Next Article in Journal
Necessary Conditions for Earthly Life Floating in the Venusian Atmosphere
Next Article in Special Issue
Symbiotic Stars in the Era of Modern Ground- and Space-Based Surveys
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Intermediate-Mass Mergers: A New Scenario for Several FS CMa Stars
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fundamental Parameters and Evolutionary Scenario of HD 327083

by
Nadezhda L. Vaidman
1,2,
Anatoly S. Miroshnichenko
2,3,
Sergey V. Zharikov
4,
Serik A. Khokhlov
1,*,
Aldiyar T. Agishev
1 and
Berik S. Yermekbayev
1
1
Faculty of Physics and Technology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi Ave., 71, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
2
Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute, Observatory, 23, Almaty 050020, Kazakhstan
3
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina—Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27402, USA
4
Instituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, AP 106, Ensenada 22800, BC, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Galaxies 2025, 13(3), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies13030047
Submission received: 12 March 2025 / Revised: 17 April 2025 / Accepted: 18 April 2025 / Published: 22 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Circumstellar Matter in Hot Star Systems)

Abstract

:
In this study, we present refined orbital and fundamental parameters of the Galactic B[e] supergiant binary system HD 327083 using the Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method applied to the radial velocities data of HD 327083. We found that the system is well described by a circular orbital model with the mass ratio of the components of q = 1.15 ± 0.07 . We modeled the evolutionary history of the system using MESA code. Initially, the system was formed by a binary with the orbital period of P o r b = 108 day, which contained stars with 13.00 ± 0.05   M and 11.50 ± 0.05   M masses. They had a relatively slow rotation υ r o t = 0.40 ± 0.13 υ c r i t and provided a strong stellar wind. The current system age is 13.6 ± 0.1 Myr, and the state of the system corresponds to a close filling of the high massive component’s Roche lobe and a beginning of the mass transfer. The mass-transfer event will occur in a short interval of ≲0.1 Myr only. After that, the mass of the post-primary drops to ≈5 M , the post-secondary mass grows until ≈20 M , and the binary will convert to a detached system with a long orbital period of ≈700 days.

1. Introduction

The B[e] phenomenon is characterized by prominent Balmer emission lines and forbidden emission lines accompanied by a substantial infrared excess indicative of the presence of circumstellar dust. These features strongly imply the presence of dense circumstellar environments consisting of gaseous and dusty material surrounding a star or a stellar system [1]. HD 327083 (MWC 873) is a complex binary system exhibiting the B[e] phenomenon. It was first identified during the Mount Wilson survey for stars with hydrogen emission lines [2] and initially classified as a B5-type star based on the intensity ratios of its helium and magnesium absorption lines [3]. Over subsequent decades, various photometric and spectroscopic studies have revealed the intricate nature of this system, including a high interstellar reddening of E ( B V ) 1.9 mag [4], near-infrared excess [5], and CO emission features. These findings led to diverse estimates of its fundamental parameters, including luminosity, effective temperature, and mass [6,7].
The binary nature of HD 327083 was revealed by Miroshnichenko et al. [8], who detected photospheric absorption lines from a secondary cool component. Based on a limited dataset, they proposed two possible orbital solutions with periods of approximately 55 and 180 days. The system was classified as a binary comprising an early B-type primary and an early F-type secondary, with nearly equal masses. These findings positioned HD 327083 as a system at an advanced evolutionary stage, potentially similar to β Lyrae-type binaries. Similar challenges in detecting and analyzing binary Be stars have been discussed in [9], where phase-locked variations in emission-line profiles were used as a diagnostic tool to confirm binarity in multiple systems.
Subsequent high-resolution interferometric studies [10,11] confirmed the presence of a circumbinary Keplerian disk, which contributes to the infrared excess and further supports the system’s post-main-sequence evolutionary status. Such gaseous-and-dusty envelopes are often associated with mass transfer in binary systems, as explored in [12] for FS CMa-type objects exhibiting the B[e] phenomenon.
Despite these advancements, several key aspects of HD 327083 remain uncertain. The orbital parameters derived in previous studies were based on a limited number of spectroscopic observations, leaving significant uncertainties in the system’s kinematics and evolutionary history. In particular, the role of mass transfer between the components and its influence on the surrounding circumbinary disk has yet to be fully constrained. Recent high-resolution spectroscopy and long-term photometric monitoring reported by Nodyarov et al. [13] refined the system’s orbital period to P orb = 107.68  days and provided updated estimates of the component masses, radii, and effective temperatures. In that work, the authors also utilized the latest Gaia EDR3 parallax measurement of HD 327083, π = 0.41 ( 2 ) mas  [14], which implies a distance of d = 2 . 26 0.17 + 0.12  kpc. This revised distance underpins the reliability of their new orbital and stellar parameters and was incorporated into their stellar evolution calculations for the system. However, a more detailed investigation of the system’s orbital dynamics and evolutionary pathways remains essential.
In this study, we aim to provide a more comprehensive picture of HD 327083’s current state and future evolution by integrating updated orbital solutions with calculated evolutionary models. We present a revised determination of the orbital parameters of HD 327083 and, based on them, perform a detailed evolutionary analysis of the system using the stellar evolution code Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA, version 24.05.1; [15,16,17,18,19,20]).

2. RV Variations

To refine the orbital parameters of HD 327083, we analyzed the radial velocity (RV) data from Nodyarov et al. [13], which include both absorption and Fe ii emission lines. We applied a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach using the emcee Python library [21]. Although we mainly assumed a circular orbit, we also allowed for an elliptical one by including the eccentricity (e) and the time of periastron passage ( T 0 ) in the model. The similar MCMC-based methodology has been validated on both circular and elliptical orbital solutions in previous studies [22].
Our primary parameters of interest were the orbital period ( P orb ), systemic velocity ( γ ), and the RV semi-amplitude (K). For initial guesses, we took the mean of all measured RVs as γ and half the difference between the maximum and minimum RVs as K. Assuming normally distributed errors for each measurement, we modeled the likelihood using a Gaussian centered on the predicted orbital RV curve.
These best-fit values, listed in Table 1, illustrate that the observed RV variations are well described by a circular orbital model. The eccentricity included in the fitting procedure turned out to be insignificant. From the best fit, we obtained a mass ratio of the system components1, q = K 2 / K 1 = M 1 / M 2 = 1.15 ± 0.07 , where K 2 corresponds to the emission lines associated with the secondary component, while K 1 is derived from the absorption lines of the primary component. The goodness of the fit is reflected in the reduced chi-square values, with χ ν , Abs 2 = 1.3 ( ν Abs = 14 ) for the absorption lines and χ ν , FeII 2 = 4.2 ( ν FeII = 9 ) for the Fe ii emission lines, where ν Abs and ν FeII denote the number of degrees of freedom for each respective data set. We note that our approach to the orbital fitting allowed us to significantly improve the orbital elements’ accuracy compared with that reported by Nodyarov et al. [13].
The optical spectrum of the system is dominated by absorption lines from the primary component, while no distinct features from the secondary component are detected. This suggests that the spectrum of the secondary component is heavily veiled, likely due to its high rotational velocity or the presence of circumstellar material. A visualization of the phase-dependent RV variations based on spectral line measurements is presented in Figure 1.

3. System Evolution

We performed evolutionary calculations for the HD 327083 system using the stellar evolution code MESA on a multicore, multiprocessor server at the Laboratory of Astrophysics of the Al-Farabi Kazakh National University2. As the input parameters, we adopted the updated RV solution. The initial orbital period was varied from 105 to 109 days (in an increment of 0.5 day), while the masses of the donor and accretor spanned the ranges 11– 15 M and 10– 14 M , respectively, with increments of 0.5 M . The effects of stellar rotation were taken into account by specifying an initial surface rotational velocity v rot as a fraction of the critical velocity, v crit , computed according to Meynet and Maeder [23]:
v crit 437 M * R * 1 2 km s 1 ,
where M * and R * are the mass and the radius of a star given in solar units, respectively. The ratio v rot / v crit was varied from 0.1 to 1.0.
We also adopted the solar metallicity ( Z = 0.014 ), which is typical for massive Galactic stars and governs their radiative mass-loss rates. For this purpose, we employed the MESA prescription of the line-driven wind scaled by a factor α wind 3 ranging from 0.1 to 1.0. For the high-temperature regime ( T eff 10,000 K ), the code follows the prescription by Vink et al. [24], and once the effective temperature drops below ∼ 8000 K , it switches to the prescription by de Jager et al. [25]. By varying α wind between 0.1 and 1.0, we can thus finely tune the stellar mass-loss rate. Recent publications (e.g., [26,27]) indicate that classical mass-loss rates for massive stars, such as those predicted by the widely used prescriptions of Vink et al. [24] for hot stars and de Jager et al. [25] for cool supergiants, may be systematically overestimated in certain temperature or metallicity regimes. However, observations also suggest that some stars exhibit mass-loss rates comparable to or even stronger than the theoretical predictions (e.g., [28,29]).
Consequently, both stars lose mass through stellar winds throughout their evolution, even outside the phases of direct Roche-lobe overflow. Additionally, the models include the so-called wind Roche-lobe overflow mechanism (WRLOF) [30,31], which allows the secondary to capture part of the primary’s outflow, if the wind acceleration region is comparable to the donor’s Roche-lobe radius. This is implemented by introducing the parameter β wind , the fraction of the primary’s wind mass that is accreted by the secondary. Here, we adopt β wind = 0.3 , i.e., 30% of the wind is accreted, while the remaining 70% leaves the system and carries away mass and angular momentum. This moderate value is commonly used in WRLOF-based models to represent a typical, neither minimal nor fully conservative, efficiency of the wind capture within a broad 0.1–0.7 range found in the literature [30].
Convective energy transport was treated with the standard Mixing-Length Theory (MLT) [32], adopting mixing_length_alpha = 2.0. Core overshooting was implemented with the MESA step prescription (overshoot_scheme = ‘step’). We adopted overshoot_f = 0.02, which corresponds to a low extension of the convective core. Although this value lies near the lower edge of the empirical range of 0–0.30 [33], it reproduces the observed parameters of both components without requiring excessive mixing.
The models were evolved from the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) up to a maximum age of 10 8 years or until numerical instabilities arose. To capture rapid phases, we relied on MESA’s built-in time-step adaptation with an accuracy of 10 3 . In addition, we employed the user hooks in run_binary_extras to mitigate non-physical resonances: (1) limiting abrupt changes in radius or luminosity by reducing the timestep if Δ R or Δ L exceeded certain thresholds, and (2) refining the mass-transfer calculations so that sudden spikes in M ˙ trigger a similar reduction in timestep. These custom routines effectively eliminated non-physical “resonances” without altering the main MESA infrastructure.
We computed 700 evolutionary tracks covering a wide range of initial conditions for the HD 327083 system. The best agreement between the observed data and calculated parameters was achieved for the model with the following initial ( t 0 = 0 year) parameters: P orb ( t 0 ) = 108 days , the primary star mass of 13.00 ± 0.05   M , the secondary star mass of 11.50 ± 0.05   M , the mass ratio q = 1.13 , the rotational velocity of both stars v rot = ( 0.40 ± 0.13 ) v crit , and α wind = 0.40 ± 0.03 .
At an age of 13.6 ± 0.1 Myr, when mass transfer starts and the mass ratio remains within range at q = 1.15 ± 0.07 , our best-fitting model predicts a current orbital period of P = 107.6 ± 0.8 days; a separation of a = 280 ± 15 R ; and component masses of 12.7 ± 0.3 M and 11.4 ± 0.2 M .
These values align well with the estimates derived from spectroscopic analysis and RV measurements. Despite their nearly identical masses, the two stars exhibit significantly different radii and temperatures: the primary star has R = 107.1 R ± 5.6 , T eff = 7300 ± 100 K, and a luminosity log ( L / L ) = 4.47 ± 0.53 , while the secondary star has R = 8.5 R ± 1.5 , T eff = 25,000 ± 250 K, and log ( L / L ) = 4.40 ± 0.12 . Both stars rotate at 0.40 v crit ; accordingly, the donor has an equatorial rotational velocity of ∼ 49 km s 1 , while the accretor rotates at ∼ 165 km s 1 .
Model calculations suggest that the primary star is on the verge of the Roche-lobe overflow (RLOF), with a filling factor of about 99.2%. We employ the “Kolb” mass-transfer scheme [34] in MESA, so once the stellar radius slightly exceeds its Roche-lobe radius, the system transitions into an active RLOF phase. This near-100% filling factor does not signify a prolonged equilibrium at that level; rather, it reflects the onset of significant mass exchange. As the star crosses the Roche boundary, the mass-transfer rate rapidly increases, producing substantial but numerically stable changes in both the orbital configuration and the stellar properties.
Upon completion of the main mass-transfer episode, the same model predicts a significant orbital expansion. By the end of this phase ( 13.7 ± 0.1 Myr), the orbital period rises to P orb = 711 ± 11 days, while the binary separation grows to a = 971 ± 22 R . Despite this considerable increase in P orb and a, our calculations indicate that the orbit remains effectively circular ( e 0.05 ), owing to strong tidal coupling in the system (e.g., [35,36]). The RLOF mechanism further suppresses eccentricity growth by ensuring a relatively symmetric mass transfer [34], so we do not expect any significant deviation from a near-zero e, even as the system evolves toward a detached configuration.
At this stage, the initially more massive donor has been stripped down to M donor = 3.7 ± 0.1 M while the former accretor has gained mass, reaching M accretor = 19.6 ± 0.3 M . The stripped donor now has a reduced radius of R = 240 ± 20 R , an effective temperature of T eff = 4430 ± 130 K, and a luminosity of log ( L / L ) = 4.30 ± 0.13 . The former accretor exhibits a contracted radius of R = 7 ± 1 R , an effective temperature of T eff = 37,300 ± 900 K, and a luminosity of log ( L / L ) = 4.93 ± 0.10 .
Further details of both stars’ evolution are illustrated in Figure 2, where we plot their luminosity–temperature tracks. The thick color-coded lines correspond to our best-fit for systems components. Meanwhile, the thinner and/or dashed lines show how varying the wind intensity parameter α wind (from 0.1 to 1.0) shifts the evolutionary paths. We keep the initial masses, orbital period, and rotation fraction fixed, so any differences arise solely from changing α wind .
Figure 3 displays the orbital period as a function of stellar age for a suite of models that share identical initial masses and orbital periods, but differ in their wind intensities (see legend). The thick red line denotes our best-fitting model, converging to an orbital period of approximately 107.6 days at the system’s current age. Even modest variations in the wind parameters—governed by scaling factors for the hot [24] and cool [25] phases—lead to appreciable differences in the rate of orbital evolution.
In particular, a stronger early mass-loss can delay or even preempt the Roche-lobe overflow (RLOF), altering both the mass distribution and subsequent evolution of the system. Conversely, weaker winds enable the stars to retain more mass, accelerating RLOF and resulting in a markedly different evolutionary pathway. Because these processes exhibit strong nonlinear feedbacks, the evolutionary tracks do not follow a single monotonic trend, but instead “branch out” into separate evolutionary routes, underscoring the high sensitivity of massive close binaries to initial conditions and wind-driven mass-loss physics (e.g., [37,38,39]).
Figure 4 shows the mass-transfer rate, M ˙ transfer , as a function of time for the same suite of models. Once the initially more massive star expands sufficiently to fill its Roche lobe, the mass-transfer rate climbs toward a peak level of ∼ 3 × 10 4 M yr 1 . Comparing this plot with Figure 3 reveals that the onset of Roche-lobe overflow (RLOF) coincides with a rapid rise in M ˙ transfer , which subsequently drives a notable increase in the orbital period. Physically, once mass begins to flow from the donor, its mass decreases, and depending on the internal structure and evolutionary stage, its radius may increase, while the accretor’s mass increases, potentially reversing the initial mass ratio and prompting orbital expansion. In our models, the first mass-transfer episode spans from 13.68 to 13.75 Myr, lasting only about 0.07 Myr. A subsequent, secondary mass-transfer phase is triggered around 14.92 Myr, but is not explored in detail here.
Figure 5 compares the evolutionary tracks of both components of the best model. The upper panel plots stellar radius vs. temperature (color-coded by luminosity) for each star, revealing how the donor expands and cools during mass loss, while the accreting component maintains a more compact structure. The lower panel plots stellar mass vs. temperature, using the same luminosity color scale, illustrating the decline of the donor’s mass and the corresponding luminosity variations. Such a configuration supports the conclusion that HD 327083 currently undergoes an active mass-exchange stage, where the nearly Roche-lobe-filling the primary star transfers matter at a rate of M ˙ 3 × 10 4 M yr 1 , thereby explaining the observed B[e] phenomenon and the likely presence of a dense circumbinary environment.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we have presented a detailed analysis of the Galactic B[e] supergiant binary system HD 327083, refining its fundamental and orbital parameters using high-resolution spectroscopy and evolutionary modeling with the MESA code. Our main findings are summarized as follows:
  • We recalculated the orbital parameters of HD 327083 (Table 1) by applying a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to the RV data from Nodyarov et al. [13]. We found that the data described by circular orbital model with a mass ratio of the components of q = K 2 / K 1 = M 1 / M 2 = 1.15 ± 0.07 .
  • We ascertained that the system evolved from a binary with an initial orbital period of P o r b ( t 0 ) = 108 days, in which the primary component’s mass was 13.00 ± 0.05   M and the secondary component’s mass was 11.50 ± 0.05   M . The initial rotational velocity of both stars were found to be υ r o t = 0.40 ± 0.13 υ c r i t , and α w i n d = 0.40 ± 0.03 .
  • Currently, the system’s age is 13.6 ± 0.1 Myr, when the more massive cold component closes to fill or fills its Roche lobe and begins a mass-transfer stage. The mass-transfer event occurred in a very short time of ≲0.1 Myr. After that, the mass of the post-primary drops to ≈5 M and that of the post-secondary grows to ≈20 M , and the binary evolves into a detached system with a long orbital period of ≈700 days.
We note that the emission lines predominantly formed near the accreting component exhibit larger RV uncertainties than the absorptions originating in the donor’s atmosphere. Therefore, further high-resolution spectroscopic monitoring of HD 327083 is essential to shed more light on the physical mechanisms responsible for these emissions. These observations will also help clarify the relative roles of the mass transfer, disk formation, and wind interactions in shaping the observed line profiles, ultimately leading to a more comprehensive understanding of massive binary systems at the beginning of the mass transfer state.

Author Contributions

Data analysis, N.L.V., A.S.M. and S.V.Z.; Software, N.L.V. and B.S.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, N.L.V., S.A.K. and A.T.A.; writing—review and editing, A.S.M. and S.V.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP19578879). S.V.Z. and A.S.M. acknowledges PAPIIT grant IN119323.

Data Availability Statement

The spectra are available on request via email at a_mirosh@uncg.edu.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript: RV—radial velocity, MCMC—Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo, MESA—Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics, MLT—mixing length theory, RLOF—Roche-lobe overflow, PMS—pre-main sequence, ZAMS—zero-age main sequence, WRLOF—wind Roche—lobe overflow mechanism.

Notes

1
Hereafter, we consider mass transfer from the initially more massive or “primary” component onto the initially less massive or “secondary” component. Hence, we use subscript “1” for the primary and subscript “2” for the secondary component. Equivalently, the primary (secondary) and donor (accretor) references are used.
2
Research Center “Data Science in Astrophysics” https://astro.kaznu.info/Computingcluster.html (accessed on 21 April 2025).
3
α wind corresponds to the Vink_scaling_factor and de_Jager_scaling_factor in MESA, which control the strength of stellar winds. See MESA documentation https://docs.mesastar.org (accessed on 21 April 2025).

References

  1. Lamers, H.J.G.L.M.; Zickgraf, F.J.; de Winter, D.; Houziaux, L.; Zorec, J. An improved classification of B[e]-type stars. Astron. Astrophys. 1998, 340, 117–128. [Google Scholar]
  2. Merrill, P.W.; Burwell, C.G. Second Supplement to the Mount Wilson Catalogue and Bibliography of Stars of Classes B and a whose Spectra have Bright Hydrogen Lines. Astrophys. J. 1949, 110, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Henize, K.G. Six Peculiar Hα-Emission Stars. Astrophys. J. 1952, 115, 133–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kozok, J.R. Photometric observations of emission B-stars in the southern Milky Way. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 1985, 61, 387–405. [Google Scholar]
  5. Whitelock, P.A.; Feast, M.W.; Roberts, G.; Carter, B.S.; Catchpole, R.M. Circumstellar CO emission at 2.3 μm in BI Cru, He 3-1138 and He 3-1359. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1983, 205, 1207–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lopes, D.F.; Damineli Neto, A.; de Freitas Pacheco, J.A. A spectroscopic study of luminous peculiar B-type stars. Astron. Astrophys. 1992, 261, 482–492. [Google Scholar]
  7. Machado, M.A.D.; de Araújo, F.X.; Lorenz-Martins, S. The peculiar B-type supergiant HD 327083. Astron. Astrophys. 2001, 368, L29–L33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miroshnichenko, A.S.; Levato, H.; Bjorkman, K.S.; Grosso, M. Properties of galactic B[e] supergiants II. HDE 327083. Astron. Astrophys. 2003, 406, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Miroshnichenko, A.S.; Chari, R.; Danford, S.; Prendergast, P.; Aarnio, A.N.; Andronov, I.L.; Chinarova, L.L.; Lytle, A.; Amantayeva, A.; Gabitova, I.A.; et al. Searching for Phase-Locked Variations of the Emission-Line Profiles in Binary Be Stars. Galaxies 2023, 11, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wheelwright, H.E.; de Wit, W.J.; Oudmaijer, R.D.; Vink, J.S. VLTI/AMBER observations of the binary B[e] supergiant HD 327083. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 538, A6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wheelwright, H.E.; de Wit, W.J.; Weigelt, G.; Oudmaijer, R.D.; Ilee, J.D. AMBER and CRIRES observations of the binary sgB[e] star HD 327083: Evidence of a gaseous disc traced by CO bandhead emission. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 543, A77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miroshnichenko, A.S.; Zharikov, S.V.; Manset, N.; Khokhlov, S.A.; Nodyarov, A.S.; Klochkova, V.G.; Danford, S.; Kuratova, A.K.; Mennickent, R.; Chojnowski, S.D.; et al. Recent Progress in Finding Binary Systems with the B[e] Phenomenon. Galaxies 2023, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nodyarov, A.S.; Miroshnichenko, A.S.; Khokhlov, S.A.; Zharikov, S.V.; Agishev, A.T.; Gabitova, I.A.; Vaidman, N.L.; Manset, N. Properties of Galactic B[e] Supergiants. X. Refined Orbit and Fundamental Parameters of the HD 327083 Binary System. Astrophys. J. 2024, 968, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bailer-Jones, C.A.L.; Rybizki, J.; Fouesneau, M.; Demleitner, M.; Andrae, R. Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. V. Geometric and Photogeometric Distances to 1.47 Billion Stars in Gaia Early Data Release 3. Astron. J. 2021, 161, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Paxton, B.; Bildsten, L.; Dotter, A.; Herwig, F.; Lesaffre, P.; Timmes, F. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA). Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2011, 192, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Paxton, B.; Cantiello, M.; Arras, P.; Bildsten, L.; Brown, E.F.; Dotter, A.; Mankovich, C.; Montgomery, M.H.; Stello, D.; Timmes, F.X.; et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2013, 208, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paxton, B.; Marchant, P.; Schwab, J.; Bauer, E.B.; Bildsten, L.; Cantiello, M.; Dessart, L.; Farmer, R.; Hu, H.; Langer, N.; et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2015, 220, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Paxton, B.; Schwab, J.; Bauer, E.B.; Bildsten, L.; Blinnikov, S.; Duffell, P.; Farmer, R.; Goldberg, J.A.; Marchant, P.; Sorokina, E.; et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Convective Boundaries, Element Diffusion, and Massive Star Explosions. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2018, 234, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Paxton, B.; Smolec, R.; Schwab, J.; Gautschy, A.; Bildsten, L.; Cantiello, M.; Dotter, A.; Farmer, R.; Goldberg, J.A.; Jermyn, A.S.; et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Pulsating Variable Stars, Rotation, Convective Boundaries, and Energy Conservation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2019, 243, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jermyn, A.S.; Bauer, E.B.; Schwab, J.; Farmer, R.; Ball, W.H.; Bellinger, E.P.; Dotter, A.; Joyce, M.; Marchant, P.; Mombarg, J.S.G.; et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Time-dependent Convection, Energy Conservation, Automatic Differentiation, and Infrastructure. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2023, 265, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Foreman-Mackey, D.; Hogg, D.W.; Lang, D.; Goodman, J. emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2013, 125, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nurmakhametova, S.T.; Vaidman, N.L.; Miroshnichenko, A.S.; Khokhlov, A.A.; Agishev, A.T.; Yermekbayev, B.S.; Danford, S.; Aarnio, A.N. HR 4049: A Spectroscopic Analysis of a Post-AGB Object. Galaxies 2025, 13, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Meynet, G.; Maeder, A. Stellar evolution with rotation. V. Changes in all the outputs of massive star models. Astron. Astrophys. 2000, 361, 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vink, J.S.; de Koter, A.; Lamers, H.J.G.L.M. Mass-loss predictions for O and B stars as a function of metallicity. Astron. Astrophys. 2001, 369, 574–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. de Jager, C.; Nieuwenhuijzen, H.; van der Hucht, K.A. Mass loss rates in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 1988, 72, 259–289. [Google Scholar]
  26. Björklund, R.; Sundqvist, J.O.; Singh, S.M.; Puls, J.; Najarro, F. New predictions for radiation-driven, steady-state mass-loss and wind-momentum from hot, massive stars. III. Updated mass-loss rates for stellar evolution. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 676, A109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Beasor, E.R.; Davies, B.; Smith, N.; van Loon, J.T.; Gehrz, R.D.; Figer, D.F. A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 492, 5994–6006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Crowther, P.A.; Lennon, D.J.; Walborn, N.R. Physical parameters and wind properties of galactic early B supergiants. Astron. Astrophys. 2006, 446, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Smith, N. Mass Loss: Its Effect on the Evolution and Fate of High-Mass Stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 52, 487–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mohamed, S.; Podsiadlowski, P. Wind Roche-Lobe Overflow: A New Mass-Transfer Mode for Wide Binaries. In Proceedings of the 15th European Workshop on White Dwarfs, Leicester, UK, 7–11 August 2006; Napiwotzki, R., Burleigh, M.R., Eds.; Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series; Astronomical Society of the Pacific: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2007; Volume 372, p. 397. [Google Scholar]
  31. Abate, C.; Pols, O.R.; Izzard, R.G.; Mohamed, S.S.; de Mink, S.E. Wind Roche-lobe overflow: Application to carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 552, A26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Böhm-Vitense, E. Über die Wasserstoffkonvektionszone in Sternen verschiedener Effektivtemperaturen und Leuchtkräfte. Mit 5 Textabbildungen. Z. Astrophys. 1958, 46, 108. [Google Scholar]
  33. Claret, A.; Torres, G. The Dependence of Convective Core Overshooting on Stellar Mass: A Semi-empirical Determination Using the Diffusive Approach with Two Different Element Mixtures. Astrophys. J. 2017, 849, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kolb, U.; Ritter, H. A comparative study of the evolution of a close binary using a standard and an improved technique for computing mass transfer. Astron. Astrophys. 1990, 236, 385–392. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zahn, J.P. Tidal friction in close binary systems. Astron. Astrophys. 1977, 57, 383–394. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tassoul, J.L. On Synchronization in Early-Type Binaries. Astrophys. J. 1987, 322, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Langer, N. Presupernova Evolution of Massive Single and Binary Stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 50, 107–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Podsiadlowski, P.; Joss, P.C.; Hsu, J.J.L. Presupernova Evolution in Massive Interacting Binaries. Astrophys. J. 1992, 391, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. de Mink, S.E.; Pols, O.R.; Langer, N.; Izzard, R.G. Massive binaries as the source of abundance anomalies in globular clusters. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 507, L1–L4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. RV variations based on spectral line measurements. (Top panel) RV variations as a function of orbital phase. The red curve (labeled “1”) corresponds to the primary (donor) star, whose RV is derived from absorption lines. The blue curve (labeled “2”) corresponds to the secondary (accretor) star, traced by several Fe ii emission lines. (Bottom panel) ( O C ) / σ diagram, where O is the observed RV, C is the fit RV value, and σ is the measurement uncertainty (standard deviation) of each RV point.
Figure 1. RV variations based on spectral line measurements. (Top panel) RV variations as a function of orbital phase. The red curve (labeled “1”) corresponds to the primary (donor) star, whose RV is derived from absorption lines. The blue curve (labeled “2”) corresponds to the secondary (accretor) star, traced by several Fe ii emission lines. (Bottom panel) ( O C ) / σ diagram, where O is the observed RV, C is the fit RV value, and σ is the measurement uncertainty (standard deviation) of each RV point.
Galaxies 13 00047 g001
Figure 2. Luminosity vs. effective temperature for the evolutionary tracks of both stars (labeled “1” for the primary/donor and “2” for the secondary/accretor), calculated under fixed initial parameters but with varying wind strength α wind . The solid lines show the evolutionary tracks for each star, with a color scale indicating luminosity. The dashed lines illustrate the range of models calculated by varying α wind . The color bar on the right indicates the value of α wind for each track. The green points correspond to the beginning of the evolution, while the cross marks the end.
Figure 2. Luminosity vs. effective temperature for the evolutionary tracks of both stars (labeled “1” for the primary/donor and “2” for the secondary/accretor), calculated under fixed initial parameters but with varying wind strength α wind . The solid lines show the evolutionary tracks for each star, with a color scale indicating luminosity. The dashed lines illustrate the range of models calculated by varying α wind . The color bar on the right indicates the value of α wind for each track. The green points correspond to the beginning of the evolution, while the cross marks the end.
Galaxies 13 00047 g002
Figure 3. Orbital period vs. system age for models with fixed initial masses and orbital period but different wind coefficients α wind . The color bar indicates the value of α wind . The thick red solid line provides the best fit to the current orbital parameters.
Figure 3. Orbital period vs. system age for models with fixed initial masses and orbital period but different wind coefficients α wind . The color bar indicates the value of α wind . The thick red solid line provides the best fit to the current orbital parameters.
Galaxies 13 00047 g003
Figure 4. The mass-transfer rate in the binary as a function of time depending on the α w i n d parameter. The thick red solid lines correspond to the best model.
Figure 4. The mass-transfer rate in the binary as a function of time depending on the α w i n d parameter. The thick red solid lines correspond to the best model.
Galaxies 13 00047 g004
Figure 5. Evolutionary tracks of both components of the best model (labeled “1” for the primary/donor and “2” for the secondary/accretor). (Top panel) Stellar radius R vs. effective temperature T eff . (Bottom panel) Stellar mass M vs. effective temperature T eff . The color scale indicates luminosity. The yellow point marks the phase where the mass ratio q = 1.15 ± 0.07 . The green point corresponds to the beginning of the evolution, while the cross marks the end.
Figure 5. Evolutionary tracks of both components of the best model (labeled “1” for the primary/donor and “2” for the secondary/accretor). (Top panel) Stellar radius R vs. effective temperature T eff . (Bottom panel) Stellar mass M vs. effective temperature T eff . The color scale indicates luminosity. The yellow point marks the phase where the mass ratio q = 1.15 ± 0.07 . The green point corresponds to the beginning of the evolution, while the cross marks the end.
Galaxies 13 00047 g005
Table 1. Comparison of orbital parameters.
Table 1. Comparison of orbital parameters.
ParameterRVabsRVem (Fe II)
P orb (days) 107.76 ± 0.01 107.77 ± 0.09
T 0 (HJD—2450000) 1810.56 ± 0.35 1923.31 ± 1.89
e 0.03 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.03
ω (degrees) 3.2 ± 0.7 4.3 ± 0.4
γ (km  s 1 ) 28.81 ± 0.35 25.98 ± 6.17
K (km  s 1 ) 48.32 ± 0.47 55.64 ± 2.78
f ( m ) , M 1.25 ± 0.03 1.92 ± 0.28
N2016
P orb —orbital period, T 0 —epoch of superior conjunction, γ —systemic velocity, e—eccentricity, ω —argument of periastron, K—semi-amplitude of the RV variations, f ( m ) —mass function, N—number of spectra used in the orbit calculation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vaidman, N.L.; Miroshnichenko, A.S.; Zharikov, S.V.; Khokhlov, S.A.; Agishev, A.T.; Yermekbayev, B.S. Fundamental Parameters and Evolutionary Scenario of HD 327083. Galaxies 2025, 13, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies13030047

AMA Style

Vaidman NL, Miroshnichenko AS, Zharikov SV, Khokhlov SA, Agishev AT, Yermekbayev BS. Fundamental Parameters and Evolutionary Scenario of HD 327083. Galaxies. 2025; 13(3):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies13030047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vaidman, Nadezhda L., Anatoly S. Miroshnichenko, Sergey V. Zharikov, Serik A. Khokhlov, Aldiyar T. Agishev, and Berik S. Yermekbayev. 2025. "Fundamental Parameters and Evolutionary Scenario of HD 327083" Galaxies 13, no. 3: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies13030047

APA Style

Vaidman, N. L., Miroshnichenko, A. S., Zharikov, S. V., Khokhlov, S. A., Agishev, A. T., & Yermekbayev, B. S. (2025). Fundamental Parameters and Evolutionary Scenario of HD 327083. Galaxies, 13(3), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies13030047

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop