Next Article in Journal
Effects of Mating on Gene Expression in Female Insects: Unifying the Field
Next Article in Special Issue
Bacteriota and Antibiotic Resistance in Spiders
Previous Article in Journal
Mitogenomes of Nine Asian Skipper Genera and Their Phylogenetic Position (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Pyrginae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inhibition of Zoonotic Pathogens Naturally Found in Pig Manure by Black Soldier Fly Larvae and Their Intestine Bacteria

1
State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, National Engineering Research Center of Microbial Pesticides, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Faculty of Science and Technology, Omdurman Islamic University, Khartoum 11111, Sudan
3
Department of Biology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA
4
Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2022, 13(1), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010066
Submission received: 27 November 2021 / Revised: 4 January 2022 / Accepted: 5 January 2022 / Published: 7 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immunity and Host-Microbe Interactions in Insects)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

With the rapid development of the economy and the improvement of people’s living standards, people need to rear a lot of livestock to meet demand for proteins. This also involves an increase in the production of livestock manure. The expanding rate of livestock manure has become a thorny issue, owing to characteristics such as plentiful nitrogen and abundant zoonotic pathogens. The saprophagous larvae of the black soldier fly (BSF) are often associated with animal manure and can significantly reduce the populations of different zoonotic pathogens in livestock manure. However, reports about the mechanisms of this phenomenon are scarce. In this study, we investigated the potential mechanisms of BSF larvae in reducing the zoonotic pathogens naturally found in pig manure. The results clearly showed that zoonotic pathogens in pig manure were significantly decreased after being treated with BSF larvae, and also suggested that the antimicrobial peptides produced by the BSF larvae and gut-associated bacteria are able to antagonize the zoonotic pathogens. This study will contribute to reveal the potential antagonistic mechanisms of BSF larvae against zoonotic pathogens and improve the safety of organic waste conversion by BSF larvae.

Abstract

Black soldier fly (BSF) larvae are often exposed to organic waste which harbors abundant zoonotic pathogens. We investigated the ability of BSF larvae to inhibit the zoonotic pathogens naturally found in pig manure. The zoonotic pathogens populations were detected by using selective medium during the conversion. Results showed that the viability of the zoonotic pathogens in pig manure was significantly affected. After eight days of conversion, the Coliform populations were undetected, and Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella spp. decreased significantly on the eighth day. Antimicrobial assays of the purified recombinant defensin-like peptide 4 (DLP4) showed that this peptide exhibits inhibitory activity against S. aureus, Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium, and Escherichia coli in vitro. Bacteria BSF-CL and BSF-F were isolated from the larvae gut, and both inhibited the growth of S. aureus and E. coli, but Salmonella spp. was sensitive to the BSF-CL strain (but not to the BSF-F strain). The results from our experiments indicate that BSF larvae are capable of functionally inhibiting potential zoonotic pathogens in pig manure through a variety of mechanisms including antimicrobial peptides expression and the gut associate microorganisms. This study provides a theoretical basis for further study on the combined mechanism of BSF larvae immunity and its gut microbes against the zoonotic pathogens in pig manure.

1. Introduction

Insects are the largest group in the animal kingdom in terms of the number and diversity of species [1]. These species are often associated with animal manure, which harbors many significant food-borne pathogens [2]. The insect antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are key factors of the immune system of insects, and they are mainly synthesized by the fat body, a large biosynthetic organ that is functionally similar to the mammalian liver [3]. Different antimicrobial substances are produced on the surface of insects to prevent microbial infection. The functional significance of the AMPs of insects in reducing the common pathogens in the surrounding environment has been demonstrated [4].
Insect diversity is reflected in the large and varied microbial communities inhabiting the gut [5]. These microorganisms contribute to the biological activity of their hosts and play a major role for stimulating the immune system and resistance against the invading pathogens [1]. In addition, some insect species provide ideal conditions for bacterial conjugation, which suggests that the gut is a “hot spot” for gene transfer [6]. Genomic analysis provides new avenues for the study of the gut microbial community and reveals the molecular foundations of the relationships between the insect and its microbiome [7]. Indigenous gut bacteria also play a role in withstanding the colonization of the gut by nonindigenous species, such as pathogens [8]. Gut bacteria have been documented to show antagonistic activity against pathogenic bacteria and fungi [9].
The defensin and defensin-like AMP family have been identified in insect, plant, and mammalian. These protein species play an important role in the innate immune systems of those organisms and mainly affect Gram-positive bacteria and appear to be the abundant group throughout the inducible AMP [10]. Recently, a novel insect defensin-like peptide DLP4 is isolated and identified in immunized hemolymph and various tissues of BSF; it shares high sequence similarity (60–67.5%) to other insect defensins, such as sapecin, and lucifensin [11,12,13]. Structurally, defensin and defensin-like AMPs have a common conserved three intermolecular disulfide bridges motif with a molecular size of 3–4 kDa [14]. Ubiquitin was first isolated from bovine thymus as an adenylate cyclase stimulating polypeptide [15].Ubiquitin is a highly conserved polypeptide consisting of 74–76 amino acid residues with a molecular weight of 8.4–8.5 kDa. This molecule is found in all groups of organisms from protozoan to vertebrates [16]. In eukaryotic organisms, ubiquitin is known as the protein degradation marker through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway [17]. Invertebrates have additional functions, such as cellular relocating, stability or activity of proteins, and as recently found, antimicrobial activities [18].
In nature, animal manure is the main food for many insects, which are able to efficiently convert manure into biomass and one of the most environmentally friendly and most economically viable insect species is the black soldier fly (BSF, Hermetia illucens; Diptera: Stratiomyidae) [19]. BSF larvae can efficiently convert the kitchen waste, spoiled feed, manure, and garbage. Thus, this species is in close contact with pathogenic microorganisms from larvae to adult [20], but has a defense mechanism to infection [21]. The BSF larvae have been reported to significantly reduce the populations of different zoonotic pathogens within the livestock and dairy manures [22,23]. Furthermore, various antimicrobial properties and substances of the BSF larvae have been reported [11,24,25]. The strong antimicrobial activity of the immunized hemolymph of the BSF larvae was confirmed against three different Salmonella species [26]. Zhou et al. have isolated bacterial strains from the gut of BSF larvae and confirmed that gut-associated Bacillus subtilis BSF-CL exhibits strong inhibitory effect against fungus Xanthomonas oryzae PXo99 and Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 [27].
We hypothesized that AMPs and the gut-associated microorganisms of the BSF larvae play essential roles in reducing the zoonotic pathogen populations naturally found in manure. To test this hypothesis, we fed pig manure to the BSF larvae and evaluated the BSF larva-associated antimicrobial activity against naturally present zoonotic pathogenic bacteria in the manure. We explored the underlying potential mechanisms by examining the expression patterns of defensin-like peptide 4 (DLP4) and Cg-ubiquitin AMP genes in the BSF larvae. The DLP4 was subsequently selected for large-scale production to investigate the antimicrobial spectrum of the molecule against some zoonotic pathogenic bacterial strains isolated from pig manure. Finally, we isolated microbes from the guts of the BSF larvae to identify their function against zoonotic pathogens in vitro. This work aimed to establish the relationship between the intestinal bacteria and antimicrobial peptides of BSF larvae and zoonotic pathogens naturally in pig manure.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Rearing of Neonate BSF Larvae

Neonate BSF larvae of Wuhan strain were obtained from a colony maintained year-round in a greenhouse [28] at the State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University in Wuhan, China. The colony was maintained in a greenhouse at 27 ± 1 °C with 60–70% relative humidity and 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod.

2.2. Pig Manure

Fresh pig manure was collected from the National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Livestock of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China before being flushed using water.

2.3. BSF Larva Conversion Systems

BSF larvae were fed with a diet (50% wheat bran and 50% corn flour) with 65% water content at 28 °C and 65% humidity for the first six days. Feeding was stopped on the seventh day, and larvae were separated from the feed. Then a total of 7500 seven-day-old BSF larvae with approximately the same weight were added to 5 kg fresh pig manure with 70% water content in a plastic container (length: 25 cm, width: 20 cm, height: 12 cm) and labelled as ‘pig manure inoculated larva group’ (PM + BSFL). The control pig manure did not contain larvae and labelled as ‘pig manure group’ (PM). Each treatment was set up in three replicates and kept for eight days at 28 °C and humidity of 65% in the green house.

2.4. Zoonotic Pathogen Populations Counting Methods

The dynamic changes of zoonotic pathogens were detected during the transformation of pig manure by BSF larvae. The zoonotic pathogen populations were counted as previously described [29]. In brief, manure samples (10 g) at different time points (zero, two, four, six, and eight) were collected from each container by using multipoint sampling method, each point collected 2 g manure. Then manure samples mixed with 90 mL of sterile physiological saline in a sterile 250 mL conical flask and shaken for 15 min at 180 rpm. The sample was made to stand for 5 min at room temperature, and the upper layer was withdrawn for the subsequent tests. The supernatant was pipetted for 10-fold gradient dilution. Crystal violet neutral red bile salt agar medium (VRBA), Baird-Parker medium, Bismuth sulfite (BS) agar medium were purchased from Qingdao Hope Bio-technology Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China) and used as a selective and differential culture medium for Coliforms, S. aureus and Salmonella spp. counting, respectively. About 100 μL of each gradient dilution was pipetted and coated with selective medium. Each gradient dilution was set up in three replicates on each selective medium and cultured in a 37 °C constant temperature incubator for more than 36 h. The bacterial numbers of the three zoonotic pathogens were recorded. The number of the colony on the plate around 30–300 CFU was used to take count of the total bacteria.

2.5. Screening of the Antagonistic Activity of the Bacteria from the Gut of the BSF Larvae against Manure-Associated Zoonotic Pathogens

The intestinal bacterial were isolated from the gut of BSF larvae after eight days conversion, the larvae were separated from the fecal and disinfected with 75% alcohol for 3 min and rinsed with sterile water three times. The intestinal extract was prepared after dissection and homogenization. Then, the intestinal extract was diluted by using sterile water. Luria-Bertani (LB) agar (tryptone [10.0 g/L], yeast extract [5.0 g/L], NaCl [10.0 g/L], agar [20.0 g/L], and 1 L of distilled water, pH 7.0 ± 0.2) was used to isolate and purify the bacterial strains from each gradient dilution. The antagonistic effect of the BSF gut isolates were tested on Petri dishes by the dual culture method [30] against three original zoonotic pathogenic microorganisms from the pig manure. All isolates were cultured for two days on the LB plates. S. aureus, E. coli, and Salmonella spp. were grown to logarithmic phase at 37 °C in the LB broth. Then, 10 µL aliquot of each of the cultures was diluted in 10 mL of preheated LB containing 0.7% agar. The bacterial plugs (5 mm diameter) of the gut isolate antagonists were placed at the center of each plate surface, and then the plates were incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. PCR amplication of the functional bacterial 16S rRNA genes was performed using the forward primer 27F (5′-GTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and the reverse primer 806R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). The PCR products were sent to Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China) for sequencing.

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis of the AMP Genes

Three larvae were collected on days zero, two, four, six, and eight from each container and soaked in 75% alcohol for 30 min. Then, the larvae were washed with RNase-free sterile water thrice and treated with liquid nitrogen. The total RNA was extracted using Trizol and determined on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Then, 5 × HiScript® III qRT SuperMix (Nanjing Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) was used to synthesize the cDNA. Moreover, conventional PCR was run for β- actin, DLP4, and Cg-ubiquitin. The amplified gene was analyzed by utilizing 2% electrophoresis gel and sequenced. After the PCR results and DNA sequence analysis confirmed that the amplified fragments represented the anticipated cDNA fragment of the tested and control genes, expression levels of the AMP transcripts were detected using the ABI 7500 (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). The specific primers used are listed in Table 1. The relative expression of DLP4 and Cg-ubiquitin to the reference gene β-actin was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method [31]. The data represented the mean of three independent reactions performed for each sample.

2.7. Strains, Plasmids, and Reagents

Escherichia coli DH5α, Escherichia coli CICC10003 S. aureus CICC10001, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium CICC10420 were obtained from the State Key Laboratory of the Agricultural Microbiology of Huazhong Agricultural University in Wuhan, China. Pichia pastoris GS115 and the yeast expression vector pGAPZαA were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The codon-optimized DLP4 gene (120 bp) in the pGH vector was performed using the forward primer (5′-CCGCTCGAGAAAAGAGCTACCTGTGATTTGTTGTC-3′) and the reverse primer (5′-CGCTCTAGACCCTTTCTGCAGTTGCAGACAGC-3′) and provided by Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). TA cloning vector pMD18-T, T4 DNA ligase, dNTPs, DNA Taq polymerase, restriction endonuclease enzymes, and DNA Marker were purchased from TaKaRa Biotechnology (Shiga, Japan). AxyPrep plasmid Miniprep Kit and AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit is the product of Axygen Scientific Inc (San Francisco, CA, USA). Trizol Reagent, RNase free ddH2O, 4× gDNA wiper, Mix 5× HiScript® III qRT SuperMix, 2 × SYBR Green qPCR master mix Kit were the products of Vazyme Biological Technology (Wuhan, China). Diethylpyrocarbonate was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Oligonucleotide primers were designed using Primer Premier 5 and synthesized by Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China).

2.8. Assay of the DLP4 Antimicrobial Activity In Vitro

The pGAPZαA-DLP4 expression plasmid was constructed (Figure S2) and transformed into Pichia pastoris GS115 to express DLP4 in the YPD medium as previously described [32]. Then, the supernatant of the culture was harvested by centrifugation at 5000× g for 10 min. Precipitation was carried out with 80% ammonium sulfate. After desalting, Ni-NTA HisTrap crude column chromatography was used to purify the protein. The recombinant DLP4 was freeze-dried and assessed by Western blot with mouse anti-His (C-term) antibody after the protein was separated by Tricine SDS-PAGE [33].
S. aureus CICC10001, S. enterica serovar Typhimurium CICC10420, and E. coli CICC10003 were grown to stationary phase at 37 °C in Mueller Hinton (MH) broth. Cultures were then diluted with fresh MH broth to an OD600 of 0.001. To assay the antimicrobial activity, an equivalent amount of 80 mL of bacteria was distributed into the microplate containing 20 mL of water or the fraction to be analyzed. Bacterial growth was evaluated after 24 h at 30 °C by optical microscopy and after 48 h by measuring the culture absorbance at 600 nm. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.9. Data Analysis

Zoonotic pathogen populations were converted to log10 CFU/g before statistical analysis. All mean values with standard deviation were calculated for each bioindicator using Microsoft Excel. One-way ANOVA was used to determine the significant difference between groups, with the coefficient of significance set to p < 0.05, and Tukey’s multiple range tests were employed to perform multiple comparisons between means by using SPSS 22.0. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Evaluation of the Efficiency of the BSF Larvae in Reducing Zoonotic Pathogens in Pig Manure

Figure 1 illustrates the effectiveness of the BSF larvae in inhibiting the proliferation of the zoonotic pathogens. The populations of S. aureus in the larva-treated manure decreased from 5.57 log CFU/g on day 0 to 3.75 log CFU/g on day eight. Significant reductions were observed on days four, six, and eight (Figure 1A). Salmonella spp. populations in larva-treated manure increased on day two (7.20 log CFU/g) and day four (6.53 log CFU/g) and then decreased from day six (4.21 log CFU/g) to day eight (3.10 log CFU/g) (Figure 1B). The number of coliforms gradually decreased from 8.18 log CFU/g on day zero to 3.84 log CFU/g on day eight, but no bacteria was detected on day 8 (Figure 1C).

3.2. Antagonistic Activity In Vitro

A total of 11 strains have been isolated from the gut of the BSF larvae. Two strains coded BSF-F and BSL-CL showed clear antagonistic activity and identified as Serratia marcescens and B. subtilis (Table 2). The results showed that both antagonistic microorganisms inhibited the growth of S. aureus and E. coli with varying efficiencies (Figure 2A,B). Salmonella spp. was sensitive to the BSF-CL strain but not to the BSF-F strain (Figure 2C).

3.3. Transcriptional Patterns of Antibacterial Genes DLP4 and Cg-Ubiquitin

To determine the mRNA expression profile of DLP4 and Cg-ubiquitin in the BSF larvae, total RNA samples from the larvae incubated in PM were analyzed by qRT-PCR, and the 2−ΔΔCT method was applied to calculate the transcript levels of the AMP genes. The highest expression of DLP4 was found at 48 h (relative expression 202-fold) after inoculation in PM, but the transcription levels decreased on day four (relative expression 9-fold). Levels increased again on day six (relative expression 74-fold) and then decreased on day eight (relative expression 12-fold) (Figure 3A). The expression of Cg-Ubiquitin and DLP4 has the same trend but differ in their quantity production. The expression of Cg-Ubiquitin increased on day two (relative expression 337-fold) and then decreased on day four (relative expression 17-fold). Levels increased on day 6 (relative expression 498-fold) and decreased on day eight (relative expression 293-fold) (Figure 3B). However, the results showed that the expression of Cg-Ubiquitin was significantly greater and more sensitive than that of DLP4. The expression of DLP4 showed a stronger response in the early stages than during the later period, but Cg-Ubiquitin showed a greater response in the late stages.

3.4. Recombinant Expression and Purification of the DLP4 Gene in P. pastoris

The P. pastoris colony with the highest DLP4 production was chosen for the large-scale peptide expression under optimal conditions, and the maximum secretion of recombinant DLP4 was observed after 96 h of incubation at 28 °C (Figure 4A). The His-tag in the N-terminus was affinity-purified using Ni–NTA materials. Approximately 15.8 mg of pure recombinant DLP4 was obtained from 500 mL of YPD culture. A 6.9 kDa single band was observed on the Coomassie blue-stained Tricine-SDS-PAGE gel as shown in Figure 4B. The expression efficiency was detected with immunoblot analysis, in which 100 μg/mL from the purified protein were applied into the Tricine-SDS-PAGE (16.5%) prior to the Western blot assay. The result revealed that the purified recombinant DLP4 was specifically recognized by the mouse anti-His (C-term) antibody as illustrated in Figure 4C.

3.5. Antimicrobial Assays of the Purified DLP4

Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays were carried out against the PM-associated Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the purified DLP4 expressed by P. pastoris. Recombinant DLP4 exerted strong inhibitory effects against S. aureus CICC10001 and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium CICC10420 but was less active against E. coli CICC10003 (Table 3).

4. Discussion

In this study, we examined the capability of BSF larvae to inhibit potential zoonotic pathogens in pig manure as well as to understand the influence of the modulation of AMP gene expression and antibacterial activity in the larvae. Different potential zoonotic pathogen strains, namely, S. aureus, Salmonella spp., and Coliform were analyzed in the pig manure after the BSF larvae were added. We determined that BSF larvae can reduce natural potential zoonotic pathogen populations in pig manure and the immune system of BSF larvae can produce antimicrobial peptides to inhibit potential zoonotic pathogens in pig manure. We also isolated two intestinal microorganisms named BSF-CL and BSF-F that could inhibit S. aureus and E. coli in vitro and BSF-CL have the function of inhibiting Salmonella in vitro.
As an ecological decomposer, the BSF larvae are often present in areas where they are in close contact with zoonotic pathogenic microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, from the larva to adult stages [34,35]. BSF larvae can survive well in these environments owing to competing with bacteria for nutrients or inhibiting them [13]. Moreover, the disinfection action of the BSF larvae may be achieved by ingesting and digesting microorganisms, as well as through the release of different types of antimicrobial peptides. BSF larvae have been successfully applied to convert different kinds of organic waste and had the ability to reduce zoonotic pathogen bacteria when treating organic wastes, especially Salmonella spp. [36]. In this study, the capability of the BSF larvae in eliminating the natural zoonotic pathogens in the pig manure was examined. Compared with control group, the populations of S. aureus and Salmonella spp. were significantly reduced in the larva-treated pig manure. The Coliform were undetected in pig manure after eight days conversion by BSF larvae. Intestinal microorganisms of BSF larvae may play a pivotal role in this progress. In recent years, a few of researchers focused on the composition of the BSF larvae gut microbiota through the culture-independent techniques (such as metataxonomics based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing) and analyzed the relationship between the BSF larvae gut microbiota and potential zoonotic pathogens [37,38]. However, in order to obtain pure cultures for research purposes and industrial applications, there is still a need to rely on culture methods, including incubation, isolation and identification steps [39]. In this study, we isolated two functional microorganisms from the gut of BSF larvae through incubation and isolation. They have the ability to antagonize zoonotic pathogens in vitro. These functional microorganisms may produce some antimicrobial active component in the BSF larvae gut and inhibit the growth of zoonotic pathogens.
Insects digesting manure are able to suppress pathogens by producing AMPs with a broad spectrum of activity against pathogen bacteria and/or fungi [40]. Most known AMPs from insects are antibacterial agents [41]. BSF larvae have sole properties that can be employed for various defense purposes and contain a range of AMPs as potent inhibitory substances against different zoonotic pathogens [2]. Furthermore, previous studies have indicated a close correlation between the resistance of the BSF larvae to zoonotic pathogens and the antimicrobial substances produced by the larvae [11,24,34]. However, additional studies are needed to explore the antimicrobial substance derived from the BSF larvae.
A comparative bioinformatics analysis of immunity-related transcriptomes from insects has revealed unexpected evolutionary plasticity [42]. The defensins are the dominant innate immune factors in different insect species and are generally overexpressed in many insects infected with microorganisms [10]. In this context, previous studies have been conducted to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of insect defensin and DLPs [11,43,44]. Among these molecules, DLP4 and Cg-ubiquitin were selected to identify their expression patterns in the BSF larvae. The analysis results of qRT-PCR revealed that the high expression of DLP4 and Cg-ubiquitin have positive correlation with the inhibition of Coliform, S. aureus, and Salmonella spp. In general, defensin demonstrates a strong antimicrobial property against different Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [45]. The antimicrobial peptide DLP4 isolated from the BSF have advantages over the conventional antibiotics in reducing the multi-drug resistant methecillin-resistant S. aureus [11]. Studies on the bactericidal effect of blowfly-derived antimicrobial substances showed potential inhibitory activity against S. aureus [46,47].
Prior studies on antimicrobial peptides in BSF mostly focused on their expression and antibacterial activity in vitro, but little did pay attention to their expression in vivo. In this study, we investigated the antimicrobial peptides expression levels after inoculated into pig manure. We found the highest expression of DLP4 and Cg-Ubiquitin were found at 48 h and 144h, respectively. The expression of DLP4 showed a stronger response in the early stages than during the later period and Cg-Ubiquitin showed a greater response in the late stages, but the expression of Cg-Ubiquitin and DLP4 has the same trend. This may the BSF larvae needs to express DLP4 and Cg-Ubiquitin in response to current environmental stress, or these two genes are co-expressed in the larvae. Due to antimicrobial peptides are not only expressed when immune responses are triggered by invading pathogens. For example, the expression of particular AMP subsets in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides is gender-specific and regulated by the presence of offspring or carcass [48]. Thus, during the conversion by BSF larvae, it may the BSF larvae expressed antimicrobial peptides and inhibited zoonotic pathogens in pig manure.
It has been reported that the antimicrobial peptide DLP4 isolated from the BSF has advantages over the conventional antibiotics for reducing the multi-drug resistant methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) [11]. Studies investigating the bactericidal effect of blowfly-derived antimicrobial substances showed potential inhibitory activity against S. aureus [46,47]. For a better explanation of the antimicrobial properties of AMPs against manure-associated pathogens or other phytopathogens, DLP4 was recombinantly expressed in P. pastoris. Our results showed that DLP4 peptide was expressed as a secretive product with ~7 kDa in GS115. The purified recombinant DLP4 was investigated for its antimicrobial property against Gram-positive bacterium S. aureus; Gram-negative bacterium Salmonella; and E. coli. The antimicrobial assay indicated that the expressed DLP4 was highly active against S. aureus, while it exhibited moderate antimicrobial activities against Salmonella and E. coli.

5. Conclusions

This study indicated the potential of BSF larvae in reducing the proliferation of natural zoonotic pathogen populations in pig manure. The results from the qRT-PCR analysis of the AMP genes DLP4 and Cg-ubiquitin and the assessment of the antimicrobial activity of the recombinant DLP4 proved that the BSF larvae possessed AMPs that could functionally inhibit natural zoonotic pathogens. The bacteria from the BSF larval gut, namely, BSF-CL and BSF-F, had broad antagonistic activity against S. aureus, Salmonella spp., and E. coli. These results suggested that AMPs produced by the BSF larvae and the gut-associated bacteria play a pivotal role in blocking the zoonotic pathogens in pig manure. Our findings suggest that pig manure treated with BSF larvae can be used as an environment-friendly biological process and minimize the environmental impact of pig manure and provide a theoretical basis for further study on the combined mechanism of BSF larvae immunity and its gut microbes against the zoonotic pathogens in pig manure.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects13010066/s1. Table S1: Primer sequences for the quantitative real-time PCR and recombinant plasmid construction; Strains, plasmids, and reagents; Figure S1: RNA extraction, first-strand cDNA synthesis, and gene amplification; Figure S2: Construction and identification of DLP4 recombinant expression plasmid.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: O.E., Y.Z., X.X., M.C., L.Z., F.H., Z.Y. and J.Z.; methodology: O.E., Y.Z., X.X., M.C., L.Z., F.H., H.R.J., J.K.T. and J.Z.; formal analysis: O.E., Y.Z., H.R.J., J.K.T. and J.Z.; supervision and project administration: M.C., L.Z., F.H., Z.Y. and J.Z.; writing—original draft preparation: O.E., Y.Z. and J.Z.; writing—review and editing: O.E., Y.Z., X.X., M.C., H.R.J., J.K.T. and J.Z.; visualization: H.R.J., J.K.T., O.E., Y.Z. and J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770136); National Natural Science Foundation of China (41977279); the National Key Technology R&D Program of China (2018YFF0213503); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662020SKPY002); National Key Technology R&D Program of China (2018YFD0500203).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are provided in the main body of the published article and Supplementary Material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, J.; Li, C.; Wang, M.; Wang, L.; Liu, X.; Gao, C.; Ren, L.; Luo, Y. Gut Structure and microbial communities in Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) and their predicted contribution to larval nutrition. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 641141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Moretta, A.; Salvia, R.; Scieuzo, C.; Di Somma, A.; Vogel, H.; Pucci, P.; Sgambato, A.; Wolff, M.; Falabella, P. A bioinformatic study of antimicrobial peptides identified in the Black Soldier Fly (BSF) Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, S.; Liu, X.; Xia, Z.; Xie, G.; Tang, B.; Wang, S. Transcriptome analysis of the molecular mechanism underlying immunity and reproduction trade-off in Locusta migratoria infected by Micrococcus luteus. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sahoo, A.; Swain, S.S.; Behera, A.; Sahoo, G.; Mahapatra, P.K.; Panda, S.K. Antimicrobial peptides derived from insects offer a novel therapeutic option to combat biofilm: A review. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 661195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gupta, A.; Nair, S. Dynamics of insect-microbiome interaction influence host and microbial symbiont. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dillon, R.J.; Dillon, V.M. The gut bacteria of insects: Nonpathogenic interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2004, 49, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shi, W.; Xie, S.; Chen, X.; Sun, S.; Zhou, X.; Liu, L.; Gao, P.; Kyrpides, N.C.; No, E.G.; Yuan, J.S. Comparative genomic analysis of the endosymbionts of herbivorous insects reveals eco-environmental adaptations: Biotechnology applications. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, X.L.; Pan, Q.J.; Tian, H.G.; Douglas, A.E.; Liu, T.X. Bacteria abundance and diversity of different life stages of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), revealed by bacteria culture-dependent and PCR-DGGE methods. Insect Sci. 2015, 22, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Amer, A.; Hamdy, B.; Mahmoud, D.; Elanany, M.; Rady, M.; Alahmadi, T.; Alharbi, S.; AlAshaal, S. Antagonistic activity of bacteria isolated from the Periplaneta americana L. gut against some multidrug-resistant human pathogens. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Robles-Fort, A.; García-Robles, I.; Fernando, W.; Hoskin, D.W.; Rausell, C.; Real, M.D. Dual antimicrobial and antiproliferative activity of TcPaSK peptide derived from a Tribolium castaneum insect defensin. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Park, S.I.; Kim, J.W.; Yoe, S.M. Purifcation and characterization of a novel antibacterial peptide from black soldier fy (Hermetia illucens) larvae. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2015, 52, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hanzawa, H.; Shimada, I.; Kuzuhara, T.; Komano, H.; Kohda, D.; Inagaki, F.; Natori, S.; Arata, Y. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance study of the solution conformation of an antibacterial protein, sapecin. FEBS Lett. 1990, 269, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cerovský, V.; Zdárek, J.; Fucík, V.; Monincová, L.; Voburka, Z.; Bém, R. Lucifensin, the long-sought antimicrobial factor of medicinal maggots of the blowfly Lucilia sericata. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, D.; Lu, W. Defensins: A Double-Edged Sword in Host Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schlesinger, D.H.; Goldstein, G. Molecular conservation of 74 amino acid sequence of ubiquitin between cattle and man. Nature 1975, 255, 423–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Seo, J.K.; Lee, M.J.; Go, H.J.; Kim, G.D.; Jeong, H.D.; Nam, B.H.; Park, N.G. Purification and antimicrobial function of ubiquitin isolated from the gill of Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Mol. Immunol. 2013, 53, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, C.; Qin, H.; Tan, J.; Hu, Z.; Zeng, L. The Role of Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway and Autophagy-Lysosome Pathway in Cerebral Ischemia. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2020, 2020, 5457049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bachère, E.; Rosa, R.D.; Schmitt, P.; Poirier, A.; Merou, N.; Charrière, G.M.; Destoumieux-Garzón, D. The new insights into the oyster antimicrobial defense: Cellular, molecular and genetic view. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015, 46, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mazza, L.; Xiao, X.; Ur Rehman, K.; Cai, M.; Zhang, D.; Fasulo, S.; Tomberlin, J.K.; Zheng, L.; Soomro, A.A.; Yu, Z.; et al. Management of chicken manure using black soldier fly (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) larvae assisted by companion bacteria. Waste Manag. 2020, 102, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Newton, G.L.; Sheppard, D.C.; Watson, D.W.; Burtle, G.J.; Thelen, E.E. The black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens, as a manure management/resource recovery tool. Symp. State Sci. Anim. Manure Waste Manag. 2016, 1, 57. [Google Scholar]
  21. Joosten, L.; Lecocq, A.; Jensen, A.B.; Haenen, O.; Schmitt, E.; Eilenberg, J. Review of insect pathogen risks for the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) and guidelines for reliable production. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2020, 168, 432–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Q.; Tomberlin, J.K.; Brady, J.A.; Sanford, M.R.; Yu, Z. Black soldier fly (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) larvae reduce Escherichia coli in dairy manure. Environ. Entomol. 2008, 37, 1525–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Erickson, M.C.; Islam, M.; Sheppard, C.; Liao, J.; Doyle, M.P. Reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis in chicken manure by larvae of the black soldier fly. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Choi, W.H.; Yun, J.H.; Chu, J.P.; Chu, K.B. Antibacterial effect of extracts of Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) larvae against Gram-negative bacteria. Entomol. Res. 2012, 42, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Park, S.I.; Chang, B.S.; Yoe, S.M. Detection of antimicrobial substances from larvae of the black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae). Entomol. Res. 2014, 44, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, K.S.; Yun, E.Y.; Goo, T.W. Antimicrobial Activity of an Extract of Hermetia illucens Larvae Immunized with Lactobacillus casei against Salmonella Species. Insects 2020, 11, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, D.Z.; Cao, L.; Wang, M.L.; Yu, Z.N.; Zhang, J.B. Screening of antagonistic bacteria from gut of black soldier fly and the molecular identification of antimicrobial active substances. Microbiol./Weishengwuxue Tongbao 2012, 39, 1614–1621. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang, J.; Huang, L.; He, J.; Tomberlin, J.K.; Li, J.; Lei, C.; Sun, M.; Liu, Z.; Yu, Z. An artificial light source influences mating and oviposition of black soldier flies, Hermetia illucens. J. Insect Sci. 2010, 10, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Huang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhan, S.; Tomberlin, J.K.; Huang, D.; Cai, M.; Zheng, L.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, J. Dual oxidase duox and toll-like receptor 3 tlr3 in the toll pathway suppress zoonotic pathogens through regulating the intestinal bacterial community homeostasis in Hermetia illucens L. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0225873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zivkovic, S.; Stojanovic, S.; Ivanovic, Z.; Gavrilovic, V.; Popovic, T.; Balaz, J. Screening of antagonistic activity of microorganisms against colletotrichum acutatum and colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2010, 62, 611–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guo, C.; Huang, Y.; Zheng, H.; Tang, L.; He, J.; Xiang, L.; Liu, D.; Jiang, H. Secretion and activity of antimicrobial peptide cecropin D expressed in Pichia pastoris. Exp. Ther. Med. 2012, 4, 1063–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Mulder, K.C.; de Lima, L.A.; Aguiar, P.S.; Carneiro, F.C.; Franco, O.L.; Dias, S.C.; Parachin, N.S. Production of a modified peptide clavanin in Pichia pastoris: Cloning, expression, purification and in vitro activities. AMB Express 2015, 5, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Sultana, A.; Luo, H.; Ramakrishna, S. Harvesting of antimicrobial peptides from insect (hermetia illucens) and its applications in the food packaging. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, X.B.; Nan, W.; Cai, R.J.; Geng, W.N.; Xu, X.Y. Changes in speciation, mobility and bioavailability of Cd, Cr and as during the transformation process of pig manure by black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens). J. Integr. Agric. 2021, 20, 1157–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lalander, C.H.; Fidjeland, J.; Diener, S.; Eriksson, S.; Vinnerås, B. High waste-to-biomass conversion and efficient Salmonella spp. reduction using black soldier fly for waste recycling. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Awasthi, M.K.; Liu, T.; Awasthi, S.K.; Duan, Y.; Pandey, A.; Zhang, Z. Manure pretreatments with black soldier fly Hermetia illucens L. (Diptera: Stratiomyidae): A study to reduce pathogen content. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 737, 139842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tanga, C.M.; Waweru, J.W.; Tola, Y.H.; Onyoni, A.A.; Khamis, F.M.; Ekesi, S.; Paredes, J.C. Organic waste substrates induce important shifts in gut microbiota of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.): Coexistence of conserved, variable, and potential pathogenic microbes. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 635881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Prakash, O.; Shouche, Y.; Jangid, K.; Kostka, J.E. Microbial cultivation and the role of microbial resource centers in the omics era. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yi, H.Y.; Chowdhury, M.; Huang, Y.D.; Yu, X.Q. Insect antimicrobial peptides and their applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 5807–5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Al Souhail, Q.; Hiromasa, Y.; Rahnamaeian, M.; Giraldo, M.C.; Takahashi, D.; Valent, B.; Vilcinskas, A.; Kanost, M.R. Characterization and regulation of expression of an antifungal peptide from hemolymph of an insect, Manduca sexta. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2016, 61, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Pöppel, A.K.; Vogel, H.; Wiesner, J.; Vilcinskas, A. Antimicrobial peptides expressed in medicinal maggots of the blow fly Lucilia sericata show combinatorial activity against bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 2508–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lee, J.; Bang, K.; Hwang, S.; Cho, S. cDNA cloning and molecular characterization of a defensin-like antimicrobial peptide from larvae of Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis (Kolbe). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2016, 43, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vieira, C.S.; Waniek, P.J.; Castro, D.P.; Mattos, D.P.; Moreira, O.C.; Azambuja, P. Impact of Trypanosoma cruzi on antimicrobial peptide gene expression and activity in the fat body and midgut of Rhodnius prolixus. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Manniello, M.D.; Moretta, A.; Salvia, R.; Scieuzo, C.; Lucchetti, D.; Vogel, H.; Sgambato, A.; Falabella, P. Insect antimicrobial peptides: Potential weapons to counteract the antibiotic resistance. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 4259–4282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Arora, S.; Baptista, C.; Lim, C.S. Maggot metabolites and their combinatory effects with antibiotic on Staphylococcus aureus. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2011, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, B.; Liu, H.; Song, W.; He, J.; Lv, D.; Wang, S.; Xu, X. Activity of antibacterial protein from maggots against Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2013, 31, 1159–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Jacobs, C.G.C.; Steiger, S.; Heckel, D.G.; Wielsch, N.; Vilcinskas, A.; Vogel, H. Sex, offspring and carcass determine antimicrobial peptide expression in the burying beetle. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Black soldier fly (BSF) larval inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus (A), Salmonella (B), and coliforms (C) in pig manure. Each point represents the mean of three independent trials (n = 3).
Figure 1. Black soldier fly (BSF) larval inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus (A), Salmonella (B), and coliforms (C) in pig manure. Each point represents the mean of three independent trials (n = 3).
Insects 13 00066 g001
Figure 2. Bacteria from the guts of the BSF larvae inhibited the zoonotic pathogens in vitro. Strains BSF-CL and BSF-F inhibited (A) S. aureus and (B) E. coli; Strain BSF-CL inhibited (C) Salmonella spp.
Figure 2. Bacteria from the guts of the BSF larvae inhibited the zoonotic pathogens in vitro. Strains BSF-CL and BSF-F inhibited (A) S. aureus and (B) E. coli; Strain BSF-CL inhibited (C) Salmonella spp.
Insects 13 00066 g002
Figure 3. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of DLP 4 and Cg-ubiquitin mRNA expression. (A) Temporal expression of the DLP4 transcripts in the larvae of BSF collected from the PM at different time points (zero, two, four, six, and eight days). (B) Temporal expression of Cg-Ubiquitin transcripts in the BSFL collected from PM at different time points (zero, two, four, six, and eight days). Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001), and the data were analyzed compared with those on day 0.
Figure 3. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of DLP 4 and Cg-ubiquitin mRNA expression. (A) Temporal expression of the DLP4 transcripts in the larvae of BSF collected from the PM at different time points (zero, two, four, six, and eight days). (B) Temporal expression of Cg-Ubiquitin transcripts in the BSFL collected from PM at different time points (zero, two, four, six, and eight days). Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001), and the data were analyzed compared with those on day 0.
Insects 13 00066 g003
Figure 4. Tricine-SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of DLP4 expressed in Pichia pastoris. (A) Analysis of proteins of the broth supernatant from the crude culture of DLP4-expressing GS115; Lanes 1 and 2: the culture supernatant samples collected at 96 h and 120 h of incubation, respectively; M, low range unstained protein marker. (B) Analysis of the purified DLP4; Lane 1: Nickel affinity chromatograph of the purified-DLP4; M, low range unstained protein marker. (C) Western blot result of the purified-DLP4; M: low range unstained protein marker; lane 1: supernatant of GS115/pGAPZαA; lane 2: purified DLP4.
Figure 4. Tricine-SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of DLP4 expressed in Pichia pastoris. (A) Analysis of proteins of the broth supernatant from the crude culture of DLP4-expressing GS115; Lanes 1 and 2: the culture supernatant samples collected at 96 h and 120 h of incubation, respectively; M, low range unstained protein marker. (B) Analysis of the purified DLP4; Lane 1: Nickel affinity chromatograph of the purified-DLP4; M, low range unstained protein marker. (C) Western blot result of the purified-DLP4; M: low range unstained protein marker; lane 1: supernatant of GS115/pGAPZαA; lane 2: purified DLP4.
Insects 13 00066 g004
Table 1. Primer sequences for the quantitative real-time PCR.
Table 1. Primer sequences for the quantitative real-time PCR.
GenePrimer1 Sequence (5′-3′)Primer 2 Sequence (5′-3′)
qβ-actinAAACCTTCAACGCCCCAGCGGCGTGTGGAAGAGCATAACC
qDLP4CTGTGACCTGTTGAGCCCTTTAACAGCTCTTTTGTCACACCATC
qCg-UbiquitinTCGTCAAGACTTTGACCGGCGGGTGCGTCCATCTTCCAAT
Table 2. Intestinal microorganisms of BSF larvae against S. aureus, E. coli, and Salmonella.
Table 2. Intestinal microorganisms of BSF larvae against S. aureus, E. coli, and Salmonella.
Strain No.Highest Identity SequencesQuery CoverageE-ValuePercent IdentityGeneBank Accession No.
BSF-FSerratia marcescens100%0.0100%CP050960.1
BSF-CLB. subtilis99%0.099.86%MW345828.1
Table 3. Minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) of DLP4.
Table 3. Minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) of DLP4.
Microorganism StrainMIC (µM)
Staphylococcus aureus CICC100011.5
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium CICC1042027
Escherichia coli CICC10003>30
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elhag, O.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, X.; Cai, M.; Zheng, L.; Jordan, H.R.; Tomberlin, J.K.; Huang, F.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, J. Inhibition of Zoonotic Pathogens Naturally Found in Pig Manure by Black Soldier Fly Larvae and Their Intestine Bacteria. Insects 2022, 13, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010066

AMA Style

Elhag O, Zhang Y, Xiao X, Cai M, Zheng L, Jordan HR, Tomberlin JK, Huang F, Yu Z, Zhang J. Inhibition of Zoonotic Pathogens Naturally Found in Pig Manure by Black Soldier Fly Larvae and Their Intestine Bacteria. Insects. 2022; 13(1):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010066

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elhag, Osama, Yuanpu Zhang, Xiaopeng Xiao, Minmin Cai, Longyu Zheng, Heather R. Jordan, Jeffery K. Tomberlin, Feng Huang, Ziniu Yu, and Jibin Zhang. 2022. "Inhibition of Zoonotic Pathogens Naturally Found in Pig Manure by Black Soldier Fly Larvae and Their Intestine Bacteria" Insects 13, no. 1: 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010066

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop