Next Article in Journal
Reproductive Behavior and Basic Biology of the Oriental Bamboo-Inhabiting Anoplomus rufipes and a Comparison with Frugivorous Dacinae Fruit Flies
Previous Article in Journal
A Fundamental Step in IPM on Grapevine: Evaluating the Side Effects of Pesticides on Predatory Mites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 6
Issue 4
10.3390/insects6040858
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Rearing Density on Survival, Growth, and Development of the Ladybird Coleomegilla maculata in Culture

by
Eric W. Riddick
*,† and
Zhixin Wu
†
National Biological Control Laboratory, Jamie Whitten Delta States Research Center, ARS-USDA, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2015, 6(4), 858-868; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects6040858
Submission received: 23 July 2015 / Revised: 6 October 2015 / Accepted: 7 October 2015 / Published: 9 October 2015
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Our research focuses on developing techniques to rear ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). We evaluated the effects of rearing density on survival, growth, and development of Coleomegilla maculata. The hypothesis that a low to moderate rearing density has limited or no effects on survival and development was tested. C. maculata first instars were reared to pupae at a density of 1, 5, 10, 15, or 20 individuals per arena (2.5 cm high, 9.0 cm diameter, and 159 cm3 volume) and fed powdered brine shrimp (Artemia franciscana) eggs. More larvae survived at the 1 and 5 densities, but no differences were detected between the 10, 15, or 20 densities. Median survival rate was at least 90% for larvae and 100% for pupae at the 10, 15, and 20 densities. Development time, body weight, and sex ratio were unaffected by rearing density. Overall, this study suggests that C. maculata larvae can be reared successfully at a density of 20 larvae/159 cm3 (≈ 0.126 larvae/cm3) in containers provisioned with powdered A. franciscana eggs. Scaling-up the size of containers, and C. maculata density in these containers, should be possible.

1. Introduction

Coleomegilla maculata (C. maculata) DeGeer (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) is a native ladybird beetle distributed in ecosystems in North, Central, and South America [1,2,3,4]. It is polyphagous, consuming eggs and young larval stages of many small, soft-bodied insects and mites, but shows a feeding preference for aphids [5,6,7] and plant pollen [8,9]. There is interest in using this ladybird beetle to control pests in field crops [10,11,12], to test non-target effects of plant toxins [13], and to control pests in protected culture, i.e., high tunnels, greenhouses, plantscapes and interiorscapes [14,15,16].
A common approach to controlling pests in protected culture, using predators (e.g., ladybird beetles), is to inundate infested plants with immature or adult stages. This necessitates a mass rearing program. For cost effective mass rearing, conservation of space in rearing facilities is essential. A first step to conserving space is to maximize insect density in rearing containers, without negatively affecting the quality of reared individuals. Rearing multiple predators in the same container can cause a change in the behavior of individuals, and potentially promulgate harmful effects on survival, development, and growth [17]. Some coccinellid larvae cannibalize their cohorts (siblings and non-siblings) under crowded conditions, especially if the food source is not suitable in quality or quantity [18,19,20]. For some species, larval-larval cannibalism occurs despite the availability of high quality food; consequently, researchers rear larvae individually rather than in groups [21]. Curbing or eliminating cannibalistic behavior so that larvae can be reared in groups is necessary for efficient mass production [22,23]. Therefore, the capacity to increase the density of immature predators within rearing systems, while eliminating or limiting cannibalism is a grand challenge to space-efficient mass production. A mass rearing system has no hope of becoming cost effective, unless space saving methods, such as group rearing of predators, are implemented.
Increasing rearing density without decreasing pre-imaginal survival and development are major obstacles to mass rearing coccinellids [24,25,26], anthocorids [27] and reduviids [28,29]. Provisioning rearing containers with refuges (i.e., hiding places) can improve the capacity to increase rearing density, with varying degrees of success for coccinellids [30,31] and anthocorids [32]. Clearly, more research on this topic is necessary, particularly to support efforts to develop rearing systems useful for the biocontrol industry (natural enemy producers). The impetus of our ongoing research has been to develop a cost- and space-efficient rearing system for C. maculata. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of rearing density on growth, development, and survival of C. maculata in the laboratory. In our recent works [14,15,16], we designed experiments to test the suitability of alternative foods for C. maculata larvae, reared in groups of 10–12 larvae per arena. Many of our critics claimed that rearing this species in such groups, even when the food source was deemed suitable, was inappropriate. Hence, this study also serves to confirm our previously published reports and show that group rearing is possible. The hypothesis that a low to moderate rearing density has limited or no effects on pre-imaginal survival and development was tested.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Research Subjects and Food Sources

Our C. maculata colony originated from adults provided by colleagues at USDA facilities in Brookings, SD and Beltsville, MD, USA. Each life stage (eggs, larvae, pupae or adults) was reared in separate containers in a climate-controlled room (24 °C, 50%–60% RH, 16 h photophase). This colony has been maintained without any introduction of “wild” individuals for over 20 consecutive generations. Larvae and adults have been reared on eggs of the Mediterranean flour moth Ephestia kuehniella (E. kuehniella) Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Frozen-fresh E. kuehniella eggs were purchased from Beneficial Insectary Inc. (Redding, California, USA) at a cost of $ 3.80 USD per 28.35 g. Upon arrival, eggs were stored in a lab refrigerator (at −20 °C), until ready for use.

2.2. Rearing Density

C. maculata eggs were harvested at random from several C. maculata mating pairs, approximately 1-month old adults, from our rearing colony and assigned randomly to Petri dish arenas. Rearing densities were 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 C. maculata first instars per Petri dish (2.5 cm high, 9.0 cm diam., 159 cm3). We used three replicate Petri dish arenas per treatment density in three identical trials, for a total of 45 arenas. There were 153 C. maculata first instars at the onset of each trial, for a total of 459 individuals for the entire experiment (three trials). A powdered formulation of brine shrimp Artemia franciscana (A. franciscana) Kellogg eggs (Anostraca: Artemiidae) [33] was used as food in each treatment arena. Freeze-dried, decapsulated A. franciscana eggs were purchased from Brine Shrimp Direct Inc. (Ogden, Utah, USA) at a cost of $ 0.99 USD per 28.35 g [15]. Each arena was provisioned with treatment food and covered with a mesh-screened lid. The quantity of food in each arena exceeded the amount that C. maculata, collectively, could consume in two days. Food was replaced, and uneaten food discarded, every other day. Each arena was provisioned with a small wad of cotton moistened with distilled water to provide a source of water. No refuges (hiding places) were provided in the arenas. Collected data included development time, larval and pupal survival rate, proportional mortality amongst larval instars, adult emergence rate, body size (live weight of teneral males and females), and sex ratio (i.e., percentage of females emerging from pupae). All experimental arenas were maintained in a growth chamber (24 °C, 60% RH, 16 h photophase), but removed from the chamber each day to record life history (growth and development) data, replenish food, and re-moisten cotton wads as needed.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data on survival, growth, and development were averaged across replicate Petri dish arenas; the arena represented the sampling unit. Data on mortality amongst larval instars were not analyzed. Data on adult body weight were averaged across adults; the adult represented the sampling unit. Initially, all data were analyzed following a completely randomized design and absolute data and percentage data were square root transformed and arcsine transformed, respectively, if the assumptions of equal variance and normality were not met [34]. Despite transformation, survival, growth, and development data failed to meet the assumptions of normality; the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance (K-W ANOVA) with H statistic was used for data analysis. The one-way analysis of variance (1-way ANOVA), using Standard Least Squares with F statistic, tested the effects of rearing density on female and male body weight. When necessary, the Steel-Dwass test or Tukey-Kramer HSD test was used as a multiple comparison procedure after the K-W ANOVA or 1-way ANOVA, respectively. JMP® 10.0.0 (2012 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and SigmaStat 3.0.1 (interfaced through Sigma Plot 12, Systat Software Inc., Richmond, CA, USA) software assisted with analysis of data.

3. Results

Rearing density had a significant effect on larval survival rate (H = 19.9; df = 4; p < 0.001; K-W ANOVA; n = 45 arenas). Slightly more larvae survived at the 1 density than the 10, 15, and 20 densities, and the 5 density than the 20 density (Table 1), but no differences were evident between the 10, 15, and 20 densities. All larvae at the 1 density treatment survived in all arenas, in all trials. Larval survival never dropped below 80% at any other density in the three trials. When mortality did occur, late 4th instars appeared to suffer the most (Figure 1). The dead larvae-in decreasing order of mortality-were 4th instars, 2nd instars, 3rd instars, and 1st instars, averaged over three trials, with a total of 8, 15, and 10 dead larvae in the first, second, and third trial, respectively.
Table
Table 1. Median values and confidence intervals for pre-imaginal survival, development time, and sex ratio of teneral adults in relation to rearing density.
Table 1. Median values and confidence intervals for pre-imaginal survival, development time, and sex ratio of teneral adults in relation to rearing density.
Life ParameterRearing DensityMedian10% C.I.25% C.I.75% C.I.90% C.I.
Larval Survival (%)1100 a100100100100
5100 ab80.0100100100
1090.0 bc80.085.095.0100
1593.3 bc80.088.310095
2095.0 c85.092.595.0100
Time as Larva (days)114.0 a11.011.514.014.0
513.0 a11.812.113.814.0
1013.7 a11.812.314.014.4
1513.6 a12.813.114.014.2
2013.2 a12.012.213.814.0
Time as Pupa (days)13.0 a2.02.04.05.0
54.0 a3.63.94.95.0
103.9 a3.23.44.44.7
153.8 a3.53.74.24.5
204.0 a3.63.84.74.7
Pupal Survival (%)1100100100100100
5100100100100100
10100100100100100
15100100100100100
20100100100100100
Sex Ratio (% ♀♀)1100 a00100100
550.0 a40.040.060.080.0
1055.6 a33.347.264.666.7
1550.0 a42.946.753.653.8
2052.6 a42.145.755.363.2
Median values followed by a different letter in a column, for each life parameter, are significantly different (p < 0.05, Steel-Dwass test). Sample size, n, 9 arenas per density. Rearing density represented number of larvae per arena (Petri dish, 2.5 cm high, 9 cm diam., 159 cm3).
Insects 06 00858 g001 1024
Figure 1. Mean ± SE proportion of dead 1st–4th instar larvae in 10, 15, and 20 density treatments in replicate trials. A total of 33 dead larvae were observed.
Figure 1. Mean ± SE proportion of dead 1st–4th instar larvae in 10, 15, and 20 density treatments in replicate trials. A total of 33 dead larvae were observed.
Insects 06 00858 g001
Larval development time was unaffected by rearing density (H = 2.7; df = 4; p = 0.61; n = 45); neither was the time from the pupal stage to the teneral adult (H = 6.1; df = 4; p = 0.19; n = 45; Table 1). Rearing density had no effect on pupal survival rate (since all pupae emerged as adults) or sex ratio, i.e., percentage of females (H = 1.2; df = 4; p = 0.87; n = 45). A total of 221 females and 208 males emerged from pupae in the combined trials, regardless of density treatment. The breakdown was 5, 23, 44, 63, and 86 females in the 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 density treatments; 4, 21, 37, 64, and 82 males in the 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 density treatments, respectively. Rearing density did not significantly affect body weight of teneral females (F = 2.28; df = 4, 216; p = 0.061) or teneral males (F = 1.46; df = 4, 203; p = 0.21) in this experiment (Figure 2).
Insects 06 00858 g002 1024
Figure 2. Mean ± SE body weight of teneral adults in relation to rearing density. A total of 208 males and 221 females were in the analysis.
Figure 2. Mean ± SE body weight of teneral adults in relation to rearing density. A total of 208 males and 221 females were in the analysis.
Insects 06 00858 g002

4. Discussion

The hypothesis that a low to moderate rearing density has limited or no effects on pre-imaginal survival of C. maculata was partially confirmed in this study. A median survival rate of 90% for larvae at the highest densities (10, 15, and 20 larvae/159 cm3), suggests very limited negative effects. When mortality did occur, late 4th instar C. maculata larvae, which were partially immobile as they began to metamorphose into prepupae, died more often, presumably from being partially eaten by slightly younger larvae. Developing coccinellid larvae are more vulnerable to attacks from sibling larvae when molting, because they are motionless [35]. Cannibalism is an impediment to mass producing coccinellids for biological control [7]. Techniques to reduce larval-larval encounters, thereby reducing cannibalism on motionless (i.e., molting) individuals could involve provisioning arenas with refuges or hiding places for molting or for pupation. Provisioning arenas with refuges or hiding places might have allowed an even higher C. maculata rearing density in this study. Although refuges or hiding places were not provided, a few previous studies have documented this technique. For example, researchers have used corrugated paper or plastics in 12-liter containers to create refuges to increase survival rate of the coccinellid Lemnia biplagiata (Swartz) [30]. Others have used excelsior (wood shavings) as refuges in 1-liter glass jars to reduce bodily contact between Coccinella septempunctata L. larvae, thereby increasing survival rate [31]. The observation that 100% of pupae metamorphosed into adults, regardless of rearing density, was not unusual, since over 95% of C. maculata pupae survived to the teneral adult stage, when reared in groups, in previous works [14,15,16]. Likewise, the observation that rearing density did not affect development time and sex ratio of emerging adults, in this study, further suggests that the moderate rearing densities (10, 15, and 20 larvae) had only minor, negative effects on C. maculata growth and development. Development time and sex ratio of teneral adults of the coccinellid Brumoides suturalis (F.) did not differ significantly between rearing densities of 1 vs. 10 larvae per arena [26].
One purpose of this study was to establish a suitable rearing density for C. maculata from the standpoint of developing space-efficient rearing methods applicable to mass rearing of this predator at a commercial scale. In several of our previous works [14,15,16], we designed experiments to test the suitability of alternate foods for C. maculata, when reared in groups of 10–12 larvae per arena (159 cm3). Several of our critics commented that we should have reared larvae individually instead. From our standpoint of developing efficient rearing techniques, rearing larvae individually is not acceptable. Hence, an underlying reason for conducting this study, and for limiting the experimental design to include low to moderate rearing densities (rather than high rearing densities), was simply to validate that group rearing of C. maculata larvae was possible. This study was not designed to determine the maximum density of C. maculata larvae that could be packed into a 159 cm3 arena. However, we are aware that C. maculata can be reared successfully at a density of 30–40 larvae per 159 cm3 when fed powdered A. franciscana eggs (Riddick, E.W. and Wu, Z., unpublished data [36]).
Based on the data generated in this study, a rearing density of 20 larvae per arena (159 cm3) would ensure successful rearing. We define successful rearing as the capacity to rear 70% or more larvae to the adult stage per arena. The 20 larvae/159 cm3 can be converted into 0.126 larvae/cm3, to provide a means of comparing successful rearing densities of other predatory insects (see Table 2). We propose that the greater the successful rearing density, the greater the potential of rearing on a commercial scale of production. We calculated the successful rearing density of several ladybird species, known as predators of aphids in agroecosystems, including B. suturalis, Adalia bipunctata (L.), and Propylea dissecta (Mulsant) (see Table 2). A rearing density of 1 versus 10 larvae of the three-striped ladybird B. suturalis, in Petri dish arenas (1.5 cm high, 14.0 cm diameter) provisioned with the aphid Aphis gossypii Glover, had no effect on pre-imaginal survival; approximately 80% of larvae metamorphosed into pupae and 90% of pupae metamorphosed into adults at either density [26]. Using 10 larvae per arena (230.79 cm3), the successful rearing density was 0.043 larvae/cm3 for B. suturalis. Larvae of A. bipunctata were reared at densities of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 individuals in glass jars (20 cm high, 15 cm diameter) and fed the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) [24]. A rearing density of 4 larvae per arena ensured a survival rate of 75%, which converts into a successful rearing density of 4 larvae/3,532 cm3 or 0.0011 larvae/cm3 for A. bipunctata (see Table 2). Larvae of P. dissecta were reared in plastic beakers (11 cm high, 9 cm wide) at densities of 1, 4, 8, 16, 25, and 35 larvae per beaker and fed the aphid Aphis craccivora Koch [25]. Rearing at a density of 25 larvae per beaker resulted in 88% larval survival, but body weight of the resultant adults (6.2 mg) was significantly less than those reared at a density of 4 larvae per beaker (i.e., 11.2 mg). Consequently, the authors concluded that 4 larvae per beaker was the most successful rearing density. Therefore, 4 larvae/699.43 cm3 converts into a successful rearing density of 0.006 larvae/cm3 (Table 2).
Table
Table 2. Comparison of larval density ensuring a survival rate of 70% or greater, successful rearing density, and female body weight of ladybird beetles used in biological control.
Table 2. Comparison of larval density ensuring a survival rate of 70% or greater, successful rearing density, and female body weight of ladybird beetles used in biological control.
PredatorLarvae per Arena at 70%+ Survival Rate *Arena Height (h) × Diameter (d), in cmArena Volume (cm3) 1Successful Rearing Density (Larvae/cm3)Body Weight (mg), at 70%+ *Reference
Coleomegilla maculata202.5 × 9.0158.960.12613.0This study
Brumoides suturalis101.5 × 14.0230.790.043-[26]
Adalia bipunctata420 × 153,5320.001-[24]
Propylea dissecta411 × 9699.430.00611.2[25]
* The number of ladybird larvae per arena demonstrating a survival rate of at least 70%. 1 Arena volume was determined from the equation for the volume of a cylinder [V = π r2 h]. The “successful rearing density” is an estimate of the ladybird larvae/cm3 with a survival rate of at least 70%. Recognition of female body weight of reared predators can be factored into the successful rearing density to more accurately compare rearing density amongst species, assuming that body weight (mass) is directly proportional to body size (length × width).
Clearly, successful rearing density is greater for C. maculata than the other coccinellids and body weight can factor into successful rearing density (0.126 larvae/cm3 × 13.0 mg/adult = 1.64 mg/cm3). Body weight provides an estimate of body size (length and width); larger sized species may or may not make more bodily contact with conspecifics than smaller sized species in the confines of a shared arena.
The reasons why C. maculata larvae are more amenable to group rearing than the other coccinellids mentioned in this study could reflect diet preferences. Although C. maculata larvae prefer aphids, they can complete development on a plant-based diet [8,9,16], which suggests that requirements for nutrients from animal (invertebrate) sources are less stringent, in comparison to other species not known to complete development on plant products. Therefore, developing C. maculata larvae do not need to cannibalize sibling larvae to glean nutrients not found in suboptimal foods. That being stated, this study highlights the suitability of powdered A. franciscana eggs for C. maculata development. Adalia bipunctata larvae are rarely capable of developing successfully on a plant-based diet, such as moist bee pollen [37]. The ability of either B. suturalis or P. dissecta larvae to develop on pollen, or any other plant product, is unreported in the literature to our knowledge, suggesting that both species are distinctly carnivorous [7]. An alternative explanation for successful group rearing of C. maculata larvae could be related to behavior and artificial selection. The insects used in this study originated from a colony adapted to group rearing. Therefore, we can’t rule-out the possibility that lab-adaptation had some underlying influence on the propensity of larvae in our experiment to tolerate rearing in close quarters with conspecifics. Further research could test for differential effects of rearing density on lab-adapted versus wild (feral) C. maculata larvae.

5. Conclusions

In this study, more larvae survived at the 1 and 5 densities, but no differences were detected between the 10, 15, or 20 densities. Nevertheless, median survival rate was 90% or greater for larvae and 100% for pupae at the 10, 15, and 20 densities. Development time, body weight, and sex ratio were unaffected by rearing density. Overall, this study suggests that C. maculata larvae can be mass produced successfully at a density of 20 larvae/159 cm3 (≈0.126 larvae/cm3) in containers provisioned with powdered A. franciscana eggs.
Scale-up of rearing systems from experimental arenas to rearing containers is necessary to reach the capacity for inundative releases [38]. Clearly, we would need to scale-up the rearing of C. maculata from 159 cm3 to maybe 5000 or 10,000 cm3 containers to facilitate commercial scale rearing. Since 85%–95% of 20 C. maculata larvae were successfully reared in 159 cm3 arenas, we predict that at least 85% of 629 larvae can be reared in 5,000 cm3 containers (i.e., 20/159 cm3 ≈ 629/5000 cm3). Future research on space-efficient rearing of C. maculata should focus at the commercial scale. Based on the meager literature on rearing density of predatory insects, along with the results of this study, we surmise that C. maculata has considerable rearing capacity and promise for commercial production for augmentative biological control.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Derrick Jones for maintaining the C. maculata colony. Juan A. Morales-Ramos, Louis S. Hesler, and Ted E. Cottrell reviewed an earlier version of this manuscript. Comments from two anonymous reviewers improved the text. The United States Government has the right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty free license in and to any copyright of this article. Mention of a commercial or proprietary product does not constitute an endorsement of the product by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). USDA-ARS is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Author Contributions

Eric W. Riddick planned the research project, wrote, revised, and edited the manuscript. Zhixin Wu conducted the experiments and helped edit the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors, Eric W. Riddick and Zhixin Wu declare no conflicts of interest, including affiliations, relationships, or financial interests relevant to the content of this manuscript.

References

  1. Gordon, R.D. The Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) of America north of Mexico. J. N.Y. Entomol. Soc. 1985, 93, 1–912. [Google Scholar]
  2. Coll, M.; Mendoza, L.C.; Roderick, G.K. Population structure of a predatory beetle: The importance of gene flow for intertrophic level interactions. Heredity 1994, 72, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Munyaneza, J.; Obrycki, J.J. Development of three populations of Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) feeding on eggs of Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ. Entomol. 1998, 27, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Krafsur, E.S.; Obrycki, J.J. Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) is a species complex. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2000, 93, 1156–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Conrad, M.S. The spotted lady beetle, Coleomegilla maculata (De Geer) as a predator of European corn borer eggs. J. Econ. Entomol. 1959, 52, 843–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Michaud, J.P.; Jyoti, J.L. Dietary complementation across life stages in the polyphagous lady beetle Coleomegilla maculata. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2008, 126, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hodek, I.; Evans, E.W. Food relationships, Chapter 5. In Ecology and Behaviour of Ladybird Beetles (Coccinellidae); Hodek, I., van Emden, H.F., Honěk, A., Eds.; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2012; pp. 141–274. [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith, B.C. A technique for rearing coccinellid beetles on dry foods, and influence of various pollens on the development of Coleomegilla maculata lengi Timb. Can. J. Zool. 1960, 38, 1047–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Smith, B.C. Growth and development of coccinellid larvae on dry foods (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Can. Entomol. 1965, 97, 760–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Andow, D.A.; Risch, S.J. Predation in diversified agroecosystems: Relations between a coccinellid predator Coleomegilla maculata and its food. J. Appl. Ecol. 1985, 22, 357–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Phoofolo, M.W.; Obrycki, J.J.; Lewis, L.C. Quantitative assessment of biotic mortality factors of the European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in field corn. J. Econ. Entomol. 2001, 94, 617–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Musser, F.R.; Shelton, A.M. Predation of Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) eggs in sweet corn by generalist predators and the impact of alternative foods. Environ. Entomol. 2003, 32, 1131–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Ostrem, J.; Romeis, J.; Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Hellmich, R.L.; Shelton, A.M.; Peng, Y. Development of a tier-1 assay for assessing the toxicity of insecticidal substances against Coleomegilla maculata. Environ. Entomol. 2011, 40, 496–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Riddick, E.W.; Wu, Z.; Rojas, M.G. Is Tetranychus urticae suitable prey for development and reproduction of naïve Coleomegilla maculata? Insect Sci. 2014, 21, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Riddick, E.W.; Wu, Z.; Rojas, M.G. Potential utilization of Artemia franciscana eggs as food for Coleomegilla maculata. BioControl 2014, 59, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Riddick, E.W.; Wu, Z.; Rojas, M.G.; Morales-Ramos, J.A. Potential utilization of Spirulina microalga as a dietary supplement for the ladybird beetle Coleomegilla maculata. Trends Entomol. 2014, 10, 39–48. [Google Scholar]
  17. Peters, T.M.; Barbosa, P. Influence of population density on size, fecundity, and developmental rate of insects in culture. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1972, 22, 431–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schellhorn, N.A.; Andow, D.A. Mortality of coccinellid (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) larvae and pupae when prey become scarce. Environ. Entomol. 1999, 28, 1092–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Michaud, J.P. A comparative study of larval cannibalism in three species of ladybird. Ecol. Entomol. 2003, 28, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pervez, A.; Gupta, A.K.; Omkar. Larval cannibalism in aphidophagous ladybirds: Influencing factors, benefits and costs. Biol. Control 2006, 38, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hesler, L.S.; McNickle, G.; Catangui, M.A.; Losey, J.E.; Beckendorf, E.A.; Stellwag, L.; Brandt, D.M.; Bartlett, P.B. Method for continuously rearing Coccinella lady beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Open Entomol. J. 2012, 6, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Allen, M.A.; Riddick, E.W. A system for harvesting eggs from the pink-spotted lady beetle. Psyche 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Riddick, E.W.; Chen, H. Production of coleopteran predators, Chapter 2. In Mass Production of Beneficial Organisms: Invertebrates and Entomopathogens; Morales-Ramos, J.A., Rojas, M.G., Shapiro-Ilan, D.I., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2014; pp. 17–55. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dimetry, N.Z. The role of predator and prey density as factors affecting behavioural and biological aspects of Adalia bipunctata (L.) larvae. Z. Ang. Entomol. 1976, 81, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Omkar; Pathak, S. Crowding affects the life attributes of an aphidophagous ladybird beetle, Propylea dissecta. Bull. Insectol. 2009, 62, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bista, M.; Mishra, G.; Omkar. Influence of crowding and diet on the development and survival of the ladybird Brumoides suturalis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) reared on two aphid species. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2012, 32, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bonte, M.; de Clercq, P. Influence of predator density, diet and living substrate on developmental fitness of Orius laevigatus. J. Appl. Entomol. 2011, 135, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Grundy, P.R.; Maelzer, D.A.; Bruce, A.; Hassan, E. A mass-rearing method for the assassin bug Pristhesancus plagipennis (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Biol. Control 2000, 18, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sahayaraj, K. Small scale laboratory rearing of a reduviid predator, Rhynocoris marginatus Fab. (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) on Corcyra cephalonica Stainton larvae by larval card method. J. Central Eur. Agric. 2002, 3, 137–148. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yu, J.-Z.; Chen, B.-H. Effect of concealment and rearing density on the development and survival of Lemnia biplagiata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J. Agric. Res. China 2001, 50, 68–74. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. Shands, W.A.; Shands, M.K.; Simpson, G.W. Techniques for mass-producing Coccinella septempunctata. J. Econ. Entomol. 1966, 59, 1022–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ito, K. A simple mass-rearing method for predaceous Orius bugs in the laboratory. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2007, 42, 573–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Riddick, E.W.; Wu, Z. Does a change from whole to powdered food (Artemia franciscana eggs) increase oviposition in the ladybird Coleomegilla maculata? Insects 2015, 6, 815–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zar, J.H. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  35. Dixon, A.F.G. Insect Predator-Prey Dynamics: Ladybird Beetles and Biological Control; Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  36. Riddick, E.W.; Wu, Z.; Jamie Whitten Delta States Research Center, ARS-USDA, Stoneville, MS, USA. Unpublished data. 2015.
  37. De Clercq, P.; Bonte, M.; van Speybroeck, K.; Bolckmans, K.; Deforce, K. Development and reproduction of Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on eggs of Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae) and pollen. Pest Manage. Sci. 2005, 61, 1129–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nordlund, D. Capacity and quality: Keys to success in the mass rearing of biological control agents. Nat. Enemies Ins. 1998, 20, 169–179. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Riddick, E.W.; Wu, Z. Effects of Rearing Density on Survival, Growth, and Development of the Ladybird Coleomegilla maculata in Culture. Insects 2015, 6, 858-868. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects6040858

AMA Style

Riddick EW, Wu Z. Effects of Rearing Density on Survival, Growth, and Development of the Ladybird Coleomegilla maculata in Culture. Insects. 2015; 6(4):858-868. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects6040858

Chicago/Turabian Style

Riddick, Eric W., and Zhixin Wu. 2015. "Effects of Rearing Density on Survival, Growth, and Development of the Ladybird Coleomegilla maculata in Culture" Insects 6, no. 4: 858-868. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects6040858

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop