Next Article in Journal
Study on the Controlling Factors of Li-Bearing Pegmatite Intrusions for Mineral Exploration, Uljin, South Korea
Previous Article in Journal
In Situ Geochemical and Sr–Nd Isotope Analyses of Apatite from the Shaxiongdong Alkaline–Carbonatite Complex (South Qinling, China): Implications for Magma Evolution and Mantle Source
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Shallow to Mid-Depth (>100–300 °C) Continental Crust Evolution with (U-Th)/He Thermochronology: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Role of Defects and Radiation Damage on He Diffusion in Magnetite: Implication for (U-Th)/He Thermochronology

1
IJCLab, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, 91405 Orsay, France
2
ISTerre, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IRD, Université Gustave Eiffel, 38000 Grenoble, France
3
Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
4
Geosciences Paris Saclay (GEOPS), Université Paris Saclay, 91404 Orsay, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2022, 12(5), 590; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12050590
Submission received: 9 March 2022 / Revised: 29 April 2022 / Accepted: 2 May 2022 / Published: 6 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thermochronology at Temperatures Higher than 150 °C)

Abstract

:
The discovery of He retentivity in magnetite has opened up the use of the magnetite (U-Th)/He method as a thermochronometer to date the exhumation of mafic and ultramafic rocks, and also as a chronometer to date magnetite crystallization during serpentinization. However, published He diffusion data reveal more complex behavior than expected. To resolve this issue and generalize the understanding of He retention in magnetite, we conducted a multiscale theoretical study. We investigated the impact of natural point-defects (i.e., vacancies unrelated to radiation damage) and defects associated with radiation damage (i.e., vacancies and recoil damage that form amorphous zones) on He diffusion in magnetite. The theoretical results show that He diffusion is purely isotropic, and that defect-free magnetite is more He diffusive than indicated by experimental data on natural specimen. Interestingly, the obtained theoretical trapping energy of vacancies and recoil damage are very similar to those obtained from experimental diffusion data. These results suggest that He diffusion in magnetite is strongly controlled by the presence of vacancies and radiation damage, even at very low damage dose. We propose that, when using magnetite (U-Th)/He thermochronometry, the impact of vacancies and radiation damage on He retention behavior should be integrated.

1. Introduction

Magnetite (Fe2+Fe3+2O4) crystallizes in a wide variety of geological environments through magmatic and hydrothermal processes, and can also be found as a detrital or authigenic mineral in sedimentary rocks [1,2]. It is a common accessory mineral in magmatic Ni–Cu–Platinum-Group Element (PGE) sulfide deposits from massive sulfide ores [3,4]. Hydrothermal magnetite is found in porphyry Cu–Mo–Au deposits [5,6]. Magnetite is also a primary constituent of iron oxide–apatite (IOA) deposits, or Kiruna-type, for which a magmatic versus hydrothermal origin is still debated (e.g., [7,8]). In addition to the interest in magnetite as a petrogenetic indicator for ore deposits [4,6,9,10], magnetite has also received a lot of attention as a product of serpentinization of the lithospheric mantle at slow-spreading ridges owing to its remarkable physical [11,12] and chemical properties [13,14,15,16].
Due to the petrological importance of magnetite, during the last fifteen years special attention has been devoted to the development and application of the magnetite (U-Th)/He thermo-geochronology method (e.g., [17,18,19,20,21]). Knowledge of helium diffusivity in magnetite is a prerequisite for the geological interpretation of magnetite (U-Th)/He data. The first and only He diffusion dataset was obtained on a magnetite crystal from the Bala Cretaceous kimberlite [17] and revealed He retentive behavior, with a calculated closure temperature of ~250 °C assuming 10 °C/Myr cooling and a sphere equivalent radius of 250 μm. The discovery of such a high closure temperature has paved the way for research into the use of the magnetite (U-Th)/He method to date the exhumation of mafic and ultramafic rocks [19,21], which are characterized by a scarcity of minerals that can be analyzed with (U-Th)/He thermochronometers. This new tool has been used to constrain the timing and duration of fossil hydrothermal mineralization and on serpentinite exhumation in a subduction-collision zone [20,22], respectively. In combination with 3He production data, the magnetite (U-Th)/He method has been used to access the cosmic-ray exposure ages of detrital magnetite [23].
However, the He diffusion dataset obtained on the Bala magnetite also revealed a complex He diffusion pattern at low temperatures, with a few percent of the He released at a lower temperature than expected [17]. In order to understand this unexpected behavior and to better constrain the diffusion and thus the retention of He in magnetite, we have developed a theoretical approach to model He diffusion in magnetite. With this approach, we can probe the effect of crystal defects on He diffusivity, which may actually account for the low temperature He diffusion behavior observed by Blackburn et al. [17]. We used the multiscale theoretical approach developed in our team, which was successfully used in previous works [24,25,26,27,28,29]. The combined theoretical and experimental data demonstrate that the impact of crystal defects (e.g., Frenkel pairs) and alpha recoil damage must be considered when characterizing He diffusive behavior over geological time scales.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Theoretical Multiscale He Diffusion Modeling

The multiscale approach combines periodic Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations at the atomic scale [30,31] and Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations [26] at the macroscopic scale. DFT calculations were performed to characterize the interstitial and vacancy sites for He insertion into the magnetite crystal model. The minimum-energy pathway (MEP) of the He diffusion process between sites was characterized using the Nudged Elastic Band (NEB) method [32,33]. The migration energy between He sites was calculated, and KMC simulations were carried out to determine the He effective activation energy and diffusion coefficient.

2.1.1. Theoretical Computational Details

We first optimized a magnetite crystal cell starting from the chemical formula [Fe3+]A[Fe3+Fe2+]BO4 where A corresponds to tetrahedral sites occupied by the Fe3+ and B corresponds to octahedral sites occupied by an equal number of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions [34]. Under geological conditions, Fe3O4 crystallizes in the spinel structure with a face-centered cubic (FCC) unit cell which is characterized by a lattice constant of 8.396 Å [35,36]. The cubic cell contains 32 O2− anions, 16 Fe3+ cations and 8 Fe2+ cations. The FCC oxygen lattice defines 64 tetrahedral interstices and 32 octahedral ones. Fe3+ cations occupy 8 of the 64 tetrahedral sites, whereas the octahedral sites are occupied by 8 Fe2+ and 8 Fe3+ ions. Figure 1 shows the crystal structure of one cell used in this study, with tetrahedral and octahedral Fe sites.
In addition, as magnetite belongs to the class of ferrites, its ferrimagnetism properties were incorporated into the calculations. Magnetite lattice is composed of two magnetic ferromagnetic sub-lattices that are anti-ferromagnetically coupled together. The net magnetic moment of sub-lattice A is anti-parallel to the net magnetic moment of sub-lattice B. Spins of tetrahedral [Fe3+]A and octahedral [Fe3+]B cancel each other, and the ferrimagnetism properties of magnetite depend only on the octahedral [Fe2+]B. Unlike paramagnetic materials, ferrimagnetic substances such as magnetite are characterized by a net spin. To characterize the magnetic properties of magnetite, in particular for its iron atoms, we used spin-polarized DFT calculations. To be consistent with our previous studies [27,28,29], we chose the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional exchange correlation potential. Structural, electronic and magnetic proprieties of pure magnetite cubic unit cell are first investigated and compared to literature results.
The cubic unit cell (Table 1 and Figure 1) has been considered as large enough to avoid a volume dilation of the system after He atom addition. Nevertheless, we performed numerous additional calculations with a super-cell characterized by a duplication along the a-axis (2 v 1 × v 2 × v 3 ) to (i) confirm the calculation results obtained with the cubic unit-cell and thus confirm the potential of our model, and (ii) better investigate the He jump between adjacent sites with the Nudged Elastic Band (NEB) method.

2.1.2. Atomic Scale

Periodic DFT [30,31] was used to perform geometrical optimizations and energy calculations over many configurations with different atom locations. Plane wave basis sets were used to solve the Kohn–Sham equations and to calculate the self-consistent total energy. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) and, in particular, the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) [37] functional exchange correlation potential, was used within the framework of the projector augmented wave method (PAW) [38,39]. For each atom, ionic cores were described with PAW pseudo-potentials, and valence electron configurations were defined as 3d74s1 for Fe; 2s2 2p4 for O. The magnetite structure used in this study was taken from the magnetite crystallographic information file by [35]. Simulations were carried out with the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP) [40,41].
Systems containing transition elements like iron are characterized by strong electronic correlations, in particular for the 3d correlated electrons [42,43,44,45]. Thus, according to our previous computational works [27,28,29], the addition of a corrected parameter (DFT+U [27,28,29]), the so-called Hubbard parameter, was necessary for the Fe atom to improve the description of the electronic and magnetic properties of magnetite. The Dudarev approach [46] was chosen to correctly describe iron valence electrons, in particular, the 3d strong intra-atomic electronic correlations with the DFT method by adding an on-site Coulomb repulsion U and an on-site exchange interaction J to the DFT Hamiltonian. In this case, the Hubbard effective parameter Ueff is defined as Ueff = U – J. The value of Ueff = 3.75 eV (U = 4.75 eV and J = 1.0 eV) was optimized according to an analytical strategy that consisted of testing different Ueff values between 2 and 7 eV, that are in the range of literature values [47,48]. Results were compared to experimental data, such as experimental magnetic moments, structural parameters and density of states of magnetite lattice. We chose the Ueff value which gave the best agreement between computational and experimental results. This Ueff value is in good agreement with literature theoretical investigations, which provide values between 3.5 eV and 4 eV [48]. Calculation parameters were selected as described in our previous works [24,25,26,27,28,29]. A cutoff energy of 450 eV was used for the plane-wave expansion of the wave function to converge the relevant quantities. The integration over the Brillouin zone was performed using the Monkhorst–Pack scheme [49] with a mesh of 3 × 3 × 3 k-points for the ( v 1 × v 2 × v 3 ) cubic unit-cell and 2 × 1 × 1 for the ( 2 v 1 × v 2 × v 3 ) supercell.
However, since natural crystals contain crystal defects, such as point defects (i.e., vacancies) or damage associated with the radioactive decay of U and Th, we also studied the impact of these types of defects on the He behavior. The impact of point defects on He diffusion was analyzed by removing one tetrahedral Fe3+ from the supercell (2 v 1 × v 2 × v 3 ). Once all possible interstitial sites were identified for the considered cubic unit cell for a defect-free magnetite structure (Figure 2) and for the magnetic structure containing a defect (Figure 3), simulations based on the NEB method [33] were carried out to determine migration energy ( E m i g i j ) for each possible jump between 16c sites, points defects and recoil damage (Table 2, Figure 2 and Figure 3).

2.1.3. Macroscopic Scale

Finally, DFT results were used as the basis for Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations to simulate the effective activation energy and pre-exponential factor for He diffusion in magnetite. The KMC method [50] simulates the time-dependent trajectories of the He atom diffusion in the free space using transition rates that depend on the migration energy barriers, E m i g i j , to jump from initial to final states. According to Transition State Theory (TST) [50,51], the thermal jumping process of an He atom can be described using the probability of jumps ( Γ i j ). Γ i j is characterized by an attempt frequency ( ν 0 ) and depends exponentially on the temperature (T). The attempt frequency, ν 0 , can be defined using the Vineyard approximation [50], based on the harmonic frequencies of the He atom at the initial ground and transition states (see [27] for more details).
Afterward, the jump probabilities for all possible transitions S0→ S1,2,3…n between an initial site S0 and all neighboring sites S1,2,3n can be calculated. For each initial site, S0, the total jump probability, Γ T o t , can be obtained as the sum of the jump probabilities to all neighbor sites. The residence time is calculated as the inverse of the total jump probability, corresponding to the time required for passing from the initial site to a neighboring one. Considering all the residence times for all the sites, the mean square displacement (MSD) of the He diffusion can be calculated. Thus, the diffusion coefficient, DT, at temperature T for a He atom can be calculated based on Einstein’s diffusion equation relating the spread of random trajectories to their duration [51]. More methodological details can be found in our previous works [24,25,26,27,28,29].

2.2. Theoretical Damage Quantification

Different types of defects can be present in the magnetite lattice, such as vacancies (Frenkel-pair defects) and recoil damage. They are produced mostly from U and Th alpha decay as Sm content is low in magnetite, but vacancies can also be present during magnetite crystallization. During alpha decay, atoms will be displaced during each decay event, and point-defect and recoil damage will be produced by the alpha particle and the recoil of the daughter element [52], respectively. We can quantify the amount of defects produced in magnetite associated with alpha decay using the SRIM “The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter” software [53]. For the 238U decay chain (mean energy of 5.36 MeV), 230 point-defects and 1600 displacements from recoil damage are produced per alpha decay. For the damage from each recoil, the vacancy density is 7 per angstrom, leading to a large damage zone, whereas the maximum density of each point defect caused by the alpha particle is 0.02 per angstrom, near the end of the alpha particle stopping range, where it reaches its maximum, low enough to keep point defects without extended crystal reconfiguration. When calculating damage fraction due to a given dose, in the following we assume that due to the high density of vacancies produced by recoil the lattice partially relaxes, creating amorphous domains in which He can be stored without energy cost (zero insertion energy) because they contain zones where atoms are far from each other, similar to cavities. The density of such domains is lower than the initial density of vacancies, by a factor g that can be estimated. For example, if a cluster of 10 point-defects is created along the recoil track, they collapse into a single amorphous domain, resulting in a g of 0.1. We leave it as a free parameter which gets a maximal theoretical value of 1. On the other hand, the vacancies created along the alpha particle survive due to their low density and they remain as point defects. We assume that most point defects are created along the alpha track, whereas the recoil produces recoil damage, as amorphous domains, having a density lower than the initial vacancy density by a factor g.
An important issue is the possible annealing of the defects. This annealing occurs in part immediately as a self-annealing due to the irradiation itself. It could apply to the point-defects which can be repaired by moving a single atom, but it is probably inefficient for recoil damage where the lattice has been eradicated. For lack of knowledge, we assume that there is no such annealing. Another possible process is thermal annealing acting over geological times and during the degassing experiments. In the former case we presume that the temperature needed to get a significant annealing is high (above 200 °C) and this is compatible with the age for the sample Rocher Blanc magnetite from the Schistes Lustrés (Western Alps) [21] (see below). During the degassing experiments, the annealing is usually negligible, although the temperature is high, due to the short dwelling time of the steps.

3. Results

The aim of simulations is to provide the distance and the hopping rate between sites, which are the main ingredients for the computation of the diffusion coefficient. The rates are not obtained from a dynamical simulation, but they derive instead from a statistical calculation of the thermal motion carried out by the TST. This latter calculation uses as input the energy landscape probed by the diffusing atom, in particular, the migration energies. The key role of the DFT is to provide this energy information, taking into account the quantum effects of electrons. The main limitation of this approach is that it relies on a static representation of the system, ignoring correlations in the thermal motion of atoms, like phonons which could be followed in a molecular dynamic simulation, but which would omit some quantum effects. Obviously, the rates depend on the energy depth of the sites, and this leads to an investigation of the different types of sites, particularly those created by crystal defects.

3.1. Defect-Free Magnetite Structure

Three insertion sites named 16c, 8b & 48f were identified in the magnetite cell ( v 1 × v 2 × v 3 ) as displayed in Figure 1. The insertion energies range from 1.13 to 3.96 eV for the 16c and 8b sites, respectively, and cannot be calculated for the 48f site as it is unstable (Table 1). One can note that the insertion energy for the 8b site is more than three times higher than for the 16c site, making it unsuitable to host an He atom as the needed energy to occupy it is too high. There are four 16c sites in a cell of 56 atoms leading to 1.3 × 1021 sites/g. In addition, we repeated the same calculations (for the 16c site) by duplicating the cell (2× the cubic cell along the a-axis) to confirm the consistency of our cell model. No significant differences were found, as only a minor difference of 0.03 eV was obtained for the insertion energy (Table 1). The computed NEB migration energy between the 16c sites is 0.97 eV for a cubic cell or 0.99 eV in the case of a doubled cell (Table 2).
The energy path between 16c sites is presented in Figure 2, and each 16c site is surrounded by 12 identical ones, allowing as many possible jumps. The average coordinate variance of a jump is 7/24 times the square of the cell size (21.0 Å2) and it is identical for the three coordinates, so that the diffusion is purely isotropic. Finally, the KMC simulation using the approach described in [26] allows us to calculate a 3D activation energy Ea of 0.97 eV and a pre-exponential D0 factor of 3.07 × 10−3 cm2/s for He diffusion in a perfect magnetite lattice. Since He is found to only diffuse between 16c sites in the case of the perfect lattice, the activation energy is equal to the migration energy between those sites. The closure temperature (Tc) is 35 °C for a crystal size of 250 µm and a cooling rate of 10°C/Ma (Table 2) based on the equation of [54]. This result is different from measurements of natural magnetite, for which a Tc of 250 °C was obtained for the same radius and cooling rate ([17]; Table 2). Helium diffusion results obtained for a defect-free magnetite structure is reported in the Arrhenius diagram on Figure 4A, where experimental diffusion results from Blackburn et al. [17]; are plotted for comparison.

3.2. Magnetite Structure Containing Crystallographic Defect or Radiation Damage

When an atom is knocked out of place by an alpha particle or recoil nucleus, a vacancy is left, but the ejected atom can create an obstruction when deposited in a diffusion path. However, as the diffusion is isotropic, this obstruction effect can be neglected because the obstructing atom can be easily bypassed in 3D. Therefore, we will discard the obstruction mechanism and we will consider only the trapping effect of vacancies. To estimate the impact of a crystal defect such as a point defect on He diffusion, one Fe3+ tetrahedral atom was removed from the supercell (2 v 1 × v 2 × v 3 ). The removal of one tetrahedral Fe-atom creates a vacancy which is characterized by an He insertion energy, Eins, of 0.50 eV and a migration energy of 1.78 eV (Table 2 and Figure 3) to jump from the vacancy to the 16c interstitial site. Although other iron atoms, or oxygen atoms, can be knocked out, we assume that these energies are still representative. The evolution of D 0 ˜   as a function of the point-defect content has been modeled using Equation 1 from Gerin et al. [24], with no annealing. The frequency factor D 0 ˜   of a crystal with defects becomes D 0 ˜ = D 0 f , with the defect fraction f ranging from 0 to 1. Using SRIM modeling, we estimated the amount of point defects associated with the alpha-decay for the Bala kimberlite magnetite used in the diffusion study of [17,18]. We calculate 1.82 × 1022 atoms per gram of magnetite. Using the magnetite (U-Th)/He age of 94 Ma, a mean U content of 0.2 ppm and a mean Th/U ratio of 0.2 [18], we modeled an alpha dose of 6.5 × 1013 alpha/g and a number of point-defects created by the α-particles of 1.5 × 1016 d/g, leading to a density (normalized to the number of sites) fpoint-defect = 1.1 × 10−5 The associated D 0 ˜   is 2.7 × 102 cm2/s. For those values, a Tc of 144 °C is obtained for a crystal size of 250 µm and a cooling rate of 10 °C/Ma. This result is also reported in the Arrhenius diagram of Figure 4A. The diagram exhibits a pattern typical of multi-domain diffusion, with the small domain’s contribution dominating at low temperature. Therefore, we will restrict the comparison to our calculation to the high temperature region, on the left side, where the data converge to a stable slope representative of the large domain. We see that the slope (activation energy) is a better match for the high temperature experimental data, but the calculated points are still much higher than the data.
When comparing to experimental data, it is clear that not only are point defects involved, but recoil damage is also. In the case of recoil damage associated with alpha decay, we can assume as a first approximation that a free space will be created that is large enough to accommodate a He atom without any energy constraint or cost. That corresponds to an He insertion energy of 0 eV in the recoil damage cavity, compared to 1.13 eV for a pristine lattice or 0.50 eV for a point defect. Thus, the energy barrier (Emig), in this case, will range from 2.10 eV (1.13 + 0.97 eV) to 2.28 eV (0.50 + 1.78 eV). This approach has already been applied to apatite and zircon and allows prediction of the maximum migration energy [24,25,55]. As for the point-defect case, a recoil damage amount (frecoil-damage) is calculated for the Bala kimberlite magnetite which reaches 7.6 × 10−5, if we adopt the limiting value g = 1, with an associated D 0 ˜   of 40 cm2/s. In that case, a Tc of 254–298 °C is obtained for a crystal size of 250 µm and a cooling rate of 10 °C/Ma. The activation energy (Ea) is almost identical to that of the high temperature data of natural magnetite [17]. However, the line is shifted downward, which is not surprising since we adopted a g parameter equal to its maximal theoretical value of 1. This value is unrealistic because we expect that if amorphization takes place, many point-defects will merge into a single amorphous domain. The amorphous zone would at least be on the order of the cell size, and we calculated the g value to be 0.023. We provide a complete and full description of the calculation in the supplementary section. In brief, the recoiling daughter produces 1600 point-defects over a range of 200–300 Å with a maximal linear density of 7 d/Å, meaning that along the track, the distance between defects is smaller than the inter-atomic distance. In such conditions, the crystal will locally collapse, producing an amorphous domain, then assuming that from the 1600 point-defects we are left with a single amorphous domain. The volume of the domain can be inferred approximatively from the number of displaced atoms. A crystal cell is a cube of length 8.5 Å containing 56 atoms, so that 1600 displacements involve 1600/56 = 28.6 cells which collapse into disorder. The domain shape is likely an elongated cylinder, but for the sake of convenience and taking into account all the orientations, we represent it as a cube of size 28.61/3 = 3.06 units of cell size. As each cell intercepts four lines of a given direction (four sites per cell) the number of lines intercepted by the amorphous zone is 3.062 × 4 = 37. Therefore, we get n = 37 in Equation (12) of the supplementary section. As a conclusion from an initial point-defect number of 1600, we get an equivalent number of defects of 37, that when combined with the meaning that a factor g = 37/1600 = 0.023 that should be applied to the initial point defect density to get the equivalent density of the amorphization. Such a value would shift the frecoil-damage up to 1.8 × 10−6 leading to a D 0 ˜   value of 1748 cm2/s and a Tc of 215–257 °C, the considering is reported in Figure 4A.

4. Discussion

4.1. He Diffusion in Magnetite Structure

4.1.1. Theoretical Investigation of He Diffusion

The DFT theoretical approach reveals that He diffusion in magnetite is purely isotropic due to the cubic symmetry of the lattice, with a high He diffusion rate as illustrated by the computed closure temperature of 35 °C for a sphere radius of 250 µm. The computation indicates that helium diffusion in defect-free magnetite is much faster than in natural magnetite. The computed closure temperature for defect-free magnetite is 200 °C below that reported in the literature for natural magnetite [17,19,21].
The DFT approach shows however that if crystal defects and/or radiation damage are present in the magnetite lattice, He diffusion is significantly slowed down, and the retentive He behavior observed for natural magnetite can be reproduced by adjusting the amount of these defects in the magnetite lattice, as already demonstrated for zircon [25]. This would imply that He atoms are mostly trapped in defects and radiation damage which therefore control the diffusion kinetics. Since the migration energy of He from those defects and damage are different, as shown in Table 2, helium atoms are either located in an insertion site, a point defect or a recoil damage zone will require a different thermal energy to diffuse out of the grain. In other words, in the case of natural magnetite, both degassing behavior and inferred closure temperature will depend on the respective amount of these defects.

4.1.2. Defect and Damage Impact on He Diffusion

As already quantified using the DFT approach for other minerals such as apatite and zircon [24,25], defects and, more specifically, radiation damage act as traps [56,57] and strongly influence He retention in the crystal structure. It is interesting to note that the He diffusion data of Blackburn et al. [17] can be very well reproduced, as shown in Figure 4A, using the He diffusion damage model of Gerin et al. [24] and the irradiation dose calculated using a sphere equivalent radius (Rs), the U, Th content and crystallization age of the Bala magnetite [18]. The conversion of the irradiation dose into amorphous zone volume indicates that this zone would be at least in the order of the cell size, and for this reason we used a g value of 0.02. More specifically, the experimental high temperature diffusion dataset of Blackburn et al. [17] (T > 440 °C), from which the authors calculated Tc, are well reproduced and similar activation energy and frequency factor are found (Figure 4A and Table 2). In addition, the activation energy of crystallographic defects is similar to that obtained from the lower temperature part of the Bala magnetite dataset (T < 440 °C). The experimental dataset can be partially reproduced using the crystallographic defect fraction produced during atomic displacements associated with radiation damage (Figure 4 and Table 2). However, a higher atomic fraction of defects, in the 2.5 × 10−3 to 1.5 × 10−5 range (or 0.25 to 0.0015 %) allows us to reproduce the experimental data, as illustrated in Figure 4B. Having a higher crystallographic defect dose in a natural crystal is not surprising, as the calculated defect fraction only represented the defects produced during alpha decay. In natural magnetite, crystallographic defects associated with crystal growth and chemical substitutions are naturally present and will then increase the defect fraction. This value is difficult to quantify and will be variable for each magnetite crystal. However, the iron tetrahedral and octahedral sites’ occupations and vacancies formation have been already investigated. At low temperatures, magnetite crystallizes with the inverse spinel structure with half of the Fe3+ in the tetrahedral site (A) and with Fe2+ and half of the Fe3+ in the octahedral sites. This trivalent divalent distribution evolves progressively with increasing temperature towards the normal spinel structure, i.e., with all Fe2+ in tetrahedral sites and Fe3+ in octahedral sites. Simulation of magnetite site occupancy by Hallström et al. [58] using the thermochemical dataset by Sundman [59] shows that between 400 and 600 °C, divalent Fe occupies between 5 and 10% of the tetrahedral sites. In addition to this temperature dependency of site occupancy, which leads to a deviation from the normal spinel end-member structure, magnetite can also exhibit non-stoichiometry.
In addition, depending on oxygen fugacity and temperature, the iron/oxygen ratio can depart from ¾ and magnetite becomes Fe(3-d)O4, with d being positive at high fO2 and negative towards low fO2 [60]. Under high fO2 conditions, iron deficiency is accounted for by formation of octahedral vacancies, whereas under reducing conditions, excess Fe2+ enters vacant octahedral sites [59]. Under the fO2 of natural magnetite formation (e.g., below the magnetite/hematite buffer), and based on the dataset of Sandman [59], interstitial Fe2+ is actually more likely than octahedral vacancies. Another alternative to produce octahedral vacancies is the formation of iron Frenkel pairs corresponding to the formation of an octahedral vacancy along with an interstitial iron atom, the stability of which in the stoichiometric magnetite structure has been investigated by Arras et al. [61] using the DFT + U method. The number of iron Frenkel pairs in stoichiometric magnetite (d = 0) has been evaluated to 10−5 per lattice molecule at 800–900 °C [60]. Additionally, octahedral iron vacancies can be created when minor (i.e., silicon, [62]) and trace (i.e., uranium, [63]) elements are incorporated into the magnetite structure. As a result, the number of defects in a crystal will exceed those formed during alpha decay, depending on the crystallization temperature, impurity content, and fO2.

4.2. Implication for Magnetite (U-Th)/He Thermo-Geo-Chronometer

Computed He diffusion simulations using the DFT approach show that He retention in natural magnetite is controlled, in the first place, by the concentration of radiation damage and, in the second place, by the concentration of point defects. Based on the obtained activation energy of 2.1 and 2.28 eV and frequency factor in this study, we modeled the evolution of the closure temperature in magnetite as a function of the defect/damage fraction. The results are reported in Figure 5, in addition to the closure temperature obtained on the Bala kimberlite magnetite [17] and expected for the Rocher Blanc magnetite, that comes from a mid-Tertiary exhumed high-pressure ophiolite from the Western Alps (France) [21] using the age, U and Th content and equivalent radius of those samples. The DFT modeling accounts for the increase in the closure temperature with the damage dose, and confirms the previous closure temperatures proposed for natural magnetite [17]. The results for natural magnetite samples [17,21] are in addition better explained with the activation energy of 2.28 eV in comparison with the value of 2.1 eV (Table 2), using the calculated frequency factor for amorphous zone production with a g factor of 0.02. This confirms that large defect zones are created during alpha decay with amorphous cores where He atoms are trapped.
These results have important implications for the interpretation of magnetite (U-Th)/He thermo-geo-chronological data. First, they show that He is very well retained in magnetite, even in young crystals with low damage dose, with Tc > 150°C, and that the (U-Th)/He method applied to magnetite (MgHe) can be used as a geochronometer for magnetite which crystallizes at low temperature (<150°C). Second, the results demonstrate that He retention evolves with the damage dose, and the MgHe method can be used as a thermochronometer, with a typical Tc of 220–280°C, as already demonstrated by Cooperdock et al. [19] and Schwartz et al. [21], who inverted MgHe data to infer a thermal history. However, consideration of the damage dose is essential to properly interpret MgHe ages and quantify the thermal history. Interestingly, based on studies conducted to date, the U and Th content of natural magnetite is relatively constant (e.g., [17,21]), in the order of a dozen ppb, and we can deduce that He retention and, consequently, Tc will be similar for each geological case. Low dispersion in MgHe ages, i.e., within the analytical dispersion, should be expected for magnetite with similar diffusion domains, as the He retention behavior in magnetite should be similar for grains with the same geological history.

5. Conclusions

This study has explored He diffusion in magnetite for the purpose of understanding the (U-Th)/He thermochronometer and geochronometer. Employing a multi-scale theoretical approach, we compute the impact of two different types of defects (i.e., point defects and recoil damage) on He diffusion. We find that He diffusion in magnetite is purely isotropic and that He is retained in defect-free magnetite, but not at the same level inferred from experimental study. However, the obtained theoretical trapping energy of vacancies and recoil damage are very similar to those obtained from experimental diffusion data, showing that defect and damage strongly traps He atoms and alters He diffusion in magnetite. Using a damage model, we can predict the amount of displaced atoms during radioactive U-Th alpha decay and the point-defect and recoil damage dose. Using such a model, experimental diffusion data from the literature are well reproduced. We show that point defects and recoil damage control He retention in magnetite, even at very low damage dose. Closure temperature can vary by more than 50 °C, with Tc ranging from 200 to 280 °C, depending on the damage dose and crystal size. From these results, and typical U and Th contents encountered in magnetite, one can anticipate low MgHe age dispersion for most geological cases. The consideration of the damage dose is required to properly interpret MgHe ages and derive meaningful thermal histories.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/min12050590/s1, Text: Diffusion coefficient in presence of defects and amorphous zones.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.B. (Fadel Bassal), J.R. and C.G.; methodology, F.B. (Fabrice Brunet) and J.R.; resources, J.R.; writing—original draft preparation, F.B. (Fadel Bassal) and J.R.; writing—review and editing, F.B. (Fadel Bassal), J.R., M.C., F.B. (Fabrice Brunet), S.S., R.K., L.T.-G. and C.G.; visualization, F.B. (Fadel Bassal) and C.G.; funding acquisition, C.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and F. Bassal salary has been funded by the Agence National de la Recherche—grant no. ANR-17-CE01-0012—RECA: Relation entre le Changement climatique et formation des latérites.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Christophe Diarra for his precious help in managing the IPNO cluster (GRIF).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Miller, D.N.; Folk, R.L. Occurrence of detrital magnetite and ilmenite in red sediments: New approach to significance of redbeds: Geological notes. AAPG Bull. 1995, 39, 338–345. [Google Scholar]
  2. Phillips, S.C.; Johnson, J.E.; Clyde, W.C.; Setera, J.; Maxbauer, D.P.; Severmann, S.; Riedinger, N. Rock magnetic and geochemical evidence for authigenic magnetite formation via iron reduction in coal-bearing sediments offshore Shimokita Peninsula, Japan (IODP Site C0020): Authigenic magnetite offshore Shimokita. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 2017, 18, 2076–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Boutroy, E.; Dare, S.A.; Beaudoin, G.; Barnes, S.-J.; Lightfoot, P.C. Magnetite composition in Ni-Cu-PGE deposits worldwide: Application to mineral exploration. J. Geochem. Explor. 2014, 145, 64–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ward, L.A.; Holwell, D.A.; Barry, T.L.; Blanks, D.E.; Graham, S.D. The use of magnetite as a geochemical indicator in the exploration for magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide deposits: A case study from Munali, Zambia. J. Geochem. Explor. 2018, 188, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Canil, D.; Grondahl, C.; Lacourse, T.; Pisiak, L.K. Trace elements in magnetite from porphyry Cu–Mo–Au deposits in British Columbia, Canada. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 72, 1116–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Nadoll, P.; Angerer, T.; Mauk, J.; French, D.; Walshe, J. The chemistry of hydrothermal magnetite: A review. Ore Geol. Rev. 2014, 61, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Knipping, J.L.; Bilenker, L.D.; Simon, A.; Reich, M.; Barra, F.; Deditius, A.; Wӓlle, M.; Heinrich, C.; Holtz, F.; Munizaga, R. Trace elements in magnetite from massive iron oxide-apatite deposits indicate a combined formation by igneous and magmatic-hydrothermal processes. Geochim. Cosmoch. Acta 2015, 171, 15–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nyström, J.O.; Billström, K.; Henríquez, F.; Fallick, A.E.; Naslund, H.R. Oxygen isotope composition of magnetite in iron ores of the Kiruna type in Chile and Sweden. GFF 2008, 130, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dare, S.A.S.; Barnes, S.-J.; Beaudoin, G.; Méric, J.; Boutroy, E.; Potvin-Doucet, C. Trace elements in magnetite as petrogenetic indicators. Miner. Depos. 2014, 49, 785–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, X.-W.; Sappin, A.-A.; Boutroy, E.; Beaudoin, G.; Makvandi, S. Trace Element Composition of Igneous and Hydrothermal Magnetite from Porphyry Deposits: Relationship to Deposit Subtypes and Magmatic Affinity. Econ. Geol. 2019, 114, 917–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maffione, M.; Morris, A.; Plümper, O.; Van Hinsbergen, D.J.J. Magnetic properties of variably serpentinized peridotites and their implication for the evolution of oceanic core complexes. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 2014, 15, 923–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Oufi, O. Magnetic properties of variably serpentinized abyssal peridotites. J. Geophys. Res. 2002, 107, 2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Brunet, F. Hydrothermal Production of H2 and Magnetite From Steel Slags: A Geo-Inspired Approach Based on Olivine Serpentinization. Front. Earth Sci. 2019, 7, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Klein, F.; Bach, W.; McCollom, T.M. Compositional controls on hydrogen generation during serpentinization of ultramafic rocks. Lithos 2013, 178, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Klein, F.; Bach, W.; Humphris, S.E.; Kahl, W.-A.; Jöns, N.; Moskowitz, B.; Berquó, T.S. Magnetite in seafloor serpentinite—Some like it hot. Geology 2014, 42, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McCollom, T.M.; Seewald, J.S. Serpentinites, Hydrogen, and Life. Elements 2013, 9, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Blackburn, T.J.; Stockli, D.F.; Walker, J.D. Magnetite (U-Th)/He dating and its application to the geochronology of intermediate to mafic volcanic rocks. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2007, 259, 360–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Blackburn, T.J.; Stockli, D.F.; Carlson, R.W.; Berendsen, P. (U–Th)/He dating of kimberlites—A case study from north-eastern Kansas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2008, 275, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cooperdock, E.H.; Stockli, D.F. Unraveling alteration histories in serpentinites and associated ultramafic rocks with magnetite (U–Th)/He geochronology. Geology 2016, 44, 967–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cooperdock, E.H.G.; Stockli, D.F.; Kelemen, P.B.; de Obeso, J.C. Timing of magnetite growth associated with peridotite-hosted carbonate veins in the SE Samail ophiolite, Wadi fins, Oman. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2020, 125, e2019JB018632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schwartz, S.; Gautheron, C.; Ketcham, R.; Brunet, F.; Corre, M.; Agranier, A.; Pinna-Jamme, R.; Haurine, F.; Monvoin, G.; Riel, N. Unraveling the exhumation history of high-pressure ophiolites using magnetite (U-Th-Sm)/He thermochronometry. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2020, 543, 116359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lazar, C.; Cooperdock, E.H.G.; Seymour, B.H.T. A continental forearc serpentinite diapir with deep origins: Elemental signatures of slab-derived fluids and a mantle wedge protolith at New Idria, California. Lithos 2021, 398–399, 106252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hofmann, F.; Cooperdock, E.H.G.; West, A.J.; Hildebrandt, D.; Strößner, K.; Farley, K.A. Exposure dating of detrital magnetite using 3He enabled by microCT and calibration of the cosmogenic 3He production rate in magnetite. Geochronol. Discuss. 2021, 3, 395–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gerin, C.; Gautheron, C.; Oliviero, E.; Bachelet, C.; Djimbi, D.M.; Seydoux-Guillaume, A.-M.; Tassan-Got, L.; Sarda, P.; Roques, J.; Garrido, F. Influence of vacancy damage on He diffusion in apatite investigated at atomic to mineralogical scales. Geochim. Cosmoch. Acta 2017, 197, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gautheron, C.; Djimbi, D.M.; Roques, J.; Balout, H.; Ketcham, R.A.; Simoni, E.; Pik, R.; Seydoux-Guillaume, A.-M.; Tassan-Got, L. A multi-method, multi-scale theoretical study of He and Ne diffusion in zircon. Geochim. Cosmoch. Acta 2020, 268, 348–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Djimbi, D.M.; Gautheron, C.; Roques, J.; Tassan-Got, L.; Gerin, C.; Simoni, E. Impact of apatite chemical composition on (U-Th)/He thermochronometry: An atomistic point of view. Geochim. Et Cosmochim. Acta 2015, 167, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bassal, F.; Roques, J.; Gautheron, C. Neon diffusion in goethite, α-FeO(OH): A theoretical multi-scale study. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2020, 47, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Balout, H.; Roques, J.; Gautheron, C.; Tassan-Got, L.; Mbongo-Djimbi, D. Helium diffusion in pure hematite (α-Fe2O3) for thermochronometric applications: A theoretical multi-scale study. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2017, 1099, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Balout, H.; Roques, J.; Gautheron, C.; Tassan-Got, L. Computational investigation of the interstitial neon diffusion in pure hematite, α-Fe2O3. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2017, 128, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864–B871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kohn, W.; Sham, L.J. Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133–A1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Mills, G.; Jónsson, H.; Schenter, G.K. Reversible work transition state theory: Application to dissociative adsorption of hydrogen. Surf. Sci. 1995, 324, 305–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Jónsson, H.; Mills, G.; Jacobsen, K.W. Nudged Elastic Band Method for Finding Minimum Energy Paths of Transitions. In Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulations; Berne, J.B., Ciccotti, C., Coker, D.F., Eds.; World Scientific: Singapore, 1998; p. 385. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fleet, M.E. The structure of magnetite. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B 1981, 37, 917–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cornell, R.M.; Schwertmann, U. The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurences and Uses, Second Edition; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wright, J.P.; Attfield, J.P.; Radaelli, P.G. Charge ordered structure of magnetite Fe3O4 below the Verwey transition. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 66, 214422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Blöchl, P.E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for open-shell transition metals. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 48, 13115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guo, H.; Barnard, A.S. Thermodynamic modelling of nanomorphologies of hematite and goethite. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 11566–11577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rohrbach, A.; Hafner, J.; Kresse, G. Electronic correlation effects in transition-metal sulfides. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2003, 15, 979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rollmann, G.; Rohrbach, A.; Entel, P.; Hafner, J. First-principles calculation of the structure and magnetic phases of hematite. Physical Review B 2004, 69, 165107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Yin, S.; Ellis, D.E. DFT studies of Cr(VI) complex adsorption on hydroxylated hematite (1102) surfaces. Surf. Sci. 2009, 603, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dudarev, S.L.; Liechtenstein, A.I.; Castell, M.R.; Briggs, G.A.D.; Sutton, A.P. Surface states on NiO (100) and the origin of the contrast reversal in atomically resolved scanning tunneling microscope images. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 56, 4900–4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Roldan, A.; Santos-Carballal, D.; de Leeuw, N.H. A comparative DFT study of the mechanical and electronic properties of greigite Fe3S4 and magnetite Fe3O4. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 204712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Santos-Carballal, D.; Roldan, A.; Grau-Crespo, R.; de Leeuw, N.H. A DFT study of the structures, stabilities and redox behaviour of the major surfaces of magnetite Fe3O4. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 21082–21097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Monkhorst, H.J.; Pack, J.D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 13, 5188–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bortz, A.B.; Kalos, M.H.; Lebowitz, J.L. A new algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of Ising spin systems. J. Comput. Phys. 1975, 17, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Einstein, A. Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Ann. Phys. 1905, 322, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ziegler, J.F. Helium Stopping Powers and Ranges in All Elements; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1977; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ziegler, J.F. SRIM-2008 The Stopping Range of Ions in Matter; United States Naval Academy: Annapolis, MD, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  54. Dodson, M.H. Closure temperature in cooling geochronological and petrological systems. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1973, 40, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Recanati, A.; Gautheron, C.; Barbarand, J.; Missenard, B.; Pinna-Jamme, R.; Tassan-Got, L.; Carter, A.; Douville, E.; Bordier, L.; Pagel, M.; et al. Helium trapping in apatite damage: Insights from (U-Th-Sm)/He dating of different granitoid lithologies. Chem. Geol. 2017, 470, 116–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Shuster, D.; Flowers, R.; Farley, K.A. The influence of natural radiation damage on helium diffusion kinetics in apatite. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2006, 249, 148–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Farley, K.A. Helium diffusion from apatite: General behavior as illustrated by Durango fluorapatite. J. Geophys. Res. 2000, 105, 2903–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Hallström, S.; Höglund, L.; Ågrena, J. Modeling of iron diffusion in the iron oxides magnetite and hematite with variable stoichiometry. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sundman, B. An assessment of the Fe-O system. J. Phase Equilibria 1991, 12, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dieckmann, R. Defects and Cation Diffusion in Magnetite (IV): Nonstoichiometry and Point Defect Structure of Magnetite (Fe3-δO4). Ber. Der Bunsenges. Für Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Arras, R.; Warot-Fonrose, B.; Calmels, L. Electronic structure near cationic defects in magnetite. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2013, 25, 256002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xu, H.; Shen, Z.; Konishi, H. Si-magnetite nano-precipitates in silician magnetite from banded iron formation: Z-contrast imaging and ab initio study. Am. Mineral. 2014, 99, 2196–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bender, W.M.; Becker, U. Quantum-Mechanical Investigation of the Structures and Energetics of Uranium and Plutonium Incorporated into the Magnetite (Fe3O4) Lattice. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2019, 3, 637–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Magnetite unit-cell used in this study for DFT calculations, with the three possible He insertion sites (16c, 8b and 48f).
Figure 1. Magnetite unit-cell used in this study for DFT calculations, with the three possible He insertion sites (16c, 8b and 48f).
Minerals 12 00590 g001
Figure 2. Migration energy pathway between two 16c interstitial sites. (A,B) view the NEB migration pathway along two different perspectives. (C) Evolution of the He energy between the interstitial sites 16c passing though the Transition State point (TS).
Figure 2. Migration energy pathway between two 16c interstitial sites. (A,B) view the NEB migration pathway along two different perspectives. (C) Evolution of the He energy between the interstitial sites 16c passing though the Transition State point (TS).
Minerals 12 00590 g002
Figure 3. Crystallographic Fe3+ point defect in the (2 v 1 × v 2 × v 3 ) cell. (A) view of the NEB migration pathway. (B) Evolution of the He energy between the interstitial site 16c and the vacancy site, passing though the transition state (TS).
Figure 3. Crystallographic Fe3+ point defect in the (2 v 1 × v 2 × v 3 ) cell. (A) view of the NEB migration pathway. (B) Evolution of the He energy between the interstitial site 16c and the vacancy site, passing though the transition state (TS).
Minerals 12 00590 g003
Figure 4. Arrhenius diagram (ln(D/a2) vs. 10,000/T) comparing He diffusion data obtained experimentally on a Bala Kimberlite magnetite grain [17] with the results of our calculations. (A) He diffusion properties obtained using DFT calculations, for a sphere equivalent radius of 250 µm, for defect-free magnetite (black line), and magnetite with point defect (green dashed line) and recoil damage (Ea = 2.1 eV (light blue dashed lines) and 2.28 eV (dark blue dashed lines), with a g factor of 0.023) concentrations estimated for Bala magnetite, D 0 ˜   using activation energies from Table 1 and frequency factors of 3.07 × 10−3, 2.7 × 102, and 1.8 × 103 cm2/s, respectively. (B) He diffusion properties obtained using DFT calculations, for a sphere equivalent radius of 250 µm, with different point defect fractions of 2.5 × 10−5, 2.5 × 10−4 and 2.5 × 10−3, that will be associated with the combination of radiation damage induced point defects and point defects formed during magnetite crystallization (named here natural point defects).
Figure 4. Arrhenius diagram (ln(D/a2) vs. 10,000/T) comparing He diffusion data obtained experimentally on a Bala Kimberlite magnetite grain [17] with the results of our calculations. (A) He diffusion properties obtained using DFT calculations, for a sphere equivalent radius of 250 µm, for defect-free magnetite (black line), and magnetite with point defect (green dashed line) and recoil damage (Ea = 2.1 eV (light blue dashed lines) and 2.28 eV (dark blue dashed lines), with a g factor of 0.023) concentrations estimated for Bala magnetite, D 0 ˜   using activation energies from Table 1 and frequency factors of 3.07 × 10−3, 2.7 × 102, and 1.8 × 103 cm2/s, respectively. (B) He diffusion properties obtained using DFT calculations, for a sphere equivalent radius of 250 µm, with different point defect fractions of 2.5 × 10−5, 2.5 × 10−4 and 2.5 × 10−3, that will be associated with the combination of radiation damage induced point defects and point defects formed during magnetite crystallization (named here natural point defects).
Minerals 12 00590 g004
Figure 5. Evolution of closure temperature (Tc) as a function of defect fraction (from 10−8 to 10−4) and alpha dose (1011 to 1015 alpha/g), for a magnetite with point defects and with recoil damage (Ea = 2.1 eV (light blue dashed lines) and 2.28 eV (dark blue dashed lines), with a g factor of 0.023). Calculations have been done for magnetite crystals of 250 and 400 µm size radius. Data for Bala kimberlite magnetite [17] and Rocher Blanc ophiolite magnetite [21] are reported.
Figure 5. Evolution of closure temperature (Tc) as a function of defect fraction (from 10−8 to 10−4) and alpha dose (1011 to 1015 alpha/g), for a magnetite with point defects and with recoil damage (Ea = 2.1 eV (light blue dashed lines) and 2.28 eV (dark blue dashed lines), with a g factor of 0.023). Calculations have been done for magnetite crystals of 250 and 400 µm size radius. Data for Bala kimberlite magnetite [17] and Rocher Blanc ophiolite magnetite [21] are reported.
Minerals 12 00590 g005
Table 1. Structural properties of magnetite ( v 1 × v 2 × v 3 ) and (2 v 1 × v 2 × v 3 ) cubic-cell and He insertion energies for interstitial sites, from PBE+U Density Functional Theory simulations.
Table 1. Structural properties of magnetite ( v 1 × v 2 × v 3 ) and (2 v 1 × v 2 × v 3 ) cubic-cell and He insertion energies for interstitial sites, from PBE+U Density Functional Theory simulations.
Defect-Free Crystala (Å)b (Å)c (Å)Einsertion (eV)
16c 8b48f
Cubic cell ( v 1 × v 2 × v 3 )8.498.498.491.133.96unstable
Cubic cell ( 2 v 1 × v 2 × v 3 )16.988.498.491.10--
Table 2. Theoretical He diffusion data for magnetite.
Table 2. Theoretical He diffusion data for magnetite.
Einsertion
(eV)
Emig
(eV)
Ea
(eV)
Do
(cm2/s)
Tc (°C) *
Rs = 250 µm
Tc (°C) *
Rs = 500 µm
Theoretical study
Defect-free crystal
( v 1 × v 2 × v 3 )
1.130.970.973.07 × 10−33547
Defect-free crystal
( 2 v 1 × v 2 × v 3 )
1.100.990.993.07 × 10−3--
Crystallographic Fe3+ point defect ** 0.501.78----
Recoil damage02.1 to 2.28----
Experimental study
Cubic cell ( 2 v 1 × v 2 × v 3 )16.988.498.49 250262
* The closure temperature (Tc) is computed for two crystal sizes and a cooling rate of 10 °C/Myr. ** in the (2 × v 2 × v 3 ) cell.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bassal, F.; Roques, J.; Corre, M.; Brunet, F.; Ketcham, R.; Schwartz, S.; Tassan-Got, L.; Gautheron, C. Role of Defects and Radiation Damage on He Diffusion in Magnetite: Implication for (U-Th)/He Thermochronology. Minerals 2022, 12, 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12050590

AMA Style

Bassal F, Roques J, Corre M, Brunet F, Ketcham R, Schwartz S, Tassan-Got L, Gautheron C. Role of Defects and Radiation Damage on He Diffusion in Magnetite: Implication for (U-Th)/He Thermochronology. Minerals. 2022; 12(5):590. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12050590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bassal, Fadel, Jérôme Roques, Marianna Corre, Fabrice Brunet, Richard Ketcham, Stéphane Schwartz, Laurent Tassan-Got, and Cécile Gautheron. 2022. "Role of Defects and Radiation Damage on He Diffusion in Magnetite: Implication for (U-Th)/He Thermochronology" Minerals 12, no. 5: 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12050590

APA Style

Bassal, F., Roques, J., Corre, M., Brunet, F., Ketcham, R., Schwartz, S., Tassan-Got, L., & Gautheron, C. (2022). Role of Defects and Radiation Damage on He Diffusion in Magnetite: Implication for (U-Th)/He Thermochronology. Minerals, 12(5), 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12050590

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop