Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Auxin and Cytokinins Concentrations, and the Structure of Bacterial Community between Host Twigs and Lithosaphonecrus arcoverticus Galls
Previous Article in Journal
Echoentomography for Assessing Braconid Parasitization on Soft-Bodied Tephritid Hosts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/insects12110981
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationships between the Pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides, the Phytophagous Mite Schizotetranychus garmani (Acari: Tetranychidae) and the Predatory Mite Euseius finlandicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Oak

by
Slobodan Milanović
1,2,*,
Katarina Mladenović
3,
Bojan Stojnić
4,
Alejandro Solla
5,
Ivan Milenković
1,2,*,
Vanja Uremović
1 and
Ayco J. M. Tack
6
1
Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
3
Institute of Forestry, Kneza Višeslava 3, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia
4
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia
5
Faculty of Forestry, Universidad de Extremadura, Avenida Virgen del Puerto 2, 10600 Plasencia, Spain
6
Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2021, 12(11), 981; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12110981
Submission received: 22 September 2021 / Revised: 25 October 2021 / Accepted: 26 October 2021 / Published: 29 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Knowledge about the relationships between plant pathogens, arthropods, and their natural enemies is scarce. We studied the relationships between the plant fungal pathogen, Erysiphe alphitoides, the phytophagous mite Schizotetranychus garmani, and the predatory mite Euseius finlandicus in leaves of pedunculate oak. In June, July and August 2016, in 30 trees located in three forests near Belgrade, Serbia, the presence of E. alphitoides, S. garmani and E. finlandicus was assessed. The occurrence of E. alphitoides was high where the population of S. garmani was high. However, the presence of the leaf pathogen E. alphitoides was not related to the amount of the predatory mite E. finlandicus. The relationships between powdery mildew and the two mite species were stable across time and space, and the presence of one mite was not influenced by the presence of the other mite.

Abstract

Food webs on forest trees include plant pathogens, arthropods, and their natural enemies. To increase the understanding of the impact of a plant pathogen on herbivore-natural enemy interactions, we studied the powdery mildew fungus Erysiphe alphitoides, the phytophagous mite Schizotetranychus garmani, and the predatory and mycophagous mite Euseius finlandicus in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) leaves. In June, July and August of 2016, we assessed the severity of powdery mildew, mite population density and adult female mite size in 30 trees in three forests near Belgrade, Serbia. In August, the infection severity of E. alphitoides related positively to the population density of S. garmani and negatively to the body size of S. garmani females. Throughout the vegetative season, the infection severity of E. alphitoides related positively to the population density of E. finlandicus but not to its body size. The effect of E. alphitoides on the population density and adult size of S. garmani was not mediated by the population density of E. finlandicus, and vice versa. Interactions were consistent in all forests and varied with the summer month. Our findings indicate that E. alphitoides can influence the average body size and population densities of prey and predatory mites studied, irrespective of predator-prey relationships.

1. Introduction

Trees interact with a large diversity of arthropods and microorganisms [1,2,3]. The harmful effect of pathogens and herbivores on tree health is generally additive [4], and the occurrence of natural enemies of herbivores counteracts this effect [5]. Previous research reported complex interactions between plant pathogens and insect herbivores [6,7]. Plant pathogens can influence herbivore preference and performance, but may also change the relationship between herbivores and their natural enemies, influencing population densities. Interactions between herbivores and pathogens have been reported as positive, neutral or negative, and are frequently asymmetric [7,8,9]. Few studies have addressed the impact of plant pathogens on the relationship between insect herbivores and their natural enemies, or explored the direct effects of plant pathogens on herbivores and the indirect effects mediated by natural enemies, simultaneously.
Plant pathogens can affect the performance of herbivores [10,11] and their natural enemies [12] and influence herbivore-natural enemy interactions [13,14]. The effect of plant pathogens on the performance of insect herbivores can be due to direct feeding, resource competition and plant-mediated effects [15,16]. Plant pathogens can also affect natural enemies by changing the population density, morphology and behaviour of herbivores [16,17] and by altering a plant’s physical structure and volatile emissions [18,19,20], although these effects are less studied. Tripartite interactions between crops, microorganisms and herbivores have been widely studied in recent decades [21,22], and some of these interactions included trees [23,24,25,26,27]. Most studies focused on insect herbivores [28,29,30] and a few addressed mites [31], but no study has examined the interaction between leaf pathogens, phytophagous mites, and their natural enemies.
Knowledge of plant-microbe-arthropod interactions is crucial for our understanding of natural systems, agriculture and forestry [22]. From a biological control perspective, we can learn how to use microbes to reduce plant attack by herbivores and determine whether certain microorganisms can enhance or limit the population densities of the natural enemies of arthropods, such as predators or parasitoids [32]. From this applied perspective, it is essential to determine whether insights gained from studies are applicable to other forests and times of year. If solutions are not applicable to large areas and different times of the season, it is necessary to identify the factors that shape spatial and temporal variations in effectiveness and globally assess the impact of microorganisms on the interactions between herbivores and their natural enemies across multiple locations and over time.
Our objective was to examine the effect of a plant pathogen on predator-prey interactions through an observational study in a forest tree species. We focused on the powdery mildew fungus Erysiphe alphitoides (Griffon and Maubl.) Braun and Takam, the phytophagous mite Schizotetranychus garmani Pritchard and Baker (Acari: Tetranychidae), the predatory mite Euseius finlandicus (Oudemans) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and the pedunculate oak Quercus robur L. oak tree. Powdery mildew and the two mite species are common in natural forest ecosystems in Serbia [33,34,35]. We addressed the following questions: (i) do powdery mildew severity and predatory mite population density influence the population density and adult female size of the phytophagous mite? (ii) do powdery mildew severity and phytophagous mite population density influence the population density and adult female size of the predatory mite? and (iii) are the relationships between powdery mildew, prey mite and predatory mite stable across oak populations and time? We hypothesised that the size and population density of the phytophagous mite are negatively affected by powdery mildew through competition for resources and negatively affected by the predatory mite through predation. We alternatively hypothesised a positive and additive effect of powdery mildew on predatory mite size and population density because the predatory mite can use the fungus as supplementary food, i.e., by being mycophagous. Finally, we hypothesised that the relationships between powdery mildew and the two mite species are stable across time (month of summer) and space.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study System

Powdery mildew caused by E. alphitoides (Figure 1a), formerly known as Microsphaera alphitoides, is one of the major foliar diseases of oaks and had a significant role in oak decline in Europe [36,37]. Disease outbreaks caused by the winter moth (Operopthera brumata L.) and the tortrix moth (Tortrix viridana L.) are common in young leaves emerging after defoliation [38,39], and seedlings are more prone than old trees to infection [40]. Disease outbreaks can also affect mature trees if favourable environmental conditions for E. alphitoides occur in spring and summer, e.g., rain events, relative humidity of 76 to 96%, and temperatures around 20 °C [40], and when leaf flush synchronises with a high density of spores of the pathogen in the air [38]. Among the 20 oak species growing in Europe [41], the pedunculate oak is widespread and highly susceptible to E. alphitoides [40].
The family Tetranichydae (Acari) is one of the main groups of plant-feeding mite species, also known as spider mites [42]. Some spider mites are polyphagous [43], have a high developmental rate and fecundity and a short generation time, spread quickly across the landscape, and tend to develop resistance to pesticides rapidly [44]. As a consequence, spider mites can cause severe economic impact [45]. Worldwide, 117 species of the genus Schizotetranychus are recorded in angiosperm plants [43]. For most species of this genus, plant damage has not been documented or described, and only four species are categorised as at risk of damaging plants of economic importance [46]. As far as the authors know, S. garmani feeds exclusively on leaves.
Mites from the family Phytoseiidae are the most significant natural enemies of spider mites [47]. Phytoseiid mites can also feed on plant sap [48], and in some groups mycophagy has evolved as a supplement to predation [49]. The phytoseiid Euseius finlandicus (Figure 1c) is one of the most significant predators of phytophagous mites worldwide and can also feed on pollen, fungal spores and hyphae, eggs and larvae of insects, honeydew and plant liquids [50]. Trophic relationships between plants, fungi and mites can therefore be highly complex.

2.2. Experimental Procedure

To study the relationships between powdery mildew and phytophagous and predatory mites in oak, three Q. robur forests were selected in spring 2006. The forests were at Besni Fok (45.00156°, 20.40794°), Progar (44.7299°, 20.16236°) and Mala Moštanica (44.65258°, 20.29552°), near Belgrade, Serbia (Figure 2). At each site, 10 trees with powdery mildew but unaffected by any other disease were selected. Each tree was the experimental unit, and the study comprised 30 trees. Fifty mature leaves from each tree were sampled once a month, in June, July and August. In Belgrade in 2016, mean temperatures and total precipitation for each month were 22.5, 24.4 and 22.3 °C and 152, 35 and 61 mm, respectively (Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia, www.hidmet.gov.rs/eng/osmotreni/naslovna.php, accessed on 25 October 2021). The 50 leaves per tree were collected at random from the lower parts of the canopies. All 1500 leaves sampled each month were carefully examined under a dissection microscope (Leica Wild M3Z, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and their mites collected. Leaf area was estimated individually using SigmaScan Pro 5.0 software (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The mites were removed in a solution of ethanol and lactic acid [51], mounted in Hoyer’s medium [52] and identified with a phase-contrast microscope (Leica DMLS, Leica Microsystems, Germany) using specialised taxonomic keys of Tetranychidae [42,53,54,55,56] and Phytoseiidae [57,58,59,60] families. The population density of S. garmani and E. finlandicus was obtained in each tree by dividing the total number of mites of each species counted on 50 leaves by the total leaf area assessed in each tree. The length of the idiosoma of all the female individuals of S. garmani and E. finlandicus collected was measured. ‘Adult female size’, referring to idiosoma length (Figure 1b,c), was also averaged in each tree.
Ten of the 50 leaves sampled from each tree were placed separately into plastic Petri dishes. Leaf petioles were wrapped in cotton moistened with sterile distilled water. Powdery patches were observed under a binocular microscope (Olympus SZ-7, Tokyo, Japan) and fungal traits were observed in detail using a light Magnum T Trinocular microscope (CETI, Batley, UK). All traits were compared with those reported by Takamatsu et al. [61] and Braun et al. [62]. Based on the morphology of conidiophores and conidia, the number of asci in chasmothecia (i.e., sexual structures) and the shape of appendages, the powdery mildew observed was identified as E. alphitoides. In each tree, the percentage of leaf area affected by powdery mildew (infection severity) was estimated following Bert et al. [63]. Each of the 50 leaves sampled per tree was visually examined and assigned to one of the following damage groups: ‘0’ = no powdery mildew symptoms, ‘A’ = less than 50% of leaf surface with powdery mildew symptoms, ‘B’ = more than 50% of leaf surface with powdery mildew symptoms, and ‘C’ = whole leaf severely distorted and/or necrotic or dead. Whole tree infection severity was calculated using the equation of Bert et al. [63] as follows:
Severity = 0.25 × (percentage of leaves in group A) + 0.75 × (percentage of leaves in group B) + 1 ×
(percentage of leaves in group C)
Tree infection severity ranged from 0 to 100, corresponding to an infected leaf area percentage of 0 to 100%. We used this equation because the infection severity values followed a Gaussian distribution and to ensure our observations were comparable with those of previous studies [63].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed after obtaining ‘severity of E. alphitoides’, ‘population density of S. garmani’ and ‘population density of E. finlandicus’ in each tree. To assess the influence of powdery mildew and the predatory mite on the population density of the phytophagous mite, we used a linear mixed model (LMM). The model included ‘population density of S. garmani’ as the dependent variable, ‘forest’ and ‘month of summer’ as random and fixed factors, respectively, and ‘powdery mildew severity’ and ‘population density of E. finlandicus’ as covariates. To assess the influence of powdery mildew and the phytophagous mite on the population density of the predatory mite, a second LMM was used, including ‘population density of E. finlandicus’ as the dependent variable, ‘forest’ and ‘month of summer’ as random and fixed factors, respectively, and ‘powdery mildew severity’ and ‘population density of S. garmani’ as covariates. To assess the influence of powdery mildew and the predatory mite on adult female size of the phytophagous mite, a third LMM was used, including ‘adult female size of S. garmani’ as the dependent variable, ‘forest’ and ‘month of summer’ as random and fixed factors, respectively, and ‘powdery mildew severity’ and ‘population density of E. finlandicus’ as covariates. Finally, to assess the influence of powdery mildew and the phytophagous mite on the adult female size of the predatory mite, a fourth LMM was used, including ‘adult female size of E. finlandicus’ as the dependent variable, ‘forest’ and ‘month of summer’ as random and fixed factors, respectively, and ‘powdery mildew severity’ and ‘population density of S. garmani’ as covariates. To assess whether the relationships between powdery mildew and the mites were influenced by space (i.e., sampling locations) and time (i.e., time of the growing season), the models included the factors ‘forest’ and ‘month of summer’. Two-way interactions between variables were also included. Normality and homoscedasticity of the dependent variables were checked by KolmogorovSmirnoff and Bartlett’s tests. All analyses were performed with Statistica v.13 (TIBCO® Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).

3. Results

The population density of S. garmani significantly covaried with the severity of E. alphitoides (model 1 in Table 1). The positive relationship between these variables was conditioned by the month of summer (significant ‘month of summer’ × ‘severity of E. alphitoides’ in Table 1), and was non-significant in June and July (p > 0.05) and significant in August (p < 0.01; Figure 3a). The population density of S. garmani was not conditioned by the population density of E. finlandicus or by the forest (Table 1). The population density of E. finlandicus also positively covaried with the severity of E. alphitoides (model 2 in Table 1), although this relationship was not influenced by the month of summer (non-significant ‘month of summer’ × ‘severity of E. alphitoides’ in Table 1), and was significant in June, July and August (p < 0.05; Figure 3b). The population density of S. garmani was not conditioned by the population density of E. finlandicus or by the forest (Table 1).
The adult female size of S. garmani significantly covaried with the severity of E. alphitoides (model 3 in Table 1). The relationship was negative and conditioned by the month of summer (significant ‘month of summer’ × ‘severity of E. alphitoides’ in Table 1), and was significant in June and August (p < 0.05) and highly significant in August (p < 0.01; Figure 4a). The adult female size of S. garmani was not conditioned by the population density of E. finlandicus or by the forest (Table 1). Moreover, the adult female size of S. garmani was not affected by its population density (r = −0.13; p > 0.1). The adult female size of E. finlandicus was influenced by the month of summer only (model 4 in Table 1), and did not vary with its population density (r = −0.09; p > 0.1), between forests or during the summer (Figure 4b). The effects tested are summarised in Figure 5.

4. Discussion

The relationships between oak powdery mildew and phytophagous and predatory mites were studied during one vegetative season in three pedunculate oak forests. The levels of powdery mildew infection related positively to the population densities of mites and negatively to the adult female size of the phytophagous mite. In contrast to the influence of powdery mildew on mite population density, the two mite species did not interact with each other. Moreover, the effect of powdery mildew severity on the density of the phytophagous and predatory mites was not mediated by the density of the predatory and phytophagous mites, respectively. While the relationships between powdery mildew, the phytophagous mite and the predatory mite were stable across space, the relationship between powdery mildew and the phytophagous mite varied during summer.
The population density of the phytophagous S. garmani was positively influenced by the biotrophic foliar pathogen E. alphitoides. A positive relationship between the density of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae and the infection level of the powdery mildew Podosphaera spp. was observed on apples and sour cherries [64]. The population of a herbivore could be expected to decrease due to competition for resources with a pathogen [15], but previous research on oak indicated that interactions between E. alphitoides and insect species can range from negative to positive [13]. Mildew had a negative effect on the growth rate of the herbivore Acronicta psi L. and a positive effect on mite size and the parasitism of Tischeria ekebladella Bjerk. [13]. One explanation of why S. garmani abundance was positively related to the severity of E. alphitoides is that the phytophagous mite could have vectored the pathogen spores and, in turn, increased the level of infection [65], or could have facilitated penetration of the fungus into the host [66]. Our experiment was not manipulative but observational, thus it ignored if E. alphitoides made trees more susceptible to S. garmani or if S. garmani made trees more susceptible to E. alphitoides. Moreover, it ignored if a feedback loop consisting of increased susceptibility of trees to combined E. alphitoides and S. garmani stress occurred.
The decreased resource quality of leaves induced by pathogen infection [67] probably explains the smaller size of S. garmani in severely infected leaves. Inoculation of Q. robur seedlings with E. alphitoides was associated with the accumulation of secondary metabolites, such as phenols and lignins, in necrotic lesions and adjacent cells in infected oak leaves [68]. Herbivory by Schizotetranychus baltazari significantly altered the biochemical profile of curry (Murraia koenigii L.) leaves, leading to increased tannin content and decreased flavonoid and phenol, compared to non-infested plants [69]. Intraspecific competition and density dependence of food consumption probably do not explain why mites at the highest densities had small body sizes because the population densities observed were low. Food quality may also have impacted populations by changing the generation time of mites [70].
The severity of E. alphitoides also related positively to the population density of the predatory E. finlandicus mite, but not to its body size. No studies have examined the effect of plant pathogens on predatory mites. One study reported a higher population density of predatory spiders as a consequence of Taphrina sp. infection in Populus trichocarpa [25], in accordance with our findings of a positive effect of pathogen infection on the population of a predatory mite. One explanation for this positive effect is that E. finlandicus fed on the fungus. Several predatory mites, including E. finlandicus [50], are known to exhibit mycophagy [49]. Another explanation is that the biotrophic pathogen E. alphitoides, by inducing production of volatile compounds, such as methyl salicylate in Q. robur foliage [71], also attracted E. finlandicus, as occurs with other predatory mites [72].
Although many studies have investigated direct and plant-mediated interactions between fungal pathogens and arthropod herbivores [10,30,73], few have examined whether plant-pathogen-insect interactions are mediated by natural enemies [6]. In our study, the effect of powdery mildew severity on the population density and adult female size of S. garmani was not mediated by the population density of the predatory E. finlandicus mite. The absence of effects of E. finlandicus on its prey mite (and vice versa) was unexpected, because previous work in the laboratory had confirmed the trophic relationships between the mite species studied [74]. The strength of the predator-prey relationship may have been weakened by the presence of E. alphitoides.
The relationship between the severity of E. alphitoides and the population density and size of S. garmani varied significantly during the season. The predatory E. finlandicus was smallest in August. Few studies have tested plant-microbe-arthropod interactions by sampling multiple times during the growing season, and our data suggest patterns of variation in these interactions over time. According to the meteorological data series from Belgrade (not shown), 2016 was a typical meteorological year. In contrast to the observed seasonal changes of plant-fungus-mite interactions, the spatial location, i.e., the forest, was not influential. Our forests were far apart (Figure 2), and thus we tentatively conclude that the tree population does not influence the relationship between E. alphitoides severity and the population density (and female size) of mites in Q. robur. More years should have been included to assess landscape-level variation in the insect community structure, or to confirm the results summarised in Figure 5 in the long term. A study with more tree replicates would permit assessment of triple interactions. Moreover, the use of clonally replicated plant material intentionally placed in the forests would allow testing of the genotype effect.

5. Conclusions

Our findings indicate that severe leaf infection during summer of Q. robur by E. alphitoides was associated with increased population densities of the phytophagous S. garmani and the predatory (also mycophagous) E. finlandicus mites. Moreover, the population density of E. finlandicus did not influence the association between the pathogen and S. garmani, and the population density of S. garmani did not influence the association between the pathogen and E. finlandicus. Our findings also indicated that E. alphitoides can influence the average body size of the phytophagous S. garmani mite. The results contribute to our knowledge of natural food webs and plant-pathogen-arthropod interactions in forests.

Author Contributions

S.M., K.M. and B.S. conceived and designed the study. S.M. and K.M. collected samples in the field, I.M. identified the fungus, and K.M. and B.S. identified the mites. V.U. estimated the infection rate of the fungus. S.M. and A.J.M.T. statistically analysed the data, S.M., A.S., A.J.M.T., B.S. and K.M. wrote the manuscript with assistance from I.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development (grant number 451-02-68/2021/14/2000169 for scientific research in 2020 at the Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade), Czech Ministry for Education, Youth and Sports (grant number CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/ 15_003/0000453 for scientific research at the Phytophthora Research Centre) and the European Regional Development Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data may be requested from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

To Jane McGrath for the English edition.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Milanovic, S.; Jankovic-Tomanic, M.; Kostic, I.; Kostic, M.; Morina, F.; Zivanovic, B.; Lazarevic, J. Behavioural and physiological plasticity of gypsy moth larvae to host plant switching. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2016, 158, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Baldrian, P. Forest microbiome: Diversity, complexity and dynamics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 109–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Elvira-Recuenco, M.; Cacciola, S.O.; Sanz-Ros, A.V.; Garbelotto, M.; Aguayo, J.; Solla, A.; Mullett, M.; Drenkhan, T.; Oskay, F.; Aday Kaya, A.G.; et al. Potential interactions between invasive Fusarium circinatum and other pine pathogens in Europe. Forests 2020, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Schuldt, A.; Hönig, L.; Li, Y.; Fichtner, A.; Härdtle, W.; von Oheimb, G.; Welk, E.; Bruelheide, H. Herbivore and pathogen effects on tree growth are additive, but mediated by tree diversity and plant traits. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 7, 7462–7474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Price, P.W.; Bouton, C.E.; Gross, P.; McPheron, B.A.; Thompson, J.N.; Weis, A.E. Interactions among three trophic levels: Influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1980, 11, 41–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Tack, A.J.M.; Dicke, M. Plant pathogens structure arthropod communities across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Funct. Ecol. 2013, 27, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fernandez-Conradi, P.; Jactel, H.; Robin, C.; Tack, A.J.M.; Castagneyrol, B. Fungi reduce preference and performance of insect herbivores on challenged plants. Ecology 2018, 99, 300–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mouttet, R.; Bearez, P.; Thomas, C.; Desneux, N. Phytophagous arthropods and a pathogen sharing a host plant: Evidence for indirect plant-mediated interactions. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. van Dijk, L.J.A.; Ehrlén, J.; Tack, A.J.M. The timing and asymmetry of plant-pathogen-insect interactions. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2020, 287, 20201303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Milanović, S.; Lazarević, J.; Karadžić, D.; Milenković, I.; Jankovský, L.; Vuleta, A.; Solla, A. Belowground infections of the invasive Phytophthora plurivora pathogen enhance the suitability of red oak leaves to the generalist herbivore Lymantria Dispar. Ecol. Entomol. 2015, 40, 479–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Milanović, S.; Milenković, I.; Dobrosavljević, J.; Popović, M.; Solla, A.; Tomšovský, M.; Jankovský, L. Growth rates of Lymantria dispar larvae and Quercus robur seedlings at elevated CO2 concentration and Phytophthora plurivora infection. Forests 2020, 11, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Biere, A.; Tack, A.J.M. Evolutionary adaptation in three-way interactions between plants, microbes and arthropods. Funct. Ecol. 2013, 27, 646–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Tack, A.; Gripenberg, S.; Roslin, T. Cross-kingdom interactions matter: Fungal-mediated interactions structure an insect community on oak. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Castagneyrol, B.; Fernandez-Conradi, P.; Rasmussen, P.U.; Robin, C.; Tack, A.J.M. Belowground–Aboveground Interactions Between Pathogens and Herbivores BT–Aboveground–Belowground Community Ecology; Ohgushi, T., Wurst, S., Johnson, S.N., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 135–174. ISBN 978-3-319-91614-9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hatcher, P.E. Three-way interactions between plant pathogenic fungi, herbivorous insects and their host plants. Biol. Rev. 1995, 70, 639–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Eberl, F.; Fernandez de Bobadilla, M.; Reichelt, M.; Hammerbacher, A.; Gershenzon, J.; Unsicker, S.B. Herbivory meets fungivory: Insect herbivores feed on plant pathogenic fungi for their own benefit. Ecol. Lett. 2020, 23, 1073–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. van Nouhuys, S.; Laine, A.-L. Population dynamics and sex ratio of a parasitoid altered by fungal-infected diet of host butterfly. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2008, 275, 787–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Corcobado, T.; Miranda-Torres, J.J.; Martín-García, J.; Jung, T.; Solla, A. Early survival of Quercus ilex subspecies from different populations after infections and co-infections by multiple Phytophthora species. Plant Pathol. 2017, 66, 792–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Biere, A.; Elzinga, J.A.; Honders, S.C.; Harvey, J.A. A plant pathogen reduces the enemy-free space of an insect herbivore on a shared host plant. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2002, 269, 2197–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Clavijo McCormick, A.; Unsicker, S.B.; Gershenzon, J. The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stout, M.; Thaler, J.; Thomma, B.; Stout, M.J.; Thaler, J.S.; Thomma, B.P.H.J. Plant-mediated interactions between pathogenic microorganisms and herbivorous arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2006, 51, 663–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Biere, A.; Goverse, A. Plant-mediated systemic interactions between pathogens, parasitic nematodes, and herbivores above- and belowground. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2016, 54, 499–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Fernández-Fernández, M.; Naves, P.; Musolin, D.L.; Selikhovkin, A.V.; Cleary, M.; Chira, D.; Paraschiv, M.; Gordon, T.; Solla, A.; Papazova-Anakieva, I.; et al. Pine pitch canker and insects: Regional risks, environmental regulation, and practical management options. Forests 2019, 10, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Franco, F.P.; Moura, D.S.; Vivanco, J.M.; Silva-Filho, M.C. Plant–insect–pathogen interactions: A naturally complex ménage à trois. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 37, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Slinn, H.L.; Barbour, M.A.; Crawford, K.M.; Rodriguez-Cabal, M.A.; Crutsinger, G.M. Genetic variation in resistance to leaf fungus indirectly affects spider density. Ecology 2017, 98, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Eberl, F.; Uhe, C.; Unsicker, S.B. Friend or foe? The role of leaf-inhabiting fungal pathogens and endophytes in tree-insect interactions. Fungal Ecol. 2019, 38, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gallardo, A.; Morcuende, D.; Solla, A.; Moreno, G.; Pulido, F.; Quesada, A. Regulation by biotic stress of tannins biosynthesis in Quercus ilex: Crosstalk between defoliation and Phytophthora cinnamomi infection. Physiol. Plant. 2019, 165, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moran, P.J. Plant-mediated interactions between insects and a fungal plant pathogen and the role of plant chemical responses to infection. Oecologia 1998, 115, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thaler, J.S.; Agrawal, A.A.; Halitschke, R. Salicylate-mediated interactions between pathogens and herbivores. Ecology 2010, 91, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lombardero, M.J.; Solla, A.; Ayres, M.P. Pine defenses against the pitch canker disease are modulated by a native insect newly associated with the invasive fungus. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 437, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gamliel-Atinsky, E.; Freeman, S.; Maymon, M.; Belausov, E.; Ochoa, R.; Bauchan, G.; Skoracka, A.; Pena, J.; Palevsky, E. The role of eriophyoids in fungal pathogen epidemiology, mere association or true interaction? Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2009, 51, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Leroux, S.J.; Loreau, M. Theoretical perspectives on bottom-up and top-down interactions across ecosystems. In Trophic Ecology: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Interactions across Aquatic and Terrestrial Systems; La Pierre, K.J., Hanley, T.C., Eds.; Ecological Reviews; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 3–28. ISBN 9781107077324. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pap, P.; Stojnić, S.; Nikolić, N.; Orlović, S.; Marković, M.; Vasić, V.; Stevanov, M. Impact of Microsphaera alphitoides Griff. et Maubl. on leaf physiological parameters in Pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) saplings. Baltic For. 2014, 20, 2–9. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mladenović, K. Species Diversity of Phytophagous and Predatory Mites of Wild Fruit Trees in Forest Ecosystems of Serbia. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  35. Dobrosavljević, J.; Marković, Č.; Marjanović, M.; Milanović, S. Pedunculate oak leaf miners’ community: Urban vs. rural habitat. Forests 2020, 11, 1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Thomas, F. Recent advances in cause-effect research on oak decline in Europe. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2008, 3, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Desprez-Loustau, M.-L.; Feau, N.; Mougou-Hamdane, A.; Dutech, C. Interspecific and intraspecific diversity in oak powdery mildews in Europe: Coevolution history and adaptation to their hosts. Mycoscience 2011, 52, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marçais, B.; Kavkova, M.; Desprez-Loustau, M.-L. Phenotypic variation in the phenology of ascospore production between European populations of oak powdery mildew. Ann. For. Sci. 2009, 66, 814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Führer, E. Oak Decline in Central Europe: A synopsis of hypotheses. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. 1998, NE-247, 7–24. [Google Scholar]
  40. Marçais, B.; Desprez-Loustau, M.-L. European oak powdery mildew: Impact on trees, effects of environmental factors, and potential effects of climate change. Ann. For. Sci. 2014, 71, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jalas, J.; Suominen, J. Atlas Florae Europaeae: Distribution of Vascular Plants in Europe Vol. 3 Salicaceae to Balanophoraceae; The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica Vanam: Helsinki, Finland, 1976; ISBN 951-9108-02-5. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bolland, H.R.; Gutierrez, J.; Flechtmann, C.H.W. World Catalogue of the Spider Mite Family (Acari:Tetranychidae); Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands; Boston, MA, USA, 1998; ISBN1 9004110879. ISBN2 9789004110878. [Google Scholar]
  43. Migeon, A.; Nouguier, E.; Dorkeld, F. Spider Mites Web: A Comprehensive Database for the Tetranychidae BT—Trends in Acarology; Sabelis, M.W., Bruin, J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 557–560. [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Leeuwen, T.; Vontas, J.; Tsagkarakou, A.; Dermauw, W.; Tirry, L. Acaricide resistance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other important Acari: A review. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Jeppson, L.R.; Keifer, H.H.; Baker, E.W. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1975; ISBN 0520023811. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vacante, V. The Handbook of Mites of Economic Plants: Identification, Bio-Ecology and Control; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2016; ISBN 9781845939946. [Google Scholar]
  47. McMurtry, J.A.; Croft, B.A. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1997, 42, 291–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Adar, E.; Inbar, M.; Gal, S.; Issman, L.; Palevsky, E. Plant cell piercing by a predatory mite: Evidence and implications. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2015, 65, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Krantz, G.W.; Lindquist, E.E. Evolution of phytophagous mites (ACARI). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1979, 24, 121–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abdallah, A.A.; Zhang, Z.-Q.; Masters, G.J.; Mcneill, S. Euseius finlandicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as a potential biocontrol agent against Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): Life history and feeding habits on three different types of food. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2001, 25, 833–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Evans, G.O.; Browning, E. LXXV.—Techniques for the preparation of mites for study. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1955, 8, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Baker, E.W.; Wharton, G.W. An Introduction to Acarology; The Macmillan Co.: New York, NY, USA; Toronto, CA, Canada, 1952. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pritchard, A.E.; Arthur, E.; Baker, E.W. A Revision of the Spider Mite Family Tetranychidae; Pacific Coast Entomological Society: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1955; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  54. Baker, E.W.; Tuttle, D.M. A Guide to the Spider Mites (Tetranychidae) of the United States; Indira Pub. House: West Bloomfield, MI, USA, 1994; ISBN1 0930337123. ISBN2 9780930337124. [Google Scholar]
  55. Flechtmann, C.H.W. Schizotetranychus-like spider mites (Acari, Prostigmata, Tetranychidae)—Revisited, new combinations and a key to groups of Schizotetranychus based on females. Acarologia 2012, 52, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Manson, D.C.M. The spider mite family Tetranychidae in New Zealand. II The genus Tetranychus. Acarologia 1967, 9, 581–597. [Google Scholar]
  57. Chant, D.A. Phytoseiid Mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 1959, 91, 5–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chant, D.A.; McMurtry, J.A. Illustrated Keys and Diagnoses for the Genera and Subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the World (Acari: Mesostigmata); Indira Pub. House: West Bloomfield, MI, USA, 2007; ISBN1 0930337220. ISBN2 9780930337223. [Google Scholar]
  59. Karg, W. Acari (Acarina), Milben Parasitiformes (Anactinochaeta), Cohors Gamasina Leach: Raubmilben; Gustav Fischer Verlag: Jena, Germany, 1993; ISBN1 3334604454. ISBN2 9783334604458. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tixier, M.S.; Baldassar, A.; Duso, C.; Kreiter, S. Dichotomous Key to Species of Phytoseiidae Mites in European Vine Fields. 2012. Available online: https://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/phytoseiidae/sitewebvineyards2/index.htm (accessed on 26 June 2017).
  61. Takamatsu, S.; Braun, U.; Limkaisang, S.; Kom-un, S.; Sato, Y.; Cunnington, J.H. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the oak powdery mildew Erysiphe alphitoides sensu lato. Mycol. Res. 2007, 111, 809–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Braun, U.; Cook, R. Taxonomic Manual of the Erysiphales (Powdery Mildews); CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 11, ISBN 978-90-70351-89-2. [Google Scholar]
  63. Bert, D.; Lasnier, J.-B.; Capdevielle, X.; Dugravot, A.; Desprez-Loustau, M.-L. Powdery mildew decreases the radial growth of oak trees with cumulative and delayed effects over years. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Reding, M.E.; Alston, D.G.; Thomson, S.V.; Stark, A.V. Association of powdery mildew and spider mite populations in apple and cherry orchards. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 84, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Roets, F.; Wingfield, M.J.; Wingfield, B.D.; Dreyer, L.L. Mites are the most common vectors of the fungus Gondwanamyces proteae in Protea infructescences. Fungal Biol. 2011, 115, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Gamliel-Atinsky, E.; Freeman, S.; Sztejnberg, A.; Maymon, M.; Ochoa, R.; Belausov, E.; Palevsky, E. Interaction of the mite Aceria mangiferae with Fusarium mangiferae, the causal agent of mango malformation disease. Phytopathology 2009, 99, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Rector, B.G.; Czarnoleski, M.; Skoracka, A.; Lembicz, M. Change in abundance of three phytophagous mite species (Acari: Eriophyidae, Tetranychidae) on quackgrass in the presence of choke disease. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 70, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Grzebyta, J.; Karolewski, P.; Zytkowiak, R.; Giertych, M.J.; Werner, A.; Zadworny, M.; Oleksyn, J. Effects of elevated temperature and fluorine pollution on relations between the pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) and oak powdery mildew (Microsphaera alphitoides). Dendrobiology 2005, 53, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
  69. Aa, S.M.; Srinivasa, N. Qualitative damage of spider mites on selected medicinal plants and the corresponding biochemical changes. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2021, 9, 1880–1885. [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhurov, V.; Navarro, M.; Bruinsma, K.A.; Arbona, V.; Santamaria, M.E.; Cazaux, M.; Wybouw, N.; Osborne, E.J.; Ens, C.; Rioja, C.; et al. Reciprocal responses in the interaction between Arabidopsis and the cell-content-feeding chelicerate herbivore spider mite. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 384–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Copolovici, L.; Väärtnõu, F.; Estrada, M.P.; Niinemets, Ü. Oak powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides)-induced volatile emissions scale with the degree of infection in Quercus robur. Tree Physiol. 2014, 34, 1399–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Shimoda, T. A key volatile infochemical that elicits a strong olfactory response of the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus, an important natural enemy of the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2010, 50, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Rostás, M.; Simon, M.; Hilker, M. Ecological cross-effects of induced plant responses towards herbivores and phytopathogenic fungi. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2003, 41, 43–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Puchalska, E.; Kozak, M. Typhlodromus pyri and Euseius finlandicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as potential biocontrol agents against spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) inhabiting willows: Laboratory studies on predator development and reproduction on four diets. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 68, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Insects 12 00981 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) White powdery patches of Erysiphe alphitoides on the upper side of a Quercus robur leaf, and dorsal side of adult females of (b) the phytophagous mite Schizotetranychus garmani and (c) the predatory mite Euseius finlandicus. Red arrows indicate idiosoma length.
Figure 1. (a) White powdery patches of Erysiphe alphitoides on the upper side of a Quercus robur leaf, and dorsal side of adult females of (b) the phytophagous mite Schizotetranychus garmani and (c) the predatory mite Euseius finlandicus. Red arrows indicate idiosoma length.
Insects 12 00981 g001
Insects 12 00981 g002 550
Figure 2. Location of the three Quercus robur forests studied, near Belgrade, Serbia.
Figure 2. Location of the three Quercus robur forests studied, near Belgrade, Serbia.
Insects 12 00981 g002
Insects 12 00981 g003 550
Figure 3. Relationships between severity of powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides) in Quercus robur leaves and (a) population density of the phytophagous mite Schizotetranychus garmani or (b) population density of the predatory mite Euseius finlandicus. Severity ranged from 0 to 100, corresponding to an infected leaf area percentage of 0 to 100%. Circles, squares and triangles represent mean values at the tree level for June, July and August, respectively.
Figure 3. Relationships between severity of powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides) in Quercus robur leaves and (a) population density of the phytophagous mite Schizotetranychus garmani or (b) population density of the predatory mite Euseius finlandicus. Severity ranged from 0 to 100, corresponding to an infected leaf area percentage of 0 to 100%. Circles, squares and triangles represent mean values at the tree level for June, July and August, respectively.
Insects 12 00981 g003
Insects 12 00981 g004 550
Figure 4. Relationships between severity of powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides) in Quercus robur leaves and adult female idiosoma size of (a) the phytophagous mite Schizotetranychus garmani or (b) the predatory mite Euseius finlandicus. Severity ranged from 0 to 100, corresponding to an infected leaf area percentage of 0 to 100%. Circles, squares and triangles represent mean values at the tree level for June, July and August, respectively.
Figure 4. Relationships between severity of powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides) in Quercus robur leaves and adult female idiosoma size of (a) the phytophagous mite Schizotetranychus garmani or (b) the predatory mite Euseius finlandicus. Severity ranged from 0 to 100, corresponding to an infected leaf area percentage of 0 to 100%. Circles, squares and triangles represent mean values at the tree level for June, July and August, respectively.
Insects 12 00981 g004
Insects 12 00981 g005 550
Figure 5. Summary of relationships in Quercus robur leaves between (a) population densities of Schizotetranychus garmani and Euseius finlandicus and (b) adult female idiosoma size of S. garmani and E. finlandicus and severity of Erysiphe alphitoides, the forest and the summer month. Asterisks indicate significances at p < 0.05 (**) and p < 0.01 (***), and no significance (ns), obtained from the models shown in Table 1.
Figure 5. Summary of relationships in Quercus robur leaves between (a) population densities of Schizotetranychus garmani and Euseius finlandicus and (b) adult female idiosoma size of S. garmani and E. finlandicus and severity of Erysiphe alphitoides, the forest and the summer month. Asterisks indicate significances at p < 0.05 (**) and p < 0.01 (***), and no significance (ns), obtained from the models shown in Table 1.
Insects 12 00981 g005
Table
Table 1. Results of the linear mixed models for analysis of relationships and interactions between powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides), a phytophagous mite (Schizotetranychus garmani) and a predatory mite (Euseius finlandicus) in leaves of Quercus robur from three forests, sampled for three months in summer. Significant p-values are indicated in bold.
Table 1. Results of the linear mixed models for analysis of relationships and interactions between powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides), a phytophagous mite (Schizotetranychus garmani) and a predatory mite (Euseius finlandicus) in leaves of Quercus robur from three forests, sampled for three months in summer. Significant p-values are indicated in bold.
ModelDependent VariablePredictorTypeDegree of FreedomF Ratiop-Value
1Population density of
Schizotetranychus garmani		Forest (F)Random
effect		20.30.696
Month of summer (M)Fixed effect20.20.750
Severity of
Erysiphe alphitoides (Ea)		Covariate15.00.027
Population density of
E. finlandicus (Ef)		Covariate10.90.331
F × MRandom
effect		42.00.104
F × Ea-21.00.345
M × Ea-26.10.003
Ea × Ef-10.30.541
2Population density of
Euseius finlandicus		Forest (F)Random
effect		20.20.795
Month of summer (M)Fixed effect21.00.353
Severity of
Erysiphe alphitoides (Ea)		Covariate112.4<0.001
Population density of
S. garmani (Sg)		Covariate10.40.530
F × MRandom
effect		40.90.451
F × Ea-20.70.470
M × Ea-20.10.849
Ea × Sg-10.10.738
3Adult female size of
Schizotetranychus garmani		Forest (F)Random
effect		22.90.079
Month of summer (M)Fixed effect20.90.411
Severity of
Erysiphe alphitoides (Ea)		Covariate19.30.006
Population density of
E. finlandicus (Ef)		Covariate10.00.958
F × MRandom
effect		41.60.201
F × Ea-21.60.214
M × Ea-23.70.044
Ea × Ef-10.00.865
4Adult female size of
Euseius finlandicus		Forest (F)Random
effect		20.40.620
Month of summer (M)Fixed effect29.6<0.001
Severity of
Erysiphe alphitoides (Ea)		Covariate10.00.825
Population density of
S. garmani (Sg)		Covariate10.40.507
F × EaRandom
effect		40.60.627
F × Ea-20.20.801
M × Ea-21.50.222
Ea × Sg-10.20.602
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Milanović, S.; Mladenović, K.; Stojnić, B.; Solla, A.; Milenković, I.; Uremović, V.; Tack, A.J.M. Relationships between the Pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides, the Phytophagous Mite Schizotetranychus garmani (Acari: Tetranychidae) and the Predatory Mite Euseius finlandicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Oak. Insects 2021, 12, 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12110981

AMA Style

Milanović S, Mladenović K, Stojnić B, Solla A, Milenković I, Uremović V, Tack AJM. Relationships between the Pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides, the Phytophagous Mite Schizotetranychus garmani (Acari: Tetranychidae) and the Predatory Mite Euseius finlandicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Oak. Insects. 2021; 12(11):981. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12110981

Chicago/Turabian Style

Milanović, Slobodan, Katarina Mladenović, Bojan Stojnić, Alejandro Solla, Ivan Milenković, Vanja Uremović, and Ayco J. M. Tack. 2021. "Relationships between the Pathogen Erysiphe alphitoides, the Phytophagous Mite Schizotetranychus garmani (Acari: Tetranychidae) and the Predatory Mite Euseius finlandicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Oak" Insects 12, no. 11: 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12110981

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop