Next Article in Journal
Association of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination with Facial-Related Neurological Disorders: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Rapid On-Site Evaluation Performed by an Interventional Pulmonologist: A Single-Center Experience
Previous Article in Journal
Precision Workforce Management for Radiographers: Monitoring and Managing Competences with an Automatic Tool
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Clinical and Molecular Traits of a Novel SPECC1L-ALK Fusion in a Patient with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

by
Antonella Centonza
1,
Tommaso Mazza
2,
Domenico Trombetta
3,
Angelo Sparaneo
3,
Francesco Petrizzelli
2,
Stefano Castellana
2,
Flavia Centra
3,
Federico Pio Fabrizio
3,
Concetta Martina Di Micco
1,
Federica Benso
4,
Fabrizio Tabbò
4,5,*,
Luisella Righi
4,
Alessandra Merlini
4,
Paolo Graziano
6 and
Lucia Anna Muscarella
3,*
1
Unit of Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
2
Unit of Bioinformatics, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
3
Laboratory of Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
4
Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, TO, Italy
5
SOC Oncologia ASLCN2 Alba e Bra, Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, 12060 Verduno, CN, Italy
6
Unit of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(7), 670; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070670
Submission received: 21 March 2024 / Revised: 7 June 2024 / Accepted: 11 June 2024 / Published: 21 June 2024

Abstract

:
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions account for 5–7% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, the therapeutic approaches for which have significantly evolved in the last few years. However, the response to target therapies remains heterogeneous, partially due to the many different ALK fusion variants reported to date. Rare fusion variants have also been discovered, but their role in influencing responses to ALK inhibitors (ALKis) remains poorly elucidated. Laboratory investigation at both the tissue and protein levels, and a molecular profile by next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed on a lung biopsy sample from one patient with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. An in silico prediction model using ColabFold software v1.5.5 was used to model and predict the entire structure of the chimeric aberrant ALK protein. Here, we report a case of a former smoker, a 60-year-old man, diagnosed with NSCLC and undergoing ALK translocation. He received first-, second- and third-generation ALK protein inhibitors (ALKis), showing a clinical benefit for about 4 years. IHC analysis and the molecular examination of the tissue biopsy indicated a positive staining for ALK and a novel ALK gene fusion variant, involving the sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domain 1-like (SPECC1L) gene with an unreported breakpoint in exon 7. The novel SPECCL1::ALK fusion was identified using Anchored Multiplex PCR (AMP)-NGS technology and was predicted to retain the Pkinase_Tyr domain at the carboxy-terminal region of the resulting chimeric protein. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of an ALK-positive NSCLC patient carrying the SPECC1L exon 7 fusion breakpoint and one of the few reports about clinical outcomes related to SPECC1L::ALK fusion. The in silico hypothesized biological role of this newly identified fusion variant corroborates the observed clinical response to multiple ALKis. The molecular findings also reinforce the utility of AMP-based NGS technology as a valuable tool for the identification of rare chromosomal events that may be related to the variability of patient outcomes to different ALKis treatments.

1. Introduction

Around 5–7% of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carry an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene fusion, and younger, non-smoking female patients are primarily affected [1]. The aberrant activation of ALK requires a tyrosine kinase domain, and the translocation to partner genes can result in the ectopic and uncontrolled expression of the ALK protein, thus conferring sensitivity to ALK inhibitors (ALKis) [2].
Despite being a clinically validated therapeutic target, ALK fusions are not as accurately targeted as other carcinogenic drivers. Lung cancer has been linked to over 90 distinct ALK fusion partners [3]; however, compared to the most common ALK fusion variants, there is currently insufficient large-scale clinical evidence regarding the predictive value of unusual fusions [2,4]. ALK-TKI clinical use remains contingent upon ALK gene rearrangement detection, independently of the fusion partner’s molecular characteristics [5]. It is of note that clinical responses are heterogeneous, depending on the fusion subtype, according to recent scientific evidence in patients with ALK+ NSCLC [6], and this should impact the choice of ALKis in terms of adverse events and tolerability, which have gradually aroused attention [5]. Thus, for an informed therapeutic treatment, knowledge of how certain uncommon ALK fusions react to ALK-TKIs is required.
Sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domain 1-like (SPECC1L) is a rare partner gene occasionally reported in ALK fusions of NSCLC, with only a few details known about its chimeric gene structure. By consequence, the sensitivity of rare SPECC1L::ALK fusion variants to ALKis remains uncertain and poorly investigated [7].
This is the first report on SPECC1L::ALK rearrangement in an NSCLC patient with a breakpoint in exon 7 of SPECC1L, which was identified using AMP-NGS technology and then investigated at the protein level by an in silico prediction model to clarify the pathogenicity of this rare event. Our results encourage the use of AMP-NGS and in silico prediction models to identify and clarify the potential oncogenic effects of rare ALK fusions in small patient cohorts that are less accessible for clinical follow-up monitoring.

2. Case Report

A 60-year-old Caucasian man (former smoker, 35 pack/year) was admitted in March 2017 to the Emergency Room of Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza in San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy, for a persistent cough and chest pain. After hospitalization at the Internal Medicine Unit, a computed tomography scan (CT) revealed a 65 × 50mm mass between the superior and inferior lobes of the left lung, with pleural effusion. The involvement of the pre- and sub-carinal, bilateral axillary, and abdominal lymph nodes was also observed, as well as a left adrenal metastasis. A video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) biopsy after a negative fibro-bronchoscopy showed a high-grade adenocarcinoma with a predominant solid pattern. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), B-Raf proto-oncogene, and serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) genes were documented as wild-type. Immunoreactivity (3+ score) to ALK protein (clone D5F3, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) expression was documented (Figure 1).
ALK rearrangement was then confirmed in 28% (18/64) of neoplastic cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis using a Vysis ALK Break Apart FISH Probe Kit (IVD, Abbott Molecular), with an observed 5’ deletion in two nuclei. The patient was then eligible for targeted therapy with crizotinib as an upfront treatment, with disease stability for 21 months (Figure 2).
Lung and nodal progression were demonstrated during restaging by computed tomography (CT) in February 2019, so the patient was included in an ongoing clinical trial on the molecular profiling of NSCLC, approved by our local ethics committee (prot.171/CE). A large molecular screening was performed on the available diagnostic neoplastic formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimen to refine his molecular profile. A first round of investigation into gene fusions was performed by RNA-targeted NGS analysis using the Oncomine Solid Tumour Fusion Transcript kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with the Ion S5™ Sequencer System, and data were analyzed on the Ion Reporter Server (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), yielding strong evidence of an ALK fusion as a 5′-3′ probe imbalance, but without any fusion variant identification. To investigate the presence of a novel and previously untargeted fusion of ALK, the biological sample was therefore resequenced using the FusionPlex Oncology Research RUO panel (Archer DX Inc., Boulder, CO, USA) on the NextSeq500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and the results were annotated through Archer™ Suite Analysis ver. 6.2.3. Identified fusions were classified as strong with, among others, the following settings: minimal reads for valid structural variation > 5; structural variation percent of GSP2 reads > 10. A rare and novel SPECCL1::ALK fusion with the recently identified SPECCL1 partner gene [S7A20, chr22:24730541, chr2:29446394] was identified in the biological sample of the patient [7]. The novel identified SPECCL1::ALK fusion variant (S7A20) arises from fusion between exon 7 of SPECCL1 at an unreported breakpoint level and exon 20 of the ALK gene [S7 (SPECCL1)::A20 (ALK); chr22:24730541- chr2:29446394, GRCh37/hg19 release)] (Figure 3A).
A two-stage bioinformatic analysis was performed to characterize this new variant, with the aim of obtaining a prediction of the chimeric protein structure, verifying the level of conservation of ALK’s functional domains, and therefore conserving the related biological functionality. We found that this novel SPECCL1::ALK (S7A20) fusion protein consisted of 1416 amino acids (aa) and, according to InterProScan [8], retained the intact tyrosine kinase domain of the ALK protein, which could result in constitutive kinase activity and oncogenic transformation, as reported for canonical ALK rearrangements (Figure 3B). This was confirmed by the alignment performed through the Clustal Omega tool (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/, accessed on 10th February 2024) of the sequence of the fusion protein onto the wild-type sequences of SPECCL1 (Figure 4) and ALK (Figure 5). This analysis identified uneven regions in terms of sequence similarity but, however, found the tyrosine kinase domain of the ALK protein completely preserved. This observation was also supported by the protein expression result from immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis with a staining score of 3+. Data were processed using the Jalview v.2.11.20 software package.
We then predicted a model of the entire fusion product by resorting to the local implementation of the ColabFold software package [9], which was run on our local GPU-equipped high-performance computing (HPC) cluster [10,11] with standard settings. Paired and unpaired MSAs (but no template information) were given as the input. Finally, only the top-ranked structure was relaxed, using the standard minimization protocol already described in [12]. The model showed some unresolved regions, a long coiled-coil domain belonging to SPECCL1, and an intact ALK’s tyrosine kinase domain. The fusion breakpoint was identified in the middle of a newly structured alpha helix (Figure 3C).
After disease progression with crizotinib, the patient started a treatment with alectinib as a second-line treatment, which allowed control of the disease for an additional 24 months. A whole-body CT scan performed in March 2021 revealed an increased size of the pulmonary mass, prompting the start of lorlatinib therapy within a compassionate program. After 8 months, due to further multiorgan progression, platinum and pemetrexed chemotherapy was administered from December 2021 to May 2022. After the declining performance status of the patient, active therapy was discontinued and, in June 22, he died.

3. Discussion

Gene fusions are the result of complex genomic alterations that occur in tumor cells and often play an important role in the etiology of tumor progression and proliferation [13]. In clinical practice, gene fusions actually represent one of the most studied molecular markers, mainly in lung cancer patients, but also in other solid tumors [14,15,16]. In particular, the identification of ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1/2/3 gene rearrangements by the scientific community has given an enormous change in therapeutic perspective for patients suffering from NSCLC in the advanced stage of the disease [17]. These rearrangements, although presenting a low incidence, are in fact the basis of therapeutic strategies with molecularly targeted drugs [18]; therefore, they require particular attention aimed at clarifying their heterogeneity and establishing their effective oncogenic activity [19,20,21].
Many ALK-TKIs have been validated since the first EML4-ALK fusion in NSCLC was discovered, and their use in clinical practice has significantly improved PFS and OS in patients with metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC [22]. Nonetheless, there is heterogeneity in the clinical response between various ALK fusion subtypes, as well as ALK fusion variants [23]. A primary rationale for these observations is that distinct 5′ fusion partners may have a different impact on the biological features of ALK fusion proteins, resulting in variations in protein stability, expression levels, oncogenic potential, and ultimately, the response to ALK-TKIs [24]. Therefore, to increase the number of targetable ALK fusions and better understand their biological function, clinicians worldwide are urged to report all identified novel fusions and share information on fusion breakpoints and responses to ALK-TKIs [2].
According to diagnostic practices, the determination of ALK gene rearrangements has been performed for many years only using FISH and/or IHC techniques, which are low-cost methodologies that provide information on the integrity of the gene sequence or on the expression of the aberrant protein, respectively. But in contrast, these approaches do not give any information about the presence of chimeric transcripts or the related chimeric protein structure.
In this scenario, NGS represents a better complementary detection method due to its ability to view the breaking point and determine whether the fusion gene created has a normal biological function [25,26]. Precise recommendations exist today for applying NGS high-throughput platforms in routine clinical contexts [27]. However, its usage, interpretation, and harmonization with other diagnostic techniques are not always simple or largely accessible due to the quality of the RNA obtained from FFPE sections, which can generate false-negative results [28]. Moreover, the currently used NGS panels for fusion discovery only allow the detection of well-known fusion transcript variants and the 3′-5′ expression imbalance, but do not give any indication about existing unreported fusions. The recent implementation of NGS using AMP technology, accompanied by adequate data analysis, can certainly constitute a great advantage in overcoming some of these limits. Markedly, it could help to reduce the heterogeneity of results obtained from different technical approaches in order to identify those ALK+ patients with a true clinical benefit from treatment with specific targeted drugs, as well as to decodify ambiguous results obtained from discordant IHC/FISH and targeted RNA-NGS analyses. Moreover, the use of AMP technology should help the identification of complex and novel patterns of coexistent instances of ALK common with rare fusion variants, which could affect different ALKi responses [29]. As described in our work, the identification of the previously unreported SPECCL1::ALK gene fusion with a novel genetic breakpoint highlights how the approach based on AMP technology is preferable to the Ampliseq targeted RNA chemistry used to identify novel or rare gene fusions, particularly for those cases with a strong positive IHC [30].
Even though many rare ALK fusion variations have been discovered, it is challenging to analyze their differences in response to ALK-TKIs by directly assessing the clinical history of the few individuals who share the same unusual fusion variant.
The SPECC1L::ALK fusion was first mentioned in a Chinese patient with lung adenocarcinoma in 2019 [31], but no details about the clinical outcome of the patient were reported. To date, responses to ALKi in two NSCLC patients with different SPECC1L-AL fusion variants have been published only in one previous work, and the clinical outcome of the patients supports the idea that SPECC1L may be a tumor driver factor that can be inhibited by a series of TKIs [7].
In this context, the in silico analysis of the molecular structure and biochemical properties of fusion proteins could help to close this gap by evaluating the preservation of the spatial conformation of functional ALK protein domains [32,33,34]. ALK fusion variants lacking the ALK kinase domain are predicted to be resistant to certain ALKi therapies, according to a number of studies [35]. Furthermore, in order to enable the automated activation of kinases, fusion partners must supply dimerization domains in order to automatically activate and send a signal downstream, just like other tyrosine kinases [36]. It is finally reported that some specific variants of ALK fusions are null fusions, meaning they are unable to translate tumor-causing kinesins [37].
We did not establish an in vitro cell model for this specific ALK fusion variant to confirm the oncogenicity of this novel variant or test the response of the different ALKis used. Anyway, the results of our bioinformatic analysis predicting the structure of the putative SPECCL1-ALK chimeric protein revealed that the tyrosine kinase domain of ALK remains conserved, thus indicating a most likely oncogenic role for the aberrant protein. This hypothesis is also corroborated by an IHC score of 3+ and a favorable outcome of the patient who received crizotinib, alectinib, and lorlatinib as sequential ALKi treatments, achieving disease control lasting 54 months. The 3D model obtained from our computational analysis supports the idea that investigating the oncogenicity of aberrant fusion proteins by in silico protein domain analysis should be of great support to predict the efficacy of different inhibitors to block the activity of different gene fusions, thus giving an indirect indication about response to specific treatments. This is of particular interest in the case of rare fusion variants whose responses to ALKi treatment could not be monitored in real life in a large cohort of patients.

4. Conclusions

The correct identification of both common and rare actionable ALK fusions in advanced NSCLC acquires even more exquisite relevance since a plethora of ALK inhibitors are now available, and the correct treatment approach in the first and further lines may influence the natural history of these patients. The positive response to multiple ALKis of a NSCLC patient carrying a new and rare SPECCL1::ALK fusion serves as a reference for further clinical treatment and encourages the use of both AMP-NGS and in silico protein prediction models to discover and study the oncogenic potential of understudied and rare, potentially druggable ALK fusion variants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: L.A.M. and A.C.; methodology: T.M., P.G., C.M.D.M., F.P., S.C., D.T., F.B. and L.A.M.; validation: A.S., F.C. and F.P.F.; data curation: A.C., T.M., P.G., L.R., F.T. and L.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation: A.C., P.G., T.M. and L.A.M.; writing—review and editing: D.T., F.P.F., C.M.D.M., L.R., F.T. and A.M.; supervision: L.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 2023 program and Ricerca Finalizzata program n. RF-2021-12373900) to LAM and by the “5 × 1000” voluntary contributions to Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Foundation IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (prot.171/CE, date of approval: 6 December 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We thank to Barbara Pasculli for her professional English editing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gainor, J.F.; Varghese, A.M.; Ou, S.H.; Kabraji, S.; Awad, M.M.; Katayama, R.; Pawlak, A.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; Yeap, B.Y.; Riely, G.J.; et al. ALK rearrangements are mutually exclusive with mutations in EGFR or KRAS: An analysis of 1,683 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 4273–4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tabbo, F.; Muscarella, L.A.; Gobbini, E.; Trombetta, D.; Castellana, S.; Rigutto, A.; Galetta, D.; Maiello, E.; Martelli, O.; Tiseo, M.; et al. Detection of ALK fusion variants by RNA-based NGS and clinical outcome correlation in NSCLC patients treated with ALK-TKI sequences. Eur. J. Cancer 2022, 174, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Facchinetti, F.; Gandolfi, L.; Vasseur, D.; Melocchi, L.; Nakazawa, S.; Tiseo, M.; Friboulet, L.; Rossi, G. ALK fusions turn sixteen in lung cancer: A review on their biology, detection and therapy. Precis. Cancer Med. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Camidge, D.R.; Dziadziuszko, R.; Peters, S.; Mok, T.; Noe, J.; Nowicka, M.; Gadgeel, S.M.; Cheema, P.; Pavlakis, N.; de Marinis, F.; et al. Updated Efficacy and Safety Data and Impact of the EML4-ALK Fusion Variant on the Efficacy of Alectinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Global Phase III ALEX Study. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2019, 14, 1233–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hou, H.; Sun, D.; Liu, K.; Jiang, M.; Liu, D.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, N.; Cong, J.; Zhang, X. The safety and serious adverse events of approved ALK inhibitors in malignancies: A meta-analysis. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019, 11, 4109–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, W.; Guo, L.; Liu, Y.; Dong, L.; Yang, L.; Chen, L.; Liu, K.; Shao, Y.; Ying, J. Potential Unreliability of Uncommon ALK, ROS1, and RET Genomic Breakpoints in Predicting the Efficacy of Targeted Therapy in NSCLC. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2021, 16, 404–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, L.; Zhang, Q.; Dong, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, J. SPECC1L-ALK: A novel gene fusion response to ALK inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2020, 143, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Blum, M.; Chang, H.Y.; Chuguransky, S.; Grego, T.; Kandasaamy, S.; Mitchell, A.; Nuka, G.; Paysan-Lafosse, T.; Qureshi, M.; Raj, S.; et al. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D344–D354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mirdita, M.; Schutze, K.; Moriwaki, Y.; Heo, L.; Ovchinnikov, S.; Steinegger, M. ColabFold: Making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 2022, 19, 679–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ballarini, P.; Guido, R.; Mazza, T.; Prandi, D. Taming the complexity of biological pathways through parallel computing. Brief. Bioinform. 2009, 10, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Biagini, T.; Petrizzelli, F.; Truglio, M.; Cespa, R.; Barbieri, A.; Capocefalo, D.; Castellana, S.; Tevy, M.F.; Carella, M.; Mazza, T. Are Gaming-Enabled Graphic Processing Unit Cards Convenient for Molecular Dynamics Simulation? Evol. Bioinform. 2019, 15, 1176934319850144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Biagini, T.; Petrizzelli, F.; Bianco, S.D.; Liorni, N.; Napoli, A.; Castellana, S.; Luigi Vescovi, A.; Carella, M.; Caputo, V.; Mazza, T. KDM6A missense variants hamper H3 histone demethylation in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 3151–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Taniue, K.; Akimitsu, N. Fusion Genes and RNAs in Cancer Development. Noncoding RNA 2021, 7, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tsimberidou, A.M.; Fountzilas, E.; Bleris, L.; Kurzrock, R. Transcriptomics and solid tumors: The next frontier in precision cancer medicine. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022, 84, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Saigi, M.; Carcereny, E.; Moran, T.; Cucurull, M.; Domenech, M.; Hernandez, A.; Martinez-Cardus, A.; Pros, E.; Sanchez-Cespedes, M. Biological and clinical perspectives of the actionable gene fusions and amplifications involving tyrosine kinase receptors in lung cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2022, 109, 102430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Williams, G.H.; Thatcher, R.P.; Polo, B.N.; Haddow, T.E.; Hardisty, K.-M.; Loddo, M. Druggable fusion gene landscape in solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38 (Suppl. S15), e13517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hendriks, L.E.; Kerr, K.M.; Menis, J.; Mok, T.S.; Nestle, U.; Passaro, A.; Peters, S.; Planchard, D.; Smit, E.F.; Solomon, B.J.; et al. Oncogene-addicted metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2023, 34, 339–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kwak, E.L.; Bang, Y.J.; Camidge, D.R.; Shaw, A.T.; Solomon, B.; Maki, R.G.; Ou, S.H.; Dezube, B.J.; Janne, P.A.; Costa, D.B.; et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 1693–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, W.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Chen, L.; Ying, J. Intergenic Breakpoints Identified by DNA Sequencing Confound Targetable Kinase Fusion Detection in NSCLC. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2020, 15, 1223–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Song, Z.; Lian, S.; Mak, S.; Chow, M.Z.; Xu, C.; Wang, W.; Keung, H.Y.; Lu, C.; Kebede, F.T.; Gao, Y.; et al. Deep RNA Sequencing Revealed Fusion Junctional Heterogeneity May Predict Crizotinib Treatment Efficacy in ALK-Rearranged NSCLC. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2022, 17, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sorokin, M.; Rabushko, E.; Rozenberg, J.M.; Mohammad, T.; Seryakov, A.; Sekacheva, M.; Buzdin, A. Clinically relevant fusion oncogenes: Detection and practical implications. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2022, 14, 17588359221144108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gil, M.; Knetki-Wroblewska, M.; Nizinski, P.; Strzemski, M.; Krawczyk, P. Effectiveness of ALK inhibitors in treatment of CNS metastases in NSCLC patients. Ann. Med. 2023, 55, 1018–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Elshatlawy, M.; Sampson, J.; Clarke, K.; Bayliss, R. EML4-ALK biology and drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer: A new phase of discoveries. Mol. Oncol. 2023, 17, 950–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Childress, M.A.; Himmelberg, S.M.; Chen, H.; Deng, W.; Davies, M.A.; Lovly, C.M. ALK Fusion Partners Impact Response to ALK Inhibition: Differential Effects on Sensitivity, Cellular Phenotypes, and Biochemical Properties. Mol. Cancer Res. 2018, 16, 1724–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, W.; Wan, R.; Guo, L.; Chang, G.; Jiang, D.; Meng, L.; Ying, J. Reliability analysis of exonic-breakpoint fusions identified by DNA sequencing for predicting the efficacy of targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Med. 2022, 20, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hernandez, S.; Conde, E.; Alonso, M.; Illarramendi, A.; de Cabo, H.B.; Zugazagoitia, J.; Paz-Ares, L.; Lopez-Rios, F. A narrative review of methods for the identification of ALK fusions in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2023, 12, 1549–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mosele, F.; Remon, J.; Mateo, J.; Westphalen, C.B.; Barlesi, F.; Lolkema, M.P.; Normanno, N.; Scarpa, A.; Robson, M.; Meric-Bernstam, F.; et al. Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: A report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann. Oncol. 2020, 31, 1491–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lin, C.; Shi, X.; Yang, S.; Zhao, J.; He, Q.; Jin, Y.; Yu, X. Comparison of ALK detection by FISH, IHC and NGS to predict benefit from crizotinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2019, 131, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wei, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Desai, A.; Tan, S.; Huang, Q.; Pu, X.; Tian, P.; Li, Y. Superior clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring multiple ALK fusions treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2023, 12, 1935–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zheng, Z.; Liebers, M.; Zhelyazkova, B.; Cao, Y.; Panditi, D.; Lynch, K.D.; Chen, J.; Robinson, H.E.; Shim, H.S.; Chmielecki, J.; et al. Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 1479–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, T.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, Z.; Yuan, H.; Zheng, D.; Zheng, S.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; et al. Detection of Novel NRG1, EGFR, and MET Fusions in Lung Adenocarcinomas in the Chinese Population. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2019, 14, 2003–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hirai, N.; Sasaki, T.; Okumura, S.; Minami, Y.; Chiba, S.; Ohsaki, Y. Monomerization of ALK Fusion Proteins as a Therapeutic Strategy in ALK-Rearranged Non-small Cell Lung Cancers. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Richards, M.W.; O’Regan, L.; Roth, D.; Montgomery, J.M.; Straube, A.; Fry, A.M.; Bayliss, R. Microtubule association of EML proteins and the EML4-ALK variant 3 oncoprotein require an N-terminal trimerization domain. Biochem. J. 2015, 467, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wiesner, T.; Lee, W.; Obenauf, A.C.; Ran, L.; Murali, R.; Zhang, Q.F.; Wong, E.W.; Hu, W.; Scott, S.N.; Shah, R.H.; et al. Alternative transcription initiation leads to expression of a novel ALK isoform in cancer. Nature 2015, 526, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ou, S.H.; Bartlett, C.H.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; Cui, J.; Iafrate, A.J. Crizotinib for the treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: A success story to usher in the second decade of molecular targeted therapy in oncology. Oncologist 2012, 17, 1351–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Katayama, R.; Lovly, C.M.; Shaw, A.T. Therapeutic targeting of anaplastic lymphoma kinase in lung cancer: A paradigm for precision cancer medicine. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 2227–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Du, X.; Shao, Y.; Gao, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Ban, Y.; Qin, H.; Tai, Y. CMTR1-ALK: An ALK fusion in a patient with no response to ALK inhibitor crizotinib. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2018, 19, 962–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Microphotographs show poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma ((a) X1.7 H&E) with a predominant solid pattern ((b) X25 H&E), positive for TTF-1 ((c) X25) and strongly immunoreactive to ALK ((d) X25 D5F3 clone).
Figure 1. Microphotographs show poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma ((a) X1.7 H&E) with a predominant solid pattern ((b) X25 H&E), positive for TTF-1 ((c) X25) and strongly immunoreactive to ALK ((d) X25 D5F3 clone).
Jpm 14 00670 g001
Figure 2. Timeline for patient with metastatic SPECCL1::ALK fusion who was treated with three subsequent lines of ALKis. Abbreviations: SD, stable disease; PR, partial response; PD, progression disease; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; m, month; IHC, immunohistochemistry; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; NGS, next-generation sequencing (for interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
Figure 2. Timeline for patient with metastatic SPECCL1::ALK fusion who was treated with three subsequent lines of ALKis. Abbreviations: SD, stable disease; PR, partial response; PD, progression disease; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; m, month; IHC, immunohistochemistry; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; NGS, next-generation sequencing (for interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
Jpm 14 00670 g002
Figure 3. (A) Schematic representation of the novel ALK::SPECCL1 fusion gene variant identified (S7A20). The blue and red arrows at the bottom of the figure show the different gene blocks that form the chimeric transcript. The upper part of the figure shows, schematically, the breakpoints at the exonic level in the ALK and SPECCL1 genes (GRCh37/hg19 reference sequence). Arrows sizes are not proportional to the exons involved in the rearrangements. (B) ColabFold model of the SPECCL1-ALK fusion protein. The SPECCL1 protein portion is stained in blue and the conserved ALK portion is stained in orange. The conserved ALK tyrosine-kinase domain is highlighted in green, and magnified into the box. (C) Schematic representation of the predicted SPECC1L-ALK fusion protein identified in the patient. The green portion represents part of SPECC1L protein conserved in the fusion protein, whereas the conserved portion of ALK protein is shown in red. The dashed rectangle represents the tyrosine kinase domain of ALK. The domains were mapped with the InterPro v88.0 program.
Figure 3. (A) Schematic representation of the novel ALK::SPECCL1 fusion gene variant identified (S7A20). The blue and red arrows at the bottom of the figure show the different gene blocks that form the chimeric transcript. The upper part of the figure shows, schematically, the breakpoints at the exonic level in the ALK and SPECCL1 genes (GRCh37/hg19 reference sequence). Arrows sizes are not proportional to the exons involved in the rearrangements. (B) ColabFold model of the SPECCL1-ALK fusion protein. The SPECCL1 protein portion is stained in blue and the conserved ALK portion is stained in orange. The conserved ALK tyrosine-kinase domain is highlighted in green, and magnified into the box. (C) Schematic representation of the predicted SPECC1L-ALK fusion protein identified in the patient. The green portion represents part of SPECC1L protein conserved in the fusion protein, whereas the conserved portion of ALK protein is shown in red. The dashed rectangle represents the tyrosine kinase domain of ALK. The domains were mapped with the InterPro v88.0 program.
Jpm 14 00670 g003
Figure 4. Bioinformatic alignment of the fusion protein with the wild-type SPECC1L protein (Uniprot Id: Q69YQ0). Colors indicate the presence of a match between the two sequences.
Figure 4. Bioinformatic alignment of the fusion protein with the wild-type SPECC1L protein (Uniprot Id: Q69YQ0). Colors indicate the presence of a match between the two sequences.
Jpm 14 00670 g004
Figure 5. Bioinformatic alignment of the fusion protein with the wild-type ALK protein (Uniprot Id: Q9UM73). Colors indicate the presence of a match between the two sequences.
Figure 5. Bioinformatic alignment of the fusion protein with the wild-type ALK protein (Uniprot Id: Q9UM73). Colors indicate the presence of a match between the two sequences.
Jpm 14 00670 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Centonza, A.; Mazza, T.; Trombetta, D.; Sparaneo, A.; Petrizzelli, F.; Castellana, S.; Centra, F.; Fabrizio, F.P.; Di Micco, C.M.; Benso, F.; et al. Clinical and Molecular Traits of a Novel SPECC1L-ALK Fusion in a Patient with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 670. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070670

AMA Style

Centonza A, Mazza T, Trombetta D, Sparaneo A, Petrizzelli F, Castellana S, Centra F, Fabrizio FP, Di Micco CM, Benso F, et al. Clinical and Molecular Traits of a Novel SPECC1L-ALK Fusion in a Patient with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2024; 14(7):670. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070670

Chicago/Turabian Style

Centonza, Antonella, Tommaso Mazza, Domenico Trombetta, Angelo Sparaneo, Francesco Petrizzelli, Stefano Castellana, Flavia Centra, Federico Pio Fabrizio, Concetta Martina Di Micco, Federica Benso, and et al. 2024. "Clinical and Molecular Traits of a Novel SPECC1L-ALK Fusion in a Patient with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer" Journal of Personalized Medicine 14, no. 7: 670. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070670

APA Style

Centonza, A., Mazza, T., Trombetta, D., Sparaneo, A., Petrizzelli, F., Castellana, S., Centra, F., Fabrizio, F. P., Di Micco, C. M., Benso, F., Tabbò, F., Righi, L., Merlini, A., Graziano, P., & Muscarella, L. A. (2024). Clinical and Molecular Traits of a Novel SPECC1L-ALK Fusion in a Patient with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 14(7), 670. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070670

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop