Next Article in Journal
Habitat Characteristics, Distribution, and Abundance of Cicindelidia haemorrhagica (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in Yellowstone National Park
Previous Article in Journal
Predation Risk Effects of Lady Beetle Menochilus sexmaculatus (Fabricius) on the Melon Aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Age- and Density-Dependent Parasitism Rate and Development Time of the Generalist Egg-Parasitoid Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on Eggs of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys

by
Eleni I. Koutsogeorgiou
1,2,†,
Theodoros Moysiadis
1,3,†,
Georgios T. Fifis
4,
Nikoloz E. Gogolashvili
4,
Dimitrios Chatzimpalasis
5 and
Stefanos S. Andreadis
1,*
1
Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Hellenic Agricultural Organization-Demeter, P.O. Box 60458, 57001 Thermi, Greece
2
Laboratory of Applied Zoology and Parasitology, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
Department of Computer Science, School of Sciences and Engineering, University of Nicosia, Nicosia 2417, Cyprus
4
Division of Agriculture, International Hellenic University—Sindos Campus, 57400 Sindos, Greece
5
School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2024, 15(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010014
Submission received: 29 November 2023 / Revised: 22 December 2023 / Accepted: 27 December 2023 / Published: 28 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Physiology, Reproduction and Development)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys, is a pentatomid bug that feeds on a wide range of economically important crops. Crop protection in newly invaded areas mainly relies on the use of broad-spectrum chemical insecticides, while little to no information is available regarding a classical biological control approach. The overall purpose of the present study was to estimate the parasitism rate and development time of the native egg parasitoid Ooencyrtus telenomicida Vassiliev (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) when offered H. halys egg-masses, taking into consideration several parameters. Specifically, we tested different parasitoid ages and densities on 1–4-day-old H. halys eggs. According to our results, parasitoid density and the age of host eggs significantly affected the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida. High parasitoid density along with younger host eggs led to higher parasitism rates. Likewise, a significant interaction was observed between the parasitoid density and their age. Successful parasitisation occurred with host eggs up to 4 days old, with parasitism rates decreasing as host egg age increased. A three-fold higher parasitism rate of H. halys eggs was observed when they were parasitised by older O. telenomicida females, compared to younger ones. Concerning the development time of O. telenomicida, individuals that developed in younger host eggs displayed a shorter development time. Parasitoid age did not affect the development time of O. telenomicida, nor did the density of parasitoids.

Abstract

Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) is an invasive pest species that was imported into Greece in 2011 and since then, has caused severe qualitative and quantitative damage to economically important crops. Its management relies mainly on the use of broad-spectrum insecticides, with little to no information available concerning the potential use of native parasitoids in terms of classical biological control. Our study aimed to assess the parasitism rate and development time of the gregarious egg parasitoid Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on H. halys egg-masses, depending on several factors such as: (i) age of parasitoids, (ii) density of parasitoids, (iii) age of host eggs, and (iv) oviposition experience of parasitoids. According to our results, the younger the host eggs and the more parasitoids, the higher the parasitism rate achieved by adults of O. telenomicida, with the maximum mean value of the parasitism rate observed with 1-day-old host eggs and 4 parasitoid pairs (57.3%). On the contrary, the lowest mean value of the parasitism rate was observed with 4-day-old host eggs and 1 parasitoid pair (6.5%). Similarly, the age of parasitoids significantly affected parasitisation. The older the parasitoids were, the higher the parasitism rate achieved by adults of O. telenomicida, with a three-fold higher parasitism rate observed at 3–4 and 5–6-day-old O. telenomicida, compared to 1–2-day-old (31.8, 32.4, and 12.1%, respectively). Individuals that developed in younger host eggs displayed a shorter development time, and the shortest development time was observed for O. telenomicida laid by 2 parasitoid pairs. Parasitoid age did not affect the development time of O. telenomicida, although there was a tendency for individuals laid by younger female parasitoids to exhibit a shorter development time. Our findings provide valuable information on the potential use of O. telenomicida as a biocontrol agent of H. halys.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB), Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), is an invasive pest native to East Asia, accidentally introduced to North America and Europe [1,2]. It causes severe damage to a wide variety of important fruit trees, vegetables, industrial crops, as well as ornamental plants [1,2]. Additionally, H. halys is considered a nuisance pest that is likely to aggregate in man-made structures in late autumn to overwinter, and protects itself from harsh winter conditions [3,4]. In Greece, BMSB was first recorded in the fall of 2011, causing nuisance issues in houses in the centre of Athens [5]. However, a few years later in 2017, the first BMSB damage to kiwi fruits was observed in two different locations in Northern Greece [6].
The main approach against BMSB relies mainly on the use of broad-spectrum chemical insecticides that were found to be only partially effective [7,8,9], incompatible with already established IPM programs [7,9], harmful to the environment [10], and providing only a short-term solution. A potential long-term and low-cost strategy to suppress the BMSB population is the classical biological control method using natural enemies [11,12,13]. However, native natural enemies across the newly invaded areas are not considered effective for biological control due to inefficiency in significantly reducing H. halys’ population in most cropping systems [14,15,16,17].
Among the natural enemies that have co-evolved with H. halys in its native range, the samurai wasp, Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), has been identified as the most specialised and efficient agent for classical biological control of H. halys populations, with high parasitism rates reaching up to 70%. Trissolcus mitsukurii (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) is the main parasitoid in Japan [1,18,19,20]. In another study, Lara et al. [21] collected T. japonicus individuals from China, and tested its host range and host specificity under laboratory conditions, suggesting that it is oligophagous with a preference for BMSB as a reproductive host compared to other non-target pentatomid species. Adventive populations of T. japonicus and T. mitsukurii have been reported worldwide [12,17,22,23,24,25,26]. In Europe, among the native parasitoids that have been recorded to attack H. halys eggs in the field are the generalists, Anastatus bifasciatus and Ooencyrtus telenomicida [2,13,14,15]. Both species can emerge as adults from the new host [27].
As is typical of Ooencyrtus spp. [28], O. telenomicida is gregarious. The oviposition behavior of O. telenomicida is complex and includes drumming, drilling, and host feeding [29]. During host establishment, the female punctures the host egg with the ovipositor and feeds on the ooplasm emerging from the wound. Females repeat the drilling-host feeding sequence from 12 to 36 times before laying their eggs [30]. Ooencyrtus telenomicida can complete development in H. halys eggs [11,13] and responds to volatiles from H. halys males and attacked plants with a deposited egg mass in olfactometer bioassays [27]. However, it has been described as polyphagous, attacking several hemipteran and lepidopteran eggs, and can also perform as a facultative hyperparasitoid of Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) [31,32,33,34]. Thus, it is likely that host detection and establishment of this parasitoid are affected by a wider range of cues and factors. Ooencyrtus telenomicida has been reported to be widespread in Europe, Asia, and Africa [13,15,17,32]. There have been reports of its population being positively influenced by annual rainfall [35].
The aim of the present study is to evaluate O. telenomicida as a biocontrol agent against H. halys, by assessing its parasitism rate on BMSB egg masses depending on several factors, such as: (i) age of parasitoids, (ii) density of parasitoids, (iii) age of host eggs, and (iv) previous oviposition experience, and their possible interactions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Colony Maintenance

Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) individuals used in this study were reared on green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) pods and green bean plants in mesh cages (30 × 30 × 30 cm) with a vinyl window and zip closure (Raising Butterflies, Salt Lake City, UT, USA). They were maintained at 26 °C, 60% RH, under a 16:8 h light–dark photoperiod. This colony was initiated in 2019 and originated from mixed-sex adults and nymphs that were collected from homes and fields in central Macedonia. The colony’s diet consisted of potted green bean plants and fresh fruits and vegetables (apples, kiwis, carrots, peppers, and green beans). Adult females typically laid eggs on the underside of the green bean leaves or on the top or side of the cage. Egg masses were removed and placed on the top of a small green bean leaf attached to a 4 mL clear screw vial (45 × 14.7 mm; BGB, Lörrach, Germany) that was glued to the bottom of a 460 mL round clear plastic cup (9 cm diameter × 7 cm high) (Jumbo S.A., Athens, Greece). Cotton balls soaked in water were added to the cups to increase humidity. First-instar nymphs (L1) were allowed to feed on fresh bean leaves. As soon as they molted into second-instar nymphs (L2), they were transferred in groups of 10 into new cups with 2–3 green beans. Featherweight forceps (BioQuip Products, Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA) were used to carefully handle the nymphs and avoid injury or death. Green beans were replaced two or three times per week to keep them fresh. Once nymphs reached the adult stage, they were transferred immediately into the mesh cages to minimise cannibalism. For the experimentation, egg masses were removed carefully with the help of a size 0 artist paint brush (Artist’s Loft™, MSPCI, Irving, TX, USA) daily and placed on Petri dishes (60 mm diameter), labelled by date to monitor the age of host eggs. Moistened cotton balls were added to the dishes to increase humidity.

2.2. Parasitoid Colony

Ooencyrtus telenomicida adults were obtained in the summer of 2020 from parasitised H. halys eggs collected from apricot trees (Prunus armeniaca L.) in Thermi, Thessaloniki, Northern Greece (40°32′17′′ N, 23°00′04′′ E). A colony of O. telenomicida was established for multiple generations at the Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Laboratory of Entomology at 26 °C, 60% RH, and under a 16:8 h light–dark photoperiod. Parasitoids were reared in the laboratory using fresh H. halys egg masses that were placed at the bottom of 460 mL round clear plastic cups. Cups were closed with a plastic lid with a 250 mm mesh net for air circulation. Adults were provided with pure honey drops ad libitum as food and moistened cotton balls as a water source, which were replenished every other day. Two egg masses were added to the parasitoid rearing cups for 48 h, after which they were removed and transferred to new cups called “incubation cups”. Adult wasps that emerged from these incubation cups were either used in experiments or returned to the rearing cups. Those used for experiments were previously sexed. Laboratory tests were conducted from October to December 2020.

2.3. Experimental Design

No-choice tests were designed to determine the effect of (i) age of parasitoids, (ii) number of parasitoids, (iii) age of host eggs, and (iv) previous oviposition experience of parasitoids on the parasitisation capability of O. telenomicida on H. halys egg masses.
In each experimental setup, O. telenomicida females of a particular age (1–2 days-old, 3–4 days-old, 5–6 days-old) and density (1 female parasitoid, 2 female parasitoids, 4 female parasitoids) were tested simultaneously on egg masses of H. halys (26–28 eggs) of a particular age (1-day old, 2-days old, 3-days old, 4-days old) (5 replicates per treatment, N = 5). All egg masses and parasitoids were taken from the mass-reared colony described above. Each treatment contained a single egg mass (26–28 eggs). Egg masses were placed on the lid of a plastic Petri dish (3.5 cm in diameter) and exposed to parasitoid females for 24 h in transparent plastic cylindrical vials (7.5 cm in diameter, 8.8 cm in height). A cotton wick saturated in honey water, placed on the bottom of a plastic Petri dish (3.5 cm in diameter), was provided as a food source for the parasitoid. After 24 h, the parasitoids were removed, and the eggs were reared at 26 °C, 60% RH, and under a 16:8 h light–dark photoperiod. Successful adult parasitoid emergence was recorded daily between 10 and 30 d. Treatments were replicated 5 times for each treatment. Only replicates in which parasitoid attack by O. telenomicida occurred on one or more eggs were included in the analysis. To obtain female parasitoids with oviposition experience, females were offered a single egg mass to oviposit 24 h prior to the experiment. For this reason, tested females with oviposition experience were 3–4 and 5–6 days old.
The following parasitism parameters were calculated: (1) parasitism rate, calculated as the number of offspring emergence over the total number of tested eggs; (2) development time of the parasitoid, calculated as the number of days from the input day until parasitoid emergence.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis had a twofold aim. First, to assess the impact of (i) age of parasitoids, (ii) number of parasitoids, (iii) age of host eggs, and (iv) previous oviposition experience on the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida. Subsequently, the same four factors were assessed regarding the development time. To assess these hypotheses, the generalised linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) and the linear mixed-effects model (LMM) were employed, depending on the nature of the response variable. In particular, when the response was represented by the parasitism rate (proportion), the GLMM was used with the binomial family of distributions and the logit link, employing the function “glmer” in R [36]. To assess the presence of over/underdispersion, the R function “testDispersion”, which performs simulation-based tests, was employed within the DHARMa R package [37]. In the case that the response was represented by the development time (continuous), the LMM was used by applying the R function “lmer” [36]. The variable age of parasitoids (AoP), number of parasitoids (NoP), age of host eggs (AoE), and previous oviposition experience (OE) were included in the model as fixed effects. Replication was included as a random effect.
In both response cases, a similar methodology was applied, including two steps. Within the first step, the corresponding model was applied in three different scenarios, assessing the impact on the response of (a) AoE and NoP, (b) AoE and AoP, and (c) AoP and NoP. In all scenarios, the R function “emmeans” was then employed to compute the estimated marginal means (EMMs) for the dependent variables, perform posthoc comparisons, and visualise the corresponding results [38]. The p-values, in the post hoc analysis, were adjusted for multiple comparisons, based on the Bonferroni correction. Next, the complete model was applied, including all four variables (AoP, NoP, AoE, and OE). The significance level was set at 5%. All the analyses were performed with the statistical computing software R v.4.2.1 [39].

3. Results

Before fitting the models, the existence of over/underdispersion was assessed, implying the presence of only small to moderate overdispersion. The parasitism rate of O. telenomicida, when studied within the first scenario (AoE and NoP), exhibited higher values (EMMs) with the treatment of 4 pairs of parasitoids at each tested age of host eggs, followed by 2 and 1 pair of parasitoids. The highest parasitism rate was observed for 4 pairs and AoE 1 (0.547, 95% CI: 0.483–0.608) (Figure 1). This difference was found to be statistically significant compared to all other combinations of AoE and NoP (Excel S1). On the other hand, 1 pair of parasitoids and AoE 4 exhibited the lowest parasitism rate among all treatments (0.045, 95% CI: 0.034–0.059). Statistically significant differences in the parasitism rate were observed between 4 and 2 pairs of O. telenomicida at every age of host eggs (Excel S1).
A similar pattern was observed within the second scenario (AoE and AoP), i.e., the older the parasitoids, the higher the parasitism rate (EMM) observed at each tested age of host eggs. More specifically, higher parasitism rates were observed for the 5–6 days-old parasitoids at each tested age of host eggs, followed by 3–4 days-old and 1–2 days-old parasitoids (Figure 2). There was no statistically significant difference in the parasitism rate between 5–6 days-old and 3–4 days-old O. telenomicida at each tested age of host eggs (Figure 2 and Excel S2). On the other hand, the parasitism rate of 1–2 days-old O. telenomicida was significantly lower compared to both 5–6 days-old and 3–4 days-old pairs at each tested age of host eggs (Figure 2 and Excel S2).
The parasitism rate (EMM) was higher when H. halys eggs were treated with 4 pairs of O. telenomicida, regardless of the age of parasitoids, followed by 2 and 1 pair of parasitoids (Figure 3). There was a statistically significant difference between the parasitism rate of 4 pairs and 2 pairs of O. telenomicida, as well as between 2 pairs and 1 pair (Figure 3). The parasitism rate of all tested number of pairs of parasitoids significantly declined with the decreasing age of parasitoids (Figure 3 and Excel S3). The highest parasitism rate was observed for 4 pairs and AoP 5–6 (0.459, 95% CI: 0.397–0.523) (Figure 3), and the lowest for 1 pair and AoP 1–2 (0.022, 95% CI: 0.016–0.030) (Figure 3).
The parasitism rate of O. telenomicida across different categories of the number of parasitoids, the age of host eggs, and the previous oviposition experience is displayed in Figure S1. The highest values for each egg age are observed when the NoP equals 4 and without OE, with the exception of AoE 3. Similarly, the development time of O. telenomicida across different categories of the abovementioned factors is displayed in Figure S2. The highest values for each egg age are observed when the NoP equals 1 and without OE, with the exception of AoE 4.
In Table 1, the results of the complete model (including all four variables AoP, NoP, AoE, and OE) concerning the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida are displayed. Specifically, the parasitism rate was significantly affected by the number of parasitoids, the age of parasitoids, the age of host eggs, and the previous oviposition experience (NoP: χ2 = 614.33, d.f. = 2, p < 0.001; AoP: χ2 = 288.52, d.f. = 2, p < 0.001; AoE: χ2 = 307.28, d.f. = 3, p < 0.001; OE: χ2 = 21.82, d.f. = 1, p < 0.001) (Table 1).
The development time (EMMs) of O. telenomicida within the first scenario (AoE and NoP) showed no statistically significant differences in the pairwise comparisons concerning the number of parasitoid pairs at each age of host eggs (Figure 4 and Excel S4). The only exception was the comparison NoP2 AoE2—NoP2 AoE4 (p < 0.001). The shortest development time was observed for the treatment of 2 pairs of O. telenomicida at each tested age of host eggs followed by 1 and 4 pairs of parasitoids (Figure 4).
Furthermore, the development time of O. telenomicida was significantly shorter on 1 and 2 days-old host eggs compared to 3 and 4 days-old eggs, regardless of the number of parasitoid pairs (Figure 4) and the age of the parasitoids (Figure 5 and Excel S5). Our results suggest that the age of parasitoids did not affect O. telenomicida’ development time. Although offspring of 1–2 days-old parasitoids displayed a shorter development time compared to that of older ones at each tested age of host eggs, this difference was not statistically significant (Figure 5).
The shortest development time was observed for the treatment of 2 pairs of O. telenomicida at each tested age of parasitoids, followed by 1 and 4 pairs of parasitoids (Figure 6), but no statistically significant differences were observed among treatments with a different number of pairs of O. telenomicida at each tested age of parasitoids (Excel S6).
The results of the complete model (including all four variables AoP, NoP, AoE, and OE) concerning the development time of O. telenomicida are shown in Table 2. Our results show that the development time was significantly affected only by the age of host eggs (AoE: χ2 = 192.20, d.f. = 3, p < 0.001) (Table 2).

4. Discussion

According to our results, the younger the host eggs were and the more parasitoids attacking them, the higher the parasitism rate observed. As host eggs got older, successful parasitisation declined. On the contrary, the older the parasitoids were, the higher the parasitism rate observed, regardless of the host egg age. This is in agreement with a study by Power et al. [40], where they showcased that the best combination for high parasitisation of the pentatomid B. hilaris eggs by O. mirus was 0–1-day-old host eggs with 3–10- day-old parasitoids. The least successful host egg age was the oldest, and the least successful parasitoid age was the youngest. Our findings also agree with Tunca et al. [41], who evaluated the parasitism rate of Ooencyrtus pityocampae Mercet (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on eggs of Philosamia ricini Hutt. (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) and found that the optimal age of host eggs for parasitisation was 1–2 days. The same study stated that older parasitoids laid more eggs, making 5-day-old parasitoids the most promising age for the highest emergence rate. Indeed, it has been previously discussed that host eggs older than 4 days are generally less suitable for Ooencyrtus species, although they may be accepted for parasitoid oviposition [28,42,43]. This may be explained by the changes in the chemical content and the properties of insect eggs taking place over time which affect the suitability of the host for successful development of the parasitoid. Host age appeared to significantly affect the feeding, resting, and oviposition behavior of Ooencyrtus nezarae Ishii (Hymenoptera; Encyrtidae) on Riptortus clavitus (Thunberg) (Hemiptera: Alydidae) eggs [38]. According to their results, although all host ages were accepted by the parasitoids, the number of feeding bouts and eggs laid per host decreased as host age increased, and parasitoids spent less time feeding or resting on older host eggs than they did on 0-day-old ones. Similar results were discussed by Hofstetter and Raffa [43], who investigated the parasitism rate of Ooencyrtus kuvanae (Howard) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on eggs of Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae). Relatively fewer parasitoid individuals emerged from older egg masses, and parasitoid reproduction decreased with host egg age.
Our study adds to the notion that a younger age of the host seems more appropriate for the development of offspring by egg parasitoids. Indeed, several studies with egg parasitoids, including Telenomus heliothidis Ashmead, Telenomus solitus Johnson, Telenomus remus Nixon, and Triphodytes gerriphagus Marchal (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) [44,45,46,47], highlight the low emergence rate of parasitoids reared on old host eggs and attribute it to the advanced state of embryonic development of the host. Developed stages may prevent feeding by the parasitoid larva because of the incapability of cuticle digestion.
On the other hand, the age of the parasitoids could also affect their ability to parasitise their hosts [48,49,50]. Our results show that the parasitism rate increased with parasitoid age and number. Tunca et al. [51] evaluated the potential of O. kuvanae as a biocontrol agent for H. halys and observed that the highest parasitism rate occurred by 5 and 7-day-old parasitoids. In a study by Aung et al. [52], the percentage parasitism and the number of progeny of O. nezarae when parasitising eggs of R. clavatus were significantly decreased in old females (20 days old). The optimal age of O. nezarae for successful parasitism ranged from 1 to 4 days [52]. In our study, the younger the female parasitoids we used in our treatments, the lower the percentage of successful parasitisation we observed. Likewise, parasitoid age (1 to 5 days old) of Trichogramma pretiosum (Riley) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) significantly affected its efficacy on Anticarsia gemmatalis (Huebner) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) eggs. A higher number of parasitoids per egg emerged after parasitism by older T. pretiosum females (5 days old) [53].
Moreover, the density of parasitoids significantly affected the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida. The higher the density of female parasitoids was, the higher the percentage of successful parasitisation we observed. Likewise, Feliciangeli and Rabinovich [53] observed that the percentage of parasitism increases rapidly with the parasite density of Ooencyrtus trinidadensis Crawford (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae); however, there is a maximum in the number of hosts parasitised per female that shifts towards larger numbers of host eggs available with increasing parasite density, reflecting a strong interaction between parasite and host densities [54].
The development time of the immature stage of parasitoids may vary with the size, age, and quality of the host in which they were reared [55]. As a matter of fact, our results show that the host age of H. halys does not only affect the parasitism rate but also the development time of immature O. telenomicida. The younger the host eggs, the shorter the development time of O. telenomicida. This particular observation is in accordance with previous reports on related Ooencyrtus species, such as O. mirus. The development time of O. mirus on 0–4-day-old B. hilaris eggs was significantly shorter than in 5-day-old host eggs [40]. On the other hand, parasitoid offsprings laid by 0-day-old O. mirus females took significantly more time to develop than those laid by older female parasitoids [40]. This also agrees with our finding that the younger the parasitoids, the shortest the development time, although no statistically significant difference was observed among treatments. Young hosts ensure that the necessary development time is available for the successful development of parasitoid offspring and also provide the best host quality [56].
In contrast with the observations conducted in the present work related to the previous oviposition experience of O. telenomicida females, Wang et al. [57] reported that oviposition experience influenced the female reproductive behaviour of Anastatus japonicus Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae). When an egg clutch of Antheraea pernyi (Guerin-Meneville) (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) was offered for oviposition, females with oviposition experience produced significantly more offspring than that produced by females without any oviposition experience [57]. However, this is not the case in our study, where oviposition experience neither affected the parasitism rate nor the development time of O. telenomicida, regardless of the treatment we tested.

5. Conclusions

Our study showcases the combined effect of host egg age, parasitoid age, and parasitoid density on the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida when parasitising eggs of H. halys. Our results suggest that the most successful parasitisation occurs when the host eggs are younger and the parasitoids are older. This may be explained by the developed embryonic state of the host eggs, which may prevent the feeding of the parasitoid due to the incapability of cuticle digestion. Our study also explores the density of the parasitoids that is most suitable for high parasitism rates, indicating that the more parasitoids attacking H. halys eggs, the higher the parasitism rate. However, there seems to be an interaction between host density and parasitoid density, influencing parasitism rates, as observed in previous studies [54]. In conclusion, our study provides valuable insight into the different factors affecting H. halys egg parasitisation and how these interact with each other, adding to a better understanding of potential biocontrol agents for this insect and their incorporation into biological management programs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects15010014/s1, Figure S1: Effect of previous oviposition experience on the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida; Figure S2: Effect of previous oviposition experience on the development time of O. telenomicida; Excel S1: Posthoc analysis for Figure 1; Excel S2: Posthoc analysis for Figure 2; Excel S3: Posthoc analysis for Figure 3; Excel S4: Posthoc analysis for Figure 4; Excel S5: Posthoc analysis for Figure 5; Excel S6: Posthoc analysis for Figure 6.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.A.; methodology, E.I.K., G.T.F., N.E.G. and D.C.; software, T.M.; validation, E.I.K., T.M. and S.S.A.; formal analysis, T.M. and S.S.A.; investigation, E.I.K., G.T.F., N.E.G. and D.C.; resources, S.S.A.; data curation, E.I.K., G.T.F., N.E.G., D.C. and S.S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, E.I.K. and S.S.A.; writing—review and editing, E.I.K., T.M., G.T.F., N.E.G., D.C. and S.S.A.; visualization, T.M. and S.S.A.; supervision, S.S.A.; project administration, S.S.A.; funding acquisition, S.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Operational Programme Competitiveness, Entrepreneur- ship, and Innovation, 2014–2020 (EPAnEK), under the call “Research-Create-Innovate” (Project Code: T2EDK-04606, Acronym: KIWIPRO).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful for field assistance from Panagiotis Markoutis, Kostas Sarrikiriakidis, Kostas Karletsas, Vasileios Binias, and Christos Michaelidis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lee, D.H.; Short, B.D.; Joseph, S.V.; Bergh, J.C.; Leskey, T.C. Review of the biology; ecology; and management of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in China; Japan; and the Republic of Korea. Environ. Entomol. 2013, 42, 627–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Haye, T.; Gariepy, T.D.; Heolmer, K.; Rossi, J.P.; Streito, J.C.; Tassus, X.; Desneux, N. Range expansion of the invasive brown marmorated stinkbug, Halyomorpha halys: An increasing threat to field, fruit and vegetable crops worldwide. J. Pest Sci. 2015, 88, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hoebeke, E.R.; Carter, M.E. Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): A polyphagous plant pest from Asia newly detected in North America. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 2003, 105, 225–237. [Google Scholar]
  4. Inkley, D.B. Characteristics of home invasion by the brown marmorated stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Entomol. Sci. 2012, 47, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Milonas, P.G.; Partsinevelos, G.K. First report of brown marmorated stink bug Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Greece. EPPO Bull. 2014, 44, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Andreadis, S.S.; Navrozidis, E.I.; Farmakis, A.; Pisalidis, A. First evidence of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) infesting kiwi fruit (Actinidia chinensis) in Greece. J. Entomol. Sci. 2018, 53, 402–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leskey, T.C.; Hamilton, G.C.; Nielsen, A.L.; Polk, D.F.; Rodriguez-Saona, C.; Bergh, J.C.; Herbert, D.A.; Kuhar, T.P.; Pfeiffer, D.; Dively, G.P.; et al. Pest status of the brown marmorated stink bug; Halyomorpha halys (Stål); in the USA. Outlooks Pest Manag. 2012, 23, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leskey, T.C.; Lee, D.H.; Short, B.D.; Wright, S.E. Impact of insecticides on the invasive Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae): Analysis of insecticide lethality. J. Econ. Entomol. 2012, 105, 1726–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kuhar, T.H.; Kamminga, K.L. Review of the chemical control research on Halyomorpha halys in the USA. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1021–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Weber, D.C.; Leskey, T.C.; Walsh, G.C.; Khrimian, A. Synergy of aggregation pheromone with methyl (E, E, Z) -2, 4, 6-decatrienoate in attraction of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2014, 107, 1061–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Haye, T.; Fischer, S.; Zhang, J.; Gariepy, T. Can native egg parasitoids adopt the invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), in Europe? J. Pest Sci. 2015, 88, 693–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Talamas, E.J.; Herlihy, M.V.; Dieckhoff, C.; Hoelmer, K.A.; Buffington, M.; Bon, M.C.; Weber, D.C. Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae) emerges in North America. J. Hymenopt. Res. 2015, 43, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Roversi, P.; Binazzi, F.; Marianelli, L.; Costi, E.; Maistrello, L.; Sabbatini Perevieri, G. Searching for native egg-parasitoids of the invasive alien species Halyomorpha halys Stal (Heteroptera Pentatomidae) in Southern Europe. Redia 2016, 99, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  14. Costi, E.; Haye, T.; Maistrello, L. Surveying native egg parasitoids and predators of the invasive Halyomorpha halys in Northern Italy. J. Appl. Entomol. 2019, 143, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Andreadis, S.S.; Gogolashvili, N.E.; Fifis, G.T.; Navrozidis, E.I.; Thomidis, T. First report of native parasitoids of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Greece. Insects 2021, 12, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Malek, R.; Kaser, J.M.; Anfora, G.; Ciolli, M.; Khrimian, A.; Weber, D.C.; Hoelmer, K.A. Trissolcus japonicus foraging behavior: Implications for host preference and classical biological control. Biol. Control 2021, 161, 104700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rot, M.; Maistrello, L.; Costi, E.; Bernardinelli, I.; Malossini, G.; Benvenuto, L.; Trdan, S. Native and non-native egg parasitoids associated with brown marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys [Stål; 1855]; Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Western Slovenia. Insects 2021, 12, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, Z.Q.; Yao, Y.X.; Qiu, L.F.; Li, Z.X. A new species of Trissolcus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) parasitizing eggs of Halyomorpha halys (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in China with comments on its biology. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2009, 102, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Qiu, L.F. Natural enemy species of Halyomorpha halys and control effects of the parasitoids species in Beijing. North. Hort. 2010, 9, 181–183, (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Gariepy, T.; Mason, P.; Gillespie, D.; Talamas, E.; Haye, T. Seasonal parasitism and host specificity of Trissolcus japonicus in northern China. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1127–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lara, J.R.; Pickett, C.H.; Kamiyama, M.T.; Figueroa, S.; Romo, M.; Cabanas, C.; Bazurto, V.; Strode, V.; Briseno, K.; Lewis, M.; et al. Physiological host range of Trissolcus japonicus in relation to Halyomorpha halys and other pentatomids from California. BioControl 2019, 64, 513–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dieckhoff, C.; Tatman, K.M.; Hoelmer, K.A. Natural biological control of Halyomorpha halys by native egg parasitoids: A multi-year survey in northern Delaware. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1143–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sabbatini Peverieri, G.; Talamas, E.J.; Bon, M.C.; Marianelli, L.; Bernardinelli, I.; Malossini, G.; Benvenuto, L.; Roversi, P.F.; Hoelmer, K. Two Asian egg parasitoids of Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae) emerge in northern Italy: Trissolcus mitsukurii (Ashmead) and Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae). J. Hymenopt. Res. 2018, 67, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abram, P.K.; Talamas, E.J.; Acheampong, S.; Mason, P.G.; Gariepy, T.D. First detection of the samurai wasp, Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae) in Canada. J. Hymenopt. Res. 2019, 68, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stahl, J.M.; Babendreier, D.; Haye, T. Life history of Anastatus bifasciatus, a potential biological control agent of the brown marmorated stink bug in Europe. Biol. Control 2019, 129, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bout, A.; Tortorici, F.; Hamidi, R.; Warot, S.; Tavella, L.; Thomas, M. First detection of the adventive egg parasitoid of Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Trissolcus mitsukurii (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) in France. Insects 2021, 12, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rondoni, G.; Bertoldi, V.; Malek, R.; Foti, M.C.; Peri, E.; Maistrello, L.; Haye, T.; Conti, E. Native egg parasitoids recorded from the invasive Halyomorpha halys successfully exploit volatiles emitted by the plant–herbivore complex. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nechols, J.R.; Tracy, J.L.; Vogt, E.A. Comparative ecological studies of indigenous egg parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae; Encyrtidae) of the squash bug, Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 1989, 62, 177–188. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jervis, M.A.; Kidd, N.A.C. Host-feeding strategies in hymenopteran parasitoids. Biol. Rev. 1986, 61, 395–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cusumano, A.; Peri, E.; Bradleigh Vinson, S.; Colazza, S. The ovipositing female of Ooencyrtus telenomicida relies on physiological mechanisms to mediate intrinsic competition with Trissolcus basalis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2012, 143, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cusumano, A.; Peri, E.; Amodeo, V.; McNeil, J.N.; Colazza, S. Intraguild interactions between egg parasitoids: Window of opportunity and fitness costs for a facultative hyperparasitoid. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Noyes, J.S. Universal Chalcidoidea Database. 2019. Available online: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/entomology/chalcidoids/index.html (accessed on 27 October 2023).
  33. Peri, E.; Cusumano, A.; Amodeo, V.; Wajnberg, E.; Colazza, S. Intraguild interactions between two egg parasitoids of a true bug in semi-field and field conditions. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Triapitsyn, S.V.; Andreason, S.A.; Power, N.; Ganjisaffar, F.; Fusu, L.; Dominguez, C.; Perring, T.M. Two new species of Ooencyrtus (Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae), egg parasitoids of the bagrada bug Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae), with taxonomic notes on Ooencyrtus telenomicida. J. Hymenopt. Res. 2020, 76, 57–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Samra, S.; Ghanim, M.; Protasov, A.; Mendel, Z. Spatial distribution and niche partitioning in the Ooencyrtus spp. complex parasitizing the eggs of Stenozygum coloratum. BioControl 2015, 60, 747–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bates, D.; Mächler, M.; Bolker, B.; Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015, 67, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hartig, F. DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R package version 0.4.6. 2022. Available online: http://florianhartig.github.io/DHARMa/ (accessed on 1 November 2023).
  38. Lenth, R. emmeans: emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.9.0. 2023. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  39. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R v.4.2.1); R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2020; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 1 January 2023).
  40. Power, N.; Ganjisaffar, F.; Xu, K.; Perring, T.M. Effects of parasitoid age, host egg age, and host egg freezing on reproductive success of Ooencyrtus mirus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) eggs. Environ. Entomol. 2021, 50, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tunca, H.; Colombel, E.A.; Ben Soussan, T.; Buradino, M.; Galio, F.; Tabone, E. Optimal biological parameters for rearing Ooencyrtus pityocampae on the new laboratory host Philosamia ricini. J. Appl. Entomol. 2016, 140, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Takasu, K.; Hirose, Y. Host acceptance behavior by the host-feeding egg parasitoid, Ooencyrtus nezarae (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae): Host age effects. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1993, 86, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hofstetter, R.W.; Raffa, K.F. Endogenous and exogenous factors affecting parasitism of gypsy moth egg masses by Ooencyrtus kuvanae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1998, 88, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Strand, M.R.; Meola, S.M.; Vinson, S.B. Correlating pathological symptoms in Heliothis virescens eggs with development of the parasitoid Telenomus heliothidis. J. Insect Physiol. 1986, 32, 389–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Navasero, R.C.; Oatman, E.R. Life history, immature morphology and adult behavior of Telenomus solitus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Entomophaga 1989, 34, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hernández, D.; Díaz, F. Effecto de la edad del hospedero Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) sobre el parasitism y la proporción sexual de la descendencia de Telenomus remus Nixon (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Bol. Entomol. Venez. 1996, 11, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sousa, J.M.; Spence, J.R. Host age and parasitism by Tiphodytes gerriphagus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), an egg parasitoid of water striders (Heteroptera: Gerridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2001, 94, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hentz, M.G.; Ellsworth, P.C.; Naranjo, S.E.; Watson, T.F. Development, longevity, and fecundity of Chelonus sp. nr. curvimaculatus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), an egg–larval parasitoid of pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Environ. Entomol. 1998, 27, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Honda, T.; Kainoh, Y. Age-related fecundity and learning ability of the egg-larval parasitoid Ascogaster reticulatus Watanabe (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Biol. Control 1998, 13, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Silva-Torres, C.S.; Ramos Filho, I.T.; Torres, J.B.; Barros, R. Superparasitism and host size effects in Oomyzus sokolowskii, a parasitoid of diamondback moth. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2009, 133, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tunca, H.; Cosic, B.; Colombel, E.A.; Venard, M.; Capelli, M.; Tabone, E. Performance of Ooencyrtus kuvanae (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on two host species, Halyomorpha halys and Philosamia ricini. J. Appl. Entomol. 2020, 144, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Aung, K.S.D.; Takagi, M.; Ueno, T. Effect of female’s age on the progeny production and sex ratio of Ooencyrtus nezarae, an egg parasitoid of the bean bug Riptortus clavatus. J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu Univ. 2010, 55, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Queiroz, A.P.; Costa, C.O.; Favetti, B.M.; Silva, G.V.; Bueno, A.F. Effects of parasitoid and host age on the parasitism of Trichogramma pretiosum on eggs of Anticarsia gemmatalis. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2020, 64, e2019105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Feliciangeli, D.; Rabinovich, J.E. Effect of parasite density of Ooencyrtus trinidadensis (Chalcidoidea, Encyrtidae), an endophagus parasite of eggs of Rhodnius prolixus, vector of Chagas’ disease in Venezuela. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 1977, 19, 21–34. [Google Scholar]
  55. Lawrence, P.O. The biochemical and physiological effects of insect hosts on the development and ecology of their insect parasites: An overview. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 1990, 13, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vinson, S.B. The general host selection behavior of parasitoid Hymenoptera and a comparison of initial strategies utilized by larvaphagous and oophagous species. Biol. Control 1998, 11, 79–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, Z.Y.; Wang, Y.F.; Yin, S.Y.; Liu, P.C.; Hu, H.Y. Oviposition experience promotes active reproductive behaviour in a synovigenic parasitoid. J. Hymenopt. Res. 2023, 95, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of the number of parasitoid pairs on the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida on different ages of H. halys eggs. AoE stands for the age of H. halys eggs. The estimated marginal means (EMMs) are displayed for the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida (black dots) along with their 95% confidence intervals (rectangles).
Figure 1. Effect of the number of parasitoid pairs on the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida on different ages of H. halys eggs. AoE stands for the age of H. halys eggs. The estimated marginal means (EMMs) are displayed for the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida (black dots) along with their 95% confidence intervals (rectangles).
Insects 15 00014 g001
Figure 2. Effect of the age of parasitoids on the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida at different ages of H. halys eggs. AoE stands for the age of H. halys eggs. The estimated marginal means (EMMs) are displayed for the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida (black dots) along with their 95% confidence intervals (rectangles).
Figure 2. Effect of the age of parasitoids on the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida at different ages of H. halys eggs. AoE stands for the age of H. halys eggs. The estimated marginal means (EMMs) are displayed for the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida (black dots) along with their 95% confidence intervals (rectangles).
Insects 15 00014 g002
Figure 3. Effect of the number of parasitoid pairs on the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida at different ages of adult parasitoids. AoP stands for the age of O. telenomicida adults. The estimated marginal means (EMMs) are displayed for the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida (black dots) along with their 95% confidence intervals (rectangles).
Figure 3. Effect of the number of parasitoid pairs on the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida at different ages of adult parasitoids. AoP stands for the age of O. telenomicida adults. The estimated marginal means (EMMs) are displayed for the parasitism rate of O. telenomicida (black dots) along with their 95% confidence intervals (rectangles).
Insects 15 00014 g003
Figure 4. Effect of the number of parasitoid pairs on the development time of O. telenomicida at different ages of H. halys eggs. AoE stands for the age H. halys eggs. The estimated marginal means (EMMs) are displayed for the development time (days) of O. telenomicida (black dots) along with their 95% confidence intervals (rectangles).
Figure 4. Effect of the number of parasitoid pairs on the development time of O. telenomicida at different ages of H. halys eggs. AoE stands for the age H. halys eggs. The estimated marginal means (EMMs) are displayed for the development time (days) of O. telenomicida (black dots) along with their 95% confidence intervals (rectangles).
Insects 15 00014 g004
Figure 5. Effect of the age of parasitoids on the development time of O. telenomicida at different ages of H. halys eggs. AoE stands for the age of H. halys eggs. The estimated marginal means (EMMs) are displayed for the development time (days) of O. telenomicida (black dots) along with their 95% confidence intervals (rectangles).
Figure 5. Effect of the age of parasitoids on the development time of O. telenomicida at different ages of H. halys eggs. AoE stands for the age of H. halys eggs. The estimated marginal means (EMMs) are displayed for the development time (days) of O. telenomicida (black dots) along with their 95% confidence intervals (rectangles).
Insects 15 00014 g005
Figure 6. Effect of the number of parasitoid pairs on the development time of O. telenomicida at different ages of adult parasitoids. AoP stands for the age of O. telenomicida adults. The estimated marginal means (EMMs) are displayed for the development time (days) of O. telenomicida (black dots) along with their 95% confidence intervals (rectangles).
Figure 6. Effect of the number of parasitoid pairs on the development time of O. telenomicida at different ages of adult parasitoids. AoP stands for the age of O. telenomicida adults. The estimated marginal means (EMMs) are displayed for the development time (days) of O. telenomicida (black dots) along with their 95% confidence intervals (rectangles).
Insects 15 00014 g006
Table 1. Results after applying the generalised linear mixed-effects model, and the linear mixed-effects model to assess the impact of the number of parasitoid pairs (NoPs), age of parasitoids (AoP), age of host eggs (AoE), and previous oviposition experience (OE) on the parasitism rate (number of emerged adult parasitoids over the total number of tested eggs).
Table 1. Results after applying the generalised linear mixed-effects model, and the linear mixed-effects model to assess the impact of the number of parasitoid pairs (NoPs), age of parasitoids (AoP), age of host eggs (AoE), and previous oviposition experience (OE) on the parasitism rate (number of emerged adult parasitoids over the total number of tested eggs).
Chisqd.f.p-Value
(Intercept)954.061<0.001
NoP 614.332<0.001
AoP 288.522<0.001
AoE 307.283<0.001
OE 21.821<0.001
Table 2. Results after applying the generalised linear mixed-effects model and the linear mixed-effects model to assess the impact of the number of parasitoid pairs (NoPs), age of parasitoids (AoP), age of host eggs (AoE), and previous oviposition experience (OE) on the development time of O. telenomicida (days since the input day until adult parasitoid emergence).
Table 2. Results after applying the generalised linear mixed-effects model and the linear mixed-effects model to assess the impact of the number of parasitoid pairs (NoPs), age of parasitoids (AoP), age of host eggs (AoE), and previous oviposition experience (OE) on the development time of O. telenomicida (days since the input day until adult parasitoid emergence).
Chisqd.f.p-Value
(Intercept)47,728.811<0.001
NoP3.4120.117
AoP1.7520.417
AoE192.203<0.001
OE0.1410.707
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koutsogeorgiou, E.I.; Moysiadis, T.; Fifis, G.T.; Gogolashvili, N.E.; Chatzimpalasis, D.; Andreadis, S.S. Age- and Density-Dependent Parasitism Rate and Development Time of the Generalist Egg-Parasitoid Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on Eggs of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys. Insects 2024, 15, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010014

AMA Style

Koutsogeorgiou EI, Moysiadis T, Fifis GT, Gogolashvili NE, Chatzimpalasis D, Andreadis SS. Age- and Density-Dependent Parasitism Rate and Development Time of the Generalist Egg-Parasitoid Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on Eggs of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys. Insects. 2024; 15(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koutsogeorgiou, Eleni I., Theodoros Moysiadis, Georgios T. Fifis, Nikoloz E. Gogolashvili, Dimitrios Chatzimpalasis, and Stefanos S. Andreadis. 2024. "Age- and Density-Dependent Parasitism Rate and Development Time of the Generalist Egg-Parasitoid Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on Eggs of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys" Insects 15, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop