Next Article in Journal
Molecular Phylogeny and Taxonomy of the Butterfly Subtribe Scolitantidina with Special Focus on the Genera Pseudophilotes, Glaucopsyche and Iolana (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae)
Next Article in Special Issue
Fitness Cost of the Field-Evolved Resistance to Sulfoxaflor and Multi-Insecticide Resistance of the Wheat Aphid Sitobion miscanthi (Takahashi)
Previous Article in Journal
Germ Cell Isolation and Cryopreservation from Reproductive Organs of Brown Mealworm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection of Chitin Synthase Mutations in Lufenuron-Resistant Spodoptera frugiperda in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cuticle Modifications and Over-Expression of the Chitin-Synthase Gene in Diflubenzuron-Resistant Phenotype

1
Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Earth Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
3
Department of Biochemical Sciences “A. Rossi Fanelli”, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
4
Department of Crop Science, Pesticide Science Lab, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece
5
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, P.O. Box 1385, GR-711 10 Heraklion, Greece
6
Medical and Veterinary Entomology, Centro Agricoltura Ambiente “G. Nicoli”, 40014 Bologna, Italy
7
Department of Biosciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
8
Pediatric CRC “Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi”, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2022, 13(12), 1109; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121109
Submission received: 24 October 2022 / Revised: 21 November 2022 / Accepted: 28 November 2022 / Published: 30 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Evolution of Pesticide Resistance)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Insect pests are a major problem worldwide and their control represents an urgency for human well-being. Insecticides acting as chitin-synthesis inhibitors (CSIs) are one of the major tools used to control these insects, but resistance is evolving in many species against several chemical classes, such as oxazolines and benzoylureas. Genetic studies showed that resistance is associated with point mutations in position 1043 of the chitin-synthase 1 gene (chs1), which change an isoleucine into phenylalanine, leucine or methionine (i.e., I1043F; I1043L; I1043M, respectively). Here, we studied the molecular and phenotypic characteristics of the homozygous I1043M strain in the mosquito Culex pipiens by comparing susceptible and resistant individuals. Our results showed that resistant mosquitoes have a striking level of resistance when exposed to the CSI diflubenzuron. Furthermore, cuticle modifications and the over-expression of the chs1 gene were detected in resistant Cx. pipiens, which are associated and, thus, likely contribute to resistance, as well as to the intensity of the resistant phenotype. Since mutations on the chs1 gene are conserved among different arthropod pest species, our results could be valuable to understand CSI resistance not only in mosquitoes, but also in a wider perspective.

Abstract

Insecticide resistance is a major threat challenging the control of harmful insect species. The study of resistant phenotypes is, therefore, pivotal to understand molecular mechanisms underpinning insecticide resistance and plan effective control and resistance management strategies. Here, we further analysed the diflubenzuron (DFB)-resistant phenotype due to the point-mutation I1043M in the chitin-synthase 1 gene (chs1) in the mosquito Culex pipiens. By comparing susceptible and resistant strains of Cx. pipiens through DFB bioassays, molecular analyses and scanning electron microscopy, we showed that the I1043M-resistant mosquitoes have: (i) a striking level of DFB resistance (i.e., resistance ratio: 9006); (ii) a constitutive 11-fold over-expression of the chs1 gene; (iii) enhanced cuticle thickness and cuticular chitin content. Culex pipiens is one of the most important vector species in Europe and the rapid spread of DFB resistance can threaten its control. Our results, by adding new data about the DFB-resistant phenotype, provide important information for the control and management of insecticide resistance.

1. Introduction

Harmful insect species represent a long-standing problem affecting human activities. In agriculture, pests have often been documented to reduce crop production, by destroying plant biomass and accelerating the decay process [1]. Likewise, in terms of human health, insect vectors have a profound effect, by spreading and transmitting pathogens that cause human and animal diseases [2].
Until the end of the last century, chemical insecticides have been the most efficient method to control pest species and mitigate their effects worldwide. However, the development of insecticide resistance has strongly hampered their efficacy and the adoption of biorational approaches is increasing. The intensive use of insecticides, indeed, has selected alleles conferring resistance in wild populations, overwhelming the effect of a wide range of compounds in several target species [3]. As reported in previous studies, since the 1950s, the number of insecticides for which one or more species evolved resistance has progressively increased and, recently, it exceeded 300 compounds [4].
Chitin synthesis inhibitors (CSIs) have been among the most important compounds employed in recent pest-management programs. These molecules are released by spraying or as larvicides in species breeding sites and act against insects and mites by inducing malformations of the cuticle and abortive molting [5,6]. Recently, the development of insecticide resistance against CSIs has been documented in several harmful pest species, such as Tetranychous urticae, Plutella xylostella and Cydia pomonella [7,8,9]. Further genetic studies showed that resistance to CSIs was associated with non-synonymous mutations in the chitin-synthase 1 gene (chs1) [10,11], a pivotal β-glycosyltransferase acting during cuticle formation [5,6]. In 2015, the same mutations in the chs1 gene were described for the first time in mosquitoes, in the species Culex pipiens [12].
Cx. pipiens is a widespread species in European regions, where it is the major vector of West Nile virus (WNV) [13,14]. Recently, the occurrence of populations resistant to the CSI diflubenzuron (DFB) was detected in Italian populations [12]. Additional genetic studies showed that resistant individuals harboured point mutations at position I1043 of the chs1 gene, an equivalent position to the oxazolines and benzoylureas (BPUs, including DFB) resistance mutations detected in T. urticae and P. xylostella [12]. In susceptible Cx. pipiens, nucleotide sequences code for isoleucine amino acid at the I1043 position, while resistant mosquitoes harbour mutated sequences coding for leucine, methionine or phenylalanine (hereafter I1043L, I1043M and I1043F, respectively) [12,15]. Since its first detection in the Emilia-Romagna region, some aspects about DFB resistance have been elucidated. Genome-editing studies have functionally validated the three resistant mutations in laboratory strains of Drosophila melanogaster using CRISPR/Cas9 technology and showed that they confer different levels of resistance (i.e., resistance ratio (RR) > 15,000 for I1043M and I1043F; RR >20 for I1043L) [11,12]. Furthermore, monitoring surveys showed that resistant mutations occur also beyond the Italian boundaries, in Turkish and French populations [15,16]. More recently, phylogenetic analyses also showed that the I1043F, I1043M and I1043L mutations originated multiple times and independently in the areas where they occur [17]. To date, although important genetic and functional information has been collected about DFB resistance, few studies have directly explored the phenotypic effects of DFB resistance in Cx. pipiens strains [12].
In this paper, we aimed to contribute to this issue by investigating the molecular and phenotypic characteristics of a resistant strain of Cx. pipiens, homozygous for the I1043M mutation. The I1043M mutation is particularly interesting among the three resistant alleles because it has a wide geographic distribution and confers high levels of resistance in other species [11]. Therefore, starting from field samples, we established susceptible and resistant laboratory colonies of Cx. pipiens and compared them to assess: (i) the resistance level of the mutated I1043M strain; (ii) the relative gene expression of the chitin-synthase 1 gene, the target of diflubenzuron; (iii) the occurrence of modifications in cuticle thickness and chitin content.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Establishment and Maintenance of Resistant and Susceptible Mosquito Colonies

Susceptible and resistant colonies of Cx. pipiens (hereafter, Cp-S and Cp-R-I1043M) were established starting from wild samples collected in the Emilia-Romagna region during summer 2020. Based on previous results about the frequency of resistant and wild-type alleles in Cx. pipiens populations [15,18], immature mosquitoes were collected in the urban areas of Forlì and Parma to establish the resistant and susceptible colonies, respectively. In each town, at least five breeding sites were sampled to have a representative sample of the population. Once collected, mosquito larvae were transferred in the Evolutionary Ecology laboratory (Sapienza University, Rome, Italy) and morphologically and genetically identified as Cx. pipiens [19] For genetic identification, a fragment of the mitochondrial gene Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI) was amplified and sequenced by using previously designed primers (CxCOI_F 5′-AAAAAGATGTATTTAAATTTCGGTCTG-3′; CxCOI_R-5′-TGTAATTGTTACTGCTCATGCTTTT-3′).
To realize the resistant homozygous I1043M colony, collected mosquitoes were exposed to DFB, using an LD50 dose previously estimated in field populations of Cx. pipiens from Ravenna (i.e., 0.06 mg/L, [12]). After DFB exposure, survivors were reared until adulthood and left to mate. Since in previous years the I1043L- and I1043F-resistant alleles were also found in resistant populations, including Forlì [15,18], a genetic identification of individuals was also performed to maintain only the I1043M allele. Specifically, after female oviposition, single egg rafts were allowed to hatch and the offspring was genetically analysed using a PCR-based assay on the chs1 gene, specific for the I1043M mutation [12]. Only homozygous depositions for the I1043M allele were retained for the colony establishment, while the others were discarded. For the susceptible colony, since resistant alleles have never been found in Parma [15,18], all collected mosquitoes identified as Cx. pipiens by morphology were used to establish the colony. The susceptible genotype of the individuals was, however, verified by sequencing a fragment of the chs1 gene spanning the codon where resistant mutations occur [12].
Both Cp-S and Cp-R-I1043M colonies were reared in a thermostatic chamber with standard conditions of temperature (26 ± 1 °C), relative humidity (70%) and photoperiod (16:8 h light: dark). Larval stages were daily fed with fish food (0.85 mg/larva) (Tetra® Goldfish Granules). Adults were maintained in 45 × 45 × 45 cm Bugdorm© insect-rearing cages (Watkins & Doncaster, Leominster, UK) and daily fed with 10% sucrose solution and water ad libitum. To maintain the colonies, blood meal was provided to females by using the Hemotek membrane-feeding system (Hemotek Ltd.©, Blackburn, UK). Mosquitoes from 6th generation of both colonies were used for the current study. A PCR-based approach designed in Cx. pipiens and specific for the I1043M allele was used to check that the I1043M allele frequency at this generation was 100% [12].

2.2. DFB Bioassays

Bioassays with diflubenzuron (DFB) were performed according to the WHO international guidelines (WHO, 2016). DFB (PESTANAL, C14H9ClF2N2O2, Sigma-Aldrich S.r.l., Milan, Italy) was diluted in acetone (ACS reagent, 99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) to prepare the 6 mg/mL stock solution. Then, the stock solution was diluted with water to make the test solutions. A range of five concentrations was selected and used to determine LD50 (the dose at which 50% of insects are dead). In particular, for the Cp-S strain the DFB concentrations tested were: 0.0005 mg/L, 0.002 mg/L, 0.01 mg/L, 0.1 mg/L and 0.3 mg/L, while for the Cp-R-I1043M, the concentrations 7.5 mg/L, 25 mg/L, 50 mg/L, 75 mg/L and 100 mg/L were used. Groups of twenty-five late 3rd-instar larvae of Cx. pipiens were placed in plastic cups with 100 mL of water and treated with DFB. Control tests treated with water and acetone were also included. All the experiments were performed in quadruplicate and three biological replicates were performed. Since CSIs, such as DFB, have a delayed action on treated individuals [6], the mortality rate was assessed every two or three days until all individuals were dead or emerged as adults. At the end of the experiments, the software Polo Plus [20] was used to estimate LDs and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs); then the LD50 values of susceptible and resistant strains were used to calculate the resistance ratio (RR = LD50 resistant strain/LD50 susceptible strain).

2.3. Expression Analysis of chs1 Gene

Gene expression analysis was performed to investigate and compare the constitutive expression of chs1 gene in resistant and susceptible Cx. pipiens mosquitoes. Total RNA was extracted from three pools of ten resistant and susceptible 4th-instar larvae using the TripleXtractor directRNA kit (GRiSP Research Solutions, Porto, Portugal), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Once extracted, the amount and the quality of RNA were assessed using Qubit™ 3 Fluorometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). cDNA was then synthesized from 200 ng of total RNA using the FIREScript Reverse Transcriptase (RT) kit (Solis Biodyne, Tartu, Estonia).
The cDNA was used as template for quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-qPCR. The RT-qPCR was performed using a QuantStudioTM 5 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystem, ThermoFisher Scientific) with the ExcelTaq™ 2X Fast Q-PCR Master Mix (SMOBIO Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan), under the following conditions: 50 ng of cDNA; 300 nM of forward and reverse primers; 98 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 98 °C for 15 s and 59 °C for 30 s; fluorescence was acquired at the end of each cycle and melting curve analysis was performed after the last cycle. Primers are reported in Table 1. Relative expression of the chs1 gene was calculated using the cycle threshold (Ct) value and the two endogenous genes (i.e., G6PDH and 18S ribosome RNA). The expression levels of the susceptible mosquitoes were considered as the basal level (set equal to 1). The relative expression of resistant and susceptible individuals was reported as means ± standard deviation (SD) and compared using Student’s t-test (p-value < 0.05), as implemented in the software GraphPad Prism v.8.0.1 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

2.4. Cuticle Analysis

2.4.1. Analysis of Cuticle Thickness by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Cuticle observations of Cx. pipiens mosquitoes were performed through Scanning Electron Microscope (FEI Quanta 400, Diepoldsau, Switzerland) at the SEM Laboratory of the Department of Earth Science, Sapienza University of Rome (Rome, Italy). A total of 20 resistant and susceptible individuals from different developmental stages (5 4th-instar larvae; 5 pupae; 5 adult females; 5 adult males) was collected and frozen at −20 °C for subsequent analyses. Before SEM observation, total body length for larvae, cephalothorax width for the pupae and wing length for adults were measured and used as proxies for body size [23,24,25]. Then, individuals with similar size (i.e., differences in body length, cephalothorax width and wing length < 0.01 mm for larvae, pupae and adults, respectively) were chosen and used for subsequent SEM analysis.
According to Bhattacharya et al. [26], the samples were placed in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube (Eppendorf®, Milano, Italy) and first immersed in a fixative solution containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M of phosphate buffer. After one hour, the samples were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol (30%, 50%, 70%, 80% and 90% 10 min each, and 95% for 40 min) and then maintained for 10 min in a mixture of 95% ethanol and isoamyl acetate (1:1) and for 15 min in pure isoamyl acetate. For chemical drying, the samples were immersed in hexamethyldisilane (HMDS) for 5 min. Finally, the samples were dried in a heater at 40 °C for 30 min. Transverse sections of the first abdominal segment were made with a scalpel under a stereomicroscope (Leica EZ4W, Milano, Italy) and attached to 12.5 mm SEM stubs using carbon tabs. The samples were then coated in gold using an Emitech K550X (Labtech, Heathfield, UK) sputter coater, with a routine cycle time for coating SEM samples with conductive coating (5–15 nm) of gold typically less than four minutes. The sections were examined in high-vacuum mode, using an accelerating voltage of 15 kV and pictures of the cuticle were taken at a resolution of 10 µm. Thicknesses of 30 points of the cuticle were measured in the SEM images for each individual using the software ImageJ, (National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, USA) in order to obtain the mean cuticular thickness (Figure S1). The comparison between the cuticular thickness in resistant and susceptible individuals was performed with Mann–Whitney’s test using the software GraphPad Prism v.8.0.1.

2.4.2. Quantification of Chitin Content

Pools of 4th-instar larvae of the Cp-S and Cp-R-I1043M strains were analysed to identify differences in chitin content. For both strains, larvae with similar size (i.e., differences in body length below 0.01 mm) were used to form the pools. To quantify the chitin content in both strains, an adaptation of the calcofluor staining method reported in Henriques et al. [27] was used. First, a 12.5 μg/μL colloidal chitin suspension was prepared starting from commercial chitin from shrimp shells (C7170, Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy) following a previously described methodology [28]. This suspension was used to build a standard curve relating the amount of chitin to the fluorescence intensity of the calcofluor white fluorescent brightener (Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy) bound to chitin (Figure S2). To this end, 0 to 6 μL of the colloidal chitin suspension was placed in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes to which 100 μL of a 1 mg/mL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) dilution of the calcofluor was added. The samples were kept in the dark for 15 min to allow for binding between the dye and the chitin. After this, samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 12,000 rpm to remove the excess of dye, and then two washes were carried out with 300 μL of distilled water, taking care not to disturb the pellet on the bottom of the tubes. After washing, the pellets were resuspended in 200 μL of water and transferred to a black Costar 96 plate (Merk Life Science S.r.l., Milano, Italy) for fluorescence measurement on a TECAN INFINITE M200 fluorescence plate reader. (TECAN, Männedorf, Switzerland). Excitation was set at 355 nm, emission at 433 nm. Relative Fluorescence Units (RFUs) were recorded in recommended “optimal” mode of the MAGELLAN software (TECAN, Männedorf, Switzerland) attached to the instrument. The assay was linear in a range of 0 to 65 μg of chitin. Linear regression was applied to estimate the unknown amount of chitin in the tested samples by fitting the obtained RFU fluorescence to the standard curve.
Larval specimens of the Cp-S and Cp-R-I1043M strains were then analysed. Three pools of twenty 4th-instar larvae for both phenotypes were collected and kept at −20 °C prior to analyses. Once thawed, 200 μL of distilled water was added to each pool and the sample was extensively manually crushed with a 2 mL volume glass Potter (Vetro Scientifica s.r.l., Rome, Italy). The resulting homogenates were divided into eight tubes, each containing 25 μL of sample. Then 100 μL of the 1 mg/mL solution of calcofluor was added to every test tube and the samples were treated as previously described for the standard curve construction.
To assess the significance of the differences in chitin content between susceptible and resistant individuals, the t-test with Welch correction was used, as implemented in the software GraphPad Prism v.8.0.1.

3. Results

3.1. DFB Bioassay

The mortality data obtained performing bioassays with both susceptible and resistant mosquitoes well fitted the Probit dose–response model (test χ2, p > 0.05). In the Cp-S strain, the Probit analysis revealed an LD50 equal to 0.005 mg/L (95%, 0.002–0.008), while in the Cp-R-1043M strain, an LD50 value of 45.04 mg/L (95%, 13.06–60.66) was found (Table 2; Figure S3). Thus, the Cp-R-1043M strain showed considerable resistance to diflubenzuron, with a resistance ratio (RRLD50) = 9006-fold. A mortality never exceeding 10% was observed in the controls.

3.2. Expression of chs1 Gene in Resistant and Susceptible Cx. pipiens Mosquitoes

The results of gene expression analysis are shown in Figure 1. Significant differences in constitutive expression of the chs1 gene were found between the two strains (t-test, p-value < 0.001). In particular, an 11-fold increase in chs1 transcripts was detected in the Cp-R-1043M samples compared to those of the Cp-S strain, suggesting a constitutive over-expression of this gene in resistant mosquitoes.

3.3. Cuticle Thickness

The SEM analysis of the cuticle thickness showed significant differences between Cp-R-1043M and Cp-S strains (Mann–Whitney Test, p < 0.001). Resistant mosquitoes had a thicker cuticle than susceptible mosquitoes at all life stages analysed (i.e., larvae, pupae and adults) (Table 3, Figure 2). Compared to the Cp-S strain, cuticle thickness in resistant mosquitoes showed an increase, ranging from 14% to 41%, observed in male adults and larvae, respectively. In both strains, among the life stages analysed, the higher value of cuticle thickness was observed in the pupal stage.

3.4. Quantification of Chitin Content

To estimate the amount of chitin content in susceptible and resistant larvae of Cx. pipiens, a fluorimetric approach using the calcofluor assay was used. As shown in Figure 3, a higher value of chitin content was observed in Cp-R-1043M individuals compared to the Cp-S strain. In particular, the mean value of the cuticle content observed in susceptible and resistant pools was 30.89 ± 1.02 µg and 47.77 ± 2.02 µg, respectively (i.e., 1.54 µg/larva and 2.39 µg/larva in Cp-S and Cp-R-1043M strain, respectively).

4. Discussion

DFB is one of the few larvicides still available to control harmful insect species, including Cx. pipiens. The occurrence of alleles conferring resistance to DFB has been recently documented in populations of Cx. pipiens sampled in the Emilia-Romagna region [12,15,18,29]. Field-monitoring studies showed that resistant alleles diffused across the region, becoming frequent in several provinces in Emilia-Romagna (i.e., relative frequency of I1043L, I1043M and I1043F up to 65%, 93% and 10%, respectively) [15,18]. Under these circumstances, studying resistant phenotypes is pivotal to re-organize effective control strategies. Here, by using different approaches, we studied the Cp-R-1043M strain of Cx. pipiens with the final aim to enhance our knowledge about the molecular and phenotypic characteristics associated with DFB resistance.
Larval bioassays were conducted on susceptible and resistant strains of Cx. pipiens to assess the level of DFB resistance. Our results showed that the LD50 estimated for the Cp-S and Cp-R-1043M strains was significantly different (Table 2), with mortality of our susceptible strain similar to that previously reported in other strains (i.e., LD50 of 0.002 mg/L) [12]. Importantly, our results revealed that the Cp-R-1043M strain was strikingly less susceptible than the Cp-S strain (RR = 9006). Previous genome-modification studies in D. melanogaster showed that the insertion of the I1043M mutation in a susceptible genetic background allowed mutated flies to survive to a very high dosage of DFB compared to the susceptible individuals (RR ranging from 2900 to 15,000) [11,12]. The high RR observed in our Cx. pipiens-resistant strain echoes the results obtained in model systems and further supports the strong impact that this resistance may have on the DFB performance in the field. Notably, the I1043M allele is rapidly expanding in the Emilia-Romagna region and mosquitoes with homozygous genotypes for the I1043M allele have been frequently observed in different provinces, also with high relative frequency [15,18]. Furthermore, this mutation has also been found in other regions across Europe, such as Turkey and France [15,16].
The analysis of the cuticle thickness and chitin content further showed unique characteristics of resistant mosquitoes compared to the susceptible strain. A thicker cuticle in resistant mosquitoes was observed by SEM, and this pattern was found consistent across all tested life stages, from larvae to adults. In addition, resistant larvae also showed an increased chitin content compared to susceptible larvae. Changes in cuticle thickness and composition have been reported in several arthropod species resistant to pyrethroids or organochlorine insecticides [30,31,32]. In mosquitoes, for example, an increase in cuticle thickness was observed in a pyrethroid-resistant strain of Anopheles funestus compared to susceptible individuals [30]. Similarly, in Cx. pipiens pallens, a thicker femur cuticle was found in resistant versus susceptible mosquitoes [33]. In all these documented cases, the observed cuticular changes were attributed to the over-expression of different genes encoding for cytochrome-P450s, cuticular proteins, laccases and ABC transporters, promoting an enriched deposition of some structural components within the cuticle, such as epicuticular lipids or cuticular proteins (i.e., leading to the so-called “penetration resistance”) [34].
The case of Cx. pipiens reported herein, to our best knowledge, is the first case documenting the occurrence of cuticle modifications in strains resistant to DFB. This observation, therefore, may act as a trailblazer to investigate if the mechanisms underpinning penetration resistance against pyrethroids, or organochlorines, can also contribute to DFB resistance, or if other molecular mechanisms are involved. Interestingly, gene expression analysis of the chs1 gene revealed an 11-fold over-expression of this gene in the Cp-R-1043M strain compared to the Cp-S mosquitoes. Chitin synthase is a pivotal enzyme in the formation of an insect cuticle because it catalyses the final steps of chitin synthesis, a major structural component of the cuticle [35]. In particular, this complex glycosyltransferase enables the elongation and translocation of nascent chitin chains across the plasma membrane, allowing their assemblage and deposition at the body surface [5]. The over-expression of the chs1 gene found in resistant Cx. pipiens mosquitoes could, therefore, explain the enhanced cuticle thickness and chitin content revealed by our analyses. Further studies integrating our results with data about gene expression of the main detoxifying families will be useful to support this hypothesis. Notably, if this hypothesis will be verified by new collected data, the resistance to DFB in Cx. pipiens would be an outstanding case study, where the same target gene (i.e., chs1) would drive both target-site resistance and cuticle modifications, reducing the intake of insecticide: the I1043M point mutation would affect the efficacy of DFB molecules by causing an aminoacidic change in the DFB target-site; the over-expression of the chs1 gene would positively affect the cuticle deposition.
Taken together, the observations in Cx. pipiens raise interesting implications for control and resistance management. The cuticular modifications observed in immature and adult stages could broaden the resistance of Cx. pipiens. Since enhanced cuticle thickness has been documented to reduce the penetration of several insecticide molecules [34], cases of cross-resistance could emerge in this species, with considerable consequences in resistance management and control practices. Furthermore, the cuticle changes observed in the Cp-R-1043M mosquitoes could affect the spreading of resistance in Cx. pipiens, by determining a fitness cost. The cuticle is a well-organized and conserved structure that is involved in several functions, such as water balance, perception of the environment, locomotion and chemical communication [36]. The modifications occurring in resistant mosquitoes could, therefore, affect all these biological functions, finally affecting the individual fitness. Since the occurrence of a fitness cost in resistant strains is one of the main variables affecting resistance diffusion, changes in cuticle structure and composition could significantly impact the speed of resistance spreading. Future studies, aiming to investigate if a fitness cost occurs in DFB-resistant phenotypes of Cx. pipiens, will be required to expand the evidence about the above issues, as well as to enhance our knowledge about the factors affecting insecticide resistance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects13121109/s1, Figure S1: Scanning electron micrographs showing a portion of two cuticle sections of susceptible (A) and resistant (B) pupae; Figure S2: Standard curve for chitin content quantification; Figure S3: Response of Cx. pipiens resistant and susceptible strains to DFB bioassay.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.M., D.P., J.V., R.B., S.E., C.B. and S.U.; sample collection, V.L. and R.B.; DNA analyses, V.L. and L.G.; cuticle analyses, V.L., L.D.B., T.R. and M.L.D.S.; data analysis, V.M., D.P., S.C. and A.N., writing leading, V.M., V.L. and S.U., review and editing, V.L, L.G., V.M., D.P., L.D.B., T.R., M.L.D.S., J.V., R.B., A.N., S.E., C.B., S.C. and S.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the project PRIN 2017 (Prot. 2017J8JR57) funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (to BC and SU).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank Maria Luisa Mangoni for letting us use the Fluorimeter Microplate Reader; Roberta Colonna and Luciano Donati for help during sampling; Arianna Puggioli for suggestions about the establishment of Cx. pipiens colonies; Daniele Lucarini for technical help; Mark Eltenton for English revision.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. García-Lara, S.; Serna Saldivar, S.O. Insect Pests. In Encyclopedia of Food and Health; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. WHO. Global Vector Control Response 2017–2030; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  3. Whalon, M.E.; Mota-Sanchez, D.; Hollingworth, R.M. (Eds.) Global Pesticide Resistance in Arthropods; Cabi International: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sparks, T.C.; Nauen, R. IRAC: Mode of Action Classification and Insecticide Resistance Management. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2015, 121, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Merzendorfer, H. Insect chitin synthases: A review. J. Comp. Physiol. B 2006, 176, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Merzendorfer, H. Chitin synthesis inhibitors: Old molecules and new developments. Insect Sci. 2013, 20, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Van Leeuwen, T.; Vontas, J.; Tsagkarakou, A.; Dermauw, W.; Tirry, L. Acaricide resistance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other important Acari: A review. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Santos, V.C.; De Siqueira, H.A.A.; Da Silva, J.E.; De Farias, M.J.D.C. Insecticide resistance in populations of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), from the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol. 2011, 40, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ju, D.; Mota-Sanchez, D.; Fuentes-Contreras, E.; Zhang, Y.L.; Wang, X.Q.; Yang, X.Q. Insecticide resistance in the Cydia pomonella (L.): Global status, mechanisms, and research directions. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 2021, 178, 104925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van Leeuwen, T.; Demaeght, P.; Osborne, E.J.; Dermauw, W.; Gohlke, S.; Nauen, R.; Grbić, M.; Tirry, L.; Merzendorfer, H.; Clark, R.M. Population bulk segregant mapping uncovers resistance mutations and the mode of action of a chitin synthesis inhibitor in arthropods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 4407–4412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Douris, V.; Steinbach, D.; Panteleri, R.; Livadaras, I.; Pickett, J.A.; Van Leeuwen, T.; Nauen, R.; Vontas, J. Resistance mutation conserved between insects and mites unravels the benzoylurea insecticide mode of action on chitin biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 14692–14697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Grigoraki, L.; Puggioli, A.; Mavridis, K.; Douris, V.; Montanari, M.; Bellini, R.; Vontas, J. Striking diflubenzuron resistance in Culex pipiens, the prime vector of West Nile virus. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Gomes, B.; Kioulos, E.; Papa, A.; Almeida, A.P.; Vontas, J.; Pinto, J. Distribution and hybridization of Culex pipiens forms in Greece during the West Nile virus outbreak of 2010. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2013, 16, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chaskopoulou, A.; L’Ambert, G.; Petric, D.; Bellini, R.; Zgomba, M.; Groen, T.A. Ecology of West Nile virus across four European countries: Review of weather profiles, vector population dynamics and vector control response. Parasit Vectors 2016, 9, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Fotakis, E.A.; Mastrantonio, V.; Grigoraki, L.; Porretta, D.; Puggioli, A.; Chaskopoulou, A.; Osório, H.; Weill, M.; Bellini, R.; Urbanelli, S.; et al. Identification and detection of a novel point mutation in the Chitin Synthase gene of Culex pipiens associated with diflubenzuron resistance. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Guz, N.; Çağatay, N.S.; Fotakis, E.A.; Durmuşoğlu, E.; Vontas, J. Detection of diflubenzuron and pyrethroid resistance mutations in Culex pipiens from Muğla, Turkey. Acta Trop. 2020, 203, 105294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mastrantonio, V.; Porretta, D.; Lucchesi, V.; Güz, N.; Çağatay, N.S.; Bellini, R.; Vontas, J.; Urbanelli, S. Evolution of adaptive variation in the mosquito Culex pipiens: Multiple independent origins of insecticide resistance mutations. Insects 2021, 12, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Porretta, D.; Fotakis, E.; Mastrantonio, V.; Chaskopoulou, A.; Michaelakis, A.; Kioulos, I.; Weill, M.; Urbanelli, S.; Vontas, J.; Bellini, R. Focal distribution of diflubenzuron resistance mutations in Culex pipiens mosquitoes from northern Italy. Acta Trop. 2019, 193, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Schaffner, F.; Angel, G.; Geoggroy, B.; Hervy, J.P.; Rhaiem, A.; Brunhes, J. The Mosquitoes of Europe/Les Moustiques d’Europe. Logiciel d’identification Et d’enseignement (CD-Rom); IRD Editions & EID Méditerranée: Montpellier, France, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  20. Robertson, J.A.; Preisler, H.K.; Russell, R.M. Polo Plus: Probit and Logit Analysis; LeOra Software: Petaluma, CA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vézilier, J.; Nicot, A.; De Lorgeril, J.; Gandon, S.; Rivero, A. The impact of insecticide resistance on Culex pipiens immunity. Evol. Appl. 2013, 6, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, N.; Li, T.; Reid, W.R.; Yang, T.; Zhang, L. Multiple Cytochrome P450 genes: Their constitutive overexpression and permethrin induction in insecticide resistant mosquitoes, Culex quinquefasciatus. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Timmermann, S.E.; Briegel, H. Larval growth and biosynthesis of reserves in mosquitoes. J. Insect Physiol. 1999, 45, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gunathilaka, P.A.; Uduwawala, U.M.; Udayanga, N.W.; Ranathunge, R.M.; Amarasinghe, L.D.; Abeyewickreme, W. Determination of the efficiency of diets for larval development in mass rearing Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 2018, 108, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yan, J.; Kibech, R.; Stone, C.M. Differential effects of larval and adult nutrition on female survival, fecundity, and size of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Front. Zool. 2021, 18, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bhattacharya, R.; Saha, S.; Kostina, O.; Muravnik, M.; Mitra, A. Replacing critical point drying with a low-cost chemical drying provides comparable surface image quality of glandular trichomes from leaves of Millingtonia hortensis L. f. in scanning electron micrograph. Appl. Microsc. 2020, 50, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Henriques, B.S.; Garcia, E.S.; Azambuja, P.; Genta, F.A. Determination of Chitin Content in Insects: An Alternate Method Based on Calcofluor Staining. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Hsu, S.C.; Lockwood, J.L. Powdered chitin agar as a selective medium for enumeration of actinomycetes in water and soil. Appl. Microbiol. 1975, 29, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Porretta, D.; Mastrantonio, V.; Lucchesi, V.; Bellini, R.; Vontas, J.; Urbanelli, S. Historical samples reveal a combined role of agriculture and public-health applications in vector resistance to insecticides. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 1567–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wood, O.R.; Hanrahan, S.; Coetzee, M.; Koekemoer, L.L.; Brooke, B.D. Cuticle thickening associated with pyrethroid resistance in the major malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Parasit Vectors 2010, 3, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lilly, D.G.; Latham, S.L.; Webb, C.E.; Doggett, S.L. Cuticle Thickening in a Pyrethroid-Resistant Strain of the Common Bed Bug, Cimex lectularius L. (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Balabanidou, V.; Kampouraki, A.; MacLean, M.; Blomquist, G.J.; Tittiger, C.; Juárez, M.P.; Mijailovsky, S.J.; Chalepakis, G.; Anthousi, A.; Lynd, A.; et al. Cytochrome P450 associated with insecticide resistance catalyzes cuticular hydrocarbon production in Anopheles gambiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 9268–9273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Huang, Y.; Guo, Q.; Sun, X.; Zhang, C.; Xu, N.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, D.; Sun, Y.; Ma, L.; Zhu, C.; et al. Culex pipiens pallens cuticular protein CPLCG5 participates in pyrethroid resistance by forming a rigid matrix. Parasit Vectors 2018, 11, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Balabanidou, V.; Grigoraki, L.; Vontas, J. Insect cuticle: A critical determinant of insecticide resistance. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2018, 27, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Muthukrishnan, S.; Mun, S.; Noh, M.Y.; Geisbrecht, E.R.; Arakane, Y. Insect Cuticular Chitin Contributes to Form and Function. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2020, 26, 3530–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Andersen, S.O. Biochemistry of the insect cuticle. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1979, 24, 29–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Analysis of chs1 relative expression in Cx. pipiens. Relative expression of the chs1 gene in the Parma (susceptible) and Forlì (resistant) strains. Susceptible individuals were used as basal level (equal to 1). The values reported are the mean ± standard errors (* p < 0.001, Student’s t-test).
Figure 1. Analysis of chs1 relative expression in Cx. pipiens. Relative expression of the chs1 gene in the Parma (susceptible) and Forlì (resistant) strains. Susceptible individuals were used as basal level (equal to 1). The values reported are the mean ± standard errors (* p < 0.001, Student’s t-test).
Insects 13 01109 g001
Figure 2. Analysis of cuticle thickness in Cx. pipiens. Cuticular thickness in susceptible and resistant mosquitoes at different life stages is shown. The boxes represent the 25% and 75% percentile and the black lines within the boxes indicate the medians; error bars correspond to the 10th and 90th percentiles. * p < 0.001 as determined by the Mann–Whitney test.
Figure 2. Analysis of cuticle thickness in Cx. pipiens. Cuticular thickness in susceptible and resistant mosquitoes at different life stages is shown. The boxes represent the 25% and 75% percentile and the black lines within the boxes indicate the medians; error bars correspond to the 10th and 90th percentiles. * p < 0.001 as determined by the Mann–Whitney test.
Insects 13 01109 g002
Figure 3. Analysis of chitin content in Cx. pipiens. Quantification of chitin content in susceptible and resistant mosquitoes. The values reported are the mean ± standard errors (* p < 0.001, Student’s t-test).
Figure 3. Analysis of chitin content in Cx. pipiens. Quantification of chitin content in susceptible and resistant mosquitoes. The values reported are the mean ± standard errors (* p < 0.001, Student’s t-test).
Insects 13 01109 g003
Table 1. Primers pairs used in gene expression analyses. For each gene, the forward and the reverse primers are shown. HK = housekeeping gene.
Table 1. Primers pairs used in gene expression analyses. For each gene, the forward and the reverse primers are shown. HK = housekeeping gene.
GenePrimer Sequences (5′-3′)Fragment Length (bp)Reference
G6PDH (HK) F: CGCGCACGAGGAAAAGTACG
R: GGTTTGCGGTCTTCCCAACC
131[21]
18S (HK) F: CGCGGTAATTCCAGCTCCACTA
R: GCATCAAGCGCCACATATAGG
159[22]
chs1 F: GCCTGTCTCCATCCGCAAG
R: CCCAGGAGACGACGTTCAG
124[12]
Table 2. Lethal doses observed in resistant and susceptible Cx. pipiens colonies. LD50 (95% CI) = Lethal dose of DFB required to kill 50% of population and its 95% confidence intervals; LD90 (95% CI) = Lethal dose of DFB required to kill 90% of population and its 95% confidence intervals; Resistant Ratio.
Table 2. Lethal doses observed in resistant and susceptible Cx. pipiens colonies. LD50 (95% CI) = Lethal dose of DFB required to kill 50% of population and its 95% confidence intervals; LD90 (95% CI) = Lethal dose of DFB required to kill 90% of population and its 95% confidence intervals; Resistant Ratio.
Strain LD50 (95% CI)LD90 (95% CI)RRLD50
Cp_S0.005 mgL−1 (0.002–0.008)0.018 mgL−1 (0.012–0.031)1
Cp_R-I1043M45.03 mgL−1 (13.06–60.66)85.81 mgL−1 (69.56–125.85)9006
Table 3. Cuticle thickness in susceptible and resistant Cx. pipiens mosquitoes. The cuticle thickness is reported for all the life stages analysed and the values are expressed in μm. N = number of mosquitoes analysed for each strain. The values are reported as the mean ± standard errors (* p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney test).
Table 3. Cuticle thickness in susceptible and resistant Cx. pipiens mosquitoes. The cuticle thickness is reported for all the life stages analysed and the values are expressed in μm. N = number of mosquitoes analysed for each strain. The values are reported as the mean ± standard errors (* p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney test).
Strain NDevelopmental Stages
L4 LarvaePupaeMale AdultsFemale Adults
Cp_S1500.86 (±0.19)2.05 (±0.29)1.06 (±0.18)1.37 (±0.33)
Cp_R-I1043M1501.22 (±0.21) *2.62(±0.19) *1.21 (±0.18) *1.78 (±0.41) *
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lucchesi, V.; Grimaldi, L.; Mastrantonio, V.; Porretta, D.; Di Bella, L.; Ruspandini, T.; Di Salvo, M.L.; Vontas, J.; Bellini, R.; Negri, A.; et al. Cuticle Modifications and Over-Expression of the Chitin-Synthase Gene in Diflubenzuron-Resistant Phenotype. Insects 2022, 13, 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121109

AMA Style

Lucchesi V, Grimaldi L, Mastrantonio V, Porretta D, Di Bella L, Ruspandini T, Di Salvo ML, Vontas J, Bellini R, Negri A, et al. Cuticle Modifications and Over-Expression of the Chitin-Synthase Gene in Diflubenzuron-Resistant Phenotype. Insects. 2022; 13(12):1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lucchesi, Valentina, Lorenzo Grimaldi, Valentina Mastrantonio, Daniele Porretta, Letizia Di Bella, Tania Ruspandini, Martino Luigi Di Salvo, John Vontas, Romeo Bellini, Agata Negri, and et al. 2022. "Cuticle Modifications and Over-Expression of the Chitin-Synthase Gene in Diflubenzuron-Resistant Phenotype" Insects 13, no. 12: 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121109

APA Style

Lucchesi, V., Grimaldi, L., Mastrantonio, V., Porretta, D., Di Bella, L., Ruspandini, T., Di Salvo, M. L., Vontas, J., Bellini, R., Negri, A., Epis, S., Caccia, S., Bandi, C., & Urbanelli, S. (2022). Cuticle Modifications and Over-Expression of the Chitin-Synthase Gene in Diflubenzuron-Resistant Phenotype. Insects, 13(12), 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121109

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop