Next Article in Journal
Effects of Fracturing Fluids on Properties of Shale Reservoir: A Case Study of the Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin
Previous Article in Journal
Thermal Behaviour of a Carbonatic Clay: A Multi-Analytical Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Geochemical and Sr–Nd–Hf–O Isotopic Study of the Early Silurian Shandan Adakites in the Longshoushan Area: Implications for the Collisional Setting of the Proto–Tethyan North Qilian Orogen, Northwest China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magma Mixing Origin for the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton in the North Qilian Orogenic Belt, China

1
Frontiers Science Center for Deep Ocean Multispheres and Earth System, Key Lab of Submarine Geosciences and Prospecting Techniques, Ministry of Education, College of Marine Geosciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
2
Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resources, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266037, China
3
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
4
College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
5
Isotope Laboratory, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1310, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2025, 15(4), 391; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15040391
Submission received: 12 February 2025 / Revised: 2 April 2025 / Accepted: 3 April 2025 / Published: 8 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tectonic Evolution of the Tethys Ocean in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau)

Abstract

:
Magma mixing or mingling is not just a geological phenomenon that widely occurs in granitoid magmatism, but a complex dynamic process that influences the formation of mafic microgranular enclaves (MMEs) and the diversity of granitic rocks. Herein, we carried out a comprehensive study that encompassed the petrology, mineral chemistry, zircon U-Pb ages, Lu-Hf isotopes, whole-rock elements, and Sr-Nd isotope compositions of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton in the northern margin of the Qilian Block, to elucidate the petrogenesis and physical and chemical processes occurring during magma mixing. The Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton is mainly composed of granodiorites accompanied by numerous mafic microgranular enclaves (MMEs) and is intruded by minor gabbro dikes. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating reveals that these rocks possess a similar crystallization age of ca. 456 Ma. The Menyuan host granodiorites, characterized as metaluminous to weakly peraluminous, belong to subduction-related I-type calc-alkaline granites. The MMEs and gabbroic dikes have relatively low SiO2 contents and high Mg# values, probably reflecting a mantle-derived origin. They are enriched in large ion lithophile elements (LILEs) and light, rare earth elements (LREEs) but are depleted in high field strength elements (HFSEs), indicating continental arc-like geochemical affinities. The host granodiorites yield relatively enriched whole-rock Sr-Nd and zircon Hf isotopic compositions (87Sr/86Sri = 0.7072–0.7158; εNd(t) = −9.21 to −4.23; εHf(t) = −8.8 to −1.2), implying a derivation from the anatexis of the ancient mafic lower continental crust beneath the Qilian Block. The MMEs have similar initial Sr isotopes but distinct whole-rock Nd and zircon Hf isotopic compositions compared with the host granodiorites (87Sr/86Sri = 0.7078–0.7089; εNd(t) = −3.88 to −1.68; εHf(t) = −0.1 to +4.1). Field observation, microtextural and mineral chemical evidence, geochemical characteristics, and whole-rock Nd and zircon Hf isotopic differences between the host granodiorites and MMEs suggest insufficient magma mixing of lithospheric mantle mafic magma and lower continental crust felsic melt. In combination with evidence from regional geology, we propose that the anatexis of the ancient mafic lower continental crust and subsequent magma mixing formed in an active continental arc setting, which was triggered by the subducted slab rollback and mantle upwelling during the southward subduction of the Qilian Proto-Tethys Ocean during the Middle-Late Ordovician.

1. Introduction

Magma mixing, or the mingling of distinct compositions, is a common phenomenon in the process of magmatic evolution and has a significant impact on the genesis and compositional diversity of granitoids [1,2,3]. Compared with magma mingling, which refers to physical dispersion without chemical exchanges between compositionally distinct magmas, magma mixing emphasizes magma interactions accompanied by mechanical and chemical exchanges [4,5,6]. The temperature, viscosity, crystallinity, and rheology of both interacting magmas affect the degree of magma homogenization of the magmatic system [7]. Calc-alkaline granitic plutons commonly contain abundant mafic microgranular enclaves (MMEs), and the MMEs and their host granitoids are considered to be the crucial objects to study the genesis and diversity of granites and the interaction between crust and mantle [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Several potential models have been put forward to account for the genesis of MMEs, including (1) wall-rock xenoliths [14,15]; (2) refractory remnants from the magma source [16,17,18]; (3) autoliths associated with early-formed cumulate minerals within the cognate magmatic system [19,20,21,22,23,24]; and (4) hybrids generated by the mixing/mingling between mafic and felsic magmas [25,26,27]. Magmatic enclaves occur as a representation of hybrid magma blobs with obvious chemical–physical disequilibrium features, which are considered as one of the most clear pieces of evidence for insufficient magma mixing [5,28,29,30]. To date, there exist two major mechanisms for the formation of magmatic enclaves: heterogeneous magma mixing and homologous magma mixing [19,21,25,31,32]. Verifying the relationship between the MMEs and host granitoids could provide additional insights into the petrogenesis and source of granitoids, the interaction between both magmatic systems, and deep geodynamic processes.
The Qilian Orogen lies in the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Platea, stretching in a NW-SE direction. It is bounded by the Alxa Block on the north, the Tarim Block on the west, the Qaidam Block on the south, and the West Qinling Orogenic Belt on the southeast (Figure 1a,b). The North Qilian Belt is considered a typical oceanic suture zone located between the Qilian Block and Alxa Block (Figure 1b [33,34]). The extensive Early Paleozoic granitic magmatism is widespread in the North Qilian Belt, and the majority of these instances of granitic magmatism are suggested to be associated with oceanic–continental subduction and subsequent continental collision [33,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. In the past decades, an ever-growing quantity of geochemical and isotopic chronological investigations has been conducted in the North Qilian Belt to ascertain the origin of early Paleozoic granitoid plutrons and their MMEs, such as the Chaidanuo, Jinzichuan, Beilinggou, Shidonggou, Niuxinshan, Tuole, Xiagucheng, Yeniutan, Leigongshan, and other plutons [33,37,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Therefore, the North Qilian Belt is an ideal study area for studying the petrogenesis of the MMEs and their host rocks and the geochemical behavior of elements and isotopes in magmatic systems during mixing. This study is concentrated on the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton, which is situated on the northern margin of the Qilian Block, which contains abundant enclaves and synplutonic dikes. The petrology, whole-rock geochemistry, Sr-Nd-Hf isotopes, zircon U-Pb ages, and mineral chemistry of the MMEs and their host granodiorites are discussed in this paper. By integrating these new results and prior geological data, our objective is to shed light on the relationship between the MMEs and host granitoids, as well as the possibility of efficient magma mixing during the crust–mantle interaction process during the subduction stage of the Qilian Proto-Tethys Ocean.

2. Geological Background

From north to south, the Qilian orogen can be partitioned into three distinct tectonic units: the North Qilian Belt, the Qilian Block, and the South Qilian Belt (Figure 1b [41,53,54,55]). The overall Qilian orogen records the complete tectonic evolution of oceanic spreading (the Proto-Tethys Ocean), oceanic plate subduction and accretion, and continent–continent (arc–continent) collision [56,57,58].
The North Qilian Belt stretches in a NW-SE direction for over 1000 km, lying between the Qilian Block to the southwest and the Alxa Block to the northeast (Figure 1b [34]), and is confirmed to be a classic subduction–accretion orogenic belt featuring a complex trench-arc–basin system [33]. The North Qilian Belt predominantly consists of early Paleozoic ophiolite suites, high-pressure/low-temperature (HP/LT) metamorphic rocks, granitoid plutons related to subduction and collision, and arc-related volcanic rocks, overlain by Silurian flysch, Devonian molasse, and Carboniferous–Triassic sedimentary cover sequences [59]. There are two ophiolite belts in the North Qilian Belt: Neoproterozoic–Cambrian ophiolite belts (550–496 Ma) of oceanic ridge origin in the south (including the Aoyougou, Yushigou, and Dongcaohe ophiolites) and Cambrian–Ordovician Ophiolite Belts (490–448 Ma) of back-arc oceanic basin origin in the north (including Jiugequan, Biandukou, and Laohushan ophiolites) [33,54,60]. The widespread granitoids with zircon U-Pb ages ranging from 520 Ma to 440 Ma are predominantly found as elongated bodies within island-arc volcanic rocks in the North Qilian Belt [33,35,39,40,41,46,61]. These granitoids are distinguished by a peraluminous granitic batholith, as well as numerous medium/high-K calc-alkaline I-type diorite-granodiorite-granite intrusions, along with a small number of minor tonalite-trondhjemite associations [35,40,62,63,64,65].
The Qilian Block consists primarily of a substantial Precambrian basement sequence, a thin Phanerozoic sedimentary overlying layer, and early Paleozoic igneous rocks [33,66,67,68,69,70,71]. A few studies have suggested that the lower Precambrian crystallized basement was partitioned into the western Tuolai Group and the Beidahe Group [72,73], the Huangyuan Group in the center [69], and the eastern Maxianshan Group [71,74], and recorded metamorphism from greenschist facies to granulite facies [75,76,77]. Voluminous Early Paleozoic basic to felsic magmatic rocks related to subduction and collision intrude into the Precambrian basement, and they are distinguished by calc-alkaline to high-K calcalkaline and shoshonitic [37,38,51,66,78,79,80,81,82,83].
An Early Paleozoic continental arc, characterized by arc magmatic rocks and associated high-temperature metamorphic rocks, has been discovered in the northern margin of the Qilian Block. The high-temperature metamorphic rocks, traditionally believed to be the part of the lower continental crust from the Qilian Block, consist mainly of granitic gneiss, metasedimentary rocks, and amphibolite (with mafic granulite occurring locally), which experienced different degrees of anatexis during the Cambrian–Ordovician period [38]. Our study area is located in the northern margin of the Qilian Block, with extensively exposed Early Paleozoic mafic to felsic plutonic intrusions, comprising gabbro, diorite, granodiorite, and granite with zircon U-Pb ages of ca. 500–446 Ma (Figure 1c). Geochemical and zircon Hf isotopic analyses show that the Early Paleozoic intrusive rocks have arc-related affinity [37,51]. The Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton, as a large and complex intrusion, provides a unique opportunity and new perspective for researching the petrogenesis and the crust–mantle interaction during the oceanic subduction process.

3. Petrology

A typical granitoid exposure with abundant mafic enclaves was identified in the Menyuan area approximately 100 km NE of Xi’ning City, adjacent to Menyuan County, Qinghai Province, China (Figure 1c and Figure 2a). The Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton in this study intruded into the Precambrian basement including Meso-Neoproterozoic gneiss, schist, and local amphibolite. The Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton is mainly composed of granodiorite intruded by a 1–3-m wide dike of gabbro (Figure 2b). The granodiorite contains a large number of mafic microgranular enclaves (MMEs) throughout the whole pluton (Figure 2c,d).
Granodiorites of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton show classic massive textures, and the dominant minerals are of medium- to coarse-grain size (Figure 3a,b). Petrographically, the thin sections reveal that the main minerals contain plagioclase (40–50 vol.%), alkali-feldspar (20–30 vol.%), quartz (10–20 vol.%), and amphibole (15 vol.%) with minor biotite and accessory minerals (e.g., zircon, apatite, sphene, and titanite) (total 5 vol.%). The secondary minerals mainly include sericite, epidote, and opaque phases. Plagioclase typically presents as euhedral to subhedral in shape, displaying clear polysynthetic twinning partly altered to sericite. Almost all alkali feldspars are turbid with the characteristics of plagioclase alteration. These alkali feldspars are microcline featuring typical tartan twinning, and within the alkali feldspar crystals, fine-grained quartz grains can be observed (Figure 3a,b). The amphibole occurs as subhedral tabular crystals and displays pleochroism. Some amphiboles are replaced by alkali feldspar and biotite. The biotite is mainly associated with amphiboles and occurs as subhedral morphologies. The MMEs are widespread in the Menyuan granodiorites and have irregular and rounded morphologies, ranging in size from ten centimeters to thirty centimeters in length, with a chilled margin; they are distributed irregularly in the host rocks (Figure 2c,d). Thin sections indicate that the MMEs have a clear boundary with the host granodiorites (Figure 3c). The MMEs are fine-to medium-fine-grained and dark-colored and show typical magmatic textures (Figure 3d–g). They mainly consist of subhedral plagioclase (~60 vol.%), amphibole (~30 vol.%), minor biotite (~5 vol.%), quartz (~3 vol.%), along with accessory minerals, such as apatite and zircon. The MME contains more mafic minerals than the host granodiorites. In addition, the characteristic microtextures observed within the MMEs encompass euhedral-subhedral plagioclase phenocryst, hornblende featuring zonal and poikilitic structures, skeletal biotite, acicular apatite, and slender hornblende (Figure 3d–g). The gabbro dike intruding into the host granodiorite displays a dark gray color, featuring a medium- to medium-fine-grained texture. It mainly consists of plagioclase (50–60 vol.%), amphibole (30–35 vol.%), and pyroxene (5–10 vol.%), with trace amounts of accessory minerals such as Fe–Ti oxides (Figure 3h).

4. Analytical Methods

In total, more than 30 representative samples were employed for zircon U-Pb dating, thin-section analyses, as well as zircon Hf and whole-rock Sr-Nd isotopes analyses. The detailed analytical methods are described in Appendix A.

5. Results

5.1. Mineral Composition

For the electron probe microanalysis, representative zonal plagioclase and amphibole grains were chosen from both the host granodiorites and MMEs from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. All analyses were conducted on fresh mineral domains to ascertain their compositions. The results are presented in Table S1 and Table S2, respectively.

5.1.1. Plagioclase

Plagioclase grains in the host granodiorite mainly plot in the bytownite and andesine fields in the Ab-Or-An diagram (Figure 4a). Some of the plagioclases in the host granodiorite recorded reversed compositional zonation with variation in the anorthite (An) content from the core (An42) to the rim (An74) (Figure 4b). In addition, plagioclase phenocryst in the MMEs mainly plot in the oligoclase and andesine fields in the Ab-Or-An diagram (Figure 4a). The anorthite (An) content of plagioclase in the MMEs is relatively lower compared to that in the host granodiorite. The plagioclase in the MMEs exhibits complex oscillatory zoning structure from core to rim, and the range of anorthite (An) content varies from 24 to 44 (Figure 4c).

5.1.2. Amphibole

Based on the classification proposed by Leake et al. (1997) [85] all amphiboles from the tested samples are calcic hornblende (CaB ≥ 1.5) and can be divided into two groups: (Na + K)A ≥ 0.5 and <0.5, respectively. Most amphibole analyses fall within the group of (Na + K)A < 0.5, located in the magnesiohornblende field (Figure 5a); the remaining amphiboles analysis spots classified under the group of (Na + K)A ≥ 0.5 mainly lie in the edenite field (Figure 5b). Based on the Ca-(Fe2+ + Fe3+)-Mg ternary diagram, the amphiboles in both the host granodiorite and the MMEs are plotted into the region of crust-mantle mixed-source, implying that the amphiboles may be the products of magmatic mixing(Figure 5c; [86]).
We applied the Al-in-amphibole barometry from Mutch et al. (2016) [87] and the Ti-in-amphibole thermometer from Liao et al. (2021) [88] to estimate the crystallization pressures and temperatures of the host granodiorites. The calculated pressures and temperatures for the host granodiorites range from 1.99 to 3.09 kbar and 714 to 774 °C, respectively. In addition, the Amp-Pl barometry from Molina et al. (2015) [89] and the Ti-in-amphibole thermometer from Liao et al. (2021) [88] were used to calculate the crystallization conditions of the MMEs, yielding pressures of 2.01–3.69 kbar and temperatures of 723–795 °C. Based on the continental crustal pressure gradient of 3.7 km per 1 kbar [90], the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton might have been emplaced at an intermediate-crustal or shallower depth (7.4–13.7 km).
Figure 5. (a,b) Amphibole classification diagram [91] for the host granodiorite and MME. (c) The Ca-(Fe2+ + Fe3+)-Mg diagram of amphibole for discriminating the magma source [92].
Figure 5. (a,b) Amphibole classification diagram [91] for the host granodiorite and MME. (c) The Ca-(Fe2+ + Fe3+)-Mg diagram of amphibole for discriminating the magma source [92].
Minerals 15 00391 g005

5.2. Zircon U-Pb Geochronology

The zircon cathodoluminescence (CL) images and Concordia diagrams of three representative samples are listed and presented in Table S3 and Figure 6. The majority of the studied zircons exhibit subhedral to euhedral prismatic, and most of them measure 100 μm to 200 μm in length and 50 μm to 100 μm in width. All the analyzed zircons exhibit clear oscillatory zoning with high Th/U ratios ranging from 0.22 to 0.9, which suggest a magmatic origin [93].
Twenty zircon spot analyses from the gabbro dike 15MY5-02 were obtained. The 206Pb/238U ages range from 520 Ma to 443 Ma, yielding a weighted average of 456.8 ± 6.3 Ma (MSWD = 2.9; Figure 6a), which can be interpreted as the emplacement age of the gabbro dike. The Th/U ratio of zircons varied between 0.57 and 0.90.
The 206Pb/238U ages given by twenty-seven analytical spots on the zircons from the MME 14MY3-06 range from 464 Ma to 448 Ma, with a weighted mean age of 456.4 ± 3.2 Ma (MSWD = 0.23; Figure 6b), which represents the crystallization age of the mafic microgranular enclaves in the Menyuan Pluton. The Th/U ratios of all zircons are greater than 0.4 (except for one value of 0.22), ranging from 0.22 to 0.79.
A total of twenty-five dating spots were performed on twenty-five zircons from the host granodiorite 16MY7-08. The 206Pb/238U ages given by 25 analytical spots on the zircons range from 470 Ma to 443 Ma, with a weighted mean age of 456.6 ± 9 Ma (MSWD = 0.77; Figure 6c), which indicates the emplacement age of the Menyuan host granodiorite. All the measured zircons showed Th/U ratios that varied between 0.36 and 0.83.

5.3. Whole-Rock Geochemistry

Field investigations and thin-section microstructures reveal that the studied samples are essentially fresh with minimal chemical alterations. The whole-rock major and trace element data are presented in Table S4.
The chemical classification reveals a broad lithological variety for the host rocks, enclaves, and gabbro dikes (Figure 7a), from relatively mafic to felsic composition (gabbro-diorite to granite). The host rocks have relatively high and variable SiO2 contents (60.03–73.34 wt.%), plotting within the diorite, granodiorite, and granite fields, exhibiting sub-alkaline features in the TAS diagram (Figure 7a). The host rocks have high contents of Al2O3 (12.68–17.44 wt.%) and K2O (1.94–3.58 wt.%) and low contents of TiO2 (0.08–0.73 wt.%), FeOT (0.73–5.82 wt.%), MgO (0.26–2.64 wt.%), and CaO (2.07–3.47 wt.%) (with corresponding Mg# values of 35–59). The total alkali content (Na2O + K2O) ranges from 5.94 wt.% to 7.45 wt.%, with Na2O/K2O ratios of 1.02–2.36. The magma was calc-alkaline to high-K calc-alkaline series (Figure 7b,c) and metaluminous to weakly peraluminous with A/CNK ratios of 0.80–1.15 (Figure 7d).
In contrast, the MMEs are characterized by lower SiO2 (49.77–54.26 wt.%), TiO2 (0.59–0.94 wt.%), and Al2O3 (13.47–15.69 wt.%), but higher MgO (6.93–8.62 wt.%), FeOT (6.68–9.12 wt.%), CaO (6.80–10.24 wt.%) (with corresponding Mg# values of 58–68), and total alkali (Na2O + K2O = 4.18–6.82 wt.%) contents with variable Na2O/K2O ratios of 0.64–2.95. The magma was calc-alkaline to shoshonitic (Figure 7b,c) and metaluminous with A/CNK ratios of 0.56–0.70 (Figure 7d). The gabbro dikes plot within the monzogabbro and monzodiorite fields, and most of the samples belong to alkaline series in the TAS diagram (Figure 7a). In addition, the gabbro dikes are also characterized by low SiO2 (48.05–54.15 wt.%) and high Al2O3 (16.23–18.16 wt.%), FeOT (7.45–10.84 wt.%), MgO (3.52–5.20 wt.%), and CaO (7.00–9.03 wt.%) (with corresponding Mg# values of 44–49), combined with low TiO2 (0.86–1.38 wt.%) contents. The total alkali content (Na2O + K2O) ranges from 5.26 wt.% to 6.39 wt.%, with Na2O/K2O ratios of 1.04–2.51. The magma was high-K calc-alkaline to shoshonite series (Figure 7b,c) and metaluminous with A/CNK ratios of 0.71–0.82 (Figure 7d).
These studied samples all exhibit similar chondrite-normalized REE distribution patterns, characterized by an enrichment of light rare earth elements (LREEs) in contrast to heavy rare earth elements (HREEs), with no significant Eu anomalies (Figure 8a–c). The primitive mantle-normalized, multi-element diagrams indicate comparable chemical features with enrichment in Ba, Th, Nd, U, and Pb, and depletion in Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf, P, and Ti (Figure 8d–f).
Figure 7. Geochemical discrimination diagrams for the magmatic rocks from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. (a) Total alkalis versus silica diagram [94]; (b) triangle plot of TotalFeO versus (Na2O + K2O wt.%) versus MgO (wt.%) (after [95]); (c) SiO2 (wt.%) versus K2O (wt.%) diagram (after [96]); (d) molar Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) versus molar Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O) (after [97]). The data for the subduction-related granitoids along the southern margin of the North Qilian Orogenic Belt (NQOB) are from [38,40,51,64].
Figure 7. Geochemical discrimination diagrams for the magmatic rocks from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. (a) Total alkalis versus silica diagram [94]; (b) triangle plot of TotalFeO versus (Na2O + K2O wt.%) versus MgO (wt.%) (after [95]); (c) SiO2 (wt.%) versus K2O (wt.%) diagram (after [96]); (d) molar Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) versus molar Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O) (after [97]). The data for the subduction-related granitoids along the southern margin of the North Qilian Orogenic Belt (NQOB) are from [38,40,51,64].
Minerals 15 00391 g007
Figure 8. Chondrite-normalized REE distribution pattern diagrams (ac) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element distribution pattern diagrams (df) for the magmatic rocks from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. The chondrite normalization values are after [98], and primitive mantle normalization values are after [99]. The compositions for the subduction-related granitoids along the southern margin of the North Qilian Orogenic Belt (NQOB) are from [38,40,51,64].
Figure 8. Chondrite-normalized REE distribution pattern diagrams (ac) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element distribution pattern diagrams (df) for the magmatic rocks from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. The chondrite normalization values are after [98], and primitive mantle normalization values are after [99]. The compositions for the subduction-related granitoids along the southern margin of the North Qilian Orogenic Belt (NQOB) are from [38,40,51,64].
Minerals 15 00391 g008

5.4. Zircon Hf and Whole-Rock Sr-Nd Isotopes

Zircon Hf and whole-rock Sr-Nd isotopic compositions for the studied samples are presented in Tables S5 and S6. The Lu-Hf isotopic analysis points are located in the same zircon grains that were used for the U-Pb dating. The initial 176Hf/177Hf ratios and εHf(t) values of the zircons were calculated based on their crystallization ages. The whole-rock initial Sr-Nd isotopic compositions and εNd(t) values were determined using a weighted mean age of 456 Ma.
The host granodiorite shows negative εHf(t) values of −8.8 to −1.2 (average −4, 24 zircons; Figure 9a) with corresponding two-stage Hf model ages of 1764–1356 Ma. Zircon grains from the MME show variable εHf(t) values of −0.1 to +4.1 (average +2.5, 27 zircons; Figure 9a) with corresponding depleted mantle model ages of 1075–905 Ma. The gabbro samples have positive εHf(t) values of +4.0 to +8.2 (average +6.13, 20 zircons; Figure 9a) with corresponding depleted mantle model ages of 906–743 Ma.
The host granodiorites have variable initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios of 0.7072–0.7158 and εNd(t) values of −9.21 to −4.23 (Figure 9b,c), with two-stage Nd model ages (TDM2) of 1939–1535 Ma, which are closed to the Nd model ages of the Precambrian basement metamorphic rocks of the Qilian Block (ca. 1.8–2.6 Ga, [100,101]). In comparison, the MMEs have slightly lower initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios of 0.7078–0.7089 and higher εNd(t) values of −3.88 to −1.68 (Figure 9b,c), with corresponding mantle-depleted Nd model ages (TDM1) of 1711–1306 Ma. The gabbro samples have homogeneous and depleted initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios of 0.7049–0.7054 and εNd(t) values of +1.23 to +2.56 with TDM1 model ages of 1187–903 Ma (Figure 9b,c), and plot in the field of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle in the North Qilian Belt.
Figure 9. Plots of (a) εHf(t) and (b) εNd(t) values versus ages and (c) (87Sr/86Sr)i versus εNd(t) diagram for samples from the NQOB. In (c), a binary mixing curve between the depleted mantle-derived Paleozoic basalt (Sample LH57, Sr = 201, (87Sr/86Sr)i = 0.7038, Nd = 12.2, εNd(t) = 6.57; [102]) and amphibolite within the Precambrian Qilian basement (Average: Sr = 250, (87Sr/86Sr)i = 0.7187, Nd = 46.5, εNd(t) = −10.01; [103]) are also shown. Blue dots on the binary mixing curve represent the mixing ratios. Data sources: Menyuan magmatic rocks [38]; the Precambrian basement rocks in the Qilian Block [101,103,104,105]; enriched mantle-derived mafic rocks in the NQOB [106,107,108]; depleted mantle-derived ophiolites and adakites in the NQOB [102,109,110,111]; coeval arc-type mafic rocks derived from metasomatized asthenospheric mantle in the NQOB [61]; thickened lower crust-derived adakitic rocks and old crust-derived granites in the NQOB [43,46,81,101,112].
Figure 9. Plots of (a) εHf(t) and (b) εNd(t) values versus ages and (c) (87Sr/86Sr)i versus εNd(t) diagram for samples from the NQOB. In (c), a binary mixing curve between the depleted mantle-derived Paleozoic basalt (Sample LH57, Sr = 201, (87Sr/86Sr)i = 0.7038, Nd = 12.2, εNd(t) = 6.57; [102]) and amphibolite within the Precambrian Qilian basement (Average: Sr = 250, (87Sr/86Sr)i = 0.7187, Nd = 46.5, εNd(t) = −10.01; [103]) are also shown. Blue dots on the binary mixing curve represent the mixing ratios. Data sources: Menyuan magmatic rocks [38]; the Precambrian basement rocks in the Qilian Block [101,103,104,105]; enriched mantle-derived mafic rocks in the NQOB [106,107,108]; depleted mantle-derived ophiolites and adakites in the NQOB [102,109,110,111]; coeval arc-type mafic rocks derived from metasomatized asthenospheric mantle in the NQOB [61]; thickened lower crust-derived adakitic rocks and old crust-derived granites in the NQOB [43,46,81,101,112].
Minerals 15 00391 g009

6. Discussion

6.1. Petrogenesis and Source Nature of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton

6.1.1. Petrogenesis of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton

The principal rock-forming minerals of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton are plagioclase and hornblende, lacking typical peraluminous minerals like muscovite, garnet, and cordierite. The host granodiorites are metaluminous to weakly peraluminous with A/CNK ratios ranging from 0.80 to 1.16 (with an average of 0.85), low K2O/Na2O ratios (0.42–0.98), and low Zr saturation temperatures (with an average of 746 °C, see Table S4), indicating affinity with I-type granites [113]. Furthermore, the studied samples of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton have a significant difference from those of sanukitoid magma featuring depleted CaO and enriched MgO elements [114] (Figure S1). These rock samples show arc-type magmatic features with enrichment of large ion lithophile elements (LILEs, e.g., Rb and Pb) and LREEs but depletion of HFSEs (e.g., Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf and Ti). Integrated with the geochemical characteristics of arc magma and low (Na2O + K2O)/CaO and TFeO/MgO ratios (Figure 10), the Menyuan granodiorites are classified as unfractionated calc-alkaline I-type granites. The fractional crystallization from mantle-derived basaltic magma, partial melting of a single heterogeneous source, such as pure crust or lithospheric mantle, as well as magma mixing between mantle-derived mafic melts and crust-derived felsic melts are the three primary mechanisms for the petrogenesis of calc-alkaline I-type granites [115,116,117].
Before discussing the petrogenesis and characteristics of the source nature, it is essential to consider the potential of crustal contamination during the ascent and emplacement of magma [119,120]. Crustal contamination is expected to result in positive Zr-Hf anomalies and positive correlation between (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios and SiO2 contents or negative correlation between εNd(t) values and SiO2 contents [121]. However, our data exhibited significant negative Zr-Hf anomalies (Figure 8), with no obvious correlation between SiO2 contents and both (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios and εNd(t) values for the MMEs and gabbro dikes (Figure 11a,b), and the εNd(t) values of host granodiorites do not decrease significantly with the increase of SiO2 contents (Figure 11b). Meanwhile, ancient inherited zircon grains are not present in the Menyuan-dated samples, indicating that contamination by ancient crustal materials is insignificant or negligible for the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. Thus, the geochemical characteristics of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton can effectively reflect their petrogenesis and magma sources.
Several genetic mechanisms have accounted for the formation of MMEs in the granitoids and their connection to the host granites: (1) xenolith: fragments from wall rocks that are incorporated during the ascent of the host magmas (e.g., [120,122]); (2) refractory remnants from the magma source region (e.g., [123,124]); (3) autoliths associated with early-formed cumulate minerals originating from a cogenetic magma (e.g., [20]); and (4) hybrid magma blobs resulting from mafic and felsic magma mixing (e.g., [7,125]). The question widely applied to their formation are whether they are of co-genetic origin or that of heterogeneous magma mixing [21,25,31,126]. The MMEs hosted in the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton are ellipsoidal or irregular in shape with clear edges and they display apparent magmatic textures, and the MMEs are distributed throughout the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton (Figure 2c,d). The fact that the MMEs and the host granodiorites have indistinguishable crystallization ages and a similar mineral assemblage eliminates the possibility that the MMEs are restites or xenoliths from magma sources or country rocks.
The Menyuan host granodiorites have variable SiO2 (60.03–73.34 wt.%), high total FeO (0.73–5.82 wt.%) and MgO (0.26–2.64 wt.%) contents, with relatively high Mg# (35.28–58.66, mean value = 43.76) values, which belong to calc-alkaline and high-K calc-alkaline rocks, and have metaluminous-to-weakly-peraluminous features (Figure 7d). Compared to the host granodiorites, MMEs have relatively lower SiO2 (49.77–54.26 wt.%) and higher MgO (6.93–8.62 wt.%) contents and Mg# (57.73–67.54) concentrations, reflecting a significant mantle contribution [121,127]. The Nb/Ta ratios of our studied samples are well above the average range of the continental crust and are inconsistent with typical crustal origin. Experimental studies have revealed that melts that originated from the partial melting of pure lower crust with no mantle material input generally correspond to low Mg# melts (<42), but high Mg# melts (>60) are derived from mantle-derived basic rocks [128,129]. Moreover, the host granodiorites have significantly enriched Sr-Nd isotope compositions with initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.7072–0.7158) and whole-rock εNd(t) values (−9.21 to −4.23), which are obviously distinct from the lithospheric mantle-derived melts in the North Qilian Belt (Figure 9c). Therefore, they are not controlled by partial melting of the mafic lower crust or lithospheric mantle.
Previous studies have shown that the mafic minerals crystallized at an early stage in the magma chamber are characterized by coarse-grained and cumulate textures [130]. However, the predominantly rock-forming minerals of the MMEs are obvious smaller compared to their host granites, and the MMEs are randomly distributed without mafic minerals’ cumulate texture. Likewise, given that the REEs are strongly incompatible elements, if the MMEs and host granites have a cognate origin and host granodiorites are derived from fractional crystallization of the basaltic magma, the contents of REEs of the host granodiorites were higher than the MMEs (e.g., [96]), but the MMEs exhibit REE contents comparable to those of the host granodiorites (Figure 8a). In addition, the fractional crystallization of the amphibole, biotite, or plagioclase was not detected in the diagrams of fractionation trends for the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton (Figure 11c–f). The fractionation crystallization from mantle-derived basaltic magma demands contemporaneous and larger amounts of mafic rocks than granites; however, the Menyuan granodiorites cropped out as large-scale plutons and gabbro dikes have an intrusive contact with the granodiorite. These observations are inconsistent with cognate or autolith origin whereby the MMEs were produced during early-formed phases within the same magma chamber as the host granodiorites. Combined with a clear whole-rock Sr-Nd and zircon Hf isotopic contrast between the host granodiorites and MMEs (Figure 9), we suggest that they are unlikely to have been formed by fractional crystallization of a single heterogeneous source. The wide ranges of major element contents and trace elemental ratios of the host granites and MMEs reflect contrasting mantle and crustal sources. Thus, the heterogeneous magma mixing from different magma sources is the most possible petrogenesis for the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton.
There are several pieces of evidence suggesting that the petrogenesis of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton may be related to incomplete magmatic mixing. The MMEs are irregular ellipsoidal in shape, and have sharp and occasionally diffusive contact with the Menyuan granodiorites, which indicate that parental mafic magma was still partially ductile while being injected into the host granitic magma and during their mixing [1,131]. Plagioclase xenocrysts captured from the host granodiorite and surrounded by fine-grained mafic minerals can be identified in MME (Figure 3e). The megacrysts of plagioclase in MMEs can be considered as the consequence of mechanical transfer occurring between felsic and mafic magmas in the course of the magmatic mingling process [115,132]. Felsic back-veins with a mineral assemblage resembling that of the host granodiorites are detected in the MMEs (Figure 2d), and they are caused by the formation of fractures due to magma-quenching crystallization when hotter mafic magma was injected into relatively cooler felsic host magma [7,116]. In addition, disequilibrium textures are common in the MMEs and host granodiorites, which are considered to be evidence of mechanical stirring of minerals between felsic and mafic magmas during magma mingling. Mostly, the plagioclase grains are rounded and embayed with dissolution textures in the MMEs, which indicates that the plagioclases crystallized in the felsic magma chamber and experienced remelting in relatively high-temperature mafic magma after mechanical transfer. The occurrences of skeletal biotite and sieve-textured hornblende in the MMEs and some euhedral-subhedral plagioclase grains rimmed with fine-grained mafic minerals in the host granodiorites probably reflect that partial dissolution and overgrowth of principal rock-forming minerals have occurred in the hybrid magma [117]. The occurrence of acicular apatite and slender hornblende (Figure 3g) can be considered to be a result of undercooling and rapid crystallization under water saturation conditions when the hotter basic magma was injected into relatively cool felsic magma [131,133]. Furthermore, plagioclase in the host granodiorites exhibit reversed compositional zonation with the rapid increase in anorthite (An) content (Figure 4b), indicating the chemical and thermal changes during plagioclase crystallization, which may be related to magmatic mixing [134,135,136]. Plagioclase in MMEs exhibits complex oscillatory zoning structure with oscillating orthite (An) content (Figure 4c). This may be attributed to the injection of high-temperature basaltic magma that caused the dissolution of the previous low-An plagioclase in the shallow magma chamber, leading to the formation of sieve textures [137]. Subsequently, the sieve-textured plagioclase continued to grow in the hybrid magma, and during the magma mixing process, these plagioclase macrocrysts were successively captured by the MMEs. These features suggest that the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton was most likely derived from a mixed source of mantle and crustal origin, while the MMEs represent mafic-hybrid magma globules scattered throughout the host granodiorites by convection.
The elemental geochemical and isotopic characteristics of the whole rocks further suggest that the magma mixing was insufficient during the formation of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. The MgO versus TFeO distribution shown on the whole-rock discrimination diagram conforms to the magma mixing trend (Figure 12a). In the Al2O3/CaO versus Na2O/CaO and CaO/Al2O3 versus K2O/MgO diagrams, there exist clear linear and curved correlations which are also in accordance with the magma mixing trend (Figure 12b,c). The behavioral differences between compatible and incompatible elements are conducive to the identification of magmatic mixing [138,139]. The Rb/V versus 1/V diagram plots along the mixing arrays of the melts, which can indicate magma mixing (Figure 12d). Additionally, similar normalized elemental patterns (Figure 8) for the studied samples of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton reflect that elemental diffusion and re-equilibration of trace elements that occurred during the magma mixing process. Zircon Hf isotopes characterized by high closure temperatures, high stability, and early crystallization in magmatic systems can effectively resist later isotopic exchange and re-equilibration between the interacting magmas [140]. As illustrated in Figure 9a, diverse Hf isotopic compositions recorded the magma source and mixing process. For the Sr-Nd isotopic system, Sr exhibits much higher mobility than Nd in both fluids and melts [141,142], which results in comparable initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios (ranging from to 0.7072 to 0.7101) but somewhat distinct εNd(t) values for the Menyuan MMEs and host granodiorites during the magma mixing process (Figure 9c). Nevertheless, the wide range of whole-rock Sr-Nd and zircon Hf isotopic compositions observed in the MMEs and host granodiorites (Figure 9a–c) indicates restricted chemical exchange between the two magma end-members from distinct sources during magma mixing, and isotopic homogenization was not achieved prior to the complete solidification of the hybrid magma [140]. Consequently, we deduce that the most likely explanation for the formation of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton involves the incomplete mixing of magma derived from mantle and crustal sources, and the MMEs are the relics of local heterogeneity within the mixed melt serving as direct evidence of magma mixing. Effective magma mixing requires the onset of local superheating of the felsic magma [143]. The occurrence of contemporaneous Menyuan gabbroic dikes indicates a regional mafic magma injection event, and the mafic mantle-derived magma underplating provides adequate energy for the partial melting of the lower crust to generate crustal melts.

6.1.2. Source Nature of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton

The key to clarifying the crust–mantle magma mixing process lies in revealing the components of crust–mantle magmatic end-members. The host granodiorites, MMEs, and gabbro dikes in this study share similar diagenetic ages, normalized elements distribution patterns, as well as spatiotemporal correlation, suggesting that they may have a genetic connection. Notably, similar geochemical and isotopic compositions between the MMEs and coeval gabbro dikes indicate that they probably originated from a similar mantle source. The finding of magma mixing origin illustrates that the geochemical characteristics of the MMEs and coeval gabbro dikes cannot accurately represent the original compositions of the magma derived from the mantle. However, we can deduce some crucial information about the mantle source from the geochemical and isotopic features of these studied rocks. The gabbro dikes are characterized by much more positive and homogeneous εNd(t) (+1.23 to +2.56) and εHf(t) (+4.0 to +8.2) values compared to other Menyuan samples in this study with depleted mantle Hf model ages of 906–743 Ma. Additionally, the MMEs have moderately enriched εNd(t) (−3.88 to −1.68) and εHf(t) (−0.1~+4.1) values with depleted mantle Hf model ages of 1075–905 Ma, which indicate an early Neoproterozoic-enriched mantle source. Notably, the Nd isotope data of the MMEs and the gabbro dikes are lower than those of the coeval depleted mantle-derived basalts-basaltic andesites (εNd(t) = +3.0 to +5.9) in the North Qilian Belt (Figure 9c [61]), but they overlap with those of enriched mantle-derived mafic rocks in the North Qilian Belt. The MMEs and the gabbro dikes in the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton are distinctly enriched in LILEs (Ba, K, and Sr) and LREEs, and are depleted in HFSEs (Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf, and Ti; Figure 8e,f), which is consistent with arc-like trace elements distribution patterns. In the La/Yb versus Nb/La diagram, most samples of the MMEs and the gabbro dikes fall in the source region of the lithosphere mantle (Figure 13a). Combined with the relatively low La/Ba and high Th/Yb ratios (Figure 13b,c), these geochemical characteristics indicate that the mafic magma was produced by partial melting of a subduction-modified continental lithospheric mantle source [145,146,147]. Combined with the Nb/Y versus Ba, Nb/Y versus Rb/Y, and Sr/Nd versus Th/Yb diagrams (Figure 13d–f), these mafic samples display a fluid-related enrichment trend, indicating that the lithospheric mantle source was probably metasomatized by subducted slab-derived fluids prior to melting [148]. Moreover, the presence of hornblende in the studied samples from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton also reflects the participation of fluids. Thus, we suggest that the mafic magma end-member in this study was derived from partial melting of the enriched lithospheric mantle metasomatized by slab-derived fluids in the North Qilian Belt.
The Menyuan host granodiorites are K-rich, calc-alkaline, and high-K calc-alkaline rocks in geochemistry and they have negative εHf(t) values of −8.8 to −1.2, corresponding with two-stage Hf model ages of 1764–1356 Ma, which indicates that they might be predominantly associated with the recycling of Paleoproterozoic-to-early-Mesoproterozoic crustal materials within the North Qilian Orogenic Belt. Their relatively low εNd(t) values range from −9.21 to −4.23, with two-stage Nd model ages of 1939–1535 Ma, which are close to the isotopic composition range of the meta-basaltic rocks from the Qilian basement, but deviate from data related to the paragneiss and Neoproterozoic granitoids from the Precambrian basement (Figure 9c). It can be inferred that the crustal-derived source of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton was produced by the partial melting of meta-basaltic rocks from the Qilian basement. Abundant meta-basaltic rocks have been identified in the Qilian Precambrian basement, and their mantle-depleted Nd model ages range from 1.8 to 2.6 Ga [100,101]. Considering all the mentioned facts, it is reasonable to confirm that the ancient mafic lower continental crustal rocks from the Qilian Block were the crustal source of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton, which is reinforced by the presence of amphibolite enclaves within the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton [38]. In this scenario, we applied a two-component mixing model of a whole rock Sr-Nd isotope to roughly simulate the interaction between the ancient mafic lower continental crust and depleted mantle-derived melts. The simple binary mixing simulation indicates that the proportions of mantle components involved in the formation of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton varied from 10% to 30%, while the proportions of ancient crustal materials varied from 70% to 90% (Figure 9c).
As discussed above, the magma originating from the lithospheric mantle and the melts of the ancient mafic lower continental crust beneath the Qilian Block made an substantial contribution to the magmatic sources of the Middle-Late Ordovician Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton.

6.2. Geodynamic Implication for the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton

The LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating data obtained from the granodiorites, MMEs, and gabbroic dikes suggest that the magma emplacement time for the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton can be constrained to the Middle-Late Ordovician period (470–443 Ma). These ages are consistent with the previous magmatic ages (ranging from 520 to 440 Ma) associated with the subduction of the North Qilian Ocean in the northern margin of the Qilian Block and adjacent regions [35,36,37,38,40,51,55,151]. For example, the ca. 466 Ma felsic volcanic rocks in the Qingshuigou were attributed to an arc setting [152].The quartz diorites (ca. 476 Ma) from the Niuxinshan and granodiorites (ca. 463 Ma) from the Minyueyaogou were formed in an active continental margin setting [153]. The 503–450 Ma I-type granite and mafic rocks, 461–443 Ma arc volcanic rocks, and 508–450 Ma metamorphic rocks at Menyuan Lenglongling-Dabanshan in the northern margin of the Qilian Block were formed during the south-dipping subduction of the North Qilian Ocean in the Early Paleozoic [37,38,51,154,155]. In this regard, the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton in this study was likely produced in an active continental arc setting related to the southward subduction of the North Qilian Oceanic slab. All studied samples from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton are calc-alkaline in composition and have similar normalized elemental patterns with enrichment in LILEs (e.g., Ba, Rb, and Pb) and depletion in HFSEs (e.g., Nb, Ta, and Ti; Figure 8e,f), typically characterizing subduction-related magmatism [145,156,157,158]. In addition, the MMEs and gabbro dike samples are mainly distributed in the island-arc basalt field in the Y/15-La/10-Nb/8 and Ti/100-Zr-Y*3 ternary diagrams (Figure 14a,b), and show affinities close to the continental arcs in the Nb/Yb versus Th/Yb diagram (Figure 13c), which support an active continental arc setting. Therefore, the U-Pb zircon ages from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton (ca. 456 Ma), in combination with the chemical characteristics described above, suggest subduction-related magmatism. The Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton can be regarded as continental arc rocks formed in an active continental arc setting, which was associated with the southward subduction of the North Qilian Ocean beneath the northern margin of the Qilian Block in the Middle-Late Ordovician period.
The triggering mechanism of Middle-Late Ordovician arc magmatism along the northern margin of the Qilian Block during the subduction-dominated stage constitutes a pivotal scientific question that needs to be discussed. The subducted slab rollback and breakoff can induce asthenospheric upwelling coupled with partial melting of the overriding lithospheric mantle. Then, the thermal perturbation migrates upward, initiating crustal anatexis within the continental crust, which establishes favorable conditions for extensive crust–mantle interaction [161]. The slab breakoff model is commonly invoked to explain syn- to post-collisional magmatism in orogenic systems, wherein detachment initiates after the complete consumption of the oceanic lithosphere, which seems inadequate to interpret the arc magmatism of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton [162,163]. Therefore, we consider that the formation of Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton in this study was most likely initiated by the slab rollback under the force of gravity during the Middle-Late Ordovician period.
Clarifying the petrogenetic affiliation of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton can provide important insights to the emplacement process of orogenic magmas and extensive crust–mantle interactions. The Menyuan Granodioritic Plutonic rocks were related to mixing between the lithospheric mantle-derived magma and ancient continental crustal melts in the active continental arc setting. During subduction, the subducted slab rollback caused partial melting of the overlying lithospheric mantle metasomatized by slab-derived fluids and the thermal upwelling of high-temperature, mantle-derived basaltic magmas. Meanwhile, the high-temperature basaltic magmatic underplating could provide sufficient energy for the anatexis of the ancient mafic continental lower crust beneath the Qilian Block to form primitive felsic melts. These crust-derived felsic melts subsequently experienced variable mixing with mantle-derived basaltic magma during ascent, ultimately emplacing as the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton in the upper crust along the northern margin of the Qilian Block (Figure 15a,b). Consequently, our results advocate for a magmatic underplating mechanism in which the upwelling of high-temperature mantle-derived magma induced extensive crust–mantle interaction.

7. Conclusions

(1) The Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton primarily consists of enclave-bearing granodiorites with minor gabbroic dike. These studied rocks samples have a consistent LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb age of ca. 456 Ma, suggesting a Middle-Late Ordovician mafic to felsic magmatism within the North Qilian orogen;
(2) The host granodiorites and the MMEs exhibit similar crystallization ages, trace elemental geochemistry, and Sr isotopic compositions, yet display heterogeneous whole-rock Nd and zircon Hf isotopic characteristics. This can be interpreted as a result of insufficient chemical and isotopic equilibration during the magma mixing process;
(3) The Menyuan host granodiorites and the MMEs were likely derived from a hybrid magma, which was composed of components derived from the lithospheric mantle and ancient mafic lower continental crust. The felsic magma was generated from the anatexis of the meta-basalt from the Precambrian Qilian basement, and the mafic magma originated from the melting of the enriched lithospheric mantle that intruded into the lower continental crust through underplating. Then, the mafic magmas mixed with felsic melts to form arc magmatic rocks ranging from gabbroic to granodioritic in the shallow crust;
(4) The geochemical and isotopic characteristics of the gabbro dikes indicate that they originated from the lithospheric mantle metasomatized by slab-derived fluids. Their presence reflects the existence of evolved mafic magmas in the region that did not directly participate in mixing with the granodiorites and provides evidence for mantle-derived magmatism;
(5) Detailed field observations, petrographic, and geochemical data suggest that the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton formed in an active continental-arc setting induced by the northward rollback of the Qilian Proto-Tethys Ocean in the Middle-Late Ordovician period.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/min15040391/s1: Figure S1: MgO (wt.%) versus CaO (wt.%) diagram (after [114]). Table S1: Plagioclase compositions of the host granodiorite and MME from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton; Table S2: Amphibole compositions of the host granodiorite and MME from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton; Table S3: LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb isotope data for the MME, host granodiorite, and gabbro dike from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton; Table S4: Whole-rock major and trace element compositions for the MME, host granodiorite, and gabbro dike from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton [165]; Table S5: LA-MC-ICP-MS zircon Lu-Hf isotope compositions for the MME, host granodiorite, and gabbro dike from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton; Table S6: Whole-rock Sr-Nd isotope compositions for the MME, host granodiorite, and gabbro dike from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, and writing—original draft preparation, S.X.; supervision, investigation, S.Y. and Q.W.; writing—review and editing, Y.Q., X.J. and X.G.; data curation, Y.W., C.L., L.W. and Y.P.; funding acquisition, S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Taishan Scholars (grant number ts20231214), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 42372247, U2344214 and 42402218), and the Natural Science Youth Foundation of Shandong Province (grant number ZR2022QD055).

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in the study are included in the article and Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Appendix A.1. LA-ICP-MS Zircon U-Pb Dating

The zircons were isolated by using heavy liquid and standard magnetic technology. The zircons were placed in epoxy resin and ground down to approximately half of their original thickness to obtain Cathodoluminescence (CL) and perform subsequent U-Pb analysis operations. By using laser ablation multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS), zircon U-Pb dating analysis of representative fresh samples was carried out in the Institute of Mineral Resources, CAGS (Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences), Beijing, China. In the process of laser ablation, the laser spot size was 30 μm, the carrier gas uesd helium, and the make-up gas was argon. Hou et al. (2009) have described detailed operating instructions and simplified data processing for the laser ablation system [166]. Zircon GJ-1 served as an external standard for U-Pb dating, and was analyzed twice every 5–10 measurements. To correct for the time-dependent drift of U-Th-Pb isotopic ratios, linear interpolation was applied every 5–10 analyses using GJ-1 as a reference [167]. The Isoplot 3.0 program was used to generate zircon U-Pb Concordia diagrams and calculate the weighted average value.

Appendix A.2. Zircon Lu-Hf Isotope Analysis

The Lu-Hf isotope analysis of zircon was performed in the Institute of Mineral Resources, CAGS, Beijing, China and by using the Neptune multi-receiver ICP-MS and New wave UP 213 laser ablative microprobe. The relevant description of the instrument and the specific method of data collection can be referred to in the literature published by Hou et al. (2007) [168]. In this experiment, the carrier gas uesd helium, and the ablation diameter was determined to be 42 μm based on zircon size. The international zircon standard GJ-1 was used as the standard material. For mass identification calibration, the index normalization of Yb isotope ratio was carried out using 173Yb/172Yb = 1.35274, and the Hf isotope ratios were calibrated using 179Hf/177Hf = 0.7325. In the calculation of εHf(t) values, the values of chondrites used were 176Lu/177Hf = 0.0336 and 176Hf/177Hf = 0.282785. The specific analysis process is consistent with the content elaborated by Griffin et al. (2000) [169].

Appendix A.3. Whole-Rock Geochemical

The analysis of rare earth elements, major elements, and trace elements in the whole rock was performed by using X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) at the CAGS, Beijing, China. The analysis error was controlled within 5%. The determination of rare earth elements and trace elements in whole rock was completed by using the ICP-MS technique. At the same time, the whole-rock major elements were completed by using the Primus II XRF technique. The separation of rare earth elements was realized by cation exchange technology. The measurement precision of elements was 10% if the abundances were below 10 ppm, whereas the measurement precision of elements was approximately 5% if the abundances were above 10 ppm. Details of the analytical procedures of major and trace elements can be referred to in the study by Liu et al. (2008) [170].

Appendix A.4. Whole-Rock Sr-Nd Isotopes

The analysis of Sr and Nd isotopes was carried out at Beijing Createch Testing Technology. The isotope dilution method was employed to determine the concentrations of Sr and Nd. After Sr and Nd were separated and purified using a double-packed column, they were analyzed by a Neptune Plus MC-ICP–MS instrument. The ratios of 87Sr/86Sr and 143Nd/144Nd were corrected by the exponential fractionation law and the assumption that 88Sr/86Sr = 8.375209 and 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219, respectively. The 143Nd/144Nd ratios of GSP-2 and BHVO-2 international Certified Reference Materials were 0.511374 ± 5 and 0.512984 ± 5, respectively, which were identified with standard values within analytical errors. The detailed analyses on the Sr-Nd isotope can be referred to in the study by Li et al. (2012) [171].

Appendix A.5. Mineral Analysis

Before analysis, the sample probe sections were carefully examined under a microscope to select target minerals for imaging. The geochemical analysis of major elements in minerals was conducted by the CAGS, Beijing, China, using a JEOL JXA 8900 electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA). The measurement accuracy of major oxides was superior to 1%. Quantitative analysis was conducted under experimental conditions of an acceleration voltage of 15 kV, a probe current of 20 nA, as well as a beam spot size of 5 μm. In addition, secondary electron (SE) and backscattered electron (BSE) images were utilized for image analysis. The results were corrected using the ZAF method. Detailed procedures and parameters are as those described in the study by Lai et al. (2016) [172].

References

  1. Kumar, S.; Rino, V.; Pal, A.B. Field Evidence of Magma Mixing from Microgranular Enclaves Hosted in Palaeoproterozoic Malanjkhand Granitoids, Central India. Gondwana Res. 2004, 7, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Turnbull, R.; Weaver, S.; Tulloch, A.; Cole, J.; Handler, M.; Ireland, T. Field and geochemical constraints on mafic–felsic interactions, and processes in high-level arc magma chambers: An example from the Halfmoon Pluton, New Zealand. J. Petrol. 2010, 51, 1477–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wiebe, R.A.; Hawkins, D.P. Growth and Impact of a Mafic-Silicic Layered Intrusion in the Vinalhaven Intrusive Complex, Maine. J. Petrol. 2015, 56, 273–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Flinders, J.; Clemens, J.D. Non-linear dynamics, chaos, complexity and enclaves in granitoid magmas. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 1996, 87, 217–223. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ortiz, A.; Becchio, R.; Juárez, S.; Suzaño, N.; Hauser, N.; Sola, A.; Bardelli, L.; Simón, V.; Quiroga, M.; Bordese, S. Magma mixing, zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopes: Insights for the Miocene magmatic plumbing system in the Soroche Porphyry, Puna Argentina, Central Andes. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 2021, 109, 103291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wilcox, R.E. The Idea of Magma Mixing: History of a Struggle for Acceptance. J. Geol. 1999, 107, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barbarin, B. Mafic magmatic enclaves and mafic rocks associated with some granitoids of the central Sierra Nevada batholith, California: Nature, origin, and relations with the hosts. Lithos 2005, 80, 155–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kumar, S.; Bora, S.; Sharma, U.K.; Yi, K.; Kim, N. Early Cretaceous subvolcanic calc-alkaline granitoid magmatism in the Nubra-Shyok valley of the Shyok Suture Zone, Ladakh Himalaya, India: Evidence from geochemistry and U–Pb SHRIMP zircon geochronology. Lithos 2017, 277, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Renjith, M.L.; Charan, S.N.; Subbarao, D.V.; Babu, E.; Rajashekhar, V.B. Grain to outcrop-scale frozen moments of dynamic magma mixing in the syenite magma chamber, Yelagiri Alkaline Complex, South India. Geosci. Front. 2014, 5, 801–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paterson, S.R.; Pignotta, G.S.; Vernon, R.H. The significance of microgranitoid enclave shapes and orientations. J. Struct. Geol. 2004, 26, 1465–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Castro, A.; Moreno-Ventas, I.; de la Rosa, J.D. H-type (hybrid) granitoids: A proposed revision of the granite-type classification and nomenclature. Earth-Sci. Rev. 1991, 31, 237–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Didier, J.; Barbarin, B. Enclaves and Granite Petrology, Developments in Petrology; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fernández, C.; Castro, A. Mechanical and structural consequences of magma differentiation at ascent conduits: A possible origin for some mafic microgranular enclaves in granites. Lithos 2018, 320–321, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chappell, B.W.; Wyborn, D. Origin of enclaves in S-type granites of the Lachlan Fold Belt. Lithos 2012, 154, 235–247. [Google Scholar]
  15. Vernon, R.H. Restite, xenoliths and microgranitoid enclaves in granites. J. Proc. R. Soc. N. S. W. 1983, 116, 77–103. [Google Scholar]
  16. Acosta-Vigil, A.; Buick, I.; Hermann, J.; Cesare, B.; Rubatto, D.; London, D.; Morgan, G.B.V.I. Mechanisms of Crustal Anatexis: A Geochemical Study of Partially Melted Metapelitic Enclaves and Host Dacite, SE Spain. J. Petrol. 2010, 51, 785–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chappell, B.W.; White, A.J.R.; Wyborn, D. The Importance of Residual Source Material (Restite) in Granite Petrogenesis. J. Petrol. 1987, 28, 1111–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Collins, W.J. Evaluation of petrogenetic models for Lachlan Fold Belt granitoids: Implications for crustal architecture and tectonic models. Aust. J. Earth Sci. 1998, 45, 483–500. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dahlquist, J.A. Mafic microgranular enclaves: Early segregation from metaluminous magma (Sierra de Chepes), Pampean Ranges, NW Argentina. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 2002, 15, 643–655. [Google Scholar]
  20. Donaire, T.; Pascual, E.; Pin, C.; Duthou, J.-L. Microgranular enclaves as evidence of rapid cooling in granitoid rocks: The case of the Los Pedroches granodiorite, Iberian Massif, Spain. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2005, 149, 247–265. [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, H.; Niu, Y.L.; Nowell, G.; Zhao, Z.D.; Yu, X.H.; Zhu, D.C.; Mo, X.X.; Ding, S. Geochemical constraints on the petrogenesis of granitoids in the East Kunlun Orogenic belt, northern Tibetan Plateau: Implications for continental crust growth through syn-collisional felsic magmatism. Chem. Geol. 2014, 370, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Niu, Y.L.; Zhao, Z.D.; Zhu, D.C.; Mo, X.X. Continental collision zones are primary sites for net continental crust growth–A testable hypothesis. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2013, 127, 96–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rodríguez, C.; Pereira, M.F.; Martí, J.; Bach, N.; Scahmuells, N. Ultra-high temperatures recorded in parental magmas from hybrid zones. GSA Bull. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rodríguez, C.; Aragón, E.; Díaz-Alvarado, J.; Castro, A.; Pedreira, R.; Sánchez-Navas, A.; Martí, J. Fractionation by compositional magma splitting: An example from Cerro Munro, Argentina. Lithos 2021, 400–401, 106396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, B.; Chen, Z.C.; Jahn, B.M. Origin of mafic enclaves from the Taihang Mesozoic orogen, north China craton. Lithos 2009, 110, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, F.; Nakamuru, E.; Fan, W.; Kobayoshi, K.; Li, C. Generation of Palaeocene Adakitic Andesites by Magma Mixing; Yanji Area, NE China. J. Petrol. 2007, 48, 661–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Plail, M.; Edmonds, M.; Woods, A.W.; Barclay, J.; Humphreys, M.C.S.; Herd, R.A.; Christopher, T. Mafic enclaves record syn-eruptive basalt intrusion and mixing. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2018, 484, 30–40. [Google Scholar]
  28. Abdel-Karim, A.-A.M.; Azer, M.K.; Mogahed, M.M. Neoproterozoic concentric intrusive complex of gabbro-diorite-tonalite-granodiorite association, Rahaba area, southern Eastern Desert of Egypt: Implications for magma mixing of arc intrusive rocks. Lithos 2021, 404–405, 106423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mandon, C.L.; Christenson, B.W.; Seward, T.M.; Schipper, C.I. Magma mixing, degassing and late sulfide saturation: Insights into the 1976–2000 eruptive sequence at White Island, New Zealand. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2021, 417, 107299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Perugini, D. What is Magma Mixing? The Mixing of Magmas: Field Evidence, Numerical Models, Experiments; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen, S.; Niu, Y.; Li, J.; Sun, W.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Shao, F. Syn-collisional adakitic granodiorites formed by fractional crystallization: Insights from their enclosed mafic magmatic enclaves (MMEs) in the Qumushan pluton, North Qilian Orogen at the northern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Lithos 2016, 248–251, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Holden, P.; Halliday, A.N.; Stephens, W.E. Neodymium and strontium isotope content of microdiorite enclaves points to mantle input to granitoid production. Nature 1987, 330, 53–56. [Google Scholar]
  33. Song, S.G.; Niu, Y.L.; Su, L.; Xia, X.H. Tectonics of the North Qilian orogen, NW China. Gondwana Res. 2013, 23, 1378–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tao, L.; Zhang, H.; Wu, J.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, L. Magma Generation of Magnetite-Rich Intermediate-Mafic Rocks and Its Mantle Processes in the Southwestern Alxa Block, NW China. J. Earth Sci. 2022, 33, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Y.X.; Song, S.G.; Niu, Y.l.; Wei, C.J. Melting of continental crust during subduction initiation: A case study from the Chaidanuo peraluminous granite in the North Qilian suture zone. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2014, 132, 311–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fu, C.; Yan, Z.; Aitchison, J.C.; Xiao, W.; Buckman, S.; Wang, B.; Li, W.; Li, Y.; Ren, H. Multiple subduction processes of the Proto-Tethyan Ocean: Implication from Cambrian intrusions along the North Qilian suture zone. Gondwana Res. 2020, 87, 207–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peng, Y.B.; Yu, S.Y.; Zhang, J.X.; Li, S.Z.; Tong, L.X.; Sun, D.Y. Early Paleozoic arc magmatism and metamorphism in the northern Qilian Block, western China: Petrological and geochronological constraints. Geol. J. 2017, 52, 339–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Peng, Y.B.; Yu, S.Y.; Zhang, J.X.; Li, Y.S.; Li, S.Z.; Lv, P. Building a continental arc section: Constraints from Paleozoic granulite-facies metamorphism, anatexis, and magmatism in the northern margin of the Qilian Block, northern Tibet Plateau. GSA Bull. 2022, 134, 1301–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qiao, J.R.; Dong, J.; Song, S.G.; Allen, M.B.; Wang, C.; Xia, X.H.; Su, L. Development of a Modern-Style Trench-Arc-Backarc System in the Proto-Tethys Ocean (Qilian Orogenic Belt, NW China). J. Petrol. 2023, 64, egad029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, C.L.; Xu, X.Y.; Gao, Q.M.; Li, X.M.; Lei, M.; Gao, Y.H.; Frost, R.B.; Wooden, J.L. Early Palaezoic grranitoid magmatism and tectonic evolution in North Qilian, NW China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2010, 26, 1027–1044. [Google Scholar]
  41. Xia, L.Q.; Li, X.M.; Yu, J.Y.; Wang, G.Q. Mid-late neoproterozoic to early paleozoic volcanism and tectonic evolution of the Qilianshan, NW China. GeoResJ 2016, 9–12, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, S.; Niu, Y.; Sun, W.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Guo, P.; Sun, P. On the origin of mafic magmatic enclaves (MMEs) in syn-collisional granitoids: Evidence from the Baojishan pluton in the North Qilian Orogen, China. Mineral. Petrol. 2015, 109, 577–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tseng, C.Y.; Yang, H.J.; Yang, H.Y.; Liu, D.Y.; Wu, C.L.; Cheng, C.K.; Chen, C.H.; Ker, C.M. Continuity of the North Qilian and North Qinling orogenic belts, Central Orogenic System of China: Evidence from newly discovered Paleozoic adakitic rocks. Gondwana Res. 2009, 16, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yan, M.Q.; Li, G.M.; Shi, W.J.; Huizenga, J.M.; Turlin, F.; Xu, C.W.; Moritz, R.; Wei, J.H. Recognizing crystal accumulation in plutonic system: Evidence from mafic microgranular enclaves in Early Silurian Qingshan granodiorite, North Qilian Orogenic Belt, NW China. Lithos 2024, 468, 107518. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang, H.; Zhang, H.F.; Xiao, W.J.; Luo, B.J.; Gao, Z.; Tao, L.; Zhang, L.Q.; Guo, L. Petrogenesis of Early Paleozoic high Sr/Y intrusive rocks from the North Qilian orogen: Implication for diachronous continental collision. Lithosphere 2020, 12, 53–73. [Google Scholar]
  46. Yu, S.Y.; Zhang, J.X.; Qin, H.P.; Sun, D.Y.; Zhao, X.L.; Cong, F.; Li, Y.S. Petrogenesis of the early Paleozoic low-Mg and high-Mg adakitic rocks in the North Qilian orogenic belt, NW China: Implications for transition from crustal thickening to extension thinning. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2015, 107, 122–139. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhu, X.H.; Chen, D.L.; Feng, Y.M.; Yunfei, R.E.N.; Zhang, X. Granitic magmatism and tectonic evolution in the Qilian Mountain Range in NW China: A review. Earth Sci. Front. 2022, 29, 241. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang, L.Q.; Zhang, H.F.; Zhang, S.S.; Xiong, Z.L.; Luo, B.J.; Yang, H.; Pan, F.B.; Zhou, X.C.; Xu, W.C.; Guo, L. Lithospheric delamination in post-collisional setting: Evidence from intrusive magmatism from the North Qilian orogen to southern margin of the Alxa block, NW China. Lithos 2017, 288, 20–34. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang, N.; Wu, C.L.; Lei, M.; Chen, H.J. Petrogenesis and tectonic implications of the Early Paleozoic granites in the western segment of the North Qilian orogenic belt, China. Lithos 2018, 312–313, 89–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, J.X.; Yu, S.Y.; Li, Y.S.; Yu, X.X.; Lin, Y.H.; Mao, X.H. Subduction, accretion and closure of Proto-Tethyan Ocean: Early Paleozoic accretion/collision orogeny in the Altun-Qilian-North Qaidam orogenic system. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2015, 31, 3531–3554. [Google Scholar]
  51. Huang, H.; Niu, Y.L.; Nowell, G.; Zhao, Z.D.; Yu, X.H.; Mo, X.X. The nature and history of the Qilian Block in the context of the development of the Greater Tibetan Plateau. Gondwana Res. 2015, 28, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Peng, Y.B.; Yu, S.Y.; Zhang, J.X.; Li, S.Z.; Sun, D.Y.; Tong, L.X. Early Paleozoic arc magmatism and metamorphism in the northern Qilian Block, western China: A case study of Menyuan-Kekeli. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2017, 33, 3925–3941. [Google Scholar]
  53. Yan, Z.; Fu, C.L.; Aitchison, J.C.; Niu, M.L.; Buckman, S.; Xiao, W.J.; Zhou, R.J.; Chen, L.; Li, J.H. Arc-continent collision during culmination of Proto-Tethyan Ocean closure in the Central Qilian belt, NE Tibetan Plateau. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2022, 134, 3079–3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yu, S.Y.; Peng, Y.B.; Zhang, J.X.; Li, S.Z.; Santosh, M.; Li, Y.S.; Liu, Y.J.; Gao, X.Y.; Ji, W.T.; Lv, P. Tectono-thermal evolution of the Qilian orogenic system: Tracing the subduction, accretion and closure of the Proto-Tethys Ocean. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2021, 215, 103547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhao, L.M.; Li, Y.L.; Cheng, S.; Li, Z.Y.; Zheng, J.P.; Qiu, H.N.; Bai, X.J.; Xiao, W.J.; Brouwer, F.M. Geochronology and geochemistry of early Paleozoic magmatism in the Qilian orogen: Constraints on closure of the Proto-Tethys Ocean. Gondwana Res. 2024, 126, 223–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, J.X.; Yu, S.Y.; Mattinson, C.G. Early Paleozoic polyphase metamorphism in northern Tibet, China. Gondwana Res. 2017, 41, 267–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dong, Y.; Sun, S.; Santosh, M.; Zhao, J.; Sun, J.; He, D.; Shi, X.; Hui, B.; Cheng, C.; Zhang, G. Central China orogenic belt and amalgamation of East Asian continents. Gondwana Res. 2021, 100, 131–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, J.X.; Mattinson, C.; Yu, S.Y.; Li, Y.S.; Yu, X.X.; Mao, X.H.; Lu, Z.L.; Peng, Y.B. Two contrasting accretion v. collision orogenies: Insights from Early Paleozoic polyphase metamorphism in the Altun–Qilian–North Qaidam orogenic system, NW China. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2019, 474, 153–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, C.; Song, S.G.; Zhao, G.C.; Allen, M.B.; Su, L.; Gao, T.Y.; Wen, T.; Feng, D. Calc-Alkaline Plutons in a Proto-Tethyan Intra-Oceanic Arc (Qilian Orogen, NW China): Implications for the Construction of Arc Crust. J. Petrol. 2023, 64, egac131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fu, D.; Huang, B.; Johnson, T.E.; Wilde, S.A.; Jourdan, F.; Polat, A.; Windley, B.F.; Hu, Z.; Kusky, T. Boninitic blueschists record subduction initiation and subsequent accretion of an arc–forearc in the northeast Proto-Tethys Ocean. Geology 2022, 50, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, X.Y.; Li, S.Z.; Yu, S.Y.; Santosh, M.; Zhao, S.J.; Guo, X.Y.; Cao, H.H.; Wang, Y.M.; Huang, Z.B. Early Paleozoic arc–back-arc system in the southeastern margin of the North Qilian Orogen, China: Constraints from geochronology, and whole-rock elemental and Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf isotopic geochemistry of volcanic suites. Gondwana Res. 2018, 59, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, Y.X.; Cui, Y.; Song, S.G.; Fu, S.M.; Zhang, L.p.; Sun, W.D.; Xiao, T.F. Late Cambrian tonalite-trondhjemite association in the eastern segment of North Qilian suture zone: Petrogenesis and geodynamic implications. Int. Geol. Rev. 2022, 64, 1431–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, Y.X.; Cui, Y.; Song, S.G.; Wu, K.; Sun, W.D.; Xiao, T.F. Petrogenesis and tectonic implications of cambrian Nb-enriched I-and aluminous A-type granites in the North Qilian suture zone. Int. Geol. Rev. 2021, 63, 1090–1109. [Google Scholar]
  64. Wu, C.L.; Gao, Y.H.; Frost, B.R.; Robinson, P.T.; Wooden, J.L.; Wu, S.P.; Chen, Q.L.; Lei, M. An early Palaeozoic double-subduction model for the North Qilian oceanic plate: Evidence from zircon SHRIMP dating of granites. Int. Geol. Rev. 2011, 53, 157–181. [Google Scholar]
  65. Wu, C.L.; Yang, J.S.; Yang, H.Y.; Wooden, J.; Shi, R.D.; Chen, S.Y.; Zheng, Q.G. Dating of two types of granite from north Qilian, China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2004, 20, 425–432. [Google Scholar]
  66. Tung, K.A.; Yang, H.Y.; Yang, H.J.; Smith, A.; Liu, D.Y.; Zhang, J.X.; Wu, C.L.; Shau, Y.H.; Wen, D.J.; Tseng, C.Y. Magma sources and petrogenesis of the early–middle Paleozoic backarc granitoids from the central part of the Qilian block, NW China. Gondwana Res. 2016, 38, 197–219. [Google Scholar]
  67. Xiao, W.J.; Windley, B.F.; Yong, Y.; Yan, Z.; Yuan, C.; Liu, C.Z.; Li, J.L. Early Paleozoic to Devonian multiple-accretionary model for the Qilian Shan, NW China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2009, 35, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yan, Z.; Fu, C.L.; Aitchison, J.C.; Buckman, S.; Niu, M.L.; Cao, B.; Sun, Y.; Guo, X.Q.; Wang, Z.Q.; Zhou, R.J. Retro-foreland basin development in response to Proto-Tethyan Ocean closure, NE Tibet Plateau. Tectonics 2019, 38, 4229–4248. [Google Scholar]
  69. Li, Y.L.; Xiao, W.J.; Li, Z.Y.; Wang, K.; Zheng, J.P.; Brouwer, F.M. Early Neoproterozoic magmatism in the Central Qilian block, NW China: Geochronological and petrogenetic constraints for Rodinia assembly. Bulletin 2020, 132, 2415–2431. [Google Scholar]
  70. Li, Y.L.; Xiao, W.J.; Zheng, J.P.; Brouwer, F.M. Northward subduction of the South Qilian ocean: Insights from early Paleozoic magmatism in the South-Central Qilian belts. Geosyst. Geoenviron. 2022, 1, 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, Z.Y.; Li, Y.L.; Xiao, W.J.; Zheng, J.P.; Brouwer, F.M. Geochemical and zircon U-Pb-Hf isotopic study of metasedimentary rocks from the Huangyuan Group of the Central Qilian block (NW China): Implications for paleogeographic reconstruction of Rodinia. Precambrian Res. 2020, 351, 105947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fu, G.M.; Su, J.P.; Hu, N.G.; Wang, Y.B. Geochemistry and tectonic setting of amphibolites in the Paleoproterozoic Beidahe Group-complex in the western segment of the Qilian Mountains. Geol. China 2005, 32, 546–547. [Google Scholar]
  73. Wang, L.; Yu, F.; Liu, Z.X.; Xu, X.F.; Jia, Y.Y. Reconstruction of protoliths of metamorphic rocks of the Tuolai Group and its tectonic setting. Geol. Bull. China 2016, 35, 1448–1455. [Google Scholar]
  74. Tung, K.A.; Yang, H.Y.; Liu, D.Y.; Zhang, J.X.; Yang, H.J.; Shau, Y.H.; Tseng, C.Y. The amphibolite-facies metamorphosed mafic rocks from the Maxianshan area, Qilian block, NW China: A record of early Neoproterozoic arc magmatism. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2012, 46, 177–189. [Google Scholar]
  75. Li, Y.L.; Xiang, H.; Zheng, J.P.; Qiu, H.N.; Bai, X.J.; Brouwer, F.M. Petrology and P-T-t Path of Huangyuan Group and Maxianshan Group in the Central Qilian Block, NW China: Implications for Tectonic Evolution of the Proto-Tethys Ocean. J. Petrol. 2022, 63, egac077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tung, K.A.; Yang, H.Y.; Liu, D.Y.; Zhang, J.X.; Yang, H.J.; Shau, Y.H.; Tseng, C.Y. The Neoproterozoic granitoids from the Qilian block, NW China: Evidence for a link between the Qilian and South China blocks. Precambrian Res. 2013, 235, 163–189. [Google Scholar]
  77. Li, Z.Y.; Li, Y.L.; Zhao, L.M.; Zheng, J.P.; Brouwer, F.M. Petrology and metamorphic PT paths of metamorphic zones in the Huangyuan Group, Central Qilian block, NW China. J. Earth Sci. 2019, 30, 1280–1292. [Google Scholar]
  78. Li, X.; Wang, C.; Wu, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, X.; Meert, J.G.; Sun, X.; Li, H.; Hao, J.; Yu, Z. Crystal accumulation induced Sr/Y variation: Insights from a rear-arc pluton in the western Central Qilian Belt, NW China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2023, 256, 105806. [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu, C.F.; Wu, C.; Song, Z.J.; Liu, W.C.; Zhang, H.Y. Petrogenesis and tectonic significance of Early Paleozoic magmatism in the northern margin of the Qilian block, northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Lithosphere 2019, 11, 365–385. [Google Scholar]
  80. Ma, D.Q.; Wang, C.; Li, H.; Zhu, X.H.; Hao, J.B.; Yu, Z.P.; Sun, X.K.; Zhang, S.; Li, X. Petrogenesis of mafic-intermediate dykes from the Central Qilian belt, NW China: Significance of the role of subducted compositions in sub-arc mantle. Geol. J. 2023, 58, 2790–2804. [Google Scholar]
  81. Yang, H.; Zhang, H.F.; Luo, B.J.; Gao, Z.; Guo, L.; Xu, W.C. Generation of peraluminous granitic magma in a post-collisional setting: A case study from the eastern Qilian orogen, NE Tibetan Plateau. Gondwana Res. 2016, 36, 28–45. [Google Scholar]
  82. Yang, H.; Zhang, H.F.; Xiao, W.J.; Tao, L.; Gao, Z.; Luo, B.J.; Zhang, L.Q. Multiple Early Paleozoic granitoids from the southeastern Qilian orogen, NW China: Magma responses to slab roll-back and break-off. Lithos 2021, 380, 105910. [Google Scholar]
  83. Yong, Y.; Xiao, W.J.; Yuan, C.; Yan, Z.; Li, J.L. Geochronology and geochernistry of Paleozoic granitic plutons from the eastern Central Qilian and their tectonic implications. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2008, 24, 855–866. [Google Scholar]
  84. Deer, W.A.; Howie, R.A.; Zussman, J. An introduction to the rock-forming minerals; Longman Scientific & Technical: Essex, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  85. Leake, B.; Woolley, A.; Birch, W.; Grice, J.; Hawthorne, F.; Kato, A.; Kisch, H.; Vladimir, K.; Laird, J.; Mandarino, J.; et al. Nomenclature of amphiboles: Report of the subcommittee on amphiboles of the International. Can. Mineral. 1997, 35, 219–246. [Google Scholar]
  86. Jiang, C.Y.; An, S.Y. On chemical characteristics of calcific amphiboles from igneous rocks and their petrogenesis significance. J. Mineral. Petrol. 1984, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  87. Mutch, E.J.F.; Blundy, J.D.; Tattitch, B.C.; Cooper, F.J.; Brooker, R.A. An experimental study of amphibole stability in low-pressure granitic magmas and a revised Al-in-hornblende geobarometer. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2016, 171, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liao, Y.; Wei, C.J.; Rehman, H.U. Titanium in calcium amphibole: Behavior and thermometry. Am. Mineral. 2021, 106, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Molina, J.F.; Moreno, J.A.; Castro, A.; Rodríguez, C.; Fershtater, G.B. Calcic amphibole thermobarometry in metamorphic and igneous rocks: New calibrations based on plagioclase/amphibole Al-Si partitioning and amphibole-liquid Mg partitioning. Lithos 2015, 232, 286–305. [Google Scholar]
  90. Tulloch, A.J.; Challis, G.A. Emplacement depths of Paleozoic-Mesozoic plutons from western New Zealand estimated by hornblende-AI geobarometry. N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 2000, 43, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Leake, B.E.; Wooley, A.R.; Arps, C.E.S.; Birch, W.D.; Gilbert, M.C.; Grice, J.D.; Hawthorne, F.C.; Kato, A.; Kisch, H.J.; Krivovichec, V.G.; et al. Nomenclature of amphiboles; report of the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. Eur. J. Mineral. 1997, 9, 623–651. [Google Scholar]
  92. Xie, Y.W.; Zhang, Y.Q. Peculiarities and genetic significance of hornblende from granite in the Hengduansan region. Acta Mineral. Sin. 1990, 10, 35–45. [Google Scholar]
  93. Hoskin, P.W.O.; Schaltegger, U. The composition of zircon and igneous and metamorphic petrogenesis. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2003, 53, 27–62. [Google Scholar]
  94. Middlemost, E.A.K. Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system. Earth-Sci. Rev. 1994, 37, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wager, L.R.; Deer, W.A. Geological investigations in East Greenland. Part III. The petrology of the Skaergaard intrusion, Kangerdlugssuag, East Geenland. Meddelser Gronl. 1939, 105, 1–352. [Google Scholar]
  96. Rollinson, H.; Pease, V. Using Geochemical Data: To Understand Geological Processes, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  97. Maniar, P.D.; Piccoli, P.M. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1989, 101, 635–643. [Google Scholar]
  98. Boynton, W.V. Cosmochemistry of the rare earth elements: Meteorite studies. In Developments in Geochemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984; Volume 2, pp. 63–114. [Google Scholar]
  99. Sun, S.S.; McDonough, W.F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 1989, 42, 313–345. [Google Scholar]
  100. Wan, Y.S.; Zhang, J.X.; Yang, J.S.; Xu, Z.Q. Geochemistry of high-grade metamorphic rocks of the North Qaidam mountains and their geological significance. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2006, 28, 174–184. [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhang, H.F.; Zhang, B.R.; Harris, N.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.L.; Chen, N.S.; Zhao, Z.D. U–Pb zircon SHRIMP ages, geochemical and Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic compositions of intrusive rocks from the Longshan–Tianshui area in the southeast corner of the Qilian orogenic belt, China: Constraints on petrogenesis and tectonic affinity. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2006, 27, 751–764. [Google Scholar]
  102. Qian, Q.; Zhang, Q. Geochemical Characteristics and Tectonic Setting of the Laohushan Basalts, North Qilian Mountains. Acta Geol. Sin. 2001, 75, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Xu, W.C. U–Pb Zircon Geochronology, Geochemical and Sr–Nd–Pb Isotopic Compositions of the Hualong Group in Qilian Mountains: Constraints on Tectonic Evolution of Crustal Basement. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  104. Yan, Z.; Aitchison, J.; Fu, C.L.; Guo, X.Q.; Niu, M.L.; Xia, W.J.; Li, J.L. Hualong Complex, South Qilian terrane: U–Pb and Lu–Hf constraints on Neoproterozoic micro-continental fragments accreted to the northern Proto-Tethyan margin. Precambrian Res. 2015, 266, 65–85. [Google Scholar]
  105. Li, Y.L.; Tong, X.; Zhu, Y.H.; Lin, J.W.; Zheng, J.P.; Brouwer, F.M. Tectonic affinity and evolution of the Precambrian Qilian Block: Insights from petrology, geochemistry and geochronology of the Hualong Group in the Qilian Orogen, NW China. Precambrian Res. 2018, 315, 179–200. [Google Scholar]
  106. Tao, L.; Zhang, H.; Gao, Z.; Yang, H.; Zhang, L.; Guo, L.; Pan, F. Across-arc geochemical and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic variations of mafic intrusive rocks at the southern Central Qilian block, China. Gondwana Res. 2018, 59, 108–125. [Google Scholar]
  107. Yang, H.; Zhang, H.F.; Luo, B.J.; Zhang, J.; Xiong, Z.L.; Guo, L.; Pan, F.B. Early Paleozoic intrusive rocks from the eastern Qilian orogen, NE Tibetan Plateau: Petrogenesis and tectonic significance. Lithos 2015, 224, 13–31. [Google Scholar]
  108. Wang, T.; Wang, Z.Q.; Yan, Z.; Ma, Z.H.; He, S.F.; Fu, C.L.; Wang, D.S. Geochronological and geochemical evidence of amphibolite from the Hualong Group, northwest China: Implication for the early Paleozoic accretionary tectonics of the Central Qilian belt. Lithos 2016, 248, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
  109. Chen, Y.X.; Xia, X.H.; Song, S.G. Petrogenesis of Aoyougou high-silica adakite in the North Qilian orogen, NW China: Evidence for decompression melting of oceanic slab. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2012, 57, 2289–2301. [Google Scholar]
  110. Hou, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, B.; Chen, Y. Indian Ocean-MORB-type isotopic signature of Yushigou ophiolite in North Qilian Mountains and its implications. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 2006, 49, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hou, Q.Y.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, B.R.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y. On the boundary of Tethyan tectonic domain on northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2006, 22, 567–577. [Google Scholar]
  112. Wang, K.X.; Yu, C.D.; Yan, J.; Liu, X.D.; Liu, W.H.; Pan, J.Y. Petrogenesis of Early Silurian granitoids in the Longshoushan area and their implications for the extensional environment of the North Qilian Orogenic Belt, China. Lithos 2019, 342, 152–174. [Google Scholar]
  113. Chappell, B.W.; Stephens, W.E. Origin of infracrustal (I-type) granite magmas. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 1988, 79, 71–86. [Google Scholar]
  114. Castro, A.; Rodríguez, C.; Gutiérrez-Alonso, G.; de la Rosa, J.D. A post-collisional batholith from Southern Iberia rooted in the Earth’s mantle: Los Pedroches batholith. Lithos 2023, 454–455, 107245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Troll, V.R.; Schmincke, H.-U. Magma Mixing and Crustal Recycling Recorded in Ternary Feldspar from Compositionally Zoned Peralkaline Ignimbrite ‘A’, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands. J. Petrol. 2002, 43, 243–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sun, Y.; Ma, C.; Liu, B. Important role of magma mixing in generating the Late Cretaceous Shima intrusion along the Middle-Lower Yangtze River belt: Evidence from petrology, geochemistry, and zircon U-Pb-Hf isotopes. Lithos 2021, 390–391, 106143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wiebe, R.A.; Smith, D.; Sturm, M.; King, E.M.; Seckler, M.S. Enclaves in the Cadillac Mountain Granite (Coastal Maine): Samples of Hybrid Magma from the Base of the Chamber. J. Petrol. 1997, 38, 393–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Whalen, J.; Currie, K.; Chappell, B. A-type granites: Geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1987, 95, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. DePaolo, D.J. Trace element and isotopic effects of combined wallrock assimilation and fractional crystallization. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1981, 53, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Maas, R.; Nicholls, I.A.; Legg, C. Igneous and Metamorphic Enclaves in the S-type Deddick Granodiorite, Lachlan Fold Belt, SE Australia: Petrographic, Geochemical and Nd-Sr Isotopic Evidence for Crustal Melting and Magma Mixing. J. Petrol. 1997, 38, 815–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Rudnick, R.; Gao, S. Composition of the Continental Crust. Treatise Geochem 3:1-64. Treatise Geochem. 2003, 3, 1–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Meng, Y.K.; Xiong, F.H.; Xu, Z.Q.; Ma, X.X. Petrogenesis of Late Cretaceous mafic enclaves and their host granites in the Nyemo region of southern Tibet: Implications for the tectonic-magmatic evolution of the Central Gangdese Belt. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2019, 176, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chappell, B.W.; White, A.J.R.; Williams, I.S.; Wyborn, D.; Hergt, J.M.; Woodhead, J.D. Discussion and Reply: Evaluation of petrogenetic models for Lachlan Fold Belt granitoids: Implications for crustal architecture and tectonic models. Aust. J. Earth Sci. 1999, 46, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. White, A.J.R.; Chappell, B.W.; Wyborn, D. Application of the Restite Model to the Deddick Granodiorite and its Enclaves: A Reinterpretation of the Observations and Data of Maas et al. (1997). J. Petrol. 1999, 40, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Clemens, J.D.; Stevens, G. What controls chemical variation in granitic magmas? Lithos 2012, 134, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Feeley, T.C.; Wilson, L.F.; Underwood, S.J. Distribution and compositions of magmatic inclusions in the Mount Helen dome, Lassen Volcanic Center, California: Insights into magma chamber processes. Lithos 2008, 106, 173–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gao, P.; Zheng, Y.F.; Zhao, Z.F. Experimental melts from crustal rocks: A lithochemical constraint on granite petrogenesis. Lithos 2016, 266–267, 133–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Martin, H.; Smithies, R.H.; Rapp, R.P.; Moyen, J.-F.; Champion, D. An overview of adakite, tonalite-trondhjemiten-granodiorite (TTG), and sanukitoid: Relationships and some implications for crustal evolution. Lithos 2005, 79, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Rapp, R.P.; Watson, E.B. Dehydration Melting of Metabasalt at 8–32 kbar: Implications for Continental Growth and Crust-Mantle Recycling. J. Petrol. 1995, 36, 891–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Barbarin, B.; Didier, J. Conclusions: Enclaves and Granite Petrology. In Enclaves and Granite Petrology; Didier, J., Barbarin, B., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991; pp. 545–549. [Google Scholar]
  131. Vernon, R.H. Microgranitoid enclaves in granites—Globules of hybrid magma quenched in a plutonic environment. Nature 1984, 309, 438–439. [Google Scholar]
  132. Blundy, J.D.; Sparks, R.S.J. Petrogenesis of Mafic Inclusions in Granitoids of the Adamello Massif, Italy. J. Petrol. 1992, 33, 1039–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Piccoli, P.M.; Candela, P.A. Apatite in Igneous Systems. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2002, 48, 255–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Pietranik, A.; Koepke, J. Interactions between dioritic and granodioritic magmas in mingling zones: Plagioclase record of mixing, mingling and subsolidus interactions in the Gęsiniec Intrusion, NE Bohemian Massif, SW Poland. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2009, 158, 17–36. [Google Scholar]
  135. Zhang, J.Y.; Ma, C.Q.; Zhang, C.; Li, J.W. Fractional crystallization and magma mixing: Evidence from porphyritic diorite-granodiorite dykes and mafic microgranular enclaves within the Zhoukoudian pluton, Beijing. Mineral. Petrol. 2014, 108, 777–800. [Google Scholar]
  136. Wang, R.Q.; Qiu, J.S.; Yu, S.B.; Lin, L.; Xu, H. Magma mixing origin for the Quxu intrusive complex in southern Tibet: Insights into the early Eocene magmatism and geodynamics of the southern Lhasa subterrane. Lithos 2019, 328–329, 14–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Tsuchiyama, A. Dissolution kinetics of plagioclase in the melt of the system diopside-albite-anorthite, and origin of dusty plagioclase in andesites. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1985, 89, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  138. Langmuir, C.H.; Vocke, R.D.; Hanson, G.N.; Hart, S.R. A general mixing equation with applications to Icelandic basalts. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1978, 37, 380–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Schiano, P.; Monzier, M.; Eissen, J.P.; Martin, H.; Koga, K.T. Simple mixing as the major control of the evolution of volcanic suites in the Ecuadorian Andes. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2010, 160, 297–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Griffin, W.L.; Wang, X.; Jackson, S.E.; Pearson, N.J.; O’Reilly, S.Y.; Xu, X.; Zhou, X. Zircon chemistry and magma mixing, SE China: In-situ analysis of Hf isotopes, Tonglu and Pingtan igneous complexes. Lithos 2002, 61, 237–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Defant, M.J.; Drummond, M.S. Derivation of some modern arc magmas by melting of young subducted lithosphere. Nature 1990, 347, 662–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Hermann, J.; Spandler, C.; Hack, A.; Korsakov, A.V. Aqueous fluids and hydrous melts in high-pressure and ultra-high pressure rocks: Implications for element transfer in subduction zones. Lithos 2006, 92, 399–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Weidendorfer, D.; Mattsson, H.B.; Ulmer, P. Dynamics of magma mixing in partially crystallized magma chambers: Textural and petrological constraints from the basal complex of the Austurhorn intrusion (SE Iceland). J. Petrol. 2014, 55, 1865–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zorpi, M.J.; Coulon, C.; Orsini, J.B.; Cocirta, C. Magma mingling, zoning and emplacement in calc-alkaline granitoid plutons. Tectonophysics 1989, 157, 315–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Elliott, T. Tracers of the slab. Geophys. Monogr.-Am. Geophys. Union 2003, 138, 23–46. [Google Scholar]
  146. McCulloch, M.T.; Gamble, J.A. Geochemical and geodynamical constraints on subduction zone magmatism. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1991, 102, 358–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Saunders, A.D.; Storey, M.; Kent, R.W.; Norry, M.J. Consequences of plume-lithosphere interactions. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 1992, 68, 41–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kepezhinskas, P.; McDermott, F.; Defant, M.J.; Hochstaedter, A.; Drummond, M.S.; Hawkesworth, C.J.; Koloskov, A.; Maury, R.C.; Bellon, H. Trace element and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic constraints on a three-component model of Kamchatka arc petrogenesis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1997, 61, 577–600. [Google Scholar]
  149. Wang, W.; Pandit, M.K.; Zhao, J.H.; Chen, W.T.; Zheng, J.P. Slab break-off triggered lithosphere-asthenosphere interaction at a convergent margin: The Neoproterozoic bimodal magmatism in NW India. Lithos 2018, 296, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Pearce, J.A. Geochemical fingerprinting of oceanic basalts with applications to ophiolite classification and the search for Archean oceanic crust. Lithos 2008, 100, 14–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ma, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.X.; Wang, J.R. Geochemical Characteristics and Tectonic Significance of Shibandun Mafic-ultramafic Cumulates in Western Part of the Central Qilian. Geoscience 2018, 32, 667. [Google Scholar]
  152. Zhang, J.X.; Xu, Z.Q.; Chen, W.; Xv, H.F. Discussion on the age of the subduction—Accretion complex/volcanic arc in the middle section of the North Qilian Mountains. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 1997, 2, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  153. Wu, C.L.; Yao, S.Z.; Yang, J.S.; Zeng, L.S.; Chen, S.Y.; Li, H.B.; Qi, X.X.; Wooden, J.L.; Mazdab, F.K. Double subduction of the Early Paleozoic North Qilian oceanic plate: Evidence from granites in the central segment of North Qilian, NW China. Geol. China 2006, 33, 1197–1208. [Google Scholar]
  154. Wang, G.Q.; Li, X.M.; Xu, X.Y.; Yu, J.Y.; Sun, J.M.; Wu, P. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of zircons from basic volcanic rocks in the Honggou copper polymetallic deposit, Menyuan area, Qinghai. Geol. Bull. China 2011, 30, 1060–1065. [Google Scholar]
  155. Guo, Z.P.; Zhao, X.M.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, J.W.; Kong, H.l. Zircon U-Pb and molybdenite Re-Os dating of the Langlike copper deposit in North Qilian Mountain and its geological implications. Geol. China 2015, 42, 691–701. [Google Scholar]
  156. Schmidt, M.W.; Jagoutz, O. The global systematics of primitive arc melts. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 2017, 18, 2817–2854. [Google Scholar]
  157. Stern, C.R.; Kilian, R. Role of the subducted slab, mantle wedge and continental crust in the generation of adakites from the Andean Austral Volcanic Zone. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1996, 123, 263–281. [Google Scholar]
  158. Wade, B.P.; Barovich, K.M.; Hand, M.; Scrimgeour, I.R.; Close, D.F. Evidence for early Mesoproterozoic arc magmatism in the Musgrave Block, central Australia: Implications for Proterozoic crustal growth and tectonic reconstructions of Australia. J. Geol. 2006, 114, 43–63. [Google Scholar]
  159. Cabanis, B. Le diagramme La/10-Y/15-Nb/8: Un outil pour la discrimination des séries volcaniques et la mise en évidence des processus de mélange et/ou de contamination crustale. Comptes Rendus l’Academie Sci. Ser. 2 1989, 309, 2023–2029. [Google Scholar]
  160. Pearce, J.A.; Cann, J.R. Tectonic setting of basic volcanic rocks determined using trace element analyses. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1973, 19, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Zhang, X.F.; Pang, Z.S.; Chen, L.X.; Liu, J.L.; Zhang, D.H.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, B.R.; Teng, C.; Cao, J. Petrogenesis and tectonic setting of the Early Permian gabbro–granite complex in the southeastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt, central Inner Mongolia, China. J. Asian Earth Sci. X 2021, 5, 100059. [Google Scholar]
  162. Hu, X.M.; Garzanti, E.; Moore, T.; Raffi, I. Direct stratigraphic dating of India-Asia collision onset at the Selandian (middle Paleocene, 59 ± 1 Ma). Geology 2015, 43, 859–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Fang, W.; Dai, L.Q.; Zheng, Y.F.; Zhao, Z.F.; Ma, L.T. Tectonic transition from oceanic subduction to continental collision: New geochemical evidence from Early-Middle Triassic mafic igneous rocks in southern Liaodong Peninsula, east-central China. Bulletin 2020, 132, 1469–1488. [Google Scholar]
  164. Zhang, J.X.; Yu, S.Y.; Li, Y.S.; Mao, X.H.; Teng, X.; Wu, Y.W.; Guo, Q. Proto-Tethys orogenic system in the northern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: Resubdivision of lithotectonic units in Qilian-North Qaidam and discussion on several controversial scientific issues. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2023, 39, 3507–3532. [Google Scholar]
  165. Watson, E.B.; Harrison, T.M. Zircon saturation revisited, temperature and composition effects in a variety of crustal magma types. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1983, 64, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Hou, K.J.; Li, Y.H.; Tian, Y.Y. In situ U-Pb zircon dating using laser ablation-multi ion counting-ICP-MS. Miner. Depos. 2009, 28, 481–492. [Google Scholar]
  167. Liu, Y.S.; Gao, S.; Hu, Z.C.; Gao, C.G.; Zong, K.Q.; Wang, D.B. Continental and oceanic crust recycling-induced melt–peridotite interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen: U–Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons from mantle xenoliths. J. Petrol. 2010, 51, 537–571. [Google Scholar]
  168. Hou, K.J.; Li, Y.H.; Zou, T.R.; Qu, X.M.; Shi, Y.R.; Xie, G.Q. Laser ablation-MC-ICP-MS technique for Hf isotope microanalysis of zircon and its geological applications. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2007, 23, 2595–2604. [Google Scholar]
  169. Griffin, W.L.; Pearson, N.J.; Belousova, E.; Jackson, S.E.; Achterbergh, E.V.; O’Reilly, S.Y.; Shee, S.R. The Hf isotope composition of Cratonic mantle: LA-MC-ICP-MS analysis of zircon megacrysts in kimberlites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2000, 64, 133–147. [Google Scholar]
  170. Liu, Y.S.; Hu, Z.C.; Gao, S.; Günther, D.; Xu, J.; Gao, C.G.; Chen, H.H. In situ analysis of major and trace elements of anhydrous minerals by LA-ICP-MS without applying an internal standard. Chem. Geol. 2008, 257, 34–43. [Google Scholar]
  171. Li, C.F.; Li, X.H.; Li, Q.L.; Guo, J.H.; Li, X.H.; Yang, Y.H. Rapid and precise determination of Sr and Nd isotopic ratios in geological samples from the same filament loading by thermal ionization mass spectrometry employing a single-step separation scheme. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 727, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Lai, Z.Q.; Zhao, G.T.; Han, Z.Z.; Liu, B.; Bu, X.J.; Leng, C.X. Back-arc magma processes in the Okinawa Trough: New insights from textural and compositional variations of plagioclase in basalts. Geol. J. 2016, 51, 346–356. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Topographic map of Tibetan Plateau. (b) Geological sketch map of the Qilian Orogenic Belt (modified from [50]). (c) Simplified geological map of the Menyuan area showing the distribution of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton and sample locations (modified from [37]). The data were compiled from Data sources: 1. [38]; 2. [37]; 3. [51]; 4. [52].
Figure 1. (a) Topographic map of Tibetan Plateau. (b) Geological sketch map of the Qilian Orogenic Belt (modified from [50]). (c) Simplified geological map of the Menyuan area showing the distribution of the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton and sample locations (modified from [37]). The data were compiled from Data sources: 1. [38]; 2. [37]; 3. [51]; 4. [52].
Minerals 15 00391 g001
Figure 2. (ad) Field photographs of granodiorite, microgranular mafic enclave, and gabbroic dike from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. Abbreviations: MME, microgranular mafic enclave.
Figure 2. (ad) Field photographs of granodiorite, microgranular mafic enclave, and gabbroic dike from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. Abbreviations: MME, microgranular mafic enclave.
Minerals 15 00391 g002
Figure 3. Microphotographs of granodiorite, microgranular mafic enclave, and gabbroic dike from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton: (a,b) medium to coarse-grained granodiorite; (c) contact between medium- to coarse-grained host granodirite and fine-grained in MME; (d) poikilitic-textured plagioclase and hornblende in MME; (e) plagioclase xenocrysts surrounded by groundmass minerals within MME; (f) fine-grained hornblende cluster and skeletal biotite in MME; (g) acicular apatite and slender hornblende in MME; (h) medium-grained gabbro dike. Mineral abbreviations: Qtz = quartz; Pl = plagioclase; Kfs = potassic feldspar; Bt = biotite; Hbl = hornblende; Ap = apatite; Cpx = Clinopyroxene.
Figure 3. Microphotographs of granodiorite, microgranular mafic enclave, and gabbroic dike from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton: (a,b) medium to coarse-grained granodiorite; (c) contact between medium- to coarse-grained host granodirite and fine-grained in MME; (d) poikilitic-textured plagioclase and hornblende in MME; (e) plagioclase xenocrysts surrounded by groundmass minerals within MME; (f) fine-grained hornblende cluster and skeletal biotite in MME; (g) acicular apatite and slender hornblende in MME; (h) medium-grained gabbro dike. Mineral abbreviations: Qtz = quartz; Pl = plagioclase; Kfs = potassic feldspar; Bt = biotite; Hbl = hornblende; Ap = apatite; Cpx = Clinopyroxene.
Minerals 15 00391 g003
Figure 4. (a) Ab-Or-An diagrams for the plagioclase [84]; (b,c) anorthite contents of plagioclase crystals illustrating oscillatory zoning. Ab—albite; Or—potassium feldspar; An—anorthite.
Figure 4. (a) Ab-Or-An diagrams for the plagioclase [84]; (b,c) anorthite contents of plagioclase crystals illustrating oscillatory zoning. Ab—albite; Or—potassium feldspar; An—anorthite.
Minerals 15 00391 g004
Figure 6. Cathodoluminescence images of representative zircons and U-Pb Concordia diagrams of magmatic rocks from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. (a) Gabbro dike; (b) MME; (c) host granodiorite. Yellow circles and red circles represent the location of zircon U-Pb dating and Hf isotopic analysis, respectively.
Figure 6. Cathodoluminescence images of representative zircons and U-Pb Concordia diagrams of magmatic rocks from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. (a) Gabbro dike; (b) MME; (c) host granodiorite. Yellow circles and red circles represent the location of zircon U-Pb dating and Hf isotopic analysis, respectively.
Minerals 15 00391 g006
Figure 10. (a) Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (ppm) versus (Na2O + K2O)/CaO diagram; (b) Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (ppm) versus TFeO/MgO diagram (after [118]).
Figure 10. (a) Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (ppm) versus (Na2O + K2O)/CaO diagram; (b) Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (ppm) versus TFeO/MgO diagram (after [118]).
Minerals 15 00391 g010
Figure 11. (a) SiO2 (wt.%) versus (87Sr/86Sr)i diagram; (b) SiO2 (wt.%) versus εNd(t) diagram; (c) Rb (ppm) versus Sr (ppm) diagram; (d) Rb (ppm) versus Ba (ppm) diagram; (e) Rb (ppm) versus Eu (ppm) diagram; (f) MgO (wt.%) versus Gd/Lu diagram. Abbreviations. Bt = biotite; Hbl = hornblende; Kfs = potassic feldspar; Pl = plagioclase.
Figure 11. (a) SiO2 (wt.%) versus (87Sr/86Sr)i diagram; (b) SiO2 (wt.%) versus εNd(t) diagram; (c) Rb (ppm) versus Sr (ppm) diagram; (d) Rb (ppm) versus Ba (ppm) diagram; (e) Rb (ppm) versus Eu (ppm) diagram; (f) MgO (wt.%) versus Gd/Lu diagram. Abbreviations. Bt = biotite; Hbl = hornblende; Kfs = potassic feldspar; Pl = plagioclase.
Minerals 15 00391 g011
Figure 12. Major and trace element covariation diagrams indicating magma mixing for the studied samples from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton ((a)—after [144]; (b,c)—after [138]; (d)—after [139]).
Figure 12. Major and trace element covariation diagrams indicating magma mixing for the studied samples from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton ((a)—after [144]; (b,c)—after [138]; (d)—after [139]).
Minerals 15 00391 g012
Figure 13. Diagrams of (a) La/Yb versus Nb/La (after [149]); (b) La/Nb versus La/Ba (after [69]); (c) Nb/Yb versus Th/Yb (after [150]); (d) Nb/Y versus Ba; (e) Nb/Y versus Rb/Y; (f) Sr/Nd versus Th/Yb ((df) after [148]) for the MMEs and gabbro dikes from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. MORB—mid-oceanic-ridge basalt; N-MORB—normal MORB; E-MORB—enriched MORB; OIB—oceanic-island basalt; DM—depleted mantle; HIMU—high U/Pb mantle source; SCLM—subcontinental lithospheric mantle. The fields for OIB, MORB, and HIMU in (b) are from [147].
Figure 13. Diagrams of (a) La/Yb versus Nb/La (after [149]); (b) La/Nb versus La/Ba (after [69]); (c) Nb/Yb versus Th/Yb (after [150]); (d) Nb/Y versus Ba; (e) Nb/Y versus Rb/Y; (f) Sr/Nd versus Th/Yb ((df) after [148]) for the MMEs and gabbro dikes from the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton. MORB—mid-oceanic-ridge basalt; N-MORB—normal MORB; E-MORB—enriched MORB; OIB—oceanic-island basalt; DM—depleted mantle; HIMU—high U/Pb mantle source; SCLM—subcontinental lithospheric mantle. The fields for OIB, MORB, and HIMU in (b) are from [147].
Minerals 15 00391 g013
Figure 14. Plots of (a) Y/15-La/10-Nb/8 (after [159]); (b) Ti/100-Zr-Y*3 (after [160]).
Figure 14. Plots of (a) Y/15-La/10-Nb/8 (after [159]); (b) Ti/100-Zr-Y*3 (after [160]).
Minerals 15 00391 g014
Figure 15. (a,b) A schematic geodynamic model illustrating the Middle-Late Ordovician magmatism in this study in the northern margin of the Qilian Block. The crust section through the Early Paleozoic continental arc in the northern margin of the Qilian Block is from [38,164].
Figure 15. (a,b) A schematic geodynamic model illustrating the Middle-Late Ordovician magmatism in this study in the northern margin of the Qilian Block. The crust section through the Early Paleozoic continental arc in the northern margin of the Qilian Block is from [38,164].
Minerals 15 00391 g015
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, S.; Qi, Y.; Yu, S.; Jiang, X.; Gao, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, Q.; Wang, L.; Peng, Y. Magma Mixing Origin for the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton in the North Qilian Orogenic Belt, China. Minerals 2025, 15, 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15040391

AMA Style

Xia S, Qi Y, Yu S, Jiang X, Gao X, Wang Y, Li C, Wang Q, Wang L, Peng Y. Magma Mixing Origin for the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton in the North Qilian Orogenic Belt, China. Minerals. 2025; 15(4):391. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15040391

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xia, Shugang, Yu Qi, Shengyao Yu, Xiaocong Jiang, Xiangyu Gao, Yue Wang, Chuanzhi Li, Qian Wang, Lintao Wang, and Yinbiao Peng. 2025. "Magma Mixing Origin for the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton in the North Qilian Orogenic Belt, China" Minerals 15, no. 4: 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15040391

APA Style

Xia, S., Qi, Y., Yu, S., Jiang, X., Gao, X., Wang, Y., Li, C., Wang, Q., Wang, L., & Peng, Y. (2025). Magma Mixing Origin for the Menyuan Granodioritic Pluton in the North Qilian Orogenic Belt, China. Minerals, 15(4), 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15040391

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop