1. Introduction
The rise of the gig economy characterized by short-term contracts, freelancing, online platforms, and digital labor is reshaping household labor dynamics across the globe. In South Asia, where traditional gender roles have historically been rigid and patriarchal, the transformation of labor through digital platforms has led to significant shifts in domestic and economic responsibilities within families [
1,
2]. Increasing female participation in online freelance markets, education technology, ride-sharing services, and home-based entrepreneurship has challenged traditional norms that confined women to unpaid domestic labor and men to sole breadwinning [
3,
4].
This economic shift is not only empowering women economically but is also encouraging men to engage more in caregiving and household responsibilities, a phenomenon known as gender role reversal [
5]. This reversal, which is particularly visible in gig economy households, signals an evolving form of work–family balance, in which time use patterns, digital access, and flexible work schedules intersect with deeply embedded cultural norms [
6]. However, this change does not occur in a vacuum; it is mediated by socioeconomic factors, educational backgrounds, digital access, household income, and prevailing gender attitudes.
While gender role shifts in Western societies have been well documented, quantitative sociological research in South Asia, particularly in Pakistan, remains limited. Given the rapid expansion of digital freelancing and gig-based work in urban and semi-urban Pakistani settings, understanding how these changes affect household structures is both timely and critical.
In Pakistan, cities like Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad, and Peshawar have emerged as digital labor hubs, thanks to rising mobile internet penetration, youth-led freelancing, and platforms like Upwork, Fiverr, Daraz, and Bykea. However, these gig opportunities are often pursued due to economic compulsion rather than choice.
In Lahore, for instance, where this study is based, the confluence of economic pressures, high youth unemployment, and growing digital literacy has contributed to an increase in households in which both spouses engage in gig work [
7]. In middle- and lower–middle-income families, men now often stay at home between gigs or after losing employment, while women contribute significantly through online education, stitching, e-commerce, or tutoring. This scenario presents a live laboratory for studying time use shifts, income redistribution, and attitudinal changes related to gender roles within the household.
However, these changes are met with cultural resistance. Traditional family systems in Punjab are slow to adapt to role fluidity, and such shifts are often hidden or stigmatized. Therefore, capturing quantitative evidence on role reversal, income dynamics, and gender-based time use will offer empirical insight into this emergent transformation.
Despite the rise of the gig economy, there remains a significant gap in empirical research that quantitatively examines its impact on intra-household gender dynamics in South Asia, particularly in Pakistan. The absence of detailed household-level data on time use patterns, labor force participation, and gender role attitudes hampers a comprehensive understanding of how digital labor is transforming traditional family structures [
8]. This study aims to address this gap by conducting a quantitative analysis of gender role reversal through household time use surveys. It further explores how participation in the gig economy, access to digital tools, and shifts in income distribution are challenging conventional gender norms. Additionally, the research investigates the intersection of class, culture, and work to reveal the complex realities of evolving gender roles in Pakistani households.
This study is driven by three core motivations. First, Pakistan is undergoing a rapid economic transformation through digitalization, with over four million freelancers and increasing online job opportunities, making the gig economy a socially significant phenomenon. Second, women’s growing participation in gig work is not only contributing economically but also reshaping household power dynamics and challenging traditional gender identities. Third, there is a critical policy gap—limited data and research on domestic role changes have left policymakers, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and digital platforms unprepared to address the evolving needs of gig-working families.
The study’s uniqueness lies in its quantitative sociological approach, being one of the first in Pakistan to examine gender role reversal on household time use data. By focusing specifically on gig-working couples, it offers a micro-level view of both economic and social transformation. Moreover, it contextualizes these changes within South Asian cultural frameworks, considering variables such as family honor, male breadwinning expectations, and digital literacy.
This research contributes significantly to the academic and policy landscape. It presents a sociological model illustrating how gig economy participation disrupts traditional household gender roles. It also delivers evidence-based recommendations for building gender-sensitive gig ecosystems. Additionally, it expands the understanding of digital labor’s influence on family life, enriching the literature on the sociology of work, gender studies, and family sociology, particularly in the Global South. Lastly, it lays the groundwork for comparative research across South Asian countries, including India, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka.
Objectives of the Study
To examine how participation in the gig economy reshapes household dynamics through time allocation, digital access, and income contribution between men and women;
To analyze the impact of women’s gig work participation on intra-household decision making, power relations, and shifts in gender ideology;
To assess the predictive strength of gig economy-related factors (time use, digital access, income share, and gender attitudes) in facilitating or resisting gender role reversal.
4. Results
Table 3 examines the relationship between male gig work hours and female gig status in predicting the male partner’s involvement in domestic labor. This was tested using a multiple regression analysis, and the results are presented in
Table 3. The model produced a statistically significant regression equation with an F-value of 12.65 (df = 2, 397,
p < 0.001), indicating that the model as a whole was effective in explaining variance in male domestic labor involvement. The R-squared (R
2) value of 0.41 suggests that approximately 41% of the variance in male partners’ time spent on household tasks is explained by the two predictor variables. The adjusted R
2 of 0.39 further confirms the model’s robustness after adjusting for the number of predictors.
Looking at the individual predictors, male gig work hours had a positive and statistically significant impact on male domestic labor involvement, with an unstandardized coefficient (B) of 0.52, standard error of 0.09, and a standardized beta (β) of 0.47. The corresponding t-value of 5.78 and p-value < 0.001 indicate a strong and reliable association. This means that for every additional hour worked in the gig economy, male partners were predicted to increase their domestic labor contribution by 0.52 units, supporting the hypothesis that greater gig engagement leads to a more equitable sharing of household tasks.
Similarly, the female gig status variable (coded as 1 = Yes) was also a significant positive predictor, with a B value of 0.86, standard error of 0.27, β = 0.31, and t = 3.19 (p = 0.001). This implies that when a female partner is also engaged in gig work, her male counterpart is predicted to contribute 0.86 units more to domestic tasks, compared to when the female is not in the gig economy. This supports the idea that dual gig participation fosters shared responsibilities in the household.
Overall, the findings from
Table 3 illustrate that both increased male gig work hours and female gig participation are significantly associated with the greater involvement of male partners in household labor. These results provide empirical evidence for shifting gender roles in gig-working households, with implications for promoting gender equity in domestic responsibilities.
From a theoretical perspective, the results align with role expansion theory, which suggests that engagement in multiple roles (such as gig work and household work) can lead to positive spillover effects. Specifically, male gig work hours had a positive and statistically significant impact (B = 0.52, β = 0.47, p < 0.001), supporting the idea that as men diversify their work roles, they also increase their domestic engagement. Similarly, female gig status was a significant predictor (B = 0.86, β = 0.31, p = 0.001). This finding reflects the Negotiation/Resource Bargaining Model, in which women’s economic participation leads to a renegotiation of household responsibilities, prompting men to contribute to more domestic tasks. These results provide empirical support for the claim that gig work fosters more equitable role sharing.
Moreover, the study assesses whether digital access influences perceptions of changed gender roles, particularly whether increased digital literacy and access to devices shift household perceptions toward gender role reversal. The data were analyzed using a Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis, as shown in
Table 4.
Starting with the correlation analysis, both independent variables (digital literacy score and the number of devices in the household) demonstrated statistically significant positive correlations with the perceived role reversal. Specifically, the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) for digital literacy score was 0.45 (p < 0.01), indicating a moderate positive relationship. This suggests that as individuals’ digital skills increase, their perceptions of gender roles become more flexible or reversed. Similarly, the number of devices in the household had a Pearson r of 0.37 (p < 0.01), which is also a moderate positive correlation. This means that greater access to digital technology in the household is associated with stronger perceptions of shifting traditional gender roles.
Moving to the multiple regression analysis, the model was statistically significant, with an F-statistic of 8.77 (df = 2, 397, p < 0.001), indicating that the model as a whole reliably predicts perceived gender role reversal based on the two digital access variables. The R2 value of 0.29 shows that about 29% of the variance in perceptions of changed gender roles is explained by digital literacy and the number of devices. The adjusted R2 score of 0.27 reflects the model’s stability after accounting for the number of predictors.
Individually, both predictors had significant effects. The digital literacy score had an unstandardized coefficient (B) of 0.41, a standard error reflected in a t-value of 6.23, and a standardized coefficient (β) of 0.39, with a p-value < 0.001. This means that for every one-unit increase in digital literacy, there is a 0.41-unit increase in the perception of gender role reversal, demonstrating a meaningful influence. Similarly, the number of devices had a B value of 0.33, β = 0.31, t = 5.48, and p < 0.001, suggesting that each additional device in the home increases perceived gender role changes by 0.33 units.
In conclusion, the results of
Table 4 provide empirical evidence that greater digital access—both in terms of skills and device availability—significantly predicts the perception of changing or reversing gender roles in gig-working households. These findings highlight the transformative role of digital inclusion in shaping evolving gender dynamics within the domestic sphere.
These findings resonate with gender structure theory, which posits that structural opportunities (like technology access) can reshape social practices and ideologies. Higher digital literacy and wider access to devices empower both men and women to renegotiate traditional household roles, thereby supporting the idea that structural resources underpin role transformation.
In addition, the study analyzes how women’s income contribution affects their intra-household decision-making authority. To assess this, an ordinal logistic regression was employed since the dependent variable decision-making power was measured on an ordinal scale (e.g., low, moderate, and high authority).
Table 5 presents the outcomes of this model, providing valuable insights into how economic participation shapes women’s empowerment in household dynamics.
The regression model was statistically significant overall, as evidenced by the model fit summary. The Chi-square test value was 18.25 with two degrees of freedom and a p-value less than 0.001, confirming that the model significantly predicts decision-making authority better than a model with no predictors. Furthermore, the Nagelkerke R2 value of 0.32 suggests that approximately 32% of the variation in women’s decision-making power can be explained by the following two predictors: women’s income contribution (%) and female employment status.
Turning to the individual predictors, women’s income contribution (%) had a B coefficient of 0.87, with a standard error (SE) of 0.24, a Wald Chi-square value of 13.18, and a p-value < 0.001. This result is statistically significant and implies that a higher income contribution by women significantly increases their decision-making power in the household. The odds ratio (Exp(B)) is 2.38, indicating that for every one-unit increase in income contribution (e.g., a 10% increase), the odds of being in a higher category of decision-making power increase by 2.38 times, holding employment status constant. This strongly supports the hypothesis that economic input strengthens women’s bargaining position at home, directly addressing Objective 3.
Similarly, female employment status (coded as 1 = employed and 0 = not employed) also showed a significant impact. The B value was 1.11, with an SE of 0.37, a Wald χ2 of 9.01, and a p-value of 0.003, confirming statistical significance. The Exp(B) value of 3.03 suggests that employed women are three times more likely to have higher decision-making power compared to non-employed women. This reinforces the idea that participation in the labor force not only contributes to household income but also elevates women’s authority in family matters, further fulfilling the objective.
In conclusion, the results from
Table 5 demonstrate that both income level and employment status significantly enhance women’s decision-making power within the household. These findings highlight the empowering effect of financial independence and labor market engagement for women in gig economy settings.
These results directly reflect the negotiation model, which emphasizes that bargaining power within households is shaped by resource control. As women increase their income contribution or employment participation, their authority in decision making increases correspondingly, thus empirically validating the theory.
In addition, we examine how gender attitudes and education influence the acceptance of role reversal in the context of gender roles, particularly within households and the labor market. To address this, both ANOVA (analysis of variance) and Chi-square tests were applied to evaluate the association between gender attitudes, educational attainment, socioeconomic status, and the dependent variable: acceptance of role reversal. The results in
Table 6 present statistically significant findings that strongly support this objective.
Firstly, the gender role ideology score was analyzed using an ANOVA, producing a statistically significant F-value of 9.53 with a p-value of <0.001. This indicates that there are significant differences in acceptance of role reversal across different levels of gender ideology. The effect size (η2 = 0.11) suggests a moderate practical impact, meaning that as individuals hold more egalitarian gender views, they are more likely to accept changes in traditional gender roles. These results show that ideological orientation is a key determinant of role reversal acceptance.
Secondly, the education level (categorized as having Bachelor’s, Master’s, or PhD degrees) was analyzed using a Chi-square test, which yielded a χ2 value of 14.82 with a Cramér’s V of 0.28 and a p-value < 0.001. This result is statistically significant and reflects a strong association between educational attainment and acceptance of role reversal. A Cramér’s V of 0.28 indicates a moderate-to-strong relationship, suggesting that higher educational attainment correlates with more progressive views on gender dynamics. Educated individuals are thus more likely to support shifting gender roles, affirming the role of formal education as a catalyst for attitudinal change—an important component of the study’s fourth objective.
Lastly, socioeconomic status (classified as low, middle, and high) was also assessed via a Chi-square test, yielding a χ2 value of 11.07, Cramér’s V of 0.22, and a p-value of 0.004. This result is also statistically significant, with a moderate effect size. It shows that individuals from higher socioeconomic backgrounds are more accepting of role reversal compared to those from lower economic strata. This suggests that economic security may encourage greater openness to non-traditional roles, potentially due to better exposure to modern, equitable gender norms. These results provide empirical support for the claim that class and material resources shape social attitudes toward gender roles.
In conclusion, the findings in
Table 6 provide strong, statistically significant evidence that gender attitudes, education, and socioeconomic status meaningfully influence the acceptance of gender role reversal. Each independent variable contributes to explaining the social and cultural foundations of gender perception change.
Theoretically, these findings extend gender structure theory, suggesting that ideology, education, and class position provide structural foundations for shifting role acceptance. Higher educational attainment and class status not only expose individuals to progressive norms but also create an enabling environment for role renegotiation.
The results presented in
Table 7 aimed to build a comprehensive predictive model for role reversal. The analysis was conducted using a hierarchical multiple regression, in which variables were added in blocks to assess their individual and cumulative contributions to predicting the Composite Role Reversal Index.
In the first model, age and marital duration were included as control variables. These accounted for 12% of the variance (ΔR2 = 0.12) in the Role Reversal Index, with an F-change of 7.53 and a p-value of less than 0.001, indicating statistical significance. This suggests that demographic characteristics such as age and the duration of marriage have a meaningful influence on the acceptance or practice of role reversal, possibly because younger or newly married couples may be more flexible in redefining gender roles.
When gig work status for both partners was added in the second model, the explained variance increased by an additional 18% (ΔR2 = 0.18), with an F-change of 9.21 (p < 0.001). This result underscores the significant role that non-traditional employment structures play in challenging conventional gender norms. Couples engaged in freelance or gig economy work may be more likely to adopt shared responsibilities and non-traditional roles due to flexible working conditions and the shifting nature of income generation.
In the third block, digital access indicators were introduced, explaining a further 14% of the variance (ΔR2 = 0.14; F-change = 8.64, p < 0.001). This highlights the impact of technological exposure on household dynamics. Access to the internet, smartphones, and digital literacy likely facilitates greater awareness of gender equality, supports remote work, and enables women’s empowerment through information access and skill development. These factors contribute to a shift in traditional roles and enhance couples’ capacity for shared decision making.
In the final model, gender ideology and education level were added, resulting in the highest change in explained variance (ΔR2 = 0.24), with an F-change of 11.93 (p < 0.001). These variables emerged as the strongest predictors of role reversal. Households with egalitarian gender attitudes and higher levels of educational attainment are significantly more likely to challenge and move beyond rigid gender roles. This finding emphasizes that role reversal is driven not only by economic or technological factors but also by shifts in values and cognitive frameworks.
The final model showed a total R2 of 0.68 and an adjusted R2 of 0.66, indicating that the full set of predictors explains 68% of the variance in the Role Reversal Index. This reflects a robust model fit and confirms that a combination of demographic, occupational, technological, and ideological factors serve as a reliable predictor of gender role redefinition. The findings validate the objective by demonstrating how multiple, interconnected variables can collectively shape contemporary attitudes and behaviors toward role reversal.
This incremental contribution across models strongly supports role expansion theory—demonstrating how multiple overlapping roles (economic, digital, and ideological) collectively drive greater role reversal. Importantly, the finding that ideology and education were the strongest predictors underscores that while structural and economic factors initiate change, sustained transformation depends on shifts in values.
The results in
Table 8 present an integrated analysis using structural equation modeling (SEM) to assess the interrelationships among core constructs relevant to all five study objectives. SEM enables the simultaneous evaluation of multiple dependent and independent variables, allowing for a holistic understanding of how gig work, digital access, economic participation, household labor division, decision making, and gender ideology interact in shaping role reversal within households. Each path coefficient, critical ratio (CR), and significance value directly inform the achievement of the study’s objectives.
The first path demonstrates that gig work participation significantly predicts digital access, with a standardized estimate (β) of 0.71, a standard error (SE) of 0.06, and a critical ratio (CR) of 11.83, which is statistically significant at p < 0.001. This finding confirms that engagement in the gig economy encourages greater access to digital tools and platforms to examine the relationship between gig work and digital inclusion. The high β value implies that as individuals participate more in gig work, their use and integration of digital technologies increases, likely due to the tech-driven nature of such employment.
The second path shows a significant positive relationship between digital access and time use redistribution in household labor, with β = 0.62, SE = 0.07, and CR = 8.86 (p < 0.001). This indicates that digital connectivity promotes the more equitable sharing of domestic responsibilities. Digital tools may facilitate flexible work arrangements, time management, or access to supportive content, contributing to a shift in traditional household roles.
In the third path, gig work participation directly enhances income contribution by women, with a β of 0.68, SE of 0.05, and CR of 13.60 (p < 0.001). This pathway directly supports and empirically confirms that women involved in gig work substantially contribute to household income, thus increasing their economic agency. The high CR value also underscores the strength and stability of this relationship.
The fourth path reflects that women’s income contribution significantly increases their intra-household decision-making power, with β = 0.57, SE = 0.06, and CR = 9.50 (p < 0.001). This finding suggests that financial participation transforms women’s bargaining position within the family, leading to greater involvement in important decisions, whether related to finances, children, or long-term planning.
In the fifth direct path, intra-household decision-making power leads to a shift in gender ideology toward egalitarianism, with β = 0.66, SE = 0.08, and CR = 8.25 (p < 0.001). This finding shows that empowerment in decision-making roles can catalyze broader ideological change in gender perceptions and expectations. As families experience balanced power dynamics, traditional patriarchal attitudes may weaken, and more equitable values emerge.
The indirect effect from gig work participation to gender ideology, mediated by digital access, income contribution, and decision-making power, is also significant (β = 0.39, p < 0.001). This indirect path further reinforces the integrated nature of these constructs and highlights how gig work catalyzes a chain of empowerment leading to ideological transformation. Thus, this mediational process ties together all five objectives within a cohesive explanatory framework.
The measurement model fit indices confirm the robustness and validity of the SEM model. The Chi-square/df ratio is 1.95, which is well below the threshold of 3, indicating a good model fit. The CFI (0.95) and TLI (0.94) both exceed the acceptable level of 0.90, suggesting that the model explains the data well relative to a null model. Furthermore, the RMSEA value of 0.045 and SRMR value of 0.041 are below their respective thresholds (<0.06 and <0.08), indicating excellent residual fit and model accuracy.
In summary, the SEM analysis provides comprehensive empirical evidence supporting all five objectives. Each construct’s path is statistically significant and theoretically meaningful, and the excellent model fit statistics reinforce the reliability of these results. The interconnected nature of gig work, digital access, economic participation, domestic labor sharing, and shifting gender ideologies illustrates a transformative process of role reversal occurring within modern households.
These SEM findings provide a holistic link between theory and results. Gig work expands roles (role expansion theory), enhances women’s bargaining power (negotiation model), and transforms ideology (gender structure theory). Together, they demonstrate a comprehensive pathway of role reversal, by which structural opportunities, resource bargaining, and value shifts converge to reshape gender relations in gig-working households.
5. Discussion
The results show that increased participation in gig work by both male and female partners lead to a more equitable division of domestic labor. Specifically, when male partners engage more in gig work and when their female partners also participate in gig-based employment, there is a noticeable rise in the male partner’s involvement in household tasks. This aligns with the findings of Banerjee, Bharati [
49], who found that flexible work arrangements, such as gig work, often lead to a renegotiation of domestic responsibilities. Similarly, Craig and Mullan [
50] argue that non-standard work schedules allow men to assume a greater share of housework, especially in dual-earner households.
Moreover, the concept of “role expansion” as introduced by Kayaalp, Page [
51] suggests that multiple roles (e.g., gig worker and household contributor) can be mutually enriching rather than conflicting. This study provides additional support for this theory within the context of the gig economy, further emphasizing the adaptive nature of gender roles in contemporary labor settings.
This study also reveals that increased digital literacy and access to digital devices positively shape perceptions toward the reversal of traditional gender roles. Digital tools appear to not only facilitate remote or flexible work but also expand exposure to progressive ideologies, enabling shifts in domestic expectations.
These findings are in line with those of Wajcman, Young [
52], who assert that technology acts as a transformative force in gender relations, especially when it enhances autonomy and communication. Similarly, Antonites [
53] emphasizes the role of digital inclusion in empowering women and reshaping household dynamics through increased access to resources, networks, and knowledge.
The analysis demonstrates that women’s contribution to household income and their employment status significantly enhance their decision-making authority within the family. This supports the bargaining model of intra-household allocation [
54,
55], which posits that economic contributions strengthen an individual’s bargaining position in household decision making.
Previous research by Kabeer [
56], Doss, Kim [
57], and Fertő, Bojnec [
58,
59] also supports these findings, indicating that women who control economic resources tend to have greater influence in household matters ranging from spending priorities to education and health decisions. The study results reinforce this perspective, showing that gig economy income is a valid and empowering economic resource.
Findings indicate that egalitarian gender attitudes, higher educational attainment, and improved socioeconomic standing are all positively associated with an acceptance of gender role reversal. These findings resonate with those of Inglehart and Norris [
60], who demonstrated that societal modernization particularly through education leads to more liberal gender attitudes.
Furthermore, Kabeer [
61] emphasizes the importance of structural and ideological factors, such as education and class, in shaping gender perceptions and enhancing women’s agency. This study provides fresh empirical evidence in support of this claim, specifically in the context of gig-working households in a developing country.
The integrated regression model suggests that demographic factors, gig economy participation, digital access, education, and gender ideology collectively shape the adoption of non-traditional gender roles. This comprehensive, multi-layered analysis is consistent with Lombardo, Meier [
62]’s gender structure theory, which posits that individual agency, interactional practices, and institutional structures all interact to reproduce or transform gender norms.
The hierarchical nature of the regression model used in our study illustrates this interaction well, showcasing how multiple variables collectively predict role reversal behavior. It also aligns with findings from Messerschmidt and Bridges [
63] on gender and power, which underscores the interdependence of structure and agency in gender transformation.
The SEM analysis captures the interrelated pathways between gig work, digital access, economic empowerment, decision making, and ideology. The mediational effect of digital and economic empowerment in reshaping gender ideologies is particularly noteworthy. This mirrors findings by Kabeer and Natali [
64], who discuss the “empowerment chain” in which access to economic opportunities and information leads to transformative changes in gender relations.
Additionally, our use of SEM to demonstrate indirect effects offers a deeper understanding of causality than traditional models allow. Such integration of variables in a single analytical framework is rare in the gender and gig economy literature, marking a methodological contribution to the field.
While numerous previous studies have examined individual aspects of gender dynamics such as time use patterns, access to digital technology, or women’s economic empowerment, this research stands out by integrating these dimensions into a unified and coherent framework. It simultaneously addresses multiple interrelated variables, offering a more comprehensive understanding of shifting gender roles in the context of gig work. The findings affirm key conclusions from earlier work, notably the positive influence of economic and digital empowerment on gender equality, and support established theoretical models like the bargaining framework and gender structure theory.
What sets this study apart, however, is its contextual and methodological innovation. Rooted in the realities of the gig economy within a developing country (Pakistan), it addresses a critical gap in the literature, which is largely informed by Western-centric perspectives. Methodologically, the use of multiple advanced statistical tools such as a regression analysis, ANOVA, ordinal logistic regression, and structural equation modeling (SEM) enhances the analytical depth and provides a holistic view of the dynamic interplay between work, technology, and gender roles. Theoretically, the study extends beyond isolated frameworks to create an integrated model that draws from role expansion theory, digital feminism, and gender structure theory, contributing to a richer conceptual discourse. Moreover, the study has strong policy relevance as it demonstrates how digital inclusion and flexible work opportunities through gig platforms can serve as transformative pathways for achieving gender equity. This has significant implications for labor policy reform, digital infrastructure development, and broader socioeconomic planning in similar contexts.