Next Article in Journal
Timing and Tectonic Implications of the Development of the Orosirian Qianlishan Ductile Shear Zones in the Khondalite Belt, North China Craton
Previous Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Electrical Structure and Metallogenic Background of the Southeastern Hubei Ore Concentration Area
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Situ Modification of Activated Carbon Made from Camellia oleifera Shell with Na2EDTA for Enhanced La3+ Recovery

1
WA School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
2
School of Architecture and Design, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
3
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
4
School of Rare Earth and New Materials Engineering, Gannan University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
5
School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
6
School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2024, 14(6), 560; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060560
Submission received: 27 April 2024 / Revised: 22 May 2024 / Accepted: 27 May 2024 / Published: 29 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy)

Abstract

:
It is important to recover La3+ from metallurgical solutions or wastewater. However, the recovery rate of La3+ is usually less than 1% and the recovery methods are not environmentally friendly or user-friendly. Therefore, a straightforward, efficient, clean, and economically friendly method is needed. In this investigation, a modified adsorbent, COSAC-Na2EDTA-15, which was made from the Camellia oleifera shell (COS) and disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Na2EDTA), was invented. In addition, characterization of the COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 adsorbent was conducted using SEM and XPS, and the principle of adsorption was revealed. The adsorption kinetics followed P-S-O KM, while the isotherm of COS-activated carbon (COSAC) aligned more closely with the Langmuir model. Compared to COSAC, the maximum La3+ adsorption capacity of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 increased from 50 to 162.43 mg/g, and the content of O and N changed from 7.31% and 1.48% to 12.64% and 4.15%, respectively. The surface of the COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 exhibited abundant C, N, and O elements, and La3+ was detected on the sample surface after adsorption. The test and analysis results fully indicate that La3+ can be successfully adsorbed on the surface of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15. Because of its easy preparation, low cost, and superior performance, activated carbon made from COS finds extensive applications in the adsorption and recovery of rare earth elements.

1. Introduction

Rare earth elements exhibit distinctive characteristics, both physical and chemical, and play a crucial role in high-tech fields and the development of advanced materials [1,2]. They are widely used in electrochemical sensors, supercapacitors, biomedical nanocomposites, luminescent materials, superconducting materials, permanent magnetic materials, and so on [3,4]. Lanthanum (La), a significant rare earth element, holds a pivotal position in strategic industries. Its primary applications encompass superconductors, ceramics, electrochemistry, catalysts, magnetism, luminescence, and additive materials [5]. According to reports, the worldwide annual consumption of lanthanum (La) is approximately 200 metric tons [6,7]. The release of La3+ into the environment and food chain has markedly escalated due to the widespread utilization of products containing La [8]. Lanthanum ions (La3+) exhibit toxicity to humans, leading to cell membrane damage and influencing the reproductive and nervous systems [9,10]. However, Hunt et al. reported that the recovery rate of La3+ is less than 1% [7]. Hence, to safeguard the environment and promote the sustainable utilization of limited resources, the recovery of La3+ from wastewater systems becomes imperative [11,12]. Currently, the main techniques used for metal ion recovery are precipitation, ion exchange, solvent extraction, and adsorption [13,14]. The adsorption method has been widely regarded because of its easy operation, high efficiency, low cost, and little pollution [15]. Activated carbon stands out as an economical and efficient adsorbent [16]. Coal, plants, and animal bones are the main sources used to produce activated carbon. However, given the sustainability and renewability of the materials, researchers have recently examined and used a variety of agricultural wastes and biomass to create activated carbon [17].
Camellia oleifera, an economically important oil crop with extensive cultivation [18], is recognized as an important woody oil tree species globally [19]. The main output obtained from Camellia oleifera is oil, while the by-product, Camellia oleifera shell (COS) [20], makes up about 50%–60% of the total weight of the fresh fruit [21]. In 2020, China produced approximately 3.68 million tons of COS [22]. The utilization rate of COS is low, and it is mainly used as a solid fuel [22] or dumped improperly [23,24], which has the potential to impact the environment. COS primarily consists of cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose [25,26], and can serve as the perfect raw material for obtaining activated carbon [27]. COS manufactured biochar can adsorb toxic chemicals [28,29] and heavy metals [30,31] in water [32]. Nevertheless, it has not yet been employed for the recovery of rare earth ions. The application of COS-derived activated carbon to remove La3+ can realize the recycling of agricultural wastes, thus reducing resource waste and environmental pollution at the same time [33].
This study represents an effort to extract rare earth elements from industrial production wastewater using camellia shells, a type of agricultural waste. In our study, Camellia oleifera shell activated carbon (COSAC) was synthesized through one-step pyrolysis with phosphoric acid activation, using COS as the precursor and adding a disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Na2EDTA) modifier. The possibility of using COSAC-Na2EDTA to recover La3+ from aqueous solutions was studied. The effects of impregnation ratio, impregnation time, activation temperature, and the modifier amount on the properties of the activated carbon were studied.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Reagents

The COS employed here was sourced from Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, China. The COS underwent a washing process with deionized water, followed by oven drying at 100 °C for 12 h, and subsequent crushing and sieving (0.106 mm) before utilization. The phosphoric acid was 85 wt%. Na2EDTA was purchased from Aladdin Reagent (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All chemical reagents utilized here were of analytical grade and were employed without further purification. The water used in the experiment was deionized water.

2.2. Synthesis of COSAC-Na2EDTA

Figure 1 shows the synthesis of COSAC-Na2EDTA. The COS powder, having 5.0 g in weight, was mixed with varying amounts of Na2EDTA (0, 10, 15, and 20 mmol) and subsequently soaked in phosphoric acid for a duration. The samples were heated to a certain temperature (500 °C, 600 °C, and 700 °C, respectively). The heating rate was 5 °C/min. When the temperature reached the target value, the samples were kept in N2 for 1 h, and cooled to room temperature. Following that, the samples underwent rinsing with deionized water until reaching a stable pH, were then dried in a vacuum oven at 90 °C overnight, and finally finely ground into particles smaller than 100 meshes. This process yielded Na2EDTA-modified camellia shell activated carbon, designated as COSAC-Na2EDTA-X, where X represents the amount of Na2EDTA.

2.3. Characterization

A nitrogen adsorption–desorption test was performed using a Micromeritics APSP 2460 4-station full-automatic specific surface area analyzer. The surface element composition, chemical bonding environment, and adsorption sites of the activated carbon were scrutinized through XPS analysis. The surface morphology and energy spectrum of activated carbon were investigated using SEM (ZEISS Sigma 300 from Oberkochen, Germany) [33]. The concentration of La3+ was measured, employing the instrument parameters recommended by the manufacturer.

2.4. Adsorption and Recovery Experiment

La(NO3)3·6H2O was used to prepare La3+ solutions of different concentrations for adsorption experiments. The La3+ solution, after preparation, was placed into a 100 mL conical flask. Subsequently, the adsorbent was added for the adsorption experiment, which took place in a constant temperature oscillator at 150 rpm/min for various durations. After the experiment, a membrane filter was used for filtration, then the concentration of La3+ was measured. When the adsorption test was finished, the desorption tests were carried out using 0.5 M HCl. The adsorption capacity, q e (mg/g), was computed using Equation (1):
q e = C 0 C e × V m
where C0 (mg/L) and Ce (mg/L) represent the initial and equilibrium concentrations of La3+ in the solution, respectively, V is the volume of solution (L), and m is the weight (g) of the adsorbent.

2.5. Kinetic and Isothermal Models

The fitting and analysis of the data included employing both the pseudo-first-order kinetic model (P-F-O KM) and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model (P-S-O KM). These models were utilized to identify the primary rate-controlling steps in the adsorption of La3+ on carbon samples, as described in Equations (2) and (3) [34,35]:
ln q e q t = l n q e k 1 t
t q t = 1 k 2 q e 2 + 1 q e t
where qe and qt represents the amount of La3+ adsorbed per mass of sorbent (mg/g) at equilibrium and any time, and k1 and k2 are rate constants of pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order, respectively.
The Langmuir and Freundlich models were employed for fitting and analyzing the data to investigate the interaction between activated carbon and the adsorbate. Both of these models have the capability to depict the adsorption process and ascertain the maximum adsorption capacity [7,36]:
q e = q m K L C e 1 + K L C e
l n q e = l n K F + 1 n l n C e
where q e represents the adsorption capacity of La3+ at equilibrium, q m denotes the maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g), Ce denotes the concentration of adsorbate in solution at the equilibrium point (mg/L), KL stands for the Langmuir constant (L/mg), KF stands for the Freundlich constant, and 1/n stands for the Freundlich exponent.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Properties of COSAC at Different Preparation Conditions

The phosphoric acid soaking time, soaking ratio (mL H3PO4/g COS), activation temperature, and Na2EDTA dosage are the key parameters in the process of preparing camellia shell-activated carbon that will affect the La3+ adsorption performance. To prepare highly efficient activated carbon from COS, the influence of preparation conditions has been optimized for its adsorption performance. The La3+ adsorption performance of COSAC following different preparation conditions is shown in Figure 2.
Firstly, the influence of COS immersion time in H3PO4 on the adsorption of La3+ was studied by fixing the activation time at 60 min, and the experimental conditions were set with an impregnation ratio of H3PO4 to COS of 15 mL/5 g, an activation temperature of 500 °C, an Na2EDTA dosage of 10 mmol, a solution pH of 5.5, and an initial La3+ concentration of 100 mg/L. The results of the adsorption performance are given in Figure 2a. When the soaking time increased from 1 to 12 h, the adsorption efficiency of the activated carbon for La3+ initially rose and then declined. With an extension of the immersion time from 1 to 3 h, the La3+ adsorption capacity of the activated carbon experienced a rapid increase, reaching 76.5 mg/g. When the time further increased to 12 h, the La3+ adsorption capacity of the activated carbon slowly declined. The cause for this may be attributed to the hydrolysis of lignin in COS by phosphoric acid, leading to an enhancement in the pore size of the activated carbon as the immersion time is prolonged. However, further extension of the time may lead to excessive erosion of the carbon skeleton, thus reducing the performance of the activated carbon. Therefore, the best soaking time of 3 h was used to study the influence of the soaking ratio 10/5, 12.5/5, and 15/5 during the adsorption test. The resulting adsorption capacities of COSAC for La3+ were observed to be 67.85, 80.58, and 76.5 mg/g, respectively, as shown in Figure 2b. Consequently, the optimal impregnation ratio was determined to be 12.5/5. This specific impregnation ratio was subsequently employed in the subsequent experiments.
The activated carbon prepared at different temperatures (500, 600, and 700 °C) was tested in batches to study the effect of pyrolysis temperature. The adsorption capacity for La3+ demonstrated an increase with the rising activation temperature, as shown in Figure 2c. With the elevation of the activation temperature from 500 to 700 °C, the adsorption capacity for La3+ exhibited an increase from 80.58 to 135.1 mg/g. At 800 °C, the presence of phosphoric acid caused adhesion between the quartz boat and the quartz tube in the tubular furnace, which led to the failure of the experiment. Therefore, 700 °C was selected to prepare COSAC.
To assess the influence of the Na2EDTA dosage on the La3+ adsorption capacity, the soaking time was kept at 3 h, the soaking ratio at 12.5/5, and the activation temperature at 700 °C, with variations in Na2EDTA dosage (0, 10, 15, and 20 mmol). The adsorption capacity exhibited an increase with the rise in Na2EDTA dosage from 0 to 15 mmol, as shown in Figure 2d. When the amount of Na2EDTA was 0 mmol, the activated carbon without an Na2EDTA modification had an La3+ adsorption capacity of 49.33 mg/g. When the amount of Na2EDTA was 15 mmol, the La3+ adsorption capacity reached 162.43 mg/g, indicating that the Na2EDTA modifier can greatly enhance the La3+ adsorption effect of activated carbon from COS. However, when the amount of Na2EDTA exceeded 15 mmol, the adsorption capacity decreased. The reason is that the added Na2EDTA will generate a large amount of ammonia through thermal decomposition, which is conducive to increasing the amide and amino group of the surface ring of the activated carbon [37]. This could improve the adsorption sites for La3+, thereby increasing the La3+ adsorption capacity. However, a further increase in dosage may disrupt the original active sites on the surface of COSAC, leading to a decrease in the La3+ adsorption capacity. Therefore, the optimal dosage is 15 mmol.

3.2. Kinetics and Isotherms

The best Na2EDTA-modified activated carbon from COS (COSAC-Na2EDTA-15) was prepared with a soaking time of 3 h, a soaking ratio of 12.5/5, an activation temperature of 700 °C, and an Na2EDTA dosage of 15 mmol. Figure 3 illustrates the adsorption performance of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 at different contact times and initial La3+ concentrations. The adsorption capacity of lanthanum ions exhibits a rapid increase over time, reaching 90% of the maximum adsorption capacity within thirty minutes, as shown in Figure 3a. With a continued increase in time, the adsorption progressively decelerated and eventually reached equilibrium after 2 h. At this time, the adsorption capacity was 162.43 mg/g.
In Figure 3b, the adsorption capacity at different initial La3+ concentrations is illustrated. As the initial concentration increases, the adsorption capacity reaches its peak value when the concentration exceeds 100 mg/g.
In order to examine the adsorption mechanism of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 for La3+, the P-F-O KM and P-S-O KM were applied for nonlinear regression fitting of the adsorption data. The corresponding kinetic fitting curves are given in Figure 4a and Figure 4b, respectively. In comparison to the P-F-O KM, the P-S-O KM exhibited a stronger correlation with the adsorption data of La3+ on COSAC-Na2EDTA-15, and its correlation coefficient was 0.99. This result suggests that the process of the adsorption of La3+ onto COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 mainly involved chemical adsorption [38].
According to the results of the Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherm models, the correlation coefficient for the Langmuir model (R2 = 0.99) surpasses that of the Freundlich model (R2 = 0.91), suggesting that the adsorption of La3+ by COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 aligns more closely with the Langmuir model, as shown in Figure 4c,d. Therefore, the adsorption of La3+ on Na2EDTA-modified camellia shell activated carbon was monolayer adsorption.

3.3. Adsorption Selectivity and Recycling Characteristics

There are a lot of coexisting ions such as sodium, magnesium, copper, and calcium ions in waste water that may affect the adsorption of lanthanum ions. Hence, it is imperative to conduct an analysis of the selectivity of La3+ over Na+, Mg2+, and Cu2+ ions. The adsorption selectivity and recycling characteristics of tea tree shell activated carbon are shown in Figure 5. Figure 5a illustrates that after four cycles COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 still exhibits good recovery performance for lanthanum ions. In Figure 5b, it is evident that Na+, Mg2+, and Cu2+ exert minimal impact on the adsorption capacity of lanthanum ions. This observation suggests that COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 exhibits excellent ion selectivity.
To assess the practical applicability of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 for the recovery of La3+, Table 1 compiles the maximum adsorption capacities (expressed in mg/g) of various adsorbents for La3+. In comparison with the adsorbents documented in the literature, both COSAC and COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 have a higher lanthanum adsorption performance and great potential for La3+ recovery.

3.4. Mechanism Analysis

Through XPS characterization of COSAC and COSAC-Na2EDTA-15, we are able to comprehend how the Na2EDTA alteration affects the quantity of O- and N-containing functional groups. The N1s and O1s peaks in the Na2EDTA-modified activated carbon are significantly enhanced compared with the unmodified activated carbon, as shown in Figure 6 and Table 2. The unmodified COSAC also contains O and a small amount of N. After modification, there is an increase in the percentage of O from 7.31% to 12.63%, and the percentage of N rises from 1.48% to 4.15%. XPS analysis indicates that Na2EDTA effectively enhances the content of N- and O-containing functional groups. This contributes to the enhanced adsorption capacity for La3+.
For a more comprehensive understanding of the La3+ adsorption mechanism on activated carbon surfaces, XPS was used to analyze the peak shift after La3+ adsorption on activated carbon. The C 1s peak was smoothed by a Gaussian function. Figure 7 is the C 1s peaks before and after the activated carbon adsorption of lanthanum ions. The C 1s spectrum of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 prior to adsorption reveals four distinct peaks with binding energies at 284.8 eV (C-C), 285.99 eV (C-O/C-N), 288.13 eV (COOR), and 290.97 eV (π-π*). When La3+ was adsorbed, the binding energies of C-C, C-O/C-N in COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 were transferred to higher regions. Figure 7 shows that the energy of the C-O/C-N peak has elevated from 285.99 to 286.03 eV. These observations suggest that the C-C and C-O/C-N functional groups present on the surface of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 establish coordination bonds with La3+, with the stable La3+ adsorption on the activated carbon surface.
The adsorption–desorption isotherms and pore size distribution of COSAC and COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 are given in Figure 8. The BET specific surface areas for these samples were determined to be 1443.45 m2/g for COSAC and 1068.68 m2/g for COSAC-Na2EDTA-15. Figure 8 illustrates that the majority of pore sizes in COSAC and COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 are below 20 nm, suggesting that the pores in the tested materials are predominantly mesoporous.
To validate the successful adsorption of La3+ by the activated carbon derived from tea camellia shell modified with Na2EDTA, the morphological changes and elemental distributions of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope and an energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS). As depicted in Figure 9, COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 exhibits a porous structure, characterized by a notable presence of C and O. The detection of lanthanum on the surface of the sample validates the XPS findings and indicates the uniform adsorption of La3+ on the surface of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15.

4. Conclusions

The agricultural waste camellia shell was used as the precursor, and Na2EDTA was added to the phosphoric acid activation process to prepare COSAC. This enhancement effectively improves the adsorption capacity for La3+. The adsorption of La3+ on modified camellia shell activated carbon is more focused on monolayer adsorption, which is more consistent with the Langmuir model. In contrast to the P-F-O KM, the P-S-O KM exhibits a superior level of linear fitting, suggesting that the predominant mechanism is chemical adsorption during the adsorption. The peak value of the adsorption capacity for La3+ is 162.43 mg/g. XPS analysis revealed that the proportion of oxygen (O) in COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 rose from 7.31% to 12.64%, while the proportion of nitrogen (N) increased from 1.48% to 4.15%. SEM-EDS analysis confirmed the presence of abundant carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and oxygen (O) elements on the surface of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15. Additionally, La3+ elements were identified on the sample’s surface, indicating the stable adsorption of La3+ on the surface of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15. The COSAC has the advantages of easy preparation, low price, and excellent performance, and is expected to become a carbon material for recovering rare earth elements from wastewater.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, L.H.: Investigation, X.Z.; Methodology, C.F. and L.L.; Writing—review and editing, S.A., B.Z. and S.L.; Conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, W.H.; Investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41662004 and 41362003).

Data Availability Statement

All data used during the study appear in the submitted article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editors and reviewers for their excellent support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Huang, Y.H.; Liu, X.G.; Shi, M.X.; Qin, Y.Y.; Li, X.C. Study on the adsorption of lanthanum ion imprinted on SBA-15/Y. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2022, 99, 100425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arul Manikandan, N.; Lens, P.N.L. Biorefining of green macroalgal (Ulva sp.) biomass and its application in the adsorptive recovery of rare earth elements (REEs). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 303, 122200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ponou, J.; Dodbiba, G.; Anh, J.-W.; Fujita, T. Selective recovery of rare earth elements from aqueous solution obtained from coal power plant ash. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 3761–3766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Huang, L.J.H.; Xiao, B.; Liu, L.H.; Li, W.H.; Duan, X.G.; Huang, W.F.; Fan, C.Y.; Dong, Y.; Liu, S.M. Selective recovery of Gd(III) by benzimidazole- and benzoxazole-linked 3D porous polymers. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 51, 103378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Danish, E.Y.; Marwani, H.M.; Almoslehi, K.F.; Bakhsh, E.M. Adsorptive removal of lanthanum based on hydrothermally synthesized iron oxide-titanium oxide nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 5408–5417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Huang, L.J.H.; Liu, L.H.; Huang, W.F.; Zhao, B.X.; Shen, Z.F.; Bao, Y.Q.; Znad, H. Recovery of lanthanum cations by functionalized magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotube bundles. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 4751–4759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kusrini, E.; Wicaksono, W.; Gunawan, C.; Daud, N.Z.A.; Usman, A. Kinetics, mechanism, and thermodynamics of lanthanum adsorption on pectin extracted from durian rind. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 6580–6588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cheng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Bian, X.; Zuo, H.; Dong, H. Adsorption and mineralization of REE-lanthanum onto bacterial cell surface. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 22334–22339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chen, F.; Deng, Q.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; Lin, L.; Qiu, Y.; Pan, L.; Zheng, X.; et al. U-Shaped Relationship of Rare Earth Element Lanthanum and Oral Cancer Risk: A Propensity Score-Based Study in the Southeast of China. Fron. Public Health 2022, 10, 905690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, Y.; Yan, C.; Zhou, S.; Liang, T.; Wen, X. Preparation of montmorillonite grafted polyacrylic acid composite and study on its adsorption properties of lanthanum ions from aqueous solution. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 9861–9875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, E.; Chen, L.; Dai, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Yan, Y. Fabrication of phosphate functionalized chiral nematic mesoporous silica films for the efficient and selective adsorption of lanthanum ions. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 277, 786–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abdel-Magied, A.F.; Abdelhamid, H.N.; Ashour, R.M.; Zou, X.; Forsberg, K. Hierarchical porous zeolitic imidazolate frameworks nanoparticles for efficient adsorption of rare-earth elements. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 278, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. dos Reis, G.S.; Pinto, D.; Lima, É.C.; Knani, S.; Grimm, A.; Silva, L.F.O.; Cadaval, T.R.S.; Dotto, G.L. Lanthanum uptake from water using chitosan with different configurations. React. Funct. Polym. 2022, 180, 105395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jiang, X.; An, Q.-D.; Xiao, Z.-Y.; Zhai, S.-R.; Cui, L. Selective capture of lanthanum and lead cations over biomass-derived ion-imprinted biomacromolecule adsorbents. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 291, 111290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Iannicelli-Zubiani, E.M.; Gallo Stampino, P.; Cristiani, C.; Dotelli, G. Enhanced lanthanum adsorption by amine modified activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 341, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H. In-situ modification of activated carbon with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt during phosphoric acid activation for enhancement of nickel removal. Powder Technol. 2018, 325, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, H.; Bi, C.; Zeng, C.; Ma, W.; Yan, L.; Li, K.; Wei, K. Camellia oleifera seed shell carbon as an efficient renewable bio-adsorbent for the adsorption removal of hexavalent chromium and methylene blue from aqueous solution. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 249, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, L.; Peng, H.; Xiao, Z.; Wu, H.; Fu, G.; Wan, Y.; Bi, H. Production of furfural and 5-hydroxymethyl furfural from Camellia oleifera fruit shell in [Bmim]HSO4/H2O/1,4-dioxane biphasic medium. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 184, 115006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, X.; Xie, M.; Hu, Y.; Li, S.; Nie, S.; Zhang, A.; Wu, H.; Li, C.; Xiao, Z.; Hu, C. Facile preparation of lignin nanoparticles from waste Camellia oleifera shell: The solvent effect on the structural characteristic of lignin nanoparticles. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 183, 114943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, F.; Jiang, J. Xylo-oligosaccharides and lignin production from Camellia oleifera shell by malic acid hydrolysis at mild conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 341, 125897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Meng, W.; Cheng, S.; Xing, B.; Zheng, Y.; Ren, X.; Xue, M.; Zhang, C.; Xia, H. Utilization of camellia oleifera shell for production of valuable products by pyrolysis. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 104348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, P.; Hu, C.; Gu, J.; Lin, X.; Yang, C.; Leu, S.-Y.; Guan, L. Pyrolysis characteristics of tea oil camellia (Camellia oleifera Abel.) shells and their chemically pre-treated residues: Kinetics, mechanisms, product evaluation and joint optimization. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2022, 164, 105526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, W.; Zhang, W.; Han, M.; Zhang, F.; Lei, F.; Cheng, X.; Ning, R.; Wang, K.; Ji, L.; Jiang, J. Production of xylooligosaccharides from Camellia oleifera Abel fruit shell using a shell-based solid acid catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 365, 128173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chaydarreh, K.C.; Lin, X.; Dandan, L.; Zhang, W.; Guan, L.; Hu, C. Developing 3-layer tea oil camellia (Camellia oleifera Abel.) shells-based particleboard with systematic study on particle geometry and distribution. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 179, 114682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, J.; Shi, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chang, S. Anatomical structure of Camellia oleifera shell. Protoplasma 2018, 255, 1777–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Long, H.; Gu, J.; Jiang, J.; Guan, L.; Lin, X.; Zhang, W.; Hu, C. Mechanically strong and biodegradable holocellulose films prepared from Camellia oleifera shells. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 299, 120189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. You, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, P.; Lei, F.; Jiang, J. Co-production of xylooligosaccharides and activated carbons from Camellia oleifera shell treated by the catalysis and activation of zinc chloride. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 306, 123131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mei, L.; Qiao, H.; Ke, F.; Peng, C.; Hou, R.; Wan, X.; Cai, H. One-step synthesis of zirconium dioxide-biochar derived from Camellia oleifera seed shell with enhanced removal capacity for fluoride from water. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 509, 144685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Q.; Li, D.; Cheng, H.; Cheng, J.; Du, K.; Hu, Y.; Chen, Y. High mesoporosity phosphorus-containing biochar fabricated from Camellia oleifera shells: Impressive tetracycline adsorption performance and promotion of pyrophosphate-like surface functional groups (C-O-P bond). Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 329, 124922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gao, Y.; Wang, B.; Luo, L.; Deng, B.; Shad, N.; Hu, D.; Aly, H.M.; Zhang, L. Effects of hydroxyapatite and modified biochar derived from Camellia oleifera fruit shell on soil Cd contamination and N2O emissions. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 177, 114476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fan, Y.; Wang, H.; Deng, L.; Wang, Y.; Kang, D.; Li, C.; Chen, H. Enhanced adsorption of Pb(II) by nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped biochar derived from Camellia oleifera shells. Environ. Res. 2020, 191, 110030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sun, S.; Zeng, X.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, L.; Zeng, X.; Liu, W.; Jiang, Q.; Jiang, C.; Wang, S. Iron oxide loaded biochar/attapulgite composites derived camellia oleifera shells as a novel bio-adsorbent for highly efficient removal of Cr(VI). J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 317, 128412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zeng, B.; Zeng, X.; Hu, L.; Huang, L.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, G.; Huang, W. Activated carbon from Camellia oleifera shells for adsorption of Y(iii): Experimental and DFT studies. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 4252–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dong, L.; Hou, L.; Wang, Z.; Gu, P.; Chen, G.; Jiang, R. A new function of spent activated carbon in BAC process: Removing heavy metals by ion exchange mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 359, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wu, F.-C.; Tseng, R.-L.; Juang, R.-S. Characteristics of Elovich equation used for the analysis of adsorption kinetics in dye-chitosan systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 150, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Duan, C.; Ma, T.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y. Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution using carbon-based adsorbents: A review. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 37, 101339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mochizuki, Y.; Bud, J.; Byambajav, E.; Tsubouchi, N. Influence of ammonia treatment on the CO2 adsorption of activated carbon. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xiao, B.; Huang, L.; Huang, W.; Zhang, D.; Zeng, X.; Yao, X. Glycine functionalized activated carbon derived from navel orange peel for enhancement recovery of Gd(Ⅲ). J. Rare Earths 2022, 40, 1794–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mehrani, Z.; Ebrahimzadeh, H.; Moradi, E.; Yamini, Y. Using three-dimensional poly (vinyl alcohol)/sodium hexametaphosphate nanofiber as a non-toxic and efficient nanosorbent for extraction and recovery of Lanthanide ions from aqueous solutions. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 307, 112925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kołodyńska, D.; Araucz, K. New titanium oxide sorbent for As(V) and Cr(VI) removal as well as La(III) and Nd(III) recovery. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 315, 113720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ni, C.; Liu, Q.; Ren, Z.; Hu, H.; Sun, B.; Liu, C.; Shao, P.; Yang, L.; Pavlostathis, S.G.; Luo, X. Selective removal and recovery of La(III) using a phosphonic-based ion imprinted polymer: Adsorption performance, regeneration, and mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zheng, X.; Wu, D.; Su, T.; Bao, S.; Liao, C.; Wang, Q. Magnetic nanocomposite hydrogel prepared by ZnO-initiated photopolymerization for La (III) adsorption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 19840–19849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ramasamy, D.L.; Porada, S.; Sillanpää, M. Marine algae: A promising resource for the selective recovery of scandium and rare earth elements from aqueous systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 371, 759–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bezzina, J.P.; Ogden, M.D.; Moon, E.M.; Soldenhoff, K.L. REE behavior and sorption on weak acid resins from buffered media. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 59, 440–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Synthesis of COSAC-Na2EDTA.
Figure 1. Synthesis of COSAC-Na2EDTA.
Minerals 14 00560 g001
Figure 2. La3+ adsorption performance of COSAC following different preparation conditions. (a) qe vs. soaking time; (b) qe vs. soaking ratio; (c) qe vs. activation temperature; (d) qe vs. Na2EDTA dosage.
Figure 2. La3+ adsorption performance of COSAC following different preparation conditions. (a) qe vs. soaking time; (b) qe vs. soaking ratio; (c) qe vs. activation temperature; (d) qe vs. Na2EDTA dosage.
Minerals 14 00560 g002aMinerals 14 00560 g002b
Figure 3. Adsorption kinetics and isotherm of La3+ adsorption on COSAC-Na2EDTA-15. (Note: the initial concentration is 100 mg/L, the temperature is 25 °C, and the initial pH is 6.0 ± 0.2). (a) qt vs. time; (b) qe vs. Ce.
Figure 3. Adsorption kinetics and isotherm of La3+ adsorption on COSAC-Na2EDTA-15. (Note: the initial concentration is 100 mg/L, the temperature is 25 °C, and the initial pH is 6.0 ± 0.2). (a) qt vs. time; (b) qe vs. Ce.
Minerals 14 00560 g003
Figure 4. Kinetics and isotherm fitting curves. (a) ln(qeqt) vs. time; (b) t/qt vs. time; (c) 1/qe vs. 1/Ce; (d) lnqe vs. lnCe.
Figure 4. Kinetics and isotherm fitting curves. (a) ln(qeqt) vs. time; (b) t/qt vs. time; (c) 1/qe vs. 1/Ce; (d) lnqe vs. lnCe.
Minerals 14 00560 g004aMinerals 14 00560 g004b
Figure 5. Adsorption selectivity and recycling characteristics of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15. (Note: the initial concentration is 100 mg/L). (a) qe vs. number of cycle; (b) qe vs. different ions.
Figure 5. Adsorption selectivity and recycling characteristics of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15. (Note: the initial concentration is 100 mg/L). (a) qe vs. number of cycle; (b) qe vs. different ions.
Minerals 14 00560 g005
Figure 6. XPS analysis of COSAC before and after Na2EDTA modification.
Figure 6. XPS analysis of COSAC before and after Na2EDTA modification.
Minerals 14 00560 g006
Figure 7. C 1s peak: (a) before lanthanum ion adsorption on the activated carbon, (b) after lanthanum ion adsorption on the activated carbon.
Figure 7. C 1s peak: (a) before lanthanum ion adsorption on the activated carbon, (b) after lanthanum ion adsorption on the activated carbon.
Minerals 14 00560 g007
Figure 8. The adsorption–desorption isotherms of N2: (a) pore size distribution; (b) COSAC and COSAC-Na2EDTA-15.
Figure 8. The adsorption–desorption isotherms of N2: (a) pore size distribution; (b) COSAC and COSAC-Na2EDTA-15.
Minerals 14 00560 g008
Figure 9. SEM-EDS images of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 after adsorption.
Figure 9. SEM-EDS images of COSAC-Na2EDTA-15 after adsorption.
Minerals 14 00560 g009
Table 1. Lanthanum (La3+) adsorption capacities of various adsorbents.
Table 1. Lanthanum (La3+) adsorption capacities of various adsorbents.
AbsorbentMax. Adsorption Capacity (mg/g)Equilibrium Time (h)Refs.
Amine modified activated carbon1071.5[15]
Iron oxide-titanium oxide nanoparticles89.631[5]
MSFs-177.743[11]
PVA/SHMP HENF181.822[39]
ADSORBSIA™ As50024.771[40]
La-IIP62.80.5[41]
Valorised Ulva Sp. biomass119.2972[2]
ZnO clay nanocomposite hydrogel58.82[42]
Sargassum fluitans73.6224[43]
Amberlite IRC8640.60--[44]
COSAC502This study
COSAC-Na2EDTA-15162.432This study
Table 2. Proportion of elements C, N, P, and O in the sample.
Table 2. Proportion of elements C, N, P, and O in the sample.
SampleC (%)N (%)P (%)O (%)
COSAC89.511.481.77.31
COSAC-Na2EDTA-1580.984.152.2312.64
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, L.; Zeng, X.; Fan, C.; Liu, L.; Alam, S.; Zeng, B.; Liu, S.; Huang, W.; Shu, R. In Situ Modification of Activated Carbon Made from Camellia oleifera Shell with Na2EDTA for Enhanced La3+ Recovery. Minerals 2024, 14, 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060560

AMA Style

Huang L, Zeng X, Fan C, Liu L, Alam S, Zeng B, Liu S, Huang W, Shu R. In Situ Modification of Activated Carbon Made from Camellia oleifera Shell with Na2EDTA for Enhanced La3+ Recovery. Minerals. 2024; 14(6):560. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060560

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Lijinhong, Xiangrong Zeng, Chunyan Fan, Lihong Liu, Shafiq Alam, Bin Zeng, Shaomin Liu, Wanfu Huang, and Ronghua Shu. 2024. "In Situ Modification of Activated Carbon Made from Camellia oleifera Shell with Na2EDTA for Enhanced La3+ Recovery" Minerals 14, no. 6: 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060560

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop