Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Physical Health, Mental Health, and Disability Comorbidities among Women Living with HIV in Canada
Next Article in Special Issue
Characteristics of Patients with Unrecognized Sleep Apnea Requiring Postoperative Oxygen Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Pharmacological Efficacy of Probiotics in Respiratory Viral Infections: A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Initiation Timing of Continuous Interscalene Brachial Plexus Blocks in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Before-and-After Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models

1
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul 04564, Korea
2
Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea
3
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This work was presented in part as J.H.P.’s Ph.D. Thesis at the University of Ulsan College of Medicine (2022).
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(8), 1293; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081293
Submission received: 22 June 2022 / Revised: 30 July 2022 / Accepted: 4 August 2022 / Published: 6 August 2022

Abstract

Severe burns may lead to a series of pathophysiological processes that result in death. Machine learning models that demonstrate prognostic performance can be used to build analytical models to predict postoperative mortality. This study aimed to identify machine learning models with the best diagnostic performance for predicting mortality in critically ill burn patients after burn surgery, and then compare them. Clinically important features for predicting mortality in patients after burn surgery were selected using a random forest (RF) regressor. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and classifier accuracy were evaluated to compare the predictive accuracy of different machine learning algorithms, including RF, adaptive boosting, decision tree, linear support vector machine, and logistic regression. A total of 731 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The 90-day mortality of the critically ill burn patients after burn surgery was 27.1% (198/731). RF showed the highest AUC (0.922, 95% confidence interval = 0.902–0.942) among the models, with sensitivity and specificity of 66.2% and 93.8%, respectively. The most significant predictors for mortality after burn surgery as per machine learning models were total body surface area burned, red cell distribution width, and age. The RF algorithm showed the best performance for predicting mortality.
Keywords: burn; mortality; machine learning burn; mortality; machine learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, J.H.; Cho, Y.; Shin, D.; Choi, S.-S. Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081293

AMA Style

Park JH, Cho Y, Shin D, Choi S-S. Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(8):1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081293

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Ji Hyun, Yongwon Cho, Donghyeok Shin, and Seong-Soo Choi. 2022. "Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 8: 1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081293

APA Style

Park, J. H., Cho, Y., Shin, D., & Choi, S.-S. (2022). Prediction of Mortality after Burn Surgery in Critically Ill Burn Patients Using Machine Learning Models. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(8), 1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081293

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop