Next Article in Journal
Inhibiting Mechanism of High pH on Molybdenite Flotation. An Experimental and DFT Study
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Geopolymeric Material Properties: A Comparative Study of Compaction Effects via Alkaline and Acidic Routes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molybdenum Mineralization in Eastern Hebei, China: Evidence from Geochronology and Isotopic Composition

1
The Eighth Geological Brigade of Hebei Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development, Qinhuangdao 066000, China
2
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR & GZAR/International Research Center on Karst under the Auspices of UNESCO, Guilin 541004, China
3
Pingguo Guangxi, Karst Ecosystem, National Observation and Research Station, Pingguo 531406, China
4
Hebei Key Laboratory of Strategic Critical Mineral Resources, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
5
Hebei Province Geology and Mineral Resources Research Center, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
6
Hebei Provincial Geological Museum, Shijiazhuang 050081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 662; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070662
Submission received: 30 May 2024 / Revised: 22 June 2024 / Accepted: 22 June 2024 / Published: 27 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Deposits)

Abstract

:
The northern margin of the North China Craton is one of the most important porphyry-skarn molybdenum ore belts in the world. The eastern Hebei Province, which contains a high number of molybdenum and gold (molybdenum) resources, is an important portion of the northern margin of the North China Craton. Xichanggou and Huashi, located in eastern Hebei, are quartz-molybdenum vein deposits that are intimately associated with intrusions that are deeply concealed in the mining area. This work presents two zircon U-Pb dates and ten molybdenite Re-Os ages from samples of the aforementioned two deposits in order to determine the timing of the intrusion and mineralization. The zircon U-Pb ages of the quartz monzonite porphyry from Xichanggou are determined to be 163.3 ± 0.3 Ma and 162.8 ± 0.4 Ma. The molybdenite Re-Os dating yielded ages of 160.3 ± 4.6 Ma for Xichanggou and 171.4 ± 19 Ma for Huashi, respectively. The isotopic composition of oxygen and hydrogen of the ore-forming fluid from Huashi, as indicated by the δDV-SMOW values (−80.0‰ to −67.6‰) and δ18OH2O values (−1.86‰ to 2.33‰), suggests that the fluid is primarily composed of water derived from magma, with some contribution from atmospheric precipitation. The sulfur isotope values (δ34S) of sulfides from Xichanggou range from 6.5‰ to 7.1‰, while the δ34S values from Huashi range from 3.3‰ to 4.9‰. The lead isotope ratios (206Pb/204Pb and 207Pb/204Pb) of sulfides from Xichanggou and Huashi average at 17.414, 15.428, and 17.591, 15.379, respectively. The Re-Os isotopic compositions of ore sulfides mostly fall within the range of 318 ppm to 50,114 ppm. These isotopic compositions indicate that the materials responsible for the formation of the ores in Xichanggou and Huashi primarily originate from the melting of lower crust materials that have been contaminated by the mantle. Based on the regional data, the molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei were formed in multiple periods, specifically approximately 170 Ma and 160 Ma in Huahsi and Xichanggou, respectively. The subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate during the middle–late Jurassic period led to the partial remelting of lower crust material, resulting in the acquisition of a significant quantity of metal elements (Mo), which were subsequently deposited.

1. Introduction

Porphyry-skarn molybdenum deposits are a significant global source of molybdenum [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. These types of Mo deposits are widespread in the southern and northern margin of the North China Craton [2,6,8]. The eastern Hebei region is situated on the northern boundary of the North China Craton. During the Mesozoic epoch, it was affected by both the closure of the Mongolia-Okhotsk plate and the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate. The regional magmatic activity and geological structure exhibit a high degree of complexity [9]. Over the past few years, numerous geologists have discovered a significant abundance of molybdenum and gold (molybdenum) deposits in this region. The typical Mo(-Cu) mineralization includes the giant Taipingcun [9], the medium-sized Sibozi [10], and the medium-sized Shouwangfen deposits [11]. Gold deposits containing molybdenum include the Yuerya large gold deposit [6], the Tangzhangzi small gold deposit [12,13] and the Xiayingfang medium-sized gold deposit [14]. The deposits in question were formed during the Mesozoic era, specifically between 190 and 110 Ma [6,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. They encompass many types, including porphyry, skarn, hydrothermal vein, and breccia. Their findings suggest that there is a significant possibility of molybdenum polymetallic mineral deposits in the eastern Hebei region.
The molybdenum deposits in the region are primarily found in the central part of the Malanyu anticlinorium. The Xichanggou molybdenum deposit is an early discovered molybdenum deposit located near the Huashi, Taipingcun, and Taiyanggou molybdenum deposits in the vicinity. The diagenesis and mineralization age available indicate that the molybdenum deposits in the area were formed as a result of the subduction of the ancient Pacific plate during the late Jurassic period [6,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. The primary focus of the research findings in the field pertains to the geological features, rock geochemistry, and chronology of individual molybdenum occurrences [6,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. In the region, there is currently a shortage of comprehensive and detailed research on the genetic process of molybdenum polymetallic deposit mineralization. This study will focus on the topic at hand, specifically the Xichanggou and Huashi molybdenum deposits, which will serve as the subjects of our investigation. This study provides novel field observations, zircon U-Pb and molybdenite Re-Os geochronology, and comprehensive stable isotope data (S-Pb-O-H) for the Xichanggou and Huashi molybdenum deposits in order to further our understanding of the ore origin. Furthermore, this study also collected the chronological and isotopic composition data of other molybdenum deposits in the region, aiming to further comprehend the process behind molybdenum mineralization in the studied area.

2. Regional Geology

The eastern Hebei region is situated in the western section of the Malanyu anticlinorium within the eastern portion of the Yanshan orogenic belt (Figure 1). The visible strata consist of the Precambrian metamorphic fold basement and the sedimentary cover from the Meso-Neoproterozoic to Mesozoic periods [25,26]. The area is characterized by well-developed regional folds, known as the Malanyu anticlinorium, as well as fault structures, specifically the Miyun-Xifengkou fault. These geological features cross and overlap, creating the fundamental tectonic framework of the region [26]. During the Archean Wutai period, the Proterozoic Lvliang period, and the Mesozoic Indosinian and Yanshanian period, the area was active with magmatic activities, which led to the formation of multiple plutons. The large plutons mainly include the Dushan intrusion formed in the Indosinian period (240 Ma) [9] and the Wangpingshi, Qianfenshuiling, Maoshan, Luowenyu, Gaojiadian, Madi, and Yuerya intrusions formed in the Yanshanian period (200~130 Ma) [9,25,26,27,28]. The rock types encompass monzonitic granite, granodiorite, granite porphyry, and quartz syenite porphyry.
The intense tectono-magmatic activity in the area not only supplies abundant materials for the formation of molybdenum, gold, copper, and other metal deposits but also serves as a dynamic source, pathway, and space for the movement of hydrothermal fluids responsible for ore formation [17]. Hence, the area is abundant in mineral resources. The minerals that are currently recognized include iron, gold, molybdenum, tungsten, copper, lead, zinc, silver, chromium, beryllium, rubidium, cesium, niobium, tantalum, and others.

3. Deposit Geology

3.1. Xichanggou Deposit

3.1.1. Deposit Geology

The Xichanggou deposit is situated in the northern section of the Malanyu anticline (Figure 1). The strata observed in the Xichanggou comprise the Mesoproterozoic Changzhougou Formation (Pt21), the Chuanlinggou Formation (Pt21ch), the Tuanshanzi Formation (Pt21t), and the Cenozoic Quaternary (Q4) (Figure 2). The area has a highly developed geological structure, which is a result of the combined effects of various crustal changes and magmatic intrusive activities. The magmatic processes in the mining area are intense, mainly due to the occurrence of stocks and dikes, and the Xichanggou granite porphyry is the most important intrusion. The intrusion has an elliptical form and is exposed in a region of about 0.26 km2.
The Xichanggou granite porphyry has a weathered surface that appears gray–white to light flesh-red, whereas the fresh surface is flesh-red. It exhibits a porphyritic structure and a block structure (Figure 3). Potassium feldspar, plagioclase, quartz, and biotite primarily form the phenocrysts, which make up 15% to 30% of the total composition. The potassium feldspar phenocrysts are 1–2 mm in size and have a content of 8% to 10%. They exhibit a fleshy-red color and have a columnar shape. The plagioclase phenocrysts, which are 1–2 mm in size and account for 4% of the total phenocryst content, exhibit a grayish-white color and a plate-like shape. Quartzes range in size from 2 to 3 mm and have a content of 8% to 10%. They are characterized by their granular nature. The biotite phenocrysts, which are 2–3 mm in size and account for 1% of the total phenocryst content, exhibit a black color and a plate-like shape. The groundmass, comprising around 70% to 85% of the total composition, consists primarily of quartz, potassium feldspar, and plagioclase. Granite porphyry is predominantly silicified or silicified cataclastic in nature. The silicified cataclastic granite porphyry exhibits the most pronounced alteration and mineralization. The observed changes are silicification, pyritization, and molybdenite mineralization. Chalcopyrite and galena mineralization can also occur occasionally.
The dikes in the mining area consist primarily of coarse-grained granite dikes, granite syenite porphyry dikes, diorite porphyrite dikes, and other similar intrusive rocks. The granite syenite porphyry dikes were the first to form and have the widest distribution of all dikes. Pyritization and molybdenite mineralization are frequently observed in the granite–syenite porphyry. In contrast, the creation of coarse-grained granite porphyry and diorite porphyrite occurs at a later stage, resulting in only localized star-shaped pyritization. The delayed formation of dikes compromises the structural integrity of the ore deposit.

3.1.2. Ore Body Characteristics

Molybdenum ore deposits are found in cryptoexplosive breccia and granite porphyry formations (Figure 4). An extensive examination identified a single pyrite ore deposit and fourteen molybdenum ore deposits, most of which remain hidden. The project controls three ore deposits, namely I, II, and III. The primary ore deposit (referred to as the II ore body) that is being managed by the project has a length of 500 m, a maximum thickness of 224.72 m, and an average grade of 0.0728%. The ore bodies primarily exhibit irregular lenticular shapes, and the continuity of mineralization is favorable. However, the occurrence of mineralization varies significantly.
There are four basic categories of ores, based on their origin and position in the contact zone. The ore types present in sequential order, from the innermost to the outermost, are the granite porphyry-type ore (Figure 5a,b), the cryptoexplosive breccia-type ore (Figure 5a), and the silicified hornfels-type ore. The primary metallic minerals present include molybdenite, pyrite, and chalcopyrite (Figure 5c–f). The primary nonmetallic minerals include potassium feldspar and biotite. The molybdenum grade in the ore typically ranges from 0.03% to 0.15%, with a maximum value of 0.33%. Additional metallic minerals, including sphalerite, galena, magnetite, chalcocite, malachite, azurite, and limonite, can be found in various types of ores. Nonmetallic minerals such as sericite, chlorite, calcite, and tremolite are also present. The ore’s texture mostly consists of a grain texture and blade texture, as well as an evident metasomatic texture, poikilitic texture, and solid solution decomposition texture. The structure consists of a pattern of scattered stars and veinlets.

3.1.3. Stage of Mineralization

The hydrothermal mineralization of the Xichanggou molybdenum deposit is divided into three stages based on the field geological characteristics, the order of mineral crystallization, the relationship between different veins, and the hydrothermal alteration of wall rock. These stages are as follows:
(1)
The molybdenite–magnetite stage is the primary phase of molybdenum mineralization. The presence of molybdenite, potassium feldspar, and iron-bearing minerals defines the mineral assemblage of this stage.
(2)
The quartz–molybdenite stage is the main metallogenic stage. During the precipitation of a significant amount of quartz, a considerable number of metal minerals, including pyrite and molybdenite, precipitated in this stage. Molybdenite is a mineral that is characterized by its tiny, scaly appearance. It is found in several forms, including disseminated, veinlet-disseminated, and reticular. Quartz veinlets, which contain molybdenite, are the most important ore veins. A limited quantity of molybdenite is present within the rock fissures, exhibiting both a singular vein and a dispersed distribution. The predominant gangue minerals include quartz, potassium feldspar, and sericite.
(3)
The quartz–polymetallic sulfide stage primarily consists of veins with minimal or absent molybdenite. These veins often formed after the quartz–molybdenite stage. The veins consist of pyrite quartz veins, galena, sphalerite quartz veins, and other minerals.

3.1.4. Alteration of Wall Rock

The extensive shale of the Chuanlinggou Formation in this region is influenced by subsequent structural changes and interactions with intrusive magmatic activity, resulting in the occurrence of hornfelsification through thermal metamorphism. The limonite mineralization is visible on the surface, exhibiting shades of gray-brown and black-brown. The intensity of silicification directly correlates with the lightness of the color. The proximity to the contact zone directly correlates with the intensity of change and the prominence of the crushing phenomenon. Silicification is the main type of alteration, and secondary sulfide mineralization includes pyritization, chalcopyrite mineralization, and lead mineralization. Chloritization, kaolinization, and carbonation occur rarely.

3.2. Huashi Deposit

3.2.1. Deposit Geology

The predominant rock formations in the mining area consist of Archean Qianxi Group hornblende plagioclase gneiss; Mesoproterozoic Changcheng System Changzhougou Formation quartz glutenite; and Cenozoic Quaternary (Figure 6). The mining area is characterized by two primary fault groups: NW–NNW-trending faults and NE-trending faults. The faults that trend in a northeast direction are designated as F1 and F4. The F1 fault lies to the west of the mining area. The F4 fault, which is of a minor magnitude, is situated in the central part of the mining region and traverses ore deposit No. 11.
The magmatic activity in the area is characterized by intense intrusive activity, predominantly occurring during the early Jurassic period. In the southern region, the Madi alkali feldspar granite is visible, and in the northern region, the Wangpingshi monzonitic granite is visible. Simultaneously, the area also has a variety of Proterozoic-Archean and Mesozoic dikes. The Madi alkali feldspar granite exhibits a strong genetic association with the Huashi molybdenum and rare metal deposits. The Madi alkali feldspar granite occurs as rock strains covering an area of 5.35 km2. The Madi alkali feldspar granite penetrated the hornblende plagioclase gneiss through at least two intrusion events. The central part of Madi has an age of 175.5 Ma, whereas the peripheral area has an age range of 156–165 Ma [19].

3.2.2. Ore Body Characteristics

The Huashi molybdenum deposit is situated within a distance of 100 m north of the Madi intrusion. The ore body mainly occurs in the biotite hornblende plagioclase gneiss and plagioclase amphibolite series of the Malanyu Formation of the Archean Zunhua Group. The occurrence of molybdenum mineralization is mostly influenced by the NW–NNW- and NE-trending faults resulting from magmatic intrusion and tectonic processes in the region. The ore veins mainly develop along the rock fracture zone resulting from the NW–NNW fault. The predominant form of molybdenum mineralization is characterized by molybdenite quartz veins (Figure 7). The ore veins are arranged in a north–south distribution, encompassing No. 2, No. 4, No. 6, No. 17, No. 13, No. 14, No. 20, No. 22, No. 15, No. 12, and No. 11.
The ore can be classified into many varieties based on its mineral composition, including massive pyrite–molybdenite quartz ore (Figure 8a,b), banded pyrite–molybdenite–quartz ore, porphyritic pyrite–molybdenite–quartz ore, and veinlet-disseminated pyrite–molybdenite–quartz ore. The predominant metal minerals found in the ore are mostly pyrite, magnetite, and molybdenite (Figure 8c–f), constituting approximately 30–40% of the total composition. Chalcopyrite, galena, and sphalerite are also present, but their quantities vary. The gangue mineral primarily consists of quartz, with trace amounts of sericite, chlorite, and other minerals.
Molybdenite is present in the cracks of quartz veins in the form of layered and compact vein-like clusters. Typically, the width of molybdenite veins ranges from 2 to 5 mm, with a maximum width of 10 mm. The majority of molybdenite does not have direct interaction with other metallic minerals. Occasionally, pyrite and scaly molybdenite are observed, and they often fill the quartz vein toward the uppermost part, particularly in its wider portion.

3.2.3. Stage of Mineralization

The hydrothermal mineralization of the Huashi molybdenum deposit is divided into three stages based on the field geological characteristics, the order of mineral crystallization, the relationship between different veins, and the hydrothermal alteration of wall rock. These stages are as follows:
(1)
Quartz–magnetite–molybdenite stage. The stage is characterized by the presence of quartz, magnetite, and molybdenite. The metallic minerals included in the sample exhibit a granular structure for magnetite, a leaf-like structure for molybdenite, and a granular structure for hematite. The gangue minerals consist primarily of quartz, together with a minor quantity of potassium feldspar.
(2)
The quartz–molybdenite stage is the main phase of metallogenesis. Molybdenite exhibits a medium-fine grain size and has a leaf-like and needle-like morphology. Molybdenite is found in the periphery of quartz veins as fine veins, and it diffuses inside the quartz veins.
(3)
Quartz–molybdenite–pyrite stage. Molybdenite is found in quartz veins as thin veins. Pyrite with anhedral to subhedral crystal shapes is scattered among quartz veins. Metasomatism occurs between the ore vein and the surrounding rock, but the boundary between them is indistinct. A significant quantity of molybdenum precipitated during both the quartz–molybdenite stage and this stage.

3.2.4. Alteration of Wall Rock

Wall rock alteration is observed on both sides of the quartz vein or within the schistosity zone, with a width ranging from 0.2 to 1.0 m. The main alteration types observed are silicification, sericitization, and pyritization, with secondary alteration processes including chloritization and kaolinization. Silicification is an important aspect of the mineralization process. This is mostly observed as the formation of quartz veins and quartz veinlets along fractures and fissures, as well as the presence of large quantities of quartz. Sericite is often found in compact formations of small scales, especially inside feldspar illusions. The hydrothermal fluid, which contains sulfur, interacts with the nearby rock, resulting in the formation of pyrite. This process is closely associated with the occurrence of silicification and sericitization. Chlorite is commonly encountered in rock fractures or scattered throughout. The primary clay minerals formed during low-temperature hydrothermal metasomatic alteration at the Earth’s surface are predominantly kaolinite minerals, including kaolinite itself.

4. Sampling and Analytical Methods

4.1. Sampling

4.1.1. Xichanggou Samples

The samples utilized for zircon U-Pb dating at the Xichanggou molybdenum deposit were chosen from two specific locations. The first sample, labeled XCG-01, was taken from the light-red quartz monzonite porphyry at ZKA002, which is situated at an elevation of +402 m. The second sample, labeled XCG-02, was obtained from the dark-red quartz syenite porphyry at the adit, with coordinates X-4469298 and Y-39546703.
The molybdenite samples for Re-Os dating are mainly from the molybdenite quartz veins found during metallogenic stage II. Molybdenite has veinlets and scattered structure with a high grade. The molybdenite samples were assigned the following numbers: XCG-07, XCG-10, XCG-11, XCG-13, and XCG-14. The molybdenite samples utilized for analyzing sulfur and lead isotopes were assigned the following numbers: XCG-03, XCG-04, XCG-05, and XCG-06.

4.1.2. Huashi Samples

The molybdenite ore samples for Re-Os dating in the Huashi deposit were collected from molybdenite quartz veins that formed in the main metallogenic phase. The molybdenite samples were assigned the following numbers: HS-01, HS-3, HS-5, HS-6, and HS-7. Simultaneously, these samples were used for conducting tests to determine the isotopes of hydrogen, oxygen, sulfur, and lead. Furthermore, the HS-2 sample was intended for isotope testing.

4.2. Analytical Methods

4.2.1. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U–Pb Dating Method

Zircon isotopic age analysis was performed by the LA-ICP-MS laboratory of the Institute of Science, China University of Geosciences (Beijing). The instruments included a Neptune multi-collector inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer and a 193 nm LA-MC-ICP-MS online laser sampling system. Zircon was denuded by a 193 nm FX laser with a spot beam of 35 μm. The laser ablation material was sent to Neptune with He as the carrier gas to expand the dispersion by dynamic zoom, so that the U-Pb isotopes with large mass differences could be received at the same time and we could determine the U-Pb isotope. The 91,500 standard zircon, NIST610 and NIST612 glass were used as external standards for sample determination. Among them, 91,500 was used as an external standard to correct the mass discrimination and isotope fractionation effect during zircon U-Pb dating, and NIST610 and NIST612 were used as external standards to calculate the contents of U, Th and Pb in zircon. The age results were calculated using the Glitter 4.0 software package. The calculation of weighted average ages and the plotting of the Concordia diagram were completed with Isoplot/Ex_ver3 [29], and the common lead adjustment was conducted using Andersen software [30].

4.2.2. Molybdenite Re-Os Dating

The Re-Os isotope composition of molybdnite separates was determined in the Key Re-Os Laboratory of China, the Academy of Geological Sciences. A more detailed procedure for sample preparation is available in Li et al. [31], Li et al. [32] and Li et al. [33]. Rhenium and Os concentrations and isotopic compositions were measured by a Thermo Fisher Scientific Triton Plus mass spectrometer operating in negative ion-detection mode [34]. The instrumental mass fractionation of Os was corrected by normalizing the measured 192Os/188Os ratio to 3.08271. Based on blank runs analyzed together with samples, the total procedural blanks were about 3 pg for Re and 0.5 pg for Os. In-house sulfide Re-Os isotope references, JCBY, from the Jinchuan Cu-Ni deposit, were used for the quality control of the whole procedure.

4.2.3. Oxygen and Hydrogen Isotopes

Oxygen was liberated from quartz by reaction with BrF5 [35] and converted to CO2 on a platinum-coated carbon rod. The δ18O analyses were conducted on a Finnigan Mat 253 mass spectrometer at the Analytical Laboratory of the Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology.
For hydrogen isotope analysis, water was taken from quartz inclusions using the detonation method. The test procedure was as follows: the quartz inclusion sample was heated to burst, and the volatiles were released to extract water vapor. Then, the water reacted with zinc at 400 ℃ to produce hydrogen [36]. After freezing in liquid nitrogen, it was collected into a sample bottle with activated carbon. The δD analyses were conducted on a Delta v advantage gas isotope mass spectrometer at the Analytical Laboratory of the Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology.

4.2.4. Sulfur and Lead Isotopes

The sulfur isotope and lead isotope of sulfide in the ore were determined in the Analytical Laboratory of the Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology. The instrument used for sulfur isotope analysis was the DeltaV Plus isotope mass spectrometer, with an analytical precision of ±0.2‰. For lead isotope data, the ISOPROBE-T thermal ionization mass spectrometer was utilized. The detection method and basis follow the “Method for Determination of Lead, Strontium, and Neodymium Isotopes in Rocks,” and the error in the lead isotope ratio was less than 0.05‰.

5. Analytical Results

5.1. Xichanggou Zircon U–Pb Ages

The zircons found in the light-red quartz monzonite porphyry (sample XCG-01) exhibit a morphology characterized by short-columnar to long-columnar shapes, measuring between 50 and 150 μm in length. The length/width ratio of these zircons ranges from 1:1 to 1:4. The majority of zircons have transparent interiors, high levels of transparency, and distinct rhythmic cathodoluminescence (CL) zoning (Figure 9a).
The LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating results of the zircons from XCG-01 are presented in Table 1, with measurements taken from 20 sites on 20 grains. The concentrations of U and Th range from 95 to 1844 ppm and 55 to 1093 ppm, respectively. The Th/U ratios range from 0.6 to 1.2. All twenty investigations show consistent results for the ratios of 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U, with no significant differences within the margin of error. The dates yielded from these analyses are tightly clustered between 162 and 165 Ma, and all data points align closely with the isochronous line. The studies produced a consistent age of 163.3 ± 0.3 Ma (MSWD = 0.007) (Figure 10a), which closely matches the weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 163.3 ± 0.9 Ma (MSWD = 0.2, n = 20) (Figure 10b).
The zircons found in the deep-red quartz monzonite porphyry (sample XCG-02) have a morphology characterized by short- to long-columnar shapes, measuring between 50 and 200 μm in length. The length/width ratio of these zircons ranges from 1:1 to 1:3. The majority of zircons have transparent interiors, high levels of transparency, and distinct rhythmic cathodoluminescence (CL) zoning, as shown in Figure 9b. The zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating results obtained from XCG-02 are presented in Table 1, with measurements taken at 20 spots on 20 individual grains. The concentrations of U and Th range from 315 to 8959 ppm and 169 to 7123 ppm, respectively. The Th/U ratios range from 0.5 to 1.1. Seventeen locations show agreement in terms of the ratios of 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U, taking into account measurement uncertainties. The dates of these locations are mostly concentrated between 161 and 165 Ma, and all of them align closely with or are on the isochronous line. The analyses resulted in a consistent age of 162.8 ± 0.4 Ma (MSWD = 0.0009) (Figure 10c), which closely matches the weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 162.7 ± 1.0 Ma (MSWD = 0.3, n = 17) (Figure 10d).

5.2. Molybdenite Re-Os Ages

5.2.1. Xichanggou Molybdenite Re-Os Age

Table 2 presents the findings of five molybdenite samples from stage II, while Figure 11 provides a visual representation of these studies. The samples have varying concentrations of Re, ranging from 5416 to 50,114 ppm. They also have a narrow range of model ages, spanning from 158.4 ± 2.3 to 163.1 ± 2.6 Ma. The 187Re-187Os isochron age is well-constrained at 160.3 ± 4.6 Ma (MSWD = 4.3) (Figure 11a), and the weighted mean Re-Os age is 160.8 ± 2.4 Ma (MSWD = 1.9) (Figure 11b). The absence of a zero-intercept indicates the absence of any measurable common 187Os, implying that all 187Os in the molybdenite are of radiogenic origin. This means that the model ages can be considered credible. Moreover, the concurrence between the isochron age and the weighted average age, taking into account the margin of error, demonstrates the precision of molybdenite Re-Os dating. Hence, the isochron age (160.3 ± 4.6 Ma) employed is the precise time when molybdenite crystallized in the Xichanggou molybdenum deposit.

5.2.2. Huashi Molybdenite Re-Os Age

Based on the comprehensive analysis presented in Table 2 and visually depicted in Figure 11, we have gained valuable insights into the molybdenite samples from stage II of the Huashi molybdenum deposit. These samples exhibit a wide range of Re concentrations, spanning from 35 to 58 ppm. Simultaneously, the model ages of the samples are relatively narrowly clustered, ranging from 168.0 ± 3.1 to 173.1 ± 2.5 Ma. The precision of the dating method is evident in the well-constrained 187Re-187Os isochron age of 171.4 ± 19 Ma (MSWD = 4.1) (Figure 12a). Additionally, the weighted mean Re-Os age of 170.6 ± 2.6 Ma (MSWD = 2.0) (Figure 12b) further supports the accuracy of our dating results. The absence of a zero-intercept in the isochron plot indicates that all 187Os present in the molybdenite samples are of radiogenic origin, derived from the radioactive decay of 187Re. This finding strengthens the credibility of the model ages. The close agreement between the isochron age and the weighted average age, within the margin of error, underscores the precision of the molybdenite Re-Os dating technique. Consequently, we adopt the isochron age of 171.4 ± 19 Ma as the precise time when molybdenite crystallized in the Huashi molybdenum deposit.

5.3. Stable Isotope Data

5.3.1. Oxygen and Hydrogen Isotopes

The oxygen and hydrogen isotope findings of the Huashi deposit are documented in Table 3 and shown in Figure 13 and Figure 14. The δDV-SMOW values of Huashi range from −80.0‰ to −67.6‰, with an average of −73.9‰. The δ18O values range from 9.2‰ to 10.5‰, with an average of 9.7‰. The computed δ18OH2O value ranges from −1.86‰ to 2.33‰, with an average of 0.03‰. In addition, we obtained the hydrogen and oxygen isotope data for Taipingcun (data that have not been published) and the Taiyanggou molybdenum deposits. These data can be found in Table 3.
Figure 13. δ18OH2O-δD diagram of Huashi, Taipingcun, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei (the base map from reference [37]).
Figure 13. δ18OH2O-δD diagram of Huashi, Taipingcun, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei (the base map from reference [37]).
Minerals 14 00662 g013
Table 3. Hydrogen and oxygen isotope composition of Huashi, Taipingcun, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei.
Table 3. Hydrogen and oxygen isotope composition of Huashi, Taipingcun, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei.
DepositSamplesTestδDV-SMOWδ18OV-SMOWδ18OH2OHomogenization Data Sources
Minerals(‰)(‰)(‰)Temperature (°C)
HuashiHS-01quartz−809.7−1.86202This study
HS-03quartz−75.410.52.33267
HS-05quartz−67.69.50.81256
HS-06quartz−74.69.4−0.65228
HS-07quartz−71.99.2−0.46236
TaipingcunTPC-2quartz−58.510.11.73263Unpublished data
TPC-4quartz−59.210.42.5274
TPC-6quartz−68.1100.34236
TaiyanggouNSD-8quartz−85.810.11.92267[18]
NSD-9quartz−82.310.5−1.77191
Note: δ18OH2O(‰) value is calculated using the 1000lnαquartz-H2O = 3.38 × 106T2 − 3.40 fractionation formula [38], where T is the corresponding average homogenization temperature of fluid inclusion. The temperature of fluid inclusions in Huashi deposit is unpublished data.

5.3.2. Sulfur Isotopes

Table 4 and Figure 15 display the sulfur isotope data. The δ34S readings of four pyrite samples from the Xichanggou deposit range from 6.5‰ to 7.1‰. The Huashi deposit exhibits a range of five δ34S values, ranging from 3.3‰ to 4.9‰. Among them, four samples of molybdenite have δ34S values ranging from 4.5‰ to 4.9‰, while one sample of pyrite has a δ34S value of 3.3‰.
In addition, we obtained the sulfur isotope data for the Taiyanggou molybdenum deposit, which may be found in Table 4 and Figure 14.

5.3.3. Lead Isotopes

The lead isotope data can be seen in Table 5. The data, along with the lead isotope data of sulfides measured by previous researchers, are incorporated into the lead isotope structure model diagram (Figure 16).
The lead isotope composition of the Xichanggou and Huashi molybdenum deposits remains stable and undergoes minimal variation, indicating the presence of typical lead features. The 206Pb/204Pb ratios of four pyrites from Xichanggou range from 16.8 to 18.0, with an average value of 17.4. The isotopic ratio of 207Pb/204Pb varied between 15.3 and 15.6, with an average value of 15.4. The range of 208Pb/204Pb ratios is between 36.9 and 38.2, with an average value of 37.6. Within the Huashi deposit, the 206Pb/204Pb ratios of a single pyrite specimen range from 16.8 to 18.6, with an average value of 17.6. The isotopic ratio of 207Pb/204Pb varied between 15.2 and 15.5, with an average value of 15.4. The ratios of 208Pb/204Pb vary between 36.3 and 37.5, with an average value of 37.0.

6. Discussion

6.1. Timing of Granites and Mineralization

Granite intrusions and associated occurrences of copper, molybdenum, gold, and rare polymetallic minerals took place in the central part of the Malanyu anticlinorium in eastern Hebei, China, between 153 and 180 Ma. The magmatic activities exhibit complexity, typified by the occurrence of many periods and cycles of replacement and overlap, resulting in the formation of composite granite (Table 6). Nevertheless, the magnitude of these intrusions varies significantly, and the smaller intrusions frequently exhibit superior ore-bearing characteristics.
During the middle Jurassic period, there was a significant increase in magmatic intrusion activity, resulting in the formation of notable intrusions like Wangpingshi, Madi, Qianshuiling, Maoshan, and others. Simultaneously, other significant metal deposits were created, including the Taipingcun molybdenum deposit, Huashi molybdenum deposit, Taiyanggou molybdenum deposit, Nanshuang copper-molybdenum deposit, Maoshan gold deposit, Yuerya gold deposit, Tangzhangzi gold deposit, and Xiayingfang gold deposit.
The Yanshanian granitic intrusions in the eastern Hebei Province have been previously dated using zircon U-Pb dating. The reported ages range from 199.1 to 153.8 Ma (Table 6). The newly obtained in situ zircon U-Pb ages of the Xichanggou quartz monzonite porphyry are determined to be 163.3 ± 0.3 Ma and 162.8 ± 0.4 Ma. The Madi intrusion, which is associated with the Huashi molybdenum, consists of a central granite that formed approximately 175.5 Ma and a periphery granite that formed between 156 and 165 Ma [19]. The dates suggest that the Xichanggou and Huashi plutons were formed through extensive magmatic intrusion during the middle to late Jurassic period.
Recently, numerous molybdenum and gold deposits have been discovered by geologists in the eastern Hebei region. The molybdenum deposits in this area consist mainly of the Taipingcun large-sized deposit [9], the Taiyanggou deposit [18], the Sibozi medium-sized deposit [10], and the Shouwangfen medium-sized deposit [11], which contain both copper and molybdenum. The gold (molybdenum) deposits include the Yuerya large-sized gold deposit [6], the Tangzhangzi small-sized gold (molybdenum) deposit [12,13], and the Xiayingfang medium-sized gold deposit [14]. Furthermore, a significant amount of study data on high-precision magmatic and metallogenic chronology have been documented in these deposits. The Sibozi molybdenum (copper) deposit was formed in two stages, as determined by molybdenite Re-Os dating. The first stage occurred at 194 Ma, while the second stage occurred at 121 Ma [10]. The intrusions associated with the deposit have ages ranging from 189.8 Ma (Wubozi granite porphyry) to 196.4 Ma (Laoshangjia granite porphyry) [10]. The ages derived from molybdenite and metallogenetic granite in the Yu’erya gold deposit were determined to be 171.9 Ma and 174–175 Ma, respectively [6]. The Tangzhangzi gold (molybdenum) deposit has a molybdenite Re-Os age of 170 Ma and a zircon U-Pb age of 173 Ma, as determined from the ore-forming granite porphyry [12,13]. The molybdenite Re-Os age of the Xiayingfang gold deposit is determined to be 164.2 Ma, while the zircon U-Pb age of the granite porphyry that formed the ore is 163.3 Ma [14]. The age of the Xintaigou molybdenum deposit, as determined by the molybdenite Re-Os dating method, is 155.8 Ma. The age of the intrusion that formed the ore, as determined by the zircon U-Pb dating method, ranges from 154.8 to 156.5 Ma. Seven molybdenite samples, taken from the Taipingcun molybdenum deposit during mineralization stage II, have been analyzed and shown to have an Re-Os isochron age of 164.4 ± 2.5 Ma. This age is in agreement with the age of the monzonitic granite that formed the ore, considering the margin of error [9]. The current work utilized Re-Os dating of molybdenite to determine that the Xichanggou molybdenum deposit was created at a precise age of 160.3 ± 4.6 Ma. This age coincides, within the margin of error, with the LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb date (162.8–163.3 Ma) obtained for the quartz monzonite porphyry. The age of Huashi molybdenum mineralization (171.4 ± 19 Ma) is consistent with the early-stage monzonitic granite of the Madi pluton (175.5 Ma) [19]. Therefore, the previously described abundant polymetallic deposits indicate a substantial and multi-stage occurrence of magmatic mineralization on a vast scale during the Jurassic-Cretaceous period in eastern Hebei. Moreover, it is probable that the Xichanggou and Huashi molybdenum mineralization occurred over two separate time periods, around 160 Ma and 170 Ma, respectively.

6.2. Source of Metal and Fluid

6.2.1. Source of Fluid

Hydrogen and oxygen isotopes play a crucial role in tracing the evolutionary history of the fluids responsible for producing ore deposits. A plot of δD versus δ18OH2O (Figure 13) shows that ore-forming fluids of the Huashi molybdenum deposit fall between the primary magmatic water or metamorphic water and the meteoric water line. Specifically, they are positioned near the primary magmatic water and are distant from the metamorphic water. The ore-forming fluid of the Huashi molybdenum deposit is likely a combination of hydrothermal solution derived from primary magmatic water and atmospheric precipitation, depending on the geological context of the ore body.
In the distribution map of H and O isotope composition (Figure 14), the δD value and δ18O value both fall within the range of granite and are similar to the corresponding value of the mantle. This suggests that the ore-forming fluid of the Huashi molybdenum deposit originates from intermediate-acid intrusive rocks associated with mineralization. These rocks may have been formed through the remelting of ancient lower crust materials and subsequently contaminated by mantle materials.
We compiled the hydrogen and oxygen isotope data from the Taipingcun and Taiyanggou molybdenum deposits in the area (Table 3). The results indicate that the two deposits exhibit comparable ore-forming fluids, specifically Huashi (Figure 13 and Figure 14). Thus, we deduce that the fluid responsible for the formation of molybdenum deposits in the area is likely a combination of hydrothermal solutions, including both water derived from magma and water from meteoric sources, exhibiting features originating from deep underground. The ore-forming fluid may originate from intermediate-acid intrusive rocks associated with mineralization, resulting from the remelting of ancient lower crust materials and the incorporation of mantle components. This is in strong agreement with the source region identified by the S and Pb isotopes that will be described later.

6.2.2. Source of Metal

The sulfur isotope composition of metal minerals in the Xichanggou and Huashi molybdenum deposits is particularly concentrated, with both deposits showing a positive and narrow range of variation (Figure 15). The substantial degree of homogenization of sulfur isotopes in the ore minerals of both deposits indicates a single source of sulfur isotopes. Furthermore, the sulfur isotope composition of the Taiyanggou molybdenum deposit we collected exhibits identical traits. The sulfur isotope composition diagram indicates that the δ34S sulfide values of the three deposits are elevated compared to the sulfur generated from the mantle-derived magmatic sulfur (0‰) [40] and are within the range of δ34S values found in granite (5‰ to 15‰) [41]. The uniform sulfur isotope composition observed here indicates that the sulfur isotopes primarily originate from intermediate-acid intrusive rocks associated with mineralization, suggesting a magmatic sulfur source.
The lead isotopic composition is effective for identifying the origin of minerals that form ore deposits. The presence of trace amounts of U and Th in metal sulfides allows for the determination of the source of ore-forming materials based on their lead isotope composition, mutual relationship, and source characteristic features [42,43,44]. In the graphs depicting the ratios of 207Pb/204Pb-206Pb/204Pb and 208Pb/204Pb-206Pb/204Pb (Figure 16), the majority of samples from the Huashi molybdenum deposit are situated close to the lead evolution line of the mantle and lower crust. Only two samples are found within the upper crust. The Xichanggou and Taiyanggou molybdenum deposits are located close to the lead evolution line of the mantle and lower crust. This suggests that the metal minerals in these deposits mostly originate from a combination of crust and mantle materials. This finding is consistent with the result suggested by the sulfur isotope.
The Re-Os isotope system is extensively used in isotope geochronology research. It serves as a valuable tool for identifying the origin of ore-forming materials in metal deposits and as a highly sensitive indicator of the extent of mixing of crustal materials during mineralization [45,46,47]. In their study, Mao et al. [46] conducted a thorough analysis and comparison of the amount of rhenium present in different types of molybdenite deposits in China. It was discovered that the amount of rhenium in the ores fell significantly as it moved from the mantle source to combinations of crust and mantle, and finally to crustal sources. The data showed a range of rhenium concentrations from hundreds of μg/g to dozens of μg/g to a few μg/g. This tool has gained recognition and is widely used by numerous geologists as a source indicator [48,49,50,51,52,53]. The molybdenite samples from the Huashi, Xichanggou, Taipingcun, and Taiyanggou deposits have Re concentrations ranging from 0.02 to 50 ppb (Table 2). This suggests that the ore-forming elements primarily originated from a mixture of mantle and crust–mantle sources.

6.3. Mineralization Process and Ore Genesis

The majority of molybdenum deposits worldwide are of magmatic–hydrothermal genesis, which is closely linked to the genesis of granite [54]. Currently, the intermediate-acid, hypabyssal-ultra, hypabyssal intrusive rocks (porphyry) that are associated with veinlets and distributed magmatic hydrothermal deposits are believed to be porphyry deposits [55,56]. The Taipingcun and Taiyanggou molybdenum deposits have been confirmed to be porphyry deposits [9,18]. The Xichanggou and Huashi molybdenum deposits have similar geological properties and metallogenic conditions. Additionally, their metallogenic dates are consistent with the ages of the corresponding intermediate-acid intrusions. Therefore, our study determines that the molybdenum deposits in Xichanggou and Huashi classify as porphyry deposits.
Mao et al. [57] identified three distinct periods of significant mineralization in northern China: 200–160 Ma, 140 Ma, and 120 Ma. Based on the chronological data of diagenesis and mineralization in Xichanggou and Huashi collected in this study, the molybdenum mineralization in the Jurassic period of eastern Hebei may be classified into two distinct stages, occurring at approximately 160 Ma and 170 Ma, respectively.
The North China Craton has remained relatively stable since its cratonization around 1.85 Ga until the Triassic period [58,59,60]. However, it has experienced significant damage and thinning of the lithosphere since the Mesozoic era [59,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68]. According to Mao et al. [57], during the late Indosinian to the middle Jurassic period, northern China is still undergoing inland collision orogeny in relation to regional tectonics. The principal cause of inland orogeny is the subduction of the Mongolia-Okhotsk Ocean, which closed about 160 Ma, both to the north and south [57,66]. According to Chen et al. [8], the Yanshan area underwent tectonic stress compression in the SN and NW–SE directions during the Indosinian and Yanshanian movements, resulting in orogeny. Zhai et al. [67] identified two distinct phases of compressional structures along the northern boundary of North China. These phases occurred during two time intervals: 180~170 to 160~150 Ma and 230~210 Ma.
Based on the previous discussion, we can summarize the metallogenic model for molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei as follows: during the Jurassic period, the Paleo-Pacific plate subducted beneath another tectonic plate, causing the northern edge of the North China Craton to transition from compressed to stretched. During the peak intensity of the north–south compressional orogeny, the lithosphere thickened, resulting in the formation of extensive nappes and folds. During this event, there was an upwelling of material from the asthenosphere and a significant interaction between the crust and mantle. This process resulted in the partial melting of material from the lower crust and the creation of magma with a granitic composition. These initial molten rocks contained an abundance of metallic elements necessary for mineral formation. Later, as magma entered the shallow crust, it consistently produced fluids containing high amounts of molybdenum and other elements, leading to the formation of ore. The intrusions can be categorized into several phases, and the associated hydrothermal deposition of metals like molybdenum may also occur in multiple phases, specifically around 170 Ma and 160 Ma. The rapid infiltration of hydrothermal fluids, which are responsible for ore formation, occurred along the intersection of faults trending in the NNE and EW directions. This process altered the physical and chemical conditions of these fluids due to mixing with atmospheric precipitation or the reaction between ore-forming fluids and wall rocks. Specifically, the mixing and reaction lead to the cooling of the fluids and the reduction of SO2 to H2S. This reduction is crucial in converting the mobile Mo(OH)6, which exists in an oxidized and fractionated magmatic system, into molybdenite (MoS2) (Figure 17a). This progress also results in the deposit of other metals in the form of sulfides. Molybdenum ores, primarily consisting of quartz vein type, are found in the advantageous locations of Xichanggou, Huashi, Taipingcun, and Taiyanggou mining areas (Figure 17b).

7. Conclusions

(1)
The quartz monzonite porphyry in the Xichanggou molybdenum deposit has zircon U-Pb ages of 163.3 ± 0.3 Ma and 162.8 ± 0.4 Ma. These ages indicate that the porphyry formed during the late Jurassic period as a result of magmatic activity. The molybdenite has an Re-Os isotopic age of 160.3 ± 4.6 Ma, which is consistent with the intrusion age. The molybdenite in Huashi has an Re-Os isotopic age of 171.4 ± 19 Ma, which is very close to the age of the ore-forming associated intrusion. Thus, it is hypothesized that the molybdenum mineralization in eastern Hebei occurred in multiple stages.
(2)
The H-O isotope composition indicates that the ore-forming fluids of the Xichanggou and Huashi molybdenum deposits are mostly composed of water from magma, with some contribution from atmospheric precipitation. The S-Pb and Re-Os isotope compositions suggest that the melting of lower crust rocks contaminated by the mantle is the main source of ore formation materials. According to the regional statistics, the molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei exhibit identical features.
(3)
The Xichanggou and Huashi molybdenum deposits are classified as porphyry molybdenum deposits. The subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate during the middle–late Jurassic period led to a process where the crust and mantle interacted. This contact resulted in the partial melting of the lower crust, which produced a significant quantity of metal elements, specifically molybdenum (Mo). Eventually, these molten materials rose to the surface, solidified, and formed deposits of molybdenum.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, Y.C.; field investigation, G.M. and X.D.; methodology, J.S.; data curation, J.S. and Y.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S.; writing—review and editing, Y.C.; supervision, X.L., Y.C. and G.M.; funding acquisition, Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Study on Metallogenic regularity and Regional Prospecting Direction of Molybdenum-Gold-Rare polymetallic Deposit in Taipingcun Ore concentration Area, Xinglong County, Hebei Province, China in 2017 (No. 454-0601-YBN-G9A6), the Natural Science Foundation Project of Hebei Province, China (No. D2024403084), the Open Project Program of Hebei Province Collaborative Innovation Center for Strategic Critical Mineral Research, Hebei GEO University, China (No. HGUXT-2023-15), Pre-research Project of Hebei GEO University, China (No. KY2024QN24), and Youth Project of Hebei GEO University, China(No. QN202217).

Data Availability Statement

All the data are presented in the paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped to significantly improve the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ouyang, H. The ore-controlling factors of porphyry-skarn molybdenum deposit. Bull. Mineral. Petrol. Geochem. 2023, 42, 095. [Google Scholar]
  2. Berzina, N.; Sotnikov, V.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M.; Eliopoulos, D. Distribution of rhenium in molybdenite from porphyry Cu-Mo and Mo-Cu deposits of Russia (Siberia) and Mongolia. Ore Geol. Rev. 2005, 26, 91–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Carten, R.; White, W.; Stein, H. High-grade granite-related molybdenum systems: Classification and origin. Geol. Assoc. Can.-Spec. Pap. 1993, 40, 521–554. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chappell, B.; White, A. Two contrasting granite types. Pacif. Geol. 1974, 8, 173–174. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chappell, B.; White, A. I-and S-type granites in the Lachlan Fold Belt. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 1992, 83, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, S.; Ye, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lu, D.; Hu, H. Re-Os age of molybdenite from the Yuerya Au deposit in eastern Hebei Province and its geological significance. Geol. China 2014, 41, 1565–1576, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Y.; Li, N.; Deng, X.; Yang, Y.; Pirajno, F. Metallogenic Regularity of Molybdenum Deposits in the Qinling Orogenic Belt; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Y.; Wang, G.; Zhang, C.; Qin, Y.; Sheng, L.; Liu, Y. Tectonic acticity of the Lengkou Fault in eastern Hebei since the Mesozoic and its geological significance. J. Geomech. 2005, 11, 341–349, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  9. Sun, J. Geological and Geochemical Characteristics and Genesis of the Molybdenum Deposit in Taiping Village, Xinglong County, Hebei Province. Doctoral Dissertation, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2017. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, Q.; Meng, X.; Yang, F.; Wu, F.; Wang, L.; Hu, H.; Liu, F.; Zhang, Z. Re-Os ages of molybdenite from the Sibozi-Liubozi molybdenum-copper deposit in Qinglong County of Hebei Province and Its Implications for Metallogeny. China Geol. 2012, 39, 1622–1634, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, R.; Liu, J.; Ye, J.; Chen, F. Chalcopyrite Rb-Sr isochron age dating and its ore for ming significance in Shouwangfen copper deposit, Hebei Province. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2008, 24, 1353–1358, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo, S.; Tang, Z.; Luo, Z.; Zhao, W. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb dating and geological significance from granite bodies in Tangzhangzi and Niuxinshan, eastern Hebei Province, China. Geol. Bull. China 2009, 28, 1458–1464, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, Z.; Ye, H.; He, W.; Cao, J.; Zhang, W.; Lu, D.; Li, C. Characteristics and molybdenite Re-Os isotopicdating of Tangzhangzi gold(molybdenum)deposit in eastern HebeiProvince. Min. Depos. 2014, 33, 1366–1378, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  14. Zou, T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, L.; Xie, H.; Shi, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, G. Geochronology of the Xiayingfang Au deposit in eastern Hebei Province. Geol. Explor. 2016, 521, 84–97, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, J.; Li, B.; Zhou, D.; Yao, S.; Li, Z. Geological Characteristics of Intermediate-Acidic Plutons in Hebei Province and Their Relationship with Mineralization; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1994; pp. 1–213. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shao, K.; Wang, B.; Li, H. Geological Characteristics of the ‘Metallogenic’ Intrusive in the ‘North China Platform’ Porphyry Molybdenum Deposit. Geol. J. Hebei Univ. 1985, 1, 1–18, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  17. Mei, Y. The Metallogenic Characteristics and Metallogenic Evolution of Jidong Gold Deposit. Doctoral Dissertation, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, China, 1997. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  18. Xu, G.; Li, Y.; Sun, J.; He, Y.; Zhao, D.; Liu, X.; Wang, D. Genesis of the Taiyanggou molybdenum deposit in the eastern Hebei Province: Evidence from chronology, geochemistry and S, Pb isotopic compositions. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2020, 94, 3343–3360, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  19. Miao, Q. Characteristics and Mineralization of Madi Alkali Feldspar Granite in Eastern Hebei. Doctoral Dissertation, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2018. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang, F.; Niu, B.; Ren, J.; Li, S. Zircon U-Pb ages and geochemical characteristics of the Mesozoic intrusive bodies along the core of the Malanyu Anticline and their tectonic significances. J. Earth 2015, 36, 455–465, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  21. Luo, Z.; Guan, K.; Qiu, Y.; Miao, L.; Qiu, Y.; McNaughton, N.; Groves, D. Zircon Shrimp U-Pb dating of Albite Dyke in Jinchangyu gold mine, Jidong Area, Hebei, China. Contrib. Geol. Miner. Resour. Res. 2001, 16, 226–231, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang, C.; Wu, G.; Xu, D.; Wang, G.; Sun, W. Mesozoic tectonic framework and evolution in the central segment of the intraplate Yanshan orogenic belt. Geol. Bull. China, 2004; 23, 864–875, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu, J.; Shi, H.; Zhao, Y.; Hao, L.; Wei, Q.; Zhao, X. LA-MC-ICP-MS Zircon U-Pb dating of the Luowenyu Granite intrusions and its geological significance in eastern Hebei Province. J. Jilin Univ. (Earth Sci. Ed.) 2012, 43, 179–188, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  24. Ye, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, F. Genesis and emplacement deformation of the late Triassic Dushan composite pluton in the Yanshan Fold-and-Thrust Belt: Constraints from the Early Mesozoic tectonic setting of the northern margin of North China. Geosci. Front. 2014, 21, 275–292. [Google Scholar]
  25. Deng, J.; Zhao, G.; Zhao, H.; Luo, Z.; Dai, S.; Li, K. Yanshanian igneous petrotectonic assemblage and orogenic-deep processes in East China. Geol. Rev. 2000, 46, 41–48, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  26. Gao, H. Early Mesozoic Stratigraphic Chronology Framework and Its Significance in Yanshan Fold Fault Belt, Northern Margin of North China; China University of Geosciences: Beijing, China, 2018; (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  27. Dai, J. The Metalloseneses and Geodynamic Settings of Molybdennm (Copper) Deposits in Yan-Liao Metallogenic Belt. Doctoral Dissertation, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, China, 2004. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, G.; Li, Z.; Qi, Y.; Sun, J.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, B. U-Pb zircon geochronology, geochemical characteristics and geological significance of the Qianfenshuiling Complex massif in the east Hebei Province. Acta Geol. Sin. 2018, 92, 1904–1917, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  29. Ludwig, K. Isoplot/Ex Version 3.00: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel; Berkeley Geochronology Center: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  30. Andersen, T. Correction of common Pb in U-Pb analyses that do not report 204Pb. Chem. Geol. 2002, 192, 59–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, C.; Qu, W.; Du, A. Comprehensive study on extraction of Rhenium with acetone in Re-Os isotopic dating. Rock Miner. Anal. 2009, 28, 233–238. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, X.; Li, W.; Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Yu, L.; Tang, G. Role of mantle-derived magma in genesis of early Yanshanian granites in the Nanling Range, South China: In situ zircon Hf-O isotopic constraints. Sci. China 2009, 52, 1262–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, C.; Qu, W.; Zhou, L.; Du, A. Rapid separation of osmium by direct distillation with carius tube. Rock Miner. Anal. 2010, 29, 14–16. [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, C.; Yang, X.; Zhao, H.; Zhou, L.; Du, A.; Li, X.; Qu, W. High Precise isotopic measurements of pg-ng Os by negative ion thermal ionization mass spectrometry. Rock Miner. Anal. 2015, 34, 392–398. [Google Scholar]
  35. Clayton, R.; Mayeda, T. The use of bromine pentafluoride in the extraction of oxygen from oxides and silicates for isotopic analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1963, 27, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Coleman, M.; Sheppard, T.; Durham, J.; Rouse, J.; Moore, G. Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis. Anal. Chem. 1982, 54, 993–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kesler, S.E.; Friedman, G.M.; Kristic, D. Mississippi Valley-type mineralization in the Silurian paleoaquifer, Central Appalachinans. Chem. Geol. 1997, 138, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Clayton, R.N.; Mayeda, T.K. Oxygen isotope exchange between quartz and water. Geophys. Res. 1972, 77, 3057–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zartman, R.E.; Doe, B.R. Plumbotectonics-the model. Tectonophysics 1981, 75, 135–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chaussidon, M.; Albarede, F.; Sheppard, S. Sulphur isotope variations in the mantle from ion microprobe analyses of micro-sulphide inclusions. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1989, 92, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ohmoto, H.; Goldhaber, M. Sulfur and carbon isotopes. In Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Ore Deposits, 3rd ed.; Barnes, H.L., Ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 517–611. [Google Scholar]
  42. Daring, J.; Storey, C.; Hawkesworth, C.; Lightfoot, P. In Situ Pb isotope analysis of Fe-Nicu sulphides by laser ablation muli-collector lCPMs:wNew ins ights into ore formation in the Sudbury impact melt sheetlyl. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 99, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, K.; Hu, R.; Bi, X.; Peng, J.; Tang, Q. Ore lead isotopes as a tracerfor ore-forming materialsources: A review. Geol.-Geochem. 2002, 30, 73–81, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang, Q.; Pan, J.; Shao, S. An interpretation of ore lead sources from lead isotopic compositions of some ore deposites in China. Geochimica 2000, 29, 231–238, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  45. Stein, H. Low-rhenium molybdenite by metamorphism in northern Sweden: Recognition, genesis, and global implications. Lithos 2006, 87, 300–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mao, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Re-Os isotopic dating of molybdenites in the Xiaoliugou W(Mo) deposit in the northern Qilian Mountains and its geological significance. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1999, 63, 1815–1818. [Google Scholar]
  47. Stein, H.; Markey, R.; Morgan, J.; Du, A.; Sun, Y. Highly precise and accurate Re- Os ages for molybdenum from the east Qinling Molybdenum belt, Shanxi Province, China. Econ. Geol. 1997, 98, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  48. Selby, D.; Creaser, R. Re–Os geochronology and systematics in molybdenite from the Endako porphyry molybdenum deposit, British Columbia, Canada. Econ. Geol. 2001, 96, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Selby, D.; Creaser, R. Late and Mid-Cretaceous mineralization in the Northern Canadian Cordillera: Constraints from Re–Os molybdenite dates. Econ. Geol. 2001, 96, 1461–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, H.; Ye, H.; Mao, J.; Wang, D.; Chen, Y.; Qu, W.; Du, A. Re–Os dating on molybdenites from Xiaoqinling and geological significance. Miner. Depos. 2007, 26, 417–424, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  51. Li, H.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Mao, J.; Hu, H.; Guo, B.; Bai, F. Geology, distribution, types and tectonic settings of Mesozoic molybdenum deposits in east Qinling area. Miner. Depos. 2005, 24, 292–304, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  52. Song, W.; Xu, C.; Qi, L.; Zhou, L.; Wang, L.; Kynicky, J. Genesis of Si-rich carbonatites in Huanglongpu Mo deposit, Lesser Qinling orogen, China and significance for Mo mineralization. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 64, 756–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Zeng, Z.; Li, W.; Peng, L.; Hu, H.; Cheng, J.; Lu, K. Age constraints on the genesis of the changkeng tungsten deposit, Nanling region, south China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 134, 104134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lowenstern, J.; Mahood, G.; Hervig, R.; Sparks, J. The occurrence and distribution of Mo and molybdenite in unaltered peralkaline rhyolites from Pantelleria, Italy. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1993, 114, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Westra, G.; Keith, S. Classification and genesis of stockwork molybdenum deposits. Econ. Geol. 1993, 114, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Woodcock, J.; Hollister, V. Porphyry molybdenite deposits of the North American cordillera. Miner. Sci. Eng. 1978, 10, 3–18. [Google Scholar]
  57. Mao, J.; Xie, G.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y. Mesozoic large-scale metallogenic pulses in North China and corresponding geodynamic settings. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2005, 21, 169–188, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  58. Yang, J.; Wu, F.; Liu, X.; Xie, L. Zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes and their geological significance of the Miyun rapakivi granites from Beijing, China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2005, 21, 1633–1644. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang, H.; Zou, D.; Santosh, M.; Zhu, B. Phanerozoic orogeny triggers reactivation and exhumation in the northern part of the Archean-Paleoproterozoic North China Craton. Lithos 2016, 261, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, X.; Cheng, H.; Dragovic, B.; Du, K.; Zhou, Y. Multi-mineral petrochronology on a high-pressure mafic granulite reveals short-lived high-temperature metamorphism in the North China Craton. J. Metamorph. Geol. 2022, 40, 1447–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, S.; Liu, S.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, J.; Song, B.; Liu, X. The 1.75-1.68 Ga anorthosite-mangerite-alkali granite suite from the northern North China Craton: Magmatism related to a Paleoproterozoic orogen. Precambrian Res. 2007, 155, 287–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Kroner, A.; Liu, X.; Xie, L.; Chen, F. Early Permian Plutons from the northern North China block: Constraints on continental arc evolution and convergent margin magmatism related to the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2009, 98, 1441–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Song, B.; Hu, J.; Liu, S.; Yang, Y.; Chen, F.; Liu, X.; Liu, J. Contrasting Late Carboniferous and Late Permian-Middle Triassic intrusive suites from the northern margin of the North China Craton geochronology, petrogenesis, and tectonic implications. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2009, 121, 181–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shao, J.; Tian, W.; Wei, C.; Zhu, W. Melilitite-derived mineral inclusions in chromite from the Gaositai Complex: Implications for an extensional tectonic setting in Early Permian at the north North China Craton. Earth Sci. 2016, 59, 583–589. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhang, J.; Wei, C.; Chu, H. Multiple metamorphic events recorded in the metamorphic terranes in central Inner Mongolia, northern China: Implication for the tectonic evolution of the Xing’an-Inner Mongolia Orogenic Belt. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2018, 167, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Xu, G.; Yang, Z.; Hu, J. The Jurassic major tectonic events of the Yanshanian intraplate deformation belt. Reg. Geol. China 2004, 23, 854–863, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhai, M.; Meng, Q.; Liu, J.; Hou, Q.; Hu, S.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Liu, W.; Shao, J.; Zhu, R. Geological features of Mesozoic tectonic regime inversion in Eastern North China and implication for geodynamics. Earth Sci. Front. 2004, 11, 285–297, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  68. Cai, Y.; Miao, Q. Geological Characteristics and Genesis of Huashi Molybdenum Deposit in Xinglong County, Hebei Province. Nonferrous Met. (Min. Sect.) 2020, 72, 93–98, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Geological tectonic sketch map of eastern Hebei (modified from [6]). Q—Quaternary; J5t—luchengzi Formation; Pt2–Pz—Mesoproterozoic-Paleozoicrock series; GPF—Gubeikou-Pingquan fracture: cover HYGF—Huangyaguan fracture; MXF—Miyun-Xifengkou fracture; 1—thrust fault; 2—anticlinal axis trace; 3—syncline axis trace; 4—Mesozoic intrusive bodies; 5—Archaeozoic Paleoproterozoic crystallization system; 6—mines area.
Figure 1. Geological tectonic sketch map of eastern Hebei (modified from [6]). Q—Quaternary; J5t—luchengzi Formation; Pt2–Pz—Mesoproterozoic-Paleozoicrock series; GPF—Gubeikou-Pingquan fracture: cover HYGF—Huangyaguan fracture; MXF—Miyun-Xifengkou fracture; 1—thrust fault; 2—anticlinal axis trace; 3—syncline axis trace; 4—Mesozoic intrusive bodies; 5—Archaeozoic Paleoproterozoic crystallization system; 6—mines area.
Minerals 14 00662 g001
Figure 2. Geological map of the Xichanggou ore field. 1—Quaternary; 2—stromatolite dolomite; 3—interbedded quartz sandstone and shale; 4—argillaceous dolomite; 5—quartz sandstone; 6—grey black shale; 7—granite porphyry; 8—medium fine-grained syenogranite; 9—coarse-grained syenogranite; 10—quartz porphyry; 11—diorite; 12—geological boundary; 13—structure; 14—borehole.
Figure 2. Geological map of the Xichanggou ore field. 1—Quaternary; 2—stromatolite dolomite; 3—interbedded quartz sandstone and shale; 4—argillaceous dolomite; 5—quartz sandstone; 6—grey black shale; 7—granite porphyry; 8—medium fine-grained syenogranite; 9—coarse-grained syenogranite; 10—quartz porphyry; 11—diorite; 12—geological boundary; 13—structure; 14—borehole.
Minerals 14 00662 g002
Figure 3. Petrographic properties of of Xichanggou granite porphyry. (a) Photograph of Granite porphyry from drill core; (b) Photomicrograph (cross polarized light) of phenocrysts of potassium feldspar, plagioclase, quartz, and biotite in a groundmass of the same assemblage. Kfs—potassium feldspar; Qtz—quartz; Bt—biotite.
Figure 3. Petrographic properties of of Xichanggou granite porphyry. (a) Photograph of Granite porphyry from drill core; (b) Photomicrograph (cross polarized light) of phenocrysts of potassium feldspar, plagioclase, quartz, and biotite in a groundmass of the same assemblage. Kfs—potassium feldspar; Qtz—quartz; Bt—biotite.
Minerals 14 00662 g003
Figure 4. Schematic map of line 1 profile of the Xichanggou molybdenum deposit.
Figure 4. Schematic map of line 1 profile of the Xichanggou molybdenum deposit.
Minerals 14 00662 g004
Figure 5. The Xichanggou molybdenum ores. (a) Photograph of molybdenite mineralization in mixed breccia of the Xichanggou deposit; (b) Photograph of molybdenite quartz veinlets in Xichanggou silicified cataclastic granitic porphyry; (cf) Photomicrographs in reflected light of sulfide minerals in the mineralizing assemblage. Mo—molybdenite; Py—Pyrite; Ccp—chalcopyrite; Po—pyrrhotite.
Figure 5. The Xichanggou molybdenum ores. (a) Photograph of molybdenite mineralization in mixed breccia of the Xichanggou deposit; (b) Photograph of molybdenite quartz veinlets in Xichanggou silicified cataclastic granitic porphyry; (cf) Photomicrographs in reflected light of sulfide minerals in the mineralizing assemblage. Mo—molybdenite; Py—Pyrite; Ccp—chalcopyrite; Po—pyrrhotite.
Minerals 14 00662 g005
Figure 6. Geological map of the Huashi ore field (modified from [19]). 1—Quaternary alluvial deposits; 2—Quaternary colluvial deposits; 3—Flesh-red alkali feldspar granite; 4—Gray–white alkali feldspar granite; 5—Iron manganese material enrichment range; 6—Containing Tianhe alkali feldspar granite; 7—Quartz sandstone in the first member of Changzhougou Formation; 8—Xiaoguanzhuang gneiss; 9—Qiuhuayu gneiss.
Figure 6. Geological map of the Huashi ore field (modified from [19]). 1—Quaternary alluvial deposits; 2—Quaternary colluvial deposits; 3—Flesh-red alkali feldspar granite; 4—Gray–white alkali feldspar granite; 5—Iron manganese material enrichment range; 6—Containing Tianhe alkali feldspar granite; 7—Quartz sandstone in the first member of Changzhougou Formation; 8—Xiaoguanzhuang gneiss; 9—Qiuhuayu gneiss.
Minerals 14 00662 g006
Figure 7. Schematic cross-sectional map of line 1 profile of the Huashi molybdenum deposit.
Figure 7. Schematic cross-sectional map of line 1 profile of the Huashi molybdenum deposit.
Minerals 14 00662 g007
Figure 8. The Xichanggou molybdenum ores. Photograph of (a,b) Molybdenite–quartz veins; Photomicrograph in reflected light (cf) Ore minerals forming the mineralized assemblage. Mo—molybdenite; Py—Pyrite; Ccp—chalcopyrite; Mag—magnetite; Hem—hematite.
Figure 8. The Xichanggou molybdenum ores. Photograph of (a,b) Molybdenite–quartz veins; Photomicrograph in reflected light (cf) Ore minerals forming the mineralized assemblage. Mo—molybdenite; Py—Pyrite; Ccp—chalcopyrite; Mag—magnetite; Hem—hematite.
Minerals 14 00662 g008
Figure 9. Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircon crystals from the Xichanggou granite porphyry:(a) CL images of zircon crystals from shallow red quartz monzonite porphyry; (b) CL images of zircon crystals from deep red quartz monzonite porphyry.
Figure 9. Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircon crystals from the Xichanggou granite porphyry:(a) CL images of zircon crystals from shallow red quartz monzonite porphyry; (b) CL images of zircon crystals from deep red quartz monzonite porphyry.
Minerals 14 00662 g009
Figure 10. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb Concordia diagrams (a,c) and weighted mean 206Pb/238U ages of zircon (b,d) in the Xichanggou granite porphyry.
Figure 10. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb Concordia diagrams (a,c) and weighted mean 206Pb/238U ages of zircon (b,d) in the Xichanggou granite porphyry.
Minerals 14 00662 g010
Figure 11. Molybdenite Re-Os isochron (a) and weighted average (b) ages of the Xichanggou molybdenum deposit.
Figure 11. Molybdenite Re-Os isochron (a) and weighted average (b) ages of the Xichanggou molybdenum deposit.
Minerals 14 00662 g011
Figure 12. Molybdenite Re-Os isochron (a) and weighted average (b) ages of the Huashi molybdenum deposit.
Figure 12. Molybdenite Re-Os isochron (a) and weighted average (b) ages of the Huashi molybdenum deposit.
Minerals 14 00662 g012
Figure 14. Distribution maps of H and O isotope composition (VSMOW) of Huashi, Taipingcun, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei.
Figure 14. Distribution maps of H and O isotope composition (VSMOW) of Huashi, Taipingcun, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei.
Minerals 14 00662 g014
Figure 15. S isotope composition (V-CDT) histogram of sulfides in Huashi, Taipingcun, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei.
Figure 15. S isotope composition (V-CDT) histogram of sulfides in Huashi, Taipingcun, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei.
Minerals 14 00662 g015
Figure 16. The 207Pb/204Pb-206Pb/204Pb (a) and 208Pb/204Pb-206Pb/204Pb (b) lead isotope growth curve diagrams of metal sulfides in Huashi, Xichanggou, and other molybdenum deposits (the base map from reference [39]).
Figure 16. The 207Pb/204Pb-206Pb/204Pb (a) and 208Pb/204Pb-206Pb/204Pb (b) lead isotope growth curve diagrams of metal sulfides in Huashi, Xichanggou, and other molybdenum deposits (the base map from reference [39]).
Minerals 14 00662 g016
Figure 17. Metallogenic model map of molybdenum and other metal deposits in the core of Malanyu composite anticline. (a) Metallogenic model map of molybdenum deposit; (b) Molybdenum deposits in the core of Malanyu composite anticline.
Figure 17. Metallogenic model map of molybdenum and other metal deposits in the core of Malanyu composite anticline. (a) Metallogenic model map of molybdenum deposit; (b) Molybdenum deposits in the core of Malanyu composite anticline.
Minerals 14 00662 g017
Table 1. LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb dating results of the Xichanggou granite porphyry.
Table 1. LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb dating results of the Xichanggou granite porphyry.
Analysis
Samples
ThUTh/U207Pb/206Pb207Pb/235U206Pb/238U207Pb/206Pb207Pb/235U206Pb/238U
(10−6)(10−6)
Sample XCG-01
XCG01-01157.98227.650.690.049160.003940.174460.013680.025740.00038155149163121642
XCG01-02502.13468.151.070.049270.002090.173940.006940.02560.000331616916361632
XCG01-03305.11314.650.970.049370.003140.174380.010730.025610.0003616511416391632
XCG01-04185.56233.730.790.049440.003710.174970.012780.025660.00039169136164111632
XCG01-0555.2794.880.580.049310.0090.174480.031610.025660.00055163309163271633
XCG01-06379.38508.070.750.049240.002450.173370.008190.025530.000331598516271632
XCG01-07143.25249.490.570.049220.003860.17580.013460.02590.00038158145164121652
XCG01-08175.95276.910.640.049370.003020.175260.01030.025740.0003716510716491642
XCG01-09285.46450.860.630.049310.00280.175540.009520.025810.000351639916481642
XCG01-1068.15106.20.640.049340.007450.175850.026270.025840.0005164272164231643
XCG01-11367.36647.190.570.04930.002080.175940.006870.025870.000331626716561652
XCG01-12834.06730.861.140.049190.001940.175820.00630.025910.000331576016451652
XCG01-131092.581843.660.590.04930.001760.172910.005510.025430.000311625216251622
XCG01-14367.72454.350.810.04930.002370.173870.007820.025570.000331628116371632
XCG01-15605.48971.810.620.049290.001880.174020.005950.025590.000321625616351632
XCG01-16279.31325.490.860.04930.002970.174430.010030.025650.0003516210616391632
XCG01-17210.56267.50.790.049360.003160.173560.010640.025490.0003616511316391622
XCG01-18587.3619.20.950.049310.002150.17350.006920.02550.000331636916261622
XCG01-19657.24533.191.230.049330.00240.174640.007880.025660.000331648116371632
XCG01-2087.71136.220.640.04920.005320.172240.018290.025370.00041157208161161623
Sample XCG-02
XCG02-01169.02314.880.540.049570.002840.174170.009940.025470.0003517510516391622
XCG02-021720.461598.321.080.049320.001240.17240.004380.025340.000311633716141612
XCG02-0320341956.751.040.04920.001150.173620.004110.025580.000311573316341632
XCG02-04801.291082.640.740.049310.001580.17520.005590.025760.000331635116451642
XCG02-05748.961002.510.750.049330.001440.17360.005080.025510.000321644516341622
XCG02-06354.05319.821.110.049430.003130.183050.011480.026850.0004168115171101713
XCG02-07724.251094.640.660.049340.001330.174150.004680.025590.000321644016341632
XCG02-08479.51791.560.610.049240.001580.171940.00550.025320.000311595216151612
XCG02-091501.081659.640.90.049350.001260.173890.004410.025550.000311643716341632
XCG02-101589.461671.610.950.049520.001280.174180.004470.02550.000311733716341622
XCG02-11857.381302.570.660.049320.001320.172870.00460.025420.000311634016241622
XCG02-12253.64496.170.510.049230.002240.168290.007570.024790.000331598015871582
XCG02-131378.561456.410.950.049350.001340.176640.004750.025960.000321644016541652
XCG02-14989.11409.390.70.049370.001280.174470.004480.025630.000311653816341632
XCG02-157123.268959.460.80.049340.001240.175530.004370.02580.000311643616441642
XCG02-161043.691148.050.910.049310.001410.173420.004880.025510.000311634316241622
XCG02-173039.032028.41.50.049710.001280.184560.004690.026930.000321813717241712
XCG02-182405.862142.121.120.04920.001230.173740.004270.025610.00031573616341632
XCG02-191565.011601.660.980.049390.001340.175750.004680.025810.000311664016441642
XCG02-201130.211309.720.860.04930.001370.173470.004740.025520.000311624116241622
Table 2. Results of Re-Os isotopic analyses of molybdenite from the Xichanggou, Huashi, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei.
Table 2. Results of Re-Os isotopic analyses of molybdenite from the Xichanggou, Huashi, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei.
Sample
No.
Weight
(g)
ω(Re)/×10−6ω(Os)/×10−6ω(187Re)/×10−6ω(187Os)/×10−6Model Age/MaData Resource
MeasuredMeasuredMeasuredMeasuredMeasured
the Xichanggou deposit This study
XCG-070.0504628,0174370.00020.005217,60927547.120.33160.43.2
XCG-100.035845416550.00050.01193404349.260.07163.12.6
XCG-110.0501150,11412400.00020.007631,49777984.480.48160.84.4
XCG-130.050126350530.00020.002139913310.550.08158.42.3
XCG-140.050076075500.00670.012538183110.280.06161.32.3
The Huashi deposit This study
HS-010.0203858.30.52.4240.12436.640.32105.80.6173.12.5
HS-030.0201339.60.380.4470.001224.890.2470.380.71169.52.9
HS-050.051435.090.680.04020.000422.060.4363.290.55172.04.0
HS-060.0201651.820.420.41140.001232.570.2692.520.98170.32.8
HS-070.0201357.30.650.20520.001236.010.41100.91.00168.03.1
The Taipingcun deposit
HB-7-10.0067434.550.270.32840.077621.710.1759.350.39163.82.3[9]
HB-7-20.0063143.250.410.10570.081327.180.2673.670.50162.52.5
HB-7-30.0063344.350.410.42300.096027.880.2676.950.52165.52.5
HB-8-10.0061945.010.390.18640.185728.290.2578.220.58165.72.5
HB-8-20.0072840.410.350.15670.156125.400.2269.440.50163.92.4
HB-9-10.0060566.640.470.35340.100941.890.30114.40.80163.82.3
HB-11-10.0070718.790.270.16130.098811.810.1732.240.21163.63.1
The Taiyanggou deposit
NSD-90.028015858370.00070.00893682239.5030.069154.72.1[18]
NSD-100.050249366920.00020.024258875815.340.10156.22.4
NSD-110.05019718.87.00.00020.0261451.84.41.1860.008157.42.4
NSD-120.050284081340.00020.00732565216.6320.042155.02.2
NSD-130.0508196091160.00020.002960397315.770.11156.52.7
NSD-140.050097329610.00020.009946063811.950.07155.52.2
Table 4. Sulfur isotopic composition of Huashi, Xichanggou, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei.
Table 4. Sulfur isotopic composition of Huashi, Xichanggou, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei.
DepositsSamplesMineralsOutput Locationδ34SV-CDT (‰)Data Sources
HuashiHS-02pyriteA small amount of anhedral–subhedral pyrite is disseminated in quartz veins.3.3This study
HS-01molybdeniteMolybdenum is veinlet-like and disseminated in quartz veins.4.5
HS-03molybdeniteMolybdenum is veinlet-like and disseminated in quartz veins.4.9
HS-06molybdeniteMolybdenum is mainly distributed at the edge of quartz veins, and a small amount of molybdenum is disseminated in quartz veins.4.8
HS-07molybdeniteMolybdenum is mainly distributed in the edge of quartz veins, and a small amount of Molybdenum is disseminated in quartz veins.4.8
XichanggouXCG-03pyriteAnhedral–subhedral pyrite is distributed in veinlets along the cracks.6.5This study
XCG-04pyriteAnhedral–subhedral pyrite is distributed in veinlets along the cracks.6.5
XCG-05pyriteAnhedral–subhedral pyrite is distributed in veinlets along the cracks.6.9
XCG-06pyriteIt-shaped pyrite is distributed in the edge cracks of quartz vein in the form of film.7.1
TaiyanggouNSD-16pyriteAnhedral–subhedral pyrite is distributed along the edge of quartz vein in veinlet shape.1.5[18]
NSD-18pyriteAnhedral–subhedral pyrite is distributed in lumps and disseminated along the cracks.1.3
NSD-19pyriteAnhedral–subhedral pyrite is disseminated in quartz veins.1.8
Table 5. Lead isotopic composition of Huashi, Xichanggou, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei.
Table 5. Lead isotopic composition of Huashi, Xichanggou, and other molybdenum deposits in eastern Hebei.
DepositSamplesMinerals206Pb/204Pb207Pb/204Pb208Pb/204PbμωTh/UΔβΔγData Resource
HuashiHS-02pyrite17.40215.42637.3799.2536.083.776.704.73This study
HS-01molybdenite16.77415.24636.4578.9933.93.65−5.04−20.05
HS-03molybdenite17.79215.29736.348.9328.413.08−1.72−23.2
HS-06molybdenite18.59815.49937.2359.2529.973.1411.470.86
HS-07molybdenite17.38915.42737.4549.2536.523.826.776.75
XichanggouXCG-03pyrite17.58815.46437.789.3037.133.869.1515.17This study
XCG-04pyrite17.97915.55538.2049.4237.543.8615.0926.56
XCG-05pyrite17.29215.39137.3739.1936.393.834.384.23
XCG-06pyrite16.79515.30336.8719.1136.343.86−1.36−9.26
TaiyanggouNSD-16pyrite16.7615.27836.6379.0635.173.76−3.02−15.84Unpublished data
NSD-18pyrite17.44315.43337.469.2636.273.797.096.27
NSD-19pyrite16.79615.29936.7749.1035.813.81−1.65−12.16
Table 6. Isotopic ages of intrusive rocks in Mesozoic intrusive belt in central eastern Hebei.
Table 6. Isotopic ages of intrusive rocks in Mesozoic intrusive belt in central eastern Hebei.
EraIntrusionRockArea
(km2)
OccurrenceSample and Method of
Dating
Age (Ma)Data Resource
Late
Jurassic
Xichanggoulight red quartz
monzonite porphyry
0.26stockZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb163.29 ± 0.31This study
deep red quartz
monzonite porphyry
stockZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb162.75 ± 0.37This study
Taiyanggougranite porphyry Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb154.8 ± 1.5[18]
black mica monzogranite Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb156.5 ± 1.2[18]
Madired monzonitic granite stockZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb175.5[19]
red alkali feldspar granite Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb165, 156[18]
Wangpingshimonzonitic granite40.5stockZircon LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb162.3 ± 1.3[20]
Taipingcunporphyroid monzonitic granite stockZircon LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb161.8 ± 2.7[9]
Qianfenshuilingfine-grained monzonitic granite10stockZircon LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb153.8 ± 2.7[20]
Maoshanmonzonitic granite50stockZircon LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb162.7 ± 1.5[20]
Middle JurassicGaojiadianquartz diorite18stockZircon LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb170.5 ± 1.8[20]
Xiajinbaogranite porphyry0. 36stockZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb163.32 ± 0.90[14]
Yueryared granite0.59stockZircon SHRIMP U-Pb174 ± 3
175 ± 1
[21]
Tangzhangzigranite porphyry0. 05stockZircon SHRIMP U-Pb173 ± 2[12]
Niuxinshanmedium-fine-grained granite0.35stockZircon SHRIMP U-Pb172 ± 2[21]
red graniteZircon SHRIMP U-Pb173 ± 2[12]
Qibozigranite0.66stockZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb168 ± 3[22]
monzonitic graniteZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb159.5 ± 0.5[10]
Early
Jurassic
Dazigoumonzonitic granite0.56stockZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb176.5 ± 1.0[10]
Wubozigranite porphyry0.3stockZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb189.8 ± 0.7[10]
Laoshangjiagranite porphyry<0.01stockZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb196.4 ± 0.8[10]
Luowenyumonzonitic granite56stockZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb196.7 ± 7.0[23]
Qingshankoumonzonitic granite16stockZircon SHRIMP U-Pb199.1 ± 2[21]
Xiaoyingzik-feldspar granite350batholithZircon LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb186.8 ± 1.3[20]
Late
Triassic
Liuzhupingmonzonitic granite stockZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb205.7 ± 0.8[10]
Sanbozimonzonitic granite<0.01stockZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb211.1 ± 1.1[10]
Dushanblack mica granite400batholithZircon SHRIMP U-Pb223 ± 2[21]
graniteZircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb222 ± 1[24]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, J.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, X.; Meng, G.; Dong, X. Molybdenum Mineralization in Eastern Hebei, China: Evidence from Geochronology and Isotopic Composition. Minerals 2024, 14, 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070662

AMA Style

Sun J, Cheng Y, Liu X, Meng G, Dong X. Molybdenum Mineralization in Eastern Hebei, China: Evidence from Geochronology and Isotopic Composition. Minerals. 2024; 14(7):662. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070662

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Jinlong, Yang Cheng, Xinxing Liu, Guang’an Meng, and Xintong Dong. 2024. "Molybdenum Mineralization in Eastern Hebei, China: Evidence from Geochronology and Isotopic Composition" Minerals 14, no. 7: 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070662

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop