Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Analysis of a Normalized Structure of a Complex Fractal–Fractional Integral Transform Using Special Functions
Previous Article in Journal
A Parametric Method for Proving Some Analytic Inequalities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Coefficient Estimates for New Subclasses of Bi-Univalent Functions with Bounded Boundary Rotation by Using Faber Polynomial Technique
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Toeplitz Matrices for a Class of Bazilevič Functions and the λ-Pseudo-Starlike Functions

by
Abbas Kareem Wanas
1,
Salam Abdulhussein Sehen
2 and
Ágnes Orsolya Páll-Szabó
3,*
1
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Al Diwaniyah 13236, Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq
2
Medical Physics Department, College of Science, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Al Diwaniyah 13236, Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq
3
Department of Statistics-Forecast-Mathematics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Babeş-Bolyai University, 400083 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2024, 13(8), 521; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13080521
Submission received: 22 February 2024 / Revised: 12 March 2024 / Accepted: 31 July 2024 / Published: 2 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Geometric Function Theory and Related Topics)

Abstract

:
In the present paper, we define and study a new family of holomorphic functions which involve the Bazilevič functions and the λ -pseudo-starlike functions. We establish coefficient estimates for the first four determinants of the symmetric Toeplitz matrices T 2 ( 2 ) , T 2 ( 3 ) , T 3 ( 1 ) and T 3 ( 2 ) for the functions in this family. Further, we investigate several special cases and consequences of our results.

1. Introduction

Let A stand for the family of functions f of the form
f ( z ) = z + n = 2 a n z n ,
which are analytic in the open unit disk U = z C : z < 1 . Let S indicate the class of all functions in A which are univalent in U.
We can say that f A is called a starlike function in U if
z f ( z ) f ( z ) > 0 , ( z U )
and a function f A is called a convex function in U if
z f ( z ) f ( z ) + 1 > 0 , ( z U ) .
A function f A is called a Bazilevič function in U if (see [1])
z 1 β f ( z ) f ( z ) 1 β > 0 ( z U ; β 0 ) .
Otherwise, a function f A is called a λ -pseudo-starlike function in U if (see [2])
z f ( z ) λ f ( z ) > 0 ( z U ; λ 1 ) .
The estimation of the bounds of Hankel matrices is very much in the focus of the univalent function theory. These matrices and determinants have an important role in many fields of mathematics and have several applications [3]. Toeplitz determinants and Hankel determinants are closely related. Hankel matrices have constant entries along the reverse diagonal, while Toeplitz matrices have constant entries along the diagonal. The symmetric Toeplitz determinant T q ( n ) for f A is defined by
T q ( n ) = a n a n + 1 a n + q 1 a n + 1 a n a n + q 2 a n + q 1 a n + q 2 a n ,
where q 1 , n 1 and a 1 = 1 . In particular,
T 2 ( 2 ) = a 2 a 3 a 3 a 2 , T 2 ( 3 ) = a 3 a 4 a 4 a 3 ,
and
T 3 ( 1 ) = 1 a 2 a 3 a 2 1 a 2 a 3 a 2 1 , T 3 ( 2 ) = a 2 a 3 a 4 a 3 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 3 a 2 .
Toeplitz determinants appear in all branches of pure and applied mathematics, including statistics and probability, image processing, quantum mechanics, queuing networks, signal processing and time series analysis. Also, Toeplitz matrices have an important role in functional analysis, applied mathematics, physics and also technical sciences (see [3]). In recent years, several authors have established estimates of the Toeplitz determinant T q ( n ) for various families of univalent functions (see [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]).
In our study, we use the following lemmas to derive the desired bounds:
Lemma 1 
([18]). If the function p P is given by the series p ( z ) = 1 + p 1 z + p 2 z 2 + p 3 z 3 + , then the sharp estimate p k 2   k = 1 , 2 , 3 , holds.
Lemma 2 
([19]). If the function p P , then
2 p 2 = p 1 2 + 4 p 1 2 x
4 p 3 = p 1 3 + 2 p 1 4 p 1 2 x p 1 4 p 1 2 x 2 + 2 4 p 1 2 1 x 2 z ,
for some x , z with x 1 and z 1 .

2. Main Results

First of all, we defined the family R ( γ , β , λ ) in the following way:
Definition 1. 
A function f A is in the family R ( γ , β , λ ) if it satisfies the condition
1 γ z 1 β f ( z ) f ( z ) 1 β + γ z f ( z ) λ f ( z ) > 0 ,
where 0 γ 1 , β 0 , λ 1 and z U .
Theorem 1. 
Let f R ( γ , β , λ ) be given by (1). Then,
a 2 2 J ,
a 3 2 S + 4 B S J 2
and
a 4 2 G + 4 A J S G + 8 N 3 J 3 S G ,
where
G = 1 γ ( β + 3 ) + γ ( 4 λ 1 ) , J = 1 γ ( β + 1 ) + γ ( 2 λ 1 ) , S = 1 γ ( β + 2 ) + γ ( 3 λ 1 ) , A = 1 γ β 1 ( β + 3 ) γ ( 6 λ 2 11 λ + 2 ) , B = 1 2 1 γ ( β 1 ) ( β + 2 ) + γ 2 λ 2 4 λ + 1 , N = 1 2 1 γ β 1 ( β + 3 ) γ ( 6 λ 2 11 λ + 2 ) × × 1 γ ( β 1 ) ( β + 2 ) + γ 2 λ 2 4 λ + 1 1 γ ( β + 2 ) γ ( 3 λ 1 ) .
Proof. 
Let f R ( γ , β , λ ) . Then, there exists p P such that
1 γ z 1 β f ( z ) f ( z ) 1 β + γ z f ( z ) λ f ( z ) = p ( z ) ,
where p has the following series representation:
p ( z ) = 1 + p 1 z + p 2 z 2 + p 3 z 3 + .
If we equate the coefficients in (3), these relations follow:
1 γ ( β + 1 ) + γ ( 2 λ 1 ) a 2 = p 1 ,
1 γ ( β + 2 ) + γ ( 3 λ 1 ) a 3 + 1 2 1 γ ( β 1 ) ( β + 2 ) + γ 2 λ 2 4 λ + 1 a 2 2 = p 2
and
1 γ ( β + 3 ) + γ ( 4 λ 1 ) a 4 1 γ β 1 ( β + 3 ) γ ( 6 λ 2 11 λ + 2 ) a 2 a 3 + 1 6 1 γ ( β 1 ) ( β 2 ) ( β + 3 ) + γ 2 3 λ ( λ 2 ) ( 2 λ 5 ) 1 a 2 3 = p 3 .
Considering (4), (5) and (6), after simplifying, we find that
a 2 = 1 J p 2 ,
a 3 = 1 S p 2 B S J 2 p 1 2
and
a 4 = 1 G p 3 + A J S G p 1 p 2 N 3 J 3 S G p 1 3 ,
where G , J , S , A , B and N are given by (2). By applying Lemma 1, we obtain
a 2 2 J ,
a 3 2 S + 4 B S J 2
and
a 4 2 G + 4 A J S G + 8 N 3 J 3 S G .
Theorem 2. 
Let f R ( γ , β , λ ) be given by (1). Then,
T 2 ( 2 ) 4 ( J 4 4 J 2 B + 4 B 2 ) J 4 S 2 4 J 2 ,
where J , B are given by (2).
Proof. 
Considering (7), (8) and (2), it is easy to see that
T 2 ( 2 ) = a 3 2 a 2 2 = p 2 2 S 2 2 B p 1 2 p 2 S 2 J 2 + B 2 p 1 4 S 2 J 4 p 1 2 J 2 .
By applying Lemma 2 to express p 2 in terms of p 1 , we obtain
a 3 2 a 2 2 = ( J 4 4 J 2 B + 4 B 2 ) p 1 4 4 J 4 S 2 p 1 2 J 2 + ( J 2 2 B ) p 1 2 x ( 4 p 1 2 ) 2 J 2 S 2 + x 2 ( 4 p 1 2 ) 2 4 S 2 .
To simplify the notation, we chose p 1 = p , and since the function p is in the family P simultaneously, we supposed that p [ 0 , 2 ] . Applying the triangle inequality with P = 4 p 2 , we can see that
a 3 2 a 2 2 ( J 4 4 J 2 B + 4 B 2 ) p 4 4 J 4 S 2 p 2 J 2 + ( J 2 2 B ) p 2 | x | P 2 J 2 S 2 + | x | 2 P 2 4 S 2 = : F ( p , x ) .
It is obvious that F ( p , x ) > 0 on [ 0 , 1 ] , and thus F ( p , x ) F ( p , 1 ) .
We can note that F ( x ) has a maximum value at [ 0 , 2 ] , when p = 2 . It follows that
T 2 ( 2 ) = a 3 2 a 2 2 4 ( J 4 4 J 2 B + 4 B 2 ) J 4 S 2 4 J 2 .
This concludes the proof. □
Remark 1. 
Taking γ = 0 and β = 1 in Theorem 2, we can obtain the result which was proven by Radhika et al. [9] [Theorem 2].
Theorem 3. 
Let f R ( γ , β , λ ) be given by (1). Then,
T 2 ( 3 ) = | a 4 2 a 3 2 | 4 ψ 1 9 G 2 J 6 S 2 4 ( J 4 4 J 2 B + 4 B 2 ) J 4 S 2 ,
where
ψ 1 = 9 J 6 S 2 + 36 J 5 S A 24 J 3 S N + 36 J 4 A 2 + 16 N 2 48 J 2 A N .
Proof. 
Applying (8), (9) and (2) and using Lemma 2, we find
| a 4 2 a 3 2 | = | ( J 4 4 J 2 B + 4 B 2 ) p 1 4 4 J 4 S 2 + ψ 1 p 1 6 144 G 2 J 6 S 2 ( J 2 2 B ) p 1 2 x ( 4 p 1 2 ) 2 J 2 S 2 + ψ 2 p 1 4 ( 4 p 1 2 ) x 12 G 2 J 4 S 2 ψ 3 p 1 4 ( 4 p 1 2 ) x 2 24 G 2 J 3 S x 2 ( 4 p 1 2 ) 2 4 S 2 + ψ 4 p 1 2 ( 4 p 1 2 ) 2 x 2 4 G 2 J 2 S 2 ( J S + A ) p 1 2 ( 4 p 1 2 ) 2 x 3 4 G 2 J S + p 1 2 ( 4 p 1 2 ) 2 x 4 16 G 2 + ψ 3 p 1 3 ( 4 p 1 2 ) ( 1 | x | 2 ) z 12 G 2 J 3 S + ( J S + A ) p 1 ( 4 p 1 2 ) 2 ( 1 | x | 2 ) x z 2 G 2 J S p 1 ( 4 p 1 2 ) 2 ( 1 | x | 2 ) x 2 z 4 G 2 + ( 4 p 1 2 ) 2 ( 1 | x | 2 ) 2 z 2 4 G 2 | ,
where
ψ 2 = 3 J 4 S 2 + 9 J 3 S A 4 J S N + 6 J 2 A 2 4 A N , ψ 3 = 3 J 3 S + 6 J 2 A 4 N , ψ 4 = J 2 S 2 + 2 J S A + A 2 .
To make the notation simple, we select p 1 = p , and because the function p is simultaneously in the family P , we can assume that p [ 0 , 2 ] . Using the triangle inequality with Z = ( 1 | x | 2 ) and P = 4 r 2 , we obtain
| a 4 2 a 3 2 | = ψ 1 p 6 144 G 2 J 6 S 2 ( J 4 4 J 2 B + 4 B 2 ) p 4 4 J 4 S 2 + ( J 2 2 B ) p 2 | x | P 2 J 2 S 2 + ψ 2 p 4 P | x | 12 G 2 J 4 S 2 + ψ 3 p 4 P | x | 2 24 G 2 J 3 S + | x | 2 P 2 4 S 2 + ψ 4 p 2 P 2 | x | 2 4 G 2 J 2 S 2 + ( J S + A ) p 2 P 2 | x | 3 4 G 2 J S + p 2 P 2 | x | 4 16 G 2 + ψ 3 p 3 P Z 12 G 2 J 3 S + ( J S + A ) p | x | P 2 Z 2 G 2 J S + p | x | 2 P 2 Z 4 G 2 + P 2 Z 2 4 G 2 = : F 1 ( p , x ) .
We differentiate F 1 ( p , x ) with regard to | x | with the use of elementary calculus, and obtain
F 1 ( p , x ) | x | = ( J 2 2 B ) p 2 ( 4 p 2 ) 2 J 2 S 2 + ψ 2 p 4 ( 4 p 2 ) 12 G 2 J 4 S 2 2 ψ 3 p 3 ( 4 p 2 ) | x | 12 G 2 J 3 S + ψ 3 p 4 ( 4 p 2 ) | x | 12 G 2 J 3 S + ψ 4 p 2 ( 4 p 2 ) 2 | x | 2 G 2 J 2 S 2 p ( J S + A ) ( 4 p 2 ) 2 | x | 2 G 2 J S + 3 ( J S + A ) p 2 ( 4 p 2 ) 2 | x | 2 4 G 2 J S p ( 4 p 2 ) 2 | x | 3 2 G 2 + p 2 ( 4 p 2 ) 2 | x | 3 4 G 2 + ( J S + A ) p ( 4 p 2 ) 2 ( 1 | x | 2 ) 2 G 2 J S | x | ( 4 p 2 ) 2 ( 1 | x | 2 ) G 2 + p | x | ( 4 p 2 ) 2 ( 1 | x | 2 ) 2 G 2 .
We find that ( F 1 ( p , x ) / | x | ) 0 for | x | [ 0 , 1 ] and fixed p [ 0 , 2 ] . As a result, F 1 ( p , x ) is an increasing function of | x | . Therefore, F 1 ( p , x ) F 1 ( p , 1 ) . Therefore,
| a 4 2 a 3 2 | ψ 1 p 6 144 G 2 J 6 S 2 ( J 4 4 J 2 B + 4 B 2 ) p 4 4 J 4 S 2 + ( J 2 2 B ) p 2 ( 4 p 2 ) 2 J 2 S 2 + ( 4 p 2 ) 2 4 S 2 + ( 2 ψ 2 + A 3 J S ) p 4 ( 4 p 2 ) 24 G 2 J 4 S 2 + ( 4 ψ 4 + 4 ( J S + A ) J S + J 2 S 2 ) p 2 ( 4 p 2 ) 2 16 G 2 J 2 C 2 .
Now, on [ 0 , 2 ] at P = 2 , we find
| a 4 2 a 3 2 | 4 ψ 1 9 G 2 J 6 S 2 4 ( J 4 4 J 2 B + 4 B 2 ) J 4 S 2 .
Remark 2. 
Taking γ = 0 and β = 1 in Theorem 3, we can obtain the same result as derived by Radhika et al. [9] [Theorem 3].
Theorem 4. 
Let f R ( γ , β , λ ) be given by (1). Then,
| T 3 ( 1 ) | = | 1 + 2 a 2 2 ( a 3 1 ) a 3 2 | 1 + 4 ψ 5 J 4 S 2 8 J 2 ,
where
ψ 5 = 4 J 3 S 8 S B J 4 + 4 J 2 B 4 B 2 .
Proof. 
From (7), (8) and (2), by applying Lemma 2 and some calculations, we obtain
| T 3 ( 1 ) | = | 1 + p 1 4 J S + p 1 2 x ( 4 p 1 2 ) J S 2 B p 1 4 J 4 S 2 p 1 2 J 2 ( J 4 4 J 2 B + 4 B 2 ) p 1 4 4 J 4 S 2 ( J 2 2 B ) p 1 2 x ( 4 p 1 2 ) 2 J 2 S 2 x 2 ( 4 p 1 2 ) 2 4 S 2 | .
For ease of notation, we select p 1 = p , and because the function p is simultaneously in the family P , we can assume that p [ 0 , 2 ] without losing generality. The result is that, using the triangle inequality with P = 4 r 2 , we obtain
| T 3 ( 1 ) | 1 + ψ 5 p 4 4 J 4 S 2 2 p 2 J 2 + ( J 2 2 B ) p 2 ( 4 p 2 ) 2 J 2 S 2 + ( 4 p 2 ) 2 4 S 2 .
Hence, at p = 2 , we find
| T 3 ( 1 ) | 1 + 4 ψ 5 J 4 S 2 8 J 2 .
Remark 3. 
Taking γ = 0 and β = 1 in Theorem 4, we can obtain the result which was derived by Radhika et al. [9] [Theorem 4].
Theorem 5. 
Let f R ( γ , β , λ ) be given by (1). Then,
| T 3 ( 2 ) | = | ( a 2 a 4 ) ( a 2 2 2 a 3 2 + a 2 a 4 ) | 2 J 8 ( 3 J 2 S + 6 J A 4 N ) p 3 12 G J 2 S 4 J 2 4 ψ 6 3 J 4 S 2 G ,
where
ψ 6 = 6 G ( J 4 4 J 2 B + 4 B 2 ) 3 J 2 S ( J S + 2 A ) + 4 S N .
Proof. 
From (7), (9) and (2) and by applying Lemma 2, we obtain
| a 2 a 4 | = p 1 J p 1 3 4 G p 1 ( 4 p 1 2 ) x 2 G + p 1 ( 4 p 1 2 ) x 2 4 G ( 4 p 1 2 ) ( 1 | x | 2 ) z 2 G A p 1 3 2 J S G A p 1 ( 4 p 1 2 ) x 2 J S G + N p 1 3 3 J 2 S G .
Applying triangle inequality and p 1 = p , we find
| a 2 a 4 | p J ( 3 J 2 S + 6 J A 4 N ) p 3 12 G J 2 S + p ( J S + A ) | x | P J S + p | x | 2 P 4 G + P Z 2 G + A p | x | P 2 J S G .
Using the same methods as in Theorems 2 and 3, we obtain
| a 2 a 4 | 2 J 8 ( 3 J 2 S + 6 J A 4 N ) p 3 12 G J 2 S .
Also, by using (7), (8), (9) and (2), applying Lemma 2 and taking p 1 = p [ 0 , 2 ] , we find
| a 2 2 2 a 3 2 + a 2 a 4 | p 2 J 2 ψ 6 p 4 12 J 4 S 2 G + ψ 7 p 2 ( 4 p 2 ) | x | 2 J 2 S 2 G + p 2 ( 4 p 2 ) | x | 2 4 J G + ( 4 p 2 ) 2 | x | 2 2 S 2 + p ( 4 p 2 ) ( 1 | x | 2 ) 2 J G : = F 2 ( p , x ) ,
where
ψ 7 = 2 G ( J 2 2 B ) J S 2 S A .
Next, we may find the maximum value of F 2 ( p , x ) on the closed area [ 0 , 2 ] × [ 0 , 1 ] . We can note that a maximum of [ 0 , 2 ] × [ 0 , 1 ] exists at an interior point ( p 0 , | x | ) . Using differentiation F 2 ( p , x ) with regard to | x | , we obtain
F 2 ( p , x ) | x | = ψ 7 p 2 ( 4 p 2 ) 2 J 2 S 2 G + p 2 ( 4 p 2 ) | x | 2 J G + ( 4 p 2 ) 2 | x | S 2 p ( 4 p 2 ) | x | ) J G .
If p = 0 ,
F 2 ( 0 , x ) = 8 S 2 | x | 2 8 S 2
If p = 2 ,
F 2 ( 2 , x ) = 4 J 2 4 ψ 6 3 J 4 S 2 G
If | x | = 0 ,
F 2 ( p , 0 ) = p 2 J 2 ψ 6 p 4 12 J 4 S 2 G + p ( 4 p 2 ) 2 J G
which has the highest possible value
4 J 2 4 ψ 6 3 J 4 S 2 G
on [ 0 , 2 ] . Also, if | x | = 1 , we obtain
F 2 ( p , 1 ) = p 2 J 2 ψ 6 p 4 12 J 4 S 2 G + ( 2 ψ 7 + J S 2 ) p 2 ( 4 p 2 ) 4 J 2 S 2 G + ( 4 p 2 ) 2 2 S 2
which has the highest possible value
4 J 2 4 ψ 6 3 J 4 S 2 G
on [ 0 , 2 ] . Therefore,
| T 3 ( 2 ) | = | ( a 2 a 4 ) ( a 2 2 2 a 3 2 + a 2 a 4 ) | 2 J 8 ( 3 J 2 S + 6 J A 4 N ) p 3 12 G J 2 S 4 J 2 4 ψ 6 3 J 4 S 2 G .
Remark 4. 
Taking γ = 0 and β = 1 in Theorem 5, we can obtain the result which was obtained by Radhika et al. [9] [Theorem 5].

3. Conclusions

The primary objective was to define a new family R ( γ , β , λ ) of holormorphic functions, associating the Bazilevič functions and the λ -pseudo-starlike functions. We generated Taylor–Maclaurin coefficient estimates for the first four determinants of the Toeplitz matrices T 2 ( 2 ) , T 2 ( 3 ) , T 3 ( 2 ) and T 3 ( 1 ) for the functions belonging to this newly introduced family. Moreover, the results obtained may provide an opportunity for researchers to find the determinants of the Toeplitz matrices for functions of other families.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K.W., S.A.S. and Á.O.P.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.W. and S.A.S.; writing—review and editing, Á.O.P.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Singh, R. On Bazilevič functions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 1973, 38, 261–271. [Google Scholar]
  2. Babalola, K.O. On λ-pseudo-starlike functions. J. Class. Anal. 2013, 3, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ye, K.; Lim, L.-H. Every matrix is a product of Toeplitz matrices. Found. Comput. Math. 2016, 16, 577–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Allu, V.; Lecko, A.; Thomas, D.K. Hankel, Toeplitz, and Hermitian-Toeplitz determinants for certain close-to-convex functions. Mediterr. J. Math. 2022, 19, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Buyankara, M.; Çaglar, M. Hankel and Toeplitz determinants for a subclass of analytic functions. Mat. Stud. 2023, 60, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cotîrlǎ, L.-I.; Wanas, A.K. Symmetric Toeplitz matrices for a new family of prestarlike functions. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Firoz, M.A.; Thomas, D.K.; Allu, V. Toeplitz determinants whose elements are the coefficients of analytic and univalent functions. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2018, 97, 253–264. [Google Scholar]
  8. Al-Khafaji, N.; Al-Fayadh, A.; Hussain, A.H.; Abbas, S.A. Toeplitz determinant whose its entries are the coefficients for class of non-bazilevic functions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1660, 012091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Radhika, V.; Sivasubramanian, S.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Jahangiri, J.M. Toeplitz matrices whose elements are the coefficients of functions with bounded boundary rotation. J. Complex Anal. 2016, 2016, 4960704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Radhika, V.; Sivasubramanian, S.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Jahangiri, J.M. Toeplitz matrices whose elements are coefficients of Bazilevič functions. Open Math. 2018, 16, 1161–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ramachandran, C.; Annamalai, S. On Hankel and Toeplitz determinants for some special class of analytic functions involving conical domains defined by subordination. Int. J. Eng. Res. 2016, 5, 553–561. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ramachandran, C.; Kavitha, D. Toeplitz determinant for some subclasses of analytic functions. Glob. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2017, 13, 785–793. [Google Scholar]
  13. Srivastava, H.M.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Khan, N.; Khan, N.; Khan, B. Hankel and Toeplitz Determinants for a Subclass of q-Starlike Functions Associated with a General Conic Domain. Mathematics 2019, 7, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tang, H.; Khan, S.; Hussain, S.; Khan, N. Hankel and Toeplitz determinant for a subclass of multivalent q-starlike functions of order α. AIMS Math 2021, 6, 5421–5439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wahid, N.H.A.A.; Mohamad, D. Toeplitz determinant for a subclass of tilted starlike functions with respect to conjugate points. Sains Malays. 2021, 50, 3745–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wanas, A.K.; Sakar, F.M.; Oros, G.I.; Cotîrlǎ, L.-I. Toeplitz determinants for a certain family of analytic functions endowed with Borel distribution. Symmetry 2023, 15, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, H.-Y.; Srivastava, R.; Tang, H. Third-order Hankel and Toeplitz determinants for starlike functions connected with the sine function. Mathematics 2019, 7, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pommerenke, C. Univalent Functions; Vandenhoeck and Rupercht: Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  19. Grenander, U.; Szego¨, G. Toeplitz Forms and Their Applications; California Monographs in Mathematical Sciences University California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1958. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wanas, A.K.; Sehen, S.A.; Páll-Szabó, Á.O. Toeplitz Matrices for a Class of Bazilevič Functions and the λ-Pseudo-Starlike Functions. Axioms 2024, 13, 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13080521

AMA Style

Wanas AK, Sehen SA, Páll-Szabó ÁO. Toeplitz Matrices for a Class of Bazilevič Functions and the λ-Pseudo-Starlike Functions. Axioms. 2024; 13(8):521. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13080521

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wanas, Abbas Kareem, Salam Abdulhussein Sehen, and Ágnes Orsolya Páll-Szabó. 2024. "Toeplitz Matrices for a Class of Bazilevič Functions and the λ-Pseudo-Starlike Functions" Axioms 13, no. 8: 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13080521

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop