Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Kazakhstan’s Clays by Mössbauer Spectroscopy and X-ray Diffraction
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Uses of Ionic Liquids in the Recovery and Utilization of Rare Earth Elements
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics of Nanoparticles in Late Pliocene Paleo-Mountain Fire Relics in Jinsuo Basin, Yunnan Province and Their Implications for Paleoclimate Evolution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Work on the Recovery of Rare Earths Using Ionic Liquids and Deep Eutectic Solvents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Dynamic Simulation of the Interaction of a Deep Eutectic Solvent Based on Tetraethylammonium Bromide with La3+ in Acidic Media

by
Luver Echeverry-Vargas
1,*,
Luz M. Ocampo-Carmona
2 and
Leopoldo Gutiérrez
1,3
1
Department of Metallurgical Engineering, University of Concepcion, Concepción 4070371, Chile
2
Department of Materials and Minerals, National University of Colombia, Medellin 050034, Colombia
3
Water Research Center for Agriculture and Mining (CRHIAM), University of Concepcion, Concepción 4070411, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 711; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070711
Submission received: 6 June 2024 / Revised: 7 July 2024 / Accepted: 10 July 2024 / Published: 13 July 2024

Abstract

:
In recent years, noticeable progress has been made in the development of alternative extraction systems characterized by greater sustainability. In this context, deep eutectic solvents (DESs) have emerged as a promising alternative to the conventional solvents commonly used in metal extraction. This work focuses on investigating the extraction of lanthanum in an aqueous solution of sulfuric acid using a deep eutectic solvent, employing molecular dynamics simulations (MD). The structural characteristics of the solvent and its interactions with the components of the aqueous solution are explored. In this study, tetraethylammonium bromide (TEABr) is combined with ethylene glycol (EG) to form a DES, in which sodium cyanide (NaCN) is subsequently solubilized. According to the results obtained from the MD simulation, the primary interactions in the DESs are established through hydrogen bonds between the bromine and the hydrogens of the methyl group of tetraethylammonium at 3.5 Å, as well as between the bromine and the hydrogens of the methylene group of ethylene glycol at 3.5 Å. Similarly, the main interactions between the binary DES and sodium cyanide occur through the hydrogens of the hydroxyl group of EG and the carbon of cyanide at 1.7 Å, and between the oxygen of the hydroxyl group of EG and the sodium at 2.5 Å. In the acidic solution, the primary interaction is highlighted between the lanthanum ion and the oxygen of the bisulfate at 2.8 Å. Additionally, it is observed that the interaction between the DES and the aqueous solution occurs between the lanthanum and the oxygen of the hydroxyl group of EG, as well as between the lanthanum and the carbon of cyanide at 4.4 Å. It is important to note that, when increasing the temperature from 25 to 80 °C, the interaction distance between the lanthanum and the carbon of cyanide decreases to 2.4 Å, suggesting a possible correlation with the increase in lanthanum extraction, as experimentally observed. Overall, this study underscores the importance of considering the fundamental structural interactions of the DES with the lanthanum acid solution, providing an essential theoretical basis for future experimental investigations.

1. Introduction

The rare earth elements (REEs) constitute a group of chemical elements encompassing all lanthanides, yttrium, and scandium. Commonly, they are classified into two distinct categories: light rare earth elements (LREEs), comprising from lanthanum to samarium, and heavy rare earth elements (HREEs), spanning from europium to lutetium [1,2,3]. REEs are dispersed throughout the earth’s crust as mixtures in various rock formations such as basalt, granite, gneiss, shale, and silicate rocks [4].
Approximately 95% of the global rare earth resources are concentrated in just three minerals: monazite ((Ce, La, Nd) PO4), bastnäsite ((Ce, La, Y) CO3F), and xenotime ((Y, Yb) PO4). These minerals represent the primary sources for the extraction of rare earth elements [5,6,7]. REEs are crucial components in key technologies for clean energy, such as wind turbines and electric vehicles. Therefore, the energy transition from fossil fuel-based energy to decarbonized energy relies heavily on the intensive use of critical elements like REEs [8], leading to a notable increase in the industrial demand for these elements [9]. It is projected that this demand will grow at an approximate annual rate of 10% during the period 2023–2028 [10].
REEs are typically leached from their processed mineral (concentrate) using aqueous inorganic acids, such as sulfuric or nitric acid [3]. The individual separation of REEs is a technical and economic challenge, often requiring multiple stages of solvent extraction (SX) from loaded leach solutions to achieve commercially viable separations [11]. The SX technique is widely recognized for transferring metal ions from the aqueous phase to an organic solution, which generally contains an extraction agent diluted in a molecular solvent. The back-extraction (or reverse extraction) of the loaded organic phase into an aqueous solution facilitates the concentration of the target metal, ready for selective recovery through methods such as electrodeposition or precipitation [12].
SX has been a subject of academic interest, both from a fundamental perspective, to understand extraction mechanisms [13], and from an applied perspective. Over time, highly efficient solvent-based systems using molecular organic solvents have been developed to treat various aqueous phases containing metals. However, with increasing environmental concerns, it is recognized that molecular organic solvents are toxic and hazardous compounds. Therefore, one of the main challenges lies in conceiving highly efficient extraction systems that adhere to the principles of green chemistry. In this context, there is a growing interest in alternative approaches to conduct extraction processes [14].
In recent years, significant progress has been made in the development of alternative extraction systems with more sustainable characteristics. In this context, deep eutectic solvents (DESs) have emerged as a promising option. DESs are formed through the complexation of an organic salt, typically a quaternary ammonium salt, with a metal salt, a hydrated metal salt, or a hydrogen bond donor (HBD) [15]. DESs can also be prepared by mixing hydrates of metal salts with HBD [16]. The charge delocalization resulting from the formation of these complexes occurs between the anion of the organic salt and the HBD species, leading to a reduction in the lattice energy of the organic salt [15]. This reduction in lattice energy results in a decrease in the melting point of the mixture compared to the individual components [17].
Due to their high polarity, DESs emerge as potential substitutes for traditional aqueous organic solvents in the separation of polar substances. The notable electrical conductivity of DESs, as well as the high solubilities of metals and metal salts in these solvents, position them as favorable compounds for applications in mineral refining, metal extraction in solution, purification by electrodeposition, and metal recovery from primary sources or waste recycling [18].
However, DESs present a series of challenges that limit their potential application in hydrometallurgical processes. One of the main issues associated with DESs is their high viscosity, which impedes mass and heat transfer in these processes. This necessitates specific operational conditions to prevent alterations in the molecular structure of the DESs, which could lead to their decomposition and, consequently, affect the efficiency of the process [19,20]. Furthermore, the design and optimization of DESs require a profound understanding of their physicochemical properties, as well as the interactions between their components and the target metals. These properties and interactions are contingent upon the molecular structure of the DES, which is complex and heterogeneous, thereby influencing the solubility, selectivity, kinetics, and thermodynamics of the hydrometallurgical processes [21].
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is a sophisticated computational technique employed to investigate atomic systems by numerically solving Newton’s equations of motion for each atom within the system. This approach offers a microscopic perspective on physical phenomena, facilitating a comprehensive analysis of the molecular interactions and the temporal evolution of the system. In the context of deep eutectic solvents (DESs), MD simulations are utilized to model the structural, dynamic, thermodynamic, and transport properties of these solvents. The atomistic insights into molecular interactions and the prediction of thermodynamic properties derived from MD simulations can significantly complement experimental findings, thereby enhancing our understanding of DESs [22,23,24,25,26]. In this study, to gain in-depth knowledge of the extraction of rare earth elements using deep eutectic solvents, a potentially applicable DES was synthesized for REE extraction. A series of molecular dynamics simulations were conducted to understand the mechanisms involved in the extraction process and how eutectic solvents can enhance extraction efficiency. The results obtained from MD simulations can be employed to optimize extraction conditions and develop more efficient and sustainable methods for extracting rare earth elements.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of the Deep Eutectic Solvent (DES)

Considering previous experiments [27], a binary deep eutectic solvent was synthesized, composed of tetraethylammonium bromide (TEABr) and ethylene glycol (ETG), in which sodium cyanide (NaCN) was dissolved. The molar ratio of the synthesized DES was 1:4:0.2. Each of the components was mixed in a beaker at a temperature of 80 °C, with constant stirring at 600 rpm until a clear liquid was formed. The process was conducted in an extraction hood, and the temperature was controlled using an oil bath. The effect of temperature on the extraction of lanthanum using the synthesized deep eutectic solvent was investigated at temperatures of 25, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 °C. Equal volumes of 10 mL of a 2.0 M sulfuric acid aqueous solution (containing 2563 mg/L of La, sourced from a prior monazite leaching process) and the DES were contacted for 10 min. Subsequently, the aqueous phase and DES were separated using a separatory funnel; following phase separation, the concentration of lanthanum in the aqueous phase was analyzed using ICP-OES. During the extraction experiments, the concentration of lanthanum in the DES was determined by mass balance. The extraction efficiency (%E) was calculated as shown in Equations (1) and (2).
D = C t C a C a
% E = 100 · D D + V a q V D E S
where [C]t is the initial concentration of lanthanum in the aqueous phase before extraction, [C]a is the concentration of the metal in the aqueous phase after extraction, Vaq is the volume of the aqueous solution, and VDES is the volume of the DES.

2.2. Molecular Dynamics Simulation

This study addressed the structural analysis of a binary DES composed of tetraethylammonium bromide (TEABr) and ethylene glycol (ETG). Subsequently, the effect on the structure of the DES formed by incorporating sodium cyanide (NaCN) was investigated. Additionally, the interaction of this DES with an acidic aqueous solution of lanthanum (H2O, HSO4 and La3+), was investigated through molecular dynamics simulations. The identification of each atom associated with the various species comprising the DES and the lanthanum aqueous solution is presented in detail in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Molecular dynamics simulations were conducted using the LAMMPS (Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator) simulation package [28]. System visualization was performed with VMD 1.9.3 software [29]. The system’s temperature and pressure were kept constant using a Nose–Hoover thermostat and barostat [30]. The models of the systems to be simulated were created using the Materials Studio 2017 5.5.2 package (Accelrys Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Initial configurations were generated using the Packmol software v20.15.0 [31].
In the initial step, a simulation box was generated for the system composed of tetraethylammonium bromide (TEABr) and ethylene glycol (ETG), establishing a TEABr–ETG ratio of 1:4. Subsequently, NaCN was integrated into the system to achieve a TEABr–ETG–NaCN ratio of 1:4:0.2. Next, the aqueous lanthanum solution and HSO4 were generated. Finally, the system composed of [TEABr–ETG–NaCN] was integrated with the aqueous lanthanum solution [H2O–La3+–HSO4], inserting a spherical cluster with a radius of 25 Å, consisting of 40 TEABr molecules, 150 ETG molecules, and 10 NaCN molecules, into a cubic box of 120 Å. This box was composed of the lanthanum aqueous solution, comprising 15,000 water molecules, 1500 HSO4 molecules, and 500 La3+ ions, as illustrated in Figure 3.
The previously defined system was subjected to a minimization process at temperatures of 298 K and 353 K, utilizing the canonical NVT ensemble for a period of 200 ps. Subsequently, the NPT ensemble was applied for 1000 ps with the purpose of adjusting the density of the systems under analysis. Finally, the NVE ensemble was employed for a duration of 5000 ps to ensure the conservation of the systems’ energy, during which radial distribution functions (RDF) were generated and analyzed. The simulation procedure carried out is shown in Figure 4.
The force field parameters for tetraethylammonium bromide, La3+, and HSO4 were taken from ligpargen based on the OPLS-AA force field [32,33], the force field parameters for ethylene glycol were adopted from Doherty’s work [25], and the behavior of water was simulated using the SPC/E model parameters [34]. The previously indicated parameters can be seen in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of DES Temperature on Lanthanum Extraction

A series of experiments were conducted at different DES temperatures to observe their effect on the extraction of lanthanum. As shown in Figure 5, the extraction of La is directly proportional to the temperature of the DES. The results indicate that increasing the temperature from 25 to 80 °C enhances the extraction of La from 7.2% to 93.3%. To understand this phenomenon, a series of molecular dynamics simulations were performed.

3.2. Density

Density is one of the most accessible properties to calculate through simulation and serves as an initial test to validate the selected force fields [35]. Table 5 presents the densities of the simulated systems at 298 K and 353 K under one atmosphere of pressure. The deviation of the densities from the experimental values at 298 K ranges between 2.45% and 4.76%. Therefore, the force fields used in the simulations reasonably predict the densities at different temperatures.

3.3. Interaction among the Components of the DES

With the purpose of obtaining a more detailed understanding of the structure of the DES composed of tetraethylammonium bromide, ethylene glycol, and sodium cyanide, the calculation of radial distribution functions (RDFs) was carried out between the bromine atom and the hydrogens of ethylene glycol (HG and HO), as well as with the hydrogens of tetraethylammonium (HS and HT). Figure 6a,b clearly illustrate that both the Br–HS and Br–HG RDFs exhibit a prominent peak at 3.5 Å, suggesting the presence of significant interactions. On the other hand, the Br–HT and Br–HO RDFs show peaks at 3.5 Å and 5.8 Å, respectively. The interaction peak between Br–HT pairs at 3.5 Å is less pronounced compared to the interaction peak of Br–HS. This suggests that, although there is a probability of finding HS -type hydrogen atoms at 3.5 Å from the bromine atom, the interaction is less intense. On the other hand, the secondary interaction peak between Br–HO pairs at 5.8 Å suggests a high probability of finding HO -type hydrogen atoms at this distance from the bromine atom, indicating the presence of a secondary structure at 5.8 Å.
Additionally, calculations of the integrals of the RDFs were performed, providing coordination numbers (NC) as a function of radial distance. In the first solvation layer of the bromine atom, defined by the first minimum value between the first two peaks, values of 6.5 for HS and 7.6 for HG were obtained. These results align with the number of hydrogens present in tetraethylammonium (TEA) and ethylene glycol (ETG), considering the 1:4 ratio between TEA and ETG, where TEA contains 4 methyl groups, while ETG has 2 methylene groups. Figure 7 provides a graphical representation of the solvation environment of the bromine atom, showing its structure of four molecules of ethylene glycol and one molecule of tetraethylammonium.
Additionally, the radial distribution function was studied at a temperature of 80 °C. Figure 8a,b illustrate that the interaction distance for the Br–HS and Br–HG pairs does not experience appreciable variations, although a slight decrease in the intensity of the Br–HS interaction is observed, and practically no alterations are observed in the intensity of the Br–HG interaction, showing a slight increase. These results lead to the conclusion that the temperature change from 25 °C to 80 °C does not constitute a determining factor in the distribution of ions and molecules for the system composed of tetraethylammonium bromide and ethylene glycol.
Similarly, the solvation environment at 25 °C of HG-type hydrogen atoms from ethylene glycol, HS-type hydrogen atoms from tetraethylammonium, and NaCN in the DES was investigated through the determination of radial distribution functions. Like the scenario observed in the system composed of tetraethylammonium bromide and ethylene glycol, both Br–HS and Br–HG interactions exhibited a peak at 3.5 Å, with intensities comparable to the system lacking NaCN. This finding indicates that the presence of NaCN does not alter the interactions of these pairs, as evidenced in Figure 9a,b.
The most notable interactions of sodium cyanide with the system composed of tetraethylammonium bromide and ethylene glycol (TEABr–ETG) manifest primarily between the pairs of atoms CM–HO and Na–OG. As evidenced in Figure 10a,b, the radial distribution function of the CM-HO pair exhibits a sharp peak of high intensity at a very short distance of 1.7 Å, while the RDF of the Na–OG interaction shows a pronounced peak at 2.5 Å. These results indicate the presence of strong interactions between these pairs, and the coordination numbers in the first solvation layer of NaCN are 1.7 for HO and 2.5 for OG. Figure 11 provides a graphical representation of the main interactions present in the DES composed of TEABr–ETG–NaCN.
The stability of the structure formed by the (TEA–ETG–NaCN) system was then investigated as the temperature was raised to 80 °C. As depicted in Figure 12a, the RDF of the Br-HG pair showed no significant changes with increasing temperature, maintaining a constant interaction distance of 3.5 Å. On the other hand, the Br-HS pair interaction exhibited no variations in the 3.5 Å interaction distance, although a slight decrease in the peak intensity was observed, as depicted in Figure 12b. This phenomenon suggests a subtle modification in the structure with the temperature increase.
As can be observed in Figure 13a, the interaction of the CM–HO pair undergoes no changes in the interaction distance, remaining constant at 1.7 Å with the temperature increase. However, the peak intensity significantly decreases as the temperature is raised to 80 °C. On the other hand, the RDF of the Na–OG pair interaction (Figure 13b) remains unchanged at 2.5 Å. Nevertheless, like the CM–HO interaction, the peak intensity decreases considerably with the temperature increase. The reduction in the peak intensities of the RDFs corresponding to the CM–HO and Na–OG interactions, with the temperature elevated to 80 °C, suggests a destabilization in the structure of the system.

3.4. Interaction among the Components of the Aqueous Solution

The aqueous system composed of H2O–La3+–HSO4 was studied to determine the primary interactions present through the determination of radial distribution functions. The closest recorded interaction occurred between lanthanum and sulfate, specifically with the oxygen atoms of sulfate (La3+–OT), at 2.8 Å, as illustrated in Figure 14a. It can be observed that this interaction reaches a significant height, indicating a high probability of finding an oxygen atom (OT) at this distance from the lanthanum ion. This suggests a strong interaction or coordination between La3+ and OT, implying a well-defined structure and specific coordination at this distance. The second peak, located at approximately 4.9 Å, is the highest. This indicates an even higher probability of finding oxygen atoms (OT) at this distance, suggesting the existence of a second coordination shell or an ordered structure beyond the first layer of immediate neighbors. The third peak appears at approximately 6.9 Å. Although less pronounced than the second peak, it remains significant, indicating a tertiary structure in the system. This greater distance suggests a long-range organization in the environment of La3+.
Additionally, a predominant interaction was identified between the lanthanum ion and water molecules, visualized through the La3+–O pairs. This phenomenon is evident in Figure 14b, where the radial distribution function exhibits a sharp peak of high intensity at 2.6 Å. Additionally, an interaction between H–OT pairs of water and sulfate was highlighted. This interaction can be seen in Figure 14c, where a peak is observed at a very short distance of 1.9 Å.

3.5. Interactions between La3+ and the DES

With the purpose of examining the interaction between the components of the DES and the aqueous solution of lanthanum (H2O–La3+–HSO4), molecular dynamics simulations were conducted for these systems at temperatures of 25 and 80 °C. Additionally, an understanding of the structural properties of these systems was sought through radial distribution functions describing the distances between the components of the DES and the aqueous solution. In Figure 15a,b, the main interactions at 25 °C between the aqueous solution and the DES are highlighted, specifically between the La3+–OG and La3+–CM pairs. The radial distribution function of the La3+–OG pair shows a peak at 4.9 Å, while the RDF of the La3+–CM pair presents a peak at 4.4 Å. Considering the intensity of these peaks and the interaction distances, it can be indicated that the predominant interaction occurs between the lanthanum ion and the carbon atom of the cyanide.
Upon increasing the temperature to 80 °C, Figure 16a reveals that the RDF of the La3+–OG pair shows no significant changes with the temperature increase, maintaining a constant interaction distance of 4.9 Å. On the other hand, the primary interaction of the La3+ –CM pair occurs at a shorter distance, 2.4 Å, as the temperature is raised to 80 °C (Figure 16b). This reduction in the interaction distance is possibly associated with the increased lanthanum extraction upon raising the temperature, as observed experimentally. These results suggest a sensitive response of molecular interactions to temperature variation, which may have significant implications in understanding and controlling the processes involving these systems. In Figure 17, the main interactions between the components of the deep eutectic solvent (TEA–ETG–NaCN) and the components of the lanthanum aqueous solution (H2O–La3+–HSO4) are schematically represented.

4. Conclusions

For a deeper understanding of the structure of a deep eutectic solvent formed by tetraethylammonium bromide, ethylene glycol, and sodium cyanide, and its interaction with an acidic aqueous solution of lanthanum, a series of molecular dynamics simulations were conducted for the TEABr–ETG–NaCN and H2O–La3+–HSO4 systems. The structural properties were verified by calculating the radial distribution functions of the main interactions. The primary interactions in the deep eutectic solvent, as indicated by the RDFs, occur between the pairs HS–Br (3.5 Å); HG–Br (3.5 Å); HO–CM (1.7 Å); and OG–Na (2.5 Å). In the acidic solution, the main interaction between the lanthanum ion and sulfate is observed between the La–OT pairs (2.8 Å). The interaction between the deep eutectic solvent and the aqueous solution is manifested through the OG–La (4.9 Å) and CM–La (4.4 Å) pairs. It is crucial to highlight that, with a temperature increase from 25 to 80 °C, the interaction distance between the CM–La pair reduces to 2.4 Å; this reduction is possibly associated with the enhanced lanthanum extraction, as observed experimentally.

Author Contributions

L.E.-V.: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft, Visualization, Methodology. L.M.O.-C.: Supervision, Methodology, Project administration, Funding acquisition. L.G.: Writing—review and editing, Writing—original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the Colombian Ministry of Science (MINCIENCIAS) for the financial support provided to the project “Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Minerals Found in Black Sands, a Residue from Alluvial Gold Mining in El Bagre-Antioquia”, under the code 110180863804 within the 2018 Call for Projects 808—CFP for Science, Technology, and Innovation projects and their contribution to the national challenges. The authors also express their appreciation to the Water Research Center for Agriculture and Mining, under the projects CRHIAM/ANID/FONDAP/15130015 and ANID/FONDAP/1523A0001. Further thanks are extended to Project ANID/ACT210030.

Data Availability Statement

Restrictions apply to the availability of these data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Suli, L.M.; Ibrahim, W.H.W.; Aziz, B.A.; Deraman, M.R.; Ismail, N.A. A Review of Rare Earth Mineral Processing Technology. Chem. Eng. Res. Bull. 2017, 19, 20–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zglinicki, K.; Małek, R.; Szamałek, K.; Wołkowicz, S. Mining Waste as a Potential Additional Source of HREE and U for the European Green Deal: A Case Study of Bangka Island (Indonesia). Minerals 2022, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Echeverry-Vargas, L.; Rojas-Reyes, N.R.; Ocampo-Carmona, L.M. Recovery of light rare earth elements, cerium, lanthanum, and neodymium from alluvial gold mining waste from the Bagre-Nechí mining district in Colombia using acid leaching, oxalate precipitation and calcination. Hydrometallurgy 2023, 216, 106009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gupta, C.K.; Krishnamurthy, N. Extractive metallurgy of rare earths. Int. Mater. Rev. 1992, 37, 197–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kanazawa, Y.; Kamitani, M. Rare earth minerals and resources in the world. J. Alloys Compd. 2006, 408–412, 1339–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jordens, A.; Cheng, Y.P.; Waters, K.E. A review of the beneficiation of rare earth element bearing minerals. Min. Eng. 2013, 41, 97–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Silva, R.G.; Morais, C.A.; Oliveira, E.D.; Soares, W.D.; Chaves, L.C.; Reis, H.L. Processing of sulfuric liquor to obtain rare earth concentrates and selective cerium removal by thermal oxidation. In Proceedings of the XXVIII National Meeting on Ore Treatment and Extractive Metallurgy Belo Horizonte-MG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 4–8 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
  8. Depraiter, L.; Goutte, S. The role and challenges of rare earths in the energy transition. Resour. Policy 2023, 86, 104137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Martins, T.S.; Isolani, P.C. Terras raras: Aplicações industriais e biológicas. Quim. Nova 2005, 28, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Karan, R.; Sreenivas, T. Recovery of Rare Earth Values from Micro-granite Type Hard Rocks Using Deep Eutectic Solvents. Trans. Indian Inst. Metals 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Entezari-Zarandi, A.; Larachi, F. Selective dissolution of rare-earth element carbonates in deep eutectic solvents. J. Rare Earths 2019, 37, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Echeverry-Vargas, L.; Ocampo-Carmona, L.M. Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Mining Tailings: A Case Study for Generating Wealth from Waste. Minerals 2022, 12, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Micheau, C.; Ueda, Y.; Akutsu-Suyama, K.; Bourgeois, D.; Motokawa, R. Deuterated Malonamide Synthesis for Fundamental Research on Solvent Extraction Systems. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2023, 41, 221–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Billard, I. Are molecular solvents, aqueous biphasic systems and deep eutectic solvents meaningful categories for liquidliquid extraction? Comptes Rendus. Chim. 2022, 25, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Smith, E.L.; Abbott, A.P.; Ryder, K.S. Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) and Their Applications. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11060–11082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Abbott, A.P.; Capper, G.; Davies, D.L.; Rasheed, R.K.; Tambyrajah, V. Novel solvent properties of choline chloride/urea mixtures. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Leroy, E.; Jacquet, P.; Coativy, G.; Reguerre, A.L.; Lourdin, D. Compatibilization of starch–zein melt processed blends by an ionic liquid used as plasticizer. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89, 955–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singh, M.B.; Kumar, V.S.; Chaudhary, M.; Singh, P. A mini review on synthesis, properties and applications of deep eutectic solvents. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2021, 98, 100210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jenkin, G.R.; Al-Bassam, A.Z.; Harris, R.C.; Abbott, A.P.; Smith, D.J.; Holwell, D.A.; Chapman, R.J.; Stanley, C.J. The application of deep eutectic solvent ionic liquids for environmentally-friendly dissolution and recovery of precious metals. Min. Eng. 2016, 87, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abbott, A.P.; Harris, R.C.; Holyoak, F.; Frisch, G.; Hartley, J.; Jenkin, G.R.T. Electrocatalytic recovery of elements from complex mixtures using deep eutectic solvents. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 2172–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hansen, B.B.; Spittle, S.; Chen, B.; Poe, D.; Zhang, Y.; Klein, J.M.; Horton, A.; Adhikari, L.; Zelovich, T.; Doherty, B.W.; et al. Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Review of Fundamentals and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2020, 121, 1232–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Singh, M.B.; Prajapat, A.; Jain, P.; Singh, P.; Bahadur, I.; Kaushik, N.K.; Kaushik, N.; Kumari, K. Investigate the ability of deep eutectic solvent (ChCl-glycerol) to sense the sulphur dioxide using density functional theory calculations and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 388, 122720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bonab, P.J.; Esrafili, M.D.; Ebrahimzadeh, A.R.; Sardroodi, J.J. Molecular dynamics simulations of choline chloride and phenyl propionic acid deep eutectic solvents: Investigation of structural and dynamics properties. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2021, 106, 107908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jindal, A.; Vasudevan, S. Ethylene Glycol Dihedral Angle Dynamics: Relating Molecular Conformation to the Raman Spectrum of the Liquid. J. Phys. Chem. B 2021, 125, 1888–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Doherty, B.; Acevedo, O. OPLS Force Field for Choline Chloride-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 9982–9993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mainberger, S.; Kindlein, M.; Bezold, F.; Elts, E.; Minceva, M.; Briesen, H. Deep eutectic solvent formation: A structural view using molecular dynamics simulations with classical force fields. Mol. Phys. 2017, 115, 1309–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Echeverry Vargas, L.D.J. Extracción de Elementos de Tierras Raras a Partir de Monacita Mediante Solventes Eutécticos Profundos y su Comparación con Solventes Orgánicos Convencionales. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia, 2022. Available online: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/83360 (accessed on 22 November 2022).
  28. Plimpton, S. Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 117, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hoover, W.G. Constant-pressure equations of motion. Phys. Rev. A 1986, 34, 2499–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Allouche, A.-R. Gabedit—A graphical user interface for computational chemistry softwares. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jorgensen, W.L.; Tirado-Rives, J. Potential energy functions for atomic-level simulations of water and organic and biomolecular systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 6665–6670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dodda, L.S.; de Vaca, I.C.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Jorgensen, W.L. LigParGen web server: An automatic OPLS-AA parameter generator for organic ligands. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W331–W336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Berendsen, H.J.C.; Grigera, J.R.; Straatsma, T.P. The missing term in effective pair potentials. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6269–6271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yusof, R.; Jumbri, K.; Rahman, M.B.A. An insight into the effects of ratios and temperatures on a tetrabutylammonium bromide and ethylene glycol deep eutectic solvent. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 339, 116709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure and atomic definition of the DES components.
Figure 1. Structure and atomic definition of the DES components.
Minerals 14 00711 g001
Figure 2. Structure and atomic definition of the components in the aqueous solution.
Figure 2. Structure and atomic definition of the components in the aqueous solution.
Minerals 14 00711 g002
Figure 3. Simulation box of the system composed of 150 ETG molecules, 40 TEABr molecules, 10 NaCN molecules, 15,000 water molecules, 1500 HSO4 molecules, and 500 La3+ ions.
Figure 3. Simulation box of the system composed of 150 ETG molecules, 40 TEABr molecules, 10 NaCN molecules, 15,000 water molecules, 1500 HSO4 molecules, and 500 La3+ ions.
Minerals 14 00711 g003
Figure 4. Molecular dynamics simulation methodology employed.
Figure 4. Molecular dynamics simulation methodology employed.
Minerals 14 00711 g004
Figure 5. Temperature effect on lanthanum extraction with the DES synthesized from an H2SO4 leaching liquor.
Figure 5. Temperature effect on lanthanum extraction with the DES synthesized from an H2SO4 leaching liquor.
Minerals 14 00711 g005
Figure 6. Radial distribution functions calculated for a central Br ion with respect to the HS and HT hydrogen atoms of tetraethylammonium (a), and the HG and HO hydrogen atoms of ethylene glycol (b).
Figure 6. Radial distribution functions calculated for a central Br ion with respect to the HS and HT hydrogen atoms of tetraethylammonium (a), and the HG and HO hydrogen atoms of ethylene glycol (b).
Minerals 14 00711 g006
Figure 7. Representative snapshot from a MD simulation of the local environment of a Br ion in the TEA and ETG system (color code: magenta—Br; red—O; navy green—C; white—H; blue—N).
Figure 7. Representative snapshot from a MD simulation of the local environment of a Br ion in the TEA and ETG system (color code: magenta—Br; red—O; navy green—C; white—H; blue—N).
Minerals 14 00711 g007
Figure 8. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C and 80 °C for a central Br ion with respect to: the HS atoms (a), and HG hydrogen atoms (b).
Figure 8. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C and 80 °C for a central Br ion with respect to: the HS atoms (a), and HG hydrogen atoms (b).
Minerals 14 00711 g008
Figure 9. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C for a central Br ion with respect to the HS hydrogen atoms (a), and HG hydrogen atoms (b), in the system composed of TEABr–ETG–NaCN.
Figure 9. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C for a central Br ion with respect to the HS hydrogen atoms (a), and HG hydrogen atoms (b), in the system composed of TEABr–ETG–NaCN.
Minerals 14 00711 g009
Figure 10. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C for the CM–HO pairs (a), and Na–OG pairs (b), in the system composed of TEABr–ETG–NaCN.
Figure 10. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C for the CM–HO pairs (a), and Na–OG pairs (b), in the system composed of TEABr–ETG–NaCN.
Minerals 14 00711 g010
Figure 11. Representative snapshot from a MD simulation of the local environment of the system composed of TEABr–ETG–NaCN (color code: magenta—Br; red—O; navy green—C; white—H; blue—N; apple green—Na).
Figure 11. Representative snapshot from a MD simulation of the local environment of the system composed of TEABr–ETG–NaCN (color code: magenta—Br; red—O; navy green—C; white—H; blue—N; apple green—Na).
Minerals 14 00711 g011
Figure 12. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C and 80 °C for a central Br ion with respect to the Hs hydrogens (a), and HG hydrogens (b), in the system composed of TEABr–ETG–NaCN.
Figure 12. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C and 80 °C for a central Br ion with respect to the Hs hydrogens (a), and HG hydrogens (b), in the system composed of TEABr–ETG–NaCN.
Minerals 14 00711 g012
Figure 13. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C and 80 °C for the CM–HO pairs (a), and Na–OG pairs (b), in the system composed of TEABr–ETG–NaCN.
Figure 13. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C and 80 °C for the CM–HO pairs (a), and Na–OG pairs (b), in the system composed of TEABr–ETG–NaCN.
Minerals 14 00711 g013
Figure 14. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C for the La3+–OT pairs (a), La3+–O pairs (b), and H–OT pairs (c), in the aqueous system composed of H2O–La3+–HSO4.
Figure 14. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C for the La3+–OT pairs (a), La3+–O pairs (b), and H–OT pairs (c), in the aqueous system composed of H2O–La3+–HSO4.
Minerals 14 00711 g014
Figure 15. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C for the La3+–OG pairs (a), and La3+–CM pairs (b), in the interaction between the components of the DES and the aqueous solution of lanthanum.
Figure 15. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C for the La3+–OG pairs (a), and La3+–CM pairs (b), in the interaction between the components of the DES and the aqueous solution of lanthanum.
Minerals 14 00711 g015
Figure 16. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C and 80 °C for the La3+–OG pairs (a), and La3+–CM pairs (b), in the interaction between the components of the DES and the aqueous solution of lanthanum.
Figure 16. Radial distribution functions calculated at 25 °C and 80 °C for the La3+–OG pairs (a), and La3+–CM pairs (b), in the interaction between the components of the DES and the aqueous solution of lanthanum.
Minerals 14 00711 g016aMinerals 14 00711 g016b
Figure 17. Schematic representation of the main interactions between (TEA–ETG–NaCN) and (H2O–La3+–HSO4). * As the temperature increases, the interaction distance decreases to 2.4 Å.
Figure 17. Schematic representation of the main interactions between (TEA–ETG–NaCN) and (H2O–La3+–HSO4). * As the temperature increases, the interaction distance decreases to 2.4 Å.
Minerals 14 00711 g017
Table 1. Charges and Lennard-Jones parameters for tetraethylammonium, sodium, and lanthanum cations, as well as for bromide, cyanide and sulfate anions.
Table 1. Charges and Lennard-Jones parameters for tetraethylammonium, sodium, and lanthanum cations, as well as for bromide, cyanide and sulfate anions.
IonAtom Typeq (e)σ (Å)ɛ (kcal/mol)
TetraethylammoniumHS0.0342.500.0300
CS−0.0863.500.0660
CT−0.0023.500.0660
HT0.0222.500.0300
N−0.0573.250.1700
BrBr−0.1794.280.7100
CyanideCM−1.003.300.0660
NM0.003.200.1700
NaNa1.004.070.0005
SulfateOT−0.5352.960.7113
S0.8023.551.0460
OM−0.6223.120.7113
HM0.4250.000.0000
LaLa33.750.0600
Table 2. Nonbonded parameters for ethylene glycol and water.
Table 2. Nonbonded parameters for ethylene glycol and water.
MoleculeAtom Typeq (e)σ (Å)ɛ (kcal/mol)
Ethylene glycolHO0.3480.000.0000
OG−0.563.000.2975
CG0.1163.500.1155
HG0.0482.500.0525
WaterO−0.823.170.1554
H0.410.000.0000
Table 3. Bond and angle force constants, kr (kcal mol−1 Å−2) and kθ, (kcal mol−1 rad−2), and equilibrium distances and angles, r0 (Å) and θ0 (degrees), for the tetraethylammonium cation and cyanide anion.
Table 3. Bond and angle force constants, kr (kcal mol−1 Å−2) and kθ, (kcal mol−1 rad−2), and equilibrium distances and angles, r0 (Å) and θ0 (degrees), for the tetraethylammonium cation and cyanide anion.
IonBondsr0krAnglesθ0kθ
TetraethylammoniumCS–CT1.529268CS–CT–HT110.737.5
CS–HS1.090340CS–CT–N111.280.0
CT–HT1.090340CT–CS–HS110.737.5
N–CT1.471367CT–N–CT113.050.0
HS–CS–HS107.833.0
HT–CT–HT107.833.0
HT–CT–N109.535.0
CyanideCM–NM1.157650
SulfateHM–OM0.945463HM–OM–S11061.9
OM–S1.670376OM–S–OT108.761.9
OT–S1.440586OT–S–OT11987.0
Table 4. Bond and angle force constants, kr (kcal mol−1 Å−2) and kθ, (kcal mol−1 rad−2), and equilibrium distances and angles, r0 (Å) and θ0 (degrees), for ethylene glycol.
Table 4. Bond and angle force constants, kr (kcal mol−1 Å−2) and kθ, (kcal mol−1 rad−2), and equilibrium distances and angles, r0 (Å) and θ0 (degrees), for ethylene glycol.
MoleculeBondsr0krAnglesθ0kθ
Ethylene glycolOG–HO0.945553HO–OG–CG108.555.0
CT–OG1.410320OG–CG–CG10850.0
CT–CT1.529268OG–CG–HG109.535.0
HC–CT1.090340CG–CG–HG110.737.5
HG–CG–HG107.833.0
WaterH–O1.000600H–O–H109.4775.0
Table 5. Comparison of the densities of the simulated and experimental systems.
Table 5. Comparison of the densities of the simulated and experimental systems.
SystemTemperature (K)Experimental Density (g/cm3)Simulated Density (g/cm3)Error (%)
TEABr–ETG2981.051.004.76
353-0.93-
TEABr–ETG–NaCN2981.061.014.72
353-0.94-
lanthanum solution2981.621.592.45
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Echeverry-Vargas, L.; Ocampo-Carmona, L.M.; Gutiérrez, L. Molecular Dynamic Simulation of the Interaction of a Deep Eutectic Solvent Based on Tetraethylammonium Bromide with La3+ in Acidic Media. Minerals 2024, 14, 711. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070711

AMA Style

Echeverry-Vargas L, Ocampo-Carmona LM, Gutiérrez L. Molecular Dynamic Simulation of the Interaction of a Deep Eutectic Solvent Based on Tetraethylammonium Bromide with La3+ in Acidic Media. Minerals. 2024; 14(7):711. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070711

Chicago/Turabian Style

Echeverry-Vargas, Luver, Luz M. Ocampo-Carmona, and Leopoldo Gutiérrez. 2024. "Molecular Dynamic Simulation of the Interaction of a Deep Eutectic Solvent Based on Tetraethylammonium Bromide with La3+ in Acidic Media" Minerals 14, no. 7: 711. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070711

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop