Next Article in Journal
Effects of Manganese and Zirconium Dispersoids on Strain Localization in Aluminum Alloys
Next Article in Special Issue
Austenitic Stainless-Steel Reinforcement for Seawater Sea Sand Concrete: Investigation of Stress Corrosion Cracking
Previous Article in Journal
Central Composite Experiment Design (CCD)-Response Surface Method (RSM) to Optimize the Sintering Process of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Water Concentration in Ethyl Alcohol on the Environmentally Assisted Embrittlement of Austempered Ductile Irons
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Environmentally Assisted Cracking Initiation in High-Temperature Water

ÚJV Group, Centrum výzkumu Řež, Řež 130, 25068 Husinec, Czech Republic
Metals 2021, 11(2), 199; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020199
Submission received: 28 December 2020 / Revised: 19 January 2021 / Accepted: 19 January 2021 / Published: 22 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmentally Assisted Cracking)

Abstract

:
Environmentally assisted cracking (EAC) is a very complex process that develops in materials that involve combining actions of environment and tensile loading. Crack initiation is the least explored stage and is not clearly defined. For this paper, current knowledge of crack initiation mechanisms was reviewed for three types of commercial structure materials exposed to high-temperature (HT) water coolants of power plants, namely ferritic low-alloy (LAS) and carbon (CS) steels, austenitic stainless (AS) steels, and nickel-based alloys. Physicochemical microprocesses engaged in the two earliest phases of the mechanism, the precursor and the incubation phases, are rather specific for each of these materials. In the latter, the slow growth phase, the crack development process passes into a sequence of repeating steps where the specific key microprocesses persist.

1. Introduction

Environmentally assisted cracking (EAC) is a significant degradation process for components of high-temperature (HT) water-cooled power systems [1,2]. In general, EAC appears under the simultaneous influence of environment and tensile loading on materials. If the load applied is predominantly static, the process is also known as stress corrosion cracking (SCC).
In the light-water-cooled nuclear reactor (LWR) systems, high-temperature (HT) water continuously flows along the surface of components and it can—after long-term operation—create suitable conditions for EAC initiation. It is well known what basic physicochemical processes take place. Corrosion reaction is in progress on the component surfaces, while protective oxide scales are building up and, at the same time, there takes place a diffusion of the oxide-building chemical elements from within towards the material surface, and diffusion of hydrogen atoms from the water into the material. When load has a suitable level that induces very slow plastic straining, a crack can initiate and grow.
Many studies and material analyses have been performed in the last decades with the aim to understand the EAC mechanism in LWR systems [3,4,5,6,7,8,9], although some processes, especially crack initiation, need further understanding. Crack initiation is the longest stage of the degradation process and thus the most important regarding a component’s lifetime. This process is the least explored and is not clearly defined. From an engineering point of view, crack initiation is considered to occur when the crack is detectable by non-destructive examination, where detection limits can be several millimeters. This is called “practical” crack initiation. In contrast, with current microscopy techniques, it is possible to investigate submicron-sized cracks and those also considered as crack initiation. This is then called “physical” crack initiation.
This paper reviews the current knowledge about EAC initiation mechanisms occurring in three types of structure materials, namely ferritic low-alloy (LAS) and carbon (CS) steels, austenitic stainless (AS) steels, and Ni-based alloys, which are typical structure materials of LWR system components. For each of the materials, characteristics of the corrosion systems and key observations of the EAC process are briefly described. Then, the “physical” crack initiation microprocesses are outlined, through which EAC develops from a solid surface of the original as-machined components up to a penetration into several micrometers. From a general point of view, many commonalities can be found in cracking mechanisms of the three materials, such as the process of surface oxidation, the diffusion of impurities and hydrogen, or the slow crack extension in microscopic steps. However, in detail view, the different chemical compositions, microstructures, and mechanical properties of the three materials begin to play a role and differences can be recognized in the cracking mechanism. Consequently, the cracking appears to have some specific features for each of the materials. Similarities and specifics of these microprocesses are shown as they appear in the selected materials. This article does not aim to describe complete mechanisms, but rather searches for the basic elements of the mechanisms among known experimental data.

2. Materials

This paper addresses EAC initiation in only three types of typical structure materials used in current LWR components, excluding the fuel components.

2.1. Low-Alloy and Carbon Steels

Low-alloy ferritic-bainitic steels (LAS) are structure materials of LWR reactor pressure vessels, e.g., 20MnMoNi5-5 (1.25wt.%Mn-0.5Mo-0.3Ni-0.17Cr), equivalent to ASME SA 508 Grade 3 Cl. 1 or 22NiMoCr3-7 (0.70Ni-0.69Mn-0.56Mo-0.33Cr-0.22Si-0.16C), equivalent to SA 533 Grade B Cl. 1, and Russian types 15Ch2MFAA, i.e., CrMoV (2.2Cr-0.55Mo-0.45Mn-0.32Si-0.3V-0.15Ni) and 15Ch2NMFAA, i.e., CrNiMoV (2.2Cr-1.3Ni-0.6Mo-0.5Mn-0.28Si-0.1V).
Carbon steels (CS), e.g., ASTM A106 (0.62Mn-0.19Si-0.19C) and SA 333 Grade 6 (0.30Mn-0.30C), have applications in CANDU systems and in piping and components of secondary circuits of pressurized water reactors (PWRs).

2.2. Austenitic Stainless Steels

Austenitic stainless (AS) steels of the 300 series (Fe-10Ni-18Cr-0.05C), types A304, A304L, A316, A316L, A321, A347 (stabilized with Nb), and Russian type 18Cr-10(-12)Ni-Ti (stabilized with Ti), are used to build primary and secondary circuit piping, reactor vessel internals (RVI), steam generator tubes and supports, nozzles, and other small items of LWRs.

2.3. Ni-Based Alloys

Nickel-based alloys, e.g., the Alloy 600 (~72Ni-16Cr-9Fe), Alloy 690 (~60Ni-29Cr-10Fe), Alloy 800 (~35Ni-23Cr-40Fe), and the corresponding weld metals for dissimilar weldments, e.g., 52/152 (~60Ni-30Cr-9Fe) and 82/182 (~66Ni-15Cr-7Fe), are used in reactor pressure vessel nozzles, steam generators tubes, and control rod drive mechanisms of PWRs. The Alloy X-750 (~70Ni-16Cr-7Fe) is used for small items, such as couplings and springs.

3. High-Temperature Water Environment

During LWR long-term operation, the components are exposed to a reducing or slightly oxidizing water environment depending on the reactor type. The water environment determines the character of the protective oxide layer, which plays a key role in EAC crack initiation.

3.1. Oxidizing Environment

The coolant of boiling water reactors (BWR) is demineralized water of a temperature usually maintained at 288 °C, low conductivity (<1 μS/cm), and normal water chemistry with about 150–400 ppb of dissolved oxygen, low sulphates and chlorides, with a corrosion potential (ECP) of ~50 mVSHE. Inside the reactor vessel, under the influence of radiation radiolysis, the water dissociates into various molecular, ionic, and radical reaction products that interact to form H2O2, H2, and O2 (of those, H2O2 concentration is about 200 ppb). These compounds increase the ECP, yet the addition of H2 to the reactor water (i.e., hydrogen water chemistry) greatly reduces the effect of radiolysis by scavenging the radiolysis products. For example, the presence of about 500 ppb H2 (5.6 cc/kg) (the gas dosage is given in cc/kg, which is an abbreviation of cm3 (STP)/kg H2O, where STP stands for standard temperature and pressure) in water can suppress the effect of radiolysis on the ECP in BWRs [10].

3.2. Reducing Environment

PWR primary cooling circuits operate at 260–360 °C. The PWR pressurized water, with conductivity of ~20 μS/cm, typically contains less than 10 ppb of dissolved oxygen, ~2 ppm H2 (25–35 cc/kg), low sulphates and chlorides, in addition to 0–1500 ppm B, 1–3 ppm Li and an ECP of ~−800 mVSHE. The water of Russian LWR variants (VVER) contains KOH (~20 g/L) instead of LiOH. A hydrogen partial pressure of ~0.17 to 0.65 bar is maintained above the subcooled primary water at ~150 bars and 280 to 325 °C in order to suppress the radiolytic decomposition of water, which has the effect of localizing redox and corrosion potentials of most structural alloys close to the redox potential of the Ni/NiO equilibrium [11].

4. EAC Initiation: Understanding the Mechanism

The EAC process begins with crack initiation on the component surface and continues with the crack propagation or growth deeper into the material. Kinetics of the two stages of the crack development are very different as shown schematically in the crack depth–time scheme in Figure 1. Very slow process in the initiation stage proceeds into faster process in the propagation stage. No abrupt change of the EAC mechanism at the passage between the two stages has been observed [12].
The crack propagation mechanism is better understood than the crack initiation mechanism. The EAC propagation generally proceeds in repeated steps as follows from many observations of fracture surfaces and crack paths in the microstructure [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Each of these crack extension steps is induced by a repeated sequence of several physicochemical microprocesses. The size of the crack extension and the duration of these steps determine the velocity of the EAC crack propagation. For example, the EAC crack observed in austenitic stainless steels exposed to hydrogenated primary PWR water is propagated in the step-repeating sequence of the three following microprocesses: (i) enhanced stress concentration in front of the crack tip induced by strain localization; (ii) enhanced oxidation along the dislocation network in the strain localization region; and (iii) local crack extension step at the oxidized region in front of the crack tip [12].
According to Staehle [20], who first established the crack depth–time scheme shown in Figure 1, three phases can be distinguished in the EAC crack initiation mechanism, i.e., the precursor, the incubation, and the slow growth. The precursor phase, setting necessary conditions for the crack initiation to occur, involves processes occurring on the surface without any penetration under it, such as accumulation of deposits on superheated surfaces, lead accumulation, depletion of alloy species, surface wear, or grain boundary (GB) oxidation. The slow development of conditions necessary for the crack typically makes precursor the longest initiation mechanism phase. The stress does not need to be applied during the whole precursor phase. During the incubation phase, the crack growth starts but with a negligible penetration, due to processes like intergranular penetration, change in oxide scale composition, or local creep. The slow growth phase characterizes a period when the crack starts to grow, but with a much slower rate than in the next propagation stage. The crack development passes from initiation into propagation when the crack depth is about 50–500 μm. Such a crack represents the onset of crack growth at engineering relevant rates [21]. This is already the “practical” initiation, even if the crack is detectable only with a special non-destructive examination technique.
Figure 1. Scheme of environmentally assisted cracking (EAC) crack development from surface showing definition of the initiation, including the precursor, the incubation, and the slow growth, and the propagation stages; adapted based on Staehle [20].
Figure 1. Scheme of environmentally assisted cracking (EAC) crack development from surface showing definition of the initiation, including the precursor, the incubation, and the slow growth, and the propagation stages; adapted based on Staehle [20].
Metals 11 00199 g001
In the slow or fast growth phases of the crack development, the physicochemical character of each microprocess can be considered similar and not dependent on the cracking stage. It can be expected that physicochemical processes occurring during the slow growth are likely repeated but accelerated in the propagation stage. In contrast, the physicochemical processes of the precursor and incubation phases can be different as at least their kinetics are much slower. Therefore, the precursor and the incubation phases should be studied separately. It is likely that the microprocesses in these two phases depend on structure materials and the corresponding high-temperature water systems. An investigation of the microprocesses in these two phases is given in the following sections.

4.1. Low-Alloy and Carbon Steels

4.1.1. Brief Characteristics of the Corrosion System

The chemical interaction of low-alloy (LAS) and carbon (CS) steels with HT water results in oxidation of the surfaces; a thick oxide scale builds up obeying the parabolic law (∆x2~t). Typically, a double-layer oxide develops, with the inner layer compact and the outer layer formed of crystallite particles of magnetite (Fe3O4). It is worth noting that the oxide scales develop on the surface of CS components in CANDU systems and the surface of LAS specimens exposed to the LWR primary water simulated in labs. The oxide scales do not develop in the LWR primary circuits where the LAS components are purposely protected by stainless steel cladding [22]. As the hydrogen has high diffusivity in the steels at temperatures around 300 °C, the hydrogen atoms produced at this corrosion reaction penetrate deep into the metal and concentrate in structural traps, such as dislocations, vacancies and other lattice defects, and in stress concentration sites.
The typical microstructure of LAS materials consists of several bainite packets (ferritic phase) arranged inside original austenite grain boundaries. In contrast, the microstructure of the CS materials is a mixture of ferrite/ferrite and ferrite/pearlite structures, where carbides (Fe3C) mainly precipitate at ferrite/pearlite boundaries [23].
These steels have relatively high strength (~650 MPa) and low ductility, which excludes high strain localization. The dynamic strain aging (DSA) effect can occur in the steels when slow loaded at temperatures around 300 °C. This effect, caused by an interaction between moving dislocations and interstitials, makes the steels appear to be stronger and harder when slow loaded. Creep does not occur at these temperatures (~0.3 TM). The concentration of thermal equilibrium vacancies is estimated to be ~10−7 at around 300 °C (based on data for pure Fe or Cr metals), which is ten times lower than a limit concentration (~10−6) enabling intergranular creep [23]. By cold working (CW), the number of thermal vacancies is increased and those persist in the material for a long time even at these temperatures [23].

4.1.2. Description of EAC in the Corrosion System

As it has been recognized, EAC initiation does not occur easily and EAC does not sustainably propagate in the LAS and CS materials in the HT water environments subjected to constant loadings in the elastic regime [22,24,25,26,27]. EAC initiation from smooth, defect-free surfaces subjected to a static load is generally observed only for stresses above the HT yield strength, quasi-stagnant water flow conditions, and increased concentration levels of anionic impurities, such as SO42− or Cl [24]. The crack path under these conditions is usually transgranular (TG) [24,26]. EAC in elastoplastic load conditions is termed strain-induced corrosion cracking (SICC) [24,26]. In simulated HT water containing oxygen, EAC initiates more easily and transgranular cleavage-like crack growth is mostly observed (Figure 2a,b). Sporadically, the intergranular (IG) fracture in local islands is found, e.g., in lab testing of CrMoV and CrNiMoV steels in oxygenated HT water [27].
A recent investigation of EAC initiation in CW CS after more than 5000 h under constant load in HT water or in air has revealed fine cavities at phase boundaries under surface developed before a crack initiation [28]. Particularly in 30% CW CS notched specimens exposed to the stress intensity of 35 MPam1/2 for 8082 h in 360 °C, the fine cavities appear in the high-stress concentration region in front of the specimen notch root, i.e., in the elastoplastic loading region, both in water and in air [29,30]. It suggests that creep occurs in the CW steels at the test condition. In addition, it appears that the number of cavities in front of the notch increases with time of exposure and that the rate of cavity formation in the water is more than ten times higher than in air. It suggests that the diffusion of vacancies that form the cavities and the consequent creep are enhanced in water [28]. This enhancement can be likely explained by the presence of hydrogen atoms in the vacancies because the concentration of hydrogen is measured to be higher close to the fracture than in other locations [28,29,30]. Indeed, atomistic simulations [31] have revealed that vacancy–hydrogen complexes (VnHm) can be produced in bcc α-Fe in high concentrations (~10−3–10−5), if the steel is CW. The VnHm can remain metastable for a rather long time and develop into cavities, while absorbing additional vacancies.

4.1.3. EAC Initiation Mechanism

EAC initiation can occur in LAS and CS steels while simultaneously exposed to the elastoplastic loading and HT water. These conditions facilitate oxide scale failures and thus increase entry of H atoms, and also stimulate local plastic deformation, i.e., formation and motion of dislocations.
Since EAC of the LAS shows mostly cleavage-like transgranular crack paths, the microprocesses occurring inside grains should be considered dominant in the crack initiation mechanism. In addition, the non-sustainability of the EAC growth has to also be considered. After initiation, the crack grows only inside a single grain; to allow continuation of growth over this barrier a reinitiation may be needed.
An excess of hydrogen likely assists dissipation of strain inside grains. It is known that H atoms attracted into dislocation cores facilitate the motion of dislocations and thus enable their higher densities in pile-ups [32]. Moreover, atomistic modelling has shown that dislocations are attracted to the VnHm complexes and then pinned by them [33]. The crack embryo can form in the hardened and enhanced plasticity regions developed from these pile-ups, as it has been proposed in the corrosion-enhanced plasticity model [34]. In contrast, EAC initiation in the CS steels occurs along ferrite/pearlite boundaries with an assistance of creep stimulated by hydrogen [30].
In agreement with all these findings, the following summary of the two earliest phases of the EAC initiation process in LAS and CS steels can be drawn.
(i) In the precursor phase: An oxidation occurs on the surface together with outward diffusion of atoms constituting the metal and inward diffusion of H atoms. The H atoms penetrate into dislocations and bond with vacancies to form VnHm complexes, which diffuse towards structure boundaries or other interfaces and form fine cavities.
(ii) In the incubation phase: The cavities grow and coalesce to a critical size, in particular in the sub-surface region where irregularities activate concentration of stress; in parallel, dislocations move along slip planes in the sub-surface region. The first penetration into the metal occurs when the first pile-ups or cavities allow the new dislocation emissions to form a wedge microcrack.

4.2. Austenitic Stainless Steels

4.2.1. Brief Characteristics of the Corrosion System

The AS steels are corrosion resistant due to their high chromium and nickel contents. Their chemical interaction with the HT water environment results in thin slow-growing oxide scales protecting the surface. For example, a microscopic investigation of the surface of a Type 316L pressurizer heater after its service in a PWR primary cooling circuit (360 °C for 115,000 h) revealed a double-oxide scale containing the Cr-rich internal oxide layer (~1 μm thick), covered by the Fe-Ni-O spinels (20–50 μm) [12]. In laboratory tests of Type 316 steel, a thin duplex oxide layer was reported to develop under stress in simulated PWR nominal water for 500 h, consisting of a compact inner layer composed of 500 nm thick FeCr2O4 spinels and a coarse-grained outer layer of Fe3O4 spinel crystals of 1–2 μm diameter [35]. A double-layer oxide film, with an Fe-rich outer layer and fine-particle Cr-rich inner layer, has been observed in Type 316L steel exposed to the simulated PWR water at 320 °C; both layers consisted of spinels (FeCrNi)3O4 and there was no change in the oxide film structure with a concentration of the dissolved hydrogen ranging from 1 to 45 cc/kg H2 [36]. Similar results were obtained for Type 304 steel, e.g., at 360 °C [37]. It is worth noting that a surface treatment and corresponding subsurface deformation significantly affects development of the oxide scale, as well as Cr and Ni diffusion [7,38,39]. Local intergranular or slip band oxidations were observed [38,40], e.g., up to 1.4 μm in depth from a polished surface of a 20% cold-rolled Type 316L steel sample exposed to PWR water at 290 °C for 1000 h [38].
Diffusivity of hydrogen in AS steels in the solution-annealed state is very low at temperatures around 300 °C, but it is significantly increased by a cold work. For example, 20% CW 316L steel showed the diffusivity increased about 5000 times in comparison to the annealed steel at 360 °C [23], and this diffusivity was further accelerated with the application of tensile stresses [39]. At higher temperatures with hydrogen gas at 600 °C, creep testing of Type 304 steel showed that the penetrating hydrogen accelerates dislocation creep [41].
AS steels typically have a medium strength and high ductility, but both these characteristics may considerably vary with heat treatment and cold work. These steels respond strongly to mechanical loading with complex strain paths, which could result in local high strain localizations close to the grain boundaries and other interfaces. In addition, slow straining at the LWR temperatures stimulates the DSA effect in these steels.

4.2.2. Description of EAC in the Corrosion System

AS steels are very resistant to EAC in typical PWR and BWR conditions, characterized by the components exposed to HT water with a controlled chemical regime and their loading limited to elastic. However, EAC initiation can be stimulated in AS steels by a cold work above 10%, by harsh surface treatments [6,7,8,9], or by increased levels of SO42− or Cl concentration. EAC has been observed as a root cause of some component damage in service [1,2,12]. EAC initiation has also been emulated in autoclave testing in HT water [6,7,8,9,42,43,44,45,46]; examples are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. Both intergranular and transgranular EAC are observed, while the IG mode dominates cracking cases in service conditions and/or in long-term constant load testing in simulated lab conditions [12,43,44], and the TG mode is more often observed in testing accelerated by slow strain rates [12,45].
EAC initiation has been investigated in many microstructure studies [e.g., 12,38,43,44]. The IG crack initiation is found as consequence of localized deformation and debonding at grain boundaries [12]. To determine local conditions of the initiation, 11% CW Type 316L steel was studied slow loaded up to 4% strain in simulated PWR water at 340 °C [44]. For those conditions, mechanical fields inside grains and grain boundaries (GB) on the surface of the specimens have been investigated experimentally and modelled. The results showed that the majority of the GBs, which cracked in the test conditions, were high-angled (HAGB), perpendicular to the tensile axis, and at the points of maximal normal stress and plastic strain. However, not all the GBs withstanding these stresses and strains developed cracks, and some GBs failed while the normal stress applied on them was lower than the maximal stress. It suggests that mechanical loading itself is not a sufficient criterion for EAC initiation. Other factors, such as intergranular oxidation depth, have to be included in the initiation mechanism.

4.2.3. EAC Initiation Mechanism

The key elements of EAC initiation of AS steels are known to be local intergranular oxidation and localized plastic strain. Nevertheless, both IG and TG cracks may initiate in the same material and water, irrespective of grain boundary segregations or other weakening, and depending only on the applied strain rate. It suggests that the plastic strain rate is another key element of the EAC mechanism.
The local model [47], developed for EAC degradation prediction, assumes crack initiation being possible at a grain boundary once the following cracking criteria are reached: intergranular oxidation deeper than the critical oxidation depth (130–200 nm) and intergranular stress higher than the critical intergranular stress (500–2000 MPa). The third key factor, namely the plastic deformation, is thus included indirectly. This factor manifests itself at the fined-element model mesh as a strain induced by applied stress, but it is not yet considered among cracking criteria.
In agreement with all these findings, the following summary of the two earliest phases of the EAC initiation process in the AS steels can be drawn:
(i) In the precursor phase: An oxidation occurs on the surface together with outward diffusion of atoms constituting the metal and inward diffusion of H atoms affected by applied stress and local plastic straining; oxidation enters the grain boundaries and slip bands underneath the surface.
(ii) In the incubation phase: Oxidation of the grain boundaries and slip bands goes deeper under the surface. When both the critical oxidation depth and critical localized strain are reached, the first penetration into the metal occurs in and along the grain boundary in the case of IG cracking, or in the cleavage plane containing the slip band in the case of TG cracking.

4.3. Ni-Based Alloys

4.3.1. Brief Characteristics of the Corrosion System

Nickel-based alloys are very resistant to corrosion in the HT water environment and form only very thin oxide films on the surface. For example, a Cr-rich oxide layer (~90 nm) with a Cr-depleted underlayer (~60 nm) has been found in Alloy 600 (mechanically polished down to 1 μm) exposed to simulated PWR water at 360 °C for 300 h [11,48]. In the case of Alloy 690 with an electropolished surface exposed to water with 18 cc/kg H2 (NiO regime) at 360 °C for ~1300 h, it developed a penetrative inner oxide film, about 100 nm thick, composed of Cr-rich (Fe,Cr,Ni)3O4 and Cr2O3 oxides, with outer NiFe2O4 particles [49].
The nature and thickness of the formed oxide films depend on dissolved O2 and H2 contents. In Alloy 600 exposed to water at 288 °C, the nature of the oxide film differs according to the concentration of hydrogen dissolved in water: at 5–10 ppb H2, the oxide film is double-layered and compact, under levels of 150–600 ppb H2 (i.e., around the Ni/NiO transition), it is double-layered but contains many defects, and at 1200 ppb H2 (where no Ni oxidation is expected), it is single-layered, ultra-thin, and Cr-enriched [50]. In Alloy 600 exposed to simulated PWR water at 325 °C without stress, the proportion of critically oxidized GBs was the highest for the dissolved H2 concentration of 43 cc/kg (close to the NiO/Ni transition) and growing with time; this proportion decreased for concentrations of 1.5 and 945 cc/kg [51]. In the case of Alloy 182 exposed to simulated PWR water at 325 °C, NiO formed on the surface at 5 cc/kg H2, whereas Cr2O3 and NiFe2O4/NiCr2O4 spinel oxides appeared at 25 and 50 cc/kg H2 [52].
In addition, preferential intergranular oxidation (PIO) has been discovered, for example, in Alloy 600 exposed to simulated PWR water [53,54,55]. The PIO particularly means that emerged-to-surface grain boundaries locally oxidize and therefore they also locally migrate. Figure 5 shows an example of PIO in Alloy 600 after its long-term exposure to water (in Ni stability conditions) with no externally applied stress [53].
Ni-based alloys have a microstructure consisting of main austenitic phase and secondary phase carbides. In general, the alloys are characterized by a high strength and ductility, especially at high temperatures (up to ~600 °C) and a very good creep resistance. It has been found that cold working accelerates Ni diffusivity at the LWR operating temperatures and that the CW-induced vacancies stay in the materials over a long period of time [23]. In comparison to carbon steels, about 10 times fewer cavities take part in the creep of Ni-based alloys at temperatures around 300 °C. A good correlation between the rate of cavity formation and crack growth has been observed for creep. It suggests that intergranular crack growth in gas environments at these temperatures is controlled by the rates of cavity formation in the CW materials [23].

4.3.2. Description of EAC in the Corrosion System

Many cracks have been found in Alloy-600 PWR plant components, which were in service up to 25 years [11]. This EAC susceptibility of Alloy 600 was then confirmed in accelerated EAC-initiation testing [21,56]. A typical EAC of Alloy 600 has IG character and initiates from the grain boundary oxidation, as illustrated in Figure 6 [21].
Testing of several Ni-based alloys at various HT water chemistries and temperatures has shown that the EAC crack growth rate shows a maximum near the Ni/NiO transition, see Figure 7a [57,58]. Additionally, EAC initiation appears to be a function of the content of dissolved H2 in water and its time depends on the distance of the corrosion potential from the NiO/Ni stability transition, see Figure 7b [51,56,58]. It suggests that hydrogen, which is diffusing more easily into metal not covered with the NiO oxide, does play a role in the EAC process. Moreover, it appears that the fundamental mechanical parameter controlling EAC initiation is the plastic strain, not stress [56], which suggests that the GB opens to crack rather by shear than by rupture.
In contrast, while Alloy 690 is considered resistant to EAC initiation under operational conditions, recent experimental studies have identified conditions when EAC initiation does occur. During long-term testing of 20% CW Alloy TT690 (under static load and exposed to hydrogenated water at 320 and 360 °C for 20,653 to 34,484 h), IG crack initiation was found and discovered to occur due to the formation of cavities at GBs. The very fine cavities (~0.1 μm) were observed on crack surfaces, initiated by creep in air and by EAC in water [23,59]. Because the crack growth rate in the water was determined to be ten times higher than in the air, it has been suggested that the rate of cavity formation in Ni-based alloys, exposed to HT water, is also affected by penetrated hydrogen [23,30]; yet, this impact of hydrogen can be expected to be more pronounced for carbon steel.
Another testing of EAC initiation with Alloy 690 exposed to simulated PWR primary water was interrupted at different stages of the initiation process in order to perform microscopical investigation [60,61,62,63], see Figure 8. It was found that with increasing time of exposure under load, fine cavities coalesce at GBs under the surface and form a microcrack. Then, the IG crack opens and slightly extends, and its flanks oxidize. Next, the mature crack continues to grow, in a way similar to creep [61]. Other microscopic investigation has shown that, initially, a compact layer of Cr2O3 forms over a migrated GB (driven by the diffusion of Cr) and small cavities appear on the GB [62]. The further straining then breaks this surface Cr2O3, oxygen diffuses along the GB, and this results in the formation of a mixture of NiO and Cr2O3 oxides. Thus, the crack initiates along the heavily oxidized migration zone of the GB [62].

4.3.3. EAC Initiation Mechanism

Crack initiation in Ni-based alloys is assisted by creep induced by formation, growth, and coalescence of the GB cavities [60] or by dynamic straining [63].
In agreement with the current findings, the following summary of the two earliest phases of the EAC initiation process in the Ni-based steels can be drawn.
(i) In the precursor phase: An oxidation of the surface inducing the diffusion of metal constituents and H atoms occurs; development of the outer oxide film depends on dissolved hydrogen content—in the Ni stability regime the spinel oxide forms, which is less protective to O and H penetration, while in the NiO stability regime, the stable NiO acts as a barrier to diffusion and less O and H penetrate the oxide film; then, an inner Cr-rich layer forms locally on the surface over the GBs and this results in PIO and migration of the GBs; H atoms form complexes with vacancies that diffuse and develop into fine cavities.
(ii) In the incubation phase: Ongoing surface oxidation depletes of chromium the parts of GBs nearer to the surface; oxygen diffuses into the metal along the GBs and forms oxides, the greatest amount close to the Ni/NiO transition; other cavities grow and coalesce on the GBs in the subsurface region, which results in a slide in the GBs causing a rupture of the IG oxide, i.e., the first penetration.

5. Concluding Remarks

This review summarizes the current knowledge of EAC initiation in three selected corrosion systems, namely the ferritic low-alloy and carbon steels, austenitic stainless steels, and Ni-based alloys, exposed to high-temperature water and load. It appears that no clear conclusion can be drawn about the conditions under which a crack embryo can emerge in these materials, due to many interrelated and time-dependent factors involved in the process.
The review shows that each of the corrosion systems exhibits its own specific physicochemical microprocesses of the crack initiation mechanism in its two earliest phases. The key microprocesses acting in the precursor and incubation phases are different for each of the corrosion systems. The key microprocesses are specifically as follows: for the ferritic low-alloy and carbon steels, a significant role played by hydrogen on cavity formation and transgranularity and the non-sustained character of the cracking; for the austenitic stainless steels, a local intergranular oxidation and a localized plastic strain and its particular kinetics; for the Ni-based alloys, a surface oxidation affected by the concentration of dissolved hydrogen, preferential intergranular oxidation, and an intergranular cavitation creep.
It is difficult to distinguish the mechanism of the pre-mature EAC crack in its third initiation phase, i.e., in the slow growth, from the subsequent propagation of the mature EAC crack. It is expected that the crack development process transforms into a sequence of repeating steps where the specific key microprocesses persist.

Funding

This research was funded by the EC Horizon 2020 MEACTOS GA No. 755151, and by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport Czech Republic, grant number LQ1603; by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), grant number CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0108, and by the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), grant number CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_008/0000293.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the EC Horizon 2020 MEACTOS GA No. 755151. The presented work was financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport Czech Republic, project LQ1603 Research for SUSEN. This work was carried out within the SUSEN Project (established in the framework of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) in project CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0108 and of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) in the project CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_008/0000293).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. de Curières, I. Corrosion in PWR Stainless Steel Components: A TSO perspective based on Operating Experience and Expertises. In Proceedings of the International Symposium Fontevraud 8, Avignon, France, 14–18 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ilevbare, G.O.; Cattant, F.; Peat, N.K. EAC of stainless steels under PWR service conditions. In Proceedings of the International Symposium Fontevraud 7, Avignon, France, 26–30 September 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Andresen, P.L. A Brief History of Environmental Cracking in Hot Water. Corrosion 2019, 75, 240–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Konings, R.J.M. Material Performance and Corrosion/Waste Materials. In Comprehensive Nuclear Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; ISBN 978-0-08-056033-5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Raja, V.S.; Shoji, T. Stress Corrosion Cracking: Theory and Practice; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2011; ISBN 978-0-85709-376-9. [Google Scholar]
  6. Turnbull, A.; Mingard, K.; Lord, J.D.; Roebuck, B.; Tice, D.R.; Mottershead, K.J.; Fairweather, N.D.; Bradbury, A.K. Sensitivity of stress corrosion cracking of stainless steel to surface machining and grinding procedure. Corros. Sci. 2011, 53, 3398–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chang, L.; Burke, M.G.; Scenini, F. Stress corrosion crack initiation in machined type 316L austenitic stainless steel in simulated pressurized water reactor primary water. Corros. Sci. 2018, 138, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chang, L.; Volpe, L.; Wang, Y.L.; Burke, M.G.; Maurotto, A.; Tice, D.; Lozano-Perez, S.; Scenini, F. Effect of machining on stress corrosion crack initiation in warm-forged type 304L stainless steel in high temperature water. Acta Mater. 2019, 165, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abe, H.; Watanabe, Y.; Miyazaki, T. Characteristics of Work Hardened Surface Layer on Austenitic Stainless Steels and Its Relation to EAC Susceptibility in High Temperature Water. In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power System-Water Reactors, Boston, MA, USA, 18–22 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chopra, O.K.; Rao, A.S. A Review of Irradiation Effects on LWR Core Internal Materials-IASCC Susceptibility and Crack Growth Rates of Austenitic Stainless Steels. J. Nucl. Mater. 2011, 409, 235–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Scott, P.M.; Combrade, P. On the Mechanism of Stress Corrosion Crack Initiation and Growth in Alloy 600 Exposed to PWR Primary Water. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power System-Water Reactors, Stevenson, WA, USA, 10–14 August 2003. [Google Scholar]
  12. Couvant, T.; Legras, L.; Pokor, C.; Vaillant, F.; Brechet, Y.; Boursier, J.M.; Moulart, P. Investigations on The Mechanisms Of PWSCC Of Strain Hardened Austenitic Stainless Steels. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems, Whistler, BC, Canada, 19–23 August 2007. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ford, F.P. Mechanisms of environmentally-assisted cracking. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 1989, 40, 343–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Parkins, R.N. Metallography of environment sensitive fracture. Mater. Charact. 1991, 26, 303–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Magnin, T.; Chieragatti, R.; Oltra, R. Mechanism of brittle fracture in a ductile 316 alloy during stress corrosion. Acta Metall. Mater. 1990, 38, 1313–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shoji, T. Progress in the Mechanistic Understanding of BWR EAC and Its Implication to the Prediction of EAC Growth Behavior in Plants. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Systems, Stevenson, WA, USA, 10–14 August 2003. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shoji, T.; Lu, Z.; Murakami, H. Formulating stress corrosion cracking growth rates by combination of crack tip mechanics and crack tip oxidation kinetics. Corros. Sci. 2010, 52, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lynch, S.P. Environmental assisted cracking: Overview of evidence for an adsorption-induced localised-slip process. Acta Metall. 1988, 36, 2639–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lynch, S.P. Chap.1: Mechanistic and Fractographic Aspects of Stress-Corrosion Cracking. In Stress Corrosion Cracking: Theory and Practice; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  20. Staehle, R.W. Introduction to initiation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Detection, Avoidance, Mechanisms, Modelling, and Prediction of SCC Initiation in Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactor Plants, Beaune, France, 7–12 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhai, Z.; Toloczko, M.B.; Olszta, M.J.; Bruemmer, S.M. Stress corrosion crack initiation of alloy 600 in PWR primary water. Corros. Sci. 2017, 123, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Seifert, H.P.; Hickling, J.; Lister, D. Corrosion and Environmentally-Assisted Cracking of Carbon and Low-Alloy Steels. In Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, Konings, R.J.M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; p. 110. ISBN 978-0-08-056033-5. [Google Scholar]
  23. Arioka, K. Role of Cavity Formation on Long-Term Stress Corrosion Cracking Initiation: A Review. Corrosion 2020, 76, 142–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Seifert, H.P.; Ritter, S.; Hickling, J. Environmentally-Assisted Cracking of Low-Alloy RPV and Piping Steels under LWR Conditions. In Proceedings of the 11th Int. Conf. Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Systems, Stevenson, WA, USA, 10–14 August 2003. [Google Scholar]
  25. Seifert, H.P.; Ritter, S. Stress corrosion cracking of low-alloy reactor pressure vessel steels under boiling water reactor conditions. J. Nucl. Mater. 2008, 372, 114–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Seifert, H.P.; Ritter, S. Strain-induced corrosion cracking behaviour of low-alloy steels under boiling water reactor conditions. J. Nucl. Mater. 2008, 378, 312–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roth, A.; Devrient, B.; Gómez-Briceño, D.; Lapeña, J.; Ernestová, M.; Žamboch, M.; Ehrnstén, U.; Föhl, J.; Weißenberg, T.; Seifert, H.-P.; et al. The Effect of Transients on the Crack Growth Behavior of Low Alloy Steels for Pressure Boundary Components Under Light Water Reactor Operating Conditions-CASTOC. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power System-Water Reactors, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 14–18 August 2005. [Google Scholar]
  28. Arioka, K.; Miyamoto, T.; Yamada, T.; Terachi, T. Formation of Cavities Prior to Crack Initiation and Growth on Cold-Worked Carbon Steel in High-Temperature Water. Corrosion 2010, 66, 015008–015008-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arioka, K.; Miyamoto, T.; Yamada, T.; Aoki, M. Role of Cavity Formation in Crack Initiation of Cold-Worked Carbon Steel in High-Temperature Water. Corrosion 2013, 69, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Arioka, K. 2014 W.R. Whitney Award Lecture: Change in Bonding Strength at Grain Boundaries Before Long-Term SCC Initiation. Corrosion 2015, 71, 403–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, S.; Li, Y.; Lo, Y.-C.; Neeraj, T.; Srinivasan, R.; Ding, X.; Sun, J.; Qi, L.; Gumbsch, P.; Li, J. The interaction of dislocations and hydrogen-vacancy complexes and its importance for deformation-induced proto nano-voids formation in α-Fe. Int. J. Plast. 2015, 74, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Birnbaum, H.K.; Sofronis, P. Hydrogen-enhanced localized plasticity-a mechanism for hydrogen-related fracture. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1994, A176, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, Y.; Li, Z.; Huang, M.; Fan, H. Study on interactions of an edge dislocation with vacancy-H complex by atomistic modelling. Int. J. Plast. 2017, 92, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Magnin, T. The corrosion enhanced plasticity model for SCC in ductile fcc alloys. In Advances in Corrosion-Deformation Interactions (Material Science Forum); Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Zurich, Switzerland, 1996; pp. 113–117. [Google Scholar]
  35. Terachi, T.; Fujii, K.; Arioka, K. Microstructural characterization of SCC crack tip and oxide film for SUS 316 stainless steel in simulated PWR primary water at 320 °C. J. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 2005, 42, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Terachi, T.; Yamada, T.; Miyamoto, T.; Arioka, K.; Fukuya, K. Corrosion Behavior of Stainless Steels in Simulated PWR Primary Water—Effect of Chromium Content in Alloys and Dissolved Hydrogen. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2008, 45, 975–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cissé, S.; Laffont, L.; Tanguy, B.; Lafont, M.-C.; Andrieu, E. Effect of surface preparation on the corrosion of austenitic stainless steel 304L in high temperature steam and simulated PWR primary water. Corros. Sci. 2012, 56, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Matthews, R.P.; Knusten, R.D.; Westraadt, J.E.; Couvant, T. Intergranular Oxidation of 316L Stainless Steel in the PWR Primary Water Environment. Corros. Sci. 2017, 125, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Arioka, K.; Iijima, Y.; Miyamoto, M. Acceleration of nickel diffusion by high tensile stress in cold-worked type 316 stainless steel at 450 °C. Phil. Mag. 2018, 98, 2609–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kruska, K.; Lozano-Perez, S.; Saxey, D.W.; Terachi, T.; Yamada, T.; Smith, G.D.W. Nanoscale characterisation of grain boundary oxidation in cold-worked stainless steels. Corros. Sci. 2012, 63, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Takazaki, D.; Tsuchiyama, T.; Komoda, R.; Dadfarnia, M.; Somerday, B.P.; Sofronis, P.; Kubota, M. Effect of Hydrogen on Creep Properties of SUS304 Austenitic Stainless Steel. Corrosion 2021, 177, 3678. [Google Scholar]
  42. Devrient, B.; Kilian, R.; Kuster, K.; Widera, M. Influence of Bulk and Surface Cold Work on Crack Initiation and Crack Growth of Austenitic Stainless Steels under Simulated BWR Environment. In Proceedings of the 15th Int. Conf. on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power System, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 19–23 August 2011. [Google Scholar]
  43. Couvant, T.; Legras, L.; Herbelin, A.; Musienko, A.; Ilevbare, G.; Delafosse, D.; Cailletaud, G.; Hickling, J. Development of Understanding of the Interaction between Localized Deformation and EAC of Austenitic Stainless Steels Exposed to Primary PWR Environment. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems, Virginia Beach, VA, USA, 23–27 August 2009. [Google Scholar]
  44. Huang, Q.; Charles, Y.; Duhamel, C.; Gaspérini, M.; Crépin, J. Influence of the Combination of Microstructure and Mechanical Fields on Stress Corrosion Cracking Initiation of Cold-Worked Austenitic Stainless Steels. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, Boston, MA, USA, 18–22 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hojná, A.; Halodová, P.; Janoušek, J.; Zimina, M. Accelerated Environmentally assisted cracking initiation of Type 316L steel in high temperature water and hydrogenated steam vapor environments. Corrosion 2020, 76, 1177–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Karlsen, W.; Diego, G.; Devrient, B. Localized deformation as a key precursor to initiation of intergranular stress corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steels employed in nuclear power plants. J. Nucl. Mater. 2010, 406, 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Couvant, T.; Burger, E.; Thaury, C.; Rainasse, C. Simulating the Susceptibility to IGEAC of Cold Work 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel Exposed to Primary Water. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, Boston, MA, USA, 18–22 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  48. Panter, J.; Viguier, B.; Cloué, J.M.; Foucault, M.; Combrade, P.; Andrieu, E. Influence of oxide films on primary water stress corrosion cracking initiation of alloy 600. J. Nucl. Mater. 2006, 348, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kuang, W.; Song, M.; Wang, P.; Was, G.S. The oxidation of alloy 690 in simulated pressurized water reactor primary water. Corros. Sci. 2017, 126, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Peng, Q.; Hou, J.; Sakaguchi, K.; Takeda, Y.; Shoji, T. Effect of dissolved hydrogen on corrosion of Inconel Alloy 600 in high temperature hydrogenated water. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 8375–8386. [Google Scholar]
  51. Fournier, L.; Calonne, O.; Combrade, P.; Scott, P.; Chou, P.; Pathania, R. Grain boundary oxidation and embrittlement prior to crack initiation in Alloy 600 in PWR primary water. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 7–11 August 2011. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kim, T.; Choi, K.J.; Yoo, S.C.; Kim, J.H. Effects of dissolved hydrogen on the crack-initiation and oxidation behavior of nickel-based alloys in high-temperature water. Corros. Sci. 2016, 106, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bertali, G.; Scenini, F.; Burke, M.G.; Huin, N. The effect of temperature on the preferential intergranular oxidation susceptibility of alloy 600. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2018, 49, 1879–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Capell, B.M.; Was, G.S. Selective Internal Oxidation as a Mechanism of Intergranular Stress Corrosion cracking of Ni-Cr-Fe alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2007, 38, 1244–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lim, Y.S.; Kim, S.W.; Hwang, S.S.; Kim, H.P.; Jang, C. Intergranular oxidation of Ni-based Alloy 600 in a simulated PWR primary water environment. Corros. Sci. 2016, 108, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Etien, R.A.; Richey, E.; Morton, D.S.; Eager, J. SCC Initiation Testing of Alloy 600 in High Temperature Water. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power System–Water Reactors, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 19–23 August 2011. [Google Scholar]
  57. Attanasio, S.A.; Morton, D.S. Measurement of the Nickel/Nickel Oxide Transition in Ni-Cr-Fe Alloys and Updated Data and Correlations to Quantify the Effect of Aqueous Hydrogen on Primary Water SCC. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Environmental Degradation on Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, Stevenson, WA, USA, 10–14 August 2003. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bai, J.; Ritter, S.; Seifert, H.-P.; Virtanen, S. Stress corrosion cracking initiation and short crack growth behaviour in Alloy 182 weld metal under simulated boiling water reactor hydrogen water chemistry conditions. Corros. Sci. 2018, 131, 208–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Arioka, K.; Staehle, R.W.; Yamada, T.; Miyamoto, T.; Terachi, T. Degradation of Alloy 690 After Relatively Short Times. Corrosion 2016, 72, 1252–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhai, Z.; Olszta, M.J.; Toloczko, M.B.; Bruemmer, S.M. Crack Initiation Behavior of Cold-Worked Alloy 690 in Simulated PWR Primary Water—Role of Starting Microstructure, Applied Stress and Cold Work on Precursor Damage Evolution. In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power System-Water Reactors, Boston, MA, USA, 18–22 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhai, Z.; Toloczko, M.; Kruska, K.; Bruemmer, S.M. Precursor Evolution and Stress Corrosion Cracking Initiation of Cold-Worked Alloy 690 in Simulated Pressurized Water Reactor Primary Water. Corrosion 2017, 73, 1224–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kuang, W.; Was, G.S. A high-resolution characterization of the initiation of stress corrosion crack in Alloy 690 in simulated pressurized water reactor primary water. Corros. Sci. 2020, 163, 108243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Moss, T.; Kuang, W.; Was, G.S. Stress corrosion crack initiation in Alloy 690 in high temperature water. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2018, 22, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Typical cleavage-like facets of EAC initiated in low-alloy steels (LAS) growing from fa-tigue pre-crack tip while tested by constant load: (a) 22NiMoCr3-7 exposed to simulated boiling water reactor (BWR) conditions at 288 °C for 1904 h at stress intensity of 49 MPam1/2; (b) CrNiMoV exposed to simulated VVER water saturated with oxygen (>1 ppm) at 320 °C for 1023 h at 36 MPam1/2. The fracture surfaces were chemically cleaned to remove oxides.
Figure 2. Typical cleavage-like facets of EAC initiated in low-alloy steels (LAS) growing from fa-tigue pre-crack tip while tested by constant load: (a) 22NiMoCr3-7 exposed to simulated boiling water reactor (BWR) conditions at 288 °C for 1904 h at stress intensity of 49 MPam1/2; (b) CrNiMoV exposed to simulated VVER water saturated with oxygen (>1 ppm) at 320 °C for 1023 h at 36 MPam1/2. The fracture surfaces were chemically cleaned to remove oxides.
Metals 11 00199 g002
Figure 3. Fracture surface of 08Ch18N10T AS steel after accelerated EAC testing (strain rate of 1 × 10−7 s−1 at the tension loading up to rupture) in HT water (320 °C, KOH, <20 ppb O2, without H2 gas addition) showing the path of the crack from its initiation in the surface layer (deformed by harsh turning), where it had TG and cleavage-like character, to its propagation into depth, where the path was locally IG.
Figure 3. Fracture surface of 08Ch18N10T AS steel after accelerated EAC testing (strain rate of 1 × 10−7 s−1 at the tension loading up to rupture) in HT water (320 °C, KOH, <20 ppb O2, without H2 gas addition) showing the path of the crack from its initiation in the surface layer (deformed by harsh turning), where it had TG and cleavage-like character, to its propagation into depth, where the path was locally IG.
Metals 11 00199 g003
Figure 4. Example of EAC initiation on the surface of solution-annealed Type 316L steel strained (of 1 × 10−6 s−1 in tension in horizontal direction) in HT water (350 °C, LiOH, <20 ppb O2, without H2 addition) [45]. The images show deformation bands, oxide particles, and cracks on the surface, together with zoomed views of boxed area of the following cracks: (a) TG cleavage-like (at local plastic strain of 0.12) and (b) IG (at 0.10). Note the fine steps lined with fine oxide particles on the internal surfaces of opened cracks.
Figure 4. Example of EAC initiation on the surface of solution-annealed Type 316L steel strained (of 1 × 10−6 s−1 in tension in horizontal direction) in HT water (350 °C, LiOH, <20 ppb O2, without H2 addition) [45]. The images show deformation bands, oxide particles, and cracks on the surface, together with zoomed views of boxed area of the following cracks: (a) TG cleavage-like (at local plastic strain of 0.12) and (b) IG (at 0.10). Note the fine steps lined with fine oxide particles on the internal surfaces of opened cracks.
Metals 11 00199 g004
Figure 5. SEM-BSE images of Alloy 600, originally with polished surface, after its exposure for 1000 h to simulated PWR water (of 40 cc/kg H2, i.e., in the Ni stability region, and at 320 °C), with no applied stress, showing: (a) GB undulations on the surface (indicated by arrows) and (b) in cross-section a GB oxidation (where the dark imaging penetration, indicated by an arrow, has been confirmed to be Cr2O3) and GB migration (where a dashed line marks the GB original position). Reprinted from the open-access publication [53].
Figure 5. SEM-BSE images of Alloy 600, originally with polished surface, after its exposure for 1000 h to simulated PWR water (of 40 cc/kg H2, i.e., in the Ni stability region, and at 320 °C), with no applied stress, showing: (a) GB undulations on the surface (indicated by arrows) and (b) in cross-section a GB oxidation (where the dark imaging penetration, indicated by an arrow, has been confirmed to be Cr2O3) and GB migration (where a dashed line marks the GB original position). Reprinted from the open-access publication [53].
Metals 11 00199 g005
Figure 6. SEM-BSE images of Alloy 600 (as a 60-grit ground finish plate specimen), which has been exposed for 6900 h to simulated PWR water (in Ni/NiO transition conditions, and at 360 °C) and to the load at the yield strength level, showing a typical morphology of a large crack, as seen on the surface and in cross-section, reproduced from [21], with permission from Elsevier, 2020.
Figure 6. SEM-BSE images of Alloy 600 (as a 60-grit ground finish plate specimen), which has been exposed for 6900 h to simulated PWR water (in Ni/NiO transition conditions, and at 360 °C) and to the load at the yield strength level, showing a typical morphology of a large crack, as seen on the surface and in cross-section, reproduced from [21], with permission from Elsevier, 2020.
Metals 11 00199 g006
Figure 7. EAC susceptibility of Ni-based alloys as a function of the content of dissolved H2 in water. (a) Chart of the EAC crack growth rate normalized to a minimum value (CGRmin) of X-750 and A600 alloys, exposed to de-aerated water at 316 °C and 338 °C, versus the difference of electrochemical potentials from the NiO/Ni transition (Delta EcP). The results show that maximum values are found in a distance close to the Ni/NiO transition. The chart is based on the published data [57]. (b) Chart of the EAC initiation time of high-temperature-annealed Alloy 600, exposed to de-aerated water at 360 °C with identical stress applied, versus Delta EcP. The results show that the EAC initiation times are much longer under conditions with stability of the nickel oxide than they are with stability of the nickel metal. The chart is based on published data [56].
Figure 7. EAC susceptibility of Ni-based alloys as a function of the content of dissolved H2 in water. (a) Chart of the EAC crack growth rate normalized to a minimum value (CGRmin) of X-750 and A600 alloys, exposed to de-aerated water at 316 °C and 338 °C, versus the difference of electrochemical potentials from the NiO/Ni transition (Delta EcP). The results show that maximum values are found in a distance close to the Ni/NiO transition. The chart is based on the published data [57]. (b) Chart of the EAC initiation time of high-temperature-annealed Alloy 600, exposed to de-aerated water at 360 °C with identical stress applied, versus Delta EcP. The results show that the EAC initiation times are much longer under conditions with stability of the nickel oxide than they are with stability of the nickel metal. The chart is based on published data [56].
Metals 11 00199 g007
Figure 8. SEM-BSE images of cross-sections of EAC initiation in 21–31% CW Alloy 690, after testing conducted at 360 °C in simulated PWR primary water (600 ppm of B; 1 ppm of Li; 25 cc/kg dissolved H, i.e., in Ni/NiO transition conditions), showing the presence of GB cavities assisting the cracking. Three examples of the GB cavities are shown: (a) the first penetration at 5,352 h, (b) a shallow IG crack at 10,049 h, and (c) a mature crack at 11,709 h [61], reproduced from [63], with permission from Elsevier, 2020.
Figure 8. SEM-BSE images of cross-sections of EAC initiation in 21–31% CW Alloy 690, after testing conducted at 360 °C in simulated PWR primary water (600 ppm of B; 1 ppm of Li; 25 cc/kg dissolved H, i.e., in Ni/NiO transition conditions), showing the presence of GB cavities assisting the cracking. Three examples of the GB cavities are shown: (a) the first penetration at 5,352 h, (b) a shallow IG crack at 10,049 h, and (c) a mature crack at 11,709 h [61], reproduced from [63], with permission from Elsevier, 2020.
Metals 11 00199 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hojná, A. Environmentally Assisted Cracking Initiation in High-Temperature Water. Metals 2021, 11, 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020199

AMA Style

Hojná A. Environmentally Assisted Cracking Initiation in High-Temperature Water. Metals. 2021; 11(2):199. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020199

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hojná, Anna. 2021. "Environmentally Assisted Cracking Initiation in High-Temperature Water" Metals 11, no. 2: 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020199

APA Style

Hojná, A. (2021). Environmentally Assisted Cracking Initiation in High-Temperature Water. Metals, 11(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020199

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop