Next Article in Journal
Using Euler Deconvolution as Part of a Mineral Exploration Project
Previous Article in Journal
Petrogenesis of the Early Cretaceous Tietonggou Diorite and Its Geological Implications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Studying Flotation of Gold Microdispersions with Carrier Minerals and Pulp Aeration with a Steam–Air Mixture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for Special Issue “Design, Modeling, Optimization and Control of Flotation Process”

by
Fardis Nakhaei
1,*,
Ahmad Hassanzadeh
2 and
Luis A. Cisternas
3
1
Department of Mining & Explosives Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, McNutt Hall, Rolla, MO 65409, USA
2
Department of Geoscience and Petroleum, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Andersens veg 15a, 7031 Trondheim, Norway
3
Department of Chemical Engineering and Mineral Process, Universidad of Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2024, 14(4), 391; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14040391
Submission received: 3 April 2024 / Accepted: 8 April 2024 / Published: 10 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design, Modeling, Optimization and Control of Flotation Process)
Flotation is a significant and widely used processing technique, effectively separating valuable and gangue minerals. Mineral producers have long sought ways to consistently monitor and control the flotation process to ensure optimal conditions for effective mineral separation [1]. However, establishing such a sophisticated control system entails significant financial investments in equipment, resulting in substantial costs. Additionally, ongoing maintenance needs to be performed to uphold the system’s high standards, which will incur additional expenses. To address these challenges, predictive models emerge as effective and economically viable solutions to handling the intricacies of the flotation process [2].
In the flotation process, numerous linear and nonlinear relationships exist between the operating parameters, chemical reagents, and minerals [3]. These connections can be evaluated using various experimental and numerical methods. Over recent decades, a variety of intelligent computing and statistical techniques, including machine learning, genetic algorithms (GAs), artificial neural networks (ANNs), fuzzy systems, and image processing, have been employed to predict the flotation process outcome and facilitate the process control [4]. It is worth noting that the crucial role of these techniques in achieving sustainable development across various industrial sectors was recognized more than a decade ago.
The papers featured in this Special Issue of Minerals, titled ‘Design, Modeling, Optimization, and Control of the Flotation Process’, explore innovative approaches for modeling, optimizing, and controlling some flotation processes. These techniques aim to enhance efficiency by maximizing the recovery of valuable minerals, while minimizing energy and reagent consumption in relevant studied flotation processes. The manuscripts published in this issue can be grouped into three broad categories.
The initial category focused on hydrodynamic and kinetic models to examine the attachment of mineral particles to bubbles. The attachment process is intricate, involving multiple physical and chemical interactions, such as adsorption, desorption, and chemical reactions. These mechanisms were numerically represented through a variety of models, employing sets of differential equations that illustrate the concentration of minerals and chemical reagents within the flotation cell as time progresses [5,6,7].
The second group concentrated on modeling and optimizing the flotation process and developing strategies to enhance our understanding of the effects of gas dispersion and its regulation using dynamic models, multivariable linear models, and image analysis [8,9]. These studies explored the stability of the froth zone under varying flotation conditions and highlighted the significance of the relationship between particle and bubble sizes as critical factors impacting successful collection, froth transport processes, and the flotation rate and efficiency.
The third group of papers in this Special Issue delved into modeling and optimizing the flotation process performance utilizing advanced computational tools and algorithms such as the response surface methodology (RSM), GA, ANN, deep learning, and fuzzy systems [10,11,12,13,14]. Some of the studies published in this Special Issue aimed to address the challenges of recovering target elements more effectively using these methods. Generally, the efficiency of the flotation process is assessed by examining the characteristics of the concentrate, specifically its grade and recovery, which are crucial economic and technical indicators for process management and improvement. Determining these parameters typically involves time-consuming procedures. While the grade can be constantly monitored using an XRF analyzer, recovery is usually determined with mass balancing techniques [15]. However, the online measurement of these parameters using X-ray analyzers, although feasible, requires expensive and complex equipment, along with ongoing maintenance, which justifies the preference for models predicting the key performance indexes derived from secondary variables [16]. Given the nonlinear and intricate nature of the flotation process, coupled with the involvement of numerous variables and a limited understanding of its physicochemical principles, accurately forecasting metallurgical performance parameters presents a significant challenge.
The techniques outlined in the Special Issue have the potential to significantly improve the optimization and control of flotation operation, aiming to maximize the process efficiency. In the near future, with the increasing demand for metals and ongoing research advancements, these innovative computational techniques are expected to become effective solutions for monitoring and controlling the flotation process. We anticipate that this Special Issue will serve as a platform for future multidisciplinary research in modeling, designing, and optimizing the flotation process.

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editors express their gratitude to all the contributing authors for submitting their valuable work and for their cooperation in ensuring the timely publication of this issue. They also extend their appreciation to the reviewers, Assistant Editors, and the Editorial Board for their contributions and efforts in bringing this Special Issue to fruition.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nakhaei, F.; Ghodrati, S.; Hoseinzadeh, S.; Valipoori Goodarzi, H.; VandGhorbany, O. Combined effect of operating variables on performance and kinetic of lead flotation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2023, 58, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Szmigiel, A.; Apel, D.B.; Skrzypkowski, K.; Wojtecki, L.; Pu, Y. Advancements in Machine Learning for Optimal Performance in Flotation Processes: A Review. Minerals 2024, 14, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bergh, L.G.; Yianatos, J.B. The long way toward multivariate predictive control of flotation processes. J. Process Control 2011, 21, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nakhaei, F.; Irannajad, M.; Mohammadnejad, S. A comprehensive review of froth surface monitoring as an aid for grade and recovery prediction of flotation process. Part A: Structural features. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2023, 45, 2587–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Evdokimov, S.I.; Golikov, N.S.; Zadkov, D.A.; Voitovich, E.V.; Kondratiev, V.V.; Petrovskiy, A.A.; Konyukhov, V.Y.; Gladkikh, V.A. Studying the Flotation of Gold-Bearing Ores Using Carrier Minerals. Minerals 2024, 14, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Evdokimov, S.I.; Golikov, N.S.; Pryalukhin, A.F.; Kondratiev, V.V.; Mishedchenko, A.; Kuzina, A.V.; Bryukhanova, N.N.; Karlina, A.I. Studying Flotation of Gold Microdispersions with Carrier Minerals and Pulp Aeration with a Steam—Air Mixture. Minerals 2024, 14, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Doubra, P.; Carelse, C.; Chetty, D.; Manuel, M. Experimental and Modelling Study of Pt, Pd, and 2E+Au Flotation Kinetics for Platreef Ore by Exploring the Influence of Reagent Dosage Variations. Minerals 2023, 13, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vinnett, L.; Cornejo, I.; Yianatos, J.; Acuña, C.; Urriola, B.; Guajardo, C.; Esteban, A. The Correlation between Macroscopic Image and Object Properties with Bubble Size in Flotation. Minerals 2022, 12, 1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Betancourt, F.; Bürger, R.; Diehl, S.; Gutiérrez, L.; Martí, M.C.; Vásquez, Y. A Model of Froth Flotation with Drainage: Simulations and Comparison with Experiments. Minerals 2023, 13, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jovanović, I.; Nakhaei, F.; Kržanović, D.; Conić, V.; Urošević, D. Comparison of Fuzzy and Neural Network Computing Techniques for Performance Prediction of an Industrial Copper Flotation Circuit. Minerals 2022, 12, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nakhaei, F.; Rahimi, S.; Fathi, M. Prediction of Sulfur Removal from Iron Concentrate Using Column Flotation Froth Features: Comparison of k-Means Clustering, Regression, Backpropagation Neural Network, and Convolutional Neural Network. Minerals 2022, 12, 1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, W.; Liu, D.; Wang, C.; Liu, R.; Wang, D.; Yu, L.; Wen, S. An Improved Python-Based Image Processing Algorithm for Flotation Foam Analysis. Minerals 2022, 12, 1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gholami, A.; Movahedifar, M.; Khoshdast, H.; Hassanzadeh, A. Hybrid Serving of DOE and RNN-Based Methods to Optimize and Simulate a Copper Flotation Circuit. Minerals 2022, 12, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mamani-Quiñonez, O.; Cisternas, L.A.; Lopez-Arenas, T.; Lucay, F.A. Control Structure Design Using Global Sensitivity Analysis for Mineral Processes under Uncertainties. Minerals 2022, 12, 736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nakhaei, F.; Irannajad, M.; Yousefikhoshbakht, M. Simultaneous optimization of flotation column performance using genetic evolutionary algorithm. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2016, 52, 874–893. [Google Scholar]
  16. Riquelme, A.; Desbiens, A.; del Villar, R.; Maldonado, M. Predictive control of the bubble size distribution in a two-phase pilot flotation column. Miner. Eng. 2016, 89, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nakhaei, F.; Hassanzadeh, A.; Cisternas, L.A. Editorial for Special Issue “Design, Modeling, Optimization and Control of Flotation Process”. Minerals 2024, 14, 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14040391

AMA Style

Nakhaei F, Hassanzadeh A, Cisternas LA. Editorial for Special Issue “Design, Modeling, Optimization and Control of Flotation Process”. Minerals. 2024; 14(4):391. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14040391

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nakhaei, Fardis, Ahmad Hassanzadeh, and Luis A. Cisternas. 2024. "Editorial for Special Issue “Design, Modeling, Optimization and Control of Flotation Process”" Minerals 14, no. 4: 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14040391

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop