Next Article in Journal
Fatigue Property and Improvement of a Rounded Welding Region between the Diaphragm Plate and Closed Rib of an Orthotropic Steel Bridge Deck
Previous Article in Journal
Leaching of Silver and Gold Contained in a Sedimentary Ore, Using Sodium Thiosulfate; A Preliminary Kinetic Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Precipitation of M23C6 Secondary Carbide Particles in Fe-Cr-Mn-C Alloy during Heat Treatment Process

by
Nguyen Thi Hoang Oanh
and
Nguyen Hoang Viet
*
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2020, 10(2), 157; https://doi.org/10.3390/met10020157
Submission received: 13 December 2019 / Revised: 15 January 2020 / Accepted: 18 January 2020 / Published: 21 January 2020

Abstract

:
The initial as-cast microstructure of high-chromium white cast iron (2.08% C, 12.1% Cr), including austenitic dendrites in a matrix of a eutectic mixture of austenite and M7C3 carbides. Heat treatment of as-cast iron leads to a transformation of the matrix from austenite to martensite phase. The secondary M23C6 carbide precipitated from matrix improving the hardness of sample from 48 HRC to 62 HRC. JMatPro simulations of volume fraction phase for Fe-C-Cr-Mn alloy shows M7C3 and austenite phases are stable at austenitization temperature (1000 °C). Eutectic carbide of M7C3 is a stable phase in the alloy which is undissolved in the matrix during the heat treatment process. The HR-TEM images of heat-treated sample revealed that both eutectic M7C3 carbide and ultrafine secondary M23C6 carbide particles distributed on the martensite matrix.

1. Introduction

High Cr white cast iron (HCCI) alloys containing chromium between 12 and 30% have a good abrasion resistance which is widely used in wear applications, such as mineral processing, cement production and steel manufacturing industries [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The abrasion resistance of HCCI alloys is about 20–25 times better than low carbon steels, due to the distribution of carbide phases on the matrix [2,7]. The production of HCCI alloys in the as-cast state consisted of primary austenite dendrites and a eutectic mixture of M7C3/austenite. A coarse carbide phase network formed directly from liquid solution leads to poor fracture properties and relatively high wear rate [8,9]. Moreover, this network is very stable and unaffected by the heat treatment (HT) process. Therefore, the mechanical properties of as-cast irons can be enhanced by using a suitable HT method, such as destabilization and then sub-critical. In the destabilization HT process, secondary carbide phases are precipitated at low austenitization temperature, causing a reduction in carbon and chromium content results in a diffusionless transformation phase from austenite to martensite. Martensite phase is considered as an advantageous effect on the wear resistance, while the pearlite and ferrite phases reduce abrasion resistance [10,11]. The main disadvantage of martensite is that it is very brittle. A sub-critical HT is useful to reduce the retained austenite and reinforce martensite matrix by precipitation of considerable secondary carbides [12]. The sub-critical temperature is relatively low temperature can avoid distortion and fissuring the cast sample [5]. As a result, the toughness is improved because of the strain stress release in martensite during sub-critical, and the hardness can be increased by secondary carbide precipitation hardening. That is a good combination of toughness and strength can be obtained for HCCI [9]. The formation and structure characterization of secondary carbide M23C6 in HCCI has attracted the attention of scientists. Qiang Liu reported that in HCCI alloys, containing 15–20% Cr the secondary carbides are M7C3 type, with higher Cr content of 25–30%, they are M23C6 type [13]. Shengqiang Ma and et al. observed only M7C3 carbide after casting when studying with 20Cr-4C composition [14]. K.Wieczerak and et al. investigated that an in-situ transformation in eutectic carbides from hexagonal M7C3 to cubic M23C6 after heating in the rapidly solidified hypoeutectic Fe-Cr-C alloy with a composition of 25Cr-0.8C [15]. J.Wang and et al. heated as-cast sample at 1000 °C for 0.5 h and then air-cooled to room temperature and found that there are two types of M23C6 with the size of 200nm, including cubic morphology with a special relative to the matrix and another has grainy morphology with no specific orientation in 16.38Cr-2.77C alloy [12]. A. Wiengmoon reported that a mixture of M7C3 type and M23C6 type carbides exist after heat treatment in the case of 2.7C-16Cr and 2.7C-26.6Cr composition [2]. The sizes of secondary carbides vary from 0.2–0.6 µm and distribution being influenced by prior annealing and destabilization conditions. C.P. Tabrett and I.R. Sare destabilized a 14.8Cr-3.08C HCCI alloy at 1100 °C, then cooled to various sub-ambient temperatures [16]. The matrix of the destabilized alloy contained a significant amount of secondary carbides, which were unpresented in the as-cast structure. Xiaoshuai Jia et al. applied a multicycle quenching-partitioning-tempering process and found only M7C3 carbide formed during the casting process of HCCI alloy with composition 12Cr-2.4C [5]. With reducing the Cr content to 12% Cr, it is not easy to get secondary carbide phase after the heat treatment process.
In this work, the combination of theory calculation by JMatPro is applied for Fe-12Cr-2.08C alloy to give suitable heat treatment parameters to improve the properties of the alloy. The formation of ultrafine secondary carbide M23C6 particles and matrix phase transformation into martensite is characterized by different microscopy methods.

2. Materials and Methods

HCCI alloy was cast from 1460 °C by using bentonite sand mold. The chemical composition of the alloy is produced under the specification for class II and type A followed the A 532M standard [17], as given in Table 1. Continuous cooling transformation (CCT) diagram for the alloy using JMatPro simulation was presented in Figure 1. The ingots subjected to destabilizing treatment, namely, austenitization in two step heating to 700 °C for 2 h and then continuing heating to 1000 °C for 2 h and finally forced-air cooling in 8 min. The tempering process was done at 250 °C for 2.5 h and air cooled [18].
The samples were ground on silicon carbide papers to 800 grits and then polished by 1 µm diamond paste. The etchant used was 10% HCl and 90% methanol for about 40 s swept on the polished surface of the sample for optical microscopy (Leica DM4000M, Solms, Germany). To extract the carbides from HCCI alloy, samples need to etch deeply and longer time of 48 h for field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM-JEOL JSM-7600F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM-JEOL JEM-2100, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used for characterization of secondary carbide M23C6. The phase transformation of the as-cast sample was determined by the NETZSCH STA 449 C (Netzsch, Selb, Germany) using differential thermal analysis (DTA) mode with a heating rate of 10 K/min under constant Ar gas flow to compare with the JMatPro result.
The thermodynamic modeling for the equilibrium and phase relationships, austenite composition at quenching temperature for HCCI alloy were simulated using JmatPro software [19,20], (Java-based Materials Property simulation software, version 7.0.0) (Sente Software Ltd., Surrey Technology Center, 40 Occam Road, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7YG, UK).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows thermodynamic simulation for Fe-12Cr-2.08C alloy. The calculation was performed in order to predict phase compositions in the equilibrium state using JMatPro software [19]. The crystallization of alloy starts at 1352 °C with the precipitation of austenite from the liquid in the temperature range of 1249 °C–777 °C, the rest of the liquid crystallizes in line with the eutectic reaction of “L → Austenite + M7C3”. The maximum eutectic carbide M7C3 is about 23.9 vol.%. The phase transformation of austenite (BCC) to ferrite (FCC) below 776 °C leads to decrease density value. It is well known that the solubility of carbon in the FCC crystal structure is much greater than in BCC, as well as that the diffusivity of both substitutional and interstitial atoms also changes substantially [21]. Consequently, this kind of transformation significantly affects the kinetics of the diffusion-controlled processes in the alloy, e.g., homogenization, in-situ carbides transformation, etc. Upon completion of the reaction, the alloy contains 83.5% for austenite and 16.5% for the M7C3 carbide. When the temperature is below 180 °C, the residual austenite phase together with a small amount of M23C6 carbide appeared. Furthermore, the presented content of M7C3 and austenite are stable at austenitization temperature (1000 °C). That means carbides of M7C3 did not dissolve in the matrix. The density of alloy also gradually increases when the phase transformation of liquid to austenite occurred, as seen in Figure 3.
The phase transformation of the as-cast sample with a heating rate of 10 K/min is observed in the DTA curve (Figure 4). There are two thermal events at 680 and 825 °C. The first exotherm peak at 680 °C is related to austenite-ferrite transformation as Y. F. Zhou and et al. mentioned [22]. The second endothermal peak appears corresponding to the solid-state transformation of M7C3 secondary carbide as reported in [23,24]. The JMathPro result (Figure 2) is quite close to the DTA curve. The optical micrographs of cast iron, shown in Figure 5. The solidification process starts with the formation of dendritic austenite and followed by M7C3 formation when the temperature drops to eutectic temperature. This is also entirely consistent with the Fe-Cr-C phase diagram [21]. In HT sample, most of the austenite phase is transferred to the martensite phase. With a high content of carbon and alloy elements, remained austenite phase can avoid perlite formation and reduce the temperature beginning to transfer the martensite phase. The network eutectic carbides are still observed, but the microstructure within the dendrites cannot be distinguished from the as-cast and HT samples. The morphology of the structure of carbides phase can be seen more clearly through SEM images in Figure 6. A strong corrosion solution of 10% volume of HCl with 90% methanol was used for deep etching for 48 h.
The HR-TEM and its selected area diffraction pattern (SADP) confirmed that the matrix phase is martensite (Figure 7b), rod carbides belong to M7C3, and the secondary particles are M23C6 carbides. The secondary carbide of M23C6 in the form of particles is rarely mentioned in HCCI alloy (12% Cr) after HT. TEM micrographs of Fe-Cr-C alloy showing M7C3 eutectic carbide and SADP (in the corner) from the region in this micrograph. The secondary carbide can be precipitated from residual austenite when cooling temperature beginning at 1273 K to room temperature as G.L.F. Powell observed. Austenite phase get transformed into the martensite phase together with the formation of M23C6 carbide particles without orientation with the matrix [25].
Selected points for EDS measurements are marked in Figure 8a and its EDX spectra are shown in Figure 8b. Table 2 shows the compositions of primary M7C3, M23C6 carbides and matrix phase. In spectrum 1, the ratio of chromium and iron atoms to C atoms is 7:3, which agrees with the stoichiometry of M7C3 carbide. The Cr/Fe ratio is near 1, which is in accordance with the (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbide [9]. Compared with primary M7C3 carbide, martensite contains more Fe atoms, but fewer Cr and C atoms as seem in spectrum 3. Results of EDX spectrum analysis of background phase (spectrum 3) show that Fe content is 79.37% atoms. Analysis of EDX spectrum for secondary particles (spectrum 4) shows that the atomic proportions of elements C, Cr and Fe correspond to the phase (Fe,Cr)23C6.
The HT process increased the hardness value of 62 HRC compared to that of the as-cast sample of 48 HRC. This can be explained that matrix transformation from austenite to martensite and the precipitation of secondary carbide particles M23C6 from matrix improve the hardening of HCCI alloy. The fine secondary carbide particles act as obstacles for grain boundary migration during the deformation in working conditions. The distribution of elements in dendrites and eutectic carbides for HT sample can be seen clearly in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images in Figure 9a–e. The carbides in the investigated alloy are enriched in chromium because this element has a greater affinity for carbon than iron. The eutectic carbides are depleted in iron, which is in a good agreement with data in Table 2. Figure 9 also shows that regions surrounding carbides are depleted, mainly in Cr, but enriched in Fe. Furthermore, carbon element distributes rather homogeneous in both martensite matrix and carbides phase. The secondary carbide M23C6 particles are precipitated in the matrix, which is uniform, in order to improve the hardness and toughness of HT sample.
The sequence of carbide formation during crystallization in investigated Fe-Cr-Mn-C alloy could be determined as following: L → γ + M7C3 eutectic reaction (as-cast) → martensite + M7C3 or/and M23C6 eutectic reaction (HT). At the beginning of solidification austenite dendric appeared in liquid at 1352 °C, cooling at a lower temperature the residual liquid transformed to γ + M7C3 by the eutectic reaction. In HT process, while the austenite phase transferred to martensite (a diffusion-less mechanism) resulting in the change of composition in the matrix, M23C6 carbide particles also precipitated.

4. Conclusions

The calculation by JMatPro software shows that the formation of austenite, the eutectic carbide M7C3 and secondary carbides of an as-cast sample. The microstructure of HCCI alloy after HT process shows the continuous eutectic carbides spreading widely throughout the matrix. DTA of as-cast sample shows that there are two exothermal peaks at 680 and 825 °C corresponding to M7C3 phase and ferrite -austenite transformation, respectively. The change of the microstructure of HCCI alloy from the cast state to the HT state can be clearly seen from the electron microscopy image through the bright field. After the HT in addition to the bar-shaped coarse carbide of M7C3, there is also a phase of nanoparticles with the needle-shaped martensite phase matrix. The secondary carbides were characterized by HR-TEM technique. The appearance of a fine carbide phase may increase the abrasion resistance of the martensite matrix, as well as improve the properties of the materials. Analysis of electron diffraction images for background phase results is martensite and nano-sized particles of M23C6 carbide, while coarse carbides are of the same type as M7C3. The matrix hardenability can be improved by the appearance of martensite and secondary carbides M23C6. The hardness of the as-cast sample increase from 48 to 62 HRC after heat treatment.
From theory calculation combines with experiment shows that thermodynamic simulation by JMatPro software can forecast the structure and phase composition of alloys, especially, it can provide recommendation for casting technology or thermal treatment in foundry plants.

Author Contributions

All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript. N.H.V. designed the research, conducted the experiments. N.H.V. and N.T.H.O. wrote the paper and revised the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by the Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 103.02-2017.366.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Nack-Joon Kim, GIFT-POSTECH, Korea for the support of TEM sample preparation and analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tabrett, C.P.; Sare, I.R.; Ghomashchi, M.R. Microstructure-property relationships in high chromium white iron alloys. Int. Mater. Rev. 1996, 41, 59–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wiengmoon, A. Carbides in high chromium cast irons. Naresuan Univ. Eng. J. 2011, 6, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wieczerzak, K.; Bała, P.; Stępień, M.; Cios, G.; Kozieł, T. The characterization of cast Fe-Cr-C alloy. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2015, 60, 779–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Gonzalez-Pociño, A.; Alvarez-Antolin, F.; Asensio-Lozano, J. Influence of thermal parameters related to destabilization treatments on erosive wear resistance and microstructural variation of white cast iron containing 18% Cr. application of design of experiments and rietveld structural analysis. Materials 2019, 12, 3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Jia, X.; Huang, Y.; Zuo, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, N.; Rong, Y. High hardness-toughness and wear resistance of white cast iron treated by a multicycle quenching-partitioning-tempering process. Heat Treat. Surf. Eng. 2019, 1, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Nayak, P.U.; Guitar, A.M.; Mücklich, F. A Comparative study on the influence of chromium on the phase fraction and elemental distribution in as-cast high chromium cast irons: simulation vs. experimentation. Metals 2019, 10, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sapate, S.G.; Rama Rao, A.V. Effect of carbide volume fraction on erosive wear behaviour of hardfacing cast irons. Wear 2004, 256, 774–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fan, C.; Chen, M.-C.; Chang, C.-M.; Wu, W. Microstructure change caused by (Cr,Fe)23C6 carbides in high chromium Fe–Cr–C hardfacing alloys. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2006, 201, 908–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abdel-Aziz, K.; El-Shennawy, M.; Omar, A.A. Microstructural characteristics and mechanical properties of heat treated high-Cr white cast iron alloys. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2017, 12, 4675–4686. [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis, J.R. Metallurgy and properties of high alloy white irons. In ASM Specially Hand Book: Cast Irons; ASM International: Cleveland, OH, USA, 1996; pp. 107–130. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gundlach, R.B. High alloy white irons. In ASM Hand Book, Casting, 4th ed.; ASM International: Cleveland, OH, USA, 1998; pp. 679–685. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, J.; Li, C.; Liu, H.; Yang, H.; Shen, B.; Gao, S.; Huang, S. The precipitation and transformation of secondary carbides in a high chromium cast iron. Mater. Charact. 2006, 56, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, Q.; Shibata, H.; Hedström, P.; Jönsson, P.G.; Nakajima, K. Dynamic precipitation behavior of secondary M7C3 carbides in Ti-alloyed high chromium Cast Iron. ISIJ Int. 2013, 53, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ma, S.; Xing, J.; He, Y.; Li, Y.; Huang, Z.; Liu, G.; Geng, Q. Microstructure and crystallography of M7C3 carbide in chromium cast iron. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 161, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wieczerzak, K.; Bala, P.; Dziurka, R.; Tokarski, T.; Cios, G.; Koziel, T.; Gondek, L. The effect of temperature on the evolution of eutectic carbides and M7C3 → M23C6 carbides reaction in the rapidly solidified Fe-Cr-C alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 698, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tabrett, C.P.; Sare, I.R. Effect of high temperature and sub-ambient treatments on the matrix structure and abrasion resistance of a high-chromium white iron. Scr. Mater. 1998, 38, 1747–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. ASTM International. A 532/A 532M—Standard Specification for Abrasion-Resistant Cast Irons; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2003; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gundlach, R.B.; Doane, D.V. Alloy Cast Irons. In ASM Handbook—Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High Performance Alloys; ASM International: Cleveland, OH, USA, 2009; Volume 1, pp. 222–269. [Google Scholar]
  19. Saunders, N.; Guo, U.K.Z.; Li, X.; Miodownik, A.P.; Schillé, J.P. Using JMatPro to model materials properties and behavior. JOM 2003, 55, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guo, Z.; Saunders, N.; Miodownik, P.; Schille, J.-P. Modelling phase transformations and material properties critical to the prediction of distortion during the heat treatment of steels. Int. J. Microstruct. Mater. Prop. 2009, 4, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Asensio, J.; Pero-Sanz, J.A.; Verdeja, J.I. Microstructure selection criteria for cast irons with more than 10 wt.% chromium for wear applications. Mater. Charact. 2002, 49, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, Y.F.; Qin, G.K.; Jiang, P.J.; Wang, S.F.; Qi, X.W.; Xing, X.L.; Yang, Q.X. Dry sliding wear behavior of (Cr, Fe)7C3-γ(Cr, Fe) metal matrix composite (MMC) coatings: the influence of high volume fraction (Cr, Fe)7C3 carbide. Tribol. Lett. 2018, 66, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huggett, P.; Ben-Nissan, B. Development of a low melting point white cast iron for use in composite alloy manufacture. Mater. Forum 2007, 31, 16–23. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhi, X.; Xing, J.; Gao, Y.; Fu, H.; Peng, J.; Xiao, B. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of a Ti-bearing hypereutectic high chromium white cast iron. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 487, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Powell, G.L.F.; Bee, J.V. Secondary carbide precipitation in an 18 wt%Cr-1 wt% Mo white iron. J. Mater. Sci. 1996, 31, 707–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. JMatPro simulation of continuous-cooling transformation diagram for the alloy.
Figure 1. JMatPro simulation of continuous-cooling transformation diagram for the alloy.
Metals 10 00157 g001
Figure 2. JMatPro simulation of volume fraction phases vs temperature for the Fe-12Cr-2.08C alloy, in the case where the formation of the M7C3 and M23C6 carbides.
Figure 2. JMatPro simulation of volume fraction phases vs temperature for the Fe-12Cr-2.08C alloy, in the case where the formation of the M7C3 and M23C6 carbides.
Metals 10 00157 g002
Figure 3. The density curve of the Fe-12Cr-2.08C alloy vs. temperature.
Figure 3. The density curve of the Fe-12Cr-2.08C alloy vs. temperature.
Metals 10 00157 g003
Figure 4. Differential thermal analysis (DTA) curve of the as-cast sample.
Figure 4. Differential thermal analysis (DTA) curve of the as-cast sample.
Metals 10 00157 g004
Figure 5. Optical micrographs of (a) as-cast sample at 200× and (b) at 1000× 1: Eutectic carbides, 2: M7C3 eutectic carbides; (c) heat treatment (HT) sample at 200× and (d) at 1000× 1: Eutectic carbides 2: Martensitic matrix.
Figure 5. Optical micrographs of (a) as-cast sample at 200× and (b) at 1000× 1: Eutectic carbides, 2: M7C3 eutectic carbides; (c) heat treatment (HT) sample at 200× and (d) at 1000× 1: Eutectic carbides 2: Martensitic matrix.
Metals 10 00157 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of (a,b) as-cast sample; (c,d) HT sample and (e) bright field TEM image for an as-cast sample and (f) bright field TEM image for HT sample.
Figure 6. SEM images of (a,b) as-cast sample; (c,d) HT sample and (e) bright field TEM image for an as-cast sample and (f) bright field TEM image for HT sample.
Metals 10 00157 g006
Figure 7. TEM characterization of microstructure in the HT sample (a) Bright field image; (b) HR-TEM image of matrix and inserted SADP pattern (at point 1) refer to martensite phase; (c) HR-TEM image and SADP (at point 2) refer to carbide M7C3; and (d) HR-TEM image and SADP (at point 3) refer to M23C6.
Figure 7. TEM characterization of microstructure in the HT sample (a) Bright field image; (b) HR-TEM image of matrix and inserted SADP pattern (at point 1) refer to martensite phase; (c) HR-TEM image and SADP (at point 2) refer to carbide M7C3; and (d) HR-TEM image and SADP (at point 3) refer to M23C6.
Metals 10 00157 g007
Figure 8. (a) Bright field image of HT sample; (b) EDX spectra corresponding to positions (spectrum 1) a dark primary carbide; (spectrum 3) a secondary carbide and (spectrum 4) a needle shape of a matrix.
Figure 8. (a) Bright field image of HT sample; (b) EDX spectra corresponding to positions (spectrum 1) a dark primary carbide; (spectrum 3) a secondary carbide and (spectrum 4) a needle shape of a matrix.
Metals 10 00157 g008
Figure 9. (a) STEM image of HT sample; The elemental distribution of (b) Cr; (c) Fe; (d) C and (e) Mn.
Figure 9. (a) STEM image of HT sample; The elemental distribution of (b) Cr; (c) Fe; (d) C and (e) Mn.
Metals 10 00157 g009
Table 1. Chemical composition of HCCI alloy analyzed via arc spark emission spectrometer.
Table 1. Chemical composition of HCCI alloy analyzed via arc spark emission spectrometer.
ElementFeCSiMnPSCrMoNiCuAl
wt.%Bal.2.080.2841.300.0930.05812.10.0460.2700.1020.05
Table 2. Chemical composition of observed phases determined by EDX (at %).
Table 2. Chemical composition of observed phases determined by EDX (at %).
SpectrumAtomic (%)Phase
MnSiOCCrFeCr/FeCr/CFe/C(Cr+Fe)/C
11.66--17.7141.3939.221.052.332.214.55M7C3
31.211.25-15.724.7977.020.060.304.90
41.13-3.0920.3337.9837.461.011.871.843.71M23C6

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oanh, N.T.H.; Viet, N.H. Precipitation of M23C6 Secondary Carbide Particles in Fe-Cr-Mn-C Alloy during Heat Treatment Process. Metals 2020, 10, 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10020157

AMA Style

Oanh NTH, Viet NH. Precipitation of M23C6 Secondary Carbide Particles in Fe-Cr-Mn-C Alloy during Heat Treatment Process. Metals. 2020; 10(2):157. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10020157

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oanh, Nguyen Thi Hoang, and Nguyen Hoang Viet. 2020. "Precipitation of M23C6 Secondary Carbide Particles in Fe-Cr-Mn-C Alloy during Heat Treatment Process" Metals 10, no. 2: 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10020157

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop