Next Article in Journal
Laser Surface Texturing for Ground Surface: Frictional Effect of Plateau Roughness and Surface Textures under Oil Lubrication
Next Article in Special Issue
Special Issue on Laser Surface Engineering for Tribology
Previous Article in Journal
A Generalised Method for Friction Optimisation of Surface Textured Seals by Machine Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Nb Addition on the Corrosion and Wear Resistance of Laser Clad AlCr2FeCoNi High-Entropy Alloy Coatings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of a Substrate’s Preheating Temperature on the Microstructure and Properties of Ni-Based Alloy Coatings

1
School of Mechanical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China
2
International Shipping Research Institute, Gongqing Institute of Science and Technology, Gongqing City 332020, China
3
Beijing Electric Power Transmission and Transformation Company Limited, Beijing 102400, China
4
Marine Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
5
Graduate School, Daejin University, Pocheon-si 11159, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Lubricants 2024, 12(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12010021
Submission received: 3 November 2023 / Revised: 18 December 2023 / Accepted: 19 December 2023 / Published: 10 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laser Surface Engineering for Tribology)

Abstract

:
Laser cladding is a new technology to fabricate a coating on the surface of a metal substrate. The properties on copper substrates are usually not very good due to the high thermal conductivity and reflectivity. The appropriate preheating temperature is helpful to fabricate coatings with good quality and properties, especially for copper substrates. In order to investigate the effect of different preheating temperatures, four coatings with different preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C) were fabricated via a laser on a copper substrate. The microstructures and properties of four coatings were investigated using SEM, XRD, EDS, a Vickers microhardness meter, a wear tester and an electrochemical workstation. The results show that the elements from Ni-based alloy powder were uniformly distributed among the binding region, which obtained a good metallurgical bonding. The microstructure was mainly composited of cellular, dendrite and plane crystals, and the main reinforced phases were γ (Fe, Ni), Cr0.09Fe0.7Ni0.21, WC and Ni3B. The values of average microhardness of the four coatings were 614.3, 941.6, 668.1 and 663.1 HV0.5, respectively. The wear rates of the four coatings were 9.7, 4.9, 12.5 and 13.3 × 10−5 mm3·N−1·m−1, respectively, which were less than that of the copper substrate (4.3 × 10−3 mm3·N−1·m−1). The decrease in wear rate was due to the existence of the reinforced phases, such as WC, Ni3B, M7C3 (M=Fe, Cr) and Cr0.09Fe0.7Ni0.21. The fine crystals in the coating preheated at 200 °C also improved the wear resistance. Additionally, the minimum values of corrosion current density were 3.26 × 10−5, 2.34 × 10−7, 4.02 × 10−6 and 4.21 × 10−6 mA·mm−2, respectively. It can be seen that the coating preheated at 200 °C had higher microhardness, lower wear rates and better corrosion resistance due to the existence of reinforced phases and fine and uniform crystals.

1. Introduction

Copper alloys are widely used in the manufacture of condenser tubes for ocean platforms due to their good corrosion resistance [1,2,3]. However, corrosion failure often occurs during long-term service, which reduces the service life of the condenser tube [4]. In order to improve the corrosion resistance of condenser tubes, some surface modification technologies are used to fabricate coatings, such as electroplating and thermal spraying [5,6,7].
In recent decades, laser cladding has been widely used to fabricate coatings due to its advantages of high efficiency and low cost [8,9,10,11,12]. As a coating material, a single metal powder or alloy powder plays an indispensable role in laser cladding technology [13,14]. During the process of laser cladding, some self-fluxing powders, such as Fe-based, Ni-based and Co-based ones and high-entropy alloys, are widely used [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Of these, Ni-based powder is the most widely used during the process of laser cladding because of its good wear resistance, good corrosion resistance and moderate price [21]. Many researchers have prepared coatings on the surface of copper alloys via laser cladding technology. Bysakh et al. [22] used a CO2 laser to obtain a cladding layer of a Cu-Fe-Al-Si alloy on the surface of a copper alloy; however, this coating had some defects. Li et al. [23] prepared a Ni60 alloy coating on the surface of aluminum bronze via supersonic flame spraying and then performed laser remelting at a laser power of 3.2 kW with a CO2 laser. Although a cladding layer with good metallurgical bonding to the substrate was obtained, bubbles still appeared due to the molten pool disturbance. There are many factors affecting the quality of laser cladding, including the laser power, scanning speed, powder feeding rate and preheating temperature [24,25,26,27]. In addition, the preheating temperature is one of the key factors of laser cladding that has been studied by many scholars [28,29,30,31]. Although the preheating temperatures of different substrates have been studied, there are few studies about the preheating temperature of copper substrate. Because of the higher thermal conductivity and reflectivity of copper substrate, the selection of the preheating temperature is particularly important to fabricate a good coating using a laser.
In this paper, four different preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C) were selected to fabricate a coating on a copper substrate. The macroscopic morphology and dilution rate were studied. The phases, microstructure, elemental distribution and properties of the four coatings were investigated using SEM, XRD, EDS, a Vickers microhardness meter, a wear tester and an electrochemical workstation. Meanwhile, the microstructure evolution of the four coatings is discussed.

2. Experimental Conditions

2.1. Materials

Copper alloy is used as the substrate; its size is 50 × 30 × 10 mm and its composition is shown in Table 1. Ni-based alloy powder is used as the cladding material; its composition is shown in Table 2. The mass fractions of the Fe, Cr and WC elements are 12.0%, 12.0% and 5.0%, respectively. There are small amounts of the C, B and Si elements.
Figure 1 is an SEM micrograph of the Ni-based alloy powder. It can be seen that the shape of most particles is nearly spherical and the surface is smooth. There are a few irregular particles with the shapes resembling a block or strip. Additionally, some particles with small sizes have tended to gather together.

2.2. Methods

The device was a CO2 laser with a continuous mode and the parameters are as follows: laser power 1.4 kW, laser beam diameter 3.0 mm, scanning speed 2 mm/s and overlapping ratio 30%. The substrate preheating temperatures were 100, 200, 300 and 400 °C, respectively. After laser cladding, the coatings were cut into 10 × 10 × 10 mm samples. After the samples were buffed and polished, a ferric chloride solution was used to etch the cladding coating for 10 s. Then, the samples were observed using optical microscopy and scanning election microscopy (TESCAN MIRA). At the same time, the element distribution was analyzed via EDS. The phases were detected by X-ray diffraction (TD-3500). The microhardness was tested using a Vickers microhardness meter with a load of 50 gf at 15 s. The microhardness was measured from the top of the Ni-based coating to the copper substrate and each point was repeated five times at the same height. The friction and wear properties were tested using a reciprocating fatigue friction and wear tester (MGW-02) with a tip force of 10 N and a friction frequency 2 Hz. An experiment testing the electrochemical corrosion was also carried out to investigate the corrosion resistance of cladding coatings. A 3.5% NaCl solution was used as the electrolyte in a CHI600E electrochemical workstation.

3. Results

3.1. Macroscopic Morphology and Dilution Rate

Figure 2 shows the macroscopic morphology of coatings preheated at four temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C). The four coatings can be successively fabricated on copper substrate but there are some pores and cracks on the surface.
The dilution rate is an important index to judge the performance of a coating. A low dilution rate is helpful to improve the coating’s properties. The molten pool depth and height of the coating are two parameters to measure dilution rate, as shown in Figure 3. The dilution rate can be calculated using Equation (1).
η = D e p t h D e p t h + H e i g h t × 100 %
In Equation (1), η is the dilution rate, Depth is the average depth of the coating’s molten pool, and Height is the average height of the coating.
Table 3 shows the height, molten pool depth and dilution rate of the four coatings with different preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C). At the four different preheating temperatures, the coatings’ heights are 0.27, 0.48, 0.39 and 0.27 mm, respectively. The depths of the molten pool are 0.1, 0.12, 0.16 and 0.18 mm, respectively. With the increasing preheating temperature, the coatings’ heights first increase and then decrease. However, the depths of the molten pool increase gradually along with the increase in the preheating temperature. The main reason for this is that higher preheating temperatures make the substrate easier to melt and so it forms a molten pool with higher temperatures, which increases the depths of the molten pool. At the four different preheating temperatures, the dilution rates were 27%, 20%, 29% and 40%, respectively. The coating with a preheating temperature of 200 °C has the lowest dilution rate (20%), which suggests that it can maintain the properties of the coating and reduce the mixing of elements between the substrate and coating.

3.2. Phases

The X-ray diffraction patterns of the coatings preheated at four different temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C) are shown in Figure 4. When the preheating temperature was 100 °C, the main phases are γ (Fe, Ni), WC, W2C, Ni3B, and M7C3 (M=Fe, Cr). When the preheating temperature was 200 °C, the higher preheating temperature increases the heat of the molten pool and prolongs the solidification time of the molten pool. Elements such as Ni, Cr and Fe have enough time to form a reinforced phase. Therefore, a new phase, Cr0.09Fe0.7Ni0.21, appears. When the preheating temperatures are 300 and 400 °C, the amount of some elements decreases gradually due to the higher temperature of molten pool, which results in the decrease in WC, W2C and boride. At the same time, a large number of substrate elements enter into the coating and form Cu0.64Zn0.36 and Ni2W4C phases.

3.3. Microstructure

Figure 5 depicts the microstructures of coatings preheated at four temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C). Figure 5(a1,b1,c1,d1) shows the microstructure of the coatings’ top regions. When the preheating temperature was 100 °C, there are a large number of equiaxed crystals. When the preheating temperatures were 200, 300 or 400 °C, some cellular crystals appear in the top regions. In addition, the coating preheated at 200 °C has fine cellular crystals. As shown in Figure 5(a2,b2,c2,d2), the microstructure of the middle position is mainly a dendrite structure. In addition, when the preheating temperature was 200 °C, the dendrite crystals are fine and uniform. With the increase in preheating temperature, the secondary dendrites grow gradually on the primary dendrites, as shown in Figure 5(c2). When the preheating temperature was 400 °C, the dendrite crystals become larger. At the bottom of the four coatings, when the preheating temperature was 100 °C, some small holes appear in the bonding region, as shown in Figure 5(a3), which decreases the binding strength between the coating and the substrate. With the increase in preheating temperature, the holes gradually disappear, as shown in Figure 5(b3,c3,d3).
Table 4 shows the percentage of element atoms at the P1–P4 points in the four coatings with different preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C). According to the percentage of element atoms at the P1 point, there are large amounts of Fe and Ni in the coating with the preheating temperature of 100 °C that form the supersaturated solid solution of the γ (Fe, Ni) phase. Some C atoms form WC and W2C and others form the Fe7C3 phase. Compared with the P1 point, the percentage of element atoms at the P2 point shows that the content of Cr increases, which becomes Cr7C3 phase. At the same time, there are a few borides. The percentage of element atoms at the P3 and P4 points indicates that a large number of Cu and Zn elements appear at P3 and P4, which is mainly the Cu0.64Zn0.36 phase. With the increase in preheating temperature, more and more elements from the substrate enter into the molten pool. This is consistent with the results of Figure 4.
Figure 6 depicts the SEM micrograph and EDS element line scanning results for the four coatings with different preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C). From the substrate to the coating, the copper element decreases gradually, whereas the Ni element increases gradually. In the diffusion zone, Cu and Ni dissolve each other and form good metallurgical bonding. At the same time, the width of the diffusion zone increases with the increase in preheating temperature. When the preheating temperature was 200 °C, the coating has the least amount of Cu. More of the Cu element appears in the diffusion zone, which also decreases the relative amount of the Ni element. The other elements in the substrate and coating, such as Fe, Al and Cr, also enter into the diffusion zone. When the preheating temperature is higher, more of the Cu element enters into the coating, as shown in Figure 6c,d.

3.4. Microhardness

Figure 7 shows the microhardnesses of the four coatings’ cross sections. The maximum microhardness values of four the coatings are 680.7, 1069.3, 815.2 and 760.9 HV0.5, respectively. The values for the average microhardness are 614.3, 941.6, 668.1 and 663.1 HV0.5, respectively. As a whole, the microhardness in the strengthening layer is stable and the fluctuation is not very large. At the binding region, the microhardness decreases quickly. When the preheating temperature was 200 °C, the coating has the highest average microhardness (941.6 HV0.5), which is caused by the reinforced phases M7C3, WC, Ni3B and Cr0.09Fe0.7Ni0.21 and the fine crystals in the top region. However, when the preheating temperature was 300 °C, some new phases, Cu0.64Zn0.36 and Ni2W4C, appear due to entrance of Cu and Zn elements from copper substrate, which decreases the coating’s microhardness.

3.5. Wear Resistance

The friction coefficients of four coatings with different preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C) are shown in Figure 8. The coating that had a preheating temperature of 200 °C has the smallest friction coefficient (around 0.1), which only has a small fluctuation, whereas the coating that had a preheating temperature 400 °C has the largest friction coefficient (around 0.3) and fluctuation. The friction coefficients of the coatings preheated at 100 and 300 °C fluctuate around 0.2 and also have large fluctuations. From the above analysis, the smallest friction coefficient (around 0.1) in the 200 °C preheated coating may be due to its lower surface roughness and fine crystals.
Figure 9 shows the wear rates of coatings preheated at different temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C). The wear rates of coatings preheated at 100, 200, 300 and 400 °C are 9.7, 4.9, 12.5 and 13.3 × 10−5 mm3·N−1·m−1, respectively. The wear rate of the coating preheated at 200 °C is the lowest, only about one-third of the wear rate of the coating preheated at 400 °C. The wear rate of copper substrate is 4.3 × 10−3 mm3·N−1·m−1. Compared with the substrate, the wear resistance of the four coatings has an obvious improvement due to the existence of the reinforced phases, such as WC, Ni3B, M7C3 (M=Fe, Cr) and Cr0.09Fe0.7Ni0.21. Additionally, when the preheating temperature was 200 °C, the coating has more fine crystals in the top region.
Figure 10 depicts the morphology of the friction and wear of coatings preheated at different temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C). It can be seen that the coating that had a preheating temperature 200 °C has the smallest depth and width of grinding crack. More M7C3, WC, W2C and borides improve the coating hardness and reinforced phase content. Meanwhile, the fine and uniform crystals are also helpful to enhance the wear resistance, which forms abrasive wear and makes the wear volume decrease.

3.6. Corrosion Resistance

Figure 11 shows the polarization curves of coatings preheated at four temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C). The polarization curves of the four coatings present a similar trend and show the certain passivation behavior. When the preheating temperatures were 100, 200, 300 and 400 °C, the free corrosion potentials are −0.708, −0.690, −0.893 and −0.817 V, respectively. The minimum values of corrosion current density are 3.26 × 10−5, 2.34 × 10−7, 4.02 × 10−6 and 4.21 × 10−6 mA·mm−2, respectively. Moreover, the corrosion current density of the copper substrate is 1.14 × 10−6 mA·mm−2, which is less than that of the coatings preheated at 100, 300 or 400 °C and more than that of the coating preheated at 200 °C. Therefore, the coating preheated at 200 °C has the lowest corrosion current density (2.34 × 10−7 mA·mm−2), which indicates that the coating has the best corrosion resistance due to a large amount of Cr7C3. This phase improves the corrosion resistance. Although the coatings with preheating temperatures of 300 and 400 °C have a Cr7C3 phase, a lot of Cu and Zn elements diffuse into the coating and reduce the corrosion resistance.

4. Discussion

Ni-based alloy coatings with different preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C) were fabricated on copper substrate. Due to the difference in preheating temperature, the microstructure, quality and properties of the coatings are different. Therefore, the phases, microstructure, microhardness, wear resistance and corrosion resistance were investigated. The microhardnesses of the coatings were 614.3, 941.6, 668.1 and 663.1 HV0.5 under preheating at temperatures of 100, 200, 300 and 400 °C, respectively. The average hardness is highest at the preheating temperature of 200 °C, which is caused by the reinforcing phases such as M7C3, WC, Ni3B and Cr0.09Fe0.7Ni0.21 and the diffusion of fine grains and fewer Cu and Zn elements in the top region. The wear rates of the four coatings were 9.7, 225, 4.9, 12.5 and 13.3 × 10−5 mm3·N−1·m−1, respectively. The 200 °C preheated coating has the lowest wear rate, which is due to the correct preheating temperature to produce finer and more uniform crystals in the top area of the coating. In the electrochemical test, the coating preheated at 200 °C has the lowest corrosion current density (2.34 × 10−7 mA·mm−2), which is due to the fact that the coating is less affected by the diffusion of Cu and Zn elements and the presence of a large amount of Cr7C3 in the coating, resulting in the best corrosion resistance.

4.1. Effect of Preheating Temperature on Pore and Crack

During the laser cladding process, if the gas in molten pool does not escape in time, some pores will appear in the coating. The existence of pores will reduce the mechanical and corrosion resistance of a coating. According to the Stocks equation [32], the gas overflow in the molten pool is mainly related to the viscosity of the liquid metal. With an increase in temperature, the viscosity of the liquid metal decreases and the gas can more easily escape from the molten pool. Figure 12 shows the schematic diagram of gas overflow in the molten pool during the laser cladding process. At lower preheating temperature, the viscosity is larger, which makes it difficult for the gas to escape and results in some pores being left in the coating, as shown in Figure 12a. This is in accordance with the result shown in Figure 5(a3). In contrast, if the preheating temperature is higher, the gas can more easily escape, as shown in Figure 12b,c. Therefore, no pores appeared in the cladding coating when the preheating temperatures were 200, 300 and 400 °C.
When the preheating temperature was 400 °C, there were some cracks at the bottom of the cladding coating, as shown in Figure 13. Higher preheating temperatures increase the heat accumulation in the molten pool, which brings larger thermal stress and shrinkage between the different phases. When the thermal stress is higher than the tensile strength of the cladding coating during the cooling of the molten pool, cracks may appear in some places, such as the crack in Figure 13.

4.2. Effect of Preheating Temperature on Microstructure

The microstructure evolution under four preheating temperatures is shown in Figure 14. When the preheating temperature is 100 °C, a large number of equiaxed crystals form in the top part of cladding coating, which do not grow due to the lower preheating temperature. With the decrease in preheating temperature, the crystals begin to grow as dendrite crystals in the middle of the cladding coating. When the preheating temperature is 200 °C, because of the increase in preheating temperature, the higher temperature promotes crystals to grow as fine cellular crystals in the top of the coating. When the preheating temperatures are 300 and 400 °C, although the microstructure of top regions is also cellular, the number of cellular crystals is more than that of the coating preheating at 200 °C. Because of the larger cooling rate and mutual inhibition, the cellular crystals are smaller. In the middle regions, a large amount of heat accumulates in the molten pool and the secondary dendrites grow on the basis of the primary dendrites. However, when the preheating temperature is 400 °C, the higher preheating temperature causes more substrate elements into the liquid molten pool and appear in the Cu0.64Zn0.36 phase, which destroys the growth of the primary dendrites and secondary dendrites.

5. Conclusions

(1) Four Ni-based alloy coatings with different preheating temperatures were successfully fabricated on the copper substrate. When the preheating temperature is 100 °C, there are some pores at the bottom of coating. When the preheating temperature is 400 °C, the effect of thermal stress is too great and a few cracks appear. At the four different preheating temperatures, the dilution rates were 27%, 20%, 29% and 40%, respectively. The coating with a preheating temperature of 200 °C has the lowest dilution rate (20%), which can maintain the property of the coating and reduces the mix of elements between the substrate and coating.
(2) When the preheating temperature is 100 °C, the main phases are γ (Fe, Ni), WC, W2C, Ni3B and M7C3 (M=Fe, Cr). When the preheating temperature is 200 °C, a new phase Cr0.09Fe0.7Ni0.21 appears. When the preheating temperatures are 300 and 400 °C, a large number of substrate elements enter into the coating and form Cu0.64Zn0.36 and Ni2W4C phases. The microstructure of the cladding coating is mainly composed of cellular, dendrite and planar crystals. The coating preheated at 200 °C has fine and uniform crystals.
(3) At the four different preheating temperatures, the values of average microhardness for the four coatings are 614.3, 941.6, 668.1 and 663.1 HV0.5, respectively. When the preheating temperature is 200 °C, it has the maximum average microhardness, which is caused by the reinforced phases M7C3, WC, Ni3B and Cr0.09Fe0.7Ni0.21 and the fine crystals in the top region. However, when the preheating temperature is 300 °C, some new phases (Cu0.64Zn0.36 and Ni2W4C) appear due to the entrance of Cu and Zn elements from the copper substrate, which decreases the coating’s microhardness.
(4) The friction coefficients of the four coatings are about 0.2, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3, respectively. The coating with a preheating temperature of 200 °C has the smallest friction coefficient (around 0.1), which also has a small fluctuation, whereas the coating with a preheating temperature of 400 °C has the largest friction coefficient (around 0.3) and fluctuation. The wear rates of the coatings preheated at 100, 200, 300 and 400 °C are 9.7, 4.9, 12.5 and 13.3 × 10−5 mm3·N−1·m−1, respectively. The wear rate of the coating preheated at 200 °C is the lowest due to the existence of the reinforced phases and fine crystals.
(5) When the preheating temperature is 100, 200, 300 and 400 °C, the corrosion potentials are −0.708, −0.690, −0.893 and −0.817 V, respectively. Moreover, the minimum values for the corrosion current density are 3.26 × 10−5, 2.34 × 10−7, 4.02 × 10−6 and 4.21 × 10−6 mA·mm−2, respectively. The coating with a preheating temperature of 200 °C has the maximum corrosion potential (−0.69 V) and the lowest corrosion current density (2.34 × 10−7 mA·mm−2), which represents the best corrosion resistance. This is due to the high amount of Cr7C3 in the coating with a preheating temperature of 200 °C and the diffusion of a smaller amount of Cu and Zn elements into the coating.

Author Contributions

Software, Y.L.; Writing—original draft, T.X. and H.J.; Resources, Y.L.; Data processing, Y.G. and F.D.; Investigation, Z.X., D.Z. and Y.G.; Formal analysis, M.Y. and D.Z.; Supervision, Y.L., Y.G. and M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science and Technology Development of Jilin Province, grant number 20230101335JC. This thesis work is also supported by Northeast Electric Power University.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Z.X. was employed by the company Beijing Electric Power Transmission and Transformation Company Limited. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Y.L.; Zhuo, L.C.; Yin, E.H. Challenges and potentials/trends of tungsten-copper (WCu) composites/pseudo-alloys: Fabrication, regulation and application. Int. J. Refract. Met. H 2021, 100, 105648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ebrahimi, M.; Par, M. Twenty-year uninterrupted endeavor of friction stir processing by focusing on copper and its alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 781, 1074–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, H.; Fu, H.; Zhu, S.; Yong, W.; Xie, J. Machine learning assisted composition effective design for precipitation strengthened copper alloys. Acta Mater. 2021, 215, 117118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rao, T.S.; Bera, S. Protective layer dissolution by chlorine and corrosion of aluminum brass condenser tubes of a nuclear power plant. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2021, 123, 105307. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhou, H.-H.; Liao, Z.-W.; Fang, C.-X.; Li, H.-X.; Feng, B.; Xu, S.; Cao, G.-F.; Kuang, Y.-F. Pulse electroplating of Ni-W-P coating and its anti-corrosion performance. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2018, 28, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, T.; Dang, N.; Liang, M.; Guo, C.; Lu, H.; Ma, J.; Liang, W. TEM observation of general growth behavior for silver electroplating on copper rod. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 451, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zang, J.; Li, H.; Sun, J.; Shen, Y.; Su, N.; Feng, X. Microstructure and thermal conductivity of Cu-Cu2AlNiZnAg/diamond coatings on pure copper substrate via high-energy mechanical alloying method. Surf. Interfaces 2020, 21, 100742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.; Xu, T.; Liu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Di, C. Wear and heat shock resistance of Ni-WC coating on mould copper plate fabricated by laser. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 8283–8288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sciacca, G.; Sinico, M.; Cogo, G.; Bigolaro, D.; Pepato, A.; Esposito, J. Experimental and numerical characterization of pure copper heat sinks produced by laser powder bed fusion. Mater. Des. 2022, 214, 110415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guan, W.; Gao, M.; Lv, H.; Yuan, J.; Chen, D.; Zhu, T.; Fang, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Tang, Z.; et al. Laser cladding of layered Zr/Cu composite cathode with excellent arc discharge homogeneity. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2021, 421, 127454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Y.; Li, Z.Y.; Li, G.H.; Tang, L. Friction and wear behavior of Ni-based alloy coatings with different amount of WC-TiC ceramic particles. J. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58, 1116–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Feng, X.; Cui, X.; Zheng, W.; Lu, B.; Dong, M.; Wen, X.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, G. Effect of the protective materials and water on the repairing quality of nickel aluminum bronze during underwater wet laser repairing. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 114, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Harooni, A.; Iravani, M.; Khajepour, A.; King, J.M.; Khalifa, A.; Gerlich, A.P. Mechanical properties and microstructures in zirconium deposited by injected powder laser additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 22, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ramakrishnan, A.; Dinda, G. Microstructural control of an Al–W aluminum matrix composite during direct laser metal deposition. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 813, 152208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, S.; Wu, C.; Zhang, C.; Sun, X.; Chen, J. An investigation on wear and cavitation erosion-corrosion characteristics of the TiC modified Fe-based composite coating via laser cladding. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 26, 8440–8455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, H.; Sun, Y.; Qiao, Y.; Du, X. Effect of Ni-coated WC reinforced particles on microstructure and mechanical properties of laser cladding Fe-Co duplex coating. Opt. Laser Technol. 2021, 142, 107209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. He, B.-M.; Liu, X.-B.; Zhang, F.-Z.; Liu, Z.-Y.; Zhang, S.-H. Tribological and oxidation behaviors of TiN reinforced Co matrix composite coatings on Inconel718 alloy by laser cladding. Tribol. Int. 2023, 188, 108781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Gao, W.; Yang, G.; Fu, H.; Xi, N.; Chen, H. High temperature wear performance of laser cladding Co06 coating on high-speed train brake disc. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 481, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Naizabekov, A.; Samodurova, M.; Bodrov, E.; Lezhnev, S.; Samoilova, O.; Trofimov, E.; Mikhailov, D.; Litvinyuk, K.; Trofimova, S.; Latfulina, Y.; et al. Use of laser cladding for the synthesis of coatings from high-entropy alloys reinforced with ceramic particles. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 19, e02541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, T.; Yu, L.T.; Chen, G.; Wang, R.Q.; Xue, Y.P.; Lu, Y.H.; Luan, B.L. Effects of Mo and Nb on the microstructure and high temperature oxidation behaviors of CoCrFeNi-based high entropy alloys. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 27, 1537–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, L.; Xue, P.; Lan, Q.; Meng, G.; Ren, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xu, P.; Liu, Z. Recent research and development status of laser cladding: A review. Opt. Laser Technol. 2021, 138, 106915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bysakh, S.; Chat, K.; Maiwald, T. Microstructure evolution in laser alloyed layer of Cu-Fe-Al-Si on Cu substrate. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 375, 661–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, Y.M.; Song, J.G.; Wang, L. Structure and Wear Performance of Laser Cladding Ni-Based Coatings on Aluminum Bronze Surface. Mater. Prot. 2012, 45, 30–32+2. [Google Scholar]
  24. Su, Z.; Li, J.; Shi, Y.; Ren, S.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X. Effect of process parameters on microstructure and tribological properties of Ni60A/Cr3C2 laser cladding on 60Si2Mn steel. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2023, 473, 130005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kumar, V.; Kumar, R.; Das, A.K. Comprehensive study of process parameters and their effect on tribological properties of laser cladded Ti6Al4V alloy: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 23, 2214–7853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, T.; Wu, W.; Li, W.; Liu, D. Laser cladding of nanoparticle TiC ceramic powder: Effects of process parameters on the quality characteristics of the coatings and its prediction model. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 116, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Y.; Xu, T.; Li, G.; Li, Z.; Du, F.; Chen, G. A multi-objective optimization of laser cladding process of Ni-based coating on the preheated copper alloy. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 35, 105614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lai, Q.; Abrahams, R.; Yan, W.Y.; Qiu, C.; Mutton, P.; Paradowska, A.; Fang, X.Y.; Soodi, M.; Wu, X.H. Effects of preheating and carbon dilution on material characteristics of laser-cladded hypereutectoid rail steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2018, 712, 548–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bidron, G.; Doghri, A.; Malot, T.; Fournier-Dit-Chabert, F.; Thomas, M.; Peyre, P. Reduction of the hot cracking sensitivity of CM-247LC superalloy processed by laser cladding using induction preheating. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2020, 277, 116461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Weisheit, A.; Rittinghaus, S.-K.; Dutta, A.; Majumdar, J.D. Studies on the effect of composition and pre-heating on microstructure and mechanical properties of direct laser clad titanium aluminide. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2020, 131, 106041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, L.; Chen, S.; Wei, M.; Liang, J.; Liu, C.; Wang, M. Microstructure and properties of 24CrNiMoY alloy steel prepared by direct laser deposited under different preheating temperatures. Mater. Charact. 2019, 158, 109931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hastie, J.C.; Koelblin, J.; Kartal, M.E.; Attallah, M.M.; Martinez, R. Evolution of internal pores within AlSi10Mg manufactured by laser powder bed fusion under tension: As-built and heat treated conditions. Mater. Des. 2021, 204, 109645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM micrograph of the Ni-based alloy powder.
Figure 1. SEM micrograph of the Ni-based alloy powder.
Lubricants 12 00021 g001
Figure 2. Macroscopic morphology of coatings preheated at four temperatures. (a) 100 °C; (b) 200 °C; (c) 300 °C; (d) 400 °C.
Figure 2. Macroscopic morphology of coatings preheated at four temperatures. (a) 100 °C; (b) 200 °C; (c) 300 °C; (d) 400 °C.
Lubricants 12 00021 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the molten pool and coating.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the molten pool and coating.
Lubricants 12 00021 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of coatings preheated at four preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C).
Figure 4. XRD patterns of coatings preheated at four preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C).
Lubricants 12 00021 g004
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of four coatings that were preheated at 100 (a1a3), 200 (b1b3), 300 (c1c3) and 400 °C (d1d3).
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of four coatings that were preheated at 100 (a1a3), 200 (b1b3), 300 (c1c3) and 400 °C (d1d3).
Lubricants 12 00021 g005
Figure 6. SEM micrograph and EDS line scan results for the four coatings with different preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C). (a) 100 °C; (b) 200 °C; (c) 300 °C; (d) 400 °C.
Figure 6. SEM micrograph and EDS line scan results for the four coatings with different preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C). (a) 100 °C; (b) 200 °C; (c) 300 °C; (d) 400 °C.
Lubricants 12 00021 g006
Figure 7. Microhardness of the four coatings’ cross sections.
Figure 7. Microhardness of the four coatings’ cross sections.
Lubricants 12 00021 g007
Figure 8. Friction coefficients of coatings preheated at four preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C).
Figure 8. Friction coefficients of coatings preheated at four preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C).
Lubricants 12 00021 g008
Figure 9. Wear rates of coatings preheated at four preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C).
Figure 9. Wear rates of coatings preheated at four preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C).
Lubricants 12 00021 g009
Figure 10. Morphology of friction and wear of coatings preheated at four preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C). (a) 100 °C; (b) 200 °C; (c) 300 °C; (d) 400 °C.
Figure 10. Morphology of friction and wear of coatings preheated at four preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C). (a) 100 °C; (b) 200 °C; (c) 300 °C; (d) 400 °C.
Lubricants 12 00021 g010
Figure 11. Polarization curves of coatings preheated at four preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C).
Figure 11. Polarization curves of coatings preheated at four preheating temperatures (100, 200, 300 and 400 °C).
Lubricants 12 00021 g011
Figure 12. Diagram of the gas overflow in the molten pool during laser cladding. (a) lower preheating temperature; (b) higher preheating temperature; (c) the highest preheating temperature.
Figure 12. Diagram of the gas overflow in the molten pool during laser cladding. (a) lower preheating temperature; (b) higher preheating temperature; (c) the highest preheating temperature.
Lubricants 12 00021 g012
Figure 13. Crack at the bottom of the coating preheated at 400 °C.
Figure 13. Crack at the bottom of the coating preheated at 400 °C.
Lubricants 12 00021 g013
Figure 14. Microstructure evolution of four preheating temperatures. (a) 100 °C; (b) 200 °C; (c) 300 °C; (d) 400 °C.
Figure 14. Microstructure evolution of four preheating temperatures. (a) 100 °C; (b) 200 °C; (c) 300 °C; (d) 400 °C.
Lubricants 12 00021 g014
Table 1. Chemical composition of the copper alloy (wt.%).
Table 1. Chemical composition of the copper alloy (wt.%).
ZnAlMnFeCu
29.06.33.21.460.1
Table 2. Chemical composition of the Ni-based alloy powder (wt.%).
Table 2. Chemical composition of the Ni-based alloy powder (wt.%).
FeCBSiCrWCNi
1212.51.5125Bal.
Table 3. Heights, molten pool depths and dilution rates of the four coatings.
Table 3. Heights, molten pool depths and dilution rates of the four coatings.
Preheating Tem. (°C)100200300400
Height (mm)0.270.480.390.27
Depth (mm)0.10.120.160.18
Dilution rate (%)27202940
Table 4. Percentage of element atoms at the P1–P4 points in the coatings.
Table 4. Percentage of element atoms at the P1–P4 points in the coatings.
PointAtomic Concentration %
NiFeCWBCuZnCr
P125.429.623.89.44.57.2-0.1
P239.711.635.45.42.81.7-3.4
P331.115.220.93.3-16.88.83.9
P425.515.49.85.4-23.718.61.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Jin, H.; Xu, T.; Xu, Z.; Du, F.; Yu, M.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, D. Effect of a Substrate’s Preheating Temperature on the Microstructure and Properties of Ni-Based Alloy Coatings. Lubricants 2024, 12, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12010021

AMA Style

Liu Y, Jin H, Xu T, Xu Z, Du F, Yu M, Gao Y, Zhang D. Effect of a Substrate’s Preheating Temperature on the Microstructure and Properties of Ni-Based Alloy Coatings. Lubricants. 2024; 12(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12010021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yu, Haiquan Jin, Tianhao Xu, Zhiqiang Xu, Fengming Du, Miao Yu, Yali Gao, and Dongdong Zhang. 2024. "Effect of a Substrate’s Preheating Temperature on the Microstructure and Properties of Ni-Based Alloy Coatings" Lubricants 12, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12010021

APA Style

Liu, Y., Jin, H., Xu, T., Xu, Z., Du, F., Yu, M., Gao, Y., & Zhang, D. (2024). Effect of a Substrate’s Preheating Temperature on the Microstructure and Properties of Ni-Based Alloy Coatings. Lubricants, 12(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12010021

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop