Next Article in Journal
Research on Tire/Road Peak Friction Coefficient Estimation Considering Effective Contact Characteristics between Tire and Three-Dimensional Road Surface
Previous Article in Journal
A Permanent Magnet Synchronous Spherical Motor for High-Mobility Servo-Actuation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multidisciplinary Collaborative Design and Optimization of Turbine Rotors Considering Aleatory and Interval Mixed Uncertainty under a SORA Framework
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Machines
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/machines10080613
Review Report
machines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Sequential Reliability Analysis for the Adjusting Mechanism of Tail Nozzle Considering Wear Degradation

Machines 2022, 10(8), 613; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10080613
by Huanhuan Hu 1, Pan Wang 1,* and Hanyuan Zhou 2
Reviewer 1:
Rafał Grzejda
Reviewer 2:
Roberto Capata
Machines 2022, 10(8), 613; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10080613
Submission received: 18 June 2022 / Revised: 15 July 2022 / Accepted: 22 July 2022 / Published: 26 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reliability Evaluation for Industrial Systems: State of the Art)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The reviewer’s comments on the paper are as follows:

Major revisions

1.        Why is the study assumed non-deformability of the elements of the analysed mechanism?

Minor revisions

1.        Page 2, Lines 25 and 26. What do the abbreviations AK-MCS, MCS mean? All of them should be explained in the text.

2.        Page 2, Line 27. Incorrect reference to Ref. [22].

3.        Page 3, Line 7. Incorrect drawing reference (also applies to subsequent pages).

4.        Page 9. Remove clutter with drawings.

Author Response

  Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

there are some errors of connection with the references

the validation part should be more ordered, the mix between formulae and explanation is a little bit confusing

however the paper is acceptable

Typos
pag 3 after figure 1 fifth line: Error
pag 4 first line
pag 4. the citation can be unique, in previous page authors just link the reference number [XX], then write... "according to ref. [9]"..... choose one!
pag. 5 fitst and fourth line
pag. 6 after figure first line, after formula third line
pag. 7 after figures first and fourth line. then after figure 7 fourth line
pag. 9 figure caption is over the text and missing figures number
pag. 10 fourth line and same problem at pag 4 (ref [21])
pag. 11 "as shown in .....!
pag. 13 after formula 14
pag. 14 2nd line after 4.1
pag. 16 after figure 12 and 13
pag. 17 after eqt. 22
pag. 17 "in eqt. 24????"
pag. 18 after figure 14 and before table 6
pag. 19
pag. 20 after figure 15

between pag 7 and 8 the font changes dimension, from 10 to 11

  Structural
1. enlighten the author's idea, novelty and contribution in introduction
2. chapter 3. instead of using the both figures caption of pag 9 to explain the analysis it should be inserted into the text

Author Response

  Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

  No comments.              
Back to TopTop