Next Article in Journal
Enrichment Methods for Metal Recovery from Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment: A Brief Review
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study on Continuous-Bending-Under-Tension of 3rd Generation Steel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Stress Corrosion Cracking Mechanism of Steel Wires with Different Strength Levels

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjian 300384, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2025, 15(2), 139; https://doi.org/10.3390/met15020139
Submission received: 8 January 2025 / Revised: 26 January 2025 / Accepted: 27 January 2025 / Published: 29 January 2025

Abstract

In civil engineering, stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is a common cause of premature failure in steel wires, and effective solutions are currently limited. Investigating the SCC behavior of steel wires with different strength levels is crucial for understanding its fracture mechanism and developing potential solutions. This study examines the SCC behavior of wire rods with three strength grades (Steel A, B, and C) through stress corrosion experiments. The results show that high-strength wire rods have smaller pearlite interlamellar spacing. Steel C has the highest tensile strength (2303 MPa), while Steel A has the lowest (1830 MPa). Regarding stress corrosion sensitivity, the SCC mechanism of Steel C is dominated by hydrogen embrittlement, while Steels A and B primarily exhibit anodic dissolution as the cracking mechanism. Although Steel C has the smallest pearlite interlamellar spacing and superior corrosion resistance, its SCC failure time is the shortest due to hydrogen embrittlement. In contrast, for the anodic dissolution cracking mechanism, Steel B has a smaller pearlite interlamellar spacing, which enhances its corrosion resistance, and exhibits higher local stress stability due to its higher strength, resulting in the best SCC resistance (failure time: 3.81 h). This study reveals the synergistic effects of microstructure and strength on the SCC behavior of wire rods, offering theoretical guidance for the application of high-strength wire rods.
Keywords: wire rods; stress corrosion cracking; pearlite interlamellar spacing; hydrogen embrittlement; anodic dissolution wire rods; stress corrosion cracking; pearlite interlamellar spacing; hydrogen embrittlement; anodic dissolution

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, G.; Ma, X.; Ma, K. Study on Stress Corrosion Cracking Mechanism of Steel Wires with Different Strength Levels. Metals 2025, 15, 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15020139

AMA Style

Zhao G, Ma X, Ma K. Study on Stress Corrosion Cracking Mechanism of Steel Wires with Different Strength Levels. Metals. 2025; 15(2):139. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15020139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Guangze, Xu Ma, and Ke Ma. 2025. "Study on Stress Corrosion Cracking Mechanism of Steel Wires with Different Strength Levels" Metals 15, no. 2: 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15020139

APA Style

Zhao, G., Ma, X., & Ma, K. (2025). Study on Stress Corrosion Cracking Mechanism of Steel Wires with Different Strength Levels. Metals, 15(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15020139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop