Next Article in Journal
Can Endothelin-1 Help Address the Diagnostic and Prognostic Challenges in Multimorbid Acute Heart Failure Patients?
Previous Article in Journal
Soluble PD-L1: From Immune Evasion to Cancer Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Extracellular Traps in Inflammation: Pathways and Therapeutic Targets

by
Stelvio Tonello
1,2,*,†,
Nicole Vercellino
1,†,
Davide D’Onghia
1,*,
Alessia Fracchia
1,
Giulia Caria
1,
Daniele Sola
3,
Paolo Amedeo Tillio
4,
Pier Paolo Sainaghi
1,‡ and
Donato Colangelo
5,‡
1
Dipartimento di Medicina Traslazionale, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
2
Dipartimento per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile e la Transizione Ecologica, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Piazza S. Eusebio 5, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
3
Laboratory of Metabolic Research, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 28824 Oggebbio, Italy
4
Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
5
Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Farmacologia, Scuola di Medicina, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Life 2025, 15(4), 627; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15040627
Submission received: 21 March 2025 / Revised: 4 April 2025 / Accepted: 7 April 2025 / Published: 8 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Biomarkers in Inflammatory Disease)

Abstract

:
New roles for immune cells, overcoming the classical cytotoxic response, have been highlighted by growing evidence. The immune cells, such as neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, and eosinophils, are versatile cells involved in the release of web-like DNA structures called extracellular traps (ETs) which represent a relevant mechanism by which these cells prevent microbes’ dissemination. In this process, many enzymes, such as elastase, myeloperoxidase (MPO), and microbicidal nuclear and granule proteins, which contribute to the clearance of entrapped microorganisms after DNA binding, are involved. However, an overproduction and release of ETs can cause unwanted and dangerous effects in the host, resulting in several pathological manifestations, among which are chronic inflammatory disorders, autoimmune diseases, cancer, and diabetes. In this review, we discuss the release mechanisms and the double-edged sword role of ETs both in physiological and in pathological contexts. In addition, we evaluated some possible strategies to target ETs aimed at either preventing their formation or degrading existing ones.

1. Introduction

1.1. Context and Objectives

New roles for immune cells that go further than the classical cytotoxic response have been highlighted by growing evidence. Net-like DNA structures called extracellular traps (ETs) offer an interesting opportunity for the better comprehension of inflammatory, infective, and autoimmune diseases. Possible insights are also coming from the analysis of ETs’ involvements in special populations of patients. We reviewed some important data offered by the literature.

1.2. From Immune Cells to ET

In recent years, growing evidence has highlighted new roles for immune cells like white blood cells (granulocytes and macrophages), overcoming the classical cytotoxic response. These cells can undergo a different type of response based on the release of cellular DNA to form extracellular traps (ETs) [1,2,3].
Neutrophils, also known as neutrophilic granulocytes or polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), have historically been described in an acute inflammatory response, and they were considered short-lived antibacterial effector cells [4]. They play a crucial role in the immune defence against bacterial and fungal pathogens and participate in developing inflammatory reactions [5]. However, recent evidence suggests neutrophils are versatile and can perform previously unsuspected functions, including reverse transmigration and modulation of other innate and adaptive immune leukocytes, establishing an important cellular crosstalk [6]. Neutrophils are the most abundant white blood cells in human circulation, representing 50 to 70% of all circulating leukocytes [7]. Moreover, the circulatory half-life of human neutrophils is still a matter of debate; it is now estimated to be longer, ranging from 7 to 9 h up to 3.75 days [8]. Through the release of α-defensins, reactive oxygen species (ROS), elastase, cathelicidin, matrix metalloproteinases, cathepsin G, and ETs are involved in the antimicrobial and cytotoxic mechanisms of action against the non-self. Neutrophils show a significant biosynthetic capacity for C-C and C-X-C chemokines, which represent factors with immunoregulatory, proinflammatory, and anti-inflammatory roles as well as fibrogenic and angiogenic cytokines [6,9].
Evidence highlighted that neutrophils play a crucial role in acute infections and inflammation but are also implicated in chronic inflammatory disorders or aging-related diseases, such as atherosclerosis, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes, and cancer [10]. Excessive activation of these cells may be responsible for the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. In this context, the lungs represent the main target of this condition, the so-called acute lung injury (ALI) and its more severe form is the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [5,10]. Although neutrophils are mostly considered beneficial to the host, their improper activation may also lead to tissue damage in the context of an autoimmune or exaggerated inflammatory reaction [11,12].
Among granulocytes, there is another class of cells that can produce ETs, eosinophils, a cell family whose classical mechanism of action is based on the presence in their cytoplasm of acidic granules released after pathogenic stimulation. As observed in neutrophils, eosinophils, after appropriate stimulation, could undergo decondensation and release DNA in the extracellular milieu. The only difference between these processes is the timing of ETs production and the fate of the specific cytoplasmic granules. ET fibers are generated more rapidly in eosinophils than in neutrophils, and acidic granules remain intact and associated with histone proteins in the final ET structure [13,14,15,16].
This type of response mechanism is not restricted to granulocytes; indeed, it has also been observed in monocytes/macrophages [3]. It is well known that circulating monocytes are extravasated after pathological stimulation and become active macrophages. Physiologically, these cells remove the noxious stimuli, as well as cellular debris, by phagocytosis. In some conditions, they have been described as being able to start releasing DNA fibers originating from the so-called Monocyte/macrophage extracellular traps (METs) to entrap the non-self-material that would be subsequently phagocytosed [3].

1.3. ETs Production

In 1996, it was discovered that neutrophils, after chemical stimulation with Phorbol Myristic Acid (PMA), could undergo a death pathway different from apoptosis and necrosis [17]. A typical aspect of this new death modality is the disruption of the nuclear and granular membranes. This kind of neutrophil suicide is characterized by the release of web-like structures formed by chromatin and antimicrobial factors, called neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [18,19]. The mechanism through which NETs are produced is called NETosis, and it contributes to the risk of thrombosis in inflammatory disorders, activating the coagulation process. The evidence suggests the discovery of two mechanisms of NETosis: vital NETosis, in which fiber expulsion occurs without altering the membrane of neutrophils, and suicidal NETosis, where PMNs die after removing the filaments [20].
In 2007, Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate (NADPH) was discovered to be crucial in disrupting the membranes and mixing nucleic acid and granular protein [19]. As stated before, the mechanism of ETs production is similar in all cell types, and it is called ETosis. The release of ETs occurs after membrane perforation and cell lysis, which are used to entrap particulate matter such as bacteria. Thus, the following evidence highlights that not only PMA but also IL-8, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, antibody–antigen complexes, autoantibodies [21], TNF, INF [22], and further stimuli trigger ETosis [23], as shown in Figure 1. ETosis could be considered a form of beneficial cellular suicide [12]. Furthermore, its mechanism of action involves the activation of different cellular receptors, such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs). Specific receptor stimulation triggers the activation of several intracellular signaling pathways, many of which involve ROS generation, NF-kB activation, and autophagy [23].

1.4. The Molecular Mechanism Involved in the ETosis Process

NETosis could be considered a model to describe ETs formation in all the immune cells studied. Loss of chromatin segregation into heterochromatin and euchromatin represents another hallmark of NETosis and of other types of ETs production [24]. In this process, many enzymes, such as the ones of azurophilic granules, elastase, and myeloperoxidase (MPO), are involved; the latter can move into the nucleus in the earliest stage of ETosis in a particular way. Elastase is the first enzyme that reaches the nucleus, and, by cleaving the H1 linker, modifies the histones’ core [24,25]. Elastase is also crucial in trap formation; indeed, it has been observed that mice deficient in this enzyme cannot produce ETs [24]. Whilst MPO enters the nucleus later, its activity is correlated with the enhancement of chromatin decondensation caused by hypochlorite acid synthesis [24,26]. Another enzyme that enters this suicidal pathway is Peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4). PAD4, after proper activation, induces deamination of the arginine residues to citrulline in histones 3 and 4, leading to a weaker DNA binding; in the literature, it has been shown that histones, as well as decondensed chromatin, are citrullinated [26,27,28,29]. Figure 2 resembles the molecular mechanism of NETs release.
The role of PAD4 in ETosis was studied in knock-out mice, demonstrating that these mice could not produce ETs [25,30,31]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that autophagy, which is essential for many immune functions, such as degranulation and ROS production, is also involved in ETs production, and this phenomenon is NADPH oxidase-dependent [32,33]. PMA stimulation of white blood cells resulted in giant vacuoles, the autophagosomes. Even if the general mechanism of this process is known, the underlying molecular mechanism is not fully understood, and it has been hypothesized that mTOR and PTEN could play a key role [34].
Neeli et al. demonstrated that the cytoskeleton regulates ETosis, with tubulin crucial in directing the granules’ exocytosis and phagocytosis [32,35,36].
Furthermore, recent in vivo studies have also demonstrated that the ETs production mechanisms in granulocytes could undergo specific pathways during aging, involving Atg5 and TLR2 [37]; while drug therapy and siRNA could inhibit such a phenomenon directed against mTOR and LC3 [38].
Despite the large body of evidence describing autophagy involvement in NETosis, the above-illustrated results are not universally accepted: Germic and coworkers have shown that ATg5-knock-out mice can retain NET-producing ability while showing reduced autophagy [39]. Moreover, it has been observed that PI3K inhibitors, such as chloroquine and A1 bafilomycin, block late autophagy but do not interfere with NET production, suggesting the possibility of an independent autophagy pathway being followed in NET formation [16,40,41,42,43,44,45].

1.5. ETs and Pathology: A General Overview

There are growing pieces of evidence suggesting ETs, particularly NETs, are involved in the onset and progression of several pathologies. As inflammation is universally recognized as a key aspect of many pathological states, neutrophil recruitment in such situations is unsurprising. In recent years, many clinical studies have focused on NETs’ correlation with autoimmune diseases (e.g., psoriasis), chronic inflammatory diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, there is a large body of evidence correlating ETs to cancer onset and progression, but this is out of the scope of the present review [6,27,46,47,48,49].

1.6. ETs and Skin Affections

Psoriasis is a common, chronic, and autoimmune dermatological condition characterized by an excessive inflammatory response directed against self-tissues. This pathology has a high incidence, affecting approximately 2–3% of the world population, and geographical location, age, ethnicity, sex, genetic, and environmental factors are strictly associated with the development of this condition [50]. It has been demonstrated that in some skin inflammatory diseases, such as acne, the roles of NETosis and inflammosomes are very important since they are closely related to the innate immune response. Inflammosomes act as one of the first factors in immune responses. The process that leads to the secretion of inflammatory cytokines interleukin 1β (IL-1β) and interleukin 18 (IL-18) is one of the mechanisms of response to external agents, such as bacterial infections, where NETosis is also involved. The activation of proteins present in the cytosol of cells, like the nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich family, and pyrin domain-containing-3 (NLRP3), leads to the inflammasome, one important factor involved in NETosis. Some authors have suggested that the inhibition of NETosis might represent possible treatments for inflammasome-mediated inflammatory diseases [51].
Psoriasis can occur at any age, particularly common in two age groups of 16–22 and 55–60 years [52]. This pathology is also associated with a dramatic reduction in patients’ quality of life, since it also has strong psychological implications. From a clinical point of view, skin symptoms are associated with many other comorbidity syndromes, such as psoriatic arthritis and cardiovascular diseases [53].
From a molecular point of view, the primary inflammatory cytokine involved in psoriasis development is IL-17, an inflammatory mediator that has been proven to induce ETs production in all immune cells considered [54,55]. In particular, the specific release of NETs happens as a result of the activation of the infiltrated neutrophils in the epidermis, a typical hallmark of psoriasis [56]. A variety of mechanisms, such as the stimulation of the Toll-Like Receptor 7 and 9 (TLR7 and TLR9) by LL37-DNA [57], the inflammasome activation [58], the macrophage pyroptosis [59], and the activation of IL-36 cytokines are enhanced by the neutrophils and NETs production. Among them, it has been observed that, in vitro and using a common mouse model of psoriasis-like inflammation [60], Toll-like Receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling and the activation of IL-36 by neutrophils are able to enhance skin inflammation through NETs release. These two players, acting in a synergistic manner, stimulate LCN2 expression, a neutrophil chemoattractant, in keratinocytes, resulting in increased neutrophil infiltration and inflammation of the skin [56].
Clinical evidence supports the hypothesis that psoriasis progression is associated with an increased ETs production due to the autoimmune response [54,55].
Even if it is well known that prominent levels of circulating ETs are dangerous, some recent in vitro experimental evidence suggests that low NETs doses could positively affect normal skin regeneration as they stimulate keratinocytes proliferation through NF-kB signaling pathway activation [10]. Such new experimental evidence declares that a physiological balance in ETs presence could exist, thus fostering the possible development of innovative personalized therapeutic medicine approaches that are useful when a rapid reconstitution of the skin integrity is needed.

1.7. ETs and Chronic Inflammatory States in Smokers

Smoking is a diffuse social habit associated with many side effects, ranging from inflammation to lung cancer, emphysema, and atherosclerosis. Nicotine-noxious effects could be observed in the oropharyngeal, respiratory, and circulatory cavities. Nicotine-induced inflammation is associated with the induction of neutrophils’ degranulation and the inhibition of their phagocytic activity. Another well-known side effect of nicotine exposure is the increase in ROS generation, a physiological condition correlated to ET production [36,61,62,63,64,65,66].
A common condition mainly associated with cigarette smoke is chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which represents a relevant public health issue with high morbidity and mortality globally [67]. Moreover, it has recently been observed that COPD severity is linked to the overproduction of NETs in the airways [68] and also airway microbiota diversity and COPD exacerbation frequency [69]. As in other conditions, NET release can appear as a double-edged sword [70]; indeed, on one hand, it represents a strong antimicrobial strategy, but on the other hand, it plays a proinflammatory and cytotoxic role, resulting in autoimmunity and tissue damage [28]. In particular, in COPD, airflow limitation and airway inflammation correlate with NETs and extracellular DNA levels in sputum [71].

1.8. ETs and Lung Pathologies

Asthma is a respiratory disease characterized by a reduced air supply to the lungs due to airway wall remodelling associated with chronic inflammation and bronchospasm. Some in vivo studies have shown a direct correlation between asthma development and ETs production. A similar correlation has also been observed in humans, where ET production in asthmatic patients was associated with IL-8, IL-17, and ROS production, all factors that are known to increase ET generation and release, thus worsening the clinical setting [66,72,73]. Moreover, it has been reported that double-stranded DNA (ds-DNA), myeloperoxidase-DNA (MPO-DNA), and citrullinated histone H3 (CitH3), which are putative surrogate biomarkers, have been detected in several sites and fluids in asthmatic patients [74]. Recently, Granger et al. discovered that both circulating NETs and eosinophil extracellular traps (EETs) represent novel biomarkers for severe asthma (SA) [75]. SA condition affects 10% of the asthmatic patients, where even in the presence of stable high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), asthma exacerbations occur more frequently [76]. In the literature, it has been reported that a higher level of EET-positive eosinophils is present in the peripheral blood of SA patients compared to non-SA patients and healthy subjects [77]. Furthermore, in asthma, altered mitochondrial function is observed: mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration are increased resulting in abnormal cellular phenotype in airway smooth muscle cells and epithelial cells [78,79,80]. Therefore, the role of mitochondria is crucial in eosinophil function and survival and EET formation [81]. EETs, released by live cells, are made of granule proteins such as the eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), major basic protein (MBP), and DNA, which has a mitochondrial origin without the presence of the expression of mitochondrial DNA genes and histone proteins [82].
Another lung disease associated with ET production is cystic fibrosis (CF), an autosomal recessive inherited disease characterized by an altered expression and activity of the CF transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene and protein, leading to an abnormal accumulation of a thick mucus layer that could be in favour of the colonization and growth of exogenous bacteria. Moreover, the loss of function of the CFTR gene is in part involved in the defective function of the macrophages [83,84]. Some authors have described that prolonged hypoxia might affect the development of interstitial pulmonary fibrosis in COVID-19 patients. In fact, hypoxia, together with fibroblast duplication and the deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM), modulates hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, (HIF-1-alpha) functions at multiple levels of the fibrotic process [85,86]. It has been shown that several mechanisms contribute to the release of macrophage extracellular traps (METs), such as augmentation in intracellular calcium, oxidative stress, IFN-γ, TNFα, extracellular DNA, drug exposure (Fosfomycin, statins), and interaction with microbes (bacteria, mycobacteria, yeast) [87]. Recently, some authors attributed to exogenous neutrophils elastase (NE) a crucial role in METs production [88]; indeed, they observed that the internalization and the activation of the proteolytic function regarding NE in the macrophages result in H3 citrullination and “histone H3 clipping”, events which anticipate the METs production [88]. These particles, such as NETs and ETs, can promote inflammation in the airway’s microenvironment and in the lung parenchyma, where histones, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB-1), myeloperoxidase, extracellular DNA, and proteinases play a crucial proinflammatory role [89]. However, METs represent the main source of ET in CF and the previously mentioned COPD patients [88].
Accordingly, clinical evidence has emphasized the correlation between ET levels in accumulating mucus and bacterial infection; indeed, DNA fibers can act as a scaffold, favouring microorganisms’ growth. Considering these observations, ET levels evaluation could represent a possible way to evaluate pneumonia severity [90,91,92].

1.9. ETs and Kidney Disease

Some clinical works have also demonstrated ET’s involvement in the development and progression of renal diseases. These authors correlated ETs production to acute kidney damage caused by the chronic inflammation of histones released from ETs. Defective NETs clearance is also associated with the production of autoantibodies against NETs themselves: antinuclear antibodies and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) [93], which can lead to pauci-immune glomerulonephritis [94]. Moreover, it has been hypothesized that the ETs’ involvement in the necro-inflammatory early stage of acute tubular necrosis observed in renal vasculitis, anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, lupus nephritis, and thrombotic microangiopathies [95,96] results in local and collateral damage. Gupta et al. have shown that NETs and their biomarkers are also involved in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) [97], one of the most crucial complications of diabetes mellitus [98] and its severity. They demonstrated that, in vitro, in diabetic mice and humans, NETs are able to contribute to the stimulation of NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β signaling in glomerular endothelial cells, resulting in glomerular endothelial dysfunction due to high glucose levels. Through PAD4 inhibition, low amounts of glucose-induced NETs are released, avoiding inflammation, renal damage, and endothelial dysfunction [97]. The production of NETs, indeed, can interfere with and decrease eNOS phosphorylation and the integrity of the endothelial barrier increasing levels of soluble VCAM-1 into the plasma, leading to endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial dysfunction, as indicated by albuminuria, reflects systemic endothelial injury and an increased risk for vascular diseases. These findings underline the significant importance of NETs formation and activity also in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases such as atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, diabetes, and obesity [99,100,101,102,103].

1.10. ETs and Neurodegenerative Disease

Neutrophils play a significant role in the development of many neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (A.D.). A.D. is a neurodegenerative disorder leading to a progressive deterioration of cognitive functions. It is characterized, at the cellular and tissue level, by β-amyloid accumulation in the neural parenchyma, causing inflammation and subsequent neuron death [104]. Many studies have highlighted neutrophil accumulation in cerebral blood vessels and their ability to release DNA fibers upon inflammatory stimulation; in the literature, it has been reported that the accumulation of ETs commonly occurs in the cerebral vessels of people with A.D. [95,104,105]. In neurons, the gathering of β-amyloid contributes to the production and activation of the factors of the complement system, such as C1q, CR1, and C5a, which are involved in the assembled neutrophils and NET release into the brain [106]. In addition, it has been reported that the complement system is not able to clean NETs, resulting in NET accumulation and overstimulation of the inflammatory complement system cascade, leading to neuronal damage [106,107].
A further study underlined the presence of a higher amount of MPO+ cells releasing NETs both inside blood vessels, in the cortex and hippocampus of individuals with A.D., compared to age-matched controls. Moreover, these authors found that in 5xFAD and 3xTg-AD mice, two transgenic mouse models of A.D., LFA-1 integrin mediates cognitive impairment and pathogenesis of A.D. through NETs formation [108].
Such clinical evidence suggests that ETs accumulation could play a pivotal role in exacerbating neuroinflammation and suggests the possibility of targeting them with innovative therapeutic approaches to treat such disease [95,104,105].

1.11. ETs and Liver Disease

Some studies have correlated ETs production and release also to liver diseases such as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), induced by different stimuli, as well as hepatitis B virus [109,110,111].
In NAFLD conditions, the lipid accumulation in the liver can lead to inflammation with neutrophils as active players which are able to release NETs. The latter overstimulates the inflammation status and retrieves several immune cells in the liver, such as T regulatory cells (Treg) and macrophages, leading to the progression from NASH to HCC [112,113]. Indeed, it has been reported that cancer progression and metastasis involvement can be enhanced by NET formation [114]. HCC cells are trapped by NETs, which promote the stimulation of the TLR4/9-COX2 axis, involved in the inflammatory response and metastatic process [115].
Moreover, it has been observed that the NET level is higher in HBV-positive HCC and is implicated in HBV-related hepatocarcinogenesis, creating an inflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME); indeed, circulatory NETs represent a tool to predict extrahepatic metastasis of HBV-related HCC. A huge NETs production is the consequence of the stimulation of TLR4/RAGE-ROS molecular pathway mediated by HBV-induced S100 calcium-binding protein A9 (S100A9), involved in HCC cells’ growth and metastasis [116].
Both in vivo experiments and clinical observational studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between circulating free DNA fibers and the development of these pathologies, suggesting their use as a potential clinical biomarker for diagnostic purposes. ET’s interest in the hepatological clinical field is still growing, and some in vivo studies have shown that a fatty acid-rich diet can increase ETs production [117,118,119,120]. In contrast, recently, it has been shown that in obese mice fed with a high-fat diet (HFD), neutrophils produce a reduced amount of NETs compared to lean controls under a normal diet (ND). According to the results, it has been found that ND neutrophils in both physiological and inflammatory conditions produce NETs through glycolysis and/or the pentose phosphate pathway. On the other hand, these strategies are involved in NETs release in cells of septic HFD mice, while they show an “exhausted phenotype” after a secondary ex vivo activation, resulting in reduced NETs production despite high glycolytic potential and flexibility to oxidize fatty acids [121].

2. Therapeutic Strategies

As reported in Table 1, the production and release of NETs can be modulated by several mechanisms of action of different molecules. Raf-MEK-ERK signaling, phosphorylation of the p65 subunit of NF-κβ via Rac2, PAD4, calcineurin signaling, blocking receptors with monoclonal antibodies, and DNAases represent some of the molecular pathways involved in decreased NET formation [122].

3. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

NETs have a controversial role. On the one hand, NETs are an efficient system through which the innate immunity can protect the host and prevent microbes from spreading; on the other hand, defective overproduction and accumulation of these free DNA fibers result in several pathological scenarios, such as cancers, infectious, non-infectious, and autoimmune diseases. Although novel therapeutic strategies targeting NETs are emerging, further and more extensive research is needed to explore their impact on different diseases.
While considerable progress has been made in understanding ETs’ biology, further research is essential to fully elucidate their specific molecular pathways in diverse diseases. Identifying disease-specific ET biomarkers could provide novel diagnostic and prognostic tools. Additionally, developing precise therapeutic strategies that balance ETs production and clearance is crucial to avoid unwanted side effects while preserving host defense. ET-targeted therapies promise precise and personalized medicine approaches in inflammatory and autoimmune disorders.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.T. and D.C.; methodology S.T., N.V., D.D. and D.C.; software, S.T., N.V., A.F., G.C., P.A.T., D.S. and D.C.; validation, S.T., D.D., P.P.S. and D.C.; formal analysis, S.T., N.V. and D.C.; investigation, S.T. and N.V.; resources, S.T., P.P.S. and D.C.; data curation, S.T., N.V. and D.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.T. and N.V.; writing—review and editing, S.T., N.V., D.D., A.F., G.C., D.S., P.A.T., P.P.S. and D.C.; supervision, P.P.S. and D.C.; project administration, S.T. and D.C.; funding acquisition, S.T., P.P.S. and D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by: Italian Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Bando PRIN 2022 grant number 2022BPNY3E. Funded by the European Union—Next Generation EU “Age-It—Ageing well in an ageing society”, PNRR Mission 4 Component 2 Inv. 1.3 CUP:C13C22000660001.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
NETsNeutrophil extracellular traps
ET sExtracellular traps
MPOMyeloperoxidase
PMNsPolymorphonuclear neutrophils
ROSReactive oxygen species
ALIAcute lung injury
ARDSAcute respiratory distress syndrome
METs Monocyte/Macrophage extracellular traps
PMAPhorbol Myristic Acid
NADPHNicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate
TLRsToll-like receptors
COPSChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Ds-DNADouble-stranded DNA
MPO-DNAMyeloperoxidase-DNA
Cit-H3Citrullinated histone
EETsEosinophil extracellular traps
SASevere asthma
ICSsInhaled corticosteroids
ECPEosinophil cationic protein
MBPMajor basic protein
CFCystic fibrosis
CFTRCystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator
NENeutrophils elastase
HMGB-1High-Mobility Group Box 1
ANCAsAntineutrophil Cytoplasmatic Antibodies
DKDDiabetic kidney disease
A.D.Alzheimer’s disease
NASHNon-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis
HCCHepatocellular carcinoma
TMETumor microenvironment
S100A9S100 Calcium-Binding Protein A9
HFDHigh-fat diet
NDNormal diet
CSECigarette smoke extract
RNORoflumilast N-Oxide
DAPTDual antiplatelet therapy
iCCAIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

References

  1. Rizzi, M.; Carniato, F.; Tonello, S.; Migliario, M.; Invernizzi, M.; Rocchetti, V.; Marchese, L.; Renò, F. Charged molecular silica trigger in vitro NETosis in human granulocytes via both oxidative and autophagic pathways. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 7058–7068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Migliario, M.; Tonello, S.; Rocchetti, V.; Rizzi, M.; Renò, F. Near infrared laser irradiation induces NETosis via oxidative stress and autophagy. Lasers Med. Sci. 2018, 33, 1919–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tonello, S.; Carniato, F.; Rizzi, M.; Migliario, M.; Rocchetti, V.; Marchese, L.; Renò, F. Charged polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes trigger in vitro METosis via both oxidative stress and autophagy. Life Sci. 2017, 190, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Malech, H.L.; Deleo, F.R.; Quinn, M.T. The role of neutrophils in the immune system: An overview. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1124, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, J.; Arase, H. Regulation of immune responses by neutrophils. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014, 1319, 66–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Scapini, P.; Cassatella, M.A. Social networking of human neutrophils within the immune system. Blood 2014, 124, 710–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ocana, A.; Nieto-Jiménez, C.; Pandiella, A.; Templeton, A.J. Neutrophils in cancer: Prognostic role and therapeutic strategies. Mol. Cancer 2017, 16, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Koenderman, L.; Tesselaar, K.; Vrisekoop, N. Human neutrophil kinetics: A call to revisit old evidence. Trends Immunol. 2022, 43, 868–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tseng, C.W.; Liu, G.Y. Expanding roles of neutrophils in aging hosts. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2014, 29, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tonello, S.; Rizzi, M.; Migliario, M.; Rocchetti, V.; Renò, F. Low concentrations of neutrophil extracellular traps induce proliferation in human keratinocytes via NF-kB activation. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2017, 88, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nathan, C. Neutrophils and immunity: Challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Zhong, L.; Ye, D.; Zhang, J.; Tu, Y.; Bornstein, S.R.; Zhou, Z.; Lam, K.S.; Xu, A. Increased neutrophil elastase and proteinase 3 and augmented NETosis are closely associated with β-cell autoimmunity in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2014, 63, 4239–4248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Navegantes, K.C.; de Souza Gomes, R.; Pereira, P.A.T.; Czaikoski, P.G.; Azevedo, C.H.M.; Monteiro, M.C. Immune modulation of some autoimmune diseases: The critical role of macrophages and neutrophils in the innate and adaptive immunity. J. Transl. Med. 2017, 15, 36–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Neves, J.S.; Weller, P.F. Functional extracellular eosinophil granules: Novel implications in eosinophil immunobiology. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2009, 21, 694–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ueki, S.; Tokunaga, T.; Fujieda, S.; Honda, K.; Hirokawa, M.; Spencer, L.A.; Weller, P.F. Eosinophil ETosis and DNA Traps: A New Look at Eosinophilic Inflammation. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016, 16, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sollberger, G.; Tilley, D.O.; Zychlinsky, A. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps: The Biology of Chromatin Externalization. Dev. Cell 2018, 44, 542–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. von Köckritz-Blickwede, M.; Goldmann, O.; Thulin, P.; Heinemann, K.; Norrby-Teglund, A.; Rohde, M.; Medina, E. Phagocytosis-independent antimicrobial activity of mast cells by means of extracellular trap formation. Blood 2008, 111, 3070–3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chuammitri, P.; Ostojić, J.; Andreasen, C.B.; Redmond, S.B.; Lamont, S.J.; Palić, D. Chicken heterophil extracellular traps (HETs): Novel defense mechanism of chicken heterophils. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2009, 129, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yousefi, S.; Mihalache, C.; Kozlowski, E.; Schmid, I.; Simon, H.U. Viable neutrophils release mitochondrial DNA to form neutrophil extracellular traps. Cell Death Differ. 2009, 16, 1438–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Guillotin, F.; Fortier, M.; Portes, M.; Demattei, C.; Mousty, E.; Nouvellon, E.; Mercier, E.; Chea, M.; Letouzey, V.; Gris, J.C.; et al. Vital NETosis vs. suicidal NETosis during normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 10, 1099038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chow, O.A.; von Köckritz-Blickwede, M.; Bright, A.T.; Hensler, M.E.; Zinkernagel, A.S.; Cogen, A.L.; Gallo, R.L.; Monestier, M.; Wang, Y.; Glass, C.K.; et al. Statins enhance formation of phagocyte extracellular traps. Cell Host Microbe 2010, 8, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Altincicek, B.; Stötzel, S.; Wygrecka, M.; Preissner, K.T.; Vilcinskas, A. Host-derived extracellular nucleic acids enhance innate immune responses, induce coagulation, and prolong survival upon infection in insects. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 2705–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kenno, S.; Perito, S.; Mosci, P.; Vecchiarelli, A.; Monari, C. Autophagy and Reactive Oxygen Species Are Involved in Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Release Induced by C. albicans Morphotypes. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vorobjeva, N.V.; Pinegin, B.V. Neutrophil extracellular traps: Mechanisms of formation and role in health and disease. Biochemistry 2014, 79, 1286–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Uribe-Querol, E.; Rosales, C. Neutrophils in Cancer: Two Sides of the Same Coin. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 2015, 983698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Phillipson, M.; Kubes, P. The neutrophil in vascular inflammation. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1381–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Delgado-Rizo, V.; Martínez-Guzmán, M.A.; Iñiguez-Gutierrez, L.; García-Orozco, A.; Alvarado-Navarro, A.; Fafutis-Morris, M. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps and Its Implications in Inflammation: An Overview. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Papayannopoulos, V. Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Leshner, M.; Wang, S.; Lewis, C.; Zheng, H.; Chen, X.A.; Santy, L.; Wang, Y. PAD4 mediated histone hypercitrullination induces heterochromatin decondensation and chromatin unfolding to form neutrophil extracellular trap-like structures. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Stadler, S.; Correll, S.; Li, P.; Wang, D.; Hayama, R.; Leonelli, L.; Han, H.; Grigoryev, S.A.; et al. Histone hypercitrullination mediates chromatin decondensation and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gevaert, E.; Zhang, N.; Krysko, O.; Lan, F.; Holtappels, G.; De Ruyck, N.; Nauwynck, H.; Yousefi, S.; Simon, H.U.; Bachert, C. Extracellular eosinophilic traps in association with Staphylococcus aureus at the site of epithelial barrier defects in patients with severe airway inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 1849–1860.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sørensen, O.E.; Borregaard, N. Neutrophil extracellular traps—The dark side of neutrophils. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 1612–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Itakura, A.; McCarty, O.J. Pivotal role for the mTOR pathway in the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps via regulation of autophagy. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2013, 305, C348–C354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Remijsen, Q.; Vanden Berghe, T.; Wirawan, E.; Asselbergh, B.; Parthoens, E.; De Rycke, R.; Noppen, S.; Delforge, M.; Willems, J.; Vandenabeele, P. Neutrophil extracellular trap cell death requires both autophagy and superoxide generation. Cell Res. 2011, 21, 290–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Allam, R.; Kumar, S.V.; Darisipudi, M.N.; Anders, H.J. Extracellular histones in tissue injury and inflammation. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 92, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stephan, A.; Fabri, M. The NET, the trap and the pathogen: Neutrophil extracellular traps in cutaneous immunity. Exp. Dermatol. 2015, 24, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xu, F.; Zhang, C.; Zou, Z.; Fan, E.K.Y.; Chen, L.; Li, Y.; Billiar, T.R.; Wilson, M.A.; Shi, X.; Fan, J. Aging-related Atg5 defect impairs neutrophil extracellular traps formation. Immunology 2017, 151, 417–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Teimourian, S.; Moghanloo, E. Role of PTEN in neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 66, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Germic, N.; Hosseini, A.; Yousefi, S.; Karaulov, A.; Simon, H.U. Regulation of eosinophil functions by autophagy. Semin. Immunopathol. 2021, 43, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pieterse, E.; Rother, N.; Yanginlar, C.; Hilbrands, L.B.; van der Vlag, J. Neutrophils Discriminate between Lipopolysaccharides of Different Bacterial Sources and Selectively Release Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tsai, S.R.; Hamblin, M.R. Biological effects and medical applications of infrared radiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2017, 170, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Germic, N.; Stojkov, D.; Oberson, K.; Yousefi, S.; Simon, H.U. Neither eosinophils nor neutrophils require ATG5-dependent autophagy for extracellular DNA trap formation. Immunology 2017, 152, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Apostolidou, E.; Kambas, K.; Chrysanthopoulou, A.; Kourtzelis, I.; Speletas, M.; Ritis, K.; Mitroulis, I. Genetic analysis of C5a receptors in neutrophils from patients with familial Mediterranean fever. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 5503–5510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Apostolidou, E.; Skendros, P.; Kambas, K.; Mitroulis, I.; Konstantinidis, T.; Chrysanthopoulou, A.; Nakos, K.; Tsironidou, V.; Koffa, M.; Boumpas, D.T.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps regulate IL-1β-mediated inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016, 75, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Skendros, P.; Mitroulis, I.; Ritis, K. Autophagy in Neutrophils: From Granulopoiesis to Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 6, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Branzk, N.; Lubojemska, A.; Hardison, S.E.; Wang, Q.; Gutierrez, M.G.; Brown, G.D.; Papayannopoulos, V. Neutrophils sense microbe size and selectively release neutrophil extracellular traps in response to large pathogens. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, L.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Zhou, B.; Chen, J.; Huang, D.; Li, J.; Li, H.; Chen, F.; et al. DNA of neutrophil extracellular traps promotes cancer metastasis via CCDC25. Nature 2020, 583, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cristinziano, L.; Modestino, L.; Antonelli, A.; Marone, G.; Simon, H.U.; Varricchi, G.; Galdiero, M.R. Neutrophil extracellular traps in cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022, 79, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Herre, M.; Cedervall, J.; Mackman, N.; Olsson, A.K. Neutrophil extracellular traps in the pathology of cancer and other inflammatory diseases. Physiol. Rev. 2023, 103, 277–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guo, J.; Zhang, H.; Lin, W.; Lu, L.; Su, J.; Chen, X. Signaling pathways and targeted therapies for psoriasis. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kim, H.J.; Lee, Y.S.; Lee, B.S.; Han, C.H.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, C.H. NLRP3 inflammasome activation and NETosis positively regulate each other and exacerbate proinflammatory responses: Implications of NETosis inhibition for acne skin inflammation treatment. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2024, 21, 466–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Damiani, G.; Bragazzi, N.L.; Karimkhani Aksut, C.; Wu, D.; Alicandro, G.; McGonagle, D.; Guo, C.; Dellavalle, R.; Grada, A.; Wong, P.; et al. The Global, Regional, and National Burden of Psoriasis: Results and Insights From the Global Burden of Disease 2019 Study. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 743180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kim, W.B.; Jerome, D.; Yeung, J. Diagnosis and management of psoriasis. Can. Fam. Physician 2017, 63, 278–285. [Google Scholar]
  54. Shen, C.; Han, Y.; Wang, B.; Tang, J.; Chen, H.; Lin, Q. Correction: Ocular biocompatibility evaluation of POSS nanomaterials for biomedical material applications. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 10262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. D’Onghia, D.; Colangelo, D.; Bellan, M.; Tonello, S.; Puricelli, C.; Virgilio, E.; Apostolo, D.; Minisini, R.; Ferreira, L.L.; Sozzi, L.; et al. Gas6/TAM system as potential biomarker for multiple sclerosis prognosis. Front Immunol. 2024, 15, 1362960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lin, A.M.; Rubin, C.J.; Khandpur, R.; Wang, J.Y.; Riblett, M.; Yalavarthi, S.; Villanueva, E.C.; Shah, P.; Kaplan, M.J.; Bruce, A.T. Mast cells and neutrophils release IL-17 through extracellular trap formation in psoriasis. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 490–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lande, R.; Gregorio, J.; Facchinetti, V.; Chatterjee, B.; Wang, Y.H.; Homey, B.; Cao, W.; Wang, Y.H.; Su, B.; Nestle, F.O.; et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells sense self-DNA coupled with antimicrobial peptide. Nature 2007, 449, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kahlenberg, J.M.; Carmona-Rivera, C.; Smith, C.K.; Kaplan, M.J. Neutrophil extracellular trap-associated protein activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome is enhanced in lupus macrophages. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 1217–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Chen, L.; Zhao, Y.; Lai, D.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Fei, K.; Jiang, G.; Fan, J. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote macrophage pyroptosis in sepsis. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. van der Fits, L.; Mourits, S.; Voerman, J.S.; Kant, M.; Boon, L.; Laman, J.D.; Cornelissen, F.; Mus, A.M.; Florencia, E.; Prens, E.P.; et al. Imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation in mice is mediated via the IL-23/IL-17 axis. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 5836–5845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Manuela, R.; Mario, M.; Vincenzo, R.; Filippo, R. Nicotine stimulation increases proliferation and matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -28 expression in human dental pulp cells. Life Sci. 2015, 135, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hosseinzadeh, A.; Thompson, P.R.; Segal, B.H.; Urban, C.F. Nicotine induces neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2016, 100, 1105–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Xu, Y.; Li, H.; Bajrami, B.; Kwak, H.; Cao, S.; Liu, P.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, H.; Ye, K.; et al. Cigarette smoke (CS) and nicotine delay neutrophil spontaneous death via suppressing production of diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 7726–7731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Qiu, S.L.; Zhang, H.; Tang, Q.Y.; Bai, J.; He, Z.Y.; Zhang, J.Q.; Li, M.H.; Deng, J.M.; Liu, G.N.; Zhong, X.N. Neutrophil extracellular traps induced by cigarette smoke activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Thorax 2017, 72, 1084–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Renò, F.; Rocchetti, V.; Migliario, M.; Rizzi, M.; Cannas, M. Chronic exposure to cigarette smoke increases matrix metalloproteinases and Filaggrin mRNA expression in oral keratinocytes: Role of nicotine stimulation. Oral Oncol. 2011, 47, 827–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wright, H.L.; Moots, R.J.; Bucknall, R.C.; Edwards, S.W. Neutrophil function in inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Rheumatology 2010, 49, 1618–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Song, Q.; Chen, P.; Liu, X.M. The role of cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary vascular endothelial cell apoptosis in COPD. Respir. Res. 2021, 22, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, K.; Liao, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, R.; Zeng, Z.; Cheng, M.; Gao, L.; Xu, D.; Wen, F.; Wang, T.; et al. Inhibition of neutrophil elastase prevents cigarette smoke exposure-induced formation of neutrophil extracellular traps and improves lung function in a mouse model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2023, 114, 109537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dicker, A.J.; Crichton, M.L.; Pumphrey, E.G.; Cassidy, A.J.; Suarez-Cuartin, G.; Sibila, O.; Furrie, E.; Fong, C.J.; Ibrahim, W.; Brady, G.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps are associated with disease severity and microbiota diversity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018, 141, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kaplan, M.J.; Radic, M. Neutrophil extracellular traps: Double-edged swords of innate immunity. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 2689–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wright, T.K.; Gibson, P.G.; Simpson, J.L.; McDonald, V.M.; Wood, L.G.; Baines, K.J. Neutrophil extracellular traps are associated with inflammation in chronic airway disease. Respirology 2016, 21, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Janssen, P.; Tosi, I.; Hego, A.; Maréchal, P.; Marichal, T.; Radermecker, C. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Are Found in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluids of Horses With Severe Asthma and Correlate With Asthma Severity. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 921077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Porto, B.N.; Stein, R.T. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Pulmonary Diseases: Too Much of a Good Thing? Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Poto, R.; Shamji, M.; Marone, G.; Durham, S.R.; Scadding, G.W.; Varricchi, G. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Asthma: Friends or Foes? Cells 2022, 11, 3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Granger, V.; Taillé, C.; Roach, D.; Letuvé, S.; Dupin, C.; Hamidi, F.; Noël, B.; Neukirch, C.; Aubier, M.; Pretolani, M.; et al. Circulating neutrophil and eosinophil extracellular traps are markers of severe asthma. Allergy 2020, 75, 699–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Bachert, C.; Han, J.K.; Desrosiers, M.; Hellings, P.W.; Amin, N.; Lee, S.E.; Mullol, J.; Greos, L.S.; Bosso, J.V.; Laidlaw, T.M.; et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 and LIBERTY NP SINUS-52): Results from two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 trials. Lancet 2019, 394, 1638–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Choi, Y.; Kim, Y.M.; Lee, H.R.; Mun, J.; Sim, S.; Lee, D.H.; Pham, D.L.; Kim, S.H.; Shin, Y.S.; Lee, S.W.; et al. Eosinophil extracellular traps activate type 2 innate lymphoid cells through stimulating airway epithelium in severe asthma. Allergy 2020, 75, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Trian, T.; Benard, G.; Begueret, H.; Rossignol, R.; Girodet, P.O.; Ghosh, D.; Ousova, O.; Vernejoux, J.M.; Marthan, R.; Tunon-de-Lara, J.M.; et al. Bronchial smooth muscle remodeling involves calcium-dependent enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis in asthma. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 3173–3181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Xu, W.; Ghosh, S.; Comhair, S.A.; Asosingh, K.; Janocha, A.J.; Mavrakis, D.A.; Bennett, C.D.; Gruca, L.L.; Graham, B.B.; Queisser, K.A.; et al. Increased mitochondrial arginine metabolism supports bioenergetics in asthma. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 2465–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Esteves, P.; Blanc, L.; Celle, A.; Dupin, I.; Maurat, E.; Amoedo, N.; Cardouat, G.; Ousova, O.; Gales, L.; Bellvert, F.; et al. Crucial role of fatty acid oxidation in asthmatic bronchial smooth muscle remodelling. Eur. Respir. J. 2021, 58, 2004252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Koranteng, J.; Chung, K.F.; Michaeloudes, C.; Bhavsar, P. The role of mitochondria in eosinophil function: Implications for severe asthma pathogenesis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2024, 12, 1360079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Silveira, J.S.; Antunes, G.L.; Kaiber, D.B.; da Costa, M.S.; Marques, E.P.; Ferreira, F.S.; Gassen, R.B.; Breda, R.V.; Wyse, A.T.S.; Pitrez, P.; et al. Reactive oxygen species are involved in eosinophil extracellular traps release and in airway inflammation in asthma. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 23633–23646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Vargas, A.; Boivin, R.; Cano, P.; Murcia, Y.; Bazin, I.; Lavoie, J.P. Neutrophil extracellular traps are downregulated by glucocorticosteroids in lungs in an equine model of asthma. Respir. Res. 2017, 18, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Martínez-Alemán, S.R.; Campos-García, L.; Palma-Nicolas, J.P.; Hernández-Bello, R.; González, G.M.; Sánchez-González, A. Understanding the Entanglement: Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) in Cystic Fibrosis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ambardar, S.R.; Hightower, S.L.; Huprikar, N.A.; Chung, K.K.; Singhal, A.; Collen, J.F. Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis: Novel Sequelae of the Current Pandemic. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Stoian, M.; Roman, A.; Boeriu, A.; Onișor, D.; Bandila, S.R.; Babă, D.F.; Cocuz, I.; Niculescu, R.; Costan, A.; Laszlo, S.Ș.; et al. Long-Term Radiological Pulmonary Changes in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Respiratory Failure due to SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Doster, R.S.; Rogers, L.M.; Gaddy, J.A.; Aronoff, D.M. Macrophage Extracellular Traps: A Scoping Review. J. Innate Immun. 2018, 10, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kummarapurugu, A.B.; Zheng, S.; Ma, J.; Ghosh, S.; Hawkridge, A.; Voynow, J.A. Neutrophil Elastase Triggers the Release of Macrophage Extracellular Traps: Relevance to Cystic Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2022, 66, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Peng, H.H.; Liu, Y.J.; Ojcius, D.M.; Lee, C.M.; Chen, R.H.; Huang, P.R.; Martel, J.; Young, J.D. Mineral particles stimulate innate immunity through neutrophil extracellular traps containing HMGB1. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tonello, S.; D’Onghia, D.; Di Ruscio, A.; Mora, S.M.; Vincenzi, F.; Caria, G.; Fracchia, A.; Vercellino, N.; Bussolati, B.; Tanzi, A.; et al. Extracellular Vesicles as a Potential Biomarker of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Systemic Sclerosis. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rizzi, M.; Tonello, S.; Morani, F.; Rizzi, E.; Casciaro, G.F.; Matino, E.; Costanzo, M.; Zecca, E.; Croce, A.; Pedrinelli, A.; et al. CGRP Plasma Levels Correlate with the Clinical Evolution and Prognosis of Hospitalized Acute COVID-19 Patients. Viruses 2022, 14, 2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Cano Plá, S.M.; D’Urso, A.; Fernández-Sánchez, J.F.; Colangelo, D.; Choquesillo-Lazarte, D.; Ferracini, R.; Bosetti, M.; Prat, M.; Gómez-Morales, J. Biomimetic Citrate-Coated Luminescent Apatite Nanoplatforms for Diclofenac Delivery in Inflammatory Environments. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gupta, S.; Kaplan, M.J. The role of neutrophils and NETosis in autoimmune and renal diseases. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2016, 12, 402–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sethi, S.; De Vriese, A.S.; Fervenza, F.C. Acute glomerulonephritis. Lancet 2022, 399, 1646–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sainaghi, P.P.; Bellan, M.; Lombino, F.; Alciato, F.; Carecchio, M.; Galimberti, D.; Fenoglio, C.; Scarpini, E.; Cantello, R.; Pirisi, M.; et al. Growth Arrest Specific 6 Concentration is Increased in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017, 55, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Alaygut, D.; Ozturk, I.; Ulu, S.; Gungor, O. NETosis and kidney disease: What do we know? Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2023, 55, 1985–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Gupta, A.; Singh, K.; Fatima, S.; Ambreen, S.; Zimmermann, S.; Younis, R.; Krishnan, S.; Rana, R.; Gadi, I.; Schwab, C.; et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Promote NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Glomerular Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetic Kidney Disease. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Reidy, K.; Kang, H.M.; Hostetter, T.; Susztak, K. Molecular mechanisms of diabetic kidney disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 2333–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Thålin, C.; Hisada, Y.; Lundström, S.; Mackman, N.; Wallén, H. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps: Villains and Targets in Arterial, Venous, and Cancer-Associated Thrombosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, 1724–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Döring, Y.; Soehnlein, O.; Weber, C. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Atherosclerosis and Atherothrombosis. Circ. Res. 2017, 120, 736–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. D’Abbondanza, M.; Martorelli, E.E.; Ricci, M.A.; De Vuono, S.; Migliola, E.N.; Godino, C.; Corradetti, S.; Siepi, D.; Paganelli, M.T.; Maugeri, N.; et al. Increased plasmatic NETs by-products in patients in severe obesity. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Gimbrone, M.A., Jr.; García-Cardeña, G. Endothelial Cell Dysfunction and the Pathobiology of Atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 620–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Díez-Delhoyo, F.; Gutiérrez-Ibañes, E.; Sanz-Ruiz, R.; Vázquez-Álvarez, M.E.; González Saldívar, H.; Rivera Juárez, A.; Sarnago, F.; Martínez-Sellés, M.; Bermejo, J.; Soriano, J.; et al. Prevalence of Microvascular and Endothelial Dysfunction in the Nonculprit Territory in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2019, 12, e007257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Pietronigro, E.C.; Della Bianca, V.; Zenaro, E.; Constantin, G. NETosis in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Angelillo-Scherrer, A.; Burnier, L.; Flores, N.; Savi, P.; DeMol, M.; Schaeffer, P.; Herbert, J.M.; Lemke, G.; Goff, S.P.; Matsushima, G.K.; et al. Role of Gas6 receptors in platelet signaling during thrombus stabilization and implications for antithrombotic therapy. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kretzschmar, G.C.; Bumiller-Bini, V.; Gasparetto Filho, M.A.; Zonta, Y.R.; Yu, K.S.T.; de Souza, R.L.R.; Dias-Melicio, L.A.; Boldt, A.B.W. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps: A Perspective of Neuroinflammation and Complement Activation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 630869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. de Bont, C.M.; Boelens, W.C.; Pruijn, G.J.M. NETosis, complement, and coagulation: A triangular relationship. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2019, 16, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zenaro, E.; Pietronigro, E.; Della Bianca, V.; Piacentino, G.; Marongiu, L.; Budui, S.; Turano, E.; Rossi, B.; Angiari, S.; Dusi, S.; et al. Neutrophils promote Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology and cognitive decline via LFA-1 integrin. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 880–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Burlone, M.E.; Pedrinelli, A.R.; Giarda, P.; Minisini, R.; Pirisi, M. Influence of age on sex-related differences among patients with hepatitis C. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 28, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Aslam, H.; Oza, F.; Ahmed, K.; Kopel, J.; Aloysius, M.M.; Ali, A.; Dahiya, D.S.; Aziz, M.; Perisetti, A.; Goyal, H. The Role of Red Cell Distribution Width as a Prognostic Marker in Chronic Liver Disease: A Literature Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Burlone, M.E.; Budkowska, A. Hepatitis C virus cell entry: Role of lipoproteins and cellular receptors. J. Gen. Virol. 2009, 90 Pt 5, 1055–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. van der Windt, D.J.; Sud, V.; Zhang, H.; Varley, P.R.; Goswami, J.; Yazdani, H.O.; Tohme, S.; Loughran, P.; O’Doherty, R.M.; Minervini, M.I.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote inflammation and development of hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 2018, 68, 1347–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Brown, Z.J.; Xia, Y.; Huang, Z.; Shen, C.; Hu, Z.; Beane, J.; Ansa-Addo, E.A.; et al. Regulatory T-cell and neutrophil extracellular trap interaction contributes to carcinogenesis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Hepatol. 2021, 75, 1271–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. De Meo, M.L.; Spicer, J.D. The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in cancer progression and metastasis. Semin. Immunol. 2021, 57, 101595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yang, L.Y.; Luo, Q.; Lu, L.; Zhu, W.W.; Sun, H.T.; Wei, R.; Lin, Z.F.; Wang, X.Y.; Wang, C.Q.; Lu, M.; et al. Increased neutrophil extracellular traps promote metastasis potential of hepatocellular carcinoma via provoking tumorous inflammatory response. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zhan, X.; Wu, R.; Kong, X.H.; You, Y.; He, K.; Sun, X.Y.; Huang, Y.; Chen, W.X.; Duan, L. Elevated neutrophil extracellular traps by HBV-mediated S100A9-TLR4/RAGE-ROS cascade facilitate the growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Commun. 2023, 43, 225–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Agraz-Cibrián, J.M.; Delgado-Rizo, V.; Segura-Ortega, J.E.; Maldonado-Gómez, H.A.; Zambrano-Zaragoza, J.F.; Durán-Avelar, M.J.; Vibanco-Perez, N.; Fafutis-Morris, M. Impaired neutrophil extracellular traps and inflammatory responses in the peritoneal fluid of patients with liver cirrhosis. Scand. J. Immunol. 2018, 88, e12714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Tonello, S.; Rizzi, M.; Matino, E.; Costanzo, M.; Casciaro, G.F.; Croce, A.; Rizzi, E.; Zecca, E.; Pedrinelli, A.; Vassia, V.; et al. Baseline Plasma Gas6 Protein Elevation Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. Dis Markers. 2022, 29, 1568352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Sola, D.; Tonello, S.; Casciaro, G.F.; Rizzi, E.; D’Onghia, D.; Pirisi, M.; Caldera, F.; Rizzi, M.; Colangelo, D.; Del Duca, N.; et al. Higher Serum Monolaurin Is Associated with a Lower Risk of COVID-19: Results from a Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Bellan, M.; Pogliani, G.; Marconi, C.; Minisini, R.; Franzosi, L.; Alciato, F.; Magri, A.; Avanzi, G.C.; Pirisi, M.; Sainaghi, P.P. Gas6 as a putative noninvasive biomarker of hepatic fibrosis. Biomark. Med. 2016, 10, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cichon, I.; Ortmann, W.; Kolaczkowska, E. Metabolic Pathways Involved in Formation of Spontaneous and Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) Differ in Obesity and Systemic Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hernández González, L.L.; Pérez-Campos Mayoral, L.; Hernández-Huerta, M.T.; Mayoral Andrade, G.; Martínez Cruz, M.; Ramos-Martínez, E.; Pérez-Campos Mayoral, E.; Cruz Hernández, V.; Antonio García, I.; Matias-Cervantes, C.A.; et al. Targeting Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation: Exploring Promising Pharmacological Strategies for the Treatment of Preeclampsia. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Chen, Y.R.; Xiang, X.D.; Sun, F.; Xiao, B.W.; Yan, M.Y.; Peng, B.; Liu, D. Simvastatin Reduces NETosis to Attenuate Severe Asthma by Inhibiting PAD4 Expression. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2023, 2023, 1493684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Demkow, U. Molecular Mechanisms of Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NETs) Degradation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Shen, Y.; You, Q.; Wu, Y.; Wu, J. Inhibition of PAD4-mediated NET formation by cl-amidine prevents diabetes development in nonobese diabetic mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2022, 916, 174623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Shi, G.; Liu, L.; Cao, Y.; Ma, G.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, T.; Mi, L.; Jia, H.; et al. Inhibition of neutrophil extracellular trap formation ameliorates neuroinflammation and neuronal apoptosis via STING-dependent IRE1α/ASK1/JNK signaling pathway in mice with traumatic brain injury. J. Neuroinflamm. 2023, 20, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Zhang, H.; Qiu, S.L.; Tang, Q.Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, J.Q.; He, Z.Y.; Bai, J.; Li, M.H.; Deng, J.M.; Liang, Y.; et al. Erythromycin suppresses neutrophil extracellular traps in smoking-related chronic pulmonary inflammation. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Farrera, C.; Fadeel, B. Macrophage clearance of neutrophil extracellular traps is a silent process. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 2647–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sollberger, G.; Choidas, A.; Burn, G.L.; Habenberger, P.; Di Lucrezia, R.; Kordes, S.; Menninger, S.; Eickhoff, J.; Nussbaumer, P.; Klebl, B.; et al. Gasdermin D plays a vital role in the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci. Immunol. 2018, 3, eaar6689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Totani, L.; Amore, C.; Piccoli, A.; Dell’Elba, G.; Di Santo, A.; Plebani, R.; Pecce, R.; Martelli, N.; Rossi, A.; Ranucci, S.; et al. Type-4 Phosphodiesterase (PDE4) Blockade Reduces NETosis in Cystic Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 702677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Le Joncour, A.; Régnier, P.; Maciejewski-Duval, A.; Charles, E.; Barete, S.; Fouret, P.; Rosenzwajg, M.; Klatzmann, D.; Cacoub, P.; Saadoun, D. Reduction of Neutrophil Activation by Phosphodiesterase 4 Blockade in Behçet’s Disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023, 75, 1628–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Shishikura, K.; Horiuchi, T.; Sakata, N.; Trinh, D.A.; Shirakawa, R.; Kimura, T.; Asada, Y.; Horiuchi, H. Prostaglandin E2 inhibits neutrophil extracellular trap formation through production of cyclic AMP. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 173, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Yoshimoto, M.; Kagawa, S.; Kajioka, H.; Taniguchi, A.; Kuroda, S.; Kikuchi, S.; Kakiuchi, Y.; Yagi, T.; Nogi, S.; Teraishi, F.; et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy inhibits neutrophil extracellular traps to reduce liver micrometastases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2023, 567, 216260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. ETosis process in PMNs: lethal and vital NETosis. (A) Different stimuli activate neutrophils: cytokines, chemical compounds, and bacteria. (B) Activated white blood cells react by changing the structure of the nuclear membrane and start to lose their integrity. (C) Release of NETs in the extracellular space with the consequent cell death (Lethal NETosis). (D) Formation of vesicles containing DNA after the rupture of the nuclear membrane. (E) Migration of vesicles with entrapped DNA to the cell membrane and NETs release, leaving the cell alive (vital NETosis). Image created with BioRender 2025.
Figure 1. ETosis process in PMNs: lethal and vital NETosis. (A) Different stimuli activate neutrophils: cytokines, chemical compounds, and bacteria. (B) Activated white blood cells react by changing the structure of the nuclear membrane and start to lose their integrity. (C) Release of NETs in the extracellular space with the consequent cell death (Lethal NETosis). (D) Formation of vesicles containing DNA after the rupture of the nuclear membrane. (E) Migration of vesicles with entrapped DNA to the cell membrane and NETs release, leaving the cell alive (vital NETosis). Image created with BioRender 2025.
Life 15 00627 g001
Figure 2. Molecular events of lethal NETosis. TLRs = Toll-like receptor; PAD4 = peptidyl arginine deiminase 4; LL-37 = human antimicrobial peptide; MPO = myeloperoxidase; NE = neutrophil elastase. Image created with BioRender 2025.
Figure 2. Molecular events of lethal NETosis. TLRs = Toll-like receptor; PAD4 = peptidyl arginine deiminase 4; LL-37 = human antimicrobial peptide; MPO = myeloperoxidase; NE = neutrophil elastase. Image created with BioRender 2025.
Life 15 00627 g002
Table 1. In the following table are reported the compounds described in the literature as a NET modulator and the published findings.
Table 1. In the following table are reported the compounds described in the literature as a NET modulator and the published findings.
AuthorsYearReferenceAnti-NETsMain Findings
Chen et al.2023[123]SimvastatinIn a mouse model of severe asthma, Simvastatin decreases Th17-mediated neutrophilic inflammation and airway hyperreactivity through the reduction in PAD4 expression, resulting in NETosis inhibition.
Demkow U2023[124]DNase I and II families
3’-exonucleases (TREX1 and TREX2)
These families of DNAse and exonucleases are involved in NETs degradation.
Shen et al.2022[125]Cl-amidineIt has been shown that Cl-amidine is involved in the inhibition of PAD4-dependent NETs formation, avoiding NETosis.
NET inhibition with Clamidine alleviated neuroinfammation, neuronal apoptosis, and neurological deficits through STING-dependent IRE1α/ASK1/JNK signaling pathway in mice with traumatic brain injury.
Shi et al.2023[126]
Wang et al.2023[68]GW31161AGW311616A represents a selective and potent inhibitor of neutrophile elastase (NE). It prevents cigarette smoke extract (CSE)-induced NETs formation through the blocking of NE nuclear translocation and subsequent chromatin decondensation.
In vivo, GW311616A reduces pulmonary generation of NETs, attenuates neutrophil numbers and percentages, and the levels of neutrophil chemotactic factors and proinflammatory cytokines in BALF. Moreover, it is able to improve lung function in the COPD mouse model.
Wang et al.2023[68]CXCR2 antagonistIt blocks the trafficking of the neutrophil from the blood into the airways. Additionally, in COPD patients, the CXCR2 antagonist partially inhibits spontaneous NETosis in sputum neutrophils of COPD patients.
Zang et al.2019[127,128]ErythromycinErythromycin inhibits CSE-induced NET formation. In mice chronically exposed to cigarette smoke, erythromycin decreases NETs in the airway and ameliorates emphysema by downregulating Th1 and Th17 cells and suppressing CD40+ and CD86+ mDCs.
Farrera et al.2013[128]Cytochalasin
Nystatin
The administration of cytochalasin, an inhibitor of actin polymerization, and nystatin, belonging to the endocytosis inhibitors family, are involved in NETs clearance mediated by the macrophages, allowing an active and endocytosis-dependent process.
Sollberger et al. 2018[129]Molecules based on the pyrazolo-oxazepine scaffold (LDC7559)A class of molecules based on the pyrazolo-oxazepine scaffold is capable of inhibiting gasdermin D and consequently NET formation. LDC7559 is able to inhibit PMA-induced NET formation without interfering with phagocytosis and impacting the physiological activity of Nox, NE, or MPO.
Totani et al.2021[130]Roflumilast They are selective PDE4 inhibitors. Roflumilast N-oxide (RNO) blocks prothrombotic functions: it inhibits Pyk2 and Akt phosphorylation, and curbs NETs production by PMNs adherent on fibrinogen-coated surfaces, and it has been approved as an adjuvant to reduce the risk of exacerbation in patients with severe COPD.
Apremilast, inhibiting PDE4, prevents the activation of neutrophil surface markers as well as NETosis, ROS production, intracellular signaling and genes, and pathways related to innate immunity, and chemotaxis.
Rolipram strongly affects PMA-induced NETosis and inhibits isolated neutrophil adhesion.
Le Joncour et al.2023 [131] Apremilast
Shishikura et al.2016[132]Rolipram
(PDE4 inhibitors)
Yoshimoto et al.2023[133]Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT): aspirin and ticagrelorSuppressing NETs production and avoiding platelet activation
may prevent the implantation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) cells.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tonello, S.; Vercellino, N.; D’Onghia, D.; Fracchia, A.; Caria, G.; Sola, D.; Tillio, P.A.; Sainaghi, P.P.; Colangelo, D. Extracellular Traps in Inflammation: Pathways and Therapeutic Targets. Life 2025, 15, 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15040627

AMA Style

Tonello S, Vercellino N, D’Onghia D, Fracchia A, Caria G, Sola D, Tillio PA, Sainaghi PP, Colangelo D. Extracellular Traps in Inflammation: Pathways and Therapeutic Targets. Life. 2025; 15(4):627. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15040627

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tonello, Stelvio, Nicole Vercellino, Davide D’Onghia, Alessia Fracchia, Giulia Caria, Daniele Sola, Paolo Amedeo Tillio, Pier Paolo Sainaghi, and Donato Colangelo. 2025. "Extracellular Traps in Inflammation: Pathways and Therapeutic Targets" Life 15, no. 4: 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15040627

APA Style

Tonello, S., Vercellino, N., D’Onghia, D., Fracchia, A., Caria, G., Sola, D., Tillio, P. A., Sainaghi, P. P., & Colangelo, D. (2025). Extracellular Traps in Inflammation: Pathways and Therapeutic Targets. Life, 15(4), 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15040627

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop