Next Article in Journal
Fine Structure of the Mouthparts of Three Tomicus Beetles Co-Infecting Pinus yunnanensis in Southwestern China with Some Functional Comments
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical Egg Activation and Rearing of First Instar Larvae of Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 12
10.3390/insects14120932
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing Using Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT) Control in Bombyx mori

by
Bin Yu
1,2,†,
Sichen Dong
1,2,†,
Xiaoyu Jiang
1,2,
Liang Qiao
3,
Jie Chen
1,2,
Tian Li
1,2,
Guoqing Pan
1,2,
Zeyang Zhou
1,2,3,* and
Chunfeng Li
1,2,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Resource Insects, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Microsporidia Infection and Prevention, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
3
College of Life Sciences, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2023, 14(12), 932; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14120932
Submission received: 7 October 2023 / Revised: 1 December 2023 / Accepted: 5 December 2023 / Published: 7 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Molecular Biology and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Lepidopteran insects are serious agricultural and forest pests that cause enormous global economic losses. The development of gene editing methods will significantly improve our ability to study gene function and greatly facilitate the control of lepidopteran pests. The application of gene editing technology in the model organism of lepidopteran insects, Bombyx mori, is mainly achieved by the microinjection of early embryos, but this approach is challenging in other lepidopteran insects. In this study, Cas9-mediated gene editing was established using the Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT) control technique by injection into B. mori female pupae. We identified a B. mori oocytes-targeting peptide ligand (BmOTP) that mediated the transduction of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein into the oocytes, resulting in heritable gene editing of the offspring. Because the BmOTP ligand was highly conserved among lepidopteran, our results will significantly facilitate genetic manipulation of other lepidopteran insects, advancing pest control or economic insect breeding.

Abstract

Lepidoptera is one of the most speciose insect orders, causing enormous damage to agricultural and forest crops. Although genome editing has been achieved in a few Lepidoptera for insect controls, most techniques are still limited. Here, by injecting female pupae of the Lepidoptera model species, Bombyx mori, gene editing was established using the Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT) control technique. We identified a B. mori oocytes-targeting peptide ligand (BmOTP, a 29 aa of vitellogenin N-terminal of silkworms) with a highly conserved sequence in lepidopteran insects that could efficiently deliver mCherry into oocytes. When BmOTP was fused to CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) and the BmOTP-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex was injected into female pupae, heritable editing of the offspring was achieved in the silkworms. Compared with embryo microinjection, individual injection is more convenient and eliminates the challenge of injecting extremely small embryos. Our results will significantly facilitate the genetic manipulation of other lepidopteran insects, which is essential for advancing lepidopteran pest control.

1. Introduction

Lepidoptera, one of the most speciose insect orders [1], causes great economic damage to agricultural and forest crops. For instance, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) has more than 350 host plants, such as corn and cotton [2]. It causes significant economic loss in the Americas and has recently invaded countries in Africa, Asia, and Oceania [3]. Helicoverpa armigera is a lepidopteran agricultural pest that causes severe damage to agricultural crops worldwide, such as cotton, tomato, and corn [4]. Hence, extensive research about the genomics and functional genomics is required to develop effective management strategies. To date, more than 30 genomic sequences of lepidopteran species have been obtained [1,5]. Genome editing has been achieved in a few lepidopteran insects. However, in most species, the editing techniques are still limited.
Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) is a model organism of Lepidoptera, and the gene-editing technology of silkworms has always been at the forefront of lepidopteran species. At present, zinc finger nuclease (ZFN) and transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) have been successfully applied in the targeted mutagenesis of silkworms using embryo injection [6,7]. As a simpler and more efficient gene-editing tool than ZFN and TALEN technologies, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has been widely used [8], and it also could mediate genome engineering in silkworms [9]. In Lepidoptera, CRISPR/Cas9 has been used in S. frugiperda [10], S. litura [11], H. armigera [12], Agrotis ipsilon [13], Cydia pomonella [14], Papilio xuthus, and Vanessa cardui [15,16]. However, most of these gene-editing tools rely on the microinjection of early embryos, which is difficult or inconvenient in other lepidopteran insects. Therefore, the development of gene-editing tools for a broader range of lepidopteran species is critical.
Recently, Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT) control technology has become the alternative genome-editing strategy without embryo injections. In this method, an ovary-targeting peptide (a peptide of Drosophila melanogaster yolk protein, DmP2C) is fused with Cas9 (DmP2C-Cas9). After injecting the Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex (Cas9 RNP; DmP2C-Cas9 protein complexed with guide RNAs) into the hemolymph of adult female insects, DmP2C transduces Cas9 RNP directly into the developing ovaries [17]. Using the DmP2C, ReMOT control has been shown to facilitate gene editing in many insect species, including Aedes aegypti [17], Agrotis ipsilon [13], Anopheles stephensi [18], Anopheles sinensis [19], Culex pipiens pallens [20], Nasonia vitripennis [21], Tribolium castaneum [22], Diaphorina citri [23], and even in the Chelicerate, Ixodes scapularis [24]. While the DmP2C ligand did not function robustly in Bemisia tabaci, an ovary-targeting peptide ligand of endogenous vitellogenin protein (BtKV) was identified to effectively mediate gene editing [25]. The ReMOT control overcomes the limitations of embryo injection by directly injecting the CRISPR/Cas9 system into the hemolymph of adult female insects. However, a gene-editing method based on the ReMOT control technique has not been established for Lepidoptera.
In this study, we developed a ReMOT control CRISPR-Cas9-based female pupae injection protocol for gene editing in B. mori. An oocytes-targeting peptide ligand (BmOTP) was identified, and injection of the Cas9 complex (Cas9 fused with BmOTP and complexed with 2 single-guide RNAs targeting to BmBLOS2 [9]) into the hemolymph of vitellogenic females resulted in heritable editing of the offspring in silkworms without the need for embryonic microinjection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect Rearing

The B. mori wild-type strain D9L was maintained in State Key Laboratory of Resource Insects at Southwest University (Chongqing, China) and reared on fresh mulberry leaves at 25 °C under a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod.

2.2. RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis

Three-day-old female pupae were grounded in liquid nitrogen, and the total RNA was extracted using a total RNA extraction kit (OMEGA, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After genomic DNA was digested with RNase-free DNase I (Takara, Tokyo, Japan) for 15 min at 37 °C, total RNA was used to reverse-transcribe the first-strand cDNA using a commercial kit (Yeasen, Shanghai, China). The cDNA samples were stored at −80 °C.

2.3. Plasmid Construction

The mCherry fragment was cloned by PCR, which was fused with an SV40 nuclear localization signal (NLS) and a (G4S)2 linker at the 5′ end, and a 3×FLAG and nucleoplasm NLS at the 3′ end. There were BamH I (between the SV40 NLS and G4S linker) and Hind III (between mCherry and FLAG) restriction enzyme sites. The mCherry fragment was inserted into the pET28a plasmid at Nde I and Xho I restriction enzyme sites to create the pET28-mCherry vector (Supplementary Sequences 1). The ovary-targeting ligands of silkworms (BmQV, BmVgN1, BmVgN2, BmVgN3, BmVgN2.1, and BmOTP) were cloned from the cDNA of female pupae by PCR. DmP2C was synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Then, the ovary-targeting ligands of silkworms and DmP2C were inserted into pET28-mCherry at the BamH I restriction enzyme site using the One Step Cloning Kit (Yeasen, Shanghai, China). The sequences for expression of fusion proteins (the ovary-targeting ligands and mCherry) are listed in Supplementary Sequences 2. Cas9 was cloned by PCR with the G4S linker at the 5′ end. After digesting the pET28-BmOTP-mCherry with BamH I and Hind III to obtain the pET28-BmOTP fragment, the mCherry fragment was replaced with the Cas9 fragment to generate the pET28-BmOTP-Cas9 vector (Supplementary Sequences 3). All primers required for PCR reaction are listed in Table S1.

2.4. Protein Expression and Purification

All pET28 vectors were transformed into E. coli Rosetta. When the culture reached an OD600 of 0.4–0.6, the recombinant bacteria was induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside for 20 h. The cells containing recombinant vector were resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and 100 mM NaCl) and sonicated. Recombinant proteins were purified using the Ni–NTA beads according to the manufacturer’s instructions (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Eluted proteins were dialyzed in dialysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mM PMSF) using a dialysis bag (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) at 4 °C, and the dialysis buffer was changed every 4 h, for a total of three times. Then, protein concentrations were estimated using Bradford Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China).

2.5. Guide RNA Generations

To knock out BmBLOS2 gene in B. mori, two sgRNAs were used against BmBLOS2 exon 2 and exon 4, following previous studies [9]. The sgRNAs were synthesized in vitro using a T7 high-yield RNA Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers required for PCR reaction are listed in Table S1.

2.6. Female Pupae Injection

To define the localization of fusion proteins in the embryo, female B. mori pupae were injected with 1 mg/mL mCherry fusion proteins (DmP2C-mCherry, BmQV-mCherry, BmVgN1-mCherry, BmVgN2-mCherry, BmVgN3-mCherry, BmVgN2.1-mCherry, and BmOTP-mCherry) once each on the 2nd and 4th days of the pupal stage, respectively, and a total of 20 μL was injected per silkworm each time. Recombinant mCherry fusion proteins lacking a targeting ligand and phosphate-buffered saline buffer (PBS) were injected as negative control. The mCherry fusion proteins or PBS injections were injected into female pupae through the stomata by a microliter syringe. On the 6th day of the pupal stage, ovaries were dissected, placed on a slide, and imaged using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
For gene editing, the 2 sgRNAs were mixed at a molar ratio of 1:1. BmOTP-Cas9 protein was mixed with the total sgRNAs (Table 1) and incubated at 25 °C for 20 min. Then Cas9 RNP was incubated with chloroquine, which was used as the endosome release reagent (ERR) [17]. The Cas9 RNP mix was injected into female pupae (20 μL per silkworm) once each on the 2nd and 4th days of pupal stage through the stomata by a microliter syringe. After injection, the pupae were reared at 25 °C until adult eclosion. The injected female moths (G−1) were crossed with the wild-type male moths, and G0 eggs were obtained.

2.7. Frozen Section of Ovarian Tissue

After injecting the mCherry fusion proteins into female pupae, the ovaries were dissected in PBS on the 6th day of pupal stage and washed with PBS. Then, an OCT embedding agent (Sakura, Torrance, CA, USA) was added, and the tissues were immersed in liquid nitrogen for embedding. The embedded ovarian tissue was sliced with a Cryotome (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the thickness was controlled at 40 μm. Tissue sections were immediately transferred to adhesive slides. Finally, the anti-fluorescence quenching agent (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) was added dropwise, and the sealing film was observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.8. ReMOT Control Mutation Analysis

After injection of G−1 female pupae, the G−1 female moths were crossed with wild-type males. The G0 progeny were screened for BmBLOS2 gene-editing phenotypes (oily skin phenotype), which were easily evaluated at the larval stage. To identify oil mutations induced by the ReMOT control, the genomic DNA of oil silkworms were extracted using a Tissue DNA Kit (OMEGA, Norcross, GA, USA). Genomic DNA from the wild-type silkworm was used as a control. The DNA fragment spanning both T1 and T2 target sites was amplified with specific primers (Table S1) by PCR and cloned into pMD19-T for sequencing (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China).

2.9. Heritability Crosses

After injection of G−1 generation, the G−1 female moths were mated with wild-type males. G0 progenies were screened for the mutants. The G0 mutants were crossed with wild-type moths to demonstrate heritability of the mutant phenotype. For the G0 mosaic oily male silkworm, G1 oily female was crossed with wild-type male, and the G2 generation were self-crossed. For the G0 complete oily female, after the crossing of G0 mutant with wild-type male silkworm, the G1 generation were self-crossed to spawn G2 eggs.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of the BmOTP Ovary-Targeting Ligand

The delivery of cargo into the silkworm ovaries was first tested with the DmP2C ligand. Our results demonstrated that there was no significant difference between DmP2C and the mCherry or PBS controls in the silkworms, indicating that DmP2C could not effectively enter the ovaries (Figure 1). To find an alternative ovary-targeting peptide ligand, B. tabaci predicted vitellogenin-A1-like was aligned with B. mori vitellogenin. The result showed that BtKV, a ligand-targeting cargo into the ovaries of B. tabaci [25], was highly similar to the N-terminal portion of silkworm vitellogenin protein (Figure S1). The conserved peptide ligand of the silkworm with B. tabaci, termed BmQV (QGLFRKMETDV), was fused with mCherry (BmQV-mCherry). Next, the recombinant BmQV-mCherry protein was injected into the female silkworms. No significant fluorescence signal was observed in the ovaries of the female pupae following BmQV-mCherry injection compared with the controls (Figure 1). After that, the 317 aa N-terminal portion of silkworm BmVg (BmVg-N), containing the conserved BmQV region, was divided into three segments (BmVgN1, BmVgN2, and BmVgN3) and fused with mCherry (Figure 2A). After injection of these fusion proteins, significant red fluorescence was observed in the developing oocytes from females injected with the BmVgN2-mCherry fusion protein, but not in the DmP2C-mCherry, BmVgN1-mCherry, and BmVgN3-mCherry-injected groups or the PBS- and mCherry-injected controls (Figure 2B).
Deletion analysis was next utilized to determine if a smaller region of BmVgN2 was sufficient for uptake into the silkworm ovaries (Figure 2C). The results showed that a 29 aa fragment, termed BmOTP (DREQQQGLFRKMETDVTGDCETLYTVSPV), was identified as sufficient to deliver mCherry to the silkworm ovaries (Figure 2D). Frozen sections of ovarian tissue further confirmed that BmOTP efficiently directed cargo into the oocyte, whereas DmP2C did not (Figure 3). The alignment of vitellogenin N-terminal sequences in the Lepidoptera species showed that the BmOTP sequence was highly conserved (Figure S2), which suggested that the BmOTP ligand could deliver cargo into the ovaries of other lepidopteran species.

3.2. Gene Editing by ReMOT Control

Because the mutation of BmBLOS2 resulted in an easily detectable oily skin phenotype [9,26,27], BmBLOS2 was used as a target to confirm the gene editing by ReMOT control. Considering the expression level of BmVg reached the peak on the 3rd day of the pupal stage [28], G−1 female pupae were injected with Cas9 RNP complex (BmOTP-Cas9, sgRNAs targeting BmBLOS2 exons 2 and exons 4, and ERR) once each on the 2nd and 4th day of the pupal stage, respectively, to achieve a higher transport efficiency and gene-editing efficiency (Figure 4A).
First, female pupae were injected with different concentrations of BmOTP-Cas9 to determine the optimal dose for gene editing (Table 1). No oily phenotype silkworm was observed as the pupae were treated with 0.1 μg/μL BmOTP-Cas9. When the protein concentration ranged from 0.5 to 2 μg/μL, there was a dose-dependent increase in BmBLOS2 gene-editing efficiency. When the protein concentration exceeded 2 μg/μL, BmOTP-Cas9 precipitated from the solution and could not be used for injection.
The ERR is another element that requires optimization in the ReMOT control system. In this study, the chloroquine was used for ERR, and the survival rate of silkworms was examined after female pupae were injected with various doses of chloroquine. As showed in Figure S3A, the survival rate of the silkworms did not considerably decrease when using ≤20 mM chloroquine. But, it significantly decreased at concentrations >20 mM. The egg productions of silkworms injected with 15 mM and 20 mM chloroquine were also not significantly different from those of the control group (Figure S3B). The data showed that chloroquine concentrations ≤20 mM were tolerable. Silkworms with the oily phenotype were generated when female pupae were treated with 15 mM or 20 mM chloroquine, whereas no gene-editing events were observed when 10 mM chloroquine was used (Table 1).
After injection, two oily phenotypes with BmBLOS2 mutations in G0 were observed: mosaic oily phenotype in male individuals and complete oily phenotype in female individuals (Figure 4B). To verify the knockout events of the oily phenotype, one mosaic oily silkworm and one complete oily silkworm were selected. Then, the silkworm genomic DNA was extracted after mating with wild-type (WT). The 4857 bp sequence containing the two target sites was amplified by PCR and sequenced. The sequencing results identified frameshift mutations due to base deletions in the oily silkworm but not in the wild-type (WT) silkworm (Figure 4C). These results suggested that deletions were common during ReMOT control in B. mori.

3.3. Heritability of Generated Mutations

To demonstrate that the mutations generated by ReMOT control were heritable in B. mori, mutant silkworms were crossed with wild-type silkworms (Figure 5). B. mori uses a ZW/ZZ sex determination system, in which heterozygous ZW produces females and homozygous ZZ produces males. When the mosaic oily phenotype G0 male moth (ZZ) was crossed with the WT female moth (ZW), 107 G1 offspring had a complete oily phenotype and 290 G1 offspring showed a wild phenotype. All G1 offspring displaying a complete oily phenotype were female. The complete oily phenotype of G1 ZW silkworms disappeared in the G2 offspring after crossing with WT males. In the G3 offspring, 62 oily females and 192 WT offspring were detected (expected mutants account for 1/4).
When the complete oily phenotype G0 female silkworm (ZW) was crossed with the WT male moth (ZZ), the G1 offspring all exhibited a WT phenotype. After mating males in the G1 generation with WT females, 103 mutants and 275 wild-type G2 offspring were observed in the broods with mutants, and all mutant offspring were females (Figure 5). The results showed that the mutant phenotypes were heritable, and the germline was edited.

4. Discussion

In this study, we have developed a heritable CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing system in B. mori using ReMOT control by switching the ovary-targeting ligand from DmP2C to BmOTP. DmP2C was derived from the yolk protein of D. melanogaster and used for the original ReMOT control method, which is effective for gene editing in a various of insect species, including mosquito [12,16,17,18], N. vitripennis [19], T. castaneum [20], and D. citri [23], as well as I. scapularis [24]. However, the DmP2C ligand failed to target the ovary in the silkworm. BtKV, an ovary-targeting peptide ligand of B. tabaci, can mediate efficient, heritable editing of the offspring genome [25] and was identified as highly similar to the N-terminal portion of silkworm vitellogenin protein (BmOTP) (Figure S1). In this study, BmOTP, a 29 aa ligand of silkworm vitellogenin protein, was identified to deliver the Cas9 RNP complex to silkworm oocytes, resulting in heritable gene editing of the progeny. The sequence of BmOTP was also highly conserved in Lepidoptera (Figure S2), suggesting that the BmOTP ligand could deliver Cas9 RNPs to the ovaries of other lepidopterans, providing a feasible and efficient option for lepidopteran insects that previously could not be genetically modified.
B. mori has been used as a model organism for gene-editing techniques in lepidopteran species, especially with the development of CRISPR/Cas technology. To date, silkworm gene editing has been chiefly accomplished by embryo injection, as initially described by Tamura et al. [29]. In contrast to embryo injection, which requires specialized equipment and highly-trained technicians, the ReMOT control system is convenient because it involves the direct injection of female pupae. In addition, diapause eggs exist in many silkworm strains, making embryo injection much more difficult. In comparison to the embryo injection, ReMOT control minimizes physical injury to the eggs by injecting during the pupal stage, making gene editing in the diapause strains of silkworms much easier.
In B. mori, the delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system based on plasmids was quick and convenient, with high stability in the silkworms [30,31,32,33]. However, Cas9- and sgRNA-positive individuals were only available in the G1 generation, and the gene-edited individuals were generated in the hybrid offspring of Cas9- and sgRNA-positive individuals. Even with the co-injection of Cas9 proteins and sgRNA in G0 eggs, the heritable gene-editing events can only be detected in the G1 generation. Moreover, the gene-editing phenotype in the G0 generation can also be identified when the CRISPR/Cas system is delivered to the embryo via mRNA [9] or protein [34]. Gene-editing events are randomized in the germ cells and/or somatic cells of G0 generation by embryo injection, and not all cells are affected, which results in some phenotypes in the G0 generation being completely non-heritable [35]. ReMOT control technology in silkworms allowed positive individuals to be screened for gene editing in the G0 generation (Figure 4), greatly reducing the time to obtain heritable offspring.
Notably, all complete oily G0 larvae were females, and all mosaic G0 larvae were males in this study. The complete oily G0 female larvae were homozygote (ZBLOS2−/W), according to the genetic analysis (Figure 5). Since fertilization occurs after egg laying in the domestic silkworm, the edited Z chromosome cannot be inherited in the G0 female offspring if the Cas9 RNP only works in the G1 pupal stage of injected females. Therefore, it is possible that the Z chromosome of the G0 male offspring was modified by undegraded Cas9 RNP in the fertilized eggs due to incomplete degradation of the Cas9 injected in the G−1 female pupa, indicating a longer editing window for ReMOT technology. In contrast to the mosaic G0 larvae generated by embryo injection [36], the oil phenotype was heritable in the mosaic larvae of the G0 males generated by ReMOT control. Approximately 1/4 of the females in the G1 generation were generated by mating the mosaic larvae of the G0 females with wild-type males. Therefore, we hypothesized that Cas9 RNP was not completely degraded after editing the BmBLOS2 gene of the maternal Z chromosome in the oocyte, and the remaining Cas9 RNP then randomly edited the BmBLOS2 gene of the paternal Z chromosome in the somatic cell, resulting in the BmBLOS2 knockout chimeras with a mosaic oil phenotype of the G0 generation.
The efficacy of gene editing in this experiment is greatly underestimated since the BmBLOS2 gene is located on the Z chromosome, resulting in the inability to screen for the Z−Z+ phenotype in males. Additionally, the use of ReMOT control technology is now mainly restricted to the production of knockouts. However, the spectrum of applications could be greatly expanded by utilizing delivery-modified Cas9 proteins or different base editors. Prime editing (PE) is a revolutionary genome-editing method that allows for the precise placement of all 12 nucleotide substitutions, short insertions, and short deletions using a catalytically impaired Cas9 fused to an engineered reverse transcriptase and a prime editing guide RNA [37], which is now widely used in many species [38,39,40,41]. The precise editing of subsequent individuals could be achieved in the future by delivering the PE system into the oocyte through ReMOT control. Recently, research has established an effective delivery of DNA to the ovary using ReMOT control based on the ability of GAL4 to bind to the UAS sequence [42]. Therefore, ReMOT control combined with these applications could quickly achieve gene knockout, knock-in, and expression control and has a wide range of applications, ultimately advancing lepidopteran pest control mechanisms.

5. Conclusions

The B. mori oocytes-targeting peptide ligand was identified in this work. Based on the BmOTP ligand, ReMOT control allows for CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in B. mori. In contrast to embryo injection, the direct injection of female silkworm pupae is more convenient and makes gene editing in the diapause strains of silkworms much easier. Since the BmOTP ligand was highly conserved among lepidopteran insects, our results will also greatly facilitate the establishment of genetic manipulation in other lepidopteran insects, advancing pest control or economic insect breeding. Furthermore, this technology could be greatly expanded by utilizing the delivery of modified Cas9 proteins or different base editors.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects14120932/s1, Figure S1: Identification of the BmVg ligand; Figure S2: Alignment of the amino acid sequences of vitellogenin N-terminal in Lepidoptera; Figure S3: The effect of chloroquine on silkworm; Table S1: Oligonucleotide primers; Supplementary Sequences 1: DNA sequences for expression of mCherry using the pET28a vector; Supplementary Sequences 2: DNA sequences for expression of fusion proteins (the ovary-targeting ligands and mCherry) using the pET28a vector; Supplementary Sequences 3: DNA sequences for expression of fusion protein BmOTP-Cas9 using the pET28a vector.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.Y., L.Q. and C.L.; methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation and visualization, B.Y., S.D. and X.J.; resources and data curation, J.C. and C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.Y.; writing—review and editing, L.Q. and C.L.; project administration and funding acquisition, T.L., G.P. and Z.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Chongqing Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System (CQMAITS202311), Natural Science Foundation of Chogqing, China (cstc2021jcyj-cxttX0005), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU-XDJH202322).

Data Availability Statement

All the datasets in this study are available from the first author or corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Tongbao Liu (Medical Research Institute, Southwest University) and Jialing Bao (State Key Laboratory of Resource Insects, Southwest University) for valuable suggestions and editing the draft of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Triant, D.A.; Cinel, S.D.; Kawahara, A.Y. Lepidoptera Genomes: Current Knowledge, Gaps and Future Directions. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2018, 25, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Montezano, D.G.; Specht, A.; Sosa-Gómez, D.R.; Roque-Specht, V.F.; Sousa-Silva, J.C.; Paula-Moraes, S.V.; Peterson, J.A.; Hunt, T.E. Host Plants of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the Americas. Afr. Entomol. 2018, 26, 286–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tay, W.T.; Meagher, R.L.; Czepak, C.; Groot, A.T. Spodoptera frugiperda: Ecology, Evolution, and Management Options of an Invasive Species. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2023, 68, 299–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tay, W.T.; Soria, M.F.; Walsh, T.; Thomazoni, D.; Silvie, P.; Behere, G.T.; Anderson, C.; Downes, S. A Brave New World for an Old World Pest: Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, C.; Zhang, L.; Liu, B.; Gao, B.; Huang, C.; Zhang, J.; Jin, M.; Wang, H.; Peng, Y.; Rice, A.; et al. Genomic Features of the Polyphagous Cotton Leafworm Spodoptera littoralis. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Takasu, Y.; Sajwan, S.; Daimon, T.; Osanai-Futahashi, M.; Uchino, K.; Sezutsu, H.; Tamura, T.; Zurovec, M. Efficient TALEN Construction for Bombyx mori Gene Targeting. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, F.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, H.; Liu, C.; Lin, Y.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. Highly Efficient and Specific Genome Editing in Silkworm Using Custom TALENs. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yadav, A.K.; Butler, C.; Yamamoto, A.; Patil, A.A.; Lloyd, A.L.; Scott, M.J. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Split Homing Gene Drive Targeting Doublesex for Population Suppression of the Global Fruit Pest Drosophila Suzukii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2301525120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Xu, J.; Zeng, B.; Ling, L.; You, L.; Chen, Y.; Huang, Y.; Tan, A. The CRISPR/Cas System Mediates Efficient Genome Engineering in Bombyx mori. Cell Res. 2013, 23, 1414–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, G.-H.; Chereddy, S.C.R.R.; Howell, J.L.; Palli, S.R. Genome Editing in the Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda: Multiple sgRNA/Cas9 Method for Identification of Knockouts in One Generation. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 122, 103373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bi, H.-L.; Xu, J.; He, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, K.; Huang, Y.-P. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated ebony Knockout Results in Puparium Melanism in Spodoptera litura. Insect Sci. 2019, 26, 1011–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Khan, S.A.; Reichelt, M.; Heckel, D.G. Functional Analysis of the ABCs of Eye Color in Helicoverpa armigera with CRISPR/Cas9-Induced Mutations. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, X.; Cao, Y.; Zhan, S.; Tan, A.; Palli, S.R.; Huang, Y. Disruption of Sex-Specific Doublesex Exons Results in Male- and Female-Specific Defects in the Black Cutworm, Agrotis ipsilon. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 1697–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Garczynski, S.F.; Martin, J.A.; Griset, M.; Willett, L.S.; Cooper, W.R.; Swisher, K.D.; Unruh, T.R. CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) CpomOR1 Gene Affects Egg Production and Viability. J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 1847–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Perry, M.; Kinoshita, M.; Saldi, G.; Huo, L.; Arikawa, K.; Desplan, C. Expanded Color Vision in Butterflies: Molecular Logic behind Three Way Stochastic Choices. Nature 2016, 535, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.; Fan, D.; Zhang, W.; Liu, G.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, L.; Fang, X.; Chen, L.; Dong, Y.; Chen, Y.; et al. Outbred Genome Sequencing and CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Butterflies. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chaverra-Rodriguez, D.; Macias, V.M.; Hughes, G.L.; Pujhari, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Peterson, D.R.; Kim, D.; McKeand, S.; Rasgon, J.L. Targeted Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein into Arthropod Ovaries for Heritable Germline Gene Editing. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Macias, V.M.; McKeand, S.; Chaverra-Rodriguez, D.; Hughes, G.L.; Fazekas, A.; Pujhari, S.; Jasinskiene, N.; James, A.A.; Rasgon, J.L. Cas9-Mediated Gene-Editing in the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles Stephensi by ReMOT Control. G3 2020, 10, 1353–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, X.; Ling, X.; Sun, Q.; Qiu, P.; Xiang, K.; Hong, J.; He, S.; Chen, J.; Ding, X.; Hu, H.; et al. High-Efficiency Gene Editing in Anopheles sinensis Using ReMOT Control. bioRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yin, H.; Zhou, D.; Sun, Y.; Ma, L.; Shen, B.; Zhu, C. ReMOT Control Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Complex to Induce Germline Mutagenesis in the Disease Vector Mosquitoes Culex pipiens pallens (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2021, 58, 1202–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chaverra-Rodriguez, D.; Dalla Benetta, E.; Heu, C.C.; Rasgon, J.L.; Ferree, P.M.; Akbari, O.S. Germline Mutagenesis of Nasonia vitripennis through Ovarian Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein. Insect Mol. Biol. 2020, 29, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shirai, Y.; Daimon, T. Mutations in Cardinal are Responsible for the Red-1 and Peach Eye Color Mutants of the Red Flour Beetle Tribolium castaneum. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 529, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chaverra-Rodriguez, D.; Bui, M.; Gilleland, C.L.; Rasgon, J.L.; Akbari, O.S. CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis of the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri. GEN Biotechnol. 2023, 2, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sharma, A.; Pham, M.N.; Reyes, J.B.; Chana, R.; Yim, W.C.; Heu, C.C.; Kim, D.; Chaverra-Rodriguez, D.; Rasgon, J.L.; Harrell, R.A.; et al. Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing in the Black-Legged Tick, Ixodes Scapularis, by Embryo Injection and ReMOT Control. iScience 2022, 25, 103781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Heu, C.C.; McCullough, F.M.; Luan, J.; Rasgon, J.L. CRISPR-Cas9-Based Genome Editing in the Silverleaf Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). CRISPR J. 2020, 3, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Takasu, Y.; Kobayashi, I.; Beumer, K.; Uchino, K.; Sezutsu, H.; Sajwan, S.; Carroll, D.; Tamura, T.; Zurovec, M. Targeted Mutagenesis in the Silkworm Bombyx mori Using Zinc Finger Nuclease mRNA Injection. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, Y.; Tan, A.; Xu, J.; Li, Z.; Zeng, B.; Ling, L.; You, L.; Chen, Y.; James, A.A.; Huang, Y. Site-Specific, TALENs-Mediated Transformation of Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 55, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, C.; Lin, Y.; Shen, G.; Chen, E.; Wang, Y.; Luo, J.; Zhang, H.; Xing, R.; Xia, Q. Female Qualities in Males: Vitellogenin Synthesis Induced by Ovary Transplants into the Male Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 453, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tamura, T.; Thibert, C.; Royer, C.; Kanda, T.; Eappen, A.; Kamba, M.; Kômoto, N.; Thomas, J.-L.; Mauchamp, B.; Chavancy, G.; et al. Germline Transformation of the Silkworm Bombyx mori L. Using a piggyBac Transposon-Derived Vector. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nartey, M.A.; Sun, X.; Qin, S.; Hou, C.-X.; Li, M.-W. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Knockout Reveals That the Clock Gene Timeless is Indispensable for Regulating Circadian Behavioral Rhythms in Bombyx mori. Insect Sci. 2021, 28, 1414–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bi, H.; Xu, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, K.; Xu, J. CRISPR Disruption of BmOvo Resulted in the Failure of Emergence and Affected the Wing and Gonad Development in the Silkworm Bombyx mori. Insects 2019, 10, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, W.; Zhang, F.; Guo, K.; Xu, J.; Zhao, P.; Xia, Q. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing of the Let-7 Seed Sequence Improves Silk Yield in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 243, 124793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, Z.-J.; Zhang, S.-S.; Niu, B.-L.; Ji, D.-F.; Liu, X.-J.; Li, M.-W.; Bai, H.; Palli, S.R.; Wang, C.-Z.; Tan, A.-J. A Determining Factor for Insect Feeding Preference in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zou, Y.; Ye, A.; Liu, S.; Wu, W.; Xu, L.; Dai, F.; Tong, X. Expansion of Targetable Sites for the Ribonucleoprotein-Based CRISPR/Cas9 System in the Silkworm Bombyx mori. BMC Biotechnol. 2021, 21, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Daimon, T.; Kiuchi, T.; Takasu, Y. Recent Progress in Genome Engineering Techniques in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Dev. Growth Differ. 2014, 56, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hong, J.W.; Jeong, C.Y.; Yu, J.H.; Kim, S.-B.; Kang, S.K.; Kim, S.-W.; Kim, N.-S.; Kim, K.Y.; Park, J.W. Bombyx mori Kynurenine 3-Monooxygenase Gene Editing and Insect Molecular Breeding Using the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat/CRISPR Associated Protein 9 System. Biotechnol. Prog. 2020, 36, e3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Anzalone, A.V.; Randolph, P.B.; Davis, J.R.; Sousa, A.A.; Koblan, L.W.; Levy, J.M.; Chen, P.J.; Wilson, C.; Newby, G.A.; Raguram, A.; et al. Search-and-Replace Genome Editing without Double-Strand Breaks or Donor DNA. Nature 2019, 576, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zong, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xue, C.; Li, B.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, G.; Huang, X.; Cao, X.; et al. An Engineered Prime Editor with Enhanced Editing Efficiency in Plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 1394–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tao, R.; Wang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Zhou, L.; Jiang, L.; Li, L.; He, X.; Li, M.; Yu, Y.; et al. WT-PE: Prime Editing with Nuclease Wild-Type Cas9 Enables Versatile Large-Scale Genome Editing. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, P.J.; Hussmann, J.A.; Yan, J.; Knipping, F.; Ravisankar, P.; Chen, P.-F.; Chen, C.; Nelson, J.W.; Newby, G.A.; Sahin, M.; et al. Enhanced Prime Editing Systems by Manipulating Cellular Determinants of Editing Outcomes. Cell 2021, 184, 5635–5652.e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bosch, J.A.; Birchak, G.; Perrimon, N. Precise Genome Engineering in Drosophila Using Prime Editing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2021996118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yang, X.-L.; Ling, X.; Sun, Q.; Chen, J.; Xiang, K.; Qiu, P.-P.; Hong, J.-F.; Yan, Z.-T.; Wang, R.; Chen, B.; et al. Construction of Exogenous DNA Delivery System Based on Ovary-Delivering Peptide and Gal4-UAS Binding Property in Anopheles sinensis (Diptera: Culicidae). Acta Entomol. Sin. 2023, 66, 723–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 14 00932 g001
Figure 1. The delivery of cargo into silkworm ovaries. The DmP2C ligand from D. melanogaster and BmQV ligand (QGLFRKMETDV) from B. mori were fused with mCherry and injected into female pupae at days 2 and 4. Ovaries were dissected 2 days after injections and imaged using fluorescence microscope. PBS and mCherry were used as controls.
Figure 1. The delivery of cargo into silkworm ovaries. The DmP2C ligand from D. melanogaster and BmQV ligand (QGLFRKMETDV) from B. mori were fused with mCherry and injected into female pupae at days 2 and 4. Ovaries were dissected 2 days after injections and imaged using fluorescence microscope. PBS and mCherry were used as controls.
Insects 14 00932 g001
Insects 14 00932 g002
Figure 2. The deletion analysis of BmVg-mediated delivery of mCherry. (A): The schematic of BmVg-ligand segmentation. The 317 aa N-terminal portion of silkworm BmVg (BmVg-N) was divided into BmVgN1 (1–133), BmVgN2 (99–164), and BmVgN3 (149–317). The mCherry fused to these derivatives (BmVgN1, BmVgN2, and BmVgN3) to express the fusion proteins in E. coli Rosetta cells. (B): Targeting of mCherry by the BmVg ligands into the ovaries. The mCherry fusion proteins containing DmP2C or BmVg ligand fragments (BmVN1, BmVN2, and BmVN3) were injected into the hemolymph of silkworm female pupae. The ovaries were dissected and imaged using fluorescence microscope. PBS and mCherry were used as controls. (C): The sequences of BmVN2 region deletions. (D): Deletion analysis of the BmVN2 region. The mCherry fusion proteins containing BmVN2 ligand fragments (BmVN2, BmVN2.1, and BmOTP) were injected into female pupae and the ovaries were imaged. PBS and mCherry were used as controls.
Figure 2. The deletion analysis of BmVg-mediated delivery of mCherry. (A): The schematic of BmVg-ligand segmentation. The 317 aa N-terminal portion of silkworm BmVg (BmVg-N) was divided into BmVgN1 (1–133), BmVgN2 (99–164), and BmVgN3 (149–317). The mCherry fused to these derivatives (BmVgN1, BmVgN2, and BmVgN3) to express the fusion proteins in E. coli Rosetta cells. (B): Targeting of mCherry by the BmVg ligands into the ovaries. The mCherry fusion proteins containing DmP2C or BmVg ligand fragments (BmVN1, BmVN2, and BmVN3) were injected into the hemolymph of silkworm female pupae. The ovaries were dissected and imaged using fluorescence microscope. PBS and mCherry were used as controls. (C): The sequences of BmVN2 region deletions. (D): Deletion analysis of the BmVN2 region. The mCherry fusion proteins containing BmVN2 ligand fragments (BmVN2, BmVN2.1, and BmOTP) were injected into female pupae and the ovaries were imaged. PBS and mCherry were used as controls.
Insects 14 00932 g002
Insects 14 00932 g003
Figure 3. The frozen section analysis of BmOTP-mediated delivery into oocyte. Female pupae were injected with mCherry fused with DmP2C or BmOTP, and ovaries were dissected for frozen section. PBS and mCherry were used as injection controls. The frozen sections were imaged using a fluorescence microscope. The arrows showed mCherry protein entering the oocyte.
Figure 3. The frozen section analysis of BmOTP-mediated delivery into oocyte. Female pupae were injected with mCherry fused with DmP2C or BmOTP, and ovaries were dissected for frozen section. PBS and mCherry were used as injection controls. The frozen sections were imaged using a fluorescence microscope. The arrows showed mCherry protein entering the oocyte.
Insects 14 00932 g003
Insects 14 00932 g004
Figure 4. Cas9-mediated gene editing using ReMOT Control. (A): The flowchart of gene editing using ReMOT control in silkworm. The injection mixture was composed of BmOTP-Cas9 protein, sgRNAs (targeting exons 2 and 4 of BmBLOS2 gene), and chloroquine (ERR) and injected into the hemolymph of G−1 female pupae. The mutant silkworm (oily phenotype) was screened in G0 offspring larva. (B): Mutants with oily skin induced by BmOTP-Cas9 RNP injection. After injection, there were 3 different phenotypes (wild-type, mosaic oily, and complete oily silkworms) in the G0 generation. (C): Molecular detection of G0 mutations. The targeting T1 sites at exons 2 (EX2) and T2 site at exons 4 (EX4) of sgRNAs are marked in green font. The protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sites are red font. A small deletion was detected at the target region of BmBLOS2 gene, causing the frameshift mutations.
Figure 4. Cas9-mediated gene editing using ReMOT Control. (A): The flowchart of gene editing using ReMOT control in silkworm. The injection mixture was composed of BmOTP-Cas9 protein, sgRNAs (targeting exons 2 and 4 of BmBLOS2 gene), and chloroquine (ERR) and injected into the hemolymph of G−1 female pupae. The mutant silkworm (oily phenotype) was screened in G0 offspring larva. (B): Mutants with oily skin induced by BmOTP-Cas9 RNP injection. After injection, there were 3 different phenotypes (wild-type, mosaic oily, and complete oily silkworms) in the G0 generation. (C): Molecular detection of G0 mutations. The targeting T1 sites at exons 2 (EX2) and T2 site at exons 4 (EX4) of sgRNAs are marked in green font. The protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sites are red font. A small deletion was detected at the target region of BmBLOS2 gene, causing the frameshift mutations.
Insects 14 00932 g004
Insects 14 00932 g005
Figure 5. Crossing scheme to identify heritability. The mosaic oily male and complete oily female were screened in the G0 generation after the injection of G−1 females. For the G0 mosaic oily male silkworm, the G0 mutant male was crossed with wild-type female silkworm. G1 oily female was crossed with wild-type male, and the G2 generation were self-crossed. For the G0 complete oily female, after the crossing of G0 mutant with wild-type male silkworm, the G1 generation were self-crossed.
Figure 5. Crossing scheme to identify heritability. The mosaic oily male and complete oily female were screened in the G0 generation after the injection of G−1 females. For the G0 mosaic oily male silkworm, the G0 mutant male was crossed with wild-type female silkworm. G1 oily female was crossed with wild-type male, and the G2 generation were self-crossed. For the G0 complete oily female, after the crossing of G0 mutant with wild-type male silkworm, the G1 generation were self-crossed.
Insects 14 00932 g005
Table 1. Gene-editing efficiency by ReMOT control in B. mori.
Table 1. Gene-editing efficiency by ReMOT control in B. mori.
BmOTP-Cas9 (μg/μL)Total sgRNAs (μg/μL)Chloroquine (mM)No. of Females Injected (n)No. of G0 BroodsNo. of G0 Broods with MutantsG0 Mutant Broods/G0 Broods (%)
0.10.0520353300
0.50.2520555111.96
10.520554912.04
2120302613.85
21152016212.5
2110201800
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, B.; Dong, S.; Jiang, X.; Qiao, L.; Chen, J.; Li, T.; Pan, G.; Zhou, Z.; Li, C. Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing Using Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT) Control in Bombyx mori. Insects 2023, 14, 932. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14120932

AMA Style

Yu B, Dong S, Jiang X, Qiao L, Chen J, Li T, Pan G, Zhou Z, Li C. Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing Using Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT) Control in Bombyx mori. Insects. 2023; 14(12):932. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14120932

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Bin, Sichen Dong, Xiaoyu Jiang, Liang Qiao, Jie Chen, Tian Li, Guoqing Pan, Zeyang Zhou, and Chunfeng Li. 2023. "Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing Using Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT) Control in Bombyx mori" Insects 14, no. 12: 932. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14120932

APA Style

Yu, B., Dong, S., Jiang, X., Qiao, L., Chen, J., Li, T., Pan, G., Zhou, Z., & Li, C. (2023). Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing Using Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT) Control in Bombyx mori. Insects, 14(12), 932. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14120932

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop