Next Article in Journal
RNA Sequencing Reveals the Potential Adaptation Mechanism to Different Hosts of Grapholita molesta
Previous Article in Journal
New Genus and Species of Limnichines from the Cretaceous Amber of Myanmar and Taxonomic Notes on the Family Limnichidae (Coleoptera, Polyphaga)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/insects13100892
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Using Trait-Based Approaches to Assess the Response of Epedaphic Collembola to Organic Matter Management Practices: A Case Study in a Rubber Plantation in South-Eastern Côte d’Ivoire

by
Aymard Kouakou Kouakou
1,2,*,
Jérôme Cortet
3,*,
Yeo Kolo
1 and
Alain Brauman
2
1
Station D’écologie de Lamto, Université Nangui Abrogoua, Abidjan 02 BP 801, Côte d’Ivoire
2
Eco & Sols, University Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, F-34398 Montperliier, France
3
UMR CEFE 5175, University of Montpellier, EPHE, University Paul-Valéry Montpellier, Route de Mende, CEDEX, F-34199 Montpellier, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2022, 13(10), 892; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100892
Submission received: 28 July 2022 / Revised: 13 September 2022 / Accepted: 27 September 2022 / Published: 30 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Ecology, Diversity and Conservation)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

While studies based on the taxonomic facet of biodiversity have already proven their value in understanding soil functioning, studies focusing on the functional facet based on the traits of organisms are scarce in the Ivorian context. Among soil organisms, springtails play an important role in soil functioning and are a useful bioindicator for assessing the impact of land use change and agricultural practices on soil biodiversity. However, their taxonomy is very poorly known in Côte d’Ivoire. The functional trait approach is therefore a relevant alternative for assessing the response of springtails communities to organic matter management in tree plantations. The aim of this study was to determine how different input of organic matter in the form of logging residues and legumes influence the body size and functional diversity of springtails. Our results showed a high functional richness and body size of springtails in the practice with trunks and large branches (R2L1). Functional traits are useful to assess the effects of agricultural practices on springtails communities.

Abstract

We used trait-based approaches to reveal the functional responses of springtails communities to organic matter inputs in a rubber plantation in Côte d’Ivoire. Pitfall traps were used to sample springtails in each practice. The results showed that the total abundance of springtails increased significantly with the amount of organic matter (R0L0 < R2L1). Larger springtails (body length, furca and antennae) were observed in plots with high organic matter. Practices with logging residues and legume recorded the highest functional richness. The principal coordinate analysis showed different functional composition patterns between practices with logging residues (R1L1 and R2L1) and those without inputs (R0L0 and R0L1). This difference in functional composition (PERMANOVA analysis) was related to the effect of practices. These results highlight the pertinence of the functional trait approach in the characterization of springtail communities, a bioindicator of soil health, for organic matter management practice.

1. Introduction

Land-use change is the cause of biodiversity loss and the depletion of terrestrial ecosystems [1]. The effects of these changes are mostly driven by the conversion of natural ecosystems to agricultural lands. Indeed, the conversion of forests into agricultural land leads to a degradation of the physical and chemical quality of soils [2]. In West Africa, particularly in Côte d’Ivoire, land-use changes lead to a decrease of total organic carbon and soil pH [3], of the abundance, richness and diversity of litter and soil arthropods [4,5]. Furthermore, the conversion of primary or secondary forests to rubber plantations appears to reduce the diversity and density of soil macroinvertebrates [6,7,8].
Successive rubber plantation cycles of 25 to 40 years [9], lead to decline of soil functions [10] and a continuous loss of soil biodiversity [11]. One of the ways to mitigate soil degradation related to intensive land use is to add organic matter. Indeed, the addition of organic matter such as logging residues and legumes after a rubber plantation cycle promotes the resilience of the main soils functions (carbon transformation, soil structure maintenance and nutrient cycling [12]).
Soil biodiversity plays a crucial role in maintaining soil functioning and ecosystem services [13]. The return of organic matter to the soil provides a suitable microclimate, provides new ecological niches and resources to maintain this biodiversity [14]. However, the effects of organic matter restitution on soil biodiversity in tree plantations are still unclear. Thus, understanding the impacts of organic matter input on soil biodiversity can contribute to the development of a sustainable management program in tree plantations.
Among soil organisms, springtails are key bioindicators of soil functions [15] such as nutrient cycling [16,17] and organic matter decomposition [18]. Springtails are also considered as relevant bioindicators of land use change [19,20,21]. They are also used as biological indicators to assess the impact of different agricultural practices on soil biodiversity [22,23,24,25].
Africa is an immense reservoir of biodiversity, representing around a quarter of the world’s biodiversity [26] due to its varied ecosystems (tropical forests, savannahs, deserts, mangroves and mountain grasslands). However, the problem of identification arises for many taxa that are still poorly known. Ecological research faces serious difficulties in identifying species due to the lack of identification keys for many species [27]. In Côte d’Ivoire, research has been conducted in this context to identify arthropod species on the basis of their taxonomy [28,29,30,31]. Concerning springtails communities, despite recent works by Zon et al. [32,33], their taxonomy is very poorly established in Côte d’Ivoire.
The functional traits refer to the characteristics of a species that can influence the performance of an individual, i.e., its growth, reproduction or survival [34]. These traits govern the responses of individuals to disturbances in their environment [34,35]. Approaches based on the use of functional traits can improve the understanding of the responses of soil invertebrates to environmental disturbances and provide complementary information to that provided by taxonomic approaches [20,36,37]. Functional traits also provide a better understanding of how abiotic factors determine the species assemblage of a soil community and predict how it will develop in response to changes in habitat [38].
Therefore, in the Côte d’Ivoire context, where the taxonomy is poorly known, the functional traits of springtails could be used as indicators of agricultural practices, particularly those linked to the management of organic matter, which is the basis of food webs, probably leading to functional community modifications.
The objective of this study was to determine how the input of organic matter, such as logging residues and legumes, modulates the functional responses of springtails. We hypothesized that (1) the massive presence of carbon would induce a greater abundance of springtails, as a result of increasing the amount of carbon and energy available for the soil food webs; (2) the high presence of organic matter on the surface is a preferential habitat for large individuals with a well-developed furca; (3) the presence of organic matter on the surface would increase the number of ecological niches and thus promote a higher functional richness and diversity. We conducted this study 12 months after the addition of logging residues and legumes in a large-scale field experiment in a rubber tree plantation in Côte d’Ivoire.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

This study was conducted in the South-East of Côte d’Ivoire on a rubber plantation. This plantation belongs to the “Société Africaine de Plantations d’Hévéas” (SAPH). The site is located (latitude 5°31′02.5″ N, longitude 3°29′46.2″ W) in the department of Grand Bassam with an area of 5503 ha. The climate of the region is sub-equatorial, adapted to rubber plantation, with four seasons. There is a large rainy season from April to June; a small dry season from July to August; a small rainy season from September to October and a large dry season from November to March. Annual rainfall varies between 1700 mm and 1900 mm and the annual temperature varies between 24 and 27 °C. The soil has a sandy-silty texture with 11% clay and an acidic pH between 4 and 5 at 0–10 cm depth [12]. The topography is homogeneous with low slopes (<5%).

2.2. Experimental Design

We set up an experimental design after the clearcutting of the previous rubber plantation (40 years old) using bulldozers in November 2017. In this site, the natural rainforest was the previous land-use type, and the logged stand consisted of the first cycle of rubber trees. The experimental design has already been described by Perron et al. [12]. However, in this paper, only one site (SAPH) was considered. The experimental design includes 4 practices replicated in 4 random blocks, resulting in 16 plots as follows:
−
R0L0: all rubber residues (R) removed from the plot, no legume (L);
−
R0L1: all rubber residues removed from the plot, legume (Pueraria phaseoloides);
−
R1L1: stumps, fine branches (less than 20 cm diameter) and leaves from the previous plantation left in the inter-row, legume (Pueraria phaseoloides);
−
R2L1: no rubber tree residues removed (leaves, trunk and stumps left), legume (Pueraria phaseoloides).
In the experimental setup described, only 3 blocks were studied in our case.
The practices defined in the experimental setup constitute an organic matter gradient. This gradient is related to the gradual increase in the amount of organic matter added between practices from R0L0 (no residues) to R2L1 (practice with the highest amount of residue) as well as to a gradual evolution of the quality in terms of C/N between R0L1, a practice with legume only (Pueraria phaseoloides) with a low C/N, and R2L1, which contains woods (trunks and branches) with a high C/N.
Rubber tree residues were put in the inter-rows. Before the tree logging, an inventory of living trees was realized. In «R1L1» and «R2L1» practices, logging residues were set up according to the results of this inventory in order to have a similar quantity of residues (leaves, trunk and stumps left) per practice in the 4 blocks and then guarantee the homogeneity of the experimental design. The number of trees per plot was 30 and 28, respectively, in R1L1 and R2L1 practice. The C stock in the practice with rubber residues was 36 t ha−1 in R1L1 and 97 t ha−1 in R2L1. The legume (Pueraria phaseoloides) was broadcast (10 kg ha−1 of wet seed) in February 2018.

2.3. Sample Collection

Sampling was carried out in November 2018 (12 months after the practices were set up), when the rubber tree residues on the ground were fully decomposed and the legume well developed. Pitfall traps were chosen for the capture of springtails in each practice. This method is efficient for sampling the surface active springtails as already shown by different authors [39,40]. In this study, plastic cups of 3.5 cm diameter were used as pitfall trap. The volume of each pitfall trap was 300 mL and each one was filled to about 1/3 of its volume with 70% ethanol. The traps were left in activity for two days. Given the climatic constraints (intense rainfall) prevailing on this site, we shortened the activity times of pitfall to two days to avoid flooding with sands and water in the traps. However, usually, the activity time of the pitfall trap is longer [39,40]. A sampling plot (25 m × 10 m) was defined to limit border effects in each practice. In each sampling plot, six pitfall traps were placed in two lines of three traps, only in the windrows for sampling epedaphic or atmobiotic springtails [41]. In each line, the pitfall trap was spaced to 10 m and the distance between the lines was 8 m (Figure 1). A total of 6 samples were taken in each plot.

2.4. Measurement of the Springtails Traits

Springtails were characterized by morphotypes rather than species for functional trait measurements. The functional traits of springtails were measured directly on individuals collected in the field. We selected traits related to dispersal ability, life form and habitat preference of springtails [20,42,43]. The selected traits are summarized in Table 1. We used observed trait data to calculate the functional diversity (FD) indices proposed by Villéger et al. [44]. The functional diversity indices calculated in this paper are as follows:
−
The functional richness (FRic) corresponds to the volume of functional space occupied by species (abundance is not involved);
−
The functional divergence (FDiv) corresponds to a degree of niche differentiation among species within communities;
−
The functional evenness (FEve) measures the regularity of the distribution of abundance in functional space;
−
The functional dispersion (FDis) is a “pure” estimator of the dispersion in trait combination abundances.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Abundance data were transformed to Log (x + 1) for normal distribution and homogeneity of variances. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and comparisons of measured traits and functional diversity indices were performed using Tukey’s test (p < 0.05) with the agricolae package [45]. All variables were tested for normality and homogeneity of the variance of the data using Shapiro–Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. Quantitative measurements of body length, antenna length and furca length (in µm in Table 1) were used to characterize the size of the springtails. We used the dbFD function of the FD package [46] to compute functional diversity (FD). dbFD uses principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) to return PCoA axes, which are used as ‘traits’ to compute FD. dBFD computes FD indices, including the three indices of Villéger et al. [44]: functional richness (FRic), functional evenness (FEve) and functional divergence (FDiv). It also computes functional dispersion (FDis) [46] and the community-level weighted means of trait values (CWM), an index of functional composition. Following this computation, the results are presented in the form of one weighted sample for each practice per block. The CWM was calculated from the observed qualitative traits (Body modification, Dens, Mucro, Ocelli, Post Antennal Organ, Pigmentation, Scales, Empodial appendage) and their different attributes. The calculation of the community-weighted mean trait attribute values was based on two matrices (practice by morphotype and morphotype by trait). The CWM were used in a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) to explore the functional composition patterns of springtails according to practice types [47]. This analysis was based on a Euclidean distance matrix. Then, a non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) using the vegan package [48] was performed to test for differences in functional composition of springtails. All statistical analyses were performed with RStudio software, version 1.3.1093 [49].

3. Results

3.1. Variation of Total Springtails Abundance with Amount of Organic Matter

The total abundance of springtails varied significantly (ANOVA, F = 3.35; Df = 3; p = 0.02) between the different practices (Figure 2). The abundance of springtails observed in the R2L1 practice was four times greater compared to the one observed in the practice without organic matter (R0L0). R0L1 and R1L1 presented intermediate abundance.

3.2. Springtails Size Response to Logging Residue and Legume Input

The measured traits show that the size of the springtails increases with the amount of organic matter (Figure 3). A significant difference in body length (ANOVA, F = 13.41; Df = 3; p = 3.52 × 10−8), antenna length (ANOVA, F = 9.54; Df = 3; p = 5.79 × 10−6) and furca length (ANOVA, F = 10.41; Df = 3; p = 2.11 × 10−6) of springtails was observed between the different practices (Figure 3A–C). The largest springtails sizes were observed in the R2L1 practice, intermediate in the R1L1 and R0L1 practices and smallest in the R0L0 practice (without residues).

3.3. Response of the Functional Diversity Indices of Springtails to Logging Residues and Legumes

Functional diversity indices varied significantly between practices (Figure 4). Significant differences (ANOVA, F = 5.47; Df = 4; p = 0.02) in functional richness (FRic) were observed between practices with the highest values in practices with rubber residues (R1L1 and R2L1, Figure 4A). Significant difference in functional divergence (FDiv, ANOVA, F = 28.60; Df = 4; p = 1.98 × 10−4) was observed between practices with residues and/ or legumes (R0L1, R1L1 and R2L1) and those without (R0L0, Figure 4B). A significant difference in functional evenness (FEve, ANOVA, F = 4.13; Df = 4; p = 0.04) was also observed between practices with legumes only (R0L1) and residues (R2L1, Figure 4C). Functional dispersion (FDis) was significantly different (ANOVA, F = 41.16; Df = 4; p = 5.97 × 10−5) between practices with rubber residues (R2L1) and those without (R0L0, Figure 4D).

3.4. Response of the Functional Composition (CWM) of Springtails to the Organic Matter Gradient

The community weighted mean trait values (CWM) were grouped into an ordination diagram by applying a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). The practices plotted in the Principal Coordinate Analysis represent plots where springtails were sampled. According to the PCoA analysis, the first axis explains 91.23% and the second axis explains 8.76% of the total variance. The functional composition patterns are separated by the absence (R0L0 and R0L1) and amount of rubber residues (R2L1, R1L1, Figure 5). The functional composition shows a significant difference between the practices (PERMANOVA, F = 1.95, R² = 0.69, p = 0.001).

4. Discussion

This study evaluated the functional response of springtails communities to organic matter inputs such as logging residues and legumes after a rubber plantation cycle. The results indicate that the abundance, diversity and functional composition of springtails varied significantly with the amount of organic matter input.
The large abundance of springtails in the practice with rubber tree residues (R2L1) is believed to be the result of the high amount of organic matter in this plot. The large amount of OM can induce a microclimate favorable to many springtails. These favorable conditions would allow a very high colonization rate with a rapid increase in springtail populations [50]. Rubber tree residues (trunk, leaves, stump and fine branch) and the legume on the ground constitute large quantities of accumulated OM that can harbor a greater abundance of springtails [51]. In addition, this high OM presence may increase the resource heterogeneity necessary for increased springtail abundance [52]. In the R0L0 practice, the absence of OM leads to a degradation of the habitat quality, which prevents many springtails to colonize this habitat [53]. Indeed, in the absence of vegetation cover and OM, the soil is subject to high solar radiation and temperature, which can impact on the abundance of springtails [54].
The body size of springtails increased significantly with the amount of OM. Such size differences could reflect a high abundance of epedaphic springtails in the presence of a large amount of OM on the soil surface [55]. Our results are in accordance with the studies of Yu et al. [55], who showed that manure input affects the functional composition of the community, favoring more active and mobile species of springtails characterized by a well-developed furca. Our results suggest that after a cycle of rubber plantations, organic matter management practices can help increase the abundance of springtails [56]. The results also suggest that the quality and availability of resources, rather than their quantity, control springtail communities. Furthermore, the sampling method could have an influence on our results as pitfall traps tend to capture epedaphic and more mobile springtails. Trends might be different with other non-selective methods (soil sampling) or a combination of methods [39,57].
The amount of OM would probably be the main factor that determines springtails communities since we observed a significant difference in functional diversity indices between practices in our study. The high functional richness (FRic) in practices R1L1 and R2L1 can be explained by the creation of new ecological niches in the presence of OM. These results would reflect that springtails occupy different amounts of niche space according to the practices. The functional divergence (FDiv) being different according to the practices seems to indicate that there are degrees of niche differentiation, and consequently, competition for the available resources. Indeed, the difference in body size of springtails in relation to the presence of OM can influence both the distribution of resources and trophic status within the food web [58]. The significant variation in functional evenness (FEve) would result from the difference in abundance of springtails between practices. This difference could influence the degree of distribution of springtails communities according to ecological niches to allow efficient use of the full range of available resources [59]. The significantly higher functional dispersion (FDis) in practices with residues than those without reflects a proportion of epedaphic springtails with the most extreme trophic niches in the community [41,60]. This variation in FDis would also be the result of variation in microclimate conditions in the practices, which influence species abundance. Some abiotic factors or changes in soil structure that we did not measure in this study could also have an influence on our results, as shown by Susanti et al. [61].
The functional composition of springtails communities was not significantly different in the two practices without rubber residues (R0L0 and R0L1). These results suggest that the springtails communities in these practices are functionally similar. Thus, the difference in practices between R0L0 and R0L1 is not sufficient to induce a significant functional change of the communities. An additional explanation for the non-differentiation in the functional composition of springtails in these two practices refers rather to the effects of adaptation and the range of ecological niches of the species, which may in fact decouple their distribution from environmental constraints [62]. The different functional composition in the practices with residues (R1L1 and R2L1) can be explained by the fact that the quantity and quality of OM, being both food and habitat for soil fauna, modulate this composition and the structure of the soil food web [63,64]. Differences in functional composition between practices would be associated with changes in trophic niches in springtails communities [41,60]. The differentiation of the trophic niches of springtails according to the practices could be explained by the regulatory power of the latter in relation to the microbial communities responsible for the decomposition of OM [65]. Indeed, depending on the amount of OM, the microbial biomass may differ from one practice to another and induce different springtail populations [66].

5. Conclusions

This study assessed the functional response of springtail communities to organic matter input after a 40-year rubber plantation cycle. Among the different practices, the one with trunks, branches and leaves, combined with the legume (R2L1) showed the greatest abundance of springtails. The results showed that in the presence of a large amount of organic matter, large springtails with a well-developed furca colonized the habitat. The presence of rubber tree residues (trunks, fine branches, leaves and stumps) induced a higher functional richness. The functional composition patterns showed that the springtail communities occupied different ecological niches. Functional trait analysis is a good alternative for studying springtails distribution and soil health. The study highlights the pertinence of the functional approach in the characterization of a community whose taxonomy is unknown.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K.K. and A.B.; Methodology, A.K.K. and A.B.; Software, A.K.K.; Validation, J.C., A.B. and Y.K.; Formal Analysis, A.K.K.; Investigation, A.K.K.; Resources, A.B., Y.K. and J.C.; Data Curation, A.K.K.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, A.K.K.; Writing—Review and Editing, A.K.K., J.C., A.B. and Y.K.; Visualization, A.K.K.; Supervision, J.C., A.B. and Y.K.; Project Administration, A.B.; Funding Acquisition, A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Institut Français du Caoutchouc” (IFC), SIPH and MICHELIN (PFI 7250A1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Due to privacy reasons, the data presented in this study are not publicly available. These data can be available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the financial companies SIPH and MICHELIN for supporting this project through the “FERTIM” program. We thank SAPH, who provided logistical and technical support, in addition to funding. This study was also supported by the “Institut Français du Caoutchouc” (IFC). Additional funding was provided by the IRD PhD Grant Program (ARTS, 2019).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Newbold, T.; Hudson, L.N.; Hill, S.L.L.; Contu, S.; Lysenko, I.; Senior, R.A.; Börger, L.; Bennett, D.J.; Choimes, A.; Collen, B.; et al. Global Effects of Land Use on Local Terrestrial Biodiversity. Nature 2015, 520, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tolimir, M.; Kresović, B.; Životić, L.; Dragović, S.; Dragović, R.; Sredojević, Z.; Gajić, B. The Conversion of Forestland into Agricultural Land without Appropriate Measures to Conserve SOM Leads to the Degradation of Physical and Rheological Soil Properties. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yao, M.K.; Angui, P.K.T.; Konaté, S.; Tondoh, J.E.; Tano, Y.; Abbadie, L.; Benest, D. Effects of Land Use Types on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Mid-West Côte d’Ivoire. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 2010, 40, 211–222. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kouadio, K.; Doumbia, M.; Jan, K.; Dagnogo, M.; Aidara, D. Soil/Litter Beetle Abundance and Diversity along a Land Use Gradient in Tropical Africa (Oumé, Ivory Coast). Sci. Nat. 2009, 6, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yeo, K.; Konaté, S.; Tiho, S.S.; Camara, S.K. Impacts of Land Use Types on Ant Communities in a Tropical Forest Margin (Oumé–Côte d’Ivoire). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 260–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gilot, C.; Lavelle, P.; Blanchart, E.; Keli, J.; Kouassi, P.; Guillaume, G. Biological Activity of Soil under Rubber Plantations in Côte d’Ivoire. Acta Zool. Fenn. 1995, 196, 186–189. [Google Scholar]
  7. N’Dri, J.K.; N’Guessan, K.K. Modification of Topsoil Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Macroinvertebrates Structure Consecutive to the Conversion of Secondary Forests into Rubber Plantations in Grand-Lahou, Côte d’Ivoire. J. Adv. Agric. 2018, 8, 1235–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tondoh, J.E.; Dimobe, K.; Guéi, A.M.; Adahe, L.; Baidai, Y.; N’Dri, J.K.; Forkuor, G. Soil Health Changes Over a 25-Year Chronosequence from Forest to Plantations in Rubber Tree (Hevea Brasiliensis) Landscapes in Southern Côte d’Ivoire: Do Earthworms Play a Role? Front. Environ. Sci. 2019, 7, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oku, E.; Iwara, A.; Ekukinam, E. Effects of Age of Rubber (Hevea Brasiliensis Muell Arg.) Plantations on PH, Organic Carbon, Organic Matter, Nitrogen and Micronutrient Status of Ultisols in the Humid Forest Zone of Nigeria. Kasetsart J. 2012, 46, 684–693. [Google Scholar]
  10. Panklang, P.; Thoumazeau, A.; Chiarawipa, R.; Sdoodee, S.; Sebag, D.; Gay, F.; Thaler, P.; Brauman, A. Rubber, Rubber and Rubber: How 75 Years of Successive Rubber Plantation Rotations Affect Topsoil Quality? Land Degrad. Dev. 2022, 33, 1159–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Panklang, P.; Thaler, P.; Thoumazeau, A.; Chiarawipa, R.; Sdoodee, S.; Brauman, A. How 75 Years of Rubber Monocropping Affects Soil Fauna and Nematodes as the Bioindicators for Soil Biodiversity Quality Index. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2022, 72, 612–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Perron, T.; Kouakou, A.; Simon, C.; Mareschal, L.; Frédéric, G.; Soumahoro, M.; Kouassi, D.; Rakotondrazafy, N.; Rapidel, B.; Laclau, J.-P.; et al. Logging Residues Promote Rapid Restoration of Soil Health after Clear-Cutting of Rubber Plantations at Two Sites with Contrasting Soils in Africa. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 816, 151526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Barnes, A.D.; Allen, K.; Kreft, H.; Corre, M.D.; Jochum, M.; Veldkamp, E.; Clough, Y.; Daniel, R.; Darras, K.; Denmead, L.H.; et al. Direct and Cascading Impacts of Tropical Land-Use Change on Multi-Trophic Biodiversity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 1511–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Carron, M.P.; Pierrat, M.; Snoeck, D.; Villenave, C.; Ribeyre, F.; Suhardi; Marichal, R.; Caliman, J.P. Temporal Variability in Soil Quality after Organic Residue Application in Mature Oil Palm Plantations. Soil Res. 2015, 53, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. George, P.B.L.; Keith, A.M.; Creer, S.; Barrett, G.L.; Lebron, I.; Emmett, B.A.; Robinson, D.A.; Jones, D.L. Evaluation of Mesofauna Communities as Soil Quality Indicators in a National-Level Monitoring Programme. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaneda, S.; Kaneko, N. Influence of Collembola on Nitrogen Mineralization Varies with Soil Moisture Content. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2011, 57, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Filser, J. The Role of Collembola in Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in Soil: Proceedings of the Xth International Colloquium on Apterygota, České Budějovice 2000: Apterygota at the Beginning of the Third Millennium. Pedobiologia 2002, 46, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cortet, J.; Joffre, R.; Elmholt, S.; Krogh, P.H. Increasing Species and Trophic Diversity of Mesofauna Affects Fungal Biomass, Mesofauna Community Structure and Organic Matter Decomposition Processes. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2003, 37, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Joimel, S.; Schwartz, C.; Hedde, M.; Kiyota, S.; Krogh, P.H.; Nahmani, J.; Pérès, G.; Vergnes, A.; Cortet, J. Urban and Industrial Land Uses Have a Higher Soil Biological Quality than Expected from Physicochemical Quality. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 584–585, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Joimel, S.; Schwartz, C.; Bonfanti, J.; Hedde, M.; Krogh, P.H.; Pérès, G.; Pernin, C.; Rakoto, A.; Salmon, S.; Santorufo, L.; et al. Functional and Taxonomic Diversity of Collembola as Complementary Tools to Assess Land Use Effects on Soils Biodiversity. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 9, 630919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. de Filho, L.C.I.O.; Filho, O.K.; Baretta, D.; Tanaka, C.A.S.; Sousa, J.P. Collembola Community Structure as a Tool to Assess Land Use Effects on Soil Quality. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo 2016, 40, e0150432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chang, L.; Wu, H.; Wu, D.; Sun, X. Effect of Tillage and Farming Management on Collembola in Marsh Soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2013, 64, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Coulibaly, S.F.M.; Coudrain, V.; Hedde, M.; Brunet, N.; Mary, B.; Recous, S.; Chauvat, M. Effect of Different Crop Management Practices on Soil Collembola Assemblages: A 4-Year Follow-Up. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 119, 354–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. de Oliveira Filho, L.C.I.; Zeppelini, D.; Sousa, J.P.; Baretta, D.; Klauberg-Filho, O. Collembola Community Structure under Different Land Management in Subtropical Brazil. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2020, 177, 294–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kontschán, J. A Second Species of the Family Eutrachytidae (Acari: Uropodina) in Africa: Mahnertellina Paradoxa Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. from the Ivory Coast. Rev. Suisse Zool. 2020, 127, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. UNEP-WCMC. The State of Biodiversity in Africa: A Mid-Term Review of Progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets; United Nations Environment Programme; UNEP-WCMC: Cambridge, UK, 2016; ISBN 978-92-807-3508-6. [Google Scholar]
  27. Korb, J.; Kasseney, B.D.; Cakpo, Y.T.; Casalla Daza, R.H.; Gbenyedji, J.N.K.B.; Ilboudo, M.E.; Josens, G.; Koné, N.A.; Meusemann, K.; Ndiaye, A.B.; et al. Termite Taxonomy, Challenges and Prospects: West Africa, A Case Example. Insects 2019, 10, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Constantinescu, I.C.; Adam, C.; Yao, P.K.; Hilare, Y.-B.; Chișamera, G.B.; D’Amico, G.; Gherman, C.M.; Mihalca, A.D.; Sándor, A.D. Descriptions of Two New Species of Feather Mites (Acarina: Psoroptidia: Pteronyssidae) from Ivory Coast. Syst. Parasitol. 2018, 95, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gómez, K.; Kouakou, L.M.; Fischer, G.; Hita-Garcia, F.; Katzke, J.; Economo, E.P. Pheidole klaman Sp. Nov.: A New Addition from Ivory Coast to the Afrotropical Pulchella Species Group (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae). ZooKeys 2022, 1104, 129–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kontschán, J.; Ermilov, S.G. The Second Species of the Genus Ivoria Kontschán, 2019: Description of Ivoriaalourouai Sp. Nov. from Ivory Coast (Acari, Mesostigmata, Urodinychidae). Zookeys 2022, 1082, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kontschán, J. Ivoria taiensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Remarkable New Mite Genus from West Africa (Acari: Mesostigmata: Urodinychidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2019, 24, 1063–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zon, D.S.; Thibaud, J.-M.; Yao, T. Stages of the Knowledge of the Collembolans of Ivory Coast (Western Africa) (Collembola). Russ. Entomol. J. 2013, 22, 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zon, S.D.; Bedos, A.; D’Haese, C.A. Phylogeny of the Genus Willemia (Collembola: Hypogastruridae) and Biogeography of the W. Buddenbrocki-Group with Description of a New Species from Ivory Coast (Western Africa). Zootaxa 2015, 3980, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Violle, C.; Navas, M.-L.; Vile, D.; Kazakou, E.; Fortunel, C.; Hummel, I.; Garnier, E. Let the Concept of Trait Be Functional! Oikos 2007, 116, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pey, B.; Nahmani, J.; Auclerc, A.; Capowiez, Y.; Cluzeau, D.; Cortet, J.; Decaëns, T.; Deharveng, L.; Dubs, F.; Joimel, S.; et al. Current Use of and Future Needs for Soil Invertebrate Functional Traits in Community Ecology. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2014, 15, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Moretti, M.; Dias, A.T.C.; de Bello, F.; Altermatt, F.; Chown, S.L.; Azcárate, F.M.; Bell, J.R.; Fournier, B.; Hedde, M.; Hortal, J.; et al. Handbook of Protocols for Standardized Measurement of Terrestrial Invertebrate Functional Traits. Funct. Ecol. 2017, 31, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reis, F.; Carvalho, F.; Martins da Silva, P.; Mendes, S.; Santos, S.A.P.; Sousa, J.P. The Use of a Functional Approach as Surrogate of Collembola Species Richness in European Perennial Crops and Forests. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 61, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sanabria, C.; Barot, S.; Fonte, S.J.; Dubs, F. Do Morphological Traits of Ground-Dwelling Ants Respond to Land Use Changes in a Neotropical Landscape? Geoderma 2022, 418, 115841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Querner, P.; Bruckner, A. Combining Pitfall Traps and Soil Samples to Collect Collembola for Site Scale Biodiversity Assessments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2010, 45, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Driessen, M.M.; Greenslade, P. Effect of Season, Location and Fire on Collembola Communities in Buttongrass Moorlands, Tasmania. Pedobiologia 2004, 48, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Potapov, A.A.; Semenina, E.E.; Korotkevich, A.Y.; Kuznetsova, N.A.; Tiunov, A.V. Connecting Taxonomy and Ecology: Trophic Niches of Collembolans as Related to Taxonomic Identity and Life Forms. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 101, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Widenfalk, L.A.; Bengtsson, J.; Berggren, Å.; Zwiggelaar, K.; Spijkman, E.; Huyer-Brugman, F.; Berg, M.P. Spatially Structured Environmental Filtering of Collembolan Traits in Late Successional Salt Marsh Vegetation. Oecologia 2015, 179, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Salmon, S.; Ponge, J.F. Species Traits and Habitats in Springtail Communities: A Regional Scale Study. Pedobiologia 2012, 55, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Villéger, S.; Mason, N.W.H.; Mouillot, D. New Multidimensional Functional Diversity Indices for a Multifaceted Framework in Functional Ecology. Ecology 2008, 89, 2290–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. De Mendiburu, F. Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2021. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  46. Laliberté, E.; Legendre, P. A Distance-Based Framework for Measuring Functional Diversity from Multiple Traits. Ecology 2010, 91, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Legendre, P.; Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; ISBN 978-0-444-53869-7. [Google Scholar]
  48. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.G.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; O’hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.H.H.; Szoecs, E.; Wagner, H. Community Ecology Package; Version 2.5–4, R Package; Vegan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  49. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio; PBC: Boston, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  50. Chauvat, M.; Wolters, V.; Dauber, J. Response of Collembolan Communities to Land-Use Change and Grassland Succession. Ecography 2007, 30, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Potapov, A.M.; Goncharov, A.A.; Semenina, E.E.; Korotkevich, A.Y.; Tsurikov, S.M.; Rozanova, O.L.; Anichkin, A.E.; Zuev, A.G.; Samoylova, E.S.; Semenyuk, I.I.; et al. Arthropods in the Subsoil: Abundance and Vertical Distribution as Related to Soil Organic Matter, Microbial Biomass and Plant Roots. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2017, 82, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Harta, I.; Simon, B.; Vinogradov, S.; Winkler, D. Collembola Communities and Soil Conditions in Forest Plantations Established in an Intensively Managed Agricultural Area. J. For. Res. 2021, 32, 1819–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Trentini, C.P.; Villagra, M.; Gómez Pámies, D.; Bernava Laborde, V.; Bedano, J.C.; Campanello, P.I. Effect of Nitrogen Addition and Litter Removal on Understory Vegetation, Soil Mesofauna, and Litter Decomposition in Loblolly Pine Plantations in Subtropical Argentina. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 429, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Trentini, C.P.; Campanello, P.I.; Villagra, M.; Ritter, L.; Ares, A.; Goldstein, G. Thinning of Loblolly Pine Plantations in Subtropical Argentina: Impact on Microclimate and Understory Vegetation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2017, 384, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yu, D.; Yao, J.; Chen, X.; Sun, J.; Wei, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Hu, F.; Liu, M. Ecological Intensification Alters the Trait-Based Responses of Soil Microarthropods to Extreme Precipitation in Agroecosystem. Geoderma 2022, 422, 115956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tao, H.-H.; Snaddon, J.L.; Slade, E.M.; Henneron, L.; Caliman, J.-P.; Willis, K.J. Application of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Effects on Soil Biota and Functions: A Case Study in Sumatra, Indonesia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 256, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jureková, N.; Raschmanová, N.; Miklisová, D.; Kováč, Ľ. A Comparison of Collecting Methods in Relation to the Diversity of Collembola in Scree Habitats. Subterr. Biol. 2021, 40, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Woodward, G.; Hildrew, A.G. Body-Size Determinants of Niche Overlap and Intraguild Predation within a Complex Food Web. J. Anim. Ecol. 2002, 71, 1063–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mason, N.W.H.; Mouillot, D.; Lee, W.G.; Wilson, J.B. Functional Richness, Functional Evenness and Functional Divergence: The Primary Components of Functional Diversity. Oikos 2005, 111, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Susanti, W.I.; Widyastuti, R.; Scheu, S.; Potapov, A. Trophic Niche Differentiation and Utilisation of Food Resources in Collembola Is Altered by Rainforest Conversion to Plantation Systems. PeerJ 2021, 9, e10971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Susanti, W.I.; Bartels, T.; Krashevska, V.; Widyastuti, R.; Deharveng, L.; Scheu, S.; Potapov, A. Conversion of Rainforest into Oil Palm and Rubber Plantations Affects the Functional Composition of Litter and Soil Collembola. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 10686–10708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bellino, A.; Baldantoni, D.; Milano, V.; Santorufo, L.; Cortet, J.; Maisto, G. Spatial Patterns and Scales of Collembola Taxonomic and Functional Diversity in Urban Parks. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fujii, S.; Berg, M.P.; Cornelissen, J.H.C. Living Litter: Dynamic Trait Spectra Predict Fauna Composition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2020, 35, 886–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sayer, E.J.; Tanner, E.V.J.; Lacey, A.L. Effects of Litter Manipulation on Early-Stage Decomposition and Meso-Arthropod Abundance in a Tropical Moist Forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 229, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Babur, E.; Dindaroğlu, T.; Roy, R.; Seleiman, M.F.; Ozlu, E.; Battaglia, M.L.; Uslu, Ö.S. Chapter 9—Relationship between Organic Matter and Microbial Biomass in Different Vegetation Types. In Microbial Syntrophy-Mediated Eco-enterprising; Developments in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology; Pratap Singh, R., Manchanda, G., Bhattacharjee, K., Panosyan, H., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 225–245. ISBN 978-0-323-99900-7. [Google Scholar]
  66. Coulibaly, S.F.M.; Winck, B.R.; Akpa-Vinceslas, M.; Mignot, L.; Legras, M.; Forey, E.; Chauvat, M. Functional Assemblages of Collembola Determine Soil Microbial Communities and Associated Functions. Front. Environ. Sci. 2019, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Insects 13 00892 g001 550
Figure 1. Sampling design in each plot.
Figure 1. Sampling design in each plot.
Insects 13 00892 g001
Insects 13 00892 g002 550
Figure 2. Variation in total abundance of springtails between practices. Vertical lines represent standard errors for each practice (n = 18). Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey test. R0L0—no residue or legume in the plot, R0L1—Legume (Pueraria phaseoloides) only, R1L1—Legume + stump + leaf + fine branches, R2L1–R1L1+ trunk.
Figure 2. Variation in total abundance of springtails between practices. Vertical lines represent standard errors for each practice (n = 18). Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey test. R0L0—no residue or legume in the plot, R0L1—Legume (Pueraria phaseoloides) only, R1L1—Legume + stump + leaf + fine branches, R2L1–R1L1+ trunk.
Insects 13 00892 g002
Insects 13 00892 g003 550
Figure 3. Average functional traits measured on the springtails according to the organic matter gradient. (A) Body length; (B) antenna length; (C) furca length. Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey test. The vertical lines represent the standard error for each practice. R0L0—no residue or legume in the plot, R0L1—Legume (Pueraria phaseoloides) only, R1L1—Legume + stump + leaf + fine branches, R2L1–R1L1 + trunk.
Figure 3. Average functional traits measured on the springtails according to the organic matter gradient. (A) Body length; (B) antenna length; (C) furca length. Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey test. The vertical lines represent the standard error for each practice. R0L0—no residue or legume in the plot, R0L1—Legume (Pueraria phaseoloides) only, R1L1—Legume + stump + leaf + fine branches, R2L1–R1L1 + trunk.
Insects 13 00892 g003
Insects 13 00892 g004 550
Figure 4. Average values of functional diversity indices of springtails according to practices. (A) FRic = functional richness; (B) FDiv = functional divergence; (C) FEve = functional evenness; (D) FDis = functional dispersion. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between practices according to the Tukey test. The vertical lines represent the standard deviation for each practice (n = 3). R0L0—no residue or legume in the plot, R0L1—Legume (Pueraria phaseoloides) only, R1L1—Legume + stump + leaf + fine branches, R2L1—R1L1+ trunk.
Figure 4. Average values of functional diversity indices of springtails according to practices. (A) FRic = functional richness; (B) FDiv = functional divergence; (C) FEve = functional evenness; (D) FDis = functional dispersion. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between practices according to the Tukey test. The vertical lines represent the standard deviation for each practice (n = 3). R0L0—no residue or legume in the plot, R0L1—Legume (Pueraria phaseoloides) only, R1L1—Legume + stump + leaf + fine branches, R2L1—R1L1+ trunk.
Insects 13 00892 g004
Insects 13 00892 g005 550
Figure 5. Principal coordinate analysis showing the patterns of functional composition of springtails communities in the different practices. This analysis is based on a Euclidean distance matrix. Points represent the centroid of replicates samples (n = 3). R0L0–no residue or legume in the plot, R0L1—Legume (Pueraria phaseoloides) only, R1L1—Legume + stump + leaf + fine branches, R2L1—R1L1+ trunk.
Figure 5. Principal coordinate analysis showing the patterns of functional composition of springtails communities in the different practices. This analysis is based on a Euclidean distance matrix. Points represent the centroid of replicates samples (n = 3). R0L0–no residue or legume in the plot, R0L1—Legume (Pueraria phaseoloides) only, R1L1—Legume + stump + leaf + fine branches, R2L1—R1L1+ trunk.
Insects 13 00892 g005
Table
Table 1. Description and attributes of morphological traits, considered for the trait-based approach of springtails communities.
Table 1. Description and attributes of morphological traits, considered for the trait-based approach of springtails communities.
TraitAttribute
Body lengthµm
Body modification Body not modified
Abdomen IV elongated
Spherical body
Furca lengthµm
DensShort
Whip-shaped
Long cylindric
MucroVery small straight
Blade-like straight
Bidentate
Tridentate
Antenna lengthµm
Ocelli4 or 5 pairs of ocelli
6, 7 or 8 pairs of ocelli
Post Antennal OrganAbsent
Present
PigmentationAbsent
Diffuse
Intense
Pattern
ScalesAbsent
Present
Empodial appendageAbsent
Present
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kouakou, A.K.; Cortet, J.; Kolo, Y.; Brauman, A. Using Trait-Based Approaches to Assess the Response of Epedaphic Collembola to Organic Matter Management Practices: A Case Study in a Rubber Plantation in South-Eastern Côte d’Ivoire. Insects 2022, 13, 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100892

AMA Style

Kouakou AK, Cortet J, Kolo Y, Brauman A. Using Trait-Based Approaches to Assess the Response of Epedaphic Collembola to Organic Matter Management Practices: A Case Study in a Rubber Plantation in South-Eastern Côte d’Ivoire. Insects. 2022; 13(10):892. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100892

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kouakou, Aymard Kouakou, Jérôme Cortet, Yeo Kolo, and Alain Brauman. 2022. "Using Trait-Based Approaches to Assess the Response of Epedaphic Collembola to Organic Matter Management Practices: A Case Study in a Rubber Plantation in South-Eastern Côte d’Ivoire" Insects 13, no. 10: 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100892

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop