Next Article in Journal
Considerations of Control Groups: Comparing Active-Control with No Treatment for Examining the Effects of Brief Intervention
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional Considerations for Para-Cycling Athletes: A Narrative Review
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Slow and Steady, or Hard and Fast? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Body Composition Changes between Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training

Sports 2021, 9(11), 155; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports9110155
by James Steele 1, Daniel Plotkin 2, Derrick Van Every 2, Avery Rosa 2, Hugo Zambrano 2, Benjiman Mendelovits 2, Mariella Carrasquillo-Mercado 2, Jozo Grgic 3 and Brad J. Schoenfeld 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sports 2021, 9(11), 155; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports9110155
Submission received: 26 October 2021 / Revised: 8 November 2021 / Accepted: 12 November 2021 / Published: 18 November 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I would like to express my compliments to the authors for this huge  work, I just have a few suggestions.

To better understand the changhes observed in body composition I would add a table showing the percentage of  methods used to detect it. For examble: in how many of the studied works was used BIA, or skifold etc.

As the studies included in the review are heterogeneous I would have expressed the variations in body composition in percentage.  I also suggest to use Fat Free Mass (FFM) instead of lean mass.

 

Author Response

I would like to express my compliments to the authors for this huge  work, I just have a few suggestions.
AUTHOR RESPONSE: Thank you very much for reviewing our manuscript. We appreciated the positive feedback, and have addressed your comments on a point-by-point basis below.


To better understand the changes observed in body composition I would add a table showing the percentage of  methods used to detect it. For examble: in how many of the studied works was used BIA, or skinfold etc.
AUTHOR RESPONSE: Good suggestion, we have added a column to Table 1 that lists the body composition measurement method for each study.


As the studies included in the review are heterogeneous I would have expressed the variations in body composition in percentage.  I also suggest to use Fat Free Mass (FFM) instead of lean mass.
AUTHOR RESPONSE: As per your suggestion, we have changed “lean mass” to FFM throughout the manuscript

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Excellent work. Just Minor corrections should be done, as well as:

 - P7, R 264: ...trunk),  and....... - extra tab which should be deleted. 

 - P19, R 420 - 429: Font number is smaller than in the rest of the text. Please, do proper corrections.

 - P19, R 432 - 433: (IT, median = 28 mins [range = 3 mins to 120 mins]; MICT, median = 120 mins [range = 48 to 250]) - Here it is necessary to emphasize exercise training period i.e. duration (on average and overall range of time) those body mass changes are.

 - P21, R 523: Diseased population - is when someone is not healthy, i.e. when he is sick or infectiously ill. It is better to change this into: even in a population with non-communicable diseases and other health risks.....

  • P22, R 598 - ...: For some references, the title of the reference is written with a capital letter for each word (4, 6, 11 ......), and for some with a lower case letter (1, 2, 3, 5,....). It is necessary to unify it in accordance with the technical requirement.

Anyway, congratulations.

Best.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Excellent work. Just Minor corrections should be done, as well as:

AUTHOR RESPONSE: Thank you very much for reviewing our paper, and for the positive feedback. We have addressed your comments on a point-by-point basis, hopefully to your satisfaction.

 - P7, R 264: ...trunk),  and....... - extra tab which should be deleted. 

AUTHOR RESPONSE: Good catch. We revised accordingly.

 - P19, R 420 - 429: Font number is smaller than in the rest of the text. Please, do proper corrections.

AUTHOR RESPONSE: We have revised so that the fonts are consistent.

 - P19, R 432 - 433: (IT, median = 28 mins [range = 3 mins to 120 mins]; MICT, median = 120 mins [range = 48 to 250]) - Here it is necessary to emphasize exercise training period i.e. duration (on average and overall range of time) those body mass changes are.

AUTHOR RESPONSE: We have revised to indicate this refers to duration

 - P21, R 523: Diseased population - is when someone is not healthy, i.e. when he is sick or infectiously ill. It is better to change this into: even in a population with non-communicable diseases and other health risks.....

AUTHOR RESPONSE: We have revised as per your suggestion.

- P22, R 598 - ...: For some references, the title of the reference is written with a capital letter for each word (4, 6, 11 ......), and for some with a lower case letter (1, 2, 3, 5,....). It is necessary to unify it in accordance with the technical requirement.

AUTHOR RESPONSE: Thanks for noting this issue. We have gone through the bibliography and revised so that the cases are consistent across citations.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop