Next Article in Journal
Overview of Updated Control Tactics for Western Flower Thrips
Previous Article in Journal
A New Subgenus of the Genus Phenolia (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae) from Myanmar Cretaceous Amber with Taxonomic, Phylogenetic and Bionomic Notes on the ‘Nitidulid’ Group of Families
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 7
10.3390/insects14070648
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of the Predatory Mite Neoseiulus barkeri against Spider Mites Damaging Rubber Trees

by
Junyu Chen
1,2,3,4,†,
Lijiu Zheng
1,2,3,4,†,
Zhengpei Ye
2,3,4,
Jianyun Wang
2,3,4,
Fangping Zhang
2,3,4,
Yueguan Fu
2,3,4,* and
Chenghui Zhang
1,*
1
College of Ecology and Environment, Hainan University, Haikou 570100, China
2
Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 570100, China
3
Engineering Research Center for Biological Control of Tropical Crops Diseases and Insect Pest, Haikou 570100, China
4
Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Haikou 570100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2023, 14(7), 648; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14070648
Submission received: 14 May 2023 / Revised: 17 July 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023 / Published: 18 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Other Arthropods and General Topics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Phytoseiid mite Neoseiulus barkeri is a widely recognized and commercially accessible predator of many insects and pest mites, with a global presence. In this study, we evaluated the biological control potential of N. barkeri against Eotetranychus sexmaculatus, Eutetranychus orientalis and Oligonychus biharensisin, which are major spider mites causing serious damage to rubber trees in China. The biological performance of N. barkeri on these pests in comparison to that on Tyrophagus putrescentiae, a storage mite used to mass-rear this predator, was determined in the laboratory. When fed on these spider mites, N. barkeri could complete its life cycle and had a high fecundity on E. orientalis or O. biharensisin. It performed better on E. orientalis than on other two spider mites. It performed similarly on O. biharensisin and T. putrescentiae, in terms of its immature developmental period, survivorship, fecundity and intrinsic rate of increase on these preys. The data provides valuable insights into our understanding of the potential efficacy of N. barkeri as a biological control agent for the management of pest spider mites on rubber trees.

Abstract

The spider mites Eotetranychus sexmaculatus, Eutetranychus orientalis and Oligonychus biharensisin are severe pests of rubber trees in China. The predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri has been found to be a natural enemy of these three pests, while nothing is known about the biological performance of this phytoseiid predator against these phytophagous mites. In this study, the development, survivorship, reproduction, adult longevity, fecundity, sex ratio and population growth parameters of N. barkeri fed on these pests were evaluated in comparison to the factitious prey Tyrophagus putrescentiae in the laboratory at 25 ± 1 °C, 75 ± 5% relative humidity and a 12:12 (L:D) h photoperiod. The results showed that N. barkeri could develop from egg to adult and reproduced successfully on the three preys. The survival rate of N. barkeri from egg to adult was higher when fed on E. orientalis (100%) and T. putrescentiae (100%) than when fed on O. biharensisin (93.60%) and E. sexmaculatus (71.42%). The shortest and longest generation time for N. barkeri were observed on E. orientalis with 6.67 d and E. sexmaculatus with 12.50 d, respectively. The maximum fecundity (29.35 eggs per female) and highest intrinsic rate of increase (rm = 0.226) were recorded when N. barkeri fed on E. orientalis, while feeding on E. sexmaculatus gave the minimum fecundity (1.87 eggs per female) and lowest reproduction rate (rm = 0.041). The values of these parameters for N. barkeri evaluated on O. biharensisin were found to be comparable to those obtained on T. putrescentiae. The sex ratio of N. barkeri progeny on the preys mentioned above, apart from O. biharensisin, was female biased. According to the findings, N. barkeri could serve as a promising biocontrol agent against E. orientalis and O. biharensisin, and possibly E. sexmaculatus on rubber trees.

1. Introduction

Biological control is a cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative to chemical control in managing pest [1]. Currently, there are more than 230 species of natural enemies available for augmentative biological control worldwide, with the Acari group, which includes 30 species of commercially available natural enemies, occupying the second largest group after hymenopteran parasitoids within the arthropods used in augmentative releases [2]. Predatory mites from the family Phytoseiidae have proven to be the most successful biocontrol agents from Acari used to control some of the most important pests including two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae, western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis and whitefly Bemisia tabaci, which infest vegetables and ornamental crops worldwide [3,4,5]. For example, in 2005, the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii, originating from the East Mediterranean coast, was introduced to the market, and by 2014, it had been sold to over 50 countries and used successfully in pest management in many greenhouse crops [3,6,7]. Most of the commercially used phytoseiid predatory mites belong to the genera Amblyseius and Neoseiulus [8]. As one of the earliest commercial biocontrol agents, N. barkeri has been available in the market for thrips control since 1981 [3,9]. Apart from thrips, it is now widely used to effectively control several other small insect pests and spider mites [10]. This predatory mite can be commonly found in citrus, mango, rubber and other plants, as well as stored products [11,12]. Due to its economic significance, the biological and ecological studies on N. barkeri have received a lot of attention. For instance, several studies have investigated the effects of different temperatures and photoperiods on the development and reproduction of N. barkeri [9,11,12,13], the impact of female age on mating and food deprivation periods on reproduction of N. barkeri [14], the effects of UV-B radiation on the survival and egg hatchability of N. barkeri [15] and the tolerance of N. barkeri to high temperature and desiccation stresses [16]. Although a limited number of studies have evaluated the biological performance of N. barkeri against phytophagous mites and pests of crops [9,17,18,19,20,21], little is known about its potential ability to control pests on trees. Further evaluation of the performance of N. barkeri against tree pests will provide a better understanding of its suitability as a biocontrol agent and potentially enhance its use in various fields.
The rubber tree, Hevea brasiliensis, is originally from the Amazon, which is a highly valuable tree used in economical production of natural rubber latex [22]. Over recent decades, rubber plantations have expanded rapidly across southern China, particularly in Hainan Island, which possesses the largest rubber plantation area, accounting for approximately one quarter of the total flora [23]. Unfortunately, rubber trees are heavily damaging by a variety of phytophagous mites, including six-spotted mite Eotetranychus sexmaculatus, oriental red mite Eutetranychus orientalis and Oligonychus biharensisin in China (Figure 1) [24,25]. These three spider mites cannot spin web but seriously affect the growth and latex production of rubber trees, causing significant economic loss [26]. The control of these spider mites currently relies primarily on acaricides, but the overuse of acaricides has resulted in pesticide resistance among the spider mites, adverse effects on natural enemies, and environmental pollution [24,27]. Since N. barkeri, a commercially produced predatory mite, has been found to be a natural enemy of these phytophagous mites on the rubber tree in China [28,29], it has application potential for controlling them.
In this study, we assessed the biological performance of N. barkeri on E. sexmaculatus, E. orientalis and O. biharensisin in comparison to that on the mold mite Tyrophagus putrescentiae. This species is a common mite found ubiquitously in soil, stored products and house dust, which is often used as factitious prey for mass-rearing predatory mites, including N. barkeri [13,30]. The development, survival and fecundity of N. barkeri on all four preys were compared under laboratory conditions. The results provide valuable insights into the potential use of N. barkeri in an augmentative biological control program aimed at mitigating spider mite infestations in rubber trees.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mites

A colony of the predatory mite N. barkeri used in this study was maintained in the laboratory for over 50 generations within artificial climate chambers. As a factitious prey, T. putrescentiae was utilized and fed with wheat bran for more than ten generations within an artificial climate box (MGC-300H, Blue pard, Shanghai, China) that originated from the laboratory’s stock culture. The preys E. sexmaculatus, E. orientalis and O. biharensisin (Figure 1) were collected from rubber trees located in the suburbs of Danzhou city, Hainan province, China, and maintained in the laboratory for more than five generations. These three spider mites were fed with leaves of rubber trees, which were kept in an upside-down position. To maintain leaf freshness, their host leaves from the middle stratum of the tree were placed on sterile water-absorbed cotton in a 25 cm × 18 cm disc. In line with their natural habits of damaging rubber tree leaves [26], leaf surface was placed upwards for rearing E. sexmaculatus and E. orientalis, while laid upside down for rearing O. biharensisin. Every 3 days, fresh rubber tree leaves were replaced. Predatory and prey mites were maintained at 25 ± 1 °C, 75 ± 5% relative humidity and a 12:12 (L:D) h photoperiod.

2.2. Experimental Unit

The experimental unit is a homemade structure designed to resemble a stock culture rearing unit (Figure 2), composing of three layers of acrylic board. The upper layer is 39.5 × 39.5 × 1.5 mm. The lower layer is 39.5 × 39.5 × 4 mm. The middle layer features a circular hole with a diameter of 18 mm in the center, which serves as a space for mite activity. To supply the moisture needed for the mites, a small hole with a diameter of 1.5 mm is positioned in the center of the lower layer. A cotton thread is threaded through this hole, which is dipped in water contained within an enamel tray. Water was added every day to prevent the cotton from drying out. The three-layer acrylic plates are secured together at the ends using long tail clamps, forming a closed feeding cell for mites.

2.3. Experimental Setup

The predatory mite N. barkeri was maintained in a rearing unit consisting of a Petri dish (5 cm diameter) with a foam plastic pad (3 cm diameter, 1 cm thick) soaked in water, which has a piece of filter paper (3 cm diameter) with plastic film (2 cm diameter) on it [31]. Each rearing unit housed an adult female N. barkeri with sufficient amounts of E. sexmaculatus, E. orientalis, O. biharensisin or T. putrescentiae provided as food. To ensure synchronized eggs for the experiments, newly laid N. barkeri eggs less than 8 h old were collected and transferred to the experimental unit using a fine camel hair brush. A single egg was placed in each experimental unit. Sixty eggs were tested in each biological replicate. Three biological replicates were conducted for each prey.
The hatching of N. barkeri eggs was observed every 8 h, at 7:00, 15:00 and 23:00 throughout the day. The hatchability and developmental period of the eggs were recorded. Once the eggs hatched, they were provided with an abundant supply of different types of prey as a food source. The development, duration of immature stages and mortality of N. barkeri were observed and recorded until they developed into adult mites. The newly emerged predatory adult mites were paired to obtain couples of one male and one female, which were subsequently placed into separate rearing units for individual cultivation. They were supplied with different adult preys as a food source. The longevity of the female predators and the number of eggs laid by them were recorded daily until their death. The eggs laid by the predators were collected and reared until adulthood, as described above, in order to determine the gender of their offspring. All experiments were carried out in an incubator under controlled conditions at 25 ± 1 °C, 75 ± 5% relative humidity, and a 12:12 (L:D) h photoperiod.

2.4. Data Analysis

Life table parameters of N. barkeri fed on various preys were determined by using the survivorship and fecundity, following the methods outlined by Xu [32]. The net increase rate R0 is calculated as the sum of lx multiplied by mx. The mean generation time (T) was obtained as Σlx × mx × x/R0. The intrinsic rate of increase (rm) was computed using the formula rm= lnR0/T. The finite rate of increase (λ) was calculated as λ = erm and doubling time (DT) as DT = ln2/rm. In these equations, x represents a unit interval of time, lx denotes the age-specific survival rate (proportion of individuals alive at age x), mx connotes the age-specific fecundity (the number of female progenies per female at age x), and e is a constant of nature.
The data were prepared in Microsoft Excel and then subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS v.22.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The effects of different prey types on the development, mortality, longevity and fecundity of N. barkeri were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and significant differences between means were confirmed by applying Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test. All the data were tested for the assumption of normality and homoscedasticity before ANOVA tests. The sex ratios of the offspring were compared using χ2 tests. The graphical illustrations were generated using Origin 7.5 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Development Period of Immature Stages

The predatory mite N. barkeri completed its development successfully when fed on E. sexmaculatus, E. orientalis, O. biharensisin and T. putrescentiae. It showed no difference in the egg (F = 0.269; df1 = 3, df2 = 173; P = 0.848) and protonymph (F = 0.246; df1 = 3, df2 = 173; P = 0.864) developmental times when fed on the four different prey types (Table 1). However, the developmental duration of larvae (F = 18.869; df1 = 3, df2 = 173; P < 0.001), deutonymph (F = 2.827; df1 = 3, df2 = 173; P = 0.04) and total immature stage (F = 17.815; df1 = 3, df2 = 104; P < 0.001) of N. barkeri were significantly influenced by preys. When E. sexmaculatus was used as a food source, the development time of larval N. barkeri was the slowest at 1.52 ± 0.11 d. In contrast, N. barkeri developed most rapidly when fed on E. orientalis, taking only 0.67 ± 0.03 d to complete the larval stage. Developmental period for larvae fed on O. biharensisin and T. putrescentiae did not significantly differ (F = 2.119; df1 = 1, df2 = 69; P = 0.150). The deutonymph developmental duration of N. barkeri was observed to be significantly longer when fed on T. putrescentiae compared to those fed the other three preys (F = 5.319; df1 = 3, df2 = 156; P = 0.002). The shortest and longest generation time recorded for N. barkeri were 6.67 ± 0.08 d and 12.50 ± 0.08 d, when fed on E. orientalis and E. sexmaculatus, respectively.

3.2. Age-Specific Survival Rate

When N. barkeri fed on E. orientalis or T. putrescentiae, all its immature survived (Table 2). When N. barkeri fed on O. biharensisin, mortality was observed at the deutonymph stage of this predatory mite, but not at the egg and other immature stages. The eggs of the predator fed on E. sexmaculatus survived, but an increasing mortality was observed during the protonymph (F = 1067.077; df1 = 3, df2 = 8; P < 0.001) and deutonymph (F = 1323.392; df1 = 3, df2 = 8; P < 0.001) stages. The accumulated survival rate of this predatory mite from egg to adult was 93.60% for those fed on O. biharensisin and 71.42% for those fed on E. sexmaculatus (F = 2101.222; df1 = 3, df2 = 8; P < 0.001).

3.3. Adult Longevity and Reproduction

Preys had a notable impact on the longevity of female adult of N. barkeri. The longest recorded female adult longevity was observed in individuals fed on E. orientalis (34.55 ± 3.02 d), followed by those fed on T. putrescentiae (19.10 ± 1.41 d), both of which were significantly longer than those fed on O. biharensisin and E. sexmaculatus (approximately 15 d) (F = 26.441; df1 = 3, df2 = 138; P < 0.001) (Table 3). Additionally, the longest female adult age of N. barkeri was recorded in individuals fed on E. orientalis (69 d), followed by those fed on T. putrescentiae (39 d), O. biharensisin (36 d) and E. sexmaculatus (30 d) (Figure 3).
Different types of prey had significant effects on the reproductive parameters of N. barkeri. The pre-oviposition period was shortest when fed on E. orientalis (1.42 ± 0.21 d), followed by T. putrescentiae (3.45 ± 0.19 d) (F = 10.659; df1 = 3, df2 = 120; P < 0.001). Feeding on these two preys resulted in a longer oviposition period of approximately 13.5 d (Table 3) (F = 48.624; df1 = 3, df2 = 167; P < 0.001). In contrast, the longest pre-oviposition period and shortest oviposition period for N. barkeri were observed when fed on E. sexmaculatus. Regarding daily egg production, N. barkeri females fed on E. sexmaculatus did not show any peak, while peaks appeared in females fed on E. orientalis, O. biharensisin and T. putrescentiae. These peaks corresponded to 10 d, 5 d and 5 d after the emergence of adults (Figure 3). The maximum reproductive ability was found when N. barkeri fed on E. sexmaculatus, with eggs laid daily at 0.37 eggs per female per day. But the maximum reproductive ability of N. barkeri was recorded as 1.2 eggs per female per day for 15 d when fed on T. putrescentiae. Females of N. barkeri reared on E. orientalis had significantly greater fecundity, producing 29.35 ± 2.25 eggs per female, compared to those reared on other three preys (F = 102.457; df1 = 3, df2 = 168; P < 0.001) (Table 3). The fecundity of N. barkeri females fed on E. sexmaculatus was only 1.87 ± 0.50 eggs per female. As shown in Table 3, the sex ratios of N. barkeri fed on E. sexmaculatus, E. orientalis and T. putrescentiae were all female biased (F = 222.170; df1 = 3, df2 = 8; P < 0.001).

3.4. Life Table Parameters

Based on the developmental time, survivorship, fecundity and longevity of N. barkeri when fed on different preys, population life table parameters of this predator were analyzed and presented in Table 4. The results showed that the type of prey significantly influenced the growth of the population of N. barkeri. The net increase rate, intrinsic rate of increase, and finite rate of increase of N. barkeri reached their highest values of 29.650, 0.226 and 1.253, respectively, when the predator was fed with E. orientalis. Conversely, these parameters were lowest when N. barkeri were fed with E. sexmaculatus with values of 2.556, 0.041 and 1.042, respectively. When feeding on O. biharensisin and T. putrescentiae, the values of these parameters for N. barkeri are comparable. These results demonstrate that the population of N. barkeri had significantly better growth when fed with E. orientalis, whereas E. sexmaculatus had the most unfavorable impact on its population growth.

4. Discussion

Since N. barkeri can feed on a diverse range of species, such as spider mites, eriophyid mites, storage mites, broad mites, thrips, whitefly eggs, fungi and nematodes, and are easy to mass-produce, it has become an ideal biocontrol agent widely used to regulate populations of phytophagous pests in agricultural and ornamental crops [3,10,17,18]. In this study, we firstly evaluated the biological performance of N. barkeri against three phytophagous mites including E. sexmaculatus, E. orientalis and O. biharensisin, which cause serious damage on rubber trees in China [24,25]. The results indicate that N. barkeri is capable of completing its life cycle and successfully reproducing on these three mites. However, we observed developmental mortality in this predatory mite when fed on E. sexmaculatus and O. biharensisin, and a very low reproductive ability when fed on E. sexmaculatus.
The durations of N. barkeri larval and protonymphal development were found to differ significantly depending on the species of spider mites infesting rubber trees on which they preyed upon. Among the three different types of spider mites, the immature developmental period of N. barkeri was observed to be the shortest (around 5.5 d) when fed on E. sexmaculatus and O. biharensisin, comparable to or shorter than other prey mite species such as Colomerus vitis (5.43 d), Aceria guerreronis (5.6 d), T. urticae (8.45 d) and thrips (6.2 d) at 25 °C or higher temperatures, as evaluated until now [9,17,18,19,20,21]. When N. barkeri fed on E. orientalis, the immature development period and generation time of N. barkeri were the shortest found (5.25 d and 6.67 d, respectively), much lower than when compared to T. putrescentiae, a preferred prey used for mass-rearing N. barkeri along with two other studied preys [13,30].
The oviposition period, longevity and fecundity of female N. barkeri fed on E. orientalis and O. biharensisin fall within the range of data obtained when it fed on other preys, such as mites, thrips and whiteflies in previous studies [17,20]. However, when fed on E. orientalis, female N. barkeri exhibited significantly longer oviposition period, greater longevity and higher fecundity than those fed on O. biharensisin. Moreover, when compared to the factitious prey, T. putrescentiae, the oviposition period and fecundity of female N. barkeri when evaluated against E. orientalis were also much longer or higher. On the other hand, when the food source was E. sexmaculatus, the oviposition period and fecundity of female N. barkeri were significantly shortened and reduced compared to previous studies using other preys as food source (oviposition period ranged from 17.85 to 28.15 d, and fecundity ranged from 20.50 to 40.25 eggs per female) [9,17,18,19,20,21]. Interestingly, it has been observed that N. barkeri tends to prey on E. sexmaculatus more efficiently than on E. orientalis, O. biharensisin or T. putrescentiae, with the highest number of E. sexmaculatus consumed by N. barkeri within a day [29]. This suggests that the nutritional composition of E. orientalis is better suited for the development and reproduction of N. barkeri than that of E. sexmaculatus. The latter may contain harmful substances that negatively affects the fecundity of female N. barkeri.
Generally, the offspring sex ratio (percentage of females) of predatory phytoseiid mites is strongly biased towards female [20,33,34,35]. Consistent with previous literatures, the offspring sex ratios of N. barkeri fed on E. sexmaculatus, E. orientalis and T. putrescentiae showed a female bias. However, when this predatory mite was fed on O. biharensisin, it did not exhibit a preference for female progeny. The sex ratio of N. barkeri fed on E. orientalis was higher than those observed for mites fed on other species including the date dust mite Oligonychus afrasiaticus (66.6%), the tetranychid mite Tetranychus urticae (70%), the grape erineum mite Colomerus vitis (73.33%) and the citrus flat mite Brevipalpus lewisi (56.67%), for which the highest value reported is 80% [17,20,36]. It has been discovered that temperature can influence the sex ratio of N. barkeri, such that the percentage of females is highest at 35 °C and lowest at 25 °C when female predatory mites fed on C. vitis, T. urticae or B. lewisi [17]. Therefore, if N. barkeri were fed on E. orientalis at a higher temperature, it is probable that a larger percentage of female offspring would be produced.
Based on the life table parameters, it is evident that the growth of N. barkeri population is significantly affected by various preys. The population growth rates for N. barkeri fed on E. orientalis and E. sexmaculatus were found to be most promising and unfavorable, respectively. This can be substantiated by the intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm), which was 0.226 when fed on E. orientalis, while it was 0.041 on E. sexmaculatus. Notably, the intrinsic rate of natural increase (0.226) and net increase rate (R0) (29.65) of N. barkeri when fed on E. orientalis were much higher than those obtained on various preys at 25 °C or even higher temperatures as per previous studies [17,20]. For instance, high values of these two parameters in N. barkeri were evaluated in Thrips tabaci (R0 = 27.78, rm = 0.22) [8] and T. urticae (R0 = 22.02, rm = 0.22) [21] at 25 °C. Moreover, these two parameters observed in N. barkeri when fed on O. biharensisin were within the ranges (R0, 10.44–30.87, and rm, 0.09–0.27) previously reported on different preys [17,20], and are comparable to those recorded on T. putrescentiae. The mean generation time (T) showed the lowest value for N. barkeri when fed on E. orientalis compared to the values obtained in previous studies (12.26–19.76 d) [9,17,18,19,20,21]. These data indicate that E. orientalis is highly suitable for the population growth of N. barkeri.
According to the biological performance of N. barkeri when fed on E. sexmaculatus, E. orientalis and O. biharensisin, this predatory mite has promising potential in controlling of E. orientalis and O. biharensisin in the field, particularly with regard to protecting rubber trees. This is primarily due to its ability to thrive well on these two types of pests, as well as to complete its lifecycle and produce sufficient progeny that help support population growth. Considering the favorable promising immature development time, reproductive capability and population growth potential of N. barkeri on E. orientalis, it would be a favorable prey for mass-rearing N. barkeri. Although N. barkeri is not well-suited for establishing a population on E. sexmaculatus, it favors preying on this phytophagous mite [29]. Furthermore, E. sexmaculatus, E. orientalis and O. biharensisin are all phytophagous mites that damage rubber trees during the same time period [24,25,26]. Pollen grains of some plants in the rubber forest can serve as alternative food sources for N. barkeri to complete their life history and reproduce [19,36]. Therefore, N. barkeri can efficiently control E. sexmaculatus in the field when other available prey is present along with pollen food. Additionally, it is reasonable to assume that N. barkeri will perform better under natural environments with the presence of different spider mites and pollen food.

5. Conclusions

Our study represents the first attempt to evaluate the biological performance of the predatory mite N. barkeri in controlling spider mites including E. sexmaculatus, E. orientalis and O. biharensisin on rubber trees. Our results indicate that N. barkeri fed on E. orientalis and O. biharensisin yielded positive results, including high rates of developmental, fecundity and population parameters. These results exceeded or were comparable to data obtained using T. putrescentiae for mass-rearing N. barkeri. Although N. barkeri was unable to sustain its population on E. sexmaculatus due to its low reproductive rate, it exhibited considerable predation when consumed on this prey resulting in completing its life cycle. Our results underscore the promising potential of N. barkeri in controlling spider mites including E. orientalis and O. biharensisin, and possibly E. sexmaculatus, which could prevent substantial damage to rubber trees. Our study can serve as a guide for further investigations aimed at fully exploring the biocontrol potential and effectiveness of N. barkeri against spider mites on rubber trees, subsequently being used in augmentative release programs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z.; software, Z.Y.; formal analysis, J.C.; investigation, J.W. and F.Z.; resources, Y.F. and C.Z.; data curation, L.Z.; visualization, J.C.; supervision, C.Z.; project administration, Y.F. and C.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.F. and J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C. and L.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.C.; L.Z., Z.Y., J.W., F.Z., Y.F. and C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 321MS071), the China Agriculture Research System Project (no. CARS-33-BC2) and the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (no. 1630042022006).

Data Availability Statement

All the information is in this document.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cock, M.J.W.; van Lenteren, J.C.; Brodeur, J.; Barratt, B.I.P.; Bigler, F.; Bolckmans, K.; Consoli, F.I.; Haas, F.; Mason, P.G.; Parra, J.R.P. Do new access and benefit sharing procedures under the convention on biological diversity threaten the future of biological control? Biocontrol 2010, 55, 199–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Van Lenteren, J.C. The state of commercial augmentative biological control: Plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake. Biocontrol 2012, 57, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Calvo, F.J.; Knapp, M.; van Houten, Y.M.; Hoogerbrugge, H.; Belda, J.E. Amblyseius swirskii: What made this predatory mite such a successful biocontrol agent? Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2015, 65, 419–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Saito, T.; Brownbridge, M. The generalist predatory mite Anystis baccarum (Acari: Anystidae) as a new biocontrol agent for western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2022, 86, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hou, F.; Ni, Z.H.; Zou, M.T.; Zhu, R.; Yi, T.C.; Guo, J.J.; Jin, D.C. The effects of alternative foods on life history and cannibalism of Amblyseius herbicolus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Insects 2022, 13, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Athias-Henriot, C. Amblyseius swirskii, un nouveau phytoseiide voisin d’A. andersoni (Acariens anactinotriches). Ann. Ec. Natl. Agric. Alger. 1962, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  7. Buitenhuis, R.; Murphy, G.; Shipp, L.; Scott-Dupree, C. Amblyseius swirskii in greenhouse production systems: A floricultural perspective. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2015, 65, 451–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Syromyatnikov, M.Y.; Kokina, A.V.; Belyakova, N.A.; Kozlova, E.G.; Popov, V.N. A simple molecular method for rapid identification of commercially used Amblyseius and Neoseiulus species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Zootaxa 2018, 4394, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bonde, J. Biological studies including population growth parameters of the predatory mite Amblyseius barkeri [Acarina: Phytoseiidae] at 25 °C in the laboratory. Entomophaga 1989, 34, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, S.; Gao, Y.; Xu, X.; Wang, E.; Wang, Y.; and Lei, Z. Evaluation of Stratiolaelaos scimitus and Neoseiulus barkeri for biological control of thrips on greenhouse cucumbers. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2014, 24, 1110–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jafari, S.; Fathipour, Y.; Faraji, F. Temperature-dependent development of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) at seven constant temperatures. Insect Sci. 2012, 19, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xia, B.; Zou, Z.W.; Li, P.X.; Lin, P. Effect of temperature on development and reproduction of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) fed on Aleuroglyphus ovatus. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2012, 56, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zou, Z.; Min, Q.; Xiao, S.; Xin, T.; Xia, B. Effect of photoperiod on development and demographic parameters of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) fed on Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Acari: Acaridae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 70, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Momen, F.M. Fertilization and starvation affecting reproduction in Amblyseius barkeri Hughes (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Anz Schädlingskunde Pflanzenschutz Umweltschutz 1994, 67, 130–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tian, C.B.; Li, Y.Y.; Wang, X.; Fan, W.H.; Wang, G.; Liang, J.Y.; Wang, Z.Y.; Liu, H. Effects of UV-B radiation on the survival, egg hatchability and transcript expression of antioxidant enzymes in a high-temperature adapted strain of Neoseiulus barkeri. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2019, 77, 527–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, J.; Liu, M.X.; Zhang, Y.; Kuang, Z.Y.; Li, W.; Ge, C.B.; Li, Y.Y.; Liu, H. Response to multiple stressors: Enhanced tolerance of Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to heat and desiccation stress through acclimation. Insects 2019, 10, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Al-Azzazy, M.M. Biological performance of the predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes (Phytoseiidae): A candidate for controlling of three mite species infesting grape trees. Vitis 2021, 60, 11–20. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fernando, L.C.P.; Aratchige, N.S.; Kumari, S.L.M.L.; Appuhamy, P.A.L.D.; Hapuarachchi, D.C.L. Development of a method for mass rearing of Neoseiulus baraki, a mite predatory on the coconut mite, Aceria guerreronis. Cocos 2004, 16, 22–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Momomen, F.M. Feeding, development and reproduction of Amblyseius barkeri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on various kinds of food substances. Acarologia 1995, 36, 101–105. [Google Scholar]
  20. Negm, M.W.; Alatawi, F.J.; Aldryhim, Y.N. Biology, predation, and life table of Cydnoseius negevi and Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on the old world date mite, Oligonychus afrasiaticus (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Insect Sci. 2014, 14, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jafari, S.; Fathipour, Y.; Faraji, F.; Bagheri, M. Demographic response to constant temperatures in Neoseiulus barkeri (Phytoseiidae) fed on Tetranychus urticae (Tetranychidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2010, 15, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Men, X.; Wang, F.; Chen, G.Q.; Zhang, H.B.; Xian, M. Biosynthesis of natural rubber: Current state and perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 20, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Sun, R.; Wu, Z.; Lan, G.; Yang, C.; Fraedrich, K. Effects of rubber plantations on soil physicochemical properties on Hainan Island, China. J. Environ. Qual. 2021, 50, 1351–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lu, F.; Chen, Z.; Lu, H.; Liang, X.; Zhang, H.; Li, Q.; Chen, Q.; Huang, H.; Hua, Y.; Tian, W. Effects of resistant and susceptible rubber germplasms on development, reproduction and protective enzyme activities of Eotetranychus sexmaculatus (Acari: Tetranychidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 69, 427–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liang, X.; Chen, Q.; Wu, C.; Liu, Y.; Fang, Y. Reference gene validation in Eotetranychus sexmaculatus (Acari: Tetranychidae) feeding on mite-susceptible and mite-resistant rubber tree germplasms. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2020, 82, 211–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.; Nie, Y.; Chen, J.; Lu, T.; Niu, L.; Jia, J.; Ye, Z.; Fu, Y. Genetic diversity of three major spider mites damaging rubber trees. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2022, 27, 2025–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kwon, D.H.; Clark, J.M.; Lee, S.H. Toxicodynamic mechanisms and monitoring of acaricide resistance in the two-spotted spider mite. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2015, 121, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Niu, J.Z.; Hull-Sanders, H.; Zhang, Y.X.; Lin, J.Z.; Dou, W.; Wang, J.J. Biological control of arthropod pests in citrus orchards in China. Biol. Control 2014, 68, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, J. The Adaptability of Neoseiulus barkeri (Hughes) to Different Prey and Its Influencing Mechanism. Ph.D. Thesis, Hainan University, Haikou, China, 2022; pp. 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  30. Asgari, F.; Moayeri, H.R.S.; Kavousi, A.; Enkegaard, A.; Chi, H. Demography and mass rearing of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) fed on two species of stored-product mites and their mixture. J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 2604–2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. McMurtry, J.A.; Scriveri, G.T. Studies on the feeding, reproduction and development of Amblyseius hibisci (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on various food substances. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1964, 57, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, R.M. Spatio Temporal Dynamics of Population Abundance a Systems Approach on Greenhouse Whiteflies; Beijing Normal University Press: Beijing, China, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  33. Amano, H.; Chant, D.A. Life history and reproduction of two species of predacious mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool. 1977, 55, 1978–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Momen, F.M. Potential of three species of predatory phytoseiid mites as biological control agents of the peach silver mite, Aculus fockeui (Acari: Phytoseiidae and Eriophyidae). Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 2009, 44, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tanigoshi, L.K. Advances in knowledge of the Phytoseiidae. In Recent Advances in Knowledge of the Phytoseiidae; Hoy, M.A., Ed.; Agricultural Sciences Publications: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1982; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nomikou, M.; Janssen, A.; Schraag, R.; Sabelis, M.W. Phytoseiid predators as potential biological control agents for Bemisia tabaci. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2001, 25, 271–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Insects 14 00648 g001 550
Figure 1. Three spider mites causing damage to rubber trees. (A) Eotetranychus sexmaculatus, (B) Eutetranychus orientalis and (C) Oligonychus biharensisin.
Figure 1. Three spider mites causing damage to rubber trees. (A) Eotetranychus sexmaculatus, (B) Eutetranychus orientalis and (C) Oligonychus biharensisin.
Insects 14 00648 g001
Insects 14 00648 g002 550
Figure 2. A schematic diagram of the experimental unit. 1, lower layer of the acrylic board; 2, middle layer of the acrylic board; 3, upper layer of the acrylic board; 4, cotton thread; 5, circular hole in the middle layer of the acrylic board (a space for mite activity); 6, long tail clamp; 7, enamel tray for containing water.
Figure 2. A schematic diagram of the experimental unit. 1, lower layer of the acrylic board; 2, middle layer of the acrylic board; 3, upper layer of the acrylic board; 4, cotton thread; 5, circular hole in the middle layer of the acrylic board (a space for mite activity); 6, long tail clamp; 7, enamel tray for containing water.
Insects 14 00648 g002
Insects 14 00648 g003 550
Figure 3. Age-specific survival rate (lx) and age-specific fecundity (mx) of Neoseiulus barkeri fed on different preys. (A) Tyrophagus putrescentiae, (B) Eutetranychus orientalis, (C) Oligonychus biharensisin and (D) Eotetranychus sexmaculatus. lx is age-specific survival rate (proportion of individuals alive at age x), and mx is age-specific fecundity (the number of female progenies per female at age x).
Figure 3. Age-specific survival rate (lx) and age-specific fecundity (mx) of Neoseiulus barkeri fed on different preys. (A) Tyrophagus putrescentiae, (B) Eutetranychus orientalis, (C) Oligonychus biharensisin and (D) Eotetranychus sexmaculatus. lx is age-specific survival rate (proportion of individuals alive at age x), and mx is age-specific fecundity (the number of female progenies per female at age x).
Insects 14 00648 g003
Table
Table 1. Development duration (days ± S.D.) of Neoseiulus barkeri fed on different preys.
Table 1. Development duration (days ± S.D.) of Neoseiulus barkeri fed on different preys.
SpeciesEggLarvaProtonymphDeutonymphGeneration Time
Tyrophagus putrescentiae1.65 ± 0.07 a0.74 ± 0.04 bc1.61 ± 0.10 a1.79 ± 0.08 a9.24 ± 0.06 b
Eutetranychus orientalis1.67 ± 0.04 a0.67 ± 0.03 c1.57 ± 0.08 a1.34 ± 0.09 b6.67 ± 0.08 c
Oligonychus biharensisin1.68 ± 0.07 a1.00 ± 0.10 b1.54 ± 0.23 a1.09 ± 0.07 b10.95 ± 1.25 a
Eotetranychus sexmaculatus1.72 ± 0.06 a1.52 ± 0.11 a1.45 ± 0.11 a1.25 ± 0.12 b12.50 ± 0.08 a
The means within the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Survival rate (% ± S.D.) of immature stages of Neoseiulus barkeri fed on different preys.
Table 2. Survival rate (% ± S.D.) of immature stages of Neoseiulus barkeri fed on different preys.
SpeciesEggLarvaProtonymphDeutonymphEgg-Adult
Tyrophagus putrescentiae100.00 ± 0.00 a100.00 ± 0.00 a100.00 ± 0.00 a100.00 ± 0.00 a100.00 ± 0.00 a
Eutetranychus orientalis100.00 ± 0.00 a100.00 ± 0.00 a100.00 ± 0.00 a100.00 ± 0.00 a100.00 ± 0.00 a
Oligonychus biharensisin100.00 ± 0.00 a100.00 ± 0.00 a100.00 ± 0.00 a93.55 ± 1.82 b93.60 ± 2.05 b
Eotetranychus sexmaculatus100.00 ± 0.00 a100.00 ± 0.00 a93.20 ± 3.05 b76.81 ± 4.01 c71.42 ± 4.30 c
The means within the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Duration of adult (days ± S.D.), fecundity (eggs/female) and sex ratio (female:male) of Neoseiulus barkeri fed on different preys.
Table 3. Duration of adult (days ± S.D.), fecundity (eggs/female) and sex ratio (female:male) of Neoseiulus barkeri fed on different preys.
SpeciesPre-Oviposition
Period		Oviposition
Period		LongevityFecunditySex Ratio
Tyrophagus putrescentiae3.45 ± 0.19 b13.64 ± 10.2 a19.10 ± 1.41 b18.45 ± 1.62 b1.95 ± 0.02 b
Eutetranychus orientalis1.42 ± 0.21 c13.32 ± 0.80 a34.55 ± 3.02 a29.35 ± 2.25 a2.10 ± 0.06 a
Oligonychus biharensisin5.64 ± 0.84 a7.65 ± 0.60 b14.71 ± 1.26 c15.36 ± 1.11 c1.00 ± 0.00 d
Eotetranychus sexmaculatus6.56 ± 1.26 a2.22 ± 0.65 c14.88 ± 1.32 c1.87 ± 0.50 d1.70 ± 0.02 c
The means within the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Life table parameters of Neoseiulus barkeri fed on different preys.
Table 4. Life table parameters of Neoseiulus barkeri fed on different preys.
SpeciesR0TrmλDT
Tyrophagus putrescentiae12.39015.1800.1661.1814.176
Eutetranychus orientalis29.65015.0200.2261.2533.072
Oligonychus biharensisin12.77218.6770.1361.1465.082
Eotetranychus sexmaculatus2.55622.9440.0411.04216.947
R0, net increase rate; T, mean generation time; rm, intrinsic rate of increase; λ, finite rate of increase; DT, doubling time.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.; Zheng, L.; Ye, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, F.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, C. Evaluation of the Predatory Mite Neoseiulus barkeri against Spider Mites Damaging Rubber Trees. Insects 2023, 14, 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14070648

AMA Style

Chen J, Zheng L, Ye Z, Wang J, Zhang F, Fu Y, Zhang C. Evaluation of the Predatory Mite Neoseiulus barkeri against Spider Mites Damaging Rubber Trees. Insects. 2023; 14(7):648. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14070648

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Junyu, Lijiu Zheng, Zhengpei Ye, Jianyun Wang, Fangping Zhang, Yueguan Fu, and Chenghui Zhang. 2023. "Evaluation of the Predatory Mite Neoseiulus barkeri against Spider Mites Damaging Rubber Trees" Insects 14, no. 7: 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14070648

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop