Next Article in Journal
Negative Strain Rate Sensitivity Induced by Structure Heterogeneity in Zr64.13Cu15.75Ni10.12Al10 Bulk Metallic Glass
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Multidimensional Screening of Flash-PEO Coatings for Mg in Comparison to Commercial Chromium(VI) Conversion Coating
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metals
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/met11020338
metals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Homogenization of 7075 and 7049 Aluminium Alloys Intended for Extrusion Welding

by
Antoni Woźnicki
1,*,
Beata Leszczyńska-Madej
2,
Grzegorz Włoch
2,
Justyna Grzyb
2,
Jacek Madura
2 and
Dariusz Leśniak
2
1
Aptiv Services Poland S.A., 30-399 Kraków, Poland
2
Faculty of Non-Ferrous Metals, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2021, 11(2), 338; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020338
Submission received: 26 November 2020 / Revised: 8 February 2021 / Accepted: 13 February 2021 / Published: 17 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Metal Casting, Forming and Heat Treatment)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
During the extrusion of aluminum alloys profiles using porthole dies, the temperature of the material in the welding chamber is one of crucial parameters determining the quality of longitudinal welds. In order to extend the permissible temperature range, the billets intended for this process should be characterized by the maximum attainable solidus temperature. Within the present work, the homogenization of AlZnMgCu alloys DC-cast (Direct Chill-cast) billets was investigated, with the aim of solidus temperature maximization. Conditions of soaking and cooling stages were analyzed. The materials were homogenized in laboratory conditions, and the microstructural effects were evaluated on the basis of DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) tests and SEM/EDS (Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy) investigations. For all examined alloys, the unequilibrium low-melting microstructure components were dissolved during soaking, which led to the significant solidus temperature increase, in comparison to the as-cast state. The values within the range of 525–548 °C were obtained. In the case of alloy with highest Cu concentration, the application of two-step soaking was necessary. In order to take advantage of the high solidus temperature obtained after soaking, the cooling rate from homogenization must be controlled, and the effective cooling manner is strongly dependent on alloy composition. For high-Cu alloy, the solidus decreased, despite the fast cooling and the careful billets preheating being necessary.

1. Introduction

In current industrial practice, the extrusion with the use of porthole dies is commonly applied for aluminum as well as its low- and medium-strength alloys. However, there is a demand for hollow profiles with higher strength, and research efforts are aiming at an elaboration of similar technology for high-strength 2xxx, 5xxx, and Cu-containing 7xxx alloys [1,2]. Among parameters determining the quality of longitudinal welds, the temperature in the welding chamber is one of great importance [1,3,4,5,6]. The hard-deformable Al alloys, in particular those of 7xxx series with Cu, are characterized by low solidus temperature [7], which becomes a factor significantly limiting the permissible temperature of material in the welding chamber. Thus, the careful selection of alloys’ chemical composition as well as suitable billets preparation for extrusion are important steps in the elaboration of hard-deformable alloys extrusion technology.
The DC-cast billets of AlZnMgCu alloys are characterized by dendritic microstructure with numerous eutectics and particles. The commonly reported phases are the M-(Cu, Zn, Al)2Mg, T-(Cu, Zn, Al)49Mg32, S-Al2CuMg, and Fe-bearing ones [8,9,10,11,12,13]. The non-equilibrium solidification during DC casting results in low billets solidus temperature, most often values in the range 470–480 °C are noted [9,14,15,16], but lower can also be found in the literature [17,18]. The solidus temperature can be increased by homogenization annealing; however, obtained effects are strongly dependent on process parameters.
The initial soaking temperature is limited by unequilibrium solidus temperature, because incipient melting, causing irreversible microstructural damage, must be avoided [9]. Thus, the first stage of soaking should be accomplished below 470 °C. The M and T phases can be effectively dissolved in these conditions. However, the S-phase, often observed in the as-cast billets microstructure or forming and growing during initial stages of annealing [9,13,19,20], is hard to redissolve, and it is frequently noted after homogenization at the mentioned temperature range [13,14,15]. In that situation, the billets solidus temperature increases slightly, but it is still below 500 °C. The complete dissolution of the S-phase is in many cases obtained after multi-stage homogenization, when due to the rise of solidus temperature during the initial stage, the application of higher final soaking temperature is possible [14,21]. Although the microstructure evolutions taking place in AlZnMgCu billets during homogenization soaking are described in the literature for many alloy compositions, the values of solidus temperature, which can be obtained after homogenization with full dissolution of low melting structure components, are unfortunately reported rarely.
Another homogenization parameter influencing the solidus temperature of billets is a cooling rate after completed soaking. The billets of described alloys are usually slowly cooled after homogenization, which leads to the precipitation of phases showing limited solubility (e.g., M, T), depletion of solid solution from Zn, Mg, and Cu, and lowering of flow stress as well as extrusion pressure. However, if cooling is very slow, the mentioned phases can be precipitated in a form of large particles, which are incapable for dissolution during billets preheating and extrusion. Their presence in the billets microstructure can cause unequilibrium incipient melting [9]. Similar effects are noted also for other Al alloys series [22,23]. Hence, taking advantage of obtaining a full dissolution of low melting microstructure components during homogenization heating and soaking is possible when the cooling rate is properly selected. This aspect of AlZnMgCu billets preparation for extrusion is also rarely described in the literature.
The mentioned lack of data regarding the attainable solidus temperature of AlZnMgCu alloys after homogenization results probably from the fact that the billets solidus temperature is not a crucial material property in the conventional solid products extrusion, where temperature in the deformation zone is usually lower. However, as it was already mentioned, the high solidus temperature is necessary for the selection of extrusion welding parameters. This work presents the results of investigations aimed at determining the homogenization conditions leading to obtaining the highest possible solidus temperature of AlZnMgCu alloys billets, which are intended for extrusion welding.

2. Materials and Methods

The billets, with the chemical composition presented in Table 1 and diameter of 100 mm, were DC cast in semi-industrial conditions. Four alloys were investigated: three within EN AW-7075 and one within EN AW-7049 grade.
The specimens with dimensions of 10 × 20 × 20 mm3, intended for examination in the as-cast state as well as for laboratory homogenization experiments, were sectioned from obtained billets.
At the first stage of work, the materials in the as-cast state were subjected to DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) analyses as well as microstructure observations. The DSC tests were performed using a Mettler Toledo 821e heat flux type calorimeter (Greifensee, Switzerland). The disc-shaped samples were inserted in ceramic pans into the cell with the temperature of 390 °C and heated 20 °C/min to the temperature of 700 °C in Ar atmosphere. The solidus temperature and heat of the incipient melting reactions were determined.
The specimens intended for microstructure examination were mounted in conductive resin and mechanically ground and polished using in sequence abrasive papers, diamond suspensions, and colloidal silica suspension. The billets microstructure was examined using LM (light microscopy) and SEM/EDS (Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy). The specimens intended for LM observations were etched with Keller reagent and examined using Olympus GX 51 microscope (Tokyo, Japan). The SEM/EDS analyses were performed on non-etched specimens using a Hitachi SU-70 scanning electron microscope (Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Thermo Scientific EDS system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). EDS analyses were applied to determine the chemical composition of the observed eutectic areas or particles and to measure main alloying elements content in the dendrites interiors.
At the second stage of work, soaking parameters were examined. The conditions of laboratory homogenization experiments were selected on the basis of literature data [9,14,20,21], earlier investigations, and the results of DSC tests of alloys in the as-cast state. The heat treatment experiments were accomplished using a Nabertherm forced convection chamber furnace. Three homogenization schemes were applied:
  • The standard homogenization with soaking at 465 °C
  • The high-temperature homogenization with two soaking stages at 465 and 475 °C
  • The high-temperature homogenization with two soaking stages at 465 and 485 °C.
In all cases, materials were heated from room temperature to 465 °C for 10 h. A similar heating rate, about 40 °C/h, was applied during heating between soaking stages. After completed soaking, specimens were quenched in water. The details of the homogenization experiments performed in the second stage of the work are presented in Table 2.
At the third stage, the influence of cooling rate from the homogenization temperature, on the billets of alloys 1, 2, and 4 microstructure, was investigated. Specimens were subjected to homogenization with soaking conditions selected on the basis of stage 2 results and cooled to room temperature in three ways. The average cooling rates in the temperature range from 465 or 475 to 200 °C, estimated on the basis of specimens temperature measurements during cooling cycles, were about 500, 120, and 60 °C/h.
Materials after all homogenization experiments were subjected to DSC tests. In stage 2, they were used for the analysis of low-melting microstructure components dissolution. In stage 3, the DSC runs were applied in order to evaluate the precipitated particles dissolution ability during rapid heating. On the basis of the obtained DSC results, specimens for microstructure observations were selected. The DSC analyses as well as the microstructure observations of homogenized alloys were performed in the manner described above.

3. Results

3.1. As-Cast Alloys

Regarding the DSC curves of all investigated alloys in the as-cast state, the incipient melting peaks are observed (Figure 1). The determined onset temperature values, indicating the unequilibrium solidus temperature of a given alloy, are within the range of 479–484 °C. The incipient melting heat varies from about 6 to about 12 J/g (Table 3).
In the microstructure of as-cast billets of all investigated alloys, the solid solution dendrites with numerous eutectic areas and particles located at dendrites/grains boundaries are observed. In the dendrites interiors, a significant microsegregation of alloying additions is noted (Figure 2).
Based on SEM/EDS microanalyses results, one can distinguish the following microstructure components, besides solid solution (Figure 3):
  • Phase (or phases) containing Al, Zn, Mg, and Cu, forming eutectics and present as separated particles. As it was noted above, M and T are the phases that contain mentioned elements, but based on EDS microanalyses results, one cannot distinguish which of them, M or/and T, is present in the alloys microstructure [24]. Moreover, the S-phase formed during unequilibrium solidification can dissolve a noticeable amount of Zn [25].
  • Particles containing mainly Al, Fe, and Cu (sometimes Si).
  • Phases rich in Mg and Si, most probably Mg2Si, are present in the form of separated particles and within eutectic areas.
Considering a similar unequilibrium solidus temperature for all investigated alloys, as well as microstructure examinations results and literature data, e.g., [9,12,13,14,15], one may expect that the predominantly observed phase containing Al, Zn, Mg, and Cu causes an incipient melting of all alloys.

3.2. Analysis of Soaking Conditions

The exemplary DSC curves of alloys subjected to homogenization are shown in Figure 4, and in Figure 5, the changes of solidus temperature and incipient melting heat are presented.
In the case of alloy 1, the incipient melting peak observed on the DSC curve in the as-cast state is found to decrease considerably already after 10 h of heating to 465 °C. During soaking, it further diminishes, and after 4 h at the temperature of 465 °C, it vanishes. The solidus temperature rises to about 548 °C and does not change with extending the soaking time to 8 h (Figure 4a and Figure 5a).
For alloy 2 (Figure 5b), after 2 h of soaking at 465 °C, the solidus temperature rises from about 483 °C noted in the as-cast state to about 493 °C. Despite extending the soaking time at 465 °C up to 24 h, a small incipient melting peak is observed on the DSC curves, and the solidus temperature does not change noticeably, which means that the low-melting microstructure components are not fully dissolved.
The mentioned increase of solidus temperature after soaking at 465 °C for 2 h enabled the safe elevation of homogenization temperature to 475 °C. After 8 h of soaking at this temperature, the vanishing of incipient melting peak and the increase of solidus temperature to 531 °C were noted (Figure 4b and Figure 5c).
In the initial stages of alloy 3 homogenization at the temperature of 465 °C, the course of solidus temperature and incipient melting heat changes is similar to the one described for alloy 2. However, after soaking for 4 and 8 h, very low values of incipient melting heat are noted (Figure 5d). After 12 h of soaking, i.e., after 22 h of homogenization, the peak vanishes, and the solidus temperature rises from about 490 °C to about 534 °C. Similarly as for alloy 2, the rise of solidus temperature observed after 2 h of soaking allowed for the application of higher homogenization temperature—475 °C. The complete dissolution of low-melting microstructure components was achieved after 4 h of soaking at mentioned temperature, i.e., after slightly above 16 h of homogenization (Figure 4c and Figure 5e).
In the case of 7049 alloy 4, within the 8 h of soaking at the temperature of 465 °C, no changes of solidus temperature, with respect to as-cast state, are noted. However, the noticeable decrease of incipient melting heat is observed, particularly during heating and early stages of soaking. After the 12 h peak vanishes, the solidus temperature increases from about 479 °C to about 525 °C, and with prolonged soaking, it does not change (Figure 4d and Figure 5f). Making use of observed increase of solidus temperature, a high-temperature homogenization with soaking at 485 °C was accomplished. However, no changes of solidus temperature are noted when compared to standard homogenization (Figure 5g).
The microstructure of alloys 1–3 within 7075 grade was firstly examined after early homogenization stages, for which the initial increase of solidus temperature was noted. Although the dendrites are still visible (Figure 6a), we observed a considerable decrease in the fraction of second phase particles at dendrites/grains boundaries as well as an equilibration of the main alloying elements concentration in the dendrites/grains interiors (see Supplementary Materials, Figure S1). The phase containing Al, Zn, Mg, and Cu is not found, but besides Mg2Si as well as Al, Fe, and Cu-rich phases, the particles containing Al, Cu, and Mg are present (Figure 7). Based on microanalyses results, in particular, the Cu:Mg ratio close to 1 and the literature data mentioned earlier [9,13,19,20], it is expected that this is the S-Al2CuMg phase. The solidus temperature noted at this stage of soaking, about 490 °C (Figure 5), is also within the range of reported solidus of AlZnMgCu alloys with the S-phase present in the microstructure [12,14,15,21,26].
In the alloys microstructure examined after homogenization variants, for which an incipient melting peak vanished, a low fraction of second-phase particles is observed (Figure 6b). In the most cases, only particles rich in Al, Fe, and Cu and phase Mg2Si are found (Figure 8). It should be noted here that the presence of the Mg2Si phase in the homogenized billets of described alloys is reported in the literature [9,25]. The distribution of main alloying elements in grains interiors is also most often sufficiently uniform (Figure S2).

3.3. Cooling from Homogenization Temperature

In the case of leanest alloy 1, the DSC curves after all examined cooling manners are very similar (Figure 9a). No incipient melting peaks are observed, and the solidus temperature is much the same as the one obtained after homogenization with water quenching (Table 4). For alloy 4 with high Zn content, only after the slowest cooling from the homogenization temperature on the DSC curve is a small peak observed with the onset at the temperature of 481 °C (Figure 9c). This value is similar to solidus temperature of that alloy in the as-cast state (480 °C). The low incipient melting heat indicates that the fraction of undissolved particles in the microstructure is rather small (Table 4). The values of solidus temperature after two other cooling manners are in agreement with those noted after water quenching. In the case of alloy 2 with the highest Cu concentration, after cooling at 500 and 120 °C/h on DSC curves, incipient melting peaks with onset at about 491–495 °C are present (Figure 9b). For the slowest cooling, two peaks are observed with onsets at 478 and 491 °C. The onset temperature of 478 °C is only slightly lower than that noted for this alloy in the as-cast state. The peaks at about 490–494 °C were observed during homogenization soaking, when the S-phase was observed in the alloy microstructure.
The SEM/EDS microanalyses of alloys after homogenization with cooling at 60 °C/h show that in the case of alloys 1 and 4, a precipitation of particles containing Al, Zn, Mg, and usually Cu took place (Figure 10b). The above-described dissimilarity in the DSC test results for these alloys may be an effect of different phases’ precipitation, larger particle sizes for alloy 4, and the values of the alloys’ solvus temperature. One may expect that the lean 7075 alloy 1 has a noticeably lower solvus temperature. Thus, for this alloy, the time for complete particles dissolution during the test was longer, and even particles that precipitated in the course of very slow cooling could be dissolved during subsequent heating. In the microstructure of alloy 2, the particles with the same components, i.e., Al, Zn, Mg, and most often Cu are also present, but additionally, the S-phase particles are found (Figure 10a).
Taking these observations into consideration, together with the presented above remarks regarding the solidus temperature, the DSC results for various cooling conditions may be explained as follows: After cooling of alloys 2 and 4 at 60 °C/h, the incipient melting is caused by the same phase(s) containing Al, Zn, Mg, and Cu, which were observed in the as-cast state. For alloy 2 cooled at 120 and 500 °C/h, the solidus results from presence in the microstructure of the S-phase, which also initiated the melting in a partially homogenized state. The mentioned slight discrepancy in onset temperature between the as-cast state and after cooling at the lowest rate may result from differences in the composition of phases formed in non-equilibrium and equilibrium conditions.

4. Discussion

In the case of all examined alloys, the low-melting microstructure components were dissolved during homogenization soaking in a degree sufficient in practice—no incipient melting peaks on the DSC curves are noted. As a result, the significant increase of solidus temperature was achieved, and the obtained values are within the range from 525 °C for alloy 4 to 548 °C for alloy 1 (Table 5).
For alloys 1, 2, and 3 of 7075 grade, the low-melting components are in sequence: phase(s) containing Al, Zn, Mg, and Cu observed in the as-cast state, and after their dissolution in the early annealing stages, it is the phase S. In the case of alloys 1 and 3, the expected results are obtained after homogenization at a temperature of 465 °C with soaking time of 4 and 12 h, respectively. This is a rather low soaking temperature when compared to literature data [9,14,20,21]. It should be mentioned here that in many papers, e.g., [12,15,25,27,28], only a significant decrease of low-melting phases content is described. The soaking time for alloy 1 can be assessed as very short, which results from low main alloying additions concentration. For alloy 3, with high Zn and medium Mg and Cu content (with respect to grade limits), it is three times longer, but it is still acceptable in the industrial practice. However, the application of higher temperature in the second soaking stage enables the shortening of total annealing time from 22 to about 16 h. In the case of alloy 2 with highest Cu content, the DSC test results after standard homogenization show the presence of phase S after soaking for 2 to 24 h. The incipient melting heat changes indicate that at this temperature, the dissolution of the S-phase is probably unattainable. Therefore, the application of high-temperature homogenization with soaking at 475 °C was necessary. As it was mentioned above, in all alloys of 7075 grade, the incipient melting in the course of homogenization (after initial solidus increase) is caused by the presence in the microstructure of the same phase S, and only for alloy 2 is the high-temperature homogenization required for its dissolution. Based on the phase diagram [26], one may expect that this discrepancy results from the fact that for alloy 2, the S-phase solvus is above 465 °C.
The DSC curves of alloy 4, with composition of 7049 grade, indicate that during homogenization soaking at the temperature of 465 °C for at least 8 h, the incipient melting results from the presence of the same phase(s) as in the as-cast state i.e., containing Al, Zn, Mg, and Cu. The dissolution of low-melting microstructure components was noted after of 12 h soaking. The lack of solidus temperature change as a result of longer homogenization at 465 °C, as well as after homogenization with soaking at 485 °C (Figure 5f,g), allows stating that for billets of this alloy, the mentioned standard homogenization is sufficient.
The obtained results clearly indicate that the cooling from the homogenization temperature may have an essential influence on the billets microstructure and solidus temperature. This is consistent with the literature data [9,14]. However, the present work shows that the effect of cooling rate is strongly dependent on alloy composition, and significant differences can be observed even within one grade. This observation, to the authors’ knowledge, is not described in the literature.
The billets of 7075 alloy 1 can be cooled very slowly without influencing the solidus temperature. In contrary, in the case of 7075 alloy 2, the lowering of solidus temperature is observed also in spite of fast cooling, at 500 °C/h. This results from the fact that during cooling from the homogenization temperature, the S-phase precipitates. As it was mentioned above, for this composition, the S-phase solvus temperature is high—the soaking investigations allow expecting that it is within the range of 465 to 475 °C. In addition, during rapid heating applied in this work, the time for particles dissolution is found to be too short, despite their small dimensions obtained as a result of fast cooling. In industrial practice, the billet preheating takes significantly longer. However, the billets are usually preheated to a temperature below the estimated above S-phase solvus [7], and a further temperature increase during extrusion may be fast. The obtained result indicates that for alloy 2, the application of fast billets cooling, within limitations resulting for example from billets dimensions, may be insufficient for taking advantage of the solidus increase obtained during soaking. In this case, special attention should be paid to billets preheating in order to ensure that the S-phase will not cause the incipient melting during the extrusion, with a significant temperature increase in a welding chamber. For example, the slow billets preheating to the temperature slightly above the S-phase solvus but below 490 °C (where melting is noted) may be applied with short holding if necessary. Then, if the mentioned temperature is too high from the point of view of extrusion parameters, the billets (short, already cut to desired length) may be fast cooled to the needed temperature. A similar billets preheating manner is described for 6xxx alloys [29].
In the case of high-Zn 7049 alloy 4, for which the precipitation of phase(s) containing Al, Zn, Mg, and Cu is noted, it is sufficient to cool the billets from homogenization temperature at moderate rate of 120 °C/h. The precipitated particles are able to dissolve during subsequent rapid heating, and the high solidus temperature of 525 °C is maintained.

5. Conclusions

On the basis of the obtained results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
  • In the case of all examined AlZnMgCu alloys, the low-melting microstructure components present in the as-cast state or formed in the initial stage of homogenization were dissolved during soaking. As a result, the significant increase of solidus temperature was achieved. The obtained values were within the range of 525 to 548 °C, depending on alloy composition.
  • For two of the investigated 7075 alloys and 7049 alloy, covering a broad Zn concentration range and characterized by low to medium Mg and Cu content, the homogenization at the temperature of 465 °C was sufficient for achieving the mentioned solidus increase. The two-step soaking with a final temperature of 475 °C may be useful for reducing the annealing time. The application of high-temperature homogenization was found to be necessary only for the alloy 7075 with increased Cu content.
  • In order to take advantage of the high solidus temperature obtained after soaking, the cooling rate from homogenization must be appropriately selected, and the effective cooling manner is strongly dependent on the alloy composition. In particular, for 7049 alloy, the application of a moderate cooling rate from a homogenization temperature of about 120 °C/h is sufficient. In the case of high-Cu 7075 alloy, despite the fast cooling, the lowering of solidus temperature was noted. In this case, the dissolution of the S-phase causing this effect must be ensured during careful billets preheating.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/11/2/338/s1, Figure S1: Exemplary distribution of main alloying additions in dendrites/grains interiors in initial stage of homogenization, 7075 alloy 3 after soaking at 465 °C for 2 h, Figure S2: Exemplary distribution of main alloying additions in grains interiors after homogenization: (a) 7075 alloy 2 after soaking at 475 °C for 8 h; (b) 7049 alloy 4 after soaking at 465 °C for 12 h, Figure S3: Dispersoids in 7075 alloy 3 after homogenization: (a) standard, with soaking at 465 °C for 12 h; (b) high-temperature, with final soaking at 475 °C for 4 h, Figure S4: Microstructure of alloys subjected to various cooling from homogenization temperature: (a–c) 7049 alloy 4 cooled at 500, 120, and 60 °C/h respectively; (d) 7075 alloy 1 cooled at 60 °C/h, Table S1: 7075 alloy 1, DSC test results after examined soaking variants., Table S2: 7075 alloy 2, DSC test results after examined soaking variants., Table S3: 7075 alloy 3, DSC test results after examined soaking variants., Table S4. 7049 alloy 4, DSC test results after examined soaking variants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.W. and G.W. methodology, A.W.; investigation, J.M., B.L.-M., J.G. and G.W.; writing—original draft preparation, A.W.; writing—review and editing, G.W., B.L.-M., J.G., J.M. and D.L.; supervision, D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by THE NATIONAL CENTRE FOR RESAERCH AND DEVELOPMENT, grant number TECHMATSTRATEG2/406439/10/NCBR/2019 “Extrusion welding of high-strength shapes from aluminium alloys 7xxx series”.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Józef Zasadziński and Wojciech Libura for valuable discussions during investigations and results analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Leśniak, D. Weldability Investigations of AlCuMg Alloys for Extrusion Welding. Arch. Met. Mater. 2012, 57, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wojtyna, A.; Leśniak, D.; Rękas, A.; Latos, T.; Zaborowski, K.; Leszczyńska-Madej, B. Analysis of Extrusion Welding Conditions for AlMg Alloys with High Mg Content. Key Eng. Mater. 2016, 682, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Duplancic, I.; Prgin, J. Determination of parameters required for joining process in hollow dies. In Proceedings of the 6th International Aluminium Extrusion Technology Seminar, Chicago, IL, USA, 14–17 May 1996; pp. 225–230. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gąsiorczyk, J.; Richert, J. Application of FEM modeling to simulate metal flow through porthole dies. In Proceedings of the 7th Aluminium Extrusion Technology Seminar, Chicago, IL, USA, 16–19 May 2000; pp. 195–202. [Google Scholar]
  5. Khan, Y.A.; Valberg, H.; Irgens, I. Joining of metal streams in extrusion welding. Int. J. Mater. Form. 2009, 2, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Leśniak, D.; Gromek, P. Estimation of Extrusion Welding Conditions for 6xxx Aluminum Alloys. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 47, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dixon, B. Extrusion of 2xxx and 7xxx Alloys. In Proceedings of the 7th International Aluminum Extrusion Technology Seminar, Chicago, IL, USA, 16–19 May 2011; pp. 281–294. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sheppard, T. Extrusion of Aluminium Alloys; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; pp. 205–252. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jackson, A.; Sheppard, T. Structural Modifications Occurring during Homogenization of Some 7xxx Alloys. In Proceedings of the 6th International Aluminum Extrusion Technology Seminar, Chicago, IL, USA, 14–17 May 1996; Aluminum Association and Aluminum Extruders Council: Wauconda, IL, USA, 1996; Volume 1, pp. 541–550. [Google Scholar]
  10. Belov, N.A.; Eskin, D.G.; Aksenov, A.A. Multicomponent Phase Diagrams, Applications for Commercial Aluminum Alloys; Elsevier: London, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lim, S.T.; Eun, I.S.; Nam, S.W. Control of Equilibrium Phases (M,T,S) in the Modified Aluminum Alloy 7175 for Thick Forging Applications. Mater. Trans. 2003, 44, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chen, H.; Gao, X.; Rometsch, P.; Xu, D.; Muddle, B. Dissolution and melting of constituent particles in a DC-cast Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy 7150 during homogenisation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Aluminium Alloys, Yokohama, Japan, 5–9 September 2010; Kumai, S., Umezawa, O., Takayama, Y., Tsuchida, T., Sato, T., Eds.; Institute of Light Metals: Yokohama, Japan, 2010; pp. 1656–1661. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fan, X.; Jiang, D.; Meng, Q.; Zhong, L. The microstructural evolution of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy during homogenization. Mater. Lett. 2006, 60, 1475–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, L.J.; Xu, D.K.; Rometsch, P.A.; Gao, S.X.; Zhang, Y.; He, Z.B.; Couper, M.J.; Muddle, B.C. Effect of Homogenisation Parameters on Dissolution and Precipitation in Aluminium Alloy AA7150. Mater. Sci. Forum 2011, 693, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fan, X.-G.; Jiang, D.-M.; Meng, Q.-C.; Zhang, B.-Y.; Wang, T. Evolution of eutectic structures in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys during heat treatment. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2006, 16, 577–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Senatorova, O.G.; Bronz, A.V.; Cheverikin, V.V.; Somov, A.V.; Blinova, N.E. Study of the Structure and Properties of Especially Strong Aluminum Alloys of the Al–Zn–Mg–Cu System. Metallurgist 2017, 60, 978–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bäckerud, L.; Król, E.; Tamminen, J.; Skanaluminium American Foundrymen’s Society. Solidification Characteristics of Aluminium Alloys: Wrought Alloys; Skanaluminium, Universitetsforlaget AS: Oslo, Norway, 1986; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shu, W.X.; Hou, L.G.; Liu, J.C.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, F.; Liu, J.T.; Zhuang, L.Z.; Zhang, J.S. Solidification Paths and Phase Components at High Temperatures of High-Zn Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloys with Different Mg and Cu Contents. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2015, 46, 5375–5392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Priya, P.; Johnson, D.R.; Krane, M.J. Modeling phase transformation kinetics during homogenization of aluminum alloy 7050. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2017, 138, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghosh, A.; Ghosh, M. Microstructure and texture development of 7075 alloy during homogenisation. Philos. Mag. 2018, 98, 1470–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deng, Y.; Yin, Z.; Cong, F. Intermetallic phase evolution of 7050 aluminum alloy during homogenization. Intermetallics 2012, 26, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Woznicki, A.; Leśniak, D.; Włoch, G.; Leszczynska-Madej, B.; Wojtyna, A. The Effect Of Homogenization Conditions On The Structure And Properties Of 6082 Alloy Billets. Arch. Met. Mater. 2015, 60, 1763–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Woźnicki, A.; Leszczyńska-Madej, B.; Leśniak, D.; Włoch, G.; Pałka, P.; Wojtyna, A. The Effect of Cooling Rate after Homogenization on the Microstructure and Properties of 2017a Alloy Billets for Extrusion with Solution Heat Treatment on the Press. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2016, 61, 1663–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. She, H.; Shu, D.; Chu, W.; Wang, J.; Sun, B. Microstructural Aspects of Second Phases in As-cast and Homogenized 7055 Aluminum Alloy with Different Impurity Contents. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2013, 44, 3504–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mondal, C.; Mukhopadhyay, A. On the nature of T(Al2Mg3Zn3) and S(Al2CuMg) phases present in as-cast and annealed 7055 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 391, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, X.M.; Starink, M.J. DSC Study on Phase Transitions and Their Correlation with Properties of Overaged Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloys. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2011, 21, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, K.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Todd, R.I. The improvement of constituent dissolution and mechanical properties of 7055 aluminum alloy by stepped heat treatments. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2003, 142, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cong, F.-G.; Zhao, G.; Jiang, F.; Tian, N.; Li, R.-F. Effect of homogenization treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of DC cast 7X50 aluminum alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2015, 25, 1027–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reiso, O.; Hafsås, J.E.; Sjothun, O.; Tundal, U. The Effect of Cooling Rate after Homogenization and Billet Preheating Practice on Extrudability and Section Properties. Part 1: Extrudability and Mechanical Properties. In Proceedings of the 6th International Aluminum Extrusion Technology Seminar, Chicago, IL, USA, 14–17 May 1996; Volume 1, pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
Metals 11 00338 g001 550
Figure 1. DSC curves of alloys in the as-cast state.
Figure 1. DSC curves of alloys in the as-cast state.
Metals 11 00338 g001
Metals 11 00338 g002 550
Figure 2. Microstructure of 7075 alloy 3 in the as-cast state: (a) optical microscope photograph; (b) SEM image with marked analysis points and distribution of main additions across dendrite.
Figure 2. Microstructure of 7075 alloy 3 in the as-cast state: (a) optical microscope photograph; (b) SEM image with marked analysis points and distribution of main additions across dendrite.
Metals 11 00338 g002
Metals 11 00338 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM/EDS (Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy) microanalyses results of eutectics and particles in the as-cast billets: (a) 7075 alloy 1; (b) 7049 alloy 4.
Figure 3. SEM/EDS (Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy) microanalyses results of eutectics and particles in the as-cast billets: (a) 7075 alloy 1; (b) 7049 alloy 4.
Metals 11 00338 g003
Metals 11 00338 g004 550
Figure 4. Exemplary DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) curves of alloys subjected to homogenization: (a) 7075 alloy 1, standard homogenization; (b) 7075 alloy 2, high-temperature homogenization; (c) 7075 alloy 3, high-temperature homogenization; (d) 7049 alloy 4, standard homogenization.
Figure 4. Exemplary DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) curves of alloys subjected to homogenization: (a) 7075 alloy 1, standard homogenization; (b) 7075 alloy 2, high-temperature homogenization; (c) 7075 alloy 3, high-temperature homogenization; (d) 7049 alloy 4, standard homogenization.
Metals 11 00338 g004
Metals 11 00338 g005 550
Figure 5. Changes of solidus temperature and incipient melting heat in the course of homogenization: (a) 7075 alloy 1; (b,c) 7075 alloy 2; (d,e) 7075 alloy 3; (f,g) 7049 alloy 4. Tables S1–S4 with determined values given in Supplementary Materials.
Figure 5. Changes of solidus temperature and incipient melting heat in the course of homogenization: (a) 7075 alloy 1; (b,c) 7075 alloy 2; (d,e) 7075 alloy 3; (f,g) 7049 alloy 4. Tables S1–S4 with determined values given in Supplementary Materials.
Metals 11 00338 g005
Metals 11 00338 g006 550
Figure 6. Exemplary microstructure of 7075 alloy 3 after homogenization: (a) soaking at 465 °C for 2 h; (b) soaking at 475 °C for 4 h (visible dispersoids reflecting former dendritic microstructure).
Figure 6. Exemplary microstructure of 7075 alloy 3 after homogenization: (a) soaking at 465 °C for 2 h; (b) soaking at 475 °C for 4 h (visible dispersoids reflecting former dendritic microstructure).
Metals 11 00338 g006
Metals 11 00338 g007 550
Figure 7. Particles of phase S-Al2CuMg and Mg2Si, 7075 alloy 2 after soaking at 465 °C for 2 h.
Figure 7. Particles of phase S-Al2CuMg and Mg2Si, 7075 alloy 2 after soaking at 465 °C for 2 h.
Metals 11 00338 g007
Metals 11 00338 g008 550
Figure 8. Examples of particles containing Al, Cu, and Fe as well as Mg2Si in observed in the microstructure of 7075 alloy 2 after soaking at 475 °C for 8 h.
Figure 8. Examples of particles containing Al, Cu, and Fe as well as Mg2Si in observed in the microstructure of 7075 alloy 2 after soaking at 475 °C for 8 h.
Metals 11 00338 g008
Metals 11 00338 g009 550
Figure 9. DSC curves of alloys subjected to various cooling rates from homogenization temperature: (a) 7075 alloy 1 after homogenization with soaking at 465 °C for 4 h; (b) 7075 alloy 2 after homogenization with final soaking at 475 °C for 8 h; (c) 7049 alloy 4 after homogenization with soaking at 465 °C for 12 h.
Figure 9. DSC curves of alloys subjected to various cooling rates from homogenization temperature: (a) 7075 alloy 1 after homogenization with soaking at 465 °C for 4 h; (b) 7075 alloy 2 after homogenization with final soaking at 475 °C for 8 h; (c) 7049 alloy 4 after homogenization with soaking at 465 °C for 12 h.
Metals 11 00338 g009
Metals 11 00338 g010 550
Figure 10. Particles observed in the alloys microstructure after cooling from the homogenization temperature at 60 °C/h: (a) 7075 alloy 2; (b) 7049 alloy 4.
Figure 10. Particles observed in the alloys microstructure after cooling from the homogenization temperature at 60 °C/h: (a) 7075 alloy 2; (b) 7049 alloy 4.
Metals 11 00338 g010
Table
Table 1. The chemical composition of investigated alloys, mass percentage.
Table 1. The chemical composition of investigated alloys, mass percentage.
Alloy DenotationSiFeCuMgCrZnTiZr
7075 alloy 10.080.161.222.080.215.140.020.15
7075 alloy 20.080.172.022.500.205.940.020.15
7075 alloy 30.100.211.542.390.205.890.020.15
7049 alloy 40.110.231.572.360.208.020.020.16
Table
Table 2. Laboratory homogenization conditions applied in stage 2.
Table 2. Laboratory homogenization conditions applied in stage 2.
Scheme Denotation/Homogenized AlloysHeating 1Soaking 1Heating 2Soaking 2
1—standard homogenization/
all alloys		10 h465 °C/
0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 h 1		--
2—high-temperature homogenization/alloys 2 and 310 h465 °C/2 h15 min.475 °C/0, 2, 4, 8 h
3—high-temperature homogenization/alloy 410 h465 °C/12 h30 min.485 °C/0, 2, 4, 8 h
1—In the case of alloy 1, soaking for up to 8 h was applied.
Table
Table 3. DSC test results of as-cast alloys.
Table 3. DSC test results of as-cast alloys.
AlloySolidus Temperature, °CIncipient Melting Heat, J/g
7075 alloy 1484.06.1
7075 alloy 2482.611.9
7075 alloy 3479.19.2
7049 alloy 4479.611.8
Table
Table 4. DSC tests results of alloys 1, 2, and 4 after homogenization with differentiated cooling.
Table 4. DSC tests results of alloys 1, 2, and 4 after homogenization with differentiated cooling.
AlloyCooling RateSolidus Temperature 1, °CIncipient Melting Heat 1, J/g
7075 alloy 1
soaking 465 °C/4 h		500 °C/h545.7
120 °C/h547.0
60 °C/h547.7
7075 alloy 2
soaking 475 °C/8 h		500 °C/h491.30.3
120 °C/h495.00.5
60 °C/h478.0/490.90.3/0.8
7049 alloy 4
soaking 465 °C/12 h		500 °C/h524.6
120 °C/h523.4
60 °C/h481.30.3
1 In the case of alloy 2 cooled at 60 °C/h onsets and heat values for both observed peaks are given.
Table
Table 5. Homogenization soaking parameters enabling maximizing the solidus temperature.
Table 5. Homogenization soaking parameters enabling maximizing the solidus temperature.
AlloySoakingSolidus Temperature, °C
7075 alloy 1465 °C/4 h548.1
7075 alloy 2465 °C/2 h + 475 °C/8 h531.2
7075 alloy 3465 °C/12 h533.2
465 °C/2 h + 475 °C/4 h531.9
7049 alloy 4465 °C/12 h525.5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Woźnicki, A.; Leszczyńska-Madej, B.; Włoch, G.; Grzyb, J.; Madura, J.; Leśniak, D. Homogenization of 7075 and 7049 Aluminium Alloys Intended for Extrusion Welding. Metals 2021, 11, 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020338

AMA Style

Woźnicki A, Leszczyńska-Madej B, Włoch G, Grzyb J, Madura J, Leśniak D. Homogenization of 7075 and 7049 Aluminium Alloys Intended for Extrusion Welding. Metals. 2021; 11(2):338. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020338

Chicago/Turabian Style

Woźnicki, Antoni, Beata Leszczyńska-Madej, Grzegorz Włoch, Justyna Grzyb, Jacek Madura, and Dariusz Leśniak. 2021. "Homogenization of 7075 and 7049 Aluminium Alloys Intended for Extrusion Welding" Metals 11, no. 2: 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020338

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop