Next Article in Journal
Laboratory Findings and Clinical Outcomes of ICU-admitted COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Assessment of Particularities Identified among Romanian Minorities
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Hemorrhagic Transformation in the Treatment of Stroke with Tissue Plasminogen Activator
Previous Article in Journal
Anesthetic Technique and Functional Outcomes in Modified Montgomery Thyroplasty
Previous Article in Special Issue
MERRF Mutation A8344G in a Four-Generation Family without Central Nervous System Involvement: Clinical and Molecular Characterization
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JPM
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/jpm13020192
jpm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Association between Electronegative Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol L5 and Cognitive Functions in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment

by
Ping-Song Chou
1,2,3,4,
Sharon Chia-Ju Chen
5,6,
Chung-Yao Hsu
1,2,4,
Li-Min Liou
1,2,
Chi-Hung Juan
7,8 and
Chiou-Lian Lai
1,2,4,*
1
Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan
2
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807377, Taiwan
3
Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807377, Taiwan
4
Neuroscience Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807377, Taiwan
5
Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807377, Taiwan
6
Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan
7
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, National Central University, Taoyuan City 320317, Taiwan
8
Cognitive Intelligence and Precision Healthcare Research Center, National Central University, Taoyuan City 320317, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(2), 192; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020192
Submission received: 30 November 2022 / Revised: 17 January 2023 / Accepted: 19 January 2023 / Published: 21 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurological Diseases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Practice)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
L5, the most electronegative subfraction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), may play a role in the pathogenesis of cerebrovascular dysfunction and neurodegeneration. We hypothesized that serum L5 is associated with cognitive impairment and investigated the association between serum L5 levels and cognitive performance in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This cross-sectional study conducted in Taiwan included 22 patients with MCI and 40 older people with normal cognition (healthy controls). All participants were assessed with the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) and a CASI-estimated Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-CE). We compared the serum total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, and L5 levels between the MCI and control groups and examined the association between lipid profiles and cognitive performance in these groups. The serum L5 concentration and total CASI scores were significantly negatively correlated in the MCI group. Serum L5% was negatively correlated with MMSE-CE and total CASI scores, particularly in the orientation and language subdomains. No significant correlation between the serum L5 level and cognitive performance was noted in the control group. Conclusions: Serum L5, instead of TC or total LDL-C, could be associated with cognitive impairment through a disease stage-dependent mode that occurs during neurodegeneration.

1. Introduction

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an intermediate stage between normal cognitive aging and dementia. MCI refers to cognitive impairment that is more severe than normal aging but does not meet the criteria for dementia. Moreover, MCI is a heterogeneous state. Although all MCI criteria include a quantifiable deficit in cognitive function in at least one domain and the absence of dementia or impaired basic daily function [1], the criteria and subtypes of MCI remain controversial in terms of the aspects of the construct. Furthermore, patients with MCI are three times more likely to develop dementia in 2–5 years compared with age-matched controls [2]. Therefore, identifying biomarkers associated with cognitive performance in patients with MCI is essential.
The brain contains approximately 25% of the cholesterol present in the entire body [3], and cholesterol is critical for maintaining the neuronal myelin membrane, acting as a cofactor for signaling molecules, and developing neuronal plasticity [4]. Furthermore, impaired cholesterol metabolism can affect the modulation of amyloid β (Aβ) and tau hyperphosphorylation, which contribute to neurodegeneration [5].
Decreased cholesterol levels have been reported to promote amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing to a nonamyloidogenic pathway by inhibiting the β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) and γ-secretase [6,7]. In addition, low cholesterol could decrease the lipid raft in the plasma membrane and then contribute to the localization of ADAM10, which is the major α-secretase enzyme for the proteolytic cleavage of the APP. Cholesterol depletion resulted in the increased α-secretase activity of ADAM10 and the increased nonamyloidogenic α-secretase cleavage of APPs on the cell surface [8]. By contrast, increased cholesterol in the brain tissue could promote BACE1 and γ-secretase activity and increase Aβ42 secretion [9,10]. Both β- and γ-secretases reside in the cholesterol-rich lipid rafts of the plasma membrane, and APPs localizing to the cholesterol-rich membrane domain facilitate β-cleavage and generate Aβ [5,11]. Studies using animal models have reported that high cholesterol could contribute to the upregulation of BACE1 and the downregulation of ADAM10 transcription, which suggests the increased release of Aβ from APP [12].
In addition to the generation of Aβ, studies have suggested that cholesterol may be involved in the aggregation of Aβ and may mediate the neural toxicity of Aβ. Cholesterol modulates lipid rafts by contributing to the formation of GM1 on the membrane, which is the major ganglioside. GM1 binds to Aβ and promotes the aggregation of Aβ in the microdomain enriched with cholesterol [5]. Moreover, increasing membrane cholesterol can induce cytotoxicity and neurodegeneration by activating Aβ-induced calcium signaling [13].
However, previous studies have reported conflicting results on the relationship between blood total cholesterol (TC) levels and cognitive impairment: the effect of cholesterol on cognition is strongly dependent on age [14] and possibly modified by vascular risk factors [15] and cholesterol subfractions [16].
High serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were associated with faster global cognitive decline in older Chinese people without dementia [17]. However, the component of LDL-C that contributes to cognitive impairment remains to be determined. In 1988, a research group led by Avogaro first separated LDL-C into electropositive and electronegative fractions through ion exchange chromatography [18]. In 2003, using anion exchange chromatography, Yang and Chen et al. divided LDL-C into five subfractions, L1–L5, with increasing electronegativity [19,20]. L5, the most electronegative LDL-C subfraction, plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. L5 causes microglial activation and produces neuroinflammatory stress [21]. Furthermore, L5 induces neurotoxic stress and impairs neuronal differentiation [22]. Therefore, we hypothesized that L5 probably contributes to neurodegenerative disorders by enhancing neuroinflammation and producing neurotoxic effects. However, the evidence for an association between L5 and neurodegenerative diseases is not well-established.
In this study, we hypothesized that L5 contributes to cognitive impairment and examined whether L5 is associated with cognitive performance in patients with MCI.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Taiwan. Patients aged >60 years who received a new diagnosis of MCI were enrolled and followed up at neurological clinics at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital. Age-compatible, healthy older adults were recruited as normal controls from the general population. All participants were required to have a minimum education level of >6 years and be right-handed, as determined by the Edinburgh inventory. All participants underwent a medical history evaluation, physical and neurological examinations, laboratory blood tests, and cognitive assessments.
The diagnosis of MCI by a neurologist was based on the presence of cognitive impairment, as evidenced by an objectively measured decline and a subjective self-report of decline in normal activities of daily living [23]. The exclusion criteria included a history of prior stroke, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, brain tumors, parkinsonism, major neuropsychiatric disorders, substance abuse, or receiving any cognition-enhancing treatment.

2.2. Cognitive Evaluation

A well-trained psychologist administered the Chinese version of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI), a comprehensive cognitive assessment, to all the participants [24]. The raters of the CASI were blinded to the results of the lipid profiles.
The nine cognitive domains of the CASI include short-term memory, long-term memory, attention, concentration, orientation, constructional praxis, abstraction and judgment, category fluency, and language ability. The maximum score of the CASI is 100, with a high score indicating better cognition. Each participant’s total CASI score and performance across the nine domains was determined. A CASI-estimated Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (MMSE-CE) was recorded because some of the CASI items could be converted to match the MMSE score [25].

2.3. Lipid Profiles and Subfractions of LDL-C

All the participants were asked to fast for at least 8 h before blood sampling and were determined to have no acute illness. Venous blood samples were collected from all participants. Each participant’s LDL-C was extracted according to its density gradient (1.019 to 1.063 g/mL) through sequential potassium bromide density centrifugation, and each LDL-C sample was treated with 5 mmol/L of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid to prevent it from ex vivo oxidation. Then, the LDL-C samples were separated into subfractions L1–L5 against a salt gradient using the UNO Q12 anion-exchange column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Berkeley, CA, USA) with the ÄKTA fast protein liquid chromatography system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Samples with an L1 to L5 subfraction were collected, concentrated, and desterilized according to a method previously described in detail [26].

2.4. Apolipoprotein E Genotype

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral venous blood leukocytes using QIAamp DNA Blood Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Exon 4 of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene was assessed using the custom TaqMan probes designed by Applied Biosystems with a real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA fragments were visualized via exposure to ultraviolet illumination (MiniGel1500, Sage Creation, China). Only the patients with 1 or 2 copies of the APOE-ɛ4 allele were considered APOE-ɛ4-positive.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

We examined the differences in the demographic data, lipid profiles, L5 concentration, L5 percentage of LDL-C (L5%), and CASI and MMSE-CE scores between the MCI and control groups using Student’s t-test, which was followed by an analysis of the homogeneity of variance between groups using Levene’s test for continuous variables and the chi-squared test for categorical variables.
To analyze the association between the electronegative LDL-C and cognitive performance, Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the correlation between L5, L5%, CASI, and MMSE-CE scores. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (IBM SPSS 19.0, Illinois, USA). All statistical tests were two-tailed, and an alpha value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

2.6. Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUHIRB-20130123) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki for experiments involving humans. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

3. Results

The sample size was estimated to be 128 participants in total, split between patients with MCI and people with normal cognition (controls). However, due to the difficulty of analyzing the L5 subfraction, blood samples from a total of 22 patients with MCI and 40 controls were analyzed in this study. The demographic data, cognitive assessment, and lipid profiles of the participants are presented in Table 1. The mean age of the participants in the MCI group was 66.6 ± 7.0 years, and 36.4% of them were men. The mean age of the participants in the control group was 64.6 ± 5.2 years, and 22.5% of them were men. The prevalence of APOE-ɛ4 carriers was 54.5% and 65.0% in the MCI and control groups, respectively. The results of the Student’s t-test and the chi-squared test revealed no significant differences in age, sex, the prevalence of APOE-ɛ4 carriers and cardiovascular risk factors between the groups, indicating no sample selection bias in the demographic data between the groups.
The MCI group had a significantly lower education level (10.5 ± 3.6 vs. 13.3 ± 3.6 years, p = 0.005), CASI score (86.4 ± 5.0 vs. 93.3 ± 3.0, p < 0.001), and MMSE-CE score (25.4 ± 2.6 vs. 28.4 ± 1.2, p < 0.001) than the control group. Among the subdomains of the CASI, the MCI group had a significantly worse performance in short-term memory, concentration, abstraction, language ability, and category fluency than the control group (Table 1).
In terms of lipid profiles, no significant differences in TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, or L5 concentrations and L5% were noted between the groups. The post hoc power analysis was 0.457 for comparing L5 concentrations between the MCI and control groups. Using the cut-off value for hyperlipidemia or coronary artery disease [27] of L5 concentrations <1.7 mg/dL and L5% <1.6%, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of individuals with L5 concentrations ≥1.7 mg/dL and L5% ≥1.6% between the groups (Table 2).
In the comparison of demographic characteristics and cognitive performance stratified by the normal range of the L5 concentration and L5% in the control and MCI groups, there was no significant difference in age, sex, education level, MMSE-CE score, or CASI score. In the comparison of the subdomains of the CASI, individuals with L5 ≥ 1.7 mg/dL or L5% ≥ 1.6% in the MCI group had a significantly worse performance in language ability (Table 3). By contrast, L5 ≥ 1.7 mg/dL and L5% ≥ 1.6% were not associated with performance in the subdomains of the CASI in the control group.
No significant correlation was observed between the serum TC and LDL-C and cognitive performance (CASI, MMSE-CE, and subdomains of the CASI) in the MCI and control groups (Table 4). However, a significant negative correlation between the serum L5 concentration and total CASI score was noted in the MCI group (Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) = −0.431, p = 0.045), particularly in the subdomain of language ability (r = −0.438, p = 0.042). In the MCI group, serum L5% was negatively correlated with the MMSE-CE score (r = −0.434, p = 0.044) and the total CASI score (r = −0.484, p = 0.023), particularly in the subdomains of orientation (r = −0.470, p = 0.027) and language ability (r = −0.533, p = 0.011; Table 4). No significant correlation between the serum L5 concentration and L5% and cognitive performance was observed in the control group.

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical study investigating the association between the electronegative L5 and cognitive function in patients with MCI and older people with normal cognition. The results revealed that L5, but not TC or LDL-C, was associated with impaired global cognitive function, orientation, and language in patients with MCI but not in older people with normal cognition. The range of L5 and L5% levels previously used to predict patients with hyperlipidemia or coronary artery disease could be applicable in predicting the language ability of patients with MCI.
The LDL-C level was reported to be an independent predictor of preclinical cognitive impairment in a study using cognitive event-related potentials [28]. In patients with subjective cognitive decline, high LDL-C levels were associated with cognitive deterioration [29]. A meta-analysis indicated that TC could be a predictive biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) or cognitive decline in later life, and an elevated LDL-C concentration ( > 121 mg/dL) may be a risk factor for AD, particularly in patients aged 60–70 years old [30,31]. Thus, LDL-C plays a stage-dependent role in the clinical progression from cognitive impairment to AD.
However, community-based cross-sectional studies conducted in China have indicated that a slightly higher LDL-C level is positively correlated with cognitive performance [32] and inversely associated with dementia in people aged ≥50 years old [33]. Furthermore, a prospective follow-up study demonstrated that LDL-C was inversely associated with incident dementia and incident AD in individuals without dementia and vascular risk factors at baseline [15].
A plausible explanation for the conflicting effects of LDL-C on cognition is that the effect of LDL-C on cognition is modified by electronegative LDL-C instead of the effect of TC or LDL-C. Notably, L5, the most electronegative LDL-C fraction in human serum, exhibits atherogenic properties [34]. Not only can atherogenic L5 cause amyloid-mediated platelet activation, platelet aggregation, and hemostasis, but it is also a risk factor for cerebral atherothrombosis [35]. Therefore, L5 contributes to cognitive impairment by causing cerebrovascular dysfunction [36]. In addition, L5 creates neuroinflammatory and neurotoxic stress, impairs neuronal viability and differentiation, and contributes to neurodegenerative diseases [21,22]. Instead of TC or LDL-C, L5 could play a key role in the pathogenesis of cognitive impairment due to neurodegeneration.
Our results support the hypothesis that L5 is involved in cognitive impairment in neurodegeneration. In patients with MCI, serum L5 levels were inversely correlated with cognitive performance, but this relationship was not significant in the controls. Therefore, the stage of progression during neurodegenerative diseases may be related to the effect of L5 on cognitive impairment. In addition, among the cognitive subdomains, serum L5 levels were highly correlated with orientation and language functions in patients with MCI. However, the mechanism of the association between L5 and orientation and language function is currently unclear. Further studies using functional neuroimaging or electroencephalogram analysis could be conducted to evaluate the susceptibility between brain regions in relation to the L5 level.
The study provides new clinical evidence for the association between electronegative L5 and cognitive function during neurodegeneration. However, when the cut-off value for cardiovascular diseases was validated in cognitive impairment, the MCI group was indistinguishable from the control groups. Due to the cuff-off value being developed for evaluating the risk of cardiovascular disease, the inapplicability of the cut-off value for cognitive function could imply that vascular pathology does not contribute to the association between L5 and cognition. On the other hand, according to Wang and colleagues’ previous reports [21,22], L5 probably contributes to cognitive impairment by enhancing neuroinflammation and producing neurotoxic effects. The cut-off value was associated with language ability in the MCI group. As a result, the cut-off value for cardiovascular diseases cannot be used to distinguish between people with normal cognition and those with MCI, but it can be used by clinical physicians to focus on evaluating and treating language function in MCI patients.
Another significant concern raised by our study findings is whether new therapeutic strategies targeting L5 are appropriate for patients with MCI. Treatments with statins for hyperlipidemia [37,38] and with pioglitazone [39], acarbose [40], and insulin [41] for diabetes have been reported to reduce the serum electronegative LDL-C levels through their effects that cause LDL-C modification, decreased systemic inflammation, and glycemic optimization. Therefore, prospective studies with long-term follow-ups are needed to examine the therapeutic potential of L5 in MCI.
This study has some limitations. First, the study had a relatively small sample size. Because the homogeneity of the variance test was not significant, and the demographic data did not significantly differ between the MCI and control groups, the results indicated no bias in the sample selection. However, the inadequate statistical power might have underestimated the effect of L5 on cognitive function. Second, MCI is a heterogeneous state with a multifactorial composition. Although neuroimaging was not conducted for the participants in this study, the MCI diagnoses were determined by a neurologist and were based on clinical symptoms, neurological examinations, laboratory blood tests, and cognitive assessments. Additionally, patients with a history of central nervous system problems and neuropsychiatric disorders were excluded; hence, neurodegenerative MCI was the focus of our study. Third, family histories of metabolic syndromes, cardiovascular diseases, or dementia and the types of medications used for hyperlipidemia and the underlying diseases were not recorded in this study. Due to the fact that there was no significant difference in the prevalence of hyperlipidemia under treatment between the MCI and control groups, the effect of the statin treatment may have been balanced between the MCI and control groups in this study. Fourth, given that the study was cross-sectional in design, the causal relationship between L5 and cognitive impairment could not be determined. To address these issues, additional longitudinal studies are needed to identify and confirm the long-term effects and therapeutic effects of L5 on cognitive impairment in patients with MCI.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that serum electronegative L5, instead of TC or total LDL-C, may be associated with cognitive impairment through a disease stage-dependent mode that occurs during neurodegeneration. Furthermore, this study serves as a pilot study for future prospective research with larger sample sizes to investigate whether L5 could be a predictor and a therapeutic target for clinical progression in patients with MCI, particularly in terms of the loss of language abilities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.-M.L., C.-H.J. and C.-L.L.; data curation, P.-S.C. and S.C.-J.C.; formal analysis, P.-S.C. and S.C.-J.C.; funding acquisition, C.-L.L.; investigation, C.-Y.H., L.-M.L. and C.-L.L.; methodology, L.-M.L. and C.-L.L.; project administration, C.-L.L.; resources, C.-L.L.; software, P.-S.C. and S.C.-J.C.; supervision, C.-H.J. and C.-L.L.; validation, C.-Y.H., C.-H.J. and C.-L.L.; visualization, C.-L.L.; writing—original draft, P.-S.C.; writing—review and editing, C.-Y.H., C.-H.J. and C.-L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST103-2314-B-037-028).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (protocol code: KMUHIRB-20130123; date of approval: 2014/01/10).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jongsiriyanyong, S.; Limpawattana, P. Mild Cognitive Impairment in Clinical Practice: A Review Article. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Demen. 2018, 33, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Petersen, R.C.; Lopez, O.; Armstrong, M.J.; Getchius, T.S.D.; Ganguli, M.; Gloss, D.; Gronseth, G.S.; Marson, D.; Pringsheim, T.; Day, G.S.; et al. Practice guideline update summary: Mild cognitive impairment: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2018, 90, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bjorkhem, I.; Meaney, S. Brain cholesterol: Long secret life behind a barrier. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004, 24, 806–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Pfrieger, F.W. Cholesterol homeostasis and function in neurons of the central nervous system. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2003, 60, 1158–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sun, J.H.; Yu, J.T.; Tan, L. The role of cholesterol metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 51, 947–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grimm, M.O.; Grimm, H.S.; Tomic, I.; Beyreuther, K.; Hartmann, T.; Bergmann, C. Independent inhibition of Alzheimer disease beta- and gamma-secretase cleavage by lowered cholesterol levels. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 11302–11311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Feringa, F.M.; van der Kant, R. Cholesterol and Alzheimer’s Disease; From Risk Genes to Pathological Effects. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021, 13, 690372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kojro, E.; Gimpl, G.; Lammich, S.; Marz, W.; Fahrenholz, F. Low cholesterol stimulates the nonamyloidogenic pathway by its effect on the alpha -secretase ADAM 10. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 5815–5820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Xiong, H.; Callaghan, D.; Jones, A.; Walker, D.G.; Lue, L.F.; Beach, T.G.; Sue, L.I.; Woulfe, J.; Xu, H.; Stanimirovic, D.B.; et al. Cholesterol retention in Alzheimer’s brain is responsible for high beta- and gamma-secretase activities and Abeta production. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008, 29, 422–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Marquer, C.; Laine, J.; Dauphinot, L.; Hanbouch, L.; Lemercier-Neuillet, C.; Pierrot, N.; Bossers, K.; Le, M.; Corlier, F.; Benstaali, C.; et al. Increasing membrane cholesterol of neurons in culture recapitulates Alzheimer’s disease early phenotypes. Mol. Neurodegener. 2014, 9, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ehehalt, R.; Keller, P.; Haass, C.; Thiele, C.; Simons, K. Amyloidogenic processing of the Alzheimer beta-amyloid precursor protein depends on lipid rafts. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sharman, M.J.; Moussavi Nik, S.H.; Chen, M.M.; Ong, D.; Wijaya, L.; Laws, S.M.; Taddei, K.; Newman, M.; Lardelli, M.; Martins, R.N.; et al. The Guinea Pig as a Model for Sporadic Alzheimer’s Disease (AD): The Impact of Cholesterol Intake on Expression of AD-Related Genes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Abramov, A.Y.; Ionov, M.; Pavlov, E.; Duchen, M.R. Membrane cholesterol content plays a key role in the neurotoxicity of beta-amyloid: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Cell 2011, 10, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Van Vliet, P. Cholesterol and late-life cognitive decline. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2012, 30, S147–S162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ding, D.; Zhou, F.; Cao, Y.; Liang, X.; Wu, W.; Xiao, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Deng, W. Cholesterol profiles and incident cognitive decline among older adults: The Shanghai Aging Study. Age Ageing 2021, 50, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Anstey, K.J.; Ashby-Mitchell, K.; Peters, R. Updating the Evidence on the Association between Serum Cholesterol and Risk of Late-Life Dementia: Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2017, 56, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ma, C.; Yin, Z.; Zhu, P.; Luo, J.; Shi, X.; Gao, X. Blood cholesterol in late-life and cognitive decline: A longitudinal study of the Chinese elderly. Mol. Neurodegener. 2017, 12, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Avogaro, P.; Bon, G.B.; Cazzolato, G. Presence of a modified low density lipoprotein in humans. Arteriosclerosis 1988, 8, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Yang, C.Y.; Raya, J.L.; Chen, H.H.; Chen, C.H.; Abe, Y.; Pownall, H.J.; Taylor, A.A.; Smith, C.V. Isolation, characterization, and functional assessment of oxidatively modified subfractions of circulating low-density lipoproteins. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2003, 23, 1083–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chen, C.H.; Jiang, T.; Yang, J.H.; Jiang, W.; Lu, J.; Marathe, G.K.; Pownall, H.J.; Ballantyne, C.M.; McIntyre, T.M.; Henry, P.D.; et al. Low-density lipoprotein in hypercholesterolemic human plasma induces vascular endothelial cell apoptosis by inhibiting fibroblast growth factor 2 transcription. Circulation 2003, 107, 2102–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, L.E.; Lai, C.L.; Lee, C.T.; Wang, J.Y. Highly electronegative low-density lipoprotein L5 evokes microglial activation and creates a neuroinflammatory stress via Toll-like receptor 4 signaling. J. Neurochem. 2017, 142, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, J.Y.; Lai, C.L.; Lee, C.T.; Lin, C.Y. Electronegative Low-Density Lipoprotein L5 Impairs Viability and NGF-Induced Neuronal Differentiation of PC12 Cells via LOX-1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Winblad, B.; Palmer, K.; Kivipelto, M.; Jelic, V.; Fratiglioni, L.; Wahlund, L.O.; Nordberg, A.; Backman, L.; Albert, M.; Almkvist, O.; et al. Mild cognitive impairment--beyond controversies, towards a consensus: Report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J. Intern. Med. 2004, 256, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, H.C.; Chou, P.; Lin, K.N.; Wang, S.J.; Fuh, J.L.; Lin, H.C.; Liu, C.Y.; Wu, G.S.; Larson, E.B.; White, L.R.; et al. Assessing cognitive abilities and dementia in a predominantly illiterate population of older individuals in Kinmen. Psychol. Med. 1994, 24, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Teng, E.L.; Hasegawa, K.; Homma, A.; Imai, Y.; Larson, E.; Graves, A.; Sugimoto, K.; Yamaguchi, T.; Sasaki, H.; Chiu, D.; et al. The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI): A practical test for cross-cultural epidemiological studies of dementia. Int. Psychogeriatr. 1994, 6, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chu, C.S.; Law, S.H.; Lenzen, D.; Tan, Y.H.; Weng, S.F.; Ito, E.; Wu, J.C.; Chen, C.H.; Chan, H.C.; Ke, L.Y. Clinical Significance of Electronegative Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Atherothrombosis. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chu, C.S.; Chan, H.C.; Tsai, M.H.; Stancel, N.; Lee, H.C.; Cheng, K.H.; Tung, Y.C.; Chan, H.C.; Wang, C.Y.; Shin, S.J.; et al. Range of L5 LDL levels in healthy adults and L5’s predictive power in patients with hyperlipidemia or coronary artery disease. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lai, C.L.; Hsu, C.Y.; Liou, L.M.; Hsieh, H.Y.; Hsieh, Y.H.; Liu, C.K. Effect of cholesterol and CYP46 polymorphism on cognitive event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 2011, 48, 1572–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Leeuw, F.A.; Tijms, B.M.; Doorduijn, A.S.; Hendriksen, H.M.A.; van de Rest, O.; de van der Schueren, M.A.E.; Visser, M.; van den Heuvel, E.; van Wijk, N.; Bierau, J.; et al. LDL cholesterol and uridine levels in blood are potential nutritional biomarkers for clinical progression in Alzheimer’s disease: The NUDAD project. Alzheimers Dement. 2020, 12, e12120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tang, Q.; Wang, F.; Yang, J.; Peng, H.; Li, Y.; Li, B.; Wang, S. Revealing a Novel Landscape of the Association Between Blood Lipid Levels and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis of a Case-Control Study. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2019, 11, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, Z.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xu, J.; Lin, J.; Zhang, R.; Kang, K.; Liu, C.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, M. Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2020, 12, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Guo, Y.; Li, P.; Ma, X.; Huang, X.; Liu, Z.; Ren, X.; Yang, Y.; Halm-Lutterodt, N.V.; Yuan, L. Association of Circulating Cholesterol Level with Cognitive Function and Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly: A Community-based Population Study. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2020, 17, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhou, F.; Deng, W.; Ding, D.; Zhao, Q.; Liang, X.; Wang, F.; Luo, J.; Zheng, L.; Guo, Q.; Hong, Z. High Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Inversely Relates to Dementia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The Shanghai Aging Study. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ke, L.Y.; Stancel, N.; Bair, H.; Chen, C.H. The underlying chemistry of electronegative LDL’s atherogenicity. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2014, 16, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shen, M.Y.; Chen, F.Y.; Hsu, J.F.; Fu, R.H.; Chang, C.M.; Chang, C.T.; Liu, C.H.; Wu, J.R.; Lee, A.S.; Chan, H.C.; et al. Plasma L5 levels are elevated in ischemic stroke patients and enhance platelet aggregation. Blood 2016, 127, 1336–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Xie, B.; Shi, X.; Xing, Y.; Tang, Y. Association between atherosclerosis and Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav. 2020, 10, e01601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Sanchez-Quesada, J.L.; Otal-Entraigas, C.; Franco, M.; Jorba, O.; Gonzalez-Sastre, F.; Blanco-Vaca, F.; Ordonez-Llanos, J. Effect of simvastatin treatment on the electronegative low-density lipoprotein present in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Am. J. Cardiol. 1999, 84, 655–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhang, B.; Matsunaga, A.; Rainwater, D.L.; Miura, S.; Noda, K.; Nishikawa, H.; Uehara, Y.; Shirai, K.; Ogawa, M.; Saku, K. Effects of rosuvastatin on electronegative LDL as characterized by capillary isotachophoresis: The ROSARY Study. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, 1832–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Nakano, K.; Hasegawa, G.; Fukui, M.; Yamasaki, M.; Ishihara, K.; Takashima, T.; Kitagawa, Y.; Fujinami, A.; Ohta, M.; Hara, H.; et al. Effect of pioglitazone on various parameters of insulin resistance including lipoprotein subclass according to particle size by a gel-permeation high-performance liquid chromatography in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocr. J. 2010, 57, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hasegawa, G.; Kajiyama, S.; Tanaka, T.; Imai, S.; Kozai, H.; Fujinami, A.; Ohta, M.; Obayashi, H.; Park, H.; Nakano, K.; et al. The alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose reduces the net electronegative charge of low-density lipoprotein in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Clin. Chim. Acta 2008, 390, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sanchez-Quesada, J.L.; Perez, A.; Caixas, A.; Rigla, M.; Payes, A.; Benitez, S.; Ordonez-Llanos, J. Effect of glycemic optimization on electronegative low-density lipoprotein in diabetes: Relation to nonenzymatic glycosylation and oxidative modification. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 86, 3243–3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the MCI and control groups.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the MCI and control groups.
CharacteristicControl (N = 40)MCI (N = 22)p-Value
Age, years, mean (±SD) 164.6 ± 5.266.6 ± 7.00.209
Sex, man, n (%) 29 (22.5%)8 (36.4%)0.242
Education, years, mean (±SD) 113.3 ± 3.610.5 ± 3.60.005 **
MMSE-CE, score, mean (±SD) 128.4 ± 1.225.4 ± 2.6<0.001 **
CASI, score, mean (±SD) 193.3 ± 3.086.4 ± 5.0<0.001 **
LTM10.0 ± 0.210 ± 0.00.160
STM10.2 ± 1.48.0 ± 1.9<0.001 **
ATT7.5 ± 0.87.3 ± 0.80.301
CCT9.7 ± 0.78.4 ± 1.3<0.001 **
ORI18.0 ± 0.017.6 ± 1.50.268
ABS4.6 ± 1.43.8 ± 1.70.039 *
JUD5.1 ± 0.65.0 ± 0.50.262
LAN10.0 ± 0.29.4 ± 0.90.007 **
FLU8.3 ± 1.77.3 ± 1.40.010 *
VC9.9 ± 0.49.6 ± 0.70.124
APOE-ɛ4, n (%) 226 (65.0%)12 (54.5%)0.419
Hypertension, n (%) 214 (35.0%)9 (40.9%)0.645
DM, n (%)212 (30.0%)10 (45.5%)0.224
Hyperlipidemia, n (%) 24 (10.0%)2 (9.1%)1.000
Metabolic syndrome, n (%) 217 (42.5%)7 (31.8%)0.409
Abbreviations: ABS—abstraction; APOE—apolipoprotein E; ATT—attention; CASI—Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument; CCT—concentration; DM—diabetes mellitus; FLU—category fluency; JUD—judgment; LAN—language ability; LTM—long-term memory; MCI—mild cognitive impairment; MMSE-CE—CASI-estimated Mini-Mental Status Examination; ORI—orientation; SD—standard deviation; STM—short-term memory; VC—visual construction. 1 Student’s t-test; 2 chi-squared test; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Table
Table 2. Comparisons of lipid profiles, serum L5 concentrations, and L5 percentages between the MCI and control groups.
Table 2. Comparisons of lipid profiles, serum L5 concentrations, and L5 percentages between the MCI and control groups.
CharacteristicControl (N = 40)MCI (N = 22)p-Value
TC, mg/dL, mean (±SD) 1189.2 ± 33.6187.4 ± 34.00.838
HDL-C, mg/dL, mean (±SD) 153.4 ± 14.451.9 ± 10.00.681
LDL-C, mg/dL, mean (±SD) 1116.0 ± 34.8112.8 ± 29.90.714
L5, mg/dL, mean (±SD) 12.0 ± 1.71.5 ± 0.70.197
L5 ≥ 1.7 mg/dL, n (%) 219 (47.5%)8 (36.4%)0.397
L5%, mean (±SD) 11.9 ± 1.61.5 ± 0.80.140
L5% ≥ 1.6%, n (%) 215 (37.5%)8 (36.4%)0.929
Abbreviations: HDL-C—high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C—low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MCI—mild cognitive impairment; SD—standard deviation; TC—total cholesterol. 1 Student t-test; 2 chi-squared test.
Table
Table 3. Comparisons of cognitive performance stratified by cut-off value of serum L5 concentrations and L5 percentage in the MCI groups.
Table 3. Comparisons of cognitive performance stratified by cut-off value of serum L5 concentrations and L5 percentage in the MCI groups.
MCI
L5 ≥ 1.7 mg/dLp-ValueL5% ≥ 1.6%p-Value
No
N = 14		Yes
N = 8		No
N = 14		Yes
N = 8
Age, years, mean (±SD) 165.3 ± 6.568.9 ± 7.70.25766.0 ± 7.667.6 ± 6.00.613
Sex, man, n (%) 25 (35.7%)3 (37.5%)1.0004 (28.6%)4 (50.0%)0.386
Education, years, mean (±SD) 111.1 ± 3.89.4 ± 3.00.27611.6 ± 3.58.6 ± 3.00.062
MMSE-CE, score, mean (±SD) 126.0 ± 1.624.4 ± 3.60.26126.0 ± 2.024.4 ± 3.20.159
CASI, score, mean (±SD) 187.7 ± 3.784.0 ± 6.30.09687.5 ± 3.984.4 ± 6.30.158
LTM10.0 ± 0.010.0 ± 0.0N/A10.0 ± 0.010.0 ± 0.0N/A
STM8.1 ± 2.07.8 ± 2.00.7508.4 ± 1.87.3 ± 2.10.196
ATT7.4 ± 0.67.0 ± 0.90.2157.4 ± 0.67.1 ± 1.00.508
CCT8.6 ± 1.28.1 ± 1.60.4518.6 ± 1.48.1 ± 1.10.451
ORI18.0 ± 0.017.0 ± 2.40.28617.9 ± 0.317.1 ± 2.50.390
ABS4.0 ± 1.93.4 ± 1.30.4173.9 ± 1.93.5 ± 1.30.579
JUD5.1 ± 0.54.8 ± 0.50.1394.9 ± 0.65.0 ± 0.00.671
LAN9.7 ± 0.58.9 ± 1.20.025 *9.7 ± 0.58.9 ± 1.20.025 *
FLU7.3 ± 1.37.3 ± 1.50.9547.0 ± 1.47.8 ± 130.219
VC9.6 ± 0.89.8 ± 0.70.5929.7 ± 0.69.5 ± 0.90.519
Abbreviations: ABS—abstraction; APOE—apolipoprotein E; ATT—attention; CASI—Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument; CCT—concentration; DM—diabetes mellitus; FLU—category fluency; JUD—judgment; LAN—language ability; LTM—long-term memory; MCI—mild cognitive impairment; MMSE-CE—CASI-estimated Mini-Mental Status Examination; ORI—orientation; SD—standard deviation; STM—short-term memory; VC—visual construction; 1 Student’s t-test; 2 Fisher’s exact test; * p < 0.05.
Table
Table 4. Correlation of serum TC, LDL-C, and L5 level with cognitive performance in patients with MCI.
Table 4. Correlation of serum TC, LDL-C, and L5 level with cognitive performance in patients with MCI.
Pearson Correlation
Coefficient		MCI (N = 22)
TCp-Value 1LDL-Cp-Value 1L5p-Value 1L5%p-Value 1
MMSE-CE0.1820.4160.1370.542−0.4090.059−0.434 *0.044
CASI0.1880.4030.1420.528−0.431 *0.045−0.484 *0.023
LTMN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
STM0.1790.4260.1690.452−0.2900.191−0.3250.140
ATT0.0580.7980.0550.807−0.1650.463−0.1610.474
CCT0.1070.6370.0470.835−0.0750.739−0.1330.556
ORI0.1840.4120.1750.435−0.4180.053−0.470 *0.027
ABS0.1790.4260.1310.562−0.2860.198−0.2620.239
JUD−0.1200.595−0.1990.374−0.1960.383−0.0360.872
LAN0.2840.2000.3020.171−0.438 *0.042−0.533 *0.011
FLU−0.2570.248−0.2860.1960.0890.6950.1540.492
VC−0.0310.8910.0030.9900.0570.802−0.1730.440
Abbreviations: ABS—abstraction; ATT—attention; CASI—Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument; CCT—concentration; FLU—category fluency; JUD—judgment; LAN—language ability; LDL-C—low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LTM—long-term memory; MCI—mild cognitive impairment; MMSE-CE—CASI-estimated Mini-Mental Status Examination; ORI—orientation; STM—short-term memory; TC—total cholesterol; VC—visual construction; 1 Pearson correlation; * p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chou, P.-S.; Chen, S.C.-J.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Liou, L.-M.; Juan, C.-H.; Lai, C.-L. The Association between Electronegative Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol L5 and Cognitive Functions in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020192

AMA Style

Chou P-S, Chen SC-J, Hsu C-Y, Liou L-M, Juan C-H, Lai C-L. The Association between Electronegative Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol L5 and Cognitive Functions in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2023; 13(2):192. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020192

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chou, Ping-Song, Sharon Chia-Ju Chen, Chung-Yao Hsu, Li-Min Liou, Chi-Hung Juan, and Chiou-Lian Lai. 2023. "The Association between Electronegative Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol L5 and Cognitive Functions in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment" Journal of Personalized Medicine 13, no. 2: 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020192

APA Style

Chou, P. -S., Chen, S. C. -J., Hsu, C. -Y., Liou, L. -M., Juan, C. -H., & Lai, C. -L. (2023). The Association between Electronegative Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol L5 and Cognitive Functions in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020192

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop