Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Trap Characteristics to Monitor the Leaffooted Bug Leptoglossus zonatus (Heteroptera: Coreidae) in Orchards
Next Article in Special Issue
Rigorous Morphological Studies Confirm That the Classical Object of Pest Control Chilocorus kuwanae Is the Same Species as Ch. renipustulatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Recent Interception Records Reveals Frequent Transport of Arboreal Ants and Potential Predictors for Ant Invasion in Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of UV-Absorbing Nets on the Performance of the Aphid Predator Sphaerophoria rueppellii (Diptera: Syrphidae)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/insects11060357
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Suitability of European Trichogramma Species as Biocontrol Agents against the Tomato Leaf Miner Tuta absoluta

by
Lea Schäfer
and
Annette Herz
*
Institute for Biological Control, Julius Kühn-Institute, Heinrichstr. 243, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2020, 11(6), 357; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11060357
Submission received: 10 April 2020 / Revised: 2 June 2020 / Accepted: 3 June 2020 / Published: 8 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Natural Enemies and Biological Control of Plant Pests)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta, originally from South America, is an invasive species threatening European tomato crops. Since various insecticides have become ineffective in controlling T. absoluta, effective and environmentally friendly alternatives are needed. Biological control, especially by Trichogramma parasitoids, is considered to be an effective means of reducing this pest. Thus, the aim of our study was to identify promising candidates of Trichogramma parasitoids for biological control of T. absoluta in Europe. We assessed the efficiency of nine European Trichogramma species and compared them to Trichogramma achaeae, as this species is already commercially available. Firstly, we verified species identity of the 10 rearing strains using molecular and morphological methods. Then, host acceptance, host preference (T. absoluta vs. rearing host Sitotroga cerealella eggs) and host searching capacity were tested under laboratory conditions. Our results indicated that T. nerudai, T. pintoi and T. cacoeciae achieved a similar level of parasitism on potted tomato plants as T. achaeae. For the next step, these promising strains should be tested under greenhouse conditions.

1. Introduction

Increasing globalization and environmental changes facilitate the spread and establishment of invasive species [1,2]. Due to the absence of natural enemies, growth of invasive populations is promoted, resulting in major losses in agriculture [1]. The tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) is native to South America and was introduced to Europe in 2006 [3]. In Germany, T. absoluta was first detected in 2009 in several tomato production sites [4]. Larval feeding damages all above-ground parts of the plant, reduces photosynthetic capacity, and consequently growth and yields [3,5,6]. In addition, infested plants are more vulnerable to secondary diseases caused by fungi and bacteria [5]. If no pest control strategies are taken, T. absoluta infestation can cause a total crop loss [6,7]. Currently, control of T. absoluta is mainly based on chemical treatments [8,9]. Besides major risks for the environment, non-target organisms [10,11,12,13], and human health [14,15], the intensive use of pesticides promotes the development of resistances. Due to their mine-feeding behavior, T. absoluta larvae are less susceptible to chemical control and frequent applications are necessary [16]. As a result, resistances against various active ingredients have been recorded [9,12,17,18,19]. For instance, plant protection products based on chlorantraniliprole and spinosad that are authorized in Germany have become ineffective in controlling the pest [20]. Moreover, European Community (EC) legislation has limited the availability of active ingredients. This will further reduce the use of conventional pesticides in the European Union [21]. Hence, alternative strategies are required that are both effective and environmentally friendly.
Biological control is a key component of integrated pest management (IPM) and allows a selective and sustainable crop protection. Trichogramma (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae) egg parasitoids are currently utilized successfully in biocontrol programs against several lepidopterous pests [22,23,24,25]. Adult female parasitoids attack the egg stage of their host and kill the target pest before crop damage by larval feeding commences [26]. In some Southern European and North African countries, Trichogramma achaeae Nagaraja & Nagarkatti is currently used for inundative biological control of T. absoluta [27]. However, the production of T. achaeae is difficult and expensive due to the absence of thelytoky and diapause [28]. In addition, T. achaeae is not a native species in Europe, even if its occurrence has been reported in the Canary Islands and Azores. Nonetheless, T. achaeae was introduced to mainland Spain and France for use in biological control of T. absoluta [29]. Commercial production and use of this non-native species is not practiced in many countries throughout the EU, including Germany, where the current legislation based on the Federal Nature Conservation Act sets some constraints to field releases of non-native organisms [30]. Since T. achaeae seems to be a good colonizer and is highly adaptive, an invasion into native ecosystems is possible [6,31]. To date, no European Trichogramma strains have been identified as suitable alternatives to T. achaeae [26,28].
Thus, the aim of the present study was to identify candidates for biological control of T. absoluta in Europe. We investigated the efficiency of 10 Trichogramma rearing strains, including four species native to Germany. Some of the selected species also occur in the original distribution or invasion area of the tomato leaf miner or have already been found in tomato crops. Accordingly, we expected a high affinity to the target system T. absoluta/tomato plant. Trichogramma achaeae was used as a control species as it is already commercially available.
This study is divided into two main parts: In the first part, species identity of the rearing strains was verified using molecular and morphological methods. In the second part, host acceptance of the target host T. absoluta and host preference (vs. the rearing host Sitotroga cerealella) were tested in a laboratory screening. Parameters assessed included parasitoid performance (level of parasitism, proportion of females parasitizing the target eggs), host-feeding, and host suitability (emergence rate, sex ratio). Based on these findings, we selected four promising species and investigated host searching capacity on potted tomato plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Biological Material

Tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum, variety Alissa F1, Ruby Red) were grown in a greenhouse (25 ± 1 °C, night temperature 15 ± 1 °C, 16:8 h light:darkness (L:D)) and were watered every second day. Seed trays with drainage openings (60 × 40 × 6 cm) containing Bio-Potgrond (Klasmann-Deilmann GmbH) as substrate were used for sowing. Seedlings (2–4 weeks old) were placed individually in plastic pots (9 × 9 × 8 cm, Soparco) filled with Fruhstorfer soil type LD 80 (HAWITA Gruppe GmbH).
The tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta was reared in nylon cages (60 × 60 × 60 cm, mesh size: 150 × 150 µm, BugDorm Megaview Science Co., Ltd., Taichung, Taiwan), on potted tomato plants, inside a rearing room (c.a. 23 ± 2 °C, 16:8 h L:D). Adult moths were supplied with honey, sugar solution (15% sucrose), and water. Honey was offered because it consists of various sugar types and pollen. Since honey dries out rapidly and then becomes too viscous for adult moths, sugar solution was offered as a basic supply. Sugar solution and water were offered in sealed plastic cups (500 mL), provided with a sponge cloth. Honey was spread thinly on a piece of Parafilm®, attached to one wall of the cage.
Egg parasitoids of the genus Trichogramma were reared on Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier 1879) eggs (BIOCARE GmbH, Dassel-Markoldendorf, Germany) at 25 ± 1 °C and at a photoperiod of 16:8 h L:D. In Germany, S. cerealella is used as factitious host for commercial production of Trichogramma. Rearing was carried out in glass tubes (length: 14.5 cm, diameter: 2.8 cm), sealed with a cotton fabric, and parasitoids were fed honey agar (3 g agar–agar, 100 mL dH2O, 200 g honey [32]).

2.2. Molecular and Morphological Identification

In this study we used 10 Trichogramma strains (Table 1) that are part of the stock collection of the Institute for Biological Control, Darmstadt, Germany. Since laboratory cultures of Trichogramma are prone to contamination by other species [33], we verified species identity through molecular and morphological methods. Molecular identification was carried out following the approach described by Silva et al. (1999) [34] and Stouthamer et al. (1999) [35]. Species were identified according to the size and the sequence of their ITS2 (internal transcribed spacer 2) PCR product of rDNA. For each strain, five females (frozen at −18 °C) were ground in distilled water. After addition of Proteinase K (20 mg/mL, biotechrabbit), samples were incubated overnight at 56 °C, followed by 10 min at 95 °C. PCR amplification was conducted using the QUIAGEN (Hilden, Germany) Taq PCR Core Kit and the primers 5′-TGT GAA CTG CAG GAC ACA TG-3′ (forward) and 5′-GTC TTG CCT GCT CTG AG-3′ (reverse) [35]. PCR products were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel (MetaPhorTM agarose, Biozym Scientific GmbH, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany) and visualized under UV light (ChemoCam, Intas Science Imaging Instruments GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) by means of DNA stain MidoriGreen (Biozym Scientific GmbH). Molecular weight standards (Gel Pilot 100bp Plus Ladder, QUIAGEN) were used as reference. PCR products were purified using the QUIAGEN MinElute PCR Purification Kit, following the manufacturer´s instructions, and sequenced in both directions by StarSEQ GmbH (Mainz, Germany). Sequences were aligned manually using Geneious Prime 2019.1.2 and compared to the ITS2 sequences of known Trichogramma spp. published in GenBank by BLAST analysis.
Morphological identification was made based on differences in male genital structures [36,37]. Males (frozen at −18 °C) from arrhenotokous rearing strains were incubated in lactic acid (90%) for one week at room temperature. Then, whole body mounts were prepared in Hoyer´s medium. Dried specimens were examined under a Zeiss Axioskop light microscope (400× magnification) and photographed using the microscope software ZEN lite (2012). Most species were characterized using an identification key of the European Trichogramma fauna [38]. Morphological terminology follows Pinto (1998) [39].

2.3. Host Acceptance and Host Preference

No-choice tests were carried out in order to investigate whether the Trichogramma strains accept and parasitize the eggs of the target pest on tomato foliage. Ten T. absoluta eggs (<24 h) were placed on each of 10 punched out tomato leaf discs (variety Alissa F1, Ø = 1.2 cm). Prepared leaf discs were then transferred into small transparent cube-shaped plastic vessels (2 × 2 × 2 cm). Then, single females of a particular strain (<24 h, naïve (no oviposition experience), mated, fed honey agar, n = 30 per strain) were added to the leaf disc-equipped plastic cubes. Trichogramma females used in the tests have been separated from males based on their antenna morphology before [41]. Egg contacts were determined by observing parasitoid females for two hours at 5-minute-time intervals using a stereomicroscope (24 observations/female in total). Subsequently, parasitoid females were removed, and leaf discs were transferred individually into medication cups for further incubation at 25 °C, 70% RH, 16:8 h L:D. After seven days, we counted the number of parasitized, black (melanized) eggs, the number of unhatched yellow-colored eggs, and the number of T. absoluta larvae. We also recorded the proportion of parasitoid females that parasitized at least one T. absoluta egg (defined as active females), as suggested by [28]. After Trichogramma emergence, the number of adults and the sex ratio of F1 generation were determined.
Choice tests were carried out to investigate whether Trichogramma strains prefer the eggs of the target or rearing host. Five T. absoluta eggs (<24 h) and five S. cerealella eggs (cold stored at 7 °C) were glued in alternating order (distance = 5 mm) with the botanical glue tragant (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, prepared as 3% solution in tap water) onto a piece of paper (2 × 2 cm). These paper sheets with eggs were exposed to single Trichogramma females (< 24 h, naïve, mated, fed honey agar, n = 30 per strain) in plastic cubes for two hours. Egg contacts were recorded in the same way as during acceptance tests described above. Eggs of T. absoluta and S. cerealella were incubated separately in medication cups at 25 °C, 70% RH, 16:8 h L:D. We recorded the number of parasitized eggs, aborted, undeveloped eggs, and hatched host larvae. The proportion of females that parasitized at least one T. absoluta or one S. cerealella egg was also calculated. In addition, we determined the number of emerged Trichogramma adults and sex ratio of F1.
Both acceptance and preference tests were conducted in the laboratory at 25 °C in a humidity tray. For this, a wet paper towel was placed at the bottom of a plastic box and covered with a wire mesh, which carried a smaller plastic tray containing the ten cubes. Almost homogeneous illumination was achieved using a fiber optic illuminator (SCHOTT), as suggested by [42]. In both laboratory screening tests (host acceptance and host preference) 10 females of each strain were tested in parallel. Since each trial was carried out three times, 30 females per strain were tested in total. We also checked egg survival in the absence of parasitoids (control condition) to assess natural egg mortality. Length and width of twenty eggs of each host species were measured using a Zeiss Axio Zoom V16 microscope in order to detect morphometric differences between T. absoluta and S. cerealella eggs.

2.4. Host Searching Capacity

Based on our findings of the laboratory screening, we selected four promising Trichogramma strains (ACA, NER, PIN, CAC) for further tests on potted tomato plants. Thirty T. absoluta eggs (<24 h) were glued with tragant individually on each of four potted tomato plants, variety Ruby Red. Half were distributed on upper and half on lower leaf faces. Prepared tomato plants were placed individually in acrylic glass cylinders (height = 40 cm, diameter = 20 cm) that were sealed with a cotton fabric to allow air circulation. Honey agar was used as food source for parasitoids. Twenty Trichogramma females (<24 h, naïve, mated, fed honey agar) per strain were released from centrifuge tubes (height = 7.5 cm, diameter = 1 cm) in a defined parasitoid: host ratio (1:1.5) at the base of the tomato plant. Experimental cylinders were randomly assigned to the four species by lot. Trials were carried out at 23 °C, 70% RH, 16:8 h L:D and were performed six times to obtain six replicates for each strain. After 48 h, T. absoluta eggs were cut out together with some leaf material, transferred into medication cups and incubated at 25 °C, 70% RH, 16:8 h L:D. Seven days after the start of the experiment, we recorded the number of parasitized eggs, aborted eggs, and hatched T. absoluta larvae. Searching capacity on the host plant was determined indirectly via the level of parasitism.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using RStudio software (version 1.1.453, RStudio Team 2016). Data were checked for homogeneity of variance (F test, Levene test) and normal distribution of residuals (Shapiro–Wilk test). If parametric assumptions were not met, we used nonparametric tests. In the acceptance test, each dependent variable (“egg contacts”, “number of parasitized eggs”, “egg mortality”) was analyzed individually using Kruskall–Wallis tests with “Trichogramma strain” as independent variable. Then, a Dunn’s post hoc test with Bonferroni adjustment was conducted where omnibus tests were significant. The parameters “proportion of active females”, “emergence rate” and “sex ratio” were evaluated descriptively according to the IOBC (International Organisation for Biological Control) guidelines [43]. Host preference was analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Here, parasitism rates were compared within one Trichogramma strain depending on host species (T. absoluta vs. S. cerealella). A t-test was used to determine whether the egg lengths and widths of the two hosts species differ. Finally, host searching capacity was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with the dependent variable “percent parasitism” and “Trichogramma strain” as independent variable.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular and Morphological Identification

Based on the size and sequence of amplified ITS2 PCR products, 10 different species were identified. The size of the amplified PCR products ranged between 500 and 900 bp. Species identity of eight rearing strains was verified according to BLAST analysis (Table 2). However, species identity of two strains (COR, PIC) was not confirmed with molecular methods (Table 2).
Species identity of arrhenotokous rearing strains was verified using morphological methods. Seven strains were characterized using an identification key of the European Trichogramma fauna. Due to morphological differences in male genital capsule, strains were assigned to certain groups and then determined at species level (Figures S1–S5). Trichogramma achaeae and T. nerudai were not included in the identification key used. Thus, species identity of ACA (Figure S5A) was confirmed using a previous research paper [31]. NER was assigned to the perkinsi (=parkeri) group based on morphological characteristics (Figure S5B).

3.2. Host Acceptance

All tested Trichogramma strains accepted and successfully parasitized the eggs of the target host T. absoluta on tomato leaf discs (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Egg contacts varied significantly depending on Trichogramma strain (Kruskal–Wallis test, df = 9, X2 = 58.40, p < 0.001, Figure 1). Only one strain (DEN) showed significantly fewer egg contacts than the control species ACA (Dunn´s test, z = 4.24, p = 0.001, Figure 1). The level of parasitism also varied significantly depending on strain (Kruskal–Wallis test, df = 9, X2 = 53.85, p < 0.001, Figure 2). In general, strains with a high egg contact rate also had a high parasitism rate and vice versa (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The three strains (ACA, NER, PIN) with the highest level of parasitism differed significantly from the strains (COR, DEN, PIC) with the lowest parasitism rates (Dunn´s test, p < 0.05, Figure 2). Altogether, six strains did not differ significantly from ACA regarding their level of parasitism (p > 0.05, Figure 2).
We also determined the percentage of active females. In four strains (ACA, NER, PIN, EVA), more than 50% of the females parasitized at least one T. absoluta egg on tomato leaf discs in 2 h (Table 3). In three strains (COR, DEN, PIC), the proportion of females that parasitized was ≤20%. Mean emergence rates and sex ratios were used as indicators for host suitability. Emergence rates of parasitoids, developed in T. absoluta eggs, exceeded 80% in six strains (ACA, BOU, CAC, EVA, NER, PIN) (Table 3). The proportion of females in F1 was at least 50% in eight Trichogramma strains (Table 3). The offspring of the thelytokous strain CAC was exclusively female (Table 3). Two strains (EVA, DEN) produced more male offspring.
Some Trichogramma species may induce additional mortality of the target pest by host-feeding. Thus, we assessed whether the selected strains increased mortality of T. absoluta eggs compared to the control condition. Egg mortality differed significantly between groups (Kruskal–Wallis test, df = 10, X2 = 42.056, p < 0.001, Figure 3). In one strain (EVA), egg mortality was significantly higher than in the control condition (Dunn´s test, z = 3.4799, p = 0.0276, Figure 3).

3.3. Host Preference

Significantly more contacts with the eggs of the rearing host S. cerealella were observed in seven strains (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.05, Figure 4). However, only the two strains ACA (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, z = 2.5023, p = 0.0128) and PIC (z = 3.6498, p = 0.0019) parasitized significantly more S. cerealella eggs, whereas NER (z = 2.053, p = 0.0421) and BOU (z = 2.853, p = 0.0046) parasitized significantly more eggs of the target host T. absoluta (Figure 5). More than half of the females parasitized at least one T. absoluta egg in all tested strains (Table 4). The proportions of females that parasitized T. absoluta eggs were at least 80% in four strains (ACA, BRA, BOU, NER). More than 60% females were active on S. cerealella eggs in all strains (Table 4) and more than 80% of females parasitized at least one S. cerealella egg in four strains (ACA, BRA, PIN, PIC).
The proportion of female offspring was at least 50% in eight strains (Figure 6), independent of host species. Offspring of CAC was exclusively female. Two strains, DEN (host: T. absoluta) and EVA (both hosts) produced a higher number of males (Figure 6).
Egg sizes of the two different host species were compared by measuring egg lengths and widths. Eggs of S. cerealella were significantly longer than T. absoluta eggs (t-test, t = 30.967, p < 0.001, n = 20, Table 5). However, egg width did not differ between the two species (t = 1.2062, p = 0.2352).
Based on our findings of the laboratory screening, we chose two arrhenotokous strains for further tests on potted tomato plants in comparison to ACA: NER and PIN seemed to have a high affinity to the target system T. absoluta/tomato plant. Both strains achieved a similar level of parasitism than the control species ACA. In addition, both strains had a high emergence rate and female offspring was ≥50%. The strain NER even preferred the eggs of the target pest in a choice-test. In addition, we chose CAC because this strain is native to Germany, demonstrated a high emergence rate from T. absoluta eggs, and produced exclusively female offspring.

3.4. Host Searching Capacity

All four tested strains were able to find and parasitize T. absoluta eggs on potted tomato plants (Figure 7). There were no significant differences in host searching capacity between the strains (ANOVA, df = 3, F = 0.3588, p = 0.7834, Figure 7). Mean level of parasitism was 58.7% for ACA, 53.7% for CAC, 42.6% for NER and 48.4% for PIN. Maximum level of parasitism was 84% for ACA, 92.9% for CAC, 76.9% for NER and 81.5% for PIN.
Overall, the design of the host acceptance test was suitable to predict the performance of the tested arrhenotokous strains on potted tomato plants. Nevertheless, the efficiency of the thelytokous strain CAC was underestimated based on the results of the laboratory screening.

4. Discussion

The results of the present study indicated that T. nerudai, T. pintoi, and T. cacoeciae can demonstrate a comparable performance in using eggs of T. absoluta as host and achieved a similar efficiency on potted tomato plants as the control species T. achaeae.

4.1. Molecular and Morphological Identification

Morphological identification is based on differences in male genital structure. Hence, species identity of the thelytokous strain CAC was only verified by molecular methods. In total, species identity of eight rearing strains was confirmed by BLAST analysis. Some of the ITS2 sequences in GenBank are only associated with generic names. Thus, species identity of COR was not confirmed with molecular methods. According to characteristics of male genital structure (e.g., posterior extension of dorsal lamina exceeds intervolsellar process, large apodemes [38,44]), the strain seemed to be T. cordubensis. However, morphological species identification is difficult without specialized skills [36], especially if no identification key is available. For that reason, the rearing strain NER could not be determined at species level using morphological methods, but was assigned to the perkinsi (=parkeri) group, consistent with [40]. Regarding T. piceum, no ITS2 sequences were available in GenBank. Even if BLAST analysis showed an almost 100% consensus with T. lingulatum, a species native to China and Japan [45], our rearing strain PIC could be clearly associated to T. piceum using the identification key of the European Trichogramma fauna. However, T. piceum and T. lingulatum share similar genital structures [46]. Although ITS2 is mostly useful in separating closely related species [35], exceptions are possible: for instance, T. minutum and T. platneri do not differ in their male genital structure [47] or their ITS2 sequence [48], but can be distinguished based on their COII sequence [49]. To ascertain whether T. piceum and T. lingulatum are distinct species, sexual compatibility should be tested with crossing experiments [50,51]. Release of the correct Trichogramma species is crucial for the success of biological control [35]. Moreover, an accidently introduced non-native species may have adverse effects on local fauna [52]. However, species identity of the four most promising strains (NER, PIN, CAC, and control species ACA) was clearly confirmed.

4.2. Host Acceptance and Host Preference

Host acceptance is considered the first critical step in the selection of suitable biocontrol agents. Two strains, NER and PIN, appeared promising regarding their level of parasitism. In general, parasitism rates significantly varied among species, as demonstrated in other screenings [26,28,42]. In addition, observed egg contacts were reflected in parasitism rates consistent with the results of previous studies [53,54]. However, a high egg contact rate does not necessarily result in a high parasitism rate, since thickness and structure of the chorion [55,56], as well as the host´s immune system [57,58], may prevent successful parasitism.
In general, the proportion of active females was relatively low in the host acceptance test. According to the recommendations in the IOBC guidelines, ≥80% of the females should parasitize at least one egg of the target pest in four hours [59]. One possible explanation for the obtained lower values is the short test duration of two hours, which was chosen due to the higher frequency of observation events and low number of eggs exposed to females. However, if the eggs were offered on a sheet of paper (host preference test), the number of active females was generally higher. Since parasitism levels are directly related to the proportion of females attacking the pest [26,28], both parameters are useful in measuring parasitoid performance. Low parasitism rates can be firstly explained by a rejection of the target eggs [28]. Most Trichogramma species tend to prefer large-sized eggs [60], while T. absoluta eggs are significantly shorter than the eggs of the rearing host S. cerealella. Secondly, some tested Trichogramma strains may not be able to cope with tomato plant trichomes [61,62,63,64,65,66]. Regarding T. dendrolimi and T. cordubensis, previous studies recorded a low affinity to the target system T. absoluta/tomato plant [28,67], consistent with our findings.
In six strains, emergence rate of parasitoids, developed in T. absoluta eggs, was at least 80%, indicating a high host-suitability. However, this trait is of minor importance since Trichogramma species are mostly released using the inundative method [23,45,68]. Tomato crops appear to be less favorable for the sustainable establishment of Trichogramma parasitoids [69]. The IOBC recommends an emergence rate of ≥80% to ensure efficient mass production on a rearing host [43].
A female-biased parasitoid sex ratio may benefit biological control, because only females parasitize and directly kill the target pest [45,70]. Thus, thelytokous species such as T. cacoeciae that produce exclusively female offspring may be favored [26]. In eight strains, the proportion of female offspring was at least 50%, as recommended by IOBC [43]. However, the two strains DEN and EVA produced a higher number of males. The sex ratio in hymenopteran parasitoids is influenced by multiple factors such as host species and host quality (e.g., size, age) [71,72,73,74]. In addition, the presence of PSR (paternal sex ratio) chromosomes or PSR-like elements results in a male-biased offspring [75,76,77]. Regarding T. evanescens, PSR-like elements have already been hypothesized [78].
Destructive host-feeding is common in hymenopteran parasitoids, including some Trichogrammatidae [79]. In one strain, EVA, the mortality of the host eggs was significantly increased compared to the egg mortality of the control, probably resulting from host-feeding. Destructive host-feeding is considered an additional effect in terms of biological control, particularly with inundative releases [80,81]. Thus, future studies should additionally determine larval reduction to evaluate parasitoid performance more precisely.
In general, host egg characteristics (e.g., size, quality, species) [82,83,84], as well as natal origin [85,86], may influence oviposition preference. In our study, preference measurement based on the two parameters (observed egg contacts, number of parasitized eggs) afforded different results. This can be explained by limitations of the first parameter in measuring preference: It is likely that parasitoid females needed more time to parasitize the larger eggs of the rearing host S. cerealella. A longer rest on a particular egg may result in an increased number of observed egg contacts for the respective host species. Previous studies have shown that the duration of parasitism behavior depends on host size [87] and species [88]. Because of its obvious limitation, the host contact parameter was not further considered for preference evaluation.
A preference for the target host T. absoluta is generally desired as it influences the parasitoid efficiency and reduces the risks on non-target organisms [83,89,90]. One of our most promising strains, NER, preferred T. absoluta eggs in a choice-test. However, this does not necessarily mean that T. absoluta eggs are preferred in the field [83,90]. Remarkably, the control species T. achaeae, which is already commercially available against T. absoluta, prefers the larger eggs of the rearing host.

4.3. Host Searching Capacity

Plant structural complexity [91,92], as well as leaf surface traits, e.g., trichomes [63,64,65,66], influence the foraging behavior of various Trichogramma species. Thus, we tested host searching capacity on potted tomato plants. T. nerudai, T. pintoi, and T. cacoeciae achieved a similar level of parasitism as the control species T. achaeae. Since no natural egg-laying took place, the presence of contact kairomones was presumably reduced. However, all strains were able to find and parasitize T. absoluta eggs on the host plant. Based on the results of the laboratory screening, we already expected a high affinity to the target system for T. nerudai and T. pintoi. Both T. nerudai [40] and T. pintoi [45] have been recorded in the Southern European invasion area of the tomato leaf miner and both species occur naturally in tomato crops [93,94]. Interestingly, T. nerudai also occurs in South America [39] and was found parasitizing T. absoluta eggs naturally in the field [95].
Regarding T. cacoeciae, the design of the laboratory screening was not suitable to predict the high level of parasitism on tomato plants. This can be explained by the short test duration (2 h) and the young age of the Trichogramma females (<24 h). A previous study indicates that parasitism rates of T. cacoeciae females increased significantly on their second day of life [96]. Since the mean longevity of Trichogramma adults in tomato greenhouse is three days [28], the test was conducted for 48 h, resulting in a higher level of parasitism. This implies that our laboratory screening underestimated the efficiency of the moderately synovigenic species T. cacoeciae. The species is interesting for biological control because of various traits such as thelytoky (100% female offspring), high emergence, and ability to diapause [97]. Since T. cacoeciae is native to Germany, it could be released according to the Federal Nature Conservation Act [43].
In our study we identified three promising Trichogramma species as potential biocontrol agents against T. absoluta. However, this does not necessarily mean that other strains of these species achieve a similar efficiency: Various screenings showed that the level of parasitism can differ among strains of the same Trichogramma species [28,98,99,100]. We also recommend using a strain of European origin of T. pintoi for further field-testing in Europe.
For the next step, T. nerudai, T. pintoi, and T. cacoeciae should be tested under greenhouse conditions, also in comparison to T. achaeae, where possible. Promising strains may be less effective in greenhouses due to different environmental conditions [26,28,69]. However, a more recent study has shown that efficiency may be improved if rearing conditions (e.g., temperature) match the abiotic conditions of the target crop [101].

5. Conclusions

Based on our laboratory screening, we identified three Trichogramma strains as promising candidates for biological control of T. absoluta in Europe: T. nerudai, T. pintoi, and T. cacoeciae achieved a similar level of parasitism on potted tomato plants as our control species, T. achaeae. Further, our results indicated that the efficiency of moderately synovigenic species, such as T. cacoeciae, may be underestimated in various testing procedures. Thus, future screenings should consider the potential effects of variation in ovigeny more carefully.

Supplementary Materials

The following material is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/6/357/s1: Microphotographs of male genital capsules of Trichogramma strains: Figure S1: Genital capsule of T. brassicae and T. evanescens, Figure S2: Genital capsule of strain COR, Figure S3: Genital capsule of T. bourarachae and T. pintoi, Figure S4: Genital capsule of strain PIC and T. dendrolimi, Figure S5: Genital capsule of T. nerudai and T. achaeae.

Author Contributions

L.S. developed the concept and methodology of the study under supervision by A.H., L.S. conducted experiments and data analysis, supported by advice from A.H., L.S. wrote the manuscript, edited and supplemented by contributions from A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Feiertag for technical assistance. We would also like to express our thanks to three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments improving a previous version of our manuscript. We would like to dedicate this work to our esteemed mentor, Sherif A. Hassan, who passed away on 7th of April 2020. Many of his ideas, methodological principles and scientific achievements in his life devoted to Trichogramma egg parasitoids inspired us to conduct this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Paini, D.R.; Sheppard, A.W.; Cook, D.C.; De Barro, P.J.; Worner, S.P.; Thomas, M.B. Global threat to agriculture from invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 7575–7579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hulme, P.E. Trade, transport and trouble: Managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Desneux, N.; Luna, M.G.; Guillemaud, T.; Urbaneja, A. The invasive South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta, continues to spread in Afro-Eurasia and beyond: The new threat to tomato world production. J. Pest Sci. 2011, 84, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zimmermann, O.; Wührer, B. The South American tomato moth, Tuta absoluta, a new pest in Germany: An assessment of the biological control options. Tuta absoluta, eine neuer Schädling in Deutschland: Eine Einschätzung der Biologischen Bekämpfungsmöglichkeiten. DGaaE Nachr. 2010, 24, 22–23. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tropea Garzia, G.; Siscaro, G.; Biondi, A.; Zappalà, L. Tuta absoluta, a South American pest of tomato now in the EPPO region: Biology, distribution and damage. EPPO Bull. 2012, 42, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Desneux, N.; Wajnberg, E.; Wyckhuys, K.A.; Burgio, G.; Arpaia, S.; Narváez-Vasquez, C.A.; González-Cabrera, J.; Ruescas, D.C.; Tabone, E.; Frandon, J. Biological invasion of European tomato crops by Tuta absoluta: Ecology, geographic expansion and prospects for biological control. J. Pest Sci. 2010, 83, 197–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. González-Cabrera, J.; Mollá, O.; Montón, H.; Urbaneja, A. Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner) in controlling the tomato borer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). BioControl 2011, 56, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arnó, J.; Gabarra, R. Side effects of selected insecticides on the Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) predators Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis (Hemiptera: Miridae). J. Pest Sci. 2011, 84, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lietti, M.M.; Botto, E.; Alzogaray, R.A. Insecticide resistance in argentine populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2005, 34, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Biondi, A.; Desneux, N.; Siscaro, G.; Zappalà, L. Using organic-certified rather than synthetic pesticides may not be safer for biological control agents: Selectivity and side effects of 14 pesticides on the predator Orius laevigatus. Chemosphere 2012, 87, 803–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Biondi, A.; Zappalà, L.; Stark, J.D.; Desneux, N. Do biopesticides affect the demographic traits of a parasitoid wasp and its biocontrol services through sublethal effects? PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cocco, A.; Deliperi, S.; Delrio, G. Control of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in greenhouse tomato crops using the mating disruption technique. J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 137, 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Desneux, N.; Decourtye, A.; Delpuech, J.-M. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52, 81–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Damalas, C.A. Understanding benefits and risks of pesticide use. Sci. Res. Essays 2009, 4, 945–949. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamilton, D.; Crossley, S. Pesticide Residues in Food and Drinking Water: Human Exposure and Risks; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  16. Luna, M.; Sánchez, N.E.; Pereyra, P.C.; Nieves, E.; Savino, V.; Luft, E.; Virla, E.; Speranza, S. Biological control of Tuta absoluta in Argentina and Italy: Evaluation of indigenous insects as natural enemies. EPPO Bull. 2012, 42, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reyes, M.; Rocha, K.; Alarcón, L.; Siegwart, M.; Sauphanor, B. Metabolic mechanisms involved in the resistance of field populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) to spinosad. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2012, 102, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Siqueira, H.; Guedes, R.; Fragoso, D.d.B.; Magalhaes, L. Abamectin resistance and synergism in Brazilian populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Int. J. Pest Manag. 2001, 47, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Siqueira, H.Á.A.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Picanço, M.C. Insecticide resistance in populations of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Agric. For. Entomol. 2000, 2, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Scholz-Döbelin, H.; Brinza, M. Tuta absoluta: A new approach in biological pest control by granulovirus „Tutavir“ and Steinernema-nematodes in an operational tomato greenhouse. DGaaE Nachr. 2019, 33, 73–74. [Google Scholar]
  21. Directive 2009/128/EC, Sustainable Use of Pesticides. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/sustainable_use_pesticides_en (accessed on 8 May 2020).
  22. Pratissoli, D.; Thuler, R.T.; Andrade, G.S.; Zanotti, L.C.M.; Silva, A.F. Estimate of Trichogramma pretiosum to control Tuta absoluta in stalked tomato. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 2005, 40, 715–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Smith, S.M. Biological control with Trichogramma: Advances, successes, and potential of their use. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1996, 41, 375–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Suckling, D.; Brockerhoff, E. Invasion biology, ecology, and management of the light brown apple moth (Tortricidae). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2010, 55, 285–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zimmermann, O. Der Einsatz von Trichogramma-Schlupfwespen in Deutschland. Gesunde Pflanz. 2004, 56, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Do Thi Khanh, H.; Chailleux, A.; Tiradon, M.; Desneux, N.; Colombel, E.; Tabone, E. Using new egg parasitoids (Trichogramma spp.) to improve integrated management against Tuta absoluta. EPPO Bull. 2012, 42, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Desneux, N.; Pizzol, P.; Thomas, C.; Pautrat, E.; Bearez, P.; Poncet, C.; Tabone, E.; Kabiri, F.; Frandon, J. Potential for direct interference between natural enemies of Tuta absoluta on tomato. In Proceedings of the XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010), International Symposium on Plant 917, Lisbon, Portugal, 22–28 August 2010; pp. 31–37. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chailleux, A.; Desneux, N.; Seguret, J.; Khanh, H.D.T.; Maignet, P.; Tabone, E. Assessing European egg parasitoids as a mean of controlling the invasive South American tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Polaszek, A. Species diversity and host associations of Trichogramma in Eurasia. In Egg Parasitoids in Agroecosystems with Emphasis on Trichogramma; Consoli, F.L., Parra, J.R.P., Zuchhi, R.A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 237–266. [Google Scholar]
  30. Federal Ministry for the Environment. Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Act on Nature Conservation and Landscape Management (Federal Nature Conservation Act—BNatSchG) of 29 July 2009. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety Web site. 2019. Available online: www.bmu.de/GE142-1 (accessed on 3 May 2020).
  31. Polaszek, A.; Rugman-Jones, P.F.; Stouthamer, R.; Hernandez-Suarez, E.; Cabello, T.; del Pino Pérez, M. Molecular and morphological diagnoses of five species of Trichogramma: Biological control agents of Chrysodeixis chalcites (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in the Canary Islands. BioControl 2012, 57, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Candolfi, M.; Blümel, S.; Forster, R.; Bakker, F.; Grimm, C.; Hassan, S.; Heimbach, U.; Mead, M.; Reber, B.; Schmuck, R.; et al. Guidelines to Evaluate Side-Effects of Plant Protection Products to Non-Target Arthropods; Dreier Druck Reinheim: Hessen, Germany, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sumer, F.; Tuncbilek, A.S.; Oztemiz, S.; Pintureau, B.; Rugman-Jones, P.; Stouthamer, R. A molecular key to the common species of Trichogramma of the Mediterranean region. BioControl 2009, 54, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Silva, I.M.; Honda, J.; van Kan, F.; Hu, J.; Neto, L.; Pintureau, B.; Stouthamer, R. Molecular differentiation of five Trichogramma species occurring in Portugal. Biol. Control 1999, 16, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stouthamer, R.; Hu, J.; van Kan, F.J.; Platner, G.R.; Pinto, J.D. The utility of internally transcribed spacer 2 DNA sequences of the nuclear ribosomal gene for distinguishing sibling species of Trichogramma. BioControl 1999, 43, 421–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pinto, J.; Stouthamer, R. Systematics of the Trichogrammatidae with emphasis on Trichogramma. In Biological Control with Egg Parasitoids; Wajnberg, E., Hassan, S.A., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 1994; pp. 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nagarkatti, S.; Nagaraja, H. Redescriptions of some known species of Trichogramma (Hym., Trichogrammatidae), showing the importance of the male genitalia as a diagnostic character. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1971, 61, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pintureau, B. Les Espèces Européennes de Trichogrammes, ILV ed.; InLibroVeritas; INRA: Villeurbanne, France, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pinto, J.D. Systematics of the North American Species of Trichogramma Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae); Entomological Society of Washington: Washington, DC, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  40. Herz, A.; Hassan, S.A.; Hegazi, E.; Khafagi, W.E.; Nasr, F.N.; Youssef, A.I.; Agamy, E.; Blibech, I.; Ksentini, I.; Ksantini, M. Egg parasitoids of the genus Trichogramma (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae) in olive groves of the Mediterranean region. Biol. Control 2007, 40, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Romani, R.; Isidoro, N.; Bin, F. Antennal structures used in communication by egg parasitoids. In Egg Parasitoids in Agroecosystems with Emphasis on Trichogramma; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 57–96. [Google Scholar]
  42. Steidle, J.L.; Rees, D.; Wright, E.J. Assessment of Australian Trichogramma species (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) as control agents of stored product moths. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2001, 37, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. International Organization for Biological Control. IOBC Quality Control Guidelines. Available online: http://www.mrqa.unibo.it/guidelines.htm (accessed on 8 March 2020).
  44. Vargas, P.; Cabello, T. A new species of Trichogramma [T. cordubensis n. sp.][Hym.: Trichogrammatidae], parasitoid of Heliothis eggs in cotton crops in the sw of spain. Entomophaga 1985, 30, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cônsoli, F.L.; Parra, J.R.; Zucchi, R.A. Egg parasitoids in Agroecosystems with Emphasis on Trichogramma; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; Volume 9. [Google Scholar]
  46. Fursov, V. Discovery of four species of Trichogramma (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae), new for the fauna of England. Вестник зоологии Vestn. Zool. 2000, 34, 107–113. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pinto, J.D.; Platner, G.R.; Stouthamer, R. The systematics of the Trichogramma minutum species complex (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), a group of important North American biological control agents: The evidence from reproductive compatibility and allozymes. Biol. Control 2003, 27, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Stouthamer, R. The use of unisexual wasps in biological control. In Quality Control and Production of Biological Control Agents-Theory and Testing Procedures; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2003; pp. 93–114. [Google Scholar]
  49. Borghuis, A.; Pinto, J.D.; Platner, G.R.; Stouthamer, R. Partial cytochrome oxidase II sequences distinguish the sibling species Trichogramma minutum Riley and Trichogramma platneri Nagarkatti. Biol. Control 2004, 30, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pintureau, B. Indices d’isolement reproductif entre espèces proches de Trichogrammes (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (Nouvelle Série) 1991, 27, 379–392. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pinto, J.D.; Stouthamer, R.; Platner, G.R.; Oatman, E.R. Variation in reproductive compatibility in Trichogramma and its taxonomic significance (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1991, 84, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Stouthamer, R.; Jochemsen, P.; Platner, G.R.; Pinto, J.D. Crossing incompatibility between Trichogramma minutum and T. platneri (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae): Implications for application in biological control. Environ. Entomol. 2000, 29, 832–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hassan, S.; Guo, M.; Bigler, F. A simple method to control the quality of mass reared egg parasites of the genus Trichogramma. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Quality Control of Mass Reared Arthropods, IOBC, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 25–28 March 1991; pp. 127–137. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wäckers, F.; De Groot, I.; Noldus, L.; Hassan, S. Measuring host preference of Trichogramma egg parasites: An evaluation of direct and indirect methods. Meas. Host Prefer. Trichogramma Egg Parasites Eval. Direct Indirect. Methods 1987, 52, 339–348. [Google Scholar]
  55. Taylor, T.A.; Stern, V.M. Host-preference studies with the egg parasite Trichogramma semifumatum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1971, 64, 1381–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Pak, G.; Van Dalen, A.; Kaashoek, N.; Dijkman, H. Host egg chorion structure influencing host suitability for the egg parasitoid Trichogramma Westwood. J. Insect Physiol. 1990, 36, 869–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Abdel-Latief, M.; Hilker, M. Innate immunity: Eggs of Manduca sexta are able to respond to parasitism by Trichogramma evanescens. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 38, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Reed, D.A.; Luhring, K.A.; Stafford, C.A.; Hansen, A.K.; Millar, J.G.; Hanks, L.M.; Paine, T.D. Host defensive response against an egg parasitoid involves cellular encapsulation and melanization. Biol. Control 2007, 41, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. van Lenteren, J.; Hale, A.; Klapwijk, J.; Van Schelt, J.; Steinberg, S. Guidelines for quality control of commercially produced natural enemies. In Quality Control and Production of Biological Control Agents: Theory and Testing Procedures; CABI: London, UK, 2003; pp. 278–316. [Google Scholar]
  60. Roriz, V.; Oliveira, L.; Garcia, P. Host suitability and preference studies of Trichogramma cordubensis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Biol. Control 2006, 36, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Keller, M.A. Influence of leaf surfaces on movements by the hymenopterous parasitoid Trichogramma exiguum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1987, 43, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lukianchuk, J.; Smith, S. Influence of plant structural complexity on the foraging success of Trichogramma minutum: A comparison of search on artificial and foliage models. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1997, 84, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Romeis, J.; Shanower, T.; Zebitz, C. Why Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) egg parasitoids of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) fail on chickpea. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1999, 89, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kauffman, W.C.; Kennedy, G.G. Relationship between trichome density in tomato and parasitism of Heliothis spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs by Trichogramma spp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Environ. Entomol. 1989, 18, 698–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kashyap, R.; Kennedy, G.; Farrar, R. Behavioral response of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley and Telenomus sphingis (Ashmead) to trichome/methyl ketone mediated resistance in tomato. J. Chem. Ecol. 1991, 17, 543–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kashyap, R.; Kennedy, G.; Farrar, R. Mortality and inhibition of Helicoverpa zea egg parasitism rates by Trichogramma in relation to trichome/methyl ketone-mediated insect resistance of Lycopersicon hirsutum f. glabratum, accession PI 134417. J. Chem. Ecol. 1991, 17, 2381–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Oliveira, L.; Durão, A.C.; Fontes, J.; Roja, I.S.; Tavares, J. Potential of Trichogramma achaeae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in biological control of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Azorean greenhouse tomato crops. J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 2010–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mills, N. Egg parasitoids in biological control and integrated pest management. In Egg Parasitoids in Agroecosystems with Emphasis on Trichogramma; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 389–411. [Google Scholar]
  69. Chailleux, A.; Biondi, A.; Han, P.; Tabone, E.; Desneux, N. Suitability of the pest–plant system Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)–tomato for Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) parasitoids and insights for biological control. J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 2310–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Cerutti, F.; Bigler, F. Quality assessment of Trichogramma brassicae in the laboratory. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1995, 75, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Charnov, E.L. The Theory of Sex Allocation; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1982; Volume 18. [Google Scholar]
  72. Cherif, A.; Kaouthar, L.G. Trichogramma cacoeciae as a biological control agent of the tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta in Northeastern Tunisia. Entomol. Hell. 2013, 22, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ueno, T. Host-size-dependent sex ratio in a parasitoid wasp. Popul. Ecol. 1999, 41, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Werren, J.H.; Simbolotti, G. Combined effects of host quality and local mate competition on sex allocation in Lariophagus distinguendus. Evol. Ecol. 1989, 3, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Stouthamer, R.; Tilborg, M.v.; De Jong, J.; Nunney, L.; Luck, R. Selfish element maintains sex in natural populations of a parasitoid wasp. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2001, 268, 617–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. van Vugt, J.F.; Salverda, M.; de Jong, J.H.; Stouthamer, R. The paternal sex ratio chromosome in the parasitic wasp Trichogramma kaykai condenses the paternal chromosomes into a dense chromatin mass. Genome 2003, 46, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Werren, J.H.; Stouthamer, R. PSR (paternal sex ratio) chromosomes: The ultimate selfish genetic elements. Genetica 2003, 117, 85–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gonçalves, C.I.; Huigens, M.E.; Verbaarschot, P.; Duarte, S.; Mexia, A.; Tavares, J. Natural occurrence of Wolbachia-infected and uninfected Trichogramma species in tomato fields in Portugal. Biol. Control 2006, 37, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jervis, M.; Kidd, N. Host-feeding strategies in hymenopteran parasitoids. Biol. Rev. 1986, 61, 395–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hansen, L.S.; Jensen, K.-M. Effect of temperature on parasitism and host-feeding of Trichogramma turkestanica (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) on Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2002, 95, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Hansen, L.S.; Jensen, K.-M.V. Trichogramma turkestanica against Ephestia kuehniella in flour mills: Extent of host-feeding and initial results of a field trial. IOBC WPRS Bull. 2002, 25, 105–108. [Google Scholar]
  82. Ruberson, J.; Kring, T. Parasitism of developing eggs by Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae): Host age preference and suitability. Biol. Control 1993, 3, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mansfield, S.; Mills, N. A comparison of methodologies for the assessment of host preference of the gregarious egg parasitoid Trichogramma platneri. Biol. Control 2004, 29, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kivan, M.; Kilic, N. Host preference: Parasitism, emergence and development of Trissolcus semistriatus (Hym., Scelonidae) in various host eggs. J. Appl. Entomol. 2002, 126, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Makee, H. Factors influencing the parasitism of codling moth eggs by Trichogramma cacoeciae March. and T. principium Sug. et Sor. (Hymen. Trichogrammatidae). J. Pest Sci. 2005, 78, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Brotodjojo, R.R.; Walter, G.H. Oviposition and reproductive performance of a generalist parasitoid (Trichogramma pretiosum) exposed to host species that differ in their physical characteristics. Biol. Control 2006, 39, 300–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Klomp, H.; Teerink, B.J. Host selection and number of eggs per oviposition in the egg-parasite Trichogramma embryophagum Htg. Nature 1962, 195, 1020–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pak, G.A. Selection of Trichogramma for Inundative Biological Control. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  89. Hassan, S. Selection of suitable Trichogramma strains to control the codling moth Cydia pomonella and the two summer fruit tortrix moths Adoxophyes orana, Pandemis heparana [Lep.: Tortricidae]. Entomophaga 1989, 34, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Babendreier, D.; Kuske, S.; Bigler, F. Parasitism of non-target butterflies by Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) under field cage and field conditions. Biol. Control 2003, 26, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gingras, D.; Dutilleul, P.; Boivin, G. Effect of plant structure on host finding capacity of lepidopterous pests of crucifers by two Trichogramma parasitoids. Biol. Control 2003, 27, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Romeis, J.; Shanower, T.; Zebitz, C. Physical and chemical plant characters inhibiting the searching behaviour of Trichogramma chilonis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1998, 87, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Baniameri, V.; Cheraghian, A. The first report and control strategies of Tuta absoluta in Iran. EPPO Bull. 2012, 42, 322–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zucchi, R.; Querino, R. Towards a database for the Trichogramma species, their hosts and plant associations in the South America. In Proceedings of the XXI International Congress of Entomology, Iguassu Falls, Brazil, 25–27 August 2000; Abstract Book I, session 05; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000; p. 201. [Google Scholar]
  95. Cagnotti, C.L.; Hernández, C.M.; Andormo, A.V.; Viscarret, M.; Riquelme, M.; Botto, E.N.; López, S.N. Acceptability and suitability of Tuta absoluta eggs from irradiated parents to parasitism by Trichogramma nerudai and Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Agric. For. Entomol. 2016, 18, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Pizzol, J.; Desneux, N.; Wajnberg, E.; Thiéry, D. Parasitoid and host egg ages have independent impact on various biological traits in a Trichogramma species. J. Pest Sci. 2012, 85, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pizzol, J.; Pintureau, B. Effect of photoperiod experienced by parents on diapause induction in Trichogramma cacoeciae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2008, 127, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bueno, R.; Parra, J.; Haddad, M. Performance of trichogrammatids as biocontrol agents of Pseudoplusia includens Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2009, 38, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Pizzol, J.; Pintureau, B.; Khoualdia, O.; Desneux, N. Temperature-dependent differences in biological traits between two strains of Trichogramma cacoeciae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). J. Pest Sci. 2010, 83, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tabone, E.; Bardon, C.; Desneux, N.; Wajnberg, E. Parasitism of different Trichogramma species and strains on Plutella xylostella L. on greenhouse cauliflower. J. Pest Sci. 2010, 83, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cascone, P.; Carpenito, S.; Slotsbo, S.; Iodice, L.; Sørensen, J.G.; Holmstrup, M.; Guerrieri, E. Improving the efficiency of Trichogramma achaeae to control Tuta absoluta. BioControl 2015, 60, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 11 00357 g001 550
Figure 1. Number of contacts per parasitoid female with T. absoluta eggs in 2 h (24 observations/female in total). Box plots denote median (solid line), whiskers show range of data, and circles represent outliers. Different letters indicate significant differences between Trichogramma strains (p < 0.05, n = 30 females per strain).
Figure 1. Number of contacts per parasitoid female with T. absoluta eggs in 2 h (24 observations/female in total). Box plots denote median (solid line), whiskers show range of data, and circles represent outliers. Different letters indicate significant differences between Trichogramma strains (p < 0.05, n = 30 females per strain).
Insects 11 00357 g001
Insects 11 00357 g002 550
Figure 2. Number of parasitized T. absoluta eggs per parasitoid female. Ten eggs of the target host were offered to each female in a no-choice test on tomato leaf discs for two hours. Box plots denote median (solid line), whiskers show range of data, and circles represent outliers. Different letters indicate significant differences between Trichogramma strains (p < 0.05, n = 30 females per strain).
Figure 2. Number of parasitized T. absoluta eggs per parasitoid female. Ten eggs of the target host were offered to each female in a no-choice test on tomato leaf discs for two hours. Box plots denote median (solid line), whiskers show range of data, and circles represent outliers. Different letters indicate significant differences between Trichogramma strains (p < 0.05, n = 30 females per strain).
Insects 11 00357 g002
Insects 11 00357 g003 550
Figure 3. Percentage of aborted (=yellow colored, unhatched) T. absoluta eggs. Egg mortality of the control condition (CON, white, no Trichogramma exposure) and egg mortality depending on the tested Trichogramma strains (30 parasitizing females per strain provided with 10 eggs) are shown. Box plots denote median (solid line), whiskers show range of data, and circles represent outliers. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Percentage of aborted (=yellow colored, unhatched) T. absoluta eggs. Egg mortality of the control condition (CON, white, no Trichogramma exposure) and egg mortality depending on the tested Trichogramma strains (30 parasitizing females per strain provided with 10 eggs) are shown. Box plots denote median (solid line), whiskers show range of data, and circles represent outliers. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Insects 11 00357 g003
Insects 11 00357 g004 550
Figure 4. Number of contacts per parasitoid female with S. cerealella (white) and T. absoluta (grey) eggs in 2 h (24 observations/female in total). Box plots denote median (solid line), whiskers show range of data, and circles represent outliers. Asterisks indicate significant differences within one Trichogramma strain (p < 0.05, n = 30 females per strain).
Figure 4. Number of contacts per parasitoid female with S. cerealella (white) and T. absoluta (grey) eggs in 2 h (24 observations/female in total). Box plots denote median (solid line), whiskers show range of data, and circles represent outliers. Asterisks indicate significant differences within one Trichogramma strain (p < 0.05, n = 30 females per strain).
Insects 11 00357 g004
Insects 11 00357 g005 550
Figure 5. Number of parasitized eggs per parasitoid female. Five eggs of the rearing host S. cerealella (white) and five T. absoluta eggs (grey) were offered to each female simultaneously in a choice-test for two hours. Box plots denote median (solid line) and whiskers show range of data. Asterisks indicate significant differences within one Trichogramma strain (p < 0.05, n = 30 females per strain).
Figure 5. Number of parasitized eggs per parasitoid female. Five eggs of the rearing host S. cerealella (white) and five T. absoluta eggs (grey) were offered to each female simultaneously in a choice-test for two hours. Box plots denote median (solid line) and whiskers show range of data. Asterisks indicate significant differences within one Trichogramma strain (p < 0.05, n = 30 females per strain).
Insects 11 00357 g005
Insects 11 00357 g006 550
Figure 6. Percentage of female offspring per Trichogramma strain developed in S. cerealella (white) and T. absoluta (grey) eggs. Box plots denote median (solid line), whiskers show range of data, and circles represent outliers.
Figure 6. Percentage of female offspring per Trichogramma strain developed in S. cerealella (white) and T. absoluta (grey) eggs. Box plots denote median (solid line), whiskers show range of data, and circles represent outliers.
Insects 11 00357 g006
Insects 11 00357 g007 550
Figure 7. Host searching capacity of four Trichogramma strains on potted tomato plants (with 30 T. absoluta eggs/plant). Percentage of parasitized T. absoluta eggs at a parasitoid:host ratio of 1:1.5 is shown (six replicates). Whiskers denote range of data. In each box, medians are shown by horizontal solid lines and means by dotted lines.
Figure 7. Host searching capacity of four Trichogramma strains on potted tomato plants (with 30 T. absoluta eggs/plant). Percentage of parasitized T. absoluta eggs at a parasitoid:host ratio of 1:1.5 is shown (six replicates). Whiskers denote range of data. In each box, medians are shown by horizontal solid lines and means by dotted lines.
Insects 11 00357 g007
Table
Table 1. Selected rearing strains of the genus Trichogramma and their origin.
Table 1. Selected rearing strains of the genus Trichogramma and their origin.
SpeciesRearing Strain 1OriginYearReference
T. achaeaeACA BC14Company 1 2unk. 3unk.
T. bourarachaeBOU EG02Egypt, olive2002[40]
T. brassicaeBRA DACompany 2 2unk.unk.
T. cacoeciaeCAC 1DE05Germany2005BBA 4
T. cordubensisCOR PT93Portugal, tomato, Noctuidae1993[34]
T. dendrolimiDEN D90Germany, apple, Cydia pomonella1990BBA
T. evanescensEVA DE97KGermany, cabbage, Pieris sp.1997BBA
T. nerudaiNER PT02Portugal, olive2002[40]
T. piceumPIC MD91Moldova1991BBA
T. pintoiPIN 3SY06Syria2006BBA
1 Abbreviations of the rearing strains (printed in bold) are used in the following. Strains BOU and PIN are not of European origin, but these species occur in Europe. 2 Name of companies are known and can be communicated on request. 3 unknown. 4 Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry (BBA), Darmstadt. Former strain collection of Dr. Sherif A. Hassan.
Table
Table 2. Analysis of the ITS2 sequence of selected Trichogramma strains. Fragment sizes of PCR products were estimated based on the result of the gel electrophoresis.
Table 2. Analysis of the ITS2 sequence of selected Trichogramma strains. Fragment sizes of PCR products were estimated based on the result of the gel electrophoresis.
StrainEstimated Size PCR Product [bp]Size Consensus Sequence [bp]Species 1Consensus [%]Accession Number 2
ACA630317T. achaeae100.0JF415936
BOU650* 78T. bourarachae96.2DQ389072
BRA520431T. brassicae100.0DQ314611
CAC580386T. cacoeciae99.5EU547668
COR530349T. sp.3100.0AY146636
DEN520423T. dendrolimi99.8AF517576
EVA550395T. evanescens99.5JF9204591
NER750346T. nerudai100.0AY182756
PIC850441T. lingulatum499.8AY244466
PIN690511T. pintoi99.8JF920460
1 Species identification according to BLAST analysis. 2 Accession numbers of ITS2sequences published in GenBank giving the highest identity score in a BLAST alignment. 3 Only generic name available. 4 No reference sequence available for T. piceum. * Only a short part of the sequencing was used due to low quality.
Table
Table 3. Active Trichogramma females (%) (= parasitizing at least one T. absoluta egg), emergence rate (%) of F1-progeny from parasitized host eggs and proportion of females (%) in the F1-progeny in the host acceptance test. Ten eggs of T. absoluta were offered to each Trichogramma female on a tomato leaf disc for 2 h and then incubated until emergence of the progeny. Arithmetic means ± standard errors (SE) are calculated from three trials per strain, each with 10 females, for active females (%) or from progeny per parasitizing female (up to 30 per strain) for emergence rate (%) and F1-females (%).
Table 3. Active Trichogramma females (%) (= parasitizing at least one T. absoluta egg), emergence rate (%) of F1-progeny from parasitized host eggs and proportion of females (%) in the F1-progeny in the host acceptance test. Ten eggs of T. absoluta were offered to each Trichogramma female on a tomato leaf disc for 2 h and then incubated until emergence of the progeny. Arithmetic means ± standard errors (SE) are calculated from three trials per strain, each with 10 females, for active females (%) or from progeny per parasitizing female (up to 30 per strain) for emergence rate (%) and F1-females (%).
StrainActive Females [%]Emergence Rate [%]Females F1 [%]
(means ± SE)(means ± SE)(means ± SE)
ACA63.3 ± 11.995.4 ± 2.663.6 ± 5.1
BOU36.8 ± 2.7100.0 ± 0.068.3 ± 4.2
BRA46.7 ± 9.848.2 ± 13.066.8 ± 10.5
CAC40.0 ± 8.2100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0
COR20.0 ± 8.266.7 ± 19.370.2 ± 5.2
DEN13.3 ± 7.275.0 ± 21.738.9 ± 16.4
EVA53.3 ± 9.8100.0 ± 0.029.5 ± 8.4
NER66.7 ± 7.298.1 ± 1.953.2 ± 7.3
PIC20.0 ± 0.063.3 ± 18.577.2 ± 7.0
PIN63.3 ± 13.688.8 ± 7.049.8 ± 6.2
Table
Table 4. Active Trichogramma females (%) (=parasitizing at least one T. absoluta or one S. cerealella egg in 2 h) during the host preference test. Five eggs of the target host T. absoluta and five eggs of the rearing host S. cerealella were simultaneously offered to each Trichogramma female. Arithmetic means ± SE are calculated from three trials per strain, each with 10 females.
Table 4. Active Trichogramma females (%) (=parasitizing at least one T. absoluta or one S. cerealella egg in 2 h) during the host preference test. Five eggs of the target host T. absoluta and five eggs of the rearing host S. cerealella were simultaneously offered to each Trichogramma female. Arithmetic means ± SE are calculated from three trials per strain, each with 10 females.
StrainActive Females [%]Active Females [%]
Host: T. absolutaHost: S. cerealella
(means ± SE)(means ± SE)
ACA86.7 ± 7.286.7 ± 7.2
BOU80.0 ± 0.073.3 ± 2.7
BRA86.7 ± 2.780.0 ± 4.7
CAC56.7 ± 2.773.3 ± 7.2
COR66.7 ± 7.263.3 ± 14.4
DEN76.7 ± 2.766.7 ± 11.9
EVA70.0 ± 8.270.0 ± 8.2
NER80.0 ± 0.076.7 ± 2.7
PIC63.3 ± 5.480.0 ± 4.7
PIN76.7 ± 11.980.0 ± 9.4
Table
Table 5. Average egg lengths and widths of the target host T. absoluta and the rearing host S. cerealella. Arithmetic means ± SE are calculated from 20 measured eggs for each host species. Different letters within a column indicate significant differences among means (t-test, p < 0.05, n = 20).
Table 5. Average egg lengths and widths of the target host T. absoluta and the rearing host S. cerealella. Arithmetic means ± SE are calculated from 20 measured eggs for each host species. Different letters within a column indicate significant differences among means (t-test, p < 0.05, n = 20).
SpeciesEgg Length [µm]Egg Width [µm]
(means ± SE)(means ± SE)
Tuta absoluta398.9 ± 3.8 b260.6 ± 2.9 a
Sitotroga cerealella622.1 ± 5.9 a265.7 ± 2.9 a

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schäfer, L.; Herz, A. Suitability of European Trichogramma Species as Biocontrol Agents against the Tomato Leaf Miner Tuta absoluta. Insects 2020, 11, 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11060357

AMA Style

Schäfer L, Herz A. Suitability of European Trichogramma Species as Biocontrol Agents against the Tomato Leaf Miner Tuta absoluta. Insects. 2020; 11(6):357. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11060357

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schäfer, Lea, and Annette Herz. 2020. "Suitability of European Trichogramma Species as Biocontrol Agents against the Tomato Leaf Miner Tuta absoluta" Insects 11, no. 6: 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11060357

APA Style

Schäfer, L., & Herz, A. (2020). Suitability of European Trichogramma Species as Biocontrol Agents against the Tomato Leaf Miner Tuta absoluta. Insects, 11(6), 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11060357

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop