Next Article in Journal
Multi-Conditional Optimization of a High-Specific-Speed Axial Flow Pump Impeller Based on Machine Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Oil Cavitation Morphology Analysis of Textured Cylindrical Rotating Friction Pair on Circular-Disk End Faces
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Machines
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/machines10111035
Review Report
machines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Design and Analysis of 6-DoFs Upper Limb Assistant Rehabilitation Robot

Machines 2022, 10(11), 1035; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10111035
by Shuang Li, Zhanli Wang *, Zaixiang Pang, Moyao Gao and Zhifeng Duan
Reviewer 1:
Zhenguo Nie
Reviewer 2:
Chien-Hsien Yeh
Machines 2022, 10(11), 1035; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10111035
Submission received: 23 September 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 3 November 2022 / Published: 7 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Robotics, Mechatronics and Intelligent Machines)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our research. We have studied comments carefully and made corrections, hoping to get your approval.

The manuscript used “Track Changes” function of MS Word to revise.Please see the attachment.

Yours sincerely,

Shuang Li

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This study disclosed a 6-DoF upper limb rehabilitation robot for the rehabilitation of stroke patients, especially those in middle and late stage. Here are some comments for the authors:

1. Brunnstrom stages of stroke can help you define the suitable stroke patients. And the spasticity influences the patients to use the robot a lot. It makes sense that the stroke patients need the rehabilitation, but what is the key advantage for the patients in middle or late stage (it is confused) using your ULRR?

2. The movement trajectory of robot is different from the patient's. How to fit the patient's limb and motion is quite important. It affects the comfort and efficientcy of the rehabilitation. The authors should describe more how to set up the ULRR on a patient. Besides, before testing the stroke patients, we may concern the usability. It is suggested to test in healthy subjects and check the motion of ULRR.

Author Response

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our research. We have studied comments carefully and made corrections, hoping to get your approval.

The manuscript used “Track Changes” function of MS Word to revise.Please see the attachment.

Yours sincerely,

Shuang Li

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop