of stainless steel, is produced in several European countries (Finland, France, Italy, Norway, Sweden, the nations formerly comprising Yugoslavia, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, and the U.K.) generating Cr-bearing wastes [7,20].
In coastal groundwater that is contaminated by either Cr-bearing rocks/ores or industrial wastes, Cr(VI) often exceeds the maximum acceptable level for Crtotal in drinking water (50 μg/L) [21]. Such groundwater, at the interface zone between land and sea, is continually influenced by both marine and terrestrial processes, and it often contains elevated concentrations of Na, Cl, B, Li, Se, As, S, Ca, and Mg, which is characteristic of the seawater composition [22,23]. Although about one quarter of the global population lives in the vicinity of the world’s coastlines [24], the potential role of the presence of seawater components, which may significantly facilitate the Cr(VI) stability, inhibiting the Cr(VI) reduction to Cr(III), is unexplored in groundwater. Additionally, because high technology metals such as the rare earth elements (REEs) have become contaminants in the environment [25,26], this study presents new data on the composition of coastal water, including REEs, from the industrial zone of the Assopos and other Neogene Basins. They are combined with available data from previous studies, and the delineated relationships are presented. A major aim was the interpretation of the Cr(VI) stability, as a function of the salinity in groundwater resulting from the intrusion of seawater, the prevention of groundwater from further degradation, and protection of the valuable water resources.

2. Chromium Background

Structure of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) and Soluble Products

Assuming that Cr(III) forms hexa-coordinate complexes with the octahedral arrangement of ligands, [Cr(H2O)63+] is the main Cr species in solutions of inorganic Cr(III) salts under strongly acidic pH, while at pH ≥ 4, Cr(III)-bound H2O molecules undergo hydrolysis, resulting in the formation of soluble oligomeric products, whilst polymeric products are insoluble (Figure 1) [27].
Surface waters commonly contain a mixture of soluble monomeric and oligomeric Cr-products [28]. Additionally, in the presence of organic matter, the formation of stable Cr(III) complexes with small organic molecules can increase their mobility at the source of contamination sites and maintain the solubility of Cr(III) even at neutral pH [27].
Chromate and dichromate have tetrahedral arrangements of coordinated oxygen (Figure 2). The chromate anion (CrO42−) is the predominant form of Cr(VI) in dilute solutions at neutral pH, co-existing in equilibrium with its protonated form [HCrO4] in an approximately 3:1 ratio at these conditions [29].

3. Geological and Hydrological Outline

Detailed studies in Greece have shown that the main aquifers in the Greece are developed in alluvial formations, such as Quaternary and Neogene unconsolidated deposits (porous aquifers) covering the lowlands and semi-mountainous area of Greece and in carbonate rocks (karstic aquifers) [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Specifically, the Neogene Assopos–Thiva Basin (Figure 3c) is mainly composed of tertiary and quaternary sediments of more than 400 m thickness, and expands over an area of approximately 700 km2. Alternations of marls and marly limestone occurs in the lowest parts of the basin sequences, and continental sediments consisting of conglomerates with small intercalations of marls, marly limestones, schists, sandstones, clays and flysch are dominant in the upper parts. A sharp tectonic contact between the sediment types, due to the intense neotectonic deformation, is a characteristic feature of the entire area [30]. The morpho-tectonic structure and evolution of this basin are the result of E–W to WNW–ESE trending fault systems, with peridotites and a Ni-laterite over-thrusted on the Triassic–Jurassic carbonates [30]. Quaternary sediments cover large parts of the Assopos valley and host two types of aquifers: (i) aquifers within Neogene conglomerates, sandstones and marly limestone to a depth of approximately 150 m; and (ii) karst type aquifers within the Triassic–Jurassic limestones at deeper levels of the basin, such as the Mavrosouvala aquifer [31,32,33]. The Neogene Basin of the Central Evia is characterized by strong geomorphological contrast and is built up mainly of Pleistocene to Holocene sediments hosting the most productive aquifers in this area. Strongly tectonized ultramafic rocks (harzburgites and lherzolites), over-thrusted onto Upper Cretaceous limestones and flysch sediments, are widespread in C. Evia. Alluvial deposits are the host rocks to the aquifer, which is probed by many shallow wells (10–180 m) or agricultural activities [11,12].
The most important aquifers in the Mesogeia Basin in Attica, which is part of the Attica–Cyclades zone, are constituted by Triassic–Jurassic limestones, Upper Cretaceous limestones, marly limestones, and travertine limestones (permeable rocks) [34,35,36,37,38]. The main part of the Mesogeia Basin, including the Koropi area (Figure 2), is occupied by Quaternary formations (gravels, sand, and clays) which characterize a low productive phreatic aquifer [35]. The alluvial deposits form a phreatic aquifer displaying limited permeability and poor hydraulic characteristics, due to fine grain compositions; they feed a large number of wells and boreholes, with depths ranging from 10 to 20 m [35,36,37].

4. Materials and Methods

Although the details of the analytical methods applied for the determination of the groundwater composition, including chromium stable isotopes, are provided in relative references, a brief outline is given here. More than two hundred coastal groundwater samples from domestic and irrigation wells from the C. Evia, Assopos–Thiva, and Attica Neogene Basins, and seawater samples from the Mediterranean Sea (Evoic gulf), collected during the period from 2007 to 2017, have been analyzed for major and trace elements by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP/MS) [11,12,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. In addition, representatives of those groundwater samples were analyzed in the present study for major and trace elements, including rare earth elements (REEs) and platinum-group elements (PGEs) by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP/MS) (Table 1). Detection limits, quality control samples and the precision of the analyses were in agreement with international standards (~10%). Physical and chemical parameters (pH and total dissolved solids) of the water samples were measured in the field using a portable Consort 561 Multiparameter Analyzer (Turnhout, Belgium). The analyses of total chromium were performed by GFAAS (Perkin Elmer 1100B system, Waltham, MA, USA), with an estimated detection limit of ~1 μg/L. The chemical analyses for Cr(VI) were performed by the 1.5-diphenylcarbohydrazide colorimetric method, using an HACH DR/4000 spectrophotometer (Loveland, CO, USA). The estimated detection limit of the method was determined at ~4 μg/L.
A series of batch water-leaching experiments for serpentinized peridotites were carried out in order to study the long-term (one week) leaching responses of Cr under atmospheric conditions [38]. Water and water leachate samples in an amount which would yield about 1 μg of total chromium were used for the Cr isotope composition, and the solutions were prepared following the method from ref [39]. Both Cr concentrations and isotope ratios were analyzed using an IsotopX “Phoenix”multicollector thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS) equipped with eight Faraday cups at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Four Cr beams (50Cr+, 52Cr+, 53Cr+, and 54Cr+) were analyzed simultaneously with 49Ti+, 51V+, and 56Fe+ beams, which were used to monitor interfering ions. The final isotope composition of a sample was determined as the average of the repeated analyses and reported relative to the certified SRM 979 standard as:
δ53Cr(‰) = [(53Cr/52Crsample/53Cr/52CrSRM979) − 1] × 1000.
The raw data were corrected for naturally- and instrumentally-induced isotope fractionation using the double spike routine. To assess the precision of the analyses, a double-spike treated, certified standard reference material (NIST SRM 979) was used.

5. Global Distribution of Coastal Groundwater

Climate change, due to increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, may affect the saltwater intrusion through changes in precipitation and temperature [40]. Coastal aquifers within the zones of influence are threatened by rising sea levels worldwide (Figure 3).
The phenomenon of seawater intrusion has been recorded in many coastal areas, such as in Texas, Florida, Indonesia, Syria, in South Asia (Bangkok) in Africa (Nigeria, Egypt and Tunisia), China, Australia, and Europe (Cyprus, Turkey, Estonia, Italy, and Greece) [10,12,23,25,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Global review publications provide an extensive array of field, laboratory, and computer-based techniques for the investigation of the seawater intrusion, its composition, and prediction of freshwater–saltwater interfaces over regional scales [23,41,42,43,44,45,46].

6. Geochemical Characteristics and Salinization of Coastal Groundwater

A common feature of the groundwater from the Neogene lacustrine formations of the Attica Basin, which has been affected by occasionally enclosed (tectonically) serpentinized peridotites, and the C. Evia, Assopos–Thiva Basins and the Loutraki area (Figure 3b,c) is the effect of the seawater intrusion [11,12,13,14,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,41], although they have been classified in various water types: the water samples from Attica as a Ca–HCO3 water type [37], while those from C. Evia and Assopos–Thiva Basins and the Loutraki area are of Mg–HCO3 type, due to the CO2-driven dissolution of dominant minerals, such as serpentine and Mg-carbonates/hydroxides [11,14,31]. In order to better understanding the hydrochemistry of the above aquifers and the driving force of the Cr(VI) stability in contaminated coastal water, representative groundwater samples from the Attica, Assopos–Thiva, and C. Evia Neogene Basins were analyzed in the present study for major and trace elements, including rare earth elements (REEs) and platinum group elements (PGEs) (Table 1), which were combined with the relative literature data.
Major and trace elements (Table 1) are in a good agreement with those in previous studies, often exhibiting Cr(VI) concentrations over the maximum acceptable level for Crtotal in drinking water (50 μg/L), although the water contaminated by industrial activities in the area of Oinofita (or Inofyta), near the Assopos river (Assopos Basin) has shown concentrations higher than 8000 μg/L [19]. Besides the elevated B, Br, Se, Li, As, V, U, S, Na, K, Ca and Mg concentrations, the concentrations for the majority of REEs are lower than the detection limit of the method (<0.01 μg/L), except values of 0.02 μg/L La and 0.01 to 0.02 μg/L Nd measured in the Assopos and C. Evia aquifers, and 0.02 μg/L Gd and 0.02 μg/L Dy measured in the Attica aquifers. The measured range for Sc of lanthanides was 2–3 μg/L in the Attica aquifers and 4–14 μg/L Sc in the C. Evia and Assopos Basins (Table 1). With respect to platinum-group elements, Pd was lower than the detection limit of the method (0.2 μg/L). The Pt was lower than detection limit (0.01 μg/L) in the Attica aquifers, while 0.01 values were measured in the C. Evia and Assopos aquifers. The Ru concentrations ranged from 0.06 to 0.3 μg/L in Attica, and from 0.06 to 0.19 μg/L in the C. Evia and Assopos Basins (Table 1). Additionally, these water samples were analyzed for the elements Au, Ag, Al, Ti, W, Tl, Te, Ta, Sn, In, Hf, Ge, Pb, Cs, Hg, Be, Bi, Cd, Ga and Y, but their concentrations were lower than the detection limit of the method. The measured concentrations for REEs and PGEs in water leachates for altered peridotites were also too low (Table 1). The available data on groundwater from previous studies exhibiting the lowest B and Cr(VI) concentrations have been recorded in the Mavrosouvala wells of karst type (Table 2), which are used for the municipal water supply of Athens city.
Present analytical data (Table 1) combining those from previous studies (Table 2) indicated that the best pronounced positive trend between B and Cr(VI) was recorded in C. Evia and Attica (Figure 4a). Limited data from the neighboring Mediterranean seawater (Assopos river estuary and Evoic Gulf) were plotted in a separate field characterized by much higher B and lower Cr(VI), comparable to those for geothermal water (Figure 4a). In addition, a good positive correlation between total dissolved solids (TDS) and B concentrations is a common feature of those water types (Figure 4b). A negative trend between the mass ratio Ca/Mg and the Cr(VI) concentrations recorded in groundwater from the studied Neogene Basins was followed by geothermal water (Figure 4c). In addition, a negative trend was clear between total organic carbon and Cr(VI) concentrations, for both lower and higher Cr(VI)concentrations of 50 μg/L in groundwater from the Assopos Basin (Figure 4d).
The plots of available stable chromium isotopes [38,46] expressed as δ53Cr values versus B and Cr(VI) concentrations for coastal groundwater from the C. Evia, Assopos Basin and water leachates for peridotites showed a negative trend (Figure 5a). Moreover, plots of δ53Cr values versus Cr(VI) concentrations for seawater from the Pacific and Atlantic oceans, and Mediterranean and Baltic seas [43], showed a negative trend as well (Figure 5b).

7. Discussion

7.1. REE and PGE as Potential Contaminants in Groundwater

Given that REEs have become contaminants in the environment, due to industrial activities [25,26], and hundreds of industrial plants are still active at the Assopos Basin, analyses of groundwater including REE are presented (Table 1) in order to evaluate the level of REEs and potential environmental impact. Although the REE concentrations were lower that the detection limit, using inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry, even the very low measured concentrations of La, Nd, Gd and Dy suggest that analysis using a more sensitive analytical method [51] is required to provide evidence for the REE behavior in that type of groundwater. With respect to PGE concentrations in groundwater, only Ru values (ranging from 0.06 to 0.30 μg/L) are often higher than the detection limit of the method (0.05 μg/L) (Table 1), suggesting that Ru is relatively mobile in the Neogene unconfined aquifers. It has been shown that humic and fulvic acids are capable of taking the PGE into solution from sulphides and Platinum Group Minerals (PGM), The complete sequence of alteration of the PGM from the fresh rocks to the weathered rocks has been proposed [52]. However, the available thermodynamic data for aqueous organic or hydroxide complexes involving the PGE are limited, and their impact on natural hydrological processes, water quality, and ecosystem processes are still unexploded [53].

7.2. Interaction between Cr(III) with Major Seawater Ions in Coastal Groundwater

Among potential redox couples in natural aquatic environments are H2O/O2, Mn(II)/Mn(IV), N2/NO3, NH4/NO3, Fe(II)/Fe(III), HS/SO4 and CH4/CO2 [54,55]. In particular, H2O2, high-valent Mn-oxides, and MnO4 may act as oxidants of Cr(III) [6,56,57] because their higher standard potentials favor that reaction [58]. Experimental data have shown that chromate adsorption by goethite is thermodynamically favorable through both inner- and outer-sphere surface complexation reactions [2]. These authors indicated that chromate adsorption decreases with increasing pH towards the zero-point-of-surface-charge (pHPZC 9.1) of the adsorbent surface, and ionic strength and temperature both affected outer-sphere surface complex.
Experimental results have indicated that H2O2 becomes a reductant at low pH [55,59]:
2HCrO4 + 3H2O2 + 8H+ → 2Cr3+ + 8H2O + 3O2
However, under alkaline conditions, hydrogen peroxide is an efficient oxidizing agent which can oxidize Cr(III) [59,60]:
2Cr(OH)3 + 3H2O2 + 4OH → 2CrO42− + 8H2O

7.3. Salinity as a Common Feature of Geothermal and Coastal Groundwater

The salinity, which is expressed by the total dissolved solids (TDS) and deduced from measurements of the electrical conductivity of groundwater, is a characteristic feature of sea and the geothermal water as well (Table 2 [23,48,49]). Geothermal water has been described in Greece, along the Hellenic Volcanic Arc, the Chalkidiki Peninsula, in Serres, many places in Thrace [61], in hot springs in the NW part of Evia (or Euboea) island, and in Central Greece [48], as well as in Hungary, Germany, France and many other countries [49,62]. In faulted regions, meteoric water can be circulated underground where it is heated by magma or hot rocks, and geothermal water ascends back to the surface; Na–Cl brines, with TDS values ranging from 99 to 107 g/L, pH values close to 5 and a reservoir rocks temperature value close to 225 ± 25 °C are well known in Germany [49,62]. According to these authors, their high Na, B, Li, Cl, and As concentrations may be related to processes of mixing between primary brines formed by advanced evaporation of seawater and meteoric freshwaters. Relatively low Cr concentrations (4.5 μg/L) and/or no detected concentrations in geothermal water [48,49,62] seems to be consistent with the assumption that hot brines have penetrated the granite basement below the sedimentary cover and the low pH from about 5, before cooling and degassing [49].

7.4. Decreasing Cr(III) Precipitation in the Presence of [B](OH)4] Ions, a Potential Buffer

It has been suggested that adsorption–desorption reactions may be the only significant mechanism influencing the fate of B in water, depending on the pH of the water and the B concentration in the solution, with the greatest adsorption being recorded at pH 7.5–9.0 [63]. Additionally, the dependence of the Cr sorption extent on the solution composition, which decreases from pure water to seawater, with no evidence for Cr(VI) sorption in seawater, is probably due to the competition between Cr(VI) and other anions for sorption sites [64]. In addition, the B(OH)3 is acidic because of its reaction with OH from water, forming the complex [B(OH)4] and releasing the corresponding proton left by the water auto-protolysis:
B(OH)3 + 2 H2O ⇌ [B(OH)4] + [H3O]+
The pKa value (=−log(Ka) of boric acid has been determined to be pKa = 8.98 [59]. Due to a relatively high pKa, boric acid has limited dissociation at neutral or low pH values. Additionally, it has been emphasized [65] that borate may be the only ion which inhibits the Cr(VI) reduction to Cr(III) [66]. The Cr(VI) reduction/removal under alkaline conditions was investigation experimentally, applying the efficient reduction of Cr(VI) by UV/sulfite process, and it was indicated that after the addition of borate buffer (pH = 9.2) the precipitation of Cr(III) was inhibited, due to the formation of a Cr(III)–borate complex [66]. Thus, the formation of the Cr(III)–borate complex tends to inhibit the precipitation of Cr(III) and facilitate the stability of Cr(VI), although under acidic conditions the Cr(VI) is effectively reduced into Cr(III) and is precipitated [67]. The negative relationship between the Ca/Mg mass ratio and Cr(VI) concentrations (Figure 4d) may suggest that the reduction of the Cr(VI) to Cr(III) precipitation is facilitated by the presence of Ca ions [66].

7.5. The Cr Isotopes (δ53Cr Values) as an Evidence of the Cr Redox Processes

The oxidation of Cr(III) to Cr(VI), and subsequent back-reduction of Cr(VI) processes, have been shown to produce significant Cr isotope fractionation [68]. During reduction, the lighter isotopes are preferentially reduced, resulting in an enrichment of 53Cr relative to 52Cr values in the remaining Cr(VI) pools. This enrichment is measured as the change in the ratio of 53Cr/52Cr, and is expressed as δ53Cr values in units per mil (‰) relative to a standard [39,60]. Thus, during the transport of the mobilized Cr(VI) in various aquifers, low Cr(VI) concentrations and elevated positive δ53Cr values imply reductive processes, probably due to the presence of Fe(II) and/or organic matter [18,38,46,69].
The Cr isotope data for groundwater from the C. Evia and Assopos–Thiva Basins [38,46,70] imply oxidative mobilization of Cr(VI) from the ultramafic host rocks, and successive back-reduction of the Cr(VI), as is exemplified by the recorded range of the δ53Cr values between 0.8 and 1.99‰. In addition, a series of leaching experiments carried out for ultramafic rock (natural outcrops) from C. Evia, have shown δ53Cr values ranging between 0.56 and 0.96‰ for the rock leachates (Table 2). Applying the available literature data concerning the redox reaction between Cr(III) and Cr(VI) and the Cr isotope fractionation during Cr redox reactions, the stability of Cr(VI) in contaminated coastal groundwater seems to be consistent with the oxidizing role of H2O2 in the presence of high B concentration in seawater (around 4.5 mg/L) [59]. Specifically, the potential Cr(III) oxidation by H2O2 in the presence of abundant tetra-hydroxyborate [(B(OH)4] complex at pH > 7.5 in contaminated coastal groundwater may be reflected in the preferential reaction of heavier Cr isotopes, leaving the reactant enriched in isotopically light Cr (Figure 4 [60,71,72]). Thus, the positive trend between B and Cr(VI) recorded in coastal groundwater from C. Evia (Figure 4a), and the negative δ53Cr–Cr(VI) and δ53Cr–B trends for coastal groundwater from C. Evia and Assopos Basin seawater (Figure 5a), may point to the role of borate in seawater on the stability of Cr(VI) in coastal groundwater from the cultivated C. Evia and Assopos–Thiva Basin. Therefore: (i) the low δ53Cr values, high Cr(VI) concentrations and the dominance of [B(OH)4] ions, as a buffer, potentially imply oxidative and alkaline pH (pH > 7) conditions, and decreasing precipitation kinetics of Cr(III) [59,60]; and (ii) elevated δ53Cr values potentially imply reductive processes, probably due to the presence of organic matter (Figure 4d), which serves various functional groups as electron donors for Cr(VI) reduction. In general, during the transport of the mobilized Cr(VI) in various aquifers, natural attenuation processes may be facilitated.

7.6. Implications of the Salinity Effect in Coastal Groundwater Contaminated by Cr(VI)

According to the structural data on the Cr(III) and Cr(VI) forms and their soluble products [27], Cr(III) at pH ≥ 4 may form insoluble polymeric products (Figure 1), while in the presence of organic matter, the formation of stable Cr(III) complexes with small organic molecules can increase their mobility and maintain the solubility of Cr(III) even at neutral pH [27]. Additionally, the chromate anion (CrO42−) is the predominant form of Cr(VI) in dilute solutions at neutral pH [27]. Under pH conditions 7.5–8.2 and Eh 0.36–0.41 V, reduction of the Cr(VI) to Cr(III) recorded at an aquifer past-contaminated by Cr(VI) (up to 4500 g/L), due to industrial activities in 1997, in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (N. Italy). Subsequently, it was naturally attenuated, and the contamination completely disappeared in 2003 [18]. However, the abundance of Cr(VI) in coastal groundwater (Table 2), contaminated by Cr(VI) by either human activities and/or natural processes, is a potential risk, causing serious constraints to food production. The lack of the of seawater effects in groundwater in the case of Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, northern Italy, as exemplified by the relatively low TDS and Na concentrations in those aquifers [73] and in turn in borate ions, may indicate that the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) is not inhibited, due to the absence of borate ions.
Assuming that, in coastal groundwater, the Cr(VI) concentrations reaching values of hundreds μg/L Cr(VI) (Table 2) may be facilitated by the presence of the [B](OH)4] ions, a potential buffer [66], efforts are needed toward the: (i) prevention and/or minimization of the contamination of aquifers by Cr(VI), which are influenced by the intrusion of seawater; (ii) prevention of coastal aquifers within the zone threatened by changes in sea level, due to climate change. The knowledge of the contamination sources, the presence of hotspots, the degree and extent of the groundwater and soil contamination, monitoring of water salinization processes, expressed by GIS (geographical information system) and risk analysis (mapping) for every coastal country would facilitate optimization of agricultural management strategies; (iii) protection from the consequence of the plant/crops irrigation with contaminated water and the bio-accumulation of toxic elements by plants, which in turn are transferred into food chain, an important threat for human health and ecosystems [74]. Efforts need to apply ways to decrease the seawater intrusion and/or the Cr(VI) concentration, such as the use of organic matter during its cultivation [75]. For example, the application of the natural organic material leonardite, which is an oxidized form of lignite, as a land management technique, seems to be a cost-effective method consistent to related protocols for the protection of the soil quality [75]. Europe accounts for roughly 40% of global lignite reserves; the top European producers include Germany, Greece, Poland, and the Czech Republic [76].

8. Conclusions

The compilation of the present and available databases/literature on the composition of coastal groundwater, and the Cr mobility as a function of the salinity led us to the following conclusions:
  • Although the Cr concentrations in seawater are less than 0.5 μg/L, the Cr(VI) concentrations in coastal groundwater affected by the intrusion of seawater reached values of hundreds of μg/L;
  • There is a pronounced positive trend between B and Cr(VI) and a negative trend between δ53Cr values and B concentrations for coastal groundwater and seawater;
  • The negative relationship between the Ca/Mg mass ratio and Cr(VI) may suggest that Ca facilitates the Cr(VI) reduction and Cr(III) precipitation;
  • Despite the precipitation of Cr(III) under alkaline conditions, the potential formation of a Cr(III)–borate complex in contaminated coastal groundwater tends to inhibit the precipitation of Cr(III) and facilitate the stability of Cr(VI);
  • The abundance of Cr(VI) in coastal groundwater may be related to the presence of [B](OH)4] ions, a potential buffer, which significantly inhibit Cr(VI) reduction to Cr(III).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology: M.E.-E., G.D.E. and I.-P.D.E.; software and validation of data: I.-P.D.E. and G.D.E.; writing—original draft preparation: M.E.-E., G.D.E. and I.-P.D.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Municipality of Oropos, Greece (Grand No AK 70/3/9997) and the University of Athens (Grant No ΚΕ 11078).

Data Availability Statement

The study did not report any additional data of those included in the presented Tables and cited references.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks are expressed once again to the University of Athens, the Municipalities of Oropos and of Dirfys-Messapia (Greece) for the financial support on the soil and groundwater contamination in Greece. Many thanks are due to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticism and suggestions to an earlier version of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shock, E.L.; Sassani, D.C.; Willis, M.; Sverjensky, D.A. Inorganic species in geologic fluids: Correlations among standard molal thermodynamic properties of aqueous ions and hydroxide complexes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1997, 61, 907–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dabizha, A.; Kersten, M. Exothermic adsorption of chromate by goethite. Appl. Geochem. 2020, 123, 104785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Keesstra, S.D.; Bouma, J.; Wallinga, J.; Tittonell, P.; Smith, P.; Cerdà, A.; Montanarella, L.; Quinton, J.N.; Pachepsky, Y.; Van Der Putten, W.H.; et al. The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Soil 2016, 2, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Shahid, M.; Shamshad, S.; Rafiq, M.; Khalid, S.; Bibi, I.; Niazi, N.K.; Dumat, C.; Rashid, M.I. Chromium speciation, bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant system: A review. Chemosphere 2017, 178, 513–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kanellopoulos, C. Influence of ultramafic rocks and hot springs with travertine depositions on geochemical composition and baseline of soils. Application to eastern central Greece. Geoderma 2020, 380, 114649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oze, C.; Bird, D.K.; Fendorf, S. Genesis of hexavalent chromium from natural sources in soil and groundwater. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 6544–6549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Wazne, M.; Jagupilla, S.C.; Moon, D.H.; Christodoulatos, C.; Koutsospyros, A. Leaching Mechanisms of Cr(VI) from chromite ore processing residue. J. Environ. Qual. 2008, 37, 2125–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mateo-Sagasta, J.; Marjani, S.; Turral, H.; Burke, J. Water Pollution from Agriculture: A Global Review Executive Summary; FAO IWMI: Rome, Italy, 2017; 35p. [Google Scholar]
  9. Oze, C.; Sleep, N.H.; Coleman, R.G.; Fendorf, S. Anoxic oxidation of chromium. Geology 2016, 44, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fantoni, D.; Brozzo, G.; Canepa, M.; Cipolli, F.; Marini, L.; Ottonello, G.; Zuccolini, M.V. Natural hexavalent chromium in groundwaters interacting with ophiolitic rocks. Environ. Geol. 2002, 42, 871–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Megremi, I. Controlling Factors of the Mobility and Bioavailability of Cr and Other Metals at the Environment of Ni-Laterites. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Athens, Athens, Greece, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. Megremi, I.; Vasilatos, C.; Atsarou, A.; Theodoratou, C.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M.; Mitsis, I. Geochemical evidences for the sources of the Cr(VI) contamination in groundwater in central Euboea and Assopos-Thiva basins, Greece. Natural versus anthropogenic origin. Eur. Water 2013, 41, 23–34. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaprara, E.; Kazakis, N.; Simeonidis, K.; Coles, S.; Zouboulis, A.I.; Samaras, P.; Mitrakas, M. Occurrence of Cr(VI) in drinking water of Greece and relation to the geological background. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 281, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pyrgaki, K.; Argyraki, A.; Kelepertzis, E.; Paraskevopoulou, V.; Botsou, F.; Dassenakis, E.; Mitsis, I.; Skourtsos, E. Occurence of hexavalent chromium in the ophiolite related aquifers of Loytraki and Schinos areas. Bull. Geol. Soc. Greece 2017, 50, 2261–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Vithanage, M.; Kumarathilaka, P.; Oze, C.; Karunatilake, S.; Seneviratne, M.; Hseu, Z.-Y.; Gunarathne, V.; Dassanayake, M.; Ok, Y.S.; Rinklebe, J. Occurrence and cycling of trace elements in ultramafic soils and their impacts on human health: A critical review. Environ. Int. 2019, 131, 104974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Paternoster, M.; Rizzo, G.; Sinisi, R.; Vilardi, G.; Di Palma, L.; Mongelli, G. Natural hexavalent chromium in the Pollino Massif groundwater (Southern Apennines, Italy): Occurrence, geochemistry and preliminary remediation tests by means of innovative adsorbent nanomaterials. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2020, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Novák, M.; Chrastný, V.; Čadková, E.; Farkaš, J.; Bullen, T.D.; Tylcer, J.; Szurmanova, Z.; Cron, M.; Prechova, E.; Curik, J.; et al. Common occurrence of a positive δ53Cr shift in central European waters contaminated by geogenic/industrial chromium relative to source values. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 6089–6096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Slejko, F.F.; Petrini, R.; Lutman, A.; Forte, C.; Ghezzi, L. Chromium isotopes tracking the resurgence of hexavalent chromium contamination in a past-contaminated area in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, northern Italy. Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 2019, 55, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Michalakis, I.B. Hydrogeological Research in the Industrial Plain of ELVAL Ltd. (Oinofita, Viotia): Implication to the Contamination Source; Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration (IGME): Athens, Greece, 2015; pp. 1–161. (In Greek) [Google Scholar]
  20. Yu, K.P.; Zhang, H.L.; Chen, B.; Xu, H.B.; Zhang, Y. Investigation of reaction mechanism on the lime-free roasting of chromium-containing slag. Metal. Mater. Trans. B 2015, 46, 2553–2563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, 4th ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rose, W.; Hawkes, E.; Webb, S. Geochemistry in Mineral Exploration, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  23. Post, V.E.A.; Eichholz, R.M.; Brentführer, R. Groundwater Management in Coastal Zones; Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR): Hannover, Germany, 2018; p. 107. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nicholls, R.J.; Lowe, J.A. Benefits of mitigation of climate change for coastal areas. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2004, 14, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pourjabbar, A.; Grawunder, A.; Lonschinski, M.; Merten, D.; Einax, J.W.; Georg Buchel, G. Statistical evidence of REE distribution and effective factors in groundwater of former uranium mining site, eastern Thuringia, Germany. In Proceedings of the 1st International Applied Geological Congress, Mashad Branch, Iran, 26–28 April 2010; pp. 1797–1802. [Google Scholar]
  26. Guo, H.; Zhang, B.; Wang, G.; Shen, Z. Geochemical controls on arsenic and rare earth elements approximately along a groundwater flow path in the shallow aquifer of the Hetao Basin, Inner Mongolia. Chem. Geol. 2010, 270, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhitkovich, A. Chromium in drinking water: Sources, metabolism, and cancer risks. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2011, 24, 1617–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stewart, I.I.; Olesik, J.W. Investigation of Cr(III) hydrolytic olymerisation products by capillary electrophoresis-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. 2000, 872, 227–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Theopold, K.H. Chromium: Inorganic and Coordination Chemistry, in Encyclopedia of Inorganic Chemistry; King, B.R., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997; Volume 2, pp. 666–678. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chatoupis, T.; Fountoulis, I. The neotectonic deformation of N. Parnis Mt, (Attica, Greece). Bull. Geol. Soc. Greece 2004, 36, 1588–1597. [Google Scholar]
  31. Giannoulopoulos, P. Hydrogeological–Hydro-Chemical Survey of Groundwater Quality in the Wider Area of Assopos River Basin, Viotia Prefecture; Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration (IGME): Athens, Greece, 2008; pp. 1–74. (In Greek) [Google Scholar]
  32. Vasilatos, C.; Megremi, I.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M.; Mitsis, I. Hexavalent chromium and other toxic elements in natural waters in the Thiva–Tanagra–Malakasa Basin, Greece. Hell. J. Geosci. 2008, 43, 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  33. Moraki, A. Assessment of groundwater contamination by hexavalent chromium and its remediation at Avlida area, Central Greece. Hell. J. Geosci. 2010, 45, 175–183. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pavlopoulos, K.; Chrisanthaki, I.; Economou–Eliopoulos, M.; Lekkas, S. Hydrochemical study of metals in the groundwater of the wider area of Koropi. In Advances in the Research of Aquatic Environment; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 169–176. [Google Scholar]
  35. Stamatis, G.; Lambrakis, N.; Alexakis, D.; Zagana, E. Goundwater quality in Mesogea basin in eastern Attica (Greece). Hydrol. Process. 2006, 20, 2803–2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Megremi, I.; Vasilatos, C.; Vassilakis, E.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M. Spatial diversity of Cr distribution in soil and groundwater sites in relation with land use management in a Mediterranean region: The case of C. In Evia and Assopos-Thiva basins. Greece. Sci. Total. Environ. 2019, 651, 656–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kampouroglou, E.E.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M. Assessment of arsenic and associated metals in the soil-plant-water system in Neogene basins of Attica, Greece. Catena 2017, 150, 206–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Economou-Eliopoulos, M.; Frei, R.; Atsarou, C. Application of chromium stable isotopes to the evaluation of Cr (VI) contamination in groundwater and rock leachates from central Euboea and the Assopos basin, (Greece). Catena 2014, 122, 216–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ellis, A.S.; Johnson, T.M.; Bullen, T.D. Chromium isotopes and the fate of hexavalent chromium in the environment. Science 2002, 295, 2060–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Arnell, N.W. Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2004, 14, 31–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Atsarou, C.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M. Contamination by Cr(VI) and other heavy metals in groundwater, soil and crops at Avlona (Greece). In Proceedings of the Protection and Restoration of the Environment XI, Water Resources Contamination Control, Thessaloniki, Greece, 3–6 July 2012; pp. 471–480. [Google Scholar]
  42. Vengosh, A.; Kloppmann, W.; Marei, A.; Livshitz, Y.; Gutierrez, A.; Banna, M.; Guerrot, C.; Pankratov, I.; Raanan, H. Sources of salinity and boron in the Gaza strip: Natural contaminant flow in the southern Mediterranean coastal aquifer. Water Resour. Res. 2005, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. DiGiulio, D.C.; Jackson, R.B. Impact to underground sources of drinking water and domestic wells from production well stimulation and completion practices in the Pavillion, Wyoming, Field. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 4524–4536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ranjan, P.; Kazama, S.; Sawamoto, M.; Sana, A. Global scale evaluation of coastal fresh groundwater resources. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2009, 52, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Papazotos, P.; Vasileiou, E.; Perraki, M. The synergistic role of agricultural activities in groundwater quality in ultramafic environments: The case of the Psachna basin, central Euboea, Greece. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Economou-Eliopoulos, M.; Frei, R.; Megremi, I. Potential leaching of Cr(VI) from laterite mines and residues of metallurgical products (red mud and slag): An integrated approach. J. Geochem. Explor. 2016, 162, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bonnand, P.; James, R.H.; Parkinson, I.; Connelly, D.; Fairchild, I.J. The chromium isotopic composition of seawater and marine carbonates. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2013, 382, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kanellopoulos, C.; Mitropoulos, P.; Valsami-Jones, E.; Voudouris, P. A new terrestrial active mineralising hydrothermal system associated with ore-bearing travertines in Greece (northern Euboea Island and Sperchios area). J. Geochem. Explor. 2017, 179, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sanjuan, B.; Negrel, G.; Le Lous, M.; Poulmarch, E.; Gal, F.; Damy, P.C. Main geochemical characteristics of the deep geo-thermal brine at Vendenheim (Alsace, France) with constraints on temperature and fluid circulation. In Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress, Rekjavik, Iceland, 27 April–1 May 2020. ffhal-02335810f. [Google Scholar]
  50. Middleton, L.T.; Elliott, D.K.; Morales, M. Coconino Sandstone; Beus, S.S., Morales, M., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kraemer, D.; Frei, R.; Viehmann, S.; Bau, M. Mobilization and isotope fractionation of chromium during water-rock interaction in presence of siderophores. Appl. Geochem. 2019, 102, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bowles, J.F.W.; Giże, A.P.; Vaughan, D.J.; Norris, S.J. Organic controls on platinum-group element (PGE) solubility in soils: Initial data. Chron. Rech. Minière 1995, 520, 65–73. [Google Scholar]
  53. McGrane, S.J. Impacts of urbanisation on hydrological and water quality dynamics, and urban water management: A review. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2016, 61, 2295–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Richard, F.C.; Bourg, A.C. Aqueous geochemistry of chromium: A review. Water Res. 1991, 25, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pettine, M.; Campanella, L.; Millero, F.J. Reduction of hexavalent chromium by H2O2 in acidic solutions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 901–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Rock, M.L.; James, B.R.; Helz, G.R. Hydrogen peroxide effects on chromium oxidation state and solubility in four diverse, chromium-enriched soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 4054–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Izbicki, J.A.; Wright, M.T.; Seymour, W.A.; McCleskey, R.B.; Fram, M.S.; Belitz, K.; Esser, B.K. Cr(VI) occurrence and geo-chemistry in water from public-supply wells in California. Appl. Geochem. 2015, 63, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Appelo, C.; Postma, D. Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution, 2nd ed.; Balkema Publishers: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pettine, M.; Millero, F.J.; La Noce, T. Chromium{III) intercations in seawater through its oxidation kinetics. Mar. Chem. 1991, 34, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zink, S.; Schoenberg, R.; Staubwasser, M. Isotopic fractionation and reaction kinetics between Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in aqueous media. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2010, 74, 5729–5745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fytikas, M.D. Geothermal exploitation in Greece. In Advances in European Geothermal Research, 2nd ed.; Strub, A.S., Ungemach, P., Eds.; Reidel: Strasbourg, France; Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1980; pp. 213–237. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sanjuan, B.; Millot, R.; Innocent, C.; Dezayes, C.; Scheiber, J.; Brach, M. Main geochemical characteristics of geothermal brines collected from the granite basement in the Upper Rhine Graben and constraints on their deep temperature and circulation. Chem. Geol. 2016, 428, 27–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Keren, R.; Gast, R.G.; Bar-Yosef, B. pH-dependent boron adsorption by Na-montmorillonite. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1981, 45, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Meena, A.H.; Arai, Y. Effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: Importance of chromate adsorption. Geochem. Trans. 2016, 17, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Edzwald, J.K.; Haarhoff, J. Seawater pretreatment for reverse osmosis: Chemistry, contaminants, and coagulation. Water Res. 2011, 45, 5428–5440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Xie, B.; Shan, C.; Xu, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Pan, B. One-step removal of Cr(VI) at alkaline pH by UV/sulfite process: Reduction to Cr(III) and in situ Cr(III) precipitation. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 308, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Qian, A.; Liao, P.; Yuan, S.; Luo, M. Efficient reduction of Cr(VI) in groundwater by a hybrid electro-Pd process. Water Res. 2014, 48, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Schauble, E.A. Applying stable isotope fractionation theory to new systems. Rev. Miner. Geochem. 2004, 55, 65–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Farkas, J.; Chrastny, V.; Novak, M.; Cadkova, E.; Pasava, J.; Chakrabarti, R.; Jacobsen, S.B.; Ackerman, L.; Bullen, T.D. Chromium isotope variations (δ53/52Cr) in mantle derived Cr sources and their weathering products: Implications for environmental studies and the evolution of δ53/52Cr in the Earth’s mantle over geologic time. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 123, 74–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Koilakos, D.I. Aspects of hexavalent chromium pollution of thebes plain aquifer, Boeotia, Greece. Water 2017, 9, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Frei, R.; Polat, A. Chromium isotope fractionation during oxidative weathering—Implications from the study of a Paleo-proterozoic (ca. 1.9 Ga) paleosol, Schreiber Beach, Ontario, Canada. Precambrian Res. 2013, 224, 434–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wu, W.; Wang, X.; Reinhard, C.T.; Planavsky, N.J. Chromium isotope systematics in the Connecticut River. Chem. Geol. 2017, 456, 98–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cucchi, F.; Franceschini, G.; Zini, L. Hydrochemical investigations and groundwater provinces of the Friuli Venezia Giulia Plain aquifers, northeastern Italy. Environ Geol. 2008, 55, 985–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Van der Putten, W.; Ramirez, K.; Poesen, J.; Lenka, L.; Šimek, M.; Anne, W.; Mari, M.; Philippe, L.; Heikki, S.; Andrey, Z.; et al. Opportunities for Soil Sustainability in Europe; European Academies’ Science Advisory Council: Halle, Germany, 2018; p. 41. [Google Scholar]
  75. Raptis, S.; Gasparatos, D.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M.; Petridis, A. Chromium uptake by lettuce as affected by the application of organic matter and Cr(VI)-irrigation water: Implications to the land use and water management. Chemosphere 2018, 210, 597–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cavani, L.; Ciavatta, C.; Gessa, C. Identification of organic matter from peat, leonardite and lignite fertilisers using humifi-cation parameters and electro-focusing. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 86, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Soluble oligomeric product, Cr(OH)2(H2O)84+ by hydrolysis and polymerization of [Cr(H2O)63+] (modified after [27].
Figure 1. Soluble oligomeric product, Cr(OH)2(H2O)84+ by hydrolysis and polymerization of [Cr(H2O)63+] (modified after [27].
Minerals 11 00160 g001
Figure 2. Structures of tetrahedral chromate, and dichromate (modified from ref [27]).
Figure 2. Structures of tetrahedral chromate, and dichromate (modified from ref [27]).
Minerals 11 00160 g002
Figure 3. Sketch map showing locations of contaminated groundwater by Cr(VI) coasts (a) examples such as in California, Pakistan, India, Northern China, the Mediterranean Sea, etc. [23]; (b) Karstic-type aquifer developed in Neogene lacustrine formations of the Mesogeia Basin in Attica [34,35,37]; (c) simplified geological map presenting the sites of the groundwater well and soil samples at the C. Evia and Assopos–Thiva Basins [11,36].
Figure 3. Sketch map showing locations of contaminated groundwater by Cr(VI) coasts (a) examples such as in California, Pakistan, India, Northern China, the Mediterranean Sea, etc. [23]; (b) Karstic-type aquifer developed in Neogene lacustrine formations of the Mesogeia Basin in Attica [34,35,37]; (c) simplified geological map presenting the sites of the groundwater well and soil samples at the C. Evia and Assopos–Thiva Basins [11,36].
Minerals 11 00160 g003
Figure 4. Plots of the Cr(VI) and total dissolved solids (TDS) versus B concentrations (a,b); Ca/Mg mass ratio and total organic carbon (TOC) versus Cr(VI) concentrations (c,d) for coastal groundwater from Attica, C. Evia), the Assopos–Thiva Basins, sea and geothermal water. Data from Table 1 and Table 2 [19,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,48,49].
Figure 4. Plots of the Cr(VI) and total dissolved solids (TDS) versus B concentrations (a,b); Ca/Mg mass ratio and total organic carbon (TOC) versus Cr(VI) concentrations (c,d) for coastal groundwater from Attica, C. Evia), the Assopos–Thiva Basins, sea and geothermal water. Data from Table 1 and Table 2 [19,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,48,49].
Minerals 11 00160 g004
Figure 5. Plot of the δ53Cr values versus B (a), and Cr(VI) (b) concentrations for coastal groundwater (GW) from the C. Evia, Assopos–Thiva Basins, water leachates for rocks (serpentinized peridotites) and soils, and seawater (Mediterranean Sea, Pacific and Atlantic oceans, and Baltic Sea). Data from refs [38,46,47,50].
Figure 5. Plot of the δ53Cr values versus B (a), and Cr(VI) (b) concentrations for coastal groundwater (GW) from the C. Evia, Assopos–Thiva Basins, water leachates for rocks (serpentinized peridotites) and soils, and seawater (Mediterranean Sea, Pacific and Atlantic oceans, and Baltic Sea). Data from refs [38,46,47,50].
Minerals 11 00160 g005
Table 1. Major and trace element concentrations in groundwater and water leachates for peridotites from C. Evia, Assopos–Thiva, and Attica Basins.
Table 1. Major and trace element concentrations in groundwater and water leachates for peridotites from C. Evia, Assopos–Thiva, and Attica Basins.
AtticaAssoposC. EviaWater Leachates, PeridotitesDetection
μg/LU.C.K.2V.3V.4KA.5KP.6Ass.A1Ass.A2Ass.AK3EV.1EV.2EV.3EV.4EV.5R2BAR2BBR3Limit
As2.56.41.31.22.32.21.03.54.81.50.50.9<0.50.71.70.50.80.5
B623110589171835371305435885713612498785
Li7.89.82.43.02.33.35.912328.43.37.58.95.51.70.2150.1
Se1.81.41.30.70.91.20.92.23.51.70.61.82.20.6<0.5<0.5<0.50.5
Ba3550424135403764424167427213.302.365.080.05
Br230210190200130210150296140023713221029014313<5<55
Cu0.92.32.02.21.21.11.10.62.12.60.92.72.61.81.50.30.60.1
Cr8.319.06.06.26.96.15911490010552128320913564320.5
Mn0.050.290.080.090.770.060.730.05<0.050.26<0.050.211.210.360.130.150.480.05
Co<0.020.340.05<0.02<0.02<0.020.31<0.02<0.020.080.020.150.280.120.04<0.02<0.020.02
Ni<0.21.5<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.23.00.85.35.115106.56.84.22.30.70.2
Fe<10<10<10<10<10<10<10<10<10<10<10<10<10<104.22.30.710
Zn<0.51.81.40.779.70.51.5<0.5741.6<0.51.31.2<0.5355.56.10.5
Sb0.110.090.170.170.210.21<0.05<0.050.2<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.050.190.110.360.05
V1.12.41.51.31.80.62.89.69.83.71.22.12.12.03.24.22.10.2
La<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.020.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Ce<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Pr<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Nd<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.010.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.02<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Sm<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02
Eu<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Gd0.02<0.01<0.01<0.010.02<0.01<0.010.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.010.010.01<0.010.01
Tb<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Dy<0.010.010.010.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Ho<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Er<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Tm<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Yb<0.01<0.010.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Lu<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Sc2.03.02.02.02.02.04.06.07.010.05.05.07.05.02.03.03.01.0
Ru0.060.14<0.050.12<0.050.300.120.060.130.15<0.050.19<0.050.14<0.050.18<0.050.05
Rh<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Pt<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.010.010.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.03<0.010.01
Pd<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.20.2
Rb2.241.401.030.881.080.440.470.650.70.570.430.890.410.810.250.500.160.01
Re<0.01<0.010.020.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01<0.010.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
Zr<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.04<0.02<0.02<0.020.020.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02
Mo0.70.20.20.30.2<0.10.10.20.20.20.1<0.10.40.10.51.70.30.1
Nb0.02<0.01<0.01<0.010.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01
P<10<10<10<10169<10<10<103010<10<10<10<1011<10<1010
Sr330224349352156200151200150611603322601742019150.01
Th<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.050.100.10<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.050.05
U2.610.380.250.300.420.400.150.341.30.231.843.280.20<0.020.03<0.02<0.020.02
mg/L
Si8.512.310.410.87.89.422.328.811.249.125.324.737.625.41212130.04
Ca85118113125144126804739388110292792626250.05
Mg451411128.21074701371144894124661.96.12.90.05
Na422937392533263041026234032403.42.82.40.05
K1.891.543.222.531.300.750.870.792,11.941.745.381.892.250.70.60.60.05
S9.06.01617171483601511433015<1<1<11.0
Cl71777078415940975904630515747<1<1<11.0
Table 2. Average composition of groundwater from the Assopos, Thiva, Attica Basins and C. Evia and seawater. Data from refs [19,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,46,47,48,49].
Table 2. Average composition of groundwater from the Assopos, Thiva, Attica Basins and C. Evia and seawater. Data from refs [19,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,46,47,48,49].
μg/L mg/L g/L
LocationnCrCr(VI)BLiAsSeCaMgSNaKpHTDSδ53Cr
Groundwater
Karst type
Mavrosouvala3<1<1182.52.4<0.590.3174140.67.40.31
Attica, Athens199.79436.43.51.91202015442.57.30.43
Attica, Koropi31121013088.41013555372178.87.40.48
Assopos basin
Avlida1070644401649.33699.837310117.41.13
Oropos36157120233338.555.3151091.67.50.59
OroposAs.K.W.900850130324.58.840.2140604082.57.71.421.16 ± 0.09
Avlona27266360.82.31.664726280.87.40.411.01 ± 0.02
C. Evia76362705.30.61.278732033.41.97.40.41.42 ± 0.37
C.EviaE7260250407.30.72.2641344322.47.340.280.98 ± 0.08
Water leachates (altered peridotites)
C. EviaR2BA35361243.21.7<0.5261.9<13.40.78.1 0.56 ± 0.04
R2BB6463980.2<0.5<0.5266.1<12.80.68.1 0.86 ± 0.06
R3302978150.8<0.5252.9<12.40.68.3 0.96 ± 0.06
Seawater
Mediterranean40.55<1420016084360400120012006380485 1.13 ± 0.09
Assopos EstuaryAss.c.0.26<1450019088360392125012606400500 0.79 ± 0.14
Pacific Ocean60.3 0.72 ± 0.14
Atlantic Ocean150.22 0.76 ± 0.24
Baltic sea120.16 0.42 ± 0.20
Antarctica30.29 0.57 ± 0.03
Geothermal water
Aedipsos, Evia9n.d. 9500140068380108031048098003006.627
K. Vourla, C. Greece5n.d. 34003802914554035020045,8001106.19.0
Vendenheim, France22.7 37,000155,000960 34506218027,40037007.596
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Eliopoulos, I.-P.D.; Eliopoulos, G.D.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M. The Cr(VI) Stability in Contaminated Coastal Groundwater: Salinity as a Driving Force. Minerals 2021, 11, 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11020160

AMA Style

Eliopoulos I-PD, Eliopoulos GD, Economou-Eliopoulos M. The Cr(VI) Stability in Contaminated Coastal Groundwater: Salinity as a Driving Force. Minerals. 2021; 11(2):160. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11020160

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eliopoulos, Ioannis-Porfyrios D., George D. Eliopoulos, and Maria Economou-Eliopoulos. 2021. "The Cr(VI) Stability in Contaminated Coastal Groundwater: Salinity as a Driving Force" Minerals 11, no. 2: 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11020160

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop