Next Article in Journal
Exploring Conditions for Handling Packing and Shipping Aedes aegypti Males to Support an SIT Field Project in Brazil
Next Article in Special Issue
Attraction of Insects to Ornamental Lighting Used on Cultural Heritage Buildings: A Case Study in an Urban Area
Previous Article in Journal
A Taxonomic Review of the Genus Telsimia Casey (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) from China, with Descriptions of Eight New Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Temperature-Dependent Development of the Post-Diapause Periods of the Apricot Seed Wasp Eurytoma maslovskii (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae): An Implication for Spring Emergence Prediction Models
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/insects13100870
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phat Queens Emerge Fashionably Late: Body Size and Condition Predict Timing of Spring Emergence for Queen Bumble Bees

by
Ellen C. Keaveny
1,2,* and
Michael E. Dillon
1,2
1
Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
2
Program in Ecology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2022, 13(10), 870; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100870
Submission received: 29 August 2022 / Revised: 16 September 2022 / Accepted: 22 September 2022 / Published: 24 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Environmental Changes on Insects Behavior, Physiology and Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Bumble bees have annual colonies that produce new queens at the end of summer. They mate and accumulate substantial fat reserves before overwintering underground prior to emerging in the spring. Because body size influences how much fat a queen can accumulate in the fall and how quickly she burns through those store in the winter, we asked if queen body condition influences the timing of spring emergence. We measured mass and body condition (indicative of remaining fat reserves) of bumble bee queens in the spring. Large queens and those in better body condition emerged throughout the spring, whereas lighter queens and those with poorer body condition emerged earlier, suggesting that depleted fat reserves could trigger early emergence of bumble bee queens.

Abstract

For insects, the timing of many life history events (phenology) depends on temperature cues. Body size is a critical mediator of insect responses to temperature, so may also influence phenology. The determinants of spring emergence of bumble bee queens are not well understood, but body size is likely important for several reasons. In fall, queens accumulate energy stores to fuel overwinter survival. Accumulation of fat stores prior to and depletion of fat stores during overwintering are likely size-dependent: larger queens can accumulate more lipids and have lower mass-specific metabolic rates. Therefore, larger queens and queens in relatively better condition may have delayed depletion of energy stores, allowing for later spring emergence. To test whether timing of spring emergence is associated with body size and condition, we captured 295 Bombus huntii queens in Laramie, WY, during the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons, weighed them, and measured intertegular width (a size metric unaffected by variation in feeding and hydration state). Early emerging queens were smaller than later emerging queens across years. Mass relative to intertegular width increased as the season progressed suggesting, as predicted, that body condition influences the timing of spring emergence for these crucial pollinators.

1. Introduction

Temperature is a major factor influencing the timing of critical life history events for diverse organisms (“phenology”; [1]). Spring emergence, peak abundance, and fall immergence (e.g., entry into diapause, overwintering quiescence, or hibernation) have all been linked to temperature cues [2,3,4], and phenological shifts are well-documented responses to ongoing climate change. Yet, phenological responses of diverse taxa to changing climates often vary considerably in magnitude and direction [5,6]. At broad spatial scales, drivers of phenological shifts appear to vary with latitude; temperature is a strong driver at higher latitudes but becomes increasingly less important at tropical latitudes where phenological shifts are tied more closely to precipitation [7]. On local scales, some organisms emerge later when snowmelt is delayed [8], whereas others emerge earlier in the spring despite increased snowpack [9]. Such variation in phenological responses to changing climate may reflect differences between the macroclimates used to assess responses and the microclimates where organisms live [10,11,12]. Further, differential physiological responses to temperature and other cues may underly variability in phenological responses [13].
Some work suggests that microclimatic variation in temperature can strongly alter phenology over small spatial scales. Flowers on south-facing slopes bloom as much as eleven days earlier than those of the same species found only 50 m away on north-facing slopes [14]; and in insects, ash borer beetles (Agrilus planipennis) 30 mm under the south-facing bark of urban ash trees (Fraxinus) are predicted to develop up to 30 days faster, thereby advancing emergence relative to those exposed to cooler and more variable air temperatures [15]. Even within the same site or microclimate, variation in phenology has been linked to physiological characteristics, such as sex and reproductive strategy (i.e., time of season when mating occurs; [16,17]). Phenological shifts can also depend on age and gravidity. In little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus), mature females emerge from hibernation earlier than both younger females and males [17]. In Richardson’s ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii), entry into hibernation for females varies with rate of weight gain which can be influenced by recovery from birthing and rearing of offspring [18], providing evidence that the physiological state of an individual can alter the timing of critical life events even within the same life stage.
Body size is a fundamental trait affecting physiology and ecology that may also influence timing of spring emergence. Across taxa, overwintering survival is often positively correlated with body size due in large part to links between size and both total lipid stores and rate of lipid depletion [19,20,21]. Body size mediates ectotherm responses to temperature, and thus likely also mediates phenological responses [22,23]. Across taxa, phenological responses vary with body size, with some organisms emerging earlier as size increases [16,21,24] while others emerge later; for some, phenology does not vary with body size. For example, in midges (Chironomidae) and damselflies (Zygoptera), body size (wing length) decreased with emergence date [25,26]. In dragonflies (Anisoptera), body size was not linked to timing of emergence [26]. Body mass and condition can also be important determinants of emergence timing [27]. In mason bees (Osmia cornuta), body mass was not linked to the timing of emergence [28], yet often if body mass does not influence emergence timing, body condition does [27], and vice versa [16,17]. Individuals that emerge early risk exposure to fatally cold temperatures while those that emerge late may face increased competition for resources, but research on the influence of body size and more so condition on timing of emergence remains surprisingly sparse.
Queen bumble bees eclose in late summer and fall, acquire substantial lipids stored in their fat body, mate, and then overwinter underground before emerging the following spring [29,30] while the remaining maternal colony dies. In spring, newly emerged queens feed on nectar and pollen as their ovaries develop [31] and eventually find suitable sites (usually underground) to start new colonies. The timing of spring emergence of bumble bee queens is clearly, in part, related to temperature [32], but can vary strikingly even for the same species at the same site [33,34,35] with important implications: those that emerge earlier may risk exposure to spring cold snaps [13] with increased likelihood of mortality [33,36] while those that emerge later may face increased competition for suitable nest sites and floral resources [37,38].
We aimed to address one factor that may lead to pronounced variation in the timing of spring emergence of bumble bee queens. Given that they are responding to temperature cues, differences in overwintering microclimates may, in part, lead to different emergence times [16,39,40,41]. Body size may also play an important role given potential effects of size on accumulation of lipid stores (larger queens can store more lipids; [20]), and on mass-specific metabolism [42,43,44] which should mean that larger queens deplete lipid stores more slowly. If queens must emerge before fully depleting stored lipids, we would predict that smaller queens would emerge earlier because, given the same overwintering temperatures, they would deplete lipid reserves more quickly (both due to smaller initial stores and higher overwintering metabolic rates). Similarly, regardless of size, we would predict that queens with poorer body condition (i.e., smaller lipid reserves) would emerge earlier.
To test these predictions, we measured mass and intertegular width (ITW, a measurement of exoskeletal size fixed at eclosion; [45,46]) of Bombus huntii queens throughout the spring emergence period for two years in Laramie, WY. Queens that weighed less emerged earlier as predicted. We used the comparison between mass and ITW to infer body condition (BeeMI) and found a striking pattern: queens that were relatively light for their size (in poor condition) emerged earlier, dominating the early spring emergence peak, whereas those in good condition (relatively heavy for their size) dominated the late spring emergence peak.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Collection

Throughout the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons, we captured B. huntii queens by net once a week in Laramie, WY (2188 m; 41.316, −105.586 +/− 0.5 mi), starting a few days after the first bumble bee was seen (30 April 2020 and 2021) and continuing until queens were no longer captured during a collection event (Figure 1). To minimize possible effects of weather conditions on sampling, we selected days and sampling periods with the best conditions for bumble bee activity (warm, sunny). Collections were standardized for 3 person-hours, and terminated early only when 50 total bees (queens or workers) were collected. Once captured, each queen bee was kept in a ventilated vial on ice for transport to the lab.

2.2. Body Size and Condition

Immediately following each survey, bees were weighed to the nearest mg (Acculab ALC-210.4; Sartorius Group, Göttingen, Germany). In 2021, bees were then photographed from the dorsal view next to an object of known size and released. The width between the tegulae (intertegular width, ITW, mm, also termed intertegular span, ITS; [45]) was measured from photographs by first setting the scale based on the object of known size and then measuring the length of a straight line drawn between the outside edges of the tegula using ImageJ [47,48]. ITW is not affected by variation in feeding or hydration state, so is a reliable estimate of body size of bumble bees [45,46,49]. We estimated body condition of queens as the bee mass to ITW ratio (BeeMI). Higher BeeMI indicates better body condition under the assumption that variation in mass of queens with the same exoskeletal dimensions is due primarily to the mass of lipid stores (for bumble bee queens prior to nest initiation, growth and depletion of the fat body is the dominant determinant of variation in mass; [50,51,52]).

2.3. Statistical Analyses

After visual inspection for normality, we compared ordinary least squares (OLS) and standard major axis (SMA) regressions of mass on ITW using package lmodel2 [53] in R ([54]; see Appendix A, Figure A1 and Figure A2). Based on visual inspection of plots and regression outputs, SMA was used to predict mass from ITW (R2 = 0.249; n = 165). Predicted values were extracted from the fitted lines, with those above and below the predicted lines heavier and lighter than expected, respectively, based on exoskeletal size (ITW) fixed at eclosion (Figure 2).
We confirmed that mass, ITW, and body condition (BeeMI) did not deviate strongly from normality by visual inspection of residuals, Q-Q plots, and histograms. To account for nonlinearity, we modeled the dependence of emergence time (day of year) on mass, ITW, and body condition using generalized additive models (GAMs) using package mgcv() [55] in R [54]. Overfitting of unconstrained models limited biologically relevant inferences. Therefore, to limit overfitting, we used a cubic regression smoother and, given 11 survey days in each year, we limited smoothers to 3 knots to constrain the variance of the data and better explain the biological relevance. Models with knots constrained to 3 were included in Table 1 (indicated by k = 3), which is reflected in the effective degrees of freedom (edf) for each model; an edf of 1 indicates a linear relationship while an edf greater than 1 indicates a strongly nonlinear relationship that increases with the edf value [56]. We compared linear models and GAMs with and without year as a covariate using Akaike information criterion values (AIC), and compared AIC values of models only where k = 3 was indicated in final model selection.
To further assess the relationship between body condition and emergence timing, we used a chi-square contingency table to analyze the association between body condition categories (heavier or lighter than expected) and the two clear emergence peaks.

3. Results

In total, we captured 132 queens between April and July of 2020 and 165 queens between April and July of 2021. Although queens were captured each week throughout the span of the 2+ month spring emergence period, they emerged in two distinct waves in both years (Figure 1). The bimodal distribution of spring emergence occurred during the same weeks each year despite large variation in weather conditions; a cold snap brought several inches of snow on 8 June 2020, whereas no late-spring cold snaps hit Laramie in 2021. Peak queen abundance was on 19 and 18 May (days 140 and 138) in 2020 and 2021, respectively, with the second peak occurring on 18 and 16 June (days 170 and 167) in 2020 and 2021.
Masses from 235 individuals total were collected across both years (70 queens in 2020 and 165 queens in 2021). The GAM including year as a covariate and the interaction between year and day of year had the lowest AIC value and was selected as the best fitting model (Table 1). Mass of bumble bee queens increased significantly with day of emergence for both years, accounting for over 39% of the variation; mass increased rapidly at the beginning of the emergence period, then tapered off (GAM, R2 = 0.397, df = 6.770; n = 295; Figure 3A). When modeling the relationship between ITW and emergence timing, the GAM without knot limitations had the lowest AIC score, but the GAM with knots limited to three was selected as the best fitting model given the small sample size (Table 1). ITW varied nonlinearly, increasing with day of emergence though this trend was statistically insignificant (GAM, R2 = 0.0794, df = 3.448, n = 165; Figure 3B). Much like mass, body condition (mass/ITW) increased nonlinearly as spring emergence progressed. We compared GAMs describing the relationship between body condition and emergence timing and selected the model with knots limited to 3 given the small sample size (Table 1). Early emerging queens had the lowest body condition (low BeeMI) with later emerging queens having increasingly better body condition until early June, at which point body condition plateaued (GAM, R2 = 0.456, df = 3.958; n = 165). While mass was positively correlated to emergence timing, body condition better accounted for the timing of spring emergence and explained over 45% of the variation of queen emergence timing (Figure 3C).
After categorizing queen body condition as heavier or lighter than expected based on the regression estimate (Figure 2), emergence timing was strongly associated with relative body condition for queen bees. The first emergence peak was dominated by queens that were lighter than expected, while heavier than expected queens made up a larger fraction of the second emergence peak (χ21 = 17.87, p < 0.0001, n = 165; Figure 4A). Queens of lower body condition emerged rapidly early on and then tapered off, whereas queens with better body condition emerged overall later with rate of emergence increasing later in the season (Figure 4B).

4. Discussion

Mass alone explained 40% of the variation in timing of queen emergence (Figure 3A; Table 1). While body mass influences overwintering survival in other bee species (Osmia), it is sex-specific—larger male mason bees had higher rates of survival during overwintering than smaller males, but this pattern did not hold true for females nor did it influence timing of emergence [28]. For commercially raised bumble bee queens (B. terrestris) held in cold storage, those less than 0.6 g had high mortality regardless of temperature or duration of storage. Queens larger than 0.6 g had higher mortality when held for longer durations, regardless of the cold storage temperature [57]. Therefore, it may be that the smallest B. huntii queens died; for those that emerged, it is clear that timing of emergence is tied to mass.
Mass is often used as a proxy for body condition. Our simple metric of body condition (BeeMI) explained even more (over 45%) of the variation in phenology of queen bumble bees. Relatively lighter queens emerged earlier (Figure 4), providing evidence that timing of bumble bee queen emergence is coupled to body condition. While previous studies have recorded increased survival of queen bumble bees that emerged later in the season, body condition was not assessed [36]. We are unaware of work assessing patterns of this sort in other insects, but other animals have shown the converse pattern: for both rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis viridis) and arctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus parryii kennicottii), relatively heavier individuals emerged earlier than lighter ones [16,27]. This contrasting pattern may be due to other reproductive pressures; for rattlesnakes, early emergence increases the time available for mating [16] and, for squirrels, early emergence increases offspring growth and survival [27]. Bumble bees mate in the fall so mating probability is decoupled from spring emergence. Only the first brood of offspring (which eclose in roughly three weeks; [58]) is dependent on the queen for resources as subsequent broods are provisioned by their sisters. As such, colony growth may depend less on timing of spring emergence and more on the timing of local resource availability [8].
Queens of similar body condition still varied in timing of spring emergence (Figure 3C). This variability may be linked to the timing of when they actually emerged. For example, a captured queen may have emerged that morning or a week or two prior such that they may differ in ovary development or body condition. Additionally, variability may be linked to selection of overwintering sites which, due to differences in microclimatic conditions, may influence spring emergence and survival [14,59]. Bumble bees overwinter underground [60] where, dependent on depth and soil characteristics, they may encounter strikingly different temperatures [61]. Therefore, where queens overwinter could alter when they experience temperatures that trigger spring emergence. Characterizing overwintering sites in the field and measuring how body size influences accumulation and depletion of energy stores in the fall and winter, respectively, could reveal key drivers of phenology of queen bumble bees and facilitate predictions of climate change impacts on these key pollinators.
Timing of emergence was not significantly linked to ITW (Figure 3B), suggesting that condition, not fixed size (exoskeletal size at eclosion) per se, is a key determinant of timing of spring emergence. Nonetheless, measurements of ITW and mass for the same individual provide a straightforward approach to estimate body condition for bumble bees (Figure 2) and possibly other insects as well. Such estimates of body condition may prove useful not only in phenology studies but in studies on land use effects [62], habitat changes [63], agriculture [64], and conservation [65,66] on health of insect populations.
A bimodal distribution of emergence is apparent across both years (Figure 1). Queen B. huntii emerged over two months, a range witnessed in previous studies. Emergence timing varies with species: B. terrestris emerge before B. lapidarius lasting for two to three months, though duration and timing varies across years [33]. During our surveys, however, the timing of B. huntii emergence from start to end occurred in two distinct waves that overlapped surprisingly closely with day of year across both years. These abundance peaks occurred within three days of each other across two years despite differences in weather conditions, indicating that emergence cues that overwintering queens are responding to may not be as strongly coupled to acute variation in air temperatures or weather than other factors. Photoperiod can influence phenology of some insects (reviewed in [4]), but this is likely not the case for bumble bees as they overwinter underground, sheltered from sunlight cues. Aside from external factors, internal factors (e.g., gene expression) may influence timing of spring emergence resulting in the bimodal peaks of emerging queens [67].
In addition to temperature being a major driver of phenology in bumble bees [8,32,34], our findings highlight the importance of body condition in bumble bee phenology, with queen physique tightly linked to timing of emergence in the spring. With over half of their lives spent overwintering underground and emergence spanning over two months (Figure 1), the physical condition of queens directly affects whether they emerge earlier or later in the season, potentially altering their already short active season by weeks. Variation in lipid accumulation during a small window in the fall [20,68] and in lipid depletion due to overwintering site selection likely contributes substantially to the timing of queen emergence in the spring. As bumble bee phenology shifts in response to changing climates with the most pronounced responses occurring in the last 40 years [32], further research characterizing the impact of emergence timing on colony success may uncover cascading effects of this critical life history stage on bumble bee populations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E.D. and E.C.K.; methodology, M.E.D. and E.C.K.; software, M.E.D. and E.C.K.; validation, M.E.D. and E.C.K.; formal analysis, M.E.D. and E.C.K.; investigation, E.C.K.; resources, M.E.D.; data curation, E.C.K. and M.E.D.; writing—original draft preparation, E.C.K.; writing—review and editing, M.E.D. and E.C.K.; visualization, M.E.D. and E.C.K.; supervision, M.E.D.; project administration, M.E.D.; funding acquisition, M.E.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the United States National Science Foundation, EF-1921562 and OIS-1826834, awarded to MED.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this study are available by email request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Megan K. Dillon for the original idea and continued support through this project, E. Rowe, S. A. Waybright, and other members of the Dillon Lab for their assistance with bee captures, as well as the kind neighbors within Laramie, WY, who provide pollinator habitat and generously allowed us to collect in their gardens.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Insects 13 00870 g0a1 550
Figure A1. Body condition was determined using non-destructive, classic body metrics. (A) Queen B. huntii were captured (B) individually weighed, and (C) photographed next to an object of a known size to later determine ITW using imageJ.
Figure A1. Body condition was determined using non-destructive, classic body metrics. (A) Queen B. huntii were captured (B) individually weighed, and (C) photographed next to an object of a known size to later determine ITW using imageJ.
Insects 13 00870 g0a1
Insects 13 00870 g0a2 550
Figure A2. SMA regression was selected for 2021 after visual inspection and regression terms of mass and ITW relationships. Body condition predictions and regression outputs were compared for 2021 using OLS (left; intercept: −0.309, slope: 0.101) and SMA (right; intercept: −1.053, slope: 0.202) with red lines indicating the OLS (A) and SMA (B) regression lines and grey lines indicating the 95% confidence intervals of each slope.
Figure A2. SMA regression was selected for 2021 after visual inspection and regression terms of mass and ITW relationships. Body condition predictions and regression outputs were compared for 2021 using OLS (left; intercept: −0.309, slope: 0.101) and SMA (right; intercept: −1.053, slope: 0.202) with red lines indicating the OLS (A) and SMA (B) regression lines and grey lines indicating the 95% confidence intervals of each slope.
Insects 13 00870 g0a2

References

  1. Van Asch, M.; Visser, M.E. Phenology of Forest Caterpillars and Their Host Trees: The Importance of Synchrony. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52, 37–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Forrest, J.R.K.; Thomson, J.D. An Examination of Synchrony between Insect Emergence and Flowering in Rocky Mountain Meadows. Ecol. Monogr. 2011, 81, 469–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Parmesan, C.; Yohe, G. A Globally Coherent Fingerprint of Climate Change Impacts across Natural Systems. Nature 2003, 421, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tauber, M.J.; Tauber, C.A. Insect Seasonality: Diapause Maintenance, Termination, and Postdiapause Development. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1976, 21, 81–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ovaskainen, O.; Skorokhodova, S.; Yakovleva, M.; Sukhov, A.; Kutenkov, A.; Kutenkova, N.; Shcherbakov, A.; Meyke, E.; Delgado, M.d.M. Community-Level Phenological Response to Climate Change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 13434–13439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Thackeray, S.J.; Sparks, T.H.; Frederiksen, M.; Burthe, S.; Bacon, P.J.; Bell, J.R.; Botham, M.S.; Brereton, T.M.; Bright, P.W.; Carvalho, L.; et al. Trophic Level Asynchrony in Rates of Phenological Change for Marine, Freshwater and Terrestrial Environments: Phenological Change across Major Environments. Glob. Change Biol. 2010, 16, 3304–3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cohen, J.M.; Lajeunesse, M.J.; Rohr, J.R. A Global Synthesis of Animal Phenological Responses to Climate Change. Nat. Clim. Change 2018, 8, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kudo, G.; Ida, T.Y. Early Onset of Spring Increases the Phenological Mismatch between Plants and Pollinators. Ecology 2013, 94, 2311–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Inouye, D.W.; Barr, B.; Armitage, K.B.; Inouye, B.D. Climate Change Is Affecting Altitudinal Migrants and Hibernating Species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 1630–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pincebourde, S.; Dillon, M.E.; Woods, H.A. Body Size Determines the Thermal Coupling between Insects and Plant Surfaces. Funct. Ecol. 2021, 35, 1424–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Potter, K.A.; Woods, H.A.; Pincebourde, S. Microclimatic Challenges in Global Change Biology. Glob. Change Biol. 2013, 19, 2932–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Woods, H.A.; Pincebourde, S.; Dillon, M.E.; Terblanche, J.S. Extended Phenotypes: Buffers or Amplifiers of Climate Change? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2021, 36, 889–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Poethke, H.J.; Hovestadt, T.; Mitesser, O. The Evolution of Optimal Emergence Times: Bet Hedging and the Quest for an Ideal Free Temporal Distribution of Individuals. Oikos 2016, 125, 1647–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jackson, M.T. Effects of Microclimate on Spring Flowering Phenology. Ecology 1966, 47, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vermunt, B.; Cuddington, K.; Sobek-Swant, S.; Crosthwaite, J.C.; Barry Lyons, D.; Sinclair, B.J. Temperatures Experienced by Wood-Boring Beetles in the under-Bark Microclimate. For. Ecol. Manag. 2012, 269, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Graves, B.M.; Duvall, D. Spring Emergence Patterns of Wandering Garter Snakes and Prairie Rattlesnakes in Wyoming. J. Herpetol. 1990, 24, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Norquay, K.J.O.; Willis, C.K.R. Hibernation Phenology of Myotis Lucifugus. J. Zool. 2014, 294, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Michener, G.R. Effect of Age and Parity on Weight Gain and Entry into Hibernation in Richardson’s Ground Squirrels. Can. J. Zool. 1978, 56, 2573–2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Armitage, K.B.; Downhower, J.F.; Svendsen, G.E. Seasonal Changes in Weights of Marmots. Am. Midl. Nat. 1976, 96, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Holm, S.N. Weight and Life Length of Hibernating Bumble Bee Queens (Hymenoptera: Bombidae) under Controlled Conditions. Insect Syst. Evol. 1972, 3, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Willis, Y.L.; Moyle, D.L.; Baskett, T.S. Emergence, Breeding, Hibernation, Movements and Transformation of the Bullfrog, Rana Catesbeiana, in Missouri. Copeia 1956, 1956, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ohlberger, J. Climate Warming and Ectotherm Body Size—From Individual Physiology to Community Ecology. Funct. Ecol. 2013, 27, 991–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chmura, H.E.; Kharouba, H.M.; Ashander, J.; Ehlman, S.M.; Rivest, E.B.; Yang, L.H. The Mechanisms of Phenology: The Patterns and Processes of Phenological Shifts. Ecol. Monogr. 2019, 89, e01337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ryan, R.A. Growth Rates of Some Ranids under Natural Conditions. Copeia 1953, 1953, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wonglersak, R.; Fenberg, P.B.; Langdon, P.G.; Brooks, S.J.; Price, B.W. Insect Body Size Changes under Future Warming Projections: A Case Study of Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera). Hydrobiologia 2021, 848, 2785–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wonglersak, R.; Fenberg, P.B.; Langdon, P.G.; Brooks, S.J.; Price, B.W. Temperature-Body Size Responses in Insects: A Case Study of British Odonata. Ecol. Entomol. 2020, 45, 795–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Buck, C.L.; Barnes, B.M. Annual Cycle of Body Composition and Hibernation in Free-Living Arctic Ground Squirrels. J. Mammal. 1999, 80, 430–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bosch, J.; Kemp, W.P. Effect of Pre-Wintering and Wintering Temperature Regimes on Weight Loss, Survival, and Emergence Time in the Mason Bee Osmia Cornuta (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Apidologie 2004, 35, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bols, J.H. Observations on Bombus and Psithyrus, Especially on Their Hibernation. Proc. R. Soc. A. 1937, 12, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Frison, T.H. Contribution to the Knowledge of the Interrelations of the Bumblebees of Illinois with Their Animate Environment. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1926, 19, 203–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cumber, R.A. The Biology of Humble-Bees, with Special Reference to the Production of the Worker Caste. Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 1949, 100, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bartomeus, I.; Ascher, J.S.; Wagner, D.; Danforth, B.N.; Colla, S.; Kornbluth, S.; Winfree, R. Climate-Associated Phenological Advances in Bee Pollinators and Bee-Pollinated Plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20645–20649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Holm, S.V. Experiments on the Domestication of Bumblebees (Bombus Latr.) in Particular B. lapidarius L. and B. terrestris L.; FAO: Québec, Canada, 1960; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lanterman, J.; Reeher, P.; Mitchell, R.J.; Goodell, K. Habitat Preference and Phenology of Nest Seeking and Foraging Spring Bumble Bee Queens in Northeastern North America (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus). Am. Midl. Nat. 2019, 182, 131–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Skou, P.; Holm, S.N.; Haas, H. Preliminary Investigations on Diseases in Bumble-Bees (Bombus Latr.). In Yearbook 1963; Royal Veterinary and Agricultural College: Frederiksberg, Denmark, 1963; pp. 27–41. [Google Scholar]
  36. Holm, S. Problems of the Domestication of Bumble Bees. Bee World 1966, 47, 179–186. [Google Scholar]
  37. Heinrich, B. Bumblebee Economics; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004; ISBN 978-0-674-01639-2. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wignall, V.R.; Brolly, M.; Uthoff, C.; Norton, K.E.; Chipperfield, H.M.; Balfour, N.J.; Ratnieks, F.L.W. Exploitative Competition and Displacement Mediated by Eusocial Bees: Experimental Evidence in a Wild Pollinator Community. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2020, 74, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. DeGregorio, B.A.; Tuberville, T.D.; Kennamer, R.A.; Harris, B.B.; Brisbin, I.L. Spring Emergence of Eastern Box Turtles (Terrapene Carolina): Influences of Individual Variation and Scale of Temperature Correlates. Can. J. Zool. 2017, 95, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fründ, J.; Zieger, S.L.; Tscharntke, T. Response Diversity of Wild Bees to Overwintering Temperatures. Oecologia 2013, 173, 1639–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schenk, M.; Mitesser, O.; Hovestadt, T.; Holzschuh, A. Overwintering Temperature and Body Condition Shift Emergence Dates of Spring-Emerging Solitary Bees. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hulbert, A.J.; Else, P.L. Mechanisms Underlying the Cost of Living in Animals. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2000, 62, 207–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kleiber, M. Body Size and Metabolic Rate. Physiol. Rev. 1947, 27, 511–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kleiber, M. Body Size and Metabolism. J. Agric. Sci. 1932, 6, 313–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Cane, J.H. Estimation of Bee Size Using Intertegular Span (Apoidea). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 1987, 60, 145–147. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vogt, J.R.; Dillon, M.E. Allometric Scaling of Tracheal Morphology among Bumblebee Sisters (Apidae: Bombus): Compensation for Oxygen Limitation at Large Body Sizes? Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2013, 86, 576–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rasband, W.S. ImageJ 1997; National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, MD, USA, 1997.
  48. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 Years of Image Analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lozier, J.D.; Parsons, Z.M.; Rachoki, L.; Jackson, J.M.; Pimsler, M.L.; Oyen, K.J.; Strange, J.; Dillon, M.E. Divergence in Body Mass, Wing Loading, and Population Structure Reveals Species-Specific and Potentially Adaptive Trait Variation across Elevations in Montane Bumble Bees. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2021, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pridal, A.; Hofbauer, J. Laboratory Rearing and Nutrition of Young Queens of Bumblebee (Bombus Terrestris L.) from Emergence to Diapause. Fruit Grow. Res. 1996, 14, 125–131. [Google Scholar]
  51. Treanore, E.D.; Kiner, J.M.; Kerner, M.E.; Amsalem, E. Shift in Worker Physiology and Gene Expression Pattern from Reproductive to Diapause-like with Colony Age in the Bumble Bee Bombus Impatiens. J. Exp. Biol. 2020, 223, jeb218768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Woodard, S.H.; Duennes, M.A.; Watrous, K.M.; Jha, S. Diet and Nutritional Status during Early Adult Life Have Immediate and Persistent Effects on Queen Bumble Bees. Conserv. Physiol. 2019, 7, coz048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Legendre, P. Lmodel2: Model II Regression 2018, R Package Version 1.7-3. Available online: https://CRAN (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  54. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2021; R Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wood, S.N. Fast Stable Restricted Maximum Likelihood and Marginal Likelihood Estimation of Semiparametric Generalized Linear Models. J. R. Stat. Soc. 2011, 73, 3–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zuur, A.F.; Ieno, E.N.; Walker, N.; Saveliev, A.A.; Smith, G.M. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R; Statistics for Biology and Health; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-0-387-87457-9. [Google Scholar]
  57. Beekman, M.; van Stratum, P.; Lingeman, R. Diapause Survival and Post-Diapause Performance in Bumblebee Queens (Bombus terrestris). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1998, 89, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tian, L.; Hines, H.M. Morphological Characterization and Staging of Bumble Bee Pupae. PeerJ 2018, 6, e6089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Rytteri, S.; Kuussaari, M.; Saastamoinen, M. Microclimatic Variability Buffers Butterfly Populations against Increased Mortality Caused by Phenological Asynchrony between Larvae and Their Host Plants. Oikos 2021, 130, 753–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liczner, A.R.; Colla, S.R. A Systematic Review of the Nesting and Overwintering Habitat of Bumble Bees Globally. J. Insect Conserv. 2019, 23, 787–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huey, R.B.; Ma, L.; Levy, O.; Kearney, M.R. Three Questions about the Eco-Physiology of Overwintering Underground. Ecol. Lett. 2021, 24, 170–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pisanty, G.; Mandelik, Y. Profiling Crop Pollinators: Life History Traits Predict Habitat Use and Crop Visitation by Mediterranean Wild Bees. Ecol. Appl. 2015, 25, 742–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bommarco, R.; Biesmeijer, J.C.; Meyer, B.; Potts, S.G.; Pöyry, J.; Roberts, S.P.M.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Öckinger, E. Dispersal Capacity and Diet Breadth Modify the Response of Wild Bees to Habitat Loss. Proc. R. Soc. B 2010, 277, 2075–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Geslin, B.; Oddie, M.; Folschweiller, M.; Legras, G.; Seymour, C.L.; van Veen, F.J.F.; Thébault, E. Spatiotemporal Changes in Flying Insect Abundance and Their Functional Diversity as a Function of Distance to Natural Habitats in a Mass Flowering Crop. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 229, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nooten, S.S.; Rehan, S.M. Historical Changes in Bumble Bee Body Size and Range Shift of Declining Species. Biodivers. Conserv. 2020, 29, 451–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Podgaiski, L.R.; Cavalleri, A.; Ferrando, C.P.R.; Pillar, V.D.; Mendonça, M., Jr. de S. Prescribed Patch Burnings Increase Thrips Species Richness and Body Size in Grassland Communities. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2018, 11, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Denlinger, D.L.; Hahn, D.A.; Merlin, C.; Holzapfel, C.M.; Bradshaw, W.E. Keeping Time without a Spine: What Can the Insect Clock Teach Us about Seasonal Adaptation? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 2017, 372, 20160257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Alford, D.V. Studies on the Fat-Body of Adult Bumble Bees. J. Apic. Res. 1969, 8, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 13 00870 g001 550
Figure 1. Bumble bee queens (B. huntii) emerged across two and a half months during the spring with a marked bimodal distribution across both 2020 (grey; n = 132) and 2021 (black; n = 165).
Figure 1. Bumble bee queens (B. huntii) emerged across two and a half months during the spring with a marked bimodal distribution across both 2020 (grey; n = 132) and 2021 (black; n = 165).
Insects 13 00870 g001
Insects 13 00870 g002 550
Figure 2. Body mass generally tracks intertegular width for bumble bee queens, with variability in mass at a given ITW indicative of body condition. Queens above the SMA regression line (R2 = 0.249) were heavier than expected (solid circles) and those below were lighter than expected (empty circles) given exoskeletal size fixed at eclosion. ITW measurements were only available for 2021.
Figure 2. Body mass generally tracks intertegular width for bumble bee queens, with variability in mass at a given ITW indicative of body condition. Queens above the SMA regression line (R2 = 0.249) were heavier than expected (solid circles) and those below were lighter than expected (empty circles) given exoskeletal size fixed at eclosion. ITW measurements were only available for 2021.
Insects 13 00870 g002
Insects 13 00870 g003 550
Figure 3. Mass and body condition varied with timing of queen emergence, while ITW did not. (A) Queen mass increased significantly with day of emergence for both 2020 (gray points and lines; n = 130) and 2021 (black points and lines; n = 165) (GAM, R2 = 0.397, df = 6.770; n = 295; Table 1); (B) ITW did not change significantly with day of year (GAM, R2 = 0.0794, df = 3.448, n = 165; Table 1); (C) Body condition (as estimated by the ratio of mass to ITW) increased strikingly with day of queen emergence early in the season, with day of emergence explaining over 45% of the variation in body condition (GAM, R2 = 0.456, df = 3.958, n = 165; Table 1).
Figure 3. Mass and body condition varied with timing of queen emergence, while ITW did not. (A) Queen mass increased significantly with day of emergence for both 2020 (gray points and lines; n = 130) and 2021 (black points and lines; n = 165) (GAM, R2 = 0.397, df = 6.770; n = 295; Table 1); (B) ITW did not change significantly with day of year (GAM, R2 = 0.0794, df = 3.448, n = 165; Table 1); (C) Body condition (as estimated by the ratio of mass to ITW) increased strikingly with day of queen emergence early in the season, with day of emergence explaining over 45% of the variation in body condition (GAM, R2 = 0.456, df = 3.958, n = 165; Table 1).
Insects 13 00870 g003
Insects 13 00870 g004 550
Figure 4. Queen body condition was strongly associated with the two queen emergence peaks. (A) Relatively light queens (dashed lines) dominated the first emergence peak, and (B) tended to emerge rapidly early in the season. Conversely, relatively heavy queens (solid line) emerged during both peaks, but dominated the second emergence peak, when lighter than expected queens were scarce (A; χ21 = 17.87, p < 0.0001, n = 165).
Figure 4. Queen body condition was strongly associated with the two queen emergence peaks. (A) Relatively light queens (dashed lines) dominated the first emergence peak, and (B) tended to emerge rapidly early in the season. Conversely, relatively heavy queens (solid line) emerged during both peaks, but dominated the second emergence peak, when lighter than expected queens were scarce (A; χ21 = 17.87, p < 0.0001, n = 165).
Insects 13 00870 g004
Table
Table 1. GAM outputs and AIC values from analyzing mass, ITW, and body condition with emergence timing. Aside from the initial model for each response variable, we limited smoothers to 3 knots to better explain the biological relevance and fit smoothers with a cubic regression to prevent overfitting. Best fit models are in bold.
Table 1. GAM outputs and AIC values from analyzing mass, ITW, and body condition with emergence timing. Aside from the initial model for each response variable, we limited smoothers to 3 knots to better explain the biological relevance and fit smoothers with a cubic regression to prevent overfitting. Best fit models are in bold.
Response VariableModelAICΔAICR2Deviance Explainededfdfn
mass~s (day of year, k = 3) + year + s (day of year) × year−889.40600.39740.70%2020:1.821 2021:1.9506.770464295
mass~s (day of year, k = 3)−888.1421.2640.38939.30%1.9583.958283295
mass~s (dayofyear, k = 3) + year−887.0862.320.38939.50%1.9584.958068295
ITW~s (day of year, k = 3)116.941300.07948.76%1.4483.447957165
condition~s (day of year, k = 3)−1195.2700.45646.30%1.9583.957785165
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Keaveny, E.C.; Dillon, M.E. Phat Queens Emerge Fashionably Late: Body Size and Condition Predict Timing of Spring Emergence for Queen Bumble Bees. Insects 2022, 13, 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100870

AMA Style

Keaveny EC, Dillon ME. Phat Queens Emerge Fashionably Late: Body Size and Condition Predict Timing of Spring Emergence for Queen Bumble Bees. Insects. 2022; 13(10):870. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100870

Chicago/Turabian Style

Keaveny, Ellen C., and Michael E. Dillon. 2022. "Phat Queens Emerge Fashionably Late: Body Size and Condition Predict Timing of Spring Emergence for Queen Bumble Bees" Insects 13, no. 10: 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100870

APA Style

Keaveny, E. C., & Dillon, M. E. (2022). Phat Queens Emerge Fashionably Late: Body Size and Condition Predict Timing of Spring Emergence for Queen Bumble Bees. Insects, 13(10), 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100870

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop