Next Article in Journal
Predictive Mapping of Prospectivity for Gold in the Central Portion of the Tapajós Mineral Province, Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogenetic and Diagenetic Controls on the Specific Surface Area of Polymetallic Nodules in Deep Ocean Basins
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploration of Natural Aggregates for a Sustainable Construction Industry in Western Colombia

1
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Minas y Energía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C. de Ríos Rosas, 21, 28003 Madrid, Spain
2
Servicio Geológico Colombiano, Medellín 111321, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2023, 13(11), 1430; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111430
Submission received: 17 October 2023 / Revised: 3 November 2023 / Accepted: 6 November 2023 / Published: 11 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Deposits)

Abstract

:
The sources of aggregates for construction materials in the area surrounding Medellín, Western Colombia, are experiencing a significant decrease due to the depletion of their resources and reserves and the policies of land use in territorial planning. The objective of this study is to identify and assess the potential sources of aggregates for the construction industry in Medellín. A lithological characterization is made in the field and laboratory tests are performed to determine the physical and chemical behaviour of the rocks in the lithostratigraphic units. The study allowed us to define the properties and quality of rocks and to map sand and gravel in unconsolidated deposits in the weathering zone of granitic rocks and in stratified rocks. The results allowed us to define the preliminary physical and chemical quality of these rocks and assess their potential as raw material for use in the construction industry. This work constitutes a tool for civil and mining authorities in making decisions on land-use policies and the proper use of resources in the face of the growth and demand requirements of these materials.

1. Introduction

Sands and gravels are a staple in infrastructure creation, urbanization, water treatment and land reclamation. For this reason, the consumption and production of sand and gravel has implications for social and environmental management in infrastructure projects, sustainable city planning, energy planning and biodiversity conservation [1]. Additionally, sand and gravel resources are the second largest resource extracted and traded by volume after water; however, it is one of the least regulated activities in many regions [1]. Thus, there is an increasing demand for information on geological materials and their geotechnical and characteristics and on other natural resources, because these materials affect the occupation of space in urbanized areas [2].
The current extraction of aggregates for the construction industry shows a projection of demand in the world that rises from 24 million to 55 million tons per year in the period 2011–2060 [3]. This situation could lead to an impact on ecosystems, with irreversible damage, in addition to increasing concern regarding the global scarcity of sand and the consequent appearance of social conflicts [4]. Achieving spatial data and systematic mapping of resources and consumer relationships would show how each supply flow is linked to specific environmental and social outcomes. This knowledge would allow researchers, companies and governments to understand, organize and facilitate the production and consumption chain to optimize resources and meet the strategic development needs of communities [5]. Recognizing the unprecedented demand for sands for the construction industry requires systematic mapping of resources, at both the local and regional levels [6]. The extraction of large volumes of sand and rocks for construction causes adverse impacts on the environment and affects economic and social development. Therefore, the joint and weighted management of geological, environmental and socio-economic parameters is a priority for informed decision making [6].
The Aburrá Valley Metropolitan Area, in its study “Integral management of quarries and mining exploitations of materials for construction in the Aburrá Valley” indicated that, even at that time, most of the exploitations of construction materials in Medellín and its surroundings lacked mining planning and design [7,8].
The urban sector around Medellín is an area of 1200 km2 made up of nine municipal administrative entities and has a population of 3,700,000 inhabitants [9]. The extractive activities of sands and gravels in the area are carried out under parameters of unsustainability that leave serious damages of difficult and expensive repair, both physically, economically and socially, which is related to small and artisanal mining companies that carry out low-tech processes [10].
The Energy Mining Planning Unit, an agency of the Colombian state, conducted research on the market for construction materials in several cities in Colombia, including Medellín and its metropolitan area [11]. The demand for construction materials in Medellín totaled 8.77 million tons for 2013. Since 2008, the average variation in the number of tons of materials shipped to Medellín has been 2% per year, with a consumption of 2.5 tons per person. In 2025, Medellín will demand 11.9 million tons of aggregate products, which will mean a demand of 3.1 tons/inhabitant [11].
The objective of this work is the mapping and determination of the preliminary physical and chemical quality of the lithostratigraphic units in the surrounding area of Medellín to define their potential for use as aggregates for concrete in the construction industry and as a tool for civil and mining authorities in making decisions on land-use policies and the proper use of resources.
The study area is located in north-western Colombia, in sectors of the Central and Western Andes Cordillera (Figure 1). The region is composed of igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks related by a fault system, mainly north–south (Figure 2). In addition, there is an intense weathering, typical of a tropical area, with soil formation up to 20 m deep.

1.1. Geological Setting

The Colombian Andes Cordillera is divided into three mountain ranges: The Eastern, Central and Western Cordilleras. The study area is represented by three elongated belts in a N–S direction on the northwestern edge of Central Cordillera and a fourth belt on the eastern edge of the Western Cordillera. The belts are regionally bounded by the Silvia–Pijao, San Jerónimo and Cauca–Almaguer faults in the sense of [12] (Figure 2), and are described from east to west as follows:
Figure 2. Distribution of lithostratigraphic units in the surroundings of Medellín. Modified from [13,14,15]. Units: 1—Migmatites and gneisses, 2—Caldas Amphibolite, 3—Medellín Ultrabasic, 4—Amphibolite and amphibolic gneisses, 5—Cajamarca Complex, 5b—Arquía Complex, 6—Pueblito Diorite, 7—Altavista Stock, 8—Sabanalarga Batholith, 9—Antioqueño Batholith, 10—Amagá Stock, 11—Quebradagrande Complex, 12—Cañasgordas Group (Barroso Basalts), 13—Combia Formation, 13b—Hypoabyssal rocks, 14—Cañasgordas Group (Sedimentary Member), 15—Amagá Formation, 16—Quaternary Deposits. Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Figure 2. Distribution of lithostratigraphic units in the surroundings of Medellín. Modified from [13,14,15]. Units: 1—Migmatites and gneisses, 2—Caldas Amphibolite, 3—Medellín Ultrabasic, 4—Amphibolite and amphibolic gneisses, 5—Cajamarca Complex, 5b—Arquía Complex, 6—Pueblito Diorite, 7—Altavista Stock, 8—Sabanalarga Batholith, 9—Antioqueño Batholith, 10—Amagá Stock, 11—Quebradagrande Complex, 12—Cañasgordas Group (Barroso Basalts), 13—Combia Formation, 13b—Hypoabyssal rocks, 14—Cañasgordas Group (Sedimentary Member), 15—Amagá Formation, 16—Quaternary Deposits. Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Minerals 13 01430 g002

1.1.1. Belt to the East of the Silvia–Pijao Fault: Medium and High-Grade Metamorphic Rocks with Cretaceous Magmatism

Migmatites and gneisses: Feldspathic quartz gneisses and granofels with biotite interspersed with biotite gneisses, often with sillimanite. These rocks have stromatic, folded, phlebitic and augen migmatitic structures [16]. The unit is characterized by a profound alteration and, generally, develops several meters of light purple saprolite with ochre, red and white spots that mark the original foliation of the rock [16].
Caldas Amphibolite: The Caldas amphibole schists consist primarily of amphibole, plagioclase and porphyroblastic garnet concentrated in layers, with subordinate quartz and biotite. These rocks have minerals strongly oriented in the S1 foliation. Intercalated schist layers made of biotite–staurolite are common and exhibit abrupt contacts [17].
Medellín Ultrabasic: This unit, called “Medellín Dunite”, is an ultramafic body of the Central Cordillera of Colombia and it constitutes a fragment of oceanic lithospheric mantle formed at a back–arc basin incipient arc scenario emplaced onto the western continental margin of Pangaea during the Triassic period. This body has been classically defined, and is still considered, as being mainly of dunite composition [18].
Amphibolite and amphibolic gneisses: Rocks with gneissic to schist structure, and locally massive to banded. Grain size varies from fine to medium. The predominant colour is black mottled with white with a dark greenish tint by uralitization and chloritization of the hornblende and foliation defined by the flat orientation of the hornblende [16].
Cajamarca Complex: This unit is composed of metasedimentary and metabasic rocks. Its formation is attributed to a Permian subduction zone, volcanic arc magmatism, opening and closing of basins and accretion of terrenes. The shists, metasedimentary rocks, are mainly formed by quartz, muscovite, biotite, graphite, andalusite and as accessory minerals titanite and zircon; the metabasics rocks are composed of epidote, actinolite, chlorite, hornblende and plagioclase [19].
Altavista Stock: Two different facies are recognized in the Altavista Stock; one facies has a predominantly medium-grained granodioritic composition represented by andesine plagioclase, quartz, K–feldspar, hornblende and biotite, with accessory minerals including apatite, zircon, titanite and opaque minerals [20]. A second and more mafic diorite facies commonly found as enclaves within the felsic facies is characterized by intermediate plagioclase, quartz, amphibole and biotite [20].
Antioqueno Batholith: An intrusive body consisting of tonalite and granodiorite and, occasionally, quartzodiorite and diorite. Although much of the surface is deeply weathered, some outcrops can be seen in the road cuts. In general, it presents as a massive, holocrystalline, medium- to coarse-grained phaneritic igneous rock [21]. The rock is composed of quartz, plagioclase, potassium feldspar, biotite and amphibole crystals, with traces of epidote, chlorite and sphene [21].

1.1.2. Belt between the Silvia–Pijao Fault and the San Jerónimo Fault: Cretaceous Sedimentary and Volcanic Rocks

Quebradagrande Complex: Albian –Aptian volcanic type basalts and andesites, and sedimentary rocks of oceanic affinity that outcrops in a highly deformed zone where spatial relationships are difficult to unravel. Berriasian–Aptian sediments that display continental to shallow marine sedimentary facies and mafic and ultramafic plutonic rocks are associated with the Quebradagrande Complex [22].

1.1.3. Belt between the San Jeronimo Fault and the Cauca–Almaguer Fault: Half-Grade Metamorphic Rocks, Presence of Granodiorites and Ultramafic Rocks from the Jurassic and an Oligocene–Miocene Sedimentary Basin

Aquia Complex: Sericite quartz schists, amphibolic schists, garnet amphibolite, actinolite schists, graphite–muscovite–quartz schists, serpentinites and rocks associated with medium-pressure metamorphism [23]. These lithotypes are interpreted as igneous and sedimentary rocks subjected to different P–T conditions. The quartz–actinolite schist unit with clinozoisite–zoisite and epidote represent between 50% and 60% of the area [23].
Pueblito Diorite: Lithology is diorite and, locally, pegmatitic gabbro. The predominant composition is dioritic with amphibole as the predominant mafic and saussuritized amphibolic gabbros as boundary facies both east and west of the main body [24].
Amagá Stock: The predominant rock is massive, granular to porphyry, medium to coarse-grained, pink to light grey mottled in colour, with black biotite. The texture is granular hypomorphic and the composition varies between quartz–monzonite and granodiorite [25]. The plagioclase is of composition An20-32, with abundant inclusions of apatite and biotite. The biotite forms nests of reddish-brown idiomorphic laminae with zircon inclusions, with a strong pleochromic halo [25].
Amagá Formation: Siliciclastic rocks such as lithoarenites and siltstones with coal mantles associated with continental fluvial sequences deposited in the Late Oligocene and Late Miocene under the influence of a transtentional tectonic component (pull-apart) in the Cauca depression [26]. The Amagá Formation represents environments associated with braided rivers and meandering rivers and is subdivided into two units. The Lower Member is composed mainly of poorly selected quartz conglomerates, well-selected sublithoarenites with high quartz contents, massive greyish silts and coal mantles. The upper limb is composed of lithic wakes, feldspathic lithoarenites and greenish and reddish silts [26]. Lithostratigraphy of the Amagá Formation can see in Figure 3.
Combia Formation: This unit has a total thickness of 193 m and comprises 34 layers of welded tuff, pyroclastic and agglomerate breccia, lapilli tuff breccia, basaltic lava flows and scoria fall/flow deposits (Figure 4) [28]. The layers are characterized by a tabular geometry. The bottom of the stratigraphic sequence is mainly characterized by lava flows and welded tuff, whereas the top of the sequence mainly consists of coarse- to very coarse-grained pyroclastic flows [28].

1.1.4. Belt West of the Cauca–Almaguer Fault: Volcano Sedimentary Rocks and Jurassic Magmatism

Cañasgordas Group (Barroso Basalts): This unit corresponds to a volcano-sedimentary unit made up of basalts and andesites with porphyry and tonsil textures, together with agglomerates, tuffs and packages of marine sedimentites intercalated and discordant on volcanic rocks [29]. The basalts and andesites of the Barroso Formation have a porphyritic texture with phenocrystals of plagioclase and clinopyroxene, in a microcrystalline-to-microlytic hyalocrystalline matrix [29].
Cañasgordas Group (Sedimentary Member): A sequence of more than 3000 m thick flysch-like sedimentary rocks, folded and faulted, which can be interpreted in terms of proximal turbidite facies. Towards the top, there are intercalations of siltstone and limestone that correspond to distal turbidites [25]. To the east of the sequence, siltstones and claystones predominate, with interspersed banks of grawacas and locally powerful banks of conglomerate [25].
Sabanalarga Batholith: Now described as Santa Fe Batholith, this unit comprises gabbros, tonalites and quartzdiorites and diorites. In some instances, gabbros show an increase in percentage of amphibole and can be classified as hornblendites. These lithological types show complex field relations. The most abundant rocks are tonalite [30].
Unconsolidated deposits: The largest recent Quaternary alluvial zones are found throughout the study area over the four belts described. These deposits correspond to alluvial terraces, floodplains and water stream channels. The alluvial deposits are related to the Cauca and San Juan rivers and a large number of small rivers. In addition, there are large alluvial areas on which the towns of the metropolitan area of Medellín and Santa Fe de Antioquia are built. The thickness of the alluvial zones is highly variable, and in the Aburrá Valley, Medellín City, it can reach 200 m [25]. These deposits are composed of fragments of different lithologies, poorly selected and without stratification. However, well-selected horizons can be observed in some alluvium that are elevated with respect to the current level of the rivers [25].

2. Materials and Methods

The key to mapping potential sources of aggregates is an understanding of the geology of the region, which includes Quaternary geology for sand and gravel deposits, stratigraphy, the origin and geological history of the region for crushed stone and weathering or alteration of sand and gravel deposits or potential sources of rock massifs for crushed stone [31]. The identification and classification of lithostratigraphic units in the surrounding area of Medellín for the use of sands and gravels is built based on the lithological distribution, physical quality and chemical quality of the rocks.
A total of 43 samples, 50 kg each, were taken from the lithostratigraphic units of the study area. The location of the samples on the geological map can be seen in File S1. Physical tests and chemical analyses were carried out for the regional mapping of potential materials for natural aggregates (see Table 1) with the respective international standards (Table 2). The list of analyses carried out on each sample can be found in File S2.
The description of the rocks in the field was made based on the concepts of weathering profile of a rocky massif [43], degree of fracturing of a massif [44], degree of strength of a rock [44] and the texture or degree of roughness or irregularity of the surface of an aggregate particle [45].
Physical quality was determined based on the concepts of [46], as follows:
  • Satisfactory: Hard to firm materials, relatively free of fractures and in shapes other than flakes; the absorption by capillarity meets specifications, and the surface texture is relatively rough.
  • Acceptable: Materials exhibit one or two of the following characteristics: firm to friable; moderately fractured; absorption of small to moderate capillarity; flat or flake; relatively soft and waterproof surface.
  • Poor: Materials exhibit one or more of the following characteristics: friable to powdery; highly fractured, absorption by moderate to high capillarity; marked volume change when wetting and drying; combination of three or more qualities of the “acceptable” type.
The limits for assessing the parameters have been taken from the specifications indicated in the Colombian Technical Standard NTC 174 (ASTM C33 [32])
Chemical quality was determined based on the concepts of [46], as follows:
  • Innocuous: Materials do not contain constituents that can chemically react in a meaningful way with constituents in the atmosphere, water or with Portland cement concrete when inside concrete or mortar under ordinary conditions.
  • Deleterious: Materials contain one or more constituents in significant proportion and are known to react chemically under ordinary conditions in Portland cement concrete or mortar in such a way as to produce a significant change in volume, interfere with the normal course of Portland cement hydration or provide substances that could produce deleterious effects on concrete or mortar.
These parameters have been corroborated or distorted, in a regional way, with physical and chemical tests on samples of material from the rock unit and with the special regional distribution, such as extensive weathering or shearing of the rocks, to give a regional vision of their characteristics.
The process included the following steps: (a) Synthesis of studies carried out in the region by state institutions, universities, regional corporations and private entities that bring together private companies in the construction materials sector; (b) Collection of lithological information in quarries and field trips with data collection and sampling of materials in 43 sites (File S1)—each sample weighed 50 kg; (c) Performing physical tests and chemical analysis on material samples; (d) Storing information and results in a geodatabase for ArcGis; (e) Interpreting results, mapping in ArcGis, discussion and conclusions.
The standardization of the materials used in the construction of roads in Medellín are determined by the Colombian Institute of Technical Standards (ICONTEC) and the National Institute of Roads of Colombia (INVIAS).
The preliminary assessment of the physical quality of samples collected in the field was carried out based on granulometry tests with ASTM sieves, Sieve Pass Value # 200, Apparent weight, absorption, Los Angeles Test for large-size coarse aggregate and clay lumps and friable particle. Testing for lightweight material, such as coal, lignite, chert or shale, was performed. However, it is necessary to say that the standards related to this test (ASTM—C123 [47],) have been withdrawn in the USA and Spain, respectively. A lithological characterization was performed by the 50-grains method [48]. Roundness has been estimated by visual comparison with standards [49]. The shape has been determined by the measurement of the dimensions long (A), intermediate (B) and short (C), with A > B > C [50].
Assessment of the chemical quality of the materials was made based on the tests Alkali reactivity—silica, presence of sulphates (SO4) and presence of organic impurities (Fe2O3).
The project did not perform chloride tests. Because some aggregates may contain chlorides that have an impact on the durability of concrete, it is recommended to add this test in future aggregate exploration campaigns.

3. Results

The determination of the physical and chemical quality of the lithostratigraphic units exposed in the western sector of Medellín has made it possible to identify and assess areas with a potential for sand and gravel in unconsolidated deposits, stratified rocks, unconsolidated deposits and deposits in rocky massifs. Likewise, areas with a potential for sands and gravels have been identified from crushed rock in the lithostratigraphic units composed of igneous rocks and metamorphic rocks, as described below.

3.1. Sources in Unconsolidated Deposits

Sources distributed in the quaternary deposits are associated with the main streams of water in the area and correspond to alluvial terraces, floodplains and current channels (Figure 5). These deposits have been differentiated as follows: (a) Sector of the Aburrá Valley with alluvial terraces related to the Medellín River in which an extensive exploitation of sands and gravels is made; (b) Sector of San Pedro–Belmira with alluvial terraces associated with the Chico River in the municipalities of Belmira and San Pedro; (c) Sector of Santa Fé de Antioquia–Sopetrán with alluvial terraces and floodplains related to the Aurrá and Tonusco rivers, and to the La Sopetrana and La Seca streams; (d) Bolombolo Sector with extensive floodplains on the banks of the Sinifaná stream and the San Juan and Cauca rivers.
The samples taken in these sectors were analysed by the 50-grains method with sizes between 19.5 and 40 mm to determine the lithology, angularity and shape. Table 3 shows how the sector of Belmira contains a large number of amphiboles, the sector of Amagá is rich in quartzites and the sectors of Santa Fe de Antioquia—Sopetrán and Bolombolo are composed mainly of basalt-andesites, porphyry andesites and some metamorphic rocks and intrusive igneous rocks.
Unconsolidated and stratified deposits show a degree of roundness, with a predominance of rounded and subrounded edges (Table 4). These deposits have a granulometric gradation directed to the right of the required range (Figure 6) and contain flat particles with a maximum of 14%, a value lower than the permissible limit of 25% in the respective local standard (Figure 7).
The physical tests carried out on sands and gravels of the unconsolidated deposits show important values with respect to the requirements of the Colombian NTC and INVIAS standards (Table 5).

3.2. Sources in Stratified Rocks

This corresponds to the levels of conglomerates and sandstones of the Combia and Amagá Formations that present strong weathering and release of particles with high potential for use as sands and gravels (Figure 8).
The sedimentary member of the Combia Formation is a sequence of thick levels of conglomerates, poorly cemented, separated by thin to medium layers of medium to fine grained sandstones, sometimes conglomeratic and cream to reddish claystone. The conglomerate contains rounded to sub-rounded edges of porphyry rocks, sandstone and claystone in a dirty sandy matrix, high in fine quartz grains. The sandstone is quartz with some sedimentary lithics. Chemical analyses to detect alkali–silica reactivity made in the 1982 sample gave a negative result (Table 6):
The Amagá Formation is a unit composed of polymeric conglomerates with edges of metamorphic rocks, diorites, black chert and milky quartz, conglomeratic sandstones, grain decreasing towards the upper levels and some layers of sandy claystone or clay sandstone, interspersed with sandstone banks.
The physical tests carried out on the sands and gravels of the stratified deposits show the location of the results with respect to the requirements. (Table 7).

3.3. Sources in Sandy Massifs

It is possible to find deposits with sand-sized material located at the level of strong weathering of the weathering profile of the granodiorite of the Stock of Amagá, granite of the La Miel Gneiss and in granodiorites and tonalites of the Antioquia Batholith (Figure 9). Figure 10 and Table 8 show the results of tests made to material from deposits of sandy massifs and their location according to the requirements of the Colombian NTC and INVIAS standards.

3.4. Sources in Igneous Rocks

Materials originating from intrusive, hypabyssal or volcanic magmatism occur abundantly in the area and have been identified as follows (Figure 11):

3.4.1. Satisfactory Material—Deleterious AS (Alkali–Silica)

Rocks with the results of physical tests with values within the normativity and satisfactory type characteristics (Table 9): The presence of siliceous minerals gives it a potential reactive character with cement alkalis. In addition, the presence of micas enhances the increase in flat particles (Table 10). The rocks of this group correspond to porphyry andesites, hornblendic andesites, porphyritic augitic andesites and dacitic porphyry of the porphyry hypabyssal rocks.

3.4.2. Acceptable Material—Deleterious AS (Alkali–Silica)

Rocks composed of minerals rich in potentially reactive silica (Table 9): This group is composed of basalts and diabase, andesite and gaps of the Basalt units of Barroso, Quebradagrande Complex and Combia Formation.

3.4.3. Acceptable Material—Deleterious by Light Particles

Rocks with acceptable physical quality and deleterious chemical quality due to the presence of light particles: Rocky materials that correspond to diorites, tonalites and dunites of the units Antioquia Batholith, Altavista Stock, Cambumbia Stock, Heliconia Diorite, Pueblito Diorite, Sabanalarga Batholith, Ebéjico Ultramafic and Medellín Dunite.

3.4.4. Poor Material—Deleterious by Light Particles

The deleterious chemical quality is determined by the presence of micas and the rocks correspond to the Amagá Stock.

3.4.5. Poor Material—Innocuous

Group formed by basic rocks of the Gabbro de Romeral and Hispania Gabbro.

3.5. Sources in Metamorphic Rocks

These rocks are widely distributed in the area and their physical and chemical characterization allows for the following classification (Figure 12).

3.5.1. Acceptable Material—Deleterious AS-Pl (Alkali–Silica, Light Particles)

Rocky materials with a potential to the alkali–silica reaction (Table 11) and the presence of light particles. They are rocks of the Palmitas Gneiss and El Retiro granulites and migmatites (Table 12).

3.5.2. Poor Material—Deleterious PL (Light Particles)

This group is composed of the Cajamarca Complex and Arquía Complex.

4. Discussion

This paper presents a thematic cartography of aggregates, such as sands and gravels, aimed at their use in concrete, mainly around the city of Medellín, Western Colombia (Figure 13). Its use is also extensive, very importantly, in other towns and intermediate sites where infrastructure works are required.
The materials with the potential to contain sand and gravel have been characterized into three groups: unconsolidated deposits, stratified deposits and rocky massif deposits. The unconsolidated deposits correspond to alluvial materials on terraces or in riverbeds and are associated with the Cauca, San Juan and Medellín rivers. Other deposits of unbound material are associated with the higher parts of the basins of these rivers.
The tests carried out in several sites of the extensive deposits of the Santa Fe de Antioquia–Sopetrán Sector present values that comply with Colombian regulations for the manufacture of Portland cement concrete. These materials have a granulometry that conforms to the Fuller & Thompson curves, values of apparent specific weight and absorption adjusted to the norm, low abrasion wear according to the test of the Los Angeles Machine and low content of clay lumps and friable particles.
In the Bolombolo sector, at the mouths of the San Juan River and the Quebrada Sinifaná, there are deposits of sand and gravel with good specifications regarding the material that passes sieve number 200, absorption and apparent specific weight. Abrasion wear is low according to the Los Angeles Machine test and the content of clay lumps and friable particles is less than the maximum allowed; therefore, they are considered as good materials for the manufacture of concrete and rolling layers.
Some alluvial material deposits associated with the Cauca and San Juan rivers, in the Bolombolo sector, contain a significant amount of sand material. This material is extracted and taken to Medellín, where it is used as a masonry material. The fine sands of this sector have contents of light particles higher than that allowed for use as fine sand in masonry, which would require special processing to achieve their elimination and subsequent use.
The San Pedro–Belmira sector has several alluvial terrace deposits located along the Chico River that contain significant amounts of sand and gravel. These materials represent the main source of sand and gravel for this region. The lithological composition corresponds almost entirely to amphibolite material with rounded and subrounded shapes. Tests on a sample of these deposits present accepted values for the specifications of material that passes mesh 200, apparent specific weight and absorption. Abrasion wear on the Los Angeles Machine is acceptable, although it is superior to the other materials tested in other alluviums of different compositions. The content of clay lumps and friable particles is below the maximum allowed.
The Amagá Formation has a lithological composition, from conglomerates and conglomeratic sands to sands, silts and clays. The lithological composition of materials larger than sand is rich in siliceous material (quartz and chert), which could be considered for the possible alkali–silica reaction with Portland cement concrete. Results of alkali–silica reactivity in the rocks of the Amagá Formation could not be achieved in this research. It is very important to consider this chemical analysis in the Amagá Formation during future aggregate exploration campaigns for concrete. The results of the tests present percentages of material that pass the sieve No 200 at a higher value than allowed; the weight losses in the Los Angeles Machine are at the limit of what is allowed and are far from the granulometric specifications.
The Combia Formation has rock levels that could provide granular material such as sand and gravel in some cases. This unit is composed of rounded to sub-rounded edges of porphyry rocks, and of sandstones and clay stones in a sandy matrix rich in quartz. The tests indicate an adjustment close to a Fuller granulometric strip and a homogeneous size distribution, and although the percentage of material that passes the sieve number 200 is higher than allowed, it meets the requirements of wear on the Los Angeles Machine, clay lumps and friable particles. The alkali–silica trial gave a negative result. The Combia Formation contains edges of andesite, which has amorphous silica which could react with cement alkalis.
In the rocky units, four divisions have been differentiated according to the combination of the results in the physical tests and chemical analysis, as follows: (a) Satisfactory materials—deleterious by alkali–silica (hypabyssal rocks); (b) Acceptable—deleterious by alkali–silica (Barroso basalts, volcanic section of the Quebradagrande Complex and the volcanic section of the Combia Formation); (c) Acceptable—deleterious by light particles (Antioquia Batholith, Altavista Stock, Cambumbia Stock, Heliconia Diorite, Pueblito Diorite, Sabanalarga Batholith, Ebéjico Ultramafic and Medellín Dunite); (d) Poor—innocuous (Romeral Gabbro and Hispania Gabbro).
Potential sources for crushed stone from metamorphic rocks contain materials with acceptable quality—deleterious from the alkali–silica reaction and light particles—and materials with poor quality—deleterious by light particles. The first group includes the rocks of the Palmitas Gneiss and El Retiro granulites and migmatites, and the second group, the Cajamarca Complex and Arquía Complex, have a planar structure that could involve fragility.
The analysis made for the rocks with a potential to be used as crushed stone indicates that all the rocks have a specific weight between 2.06 and 2.95 g/cm3, with the exception of rock samples from Romeral Gabbro, Hispania Gabbro, Medellín Amphibolite, Sucre Amphibolite, Barroso Basalts and Pueblito Diorite. Absorption values indicate that all sampled materials meet the required specification. All materials have an absorption of less than 1%, with the exception of andesitic porphyries, basalts of the Combia Formation, Amagá Stock, Palmitas Gneiss and El Retiro Gneiss, which have a value between 1.0 and 2.4 g/cm3.
The Los Angeles Test allows one to separate several groups, as follows: (a) values between 5 and 20% for volcanic rocks of the Barroso Basalts and Quebradagrande Complex, Andesitic porphyries, diorites of Altavista, Pueblito and Sabanalarga, ultramafic rocks in Medellín, Palmitas Gneiss and Medellín Amphibolite; (b) Values between 20 and 35% for the rocks of the Antioquia Batholith, Hispania Gabbro, Retiro Gneiss, quartzites of the Cajamarca Complex and hornfels in this complex; (c) Values greater than 40% obtained in the Medellín Amphibolite, Sucre Amphibolite and Amagá Stock.

5. Conclusions

The present work of aggregate exploration in the surrounding area of Medellín, Colombia, has allowed us to obtain a cartography of potential units of sand and gravels for the construction industry, with a preliminary regional characterization of their physical and chemical parameters.
Materials located in unconsolidated deposits, such as alluvial and terraces, show good results in the physical and chemical tests. In local exploration campaigns, the silica–alkali reactivity test must be performed, especially when the lithology contains quartz material.
Stratified rocks, such as sandstones and conglomerates, can be used as raw material for aggregates, with subsequent processing in the plant. These are quartz rocks that did not present positive silica–alkali reactivity in a preliminary way, although this situation must be taken into account in the local definition of resources to understand their behaviour.
The sandy massifs are a source of abundant sand due to their well-developed weathering profiles. Specific gravity meets the requirements, but sieve material 200 (ASTM) and flat, friable particles must be controlled.
Igneous rock units present a variety of materials with good, acceptable and poor conditions to be used as aggregates. In general, intrusive rocks and volcanic rocks show good physical results (LA Test) and good specific gravity, but rocks that have a significant quartz component may be reactive to silica–alkali.
Metamorphic units have a high potential for aggregates when they have a massive or gneiss structure. These rocks have poor potential when they are schist due to the high presence of micas and deformed quartz.
It has been possible to classify the potential of lithostratigraphic units to obtain natural aggregates according to the basic tests of granulometry, apparent weight, absorption, Los Angeles Test and flat and friable particles. In addition, the angularity and shape of the grains in the alluvial and stratified materials were determined. The initial chemical behaviour has been achieved with the analysis of silica reactivity—alkali, presence of sulphates (SO4) and the presence of organic impurities (Fe2O3).
Mapping potential rocks for natural aggregates allows the construction industry to focus the search for raw materials from sand and gravels. This cartography is a basic tool for civil authorities to make decisions regarding territorial planning.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/min13111430/s1. File S1: Sampling location on the geological map.doc; File S2: Testing and standards.xlsx.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M., J.L.P. and B.C.; methodology, M.M., J.L.P. and B.C.; software: M.M.; validation: M.M., J.L.P. and B.C.; formal analysis, M.M.; investigation, M.M. and J.L.P.; resources, B.C.; data curation, M.M.; writing—original draft preparation: M.M. and J.L.P.; writing—review and editing, M.M., J.L.P. and B.C.; visualization, M.M.; supervision, B.C.; project administration, J.L.P. and B.C.; funding acquisition, B.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by an ALFA scholarship from the European Union, granted by the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. The fieldwork and laboratory tests were supported by the Servicio Geologico Colombiano.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

This article is part of a research included in M. Maya’s PhD studies at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. We thank Sebastián González for support in ArcGis. Many thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable evaluation that contributed to improving the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. UNEP. Sand and Sustainability: Finding New Solutions for Environmental Governance of Global sand Resources; GRID-Geneva, United Nations Environment Programme: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. de Sena Nola, I.T.; Zuquette, L. Procedures of engineering geological mapping applied to urban planning in a data-scarce area: Application in southern Brazil. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 2021, 107, 10341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. OECD. Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060: Economic Drivers and Environmental Consequences; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hernandez, M.; Scarr, S.; Daigle, K. The Messy Business of Sand Mining Explained. Available online: https://graphics.reuters.com/GLOBAL-ENVIRONMENT/SAND/ygdpzekyavw/ (accessed on 10 August 2023).
  5. Torres, A.; Simoni, M.U.; Keiding, J.K.; Müller, D.B.; Zu Ermgassen, S.O.S.E.; Liu, J.; Jaeger, J.A.G.; Winter, M.; Lambin, E.F. Sustainability of the global sand system in the Anthropocene. One Earth 2021, 4, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. UNEP. Sand and Sustainability: 10 Strategic Recommendations to Avert a Crisis; GRID-Geneva, United Nations Environment Programme: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  7. Área Metropolitana del valle de Aburrá. Manejo Integral de Canteras y Explotaciones Mineras de Materiales Para la Construcción en el Valle de Aburra; Área Metropolitana del valle de Aburrá: Medellin, Colombia, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  8. Área Metropolitana del valle de Aburrá. Lineamientos Para el Ordenamiento Ambiental de la Actividad Minera en el Valle de Aburra; Área Metropolitana del valle de Aburrá: Aburrá Valley; Colombia, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  9. DANE. Resultados Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda—2018, Valle de Aburrá; DANE: Bogota, Colombia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ramírez, M.I. Sostenibilidad de la Explotación de Materiales de Construcción en el Valle de Aburrá; Tesis de Maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia: Medellín, Colombia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  11. UPME. Evaluación de la Situación Actual y Futura del Mercado de los Materiales de Construcción y Arcillas en las Ciudades de Bogotá, Medellín, Bucaramanga, Barranquilla, Santa Marta y Eje Cafetero; Contrato No. 19547-004-2013; UPME: Bogotá, Colombia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  12. Maya, M.; González, H. Unidades litodémicas en la Cordillera Central de Colombia. Boletín Geológico 1995, 35, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Calle, B.; González, H.; De La Peña, R.; Escorce, E.; Durango, J. Mapa Geológico de Colombia; Plancha 166, Jericó. Escala 1:100,000; INGEOMINAS: Boyaca, Colombia, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mejía, M.; Álvarez, E.; González, H.; Grosse, E. Mapa Geológico de Colombia; Plancha 130, Santa Fe de Antioquia. Escala 1:100,000; INGEOMINAS: Boyaca, Colombia, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mejía, M.; Álvarez, E.; González, H.; Grosse, E. Mapa Geológico de Colombia; Plancha 146, Medellín Occidental. Escala 1:100,000; INGEOMINAS: Boyaca, Colombia, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rodríguez, G.; González, H.; Zapata, G. Geología de la Plancha 147, Medellín Oriental, Departamento de Antioquia; Ingeominas: Manizales, Colombia, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bustamante, A.; Juliani, C. Unraveling an antique subduction process from metamorphic basement around Medellín city, Central Cordillera of Colombian Andes. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 2011, 32, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garcia–Casco, A.; Restrepo, J.J.; Correa–Martínez, A.M.; Blanco-Quintero, I.F.; Proenza, J.A.; Weber, M.; Butjosa, L. The petrologic nature of the “Medellín Dunite” revisited: An algebraic approach and proposal of a new definition of the geological body. In The Geology of Colombia, Volume 2 Mesozoic. Servicio Geológico Colombiano; Gómez, J., Pinilla-Pachon, A.O., Eds.; Publicaciones Geológicas Especiales: Bogotá, Colombia, 2020; Volume 36, pp. 45–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Madrid-Restrepo, D.C. Protolith and Metamorphic Conditions of the Metapelites from the Rio Claro Region (Antioquia Department). Bachelor’s Thesis, Universidad EAFIT, Medellin, Columbia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cardona, A.; León, S.; Jaramillo, J.S.; Valencia, V.; Zapata, S.; Pardo-Trujillo, A.; Schmitt, A.K.; Mejía, D.; Arenas, J.C. Cretaceous record from a Mariana– to an Andean–type margin in the Central Cordillera of the Colombian Andes. In The Geology of Colombia, Volume 2 Mesozoic. Servicio Geológico Colombiano; Gómez, J., Pinilla-Pachon, A.O., Eds.; Publicaciones Geológicas Especiales: Bogotá, Colombia, 2020; Volume 36, p. 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Albarracín, H.; Rodríguez, G.; Nivia, A.; Sepúlveda, Y.; Gómez, J.; Salazar, Z. Memoria Explicativa del Mapa Geológico de la Plancha; Santa Rosa de Osos, escala 1:100.000; Ingeominas: Manizales, Colombia, 2011; Volume 131. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nivia, A.; Marriner, G.; Kerr, A.; Tarney, J. The Quebradagrande Complex: A Lower Cretaceous ensialic marginal basin in the Central Cordillera of the Colombian Andes. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 2006, 21, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arango-Escobar, J.E.; Toro-Toro, L.M.; Moreno-Sánchez, M.; Ruíz-Jiménez, E.C. Petrografía y evolución tectónica de los esquistos del Complejo Arquía, al occidente de Manizales en el sector de La Manuela, vías Palestina y Chinchiná, Colombia. Colombia. Boletín De Geol. 2021, 43, 63–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. González, H.; Londoño, A. Diorita de Pueblito (K1dp). Cordillera Central, Departamento de Antioquia. Catálogo de Unidades litoestratigráficas de Colombia; Cretácico Inferior.; INGEOMINAS: Bogotá, Colombia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  25. González, H. Mapa Geológico del Departamento de Antioquia. Geología, Recursos Minerales y Amenazas Potenciales; Escala 1:400,000; INGEOMINAS: Bogotá, Colombia, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sierra, G.M.; Silva, J.C.; Correa, L.G. Estratigrafía Secuencial de la Formación Amagá. In Boletín de Ciencias de la Tierra; Universidad Nacional de Colombia: Medellín, Colombia, 2003; Volume 15. [Google Scholar]
  27. Silva-Tamayo, J.C.; Lara, M.; Salazar–Franco, A.M. Oligocene—Miocene coal bearing successions of the Amagá Formation, Antioquia, Colombia: Sedimentary environments, stratigraphy, and tectonic implications. In The Geology of Colombia, Volume 3 Paleogene—Neogene. Servicio Geológico Colombiano; Gómez, J., Mateus-Zabala, D., Eds.; Publicaciones Geológicas Especiales: Bogotá, Colombia, 2020; Volume 37, pp. 331–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bernet, M.; Mesa Garcia, J.; Chauvel, C.; Ramírez-Londoño, M.J.; Marín-Cerón, M.I. Thermochronological, petrographic and geochemical characteristics of the Combia Formation, Amagá basin, Colombia. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 2020, 104, 102897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rodríguez, G.; Arango, M.I. Formación Barroso: Arco volcánico toleitico y diabasas de San José de Urama: Un prisma acrecionario T-Morb en el segmento norte de la cordillera Occidental de Colombia. In Boletín de Ciencias de la Tierra; Universidad Nacional de Colombia: Medellín, Colombia, 2013; Volume 33. [Google Scholar]
  30. Weber, M.; Gómez-Tapias, J.; Cardona, A.; Duarte, E.; Pardo-Trujillo, A.; Valencia, V.A. Geochemistry of the Santa Fé Batholith and Buriticá Tonalite in NW Colombia—Evidence of subduction initiation beneath the Colombian Caribbean Plateau. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 2015, 62, 257–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Langer, W.H.; Green, G.N.; Knepper, D.H.; Lindsey, D.A.; Moore, D.W.; Nealee, L.D.; Reed, J.C., Jr. Distribution and Quality of Potential Sources of Aggregate Infrastructure Resources Project Area, Colorado-Wyoming; Scale 1:500,000. OFR 97-477; United States Geological Survey: Colorado, WY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  32. ASTM C33/C33M-18; Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2023.
  33. ASTM C40-04; Standard Test Method for Organic Impurities in Fine Aggregates for Concrete. American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2011.
  34. ASTM C88-99a; Standard Test Method for Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulfate or Magnesium Sulfate. American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2018.
  35. ASTM D75/D75M-19; Standard Practice for Sampling Aggregates. American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2019.
  36. ASTM C127-15; Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate. American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2016.
  37. ASTM C136/C136M-19; Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates. American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2020.
  38. ASTM C142/C142M-17; Standard Test Method for Clay Lumps and Friable Particles in Aggregates. American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2023.
  39. ASTM C144-18; Standard Specification for Aggregate for Masonry Mortar. American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2019.
  40. ASTM C1293-20a; Standard Test Method for Determination of Length Change of Concrete Due to Alkali-Silica Reaction. American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2020.
  41. ASTM D6913/D6913M-17; Standard Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis. American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2020.
  42. ASTM C535-16; Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Large-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine. American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2020.
  43. Deere, D.U.; Patton, F.D. Geological factors controlling slope stability in open pit mines. In Stability in Open Pit Mining; Browner, C.O., Milligan, V., Eds.; Society of mining Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 1971; Volume 242. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dunn, J.R. Chapter 4—Geology and Exploration. In The Aggregate Handbook; Barksdale, R.D., Ed.; National Stone Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1991; pp. 4-2–4-45. [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith, M.R.; Collis, L. (Eds.) Aggregates—Sand, Gravel and Crushed Rock Aggregates for Construction Purposes; Geological Society Engineering, Geology Special Publication No. 9; The Geological Society: London, UK, 1993; Volume 339. [Google Scholar]
  46. Langer, W.H.; Knepper, D.H. Geologic Characterization of Natural Aggregate—A Field Geologist’s Guide to Natural Aggregate Resource Assessment; OFR 95-582; U.S. Geological Survey: Liston, VA, USA, 1995; Volume 32. [Google Scholar]
  47. ASTM C123/C123M-1; Standard Test Method for Lightweight Particles in Aggregate (Withdrawn 2023). American Society for Testing Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2023.
  48. Langer, W.; Lindsay, D. Preliminary Report on Deposit Models for Sand and Gravel in the Cache la Poudre River Valley; OFR 99-587; U.S. Geological Survey: Liston, VA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pettijohn, F.J. Sedimentary Rocks, 3rd ed.; Harper and Row: New York, NY, USA, 1975; Volume 628. [Google Scholar]
  50. Krumbein, W.C. Measurement and geological significance of shape and roundness of sedimentary particles. J. Sediment. Petrol. 1941, 11, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Instituto Nacional de Vías. INV E230 Sección 200 – Agregados pétreos. Bogotá, Colombia. 2013. Available online: https://www.umv.gov.co/sisgestion2019/Documentos/APOYO/GLAB/GLAB-DE-002_V1_Normas__Invia_Seccion__200-13.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2023).
Figure 1. Location of the study area west of Medellín (white rectangle). White square: Northwestern South America.
Figure 1. Location of the study area west of Medellín (white rectangle). White square: Northwestern South America.
Minerals 13 01430 g001
Figure 3. Lithostratigraphy of the Amagá Formation in the Santa Fe de Antioquia–San Jerónimo, (Source: [27]).
Figure 3. Lithostratigraphy of the Amagá Formation in the Santa Fe de Antioquia–San Jerónimo, (Source: [27]).
Minerals 13 01430 g003
Figure 4. La Metida Creek stratigraphic section, Combia Formation, of the western Amagá basin [28]. X: No lithological register.
Figure 4. La Metida Creek stratigraphic section, Combia Formation, of the western Amagá basin [28]. X: No lithological register.
Minerals 13 01430 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of sand and gravel sources in unconsolidated deposits (orange areas). Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Figure 5. Distribution of sand and gravel sources in unconsolidated deposits (orange areas). Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Minerals 13 01430 g005
Figure 6. Distribution of the grain size of samples in unconsolidated deposits with fine aggregate with respect to the Colombian standard NTC 2240ASTM C144 [39]). Samples 1969: Cauca River–Colfrutas Sector; Sample 1983-2: San Juan River mouths Cauca River; Sample 1986-1-2-3: Cauca River, Bolombolo.
Figure 6. Distribution of the grain size of samples in unconsolidated deposits with fine aggregate with respect to the Colombian standard NTC 2240ASTM C144 [39]). Samples 1969: Cauca River–Colfrutas Sector; Sample 1983-2: San Juan River mouths Cauca River; Sample 1986-1-2-3: Cauca River, Bolombolo.
Minerals 13 01430 g006
Figure 7. Flat particles in materials of unconsolidated deposits and stratified rocks. The permissible limit is 25% according to the INV E-230 standard (INV: Norma del Instituto Nacional de Vias, Colombia) (UNE-EN 933-3: 2012) [51].
Figure 7. Flat particles in materials of unconsolidated deposits and stratified rocks. The permissible limit is 25% according to the INV E-230 standard (INV: Norma del Instituto Nacional de Vias, Colombia) (UNE-EN 933-3: 2012) [51].
Minerals 13 01430 g007
Figure 8. Distribution of potential deposits for sands and gravels in stratified rocks (yellow areas). Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Figure 8. Distribution of potential deposits for sands and gravels in stratified rocks (yellow areas). Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Minerals 13 01430 g008
Figure 9. Distribution of sand and gravel sources in sandy massifs (brown areas)., Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Figure 9. Distribution of sand and gravel sources in sandy massifs (brown areas)., Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Minerals 13 01430 g009
Figure 10. Distribution of grain size of samples of sandy massifs with extreme weathering. 2012: Antioqueño Batholith; 2002: La Miel Gneiss.
Figure 10. Distribution of grain size of samples of sandy massifs with extreme weathering. 2012: Antioqueño Batholith; 2002: La Miel Gneiss.
Minerals 13 01430 g010
Figure 11. Distribution of igneous rocks, volcanic (dark green), hypoabissal (light green) and intrusive (grey). Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Figure 11. Distribution of igneous rocks, volcanic (dark green), hypoabissal (light green) and intrusive (grey). Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Minerals 13 01430 g011
Figure 12. Distribution of metamorphic rocks: metasedimentary (dark amethyst) and metaigneous (Fucsia pink). Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Figure 12. Distribution of metamorphic rocks: metasedimentary (dark amethyst) and metaigneous (Fucsia pink). Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Minerals 13 01430 g012
Figure 13. Distribution of sand, gravel and rocks as a source for construction materials in Medellín, Colombia: (1) Unconsolidated deposits; (2) Stratified rocks; (3) Sandy massif; (4) Volcanic rocks (dark green) and hypoabissal rocks (light green); (5) Intrusive rocks, (6) hypoabissal rocks, or crushing: (6) Metasedimentary rocks, and (7) Metaigneous rocks. Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Figure 13. Distribution of sand, gravel and rocks as a source for construction materials in Medellín, Colombia: (1) Unconsolidated deposits; (2) Stratified rocks; (3) Sandy massif; (4) Volcanic rocks (dark green) and hypoabissal rocks (light green); (5) Intrusive rocks, (6) hypoabissal rocks, or crushing: (6) Metasedimentary rocks, and (7) Metaigneous rocks. Blue line: river; discontinuous double line: road.
Minerals 13 01430 g013
Table 1. Physical tests and chemical analyses performed on samples by type of rock. Blue ground: Test done.
Table 1. Physical tests and chemical analyses performed on samples by type of rock. Blue ground: Test done.
Type of RocksSamplesGranulom.Passes 200 Mesh (%)Specific WeightAbsorp.L.A. TestClay LumpsSilica–alkali ReactivityLightweight MaterialSulphatesFe2O3
Dep. Unconsol.7
Intrusive11
Metamorphic9
Porphyric2
Sedimentary2
Ultramafic4
Volcanic8
Standard ASTMD 422C 136C 127C 127C 131C 142C 227C 123C 88C 40
Standard NTC 15227717617698589175130126127
Standard UNE
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials; UNE: Una Norma Española; NTC: Norma Técnica Colombiana.
Table 2. Standards used in this research.
Table 2. Standards used in this research.
StandardASTMUNENTC
Standard specifications for concrete aggregates [32]C 3312620174
Testing for organic impurities in fine aggregates for concrete [33]C 401744-1127
Test for soundness of aggregates by use of sodium sulphate or magnesium sulphate [34]C 881367-2126
Standard practice for sampling aggregates [35]D 075932-1129
Specific gravity and absorption of coarse aggregate [36]C 1271097-6176
Sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates [37]C 136933-177
Standard test method for clay lumps and friable particles in aggregates [38]C 142146403589
Standard specification for aggregates for masonry mortar [39]C 144131392240
Test method for potential alkali reactivity of aggregates (chemical method) [40]C 227146512175
Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils [41]D 6913 933-11522
Standard test method for resistance to degradation of large-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles Machine [42]C 5351097-298
Table 3. Lithological composition of unconsolidated deposits and rocks stratified with sand and gravel (Unit: %).
Table 3. Lithological composition of unconsolidated deposits and rocks stratified with sand and gravel (Unit: %).
SampleAmphiboliteBasalt/DiabaseQuartzite/QuartzChertDioriteSchist SlateGabbroGraniteAndesiteUltramafic
Santa Fe de Antioquia–Sopetrán Sector
1956-2 72 202 6
1968-1.1 4816 4248
1968-2.1 608 16 4 12
1970-1860 8 24
Bolombolo Sector
1983-3 78 810 2 2
1985-2 66 8 26
San Pedro–Belmira Sector
2011-296 2 2
Stratified rocks—Amagá Formation—Lower Member
2007-22 6614 108
Table 4. Degree of roundness and shape of unconsolidated deposits and rocks stratified with sand and gravel (units: ratio).
Table 4. Degree of roundness and shape of unconsolidated deposits and rocks stratified with sand and gravel (units: ratio).
SampleDegree of Roundness Shape
AngularSubangularSubroundedRoundedWell RoundedFlat B/C > 3Elongated A/B > 3
Santa Fe de Antioquia–Sopetrán Sector
1956-22263830400
1968-1.10164036840
1968-2.101232506120
1970-101038484140
Bolombolo Sector
1983-32222842680
1985-20345412060
San Pedro–Belmira Sector
2011-2014205214140
(Stratified rocks—Amagá Formation—Lower Member)
2007-22282246220
A: long dimension; B: Intermediate dimension; C: Short dimension.
Table 5. Results of physical tests of unconsolidated deposits of sand and gravel.
Table 5. Results of physical tests of unconsolidated deposits of sand and gravel.
SampleRock UnitAdded ProductPasses 200 Mesh (%)Apparent Weight Esp. (g/cm3)Absorption (%)Los Angeles Test (%)Clay Lumps and Friable Particles (%)
Santa Fe de Antioquia–Sopetrán–San Jerónimo Sector
1956-1Recent AlluviumFuller 1 1/23.242.622.4116.80.47
1968-1Recent AlluviumFuller 2”0.852.671.416.60.19
1968-2Recent AlluviumFuller 4”0.672.751.2918.20.18
1970Recent AlluviumFuller 3”1.922.741.3918.50.35
Bolombolo Sector
1983-1Recent AlluviumNTC 1740,02.870.99.50.1
1985-1Recent Alluvium4” Fuller1.22.880.613.40.34
San Pedro–Belmira Sector
2011-1Recent Alluvium4” Fuller2.122.731.5429.40.22
Standard NTC 174 Max 5.0Min. 2.55Max. 3.0Max. 40%. Max. 5.0
Table 6. Results of the alkali–silica test in rocks stratified with sand and gravel.
Table 6. Results of the alkali–silica test in rocks stratified with sand and gravel.
Sample (#)Alkali Reactivity Test—Silica
Silica Concentration (Sc) (mole/L)Alkalinity Reduction (Rc) (mole/L)Potentiality
1982 (Combia Formation)40559No
Table 7. Results of physical tests of stratified rocks with sand and gravel.
Table 7. Results of physical tests of stratified rocks with sand and gravel.
SampleRock UnitAdded ProductPasses 200 (%)Apparent Weight Specific (g/cm3)Absorption (%)Los Angeles Test (%)Clay Lumps and Friable Particles (%)
1982Combia Formation Fuller 4” 5.812.38.0130.31.80
2007-1Amagá FormationFuller 2” 11.542.531.8743.60.8
Standard NTC 174 Max 5.0Min. 2.55 g/cm3Max. 3.0%Max. 45%Max. 5.0%
Table 8. Results of physical tests on sandy massifs.
Table 8. Results of physical tests on sandy massifs.
SampleRock UnitAggregate ProductPasses 200 (%)Specific Gravity (g/cm3)Absorption (%)Clay Lumps and
Friable Particles (%)
Light
Particles (%)
1971Amagá Stock1 inch Fuller 2.492.563.652.740.8
1999Antioquia BatholithConcrete sand9.512.388.21.22.6
2012Antioquia BatholithMortar sand27.42.311.765.83.8
2002La Miel GneissMortar sand14.142.484.86.41.1
Specification NTC 174; <5%ASTM C127: <3%ASTM C127: <3%NTC 174, <5%INVIAS E221: <0.5%
Table 9. Results of chemical tests performed on igneous rock samples.
Table 9. Results of chemical tests performed on igneous rock samples.
SampleRock UnitSulphates (%)Fe2O3(%)Alkali–Silica
Silica Concentration (Sc) (mole/L)Alkalinity Reduction (Rc) (mole/L)Potentiality
Satisfactory Material—Deleterious AA (Alkali–Silica)
1977Andesitic Hb. Porphyry 82.675Yes
1981Hb Porphyry Andesite 77.896No
Acceptable Material—Deleterious AA (Alkali–Silica)
1979Barroso Basalts 86.4-undefined
1987Barroso Basalts 3340.5Yes
1954Quebradagrande Complex 84.272Yes
1967Quebradagrande Complex 78.8181No
1991Combia Formation 138.8106Yes
1992Combia Formation 115,2145,5No
Acceptable Material—Deleterious PL (Light Particles)
2004Medellin Dunite 1.18
1959Ultramafic 0.15
Poor Material—Innocuous
1989Hispania Gabbro 0.0380.47
Regulations INVIAS E-233: <1.2 INVIAS E-234
Table 10. Results of physical tests carried out on igneous rock units and their assessment with respect to the limits allowed by the respective regulations.
Table 10. Results of physical tests carried out on igneous rock units and their assessment with respect to the limits allowed by the respective regulations.
SampleRock UnitApparent Specific Weight (g/cm3)Absorption (%)Los Angeles Test (%)Particles Light (%)
Satisfactory Material—Deleterious AA (Alkali–Silica)
MMS 1977Andesitic Hb Porphyry2.6540.9815.6
MMS 1981Hb Porphyry Andesite2.7332.3512.8
Acceptable Material—Deleterious AA (Alkali–Silica)
MMS 1979Barroso Basalts2.9340.218
MMS 1987Barroso Basalts3.0380.59
MMS 1954Quebradagrande Complex2.888010.7
MMS 1967Quebradagrande Complex2.8510.216.3
MMS 1991Combia Formation2.6991.4914.6
MMS 1992Combia Formation2.6930.1417.7
Acceptable Material—Deleterious PL (Light Particles)
MMS 2015Altavista Stock2.820.311
MMS 2013Antioquia Batholith2.680.631.72.3
MMS 2016Antioquia Batholith2.6820.422.61.9
MMS 1993Cambumbia Stock2.80.3113.93.95
MMS 1957Heliconia Diorite2.8470.9832.3
MMS 2004Medellin Dunite2.7620.214.7
MMS 1958Pueblito Diorite3.0210.096.35.45
MMS 1976Pueblito Diorite3.002010.14.45
MMS 1966Sabanalarga Batholith 2.8150.421.3
MMS 1959Ultramafic (Jurassic) 2.7280.520.6
Poor Material—Deleterious PL (Light Particles)
MMS 1972Amagá Stock2.6421.3156.61.6
Poor Material—Innocuous
MMS 1989Hispania Gabbro2.9680.224.3
MMS 1953Romeral Gabbro2.9610.038.6
Regulations ASTM C127
(>2.55)
ASTM
(<3)
INVIAS E-218, E-219 (LA < 40)INVIAS E-221 (<1)
Table 11. Results of chemical analysis in metamorphic rocks.
Table 11. Results of chemical analysis in metamorphic rocks.
SampleRock UnitSulphates (%)Alkali–Silica
Silica Concentration (Sc) (mole/L)Alkalinity Reduction (Rc) (mole/L)Potentiality
1964Cajamarca Complex 85.6117No
2000Medellín Amphibolite0.028
1998Medellín Amphibolite0.028
1952-01Palmitas Gneiss0.014112.8UndefinedUndefined
2001El Retiro Gneiss and Migmatites 44237.5No
Standard INVIAS E-233 (<1.2)INVIAS E-234
Table 12. Results of physical tests on metamorphic rocks.
Table 12. Results of physical tests on metamorphic rocks.
SampleRock UnitApparent Specific Weight (g/cm3)Absorption (%)Los Angeles Machine (%)Light Particles (%)
MMS 2009Cajamarca Complex (Hornfels)2.7290.9626.93.15
MMS 1964Cajamarca Complex (Quartzite)2.6390.721.7
MMS 1998Medellin Amphibolite2.945010.90.25
MMS 2000Medellín Amphibolite 3.010.641.91.65
MMS 1952-1Palmitas Gneiss2.761115.40.15
MMS 2001El Retiro Gneiss and Migmatites2.6942.1427.42.15
MMS 1962Sucre Amphibolite 2.9850.439.6
Standard ASTM C127: >2.55ASTM (<3)INVIAS E-218 and E-219 (LA < 40)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maya, M.; Parra, J.L.; Calvo, B. Exploration of Natural Aggregates for a Sustainable Construction Industry in Western Colombia. Minerals 2023, 13, 1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111430

AMA Style

Maya M, Parra JL, Calvo B. Exploration of Natural Aggregates for a Sustainable Construction Industry in Western Colombia. Minerals. 2023; 13(11):1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111430

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maya, Mario, José Luis Parra, and Benjamín Calvo. 2023. "Exploration of Natural Aggregates for a Sustainable Construction Industry in Western Colombia" Minerals 13, no. 11: 1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111430

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop