Multiple Mating in the Citrophilous Mealybug Pseudococcus calceolariae: Implications for Mating Disruption
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Insect Rearing
2.2. Multiple Mating Experiment
2.3. Flight Tunnel Experiments
2.3.1. Trial 1: Male Response to a Single Loading of Sex Pheromone
2.3.2. Trial 2: Male Response to Four Different Loadings of Sex Pheromone
2.3.3. Trial 3: Mimicking Mating Disruption
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Multiple Mating Experiment
3.2. Flight Tunnel Experiments
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bostanian, N.J.; Vincent, C.; Isaacs, R. Arthropod Management in Vineyards: Pests, Approaches, and Future Directions; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Daane, K.M.; Almeida, R.P.; Bell, V.A.; Walker, J.T.; Botton, M.; Fallahzadeh, M.; Mani, M.; Miano, J.L.; Sforza, R.; Walton, V.M.; et al. Biology and management of mealybugs in vineyards. In Arthropod Management in Vineyards; Bostanian, N.J., Vincent, C., Isaacs, R., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 271–307. [Google Scholar]
- Tsai, C.W.; Rowhani, A.; Golino, D.A.; Daane, K.M.; Almeida, R.P.P. Mealybug transmission of grapevine leafroll viruses: An analysis of virus–vector specificity. Phytopathology 2010, 100, 830–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesan, T.; Jalali, S.K.; Ramya, S.L.; Prathibha, M. Insecticide resistance and its management in mealybugs. In Mealybugs and Their Management in Agricultural and Horticultural Crops; Mani, M., Shivaraju, C., Eds.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2016; pp. 223–229. [Google Scholar]
- Charles, J.G.; Walker, J.T.S.; White, V. Resistance to chlorpyrifos in the mealybugs Pseudococcus affinis and P. longispinus in Hawkes Bay and Waikato pipfruit orchards. Proc. N. Z. Plant Prot. Conf. 1993, 46, 120–125. [Google Scholar]
- Saddiq, B.; Shad, S.A.; Khan, H.A.A.; Aslam, M.; Ejaz, M.; Afzal, M.B.S. Resistance in the mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in Pakistan to selected organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides. Crop Prot. 2014, 66, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.; Akhtar, S. Development of resistance to insecticides in the invasive mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Pakistan. Crop Prot. 2016, 88, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grimes, E.W.; Cone, W.W. Control of the grape mealybug, Pseudococcus maritimus (Hom.: Pseudococcidae), on Concord grape in Washington. J. Entomol. Soc. Br. Columbia 1985, 82, 3–6. [Google Scholar]
- Prabhaker, N.; Gispert, C.; Castle, S.J. Baseline susceptibility of Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from California to select insecticides. J. Econ. Entomol. 2012, 105, 1392–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anand, P.; Ayub, K. The effect of five insecticides on Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) and its natural enemies Anagyrus kamali Moursi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), and Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant and Scymnus coccivora Aiyar (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Int. Pest Control 2000, 42, 170–173. [Google Scholar]
- Zettler, J.L.; Follett, P.A.; Gill, R.F. Susceptibility of Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) to methyl bromide. J. Econ. Entomol. 2002, 95, 1169–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ioriatti, C.; Lucchi, A. Semiochemical strategies for tortricid moth control in apple orchards and vineyards in Italy. J. Chem. Ecol. 2016, 42, 571–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pertot, I.; Caffi, T.; Mugnai, L.; Hoffmann, C.; Grando, M.S.; Gary, C.; Lafond, D.; Duso, C.; Thiéry, D.; Mazzoni, V.; et al. A critical review of plant protection tools for reducing pesticide use on grapevine and new perspectives for implementation of IPM in viticulture. Crop Prot. 2017, 97, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucchi, A.; Benelli, G. Towards pesticide-free farming? Sharing needs and knowledge promotes Integrated Pest Management. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 13439–13445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Daane, K.M.; Bentley, W.J.; Millar, J.G.; Walton, V.M.; Cooper, M.L.; Biscay, P.; Yokota, G.Y. Integrated management of mealybugs in California vineyards. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Grape Production and Processing, Baramati (Pune), Maharashtra, India, 6–11 February 2006; Adsule, P.G., Indu, S., Sawant, I.S., Shikhamany, S.D., Eds.; International Society for Horticultural Science: Madison, WI, USA, 2008; pp. 235–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansour, R.; Belzunces, L.; Suma, P.; Zappalà, L.; Mazzeo, G.; Grissa-Lebdi, K.; Russo, A.; Biondi, A. Vine and citrus mealybug pest control based on synthetic chemicals. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 38, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carde, R.T. Principles of mating disruption. In Behavior-Modifying Chemicals for Pest Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants; Ridgway, R., Silverstein, R.M., Inscoe, M., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 47–71. [Google Scholar]
- Millar, J.G.; Daane, K.M.; McElfresh, J.S.; Moreira, J.A.; Bentley, W.J. Chemistry and applications of mealybug sex pheromones. In Semiochemicals in Pest and Weed Control; Petroski, R.J., Maria, R., Tellez, M.R., Behle, R.W., Eds.; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; Volume 906, pp. 11–27. [Google Scholar]
- Pherobase. Available online: http://www.pherobase.com (accessed on 21 July 2019).
- Walton, V.M.; Daane, K.M.; Bentley, W.J.; Millar, J.G.; Larsen, T.E.; Malakar-kuenen, R. Pheromone-based mating disruption of Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in California vineyards. J. Econ. Entomol. 2006, 99, 1280–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cocco, A.; Muscas, E.; Mura, A.; Iodice, A.; Savino, F.; Lentini, A. Influence of mating disruption on the reproductive biology of the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), under field conditions. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 2806–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucchi, A.; Suma, P.; Ladurner, E.; Iodice, A.; Savino, F.; Ricciardi, R.; Cosci, F.; Marchesini, E.; Conte, G.; Benelli, G. Managing the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus, through pheromone-mediated mating disruption. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 10708–10718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petersen, C.L.; Charles, J.G. Transmission of grapevine leafroll-associated closteroviruses by Pseudococcus longispinus and P. calceolariae. Plant Pathol. 1997, 46, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartlett, B.R. Introduced Parasites and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds: A World Review; Agric Res. Service, Agriculture Handbook nr 480; U.S. Dep. Agric.: Washington DC, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- El-Sayed, A.M.; Unelius, C.R.; Twidle, A.; Mitchell, V.; Manning, L.A.; Cole, L.; Suckling, D.M.; Flores, M.F.; Zavievo, T.; Bergamann, J. Chrysanthemyl 2-acetoxy-3-methylbutanoate: The sex pheromone of the citrophilous mealybug, Pseudococcus calceolariae. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 1075–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sullivan, N.J.; Butler, R.C.; Salehi, L.; Twidle, A.M.; Baker, G.; Suckling, D.M. Deployment of the sex pheromone of Pseudococcus calceolariae (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) as a potential new tool for mass trapping in citrus in South Australia. N. Z. Entomol. 2019, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rotundo, G.; Tremblay, E. Osservazioni sull’attivita di volo dei maschi di Pseudococcus calceolariae (Mask.)(Homoptera Coccoidea). Boll. Lab. Entomol. Agrar. Filippo Silvestri 1976, 33, 108–112. [Google Scholar]
- Rotundo, G.; Tremblay, E.; Papa, P. Short-range orientation of Pseudococcus calceolariae (Mask.) males (Homoptera Coccoidea) in a wind tunnel. Boll. Lab. Entomol. Agrar. Filippo Silvestri 1980, 37, 31–37. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, E.B.; Branco, M.; Mendel, Z.; Franco, J.C. Mating behavior and performance in the two cosmopolitan mealybug species Planococcus citri and Pseudococcus calceolariae (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). J. Insect Behav. 2013, 26, 304–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, E.B.; Mendel, Z.; Franco, J.C. Can facultative parthenogenesis occur in biparental mealybug species? Phytoparasitica 2010, 38, 19–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suckling, D.M.; Stringer, L.D.; Jimenez-Perez, A.; Walter, G.H.; Sullivan, N.; El-Sayed, A.M. With or without pheromone habituation: Possible differences between insect orders? Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 1259–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, E.B.; Mourato, C.; Branco, M.; Mendel, Z.; Franco, J.C. Biparental mealybugs may be more promiscuous than we thought. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2018, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foster, S.P.; Ayers, R.H. Multiple mating and its effects in the lightbrown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker). J. Insect Physiol. 1996, 42, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knight, A.L. Multiple mating of male and female codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple orchards treated with sex pheromone. Environ. Entomol. 2007, 36, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waterworth, R.A.; Wright, I.M.; Millar, J.G. Reproductive biology of three cosmopolitan mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) species, Pseudococcus longispinus, Pseudococcus viburni, and Planococcus ficus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2011, 104, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharon, R.; Zahavi, T.; Sokolsky, T.; Sofer-Arad, C.; Tomer, M.; Kedoshim, R.; Harari, A.R. Mating disruption method against the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus: Effect of sequential treatment on infested vines. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2016, 161, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cocco, A.; Lentini, A.; Serra, G. Mating disruption of Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in vineyards using reservoir pheromone dispensers. J. Insect Sci. 2014, 14, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, E.B.; Mouco, J.; Antunes, R.; Mendel, Z.; Franco, J.C. Mate location and sexual maturity of adult male mealybugs: Narrow window of opportunity in a short lifetime. IOBC Wrps Bull. 2009, 41, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
- Mendel, Z.; Protasov, A.; Jasrotia, P.; Silva, E.B. Sexual maturation and aging of adult male mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 2012, 102, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Sayed, A.M.; Gödde, J.; Witzgall, P.; Arn, H. Characterization of pheromone blend for grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana by using flight track recording. J. Chem. Ecol. 1999, 25, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benelli, G.; Stefanini, C.; Giunti, G.; Geri, S.; Messing, R.H.; Canale, A. Associative learning for danger avoidance nullifies innate positive chemotaxis to host olfactory stimuli in a parasitic wasp. Naturwissenschaften 2014, 10, 753–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SAS Institute. JMP 11; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Benelli, G.; Desneux, N.; Romano, D.; Conte, G.; Messing, R.H.; Canale, A. Contest experience enhances aggressive behaviour in a fly: When losers learn to win. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franco, J.C.; Zada, A.; Mendel, Z. Novel approaches for the management of mealybug pests. In Biorational Control of Arthropod Pests; Ishaaya, I., Horowitz, A.R., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 233–278. [Google Scholar]
- Franco, J.C.; Gross, S.; Silva, E.B.; Suma, P.; Russo, A.; Mendel, Z. Is mass-trapping a feasible management tactic of the citrus mealybug in citrus orchard? Anais Inst. Super. Agron. 2003, 49, 353–367. [Google Scholar]
- Aak, A.; Birkemoe, T.; Knudsen, G.K. Efficient mass trapping: Catching the pest, Calliphora vicina (Diptera, Calliphoridae), of Norwegian stockfish production. J. Chem. Ecol. 2011, 37, 924–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navarro-Llopis, V.; Alfaro, F.; Domínguez, J.; Sanchis, J.; Primo, J. Evaluation of traps and lures for mass trapping of Mediterranean fruit fly in citrus groves. J. Econ. Entomol. 2008, 101, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Visser, J.H.; Avé, D.A. General green leaf volatiles in the olfactory orientation of the Colorado beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1978, 24, 738–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elzen, G.W.; Williams, H.J.; Vinson, S.B. Wind tunnel flight responses by hymenopterous parasitoid Campoletis sonorensis to cotton cultivars and lines. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1986, 42, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruce, T.J.A.; Wadhams, L.J.; Woodcock, C.M. Insect host location: A volatile situation. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, J.R.; Roelofs, W.L. Sustained-flight tunnel for measuring insect responses to wind-borne sex pheromones. J. Chem. Ecol. 1978, 4, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanders, C.J. Disruption of male spruce budworm orientation to calling females in a wind tunnel by synthetic pheromone. J. Chem. Ecol. 1982, 8, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanders, C.J. Effects of prolonged exposure to different concentrations of synthetic pheromone on mating disruption of spruce budworm moths in a wind tunnel. Can. Entomol. 1996, 128, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lentini, A.; Mura, A.; Muscas, E.; Nuvoli, M.T.; Cocco, A. Effects of delayed mating on the reproductive biology of the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 2018, 108, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unelius, C.R.; El-Sayed, A.M.; Twidle, A.; Bunn, B.; Zavievo, T.; Flores, M.F.; Bell, V.; Bergmann, J. The absolute configuration of the sex pheromone of the citrophilous mealybug, Pseudococcus calceolariae. J. Chem. Ecol. 2011, 37, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Figueredo, A.J.; Baker, T.C. Reduction of the response to sex pheromone in the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) following successive pheromonal exposures. J. Insect Behav. 1992, 5, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laudonia, S.; Viggiani, G. Natural enemies of the citrophilus mealybug (Pseudococcus calceolariae Mask.). Boll. Lab. Entomol. Agrar. Filippo Silvestri 1986, 43, 167–171. [Google Scholar]
- Afifi, A.I.; Arnaouty, S.A.E.; Attia, A.R.; Alla, A.E.M.A. Biological Control of Citrus Mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso.) using Coccinellid Predator, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 13, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansour, R.; Grissa-Lebdi, K.; Khemakhem, M.; Chaari, I.; Trabelsi, I.; Sabri, A.; Marti, S. Pheromone-mediated mating disruption of Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcideae) in Tunisian vineyards: Effect on insect population dynamics. Biologia 2017, 72, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Sayed, A.M.; Suckling, D.M.; Wearing, C.H.; Byers, J.A. Potential of mass trapping for long-term pest management and eradication of invasive species. J. Econ. Entomol. 2006, 99, 1550–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Sayed, A.M.; Suckling, D.M.; Byers, J.A.; Jang, E.B.; Wearing, C.H. Potential of “Lure and Kill” in long-term pest management and eradication of invasive species. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102, 815–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ricciardi, R.; Lucchi, A.; Benelli, G.; Suckling, D.M. Multiple Mating in the Citrophilous Mealybug Pseudococcus calceolariae: Implications for Mating Disruption. Insects 2019, 10, 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10090285
Ricciardi R, Lucchi A, Benelli G, Suckling DM. Multiple Mating in the Citrophilous Mealybug Pseudococcus calceolariae: Implications for Mating Disruption. Insects. 2019; 10(9):285. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10090285
Chicago/Turabian StyleRicciardi, Renato, Andrea Lucchi, Giovanni Benelli, and David Maxwell Suckling. 2019. "Multiple Mating in the Citrophilous Mealybug Pseudococcus calceolariae: Implications for Mating Disruption" Insects 10, no. 9: 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10090285