Next Article in Journal
Identification of Female Sex Pheromone of a Plant Bug, Polymerus pekinensis Reuter (Hemiptera: Miridae)
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Ultraviolet Radiation on Growth, Development and Antioxidant Enzymes of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anise and Fennel Essential Oils and Their Combination as Natural and Safe Housefly Repellents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 16
Issue 2
10.3390/insects16020110
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Comprehensive Review: Biology of Anopheles squamosus, an Understudied Malaria Vector in Africa

by
Valerie T. Nguyen
1,
Dalia S. Dryden
1,
Brooke A. Broder
1,
Ayaan Tadimari
1,
Primrose Tanachaiwiwat
1,
Derrick K. Mathias
1,
Panpim Thongsripong
1,
Lawrence E. Reeves
1,
Renee L. M. N. Ali
2,
Mary E. Gebhardt
2,
Kochelani Saili
3,
Limonty Simubali
3,
Edgar Simulundu
3,
Douglas E. Norris
2 and
Yoosook Lee
1,*
1
Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Nematology, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Vero Beach, FL 32962, USA
2
The W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
3
Macha Research Trust, Macha 10101, Southern, Zambia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2025, 16(2), 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020110
Submission received: 9 December 2024 / Revised: 13 January 2025 / Accepted: 21 January 2025 / Published: 23 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surveillance and Control of Arthropod-Borne Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Simple Summary

Anopheles squamosus is a widespread mosquito species in Africa. Studies have shown that this species feeds on humans in indoor settings and is found to be infected with human malaria parasites. Despite this, An. squamosus continues to be an understudied species that has circumvented disease control measures. For this review, published literature, as well as online databases that reported Anopheles squamous occurrence in Africa were compiled. Our work indicates that An. squamosus is abundant throughout the African continent and exhibits similar behaviors to primary malaria vectors in southern and eastern African countries, like Zambia. Further studies are needed to develop resources to accurately identify this species from other mosquito species and to develop effective control strategies based on their biology and behavior.

Abstract

With ongoing global efforts to eliminate malaria, several countries have entered a pre-elimination stage, in which populations of the primary mosquito vector are reduced and the rates of malaria transmission are low. Efforts to eliminate malaria have changed the dynamics of disease transmission, causing a shift in anopheline community composition in some regions. One of the most abundant species of Anopheles found in pre-elimination areas, such as southern Africa, is Anopheles squamosus (Theobald, 1901; Diptera: Culicidae). Although An. squamosus has been documented across the African continent, limited information is available about its biology. Knowing what, when, and where the malaria vector bites humans can help develop effective malaria control strategies. The aim of this review is to compile the information available on An. squamosus’s biology, ecology, distribution, behavior, and potential role in disease transmission. The review of current literature suggested that An. squamosus is abundant throughout the African continent. Studies indicate that this species occupies the same range and exhibits similar behaviors to primary malaria vectors in southern and eastern African countries, like Zambia. In conclusion, An. squamosus continues to be an understudied species that has circumvented disease control measures and further studies are needed to develop effective control strategies.

1. Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there were approximately 249 million malaria cases in the 85 countries where the disease is endemic and an estimated 608,000 deaths in 2022 [1]. The WHO has supported efforts to reduce the global burden of malaria by developing a framework for working toward elimination. The current malaria elimination strategies laid out in WHO guidelines for malaria (2024) include vector control, chemotherapies, and vaccines [2,3]. The current Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016–2030 (GTS) target is reducing malaria incidence and mortality rates by 90% and eliminating malaria in at least 35 countries by 2030 [4]. Between 2011 and 2021, there was an annual average reduction of malaria incidence of 25.4% [5]. However, this decrease was heterogeneous both within and across countries, and there was a 5% global increase in malaria incidence rates between 2019 and 2020, likely due in part to disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic [2,6].
With global efforts to reduce the burden of malaria, several African regions, such as Cape Verde, central Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, Isle of Príncipe, and southern Zambia, reached the pre-elimination stages of malaria transmission [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. The pre-elimination status is defined by a population with either a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) positivity rate below 5% annually or a parasite positivity rate lower than 5% among those with a fever [14]. The decrease in global malaria cases has been largely attributed in part to vector control that utilizes tools, such as insecticide-treated bed nets (ITN) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), which target indoor-foraging (endophagic) and indoor-resting (endophilic) mosquitoes [15,16]. As a result of the implementation of these control methods, many of the principal vector species of malaria, such as Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.), have been declining in abundance in some countries, like Kenya, Tanzania, and Zambia [17,18,19,20].
Identification of the knowledge gaps must be done to adequately assess vector-borne pathogens across the African continent. There is a need for improved infrastructure, an understanding of the ecology of vector species and the environmental conditions that impact them, to assess their role in disease transmission [21,22,23]. For example, in Zambia, the need for vector ecology studies could be alleviated by improving the understanding of the human–vector contact frequency, which is pivotal for assessing disease transmission in vector-borne systems and planning mitigation measures [21]. To adequately assess trends in vector-borne diseases in Africa, there must be an effort to increase the capacity for research on vector-borne zoonotic diseases by enhancing the interdisciplinary focus of research and building stronger communications between countries [24].
Despite these achievements and the identification of areas for improvement, the final elimination of malaria from many regions and countries (e.g., southern Zambia, northeastern South Africa, Botswana, and Namibia) is now proving to be frustratingly difficult, and such locations remain static in the pre-elimination stage. Tenacious residual malaria infections persist in these pre-elimination zones despite access to rapid diagnostics and treatment, comprehensive IRS campaigns, and the widespread distribution of ITNs [14]. Despite the prolonged extirpation or decline of major vector species, persistent residual malaria has prompted many involved in malaria control to suspect that understudied secondary vector species contribute to the remaining malaria transmission in pre-elimination zones [25,26]. These residual malaria cases highlight that existing vector control tools that have focused on the major vector species alone are not sufficient to eliminate malaria from some regions [27].
Species often considered secondary vectors have been implicated in malaria transmission in pre-elimination zones and are often understudied. Examples include An. vaneedeni and An. parensis (members of the An. funestus group) in southern Africa and An. coustani and An. ziemanni in central Africa [28,29,30,31]. An expanding body of work has implicated An. squamosus, An. rufipes, and An. coustani in malaria transmission in Zambia, especially in pre-elimination settings [17,26,32,33,34]. Anopheles collections in Zambia revealed morphological misidentification and underrepresentation of many anopheline species in sequence databases, which confounds efforts to confirm the identity of potential malaria vector species [35]. Therefore, continued development of methodologies that allow more accurate species identification of these understudied malaria vector populations is critical for understanding malaria transmission in the pre-elimination setting and elucidating the potential role of the understudied secondary vectors in residual malaria cases.
Studies of malaria transmission dynamics in pre-elimination settings are particularly relevant to discussions of gene drive and other novel vector control strategies. For example, the ITN, one of the most successful malaria control tools, was devised with the understanding that the primary malaria vector bites humans at night indoors while people are sleeping [36]. Other Anopheles species that bite humans outdoors could circumvent control measures, like ITNs. Other regions in Africa will inevitably reach the malaria pre-elimination phase at some future time through the implementation of available and perhaps new control strategies. Understanding the behavior and ecology of understudied malaria vectors will be critical in advancing comprehensive malaria control strategies targeting multiple vector species that can lead to malaria elimination.
Anopheles squamosus is a secondary vector species of malaria that can be found across sub-Saharan Africa [37]. This species is currently understudied because it is believed to forage outdoors (exophagic) and to be primarily associated with non-human animal hosts (zoophilic) [26]. These are based on limited studies and have created a perception that it does not pose a threat to public health. However, studies have shown that An. squamosus will opportunistically feed on humans and can be present around human dwellings [23,26]. Moreover, this species has been found naturally infected with Plasmodium falciparum, a causative agent of human malaria, and is abundantly collected during mosquito surveys [32,38].
Another barrier to studying An. squamosus is the morphological identification and separation of this species from other difficult to distinguish African anophelines. Many other anophelines, like An. gambiae s.l., exist as complexes of morphologically similar species with members exhibiting variable vector capability [32,39], insecticide resistance [40], and host association [41,42]. Therefore, the ability to distinguish exact species within an anopheline group is critical for assessing the associated malaria risk and planning effective interventions targeted to the particular species of concern. As adults, An. squamosus is morphologically identical to An. cydippis [43], and there are at least five chromosomal forms based on chromosome inversions that may correspond to cryptic species under the name An. squamosus [44]. Unless genetic methods are used to distinguish these taxa, any study of these species is based on an uncertain amalgamation of these cryptic species.
Creating further challenges to studying this and other understudied malaria vectors is the diversity and morphological similarity among Afrotropical anophelines [44]. Distinguishing African anophelines from one another often requires specimens with morphological characters intact, which can be challenging because of the methods and logistics of field collections [32,39,40,41,42].
Existing knowledge of An. squamosus is scattered across multiple articles published over decades, some of which are not digitized or available online, which poses a challenge to accessing and compiling what is known about this species. As of September 2024, only 53 results are found when searching “Anopheles squamosus” in PubMed. The objective of this review is to present a summary of the literature recovered on the identification, distribution, ecology, and biology of this species. In addition, it aims to shed light on the knowledge gaps regarding An. squamosus as an understudied malaria vector and to inspire future research on this and other understudied Anopheles species in Africa.

2. Materials and Methods

We conducted literature searches for An. squamosus using online search engines including PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide database. Term searches ranged from general terms, such as “Anopheles”, to specific terms such as “Anopheles squamosus”. In each search engine, the following search terms were used: “Anopheles”, “Anopheles squamosus”, “An. squamosus”, “A. squamosus”, “Anopheles squamosus AND Plasmodium falciparum”. We provided a flow diagram of our literature review process following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines in Figure 1 [45]. We investigated the literature and extracted all available records of An. squamosus and other Anopheles spp. found together with An. squamosus in an Excel spreadsheet (see Supplementary Material Table S1). Additional species occurrence records were also retrieved from the Africa Vector Database [46]. For categorizing each country to subregions in a continent, we used the geographic regional groups according to UN M49 Standard country and area codes for statistical use [47]. For example, UN M49 Standard classifies Africa into 4 subgroups, namely Eastern, Middle, Southern, and Western Africa.
The distribution map of An. squamosus was created using QGIS software version 3.30.2 [48]. The basemap of African continent topography in the public domain was obtained from Natural Earth Tiles [49].
Representative images of An. squamosus morphology in Zambia were created using adult female specimens collected along the outer perimeter of a goat pen using mouth aspirations at the Hanatanga Village in the Ngolwe zone of southern Zambia (16°12′26.766″ S; 27°0′1.554″ E) in January 2024. This site was selected because An. squamosus has been collected in high abundance by the Macha Research Trust team in their previous malaria vector surveillance studies [32,33]. Collected An. squamous were frozen at 0 °C overnight and mounted to a glass microscope slide within 24 h. A total of three An. squamosus samples in the best conditions were used for photography. The mounted mosquito was photographed with a Canon 5D SR digital SLR camera using a focus-stacking system that consisted of a 5× or 10× Mitutoyo infinity-corrected microscope objective attached to a Canon 200 mm L prime lens. The camera and lens were mounted onto an automated StackShot rail (Cognisys Inc., Traverse City, MI, USA). The camera was moved so that the mosquito specimen was just out of focus, and then moved in increments of either 7 µm (5×) or 15 µm (10×), with one photograph taken between each step, until the mosquito was out of focus in the opposite direction. The raw images were stacked (i.e., the in-focus areas of each image were digitally merged to create one image with the entire specimen in focus) using Helicon Focus (v 8.2.13) program and then edited to clean the background using Adobe Photoshop (v 25.5.1).

3. Results

3.1. Anopheles squamosus Identification

In 1901, Theobald described An. squamosus as “a very pronounced scaly species, not like any other Anopheles I have ever seen” [37]. As an adult, An. squamosus can be identified by several key features from other Anopheles, except for An. cydippis, as described in several morphological identification keys [44,50,51]. The first distinguishing feature is the presence of laterally projecting tufts of abdominal scales (Figure 2b). Anopheles squamosus is described by Evans [50] as being predominantly black with contrasting pure white scales. Females have shaggy palpi with four narrow bands that are white, black, or bronzy-brown dorsal scales, and their last dorsal segment has numerous white scales (Figure 2a).
A study to assess the accuracy of identifying anopheline species found that only 37% of adult An. squamosus were identified correctly by morphology [30]. Distinguishing this species must be done in their 4th instar larval stage or through molecular tools. However, utilizing larval keys to differentiate An. squamosus from An. cydippis is challenging.
Currently, An. squamosus makes up only 0.6% of the literature on anopheline species when searching PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. In addition, there is a major lack of genomic resources for this species within NCBI, with only 210 genetic sequences as of September 2024. Furthermore, no cytochrome C oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences of An. cydippis are available, and the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) assay used by many researchers to distinguish cryptic anopheline species does not reliably amplify An. squamosus/An. cydippis DNA [38].

3.2. Anopheles squamosus Distribution

In 1901 The current literature describing the distribution of these species varies throughout historical documentation. Theobald [37] describes this species as being native to the Middle African region in 1907. Evans [50] states that the distribution of An. squamosus is broad, covering Western, Eastern, and Southern Africa in 1927. Similarly, De Meillon [52] describes its distribution as widespread and practically across the whole continent in 1951. The literature review from this study suggested that An. squamosus is widespread across the African continent, consistent with the findings of De Meillon [52]. This species has been documented in 41 African countries across entomological surveys since 1898, as described in the Africa Vector Database, Updated list of Anopheles species (Diptera: Culicidae) by country in the Afrotropical Region and associated islands by Irish et al. [53], and by other anopheline distribution descriptions (Table 1 and Table S1). The Africa Vector Database contains an inventory of anopheline species in Africa between 1898 and 2016 created by Kenyan Medical Research Institute and Wellcome Trust collaborators to document anopheline species occurrence. The data compiled from this database in addition to literature published after 2016 identified 1331 unique geographic coordinate points where An. squamosus presence has been reported [17,23,32,33,34,46,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63] (Figure 3).
The first documented capture of this species occurred in 1898 in Sierra Leone (Western Africa). Two years later, it was documented in eastern Africa, 5765 km away. By 1904, An. squamosus was documented in Africa’s Eastern, Middle, Southern, and Western regions. Identifying this species at distance points over a short period indicates that this species was widespread throughout Africa before 1898. The known distribution of An. squamosus based on these data reaches its northern limit at Adrar, Mauritania (20.511° N, −13.049° E) [46] and extends as far south as Northern Cape, South Africa (−30.452° S, 21.228° E) [39]. Its most eastern occurrence has been documented in the Sava region of Madagascar (−15.2428° S, 50.4434° W) [46] and the furthest western report was from Thies, Senegal (14.801° N, −16.926° E) [46].
Kuznetsov [64] described the only detection of An. squamosus outside of the African continent in the country of Yemen. This observation occurred in 1965 during larval sampling in the coastal plain of Tihama in quick-drying pools that are not ideal for the complete lifecycle of anopheline species. A total of 380 larvae were documented in this survey, with one larva being identified as An. squamosus. Since this documentation, there has not been another published occurrence of An. squamosus outside of Africa. It remains to be determined if this species is reproductively established in Yemen and other western Asian countries.
Anopheles squamosus can be found in abundance throughout much of the known distribution. Anopheline surveillance was informative at providing a snapshot of the community composition of potential vectors inhabiting a given location. Across 25 studies in 9 countries (Ethiopia, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Senegal, South Africa, and Zambia) primarily in eastern and southern Africa, An. squamosus comprised as low as 0.1% and as high as 68.0% of adult anopheline trap captures (Figure 4, Table 2) [23,26,29,30,33,38,39,41,42,54,56,57,59,60,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74]. These studies consisted of both indoor and outdoor surveys using various methods of collection (human-baited traps, animal-baited traps, CDC light traps).
The widespread distribution of An. squamosus is similar to that of the primary malaria vectors in Africa, such as those in the An. gambiae and An. funestus groups [46]. Based on the data in the African Vectors Database, An. squamosus was captured most often alongside species in the An. gambiae complex, An. coustani, and An. funestus complex [46]. The occurrence of An. squamosus in regions where other vectors actively transmit malaria suggests that this vector has potential exposure to circulating parasites and may sustain malaria transmission when primary vectors are reduced or eliminated.

3.3. Larval Biology of Anopheles squamosus

Identification of larval habitats for An. squamosus is essential, as they can be morphologically distinguished from An. cydippis in this life stage [38]. In addition, control of malaria vectors in the larval stage can be more effective in certain settings due to their inability to escape the habitats [62,78,79]. Since indoor targeted malaria control for adult anophelines is ineffective against exophagic vectors, targeting these species’ larval stages could be an effective alternative control strategy. However, little larval biology is known for this species. One study was conducted to obtain F1 progeny from wild populations of An. squamosus in Madagascar and 35.6% of wild females successfully oviposited in tubes or cages [80]. However, this study did not record the successful hatch rate from these eggs to larvae. No other documented colonization attempt of this species is available to date. Consequently, the duration of larval or adult life span is unknown for this species.
Anopheles squamosus larvae have been recorded in naturally occurring (ponds, rivers, and lagoons) and human-created (rice fields, irrigation drains, and tire tracks) bodies of water [73]. They are often associated with six other African anopheline species in these larval habitats (An. gambiae s.l., An. funestus s.l., An. coustani, An. cinereus, An. demeilloni, and An. pharoensis) [56,81]. In swamps of Ethiopia, they have been found to coexist in high numbers with An. pharoensis [67]. The highest contributing factors for the presence of An. squamosus larvae are high vegetation and algae [67]. There is also a positive correlation of An. squamosus with shallow depths of water [56]. In Ethiopia, Kenea et al. [67] found that An. squamosus larvae were located further away from human dwellings. In contrast, Adugna et al. [56] reported a positive correlation of An. squamosus larval habitats being closer to human dwellings. The studies on larval habitats and species associations were spatiotemporally sparse and only completed in eastern Africa. Therefore, the reported findings and any conclusions drawn from them are extremely limited.
There is very little known on the microbial tolerance of An. squamosus. Anopheles squamosus larvae have been observed to be more tolerant than the An. gambiae complex when exposed to fungal biocontrol agents, such as Coelomomyces [81]. Coelomomyces fungus can infect mosquito larvae and prevent pupation while other organisms remain unaffected [82]. Muspratt found that Coelomomyces fungus was highly effective for controlling An. gambiae larvae (>95% mortality) [81]. However, when An. squamosus was exposed to the same Coelomomyces fungus, there was a very low percentage (8% infection rate) of larvae infected with the biocontrol agent [81]. This suggests that An. squamosus may behave differently from principal malaria vector species when exposed to such biological control agents, and studies of immune response based on the well-studied principal malaria vectors may not translate to other anopheline species. There are no other studies testing additional microbial larvicides on An. squamosus reported as of December 2024.

3.4. Adult Anopheles squamosus Behavior

Understanding vector behavior is critical for disease control, as these vector behaviors can be interrupted to effectively reduce pathogen transmission [83,84]. Approximately 30–40 of the 430 described Anopheles species are currently known to be vectors of human pathogens [85]. A key behavioral trait that primary human malaria vectors exhibit is the propensity to feed on people indoors at night [83,86]. Targeting this behavior using ITN and IRS campaigns has drastically reduced malaria cases in many areas [29,36]. However, this has caused changes in the behaviors of primary vectors in some countries and shifts in the anopheline community composition in others [17,20,87,88].
Knowledge on the behavior of adult An. squamosus is scarce and can be attributed to the lack of research focused on this species. This species is commonly associated with livestock and considered zoophilic, which has made it less of a concern for human health initiatives [26]. In the low transmission areas of Mozambique, An. squamosus predominantly exhibits exophagic behavior [29], and they were reported to forage in the early evening in one study in Zambia [26].
Despite the notion that An. squamosus adults express exophagic behavior, this species has been recorded in indoor settings. In high transmission areas in Mozambique, up to 68.4% of An. squamosus were captured host-seeking indoors, predominantly in the evening before human occupants went to bed and while they were in bed [29]. The close proximity of An. squamosus to humans can increase instances of malaria transmission due to their potential ability to vector human Plasmodium parasites [89]. This species has been captured using CDC light traps, human landing catches (HLC), human-baited traps, and livestock-baited traps. Seven trapping studies were identified during our literature review that collected An. squamous or An. cydippis indoors. Across these studies, up to 41% of trap captures consisted of species identified as An. squamosus [29,33,38,55,56,65,66] with an average of 14.7% of indoor trap captures identified as An. squamosus.
Historically, this species has been considered zoophilic [37], as Anopheles squamosus has demonstrated a preference for feeding on non-human hosts if they are present [26]. However, there is evidence that feeding behavior for An. squamosus varies depending on its location. Across several studies, there were observed differences in HLC in different countries, which may be attributed to the availability of alternate hosts [23,30,55,66,74]. The recorded host species for An. squamosus include sheep, cow, pigeon, chicken, goat, dog, pig, and human [26,32,33,39,56,57]. From five host association studies between 2011 and 2022, where 670 specimens were collected, the host most often found for An. squamosus was cow (n = 250), followed by goat (n = 158), non-human (n = 65), pig (n = 60), cow and goat (50), cow and human (n = 40), human (n = 26), cow and pig (n = 12), dog (n = 5), human and animal (n = 3), and chicken (n = 1) (Table 3) [26,32,33,56,57]. From these studies, a total of 10.3% of the blood meals contained human blood, indicating that this species readily feeds on humans across habitats. In Macha, Zambia, An. squamosus had a higher rate of reported anthropophily when compared to Cameroon, Kenya, and Senegal based on indoor CDC light trap collections [26].

3.5. Anopheles squamosus Contribution to Pathogen Transmission

Anopheles squamosus has been implicated as a potential pathogen vector in Zambia, Madagascar, Mozambique, Namibia, Mali, Kenya, and Tanzania (Table 4) [26,29,46,68,69,73,90,91]. Although it is considered a secondary vector species of certain human diseases, such as malaria, secondary vector species may become primary vectors under certain conditions [92]. Distinguishing features of a primary malaria vector include their relative abundance, a high propensity to feed on humans, and sporozoite rate [93]. Most of the published studies on An. squamosus is focused on Zambia and Madagascar. Despite being identified across sub-Saharan Africa, pathogen transmission is unique to a location, as environmental and socio-economic factors impact transmission, which can vary from country to country [94].
Anopheles squamosus has been found infected with human Plasmodium sporozoites in Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, Madagascar, Tanzania, and Zambia [29,32,33,46,88]. Reported infection rates are variable due to sample size; however, these reports verify that An. squamosus feeds on humans frequently enough to be infected with infectious human-only parasites. The first detection of Plasmodium sporozoites in An. squamosus was in Tanzania in 1964, where a single mosquito was infected with the parasite [96]. In a study in Mozambique, An. squamosus had the highest Plasmodium sporozoite infection rate of 5.8%, more than An. parensis, An. arabiensis, and An. funestus [29]. In a trapping study in Zambia, all three captured An. squamosus samples were found to be infected with P. falciparum [33]. In Madagascar, two distinct strains of P. vivax, another causative agent of human malaria, were identified in An. squamosus [57].
Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is a virus that causes a mosquito-borne viral zoonosis affecting humans and livestock. RVFV can cause severe disease in animals, while severe symptoms in humans are rare [99,100]. Aedes mosquitoes are recognized as the primary vector for RVFV; however, Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes are considered secondary vectors [99]. Some anopheline species can maintain RVFV and transmit it to their offspring [68], and in Madagascar, RVFV was detected in five pools of An. squamosus, suggesting this species could be a host of RVFV [68].
Bluetongue disease, caused by bluetongue virus (BTV), is transmitted predominantly by Culicoides biting midges among ruminant animals. It causes a wide array of symptoms for ruminant animals but distinctly causes severe swelling of the tongue [101]. A survey of mosquitoes in Madagascar identified a pool of An. squamosus that tested positive for BTV [98]. Although it does not indicate that this species is a competent vector of BTV, it demonstrates that these mosquitoes can acquire the virus from infected animals. Further research will be needed to determine any roles for An. squamosus in maintenance and transmission of BTV.

3.6. Genetic Information of Anopheles squamosus

As mentioned in the An. squamosus identification section, there is limited DNA sequence data available for An. squamosus [102]. There is no DNA sequence available for An. cydippis, a species that shares identical adult morphology. Therefore, the capacity to develop An. squamosus-specific species identification assay is limited.
There are ongoing efforts to overcome these barriers, including the authors of this paper [102]. The first complete mitogenome sequence (Genbank Accession # OP776919) and nuclear genome sequence data (NCBI Sequencing Reads Archive accession number WRR22114392) became available in 2023. The An. squamosus mitogenome sequence was closely matched to the An. gambiae mitogenome sequence (Genbank Accession # L20934) with 91.5% sequence similarity. The high-throughput short reads sequencing of An. squamosus allowed the assembly of a contig containing the intergenic transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region [102], and the contig sequence is available on Genbank (Accession # OQ241725).

4. Discussion

Anopheles squamosus has been documented in 41 of the 54 currently recognized African countries, with many studies reporting a robust number of this species [103]. These collection records indicate that this species was likely widespread and well-established long before their first documentation in the early 1900s. The broad distribution of An. squamosus is similar to other primary malaria vectors in Africa, such as An. gambiae, An. arabiensis, and An. funestus, suggesting that An. squamosus has a reasonable chance of coming into contact with human hosts and infectious parasites. In Zambia, this species exhibited a high human blood index, even in the presence of livestock [26]. In addition, they have been found to be infected with human Plasmodium sporozoites [34,97]. These combinations of factors suggest that An. squamosus may play a more significant role in malaria transmission than previously recognized.
Anopheles squamosus poses a challenge for malaria transmission [25,96,104]. due to its exophilic nature, which allows them to evade indoor-based malaria intervention methods such as ITN and IRS. As a result, humans are more likely to encounter An. squamosus and other secondary vector species in outdoor settings when outdoor-based interventions are not put in place [36,87]. For example, in Mozambique, there was an increase in outdoor An. squamosus population numbers [29] after an increase in IRS campaigns. This suggests a potential behavioral adaptation or shift in mosquito community populations in response to indoor malaria control. Therefore, targeted control of primary endophagic vectors through ITN and IRS has the potential to shift vector status in favor of exophagic vectors, like An. squamosus [105]. This highlights the need for comprehensive control approaches that address both indoor and outdoor transmission risks.
The public health significance of An. squamosus cannot be understated, as it has also been identified as a potential vector of RVFV, and BTV due to zoophilic behavior. For An. squamosus, records indicate a high vector abundance, a propensity to feed on humans, and positive Plasmodium sporozoite rates, thus indicating that this species is a competent vector for malaria. Tackling the primary malaria vector remains the highest priority for many malaria-endemic countries. However, the lack of knowledge on understudied malaria vectors places major barriers in developing effective malaria elimination strategies.
Despite its significant role in malaria transmission, there is a lack of reliable molecular identification tools, such as internal transcribed spacer (ITS) polymerase chain reaction (PCR), for An. squamosus. The current molecular identification of An. squamosus based on Sanger sequencing of Cytochrome Oxidase I is not ideal for routine surveillance. Since An. squamosus is morphologically identical to An. cydippis in their adult life stages, distinguishing between these cryptic species becomes challenging without robust molecular species identification tools [106]. This represents the key barrier to gaining further understanding of the biology and behavior of this species. Therefore, there is a pressing research need for building more genomic resources to improve our understanding of and enhance surveillance for An. squamosus. Some efforts are underway to address this research need by assembling the mitogenome and nuclear genome of An. squamosus [102]. Further studies comparing the An. squamosus ITS2 sequences with those from other Anopheles species may facilitate the development of a low-cost molecular species identification assay suitable for routine malaria vector surveillance. Sequencing data for An. cydippis may also facilitate the identification of the two species at adult stages, allowing more in-depth analysis on the similarity and differences on the bionomics of the two species.
Past studies that identify An. squamosus on morphology alone may not be accurate [35]. In our effort to create a reliable distribution map, we attempted to separate records verified only by morphological examination from records confirmed by both morphological and molecular methods. However, the lack of detailed metadata for many of the records and publications prevented accurate categorization. This further emphasizes the need for cost-effective tools that will help enhance species identification, allowing further investigations to inform on the role of An. squamosus in pathogen transmission and development of disease mitigation strategies.

5. Conclusions

Anopheles squamosus is a widespread mosquito species found abundantly across the African continent (41 of the 54 African countries). Despite their implication in malaria transmission and potentially vectoring other diseases impacting human and animal health, research and information on this species remains scarce. Historically, An. squamosus has been regarded as an exophagic and zoophilic species, and as a result, they are not viewed as a threat to public health. However, our review indicates that this species occupies the same range and exhibits similar behaviors to primary malaria vectors, as they have been implicated as feeding on humans in indoor settings and found to be infected with human Plasmodium parasites. The larval biology of this species is largely unknown, and genetic information for this species is very limited. There is no reliable molecular species identification assay that can positively identify An. squamosus to date. Further research to gain more information on their biology, behavior, and genetics is needed for developing appropriate vector control strategies. Ultimately, such new strategies can be added to the existing malaria elimination framework for countries and regions in pre-elimination stages.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects16020110/s1, Table S1: Records of Anopheles squamosus occurrences.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.T.N. and Y.L.; investigation, V.T.N., D.S.D., B.A.B., A.T., P.T. (Primrose Tanachaiwiwat), M.E.G., D.E.N., K.S., L.S., E.S., L.E.R. and Y.L.; data curation, V.T.N., D.S.D., B.A.B., A.T. and P.T. (Primrose Tanachaiwiwat); formal analysis, V.T.N.; resources, E.S., D.E.N. and Y.L.; validation, D.K.M., P.T. (Panpim Thongsripong), L.E.R., R.L.M.N.A., M.E.G., K.S., E.S., R.L.M.N.A., D.E.N. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, V.T.N. and Y.L.; writing—review and editing, V.T.N., D.K.M., P.T. (Panpim Thongsripong), L.E.R., R.L.M.N.A., M.E.G., K.S., E.S., D.E.N. and Y.L.; visualization, V.T.N.; supervision, D.K.M., P.T. (Panpim Thongsripong) and Y.L.; project administration, Y.L.; funding acquisition, V.T.N. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the United States National Institute of Health as part of the International Centers of Excellence for Malaria Research (2U19AI089680), Small Grant Program (R03AI178041), and T32 Institutional Training Grant (T32AI0074717). Additional support was provided by the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Multistate Hatch Project (1025565 and 7007941), the Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute, the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Dean’s Award at the University of Florida, and Global Fellows Program at the University of Florida International Center.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created in this study.

Acknowledgments

We thank Phillimon Ndubani as well as his incredible staff members at the Macha Research Trust for facilitating our mosquito collection to obtain high quality images of our study species. We thank Ana L. Romero-Weaver at the University of Florida for reviewing our manuscript. We thank Liliana M. Cano and Bianca B. Burini at the University of Florida for serving as faculty advisors for VTN and providing valuable advice on this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders did not have a specific role in the conceptualization, design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the funding agencies.

References

  1. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2023; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; ISBN 978-92-4-008617-3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gao, L.; Shi, Q.; Liu, Z.; Li, Z.; Dong, X. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Malaria Control in Africa: A Preliminary Analysis. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hessou-Djossou, D.; Djègbè, I.; Loko, Y.L.E.; Boukari, M.K.Y.G.; Nonfodji, O.M.; Tchigossou, G.; Djouaka, R.; Akogbeto, M. Attitudes and Prevention Towards Malaria in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic in Urban Community in Benin, West Africa. Malar. J. 2023, 22, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. World Health Organization. Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016–2030; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; ISBN 978-92-4-156499-1. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chalageri, V.H.; Marinaik, S.B.; Nath, S.N.; Singhal, R.; Rawat, S.; Ravikumar, K.; Shariff, M.; Eapen, A. Malaria Control—Lessons Learned from Trends of Malaria Indices over Three Decades in Karnataka, India. Malar. J. 2023, 22, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for Malaria. Available online: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/LwRMXj/section/LpOA4j (accessed on 3 January 2025).
  7. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2017; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; ISBN 978-92-4-156552-3. [Google Scholar]
  8. DePina, A.J.; Niang, E.H.A.; Barbosa Andrade, A.J.; Dia, A.K.; Moreira, A.; Faye, O.; Seck, I. Achievement of Malaria Pre-Elimination in Cape Verde According to the Data Collected from 2010 to 2016. Malar. J. 2018, 17, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, P.-W.; Liu, C.-T.; Rampao, H.S.; do Rosario, V.E.; Shaio, M.-F. Pre-Elimination of Malaria on the Island of Príncipe. Malar. J. 2010, 9, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kobayashi, T.; Kurani, S.; Hamapumbu, H.; Stevenson, J.C.; Thuma, P.E.; Moss, W.J. Prevalence of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency and Gametocytemia in a Pre-Elimination, Low Malaria Transmission Setting in Southern Zambia. The Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021, 104, 1000–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wotodjo, A.N.; Doucoure, S.; Diagne, N.; Sarr, F.D.; Sokhna, C. Malaria Epidemics Associated with Low Net Use in Preadolescent and Young Adult Population in Dielmo (Senegal), a Malaria Pre-Elimination Area. Parasites Vectors 2024, 17, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Silva, R.; Lopes, L.F.; Rodrigues, A.; Arez, A.P.; Medeiros, M.M. Assessing the Burden of Submicroscopic Plasmodium Infections in a Pre-Elimination Malaria Setting in Sub-Saharan Africa, Guinea-Bissau. Malar. J. 2024, 23, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kobayashi, T.; Kanyangarara, M.; Laban, N.M.; Phiri, M.; Hamapumbu, H.; Searle, K.M.; Stevenson, J.C.; Thuma, P.E.; Moss, W.J. Characteristics of Subpatent Malaria in a Pre-Elimination Setting in Southern Zambia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2019, 100, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moonasar, D.; Nuthulaganti, T.; Kruger, P.S.; Mabuza, A.; Rasiswi, E.S.; Benson, F.G.; Maharaj, R. Malaria Control in South Africa 2000–2010: Beyond MDG6. Malar. J. 2012, 11, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. World Health Organization. Malaria Vector Control. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/prevention/vector-control (accessed on 3 May 2023).
  16. Bhatt, S.; Weiss, D.J.; Cameron, E.; Bisanzio, D.; Mappin, B.; Dalrymple, U.; Battle, K.E.; Moyes, C.L.; Henry, A.; Eckhoff, P.A.; et al. The Effect of Malaria Control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature 2015, 526, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cross, D.E.; Thomas, C.; McKeown, N.; Siaziyu, V.; Healey, A.; Willis, T.; Singini, D.; Liywalii, F.; Silumesii, A.; Sakala, J.; et al. Geographically Extensive Larval Surveys Reveal an Unexpected Scarcity of Primary Vector Mosquitoes in a Region of Persistent Malaria Transmission in Western Zambia. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bayoh, M.N.; Mathias, D.K.; Odiere, M.R.; Mutuku, F.M.; Kamau, L.; Gimnig, J.E.; Vulule, J.M.; Hawley, W.A.; Hamel, M.J.; Walker, E.D. Anopheles gambiae: Historical Population Decline Associated with Regional Distribution of Insecticide-Treated Bed Nets in Western Nyanza Province, Kenya. Malar. J. 2010, 9, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. O’Loughlin, S.M.; Magesa, S.M.; Mbogo, C.; Mosha, F.; Midega, J.; Burt, A. Genomic Signatures of Population Decline in the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Malar. J. 2016, 15, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Msugupakulya, B.J.; Urio, N.H.; Jumanne, M.; Ngowo, H.S.; Selvaraj, P.; Okumu, F.O.; Wilson, A.L. Changes in Contributions of Different Anopheles Vector Species to Malaria Transmission in East and Southern Africa from 2000 to 2022. Parasites Vectors 2023, 16, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mubemba, B.; Mburu, M.M.; Changula, K.; Muleya, W.; Moonga, L.C.; Chambaro, H.M.; Kajihara, M.; Qiu, Y.; Orba, Y.; Hayashida, K.; et al. Current Knowledge of Vector-Borne Zoonotic Pathogens in Zambia: A Clarion Call to Scaling-up “One Health” Research in the Wake of Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Okoro, O.J.; Deme, G.G.; Okoye, C.O.; Eze, S.C.; Odii, E.C.; Gbadegesin, J.T.; Okeke, E.S.; Oyejobi, G.K.; Nyaruaba, R.; Ebido, C.C. Understanding Key Vectors and Vector-Borne Diseases Associated with Freshwater Ecosystem across Africa: Implications for Public Health. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 862, 160732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Degefa, T.; Githeko, A.K.; Lee, M.-C.; Yan, G.; Yewhalaw, D. Patterns of Human Exposure to Early Evening and Outdoor Biting Mosquitoes and Residual Malaria Transmission in Ethiopia. Acta Trop. 2021, 216, 105837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Swei, A.; Couper, L.I.; Coffey, L.L.; Kapan, D.; Bennett, S. Patterns, Drivers, and Challenges of Vector-Borne Disease Emergence. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020, 20, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Antonio-Nkondjio, C.; Kerah, C.H.; Simard, F.; Awono-Ambene, P.; Chouaibou, M.; Tchuinkam, T.; Fontenille, D. Complexity of the Malaria Vectorial System in Cameroon: Contribution of Secondary Vectors to Malaria Transmission. J. Med. Entomol. 2006, 43, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fornadel, C.M.; Norris, L.C.; Franco, V.; Norris, D.E. Unexpected Anthropophily in the Potential Secondary Malaria Vectors Anopheles coustani s.l. and Anopheles squamosus in Macha, Zambia. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rodriguez, M.H. Residual Malaria: Limitations of Current Vector Control Strategies to Eliminate Transmission in Residual Foci. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 223, S55–S60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tabue, R.N.; Nem, T.; Atangana, J.; Bigoga, J.D.; Patchoke, S.; Tchouine, F.; Fodjo, B.Y.; Leke, R.G.; Fondjo, E. Anopheles ziemanni a Locally Important Malaria Vector in Ndop Health District, North West Region of Cameroon. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Montoya, L.F.; Alafo, C.; Martí-Soler, H.; Máquina, M.; Comiche, K.; Cuamba, I.; Munguambe, K.; Cator, L.; Aide, P.; Galatas, B.; et al. Overlaying Human and Mosquito Behavioral Data to Estimate Residual Exposure to Host-Seeking Mosquitoes and the Protection of Bednets in a Malaria Elimination Setting Where Indoor Residual Spraying and Nets Were Deployed Together. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0270882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lobo, N.F.; Laurent, B.S.; Sikaala, C.H.; Hamainza, B.; Chanda, J.; Chinula, D.; Krishnankutty, S.M.; Mueller, J.D.; Deason, N.A.; Hoang, Q.T.; et al. Unexpected Diversity of Anopheles Species in Eastern Zambia: Implications for Evaluating Vector Behavior and Interventions Using Molecular Tools. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chinula, D.; Hamainza, B.; Chizema, E.; Kavishe, D.R.; Sikaala, C.H.; Killeen, G.F. Proportional Decline of Anopheles quadriannulatus and Increased Contribution of An. arabiensis to the An. gambiae Complex Following Introduction of Indoor Residual Spraying with Pirimiphos-Methyl: An Observational, Retrospective Secondary Analysis of Pre-Existing Data from South-East Zambia. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stevenson, J.C.; Pinchoff, J.; Muleba, M.; Lupiya, J.; Chilusu, H.; Mwelwa, I.; Mbewe, D.; Simubali, L.; Jones, C.M.; Chaponda, M.; et al. Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity of Malaria Vectors in Northern Zambia: Implications for Vector Control. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gebhardt, M.E.; Searle, K.M.; Kobayashi, T.; Shields, T.M.; Hamapumbu, H.; Simubali, L.; Mudenda, T.; Thuma, P.E.; Stevenson, J.C.; Moss, W.J.; et al. Understudied Anopheline Contribute to Malaria Transmission in a Low-Transmission Setting in the Choma District, Southern Province, Zambia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2022, 106, 1406–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Saili, K.; de Jager, C.; Sangoro, O.P.; Nkya, T.E.; Masaninga, F.; Mwenya, M.; Sinyolo, A.; Hamainza, B.; Chanda, E.; Fillinger, U.; et al. Anopheles rufipes Implicated in Malaria Transmission Both Indoors and Outdoors alongside Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis in Rural South-East Zambia. Malar. J. 2023, 22, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jones, C.M.; Ciubotariu, I.I.; Muleba, M.; Lupiya, J.; Mbewe, D.; Simubali, L.; Mudenda, T.; Gebhardt, M.E.; Carpi, G.; Malcolm, A.N.; et al. Multiple Novel Clades of Anopheline Mosquitoes Caught Outdoors in Northern Zambia. Front. Trop. Dis. 2021, 2, 780664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Govella, N.J.; Okumu, F.O.; Killeen, G.F. Insecticide-Treated Nets Can Reduce Malaria Transmission by Mosquitoes Which Feed Outdoors. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2010, 82, 415–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Theobald, F.V. A Monograph of the Culicidae, or Mosquitoes: Mainly Compiled from the Collections Received at the British Museum from Various Parts of the World in Connection with the Investigation into the Cause of Malaria Conducted by the Colonial Office and the Royal Society; Order of the Trustees: London, UK, 1907; Volume IV, pp. 1–700. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hoffman, J.E.; Ciubotariu, I.I.; Simubali, L.; Mudenda, T.; Moss, W.J.; Carpi, G.; Norris, D.E.; Stevenson, J.C. Southern and Central Africa International Centers of Excellence for Malaria Research. Phylogenetic Complexity of Morphologically Identified Anopheles squamosus in Southern Zambia. Insects 2021, 12, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jupp, P.G.; McIntosh, B.M.; Nevill, E.M. A Survey of the Mosquito and Culicoides Faunas at Two Localities in the Karoo Region of South Africa with Some Observations of Bionomics. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 1980, 47, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Main, B.J.; Lee, Y.; Collier, T.C.; Norris, L.C.; Brisco, K.; Fofana, A.; Cornel, A.J.; Lanzaro, G.C. Complex Genome Evolution in Anopheles coluzzii Associated with Increased Insecticide Usage in Mali. Mol. Ecol. 2015, 24, 5145–5157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Logan, T.M.; Linthicum, K.J.; Thande, P.C.; Wagateh, J.N.; Roberts, C.R. Mosquito Species Collected from a Marsh in Western Kenya during the Long Rains. J. Am. Mosq. Control. Assoc. 1991, 7, 395–399. [Google Scholar]
  42. Konate, L.; Diagne, N.; Brahimi, K.; Faye, O.; Legros, F.; Rogier, C.; Petrarca, V.; Trape, J.F. Biology of the Vectors and Transmission of Plasmodium falciparum, P. malariae and P. ovale in a Village in the Savanna of West Africa (Dielmo, Senegal). Parasite 1994, 1, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gillies, M.; Coetzee, M. A Supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara (Afrotropical Region). Publ. S. Afr. Inst. Med. Res. 1987, 55, 1–143. [Google Scholar]
  44. Coetzee, M. Key to the Females of Afrotropical Anopheles Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Malar. J. 2020, 19, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. Syst. Rev. 2021, 10, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kyalo, D.; Amratia, P.; Mundia, C.W.; Mbogo, C.M.; Coetzee, M.; Snow, R.W. A Geo-Coded Inventory of Anophelines in the Afrotropical Region South of the Sahara: 1898–2016. Wellcome Open Res. 2017, 2, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. UNSD—Methodology. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/ (accessed on 21 February 2024).
  48. QGIS Association QGIS Geographic Information System. Available online: https://www.qgis.org/ (accessed on 21 February 2024).
  49. Natural Earth Tiles Natural Earth Vector and Raster Tiles. Available online: https://www.naturalearthdata.com/ (accessed on 22 February 2024).
  50. Evans, A.M. A Short Illustrated Guide to the Anophelines of Tropical and South Africa; University Press Ltd.: Liverpool, UK; Hodder and Stoughton Ltd.: London, UK, 1927. [Google Scholar]
  51. Glick, J.I. Illustrated Key to the Female Anopheles of Southwestern Asia and Egypt (Diptera: Culicidae); Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  52. de Meillon, B. Species and Varieties of Malaria Vectors in Africa and Their Bionomics. Bull. World Health Organ. 1951, 4, 419–441. [Google Scholar]
  53. Irish, S.R.; Kyalo, D.; Snow, R.W.; Coetzee, M. Updated List of Anopheles Species (Diptera: Culicidae) by Country in the Afrotropical Region and Associated Islands. Zootaxa 2020, 4747, zootaxa.4747.3.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cornel, A.J.; Lee, Y.; Almeida, A.P.G.; Johnson, T.; Mouatcho, J.; Venter, M.; de Jager, C.; Braack, L. Mosquito Community Composition in South Africa and Some Neighboring Countries. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Degefa, T.; Yewhalaw, D.; Zhou, G.; Atieli, H.; Githeko, A.K.; Yan, G. Evaluation of Human-Baited Double Net Trap and Human-Odour-Baited CDC Light Trap for Outdoor Host-Seeking Malaria Vector Surveillance in Kenya and Ethiopia. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Adugna, T.; Yewhelew, D.; Getu, E. Bloodmeal Sources and Feeding Behavior of Anopheline Mosquitoes in Bure District, Northwestern Ethiopia. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Finney, M.; McKenzie, B.A.; Rabaovola, B.; Sutcliffe, A.; Dotson, E.; Zohdy, S. Widespread Zoophagy and Detection of Plasmodium spp. in Anopheles Mosquitoes in Southeastern Madagascar. Malar. J. 2021, 20, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Guarido, M.M.; Govender, K.; Riddin, M.A.; Schrama, M.; Gorsich, E.E.; Brooke, B.D.; Almeida, A.P.G.; Venter, M. Detection of Insect-Specific Flaviviruses in Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Northeastern Regions of South Africa. Viruses 2021, 13, 2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Haileselassie, W.; Zemene, E.; Lee, M.-C.; Zhong, D.; Zhou, G.; Taye, B.; Dagne, A.; Deressa, W.; Kazura, J.W.; Yan, G.; et al. The Effect of Irrigation on Malaria Vector Bionomics and Transmission Intensity in Western Ethiopia. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Maekawa, Y.; Pemba, D.; Kumala, J.; Gowelo, S.; Higa, Y.; Futami, K.; Sawabe, K.; Tsuda, Y. DNA Barcoding of Mosquitoes Collected Through a Nationwide Survey in 2011 and 2012 in Malawi, Southeast Africa. Acta Trop. 2021, 213, 105742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Membere, O.; Bawo, D.D.S.; Onwuteaka, J.; Ugbomeh, A.P.; Nwosu, O.R. Abundance and Diversity of Insects Associated with Rhizophora mangle and Avicennia germinans in Bundu-Ama Mangrove Ecosystem of the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Sci. Afr. 2021, 14, e01058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nicholas, K.; Bernard, G.; Bryson, N.; Mukabane, K.; Kilongosi, M.; Ayuya, S.; Mulama, D.H. Abundance and Distribution of Malaria Vectors in Various Aquatic Habitats and Land Use Types in Kakamega County, Highlands of Western Kenya. Ethiop. J. Health Sci. 2021, 31, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zemene, E.; Belay, D.B.; Tiruneh, A.; Lee, M.-C.; Yewhalaw, D.; Yan, G. Malaria Vector Dynamics and Utilization of Insecticide-Treated Nets in Low-Transmission Setting in Southwest Ethiopia: Implications for Residual Transmission. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kuznetsov, R.L. Detection of Anopheles caustani Laveran, 1900 and Anopheles squamosus Theobald, 1901 on the Territory of the Yemen Arab Republic. Meditsinskaya Parazitol. I Parazit. Bolezn. 1971, 40, 441–443. [Google Scholar]
  65. Fontenille, D.; Rakotoarivony, I.; Rajaonarivelo, E.; Lepers, J. p Etude des Culicidae dans le Firaisam-pokontany d’Ambohimanjaka aux Environs de Tananarive: Résultats d’une Enquête Longitudinale, en Particulier sur la Transmission Vectorielle du Paludisme. Arch. L’institut Pasteur Madag. 1988, 55, 231–243. [Google Scholar]
  66. Andrianaivolambo, L.; Domarle, O.; Randrianarivelojosia, M.; Ratovonjato, J.; Le Goff, G.; Talman, A.; Ariey, F.; Robert, V. Anthropophilic Mosquitoes and Malaria Transmission in the Eastern Foothills of the Central Highlands of Madagascar. Acta Trop. 2010, 116, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kenea, O.; Balkew, M.; Gebre-Michael, T. Environmental Factors Associated with Larval Habitats of Anopheline Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Irrigation and Major Drainage Areas in the Middle Course of the Rift Valley, Central Ethiopia. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2011, 48, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Ratovonjato, J.; Olive, M.-M.; Tantely, L.M.; Andrianaivolambo, L.; Tata, E.; Razainirina, J.; Jeanmaire, E.; Reynes, J.-M.; Elissa, N. Detection, Isolation, and Genetic Characterization of Rift Valley Fever Virus from Anopheles (Anopheles) coustani, Anopheles (Anopheles) squamosus, and Culex (Culex) antennatus of the Haute Matsiatra Region, Madagascar. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Masaninga, F.; Muleba, M.; Masendu, H.; Songolo, P.; Mweene-Ndumba, I.; Mazaba-Liwewe, M.; Kamuliwo, M.; Ameneshewa, B.; Siziya, S.; Babaniyi, O. Distribution of Yellow Fever Vectors in Northwestern and Western Provinces, Zambia. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2014, 7, S88–S92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Munhenga, G.; Brooke, B.D.; Spillings, B.; Essop, L.; Hunt, R.H.; Midzi, S.; Govender, D.; Braack, L.; Koekemoer, L.L. Field Study Site Selection, Species Abundance and Monthly Distribution of Anopheline Mosquitoes in the Northern Kruger National Park, South Africa. Malar. J. 2014, 13, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Nepomichene, T.N.J.J.; Tata, E.; Boyer, S. Malaria Case in Madagascar, Probable Implication of a New Vector, Anopheles coustani. Malar. J. 2015, 14, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. St. Laurent, B.; Cooke, M.; Krishnankutty, S.M.; Asih, P.; Mueller, J.D.; Kahindi, S.; Ayoma, E.; Oriango, R.M.; Thumloup, J.; Drakeley, C.; et al. Molecular Characterization Reveals Diverse and Unknown Malaria Vectors in the Western Kenyan Highlands. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2016, 94, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tantely, M.L.; Le Goff, G.; Boyer, S.; Fontenille, D. An Updated Checklist of Mosquito Species (Diptera: Culicidae) from Madagascar. Parasite 2016, 23, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hakizimana, E.; Karema, C.; Munyakanage, D.; Githure, J.; Mazarati, J.; Tongren, J.; Takken, W.; Binagwaho, A.; Koenraadt, S. Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Mosquitoes and Risk of Malaria Infection in Rwanda. Acta Trop. 2018, 182, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sang, R.; Arum, S.; Chepkorir, E.; Mosomtai, G.; Tigoi, C.; Sigei, F.; Lwande, O.W.; Landmann, T.; Affognon, H.; Ahlm, C.; et al. Distribution and Abundance of Key Vectors of Rift Valley Fever and Other Arboviruses in Two Ecologically Distinct Counties in Kenya. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fontenille, D.; Rakotoarivony, I. Reappearance of Anopheles funestus as a Malaria Vector in the Antananarivo Region, Madagascar. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1988, 82, 644–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Elissa, N.; Karch, S.; Bureau, P.; Ollomo, B.; Lawoko, M.; Yangari, P.; Ebang, B.; Georges, A.J. Malaria Transmission in a Region of Savanna-Forest Mosaic, Haut-Ogooué, Gabon. J. Am. Mosq. Control. Assoc. 1999, 15, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  78. Killeen, G.F.; Fillinger, U.; Knols, B.G. Advantages of Larval Control for African Malaria Vectors: Low Mobility and Behavioural Responsiveness of Immature Mosquito Stages Allow High Effective Coverage. Malar. J. 2002, 1, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Foster, W.A.; Walker, E.D. Mosquitoes (Culicidae). In Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 3rd ed.; Mullen, G.R., Durden, L.A., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 261–325. ISBN 978-0-12-814043-7. [Google Scholar]
  80. Nepomichene, T.N.; Andrianaivolambo, L.; Boyer, S.; Bourgouin, C. Efficient Method for Establishing F1 Progeny from Wild Populations of Anopheles Mosquitoes. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Muspratt, J. Destruction of the Larvae of Anopheles gambiae Giles by a Coelomomyces Fungus. Bull. World Health Organ. 1963, 29, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Couch, J.N. Mass Production of Coelomomyces, a Fungus That Kills Mosquitoes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1972, 69, 2043–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Elliott, R. The Influence of Vector Behavior on Malaria Transmission. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1972, 21, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wilson, A.L.; Courtenay, O.; Kelly-Hope, L.A.; Scott, T.W.; Takken, W.; Torr, S.J.; Lindsay, S.W. The Importance of Vector Control for the Control and Elimination of Vector-Borne Diseases. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0007831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. CDC Anopheles Species Mosquitos. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/mosquitoes/about/life-cycle-of-anopheles-mosquitoes.html (accessed on 26 January 2022).
  86. Russell, T.L.; Beebe, N.W.; Cooper, R.D.; Lobo, N.F.; Burkot, T.R. Successful Malaria Elimination Strategies Require Interventions That Target Changing Vector Behaviours. Malar. J. 2013, 12, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Jamet, H.; Curtis, C. Mosquito Behavior and Vector Control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2005, 50, 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kibret, S.; Wilson, G.G. Increased Outdoor Biting Tendency of Anopheles arabiensis and Its Challenge for Malaria Control in Central Ethiopia. Public Health 2016, 141, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Midega, J.T.; Smith, D.L.; Olotu, A.; Mwangangi, J.M.; Nzovu, J.G.; Wambua, J.; Nyangweso, G.; Mbogo, C.M.; Christophides, G.K.; Marsh, K.; et al. Wind Direction and Proximity to Larval Sites Determines Malaria Risk in Kilifi District in Kenya. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Huestis, D.L.; Dao, A.; Diallo, M.; Sanogo, Z.L.; Samake, D.; Yaro, A.S.; Ousman, Y.; Linton, Y.-M.; Krishna, A.; Veru, L.; et al. Windborne Long-Distance Migration of Malaria Mosquitoes in the Sahel. Parasites Vectors 2019, 574, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lukubwe, O.; Mwema, T.; Joseph, R.; Maliti, D.; Iitula, I.; Katokele, S.; Uusiku, P.; Walusimbi, D.; Ogoma, S.B.; Gueye, C.S.; et al. Baseline Characterization of Entomological Drivers of Malaria Transmission in Namibia: A Targeted Operational Entomological Surveillance Strategy. Parasites Vectors 2023, 16, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Oaks, S.C.; Mitchell, V.S.; Pearson, G.W.; Carpenter, C.C.J. Vector Biology, Ecology, and Control. In Malaria: Obstacles and Opportunities; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1991; ISBN 0-309-54389-4. [Google Scholar]
  93. Graumans, W.; Jacobs, E.; Bousema, T.; Sinnis, P. When Is a Plasmodium-Infected Mosquito an Infectious Mosquito? Trends Parasitol. 2020, 36, 705–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Parham, P.E.; Waldock, J.; Christophides, G.K.; Hemming, D.; Agusto, F.; Evans, K.J.; Fefferman, N.; Gaff, H.; Gumel, A.; LaDeau, S.; et al. Climate, Environmental and Socio-Economic Change: Weighing up the Balance in Vector-Borne Disease Transmission. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 20130551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mwema, T.; Lukubwe, O.; Joseph, R.; Maliti, D.; Iitula, I.; Katokele, S.; Uusiku, P.; Walusimbi, D.; Ogoma, S.B.; Tambo, M.; et al. Human and Vector Behaviors Determine Exposure to Anopheles in Namibia. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gillies, M.T. The Role of Secondary Vectors of Malaria in North-East Tanganyika. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1964, 58, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Stevenson, J.C.; Simubali, L.; Mbambara, S.; Musonda, M.; Mweetwa, S.; Mudenda, T.; Pringle, J.C.; Jones, C.M.; Norris, D.E. Detection of Plasmodium falciparum Infection in Anopheles squamosus (Diptera: Culicidae) in an Area Targeted for Malaria Elimination, Southern Zambia. J. Med. Entomol. 2016, 53, 1482–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Andriamandimby, S.F.; Viarouge, C.; Ravalohery, J.-P.; Reynes, J.-M.; Sailleau, C.; Tantely, M.L.; Elissa, N.; Cardinale, E.; Sall, A.A.; Zientara, S.; et al. Detection in and Circulation of Bluetongue Virus Among Domestic Ruminants in Madagascar. Vet. Microbiol. 2015, 176, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hartman, A. Rift Valley Fever. Clin. Lab. Med. 2017, 37, 285–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. CDC Rift Valley Fever. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/rvf/index.html (accessed on 11 March 2024).
  101. USDA Bluetongue. Available online: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease/cattle/bluetongue (accessed on 24 August 2023).
  102. Nguyen, V.T.; Collier, T.C.; Seok, S.; Wang, X.; Mburu, M.M.; Simubali, L.; Gebhardt, M.E.; Norris, D.E.; Lee, Y. The First Genome Sequence of Anopheles squamous from Macha, Zambia. F1000Research 2023, 12, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Longo-Pendy, N.M.; Boundenga, L.; Kutomy, P.O.O.; Mbou-Boutambe, C.; Makanga, B.; Moukodoum, N.; Obame-Nkoghe, J.; Makouloutou, P.N.; Mounioko, F.; Akone-Ella, R.; et al. Systematic Review on Diversity and Distribution of Anopheles Species in Gabon: A Fresh Look at the Potential Malaria Vectors and Perspectives. Pathogens 2022, 11, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sougoufara, S.; Ottih, E.C.; Tripet, F. The Need for New Vector Control Approaches Targeting Outdoor Biting Anopheline Malaria Vector Communities. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Afrane, Y.A.; Mweresa, N.G.; Wanjala, C.L.; Gilbreath III, T.M.; Zhou, G.; Lee, M.-C.; Githeko, A.K.; Yan, G. Evaluation of Long-Lasting Microbial Larvicide for Malaria Vector Control in Kenya. Malar. J. 2016, 15, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Stevenson, J.C.; Norris, D.E. Implicating Cryptic and Novel Anophelines as Malaria Vectors in Africa. Insects 2016, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 16 00110 g001
Figure 1. PRISMA [45] flow diagram of the literature review process for studies of An. squamosus.
Figure 1. PRISMA [45] flow diagram of the literature review process for studies of An. squamosus.
Insects 16 00110 g001
Insects 16 00110 g002
Figure 2. Stacked focus image of An. squamosus taken by Dr. Lawrence E. Reeves and processed by Valerie T. Nguyen. (a) Lateral view of a blood-fed, (b) abdomen tufts, and (c) wing of An. squamosus female.
Figure 2. Stacked focus image of An. squamosus taken by Dr. Lawrence E. Reeves and processed by Valerie T. Nguyen. (a) Lateral view of a blood-fed, (b) abdomen tufts, and (c) wing of An. squamosus female.
Insects 16 00110 g002
Insects 16 00110 g003
Figure 3. Anopheles squamosus distribution across Africa and West Asia. Highlighted countries are documented presence of An. squamosus collected from WRBU and Kyalo et al. [46] and countries where Plasmodium spp. has been identified in this species. The points on the map indicate coordinate data where An. squamosus has been captured.
Figure 3. Anopheles squamosus distribution across Africa and West Asia. Highlighted countries are documented presence of An. squamosus collected from WRBU and Kyalo et al. [46] and countries where Plasmodium spp. has been identified in this species. The points on the map indicate coordinate data where An. squamosus has been captured.
Insects 16 00110 g003
Insects 16 00110 g004
Figure 4. Proportion of An. squamosus captured across 25 anopheline trapping studies conducted between 1980 and 2022. The basemap of African continent topography is obtained from Natural Earth Tiles [49].
Figure 4. Proportion of An. squamosus captured across 25 anopheline trapping studies conducted between 1980 and 2022. The basemap of African continent topography is obtained from Natural Earth Tiles [49].
Insects 16 00110 g004
Table 1. Geographic region, country and year of first documented occurrence of An. squamosus. The geographic regions are according to UN M49 Standard country and area codes for statistical use [47].
Table 1. Geographic region, country and year of first documented occurrence of An. squamosus. The geographic regions are according to UN M49 Standard country and area codes for statistical use [47].
Geographic RegionCountryFirst Documented Occurrence
Eastern AfricaEritrea1941
Ethiopia1920
Burundi1935
Kenya1900
Madagascar1902
Malawi2012
Mozambique1901
Rwanda1933
Somalia1951
South Sudan1903
Tanzania1902
Uganda1907
Zambia1941
Zimbabwe1901
Middle AfricaAngola1904
Cameroon1907
Central African Republic1950
Chad1950
Republic of Congo1943
Democratic Republic of the Congo1902
Gabon1999
Northern AfricaSudan1903
Southern AfricaBotswana1961
Eswatini1974
Namibia1950
South Africa1905
Western AfricaBenin1950
Burkina Faso1948
Cote d’Ivoire1950
Gambia1902
Ghana1911
Guinea1950
Guinea-Bissau1946
Liberia1902
Mali1909
Mauritania1945
Niger1961
Nigeria1909
Senegal1908
Sierra Leone1898
Togo1902
Western AsiaYemen1965
Table 2. Mean percent of An. squamosus collected in anopheline trapping studies grouped by country. Geographic regions are according to UN M49 Standard country and area codes for statistical use [47].
Table 2. Mean percent of An. squamosus collected in anopheline trapping studies grouped by country. Geographic regions are according to UN M49 Standard country and area codes for statistical use [47].
Geographic RegionCountryMean
% An. squamosus		% An. squamosus RangeReferences
Eastern AfricaEthiopia7.00.34–27.2[23,56,59,67]
Kenya38.80.26–68.0[41,72,75]
Madagascar68.02.76–97.4[57,66,68,71,73,76]
Malawi9.5 -[60]
Mozambique8.72.3–32[29]
Rwanda0.004 [74]
Zambia10.00.5–41.4[45]
Middle AfricaGabon0.23-[77]
Southern AfricaSouth Africa18.80.12–100[39,54,70]
Western AfricaSenegal0.1 -[42]
Table 3. Identified bloodmeals across five studies between 2011 and 2022.
Table 3. Identified bloodmeals across five studies between 2011 and 2022.
Identified Blood MealSample SizeProportion (%)References
Chicken10.1[57]
Human and Animal30.5[33]
Dog50.8[33]
Cow and Pig121.8[57]
Human263.9[33,57]
Cow and Human406.0[56,57]
Cow and Goat507.5[33]
Pig609.0[26,33]
Non-human659.7[33]
Goat15823.6[26,33,38]
Cow25037.3[26,33,38,56]
Total670
Table 4. Diseases to which An. squamosus has been implicated as a potential vector.
Table 4. Diseases to which An. squamosus has been implicated as a potential vector.
Disease/PathogenDetection MethodCountryReferences
MalariaELISA, Salivary gland dissectionKenya, Madagascar, Mali, Mozambique, Namibia, Tanzania, Zambia[29,33,46,95,96,97]
Rift Valley feverPCRMadagascar[68]
BluetongueIndirect Immunofluorescence assayMadagascar[98]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, V.T.; Dryden, D.S.; Broder, B.A.; Tadimari, A.; Tanachaiwiwat, P.; Mathias, D.K.; Thongsripong, P.; Reeves, L.E.; Ali, R.L.M.N.; Gebhardt, M.E.; et al. A Comprehensive Review: Biology of Anopheles squamosus, an Understudied Malaria Vector in Africa. Insects 2025, 16, 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020110

AMA Style

Nguyen VT, Dryden DS, Broder BA, Tadimari A, Tanachaiwiwat P, Mathias DK, Thongsripong P, Reeves LE, Ali RLMN, Gebhardt ME, et al. A Comprehensive Review: Biology of Anopheles squamosus, an Understudied Malaria Vector in Africa. Insects. 2025; 16(2):110. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020110

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Valerie T., Dalia S. Dryden, Brooke A. Broder, Ayaan Tadimari, Primrose Tanachaiwiwat, Derrick K. Mathias, Panpim Thongsripong, Lawrence E. Reeves, Renee L. M. N. Ali, Mary E. Gebhardt, and et al. 2025. "A Comprehensive Review: Biology of Anopheles squamosus, an Understudied Malaria Vector in Africa" Insects 16, no. 2: 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020110

APA Style

Nguyen, V. T., Dryden, D. S., Broder, B. A., Tadimari, A., Tanachaiwiwat, P., Mathias, D. K., Thongsripong, P., Reeves, L. E., Ali, R. L. M. N., Gebhardt, M. E., Saili, K., Simubali, L., Simulundu, E., Norris, D. E., & Lee, Y. (2025). A Comprehensive Review: Biology of Anopheles squamosus, an Understudied Malaria Vector in Africa. Insects, 16(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020110

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop