Next Article in Journal
Biodiversity of Forensically Relevant Blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) at the Anthropology Research Facility in Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
Next Article in Special Issue
”Unmasking the Villain”: Integrative Taxonomy Reveals the Real Identity of the Key Pest (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) of Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) in South America
Previous Article in Journal
Description of the Nymphal Stages of Hoplopleura affinis (Anoplura: Hoplopleuridae) from the Striped Field Mouse Apodemus agrarius with a Global Checklist of Hoplopleura Species from the Genus Apodemus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thelytokous Reproduction of Onion Thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman 1889, Infesting Welsh Onion and Genetic Variation among Their Subpopulations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Franklinothrips vespiformis (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae): Life History, Distribution, and Prospects as a Biological Control Agent

1
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Mineral Oil Pesticides, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510260, China
2
BioBee USA, 5126 S. Royal Atlanta Dr, Tucker, GA 30084, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2022, 13(2), 108; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13020108
Submission received: 24 November 2021 / Revised: 11 January 2022 / Accepted: 11 January 2022 / Published: 18 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Economic Pest Thrips: Biology, Ecology, and Population Genetics)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Predatory species are a small but significant part of the Thysanoptera, which is often overlooked. Franklinothrips are found throughout the tropics and are regarded as major natural enemies of thrips and other small arthropod prey. In this review, we summarized the geographical background, morphology, and prey associations, with an emphasis on Franklinothrips vespiformis, the most widely distributed predatory thrips species. This literature review could serve as a foundation for future research into Franklinothrips as biocontrol agents for economically important insect and mite pests in China.

Abstract

Predatory species comprise a small but important and often overlooked component of the Thysanoptera. A case in point, the ant-mimicking Franklinothrips are widely distributed in the tropics and are considered important generalist natural enemies for thrips and some other small arthropod prey. Franklinothrips present an addition to biocontrol applications, i.e., greenhouse or commercial application for certain target pests and situations. Current knowledge, including distribution, biological features, life history pa rameters, prey specificity, host plant associations and lass production is yet insufficient to decide to what extent Franklinothrips could contribute for biological control programs. In this review, we summarized the geographical background, morphology, and prey associations, with a focus on F. vespiformis, the most widely distributed species of predatory thrips. This literature review serves as the basis for future research into the use of Franklinothrips as biocontrol agents for economically significant insect and mite pests in China and elsewhere.

1. Introduction

The Thysanoptera (thrips) constitute approximately 6500 species that are globally distributed and represent many of the smallest winged insects [1,2]. Several thrips species are globally important, due to their capacity to disperse through the plant trade and vector plant tospoviruses, which cause significant agricultural losses [3]. While most of the thrips are detritivores (mainly fungal feeders) and herbivores (feeders of flowers, fruits, and leaves) [4,5], approximately 300 species have evolved a predatory lifestyle [6].
Predatory thrips are known from several families. Surveys in three districts of northern Thailand revealed 10 species of predatory Phlaeothripidae in five genera, including Aleurodothrips fasciapennis, which were present throughout the year and contributed to pest control [7]. In USA, mite-predatory species Scolothrips sexmaculatus (Thripidae) and Leptothrips mali (Phlaeothripidae) are considered important biological control agents in almonds and apple orchards, respectively [8,9]. However, most of the predatory thrips species are confined within the Aeolothripidae. While most of the aeolothripids are generalist facultative predators of small arthropods and distributed in temperate regions [6], a few genera are native to the tropics and more specialized.
Species of Franklinothrips (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae) are predatory on various other insects. These fast moving, ant-mimicking predatory thrips are widely distributed in the tropics, with 17 species described [1,10,11]. In addition, they are unusual among thrips due to the fact that most of them are habitually parthenogenetic and spin a silken cocoon [12]. Moreover, cocoon spinning is observed among the Aeolothripidae [13]. Among Franklinothrips, F. vespiformis is the most widespread and was noted considerably earlier as distinctive from most of the other Aeolothrips [14]. F. vespiformis has gained attention for its potential as a biocontrol agent for a diverse range of greenhouse pests, and it has already been commercially cultured in Europe for certain use [15,16]. F. orizabensis, a similar species, has also been documented as a biocontrol agent for thrips management in avocado plantations in California, USA [17].
This review collates the fragmented literature on Franklinothrips regarding their global distribution, with a particular focus on host associations and prospects of F. vespiformis as a biological control agent. With this review, we anticipate that it may help pave the way for the use of predatory thrips in integrated pest management systems.

2. Distribution

2.1. F. vespiformis

The native range is presumed to be Central America [10], although this species has been recorded subsequently in North and South America, Southeast Asia, Africa, Oceania, and Europe. F. vespiformis is distributed in different locations with references, as shown in Table 1, and distributed in wild and artificially released populations around the globe, as shown in Figure 1.
In Latin America, F. vespiformis was first described in 1909 [22] and subsequently noted as abundant in avocado agroecosystems in Mexico [23]. This species has been found in Taiwan [32], India [33,34], and many Caribbean, Central, and South American countries, including Nicaragua, Peru, and Brazil [24,25]. Finally, in Oceania, F. vespiformis was recorded from Fiji, New Caledonia, as well as the eastern coast of Australia [10], also found in Japan, Thailand and mainland of China [7,11,36].

2.2. Other Franklinothrips Species

Compared with the pantropical F. vespiformis, the reported distribution of 16 other Franklinothrips spp. are relatively more localized. The current known distribution includes F. atlas Hood and F. megalops Trybom (mainly in Africa), F. basseti Mound and Marullo as well as F. variegatus Girault (Australia), F. brunneicornis Mound and Reynaud (New Caledonia), and F. fulgidus Hood and F. lineatus Hood (Brazil) [1]. Five additional species are noted from Asia, i.e., F. rarosae Reyes (Philippines), F. strasseni Mound and Reynaud (Nepal), F. suzukii Okajima (Taiwan), F. tani Mirab-Balou, Shi and Chen (China), and F. uttarakhandiensis Vijay Veer (India) [1]. Moreover, three additional species are recorded from Central America, i.e., F. tenuicornis Hood (Panama), as well as F. orizabensis Johansen and F. caballeroi Johansen (Mexico and Costa Rica). Furthermore, in USA, F. orizabensis, which closely resembles F. vespiformis, has been reported from Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, and Texas [17,43].

3. Morphological Characteristics

F. vespiformis experiences partial metamorphosis, developing through egg, larva, pupa, and adult stages (Figure 2). The following is based on the authors’ observations, which is supplemented with published findings [36,44,45].

3.1. Eggs

Eggs are produced singly inside the leaf tissue, and they can be distinguished by yellow-green projections. Eggs are kidney-shaped and transparent white, with dimensions of 0.4 ± 0.01 mm by 0.1 ± 0.003 mm (Figure 2a).

3.2. Larva

Two instars are included in the larval period. The newly emergent first instars are pale white, with the third antennal segment about 3.5 to 4.5 times as long as wide (Figure 2b). After feeding for 1 or 2 days, the mesothorax and abdomen segments III–VII develop a red coloration (Figure 2c). The second instars have a distinctive hump-back. In addition, the head and prothorax develop a red coloration as the mesothorax. The second instar in the third antennal segment is about 7.0 to 8.0 times as long as wide, and the fore tibia and tarsus are dark (Figure 2d). Both of the instars possess seven segmented antennae with three distal segments, which are closely fused. The red hypodermal pigments are only present on the femora.

3.3. Pupa

Pupae are found underneath the leaves, inside a white silk cocoon constructed by the larva (2e). The pupa are red in color with three stages, pre-pupal stage, pupal stage 1 (Figure 2f) and pupal stage 2 (Figure 2g). Wing buds are well developed, but shorter in pre-pupal stage (show non-obvious movement, prepared for cocoon construction). The pupal skin of the appendages is segmented only in pre-pupa. The antennal sheaths do not reach the metathorax (pupa 1), but reach the abdomen (pupa 2). In addition, posterior wing buds reach abdominal segment III (pupa 1), while both the anterior and posterior wing buds reach abdominal segment V (pupa 2). The legs and hind tibiotarsus are shorter than pterothorax (pupa 1), and the legs and hind tibiotarsus are longer than pterothorax (pupa 2).

3.4. Adult Female

Female F. vespiformis (myrmici) are common and have a body length of 2.5–3.0 mm (Figure 3a). Females are fully winged and their forewing is slender with a rounded apex. The body is black with white bands on the second and third segments, and an anteriorly narrowed abdomen. The abdomen is broadest at segment five or six. The body, legs, and antennae are brown. However, antennal segments I–III and abdominal segments II and III are yellow. Moreover, the anterior margins are brown and the femora is often yellowish at distal end. Legs brown with femora yellowish at distal end. Fore-wing brown with three paler areas in the base, middle and sub-apex.

3.5. Adult Male

Male F. vespiformis are rare, similar to female in colour with a smaller and less ant-like appearance (Figure 3b). Males have a longer and darker antennae, a less constricted waist, and commonly paler wings. The second and third antennal segment is approximately as long as the head, with a long sensory metanotum formed of irregular scallops. The head is broader than long, the eyes are prolonged ventrally, and the posterior ocelli are larger than the anterior. The prothorax is narrower towards the base, and the metanotum has no sculpture medially, with long and slender legs. Abdominal sternite II with two pairs of discal setae; sternites III–VIII with two pairs of posteromarginal setae and one pair of discal setae in a line.

4. Life History

4.1. Developmental Parameters

F. vespiformis is active at temperatures over 18 °C and develop from egg to adult within roughly 3 weeks at 27 °C. Moreover, it survives up to 60 days as an adult (Table 2), with no reported diapause. Previous studies of mass storage suggest a differential cold tolerance among the different life stages. In general, the viability of the eggs declines when stored below 7.0 °C, although storing eggs at 12.5 °C for 4–5 weeks was possible [15,16]. The potential to store eggs may assist the mass rearing and dissemination of F. vespiformis as a biological control agent.

4.2. Sex Ratio

Although F. vespiformis consists of both males and females, it is usually an unisexual species. Males were not found in Japan [36] and appear to be rare in populations from other countries [14,20]. Wolbachia-mediated parthenogenesis has been reported in F. vespiformis and other thrips species [46,47,48]. Heat and tetracycline treatments appeared to produce male F. vespiformis. Despite the fact that males produced motile sperm, which was forwarded via spermatheca, mating had no effect on the subsequent generation’s sex ratios. This indicates that the sperm do not fertilize eggs [46]. Among the introduced thrips, parthenogenesis is common, possibly spreading more easily than sexual forms [49,50].

4.3. Ovipositing Behavior

Arakaki and Okajima [36] as well as Arakaki, Miyoshi, and Noda [46] studied the reproductive behavior of F. vespiformis. Viable eggs are produced via parthenogenesis with eggs laid singly into the stem, leaf vein or other soft plant tissue using their serrated ovipositor. Females can oviposit three eggs within an hour, producing 150 to 200 eggs in their lifetime. Moreover, females deposit a drop of yellowish protective secretion on the exposed tip of the eggs, which makes them difficult to locate.

4.4. Cocoon Spinning

Several species among Franklinothrips and Aeolothrips construct silken cocoons underneath the leaves or in the soil or leaf litter, for example, Aeolothrips kuwanaii, A. fasciatus, A. melaleucus, Orothrips kelloggi, Ankothrips yuccae, and A. gracilis [10,12,51]. Reyne [12] indicated that the cocoon production of F. vespiformis takes a full and larvae were observed sharply twisting and turning their abdomens, with the final cocoon as white and oval-shaped, measuring roughly 2.7 mm × 1.3 mm in size [12,36].

4.5. Ant-Mimicking Behavior

While some degree of myrmecomorphy is associated with most of the Franklinothrips, the extent of ant-like features and behavior is highly pronounced in adult female F. vespiformis [14]. A highly constricted first abdominal segment produces an ant-like waist [36]. Similar to ants, individuals can run quickly and palpate their antennae on the ground. These distinguishing characteristics have been proposed in order to help adults escape predation [52,53].

5. Franklinothrips: Perspectives for Biological Control of Pests

5.1. Natural Prey Range

Franklinothrips are generalist or opportunist feeders of thrips, but also attack a broad range of small arthropods and smaller conspecifics [10]. Among them, F. vespiformis is known to prey upon phytophagous insects and mites from several orders (Table 3). Larvae and adults move quickly and seize the prey with their front legs, which are used to hold the prey while feeding [36].
Both larvae and adults are particularly predacious on other thrips, feeding on adults, larvae, and pupal stages. In Trinidad, F. vespiformis was observed feeding on the cacao thrips, Selenothrips rubrocinctus and Dinurothryps hookeri on ornamental flowers, and Caliothrips insularis on the Sudan grass [26]. In Mexico, F. vespiformis are the most prevalent among 16 predatory thrips, which were captured in an avocado orchard infested with several species of pest thrips. In Brazil, F. vespiformis was frequently found in association with Leucothrips furcatus, which appeared as the prey [31]. Additional economically important thripine targets for F. vespiformis include Thrips tabaci, T. palmi, and Frankliniella occidentalis [40].
In addition, F. vespiformis is predaceous on several non-thripine targets. In citrus and avocado plantation in Central and South America, F. vespiformis naturally prey on spider mites (Oligonychus yothersi), leafhoppers (Idona minuenda), and whiteflies (Trialeurodes floridensis) [29]. In laboratory tests, F. vespiformis was observed piercing serpentine leafminer (Liriomyza trifolii) larvae. However, nymps of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii were found to be unsuitable as prey [36].
In nature, F. vespiformis is usually found on low growing plants, shrubs, and bushes and has similar feeding habits to Aeolothrips melaleucus [51,54]. It is found in a variety of habitats, including roadsides [54], rainforests, orchards, and field crops [40]. Adult Franklinthrips feed on non-prey materials and can survive for extended periods of time on pollen and plant sap [43]. When reared under crowded conditions (10 individuals/Petri dish), adults and larval become cannibalistic [36].
Table 3. Known prey and associated host plant associations for Franklinothrips vespiformis.
Table 3. Known prey and associated host plant associations for Franklinothrips vespiformis.
PreySpeciesStage of Prey *Host PlantReference(s)
LeafhopperIdona minuendanaCitrus, avocado[29]
LeafminerLiriomyza trifoliiLChrysanthemums and celery[36]
Spider mitesOligonychus yothersiE, L, ASolanaceous plants[29]
Tetranychus
urticae
L, ALaboratory[36,41]
Tetranychus
neocaledonicus
L, ALima beans[30]
ThripsCaliothrips
insularis
-Mint[26]
Caliothrips phaseoliL, ALima bean[30]
Dinurothrips hookeri-Ornamental flowers[26]
Echinothrips americanusL, A, PGreenhouse crops[40]
Frankliniella
occidentalis
L, A, PApple, vegetables, and ornamental crops[40,41,55]
Frankliniella
intonsa
-Vegetables and ornamental crops[55,56]
Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis-Avocado[40,57]
Leucothrips
furcatus
L, ACurcubits[31]
Parthenothrips dracaenaeL, A, PFicus species, dracaena, [40] palm, and orchid[40]
Scirtothrips
dorsalis
LChilli and beans[53]
Selenothrips
rubrocinctus
-Sudan grass[26]
Thrips palmiL, ALaboratory[36,40]
Thrips tabaci-Onion[38,39,40,56]
WhiteflyTrialeurodes floridensisE, LCitrus, avocado[29]
Bemisia tabaci (MEAM 1)-Laboratory[36,53]
* E: Egg; L: Larvae; P: Pre-pupa/pupa; A: Adult.

5.2. Franklinothrips: As Augmentative Biological Control Agents

While predatory thrips are considered an important component of natural and agro-ecosystems, their use as commercial bio-control agents has gained relatively little attention. However, in Europe, F. vespiformis has been tested and marketed for use against thrips in greenhouses, nurseries, botanical gardens, and interiorscapes for many years [15,16,42]. In addition, F. orizabensis has been the focus of successful research with an augmentative release against several pest thrips in California avocado groves [17,43].

5.3. Release of F. vespiformis in Greenhouse Crops

Several studies have investigated the use of F. vespiformis to manage thrips in green- houses. In southern France, F. vespiformis was first introduced in rose greenhouses for 2 years, with a predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to suppress onion thrips T. tabaci and western flower thrips F. occidentalis [39]. Although widely used, N. cucumeris is less effective where temperatures are high. Therefore, F. vespiformis was used to supplement the control. In this case, F. vespiformis was generally effective at reducing populations of thrips below economic thresholds, although it did not provide a long-term establishment, suggesting that repeated introductions would be needed. Follow-up tests showed that the combined use of F. vespiformis and N. cucumeris during periods of high thrips infestation gave better results when compared with N. cucumeris alone [38]. In another study in greenhouse cucumbers, the weekly release of one F. vespiformis adult per plant over 4 weeks after flowering, reduced the populations of thrips on leaves to low levels, although less control was observed on flowers [56]. In Japan, F. vespiformis was released in greenhouses to control T. palmi in eggplants and cucumbers [36,46].
Some evidence suggests that the releases were successful in ornamental plants. When F. vespiformis was used in Crown-of-Thorns (Euphorbia milii var. splendens), Frankliniella occidentalis larvae were drastically decreased compared to the control. Only one F. occidentalis larva/flower was found 7 weeks following the release of F. vespiformis, compared to 14 larvae/flower in the control plots [48]. Despite these limited studies, the prey range, choice, and requirements for the release of F. vespiformis in most greenhouse crops are yet unknown.

5.4. Commercial Availability

Since predatory thrips typically do not occur at high densities, they can be reared for augmentative use. In Europe, F. vespiformis is sold through at least two distributors for pest thrips, including Frankliniella occidentalis, Echinothrips americanus, Parthenothrips dracaenae, Scirtothrips spp, and Thrips palmi [58,59]. The product is sold as adult thrips in a tube, which can be stored for 2 days at 10–15 °C. The success of releases will vary, based on the release rate, environmental conditions, and economic threshold of the target pest [16,17].

6. Other Predatory Thrips and Prey Associations

Surveys have found predatory thrips on many natural and cultivated plants, which reflect the host range of their prey (Table 4). Surveys of annual and perennial field crops, shrubs or trees, and roadside vegetation and weeds in three districts of northern Thailand revealed 10 species of predatory thrips in five genera of the Phlaeothripidae, i.e., Aleurodothrips fasciapennis, Androthrips flavipes, A. ramachandrai, Karnyothrips flavipes, two indeterminate Karnyothrips spp., Leptothrips sp., Podothrips lucasseni, and two indeterminate Podothrips spp. In this case, thrips hosts were present throughout the year. Preys of predatory thrips were identified on asteraceous weeds, including Bidens pilosa and Tridax procumbens, but also eriophyid mites were identified on Siam weed (Chromolaena odoratum). P. lucasseni was found on eriophyid mites on Sandoricum koetjape (santol) and Litchi chinensis (litchi). In addition, distinct distributions were found, i.e., Karnyothrips flavipes was usually correlated with green field crops, such as coffee, garlic (Allium sativum), and Spanish needle (B. pilosa). Kar nyothrips were observed feeding on unidentified crambid larvae (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on Spondias pinnata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in another province. Podothrips spp. were observed in association with thrips on Argyreia capitiformis, aphids on Lepistemon bi nectariferum and Bidens pilosa, spider mites on Bambusa sp. (bamboo). Childers and Nakahara (2006) [60] found diverse predatory species of thrips in citrus groves in Florida, USA, associated with six weed species. The potential host diversity of predatory thrips on commercial crops highlighted by these surveys suggests that other species could be explored further as biological control agents.

7. Future Research Perspectives

Since its original description by Crawford [22], reports show that F. vespiformis is a widespread and important natural enemy of thrips and other small arthropods, as well as an interesting and unusual model organism for Batesian mimicry. From a pest management perspective, the advantages of F. vespiformis include the relatively wide range of attacked hosts and life-stages. The ability of this predator to attack thrips species, such as E. americanus, which are not easily controlled by most of the current commercial biological control agents, including predatory mites [66], is of particular benefit. However, the relatively slow intrinsic rate of increase, when compared with predatory mites [67], and its tendency for cannibalism [36] are hindrances, increasing the cost and complexity for mass production. Nevertheless, as the global market for predatory insects expands and moves towards the use of multiple biological control agents and bioactive molecules [68], we anticipate increased interest, production, and deployment of F. vespiformis (and likely F. orizabensis) in crops where the current biocontrol agents do not provide reliable (or need supplemental) control. Their ability to feed on eggs of thrips, which are hidden in plant tissues and cryptic prey, such as leafminers [36,69] is also encouraging. Moreover, given that F. vespiformis can be cold-stored for a relatively long time period [15] will benefit its distribution to end users.
Despite their potential, it remains unclear on which crops F. vespiformis can be most effectively employed. The research gaps identified while compiling this review include the determination of optimal pest/crops associations, and the potential intraguild interactions with other biocontrol agents. To that end, most of the effective application rates and timing need further assessment under both greenhouse and field conditions. The provision of thrips banker plant systems or other supplemental food, such as pollen also need further investigation [40]. Of note, F. vespiformis may feed on a commercial supply of decapsulated brine shrimp eggs, which are used to support other commercially produced beneficial insects and mites (SPA personal observations). Moreover, it is possible that the ant-like appearance of F. vespiformis may help in the protection from negative intraguild interactions, while its adaption to topical environments may make it less likely to be established outdoor in temperate regions.
In conclusion, F. vespiformis is both a charismatic and economically important species of thrips, which warrants further attention in both conservation and augmentative biological control research. Furthermore, additional ecological and applied pest management studies will determine the role of this predator as both an invasion risk in natural ecosystems and as a commercial success in agricultural pest control.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H. and R.M.; methodology, M.H., Z.W., R.M. and S.P.A.; software, M.H., J.G., F.Y. and Z.W.; validation, M.H., Z.W., R.M. and J.G.; investigation, M.H., R.M. and L.C.; data curation, M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.H., Z.W., R.M., S.P.A. and J.G.; writing—review and editing, M.H., Z.W., R.M., S.P.A., J.G., F.Y. and L.C.; supervision, M.H. and R.M.; project administration, M.H. and R.M.; funding acquisition, M.H. and R.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the GDAS Special Project of Science and Technology Development (2021GDASYL-20210103051), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2017B020202005), and the Research Programs of Guangzhou (202103000065).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. ThripsWiki. Providing information on the World’s thrips (version Nov 2018). In Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 2019 Annual Checklist; Roskov, Y., Ower, G., Orrell, T., Nicolson, D., Bailly, N., Kirk, P.M., Bourgoin, T., DeWalt, R.E., Decock, W., Nieukerken, E., et al., Eds.; Naturalis: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2019; Available online: www.catalogueof-life.org/annual-checklist/2019 (accessed on 23 November 2021).
  2. Parker, B.; Skinner, M.; Ewis, T. (Eds.) Thrips Biology and Management; NATO ASI Series. Life Science; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1995; Volume 276. [Google Scholar]
  3. Riley, D.G.; Joseph, S.V.; Srinivasan, R.; Diffie, S. Thrips vectors of tospoviruses. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2011, 2, I1–I10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Morse, J.G.; Hoddle, M.S. Invasion biology of thrips. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2006, 51, 67–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Reynaud, P. Thrips (Thysanoptera). Chapter 13.1. BioRisk 2010, 4, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. zur Strassen, R. Binomial data of some predacious thrips. In Thrips Biology and Management; Parker, B., Skinner, M., Ewis, T., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1995; pp. 325–328. [Google Scholar]
  7. Saengyot, S. Predatory thrips species composition, their prey and host plant association in Northern Thailand. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2016, 50, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Parrella, M.; Rowe, D.; Horsburgh, R. Biology of Leptothrips mali, a common predator in Virginia apple orchards. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1982, 75, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haviland, D.R.; Rill, S.M.; Gordon, C.A. Field biology of Scolothrips sexmaculatus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) as a predator of Tetranychus pacificus (Acari: Tetranychidae) in California almonds. J. Econ. Entomol. 2021, 114, 1111–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mound, L.A.; Reynaud, P. Franklinothrips; a pantropical Thysanoptera genus of ant-mimicking obligate predators (Aeolothripidae). Zootaxa 2005, 864, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mirab-Balou, M.; Shi, M.; Chen, X.-X. A new species of Franklinothrips Back (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae) from Yunnan, China. Zootaxa 2011, 2926, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Reyne, A. A Cocoonspinning Thrips. Tijdschr. Voor Entomol. 1920, 63, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pereyra, V.; Cavalleri, A. The genus Heterothrips (Thysanoptera) in Brazil, with an identification key and seven new species. Zootaxa 2012, 3237, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Goldarazena, A.; Gattesco, F.; Atencio, R.; Korytowski, C. An updated checklist of the Thysanoptera of Panama with comments on host associations. Check List 2012, 8, 1232–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Larentzaki, E.; Powell, G.; Copland, M.J. Effect of cold storage on survival, reproduction and development of adults and eggs of Franklinothrips vespiformis (Crawford). Biol. Control 2007, 43, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Larentzaki, E.; Powell, G.; Copland, M.J. Effect of temperature on development, overwintering and establishment potential of Franklinothrips vespiformis in the UK. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2007, 124, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hoddle, M.S.; Oevering, P.; Phillips, P.A.; Faber, B.A. Evaluation of augmentative releases of Franklinothrips orizabensis for control of Scirtothrips perseae in California avocado orchards. Biol. Control 2004, 30, 456–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mahaffey, L.A.; Cranshaw, W.S. Thrips species associated with onion in Colorado. Southwest. Entomol. 2010, 35, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stannard, L.J., Jr. Peanut-winged thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1952, 45, 327–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stannard, L.J. Phylogenetic studies of Franklinothrips (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae). J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 1952, 42, 14–23. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoddle, M.S.; Mound, L.A.; Paris, D.L. Thrips of California; CBIT Publishing: Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 2012; Available online: https://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/thrips_of_california/Thrips_of_California.html (accessed on 23 November 2021).
  22. Crawford, D. Some Thysanoptera of Mexico and the south. I. Pomona Coll. J. Entomol. 1909, 1, 109–119. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cambero-Campos, J.; Johansen-Naime, R.; García-Martínez, O.; Cerna-Chávez, E.; Robles-Bermúdez, A.; Retana-Salazar, A. Species of thrips (Thysanoptera) in avocado orchards in Nayarit, Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 2011, 94, 982–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. CABI. Invasive Species Datasheet, Franklinothrips vespiformis (Vespiform Thrips). 2021. Available online: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/24485 (accessed on 23 November 2021).
  25. Greathead, D.J.; Greathead, A.H. Biological control of insect pests by insect parasitoids and predators: The BIOCAT database. Biocontrol 1992, 13, 61N–68N. [Google Scholar]
  26. Callan, E.M. Natural enemies of the cacao thrips. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1943, 34, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Williams, C. Plant diseases and pests: Notes on some Trinidad thrips of economic importance. Trinidad Tobago Bull. 1918, 3, 143–146. [Google Scholar]
  28. Watson, J.; Hubbell, T. On a collection of Thysanoptera from Honduras. Fla. Entomol. 1924, 7, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moulton, D. The Thysanoptera of South America. Revta Entomol. 1932, 2, 464–465. [Google Scholar]
  30. de França, S.M.; de Melo Júnior, L.C.; Neto, A.V.G.; Silva, P.R.R.; Lima, É.F.B.; Melo, J.W.S. Natural enemies associated with Phaseolus lunatus L. (Fabaceae) in Northeast Brazil. Fla. Entomol. 2018, 101, 688–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lima, E.F.B.; Souza-Filho, M.F. Leucothrips furcatus (Thysanoptera Thripidae): A new pest of Sechium edule (Cucurbitaceae) in Brazil. Bull. Insectol. 2018, 71, 189–191. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, C.-L. Two new records and two new species of thrips (Thysanoptera, Terebrantia) of Taiwan. Chin. J. Entomol. 1993, 13, 251–257. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tyagi, K.; Kumar, V. Thrips (Insecta: Thysanoptera) of India-an updated checklist. Halteres 2016, 7, 64–98. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mahendran, P.; Radhakrishnan, B. Franklinothrips vespiformis Crawford (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae), a potential predator of the tea thrips, Scirtothrips bispinosus Bagnall in south Indian tea plantations. Entomon 2019, 44, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sartiami, D.; Mound, L.A. Identification of the terebrantian thrips (Insecta, Thysanoptera) associated with cultivated plants in Java, Indonesia. ZooKeys 2013, 306, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  36. Arakaki, N.; Okajima, S. Notes on the biology and morphology of a predatory thrips, Franklinothrips vespiformis (Crawford) (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae): First record from Japan. Entomol. Sci. 1998, 1, 359–363. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pijnakker, J.; Overgaag, D.; Guilbaud, M.; Vangansbeke, D.; Duarte, M.; Wäckers, F. Biological control of the Japanese flower thrips Thrips setosus Moulton (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in greenhouse ornamentals. IOBC-WPRS Bull. 2019, 147, 107–112. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pizzol, J.; Nammour, D.; Hervouet, P.; Poncet, C.; Desneux, N.; Maignet, P. Population dynamics of thrips and development of an integrated pest management program using the predator Franklinothrips vespiformis. In Proceedings of the XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010), Lisbon, Portugal, 22–27 August 2010; pp. 219–226. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pizzol, J.; Nammour, D.; Ziegler, J.-P.; Voisin, S.; Maignet, P.; Olivier, N.; Paris, B. Efficiency of Neoseiulus cucumeris and Franklinothrips vespiformis for controlling thrips in rose greenhouses. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on High Technology for Greenhouse System Management: Greensys 2007, Naples, Italy, 4–6 October 2007; Volume 801, pp. 1493–1498. [Google Scholar]
  40. Loomans, A.; Vierbergen, G. Franklinothrips: Perspectives for greenhouse pest control. IOBC WPRS Bull. 1999, 22, 157–160. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zegula, T.; Sengonca, C.; Blaeser, P. Entwicklung, reproduktion und Prädationsleistung von zwei Raubthrips-arten Aeolothrips intermedius Bagnall und Franklinothrips vespiformis Crawford (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae) mit ernährung zweier natürlicher beutearten. Gesunde Pflanz. 2003, 55, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cox, P.; Matthews, L.; Jacobson, R.; Cannon, R.; MacLeod, A.; Walters, K. Potential for the use of biological agents for the control of Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) outbreaks. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2006, 16, 871–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hoddle, M.S. Predation behaviors of Franklinothrips orizabensis (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae) towards Scirtothrips perseae and Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Biol. Control 2003, 27, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tyagi, K.; Mound, L.; Kumar, V. Sexual dimorphism among Thysanoptera Terebrantia, with a new species from Malaysia and remarkable species from India in Aeolothripidae and Thripidae. Insect Syst. Evol. 2008, 39, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kumar, B. Thrips. In Polyphagous Pests of Crops; Omkar, Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 373–407. [Google Scholar]
  46. Arakaki, N.; Miyoshi, T.; Noda, H. Wolbachia-mediated parthenogenesis in the predatory thrips Franklinothrips vespiformis (Thysanoptera: Insecta). Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2001, 268, 1011–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kumm, S.; Moritz, G. First detection of Wolbachia in arrhenotokous populations of thrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae and Phlaeothripidae) and its role in reproduction. Environ. Entomol. 2008, 37, 1422–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nguyen, D.T.; Spooner-Hart, R.N.; Riegler, M. Loss of Wolbachia but not Cardinium in the invasive range of the Australian thrips species, Pezothrips kellyanus. Biol. Invasions 2016, 18, 197–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. O’Neill, K. Identification of the Newly Introduced Phlaeothripid Haplothrips? Clarisetis Priesner (Thysanoptera). Ann. Ent Soc. Am. 1960, 53, 507–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pal, S.; Wahengbam, J.; Raut, A.; Banu, A.N. Eco-biology and management of onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J. Entomol. Res. 2019, 43, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Putman, W.L. Notes on the predaceous thrips Haplothrips subtilissimus hal. and Aeolothrips melaleucus Hal. Can. Entomol. 1942, 74, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Johansen, R.M. Algunos aspectos sobre la conducta mimetic de Franklinothrips vespiformis (Crawford (Insecta: Thysanoptera)). An. Instit. Biol. Univ. Nac. Mex. 1977, 47, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  53. Johansen, R.M. Nuevos estudios acerca del mimetismo en el genero Franklinothrips Back (Insect: Thysanoptera) en Mexico. An. Inst. Biol. Univ. Nac. Mex. 1983, 53, 133–156. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mao, R.; Xiao, Y.; Arthurs, S. Vespiform Thrips Franklinothrips vespiformis Crawford (Insecta: Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae); University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2018; IFAS Extension EENY621; 4p, Available online: https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/IN/IN108300.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2021).
  55. Kort, I.B.; Moraza, M.L.; Attia, S.; Mansour, R.; Kheder, S.B. Beneficial arthropods as potential biocontrol candidates of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) occurring in Tunisian citrus orchards. Biologia 2020, 75, 2261–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Imura, T. Potential for biological control of thrips on greenhouse cucumbers by Franklinothrips vespiformis (Crawford). Proc. Kansai Plant Prot. Soc. 2003, 45, 47–49. [Google Scholar]
  57. McMurtry, J.A. The role of exotic natural enemies in the biological control of insect and mite pests of avocado in California. In Proceedings of the Second World Avocado Congress, Orange, CA, USA, 21–26 April 1991; California Avocado Society: Ventura, CA, USA, 1992; pp. 247–252. [Google Scholar]
  58. Entocare. Predatory Thrips Franklinothrips vespiformis. 2021. Available online: https://entocare.nl/biological-control-thrips/franklinothrips-vespiformis/?lang=en (accessed on 23 November 2021).
  59. Koppert. Franklinothrips vespiformis, Thrips Prédateur Franklinothrips vespiformi. 2021. Available online: https://www.koppert.fr/franklinothrips-vespiformis/ (accessed on 23 November 2021).
  60. Childers, C.C.; Nakahara, S. Thysanoptera (thrips) within citrus orchards in Florida: Species distribution, relative and seasonal abundance within trees, and species on vines and ground cover plants. J. Insect Sci. 2006, 6, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hua, L.Z. List of Chinese Insects: Homoptera: Adelgoidea and Aphidoidea; Zhongshan University Press: Guangzhou, China, 2000; Volume 1, pp. 110–131. [Google Scholar]
  62. Mirab-balou, M.; Chen, X.X. Aleurodothrips fasciapennis Franklin: A newly recorded genus and species for Iran (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae). Munis Entomol. Zool. 2012, 7, 334–338. [Google Scholar]
  63. Devasahayam, S.; Koya, K.M.A. Natural enemies of major insect pests of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) in India. J. Spices Arom. Crop. 1994, 3, 50–55. [Google Scholar]
  64. de Borbon, C.M.; Agostini, J.P. Gynaikothrips uzeli (Zimmermann) and Androthrips ramachandrai Karny (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae), first record for Argentina. Rev. Faculdad Cienc. Agrar. Univ. Nac. Cuyo. 2011, 43, 253–260. [Google Scholar]
  65. Vega, F.E.; Infante, F.; Castillo, A.; Jaramillo, J. The coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): A short review, with recent findings and future research directions. Terr. Arthropod Rev. 2009, 2, 129–147. [Google Scholar]
  66. Ghasemzadeh, S.; Leman, A.; Messelink, G.J. Biological control of Echinothrips americanus by phytoseiid predatory mites and the effect of pollen as supplemental food. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2017, 73, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Nomikou, M.; Janssen, A.; Schraag, R.; Sabelis, M.W. Phytoseiid predators as potential biological control agents for Bemisia tabaci. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2001, 25, 271–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Hussain, M.; Debnath, B.; Qasim, M.; Bamisile, B.S.; Islam, W.; Hameed, M.S.; Wang, L.; Qiu, D. Role of saponins in plant defense against specialist herbivores. Molecules 2019, 24, 2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Sureshkumar, N.; Ananthakrishnan, T.N. Biotic interactions in relation to prey-predator relationship with special reference to some thrips species (Thysanoptera: Insecta). J. Entomol. Res. 1987, 11, 192–202. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Known global distribution of Franklinothrips vespiformis. Red spots indicate locations with wild populations; green spots indicate artificial releases.
Figure 1. Known global distribution of Franklinothrips vespiformis. Red spots indicate locations with wild populations; green spots indicate artificial releases.
Insects 13 00108 g001
Figure 2. Different stages of Franklinothrips vespiformis. (a) Egg; (bd) Larva: (b) Newly emerged larva; (c) first instar larva; (d) second instar larva; (eg) pupal stages: (e) pupa into cocoon; (f) Pupal stage 1; (g) pupal stage 2; (h) adult.
Figure 2. Different stages of Franklinothrips vespiformis. (a) Egg; (bd) Larva: (b) Newly emerged larva; (c) first instar larva; (d) second instar larva; (eg) pupal stages: (e) pupa into cocoon; (f) Pupal stage 1; (g) pupal stage 2; (h) adult.
Insects 13 00108 g002
Figure 3. Sexual dimorphism in adult Franklinothrips vespiformis. (a) Female; (b) Male.
Figure 3. Sexual dimorphism in adult Franklinothrips vespiformis. (a) Female; (b) Male.
Insects 13 00108 g003
Table 1. The distribution of Franklinothrips vespiformis.
Table 1. The distribution of Franklinothrips vespiformis.
RegionCountry (Location)Reference(s)
North AmericaUSA (Colorado)[18]
USA (Arizona, California, Florida, Texas)[10,19,20,21]
Mexico[22,23,24,25]
CaribbeanJamaica, Dominican Republic, Barbados[24,25]
Puerto Rico[25]
Trinidad and Tobago[26,27]
St. Vincent Island, West Indies[24,25]
Central AmericaCosta Rica, El Salvador, Nicaragua[14,22,24]
Honduras[28]
Panama[14]
South AmericaBrazil[29,30,31]
Paraguay[24]
Peru (Miraflores)[14]
Surinam[12,25]
AsiaChina (Taiwan)[32]
China (Guangdong Yunnan, Guangxi)[11]
India (Karnataka, Maharashtra, Kerala, Tamil Nadu)[33,34]
Indonesia (Java)[35]
Japan (Okinawa)[36,37]
Thailand[7,25]
OceaniaAustralia (Queensland)[10]
New Caledonia[10]
Hawaii[24]
EuropeFrance[38,39,40]
Germany[41]
Portugal[24]
UK[15,16,42]
Table 2. Developmental parameters (days) of Franklinothrips vespiformis reared at different temperatures.
Table 2. Developmental parameters (days) of Franklinothrips vespiformis reared at different temperatures.
Development ParameterTemperature (°C)Reference(s)
21 °C25 °C27 °C
Life Stage (Days (±SE))[15,16]
Eggs16.06 ± 0.810.39 ± 0.19.7 ± 0.0
Larva 14.04 ± 0.122.03 ± 0.01.9 ± 0.0
Larva 23.9 ± 0.12.1 ± 0.01.1 ± 0.0
Prepupal and Pupal 12.5 ± 0.17.4 ± 0.15.3 ± 0.0
Unmated Males24.3 ± 1.616.4 ± 1.39.0 ± 0.7
Mated Males15.6 ± 1.912.8 ± 1.68.0 ± 0.6
Reproductive parameter (±SE)
Unmated Females
Pre-oviposition period (days)1.6 ± 0.20.9 ± 0.22.4 ± 1.0
Mean total progeny67.9 ± 21.471.2 ± 12.98.5 ± 3.8
Mean daily progeny2.3 ± 0.24.1 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.1
Mean lifetime oviposition rate154 ± 22.4314 ± 44.1105 ± 17.9
Mean daily oviposition rate7.1 ± 0.418.1 ± 13.612.9 ± 1.3
Mated Females
Pre-oviposition period (days)1.5 ± 0.20.9 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.2
Mean total progeny35.2 ± 6.644.4 ± 11.88.4 ± 2.8
Mean daily progeny1.8 ± 0.13.1 ± 0.20.9 ± 0.2
Mean lifetime oviposition rate128 ± 25.5220 ± 47.9101 ± 14.7
Mean daily oviposition rate6.5 ± 0.515.9 ± 1.112.8 ± 1.1
Population growth parameters (±SE)
Net reproductive rate (R0)18.5 ± 0.1833.3 ± 0.284.5 ± 0.07
Generation time (Tc)49.1 ± 0.1227.9 ± 0.0524.2 ± 0.06
Intrinsic rate of increase (rm)0.06 ± 0.00020.13 ± 0.00030.06 ± 0.0007
Finite rate of increase (λ)1.06 ± 0.00021.14 ± 0.00041.07 ± 0.0007
Survival time in days (Td)11.12 ± 0.035.16 ± 0.0111.05 ± 0.12
Table 4. Host plant associations of Franklinothrips and other predatory thrips with their prey.
Table 4. Host plant associations of Franklinothrips and other predatory thrips with their prey.
Predatory ThripsPreyHost PlantCountryReference(s)
Aleurodothrips
fasciapennis
Thrips spp., Coccus sp.,
Aleurodicus dispersus
Bidens pilosa (Asteraceae), Derris indica (Fabaceae), Spondias pinnata (Anacardiaceae), Manihot esculenta (Euphorbiaceae)Thailand[7]
Whiteflies, psyllid, scaleCitrus (Rutaceae)Florida, USA, China[60,61]
Planococcus citriGrape (Vitaceae)Iran[62]
AndrothripsflavipesGynaikothrips ficorumFicus retusa (Moraceae)Thailand[7]
Liothrips karnyiPiper nigrum (Piperaceae)Kerala, India[63]
A. ramachandraiMontandoniola confusaPterocarpus indicus (Leguminosae)Thailand[7]
Gynaikothrips uzeliFicus retusa (Moraceae)China[62]
G. uzeliFicus benjamina (Moraceae)Argentina[64]
F. vespiformis Citrus spp., AvocadoCentral and South America[29]
F. orizabensis Avocado, Persea americana (Lauraceae)California, USA[43]
KarnyothripsflavipesCoccus viridisCoffea arabica (Rubiaceae)Thailand[7]
Hypothenemus hampeiCoffea arabica (Rubiaceae)Kenya[65]
Thrips spp.Citrus (Rutaceae)Florida, USA[61]
Thrips spp.Allium sativum (Alliaceae), Bidens pilosa (Asteraceae), Gomphrena celosiodes (Amaranthaceae)Thailand[7]
Leptothrips spp.Thrips spp.Bidens pilosa, Tridax procumbens, Chromolaena
odoratum (Asteraceae)
Thailand[7]
Thrips spp.Citrus (Rutaceae)Florida, USA[61]
Podothrips spp.Aceria litchi, Thrips spp.,
Aphis sp.,
Eutetranychus sp.
Sandoricum koetjape (Meliaceae), Litchi chinensis (Sapindaceae) Argyreia capitiformis (Convolvulaceae), Bambusa sp. (Poaceae)Thailand[7]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hussain, M.; Wang, Z.; Arthurs, S.P.; Gao, J.; Ye, F.; Chen, L.; Mao, R. A Review of Franklinothrips vespiformis (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae): Life History, Distribution, and Prospects as a Biological Control Agent. Insects 2022, 13, 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13020108

AMA Style

Hussain M, Wang Z, Arthurs SP, Gao J, Ye F, Chen L, Mao R. A Review of Franklinothrips vespiformis (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae): Life History, Distribution, and Prospects as a Biological Control Agent. Insects. 2022; 13(2):108. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13020108

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hussain, Mubasher, Zhaohong Wang, Steven P. Arthurs, Jing Gao, Fengxian Ye, Lingling Chen, and Runqian Mao. 2022. "A Review of Franklinothrips vespiformis (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae): Life History, Distribution, and Prospects as a Biological Control Agent" Insects 13, no. 2: 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13020108

APA Style

Hussain, M., Wang, Z., Arthurs, S. P., Gao, J., Ye, F., Chen, L., & Mao, R. (2022). A Review of Franklinothrips vespiformis (Thysanoptera: Aeolothripidae): Life History, Distribution, and Prospects as a Biological Control Agent. Insects, 13(2), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13020108

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop