Next Article in Journal
Comparative Population Biology and Related Gene Expression in the Beta-Cypermethrin-Resistant Strains of Bactrocera Dorsalis (Hendel)
Previous Article in Journal
Pesticide Contamination in Native North American Crops, Part II—Comparison of Flower, Honey Bee Workers, and Native Bee Residues in Lowbush Blueberry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Diel Activity Pattern of Haemaphysalis longicornis and Its Relationship with Climatic Factors

Division of Vectors and Parasitic Diseases, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, 187 Osongsaengmyeong 2-ro, Osong-eup, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju 28159, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(8), 568; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15080568
Submission received: 18 June 2024 / Revised: 19 July 2024 / Accepted: 25 July 2024 / Published: 26 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Medical and Livestock Entomology)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Many tick species pose a threat to public health by transmitting diseases to humans and animals. Haemaphysalis longicornis (The Asian longhorned tick) is known to be the main vector that transmits severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus. In the United States, it was first identified in New Jersey during 2017 on domestic sheep. Even though H. longicornis is an important vector, research on its major activity period is lacking. Tick activity patterns may vary depending on climate factors, the host, and region. This study aimed to survey the patterns of diel activity in H. longicornis and the potential effects of climatic factors on tick activity. The highest activity occurred at 10:00 to 14:00. Avoiding the times of highest activity is considered the best way to reduce contact with ticks.

Abstract

Haemaphysalis longicornis is one of the most medically important carriers of various pathogens. Although H. longicornis is an important vector, only basic ecological and biological information has been obtained, primarily focusing on its abundance and distribution. This study determined the most active time and meteorological conditions for the diel activity of H. longicornis. The diel activity pattern of H. longicornis was the highest between 10:00 and 14:00, and the lowest between 22:00 and 02:00. The major activity temperature of H. longicornis was between 25 °C and 40 °C, with the highest activity at 35 °C. The relative humidity was between 30% and 70% during the active period. Temperature had the highest correlation with diel activity (R = 0.679), followed by humidity (R = −0.649) and light intensity (R = 0.572). Our results provide basic information for the development of tick-borne disease vector control programs and tick surveillance.

1. Introduction

Ticks transmit numerous viral, bacterial, and protozoan pathogens to humans and other animals. As the twenty-first century advances, tick-borne viruses and novel viruses will definitely emerge [1], such as severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS), Heartland virus, Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV), and Powassan virus. Additionally, Jingmen tick virus [2], Yezo virus [3], Toyo virus [4], and Songlin virus [5] have been identified in China and Japan.
Ticks are increasing in density and expanding their geographical distribution owing to climate change [6,7]. Additionally, global warming causes increased tick activity and changes in tick development, reproduction, and survival rates, as well as changes in the development rates of pathogens that are carried by vectors [7,8]. Ixodes ricinus is widely distributed in northwestern Europe, and climate change has expanded its range northward into Norway [9]. The black-legged tick I. scapularis has been recorded over an expanded geographic range in the eastern-to-northern parts of the USA over the last half of the century [10]. Additionally, an invasion of the red sheep tick (Haemaphysalis punctata) was first identified at Rhode Island, USA in 2010 [11]. After the Asian long-horned tick (Haemaphysalis longicornis) was first reported in New Jersey [12], the distribution area has expanded to the southern area of the USA and was recently confirmed in Georgia [13]. Modeling analysis using climate data shows that H. longicornis has a broad potential distribution in the United States and Mexico [14]. Currently, there is great concern regarding the potential role of H. longicornis as a vector for transmitting pathogens to humans and domestic animals.
H. longicornis Neumann is distributed across eastern China, Japan, the Russian Far East, and the Republic of Korea (ROK). It was introduced to Australia over a century ago [15,16,17]. H. longicornis was first discovered in the United States in 2017 [12] and has expanded to various regions [18,19,20,21]. Because H. longicornis is a three-host Ixodid tick, each life stage (adult, nymph, and larva) must include feeding with blood for development into the next life stage [16]. Furthermore, exotic populations of H. longicornis commonly reproduce asexually via parthenogenesis [16,22]. Typically, in the summer, adult females lay 1000 to 4000 eggs in moist soil [23]. Laboratory studies have shown that eggs hatch approximately 25 days after oviposition when stored at 25 °C [24]. Larvae that hatch in the field immediately search tall grass or shrubs for a host [16,25,26]. They can often be found in clusters browsing together at the tips of plants [26]. After blood feeding, the larvae molt into nymphs and typically undergo diapause during the winter [16]. Field surveys demonstrate that H. longicornis overwinters mainly at the nymphal stage in the topsoil layer [27]. In late winter or early spring, depending on the temperature and photoperiod, the nymphs become active again and quest for new hosts [16], such as cattle, sheep, deer, or horses [25]. Generally, one generation occurs over the course of a year as ticks undergo a diapause to increase their chances of survival [16,28].
Additionally, H. longicornis is one of the most medically and veterinary important vectors that can transmit various pathogens, including Anaplasma bovis, A. phagocytophilum, Babesia ovata, Bartonella grahamii, Ba. henselae, Borrelia burgdorferi, Bo. miyamotoi, Coxiella burnetii, and Ehrlichia chaffeensis [29,30,31,32,33,34]. H. longicornis is the main vector of the SFTS virus, which has recently emerged as a lethal pathogen in the ROK, Japan, and China. SFTS was first identified in a patient in China, 2009 [34,35]. In 2013, SFTS cases were first reported in the ROK and Japan, and there were a number of cases in East Asia and other regions, including Thailand, Vietnam, and Myanmar [36,37,38,39,40]. In the ROK, 1895 patients were reported between 2013 and 2023, with a mortality rate of 18.7% [41]. In China, 7721 laboratory-confirmed SFTS cases were reported in 2010–2018, with an overall mortality rate of 10.5% [42]. Between 2010 and 2019, 13,824 SFTS cases were reported in mainland China, with a nationwide average annual fatality rate of 5.2% [43]. In Japan, 174 patients with SFTS were investigated between 2013 and 2021, with a mortality rate of 35% [44]. The highest number of cases was 116 in 2022 [45].
The risk of tick-borne diseases in humans is influenced by many factors; however, the final issue is the questing activity time of unfed ticks. Therefore, studies have been conducted on the diel activity patterns of various species. Questing activities are influenced by climatic and environmental factors. The endogenous rhythm of the ticks and meteorological factors (particularly the temperature, humidity, and insolation) are considered to be the main parameters governing tick diel activity [46,47]. Humidity is one of the most influential factors affecting questing activity and tick survival [48]. Additionally, the activity and behavior of the host may be important [47]. Studies on the activity patterns of ticks have been conducted in several species, and the activity patterns greatly differ for each species. For example, the adult stages of the Dermacentor reticulatus peak activity occurs at 18:00–18:25 in spring and 14:00–14:25 in autumn [49]. Ixodes scapularis exhibited the highest activity in the early morning, whereas contrast Amblyomma americanum nymphs showed peak activity around noon [50]. I. ricinus activity peaked between 23:00 and 03:00 [51]. Although H. longicornis is an important vector, only basic ecological and biological information has been obtained, primarily focusing on its abundance and distribution.
This study aimed to survey the patterns of diel activity in H. longicornis and the potential effects of climatic factors on tick activity. Ultimately, we could identify the major activity times of ticks, provide guidelines to reduce the risk of contact between humans and ticks, and prevent the spread of tick-borne infectious diseases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

This study was conducted in Iin-myeon, GongJu-si, Chungcheongnamd-do, Republic of Korea (36°24′45′′ N, 127°04′05′′ E). This area was selected as a suitable environment for hosts because there are resting places and water supply sources around it (Figure 1). Additionally, several ticks were collected from a previous study. The collection site was covered with grass and shrubs, with an area of approximately 0.045 km2. A 50 × 70 m experimental section was established at the center.

2.2. Sampling Methods and Identification

The ticks were collected using a dry-ice bait trap. The main body of the trap was a white tarpaulin cylinder with an open top (36 cm diameter × 40 cm height). Additionally, a cylindrical ice chest (10 cm diameter × 30 cm height) containing 3 pieces of dry ice (ca, 2.5 kg total) was placed inside the trap to attract ticks [52].
The study was conducted on the third week of every month from April to September at 4 h intervals for 24 h in 2022. The experiment was performed randomly on sunny days. If it rained, we changed the collection period. In August, tick collection could not be conducted owing to rain and wet ground from the rainy season. The attracted ticks (only adults and nymphs) were counted and released 5 m away from the trap to minimize the effects of ticks being removed during collection. The distance between the traps was set to 20 m because the attraction distance of the ticks to dry ice was up to 8 m [17]. To eliminate site bias, the traps were moved to different sites for each time period (Figure 2A). Each trap had a pole with reflective tape to easily find a trap at night (Figure 2B).
For identification, the ticks collected during the last period were brought to the laboratory and identified to the species and life stage levels using a stereomicroscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and morphological keys [53].

2.3. Environmental Measurements

The temperature (°C) and relative humidity (RH) (%) were measured at knee height (trap height) near the dry-ice trap using CEM DT-172 (CEM, Shenzhen, China) at three points at the collection site. The light intensity was measured using a CEM DT-8808 (CEM, Shenzhen, China) at the same location. The temperature, humidity, and light intensity were also measured when ticks were counted from the trap.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The collection results were analyzed at 4 h intervals, and the collected ticks at each time period were compared using an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The mean of each group was used in this test. The relationships between the climatic variables were examined using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. We used multiple linear regression to examine the relationships between climatic variables and the number of ticks collected.

3. Result

A total of 412 ticks were collected during the last period, including 53 adults and 376 nymphs. A total of 396 individuals were H. logicornis (48 adults and 365 nymphs) and 16 individuals were H. flava (five adults and 11 nymphs). From April to July, all ticks were H. longicornis. In September, 16 of the 64 ticks collected were H. flava and the remaining 48 were H. longicornis.
Comparing daytime and nighttime, the t-test results confirmed that tick activity patterns were significantly (p < 0.01) higher during the daytime in all life stages (adult: t = 3.541, p = 0.001, df = 178, nymph: t = 3.712, p < 0.001, df = 178, total: t = 4.024, p < 0.001, df = 178) (Table 1).
The overall activity pattern was the highest in June, and the lowest activity pattern occurred in April and October. Comparing time periods, the 10:00–14:00 time period had the highest tick activity (average collected: 37.8), followed by 14:00–16:00 (30.9), 16:00–10:00 (26.7), 18:00–22:00 (9.9), 02:00–06:00 (7.7), and 22:00–02:00 (2.8). The average temperature during the study period was 24 °C, the lowest temperature was 5.7 °C in September, and the highest temperature was 42.1 °C in June. The average temperature was over 20 °C, except for April, and the daily temperature range was between 5.7–36.5 °C, with the highest being in April. The average relative humidity at the time of the study was 65.6% and ranged from 11.0 to 100.0%. During the survey period, the highest relative humidity was 100%, except in May and September (Table 2).
Most months showed the highest activity patterns to be between 10:00 and 14:00. In May and July, relatively high activity patterns were observed from 14:00 to 18:00. In June, tick activity had a very different pattern from that at other times, with the highest activity between 06:00 and 10:00, followed by 14:00–18:00, 10:00–14:00, 18:00–22:00, 02:00–06:00, and 22:00–02:00 (Figure 3).
Adults and nymphs showed the highest activity between 10:00 and 14:00. At this time, the average temperature was 36.0 °C and the average relative humidity was 34.4% (Figure 4). The higher the temperature, the greater the tick activity. Tick activity was the lowest between 02:00 and 06:00, except for in June. The tick activity during this period was statistically significant compared to April, May, and September.
The activity patterns of ticks highly correlated with temperature (r = 0.679, p < 0.05), light intensity (r = 0.572, p < 0.05), and relative humidity (r = −0.361, p < 0.05) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

In the ROK, the peak developmental stage is summer for adults, spring for nymphs, and fall for larvae [52,54]. This study obtained consistent results, showing that adults were most frequently confirmed from June to July and nymphs from May to June. Additionally, 96.1% (396/412) of the identified ticks were H. logicornis, and a small amount of H. flava was collected only in September. These results are consistent with those of the other reports stating that the dominant species was H. longicornis [55,56].
H. longicornis is present in ten countries of the world, feeds on a variety of animal hosts, and is related to 30 human pathogens, including various species of Rickettsia, Anaplasma, Borrelia, Babesia, and viruses [17,29,34]. The prediction model revealed that H. longicornis could potentially spread to more extensive regions, which is important for public health and veterinary care. Therefore, ecological research on H. longiconis in field environments is important [57]. In this study, we confirmed the activity patterns of H. longicornis in the field.
The dial activity patterns of Ixodes ricinus, I. scapularis, I. persulcatus, and Amblyomma americanum were reported, which are vectors for Lyme disease [50,51,58]. Additionally, Dermacentor variablis (which is a vector for Rocky Mountain spotted fever and tularemia) has been studied [49]. In this study, H. longicornis in the ROK showed the highest activity between 10:00 and 14:00, which is similar to the activity patterns of I. persulcatus [58]. These different diel activity times are influenced by species, environmental factors, the climate of the region, and microhabitats [59].
Our study shows that H. longicornis preferred temperature ranges between 18 and 35 °C, and the survivable temperature is known to be 12–40 °C [16,19]. If temperatures exceed 40 °C, heat stress can cause death. When the temperature falls below 12 °C, host-seeking activities are slowed down or the ticks do not move [16]. In this study, the temperature of the research period was investigated in a wider range, between 5.7 and 42.1 °C. The temperature between 10:00 and 14:00 (the most active period) was mainly 35–40 °C. This result is consistent with A. americanum, A. maculatum, D. andersoni, D. variablis, I. scapularis, and Rhipicephalus sangineus, which have activity patterns at temperatures higher than their preferred temperatures [60]. A low activity was seen between 10:00 and 14:00 in June, because of the temperature exceeding 40 °C. Similarly, a low activity pattern appeared at temperatures below 12 °C during the nighttime in April and May. However, high activity was confirmed in June and July at 02:00–06:00, when the temperatures were approximately 20 °C.
Relative humidity is an important microclimatic factor for the survival and activity of H. longicornis, A. americanum, I. scapularis, I. ricinus, and D. reticulatus [49,50,51,61,62,63]. However, there was a weak correlation between relative humidity and the number of ticks collected in this study. The critical equilibrium of relative humidity for H. longicornis is approximately 85% [57]. When the humidity falls below this threshold, the tick continuously loses water [64], which has a negative effect on survival [65]. In this study, the humidity at the time of the highest activity was approximately 50%, and it was judged that they showed considerable activity in replenishing soil moisture before the moisture evaporated. Therefore, it seems that high relative humidity did not have a significant effect on activity patterns. Additionally, water droplets formed on the collection trap because the humidity was close to 100% at night and dawn. Occasionally, the tick was locked in water droplets. It is thought that tick activity is inhibited even when it rains or humidity is very high.
Light intensity and temperature (R = 0.802) were highly correlated. However, light intensity and activity patterns showed a low correlation (R = 0.572). Climatic factors related to light are more strongly associated with diapause than with activity. In particular, the photoperiod has a greater influence than light intensity on activity [16,66]. A long-day photoperiod triggers host-seeking behavior in H. longicornis in the laboratory [66]. In this study, the overall tick activity pattern was the highest in June, when the day length was the longest.
Climatic stress decreases tick survival, but increases the rate of host-seeking activity [67]. A variety of local field conditions can affect questing activity, including temperature and relative humidity [46,50], precipitation [68], time of day [69], seasonality [70,71], solar radiation [72], forest structure [73], and understory structure and invasive shrubs [74]. Additionally, several intrinsic factors (such as geographic origin and local adaptation) may influence tick-questing activity [75,76], and infected pathogens boost tick mobility [77]. For example, it is necessary to study the ecology of ticks through the analysis of various aspects as well as climatic factors.
Also, host preferences influence tick distribution, and the survival of tick populations depends on the presence of suitable hosts [78]. H. longicornis is known to prefer large mammals (e.g., cattle, sheep, deer) over small ones [16]. In ROK, H. longicornis was identified in medium- and large-sized mammals such as cattle, goats, wild boars, roe deer, raccoons, badgers, and migratory birds [79,80,81], but not in small mammals (rodents) [82]. However, in the United State, H. longicornis have been found on medium- and large-sized mammals (coyotes, rabbits, raccoons, and deer), as well as small mammals (possums and marmots) [83]. Tick distribution can be influenced by several factors, including local host populations and species [84]. Although this study provided general guidelines for the highest activity of H. longicornis, climate changes may alter the activity of the species. The study is limited to a particular region. It is unknown if other environmental, climatic conditions and the effects of the host have a definite effect on their activity.
Ticks are associated with the transmission of various pathogens of medical and veterinary importance. They are considered one of the most important arthropod vectors after mosquitoes [85]. Our study determined the period of major daily activity of H. longicornis. These results will help inform the public about the risk of exposure to ticks during daytime outdoor activities. It also provides basic information for the development of tick-borne disease vector control programs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.-E.N. and H.-I.L.; methodology, G.-h.K., H.S.L. and H.K.; formal analysis, B.-E.N. and H.S.L.; data curation, G.-h.K.; funding acquisition, H.-I.L.; validation, G.-h.K., H.S.L. and H.K.; writing—original draft, B.-E.N.; supervision, H.-I.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA; 6332-304-210) of the Republic of Korea.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Tae-Kyu Kim and Se Hoon Cho for his field survey and thoughtful contributions to this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mansfield, K.L.; Jizhou, L.; Phipps, L.P.; Johnson, N. Emerging tick-borne viruses in the twenty-first century. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jia, N.; Wang, J.; Shi, W.; Du, L.; Sun, Y.; Zhan, W.; Jiang, J.-F.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, B.; Ji, P. Large-scale comparative analyses of tick genomes elucidate their genetic diversity and vector capacities. Cell 2020, 182, 1328–1340.e1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kodama, F.; Yamaguchi, H.; Park, E.; Tatemoto, K.; Sashika, M.; Nakao, R.; Terauchi, Y.; Mizuma, K.; Orba, Y.; Kariwa, H. A novel nairovirus associated with acute febrile illness in Hokkaido, Japan. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kobayashi, D.; Kuwata, R.; Kimura, T.; Faizah, A.N.; Higa, Y.; Hayashi, T.; Sawabe, K.; Isawa, H. Toyo virus, a novel member of the Kaisodi group in the genus Uukuvirus (family Phenuiviridae) found in Haemaphysalis formosensis ticks in Japan. Arch. Virol. 2021, 166, 2751–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ma, J.; Lv, X.-L.; Zhang, X.; Han, S.-Z.; Wang, Z.-D.; Li, L.; Sun, H.-T.; Ma, L.-X.; Cheng, Z.-L.; Shao, J.-W. Identification of a new orthonairovirus associated with human febrile illness in China. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dantas-Torres, F. Climate change, biodiversity, ticks and tick-borne diseases: The butterfly effect. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2015, 4, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sonenshine, D.E. Range expansion of tick disease vectors in North America: Implications for spread of tick-borne disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Estrada-Peña, A.; Ayllón, N.; De La Fuente, J. Impact of climate trends on tick-borne pathogen transmission. Front. Physiol. 2012, 3, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hvidsten, D.; Frafjord, K.; Gray, J.S.; Henningsson, A.J.; Jenkins, A.; Kristiansen, B.E.; Lager, M.; Rognerud, B.; Slåtsve, A.M.; Stordal, F. The distribution limit of the common tick, Ixodes ricinus, and some associated pathogens in north-western Europe. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Eisen, L.; Eisen, R.J. Changes in the geographic distribution of the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, in the United States. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2023, 14, 102233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tufts, D.M.; Diuk-Wasser, M.A. First hemispheric report of invasive tick species Haemaphysalis punctata, first state report of Haemaphysalis longicornis, and range expansion of native tick species in Rhode Island, USA. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rainey, T.; Occi, J.L.; Robbins, R.G.; Egizi, A. Discovery of Haemaphysalis longicornis (Ixodida: Ixodidae) parasitizing a sheep in New Jersey, United States. J. Med. Entomol. 2018, 55, 757–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fausett, E.; Kirstein, O.D.; Bellman, S.; Long, A.; Roeske, I.; Cheng, C.; Piantadosi, A.; Anderson, T.K.; Vazquez-Prokopec, G.M. Surveillance and detection of Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) in protected areas from Georgia, USA. J. Med. Entomol. 2024, 61, tjae051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Raghavan, R.; Barker, S.; Cobos, M.E.; Barker, D.; Teo, E.; Foley, D.; Nakao, R.; Lawrence, K.; Heath, A.; Peterson, A.T. Potential spatial distribution of the newly introduced long-horned tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis in North America. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Beard, C.B.; Occi, J.; Bonilla, D.L.; Egizi, A.M.; Fonseca, D.M.; Mertins, J.W.; Backenson, B.P.; Bajwa, W.I.; Barbarin, A.M.; Bertone, M.A. Multistate infestation with the exotic disease–vector tick Haemaphysalis longicornis—United States, August 2017–September 2018. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2018, 67, 1310–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Heath, A. Biology, ecology and distribution of the tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann (Acari: Ixodidae) in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 2016, 64, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hoogstraal, H.; Roberts, F.H.; Kohls, G.M.; Tipton, V.J. Review of Haemaphysalis (Kaiseriana) Longicornis Neumann (resurrected) of Australia, New Zealand, New Caledonia, Fiji, Japan, Korea, and Northeastern China and USSR, and its parthenogenetic and bisexual populations (Ixodoidea, Ixodidae). J. Parasitol. 1968, 54, 1197–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Piedmonte, N.P.; Vinci, V.C.; Daniels, T.J.; Backenson, B.P.; Falco, R.C. Seasonal activity of Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) in southern New York state. J. Med. Entomol. 2021, 58, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rochlin, I. Modeling the Asian longhorned tick (Acari: Ixodidae) suitable habitat in North America. J. Med. Entomol. 2019, 56, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tufts, D.M.; Goodman, L.B.; Benedict, M.C.; Davis, A.D.; VanAcker, M.C.; Diuk-Wasser, M. Association of the invasive Haemaphysalis longicornis tick with vertebrate hosts, other native tick vectors, and tick-borne pathogens in New York City, USA. Int. J. Parasitol. 2021, 51, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wormser, G.P.; McKenna, D.; Piedmonte, N.; Vinci, V.; Egizi, A.M.; Backenson, B.; Falco, R.C. First recognized human bite in the United States by the Asian longhorned tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 314–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Egizi, A.M.; Robbins, R.G.; Beati, L.; Nava, S.; Occi, J.L.; Fonseca, D.M. A pictorial key to differentiate the recently detected exotic Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann, 1901 (Acari, Ixodidae) from native congeners in North America. Zookeys 2019, 818, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Grove, D.; Fryxell, T.R.; Hickling, G.J.; Vail, K.; Ivey, J. Asian Longhorned Tick. 2019. Available online: https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/F/2019/focus-on-asian-longhorned-tick.pdf (accessed on 12 May 2024).
  24. Yano, Y.; Shiraishi, S.; Uchida, T. Effects of temperature on development and growth in the tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1987, 3, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tufts, D.M.; VanAcker, M.C.; Fernandez, M.P.; DeNicola, A.; Egizi, A.; Diuk-Wasser, M.A. Distribution, host-seeking phenology, and host and habitat associations of Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks, Staten Island, New York, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schappach, B.L.; Krell, R.K.; Hornbostel, V.L.; Connally, N.P. Exotic Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) in the United States: Biology, ecology, and strategies for management. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2020, 11, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kim, J.-Y.; Jung, M.; Kho, J.-W.; Song, H.; Moon, K.; Kim, Y.H.; Lee, D.-H. Characterization of overwintering sites of Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) and tick infection rate with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus from eight provinces in South Korea. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tian, Y.; Kaufman, P.E. Asian longhorned tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann (Arachnida: Acari: Ixodidae): EENY-739/IN1263, 8/2019. EDIS 2020, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kang, J.-G.; Ko, S.; Smith, W.B.; Kim, H.-C.; Lee, I.-Y.; Chae, J.-S. Prevalence of Anaplasma, Bartonella and Borrelia Species in Haemaphysalis longicornis collected from goats in North Korea. J. Vet. Sci. 2016, 17, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kim, C.-M.; Kim, M.-S.; Park, M.-S.; Park, J.-H.; Chae, J.-S. Identification of Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and A. bovis in Haemaphysalis longicornis and Ixodes persulcatus ticks from Korea. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2003, 3, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lee, J.H.; Park, H.S.; Jang, W.J.; Koh, S.E.; Park, T.K.; Kang, S.S.; Kim, B.J.; Kook, Y.H.; Park, K.H.; Lee, S.H. Identification of the Coxiella sp. detected from Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks in Korea. Microbiol. Immunol. 2004, 48, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Price, K.J.; Graham, C.B.; Witmier, B.J.; Chapman, H.A.; Coder, B.L.; Boyer, C.N.; Foster, E.; Maes, S.E.; Bai, Y.; Eisen, R.J. Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto DNA in field-collected Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks, Pennsylvania, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Kelly, P.; Li, J.; Ren, Y.; Wang, C. Borrelia miyamotoi sensu lato in Père David Deer and Haemaphysalis longicornis Ticks. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yu, X.-J.; Liang, M.-F.; Zhang, S.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.-D.; Sun, Y.-L.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q.-F.; Popov, V.L.; Li, C. Fever with thrombocytopenia associated with a novel bunyavirus in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364, 1523–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xu, B.; Liu, L.; Huang, X.; Ma, H.; Zhang, Y.; Du, Y.; Wang, P.; Tang, X.; Wang, H.; Kang, K. Metagenomic analysis of fever, thrombocytopenia and leukopenia syndrome (FTLS) in Henan Province, China: Discovery of a new bunyavirus. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, K.-H.; Yi, J.; Kim, G.; Choi, S.J.; Jun, K.I.; Kim, N.-H.; Choe, P.G.; Kim, N.-J.; Lee, J.-K.; Oh, M.-d. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, South Korea, 2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Takahashi, T.; Maeda, K.; Suzuki, T.; Ishido, A.; Shigeoka, T.; Tominaga, T.; Kamei, T.; Honda, M.; Ninomiya, D.; Sakai, T. The first identification and retrospective study of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Japan. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 209, 816–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ongkittikul, S.; Watanawong, R.; Rompho, P. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus: The first case report in Thailand. Bangk. Med. J. 2020, 16, 204. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tran, X.C.; Yun, Y.; Kim, S.-H.; Thao, N.T.P.; Man, P.K.C.; Yoo, J.R.; Heo, S.T.; Cho, N.-H.; Lee, K.H. Endemic severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, Vietnam. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Win, A.M.; Nguyen, Y.T.H.; Kim, Y.; Ha, N.-Y.; Kang, J.-G.; Kim, H.; San, B.; Kyaw, O.; Htike, W.W.; Choi, D.-O. Genotypic heterogeneity of Orientia tsutsugamushi in scrub typhus patients and thrombocytopenia syndrome co-infection, Myanmar. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. KDCA (Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency) Infectious Disease Web-Portal. Available online: http://www.kdca.go.kr/npt/biz/npp/nppMain.Do (accessed on 2 May 2024).
  42. Miao, D.; Liu, M.-J.; Wang, Y.-X.; Ren, X.; Lu, Q.-B.; Zhao, G.-P.; Dai, K.; Li, X.-L.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.-A. Epidemiology and ecology of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in China, 2010–2018. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, e3851–e3858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Huang, X.; Li, J.; Li, A.; Wang, S.; Li, D. Epidemiological characteristics of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome from 2010 to 2019 in Mainland China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yokomizo, K.; Tomozane, M.; Sano, C.; Ohta, R. Clinical Presentation and Mortality of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome in Japan: A Systematic Review of Case Reports. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hidaka, K.; Mitoma, S.; Norimine, J.; Shimojima, M.; Kuroda, Y.; Hinoura, T. Seroprevalence for severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus among the residents of Miyazaki, Japan: An epidemiological study. J. Infect. Chemother. 2024, 30, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Duffy, D.C.; Campbell, S.R. Ambient air temperature as a predictor of activity of adult Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 1994, 31, 178–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lane, R.S.; Kleinjan, J.E.; Schoeler, G.B. Diel activity of nymphal Dermacentor occidentalis and Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae) in relation to meteorological factors and host activity periods. J. Med. Entomol. 1995, 32, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Daniel, M.; Dusbabek, F. Micrometeorological and microhabitat factors affecting maintenance and dissemination of tick-borne diseases in the environment. Ecol. Dyn. Tick-Borne Zoonoses 1994, 91, 138. [Google Scholar]
  49. Bartosik, K.; Wiśniowski, Ł.; Buczek, A. Questing behavior of Dermacentor reticulatus adults (Acari: Amblyommidae) during diurnal activity periods in eastern Poland. J. Med. Entomol. 2012, 49, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Schulze, T.L.; Jordan, R.A. Meteorologically mediated diurnal questing of Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) nymphs. J. Med. Entomol. 2003, 40, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mejlon, H.A. Diel activity of Ixodes ricinus Acari: Ixodidae at two locations near Stockholm, Sweden. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1997, 21, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Seo, M.-G.; Noh, B.-E.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, T.-K.; Song, B.-G.; Lee, H.I. Nationwide temporal and geographical distribution of tick populations and phylogenetic analysis of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in ticks in Korea, 2020. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yamaguti, N.; Tipton, V.J.; Keegan, H.L.; Toshioka, S. Ticks of Japan, Korea, and the Ryukyu islands. Brigh. Young Univ. Sci. Bull. Biol. Ser. 1971, 15, 1. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kim, H.G.; Jung, M.; Lee, D.-H. Seasonal activity of Haemaphysalis longicornis and Haemaphysalis flava (Acari: Ixodida), vectors of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) virus, and their SFTS virus harboring rates in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2022, 87, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kim-Jeon, M.-D.; Jegal, S.; Jun, H.; Jung, H.; Park, S.H.; Ahn, S.K.; Lee, J.; Gong, Y.W.; Joo, K.; Kwon, M.J. Four year surveillance of the vector hard ticks for SFTS, Ganghwa-do, Republic of Korea. Korean J. Parasitol. 2019, 57, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Seo, J.-W.; Han, S.-Y.; Sung, S.-H.; Jung, E.-Y.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, S.-J.; Yoo, S.-S. Survey on tick distribution and tick-borne pathogens in Daejeon and adjacent areas in South Korea. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2021, 12, 101711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhao, L.; Li, J.; Cui, X.; Jia, N.; Wei, J.; Xia, L.; Wang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, X. Distribution of Haemaphysalis longicornis and associated pathogens: Analysis of pooled data from a China field survey and global published data. Lancet Planet. Health 2020, 4, e320–e329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Alekseev, A.N.; Dubinina, H.V. Abiotic parameters and diel and seasonal activity of Borrelia-infected and uninfected Ixodes persulcatus (Acarina: Ixodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2000, 37, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Randolph, S. The impact of tick ecology on pathogen transmission dynamics. In Ticks: Biology, Disease and Control; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008; pp. 40–72. [Google Scholar]
  60. Fieler, A.M.; Rosendale, A.J.; Farrow, D.W.; Dunlevy, M.D.; Davies, B.; Oyen, K.; Xiao, Y.; Benoit, J.B. Larval thermal characteristics of multiple ixodid ticks. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2021, 257, 110939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Heath, A. The temperature and humidity preferences of Haemaphysalis longicornis, Ixodes holocyclus and Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Ixodidae): Studies on eggs. Int. J. Parasitol. 1979, 9, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Heath, A. The temperature and humidity preferences of Haemaphysalis longicornis, Ixodes holocyclus and Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Ixodidae): Studies on engorged larvae. Int. J. Parasitol. 1981, 11, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tsunoda, T. Influence of aggregation and relative humidity on longevity of unfed bush tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann (Acari: Ixodidae). J. Parasitol. 2008, 94, 990–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Knülle, W.; Rudolph, D. Humidity relationships and water balance of ticks. In Physiology of Ticks; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982; pp. 43–70. [Google Scholar]
  65. Estrada-Peña, A.; de la Fuente, J. The ecology of ticks and epidemiology of tick-borne viral diseases. Antivir. Res. 2014, 108, 104–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. FUJIMOTO, K. Effect of photoperiod on the host attachment and development in the tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis. Med. Entomol. Zool. 1995, 46, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nielebeck, C.; Kim, S.H.; Pepe, A.; Himes, L.; Miller, Z.; Zummo, S.; Tang, M.; Monzón, J.D. Climatic stress decreases tick survival but increases rate of host-seeking behavior. Ecosphere 2023, 14, e4369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Burtis, J.C.; Sullivan, P.; Levi, T.; Oggenfuss, K.; Fahey, T.J.; Ostfeld, R.S. The impact of temperature and precipitation on blacklegged tick activity and Lyme disease incidence in endemic and emerging regions. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Dubie, T.R.; Turner, J.; Noden, B.H. Questing behavior and analysis of tick-borne bacteria in Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) in Oklahoma. J. Med. Entomol. 2018, 55, 1569–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Mangan, M.J.; Foré, S.A.; Kim, H.-J. Seasonal changes in questing efficiency of wild Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) nymphs. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2022, 13, 101988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Di, C. Exploring Local Environmental Factors Influencing Geographic Distribution of Black-Legged Tick Questing Activity. Master’s Thesis, CUNY Hunter College, New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  72. Jensen, P. Host seeking activity of Ixodes ricinus ticks based on daily consecutive flagging samples. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2000, 24, 695–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Schulze, T.L.; Jordan, R.A. Influence of meso-and microscale habitat structure on focal distribution of sympatric Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2005, 42, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Adalsteinsson, S.A.; D’Amico, V.; Shriver, W.G.; Brisson, D.; Buler, J.J. Scale-dependent effects of nonnative plant invasion on host-seeking tick abundance. Ecosphere 2016, 7, e01317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Arsnoe, I.M.; Hickling, G.J.; Ginsberg, H.S.; McElreath, R.; Tsao, J.I. Different populations of blacklegged tick nymphs exhibit differences in questing behavior that have implications for human Lyme disease risk. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Gilbert, L.; Aungier, J.; Tomkins, J.L. Climate of origin affects tick (Ixodes ricinus) host-seeking behavior in response to temperature: Implications for resilience to climate change? Ecol. Evol. 2014, 4, 1186–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Benelli, G. Pathogens manipulating tick behavior—Through a glass, darkly. Pathogens 2020, 9, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Walker, A.R. Ticks of Domestic Animals in Africa: A Guide to Identification of Species; Bioscience Reports Edinburgh: London, UK, 2003; Volume 74. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ji, S.-R.; Byun, H.-R.; Rieu, M.-S.; Han, S.-W.; Nam, H.-Y.; Seo, S.; Park, S.-Y.; Kang, H.-Y.; Choi, C.-Y.; Cho, S.-Y. First detection of Bandavirus dabieense in ticks collected from migratory birds in the Republic of Korea. Acta Trop. 2024, 257, 107279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Chae, J.-B.; Cho, Y.-S.; Cho, Y.-K.; Kang, J.-G.; Shin, N.-S.; Chae, J.-S. Epidemiological investigation of tick species from near domestic animal farms and cattle, goat, and wild boar in Korea. Korean J. Parasitol. 2019, 57, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Kim, B.-J.; Kim, H.; Won, S.; Kim, H.-C.; Chong, S.-T.; Klein, T.A.; Kim, K.-G.; Seo, H.-Y.; Chae, J.-S. Ticks collected from wild and domestic animals and natural habitats in the Republic of Korea. Korean J. Parasitol. 2014, 52, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kim, H.C.; Chong, S.T.; Sames, W.J.; Nunn, P.V.; Wolf, S.P.; Robbins, R.G.; Klein, T.A. Tick surveillance of small mammals captured in Gyeonggi and Gangwon Provinces, Republic of Korea, 2004–2008. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2010, 15, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Thompson, A.T.; White, S.A.; Shaw, D.; Garrett, K.B.; Wyckoff, S.T.; Doub, E.E.; Ruder, M.G.; Yabsley, M.J. A multi-seasonal study investigating the phenology, host and habitat associations, and pathogens of Haemaphysalis longicornis in Virginia, USA. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2021, 12, 101773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Léger, E.; Vourc’h, G.; Vial, L.; Chevillon, C.; McCoy, K.D. Changing distributions of ticks: Causes and consequences. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2013, 59, 219–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Parola, P.; Raoult, D. Ticks and tickborne bacterial diseases in humans: An emerging infectious threat. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 32, 897–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Map of the study site where the traps were installed. (A) The location of the site shown broadly and the white box is the actual survey location (image source by Korea Statistical Information Service). (B) Panoramic view of the study site.
Figure 1. Map of the study site where the traps were installed. (A) The location of the site shown broadly and the white box is the actual survey location (image source by Korea Statistical Information Service). (B) Panoramic view of the study site.
Insects 15 00568 g001
Figure 2. Sampling location method (1: 10:00–12:00, 2: 12:00–14:00, 3: 14:00–16:00, 4: 16:00–18:00, 5: 18:00–20:00, 6: 20:00–22:00, 7: 22:00–24:00, 8: 24:00–02:00, 9: 02:00–04:00, 10: 04:00–06:00, 11: 06:00–08:00, 12: 08:00–10:00, 13: 10:00–12:00) and environmental measure point. (A) Dry ice bait trap and stick with reflective tape. (B) The ticks collected during the last period were used for identification in the laboratory.
Figure 2. Sampling location method (1: 10:00–12:00, 2: 12:00–14:00, 3: 14:00–16:00, 4: 16:00–18:00, 5: 18:00–20:00, 6: 20:00–22:00, 7: 22:00–24:00, 8: 24:00–02:00, 9: 02:00–04:00, 10: 04:00–06:00, 11: 06:00–08:00, 12: 08:00–10:00, 13: 10:00–12:00) and environmental measure point. (A) Dry ice bait trap and stick with reflective tape. (B) The ticks collected during the last period were used for identification in the laboratory.
Insects 15 00568 g002
Figure 3. Total tick (adult + nymph) activity patterns by month (indicated by averaging the collected tick in each time period by month).
Figure 3. Total tick (adult + nymph) activity patterns by month (indicated by averaging the collected tick in each time period by month).
Insects 15 00568 g003
Figure 4. Tick activity patterns, temperature, and relative humidity by time period. Trap indexes with the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability (Duncan’s multiple range test). RH = relative humidity.
Figure 4. Tick activity patterns, temperature, and relative humidity by time period. Trap indexes with the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability (Duncan’s multiple range test). RH = relative humidity.
Insects 15 00568 g004
Table 1. Number of Haemaphysalis longicornis sampled (mean ± S.D) during the daytime and nighttime at 5 months.
Table 1. Number of Haemaphysalis longicornis sampled (mean ± S.D) during the daytime and nighttime at 5 months.
AprilMayJuneJulySeptemberTotal
Adults
Daytime6.7 ± 23.32.4 ± 4.014.3 ± 20.514.1 ± 8.72.4 ± 2.88.0 ± 15.2
Nighttime0.1 ± 0.30.9 ± 1.75.6 ± 6.03.5 ± 3.20.4 ± 0.72.1 ± 3.4
Nymphs
Daytime7.2 ± 5.825.5 ± 39.758.8 ± 88.515.6 ± 20.912.1 ± 10.523.8 ± 47.5
Nighttime0.2 ± 0.43.7 ± 6.214.8 ± 23.14.3 ± 5.80.5 ± 0.94.7 ± 12.0
Total
Daytime13.8 ± 25.927.9 ± 43.173.1 ± 105.929.7 ± 24.614.5 ± 13.031.8 ± 57.0
Nighttime0.3 ± 0.64.6 ± 7.520.4 ± 28.17.8 ± 8.30.9 ± 1.36.9 ± 15.1
Student’s t-test for daytime and nighttime: p < 0.01; daytime = 06:00–18:00; nighttime = 18:00–06:00.
Table 2. Mean ± S.D. of the total tick (adult + nymph) and climate factors (temperature and relative humidity range).
Table 2. Mean ± S.D. of the total tick (adult + nymph) and climate factors (temperature and relative humidity range).
DateTime PeriodTemperature
(Mean)
Relative Humidity (Mean)
06:00–10:0010:00–14:0014:00–18:0018:00–22:0022:00–02:0002:00–06:00
27 April4.7 ± 5.127.0 ± 43.49.8 ± 7.00.8 ± 0.80.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.05.7–36.5 (17.8 °C)11.0–100.0 (61.5%)
18 May21.3 ± 39.134.0 ± 61.028.5 ± 31.47.0 ± 6.56.2 ± 10.90.5 ± 0.59.5–34.1 (20.7 °C)16.3–85.4 (46.9%)
20 June83.2 ± 93.062.7 ± 140.873.5 ± 96.931.5 ± 28.43.2 ± 4.026.5 ± 36.117.7–42.1 (28.4 °C)28.3–100.0 (68.0%)
28 July16.5 ± 8.137.0 ± 26.535.5 ± 31.310.0 ± 11.74.2 ± 2.39.3 ± 8.221.3–40.3 (28.2 °C)39.5–100.0 (84.1%)
14 September7.7 ± 10.328.7 ± 9.97.2 ± 3.30.3 ± 0.50.3 ± 0.52.2 ± 1.719.0–36.1 (25.2 °C)37.2–88.0 (67.5%)
Total Mean26.7 ± 51.537.8 ± 68.530.9 ± 50.69.9 ± 17.42.8 ± 5.57.7 ± 18.55.7–42.1 (24.0 °C)11.0–100.0 (65.6%)
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients comparing three climate factors and the collected ticks.
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients comparing three climate factors and the collected ticks.
TEMPHUMDLIT
Temperature (TEMP)
Relative humidity (HUMD)−0.593 *
Light intensity (LIT)0.802 *−0.649 *
Collected total tick (CTT)0.679 *−0.361 *0.572 *
Coefficients followed by an asterisk (*) are significant (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Noh, B.-E.; Kim, G.-h.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, H.; Lee, H.-I. The Diel Activity Pattern of Haemaphysalis longicornis and Its Relationship with Climatic Factors. Insects 2024, 15, 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15080568

AMA Style

Noh B-E, Kim G-h, Lee HS, Kim H, Lee H-I. The Diel Activity Pattern of Haemaphysalis longicornis and Its Relationship with Climatic Factors. Insects. 2024; 15(8):568. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15080568

Chicago/Turabian Style

Noh, Byung-Eon, Gi-hun Kim, Hak Seon Lee, Hyunwoo Kim, and Hee-Il Lee. 2024. "The Diel Activity Pattern of Haemaphysalis longicornis and Its Relationship with Climatic Factors" Insects 15, no. 8: 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15080568

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop