1. Introduction
Concrete is the most used building material in modern times, consisting of aggregate and gravel bound into a solid mass by a hardening cement paste. It is the main component in infrastructure constructions such as bridges and tunnels, dams and highways, and an essential component in buildings, ranging from ordinary houses to skyscrapers.
The concrete industry is the third-largest CO
-emitting industry in the world. Cement clinker, the principal component in cement and thereby concrete constructions, generates approximately one kilogram of carbon dioxide per kilogram produced. Many cements are blended with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), and the average clinker content globally is ~75%, but still, cement accounts for more than 90% of the emissions within the concrete industry [
1]. In 2019, the global cement consumption was 4.1 billion metric tons, which accounted for approximately 5–8% of the global CO
emissions [
2,
3,
4].
In addition to the need for new concrete constructions, existing steel-reinforced concrete constructions need maintenance and replacement as they deteriorate over time. The deterioration is mainly due to rebar corrosion, as the alkaline pore solution neutralizes by acidic gases like CO in the atmosphere and/or aggressive ions like chloride diffuse into the pore solution from the exposed environment with time, depassivating the steel rebars. The depassivation will result in rebar corrosion, with an expanding corrosion product that will promote crack formation in the hardened concrete, accelerating the degradation.
Today, to prevent depassivation of the rebars, the concrete is made with very low permeability, and extra-thick concrete covers the rebars to delay corrosion initiation. This results in a higher strength class than required for the constructions driven by the exposure classes, with a high cement consumption to prevent corrosion, increasing the construction’s service life.
Aluminum is passive in neutral environments, unlike steel, but the hydroxide formed during the cement hydration will dissolve the aluminum before the pore solution neutralizes. In the research project Durable Aluminum Reinforced Environmentally-friendly Concrete Construction (DARE2C), which this study is a part of, the aim is to stabilize aluminum with a high amount of calcined clay (>50%) replacing cement [
5,
6]. The calcined clay is pozzolanic in nature, meaning that it will consume calcium hydroxide released by the cement hydration and deplete it totally [
7]. Cement blends with SCM are quite common, but the cement replacement is restricted to less than 35% of the cement mass to secure the presence of calcium hydroxide to protect the steel rebars against corrosion in traditional concrete constructions [
8,
9].
Aluminum will be compatible with this cement paste over time; however, corrosion will occur during the cement hydration before the active hydroxides are removed by the SCM, according to reaction Equation (
1). Hydrogen gas then develops, resulting in a porous cement region enclosing the rebars with potentially reduced bond strength [
6].
By measuring the gas composition as a function of time by gas chromatography (GC) of an aluminum sample embedded in the cement paste during the cement hydration, the hydrogen gas development can indicate active corrosion and further passivation. As the gas chromatograph analyzes the gas composition only, information about the progress of passivation will not be provided. Therefore, by incorporating an open-circuit potential (OCP) measurement in parallel with the GC, this will provide additional information on the progress of corrosion and passivation as a function of time during the cement hydration. The combination of GC and OCP for measuring the hydrogen gas development of aluminum embedded in cement paste has to the authors’ knowledge never been published and is considered novel.
One hypothesis is that a metastable aluminosilicate complex may form on the aluminum surface after the dissolution of the oxide film during the cement hydration. The metastable complex may form due to the silicate supply from the SCM in the alkaline solution [
10]. The complex could potentially create a film with an inhibiting effect on the aluminum surface, restraining corrosion during the cement hydration [
11,
12].
As the pore solution will be depleted of active hydroxides, degradation mechanisms such as alkali aggregate reaction (AAR) will not occur, and old concrete constructions could potentially be recycled into new ones. As chlorides will bind, such as Friedel’s salt in the cementitious binder formed by the SCM, seawater could potentially be used as a curing agent instead of freshwater, and the constructions would be suited for marine environments. The best hardening accelerator, calcium chloride, can be utilized again as well [
6,
13].
Aluminum-reinforced concrete construction has the potential to spearhead a new concept of concrete constructions with a low carbon footprint with extraordinarily long service life. As aluminum would be passive in neutral environments, we can allow a higher permeability in the concrete, as well as significantly reduce the thickness of the concrete covers. This, in addition to a high cement substitution, will reduce the cement consumption drastically. The design of concrete constructions can be based on the strength class rather than the exposure class. All these factors together would result in a significant reduction in the third-largest CO
emitting industry [
6].
In this work, the chemical stability of a sand-cast aluminum lattice is investigated by measuring the hydrogen gas development in parallel with the OCP during the cement hydration.
3. Results and Discussion
The samples’ chemical stability embedded in a cement paste where cement was replaced by 55% calcined kaolinitic clay were investigated by GC and OCP during the cement hydration.
Figure 3 presents the hydrogen gas development as a function of time for the different samples embedded in a cement paste with 51% calcined kaolinitic clay. As the gas chromatograph analyses the hydrogen gas concentration in the desiccator as a function of time, the hydrogen gas development has stopped when the curve flattens out, while the initial slope presents the corrosion rate. As the GC and the OCP were measured in parallel, the system had a small leakage due to the plastic cork, as can be seen, for instance, for measurement 5 in
Figure 3; the hydrogen gas concentration decreases with time after the hydrogen gas development has stopped.
The blue curves in
Figure 3 present the samples from the right arm of the lattice and the orange curves present samples from the left arm, as illustrated in
Figure 1. The difference in hydrogen gas development is distinctive for the heat treated, and the non-heat-treated samples, where the non-heat-treated samples have a rapid hydrogen gas development before it stagnates, presented by the solid and (-..-) lines, and the heat treated a prolonged hydrogen gas development with no distinctive stop, presented by (- -) and (...) lines.
The measurements indicate that active corrosion occurs during the cement hydration as hydrogen gas develops. For all measurements, the hydrogen gas development stagnates during the cement hydration, indicating that aluminum is compatible with the cement paste over time [
6]. After 28 days, the aluminum cement interface was chiseled open, as presented in
Figure 4. As no white corrosion products can be seen at the interface, this indicates that the aluminum sample is compatible with the cement paste.
For the non-heat-treated samples, the hydrogen gas development differs between the samples from the right and the left arm of the lattice. As the sand mold was manually removed shortly after casting, this could have resulted in different cooling rates for the different arms of the lattice. As the surface roughness was removed for sample 5, the original oxide film formed after casting will not be present, which would have grown due to the isolating effect by the sand mold just after casting. This could have resulted in a less thick oxide film for sample 5 compared to sample 1(R), where sample 5 developed the most hydrogen gas of all the GC measurements presented in
Figure 3.
The OCP was measured in parallel with the hydrogen gas development, by measuring the voltage difference between the aluminum sample and an Ag/AgCl reference and counter electrode during the cement hydration.
As the reference and counter electrode was an Ag/AgCl electrode, this was not perfectly suited for the cement paste’s alkaline environment, and there was a chance that it would not work because of that. Other electrodes were also considered, such as graphite and mercury oxide electrodes, but the Ag/AgCl electrode was chosen due to time limitations and cost. The OCP measurement for samples 1(R), 3(R,A), and 5 did not work, as the measurements were not stable, but for those measurements that did work; there were different trends for the OCPs for the non-heat-treated and heat-treated samples, such as for the hydrogen gas development, providing more information about the progress of stabilization as presented in
Figure 5.
For the non-heat-treated samples in
Figure 5, for measurements 2(R) and 6, the OCP drops immediately before it stabilizes for a time period at approximately −1250 mV. Then, the OCP increases again, and the aluminum becomes nobler before it stabilizes again. The OCP’s second stabilization coincides as the hydrogen development stops in
Figure 3 at approximately 10 h, as illustrated in
Figure 6.
The initial drop indicates that active corrosion takes place during the cement hydration. As two stable potentials were observed after active corrosion, the first stable potential could indicate the formation of a metastable complex. It is possible that a silicate complex forms on the surface, blocking further reaction since there is a huge difference in dissolution rate at pH = 11.5 for sodium hydroxide (>2.5 mm/year) versus sodium silicate (<0.1 mm/year) [
12]. The reaction between sodium hydroxide from cement and the calcined clay will supply sodium silicate to the pore water [
10]. The start of the second stable potential, might imply the formation of a stable oxide film. This complies with
Figure 6, as the hydrogen gas development stopped simultaneously as the second stable potential was observed, indicating regeneration of a stable oxide film on the aluminum surface and passivation [
11].
For the heat-treated samples in
Figure 5, measurements 4(R,A) and 8(A) have the same starting trend as the non-heat-treated samples, but the trend was prolonged, and the second stabilization of the OCP does not take place. The stabilization was in accordance with
Figure 6, as the heat-treated samples did not have an evident stop in the hydrogen gas development. This could indicate that the metastable complex is more stable and favorable for these samples than for the non-heat-treated ones.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.J.; methodology, I.R.; validation, I.W., T.F. and H.J.; investigation, I.R.; resources, H.J. and T.F.; writing—original draft preparation, I.R.; writing—review and editing, I.R., I.W., T.F. and H.J.; visualization, I.R.; supervision, I.W., T.F. and H.J.; project administration, I.R., I.W., T.F. and H.J.; funding acquisition, DARE2C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The research in this project has been a part of the Norwegian research project DARE2C with partners Norsk Hydro ASA, NTNU, SINTEF, Norcem AS, Veidekke ASA, and Overhalla Betongbygg AS, with project number no- 269767 funded by the Research Council of Norway.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my gratitude to Heiko Gaertner, and Øyvind Lindgård for their guidance during the chemical stability measurements at SINTEF, and Geir Oshaug, for giving me a warm welcome and insight into the casting industry at Oshaug Metall in Molde.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
SCM | Supplementary Cementitious Material |
DARE2C | Durable Aluminum-Reinforced Environmentally-friendly Concrete Construction |
GC | Gas Chromatography |
OCP | Open-Circuit Potential |
AAR | Alkali Aggregate Reaction |
References
- Fonta, P. Cement Industry Energy and CO2 Performance- Getting the Numbers Right (GNR); The Cement Sustainability Initiative, World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD): Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- James, F.; Reilly, II. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2020; U.S. Geologica Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2020; p. 42. ISBN 978-1-4113-4362-7.
- Danner, T.; Sletnes, M.; Justnes, H. Alkali-reduced Bauxite Residue as Novel SCM. Nord. Concr. Res. 2020, 63, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehne, J.; Preston, F. Making Concrete Change Innovation in Low-carbon Cement and Concrete; Chatham House Report; The Royal Institute of International Affairs: London, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-1-78413-272-9. [Google Scholar]
- Justnes, H. Concrete Reinforced with Aluminium Metal- Principles and Implication. In Proceeding of the 20th International Conference on Building Materials (ibausil), Weimar, Germany, 12–14 September 2018; pp. 84–95. [Google Scholar]
- Justnes, H. Durable Aluminum Reinforced Environmentally-friendly Concrete Construction—DARE2C. Nord. Concr. Res. 2017, 56, 71–81. [Google Scholar]
- Danner, T.; Norden, G.; Justnes, H. Calcareous smectite clay as a pozzolanic alternative to kaolin. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 2019, 23, 18. [Google Scholar]
- Justnes, H. Performance of SCMs-Chemical and Physical Principles. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Sustainable Building Materials (ICSBM2019), Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 12–15 August 2019; ISBN 978-90-386-4898-9. [Google Scholar]
- Justnes, H.; Østnor, T.A.; Ng, S. Applicability of Nordic Clays as SCM. In Proceedings of the International RILEM Conference on Materials, Systems and Structures in Civil Engineering, Conference Segment on Concrete with Supplementary Cementitious Materials, Lyngby, Denmark, 22–14 August 2016; RILEM Proceedings 113. Technical University of Denmark: Lyngby, Denmark, 2016; pp. 331–340, ISBN 978-2-35158-178-0. [Google Scholar]
- Danner, T. Reactivity of Calcined Clays. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway, 2013; p. 229. [Google Scholar]
- Vargel, C. Corrosion of Aluminium; Part B. Corrosion of Aluminium; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 81–230. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, J.R. Corrosion of Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys; Chapter 2: Understanding the Corrosion Behaviour of Aluminum; The Materials Information Society: Materials Park, OH, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Justnes, H. Aluminium Metal Reinforced Concrete—An Environmentally Friendly System with Infinite Service Life. ICJ Indian Concr. J. 2020, 94, 68–73. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1.
Sample selection from the sand-cast lattice, with a sample dimension of 3.3 cm × 1.7 cm × 1 cm for the chemical stability measurements. A thin coating line of nitrocellulose in butyl acetate starting 1.5 cm from the bottom of the samples were incorporated to avoid excess corrosion at the interface.
Figure 2.
Setup of the GC and OCP measurements in parallel. Point A represents the aluminum sample embedded in the cement paste, connected to the electrochemical measurement within the desiccator. Point B represents the system’s pressure gauge, and point C the outlet for the wires for the electrochemical measurement and the gas to be analyzed by the gas chromatograph. Point D represents the Agilent 490 Micro GC, and point E the Reference 600 Potentiostat by GAMRY Instruments, analyzing the gas composition and the OCP during the cement hydration.
Figure 3.
The hydrogen gas development of the aluminum samples embedded in a cement paste with 51% calcined kaolinitic clay during the cement hydration. The blue curves represent samples from the right arm, and the orange curves samples from the left arm of the lattice. The line style differentiates between the sample conditions.
Figure 4.
The aluminum cement interface after the aluminum sample has been in the cement paste for 28 days. There is no visual white corrosion product at the interface, indicating that the aluminum sample is compatible with the cement paste.
Figure 5.
The OCP between an Ag/AgCl reference and counter electrode and the aluminum sample embedded in a cement paste with 51% calcined kaolinitic clay during the cement hydration. The blue curves represents samples form the right arm and the orange curve sample from the left arm of the lattice. The line style differentiates between the sample conditions.
Figure 6.
The hydrogen gas development and OCP measured in parallel during the cement hydration of samples 6 and 8(A). Two stable potentials were observed for the non-heat-treated sample 6, and the first stable potential for the heat-treated sample 8(A).
Table 1.
The sample conditions for the samples from the left and right arm of the lattice.
Condition | Left Arm | Right Arm |
---|
Surface roughness and no heat treatment | 1(R) | 2(R) |
Surface roughness and heat treatment | 3(R,A) | 4(R,A) |
No surface roughness and no heat treatment | 5 | 6 |
No surface roughness and heat treatment | 7(A) | 8(A) |
Table 2.
The cement paste composition given in parts by weight with a water to binder ratio of 0.5.
Component | Amount [Parts by Weight] |
---|
Water | 0.5 |
Cement (CEM I) | 0.41 |
Calcined kaolinitic clay | 0.51 |
Gypsum | 0.05 |
Limestone filler | 0.03 |
Table 3.
The procedure for mixing the cement paste, placing the sample, and connecting the GC and OCP.
Step | Procedure |
---|
1. | Pour the water into the high shear mixer bowl. |
2. | Add dry powder mix. |
3. | Blend for 1 [min] at max speed. |
4. | Pour into plastic cup. |
5. | Place the sample in the sample holder within the plastic lid. |
6. | Place the Ag/AgCl electrode in the holder within the plastic lid. |
7. | Tamp the cup 10 times. |
8. | Connect the electrochemical measurement. |
9. | Place the cup in the desiccator. |
10. | Connect the gas chromatograph. |
Table 4.
Gas chromatography parameters for column A and B, analyzing the conductivity of lighter and heavier elements.
Parameters | Column A | Column B |
---|
Injector Heating [°C] | 90 | 65 |
Column Heating [°C] | 110 | 70 |
Injection Time [ms] | 50 | 50 |
Backflush Time [s] | 8 | - |
Column Pressure [bar] | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).