Delivering Personalized Care at a Distance: How Telemedicine Can Foster Getting to Know the Patient as a Person
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Personalized Medicine: Benefits Offered by Telemedicine
3. Patient-Centered Communication Skills and Telemedicine
4. Getting to Know the Patient at Home: Adapting Components of Home Health Visits to Inform Personalized Telemedicine
5. Limitations of Telemedicine to Provide Personalized Care
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- What is Telehealth? Available online: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.18.0268 (accessed on 29 December 2020).
- Baum, A.; Kaboli, P.J.; Schwartz, M.D. Reduced In-Person and Increased Telehealth Outpatient Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ann. Intern. Med. 2021, 174, 129–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziegelstein, R.C. Personomics: The Missing Link in the Evolution from Precision Medicine to Personalized Medicine. J. Pers. Med. 2017, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boling, P.A.; Leff, B. Comprehensive longitudinal health care in the home for high-cost beneficiaries: A critical strategy for population health management. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2014, 62, 1974–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, M.; Waller, M.; Pandya, A.; Portnoy, J. A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020, 20, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orlando, J.F.; Beard, M.; Kumar, S. Systematic review of patient and caregivers’ satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patients’ health. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0221848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mustafa, S.S.; Vadamalai, K.; Ramsey, A. Patient Satisfaction with In-Person, Video, and Telephone Allergy/Immunology Evaluations during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pr. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mojdehbakhsh, R.P.; Rose, S.; Peterson, M.; Rice, L.; Spencer, R. A quality improvement pathway to rapidly increase telemedicine services in a gynecologic oncology clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic with patient satisfaction scores and environmental impact. Gynecol. Oncol. Rep. 2021, 36, 100708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riley, P.E.; Fischer, J.L.; Nagy, R.E.; Watson, N.L.; McCoul, E.D.; Tolisano, A.M.; Riley, C.A. Patient and Provider Satisfaction With Telemedicine in Otolaryngology. OTO Open 2021, 5, 2473974–20981838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harkey, L.C.; Jung, S.M.; Newton, E.R.; Patterson, A. Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth in Rural Settings: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Telerehabilitation 2020, 12, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirby, D.J.; Fried, J.W.; Buchalter, D.B.; Moses, M.J.; Hurly, E.T.; Cardone, D.A.; Yang, S.S.; Virk, M.S.; Rokito, A.S.; Jazrawi, L.M.; et al. Patient and Physician Satisfaction with Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Sports Medicine Perspective. Telemed. e-Health 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sabbagh, R.; Shah, N.; Jenkins, S.; Macdonald, J.; Foote, A.; Matar, R.; Steffensmeier, A.; Grawe, B. The COVID-19 pandemic and follow-up for shoulder surgery: The impact of a shift toward telemedicine on validated patient-reported outcomes. J. Telemed. Telecare 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Appleman, E.R.; O’Connor, M.K.; Boucher, S.J.; Rostami, R.; Sullivan, S.K.; Migliorini, R.; Kraft, M. Teleneuropsychology clinic development and patient satisfaction. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2021, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sathiyakumar, V.; Apfeld, J.C.; Obremskey, W.T.; Thakore, R.V.; Sethi, M.K. Prospective randomized controlled trial using telemedicine for follow-ups in an orthopedic trauma population: A pilot study. J. Orthop. Trauma 2015, 29, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, P.J.; Jay, G.M.; Kalpakjian, C.; Andrews, C.; Smith, S. Patient and Provider-Reported Satisfaction of Cancer Rehabilitation Telemedicine Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic; PM&R: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Champion, A.; Congiusta, A.; Yagnik, A. Comparison of patient satisfaction measures between in-person and telemedicine postoperative appointments following third molar surgery. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Erben, Y.; Franco-Mesa, C.; Hamid, O.; Lin, M.; Stone, W.; Meltzer, A.J.; Hattery, W.; Palaj, A.; Wilshusen, L.L.; Vista, T.; et al. Telemedicine In Vascular Surgery During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic—A Multi-Site Healthcare System Experience. J. Vasc. Surg 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shaverdian, N.; Gillespie, E.F.; Cha, E.; Kim, S.Y.; Benvengo, S.; Chino, F.; Kang, J.J.; Li, Y.; Atkinson, T.M.; Lee, N.; et al. Impact of Telemedicine on Patient Satisfaction and Perceptions of Care Quality in Radiation Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2021, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Polinski, J.M.; Barker, T.; Gagliano, N.; Sussman, A.; Brennan, T.A.; Shrank, W.H. Patients’ Satisfaction with and Preference for Telehealth Visits. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2016, 31, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Elliott, T.; Tong, I.; Sheridan, A.; Lown, B.A. Beyond Convenience: Patients’ Perceptions of Physician Interactional Skills and Compassion via Telemedicine. Mayo Clin. Proc. Innov. Qual. Outcomes 2020, 4, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simpson, S.; Bell, L.; Knox, J.; Mitchell, D. Therapy via videoconferencing: A route to client empowerment? Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 2005, 12, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grindlay, K.; Lane, K.; Grossman, D. Women’s and providers’ experiences with medical abortion provided through telemedicine: A qualitative study. Womens Health Issues 2013, 23, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siminerio, L.; Ruppert, K.; Huber, K.; Toledo, F.G.S. Telemedicine for Reach, Education, Access, and Treatment (TREAT): Linking telemedicine with diabetes self-management education to improve care in rural communities. Diabetes Educ. 2014, 40, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roter, D. The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship. Patient Educ. Couns. 2000, 39, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, A.; Hoppe, R.B. “Best practice” for patient-centered communication: A narrative review. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 2013, 5, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zolnierek, K.B.H.; Dimatteo, M.R. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: A meta-analysis. Med. Care 2009, 47, 826–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Stewart, M.; Brown, J.B.; Donner, A.; McWhinney, I.R.; Oates, J.; Weston, W.W.; Jordan, J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J. Fam. Pract. 2000, 49, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- The Internal Medicine Milestone Project: A Joint Initiative of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Internal Medicine. Available online: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/InternalMedicineMilestones.pdf (accessed on 6 November 2020).
- New and Emerging Areas in Medicine Series: Telehealth Competencies. Available online: https://www.aamc.org/system/files/2020-09/hca-telehealthcollection-telehealth-competencies.pdf (accessed on 6 November 2020).
- Hashim, M.J. Patient-Centered Communication: Basic Skills. Am. Fam. Physician 2017, 95, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
- Hanyok, L.A.; Hellmann, D.B.; Rand, C.; Ziegelstein, R.C. Practicing patient-centered care: The questions clinically excellent physicians use to get to know their patients as individuals. Patient 2012, 5, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zulman, D.M.; Haverfield, M.C.; Shaw, J.G.; Brown-Johnson, C.G.; Schwartz, R.; Tierney, A.A.; Zionts, D.L.; Safaeinili, N.; Fischer, M.; Thadaney Israni, S.; et al. Practices to Foster Physician Presence and Connection With Patients in the Clinical Encounter. JAMA 2020, 323, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prince-Paul, M.; Kelley, C. Mindful Communication: Being Present. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 2017, 33, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unwin, B.K.; Tatum, P.E. House Calls. American Fam. Physician 2011, 83, 925–931. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, G.; Gibbons, R. House calls to the elderly—A vanishing practice among physicians. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 337, 1815–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Thomas, J.; Zimmer, R.; Cleveland, M.; Hayashi, J.L.; Colburn, J.L. Ten Things Every Geriatrician Should Know About House Calls. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2018, 67, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hamrick, I. More house calls by fewer physicians. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2012, 25, 759–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sairenji, T.; Wilson, S.A.; D’Amico, F.; Peterson, L.E. Training Family Medicine Residents to Perform Home Visits: A CERA Survey. J. Grad. Med Educ. 2017, 9, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tschudy, M.M.; Pak-Gorstein, S.; Serwint, J.R. Home visitation by pediatric residents—Perspectives from two pediatric training programs. Acad. Pediatr. 2012, 12, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Geriatric Medicine. Available online: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/125_GeriatricMedicine_2020.pdf?ver=2020-06-23-055053-010 (accessed on 9 January 2021).
- Ratanawongsa, N.; Rand, C.S.; Magill, C.F.; Hayashi, J.; Brandt, L.; Christmas, C.; Record, J.D.; Howell, E.E.; Federowicz, M.A.; Hellmann, D.B.; et al. Teaching residents to know their patients as individuals. The Aliki Initiative at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center. Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha-Honor Med Soc. 2009, 72, 4–11. [Google Scholar]
- Record, J.D.; Rand, C.; Christmas, C.; Hanyok, L.; Federowicz, M.; Bilderback, A.; Patel, A.; Khajuria, S.; Hellmann, D.B.; Ziegelstein, R.C. Reducing heart failure readmissions by teaching patient-centered care to internal medicine residents. Arch. Intern. Med. 2011, 171, 858–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hanyok, L.A.; Brandt, L.E.; Christmas, C.; Hellmann, D.B.; Rand, C.S.; Ratanawongsa, N.; Record, J.; Ziegelstein, R.C. The Johns Hopkins Aliki Initiative: A Patient-Centered Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents. MedEdPORTAL 2012, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanyok, L.A.; Record, J.D.; Christmas, C.; Hellmann David, B.; Rand Cynthia, S.; Ziegelstein Roy, C. Update on the Aliki Initiative at year 10: Changing the culture of medicine to know our patients as individuals. Pharos 2018, 28–34. [Google Scholar]
- Christmas, C.; Dunning, K.; Hanyok, L.A.; Ziegelstein, R.C.; Rand, C.S.; Record, J.D. Effects on Physician Practice After Exposure to a Patient-Centered Care Curriculum During Residency. J. Grad Med. Educ. 2020, 12, 705–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moo, L.R. Home Video Visits: Two-Dimensional View of the Geriatric 5 M’s. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2020, 68, 2425–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kojima, N.; Klausner, J.D. Virtual House Calls: Telemedicine and Reforming the Health Care Delivery Model with Strategies Implemented in a Novel Coronavirus Pandemic. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2020, 35, 2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robb, J.F.; Hyland, M.H.; Goodman, A.D. Comparison of telemedicine versus in-person visits for persons with multiple sclerosis: A randomized crossover study of feasibility, cost, and satisfaction. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2019, 36, 101258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hogan, J.; Boykin, D.; Schneck, C.D.; Ecker, A.H.; Fletcher, T.L.; Lindsay, J.A.; Shore, J.H. Clinical Lessons from Virtual House Calls in Mental Health: The Doctor Is in the House. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. 2019, 42, 575–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, C.A.; Beran, D.B.; Biglan, K.M.; Boyd, C.M.; Dorsey, E.R.; Schmidt, P.N.; Simone, R.; Willis, A.W.; Galifianakis, N.B.; Katz, M.; et al. National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for Parkinson disease. Neurology 2017, 89, 1152–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tinetti, M.; Huang, A.; Molnar, F. The Geriatrics 5M’s: A New Way of Communicating What We Do. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2017, 65, 2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hayashi, J.L.; Ripp, J.; Colburn, J.L. Geriatric Home-Based Medical Care: Principles and Practice. In How to Perform a House Call; Hayashi, J.L., Leff, B., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 57–62. [Google Scholar]
- Kelly, S.A.; Schesing, K.B.; Thibodeau, J.T.; Ayers, C.R.; Drazner, M.H. Feasibility of Remote Video Assessment of Jugular Venous Pressure and Implications for Telehealth. AMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eberly, L.A.; Kallan, M.J.; Julien, H.M.; Haynes, N.; Khatana, S.A.M.; Nathan, A.S.; Snider, C.; Chokshi, N.P.; Eneanya, N.D.; Takvorian, S.U.; et al. Patient Characteristics Associated With Telemedicine Access for Primary and Specialty Ambulatory Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2031640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uscher-Pines, L.; Mehrotra, A. Analysis of Teladoc use seems to indicate expanded access to care for patients without prior connection to a provider. Health Aff. Proj. Hope 2014, 33, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ryan, C. Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2016. Available online: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2018/acs/acs-39.html (accessed on 6 November 2020).
- Anderson, M.; Perrin, A.; Jiang, J.; Kumar, M. 10% of Americans don’t use the internet. Who are they? Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/22/some-americans-dont-use-the-internet-who-are-they/ (accessed on 6 November 2020).
- Barriers to Telehealth in Rural Areas. Available online: https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/toolkits/telehealth/1/barriers (accessed on 9 January 2021).
Benefits for Patients | Benefits for Clinicians |
---|---|
No travel required
| No travel required
|
Can be done anywhere there is internet/phone connection within licensing limits of the physician Home environment usually a more comfortable setting for the patient | Opportunity to learn about patient’s home environment
|
May increase access to medical care despite geographically remote locations and/or shortage of physicians in area | Opportunity to review medication organization and reconcile discrepancies, nutrition patterns in home environment |
Reduce risk of exposure to infection in waiting room and office | Reduce risk of exposure to infection |
When feeling known as a person, potential for increased trust in clinician and satisfaction with medical care | Potential for increased sense of satisfaction with work when learning more about patient as a person |
Strategies to Provide Personalized Telemedicine: Patient-Centered Communication Skills | |
---|---|
Planning participants | Ask patient whether they would like to involve a family member, caregiver, or other person in their support network in the telemedicine visit. |
Opening the visit | Begin with introductions if the patient is involving another person in the visit. Build rapport by opening with brief non-medical conversation that could explore patient’s life at home. |
Elicit the patient’s perspective | Shared agenda-setting History gathering: Prompt the patient to describe how their symptoms have impacted their daily life and consider an opportunity to use the video visit to share visual examples of this, where applicable. Shared decision-making |
Show evidence of active listening | Be fully present. Minimize distractions in the environment. Use nonverbal communication such as nodding and facial expressions that convey empathy. Notice and follow up on patient’s emotional cues. |
Domain | Office Visit | Telemedicine Visit |
---|---|---|
Assessing patient’s self-management | Patient or caregiver report; review medication adherence by memory or list | Patient can show their organization system; can demonstrate use of inhalers or other medical devices |
Involving family/caregivers | If a family member/caregiver accompanies patient to office, they may participate in the office visit or stay in waiting room. Family members living far away may not be able to participate. | Potential to involve more care partners in more visits, even individuals at distant sites. |
Home environment | Limited, indirect information about level of organization in home, safety of home environment | Potential for visualizing much of the home environment for level of organization and safety |
Coordination of care and co-management | Single physician–patient dyad at one visit | Potential for more than one physician on patient’s care team to join all or part of the same telemedicine visit (e.g., primary care provider and specialist) |
Time and convenience | Time and convenience favors physician/care team | Potential for favorable time and convenience benefits for both physician and patient, when the patient is comfortable with the telemedicine modality and has access |
Physical examination | Opportunity for complete, in-person examination | Limited visual assessment; some maneuvers may be assessed with involvement of patient and caregiver |
Nonverbal communication | Can be facilitated by in-person environment | Can be limited somewhat by video conference modality |
Patient Access | Transportation, and insurance coverage vs. sliding scale payment model | Requires access to a device and internet connection |
Potential Limitation of Telemedicine | Potential Solutions | Examples from the Authors’ Practices |
---|---|---|
Potential challenges in building the patient–clinician relationship, due to physical distance and related barriers to non-verbal communication | Use strategies as above to build rapport through non-medical conversation that explores patient’s life at home and refers to the setting visible in the patient’s environment during telemedicine visit. Select an in-person office visit as the modality for some future appointments if feasible. | A 65-year-old man was seen for an initial telemedicine visit and began noting, “I can see that a virtual visit might be alright if I had a very specific issue but how can this be good for a general appointment?” The clinician spent the first few minutes of the visit asking general questions about the patient’s life [31] while taking advantage of the video home visit to ask the patient the walk around the house and illustrate certain things in the narrative (e.g., his home office, his dog, his woodwork). This helped the patient feel that the clinician was interested in knowing him as a person. At the end of the visit, the patient commented, “I really felt like you got to know me better than on any of my in-person visits with other doctors.” |
Physical examination limited | Engage a caregiver or family member in assisting with some maneuvers, such as demonstrations of motor strength, gait, and musculoskeletal examination. Leverage use of remote monitoring technologies, such as a blood pressure monitoring device, thermometer, pulse oximeter, scale, glucometer, and smartphone-enabled personal electrocardiogram. Physical assessments by members of interprofessional home care teams, with home visits by a nurse, physical therapist, occupational therapist, or other team member | An 86-year-old woman with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease noted mild dyspnea during a follow-up telemedicine visit. She noted no orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. The remote video-assisted physical examination showed no lower extremity edema and examination of the jugular veins showed no distention [53], making volume overload unlikely and guiding the appropriate treatment. |
Potential for limited access to telemedicine, due to financial barriers, geographic barriers, lack of familiarity or access to technology, or other reasons | Telephone visits In-person office visits Home visits | A 59-year-old woman lives in an area without good internet connection. Attempts at videoconferencing proved challenging, so visits were by telephone. The patient reported palpitations, and the history suggested that this symptom was related to anxiety and stress, exacerbated recently by the pandemic and national political events. The clinician recommended that she purchase a smartphone-enabled personal electrocardiogram device and then obtain and send recordings of heart rhythm during episodes of palpitations. These all showed normal sinus rhythm. Subsequent telephone visits were spent discussing stress-reducing techniques which eliminated further episodes. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Record, J.D.; Ziegelstein, R.C.; Christmas, C.; Rand, C.S.; Hanyok, L.A. Delivering Personalized Care at a Distance: How Telemedicine Can Foster Getting to Know the Patient as a Person. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11020137
Record JD, Ziegelstein RC, Christmas C, Rand CS, Hanyok LA. Delivering Personalized Care at a Distance: How Telemedicine Can Foster Getting to Know the Patient as a Person. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2021; 11(2):137. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11020137
Chicago/Turabian StyleRecord, Janet D., Roy C. Ziegelstein, Colleen Christmas, Cynthia S. Rand, and Laura A. Hanyok. 2021. "Delivering Personalized Care at a Distance: How Telemedicine Can Foster Getting to Know the Patient as a Person" Journal of Personalized Medicine 11, no. 2: 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11020137
APA StyleRecord, J. D., Ziegelstein, R. C., Christmas, C., Rand, C. S., & Hanyok, L. A. (2021). Delivering Personalized Care at a Distance: How Telemedicine Can Foster Getting to Know the Patient as a Person. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11020137