Next Article in Journal
High-Throughput Screening of PAM-Flexible Cas9 Variants for Expanded Genome Editing in the Silkworm (Bombyx mori)
Previous Article in Journal
Unveiling the Mainland vs. Insular Variability of the Eumerus barbarus Species Group (Diptera: Syrphidae) in the Western Mediterranean Basin
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 15
Issue 4
10.3390/insects15040240
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Carbohydrate Intake on Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles deaneorum Fitness under Lab-Reared Conditions

by
Najara A. C. Santos
1,2,
Mirilene M. Martins
3,
Alice O. Andrade
1,4,
Alessandra S. Bastos
1,2,
José D. C. Pontual
1,2,
Jéssica E. Araújo
1,3,
Marina L. Rocha
1,5,
Jansen F. Medeiros
1,2,3 and
Maisa S. Araujo
1,2,4,5,6,*
1
Plataforma de Produção e Infecção de Vetores da Malária (PIVEM), Laboratório de Entomologia, Fiocruz Rondônia, Porto Velho 76812-245, RO, Brazil
2
Instituto Nacional de Epidemiologia da Amazônia Ocidental (INCT-EpiAMO), Porto Velho 76812-245, RO, Brazil
3
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Experimental, Fundação Universidade Federal de Rondônia, Fiocruz Rondônia, Porto Velho 76812-245, RO, Brazil
4
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, SP, Brazil
5
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Conservação e uso de Recursos Naturais—PPGReN, Fundação Universidade Federal de Rondônia, Porto Velho 76812-245, RO, Brazil
6
Laboratório de Pesquisa Translacional e Clínica, Centro de Pesquisa em Medicina Tropical (CEPEM), Porto Velho 76812-329, RO, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(4), 240; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15040240
Submission received: 26 February 2024 / Revised: 25 March 2024 / Accepted: 26 March 2024 / Published: 30 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Physiology, Reproduction and Development)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The carbohydrate source is a nutritional aspect critical for the basic behaviors of mosquitoes, such as flying and mating. For the maintenance of a colony of mosquitoes, it is important to choose a good source of carbohydrates that increases mosquito fitness. In this study, we found that a 15% honey solution increased mosquito longevity in comparison with a 10% sugar solution, probably due to the nutritional value of honey. Accordingly, a carbohydrate source based on a 15% honey solution could be a better choice for maintenance of Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles deaneorum in the lab-rearing context.

Abstract

The maintenance of a highly productive colony of anopheline mosquitoes requires standardized methods in order to obtain a sufficient number of homogeneous individuals for malaria research. In this context, nutritional status may affect survival, fecundity, and the capacity to support pathogen development. Here we assess the effects of carbohydrate sources on fecundity, survival, and susceptibility to Plasmodium vivax infection in colonies of Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles deaneorum mosquitoes. Newly emerged females from each species were fed either 10% sugar or 15% honey solutions until the end of each experiment. The type of carbohydrate meal did not impact any entomological parameters for An. deaneorum, except for survival. For both species, honey meal significantly increased median survival post-emergence by three to four days, probably due to its nutritional value. For An. darlingi fed with honey, a higher mean frequency in stage 5 was observed at 48 h post-blood-meal, which could indicate a delay in the digestion process. However, no effects on fecundity parameters were observed. Regarding susceptibility, An. darlingi fed with sugar exhibited a low intensity of sporozoites, although any negative effects of sucrose on sporozoites invasions in the salivary glands are unknown. Based on the increase in mosquito survival, a carbohydrate source composed of 15% honey solution could be better for maintaining An. darlingi and An. deaneorum in the lab-rearing context.

1. Introduction

The rearing and maintenance of anopheline colonies in the laboratory is a prerequisite for understanding various aspects of mosquito biology, insecticide resistance, and pathogen–microbiota–mosquito interactions, as well as for studying and assessing transmission-blocking activities of drugs and vaccines [1]. To study the interaction between Anopheles mosquitoes and malaria vivax, we have colonized two species of Anopheles in our laboratory: Anopheles darlingi [2] and Anopheles deaneorum [3].
Anopheles darlingi is the main malaria vector for both Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum in deforested regions of the Amazon biome [4]. The second species, An. deaneorum, belongs to the Albitarsis complex and remains a secondary vector for malaria transmission in certain regions of the Western Amazon [5,6].
Establishing anopheline colonies presented a challenge due the species’ limited ability to mate in restricted spaces [7]. Currently, free-mating laboratory populations of An. darlingi have been established to enhance studies on malaria transmission in Neotropical anopheline mosquitoes [2,8,9,10]. However, maintaining a highly productive colony is a labor-intensive effort that typically requires standardized rearing methods to obtain a sufficient number of homogeneous and susceptible mosquitoes for the experimental procedures [8,11]. In this context, nutritional status plays a crucial role in producing healthy adult mosquitoes with the energy necessary for survival [12,13,14] and fecundity [12,15], and capable of supporting pathogen replication, development, and transmission [16,17].
In nature, adult mosquitoes primarily ingest plant-derived sugars [15] to meet their physiological needs, e.g., for males to perform swarming behavior [18] and for females to fly in search of mates, blood-meal sources, and oviposition sites [14,15]. This is important not only for wild mosquitoes but also for those reared in laboratory conditions, where maintaining high adult vitality and mating ability is essential for colony maintenance [11]. In research laboratories, adult anopheline mosquitoes are typically fed a 10% sugar solution in the contexts of rearing [9,10,19,20,21,22] and maintaining experimental Plasmodium-infected mosquito species [9,23,24]. However, other carbohydrate sources and varying concentrations can also be found in the literature, such as 5% glucose solution, 10% dextrose solution, 5% sucrose solution, 8% honey–water solution, and 10% honey–water solution [8,25,26,27].
During the initial establishment of our colonies of An. darlingi and An. deaneorum [2,3], a high mortality rate for males had been observed that limited our attempts to induce copulation using flashes of light. The introduction of honey as a carbohydrate source improved male survival. At that time, the concentration of the 15% honey solution was determined based on the viscosity of the available honey. Honey produced by stingless bees tends to be more liquid in consistency. Therefore, the establishment of our highly productive An. darlingi and An. deaneorum colonies was achieved using a 15% honey solution sourced from local honey produced by stingless bees [2,3]. After obtaining these colonies, we sought to investigate whether maintaining mosquito colony with a 15% honey solution could interfere with certain aspects of An. darlingi and An. deaneorum mosquitoes, particularly with regard to their susceptibility to Plasmodium infection.
Our hypothesis was that a carbohydrate meal based on a 15% honey solution would enhance the fecundity, survival, and susceptibility to P. vivax in mosquitoes, compared to a common 10% sugar solution, which is the standard carbohydrate source for mosquito colonies [9,10,19,20,21,22]. Here, we present our findings on the effects of different carbohydrate sources on biological parameters related to colony maintenance, including blood digestion, fecundity, male and female survival, and the susceptibility of laboratory-reared females from both the An. darlingi and An. deaneorum species to P. vivax infection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mosquito Rearing

All experiments were performed using laboratory-reared mosquitoes from the Production and Infection of Malaria Vectors Platform (PIVEM/Fiocruz RO) in Brazil. Colonies of An. darlingi and An. deaneorum have been established and maintained since 2018 by the principal authors of Araujo et al. [2] and Araujo et al. [3]. The colonies are reared under controlled conditions of temperature (26 ± 1 °C) and humidity (70% ± 10%), and kept under a 12 h light–dark cycle. Adult mosquitoes are fed with a 15% honey solution ad libitum, and rabbit blood has been used to maintain egg production across generations. The use of rabbits for maintenance and experimental studies was approved by the Animal Utilization Ethical Committee of Fiocruz Rondônia (CEUA) under protocol 2019/10.
Larvae have been reared in plastic containers filled with distillated water (1 L) which has been changed twice a week, and have been fed daily with TetraMin® Marine fish food (Tetra GmbH, Melle, Germany).
To assess the effects of different carbohydrate sources on mosquitoes, all experiments were performed using newly emerged females. These females were separated into two experimental groups: (i) a group fed with 15% honey solution (local honey producer PROVE Vilhena/Rondônia/Brazil) ad libitum, referred to as the honey group; and (ii) a second group fed with 10% sugar solution (cane sugar, Barralcol, Barra do Bugres, Brazil) ad libitum, referred to as the sugar group. These carbohydrate sources were provided daily to their respective mosquito groups until the end of each experiment.

2.2. Blood Digestion

To evaluate the effects of honey and sugar feeding on blood digestion, females aged 5–6 days were separated from each experimental group and allowed to feed on physically restrained rabbits for 20 min. Twenty (n = 20) fully engorged females were placed individually in Falcon tubes (50 mL) adapted with tulle lids. The gonotrophic cycle/blood digestion of each female was observed at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h, following the Sella scale, as described by Detinova et al. [28], to classify the degree of blood-meal digestion in categories ranging from fully engorged females (stage 2) to complete blood digestion (stage 7). Honey or sugar solution was available ad libitum until the end of the experiment. Each engorged female was considered a biological unit of replication, and the entire experiment was repeated three times on different days.

2.3. Fecundity

To investigate whether different carbohydrate sources have varying effects on mosquito fecundity, we assessed the engorgement rate, egg production rate (eggs/female), and hatching rate. For this purpose, 100 females, aged 5–6 days, from each experimental group were placed in a new cage and allowed to feed on rabbit for 20 min. Only fully engorged females were transferred to a new cage, and their respective carbohydrate sources were provided ad libitum.
Two days after the blood meal, dark cups with filter paper and 1/3 filled with distilled water were placed inside the cage with the blood-fed gravid females. Mosquito females were allowed to oviposit for three days. The eggs were counted using a stereomicroscope (Leica EZ4, Leica Microsystems, Heerbrugg, Switzerland). After recording the egg count, the eggs were transferred to pans (30.3 × 22.1 × 7.5 cm) with filter paper and 1 L of distillated water for egg hatching. The eggs were kept in the pans for five consecutive days. On the fifth day, all larvae were counted and recorded to assess the egg hatching rate for each experimental group.
The biological unit of replication for engorgement rate and egg production was the cage containing the engorged females, while for the hatching rate, it was the pans. Two replications were performed per experimental group, and the entire experiment was repeated four times on different days.

2.4. Survival

To assess the effects of different carbohydrate sources on the lifespan of mosquitoes, 50 newly emerged males and 50 newly emerged females from each carbohydrate source group were monitored daily until the death of the last mosquito in the cage. Either 10% sugar or 15% honey solutions were provided ad libitum throughout the experiment for their respective experimental groups. Daily mortality was recorded for survival analysis. The experimental groups were conducted with three technical replications, and the entire experiment was repeated five and four times for An. darlingi and An. deaneorum, respectively, on different days.

2.5. Mosquito Infection

Artificial infections using a Direct Membrane Feeding Assay (DMFA) with blood from patients positive for P. vivax were performed on mosquitoes fed with sugar or honey solution to assess the effect of carbohydrate source on P. vivax infection in An. darlingi and An. deaneorum.
Blood collection from P. vivax-positive patients was performed at the Centro de Pesquisa em Medicina Tropical (CEPEM), in Porto Velho, Rondonia, Brazil. The blood collection was approved by Centro de Pesquisa em Medicina Tropical (CEPEM) Ethical Committee (protocol #28176720.9.0000.0011), and informed consent was obtained from the volunteers. Patients diagnosed with vivax malaria by Giemsa-stained blood smears were invited to participate in the study, with the following criteria: age > 18 years, not an indigenous person, not a pregnant woman, absence of signs or symptoms of severe malaria or concomitant disease, and formal agreement to the study’s procedures. Approximately 10 mL of blood was collected by venipuncture in heparinized Vacutainer tubes and stored at 37 °C until DMFA (within ~15 min).
Before DMFA, female mosquitoes from both species were deprived of their respective carbohydrate sources overnight. Two mL of infected blood from each patient were added to a 5 cm diameter glass membrane feeder fitted with a Parafilm membrane. The glass membrane feeders were accoupled in a water-bath to maintain a constant temperature of 37 °C. Cohorts of approximately 100 female mosquitoes from each species were selected, and each group fed on the infected blood in the glass membrane feeder for 30 min. Only fully fed mosquitoes were kept in the experiment aiming to assess the P. vivax sporogonic development. After the blood meal, the honey or sugar solution was provided every other day until the time of dissection. Daily mortalities were recorded from 1 to 14 days post-blood-feeding for survival analysis.

2.6. Mosquito Dissection

Around 20–30 mosquitoes were dissected on post-infection day 7 to record oocyst load in the midgut. The midguts were dissected in PBS 1× and stained with 0.2% commercial mercurochrome (SIGMA-ALDRICH, Steinheim, Germany). The presence of oocysts was determined under a microscope (10× magnification) (Leica ICC50W, Leica Microsystems, Heerbrugg, Switzerland). At 14 days post-infection (dpi), surviving mosquitoes were dissected to record sporozoite load in their salivary glands. The salivary glands of five individuals were pooled, ground with a glass tissue-grinder, and then centrifuged for 30 s. Sporozoite numbers were counted using a Neubauer chamber hematocytometer under a contrast microscope (40× magnification). Each mosquito was considered a biological unit of replication.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

To assess the effect of carbohydrate source on the blood digestion, we calculated the mean frequency of mosquitoes in each stage of gonotrophic cycle/blood digestion at various time points (24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h). The frequency of mosquitoes in each stage was compared between the honey and sugar groups, using unpaired t-tests. For fecundity, we estimated parameters including engorgement, number of eggs per female, and hatching rate. Data with normal distribution were compared using unpaired t-tests, while data with non-parametric distribution were compared using the Mann–Whitney test. Daily mortality data were used to construct Kaplan–Meier curves to conduct survival analysis with 95% confidence intervals, and the curves were compared using the log-rank test. The prevalence rate of oocyst in each group was compared using a chi-square test, while oocyst and sporozoite intensity were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

We assessed whether different carbohydrate sources had different effects on lab-reared An. darlingi and An. deaneorum by observing blood digestion time, fecundity, survival, and infection parameters with P. vivax.

3.1. Blood Digestion

To evaluate the effects of different carbohydrate sources on blood feeding status, we classified the engorged females of An. darlingi and An. deaneorum according to Sella degrees at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-blood-meal. We observed that neither the 15% honey solution nor the 10% sugar solution changed the blood-feeding status of An. darlingi or An. deaneorum at the observed time points (Figure 1A,B and C; Table 1). The sole exception was An. darlingi fed with honey, which exhibited a higher mean frequency of females in stage 5 at 48 h post-blood-meal (hpb) (65.2%; SD ± 9.4; CI 95% 41.8–88.5%), compared to the sugar group (27%; SD ± 9.5; CI 95% 3.4–50.8) (t-test: t = 4.923; df = 3.999; p = 0.007).

3.2. Survival and Fecundity

Mosquitoes fed with honey solution showed increases in their lifespans compared to the sugar group (p > 0.0001). The honey solution resulted in an average increase of 13 days in lifespan for An. darlingi females and males, as well as for females of An. deaneorum (Figure 2A–C). For males of An. deaneorum, we observed an increase of 32 days in lifespan (Figure 2D). The median survival increased by 4 days for An. darlingi and An. deaneorum females (Figure 2A,C), while for males of both species, it increased by 3 days when mosquitoes were fed honey solution (Figure 2B,D).
However, there was no clear evidence indicating differences between the groups of An. darlingi and An. deaneorum fed with either honey or sugar solution as to the fecundity parameters (Table 2).

3.3. Mosquito Infection

To assess the performance of An. darlingi and An. deaneorum fed with either honey or sugar solution under P. vivax infection, we conducted six independent DMFA assays. The parasitemia of the P. vivax blood samples ranged from 1640 to 33,840 parasites/μL, and gametocytemia ranged from 40 to 1120 gametocyte/μL. Data from each DMFA is shown in Supplementary Table S1.
Anopheles darlingi fed with honey solution showed an increase of 6.18% in the prevalence of infection (95.81%; CI 95% 91.4–98.1%) compared to An. darlingi fed with sugar solution (90.23%; CI 95% 84.8–93.8%) (Figure 3A). However, we did not observe clear statistical effects of the specific carbohydrate tested on the prevalence of infection for An. darlingi (χ2 = 3245; df = 1; p-value = 0.071). Increases in oocyst and sporozoite intensities were observed in An. darlingi fed with honey solution. Mosquitoes fed with honey showed a 22% increase in the intensity of oocyst (60; CI 95% 47–86) compared to mosquitoes fed with sugar solution (49; CI 95% 38–57) (Figure 3A); however, the effect was statistically unclear (U = 11,029; p = 0.060).
As for sporozoite intensity, the honey group achieved a median of 5280 sporozoites (CI 95% 4160–10,160), while the sugar group had a median of 3577 sporozoites (CI 95% 2933–6080) (Figure 3B). Sporozoite intensity, comparing the honey group and mosquitoes fed with sugar solution, was 47.6% higher in the honey group. Although the oocyst intensity distribution in the honey group did not show a statistically significant difference compared to the sugar group, the difference in sporozoite intensity between the groups was statistically significant (U = 7677; p-value < 0.0001).
On the other hand, for An. deaneorum mosquitoes, no differences were observed between the experimental groups. The prevalence of infection did not show a clear difference between the experimental groups based on carbohydrate source (χ2 = 0.06801, df = 1; p-value = 0.794) (Figure 3D). Although the oocyst intensity increased from 42 (CI 95% 68.6–105.9) in the honey group to 46.5 (CI 95% 98.4–147.2) in the sugar group, the difference was not statistically clear (U = 13,558, p-value 0.1338) (Figure 3D). No clear difference was observed in sporozoite intensity (U = 9049; p-value = 0.079), with the sugar group achieving a median of 6560 sporozoites (CI 95% 5880–7373) and the honey group 4800 sporozoites (CI 95% 6074–9328) (Figure 3E).
Finally, we assessed the effect of the carbohydrate source on the survival of P. vivax-infected mosquitoes. For both species, the survival analyses did not show clear differences between the survival curves of the experimental groups (An. darlingi: p-value = 0.750; An. deaneorum: p-value = 0.760) (Figure 3C,F).

4. Discussion

In laboratory-rearing conditions, we assessed the differences between two carbohydrate sources in some aspects of An. darlingi and An. deaneorum fitness. Our investigation found that honey and sugar solutions did not clearly show differences in terms of fecundity or susceptibility to Plasmodium. However, we observed a delay in blood digestion at 48 h post-blood-meal in the honey group, along with a substantial increase in both male and female longevity.
Based on a study that registered that honey compounds inhibit proteinases in honeybees [29,30], it was observed that a 10% concentration honey solution inhibited the trypsin enzyme in two mosquito species, Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus, as well as bovine trypsin. Additionally, the authors found that ascorbic acid and riboflavin, both present in honey, had high inhibitory effects on trypsin. Trypsin enzymes play a role in blood digestion in mosquitoes, specifically in the hydrolysis of hemoglobin [31]. Mosquitoes in general store sugar meals in the crop before digestion, so proteinase inhibitors may remain away from the blood-digestion site in the midgut [30]. However, An. darlingi appear to quickly release the carbohydrate meal from the crop [32,33]. The high proportion of mosquitoes fed with honey solution found to be in stage 5 of blood digestion may be due to the presence of proteinase inhibitors in honey.
Despite the potential delay in blood digestion mentioned earlier, fecundity parameters assessed in the subsequent experiment were not affected by the different carbohydrate sources. This suggested that the observed difference in blood digestion may not have had a significant biological impact on the fecundity of the mosquitoes. Similarly, maintaining mosquitoes with either sugar or honey did not alter fertility measures. Sugar meals are known to increase glycogen and triglyceride reserves in females, which may contribute to oocyte development and improve female longevity after oviposition [34]. Although we did not assess the nutritional aspects and caloric values of honey and sugar solutions, both appear to be equally effective in promoting female fecundity. Further investigation is needed to understand the physiological and molecular aspects of digestion in An. darlingi and An. deaneorum, as well as the implications of diet on the reproduction of these neotropical anophelines.
It is well-documented that sugar meals increase the survival rates of mosquitoes [14,16,35,36,37]. In our study, mosquitoes fed with honey solution showed an increased lifespan compared to those fed with sugar solution. The nutritional value of honey solution may be the reason for this improvement in the longevity of An. darlingi and An. deaneorum. Honey is known to contain carbohydrates and amino acids, and the presence of amino acids in the sugar feeding of mosquitoes may enhance their survival, as observed in Culex quinquefasciatus [13].
In the context of mosquito infection, the diet is a key regulator for the immune system, working against pathogen establishment. Almire et al. [38] describe a high expression of antiviral genes mediated by a sugar meal rich in glucose and fructose in Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. In anopheline mosquitoes, the efficiency of the immune response via melanization against Plasmodium infection was found to be worse in mosquitoes fed with a lower-sugar concentrate. This suggests that blood meals and sugar feeding are important for mounting an efficient melanization response in An. stephensi [39]. Furthermore, Plasmodium infection has been shown to increase sugar feeding in anopheline mosquitoes. This observed phenomenon could benefit the parasite by reducing mosquito mortality rates or even ensuring a high glucose supply for oocyst development [40,41]. The results for P. vivax infection suggest that sugar meals based on honey or sugar solutions may not interfere with P. vivax development, and that both carbohydrate sources can be used during mosquito maintenance throughout the sporogonic cycle. Although mosquitoes fed with sugar meals showed lower sporozoite intensity than those fed with honey, there are no indications that sucrose affects sporozoite invasions in the salivary glands [42].

5. Conclusions

The comparison between honey and sugar solutions revealed no significant differences in fecundity parameters, which are crucial for colony propagation. However, a notable increase in the longevity of both female and male mosquitoes fed with honey suggests its potential as an alternative for anopheline rearing in laboratory settings. Importantly, honey solution did not compromise mosquito susceptibility to Plasmodium, which is vital for studies assessing the transmission-blocking effectiveness of compounds. Considering the potential challenges in obtaining or affording pure honey, using sugar meals as an alternative is feasible, and without significant drawbacks for anopheline production.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects15040240/s1, Table S1: Data from each DMFA.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and project administration: M.S.A. Methodology: N.A.C.S., M.M.M., A.O.A., A.S.B., J.D.C.P., J.E.A. and M.L.R. Formal analysis: N.A.C.S. and M.M.M. Investigation: N.A.C.S., M.M.M. and M.S.A. Writing—original draft: N.A.C.S. Writing—review: M.S.A. and J.F.M. Supervision: M.S.A. Funding acquisition: M.S.A. and J.F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received partial support from the Brazilian Ministry of Health/DECIT/CNPq No. 23/2019 (grant number 442653/2019-0), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-003970). Under the grant conditions of the Foundation, a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic License has already been assigned to the author-accepted manuscript version that might arise from this submission. The study also received funding from PPSUS/Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Rondônia (FAPERO) No. 001/2020 (grant number 0012.259726/2020-70), the International Centers of Excellence for Malaria Research (ICEMR) program GR109237 (CON-80002357). N.A.C.S. and M.M. express their appreciation for the Fellowship granted by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (grant number 88887.499061/2020-00). J.F.M is a CNPq Productivity Fellow (process number: 304830/2022-4).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The blood collection was approved by Centro de Pesquisa em Medicina Tropical (CEPEM) Ethical Committee (protocol #28176720.9.0000.0011, approved on 3 June 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from the volunteers.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Fiocruz Rondônia for their support during the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Tachibana, M.; Takakshima, E.; Morita, M.; Sattabongkot, J.; Ishino, T.; Culleton, R.; Torii, M.; Tsuboi, T. Plasmodium vivax transmission-blocking vaccines: Progress, challenges and innovation. Parasitol Int. 2022, 87, 102525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Araujo, M.S.; Andrade, A.O.; Santos, N.A.C.; Pereira, D.B.; Costa, G.S.; Paulo, P.F.M.; Rios, C.T.; Moreno, M.; Pereira-da-Silva, L.H.; Medeiros, J.F. Brazil’s first free-mating laboratory colony of Nyssorhynchus darlingi. Rev. Soc. Med. Trop. 2019, 52, e20190159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Araujo, S.A.; Santos, N.A.C.; Andrade, A.O.; Castro, B.C.; Bastos, A.S.; Resadore, F.; Pereira-da-Silva, L.H.; Medeiros, J.F. Description of an automatic copulation induction system used to establish a free-mating laboratory colony of Nyssorhynchus deaneorum from Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2020, 115, e200070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vittor, A.Y.; Pan, W.; Gilman, R.H.; Tielsch, J.; Glass, G.; Shields, T.; Sánchez-Lozano, W.; Pinedo, V.V.; Salas-Cobos, E.; Flores, S.; et al. Linkin deforestation to malaria in the Amazon: Characterization of the breeding habitat of the principal malaria vector, Anopheles darlingi. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009, 81, 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rosa-Freitas, M.G. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) deaneorum: A new species in the Albitarsis complex (Diptera: Culicidae). Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 1989, 84, 535–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Klein, T.A.; Lima, J.B.P.; Tada, M.S.; Mil, R. Comparative Susceptibility of Anopheline Mosquitoes in Rondonia, Brazil to Infection by Plasmodium vivax. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1991, 45, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Benedict, M.Q.; Knols, B.G.; Bossin, H.C.; Howell, P.I.; Mialhe, E.; Caceres, C.; Robinson, A.S. Colonization and mass rearing: Learning from others. Malar. J. 2009, 8, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Villarreal-Trevino, C.; Vasquez, G.M.; Lopez-Sifuentes, V.M.; Escobedo-Vargas, K.; Huayanay-Repetto, A.; Linton, Y.M.; Flores-Mendoza, C.; Lescano, A.G.; Stell, F.M. Establishment of a free-mating, long-standing and highly productive laboratory colony of Anopheles darlingi from the Peruvian Amazon. Malar. J. 2015, 14, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moreno, M.; Tong, C.; Guzmán, M.; Chuquiyauri, R.; Llanos-Cuentas, A.; Rodriguez, H.; Gamboa, D.; Meister, S.; Winzeler, E.A.; Maguina, P.; et al. Infection of laboratory-colonized Anopheles darlingi mosquitoes by Plasmodium vivax. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 90, 612–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Puchot, N.; Lecoq, M.T.; Carinci, R.; Duchemin, J.B.; Gendrin, M.; Bourgouin, C. Establishment of a colony of Anopheles darlingi from French Guiana for vector competence studies on malaria transmission. Front. Trop. Dis. 2022, 3, 949300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Coluzzi, M. Maintenance of Laboratory colonies of Anopheles mosquitos. Bull. Org. Mond. Santé. 1964, 31, 441–443. [Google Scholar]
  12. Manda, H.; Gouagna, L.C.; Foster, W.A.; Jackson, R.R.; Beier, J.C.; Githure, J.I.; Hassanali, A. Effect of discriminative plat-sugar feeding on the survival and fecundity of Anopheles gambiae. Malar. J. 2007, 6, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vrzal, E.M.; Allan, S.A.; Hahn, D.A. Amino acids in nectar enhance longevity of female Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. J. Insect Physiol. 2010, 46, 1659–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gary, R.E.; Foster, W.A. Effects of available sugar on the reproductive fitness and vectorial capacity of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2001, 38, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Foster, W.A. Mosquito sugar feeding and reproductive energetics. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1995, 40, 443–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Carvajal-Lago, L.; Ruiz-López, M.J.; Figuerola, J.; Martínez-de la Puente, J. Implications of diet on mosquito life history traits and pathogen transmission. Environ. Res. 2021, 195, 110893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barker, C.M.; Reisen, W.K. Epidemiology of Vector-Borne Diseases. In Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 3rd ed.; Mullen, G.R., Durden, L.A., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 33–49. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gary, R.E., Jr.; Cannonn, J.W., III; Foster, W.A. Effect of sugar on male Anopheles gambiae mating performance, as modified by temperature, space, and body size. Parasit. Vectors. 2009, 2, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Horosko, S., 3rd; Lima, J.B.; Brandolini, M.B. Establishment of a free-mating colony of Anopheles albitarsis from Brazil. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1997, 13, 95–96. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shute, G.T. A method of maintaining colonies of East African strains of Anopheles gambiae. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1956, 50, 92–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grieco, J.P.; Achee, N.L.; Briceno, I.; King, R.; Andre, R.; Roberts, D.; Rejmankova, E. Comparison of life table attributes from newly established colonies of Anopheles albimanus and Anopheles vestitipennis in northern Belize. J. Vector Ecol. 2003, 28, 200–207. [Google Scholar]
  22. Timinao, L.; Vinit, R.; Katusele, M.; Schofield, L.; Burkot, T.R.; Karl, S. Optimization of the feeding rate of Anopheles farauti s.s. colony mosquitoes in direct membrane feeding assays. Parasit. Vectors 2021, 14, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moreno, M.; Tong-Rios, C.; Orjuela-Sanchez, P.; Carrasco-Escobar, G.; Campo, B.; Gamboa, D.; Winzeler, E.A.; Vinetz, J.M. Continuous supply of Plasmodium vivax sporozoites from colonized Anopheles darlingi in the Peruvian Amazon. ACS Infect. Dis. 2018, 4, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rios-Velásquez, C.M.; Martins-Campos, K.M.; Simões, R.C.; Izzo, T.; Santos, E.V.; Pessoa, F.A.C.; Lima, J.B.P.; Monteiro, W.M.; Secundino, N.F.C.; Lacerda, M.V.G.; et al. Experimental Plasmodium vivax infection of key Anopheles species from the Brazilian Amazon. Malar. J. 2013, 12, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vavra, J.; Undeen, A.H. Nosema algerae n. sp. (Cnidospora, Microsporida) a pathogen in a laboratory colony of Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera, Culicidae). J. Protozool. 1970, 17, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, S.J.; Choochote, W.; Jitpakdi, A.; Junkum, A.; Park, S.J.; Min, G.S. Establishment of a self-mating mosquito colony of Anopheles sinensis from Korea. Entomol. Res. 2003, 33, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dreyer, S.M.; Leiva, D.; Magaña, M.; Pott, M.; Kay, J.; Cruz, A.; Achee, N.L.; Grieco, J.P.; Vaughan, J.A. Fipronil and ivermectin treatment of cattle reduced the survival and ovarian development of field-collected Anopheles albimanus in a pilot trial conducted in nothern Belize. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Detinova, T.S.; Bertram, D.S. Age-Grouping Methods in Diptera of Medical Importance, with Special Reference to Some Vectors of Malaria. World Health Organization. Available online: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/41724(accessed on 3 January 2024).
  29. Bailey, L. The action of the proventriculus of the worker honeybee, Apis mellifera L. J. Expl. Biol. 1952, 29, 310–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gooding, R.H.; Cheung, A.C.; Rolseth, B.M. The digestive processes of haematophagous insects. III. Inhibition of trypsin by honey and possible functions of the esophageal diverticula of mosquitoes (Diptera). Can. Ent. 1973, 105, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gooding, R.H. In vitro properties of proteinases in the midgut of adult Aedes aegypti L. and Culex fatigans (Wiedemann). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1966, 17, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pajot, F.X.; Le Pont, F.; Molez, J.F. Données sur l’alimentation non sanguine chez Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) darlingi Root, 1926 (Diptera, Culicidae) en Guyane française. Ent. Méd. Parasitol. 1975, 3, 131–134. [Google Scholar]
  33. Okuda, K.; Caroci, A.; Ribolla, P.; Marinotti, O.; Bianchi, A.G.; Bijovsky, A.T. Morphological and enzymatic analysis on the midgut of Anopheles darlingi during blood digestion. J. Insect Physiol. 2005, 51, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nayar, J.K.; Sauerman, D.M., Jr. The effects of nutrition on survival and fecundity in Florida mosquitoes. J. Med. Ent. 1975, 12, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gary, R.E.; Foster, W.A. Anopheles gambiae feeding and survival on honeydew and extra-floral nectar of peridomestic plants. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2004, 18, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Andersson, I.H. The effect of sugar melas and body size on fecundity and longevity of female Aedes communis (Diptera: Culicidae). Physiol. Entomol. 1992, 17, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Okech, B.A.; Gouagna, L.C.; Kabiru, E.W.; Beier, J.C.; Yan, G.; Githure, J.I. Influence of age and previous diet of Anopheles gambiae on the infectivity of natural Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes from human volunteers. J. Insect Sci. 2004, 4, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Almire, F.; Terhzaz, S.; Terry, S.; McFarlane, M.; Gestuveo, R.J.; Szemiel, A.M.; Varjak, M.; McDonal, A.; Kohl, A.; Pondeville, E. Sugar feeding protects against arboviral infection by enhancing gut immunity in the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Koella, J.C.; Sorensen, F.L. Effect of adult nutrition on the melanization immune response of malaria vector Anopheles stephensi. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2002, 16, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nyasembe, V.O.; Tea, P.E.A.; Sawa, P.; Tumlinson, J.H. Plasmodium falciparum infection increases Anopheles gambiae attraction to nectar sources and sugar uptake. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rivero, A.; Ferguson, H.M. The energetic budget of Anopheles stephensi infected with Plasmodium chabaudi: Is energy depletion a mechanism for virulence? Proc. Biol. Sci. 2003, 270, 1365–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Basseri, H.R.; Doosti, S.; Akbarzadeh, K.; Nateghpour, M.; Whitten, M.M.A.; Ladoni, H. Competency of Anopheles stephensi mysorensis strain for Plasmodium vivax and the role of inhibitory carbohydrates to block its sporogonic cycle. Malar. J. 2008, 7, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 15 00240 g001
Figure 1. Frequency of blood digestion status of Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles deaneorum females under honey or sugar intake. Plots (A,B) show the mean frequency of each Sella degree observed in the females at each analyzed time point. (C) shows blood digestion stages according to Sella classification.
Figure 1. Frequency of blood digestion status of Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles deaneorum females under honey or sugar intake. Plots (A,B) show the mean frequency of each Sella degree observed in the females at each analyzed time point. (C) shows blood digestion stages according to Sella classification.
Insects 15 00240 g001
Insects 15 00240 g002
Figure 2. Survival curves of female and male Anopheles darlingi (A,B) and Anopheles deaneorum (C,D) mosquitoes fed with honey or sugar meal. Dotted lines indicate the median survival of each group. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2. Survival curves of female and male Anopheles darlingi (A,B) and Anopheles deaneorum (C,D) mosquitoes fed with honey or sugar meal. Dotted lines indicate the median survival of each group. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval.
Insects 15 00240 g002
Insects 15 00240 g003
Figure 3. Infection parameters according to carbohydrate source. (A,D) show oocyst intensities of Plasmodium vivax experimental infection in Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles deaneorum, respectively. (B,E) show sporozoite intensities for each species according to carbohydrate source. (C,F) show survival curve post-infection for each species according to carbohydrate source. Bars indicate median, and “ns” indicates a statistical non-difference. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3. Infection parameters according to carbohydrate source. (A,D) show oocyst intensities of Plasmodium vivax experimental infection in Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles deaneorum, respectively. (B,E) show sporozoite intensities for each species according to carbohydrate source. (C,F) show survival curve post-infection for each species according to carbohydrate source. Bars indicate median, and “ns” indicates a statistical non-difference. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Insects 15 00240 g003
Table 1. Mean frequency of Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles deaneorum mosquitoes according to Sella stages.
Table 1. Mean frequency of Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles deaneorum mosquitoes according to Sella stages.
Mosquito SpeciesSella Stage24 h48 h72 h96 h
Honey (±SD)Sugar (±SD)Honey (±SD)Sugar (±SD)Honey (±SD)Sugar (±SD)Honey (±SD)Sugar (±SD)
Anopheles darlingiStage 23.7 (6.4)3.5 (6.0)------
Stage 363.0 (30.0)57.9 (41.1)0 (0)2.1 (3.6)----
Stage 433.3 (35.1)38.6 (44.7)4.5 (3.9)6.3 (10.9)0 (0)2.4 (4.1)--
Stage 5--65.2 (9.4) *27.0 (9.5) *8.9 (8.4)2.4 (4.1)6.1 (10.5)0 (0)
Stage 6--30.4 (12.6)62.5 (18.8)15.8 (8.0)14.7 (14.3)8.6 (8.3)5.6 (4.9)
Stage 7--0 (0)2.1 (3.6)75.3 (15.2)80.6 (7.9)85.4 (13.8)94.4 (4.9)
Anopheles deaneorumStage 28.6 (6.2)1.7 (2.9)------
Stage 364.0 (24.6)62.2 (26.6)------
Stage 425.8 (21.2)36.1 (28.0)7.8 (13.6)1.9 (3.2)----
Stage 51.7 (2.9)0 (0)53.3 (16.2)56.6 (23.8)3.9 (3.4)1.8 (3.0)--
Stage 6--42.5 (19.3)28.7 (31.6)13.4 (6.9)11.3 (9.9)3.7 (6.4)4.1 (7.2)
Stage 7--7.3 (2.8)11.1 (9.6)82.7 (7.0)86.9 (11.4)96.3 (6.4)95.8 (7.2)
* p-value < 0.05.
Table 2. Fecundity parameters according to carbohydrate source.
Table 2. Fecundity parameters according to carbohydrate source.
Species/ParametersHoney (±SD)Sugar (±SD)p-Value
Anopheles darlingi
Engorgement rate (%).87.4 ± 16.093.1 ± 8.80.559
Eggs/female27.5 ± 10.216.4 ± 5.20.118
Hatching rate (%)84.1 ± 10.275.9 ± 18.90.481
Anopheles deaneorum
Engorgement rate (%)71.7 ± 19.370 ± 22.30.909
Eggs/female15.1 ± 10.621.5 ± 15.50.519
Hatching rate (%)64.7 ± 11.164.8 ± 11.90.985
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos, N.A.C.; Martins, M.M.; Andrade, A.O.; Bastos, A.S.; Pontual, J.D.C.; Araújo, J.E.; Rocha, M.L.; Medeiros, J.F.; Araujo, M.S. Effects of Carbohydrate Intake on Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles deaneorum Fitness under Lab-Reared Conditions. Insects 2024, 15, 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15040240

AMA Style

Santos NAC, Martins MM, Andrade AO, Bastos AS, Pontual JDC, Araújo JE, Rocha ML, Medeiros JF, Araujo MS. Effects of Carbohydrate Intake on Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles deaneorum Fitness under Lab-Reared Conditions. Insects. 2024; 15(4):240. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15040240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos, Najara A. C., Mirilene M. Martins, Alice O. Andrade, Alessandra S. Bastos, José D. C. Pontual, Jéssica E. Araújo, Marina L. Rocha, Jansen F. Medeiros, and Maisa S. Araujo. 2024. "Effects of Carbohydrate Intake on Anopheles darlingi and Anopheles deaneorum Fitness under Lab-Reared Conditions" Insects 15, no. 4: 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15040240

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop