Next Article in Journal
Biochemical Mechanisms, Cross-resistance and Stability of Resistance to Metaflumizone in Plutella xylostella
Previous Article in Journal
Host Plant and Antibiotic Effects on Scent Bouquet Composition of Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua Calling Males, Two Polyphagous Tephritid Pests
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/insects11050310
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Insecticidal Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Strains on the Nettle Caterpillar, Euprosterna elaeasa (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae)

by
Angelica Plata-Rueda
1,
Hughes Antonio Quintero
2,
José Eduardo Serrão
3 and
Luis Carlos Martínez
3,*
1
Department de Entomology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais 36570–000, Brazil
2
Department of Crop Protection, Monterrey Oil Palm Plantation, Puerto Wilches, Santander 687–061, Colombia
3
Department of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais 36570–000, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2020, 11(5), 310; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050310
Submission received: 10 April 2020 / Revised: 13 May 2020 / Accepted: 14 May 2020 / Published: 15 May 2020
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the present work, we evaluated the insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) strains on Euprosterna elaeasa as an alternative for the organophosphate insecticide use in oil palm plantations in the Americas. The toxic effects of four Bt-strains (HD-1 var. kurstaki, SA-12 var. kurstaki, ABTS-1857 var. aizawai, and GC-91 var. aizawai) were evaluated against E. elaeasa caterpillars for toxicity, survival, anti-feeding, and mortality in field-controlled conditions. The Bt-strains, ABTS-1857 var. aizawai (LC50 = 0.84 mg mL−1), GC-91 var. aizawai (LC50 = 1.13 mg mL−1), and HD-1 var. kurstaki (LC50 = 1.25 mg mL−1), were the most toxic to E. elaeasa. The caterpillar survival was 99% without exposure to Bt-strains, and decreased to 52–23% in insects treated with the LC50 and 10–1% in insects exposed to LC90 after 48 h. Furthermore, Bt-strains decreased significantly the consumption of oil palm leaves of E. elaeasa 3 h after exposure. Mortality of E. elaeasa caterpillars caused by Bt-strains had similar lethal effects in the laboratory and in field conditions. Our data suggest that Bt-strains have insecticidal activity against E. elaeasa and, therefore, have potential applications in oil palm pest management schemes.

1. Introduction

The nettle caterpillar, Euprosterna elaeasa Dyar (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) is a significant pest of Elaeis guineensis Jacquin (Arecales: Arecaceae) from Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Mexico, Panamá, Peru, Surinam, Trinidad and Tobago, and Venezuela [1,2]. This insect also damages other palm trees species, such as Bactris gasipaes Kunth, Calappa botryophora (Mart.) Kuntze, Cocos nucifera Linnaeus, and Desmoncus polyacanthos (Mart.) Kuntze [1,3]. The life cycle of E. elaeasa is 64 days (egg 5.1, larva 35.2, pupa 19.4, and adult 4.7) [4]. Euprosterna elaeasa damages oil palm leaves with a consumption rate of 66 cm2/caterpillar, and the damage causes an 80% loss of plant canopy with 1000 insects/leaf. It is also a reason behind Pestalotiopsis fungal disease in oil palm plantations [2,4].
In Colombia, chemical insecticides such as acephate, methamidophos, and monocrotophos are used on oil palm crops to control E. elaeasa [1,5]. Due to the high level of infestation and the rapid spread of E. elaeasa in oil palm trees, the use of insecticides is common practice [6,7]. However, recent studies have shown the presence of these insecticides in minimal quantities in palm oil [8,9]. Conventional insecticides are expensive and cause environmental pollution [10], atmosphere ozone-depletion [11], residual long [12], and insecticide resistance [13]. New alternatives that are more sustainable, different from organophosphates, are needed to replace the main insecticides historically used against E. elaeasa for the past 50 years [1,6]. The search for alternatives for E. elaeasa control is important, considering the impact generated by the use of insecticides in this agroecosystem [6]. Thus, the use of natural enemies, such as viruses, bacteria, and fungi, can be an alternative for oil palm pest control [14,15,16].
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a biocontrol agent for defoliating pests worldwide, and individual strains are specific to a small group of insect targets without effects on animals and environment [17]. Bt is a gram-positive spore-forming bacterium with entomopathogenic properties. In the sporulation, Bt produces crystalline or “Cry” inclusions, called δ-endotoxins, biosynthesized during the second phase of the growth cycle [18]. In this cycle, the Cry proteins are converted in active toxins upon insect ingestion [19]. Several Cry proteins displaying activity on insects have been identified: the Cry1 proteins are toxic to Lepidoptera [20], while the Cry3 proteins are toxic to Coleoptera [21,22]; also, a high number of different subgroups (Cry1Ac, Cry1Ba, Cry8Ca, Cry1Eb, Cry1J, etc.) are active against mosquitoes, Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, and Hymenoptera [21,23,24].
Bt was reported as a biological control agent for oil palm pests [6,25]. Different oil palm lepidopteran species may have different levels of susceptibility to a specific Cry protein that occurs in Metisa plana Walker (Psychidae) [16], Opsiphanes cassina Felder (Nymphalidae) [26], and Tirathaba rufivena Walker (Pyralidae) [27]. This microbiological agent provides biodiversity in agroecosystems and the delivery of ecosystem services to agricultural production, especially in pest population regulation [28]. Since the entomopathogenic bacterium infects their host through the midgut, they hold greater potential as biocontrol agents for E. elaeasa; however, the use of Bt on this insect has not been carried out.
This study evaluated the insecticidal activity of Bt strains as potential agents to control E. elaeasa, explained in different experiments: (i) toxicity test, (ii) survivorship, (iii) anti-feeding effect, and (iv) mortality in field conditions. The objective was to contribute to the development of strategies for controlling E. elaeasa, as a replacement for organophosphate insecticides.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects

In the field, 2527 adults of E. elaeasa (males = 1284, females = 1243) were captured manually during the day, in 5-yr-old commercial plantations of oil palm in the county of Puerto Wilches, Santander, Colombia (N 07°20’, W 73°54’). The insects were transferred in plastic trays (30 × 50 × 50 cm) with perforated lids for ventilation to the Entomology Laboratory of the Oil Palm Monterrey Plantation (Puerto Wilches, Santander, Colombia) to establish a breeding colony in laboratory conditions. Adults were fed a honey solution daily (15 mL of honey and distilled water, in a 2:1 ratio) applied with a sponge. Males and females of E. elaeasa were isolated in glass containers (30 × 30 × 30 cm) covered with a nylon mesh and containing E. guineensis leaves. For egg development, 9800 eggs oviposited on the surface of the leaves were collected every 24 h and placed in Petri dishes (90 × 15 mm high) containing a paper towel saturated with water. After hatching, first-instar caterpillars (n = 7550) were placed individually in glass vials (5 × 25 cm) covered with cotton and fed every 24 h with E. guineensis leaves. Eggs and caterpillars were maintained in incubators at 27 ± 1 °C, with 75 ± 5% RH and 12:12 (L:D) photoperiod. Newly third instar E. elaeasa caterpillars were used in the laboratory and field condition bioassays.

2.2. Concentration–Mortality Bioassay

Commercial Bt formulations commonly used to control Lepidoptera were used in all bioassays and selected for quality, high-efficiency, and non-toxicity (toxicity Class IV) [18]. The following Bt strains, HD-1 var. kurstaki (Dipel®, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL, USA), SA-12 var. kurstaki (Thuricide®, Certis USA LLC, Columbia, MD, USA), ABTS-1857 var. aizawai (XenTari®, Valent Bioscience Corporation, Osage, Iowa, USA), and GC-91 var. aizawai (Agree®, Certis USA LLC, Columbia, MD, USA), were prepared in an aqueous solution with 0.1% Triton X-100 (strains and distilled water) to obtain a stock suspension (100 g L−1), from which dilutions were prepared as needed. Six concentrations (0.156, 0312, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg mL−1) were used to evaluate the toxicity of each Bt-strain to E. elaeasa caterpillars, construct concentration–mortality curves, and estimate the lethal concentrations (LC50 and LC90). Distilled water with 0.1% Triton X-100 was used as control. The application of the concentrations was carried out by the feeding method using oil palm leaves. Pieces (10 × 10 mm) of oil palm leaves were cut, sterilized with 5% sodium hypochlorite with three successive series of distilled water, and dried at room temperature. Then, pieces of oil palm leaf were dipped in solutions of different concentrations of each Bt-strain for 10 s and allowed to air dry for a period of 1 h. Caterpillars were placed individually in Petri dishes, and a piece of oil palm leaf treated with Bt-strain was provided. Three replicates with 50 insects of each were used in concentration testing, and the experimental design was completely randomized. The dead insects were counted after 48 h Bt-strain exposure.

2.3. Time–Mortality Bioassay

Caterpillars of E. elaeasa were placed individually in Petri dishes and exposed to the lethal concentrations (LC50 and LC90) of each of the Bt-strains determined in the dose–response relationship. A control was performed using distilled water with 0.1% Triton X-100. Exposure procedures and conditions were the same as described above for the concentration–mortality bioassay Section 2.2. The number of live insects was recorded every 6 h for 2 d. Three replicates of 50 insects were used by each Bt-strain and the experimental design was completely randomized.

2.4. Anti–Feeding Effect

Caterpillars of E. elaeasa were placed individually in Petri dishes with a piece of oil palm leaf (10 × 10 mm) treated with LC50 or LC90 of each Bt-strains and distilled water as control. Caterpillars were in contact with E. guineensis leaves for 3 h and, after this, the pieces were photographed with a digital photographic camera (D40, 18D55 mm, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Kantō, Japan) with a 15 cm macro focus in natural and flourishing light (SB-700 Nikon Corporation). The images were analyzed using the digital analysis software, UTHSCSA Image Tool v. 2.0 (University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA). The leaf area consumed by the caterpillar was measured in mm2, with pixels based on the RGB (red, 213 nm; green, 111 nm; blue, 56 bits) histogram. Twenty repetitions for each of the Bt-strain concentrations (LC50 and LC90) and control were carried out in a completely randomized design.

2.5. Mortality in Semi–Controlled Test

The bioassay was conducted in 5-yr-old commercial oil palm plantations (cv ‘Tenera’ × ‘Deli Ghana’) in the county of Puerto Wilches (Santander, Colombia), with an average temperature of 27.98 °C, 81–93% relative humidity, 1455 to 2258 h of sunshine per year, and 2189 mm of annual rainfall. In these conditions, fifty palm trees were selected and E. elaeasa caterpillars were used for each Bt-strain in the controlled field test. For each palm tree, 50 caterpillars were placed on the leaf No. 17, according to the rules of phyllotaxy [29] and isolated with a nylon trap (0.5 × 0.5 × 1.20 m). Treatments consisted of adding each Bt-strain at the calculated LC90 concentration, and distilled water with 0.1% Triton X-100 as the control, with ten replications per treatment. Applications of 100 mL of Bt-strain per leaf were made by a manual pump (Royal Condor®, 5 L capacity, Soacha, Cundinamarca, Colombia), and the number of dead caterpillars was counted after 15 d Bt-strain exposure.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The concentration–mortality data were submitted to Probit analysis to obtain a dose–response curve [30]. The time–mortality data were analyzed for survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier estimators, log-rank test) with the Origin Pro 9.1 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). Anti-feeding effect data were arcsine-transformed and submitted to one-way ANOVA, and a Tukey’s honestly significance difference (HSD) (p < 0.05) test was also used for comparison of means. Mortality data in semi-controlled conditions were summarized in percentages and submitted to one-way ANOVA and a Tukey’s HSD (p < 0.05); also, all values presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical procedures were analyzed by SAS 9.0 software (SAS Institute, Campus Drive Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Concentration–Mortality Bioassay

The dose–response model provided a good fit to the data (p > 0.05), allowing the determination of toxicological endpoints, and confirms the toxicity of each Bt-strain to E. elaeasa Table 1. The bioassay showed that ABTS-1857 var. aizawai had LC50 = 0.84 mg mL−1 (range of 0.66–1.16 mg mL−1), GC-91 var. aizawai had LC50 = 1.09 mg mL−1 (range of 0.74–1.72 mg mL−1), HD-1 var. kurstaki had LC50 = 1.13 mg mL−1 (range of 0.84–1.56 mg mL−1), and SA-12 var. kurstaki had LC50 = 1.25 mg mL−1 (range of 0.80–2.13 mg mL−1). Mortality was <1% in the control group.

3.2. Time–Mortality Bioassay

Survival rate was determined 48 h after E. elaeasa caterpillar exposure to Bt-strains at lethal concentrations, LC50 and LC90. Survival rates differed between treatments at LC50 (log-rank test, χ2 = 9.47, df = 3, and p < 0.001). E. elaeasa survival decreased from 99.9% in the control to 52.79% with SA-12 var. kurstaki, 51.37% with GC-91 var. aizawai, 35.62% with HD-1 var. kurstaki, and 23.12% with ABTS-1857 var. aizawai (Figure 1A).
At LC90, the survival rates of E. elaeasa were different according to the treatments (log-rank test, χ2 = 18.57, df = 4, p < 0.001), decreasing from 99.9% (control) to 10.13% with SA-12 var. kurstaki, 9.87% with GC-91 var. aizawai, and 0% with both the HD-1 var. kurstaki and ABTS-1857 var. aizawai (Figure 1B).

3.3. Anti–Feeding Effect

The four Bt-strains caused an anti-feeding effect on E. elaeasa caterpillars, with lower leaf area consumed in comparison to control (Figure 2). The leaf area consumed by E. elaeasa differed between Bt-strains at LC50 (F4,19 = 9.51, p < 0.001), decreasing from 26.41 mm2 (control) to 11.38 mm2 with GC-91 var. aizawai, 8.89 mm2 with ABTS-1857 var. aizawai, 8.44 mm2 with SA-12 var. kurstaki, and 6.83 mm2 with HD-1 var. kurstaki (Figure 2A). However, at LC90 all Bt-strains had similar anti-feeding effects among them (F4,19 = 27.36, p > 0.05; Figure 2B).

3.4. Mortality in Semi–Controlled Test

The mortality caused by the Bt-strains to E. elaeasa caterpillars was different in a semi–controlled test (F4,49 = 48.19; p < 0.05), as shown in Figure 3. Mortality caused by Bt-strains of LC90 to E. elaeasa caterpillars was higher in HD-1 var. kurstaki and ABTS-1857 var. aizawai (92.1 ± 0.2% and 89.1 ± 2.1%, respectively) than with GC-91 var. aizawai and SA-12 var. kurstaki (86.8 ± 5.1% and 84.1 ± 4.9%, respectively), but they were all higher than in the control (2.67 ± 0.7%).

4. Discussion

The use of various Bt-strains was effective in causing mortality, compromising survivorship, and reducing the consumption rate of the nettle caterpillar, E. elaeasa. The Bt-strains HD-1 var. kurstaki, SA-12 var. kurstaki, ABTS-1857 var. aizawai, and GC-91 var. aizawai were toxic to E. elaeasa caterpillars and have a strong effect through oral exposure. Bt-strains caused mortality in E. elaeasa in a concentration-dependent manner, as demonstrated in other defoliating pests [19,31,32]. Euprosterna elaeasa caterpillars exposed to high concentrations of Bt-strains displayed muscle contractions, oral or anal secretions, and consequently, septicemia. In this context, symptoms in E. elaeasa caterpillars were consistent with the known effects of microbial disruption of insect midgut membranes. A set of results point to the effects on the digestive system of lepidopterous pests, such as Diatraea saccharalis Fabricius (Crambidae) [33], Plutella xylostella Linnaeus (Plutellidae) [34], and Spodoptera frugiperda JE Smith (Noctuidae) [35], after Bt-strains oral exposure. In general, few Bt-strains are effective against E. elaeasa at different concentrations and reinforce their use as an alternative to organophosphate insecticides on this species.
In this study, the survival time of E. elaeasa decreases mainly with HD-1 var. kurstaki and ABTS-1857 var. aizawai. However, periods of Bt-strains, from 24 to 48 h, were necessary to induce mortality in E. elaeasa. Survivorship of this insect is associated with the quick action in the midgut of several Cry proteins produced by Bt-strains and observed in other lepidopteran pests [36,37]. In this study, the compared effects of the Bt-strains on E. elaeasa occur at various periods. These time differences occur commonly between strains of the same subspecies (e.g., Bt var. kurstaki and Bt var. aizawai) [38], by specific variation of the δ-endotoxins originating from different Bt-strains [39], host immune responses [40], and virulent factors of strain types [41]. In this sense, Bt toxins have been reported to reduce or inhibit larval growth, development, or weight, interrupting the insect’s lifecycle [42]. The rapid effect against E. elaeasa suggests that the insecticidal activity of Bt-strains causes detrimental effects on neonates, with appreciable population reduction during the first days of infestation and can be essential for protecting oil palm trees.
The decrease in the consumption of oil palm leaves treated with LC50 and LC90 of Bt-strains suggests an anti-feeding effect on E. elaeasa, represented by different rates of intoxication and, consequently, cessation of feeding. On the other hand, the concentration-dependent effect on total food consumption by both lethal concentrations indicates that intoxication of Bt-strains is cumulative. Effects of Bt-strains after 24 h exposure on Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Noctuidae), Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Gracillariidae), and Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Gelechiidae) were observed [43,44,45], causing a dramatic reduction in initial leaf consumption. In E. elaeasa, the reduced consumption (in both lethal concentrations) exposure regimes demonstrated that intoxication has serious deleterious effects that may translate into metabolic costs associated with the repair of midgut epithelium damage in caterpillar survivors. For instance, altered permeability and damage of the midgut interfere with food uptake, affect activity enzymes associated with digestion, and influence energy metabolism. Additionally, intoxication alters hemolymph pH and suppresses the immune response [19,39,40]. Our results demonstrate that the interplay of concentration and exposure regimen can produce anti-feeding effects, indicating that Bt-strains intoxication of E. elaeasa caterpillars is cumulative.
The Bt-strains, HD-1 var. kurstaki, SA-12 var. kurstaki, ABTS-1857 var. aizawai, and GC-91 var. aizawai, showed lethal effects against E. elaeasa in palm trees in the field, and results were consistent with those observed in the laboratory. However, mortality level at the larval stage was lower than those obtained under laboratory conditions. Efficacy of Bt-strains in field conditions may be due to environmental factors [46], toxins degradation [47], gut microbiota competition [48], and inactivation by the target organism [49]. The lethal effect of Bt and its effectiveness was also studied in other Limacodidae pests under field conditions as a potential biocontrol agent for Acharia apicalis Dyar [50], Acharia fusca Stoll [51], and Parasa lepida Cramer [52]. The results show that Bt-strains have a specific mode of action that affects a high number of E. elaeasa caterpillars. In particular, HD-1 var. kurstaki and ABTS-1857 var. aizawai are the most effective in the field, and that maximum efficiency from strains should be used during this life stage.

5. Conclusions

The insecticidal effect of four Bt-strains for controlling E. elaeasa were studied. The Bt-strains HD-1 var. kurstaki, SA-12 var. kurstaki, ABTS-1857 var. aizawai, and GC-91 var. aizawai cause mortality, reduces survivorship, and an anti-feeding effect on this insect, with the potential to control its field populations. The toxicity of the bacterium may efficiently manage E. elaeasa caterpillars and reduce the insect’s damage to oil palm trees and transmission of the Pestalotiopsis fungal complex. Bt-strains have lethal and sublethal effects on E. elaeasa, and are an alternative to organophosphate insecticides in oil palm plantations, aiding efforts to manage insecticide resistance.

Author Contributions

A.P.-R., H.A.Q., J.E.S., and L.C.M. conceived, designed, and conducted the experiments. All authors analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Brazilian research agencies “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico” CNPq (grant number 305165/2013-5), “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior” CAPES (grant number 2815/11), and “Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais” FAPEMIG (grant number APQ-01079-13).

Acknowledgments

We thank Adriana Casado for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Genty, P.; Desmier de Chenon, R.; Morin, J.P. Les ravageurs du palmier a huile en Amerique latine. Oléagineux 1978, 33, 325–419. [Google Scholar]
  2. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A. Lepidoptera vectors of Pestalotiopsis fungal disease: First records in oil palm plantations from Colombia. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2013, 33, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Howard, F.W.; Giblin-Davis, R.; Moore, D.; Abad, R. Insects on Palms; Cabi: London, UK, 2001; p. 400. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvarado, H.; de La Torre, R.A.; Barrera, E.; Martínez, L.; Bustillo, A. Ciclo de vida y tasa de consumo de Euprosterna elaeasa Dyar (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) defoliador de la palma de aceite. Rev. Palmas 2014, 35, 41–51. [Google Scholar]
  5. Reyes, A.R.; Cruz, M.A.; Genty, P. The root absorption technique for controlling oil-palm pests. Oléagineux 1988, 43, 363–370. [Google Scholar]
  6. Martínez, O.L.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Martínez, L.C. Oil palm plantations as an agroecosystem: Impact on integrated pest management and pesticide use. Outlooks Pest Manag. 2013, 24, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hernández-Lambraño, R.; Caballero-Gallardo, K.; Olivero-Verbel, J. Toxicity and antifeedant activity of essential oils from three aromatic plants grown in Colombia against Euprosterna elaeasa and Acharia fusca (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae). Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Yeoh, C.B.; Kuntom, A.; Dorasamy, S.; Omar, M.R.; Nor, M.Y.M.; Noh, M.R.M. 2006. Determination of acephate, methamidophos and monocrotophos in crude palm oil. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2006, 108, 960–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yeoh, C.B.; Chong, C.L. Acephate, methamidophos and monocrotophos residues in a laboratory-scale oil refining process. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2009, 111, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goulson, D. An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Last, J.M. Global change: Ozone depletion, greenhouse warming, and public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 1993, 14, 115–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shipp, J.L.; Wang, K.; Ferguson, G. Residual toxicity of avermectin b1 and pyridaben to eight commercially produced beneficial arthropod species used for control of greenhouse pests. Biol. Control 2000, 17, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Samantsidis, G.R.; O’Reilly, A.O.; Douris, V.; Vontas, J. Functional validation of target-site resistance mutations against sodium channel blocker insecticides (SCBIs) via molecular modeling and genome engineering in Drosophila. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 104, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zeddam, J.L.; Cruzado, J.A.; Rodriguez, J.L.; Ravallec, M. A new nucleopolyhedrovirus from the oil-palm leaf-eater Euprosterna elaeasa (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae): Preliminary characterization and field assessment in Peruvian plantation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2003, 96, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bakeri, S.A.; Ali, S.R.A.; Tajuddin, N.S.; Kamaruzzaman, N.E. Efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi, Paecilomyces spp., in controlling the oil palm bagworm, Pteroma pendula (Joannis). J. Oil Palm Res. 2009, 21, 693–699. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kamarudin, N.; Ali, S.R.A.; Masri, M.M.M.; Ahmad, M.N.; Manan, C.A.H.C.; Kamarudin, N. Controlling Metisa plana Walker (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) outbreak using Bacillus thuringiensis at an oil palm plantation in Slim River, Perak, Malaysia. J. Oil Palm Res. 2017, 29, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Schnepf, E.; Crickmore, N.; Van Rie, J.; Lereclus, D.; Baum, J.; Feitelson, J.; Zeigler, D.R.; Dean, D.H. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62, 775–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bravo, A.; Likitvivatanavong, S.; Gill, S.S.; Soberón, M. Bacillus thuringiensis: A story of a successful bioinsecticide. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 41, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Castro, B.M.D.C.; Martinez, L.C.; Barbosa, S.G.; Serrão, J.E.; Wilcken, C.F.; Soares, M.A.; Silva, A.A.D.; Carvalho, A.G.D.; Zanuncio, J.C. Toxicity and cytopathology mediated by Bacillus thuringiensis in the midgut of Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Armengol, G.; Escobar, M.C.; Maldonado, M.E.; Orduz, S. Diversity of Colombian strains of Bacillus thuringiensis with insecticidal activity against dipteran and lepidopteran insects. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 102, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gill, S.S.; Cowles, E.A.; Pietrantonio, P.V. The mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxins. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1992, 37, 615–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Naimov, S.; Weemen-Hendriks, M.; Dukiandjiev, S.; de Maagd, R.A. Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin Cry1 hybrid proteins with increased activity against the Colorado potato beetle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 5328–5330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zhong, C.; Ellar, D.J.; Bishop, A.; Johnson, C.; Lin, S.; Hart, E.R. Characterization of a Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin which is toxic to insects in three orders. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2000, 76, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. da Silva Rolim, G.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Martínez, L.C.; Ribeiro, G.T.; Serrão, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C. Side effects of Bacillus thuringiensis on the parasitoid Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safe. 2020, 189, 109978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Basri, W.M.; Ramlah, A.A.S.; Norman, K. Status report on the use of Bacillus thuringiensis in the control of some oil palm pests. Elaeis 1994, 6, 82–101. [Google Scholar]
  26. González, G.R.; Acuña, R.S.; Moizant, R.C.; Maestre, R.B.; Quintana, A.D.; Marcano, J.F. Agricultural technology of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq,) and integrated management of its defoliator Opsiphanes cassina Felder (Lepidoptera: Brassolidae) in commercial plantations at Monagas State, Venezuela. Rev. Cient. UDO Agr. 2012, 12, 584–598. [Google Scholar]
  27. Prasetyo, A.E.; Lopez, J.A.; Eldridge, J.R.; Zommick, D.H.; Susanto, A. Long-term study of Bacillus thuringiensis application to control Tirathaba rufivena, along with the impact to Elaeidobius kamerunicus, insect biodiversity and oil palm productivity. J. Oil Palm Res. 2018, 30, 71–82. [Google Scholar]
  28. Xiao, Y.; Wu, K. Recent progress on the interaction between insects and Bacillus thuringiensis crops. Philos. T. R. Soc. B 2019, 374, 20180316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Leucothyreus femoratus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): Feeding and behavioral activities as an oil palm defoliator. Fla. Entomol. 2013, 96, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Finney, D.J. Probit Analysis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1964; p. 333. [Google Scholar]
  31. Berretta, M.F.; Pedarros, A.S.; Sauka, D.H.; Pérez, M.P.; Onco, M.I.; Benintende, G.B. Susceptibility of agricultural pests of regional importance in South America to a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ia protein. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2020, 107354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chakrabarty, S.; Jin, M.; Wu, C.; Chakraborty, P.; Xiao, Y. Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein family Vip3A and mode of action against pest lepidopteran. Pest Manage. Sci. 2020, 76, 1612–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Daquila, B.V.; Scudeler, E.L.; Dossi, F.C.A.; Moreira, D.R.; Pamphile, J.A.; Conte, H. Action of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) in the midgut of the sugarcane borer Diatraea saccharalis (Fabricius, 1794) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safe. 2019, 184, 109642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Santos, M.S.; Dias, N.P.; Costa, L.L.; De Bortoli, C.P.; Souza, E.H.; Santos, A.C.F.; De Bortoli, S.A.; Polanczyk, R.A. Interactions of Bacillus thuringiensis strains for Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) susceptibility. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2019, 168, 107255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Del Valle Loto, F.; Carrizo, A.E.; Romero, C.M.; Baigorí, M.D.; Pera, L.M. Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) strains from northern Argentina: Esterases, profiles, and susceptibility to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillales: Bacillaceae). Fla. Entomol. 2019, 102, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Venette, R.C.; Luhman, J.C.; Hutchison, W.D. Survivorship of field-collected European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) larvae and its impact on estimates of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner. J. Entomol. Sci. 2000, 35, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bommireddy, P.L.; Leonard, B.R. Survivorship of Helicoverpa zea and Heliothis virescens on cotton plant structures expressing a Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein. J. Econ. Entomol. 2008, 101, 1244–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mashtoly, T.A.; Abolmaaty, A.; El-Said El-Zemaity, M.; Hussien, M.I.; Alm, S.R. Enhanced toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki and aizawai to black cutworm larvae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with Bacillus sp. NFD2 and Pseudomonas sp. FNFD1. J. Econ. Entomol. 2011, 104, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Liao, C.; Brooks, L.; Trowell, S.C.; Akhurst, R.J. Binding of Cry δ-endotoxins to brush border membrane vesicles of Helicoverpa armigera and Helicoverpa punctigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insect Sci. 2005, 12, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rahman, M.M.; Roberts, H.L.; Schmidt, O. Tolerance to Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin in immune-suppressed larvae of the flour moth Ephestia kuehniella. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2007, 96, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, M.J.; Han, J.K.; Park, J.S.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, S.H.; Cho, J.I.; Kim, K.S. Various enterotoxin and other virulence factor genes widespread among Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis strains. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 25, 872–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Prodhan, M.; Haider, Z.; Shirale, D.K.; Islam, M.; Hossain, M.; Paranjape, V.; Shelton, A.M. Susceptibility of field populations of eggplant fruit and shoot borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenée) to Cry1Ac, the protein expressed in Bt eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) in Bangladesh. Insects 2019, 10, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Singh, G.; Rup, P.J.; Koul, O. Acute, sublethal and combination effects of azadirachtin and Bacillus thuringiensis toxins on Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2007, 97, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Amiri-BeSheli, B. Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis, mineral oil, insecticidal emulsion and insecticidal gel against Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Plant Prot. Sci. 2008, 44, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Amizadeh, M.; Hejazi, M.J.; Niknam, G.; Arzanlou, M. Compatibility and interaction between Bacillus thuringiensis and certain insecticides: Perspective in management of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2015, 25, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hilbeck, A.; Otto, M. Specificity and combinatorial effects of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins in the context of GMO environmental risk assessment. Frontiers Environ. Sci. 2015, 3, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pang, A.S.; Gringorten, J.L. Degradation of Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin in host insect gut juice. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998, 167, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Broderick, N.A.; Robinson, C.J.; McMahon, M.D.; Holt, J.; Handelsman, J.; Raffa, K.F. Contributions of gut bacteria to Bacillus thuringiensis-induced mortality vary across a range of Lepidoptera. BMC Biol. 2009, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Miranda, R.; Zamudio, F.Z.; Bravo, A. Processing of Cry1Ab δ-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis by Manduca sexta and Spodoptera frugiperda midgut proteases: Role in protoxin activation and toxin inactivation. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2001, 31, 1155–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jaramillo-Celis, R.; Jiménez-Lacharme, F.; Hidalgo-Salvatierra, O. Susceptibility of the larvae of Sibine apicalis (Dyar) to Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki. Turrialba 1974, 24, 106–107. [Google Scholar]
  51. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Serrao, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C. Life history traits and damage potential of an invasive pest Acharia fusca (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) on oil palm. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2014, 107, 1086–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arumugam, G.; Karuppiah, H.; Sreeramulu, B.; Paulchamy, R.; Sundaram, J. Occurrence of natural lectin with bacterial agglutination property in the serum of lepidopteran pest, Parasa lepida. Entomol. Sci. 2019, 22, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 11 00310 g001 550
Figure 1. Survival curves of Euprosterna elaeasa caterpillars exposed to Bacillus thuringiensis strains, subjected to survival analyses using the Kaplan–Meier estimators’ log-rank test. Lethal dose of (A) LC50 (χ2 = 9.47; p < 0.001) and (B) LC90 (χ2 = 18.57; p < 0.001).
Figure 1. Survival curves of Euprosterna elaeasa caterpillars exposed to Bacillus thuringiensis strains, subjected to survival analyses using the Kaplan–Meier estimators’ log-rank test. Lethal dose of (A) LC50 (χ2 = 9.47; p < 0.001) and (B) LC90 (χ2 = 18.57; p < 0.001).
Insects 11 00310 g001
Insects 11 00310 g002 550
Figure 2. Leaf area consumed by Euprosterna elaeasa caterpillars exposed to Bacillus thuringiensis strains (LC50 (A) and LC90 (B) estimated values). Treatments (mean ± SEM) differ at p < 0.05 (Tukey’s mean separation test).
Figure 2. Leaf area consumed by Euprosterna elaeasa caterpillars exposed to Bacillus thuringiensis strains (LC50 (A) and LC90 (B) estimated values). Treatments (mean ± SEM) differ at p < 0.05 (Tukey’s mean separation test).
Insects 11 00310 g002
Insects 11 00310 g003 550
Figure 3. Mortality of Euprosterna elaeasa caterpillars by Bacillus thuringiensis strains to level LC90 application on oil palm trees. Treatment means (percent mortality ± SEM) with different letters show significant differences by Tukey’s HSD test at the p < 0.05 level.
Figure 3. Mortality of Euprosterna elaeasa caterpillars by Bacillus thuringiensis strains to level LC90 application on oil palm trees. Treatment means (percent mortality ± SEM) with different letters show significant differences by Tukey’s HSD test at the p < 0.05 level.
Insects 11 00310 g003
Table
Table 1. Lethal concentration of Bacillus thuringiensis strains against Euprosterna elaeasa after 48 h exposure obtained from probit analysis (df = 5). The chi-square value refers to the goodness of fit test at p > 0.05.
Table 1. Lethal concentration of Bacillus thuringiensis strains against Euprosterna elaeasa after 48 h exposure obtained from probit analysis (df = 5). The chi-square value refers to the goodness of fit test at p > 0.05.
StrainNo. InsectsLethal ConcentrationEstimated Concentration (mg mL−1)95% Confidence Interval (mg mL−1)Slope ± SEχ2
(p-Value)
HD-1
var. kurstaki		150LC501.1330.845–1.5612.22 ± 0.251.23 (0.36)
150LC904.2682.802–8.512
SA-12
var. kurstaki		150LC501.2580.805–2.1362.40 ± 0.411.89 (0.16)
150LC904.2992.442–10.92
ABTS-1857
var. aizawai		150LC500.8400.664–1.0751.73 ± 0.351.34 (0.22)
150LC904.6233.172–7.875
GC-91
var. aizawai		150LC501.0970.742–1.7242.40 ± 0.411.38 (0.22)
150LC904.5792.647–8.894

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Plata-Rueda, A.; Quintero, H.A.; Serrão, J.E.; Martínez, L.C. Insecticidal Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Strains on the Nettle Caterpillar, Euprosterna elaeasa (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae). Insects 2020, 11, 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050310

AMA Style

Plata-Rueda A, Quintero HA, Serrão JE, Martínez LC. Insecticidal Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Strains on the Nettle Caterpillar, Euprosterna elaeasa (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae). Insects. 2020; 11(5):310. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050310

Chicago/Turabian Style

Plata-Rueda, Angelica, Hughes Antonio Quintero, José Eduardo Serrão, and Luis Carlos Martínez. 2020. "Insecticidal Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Strains on the Nettle Caterpillar, Euprosterna elaeasa (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae)" Insects 11, no. 5: 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050310

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop