Next Article in Journal
Justiciability of the Right to Water in the SADC Region: A Critical Appraisal
Previous Article in Journal
Off to the Courts? Or the Agency? Public Attitudes on Bureaucratic and Legal Approaches to Policy Enforcement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Why Insurers Are Wrong about Adverse Selection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Concerns about Genetic Discrimination after Regulation: A Qualitative Study of the Situation Regarding BRCA and Huntington’s Disease in Belgium

Centre for Sociological Research, Life Sciences & Society Lab, Parkstraat 45, box 3601, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 2 February 2018 / Revised: 14 April 2018 / Accepted: 20 April 2018 / Published: 26 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Discrimination and the Law)

Abstract

Although there is no unequivocal evidence of genetic discrimination (GD), and despite laws that prohibit it, individuals confronted with genetic diseases still seem to be concerned. The aim of this study was to gain in-depth understanding of experiences and concerns in relation to possible genetic discrimination. This article presents an analysis of semi-structured interviews with 42 individuals who had or were at risk of breast and ovarian cancer (BRCA) or Huntington’s disease (HD) in Belgium. Even after regulation, individuals at risk of BRCA and HD express concerns about possible genetic discrimination. These concerns relate to direct forms of GD, for instance those related to insurance and employment. Individuals were often unclear about and wary of legislation. Importantly, concerns were also expressed as to more subtle and indirect forms of GD, e.g., in social relations, where individuals fear being treated ‘differently’ and unfairly. Our study demonstrates how these concerns emerge at particular moments in life and how levels and forms of concern are influenced by the specific genetic disorder. Worries concerning these more subtle forms of genetic discrimination are more difficult to protect by law. Current legislative efforts do not appear to be effective in alleviating concerns about genetic discrimination. These regulations seem to be unclear, some participants are unsure about their effectiveness and they do not succeed in incorporating all forms of genetic discrimination. Particularly challenging is how to address indirect forms of genetic discrimination.
Keywords: genetic discrimination; concerns; BRCA; Huntington’s disease; living with genetic risk; stigma; regulation; qualitative research; Europe genetic discrimination; concerns; BRCA; Huntington’s disease; living with genetic risk; stigma; regulation; qualitative research; Europe

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wauters, A.; Van Hoyweghen, I. Concerns about Genetic Discrimination after Regulation: A Qualitative Study of the Situation Regarding BRCA and Huntington’s Disease in Belgium. Laws 2018, 7, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7020017

AMA Style

Wauters A, Van Hoyweghen I. Concerns about Genetic Discrimination after Regulation: A Qualitative Study of the Situation Regarding BRCA and Huntington’s Disease in Belgium. Laws. 2018; 7(2):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7020017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wauters, Annet, and Ine Van Hoyweghen. 2018. "Concerns about Genetic Discrimination after Regulation: A Qualitative Study of the Situation Regarding BRCA and Huntington’s Disease in Belgium" Laws 7, no. 2: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7020017

APA Style

Wauters, A., & Van Hoyweghen, I. (2018). Concerns about Genetic Discrimination after Regulation: A Qualitative Study of the Situation Regarding BRCA and Huntington’s Disease in Belgium. Laws, 7(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7020017

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop