Influence of CAD/CAM Abutment Heights on the Biomechanical Behavior of Zirconia Single Crowns
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Specimen Preparation
2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
2.3. Maximum Fracture Load
2.4. Survival Fatigue Analysis
2.5. Finite Element Analysis (FEA)
3. Results
3.1. Surface Analysis (SEM)
3.2. Maximum Fracture Load
3.3. Survival Fatigue Analysis
3.4. Finite Element Analysis (FEA)
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- Both abutment heights presented similar and adequate fracture strength;
- Long universal link abutment showed greater fatigue strength during the survival test, however, without difference in the number of cycles;
- The stress concentration results corroborate the mechanical failure in the prosthetic screw during fatigue for implant-supported anterior crowns.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Almehmadi, N.; Kutkut, A.; Al-Sabbagh, M. What is the best available luting agent for implant prosthesis? Dent. Clin. North Am. 2019, 63, 531–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hurson, S. Implant/Abutment biomechanics and material selection for predictable results. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2018, 39, 440–444. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, M.; Chen, J.; Pei, X.; Han, J.; Wang, J. Network meta-analysis of survival rate and complications in implant-supported single crowns with different abutment materials. J. Dent. 2019, 88, 103115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matos, J.D.M.; Santos, A.C.M.; Nakano, L.J.N.; Vasconcelos, J.E.L.; Andrade, V.C.; Nishioka, R.S.; Bottino, M.A.; Lopes, G.R.S. Metal alloys in dentistry: An outdated material or required for oral rehabilitation? Int. J. Odontostomat. 2021, 15, 702–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tribst, J.P.M.; Dal Piva, A.M.O.; Borges, A.L.S.; Bottino, M.A. Different combinations of CAD/CAM materials on the biomechanical behavior of a two-piece prosthetic solution. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 2019, 22, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Demachkia, A.M.; Sichi, L.G.B.; Rodrigues, J.V.M.; Junior, L.N.; de Araújo, R.M.; Ramos, N.d.C.; Bottino, M.A.; Tribst, J.P.M. Implant-Supported Restoration with Straight and Angled Hybrid Abutments: Digital Image Correlation and 3D-Finite Element Analysis. Eur. J. Gen. Dent. 2022, 11, 023–031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajimiragha, H.; Abolbashari, M.; Nokar, S.; Abolbashari, A.; Abolbashari, M. Bone response from a dynamic stimulus on a one-piece and multi-piece implant abutment and crown by finite element analysis. J. Oral. Implantol. 2014, 40, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matos, J.D.M.; Lopes, G.D.R.S.; Nakano, L.J.N.; Ramos, N.C.; Vasconcelos, J.E.L.; Bottino, M.A.; Tribst, J.P.M. Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 24, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matos, J.D.M.; Nakano, L.J.N.; Bottino, M.A.; Jesus, R.H.; Maciel, L.C. Current considerations for dental ceramics and their respective union systems. Rev. Bras. Odontol. 2020, 77, e1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tribst, J.P.M.; Dal Piva, A.M.O.; Borges, A.L.S.; Anami, L.C.; Kleverlaan, C.J.; Bottino, M.A. Survival probability, weibull characteristics, stress distribution, and fractographic analysis of polymer-infiltrated ceramic network restorations cemented on a chairside titanium base: An in vitro and in silico study. Materials 2020, 13, 1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matos, J.D.M.; Arcila, L.V.; Ortiz, L.P.; Lopes, G.R.; Anami, L.C.; Ramos, N.C.; Tribst, J.P.M.; Bottino, M.A. Hybrid abutment during prosthetic planning and oral rehabilitation. Minerva Dent. Oral. Sci. 2022, 71, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kutkut, A.; Abu-Hammad, O.; Mitchell, R. Esthetic considerations for reconstructing implant emergence profile using titanium and zirconia custom implant abutments: Fifty case series report. J. Oral. Implantol. 2015, 41, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ElHoussiney, A.G.; Zhang, H.; Song, J.; Ji, P.; Wang, L.; Yang, S. Influence of implant location on the clinical outcomes of implant abutments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 2018, 10, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lopes, G.d.R.S.; Matos, J.D.M.d.; Queiroz, D.A.; Tribst, J.P.M.; Ramos, N.d.C.; Rocha, M.G.; Barbosa, A.B.; Bottino, M.A.; Borges, A.L.S.; Nishioka, R.S. Influence of Abutment Design on Biomechanical Behavior to Support a Screw-Retained 3-Unit Fixed Partial Denture. Materials 2022, 15, 6235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soleimani, F.; Jalali, H.; Mostafavi, A.S.; Zeighami, S.; Memarian, M. Retention and Clinical Performance of Zirconia Crowns: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Dent. 2020, 2020, 8846534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, C.E.P.; Soares, S.; Machado, C.M.; Bergamo, E.T.P.; Coelho, P.G.; Witek, L.; Ramalho, I.S.; Jalkh, E.B.B.; Bonfante, E.A. Effect of CAD/CAM abutment height and cement type on the retention of zirconia crowns. Implant. Dent. 2018, 27, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Queiroz, D.A.; Hagee, N.; Lee, D.J.; Zheng, F. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020, 124, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Preis, V.; Hahnel, S.; Behr, M.; Bein, L.; Rosentritt, M. In-vitro fatigue and fracture testing of CAD/CAM-materials in implant-supported molar crowns. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roberts, E.E.; Bailey, C.W.; Ashcraft-Olmscheid, D.L.; Vandewalle, K.S. Fracture resistance of titanium-based lithium disilicate and zirconia implant restorations. J. Prosthodont. 2018, 27, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gomes, L.C.L.; Pierre, F.Z.; Tribst, J.P.M.; Ramos, N.d.C.; Bresciani, E.; de Araújo, R.M.; Júnior, L.N.; Bottino, M.A. Occlusal Scheme Effect on the Biomechanical Response of Full-Arch Dental Prosthesis Supported by Titanium Implants: A Systematic Review. Metals 2021, 11, 1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armentia, M.; Abasolo, M.; Coria, I.; Albizuri, J. Fatigue Design of Dental Implant Assemblies: A Nominal Stress Approach. Metals 2020, 10, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lo Giudice, R.; Sindoni, A.; Tribst, J.P.M.; Dal Piva, A.M.d.O.; Lo Giudice, G.; Bellezza, U.; Lo Giudice, G.; Famà, F. Evaluation of Zirconia and High Performance Polymer Abutment Surface Roughness and Stress Concentration for Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses. Coatings 2022, 12, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biadsee, A.; Özcan, M.; Masarwa, L.; Haddad, M.; Husain, N.A.-H.; Ormianer, Z. Effect of Titanium-Base Abutment Height on Optical Properties of Monolithic Anterior Zirconia Crowns. Materials 2022, 15, 7643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Vasconcelos, J.E.L.; de Matos, J.D.M.; Queiroz, D.A.; Lopes, G.d.R.S.; de Lacerda, B.C.G.V.; Bottino, M.A.; Turssi, C.P.; Basting, R.T.; do Amaral, F.L.B.; França, F.M.G. Implant—Abutment Misfit after Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Experimental Study. Materials 2022, 15, 5341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borges, A.L.S.; Costa, A.K.F.; Dal Piva, A.M.d.O.; Pinto, A.B.A.; Tribst, J.P.M. Effect of Three Different Veneering Techniques on the Stress Distribution and in Vitro Fatigue Behavior of Core-Veneer All-Ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospect. 2021, 15, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miyashiro, M.; Suedam, V.; Neto, R.T.M.; Ferreira, P.M.; Rubo, J.H. Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant supported prosthesis—tension tests. J. Appl. Oral. Sci. 2011, 19, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vasconcellos, D.K.D.; Özcan, M.; Maziero Volpato, C.Â.; Bottino, M.A.; Yener, E.S. Strain Gauge Analysis of the Effect of Porcelain Firing Simulation on the Prosthetic Misfit of Implant-Supported Frameworks. Implant. Dent. 2012, 21, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Omaish, H.H.; Abdelhamid, A.M.; Neena, A.F. Comparison of the Strain Developed around Implants with Angled Abutments with Two Reinforced Polymeric CAD-CAM Superstructure Materials: An in Vitro Comparative Study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2022, 127, 634.e1–634.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, C.M.; Ramos, E.V.; Kreve, S.; de Carvalho, G.A.P.; Franco, A.B.G.; de Macedo, L.G.S.; Silva, A.d.M.; Dias, S.C. Reverse Torque Evaluation in Indexed and Nonindexed Abutments of Morse Taper Implants in a Mechanical Fatigue Test. Dent. Res. J. 2019, 16, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bottino, M.A.; de Oliveira, F.R.; Sabino, C.F.; Dinato, J.C.; Silva-Concílio, L.R.; Tribst, J.P.M. Survival Rate and Deformation of External Hexagon Implants with One-Piece Zirconia Crowns. Metals 2021, 11, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 14801:2016; Dentistry—Implants—Dynamic Fatigue Test for Endosseous Dental Implants. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
- Bordin, D.; Cury, A.A.D.B.; Faot, F. Influence of abutment collar height and implant length on stress distribution in single crowns. Braz. Dent. J. 2019, 30, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grassi, E.D.A.; de Andrade, G.S.; Tribst, J.P.M.; Machry, R.V.; Valandro, L.F.; Ramos, N.d.C.; Bresciani, E.; Saavedra, G.d.S.F.A. Fatigue Behavior and Stress Distribution of Molars Restored with MOD Inlays with and without Deep Margin Elevation. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2022, 26, 2513–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matos, J.D.M.d.; Queiroz, D.A.; Nakano, L.J.N.; Andrade, V.C.; Ribeiro, N.d.C.R.; Borges, A.L.S.; Bottino, M.A.; Lopes, G.d.R.S. Bioengineering Tools Applied to Dentistry: Validation Methods for In Vitro and In Silico Analysis. Dent. J. 2022, 10, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jongsma, L.A.; Jager, N.; Kleverlaan, C.J.; Pallav, P.; Feilzer, A.J. Shear bond strength of three dual-cured resin cements to dentin analyzed by finite element analysis. Dent. Mater. 2012, 28, 1080–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Osman, R.B.; Elkhadem, A.H.; Ma, S.; Swain, M.V. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: Three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implant. 2013, 28, e198–e208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Piconi, C.; Maccauro, G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999, 20, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fernández-Asián, I.; Martínez-González, Á.; Torres-Lagares, D.; Serrera-Figallo, M.-Á.; Gutiérrez-Pérez, J.-L. External Connection versus Internal Connection in Dental Implantology. A Mechanical in vitro Study. Metals 2019, 9, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, B.A.; Kim, B.H.; Kweon, H.H.I.; Kim, Y.T. The prosthetic abutment height can affect marginal bone loss around dental implants. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2018, 20, 799–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kourtis, S.; Damanaki, M.; Kaitatzidou, S.; Kaitatzidou, A.; Roussou, V. Loosening of the fixing screw in single implant crowns: Predisposing factors, prevention and treatment options. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2017, 29, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spinato, S.; Galindo-Moreno, P.; Bernardello, F.; Zaffe, D. Minimum Abutment Height to Eliminate Bone Loss: Influence of Implant Neck Design and Platform Switching. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac Implant. 2018, 33, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pico, A.; Martín-Lancharro, P.; Caneiro, L.; Nóvoa, L.; Batalla, P.; Blanco, J. Influence of abutment height and implant depth position on interproximal peri-implant bone in sites with thin mucosa: A 1-year randomized clinical trial. Clin. Oral. Implant. Res. 2019, 30, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Z.; Lin, C.Y.; Li, J.; Wang, H.L.; Yu, H. Influence of abutment height on peri-implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2019, 122, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coray, R.; Zeltner, M.; Özcan, M. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016, 62, 333–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spitznagel, F.A.; Bonfante, E.A.; Vollmer, F.; Gierthmuehlen, P.C. Failure load of monolithic lithium disilicate implant-supported single crowns bonded to ti-base abutments versus to customized ceramic abutments after fatigue. J. Prosthodont. 2021, 31, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pitta, J.; Hicklin, S.P.; Fehmer, V.; Boldt, J.; Gierthmuehlen, P.C.; Sailer, I. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implant. 2019, 34, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taha, D.; Sabet, A. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2021, 126, e1–e93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, L.F.; Stanford, C.; Feine, J.; McGuire, M. Prospective assessment of CAD/CAM zirconia abutment and lithium disilicate crown restorations: 2.4 year results. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016, 116, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Testori, T.; Weinstein, T.; Scutellà, F.; Wang, H.L.; Zucchelli, G. Implant placement in the esthetic area: Criteria for positioning single and multiple implants. Periodontol 2000 2018, 77, 176–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liaw, K.; Delfini, R.H.; Abrahams, J.J. Dental implant complications. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR 2015, 36, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoichkov, B.; Kirov, D. Analysis of the causes of dental implant fracture: A retrospective clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2018, 49, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elias, C.N.; Oshida, Y.; Lima, J.H.; Muller, C.A. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2008, 1, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, S.; Lü, C.; Li, J.H.; Zhu, B.M.; Wang, W.Q. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of an abutment buffer layer on implant stress distribution. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2020, 38, 537–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Torkzaban, P.; Ziaei, N.; Tootiaee, B.; Khoshhal, M.; Vafaee, F.; Panahandeh, N. Effect of implant-abutment connection type on stress distribution in peri-implant bone and abutment micromovement: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J. Long-Term Eff. Med. Implant. 2019, 29, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Korkmaz, I.H.; Kul, E. Investigation of the type of angled abutment for anterior maxillary implants: A finite element analysis. J. Prosthodont. 2021, 31, 689–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cho, S.Y.; Huh, Y.H.; Park, C.J.; Cho, L.R. Three-dimensional finite element analysis on stress distribution of internal implant-abutment engagement features. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 2018, 33, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bonfante, E.A.; Coelho, P.G. A critical perspective on mechanical testing of implants and prostheses. Adv. Dent. Res. 2016, 28, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Zordk, W.; Elmisery, A.; Ghazy, M. Hybrid-abutment-restoration: Effect of material type on torque maintenance and fracture resistance after thermal aging. Int. J. Implant. Dent. 2020, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramalho, I.S.; Bergamo, E.T.P.; Witek, L.; Coelho, P.G.; Lopes, A.C.O.; Bonfante, E.A. Implant-abutment fit influences the mechanical performance of single-crown prostheses. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 102, 103506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Material | Composition | Young Modulus (GPa) | Poisson Ratio |
---|---|---|---|
Polyurethane [25] | Poly[oxy(methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)], .alpha.-hydro-.omega.-hydroxy-, polymer with 1,1′-methylenebis [4-isocyanatobenzene] 4,4′-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate Benzene, 1,1′-methylenebis [4-isocyanato-, homopolymer] 4-methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-one | 3.6 | 0.30 |
Resin Cement [30] | 10-MDP, hydrophobic aromatic and aliphatic photoinitiator, dibenzoyl peroxide dimethacrylate, hydrophilic dimethacrylate, silanized silica | 7.5 | 0.25 |
Titanium [31] | Titanium alloy ASTM F136 | 110 | 0.30 |
Y-TZP [32] | 8 mol% Y-TZP: ZrO2 principal component, Y2O3 < 12%, Al2O3 < 1%, SiO2 < 0.02%, Fe2O3 < 0.02% | 220 | 0.30 |
Conversion Source | SQ | gl | QM | F | p-value | F-critical |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Groups | 63.68 | 1 | 63.68 | 1.86 | 0.18 | 4.41 |
Group | Mean Value (kgf) | SD | CI 95% |
Long | 39.4 a | ±6.96 | (46.36–32.44) |
Short | 43.1 a | ±7.68 | (50.78–35.42) |
Group | Mean (Cycles) | SD | CI-Minimum | CI-Maximum |
Long | 64,610.4 | 4791.4 | 55,219.12 | 74,001.67 |
Short | 60,760.0 | 1264.8 | 58,280.83 | 63,239.16 |
Group | Mean (Load) | SD | CI-Minimum | CI-Maximum |
Long | 450.0 | 16.6 | 417.3 | 482.6 |
Short | 400.0 | 0.0 | 400.0 | 400.0 |
Total Cycles/Load (N) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | 5 k/100 | 15 k/200 | 25 k/250 | 35 k/300 | 45 k/350 | 55 k/400 | 65 k/450 | 75 k/500 | 85 k/550 |
Long | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% (9%) | 60% (15%) | 50% (15%) | 30% (14%) | 0 |
Short | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 87.5% (11%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
de Matos, J.D.M.; Gomes, L.S.; de Carvalho Ramos, N.; Queiroz, D.A.; Tribst, J.P.M.; Campos, T.M.B.; Borges, A.L.S.; da Rocha Scalzer Lopes, G.; Bottino, M.A.; Paes Junior, T.J.A. Influence of CAD/CAM Abutment Heights on the Biomechanical Behavior of Zirconia Single Crowns. Metals 2022, 12, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122025
de Matos JDM, Gomes LS, de Carvalho Ramos N, Queiroz DA, Tribst JPM, Campos TMB, Borges ALS, da Rocha Scalzer Lopes G, Bottino MA, Paes Junior TJA. Influence of CAD/CAM Abutment Heights on the Biomechanical Behavior of Zirconia Single Crowns. Metals. 2022; 12(12):2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122025
Chicago/Turabian Stylede Matos, Jefferson David Melo, Leonardo Silva Gomes, Nathália de Carvalho Ramos, Daher Antonio Queiroz, João Paulo Mendes Tribst, Tiago Moreira Bastos Campos, Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer Lopes, Marco Antonio Bottino, and Tarcisio José Arruda Paes Junior. 2022. "Influence of CAD/CAM Abutment Heights on the Biomechanical Behavior of Zirconia Single Crowns" Metals 12, no. 12: 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122025