Next Article in Journal
Evolution and Structural Analyses of Glossina morsitans (Diptera; Glossinidae) Tetraspanins
Previous Article in Journal
Densities of Eggs and Nymphs and Percent Parasitism of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on Common Weeds in West Central Florida
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Infestation Level Influences Oviposition Site Selection in the Tomato Leafminer Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

Functional and Evolutionary Entomology, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, 2 Passage des Déportés, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2014, 5(4), 877-884; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5040877
Submission received: 10 October 2014 / Revised: 23 October 2014 / Accepted: 29 October 2014 / Published: 11 November 2014

Abstract

:
The tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), is a devastating pest that develops principally on solanaceous plants throughout South and Central America and Europe. In this study, we tested the influence of three levels of T. absoluta infestations on the attraction and oviposition preference of adult T. absoluta. Three infestation levels (i.e., non-infested plants, plants infested with 10 T. absoluta larvae, and plants infested with 20 T. absoluta larvae) were presented by pairs in a flying tunnel to groups of T. absoluta adults. We found no differences in terms of adult attraction for either level of infestations. However, female oviposition choice is influenced by larvae density on tomato plants. We discuss the underlying mechanisms and propose recommendations for further research.

1. Introduction

The tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), is a widespread invasive species damaging economically important cultivated solanaceous crop plants [1]. It is a serious threat to commercial tomato and potato production in South and Central America as well as in Europe. Larvae feed on the mesophyll of all aerial parts of the plants, as well as on the fruit, resulting in significant yield loss and cosmetic damage to fresh market tomato [1,2,3].
Chemical applications remain the most effective control methods available to reduce T. absoluta threat levels. However, the need for alternative control methods is strengthened by the appearance of resistant populations [4] as well as by the side effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods [5]. No tomato cultivars are entirely resistant to T. absoluta, even if some are less susceptible [6]. Preventing pest mating by using synthetic pheromones has been developed. However, the ability of T. absoluta females to reproduce parthenogenetically weakened any of these pheromone-based control methods [7]. Biological control approaches using indigenous natural enemies is among the most promising. A list of the Afro-Eurasian natural enemies of T. absoluta, including Braconid parasitoids and Mirid predatory bugs, has been compiled, and their potential for inclusion in sustainable control strategies discussed [8]. However, to optimize such effective environmentally sound control strategies, it is necessary to understand the relationships occurring between this leafminer and its host plants [9].
The attraction and oviposition of female T. absoluta are mediated by the volatile signature of their host plant [10]. Tomato leaf odors mainly include volatile terpenoid compounds which elicit in mated females upwind orientation flight followed by landing as well as egg-laying. These observations demonstrate the essential role of plant volatiles in T. absoluta host-finding behavior. Similar observations were made for potato plants: the volatile headspace of Solanum tuberosum is implicated in the host selection by female T. absoluta [11]. In the present study, we evaluate the impact of the level of T. absoluta infestations on the attraction and oviposition site selection by mated T. absoluta.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Moneymaker) were cultivated in a greenhouse (25 ± 5 °C) in plastic pots (20 cm diameter × 20 cm height) filled with loam (VP113BIO; Peltracom, Belgium) and grown with a 16L:8D photoperiod. The plants were watered once every 2 days.

2.2. Insect Rearing

In July 2011, 200 third instar larvae of the tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, were collected from a commercial tomato plantation located in Saint-Andiol (France), and were subsequently kept under laboratory conditions at 24 ± 1 °C, 60%–70% RH, and with a 16L:8D photoperiod. T. absoluta colony was reared on tomato in net cages (46.5 × 46.5 × 46.5 cm). Caterpillars were provided with fresh plants three times a week until pupation. Five generations were raised before starting any experiment to maintain a 1:1 female/male ratio in the colony and avoid parthenogenetic reproduction of the females (and a consequent decrease in fitness) [7].

2.3. Bioassays

Flying tunnels (232.5 × 46.5 × 46.5 cm) were used to evaluate the attraction of T. absoluta males and females as well as the oviposition site selection by females facing non-infested tomato plants versus T. absoluta-infested plants. The tunnels were divided into three non-ventilated areas [11]: a central area for insect release and two areas at opposite sites containing the plants. Three dual-choice assays were conducted: (1) non-infested tomato plants versus tomato plants infested with 10 T. absoluta larvae; (2) non-infested tomato plants versus tomato plants infested with 20 T. absoluta larvae; and (3) tomato plants infested with 10 T. absoluta larvae versus tomato plants infested with 20 larvae. The tomato plants used in the experiments were 4 weeks old and corresponded to a 107 BBCH (Biologische Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt und Chemische Industrie) code (approximately 30 cm high and 6–7 leaves). Infestations were performed by cutting, from the rearing colony, 10 or 20 small leaf pieces (depending on the number of individuals per plant required for the experimental setup), each containing a single second T. absoluta instar, which were randomly deposited on the tomato plants intended for the experiments. Non-infested and infested tomato plants were kept 4 days under laboratory conditions until the bioassays. After incubation, tomato plants were set in both sides of the flying tunnel, and twenty newly emerged T. absoluta adults (<24 h) were placed in the neutral area at a distance of 116.5 cm from each plant. After 48 h, the number of males, females, and eggs laid on each plant were counted. Forty-eight hours allow the couples to explore the tunnel, to mate, and also allow the females to lay eggs in sufficient numbers on one of the two plants. Each plant combination was randomly tested four times (for a total of 80 insects tested per dual choice assay). The experiments were carried out under laboratory conditions (20 ± 1 °C, 65% ± 5% RH, and a 16L:8D photoperiod under cool white LED lights (77 µmoL/sqm/s)). These conditions were monitored using an automatic data logger (HOBO RH/TEMP 8 K; Onset Computer Corporation, Bourne, MA, USA).

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Binomial proportion tests (equal distribution hypothesized) were used to compare the number of males, females and eggs laid on each studied plant (the results of the four bioassay replicates were pooled together). All tests were performed using Minitab® v.16 software [12].

3. Results

Table 1 lists the total numbers of males, females and eggs on each side of the tunnel. In terms of adult attraction, we found no preference for either level of infestations. Although nearly significant, we found no difference in terms of number of eggs laid on the non-infested plants versus the plants infested by 10 T. absoluta larvae (p = 0.086). In the dual choice including a non-infested plant versus a 20 larvae-infested tomato plant, females significantly preferred laying eggs on the non-infested plants (p = 0.047). Finally, females significantly preferred laying eggs on a 10 larvae-infested plant than on a 20 larvae-infested plant (p < 0.001).
Table 1. Results of dual choice bio-assays evaluating the preference of T. absoluta for non-infested, 10 larvae-infested and 20 larvae-infested tomato plants. The number of adult males and females, and eggs laid by females, was assessed in each zone/plant of the flying tunnel (0 = non-infested plant area, 10 = 10 larvae-infested plant area, 20 = 20 larvae-infested plant area). Values are total numbers of individuals for each combination (four replicates).
Table 1. Results of dual choice bio-assays evaluating the preference of T. absoluta for non-infested, 10 larvae-infested and 20 larvae-infested tomato plants. The number of adult males and females, and eggs laid by females, was assessed in each zone/plant of the flying tunnel (0 = non-infested plant area, 10 = 10 larvae-infested plant area, 20 = 20 larvae-infested plant area). Values are total numbers of individuals for each combination (four replicates).
Number of Tested InsectsResponding Insects (%) 1 Two Choice Assayp-value
8172 (89) 100
Males16190.736
Females16210.511
Eggs2141790.086
8568 (80) 200
Males12230.090
Females16171.000
Eggs1632020.047
8255 (67) 2010
Males8120.503
Females15200.500
Eggs60160<0.001
1 Responding insects include living individuals present in one of the two side areas of the tunnel.

4. Discussion

This study shows that the oviposition site choice by female T. absoluta is likely to be dependent on the infestation level by conspecifics. It is generally assumed that larval survivability depends on the female’s oviposition choice because most lepidopteran larvae are unable to move to an alternative food source [13,14]. A key assumption could be that previous leafminer infestation will result in a less favorable host environment compared to an uninfested one as over-infested sites are unlikely to support growth and development of a newly laid egg. In the light of the results, high larvae density on tomato plants could be effectively associated by females with a poor quality host for egg laying. Indeed, the number of eggs laid on the plant infested by 20 T. absoluta larvae was lower than on plants with lower infestation levels in two tested combinations. However, female preferences are not restricted to the least infested plant and oviposition seems to be stimulated at a certain density threshold, as the number of eggs was found to be statistically similar between the non-infested plant and the plant infested with 10 larvae only (although the later was higher). This suggests that female oviposition response could be more sophisticated than would be expected from a simple intraspecific competition model based on the detection of previous infestation.
Considering T. absoluta antagonists may provide more explanations about this behavior. In their natural environment, solanaceous leafminers are significantly affected by many factors including natural enemies (as predators and parasitoids) that keep them at endemic levels [8]. Natural enemies were not involved in the present study but could be expected to play a role in forging the oviposition behavior of the tomato leafminer. Non-infested sites may pose some risks in terms of offspring survivability as early infesters may be exposed to predation or parasitism, while later infesters may have an increased chance to escape because at least partial satiation of the natural enemies has occurred [15]. Under these conditions, gravid leafminer females may have develop a system of host plant assessment manifested by moderate oviposition level on non-infested sites, increased level on sparsely infested sites, and reticent level on heavily infested sites.
During oviposition, females are exposed to a variety of cues, including plant volatiles, contact chemicals, and visual signals, which help to determine the suitability of a host plant [13]. By example, T. absoluta oviposition preferentially occurs on the upper third of the tomato plant where highest densities of trichomes (which impair parasites performance) can be found, resulting in clumped and patched leafminer distribution in tomato crops [16]. In the present experiment, we excluded the potential effect of the chemical host marking by ovipositing females on their preferences because the larvae used to infest the tomato plants in the experimental setup were excised from the rearing colony. However, many insect species mark the host patch during egg lay to regulate the oviposition site selection [17]. Especially, oviposition-deterring pheromones associated with egg lay are involved in reducing competition [18]. Moreover, egg deposition could be responsible for the release of oviposition-induced plant volatiles which could have an impact on female preferences [19]. Further researches can be oriented in studying the role of egg-infested plants in oviposition preferences by conspecific females.
We found differences in terms of total number of eggs laid on both plants, but no difference in terms of number of adult males and females in both sides of the tunnel. The total duration of the assay (48 h) and the design of the tunnel allow adults to freely move from one area to another, even after laying eggs on a plant. A shorter observation period (<1 h) would have probably allowed to determine the most attractive area for ovipositing females. T. absoluta females rely on olfactory cues during host-searching and host-assessment as suitable larval substrate for oviposition [10]. By contrast, lepidopteran males are primarily attracted by female sex pheromones and rarely exhibit adaptive behavior in response to host plant volatiles [20]. The lack of male preferences to plant combinations could also be related to the lack of female choice.
Polyphagous predators, as Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur (Heteroptera: Miridae) which is a natural enemy of T. absoluta, are considered to be important candidate biological control agents [8]. Understanding the chemical volatiles involved both in T. absoluta oviposition choice and M. pygmeus attraction could help to develop reliable strategies in order to repulse gravid females from tomato crops and attract predators to infested sites, respectively. In an equivalent behavioral assay system, M. pygmaeus was previously found to discriminate a tomato plant infested by T. absoluta from a non-infested plant [21]. Volatile blends released by the tested plants were characterized and they were found to differ according to the infestation level (non-infested plants, plants infested by 10 larvae and 20 larvae). The volatile profiles were found to differ starting from 4 days after infestation. These authors also found that the more T. absoluta larvae are infesting the plant, the greater the amount of induced volatile chemicals released. As lepidopteran females are classically attracted to the odor blends released by plants which indicate mating sites and reflect larval host plant quality [11,22], we might expect that the volatile compounds responsible for the attraction of M. pygmaeus to infested tomato plants could also be involved in T. absoluta oviposition behavior. By contrast, egg deposition was not found to render tomato plants more attractive to leafminer predators as M. pygmeus [23], but oviposition-induced plant volatiles (if any) may also have an impact on gravid female behavior as explained above. Further electrophysiological and behavioral assays are required to confirm the effect of such specific chemicals on the choice of the oviposition site in T. absoluta.

5. Conclusions

This study suggests that T. absoluta oviposition behavior is dependent on the host plant infestation level by conspecifics. Preferences between conspecific-infested and non-infested host appear to be governed by a more complex mechanism than a simple intra-specific competition model, and other factors as parasites may have play a role in forging the leafminer oviposition behavior. These results provide useful information and perspectives for the development of further pest control strategies.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Service Public de Wallonie (SPW-DGO3, project D31-1263). The authors thank Emilie Joie and Maud Fagan for technical support in plant cultures and insect rearing.

Author Contributions

Lara De Backer, Rudy Caparros Megido and François J. Verheggen conceived and designed the experiments. Thomas Bawin, David Dujeu and Pauline Legrand performed the experiments. Thomas Bawin and François J. Verheggen analyzed the data. Frédéric Francis is the head of the department and provided access to equipment and laboratories. Thomas Bawin and François J. Verheggen wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Desneux, N.; Wajnberg, E.; Wyckhuys, K.A.G.; Burgio, G.; Arpaia, S.; Narvaez-Vasquez, C.A.; Gonzalez-Cabrera, J.; Catalan Ruescas, D.C.; Tabone, E.; Frandon, J.; et al. Biological invasion of European tomato crops by Tuta absoluta: Ecology, geographic expansion and prospects for biological control. J. Pest Sci. 2010, 83, 197–215. [Google Scholar]
  2. Desneux, N.; Luna, M.G.; Guillemaud, T.; Urbaneja, A. The invasive South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta, continues to spread in Afro-Eurasia and beyond: The new threat to tomato world production. J. Pest Sci. 2011, 84, 403–408. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tropea Garzia, G.; Siscaro, G.; Biondi, A.; Zappalà, L. Tuta absoluta, an exotic invasive pest from South America now in the EPPO region: Biology, distribution and damage. EPPO Bull. 2012, 42, 205–210. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gontijo, P.C.; Picanço, M.C.; Pereira, E.J.G.; Martins, J.C.; Chediak, M.; Guedes, R.N.C. Spatial and temporal variation in the control failure likelihood of the tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2013, 162, 50–59. [Google Scholar]
  5. Desneux, N.; Decourtye, A.; Delpuech, J.M. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52, 81–106. [Google Scholar]
  6. Oliveira, F.A.; da Silva, D.J.H.; Leite, G.L.D.; Jham, G.N.; Picanco, M. Resistance of 57 greenhouse-grown accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum and three cultivars to Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Sci. Hortic. 2009, 119, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Caparros Megido, R.; Haubruge, E.; Verheggen, F.J. First evidence of deuterotokous parthenogenesis in the tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Pest Sci. 2012, 85, 409–412. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zappalà, L.; Biondi, A.; Alma, A.; Al-Jboory, I.J.; Arnò, J.; Bayram, A.; Chailleux, A.; El-Arnaouty, A.; Gerling, D.; Guenaoui, Y.; et al. Natural enemies of the South American moth, Tuta absoluta, in Europe, North Africa and Middle-East, and their potential use in pest control strategies. J. Pest Sci. 2013, 86, 635–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Szendrei, Z.; Rodriguez-Saona, C. A meta-analysis of insect pest behavioral manipulation with plant volatiles. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2010, 134, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Proffit, M.; Birgersson, G.; Bengtsson, M.; Reis, R., Jr.; Witzgall, P.; Lima, E. Attraction and oviposition of Tuta absoluta females in response to tomato leaf volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 2011, 37, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Caparros Megido, R.; de Backer, L.; Ettaïb, R.; Brostaux, Y.; Fauconnier, M.-L.; Delaplace, P.; Lognay, G.; Belkadhi, M.S.; Haubruge, E.; Francis, F.; et al. Role of larval host plant experience and solanaceous plant volatile emissions in Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) host finding behavior. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2014, 8, 293–304. [Google Scholar]
  12. Minitab. Available online: http://www.minitab.com/fr-FR/default.aspx (accessed on 10 November 2014).
  13. Awmack, C.S.; Leather, S.R. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47, 817–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gripenberg, S.; Mayhew, P.J.; Parnell, M.; Roslin, T. A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Torres, J.B.; Evangelista, W.S., Jr.; Barras, R.; Guedes, N.C. Dispersal of Podisus nigrispinus (Het., Pentatomidae) nymphs preying on tomato leafminer: Effect of predator release time, density and satiation level. J. Appl. Entomol. 2002, 126, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Faria, C.A.; Torres, J.B.; Fernandes, A.M.V.; Farias, A.M.I. Parasitism of Tuta absoluta in tomato plants by Trichogramma pretiosum Riley in response to host density and plant structures. Cienc. Rural 2008, 38, 1504–1509. [Google Scholar]
  17. Renwick, J.A.A. Chemical ecology of oviposition in phytophagous insects. Experientia 1989, 45, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sielezniew, M.; Stankiewicz-Fiedurek, A.M. Behavioural evidence for putative oviposition-deterring pheromone in the butterfly, Phengaris (Maculinea) teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 2013, 110, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fatouros, N.E.; Lucas-Barbosa, D.; Weldegergis, B.T.; Pashalidou, F.G.; van Loon, J.J.A.; Dicke, M.; Harvey, J.A.; Gols, R.; Huigens, M.E. Plant volatiles induced by herbivore egg deposition affect insects of different trophic levels. PLoS One 2012, 7, e43607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ramaswamy, S.B. Host finding by moths: Sensory modalities and behaviours. J. Insect Physiol. 1988, 34, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. De Backer, L.; Caparros Megido, R.; Fauconnier, M.-L.; Brostaux, Y.; Francis, F.; Verheggen, F. Tuta absoluta-induced plant volatiles: Attractiveness toward the generalist predator Macrolophus pygmaeus. J. Pest Sci. 2014, in press. [Google Scholar]
  22. Trona, F.; Casado, D.; Coracini, M.; Bengtsson, M.; Ioriatti, C.; Witzgall, P. Flight tunnel response of codling moth Cydia pomonella to blends of codlemone, codlemone antagonists and pear ester. Physiol. Entomol. 2010, 35, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lins, J.C., Jr.; van Loon, J.J.A.; Bueno, V.H.P.; Lucas-Barbosa, D.; Dicke, M.; van Lenteren, J.C. Response of the zoophytophagous predators Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis to volatiles of uninfested plants and to plants infested by prey or conspecifics. BioControl 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bawin, T.; De Backer, L.; Dujeu, D.; Legrand, P.; Megido, R.C.; Francis, F.; Verheggen, F.J. Infestation Level Influences Oviposition Site Selection in the Tomato Leafminer Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Insects 2014, 5, 877-884. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5040877

AMA Style

Bawin T, De Backer L, Dujeu D, Legrand P, Megido RC, Francis F, Verheggen FJ. Infestation Level Influences Oviposition Site Selection in the Tomato Leafminer Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Insects. 2014; 5(4):877-884. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5040877

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bawin, Thomas, Lara De Backer, David Dujeu, Pauline Legrand, Rudy Caparros Megido, Frédéric Francis, and François J. Verheggen. 2014. "Infestation Level Influences Oviposition Site Selection in the Tomato Leafminer Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)" Insects 5, no. 4: 877-884. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5040877

APA Style

Bawin, T., De Backer, L., Dujeu, D., Legrand, P., Megido, R. C., Francis, F., & Verheggen, F. J. (2014). Infestation Level Influences Oviposition Site Selection in the Tomato Leafminer Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Insects, 5(4), 877-884. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5040877

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop