Next Article in Journal
Her Majesty’s Desert Throne: The Ecology of Queen Butterfly Oviposition on Mojave Milkweed Host Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Stable Isotope Enrichment (Δ15N) in the Predatory Flower Bug (Orius majusculus) Predicts Fitness-Related Differences between Diets
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Mazes to Study the Effects of Spatial Complexity, Predation and Population Density on Mate Finding

Insects 2020, 11(4), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11040256
by Lloyd D. Stringer 1,2,3,*, Nicola J. Sullivan 1,2, Robyn White 1, Alfredo Jiménez-Pérez 4, Jess Furlong 1, John M. Kean 2,5, Jacqueline R. Beggs 3 and David Maxwell Suckling 1,2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Insects 2020, 11(4), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11040256
Submission received: 28 February 2020 / Revised: 8 April 2020 / Accepted: 15 April 2020 / Published: 20 April 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The mazes are designed well but this brings to mind the question of flying in mating and avoidance behavior - is it necessary?

 

Would the same results occur in a 3D maze? The Allee effect should be highlighted a bit more and connected to the hypothesis.

 

The fly density assay is well designed, and he result that the number of pairs present affects the mating rate is interesting.

 

It seems that the Chelifer doesn't prefer one sex of fly over the other, but I think that is an avenue worth investigation.

 

 

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript gives a good contribution to spatial effects on predators using mazes. However, I have concerns about some statistical methods and values of the paper that I believe need to be addressed in order to improve its clarity. Their approach is interesting but it has some flaws that make this version unacceptable for publication. Provided they conduct changes to the manuscript, I believe this paper could be of interest to the interested reader on population insect density.
Please see my specific comments below:
L.41: Place “,” after reality
L.51: … gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar from…
L.65 and L.69: we hypothetized…
L.75 Colonies…Which species?
L.77-78: Change ml by mL
L.79: Since D. simulans…
L.86: majority of D. simulans are…
L.90: Change ml by mL
L.150-151: Drosophila stimulans in italic
L.151: …digitized…
L.74-148: In material and methods, provide information about different statistical methods used in each experiment.
L.170: Delete “significantly”
L.172 and 176: Provide the χ2 value
L.183-189: Again, there is no statistical data information.
Ls.268-270: These sentence is no conclusive, place by discussion or delete.

 

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript “Mazes to study the effects of spatial complexity, predation and population density on mate finding” has been improved and all my questions were taken into account. I recommend the publication in “Insects”.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

I appreciate the time you have taken to consider our original submission and our revisions based on your very helpful suggestions.

Sincerely,

Lloyd Stringer

Back to TopTop