Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Lifetime Alcohol and Cigarette Smoking Loads on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Progression: A Cross-Sectional Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Causal Role of Lipoxidative Damage in Mitochondrial Bioenergetic Dysfunction Linked to Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology
Previous Article in Journal
The Optimal Application of Medium Potency Topical Corticosteroids in Preventing Laser-Induced Inflammatory Responses—An Animal Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mitochondrial Dynamics, ROS, and Cell Signaling: A Blended Overview
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Organization of the Respiratory Supercomplexes in Cells with Defective Complex III: Structural Features and Metabolic Consequences

Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2021, 11(4), 351; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040351
Submission received: 18 March 2021 / Revised: 12 April 2021 / Accepted: 14 April 2021 / Published: 17 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impaired Mitochondrial Bioenergetics under Pathological Conditions)

Abstract

:
The mitochondrial respiratory chain encompasses four oligomeric enzymatic complexes (complex I, II, III and IV) which, together with the redox carrier ubiquinone and cytochrome c, catalyze electron transport coupled to proton extrusion from the inner membrane. The protonmotive force is utilized by complex V for ATP synthesis in the process of oxidative phosphorylation. Respiratory complexes are known to coexist in the membrane as single functional entities and as supramolecular aggregates or supercomplexes (SCs). Understanding the assembly features of SCs has relevant biomedical implications because defects in a single protein can derange the overall SC organization and compromise the energetic function, causing severe mitochondrial disorders. Here we describe in detail the main types of SCs, all characterized by the presence of complex III. We show that the genetic alterations that hinder the assembly of Complex III, not just the activity, cause a rearrangement of the architecture of the SC that can help to preserve a minimal energetic function. Finally, the major metabolic disturbances associated with severe SCs perturbation due to defective complex III are discussed along with interventions that may circumvent these deficiencies.

1. Introduction

The mitochondria are cytosolic organelles of eukaryotic cells in charge of ATP production through the process of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). However, several other important pathways are associated with mitochondria, such as the citric acid cycle [1,2], the fatty acids oxidation [3] and lipid droplets formation [4], the iron–sulfur (Fe–S) protein biogenesis [5] and amino acids catabolism [6]. Furthermore, mitochondria are implicated in the buffering of cytosolic calcium concentration [7], in generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [8], and in regulation and execution of different types of cell death [9]. They are also involved in an array of adaptive responses triggered by perturbations of intracellular homeostasis [10], orchestrating anabolic and catabolic reactions, which are finely adjusted according to different cytosolic conditions. All these interconnected functions are sustained by the activity of the “mitochondrial proteome”, estimated to contain at least 1000 (in yeast) [11] to 1500 (in humans) [12] different proteins, 15% of which are directly involved in energy metabolism and the OXPHOS system. Note that recent bioinformatics analysis in yeast provided evidence for more proteins than expected, cryptically localized inside mitochondria [13].
As typically described in the textbooks, mitochondria have two membranes, the outer membrane, which acts a barrier separating mitochondria from the cytoplasm, and the inner membrane surrounding the matrix, where soluble enzymes of intermediary metabolism, ribosomes and the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) are hosted. The inner mitochondrial membrane is characterized by an extraordinarily high protein content and, in particular, encloses many copies of the respiratory chain components that together with the ATP synthase (named also complex V, CV) form the molecular machinery of OXPHOS, i.e., the ATP production from ADP and inorganic phosphate. The mitochondrial respiratory chain consists of four enzymatic multi-subunit complexes, namely the NADH-coenzyme Q reductase (Complex I, CI), the succinate-Coenzyme Q reductase (Complex II, CII), the ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase (Complex III, CIII), and the cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV, CIV). Two mobile redox-active compounds, the lipophilic coenzyme Q (CoQ) and the hydrophilic cytochrome c, connect the enzymatic complexes, thus allowing the electron transfer from soluble reducing equivalents (NADH and FADH2) to molecular oxygen.
Unlike the oxidation of NADH which only occurs via CI, FADH2 can be oxidized at the inner membrane mainly by CII, but also by other less abundant proteins such as the glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [14], the electron transfer flavoprotein dehydrogenases [15,16,17], the dihydroorotate dehydrogenase [18], the choline dehydrogenase [19], the sulfide CoQ reductase [20], and the proline dehydrogenase [21]. All these proteins are able to feed electrons to CoQ and in turn to CIII, which therefore can be considered the central collector delivering electrons through cytochrome c to CIV. The electron transport is coupled to proton extrusion from the matrix into the intermembrane space generating a transmembrane proton gradient at the level of CI, CIII and CIV, but not of CII. This later, together with other FAD-linked enzymes, does not contribute to energy conservation.

2. Mitochondrial Proteins Are Encoded by Two Genomes

Most mitochondrial proteins are encoded in the nucleus, synthesized in the cytosol and then imported into mitochondria by specific targeting mechanisms. However, these organelles are characterized by the presence of an independent genome, the mtDNA. This peculiarity is believed to be due to the evolutionary origin of mitochondria from alpha-proteobacteria integrated into proto-eukaryotic host, of which the details are still debated [22]. Most mitochondrial genes were then transferred to the nucleus, although a few of respiration-competent genes were conserved as an independent genome. The mtDNA is a circular double-stranded DNA, in humans of approximately 16.5 kb, encoding for thirteen polypeptides, all essential subunits of the OXPHOS system, and also for two ribosomal RNAs and twenty-two transfer RNAs, required for the intra-mitochondrial translation of the thirteen proteins. The evolutionary pathways involved in maintaining this transcriptionally active genome in addition to nuclear DNA are still poorly understood. New system biology and bioinformatics approaches have confirmed that the very high hydrophobicity of the proteins encoded by mtDNA is crucial to limit their translocation from the cytoplasm to the mitochondrial membrane and to favour mistargeting to the endoplasmic reticulum. In addition, the high CG content has been shown to increase the thermodynamic stability of the mtDNA, protecting from environmental insults [23]. Of note is that the high GC content might be related also to the surprisingly very high local temperature (about 50 °C) recently determined inside mitochondria [24]. Finally, the preferential encoding of components essential for organelle function in the mtDNA would allow localized control of gene expression and therefore the assembly of protein complexes [25].

3. Both Genomes Contribute to the Onset of Mitochondrial Diseases

Mitochondrial diseases are genetically heterogeneous disorders caused by mutations in nuclear genes encoding OXPHOS structural proteins or assembly factors, which are proteins required for the correct maturation of the complexes, but not contributing to the final structures. Mutations can also affect the molecular machineries of mtDNA replication and maintenance, of mitochondrial transcription and translation, as well as proteins involved in cristae shaping, network dynamics and quality control, composition of membrane lipids or mechanisms of antioxidant defences. Disorders can also be caused by mutations in the mtDNA, encoding structural OXPHOS subunits. In this case the genetic features are very peculiar, since the mtDNA inheritance mode follows the maternal lineage. Furthermore, each cell presents multiple copies (100–1000) of this genome, so that mutated and non-mutated copies can co-exist in the same individual, generating a phenomenon called heteroplasmy. Accordingly, the clinical phenotype and the severity of biochemical dysfunctions are highly variable, and pathology only manifests when the percentage of mutated mtDNA exceeds a threshold, which is variable for each kind of mutation. For a recent exhaustive review on the genetic basis of primary mitochondrial diseases we refer to Fernandez-Vizarra and Zeviani, 2020 [26].

4. The OXPHOS System

The structures of individual mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes have been determined by X-ray crystallography [27,28,29,30] or electron cryo-microscopy [31,32,33,34,35]. The bovine or human mitochondrial CI contains 44 different subunits, forming an L-shaped structure. The minimal functional unit of CI, which is conserved from bacteria to mammals, comprises 14 subunits known as core subunits. Subunits ND1-ND6 and ND4L form the hydrophobic membrane arm, the other seven core subunits form the hydrophilic arm protruding into the matrix and comprising a flavin mononucleotide (FMN) and eight iron–sulfur clusters as redox active prosthetic groups. This latter contains the NADH binding and electron transfer sites, whereas the membrane arm performs the proton translocation. The other supernumerary subunits play significant roles in the assembly, stabilization and regulation of CI [35,36,37].
CII is composed of four subunits, forming a hydrophilic head, containing a FAD binding protein and an iron–sulfur protein, and the hydrophobic arm with two membrane-anchor proteins (CybL and CybS). Three kinds of prosthetic groups, FAD, heme and iron–sulfur clusters, were recognized in CII, coupled with two Q-binding sites [38,39].
The mammalian CIII monomer is composed of three respiratory subunits (cytochrome b/MTCYB, cytochrome c1/CYC1 and the Rieske iron–sulfur protein/UQCRFS1, two core proteins (UQCRC1, UQCRC2) and six low-molecular-weight proteins (UQCRH/QCR6, UQCRB/QCR7, UQCRQ/QCR8, UQCR10/QCR9, UQCR11/QCR10 and a cleavage product of UQCRFS1). CIII is present as dimer (approx 450 kDa), although it is still controversial whether the two monomers of CIII2 function cooperatively or independently [40,41].
The CIV monomer has a mass of approximately 200 kDa and is believed to occur in the membrane both as a monomer and a dimer [42]. Each CIV monomer consists of 14 subunits [43], since NDUFA4, which was considered to be a subunit of CI, is actually a subunit of CIV [44]. The four redox-active metal centres constituting the electron transport pathway are heme a3 and CuB, forming the binuclear centre that binds oxygen, and heme a, located in subunit COXI. The CuA center is incorporated in COXII [45]. The remaining subunits (COX4, 5A, 5B, 6A, 6B, 6C, 7A, 7B, 7C, 8A) are thought to have a structural role in the stabilization of the complex [46,47].

5. OXPHOS Optimization by the Inner Membrane Architecture

The general notion that the inner membrane is heavily folded to form the cristae has been reconsidered after 3D electron microscopy (EM) tomographic analysis in mitochondria from a wide variety of organisms, revealing that the cristae membrane opens toward the intermembrane space through narrow tubular structures, the crista junctions [48]. The molecular components of these cristae junctions have been subsequently identified, the most relevant being the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system (MICOS) [49,50,51] and the high-molecular-weight GTPase Optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) [52,53,54] (Figure 1).
Furthermore, the observation of mitochondrial specimens in their native environment by means of the immuno-EM and cryo-EM tomography allowed to demonstrate that dimers of CV are arranged in long rows along the tightly curved ridges of the cristae membrane [55] (Figure 1). These ribbons of CV dimers are involved in the folding of the crista membrane [56]. It seems therefore that the intra-mitochondrial architecture is more complex than initially believed, with MICOS, OPA1 and CV dimers playing a structural role, together with the abundance of non-bilayer cone-shaped phospholipids, such as cardiolipin and phosphatidylethanolamine [53,57,58].
Of note is that the presence of MICOS and other proteins at the cristae junctions provides severe constraints to the mobility of protein complexes along the inner membrane, and therefore two sub-compartments with unequal protein distribution and functions can be envisaged: the cristae membrane, protruding in the matrix, and the inner boundary membrane, facing the outer membrane. The respiratory complexes are mainly found in the cristae membrane [56]. Further, sophisticated analysis of diffusion and directionality of movement of single complexes by super resolution microscopy revealed that all the complexes are trapped in the laminar part of cristae, except CII which is also found in the inner boundary membrane [59] (Figure 1). It has to be noticed that CII is a rather small complex and does not associate in supramolecular assemblies with other complexes. It follows that the specific geometry of the inner membrane, dictated by the cristae junction organization at the bottom and CV dimers on the top of crista, has a critical impact on the energetic function of mitochondria. As summarized in Figure 1, protons ejected by CI, CIII and CIV segregated on the laminar part of the cristae, are enriched in the intracristal space and flow back into the matrix through CV. This arrangement was predicted to be highly efficient in promoting energy conversion [56]. However, the intracristal membrane geometry has not been shown to influence the local pH gradients [60,61], consequently it has been proposed that the tight packing of the OXPHOS machinery in the cristae membranes favours the kinetic coupling between proton pumping and ATP synthesis [61]. The extraordinary power of super resolution live-cell imaging in combination with EM tomography and genome editing will further illuminate the functional details and dynamic aspects of this important microcompartment.

6. Supramolecular Organization of the Respiratory Complexes

The unequal protein complex distribution within the inner membrane subcompartments is also favoured by their size and their ability to interact with other complexes to form high-molecular-weight macromolecular aggregates. Differently form CII, which is always found alone, the proton-pumping CI, CIII and CIV can assemble in non-covalent associations defined as respiratory supercomplexes (SCs). Respiratory SCs were first identified by non-denaturing blue native gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) of mitochondrial membrane extracts, using the mild detergents Triton X-100 and digitonin, as high-molecular-weight gel bands, showing activity for CI, CIII and CIV [62,63]. The mammalian SCs containing CI, CIII dimer (CIII2), and CIV with different stoichiometry are sometimes referred to as respirasomes, because they contain all the components required to transfer electrons from NADH to molecular oxygen [63,64,65]. In human cells, the respirasome comprises most of CI (>90%), approximately 40–50% of CIII2 and 20–30% of CIV. Differently from CI, significant amounts of CIII2 (50–60%) and CIV (70–80%) can be also found as isolated complexes within the membrane. The CIII+CIV SC represents about 5% of total amount of the complexes [66].

6.1. The CI+CIII2+CIV SC or Respirasome

The structures of the CI+CIII2+CIV SC isolated from different mammalian mitochondria have been determined by single-particle electron cryo-EM at resolutions ranging from ~30 to ~4 Å [67,68,69,70] or by electron cryotomography (cryo-ET) at ~30 Å resolution [71,72].
In the structure of respirasome, CIII2 borders the concave arc of CI membrane arm, and CIV is located near CIII2 at the distal end of the CI membrane arm, with cardiolipin molecules filling the gaps between the individual complexes [67,71]. In the respirasome, two distinct arrangements have been identified, a major “tight” and a minor “loose” form, which mainly diverge for the position of CIV. As illustrated in the cartoon of Figure 2, the most extensive and stable interactions take place between CI and CIII2.
Two are the major interaction points: in the inner membrane between CI subunit NDUFA11 and the CIII subunits UQCRB, UQCRQ and UQCRH, and at the matrix between the CI subunits NDUFB4 and NDUFB9 and CIII subunits UQCRC1 and UQCRFS1 [69]. Another important interaction occurs between CI subunit NDUFB7 and subunit UQCRH on CIII2. Of note is that both subunits contain disulphide bonds, suggesting that redox regulation might modulate the interactions between the respiratory complexes [69].
Few interactions occur between CI and CIV, the most important linking the CI ND5 subunit to COX7C at the interface between matrix and inner membrane, the other between NDUFB3 subunit and COX8B. The contacts between CIII and CIV mainly involve the CIV COX7A subunit with the UQCRC1 and UQCR11 subunits and COX5B subunits with the UQCRC1 subunit [69].
Interestingly, high-molecular-weight bands above the CI+CIII2+CIV SC were previously described by BN-PAGE analysis [63]. More recently, mass spectrometry analysis has suggested that the main components of these bands are subunits of CI, CIII and CIV, and EM analysis detected a minor population of particles with circular arrangements. This led to proposing a higher oligomeric state named megacomplex CI2+CIII2+CIV2. This assembled structure is shaped by a central CIII2 surrounded by two copies each of CI and CIV. This arrangement may be an oligomerization form of respiratory complexes operating under the most efficient emergency conditions, because both monomers of the CIII dimer could receive CoQH2 from each CI and pass reduced cytochrome c to one adjacent CIV. Further analysis by cryo-EM allowed to better define the architecture of the megacomplex [73], although these results were intensely debated, mainly due to limitations of cryo-ET technology in the reconstruction of supramolecular assemblies.

6.2. The CI+CIII2 SC

CI can also assemble with the CIII dimer alone to form the CI+CIII2 SC. Recently, a functional CI+CIII2 SC has been isolated from ovine heart mitochondria and characterized by cryoEM, demonstrating that the contacts between CI and CIII2 are evolutionarily conserved [72] and are similar to those of the respirasome, confirming the stabilizing role of CIII2 on CI [69,74].

6.3. The CIII2+CIV SC

Isolated CIII2 and CIV coexists with the CIII2+CIV SC, which has not been structurally characterized in mammalian tissues, likely due to its low relative abundance. Cryo-EM studies on yeast, which lacks CI, detected a CIII dimer at the core of the SC flanked by a CIV monomer on either side. The CIII–CIV interface revealed protein-protein interactions on either side of the membrane and with lipids within the membrane. The majority of interactions occur on the matrix side between Cor1/UQCRC1 and the N-terminus of COX5A, whereas the C-terminal domain of COX5A interacts with both Qcr6/UQCRH and cytochrome c1 on the intermembrane space. Within the membrane, COX5A contacts the N-terminal helix of Rip1/UQCRH and Qcr8/UQCRQ via a cardiolipin molecule and another lipid modelled as phosphocholine. Two other cardiolipins indirectly support the CIII–CIV interface highlighting again their crucial role in SC formation [75].

7. SCs Assembly Factors

Several molecules able to directly or indirectly promote mitochondrial SCs assembly and stability have been identified, such as cardiolipins, stomatin-like protein 2, prohibitin 1 and 2, and others (for a recent review, see [76]). Here we consider the protein factors involved in SCs assembly, the most studied being HIGD2A (hypoxia inducible domain family member 2A) [66,77,78,79,80] and COX7A2L [81]. HIGD2A mainly functions in CIV assembly [77,82] and mediates CIV integration within the respirasome, as well [66,80]. The mammalian homologous HIGD1A has been reported to assist the assembly of CIII and CIII-containing SCs biogenesis, having overlapping functions with HIGD2A [82]. These findings suggest the involvement of multiple pathways to assemble the respiratory complexes and to gather the SCs [82,83,84].
COX7A2L (also called SCAF1) has been the subject of various studies with contradictory results, due to the presence of two variants (long and short forms) differently expressed in mouse strains and tissues [81]. There is an agreement that long COX7A2L can bind to both CIII2 and CIV and is required for formation of the CIII2+IV SC [79,83,84], as well as for the assembly of the megacomplexes [73], but is dispensable for the respirasome [66,80].
Assembly factors specifically interacting with CIII were identified in yeast and their orthologs validated in human cells, namely, Cbp3 (UQCC1) and Cbp6 (UQCC2) [85] and Cbp4 (UQCC3) [86]. The best-characterized is UQCC3 (ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase complex assembly factor 3; also known as C11orf83), which is involved in the early phase of CIII assembly and in the stabilization of CIII-containing SCs [86,87]. Interestingly, UQCC3 was reported to be indispensable for simultaneously maintaining both OXPHOS and glycolysis during hepatocarcinoma cells hypoxia adaption, suggesting a role in energetic reprogramming [88].
Table 1 summarizes the genetic alterations affecting CIII structural subunits and assembly factors, which will be considered in the following paragraphs, also indicating the redox activities and the assembly state of complexes/SCs.

8. Models of SC Organization

The question of the organization of the respiratory chain has been debated since the pioneering studies aimed at identifying the molecular components and catalytic mechanisms [89,90]. Hackenbrock et al. (1986) described the ”fluid” or “random collision model” of electron transfer, where each complex acts as an individual entity, CoQ and cytochrome c freely diffuse within the lipid bilayer, and electron transfer occurs during random and transient collision events [91]. The alternative solid-state model derives from the early observations reporting that CI and CIII preferentially associated in the native membranes [92]. Since 2000, the solid-state model has received strong support from isolation of SCs by BN-PAGE and then by development of protein crystallography and cryo-EM approaches. According to the solid model, a unique multicomplex unit is able to execute all the steps of respiration. More recently, the two models have been merged in the so-called “plasticity” model [64,93], based on the coexistence of individual CIII and CIV complexes, with a variable combination of SCs. Dynamic SC association/dissociation can be triggered under physiological conditions by availability of different substrates (NADH and FADH2), determining a variety of different structural options that allow to adapt the efficiency of the respiratory chain to metabolic demands. One consequence of the possibility to preferentially use NADH- or FADH2-dependent substrates through isolated complexes and SCs is the presence of partially dedicated pools of the mobile electron carrier CoQ [81,94]. However, demonstrating the presence of two CoQ pools is experimentally difficult and therefore this issue has been disputed [95,96]. According to the working model proposed by the Enriquez group, under normal circumstances, the superassembly in the respirasome generates a CoQ fraction within the SCs functionally dedicated to NADH oxidation. Given that also individual CIII2 co-exist with the SC, CoQH2 generated by CII or by other FADH2-dependent enzymes can be oxidized by the free CIII out of respirasome. Under conditions of block/lack of CIII or CIV, all CIII is associated with CI and CoQH2 can diffuse out and be oxidized outside the SCs, and, on the other hand, the ubiquinol generated by CII can diffuse in and be oxidized by CI+CIII2 SC [81,94]. Additionally, for cytochrome c the existence of a unique pool is also unlikely, given that this protein, besides transferring electrons between CIII and IV, can interact with many mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial components, exerting a variety of roles, among them the trigger of apoptotic cell death. SCAF1, which has been shown to be required for CIII and CIV interaction, plays an important role in the cytochrome c pool functional segmentation and likely in the efficient use of respiratory substrates. For a detailed discussion on CoQ and cytochrome c segmentation in SCs, we refer to [97].

9. Functional Roles of the SCs and CIII Involvement

Even if the evidence in support of SCs in detergent extracts is beyond question and the SCs in situ arrangement in the mitochondrial inner membrane has been defined, their physiological functional significance is still debated. The hypothesis of a catalytic advantage provided by SCs [67,81,98] has been questioned [65,72,95,96,99]. Catalytic advantage would imply substrate channelling, i.e., a defined conduit for the hydrophobic quinol from its reduction site in CI to CIII, where it is oxidized. However, no structural evidence for such a protein-defined conduit between CI and CIII2 was obtained [100].
As alternative hypotheses, it has been proposed that SC organization could support CI assembly and stability [101,102], preventing dangerous casual protein aggregations within the membrane [100,103]. Finally, it has to be recalled that CI and CIII2 are the main sources of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the mitochondrial matrix and in the inner membrane [104,105,106,107], and that experimental dissociation of the SCs results in increased ROS production from CI [108]. It was, therefore, proposed that SCs organization could reduce ROS generation and subsequent oxidative damage to membrane components [108,109], although the molecular mechanism was not clearly defined. Analysis of recent structural data allowed to propose that in the respirasome, the interactions of CIII2 with CI and CIV break the symmetry of CIII2, ensuring efficient oxidation of QH2 and allowing CI to operate at full rate, thus helping to reduce ROS formation at CI [100].
The relationship between SCs and ROS is intriguing, because it is difficult to dissect how important SCs are to prevent ROS production and how ROS production depends on SCs disassembly. There is evidence that the production of ROS due to CIII dysfunction plays a role in the stability of SCs. It has been reported that some pathogenic mutations in BCS1L, the chaperone protein needed to incorporate the UQCFRS1 protein in CIII, affected CIII activity, inducing ROS production and secondary CI and CIV activity/stability alteration [110]. Furthermore, in a mouse cellular model lacking UQCFRS1 protein, the increase of ROS production due to CIII deficit induced a general reduction in the assembly and stability of CI, CIV, and in turn of SCs; however, this latter defect was partially rescued in presence of antioxidants treatment or hypoxia [111].
In addition to a direct ROS production by CIII due to its defective activity, it has been shown that the lack of CIII, by increasing the CoQH2/CoQ ratio, could promote the backflow of electrons from CoQH2 to CI by the reverse electron transfer (RET) reaction through CI. RET produced the oxidation of cysteine residues of CI, triggering its degradation and in turn hampering SC formation [94]. Although in this study the occurrence of RET and ROS production was not directly demonstrated, the ROS involvement was suggested by partial rescue of CI assembly after treatment with the CI inhibitor rotenone and under hypoxic conditions, all interventions that prevent RET. The overexpression of SOD2, however, was not effective [94]. An interesting finding has been recently reported, showing that Na+ modulates ROS production during acute hypoxia through the regulation of inner membrane fluidity [112]. Noticeably, this increased ROS production was associated with reduction in combined CII+CIII enzymatic activity and respiratory capacity, whereas combined CI+CIII activity and respiration remained unchanged. This finding reinforces the general idea of that formation of the CI+CIII2 SC limits the production of ROS.
Finally, in a human cellular model carrying an 18-bp frame deletion in MTCYB associated with a severe impairment of CIII, CI and CIV assembly and ROS production, treatment with the antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine partially rescued respirasome formation [113]. Taken together, these data indicate that ROS production may affect respiratory complexes and SCs assembly, thus, it is reasonable to speculate that the correct assembly of SCs could be useful to reduce ROS production in a healthy respiratory chain.
The fact that the mutual arrangement of CI and CIII2 is essentially conserved from obligate aerobic yeast to mammals, and plants seems to favour the hypothesis that specifically these two complexes have a functional role in maintaining the respiratory chain stability reducing ROS production [51]. Further structural and biochemical work is needed, also considering that in some cases a slight increase of ROS was detected, but the assembly of respiratory complexes and SCs was normal, suggesting that ROS levels could modulate the response to this supermolecular organization [114,115,116]. The influence of tissue-specific subunit isoforms is also to be taken into account [83].

10. SCs Biogenesis and Role of CIII

An important issue to be elucidated concerns the SCs biogenesis, i.e., how CI, CIII and CIV interact in the respirasome formation. Currently, two models have been presented. The first model proposes that the close interplay among the three complexes favours better structural stability, implying that the isolated forms of respiratory complexes, in particular CI, are more prone to degradation. Accordingly, the complexes are supposed to follow separate assembly pathways to build mature individual complexes and to form SCs in a second step [93,117]. The second model suggests a central role of CI acting as a scaffold for the sequential incorporation of CIII2 and CIVn subassemblies to form mature SCs [102]. However, this latter model does not rule out the occurrence of a dynamic exchange of CIII2 and CIV once the respirasome assembly has been completed, allowing the formation of the other SCs and the co-existence with free complexes [66]. Both models have been developed from data obtained in experiments in which SCs biogenesis was studied following the time-course of respiratory complexes assembly after mitochondrial translation inhibition, by using diverse antibiotics and different experimental conditions, and this may explain some conflicting results. Recently, interesting information obtained by combining the Stable Isotope Labelling by Amino acids in Cell culture (SILAC) and complexome profiling techniques, suggested a new main role of CIII in SCs formation as a structural and functional platform for the overall respiratory chain biogenesis [118,119]. In particular, Protasoni et al., 2020 [118] analyzed human cells bearing a 4-bp MTCYB deletion that induced a frameshift with the loss of the encoded protein and of CIII2, associated with hampered CI biogenesis due to the stall in N-module incorporation and decreased CI stability. Furthermore, the CIV assembly was also defective because some CIV subunits were recruited within the accumulated CIII subassemblies. A similar analysis was carried out by Páleníková et al. (2021) [119], in cells bearing a 18-bp frame deletion in MTCYB gene that produced a protein shortened of six amino acids and induced a strong defect of CIII2 activity/assembly as well as of CI and CIV [113,120,121]. These cells, differently from those with the 4-bp deletion, exhibited some amount of isolated CIII2 and CI, that were associated in the enzymatically active CI+III2 SC [113,121], in agreement with structural data demonstrating the existence of multiple interactions between the two complexes [74]. However, Páleníková et al. (2021) showed that several sub-complexes with mixed CIII, CI and CIV subunits were also present, indicating that the decreased CIII2 assembly leads the formation of intermediates that trap other respiratory complex subunits impairing their assembly [119]. Taken together, these data support a cooperative assembly model in the respiratory chain structural and functional maturation and in SCs biogenesis, highlighting the central role of CIII2 as scaffold for the ordered association with mixed CI and CIV subunits. Exhaustive studies focused on the mechanisms of SCs biogenesis in presence of CIII deficiency are still lacking; however, after reviewing literature it appears that mutations that disrupt CIII assembly also induce an impairment of CI and CIV and of SCs formation as well. Indeed, severe mutations in both CIII structural subunits or in early assembly factors strongly affect CIII structure and reduce CI and CIV stability [85,86,111,112,118,122,123,124,125,126,127,128] (Table 1). Unfortunately, several reported mutations that could be relevant for CIII structure, such as truncating mutations in cytochrome b, were poorly or not at all investigated for CIII assembly and related influence on CI, CIV and SCs structure (Table 1). However, it appears that most MTCYB missense mutations affect neither the assembly of CIII nor CI and CIV (Table 1), except for the p.Y278C mutation that was associated with a slight reduction of CI activity only and a reduced amount of the CIII2 +CIV SC [129], and the p.E373K that disassembled CIII and CI, but not CIV [130]. Taken together, these findings indicate that the assembly of CI and CIV depends on the physical presence of assembled CIII species and not on their catalytic activity, although ROS production could play a role in specific cases [111]. However, the role of CIII structure in SCs biogenesis is far from being clarified; for instance, some authors suggested that the complete formation of the CIII2+CIV SC is important to safely activate CI only when the respiratory chain is fully assembled [102], but some data show that CI could interact with a pre-CIII to form enough SC to ensure sufficient respiratory chain activity [115,131]. These data suggest that regardless of the mutation, there is a tendency to maintain respiratory complex stability and SC assembly to mitigate CIII dysfunction. This latter piece of evidence is supported by recent papers showing that missense mutations in MTCYB that induce defective CIII enzymatic activity when detected in the isolated complex, are mitigated when CIII activity is measured under conditions in which the respiratory complex is organized into SCs [129,132]. Although further work is clearly needed, recent structural details obtained from cryo-EM analysis of active SC particles from sheep mitochondria highlighted the specific involvement of cytochrome b in the crosstalk between CI and CIII2, confirming its role in structural/functional interactions between the two complexes [74].

11. Metabolic Disturbances and Treatment Options

Defective CIII and associated perturbation of the supramolecular organization of CIII-containing SCs result in several significant metabolic alterations, which are briefly summarized in Figure 3 and discussed in detail below, providing also some hints on experimental treatments specifically aimed at improving these metabolic disturbances. For an extensive recent review of the therapeutic strategies to treat mitochondrial disease, we refer to [133].

11.1. Unbalanced Intracellular Redox Homeostasis

It is widely accepted that even under physiological conditions the electron flow through the mitochondrial respiratory chain results in mild ROS production [134,135], with CI and CIII being the main redox components responsible for molecular oxygen reduction to superoxide anions [104,105,106,107,136]. As mentioned above (point 9), one of the proposed roles of the supramolecular organization into SCs is to limit ROS formation, avoiding the diffusion of free radicals with damaging effects at protein and lipid levels [100,137,138]. Accordingly, different experimental conditions causing disruption or prevention of the association between CI and CIII were shown to increase ROS production, supporting the view that dissociation of SCs may strictly link oxidative stress and energy failure [108]. Furthermore, pathological conditions leading to dismantling the SCs organization, such those described in cells with 4- and 18-bp MTCYB deletions, were also shown to enhance ROS generation [94], and, due to up-regulation of intracellular efficient antioxidant defences in both cytosol and mitochondrial compartments, to cause a significant unbalance in the redox homeostasis [113,121,139]. Of note, mild to moderate increase in oxidative stress associated with parallel SCs depletion was detected in different brain areas of neuron-specific mice KO for the UQCRFS1 gene, demonstrating that ROS can modulate the SCs architecture to cope with a high level of ROS [140]. This conclusion is further supported by previous finding that a superoxide dismutase mimetic compound and SOD2 overexpression induced a partial increase in SCs in the UQCRFS1 KO cells [111,140]. Moreover, the prolonged treatment of cells bearing the 18-bp MTCYB deletion with N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) significantly increased the rate of ATP synthesis driven by CI substrates as well as the amount of free CI, CIII and CIV and of the respirasome. It is likely that NAC may provide optimal redox conditions for respiratory complexes interactions and SCs re-organization [113], also considering that both CI subunit NDUFB7 and CIII subunit UQCRH contain disulphide bonds [69].

11.2. Accumulation of the Reduced Form of Pyridine Nucleotides and CoQ

Direct consequences of defective CIII are energy failure and metabolic derangements, as indicated by a huge number of case reports describing lactic acidosis and hypoglycaemia as recurrent clinical phenotypes of patients bearing mutations in different CIII-related genes, i.e., MTCYB [120,141], UQCRC2 [127,142], UQCC3 [86] and others. Metabolomics analyses in liver of the mouse model of CIII dysfunction (Bcs1lc.232A>G mutant) revealed a decrease in carbohydrate intermediates, demonstrating an increase in glycolysis to compensate for the reduced mitochondrial ATP production [143]. Subsequently, targeted metabolomics detected increases in glucogenic and ketogenic amino acids in circulation, supporting a starvation-like condition [144]. Of note is that this mouse model, despite the severe CIII dysfunction, does not present significant perturbations in the SCs organization [115].
On the other hand, when the assembly of CIII-containing SCs is compromised, in addition to CIII, the amount of CI collapses as well, leading to elevation of the cellular ratio of reduced and oxidized pyridine nucleotides (NADH/NAD+). The inability to oxidize NADH in the mitochondrial matrix affects not only the efficiency of OXPHOS but also the flux of metabolites through the Krebs cycle. As a consequence, the cells become heavily dependent on aerobic glycolysis for survival. The glycolytic flux relies on the activity of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase which requires NAD+, generated from NADH oxidation by the cytosolic lactate dehydrogenase enzyme. In agreement with this notion, we found that the amount of lactate released into the growth medium by the homoplasmic cells bearing the 18-bp MTCYB deletion was significantly greater than WT cells. Noticeably, cells bearing the p.278Y>C MTCYB mutation impairing CIII activity without affecting SCs organization failed to increase lactate release [121], in accord with the clinical phenotype of patients, presenting lactic acidosis in the patient bearing the 18-bp MTCYB deletion [120], but not in that with the p.278Y>C mutation [145]. The molecular mechanism underlining this metabolic switch is unknown, although the possible role for UQCC3 may be worth investigating [88].
Interestingly, previous studies described benefits in lifespan and energetic function of defective CI by interventions targeting NADH elevation, such as supplementation with NAD-precursor [146] inhibition of mTOR [147] and of mitochondrial serine catabolism [148], as well as hypoxia treatment [149]. To circumvent the CI deficiency, some studies took advantage of the xenotopic expression of the single-subunit yeast enzyme NADH dehydrogenase (Ndi1) [150,151,152]. In yeast, Ndi1 catalyses the oxidation of NADH in the matrix like CI, but is unable to restore the proton pumping. Ndi1 protein expression in human cultured cells lacking CI restored the NADH-dependent respiration as well as the growth in glucose-free medium containing galactose [153,154]. Recently, McEllroy et al. (2020) generated a mouse that conditionally expresses Ndi1, confirming that its expression dramatically prolong lifespan, but was unable to significantly improve motor function in a mouse model of Leigh syndrome due to loss of the NDUFS4 CI subunit [155]. In the absence of structural data showing Ndi1 association with SCs, it is reasonable to speculate that the ability of Ndi1 to ameliorate the cell viability does not depend on association with other respiratory complexes, rather it depends on the restoration of NADH oxidation allowing for a compensatory increase in glycolysis and sufficient metabolite flux in the Krebs cycle.
At cellular level, the primary consequence of the specific drop/lack of CIII is the blockade of CoQH2 oxidation, preventing the NADH and FADH2 oxidation by CI and CII. As mentioned above, elevation of CoQH2/CoQ ratio causes reverse electron transport through CI, with local generation of superoxide, triggering CI subunits degradation and tuning the amount of this complex [94]. This is in agreement with previous data showing that CIII can be released from CI-containing SCs under metabolic conditions (e.g., starvation) when electron flux from FAD overwhelms the oxidation of CoQ, supporting the plasticity model of SCs organization [81]. The alternative oxidase (AOX) is a single-protein electron transport system present in bacteria, lower eukaryotes and plants that can perform CoQH2 oxidation instead of CIII and CIV, by transferring electrons directly from quinols to oxygen without proton translocation [156]. The xenotopic expression of tunicated AOX in mouse was recently investigated, failing to show any association of AOX with SCs. This finding supports the notion that xenotopically expressed AOX acts as a freely diffusible redox partner [157]. Of note is that the expression of AOX from Emericella nidulans in MTCYB KO cells induced CoQH2 oxidation, thus reducing the oxidative stress and inhibiting CI degradation. Despite the increased CI amount, the SCs were not restored due to the lack of CIII [94], further corroborating the central role of CIII as a scaffold for incorporation of CI and CIV [118]. Furthermore, AOX was reported to provide a full functional rescue of the cardiomyopathy of the Bcs1lc.232A>G mutant mice, by restoring respiration to wild-type level. Noticeably, the CIII and CI+CIII2+CIV assembly was partially rescued in cardiac mitochondria, likely secondary to the general improvement in mitochondrial structure and function [144].
The observation that expression of a single enzyme, such as AOX, can bypass defective oxidative reactions carried out by dozens of proteins is intriguing. Besides representing a useful tool for detecting the contribution of ATP requirement from the NAD+ and CoQ regeneration, the oxidase may be of potential use for respiratory chain deficiencies, although a gene therapy approach seems quite problematic at present. In fact, it has to be considered that correction of the mutated gene in affected tissue of monogenic diseases by CRISPR/CAS9 genome editing, already shown to be promising in animal models, requires sophisticated gene-specific tools and is still under development for mtDNA interventions. Conversely, the expression of one protein such AOX might be, in theory, beneficial for restoring most of the metabolic stress induced by OXPHOS impairment caused by a wide variety of mutations.

11.3. Elevation of Succinate and Effects on Gene Expression Regulation

The lack of CIII and the extremely limited availability of oxidized CoQ results in the inability of the Krebs cycle to progress from succinate to fumarate, as demonstrated by the markedly increased levels of succinate and reduction of fumarate and malate detected by us in cells with the 18-bp MTCYB deletion [121] and also in cells bearing the 4-bp MTCYB deletion [158]. In cells with the p.278Y>C MTCYB mutation, with normal SCs organization, we also detected a weak increase of succinate, but increased malate and normal fumarate, suggesting that some succinate can be oxidized to fumarate which in turn produces malate, likely as a consequence of CIII assembly in the respirasome, that can preserve significant electron transport [121]. Elevation of succinate and fumarate was reported in the liver of Bcs1lc.232A>G mutant mouse, in line with the blockade of the Krebs cycle flux [159].
Succinate accumulation in the cytosol has been shown to have a strong impact in gene expression regulation, by inhibiting the 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases, which catalyse hydroxylation reactions on various types of substrates. In particular, succinate, competing with 2-oxoglutarate, inhibits the activity of prolyl hydroxylases, leading to stabilization of Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1α (HIF-1α) under normoxia, defined as a pseudo-hypoxic condition [160]. HIF-1α can then translocate from cytoplasm to the nucleus where it associates with HIF-1β, to activate transcription of HIF-1α-target genes, among which are those encoding glycolytic enzymes [161]. It is likely that the huge increase of succinate levels determined in cells with the 18-bp MTCYB deletion may be at least in part responsible for the glycolytic switch revealed by increased extracellular lactate production [121].
In addition to succinate and fumarate, the levels of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (L-2-HG) were increased in RISP/ UQCRFS1 KO cells [162] and also in cells bearing the 4-bp MTCYB deletion [158]. All these Krebs cycle metabolites competitively inhibit the activity of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases, including also JmJC domain-containing histone lysine demethylases and ten-eleven translocation TETs family of 5-methlycytosine hydroxylases, involved in oxidizing 5-methylcytosine into 5-hydroxymethylcytosine [163]. Accordingly, the DNA and histone methylation were increased upon loss of RISP in fetal hematopoietic stem cells, impairing their differentiation and maintenance of stemness [162]. The increase in these metabolites, through inhibition of the histone and DNA demethylases, can therefore represent a very important factor affecting the epigenetic landscape of the cells and causing wide-ranging effects on cell physiology (for a review on Krebs metabolites and epigenetics, see [164]).

12. Conclusions and Perspectives

The development of cryo-EM technology has provided a powerful tool to analyse at atomic level the specific associations of CI, CIII and CIV into the respirasome, the CI+CIII2 and the CIII2+CIV1-2 SCs. However, these techniques suffer from some limitations, mainly associated with the mitochondrial purification procedures and the type/amount of detergent. In this regard, the development of the “in situ” reconstruction of SCs in eukaryotic cells in vivo by using the proximity-dependent labeling followed by mass spectrometry will open the possibility to identify potentially interacting proteins and their subcellular spatial localization [165,166]. Dynamic rearrangements between individual complexes and SCs have been demonstrated to occur (Table 1). It is necessary to identify the functional consequences of these arrangements as well as their implications in the regulation of the respiratory function under different physiological conditions. More biochemical and biophysical experiments, in combination with advances in super-resolution light microscopy are needed for clarify the functional mechanism of the SCs. This information will be crucial to elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the mitochondrial disorders associated with both nuclear and mtDNA mutations, and, hopefully, to identify effective treatments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.G. and M.R.; writing, original draft and figures preparation, M.R.; writing and editing, A.M.G.; supervision, C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Erika Fernandez-Vizarra, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK, for kindly sharing some SILAC and complexome profiling results. This article is dedicated to the memory of Francisca Diaz, University of Miami, USA, who significant contributed to the study of SCs alteration in mitochondrial dysfunctions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Raimundo, N.; Baysal, B.E.; Shadel, G.S. Revisiting the TCA cycle: Signaling to tumor formation. Trends Mol. Med. 2011, 17, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Martínez-Reyes, I.; Diebold, L.P.; Kong, H.; Schieber, M.; Huang, H.; Hensley, C.T.; Mehta, M.M.; Wang, T.; Santos, J.H.; Woychik, R.; et al. TCA Cycle and Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Are Necessary for Diverse Biological Functions. Mol. Cell 2016, 61, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Kastaniotis, A.J.; Autio, K.J.; Kerätär, J.M.; Monteuuis, G.; Mäkelä, A.M.; Nair, R.R.; Pietikäinen, L.P.; Shvetsova, A.; Chen, Z.; Hiltunen, J.K. Mitochondrial fatty acid synthesis, fatty acids and mitochondrial physiology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2017, 1862, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Benador, I.Y.; Veliova, M.; Liesa, M.; Shirihai, O.S. Mitochondria Bound to Lipid Droplets: Where Mitochondrial Dynamics Regulate Lipid Storage and Utilization. Cell Metab. 2019, 29, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Lill, R.; Broderick, J.B.; Dean, D.R. Special issue on iron-sulfur proteins: Structure, function, biogenesis and diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2015, 1853, 1251–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Minton, D.R.; Nam, M.; McLaughlin, D.J.; Shin, J.; Bayraktar, E.C.; Alvarez, S.W.; Sviderskiy, V.O.; Papagiannakopoulos, T.; Sabatini, D.M.; Birsoy, K.; et al. Serine Catabolism by SHMT2 Is Required for Proper Mitochondrial Translation Initiation and Maintenance of Formylmethionyl-tRNAs. Mol. Cell 2018, 69, 610–621.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Gherardi, G.; Monticelli, H.; Rizzuto, R.; Mammucari, C. The Mitochondrial Ca2+ Uptake and the Fine-Tuning of Aerobic Metabolism. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 554904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sena, L.A.; Chandel, N.S. Physiological Roles of Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species. Mol. Cell 2012, 48, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Bock, F.J.; Tait, S.W.G. Mitochondria as multifaceted regulators of cell death. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liesa, M.; Shirihai, O.S. Mitochondrial Dynamics in the Regulation of Nutrient Utilization and Energy Expenditure. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 491–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Morgenstern, M.; Stiller, S.B.; Lübbert, P.; Peikert, C.D.; Dannenmaier, S.; Drepper, F.; Weill, U.; Höß, P.; Feuerstein, R.; Gebert, M.; et al. Definition of a High-Confidence Mitochondrial Proteome at Quantitative Scale. Cell Rep. 2017, 19, 2836–2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kulak, N.A.; Pichler, G.; Paron, I.; Nagaraj, N.; Mann, M. Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Monteuuis, G.; Miścicka, A.; Świrski, M.; Zenad, L.; Niemitalo, O.; Wrobel, L.; Alam, J.; Chacinska, A.; Kastaniotis, A.J.; Kufel, J. Non-canonical translation initiation in yeast generates a cryptic pool of mitochondrial proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 5777–5791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Harding, J.W.; Pyeritz, E.A.; Copeland, E.S.; White, H.B. Role of glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase in glyceride metabolism. Effect of diet on enzyme activities in chicken liver. Biochem. J. 1975, 146, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Watmough, N.J.; Frerman, F.E. The electron transfer flavoprotein: Ubiquinone oxidoreductases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2010, 1797, 1910–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alcázar-Fabra, M.; Navas, P.; Brea-Calvo, G. Coenzyme Q biosynthesis and its role in the respiratory chain structure. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2016, 1857, 1073–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Henriques, B.J.; Olsen, R.K.J.; Gomes, C.M.; Bross, P. Electron transfer flavoprotein and its role in mitochondrial energy metabolism in health and disease. Gene 2021, 776, 145407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Evans, D.R.; Guy, H.I. Mammalian Pyrimidine Biosynthesis: Fresh Insights into an Ancient Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 33035–33038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Salvi, F.; Gadda, G. Human choline dehydrogenase: Medical promises and biochemical challenges. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2013, 537, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hildebrandt, T.M.; Grieshaber, M.K. Three enzymatic activities catalyze the oxidation of sulfide to thiosulfate in mammalian and invertebrate mitochondria. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 3352–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hancock, C.N.; Liu, W.; Alvord, W.G.; Phang, J.M. Co-regulation of mitochondrial respiration by proline dehydrogenase/oxidase and succinate. Amino Acids 2016, 48, 859–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zachar, I.; Boza, G. Endosymbiosis before eukaryotes: Mitochondrial establishment in protoeukaryotes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 3503–3523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Johnston, I.G.; Williams, B.P. Evolutionary Inference across Eukaryotes Identifies Specific Pressures Favoring Mitochondrial Gene Retention. Cell Syst. 2016, 2, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Chrétien, D.; Bénit, P.; Ha, H.-H.; Keipert, S.; El-Khoury, R.; Chang, Y.-T.; Jastroch, M.; Jacobs, H.T.; Rustin, P.; Rak, M. Mitochondria are physiologically maintained at close to 50 °C. PLoS Biol. 2018, 16, e2003992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Allen, J.F. Why chloroplasts and mitochondria retain their own genomes and genetic systems: Colocation for redox regulation of gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 10231–10238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Fernandez-Vizarra, E.; Zeviani, M. Mitochondrial disorders of the OXPHOS system. FEBS Lett. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Iwata, S.; Lee, J.W.; Okada, K.; Lee, J.K.; Iwata, M.; Rasmussen, B.; Link, T.A.; Ramaswamy, S.; Jap, B.K. Complete Structure of the 11-Subunit Bovine Mitochondrial Cytochrome bc1 Complex. Science 1998, 281, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tsukihara, T.; Aoyama, H.; Yamashita, E.; Tomizaki, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Shinzawa-Itoh, K.; Nakashima, R.; Yaono, R.; Yoshikawa, S. The Whole Structure of the 13-Subunit Oxidized Cytochrome c Oxidase at 2.8 A. Science 1996, 272, 1136–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, F.; Huo, X.; Zhai, Y.; Wang, A.; Xu, J.; Su, D.; Bartlam, M.; Rao, Z. Crystal Structure of Mitochondrial Respiratory Membrane Protein Complex II. Cell 2005, 121, 1043–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zickermann, V.; Wirth, C.; Nasiri, H.; Siegmund, K.; Schwalbe, H.; Hunte, C.; Brandt, U. Mechanistic insight from the crystal structure of mitochondrial complex I. Science 2015, 347, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhu, J.; Vinothkumar, K.R.; Hirst, J.Z.J. Structure of mammalian respiratory complex I. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 536, 354–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Blaza, J.N.; Vinothkumar, K.R.; Hirst, J. Structure of the Deactive State of Mammalian Respiratory Complex I. Structure 2018, 26, 312–319.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Agip, A.-N.A.; Blaza, J.N.; Bridges, H.R.; Viscomi, C.; Rawson, S.; Muench, S.P.; Hirst, J. Cryo-EM structures of complex I from mouse heart mitochondria in two biochemically defined states. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018, 25, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fiedorczuk, K.; Letts, J.A.; Degliesposti, G.; Kaszuba, K.; Skehel, G.D.M.; Sazanov, L.A. Atomic structure of the entire mammalian mitochondrial complex I. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 538, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kampjut, D.; Sazanov, L.A. The coupling mechanism of mammalian respiratory complex I. Science 2020, 370, eabc4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vinothkumar, K.R.; Zhu, J.; Hirst, J. Architecture of mammalian respiratory complex I. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 515, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Yoga, E.G.; Angerer, H.; Parey, K.; Zickermann, V. Respiratory complex I—Mechanistic insights and advances in structure determination. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2020, 1861, 148153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cecchini, G. Function and Structure of Complex II of the Respiratory Chain. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2003, 72, 77–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bezawork-Geleta, A.; Rohlena, J.; Dong, L.; Pacak, K.; Neuzil, J. Mitochondrial Complex II: At the Crossroads. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017, 42, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sarewicz, M.; Pintscher, S.; Pietras, R.; Borek, A.; Bujnowicz, Ł.; Hanke, G.; Cramer, W.A.; Finazzi, G.; Osyczka, A. Catalytic Reactions and Energy Conservation in the Cytochrome bc1 and b6f Complexes of Energy-Transducing Membranes. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 2020–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Guo, R.; Gu, J.; Wu, M.; Yang, M. Amazing structure of respirasome: Unveiling the secrets of cell respiration. Protein Cell 2016, 7, 854–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Hakvoort, T.B.; Moolenaar, K.; Lankvelt, A.H.; Sinjorgo, K.M.; Dekker, H.L.; Muijsers, A.O. Separation, stability and kinetics of monomeric and dimeric bovine heart cytochrome c oxidase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1987, 894, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zong, S.; Wu, M.; Gu, J.; Liu, T.; Guo, R.; Yang, M. Structure of the intact 14-subunit human cytochrome c oxidase. Cell Res. 2018, 28, 1026–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Balsa, E.; Marco, R.; Perales-Clemente, E.; Szklarczyk, R.; Calvo, E.; Landázuri, M.O.; Enríquez, J.A. NDUFA4 Is a Subunit of Complex IV of the Mammalian Electron Transport Chain. Cell Metab. 2012, 16, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Hill, B.C. The sequence of electron carriers in the reaction of cytochrome c oxidase with oxygen. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 1993, 25, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kadenbach, B.; Hüttemann, M. The subunit composition and function of mammalian cytochrome c oxidase. Mitochondrion 2015, 24, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ishigami, I.; Zatsepin, N.A.; Hikita, M.; Conrad, C.E.; Nelson, G.; Coe, J.D.; Basu, S.; Grant, T.D.; Seaberg, M.H.; Sierra, R.G.; et al. Crystal structure of CO-bound cytochrome c oxidase determined by serial femtosecond X-ray crystallography at room temperature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 8011–8016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Frey, T.G.; Mannella, C.A. The internal structure of mitochondria. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000, 25, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Harner, M.; Körner, C.; Walther, D.; Mokranjac, D.; Kaesmacher, J.; Welsch, U.; Griffith, J.; Mann, M.; Reggiori, F.; Neupert, W. The mitochondrial contact site complex, a determinant of mitochondrial architecture. EMBO J. 2011, 30, 4356–4370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Rampelt, H.; Zerbes, R.M.; van der Laan, M.; Pfanner, N. Role of the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system in membrane architecture and dynamics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2017, 1864, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Stephan, T.; Brüser, C.; Deckers, M.; Steyer, A.M.; Balzarotti, F.; Barbot, M.; Behr, T.S.; Heim, G.; Hübner, W.; Ilgen, P.; et al. MICOS assembly controls mitochondrial inner membrane remodeling and crista junction redistribution to mediate cristae formation. EMBO J. 2020, 39, 104105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Frezza, C.; Cipolat, S.; De Brito, O.M.; Micaroni, M.; Beznoussenko, G.V.; Rudka, T.; Bartoli, D.; Polishuck, R.S.; Danial, N.N.; De Strooper, B.; et al. OPA1 Controls Apoptotic Cristae Remodeling Independently from Mitochondrial Fusion. Cell 2006, 126, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Quintana-Cabrera, R.; Quirin, C.; Glytsou, C.; Corrado, M.; Urbani, A.; Pellattiero, A.; Calvo, E.; Vázquez, J.; Enríquez, J.A.; Gerle, C.; et al. The cristae modulator Optic atrophy 1 requires mitochondrial ATP synthase oligomers to safeguard mitochondrial function. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Del Dotto, V.; Fogazza, M.; Carelli, V.; Rugolo, M.; Zanna, C. Eight human OPA1 isoforms, long and short: What are they for? Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2018, 1859, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Paumard, P.; Vaillier, J.; Coulary, B.; Schaeffer, J.; Soubannier, V.; Mueller, D.M.; Brèthes, D.; Di Rago, J.-P.; Velours, J. The ATP synthase is involved in generating mitochondrial cristae morphology. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Davies, K.M.; Strauss, M.; Daum, B.; Kief, J.H.; Osiewacz, H.D.; Rycovska, A.; Zickermann, V.; Kühlbrandt, W. Macromolecular organization of ATP synthase and complex I in whole mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 14121–14126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Rampelt, H.; Van Der Laan, M. The Yin & Yang of Mitochondrial Architecture—Interplay of MICOS and F1Fo-ATP synthase in cristae formation. Microb. Cell 2017, 4, 236–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kondadi, A.K.; Anand, R.; Reichert, A.S. Cristae Membrane Dynamics—A Paradigm Change. Trends Cell Biol. 2020, 30, 923–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Busch, K.B. Inner mitochondrial membrane compartmentalization: Dynamics across scales. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2020, 120, 105694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rieger, B.; Junge, W.; Busch, K.B. Lateral pH gradient between OXPHOS complex IV and F0F1 ATP-synthase in folded mitochondrial membranes. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Toth, A.; Meyrat, A.; Stoldt, S.; Santiago, R.; Wenzel, D.; Jakobs, S.; Von Ballmoos, C.; Ott, M. Kinetic coupling of the respiratory chain with ATP synthase, but not proton gradients, drives ATP production in cristae membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 2412–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Stuart, R.A.; Cruciat, C.-M.; Brunner, S.; Baumann, F.; Neupert, W. The Cytochrome bc 1 and Cytochrome c Oxidase Complexes Associate to Form a Single Supracomplex in Yeast Mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 18093–18098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Schägger, H. Supercomplexes in the respiratory chains of yeast and mammalian mitochondria. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 1777–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Acín-Pérez, R.; Fernández-Silva, P.; Peleato, M.L.; Pérez-Martos, A.; Enriquez, J.A. Respiratory Active Mitochondrial Supercomplexes. Mol. Cell 2008, 32, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Milenkovic, D.; Blaza, J.N.; Larsson, N.-G.; Hirst, J. The Enigma of the Respiratory Chain Supercomplex. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 765–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Lobo-Jarne, T.; Ugalde, C. Respiratory chain supercomplexes: Structures, function and biogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 76, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Althoff, T.; Mills, D.J.; Popot, J.-L.; Kühlbrandt, W. Arrangement of electron transport chain components in bovine mitochondrial supercomplex I1III2IV1. EMBO J. 2011, 30, 4652–4664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Sousa, J.S.; Mills, D.J.; Vonck, J.; Kühlbrandt, W. Functional asymmetry and electron flow in the bovine respirasome. eLife 2016, 5, e21290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Letts, J.A.; Fiedorczuk, K.; Sazanov, J.A.L.K.F.L.A. The architecture of respiratory supercomplexes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 537, 644–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gu, J.; Wu, M.; Guo, R.; Yan, K.; Lei, J.; Gao, N.; Yang, M. The architecture of the mammalian respirasome. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 537, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dudkina, N.V.; Kudryashev, M.; Stahlberg, H.; Boekema, E.J. Interaction of complexes I, III, and IV within the bovine respirasome by single particle cryoelectron tomography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 15196–15200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Davies, K.M.; Blum, T.B.; Kühlbrandt, W. Conserved in situ arrangement of complex I and III2 in mitochondrial respiratory chain supercomplexes of mammals, yeast, and plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 3024–3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Guo, R.; Zong, S.; Wu, M.; Gu, J.; Yang, M. Architecture of Human Mitochondrial Respiratory Megacomplex I2III2IV2. Cell 2017, 170, 1247–1257.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Letts, J.A.; Fiedorczuk, K.; Degliesposti, G.; Skehel, M.; Sazanov, L.A. Structures of Respiratory Supercomplex I+III2 Reveal Functional and Conformational Crosstalk. Mol. Cell 2019, 75, 1131–1146.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Hartley, A.M.; Lukoyanova, N.; Zhang, Y.; Cabrera-Orefice, A.; Arnold, S.; Meunier, B.; Pinotsis, N.; Maréchal, A. Structure of yeast cytochrome c oxidase in a supercomplex with cytochrome bc1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2019, 26, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Azuma, K.; Ikeda, K.; Inoue, S. Functional Mechanisms of Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Supercomplex Assembly Factors and Their Involvement in Muscle Quality. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chen, Y.-C.; Taylor, E.B.; Dephoure, N.; Heo, J.-M.; Tonhato, A.; Papandreou, I.; Nath, N.; Denko, N.C.; Gygi, S.P.; Rutter, J. Identification of a Protein Mediating Respiratory Supercomplex Stability. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 348–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Ikeda, K.; Shiba, S.; Horie-Inoue, K.; Shimokata, K.; Inoue, S. A stabilizing factor for mitochondrial respiratory supercomplex assembly regulates energy metabolism in muscle. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Pérez-Pérez, R.; Lobo-Jarne, T.; Milenkovic, D.; Mourier, A.; Bratic, A.; García-Bartolomé, A.; Fernández-Vizarra, E.; Cadenas, S.; Delmiro, A.; García-Consuegra, I.; et al. COX7A2L Is a Mitochondrial Complex III Binding Protein that Stabilizes the III2+IV Supercomplex without Affecting Respirasome Formation. Cell Rep. 2016, 16, 2387–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Lobo-Jarne, T.; Pérez-Pérez, R.; Fontanesi, F.; Timon-Gomez, A.; Wittig, I.; Peñas, A.; Serrano-Lorenzo, P.; García-Consuegra, I.; Arenas, J.; Martín, M.A.; et al. Multiple pathways coordinate assembly of human mitochondrial complex IV and stabilization of respiratory supercomplexes. EMBO J. 2020, 39, e103912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lapuente-Brun, E.; Moreno-Loshuertos, R.; Acín-Pérez, R.; Latorre-Pellicer, A.; Colás, C.; Balsa, E.; Perales-Clemente, E.; Quirós, P.M.; Calvo, E.; Rodríguez-Hernández, Á.; et al. Supercomplex Assembly Determines Electron Flux in the Mitochondrial Electron Transport Chain. Science 2013, 340, 1567–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Timón-Gómez, A.; Garlich, J.; Stuart, R.A.; Ugalde, C.; Barrientos, A. Distinct Roles of Mitochondrial HIGD1A and HIGD2A in Respiratory Complex and Supercomplex Biogenesis. Cell Rep. 2020, 31, 107607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cogliati, S.; Calvo, E.; Loureiro, M.; Guaras, A.M.; Nieto-Arellano, R.; Garcia-Poyatos, C.; Ezkurdia, I.; Mercader, C.G.-P.N.; Vázquez, J.; Enriquez, J.A. Mechanism of super-assembly of respiratory complexes III and IV. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 539, 579–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, K.; Wang, G.; Zhang, X.; Hüttemann, P.P.; Qiu, Y.; Liu, J.; Mitchell, A.; Lee, I.; Zhang, C.; Lee, J.-S.; et al. COX7AR is a Stress-inducible Mitochondrial COX Subunit that Promotes Breast Cancer Malignancy. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Tucker, E.J.; Wanschers, B.F.J.; Szklarczyk, R.; Mountford, H.S.; Wijeyeratne, X.W.; Brand, M.A.M.V.D.; Leenders, A.M.; Rodenburg, R.J.; Reljić, B.; Compton, A.G.; et al. Mutations in the UQCC1-Interacting Protein, UQCC2, Cause Human Complex III Deficiency Associated with Perturbed Cytochrome b Protein Expression. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1004034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Wanschers, B.F.; Szklarczyk, R.; Brand, M.A.V.D.; Jonckheere, A.; Suijskens, J.; Smeets, R.; Rodenburg, R.J.; Stephan, K.; Helland, I.B.; Elkamil, A.; et al. A mutation in the human CBP4 ortholog UQCC3 impairs complex III assembly, activity and cytochrome b stability. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 6356–6365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Desmurs, M.; Foti, M.; Raemy, E.; Vaz, F.M.; Martinou, J.-C.; Bairoch, A.; Lane, L. C11orf83, a Mitochondrial Cardiolipin-Binding Protein Involved inbc1Complex Assembly and Supercomplex Stabilization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2015, 35, 1139–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Yang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Guo, F.; Li, Q.; Luo, H.; Shu, Y.; Shen, Y.; Gan, J.; Xu, L.; Yang, H. Mitochondrial UQCC3 Modulates Hypoxia Adaptation by Orchestrating OXPHOS and Glycolysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cell Rep. 2020, 33, 108340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Chance, B.; Williams, G.R. A Method for the Localization of Sites for Oxidative Phosphorylation. Nat. Cell Biol. 1955, 176, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Green, D.E.; Tzagoloff, A. The mitochondrial electron transfer chain. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1966, 116, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hackenbrock, C.R.; Chazotte, B.; Gupte, S.S. The random collision model and a critical assessment of diffusion and collision in mitochondrial electron transport. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 1986, 18, 331–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Hatefi, Y.; Haavik, A.; Griffiths, D. Studies on the Electron Transfer System. J. Biol. Chem. 1962, 237, 1676–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Acin-Perez, R.; Enriquez, J.A. The function of the respiratory supercomplexes: The plasticity model. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2014, 1837, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Guarás, A.; Perales-Clemente, E.; Calvo, E.; Acín-Pérez, R.; Loureiro-Lopez, M.; Pujol, C.; Martínez-Carrascoso, I.; Nuñez, E.; García-Marqués, F.; Rodríguez-Hernández, M.A.; et al. The CoQH2/CoQ Ratio Serves as a Sensor of Respiratory Chain Efficiency. Cell Rep. 2016, 15, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Blaza, J.N.; Serreli, R.; Jones, A.J.Y.; Mohammed, K.; Hirst, J. Kinetic evidence against partitioning of the ubiquinone pool and the catalytic relevance of respiratory-chain supercomplexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 15735–15740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Fedor, J.G.; Hirst, J. Mitochondrial Supercomplexes Do Not Enhance Catalysis by Quinone Channeling. Cell Metab. 2018, 28, 525–531.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Hernansanz-Agustín, P.; Enríquez, J.A. Functional segmentation of CoQ and cyt c pools by respiratory complex superassembly. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2021, 167, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bianchi, C.; Genova, M.L.; Castelli, G.P.; Lenaz, G. The Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Is Partially Organized in a Supercomplex Assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 36562–36569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Trouillard, M.; Meunier, B.; Rappaport, F. Questioning the functional relevance of mitochondrial supercomplexes by time-resolved analysis of the respiratory chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, E1027–E1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Letts, J.A.; Sazanov, L.A. Clarifying the supercomplex: The higher-order organization of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017, 24, 800–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Schägger, H.; de Coo, R.; Bauer, M.F.; Hofmann, S.; Godinot, C.; Brandt, U. Significance of Respirasomes for the Assembly/Stability of Human Respiratory Chain Complex I. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 36349–36353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Moreno-Lastres, D.; Fontanesi, F.; García-Consuegra, I.; Martín, M.A.; Arenas, J.; Barrientos, A.; Ugalde, C. Mitochondrial Complex I Plays an Essential Role in Human Respirasome Assembly. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 324–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Hirst, J. Open questions: Respiratory chain supercomplexes—why are they there and what do they do? BMC Biol. 2018, 16, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Muller, F.L.; Liu, Y.; Van Remmen, H. Complex III Releases Superoxide to Both Sides of the Inner Mitochondrial Membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 49064–49073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Kussmaul, L.; Hirst, J. The mechanism of superoxide production by NADH: Ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) from bovine heart mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 7607–7612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Murphy, M.P. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem. J. 2009, 417, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Pryde, K.R.; Hirst, J. Superoxide Is Produced by the Reduced Flavin in Mitochondrial Complex I. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 18056–18065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Maranzana, E.; Barbero, G.; Falasca, A.I.; Lenaz, G.; Genova, M.L. Mitochondrial Respiratory Supercomplex Association Limits Production of Reactive Oxygen Species from Complex I. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 19, 1469–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Lopez-Fabuel, I.; Le Douce, J.; Logan, A.; James, A.M.; Bonvento, G.; Murphy, M.P.; Almeida, A.; Bolaños, J.P. Complex I assembly into supercomplexes determines differential mitochondrial ROS production in neurons and astrocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 13063–13068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Morán, M.; Marín-Buera, L.; Gil-Borlado, M.C.; Rivera, H.; Blázquez, A.; Seneca, S.; Vázquez-López, M.; Arenas, J.; Martín, M.A.; Ugalde, C. Cellular pathophysiological consequences of BCS1L mutations in mitochondrial complex III enzyme deficiency. Hum. Mutat. 2010, 31, 930–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Diaz, F.; Enriquez, J.A.; Moraes, C.T. Cells Lacking Rieske Iron-Sulfur Protein Have a Reactive Oxygen Species-Associated Decrease in Respiratory Complexes I and IV. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012, 32, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Hernansanz-Agustín, P.; Choya-Foces, C.; Carregal-Romero, S.; Ramos, E.; Oliva, T.; Villa-Piña, T.; Moreno, L.; Izquierdo-Álvarez, A.; Cabrera-García, J.D.; Cortés, A.; et al. Na+ controls hypoxic signalling by the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Nature 2020, 586, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Tropeano, C.V.; Aleo, S.J.; Zanna, C.; Roberti, M.; Scandiffio, L.; Polosa, P.L.; Fiori, J.; Porru, E.; Roda, A.; Carelli, V.; et al. Fine-tuning of the respiratory complexes stability and supercomplexes assembly in cells defective of complex III. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2020, 1861, 148133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Nogueira, C.; Barros, J.; Sá, M.J.; Azevedo, L.; Taipa, R.; Torraco, A.; Meschini, M.C.; Verrigni, D.; Nesti, C.; Rizza, T.; et al. Novel TTC19 mutation in a family with severe psychiatric manifestations and complex III deficiency. Neurogenetics 2013, 14, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Davoudi, M.; Kotarsky, H.; Hansson, E.; Fellman, V. Complex I Function and Supercomplex Formation Are Preserved in Liver Mitochondria Despite Progressive Complex III Deficiency. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Davoudi, M.; Kotarsky, H.; Hansson, E.; Kallijärvi, J.; Fellman, V. COX7A2L/SCAFI and Pre-Complex III Modify Respiratory Chain Supercomplex Formation in Different Mouse Strains with a Bcs1l Mutation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Guerrero-Castillo, S.; Baertling, F.; Kownatzki, D.; Wessels, H.J.; Arnold, S.; Brandt, U.; Nijtmans, L. The Assembly Pathway of Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Complex I. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Protasoni, M.; Pérez-Pérez, R.; Lobo-Jarne, T.; Harbour, M.E.; Ding, S.; Peñas, A.; Diaz, F.; Moraes, C.T.; Fearnley, I.M.; Zeviani, M.; et al. Respiratory supercomplexes act as a platform for complex III -mediated maturation of human mitochondrial complexes I and IV. EMBO J. 2020, 39, e102817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Páleníková, P.; Harbour, M.E.; Prodi, F.; Minczuk, M.; Zeviani, M.; Ghelli, A.; Fernández-Vizarra, E. Duplexing complexome profiling with SILAC to study human respiratory chain assembly defects. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2021, 1862, 148395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Carossa, V.; Ghelli, A.; Tropeano, C.V.; Valentino, M.L.; Iommarini, L.; Maresca, A.; Caporali, L.; La Morgia, C.; Liguori, R.; Barboni, P.; et al. A Novel in-Frame 18-bp Microdeletion in MTCYB Causes a Multisystem Disorder with Prominent Exercise Intolerance. Hum. Mutat. 2014, 35, 954–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Tropeano, C.V.; Fiori, J.; Carelli, V.; Caporali, L.; Daldal, F.; Ghelli, A.M.; Rugolo, M. Complex II phosphorylation is triggered by unbalanced redox homeostasis in cells lacking complex III. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2018, 1859, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Blakely, E.L.; Mitchell, A.L.; Fisher, N.; Meunier, B.; Nijtmans, L.G.; Schaefer, A.M.; Jackson, M.J.; Turnbull, D.M.; Taylor, R.W. A mitochondrial cytochrome b mutation causing severe respiratory chain enzyme deficiency in humans and yeast. FEBS J. 2005, 272, 3583–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lamantea, E.; Carrara, F.; Mariotti, C.; Morandi, L.; Tiranti, V.; Zeviani, M. A novel nonsense mutation (Q352X) in the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene associated with a combined deficiency of complexes I and III. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2002, 12, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Haut, S.; Brivet, M.; Touati, G.; Rustin, P.; Lebon, S.; Garcia-Cazorla, A.; Saudubray, J.M.; Boutron, A.; Legrand, A.; Slama, A. A deletion in the human QP-C gene causes a complex III deficiency resulting in hypoglycaemia and lactic acidosis. Qual. Life Res. 2003, 113, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Barel, O.; Shorer, Z.; Flusser, H.; Ofir, R.; Narkis, G.; Finer, G.; Shalev, H.; Nasasra, A.; Saada, A.; Birk, O.S. Mitochondrial Complex III Deficiency Associated with a Homozygous Mutation in UQCRQ. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008, 82, 1211–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Gaignard, P.; Menezes, M.; Schiff, M.; Bayot, A.; Rak, M.; de Baulny, H.O.; Su, C.-H.; Gilleron, M.; Lombes, A.; Abida, H.; et al. Mutations in CYC1, Encoding Cytochrome c1 Subunit of Respiratory Chain Complex III, Cause Insulin-Responsive Hyperglycemia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 93, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Miyake, N.; Yano, S.; Sakai, C.; Hatakeyama, H.; Matsushima, Y.; Shiina, M.; Watanabe, Y.; Bartley, J.; Abdenur, J.E.; Wang, R.Y.; et al. Mitochondrial Complex III Deficiency Caused by a HomozygousUQCRC2Mutation Presenting with Neonatal-Onset Recurrent Metabolic Decompensation. Hum. Mutat. 2013, 34, 446–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Feichtinger, R.G.; Brunner-Krainz, M.; Alhaddad, B.; Wortmann, S.B.; Kovacs-Nagy, R.; Stojakovic, T.; Erwa, W.; Resch, B.; Windischhofer, W.; Verheyen, S.; et al. Combined Respiratory Chain Deficiency and UQCC2 Mutations in Neonatal Encephalomyopathy: Defective Supercomplex Assembly in Complex III Deficiencies. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 7202589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Ghelli, A.; Tropeano, C.V.; Calvaruso, M.A.; Marchesini, A.; Iommarini, L.; Porcelli, A.M.; Zanna, C.; De Nardo, V.; Martinuzzi, A.; Wibrand, F.; et al. The cytochrome b p.278Y>C mutation causative of a multisystem disorder enhances superoxide production and alters supramolecular interactions of respiratory chain complexes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 2141–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Acín-Pérez, R.; Bayona-Bafaluy, M.P.; Fernández-Silva, P.; Moreno-Loshuertos, R.; Pérez-Martos, A.; Bruno, C.; Moraes, C.T.; Enríquez, J.A. Respiratory complex III is required to maintain complex I in mammalian mitochondria. Mol. Cell. 2004, 13, 805–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Spinazzi, M.; Radaelli, E.; Horré, K.; Arranz, A.M.; Gounko, N.V.; Agostinis, P.; Maia, T.M.; Impens, F.; Morais, V.A.; Lopez-Lluch, G.; et al. PARL deficiency in mouse causes Complex III defects, coenzyme Q depletion, and Leigh-like syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Iommarini, L.; Ghelli, A.; Leone, G.; Tropeano, C.V.; Kurelac, I.; Amato, L.B.; Gasparre, G.; Porcelli, A.M. Mild phenotypes and proper supercomplex assembly in human cells carrying the homoplasmic m.15557G > A mutation in cytochrome b gene. Hum. Mutat. 2018, 39, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Bottani, E.; Lamperti, C.; Prigione, A.; Tiranti, V.; Persico, N.; Brunetti, D. Therapeutic Approaches to Treat Mitochondrial Diseases: “One-Size-Fits-All” and “Precision Medicine” Strategies. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Ježek, P.; Hlavatá, L. Mitochondria in homeostasis of reactive oxygen species in cell, tissues, and organism. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005, 37, 2478–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Raha, S.; Robinson, B.H. Mitochondria, oxygen free radicals, disease and ageing. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000, 25, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wong, H.-S.; Dighe, P.A.; Mezera, V.; Monternier, P.-A.; Brand, M.D. Production of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide from specific mitochondrial sites under different bioenergetic conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 16804–16809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Seelert, H.; Dani, D.; Dante, S.; Hauß, T.; Krause, F.; Schafer, E.; Frenzel, M.; Poetsch, A.; Rexroth, S.; Schwaßmann, H.; et al. From protons to OXPHOS supercomplexes and Alzheimer’s disease: Structure–dynamics–function relationships of energy-transducing membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2009, 1787, 657–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Genova, M.L.; Lenaz, G. Functional role of mitochondrial respiratory supercomplexes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2014, 1837, 427–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Malferrari, M.; Ghelli, A.; Roggiani, F.; Valenti, G.; Paolucci, F.; Rugolo, M.; Rapino, S. Reactive Oxygen Species Produced by Mutated Mitochondrial Respiratory Chains of Entire Cells Monitored Using Modified Microelectrodes. ChemElectroChem 2019, 6, 627–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Anwar, M.R.; Saldana-Caboverde, A.; Garcia, S.; Diaz, F. The Organization of Mitochondrial Supercomplexes is Modulated by Oxidative Stress In Vivo in Mouse Models of Mitochondrial Encephalopathy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Mori, M.; Goldstein, J.; Young, S.P.; Bossen, E.H.; Shoffner, J.; Koeberl, D.D. Complex III deficiency due to an in-frame MTCYB deletion presenting as ketotic hypoglycemia and lactic acidosis. Mol. Genet. Metab. Rep. 2015, 4, 39–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Gaignard, P.; Eyer, D.; Lebigot, E.; Oliveira, C.; Therond, P.; Boutron, A.; Slama, A. UQCRC2 mutation in a patient with mitochondrial complex III deficiency causing recurrent liver failure, lactic acidosis and hypoglycemia. J. Hum. Genet. 2017, 62, 729–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Levéen, P.; Kotarsky, H.; Mörgelin, M.; Karikoski, R.; Elmér, E.; Fellman, V. The GRACILE mutation introduced into Bcs1l causes postnatal complex III deficiency: A viable mouse model for mitochondrial hepatopathy. Hepatology 2011, 53, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Rajendran, J.; Tomašić, N.; Kotarsky, H.; Hansson, E.; Velagapudi, V.; Kallijärvi, J.; Fellman, V. Effect of High-Carbohydrate Diet on Plasma Metabolome in Mice with Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Complex III Deficiency. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Wibrand, F.; Ravn, K.; Schwartz, M.; Rosenberg, T.; Horn, N.; Vissing, J. Multisystem disorder associated with a missense mutation in the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Ann. Neurol. 2001, 50, 540–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Lee, C.F.; Caudal, A.; Abell, L.; Gowda, G.A.N.; Tian, R. Targeting NAD+ Metabolism as Interventions for Mitochondrial Disease. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Johnson, S.C.; Yanos, M.E.; Kayser, E.-B.; Quintana, A.; Sangesland, M.; Castanza, A.; Uhde, L.; Hui, J.; Wall, V.Z.; Gagnidze, A.; et al. mTOR Inhibition Alleviates Mitochondrial Disease in a Mouse Model of Leigh Syndrome. Science 2013, 342, 1524–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Yang, L.; Canaveras, J.C.G.; Chen, Z.; Wang, L.; Liang, L.; Jang, C.; Mayr, J.A.; Zhang, Z.; Ghergurovich, J.M.; Zhan, L.; et al. Serine Catabolism Feeds NADH when Respiration Is Impaired. Cell Metab. 2020, 31, 809–821.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Jain, I.H.; Zazzeron, L.; Goli, R.; Alexa, K.; Schatzman-Bone, S.; Dhillon, H.; Goldberger, O.; Peng, J.; Shalem, O.; Sanjana, N.E.; et al. Hypoxia as a therapy for mitochondrial disease. Science 2016, 352, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Seo, B.B.; Kitajima-Ihara, T.; Chan, E.K.L.; Scheffler, I.E.; Matsuno-Yagi, A.; Yagi, T. Molecular remedy of complex I defects: Rotenone-insensitive internal NADH-quinone oxidoreductase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria restores the NADH oxidase activity of complex I-deficient mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 9167–9171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Perales-Clemente, E.; Bayona-Bafaluy, M.P.; Pérez-Martos, A.; Barrientos, A.; Fernández-Silva, P.; Enriquez, J.A. Restoration of electron transport without proton pumping in mammalian mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 18735–18739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Wheaton, W.W.; Weinberg, S.E.; Hamanaka, R.B.; Soberanes, S.; Sullivan, L.B.; Anso, E.; Glasauer, A.; Dufour, E.; Mutlu, G.M.; Budigner, G.S.; et al. Metformin inhibits mitochondrial complex I of cancer cells to reduce tumorigenesis. eLife 2014, 3, e02242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Bai, Y.; Hájek, P.; Chomyn, A.; Chan, E.; Seo, B.B.; Matsuno-Yagi, A.; Yagi, T.; Attardi, G. Lack of Complex I Activity in Human Cells Carrying a Mutation in MtDNA-encoded ND4 Subunit Is Corrected by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae NADH-Quinone Oxidoreductase (NDI1) Gene. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 38808–38813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Yagi, T.; Seo, B.B.; Nakamaru-Ogiso, E.; Marella, M.; Barber-Singh, J.; Yamashita, T.; Matsuno-Yagi, A. Possibility of trans-kingdom gene therapy for Complex I diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2006, 1757, 708–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. McElroy, G.S.; Reczek, C.R.; Reyfman, P.A.; Mithal, D.S.; Horbinski, C.M.; Chandel, N.S. NAD+ Regeneration Rescues Lifespan, but Not Ataxia, in a Mouse Model of Brain Mitochondrial Complex I Dysfunction. Cell Metab. 2020, 32, 301–308.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. El-Khoury, R.; Kemppainen, K.K.; Dufour, E.; Szibor, M.; Jacobs, H.T.; Rustin, P. Engineering the alternative oxidase gene to better understand and counteract mitochondrial defects: State of the art and perspectives. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 2243–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Szibor, M.; Gainutdinov, T.; Fernandez-Vizarra, E.; Dufour, E.; Gizatullina, Z.; Debska-Vielhaber, G.; Heidler, J.; Wittig, I.; Viscomi, C.; Gellerich, F.; et al. Bioenergetic consequences from xenotopic expression of a tunicate AOX in mouse mitochondria: Switch from RET and ROS to FET. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2020, 1861, 148137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Mullen, A.R.; Wheaton, W.W.; Jin, E.S.; Chen, P.-H.; Sullivan, L.B.; Cheng, T.; Yang, Y.; Linehan, W.M.; Chandel, N.S.; DeBerardinis, R.J. Reductive carboxylation supports growth in tumour cells with defective mitochondria. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 481, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Kotarsky, H.; Keller, M.; Davoudi, M.; Leveen, P.; Karikoski, R.; Enot, D.P.; Fellman, V. Metabolite Profiles Reveal Energy Failure and Impaired Beta-Oxidation in Liver of Mice with Complex III Deficiency Due to a BCS1L Mutation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Selak, M.A.; Armour, S.M.; MacKenzie, E.D.; Boulahbel, H.; Watson, D.G.; Mansfield, K.D.; Pan, Y.; Simon, M.; Thompson, C.B.; Gottlieb, E. Succinate links TCA cycle dysfunction to oncogenesis by inhibiting HIF-α prolyl hydroxylase. Cancer Cell 2005, 7, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Semenza, G.; Roth, P.; Fang, H.; Wang, G. Transcriptional regulation of genes encoding glycolytic enzymes by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 23757–23763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ansó, E.; Weinberg, S.E.; Diebold, L.P.; Thompson, B.J.; Malinge, S.; Schumacker, P.T.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shao, Y.Z.Z.; Steadman, M.; et al. The mitochondrial respiratory chain is essential for haematopoietic stem cell function. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017, 19, 614–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Chowdhury, R.; Yeoh, K.K.; Tian, Y.; Hillringhaus, L.; Bagg, E.A.; Rose, N.R.; Leung, I.K.H.; Li, X.S.; Woon, E.C.Y.; Yang, M.; et al. The oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate inhibits histone lysine demethylases. EMBO Rep. 2011, 12, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Martínez-Reyes, I.; Chandel, N.S. Mitochondrial TCA cycle metabolites control physiology and disease. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Roux, K.J. Marked by association: Techniques for proximity-dependent labeling of proteins in eukaryotic cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013, 70, 3657–3664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Varnaitė, R.; MacNeill, S.A. Meet the neighbors: Mapping local protein interactomes by proximity-dependent labeling with BioID. Proteomics 2016, 16, 2503–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  167. De Coo, I.F.M.; Renier, W.O.; Ruitenbeek, W.; Ter Laak, H.J.; Bakker, M.; Schägger, H.; Van Oost, B.A.; Smeets, H.J.M. A 4–base pair deletion in the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene associated with parkinsonism/MELAS overlap syndrome. Ann. Neurol. 1999, 45, 130–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Rana, M.; De Coo, I.; Diaz, F.; Smeets, H.; Moraes, C.T. An out-of-frame cytochrome b gene deletion from a patient with parkinsonism is associated with impaired complex III assembly and an increase in free radical production. Ann. Neurol. 2000, 48, 774–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Andreu, A.L.; Hanna, M.G.; Reichmann, H.; Bruno, C.; Penn, A.S.; Tanji, K.; Pallotti, F.; Iwata, S.; Bonilla, E.; Lach, B.; et al. Exercise Intolerance Due to Mutations in the Cytochrome b Gene of Mitochondrial DNA. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 341, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Schuelke, M.; Krude, H.; Finckh, B.; Mayatepek, E.; Janssen, A.; Schmelz, M.; Trefz, F.; Trijbels, F.; Smeitink, J. Septo-optic dysplasia associated with a new mitochondrial cytochrome b mutation. Ann. Neurol. 2002, 51, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Emmanuele, V.; Sotiriou, E.; Rios, P.G.; Ganesh, J.; Ichord, R.; Foley, A.R.; Akman, H.O.; DiMauro, S. A Novel Mutation in the Mitochondrial DNA Cytochrome b Gene (MTCYB) in a Patient with Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy, Lactic Acidosis, and Strokelike Episodes Syndrome. J. Child Neurol. 2013, 28, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Legros, F.; Chatzoglou, E.; Frachon, P.; De Baulny, H.O.; Laforêt, P.; Jardel, C.; Godinot, C.; Lombès, A. Functional characterization of novel mutations in the human cytochrome b gene. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2001, 9, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Bruno, C.; Santorelli, F.M.; Assereto, S.; Tonoli, E.; Tessa, A.; Traverso, M.; Scapolan, S.; Bado, M.; Tedeschi, S.; Minetti, C. Progressive exercise intolerance associated with a new muscle-restricted nonsense mutation (G142X) in the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Muscle Nerve 2003, 28, 508–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Keightley, J.A.; Anitori, R.; Burton, M.D.; Quan, F.; Buist, N.R.; Kennaway, N.G. Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy and Complex III Deficiency Associated with a Stop-Codon Mutation in the Cytochrome b Gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000, 67, 1400–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Valnot, I.; Kassis, J.; Chretien, D.; De Lonlay, P.; Parfait, B.; Munnich, A.; Kachaner, J.; Rustin, P.; Rötig, A. A mitochondrial cytochrome b mutation but no mutations of nuclearly encoded subunits in ubiquinol cytochrome c reductase (complex III) deficiency. Qual. Life Res. 1999, 104, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Dumoulin, R.; Mandon, G.; Collombet, J.M.; Blond, J.L.; Carrier, H.; Godinot, C.; Flocard, F.; Villard, J.; Guibaud, P.; Mathieu, M.; et al. Human cultured myoblasts: A model for the diagnosis of mitochondrial diseases. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 1993, 16, 545–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Bouzidi, M.F.; Carrier, H.; Godinot, C. Antimycin resistance and ubiquinol cytochrome c reductase instability associated with a human cytochrome b mutation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 1996, 1317, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Fragaki, K.; Procaccio, V.; Bannwarth, S.; Serre, V.; O’Hearn, S.; Potluri, P.; Augé, G.; Casagrande, F.; Caruba, C.; Lambert, J.C.; et al. A neonatal polyvisceral failure linked to a de novo homoplasmic mutation in the mitochondrially encoded cytochrome b gene. Mitochondrion 2009, 9, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Mancuso, M.; Filosto, M.; Stevens, J.C.; Patterson, M.; Shanske, S.; Krishna, S.; DiMauro, S. Mitochondrial myopathy and complex III deficiency in a patient with a new stop-codon mutation (G339X) in the cytochrome b gene. J. Neurol. Sci. 2003, 209, 61–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Andreu, A.L.; Bruno, C.; Shanske, S.; Shtilbans, A.; Hirano, M.; Krishna, S.; Hayward, L.; Systrom, D.S.; Brown, R.H.; DiMauro, S. Missense mutation in the mtDNA cytochrome b gene in a patient with myopathy. Neurology 1998, 51, 1444–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Gusic, M.; Schottmann, G.; Feichtinger, R.G.; Du, C.; Scholz, C.; Wagner, M.; Mayr, J.A.; Lee, C.-Y.; Yépez, V.A.; Lorenz, N.; et al. Bi-Allelic UQCRFS1 Variants Are Associated with Mitochondrial Complex III Deficiency, Cardiomyopathy, and Alopecia Totalis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2020, 106, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Hinson, J.T.; Fantin, V.R.; Schönberger, J.; Breivik, N.; Siem, G.; McDonough, B.; Sharma, P.; Keogh, I.; Godinho, R.; Santos, F.; et al. Missense Mutations in the BCS1LGene as a Cause of the Björnstad Syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. De Meirleir, L.; Seneca, S.; Damis, E.; Sepulchre, B.; Hoorens, A.; Gerlo, E.; Silva, M.T.G.; Hernandez, E.M.; Lissens, W.; Van Coster, R. Clinical and diagnostic characteristics of complex III deficiency due to mutations in the BCS1Lgene. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2003, 121A, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Blázquez, A.; Gil-Borlado, M.C.; Morán, M.; Verdú, A.; Cazorla-Calleja, M.R.; Martín, M.A.; Arenas, J.; Ugalde, C. Infantile mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with unusual phenotype caused by a novel BCS1L mutation in an isolated complex III-deficient patient. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2009, 19, 143–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Visapää, I.; Fellman, V.; Vesa, J.; Dasvarma, A.; Hutton, J.L.; Kumar, V.; Payne, G.S.; Makarow, M.; Van Coster, R.; Taylor, R.W.; et al. GRACILE Syndrome, a Lethal Metabolic Disorder with Iron Overload, Is Caused by a Point Mutation in BCS1L. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002, 71, 863–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  186. Oláhová, M.; Berti, C.C.; Collier, J.J.; Alston, C.L.; Jameson, E.; Jones, S.A.; Edwards, N.; He, L.; Chinnery, P.F.; Horvath, R.; et al. Molecular genetic investigations identify new clinical phenotypes associated with BCS1L-related mitochondrial disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019, 28, 3766–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Fernandez-Vizarra, E.; Bugiani, M.; Goffrini, P.; Carrara, F.; Farina, L.; Procopio, E.; Donati, A.; Uziel, G.; Ferrero, I.; Zeviani, M. Impaired complex III assembly associated with BCS1L gene mutations in isolated mitochondrial encephalopathy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007, 16, 1241–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. De Lonlay, P.; Valnot, I.; Barrientos, A.; Gorbatyuk, M.; Tzagoloff, A.; Taanman, J.-W.; Benayoun, E.; Chrétien, D.; Kadhom, N.; Lombès, A.; et al. A mutant mitochondrial respiratory chain assembly protein causes complex III deficiency in patients with tubulopathy, encephalopathy and liver failure. Nat. Genet. 2001, 29, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Ezgu, F.; Senaca, S.; Gunduz, M.; Tumer, L.; Hasanoglu, A.; Tiras, U.; Unsal, R.; Bakkaloglu, S.A. Severe renal tubulopathy in a newborn due to BCS1L gene mutation: Effects of different treatment modalities on the clinical course. Gene 2013, 528, 364–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Tuppen, H.A.; Fehmi, J.; Czermin, B.; Goffrini, P.; Meloni, F.; Ferrero, I.; He, L.; Blakely, E.L.; McFarland, R.; Horvath, R.; et al. Long-term survival of neonatal mitochondrial complex III deficiency associated with a novel BCS1L gene mutation. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2010, 100, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Al-Owain, M.; Colak, D.; AlBakheet, A.; Al-Younes, B.; Al-Humaidi, Z.; Al-Sayed, M.; Al-Hindi, H.; Al-Sugair, A.; Al-Muhaideb, A.; Rahbeeni, Z.; et al. Clinical and biochemical features associated with BCS1L mutation. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2013, 36, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Baker, R.A.; Priestley, J.R.C.; Wilstermann, A.M.; Reese, K.J.; Mark, P.R. Clinical spectrum of BCS1L Mitopathies and their underlying structural relationships. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2019, 179, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Gil-Borlado, M.C.; González-Hoyuela, M.; Blázquez, A.; García-Silva, M.T.; Gabaldón, T.; Manzanares, J.; Vara, J.; Martín, M.A.; Seneca, S.; Arenas, J.; et al. Pathogenic mutations in the 5′ untranslated region of BCS1L mRNA in mitochondrial complex III deficiency. Mitochondrion 2009, 9, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Kunii, M.; Doi, H.; Higashiyama, Y.; Kugimoto, C.; Ueda, N.; Hirata, J.; Tomita-Katsumoto, A.; Kashikura-Kojima, M.; Kubota, S.; Taniguchi, M.; et al. A Japanese case of cerebellar ataxia, spastic paraparesis and deep sensory impairment associated with a novel homozygous TTC19 mutation. J. Hum. Genet. 2015, 60, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Melchionda, L.; Damseh, N.S.; Abu Libdeh, B.Y.; Nasca, A.; Elpeleg, O.; Zanolini, A.; Ghezzi, D. A novel mutation in TTC19 associated with isolated complex III deficiency, cerebellar hypoplasia, and bilateral basal ganglia lesions. Front. Genet. 2014, 5, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Ghezzi, D.; Arzuffi, P.; Zordan, M.; Da Re, C.; Lamperti, C.; Benna, C.; D’Adamo, P.; Diodato, D.; Costa, R.; Mariotti, C.; et al. Mutations in TTC19 cause mitochondrial complex III deficiency and neurological impairment in humans and flies. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Koch, J.; Freisinger, P.; Feichtinger, R.G.; Zimmermann, F.A.; Rauscher, C.; Wagentristl, H.P.; Konstantopoulou, V.; Seidl, R.; Haack, T.B.; Prokisch, H.; et al. Mutations in TTC19: Expanding the molecular, clinical and biochemical phenotype. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2015, 10, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Atwal, P.S.; Zschocke, J.; Gibson, K.M. Mutations in the Complex III Assembly Factor Tetratricopeptide 19 Gene TTC19 Are a Rare Cause of Leigh Syndrome. JIMD Rep. Vol. 14 2014, 14, 43–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Habibzadeh, P.; Inaloo, S.; Silawi, M.; Dastsooz, H.; Fard, M.A.F.; Sadeghipour, F.; Faghihi, Z.; Rezaeian, M.; Yavarian, M.; Böhm, J.; et al. A Novel TTC19 Mutation in a Patient with Neurological, Psychological, and Gastrointestinal Impairment. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Ardissone, A.; Granata, T.; Legati, A.; Diodato, D.; Melchionda, L.; Lamantea, E.; Garavaglia, B.; Ghezzi, D.; Moroni, I.; Zschocke, J. Mitochondrial Complex III Deficiency Caused by TTC19 Defects: Report of a Novel Mutation and Review of Literature. JIMD Rep. 2015, 22, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Morino, H.; Miyamoto, R.; Ohnishi, S.; Maruyama, H.; Kawakami, H. Exome sequencing reveals a novel TTC19 mutation in an autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia patient. BMC Neurol. 2014, 14, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  202. Mordaunt, D.A.; Jolley, A.; Balasubramaniam, S.; Thorburn, D.R.; Mountford, H.S.; Compton, A.G.; Nicholl, J.; Manton, N.; Clark, D.; Bratkovic, D.; et al. Phenotypic variation of TTC19-deficient mitochondrial complex III deficiency: A case report and literature review. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2015, 167, 1330–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Bottani, E.; Cerutti, R.; Harbour, M.E.; Ravaglia, S.; Dogan, S.A.; Giordano, C.; Fearnley, I.M.; D’Amati, G.; Viscomi, C.; Fernandez-Vizarra, E.; et al. TTC19 Plays a Husbandry Role on UQCRFS1 Turnover in the Biogenesis of Mitochondrial Respiratory Complex III. Mol. Cell 2017, 67, 96–105.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  204. Dallabona, C.; Abbink, T.E.M.; Carrozzo, R.; Torraco, A.; Legati, A.; Van Berkel, C.G.M.; Niceta, M.; Langella, T.; Verrigni, D.; Rizza, T.; et al. LYRM7 mutations cause a multifocal cavitating leukoencephalopathy with distinct MRI appearance. Brain 2016, 139, 782–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  205. Kremer, L.S.; L’Hermitte-Stead, C.; Lesimple, P.; Gilleron, M.; Filaut, S.; Jardel, C.; Haack, T.B.; Strom, T.M.; Meitinger, T.; Azzouz, H.; et al. Severe respiratory complex III defect prevents liver adaptation to prolonged fasting. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Invernizzi, F.; Varanese, S.; Thomas, A.M.; Carrara, F.; Onofrj, M.; Zeviani, M. Two novel POLG1 mutations in a patient with progressive external ophthalmoplegia, levodopa-responsive pseudo-orthostatic tremor and parkinsonism. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2008, 18, 460–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Hempel, M.; Kremer, L.S.; Tsiakas, K.; Alhaddad, B.; Haack, T.B.; Löbel, U.; Feichtinger, R.G.; Sperl, W.; Prokisch, H.; Mayr, J.A.; et al. LYRM7—Associated complex III deficiency: A clinical, molecular genetic, MR tomographic, and biochemical study. Mitochondrion 2017, 37, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Architecture of the inner membrane and unequal distribution of OXPHOS complexes. CI, CIII and CIV are in the cristae membrane, CV dimers are at the cristae tip, whereas CII is also found in the inner boundary membrane. MICOS and OPA1 stabilize the cristae junctions, providing constrains to membrane mobility of complexes.
Figure 1. Architecture of the inner membrane and unequal distribution of OXPHOS complexes. CI, CIII and CIV are in the cristae membrane, CV dimers are at the cristae tip, whereas CII is also found in the inner boundary membrane. MICOS and OPA1 stabilize the cristae junctions, providing constrains to membrane mobility of complexes.
Life 11 00351 g001
Figure 2. Proposed interactions between the respiratory complexes of the respirasome (according to [69]). Nomenclature of human subunits is indicated. The number of tight contacts between CI and CIII is greater than those between CI–CIV and CIII–CIV.
Figure 2. Proposed interactions between the respiratory complexes of the respirasome (according to [69]). Nomenclature of human subunits is indicated. The number of tight contacts between CI and CIII is greater than those between CI–CIV and CIII–CIV.
Life 11 00351 g002
Figure 3. Major metabolic alterations associated with perturbed supramolecular organization of CIII-containing SCs and proposed treatments.
Figure 3. Major metabolic alterations associated with perturbed supramolecular organization of CIII-containing SCs and proposed treatments.
Life 11 00351 g003
Table 1. Disease genes encoding structural subunits and assembly factors associated with CIII deficiency.
Table 1. Disease genes encoding structural subunits and assembly factors associated with CIII deficiency.
Mutated GeneMutationEnzymatic ActivityIsolated Complexes AssemblySupercomplexes AssemblyRefs.
CIIICIIICICIVCIIICICIVCI+CIII+CIVCI+CIIICIII+CIV
Structural subunits
MTCYBp.14I> *[118,167,168]
p.34G>Smild ↓=n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[169]
p.35S>Pn.d.n.dn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[170]
p.40C>Rmild ↓mild ↓mild ↓n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[171]
p.113W> *n.d.n.dn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[169]
p.135W> *n.d.n-dn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[172]
p.141W> *==n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[169]
p.142G> *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[173]
p.151S>Pn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[172]
p.166G> *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[174]
p.166G>En.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[175]
p.∆251-258mild ↓=n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[169]
p.271E>Kmild ↓========[132]
p.278Y>Cmild ↓n.d.===mild↑mild↑[129,145]
p.290G>Dn.d.n.dn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[176,177]
p.297S>P====n.d.n.d.n.d.[178]
p.∆300-305[113,120]
p.318K>P==n.d.n.d.n.d.[122]
p.326W> *n.d.n.dn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[169]
p.339G> *n.d.n.dn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[179]
p.339G>En.d.n.dn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[180]
p.352Q> *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[123]
p.373E>K==n.d.n.d.n.d.[130]
UQCRBChange at C-termn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[124]
UQCRQp.45S>F; p.45S>F=n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[125]
CYC1p.96W>C; p.215L>Fn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[126]
UQCRC2p.183R>W; p.183R>W=n.d.[127]
p.183R>W; p183R>W=n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[142]
UQCRFS1p.14V>D; p.204R> *reduced overall respirationn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[181]
p.72V>T81del10; p.72V>T81del10reduced overall respirationn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[181]
mouse KO[111]
Assembly Factors
BCS1Lp.35G>R; p.184R>Cn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.=n.d.[182]
p.45R>C; p.56R> *=n.d.n.d.n.d.[110,183]
p.50T>A; p.50T>Amild ↓n.d.n.d.mild↓=n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[110,184]
p.R56 *; g1181A>G/g1164C>C==n.d.n.d.n.d.[110,183]
p.R56 *; p.327V>A===n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[185]
p.R56 *; p.69R>C=====n.d.n.d.n.d.[186]
p.73R>C; p.368F>I========[187]
p.78S>G; p.144R>Q===n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[185]
p.99P>L; p.99P>Ln.d.n.d.n.d.[110,188,189]
p.109R>W; p.109R>W====n.d.n.d.n.d.[186]
p.129G>R; p.129G>Rn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[190,191]
p.155R>P; p.353V>Mn.d.=n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[188]
p.183R>C; p.184R>C========[187]
p.184R>C; g1892A>G===mild ↓==n.d.[110]
p.184R>C; p.280L>Fn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[192]
p.277S>N; p.277S>Nn.d.=n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[188]
decreased levels BCS1Ln.d.==n.d.n.d.n.d.[193]
mouse p.78S>G: p.78S>G====mild ↓mild ↓mild ↓[115]
mouse KO [116]
TTC19p.54P>A *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[194]
p.77Q>R *; p.77Q>R *n.d.n.d.=n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[195]
p.173Q> *==n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[196]
p.185L>Pn.d.n.d.n.d.=n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[197]
p.186W> *; p.322G>M *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[198]
p.194R>N *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[199]
p.219L> *==n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[196]
p.261E>G *; p.261A>G *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[200]
p.277Q> *; p.277Q> *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[201]
p.313Q> *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[202]
p.321A> *; p.321A> *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[114]
p.324L>Pn.d.n.d.n.d.=n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[197]
mouse and human KO==mild ↓=====[203]
UQCC2Protein absentmild ↓mild↑[85]
p.[8R>P;10L>F];[8R>P;10L>F]==[128]
UQCC3p.20V>E; p.20V>Emild ↓==n.d.n.d.n.d.[86]
LYRM7p.13T>H *; p.13T>H *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[204]
LYRM7p.18R>D *; p.18R>A *mild ↓mild ↓mild ↓mild ↓n.d.n.d.n.d.[205]
p.25D>N; p25D>Nn.d.n.d.n.d.=n.d.n.d.n.d.[206]
p.25D>N; p25D>Nn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[204]
p.72Q> *; p72Q> *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[204]
p.82K>N *; p.82K>N *n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[204]
Protein absentn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.[207]
*, a stop in the protein synthesis; ↓, decrease; ↑, increase; =, no change; n.d., not determined.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rugolo, M.; Zanna, C.; Ghelli, A.M. Organization of the Respiratory Supercomplexes in Cells with Defective Complex III: Structural Features and Metabolic Consequences. Life 2021, 11, 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040351

AMA Style

Rugolo M, Zanna C, Ghelli AM. Organization of the Respiratory Supercomplexes in Cells with Defective Complex III: Structural Features and Metabolic Consequences. Life. 2021; 11(4):351. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040351

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rugolo, Michela, Claudia Zanna, and Anna Maria Ghelli. 2021. "Organization of the Respiratory Supercomplexes in Cells with Defective Complex III: Structural Features and Metabolic Consequences" Life 11, no. 4: 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040351

APA Style

Rugolo, M., Zanna, C., & Ghelli, A. M. (2021). Organization of the Respiratory Supercomplexes in Cells with Defective Complex III: Structural Features and Metabolic Consequences. Life, 11(4), 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11040351

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop